Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Perspectives of Aminoflavonoids—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term IGF-1 Maintenance in the Upper-Normal Range Has Beneficial Effect on Low-Grade Inflammation Marker in Adults with Growth Hormone Deficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine Development: Lessons, Challenges, and Future Innovations

by
Rebeca Santamarina-Fernández
1,
Víctor Fuentes-Valverde
1,2,3,
Alis Silva-Rodríguez
1,
Patricia García
1,2,
Miriam Moscoso
1,2,* and
Germán Bou
1,2,4
1
Servicio de Microbiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
2
CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
3
Área de Medicamentos Biológicos, Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS), 28022 Madrid, Spain
4
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad de A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(5), 2012; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052012
Submission received: 11 January 2025 / Revised: 18 February 2025 / Accepted: 23 February 2025 / Published: 25 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen with a multidrug-resistant profile that has become a critical threat to global public health. It is one of the main causes of severe nosocomial infections, including ventilator-associated pneumonia, chronic infections in patients with cystic fibrosis, and bloodstream infections in immunosuppressed individuals. Development of vaccines against P. aeruginosa is a major challenge owing to the high capacity of this bacterium to form biofilms, its wide arsenal of virulence factors (including secretion systems, lipopolysaccharides, and outer membrane proteins), and its ability to evade the host immune system. This review provides a comprehensive historical overview of vaccine development efforts targeting this pathogen, ranging from early attempts in the 1970s to recent advancements, including vaccines based on novel proteins and emerging technologies such as nanoparticles and synthetic conjugates. Despite numerous promising preclinical developments, very few candidates have progressed to clinical trials, and none have achieved final approval. This panorama highlights the significant scientific efforts undertaken and the inherent complexity of successfully developing an effective vaccine against P. aeruginosa.

1. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Clinically Relevant Pathogen

The rapid rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the top 10 global health threats identified in the 13th General Programme of Work 2019–2023 (GPW13) [1]. Abban and Ayerakwa estimated that 4.95 million deaths worldwide are associated with AMR, warning that underdeveloped countries experience higher mortality rates [2]. There is therefore an urgent need to consider AMR a critical global public health and socio-economic problem. P. aeruginosa is one of the main pathogens associated with AMR-related deaths [2,3].
P. aeruginosa is an aerobic, nonfermenting, Gram-negative bacillus in the Pseudomonadaceae family and is characterized by polar flagellum-driven motility. It is found in almost all environments, ranging from water and soil to humans, and it is a pathogen of medical relevance due to its resistance mechanisms and ability to infect vulnerable populations [4]. The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have identified P. aeruginosa as a prevalent pathogen in healthcare-associated infections, with particularly high incidence rates in long-term care hospitals [5]. This trend highlights the global challenge, with the American and African continents being particularly affected by this pathogen [6,7].
The opportunistic nature of P. aeruginosa allows it to colonize healthy skin and hospital environments. The bacterium can contaminate various surfaces and can be transmitted by healthcare workers to immunosuppressed patients such as burn victims, cancer patients, and transplant recipients [8]. This pathogen is associated with a broad range of infections, including bloodstream infections, folliculitis, otitis, urinary tract infections, and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) [8,9]. VAP, the most common nosocomial infection, affects the lung parenchyma of patients who have been intubated for at least 48 h. Between 9% and 29% of such patients are affected by VAP, depending on the duration of the intubation and the underlying cause of the mechanical ventilation (e.g., surgery, disease, transplantation) [8,9,10,11,12,13]. P. aeruginosa is the leading cause of VAP and is also one of the most common pathogens in community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonias, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs) [11,12,13,14]. Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) comprise another susceptible group frequently colonized by P. aeruginosa. CF is a recessive genetic disease that is most prevalent in Europe, North America and Australia. It is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), which impair chloride ion transport and mucus clearance in the airways. Approximately 360 variants of the CFTR gene have been identified and classified into six main classes of CFTR mutations based on their functional effects, including defects in protein synthesis, processing or transport within the cell. The most common mutation, present in approximately 66% of CFTR alleles, is F508del, which results in CFTR misfolding and improper chloride channel function [15]. Patients with CF experience chronic inflammation of the airways and are predisposed to persistent infections by pathogens such as P. aeruginosa [16], which has a prevalence of approximately 24.5% in this population. The genetic adaptability of P. aeruginosa allows it to establish chronic infections that, together with airway inflammation, contribute to morbidity and mortality in these patients [17,18].

2. Pathogenesis and Virulence Factors of P. aeruginosa

Pathogenesis in P. aeruginosa is mediated by a wide range of virulence factors (VFs) that facilitate adhesion, modulate host cell signaling pathways and degrade the extracellular matrix, causing severe invasive disease or persistent infections that are extremely difficult to eradicate. P. aeruginosa infection progresses through three key stages: adhesion/colonization, local invasion and systemic dissemination (Figure 1) [19]. In the initial adhesion phase, P. aeruginosa attaches to epithelial surfaces using flagella, type IV pili and outer membrane proteins (e.g., OprF), which interact with specific galactose- or mannose- or sialic-acid-containing receptors and also contribute to biofilm formation. During invasion, P. aeruginosa utilizes the type III secretion system (T3SS) to inject cytotoxins like ExoS and ExoU directly into host cells, which disrupt the cytoskeleton, induce apoptosis and impair immune responses. In addition, proteases, elastases (LasB) and phospholipases degrade epithelial barriers, including the glycocalyx, allowing deeper tissue penetration. During the dissemination phase, the bacterium utilizes its flagellum and rhamnolipids to spread, while quorum-sensing (QS) mechanisms coordinate VFs production. QS systems, which regulate gene expression in a cell-density-dependent manner (e.g., AHLs, DKPs, LuxR, PQS, HHQ), are a clear example of the intricate regulatory networks that connect the pathogenic mechanisms of this bacterium [20,21]. Moreover, siderophores like pyoverdine enable iron acquisition, promoting bacterial survival in the bloodstream and proliferation within the host, leading to extensive tissue damage, characteristic of acute infections. However, in chronic infections, P. aeruginosa undergoes adaptive changes (loss of flagella and pili, alterations in LPS, increased biofilm formation, etc.) to persist in the host environment. These adaptations allow the bacterium to adhere to the respiratory epithelium, avoid immune recognition and contribute to a sustained inflammatory state [19].
Among the major VFs considered as potential targets for vaccine development against P. aeruginosa are (Figure 2) the following.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a key component of the outer membrane (OM) and is composed of lipid A, a core region, and the O-antigen (OPS) [22]. The OPS can produce two distinct antigens: the common polysaccharide antigen (CPA) and the variable O-specific antigen (OSA), which is used for serotyping [23]. LPS plays a crucial role in interactions with host receptors, evasion of host defense mechanisms, biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance. Specifically, lipid A has endotoxic properties that induce inflammation, stimulate the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and contribute to tissue damage during infections [23].
Outer membrane proteins (OMPs), such as OprF, maintain membrane integrity, regulate membrane permeability, and facilitate the acquisition of ions and nutrients. These proteins can also participate in biofilm formation and the secretion of other VFs. Additional porins, such as OprH, OprI, OprD, OprG, and OprL, contribute to antibiotic resistance, molecular transport, adhesion and membrane biogenesis [22].
Biofilm formation is a well-known characteristic of P. aeruginosa. An increase in c-di-GMP levels in response to environmental factors promotes secretion of adhesive molecules and matrix components, enabling the bacteria to adhere to surfaces and to each other; the bacteria then adapt physiologically until detachment of the biofilm is activated by various metabolic or environmental factors [24]. The biofilm matrix is formed by exopolysaccharides (e.g., alginate, levan, PsI, and PeI), extracellular DNA (eDNA), other polysaccharides and various proteins that act as adhesives and stabilizers, protect bacteria against external threats and impair antibiotic penetration [24,25]. Studies have demonstrated that low concentrations of aminoglycosides can induce biofilm formation [26], while alginate overproduction enhances resistance by limiting antibiotic penetration into the biofilm [27].
The type III secretion system (T3SS) is a membrane-associated system that assembles an injection complex, commonly known as the injectisome, which excretes proteins from the bacterial cytosol into the extracellular environment. The classical effector proteins are ExoS, ExoT, ExoU, and ExoY, and other molecules such as PemA/PemB and the flagellar filament. These factors disrupt immune responses, inhibit DNA synthesis and induce cell death [28,29], leading to epithelial damage and promoting bacterial persistence in the lung [22]. The type VI secretion system (T6SS) also plays a role in virulence by targeting the host microbiota and facilitating epithelial cell invasion [30].
The polar flagellum enables P. aeruginosa to swim in aqueous or low-viscosity environments, and it also plays an important role in chemotaxis and adhesion to mucosal surfaces, such as the pulmonary epithelium, which is protected by a thick layer of mucus [31,32].
Type IV pili are flexible, retractile appendages involved in biofilm formation, contractile motility and adherence. They are composed of pilin proteins that participate in pilus assembly (major pilins) and can have additional roles in DNA uptake and aggregation (minor pilins) [31,33].
Other secreted VFs include exotoxins and proteolytic enzymes such as elastases and alkaline protease (AprA). Exotoxin A (ETA), which is secreted via the type II secretion system (T2SS), binds to host cells and is internalized in clathrin-coated vesicles, where it induces apoptosis and necrosis and modulates inflammatory responses. Pyocyanin generates oxidative stress by increasing ROS levels, leading to cell damage and reduced lung function. Finally, the iron acquisition systems in P. aeruginosa include siderophores, such as pyoverdine, pyochelin and yersiniabactin, among others [34]. Overexpression of these systems is often associated with hypervirulence [22].
The various VFs associated with P. aeruginosa are potential targets for vaccine development (Figure 1). Detailed studies of these factors are therefore essential for designing effective strategies to combat infections caused by this pathogen.

3. Immunology of P. aeruginosa Infections

As an opportunistic pathogen, P. aeruginosa triggers a robust immune response while simultaneously developing evasion strategies. The immune response to this pathogen is therefore complex and multifactorial, involving both innate and adaptive immunity.
The innate immune response, which serves as the first line of defense, depends on pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), e.g., Toll-like receptors (TLR), to detect bacterial elements. Upon recognition, TLRs activate a signaling cascade that leads to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interleukins (ILs), and to the recruitment of phagocytic immune cells [35]. P. aeruginosa is known to express agonists for TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR9, which recognize lipopeptides, LPS, flagellin, and unmethylated CpG DNA, respectively [36]. In particular, TLR4 and TLR5, which recognize LPS and flagellin, are essential for triggering the immune response in respiratory infections [37,38]. The phagocytic immune cells activated in this response to respiratory infections include neutrophils, which destroy bacteria through proteolytic enzymes, ROS [39], and macrophages. However, P. aeruginosa evades this response by forming biofilms and using T3SS effectors like ExoS, which can lyse macrophages and inhibit the phagocytic absorption of both neutrophils and macrophages [36,40]. Likewise, the ability of this pathogen to form biofilms further enhances its persistence in the host [24,25,41].
On the other hand, the adaptive immune response is activated when antigen-presenting cells (APCs) present P. aeruginosa antigens to T lymphocytes, initiating a cascade that activates B lymphocytes to produce specific antibodies. These antibodies facilitate the clearance of bacteria through phagocytosis and/or opsonization [35,39]. However, persistent P. aeruginosa cells can survive macrophage attacks and even redirect them toward an anti-inflammatory M2-type response (Figure 3) [42]. Th17 cells, a subtype of CD4+ T lymphocytes, secrete IL-17, IL-21, IL-22, and IL-26, which are crucial cytokines for mucosal immunity, particularly in pulmonary infections [43,44]. IL-17 and IL-22 stimulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from mucosal cells [45] and play a key role in controlling bacterial loads during the early stages of infection. However, Th17 differentiation is controlled by both interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) (Th1) and IL-4 (Th2) [45]. In chronic infections, such as those observed in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), excessive release of IL-17 has a dual effect: it contributes to bacterial clearance and can also lead to prolonged inflammation and tissue damage [46]. Other cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-18, are also responsible for the exacerbated damage in acute pneumonia through activation of inflammasomes [47].
The immune response to P. aeruginosa in patients with CF is mediated by exacerbated chronic inflammation and ineffective bacterial clearance. It is characterized by the massive recruitment of neutrophils to the lungs, where elastases and ROS are released. However, these responses cause tissue damage without effectively eliminating the bacteria. The biofilm formation and antigenic variability of P. aeruginosa enable the bacteria to evade phagocytosis and antibiotics, thus contributing to the persistence of the infection. The continuous release of cytokines and proteases by neutrophils results in progressive deterioration of tissue, worsening the condition of patients with CF and making P. aeruginosa infection a key factor in the progression of lung disease [39,41,48,49]. Further studies are required in regard to achieving elimination of the pathogen from the organism or preventing P. aeruginosa infections, for which effective vaccines would play a key role.

4. Vaccination Against P. aeruginosa

Historical successes, such as the eradication of smallpox [50] and the development of the SARS-Cov-2 vaccine [51,52] in record time, have inspired both past and future efforts to develop a vaccine against P. aeruginosa. Different strategies targeting VFs have been explored for more than 50 years, but no successful vaccine against this pathogen has yet been approved for human use. Figure 4 shows the number of studies conducted using different technologies to develop vaccines against P. aeruginosa, including those in the preclinical stages and those that have advanced to the clinical phases. Tables S1–S4 summarize the key characteristics of the experimental vaccines evaluated in different animal infection models, including pneumonia, burns, sepsis, and others. Table S5 lists the vaccine candidates targeting P. aeruginosa that have advanced to phase I, II, and III clinical trials.

4.1. Live-Attenuated Vaccines

Live-attenuated vaccines use pathogenic strains with reduced virulence while preserving immunogenicity to provoke an effective immune response [53]. Moreover, these vaccine candidates contain multiple antigenic components, which stimulate multiple immune effectors in the host, thereby reducing the selective pressure for the emergence of resistant strains. The development of resistance could occur when vaccine candidates include antigens that are not essential for causing acute pneumonia or system invasion [54]. Unfortunately, this vaccination strategy is highly reactogenic and is associated with side effects such as weight loss and lesions at the injection site in mice [55,56]. While these vaccines often elicit stronger cellular immune responses than inactivated vaccines, providing long-lasting protection, safety concerns, such as the potential reversion to virulence, require careful evaluation and optimization.

4.1.1. Live Auxotrophic Vaccines

Mutants of P. aeruginosa PAO1 with a deletion of the aroA gene, rendering the strains auxotrophic for aromatic amino acids, have shown some effectiveness in pneumonia models with mice and rabbits [57,58]. Intranasal vaccination (IN) with PAO1 ΔaroA induced high titers of opsonizing antibodies and provided protection against homologous LPS strains [57], with no dissemination to other organs observed [58]. Modified PA14 ΔaroA strains provided broader protection, inducing IL-17 secreted by T cells [59]. Finally, a multivalent live-attenuated mucosal vaccine with ΔaroA strains covering diverse O-antigen epitopes in the O2/O5 serogroup generated multifactorial immunity against P. aeruginosa lung infections, with opsonophagocytic antibodies targeting LPS O-antigens, the LPS core, and surface proteins [54].
On the other hand, PAO1 mutants lacking the murI gene, which encodes glutamate racemase, generated a D-glutamate auxotrophic strain with attenuated virulence, capable of inducing robust antibody responses and providing protection against heterologous strains [60]. This vaccine elicited IL-17 and IL-4 secretion by T cells, enhancing mucosal immunity when administered IN and providing protection against lethal pneumonia [56]. However, for the PAO1 ΔmurI mutant, some variants regained D-glutamate auxotrophy. Additionally, D-alanine auxotrophy in the alanine racemase-defective triple mutant PAO1 ΔmurI Δalr ΔdadX improved the safety of the vaccine candidate [55].
A novel live auxotrophic vaccine for p-benzoyl-L-phenylalanine (BzF) demonstrated protection against P. aeruginosa sepsis and acute pneumonia, eliciting higher IgG responses than the inactivated PAO1 and showing cross-reactivity against several strains [61].

4.1.2. Recombinant Vaccines with Attenuated Carriers

Recombinant vaccines using attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Thyphimurium (SL3261/pLPS2) as carriers to express P. aeruginosa antigens (e.g., LPS O-antigens) have been evaluated in animal models. Oral administration (PO) of the construct expressing the P. aeruginosa (PA103) serogroup O11 in acute pneumonia models provided better protection than intraperitoneal (IP) administration and induced strong immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA responses [62]. IN administration was also effective, even in patients with corneal lesions and burns [63]. The efficacy of the vaccine was also demonstrated in immunocompromised mice susceptible to pneumonia, improving survival [64]. A similar vaccine expressing the P. aeruginosa serotype O9 required a higher dose for immunization but showed comparable efficacy, increasing the IgG2a and IgG2b levels, as well as enhancing the opsonophagocytic killing capacity [65]. However, the same procedure using Salmonella Typhimurium SL1344 ΔwecA, an attenuated mutant strain with a disruption in the enterobacterial common antigen biosynthesis pathway, failed to protect against IN infection in pneumonia models when administered PO, although it was successful via IP injection [66].

4.1.3. Killed but Metabolically Active (KBMA) Vaccines

An approach involving the photochemical inactivation of P. aeruginosa strains that do not cause disease but retain metabolic activity to elicit a potent immune response has been reported [67]. A KBMA vaccine against P. aeruginosa (PA CHA ΔuvrAB ΔexoS ΔexoT) generated high antibody titers and specific T cell activation (Th17, Th1 and Th2). IN administration in lethal pneumonia models yielded a survival rate of 58.3% in immunized mice relative to non-immunized mice [68].

4.2. Inactivated Vaccines

Inactivated vaccines utilize dead pathogenic cells, obtained by different techniques, such as inactivation by formaldehyde, heat or hydrogen peroxide treatment. These vaccines are generally safer than live vaccines but tend to generate weaker immune responses, and booster doses are often required [69].
Pseudostat® is a prototype vaccine consisting of P. aeruginosa inactivated with paraformaldehyde that was tested in acute respiratory infection models using various administration routes, including PO, intratracheal (IT), intra-Peyer’s patch (IPP) and subcutaneous (SC) routes [70]. The most effective method was IPP, yielding up to 96% bacterial clearance in bronchoalveolar fluid (BAL) and an associated increase in survival rates. High antibody levels were correlated with bacterial clearance, but excessive titers were linked to a poor prognosis in some studies. Remarkably, intestinal mucosal immunization provided some protection against respiratory infections [70]. Pseudostat® reached the phase I clinical trial stage on two occasions, reflecting scientific interest in this candidate. The initial trial demonstrated a reduced bacterial load in sputum and improved lymphocytic immunity [71]. Subsequent studies in healthy volunteers showed the development of specific IgA and IgG responses. Although some adverse effects detected during the study, such as headache, gastrointestinal disorders or upper respiratory tract infections, were not considered clinically significant [72], further development of this vaccine was limited.
Rodgers et al. developed microneedles loaded with heat-inactivated P. aeruginosa PAO1, delivering antigens quickly into the skin. This approach reduced the bacterial loads in the lungs and spleen [73]. Additionally, IN administration of a heat-inactivated whole-cell vaccine with Curdlan as an adjuvant reduced the bacterial loads in the nasal lavage and lungs, although it was less effective at resolving lung inflammation than its counterpart targeting Bordetella pertussis [74]. The humoral response was shown to play a critical role in this vaccination approach [75].
PAO1 vaccines inactivated by hydrogen peroxide or heat have been evaluated in sepsis models. The surface epitopes were better preserved when hydrogen inactivation was used, generating stronger immunogenic responses. This approach enhanced IgG production and improved IFN-γ and IL-4 secretion, although the cells appeared to release unidentified material, possibly DNA, during vaccination [76].
Bacterial ghosts (BGs), which are empty bacterial envelopes retaining all the surface structures [77], have been tested with P. aeruginosa in both oral and topical vaccination. BGs triggered robust humoral and cellular immune responses, with increased phagocytic activity and elevated IFN-γ levels. These vaccines effectively reduced the bacterial loads in the organs and protected against epidermal ulcers in diabetic rat models [78].
Jiang et al. (2023) have recently used X-ray-inactivated P. aeruginosa in a murine keratitis model. IN immunization reduced bacterial colonization in the cornea and improved the clinical severity scores following P. aeruginosa infection. By contrast, non-immunized mice had increased bacterial loads in the respiratory tract, suggesting translocation of the infection. The vaccine provided cross-protection against heterologous strains, induced M2 macrophage responses to reduce inflammation, and increased anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 [79].

4.3. LPS-Based Vaccines

A heptavalent vaccine, designed in the 1970s, was based on seven immunotypes of antigens capable of inducing cross-protection [80]. Initial safety and antigenicity studies in prison volunteers led to clinical trials under the name Pseudogen®, which was used to immunize patients with CF or burns. Despite eliciting increased levels of LPS-specific antibodies, this vaccine caused high levels of toxicity, with no clinical improvement [81]. Phase I and II trials, first with prisoner volunteers and later with burn patients (over 20% total body surface burned), suggested a correlation between antibody titers and infection resistance. However, positive outcomes were not achieved with severe infections [82]. Further trials demonstrated that Pseudogen® prevented sepsis and reduced mortality caused by P. aeruginosa, highlighting the critical role of neutrophils and IgG in resistance to infection [83,84]. Optimized dosing further reduced mortality, even in severe burns (over 40% of the body), with an overall reduction of 15.7% and an 86% for P. aeruginosa-related sepsis [85]. Despite these findings, inconclusive results in cancer patients and several reported adverse reactions raised safety concerns [86]. In addition, trials in children and adults with acute leukemia and CF also yielded disappointing results due to toxicity concerns [87,88,89].
Around the same time, PEV-01, a polyvalent vaccine combining 16 P. aeruginosa serotypes, was developed [90]. In sepsis models, each component induced early protection in mice. Phase II trials showed no toxicity and provision of early protection in healthy volunteers and burn patients [91,92]. However, subsequent studies in CF patients reported the worsening of disease in colonized and vaccinated individuals [93].
Exotoxin A (ETA) is one of the most potent cytotoxins secreted by P. aeruginosa. ETA production is regulated by iron and its cytopathic activity stems from inhibiting protein biosynthesis and suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-10, IL-6, and IL-8, which contribute to the severity of the infection [11]. A combined vaccine (Aerugen®) was developed using attenuated ETA and LPS from P. aeruginosa 27316 (immunotype 5), adjuvanted with Al(OH)3. Experiments in rabbits and mice showed that Aerugen® was non-toxic, elicited anti-LPS and anti-ETA IgG responses, and also protected against fatal sepsis caused by P. aeruginosa in a burn-induced sepsis model in mice [94]. Aerugen® advanced to phase III trials. Initial studies in healthy volunteers and non-colonized CF patients demonstrated enhanced immunity to LPS components and robust IgG responses [95,96,97,98]. However, phase III clinical trials with nearly 500 CF patients showed no differences between the vaccinated and control groups, leading to the study being suspended [99].
More recently, a conjugate vaccine composed of LPS from both Klebsiella pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa was evaluated in a murine pneumonia model, demonstrating 100% survival and highlighting the protective potential of LPS [100].
Immunization with the O-antigen of LPS triggers the production of opsonizing antibodies, which correlate with protection against P. aeruginosa infection in animal models and patients during acute infection. However, due to its properties, the O-antigen does not confer broad-spectrum immunogenicity or cross-protection against other serotypes [101,102]. These antigens, which induce a T-independent immune response, are ineffective in protecting young populations or immunocompromised individuals, and they do not generate immunological memory [103]. Due to this diversity of serotypes and the lack of demonstrated clinical efficacy of these vaccine candidates, recent studies have mainly focused on developing vaccines based on conserved epitopes, outer membrane vesicles, or whole cells (inactivated or attenuated).

4.4. Alginate-Based Vaccines

The mucoid exopolysaccharide (MEP) or alginate produced by P. aeruginosa protects against antibiotics, inhibits the complement system and reduces phagocytosis [104]. These findings suggest that the alginate could be a potential vaccine target. Pier et al. (1990) found that opsonizing antibodies against MEP were effective in models of endobronchial and chronic infections, aiding phagocytosis and reducing the bacterial load in the lungs of immunized mice [105]. However, the vaccine showed limited effectiveness against strains that induce non-opsonizing antibodies. Two alginate-based vaccines from the mucoid P. aeruginosa strain 2192, differing in the molecular size of MEP, reached phase I trials but elicited weak opsonizing antibody responses in healthy individuals. Additionally, booster doses failed to enhance immunity, limiting their potential use [106].
To improve the immune response against mucoid strains of P. aeruginosa, Cryz and colleagues combined alginate and ETA, demonstrating enhanced opsonizing antibody titers, improved phagocytosis, and partial neutralization of ETA toxicity. While promising for CF patients, this approach carried risks of immune hypercomplex formation, which could aggravate the clinical course of the disease [107]. In animal models, a conjugate vaccine using MEP linked to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) showed increased IgG titers and cross-reactivity against heterologous mucoid strains. In addition, the vaccine induced opsonizing antibodies in the presence of non-opsonizing antibodies, a common characteristic in CF patients [108]. Although KLH is considered a promising carrier, concerns about allergic reactions and variability have so far limited its widespread use in human vaccine development.
Nanotechnology has also been applied to alginate-based vaccine development. A polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-based vaccine conjugated with alginate enhanced opsonic activity and pro-inflammatory cytokine production (TNF-α, IL-4, IL-17A, and INF-γ). In a model of chronic infection, this vaccine significantly reduced the bacterial load in the spleen of immunized mice [109]. At the same time, a combination of alginate with solid lipid nanoparticles (Alg-SLNs), administered via intramuscular (IM) injection, resulted in increased IgG, IgA and IgM titers and the production of opsonophagocytic antibodies. The conjugate provided superior protection against P. aeruginosa than alginate alone in an acute pneumonia model [110].
Researchers have recently developed a vaccine using synthetic mannuronic acid alginate glycans conjugated with CRM-197-1, and adjuvanted with Freund’s adjuvant (FA). This vaccine elicited high IgG1 and IgG2b antibody titers and improved survival rates in a murine pneumonia model, reducing the bacterial loads in the lungs and bloodstream for both the mucoid and non-mucoid strains of P. aeruginosa [111].

4.5. OMP-Based Vaccines

Vaccine candidates based on OMPs typically include antigens with highly conserved and surface-exposed immunogenic domains [9]. Unlike live-attenuated vaccines, OMP-based vaccines are considered safer, as they generate fewer adverse effects, which, when present, tend to be milder [112]. However, they exhibit lower immunogenicity compared to attenuated whole-cell vaccines and are more susceptible to enzymatic degradation and/or mucociliary clearance on mucosal surfaces [9].
OprI, a lipoprotein of the OM of P. aeruginosa, has been studied as a vaccine candidate. Finke and colleagues demonstrated that both recombinant OprI expressed in Escherichia coli and the purified OprI from P. aeruginosa serogroup 12, adjuvanted with Al(OH)3, increased survival rates in a sepsis model [113]. Likewise, a chimeric OprI-ExoS protein encapsulated in gelatin nanoparticles enhanced both Th1 and Th2 responses, increasing IgA and IgG titers and cytokines such as IL-4, IL-17, and INF-γ. In a pneumonia model, immunized mice had significantly lower bacterial counts, with slightly better results in those receiving alum-adjuvanted protein than the nanoparticle-based vaccine [114].
OprF, another OMP, has also been extensively studied as a protective immunogen. In a burn model, the OprF protein provided immunity and reduced mortality in infected mice [115]. In a chronic pneumonia model, OprF conjugated with elastase and ETA adjuvanted with Al(OH)3 provided protection against P. aeruginosa infection, but the combination with elastase A exacerbated lung damage [116]. In acute pneumonia models, recombinant OprF activated dendritic cells (DCs), similarly to native OprF, and demonstrated a superior capacity to reduce bacterial colonization and promote production of IL-10, IL-12p70, INF-γ, leading to a decrease in inflammation [117]. To enhance the immune response to OprF, P. aeruginosa epitopes (Epi8) were incorporated into adenoviral (Ad) vectors, and OprF was conjugated with the AdC7-RGD (modified with an arginine–glycine–aspartic acid sequence), promoting robust humoral and cellular responses [118,119,120,121]. The histidine-tagged OprF, adjuvanted with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) or alum, increased the IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies and decreased the bacterial counts in the kidneys and lungs. In addition, decreased neutrophil recruitment and reduced tissue damage in the liver of immunized mice were observed [122]. Mayeux et al. generated OprF proteoliposomes, achieving 90% survival in an acute pneumonia model using the CHA strain of P. aeruginosa. Moreover, sera containing OprF-induced antibodies provided complete protection as a post-infection treatment [123]. On the other hand, a multi-epitope vaccine derived from OprF conjugated with a TLR agonist and formulated in dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC)/cholesterol (Chol) liposomes, generated a balanced Th1/Th2 response and induced potent opsonophagocytic activity [124].
In chronic pneumonia models, Gomi and colleagues evaluated an adenoviral vector vaccine (AdC7) expressing P. aeruginosa OprF fused with an integrin-binding RGD sequence. This vaccine, administered IN, generated strong humoral and cellular immune responses, successfully resolving the infection and decreasing pulmonary bacterial colonization [125].
The combination of OprI and OprF with ETA, adjuvanted with aluminum phosphate, improved survival in a burn model (60% vs. 50% survival with OprF alone) while enhancing phagocytosis and neutralizing ETA’s cytotoxicity [126]. Nanoparticle-based vaccines, such as polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) containing a combination of OprI, OprF and AlgE epitopes, administered by the SC route, increased the IgG2c levels and cytokine production (IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-17A, and IL-6), indicating a Th1 immune response [127]. Similarly, a recombinant Salmonella enterica vaccine expressing OprF and OprI of P. aeruginosa increased the IgG and IgA levels, resulting in a balanced Th1/Th2 response. Following SC administration and subsequent challenge in a pneumoniae model, this vaccine achieved a 77.78% survival rate [128].
Mannose-modified chitosan microspheres have been evaluated to improve the immunity induced by OprF-OprI vaccines. This approach increased the INF-γ and TNF-α levels and also the IgM and IgA titers in mucosal samples following IN administration, providing 75% protection against P. aeruginosa infection [129]. The combination of OprF, OprI and flagellin B increased specific titers against all the proteins and enhanced the phagocytosis and reduced bacterial counts in the blood. However, OprF-flagellin B failed to protect against the non-mucoid PAK strain, and its use against mucoid strains was ruled out [130].
The IC43 vaccine, a fusion protein of OprF and OprI (OprF190–342–OprI21–83), combines the immunogenic properties of both proteins. Jing and colleagues evaluated an IC43 heptamer fused with alpha-hemolysin (HLA) and adjuvanted with alum, achieving 80% survival compared to 30% with IC43 alone, along with a reduced bacterial load and decreased inflammation in the lungs [131]. A systemic formulation of the IC43 candidate was first evaluated in three phase I trials with healthy individuals and burn patients using different doses, demonstrating safety, tolerability, and increased specific IgG levels [132,133,134]. Later, in phase II trials, ICU patients with mechanical ventilation maintained elevated IgG levels over time, although the study lacked statistical power to assess infection and mortality rates [135]. In phase III trials, with a larger sample size, IC43 was well tolerated, but no differences in mortality or survival were observed compared to controls [136]. Similarly, a mucosal formulation of IC43 was tested in phase I trials with healthy individuals, resulting in increased IgG and IgA titers without adverse effects [137]. Phase I/II studies comparing systemic and mucosal formulations showed superior immune responses with the systemic formulation following a booster dose [138,139].
PHA microspheres presenting antigens such as OprF, OprI, AlgE, and PopB (a translocator protein) with alum generated specific immune responses and high survival rates [140]. Biopolymer particles delivering multiple proteins (OprF, OprI, AlgE, OprL, PopB, PilA, PilO, FliC, Hcp1, and CdrA) adjuvanted with Alhydrogel® also conferred protection [141]. The combination of OprF/I with PopB improved the protection against P. aeruginosa pneumonia, increasing the IgG titers and survival [142]. Likewise, a combination of OprF-OprI-PopB adjuvanted with granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor enhanced the production of IFN-γ, IL-17A, and IL-4, leading to 83.3% survival and reduced tissue damage in a burn model in rats [143].
Beyond OprI and OprF, other OM components of P. aeruginosa have been explored as vaccine candidates. Wu et al. identified several proteins (PopB, FpvA, FptA, OprL, and PilQ) that induced IL-17 release in vitro. Purified PopB, adjuvanted with Curdlan, demonstrated protective efficacy in an acute pneumonia model caused by P. aeruginosa. While PopB generated a strong systemic and mucosal immune response after IN administration, the specific antibodies lacked opsonic killing capacity [144]. Gao et al. also evaluated recombinant OprL with Curdlan, which activated Th1 and Th17 immune responses, reduced inflammation and provided cross-protection against multiple P. aeruginosa strains [145]. In another study, OprH produced protective effects against infection when administered in micelles, while other proteins, such as FpvA, HasR, and FoxA, did not [146]. Baker et al. tested a mucosal adjuvant, the double mutant heat-labile toxin of E. coli (dmLT), with an OMP vaccine, increasing IgG and IL-17A production and achieving a 53% survival rate in a pneumonia model [147]. In a recent study, an extracellular polysaccharide isolated from Lactobacillus plantarum combined with OprH improved cytokine production (IFN-γ, IL-2, and IL-4) and survival rates, although not as effectively as an inactivated vaccine [148].
PcrV, a component of the P. aeruginosa T3SS, has been widely evaluated as a vaccine candidate. Golpasha et al. found that a bivalent combination of PcrV and 3-oxo-C12-HSL increased IgG and IgG1 production and led to 86% survival in a burn model, with reduced bacterial colonization in the liver and spleen of immunized mice, although not in the skin [149]. Hybrid proteins like PcrV-ExoS adjuvanted with alum or monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) improved the immune responses (IgA, IgG and cytokines IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-17) and reduced the bacterial loads in the bladder and kidneys in a murine bladder infection model with P. aeruginosa PAO1 [150]. A recombinant protein composed of PcrV, OprF and OprI produced high IgG titers and 75% survival in a burn mouse model, with significant reductions in bacterial loads in the liver, spleen, kidney, and skin [151]. Furthermore, a multi-epitope PcrV-OmpE vaccine enhanced the antibody responses and the reduced bacterial load in the bladder in a rabbit urinary tract infection model. In silico analysis confirmed its stable interaction with both TLR2 and TLR4 [152].
In acute pneumonia models, Sawa and colleagues demonstrated that PcrV immunization increased IgG titers and reduced mortality, bacterial colonization, inflammation, and lung damage [153]. A trivalent combination of PcrV, OprI and Hcp1 (a protein regulated by T6SS), adjuvanted with alum, provided better protection, higher survival rates, and less tissue damage and inflammation following infection [154]. Further studies evaluating PcrV with different adjuvants (FA, alum, CpG ODN) via the IP route showed that FA provided the highest protection against mortality, while alum and CpG produced more balanced results. When administered IN, CpG improved survival, reduced pulmonary edema and inflammation, and enhanced Ig titers compared to alum in preventing P. aeruginosa infection [155]. To improve the PcrV efficacy, Wan et al. identified the dominant domains for the immune response and combined them into a vaccine that increased the IgG and IgA levels, protecting against P. aeruginosa lung colonization [156]. Additionally, a recombinant fusion protein (PaF) composed of PcrV, PopB and the A1 subunit of dmLT [157,158,159,160] induced higher IgG and IgA titers, stimulated a Th17 response, and enhanced bacterial elimination from the lungs [158,160]. When comparing different formulations, such as the oil-in-water MedImmune emulsion (ME), chitosan particles, TLR4 agonists and BECC438 (non-toxic lipid A analogue), researchers found BECC438/ME to be the most effective, although it failed to protect against the P. aeruginosa serogroup O12, which produces the exolysin A (ExlA) toxin [159]. To provide broader protection, ExlA was include in the vaccine formulation [157].
Th17-dependent epitopes, such as rePcrV and reAmpC, were used to construct a chimeric protein (PVAC) that strongly enhanced IL-17 production and protection against different P. aeruginosa strains [161]. IN vaccination with rePcrV adjuvanted with Curdlan improved phagocytosis and protection, as well as immune cell recruitment and IL-17A production [162]. In another study, a PcrV/OprI vaccine encapsulated in ferritin nanoparticles, and administered IM without adjuvant, increased antibody titers and INF-γ-producing lymphocytes, indicating a Th1 profile. This vaccine led to a 60% survival rate and reduced bacterial colonization in the spleen and lungs, and it lowered the pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12) in a pneumonia model [163]. PomT, a vaccine combining PcrV, OprF and the mutated ETA, demonstrated similar efficacy to PcrV alone in a pneumonia model [164].
In addition to PcrV, the chaperone protein PcrH, which directly binds the PopB translocator, has also been tested [165]. The PopB/PcrH conjugate, adjuvanted with Curdlan and encapsulated in PLGA particles, enhanced Th17 cytokine and significantly reduced bacterial colonization in the lung, improving survival in acute pneumonia models [166]. Another vaccine candidate, LptF (a lipotoxin related to OmpA), elicited a Th2-type response, increasing IgG1 titers and providing protection in acute pneumonia models by reducing the bacterial loads in the lungs and spleen [167]. Furthermore, the chitin-binding protein D (CbpD), associated with T2SS, protected mice in both pneumonia and sepsis models [168].

4.6. Pili-Based Vaccines

Pili and related molecules have been explored as vaccine candidates in acute pneumonia models. A recombinant vaccine based on PilA, a type IV pilus protein, adjuvanted with alum and naloxone, stimulated robust humoral and cellular immune responses, increasing IL-4, INF-γ and IL-17 production following SC administration [169]. The survival rates were higher in immunized mice and bacterial counts reduced in the lungs, with elevated IgG and IgG1 levels, suggesting a Th2-biased immune response [169]. A similar vaccine based on the PilY1 epitope (EP 167-193), delivered via a macrophage membrane-coated PLGA formulation (PNPS@M-EP167-193), increased the titers of epitope-specific antibodies, after IM administration, without in vitro toxicity [170].
Pili-based vaccines for P. aeruginosa have been less frequently explored in sepsis models. A synthetic peptide consensus vaccine (C1s) targeting the type IV pilus receptor binding domain (RBD) provided cross-protection and improved survival rates, highlighting the importance of preserving the RBD receptor backbone structure in vaccine design [171]. The study also demonstrated that synthetic peptide-based vaccines were more effective than those derived from pilus structural proteins [172].
For burn-related skin infections, Korpi et al. combined flagellin B and PilA, eliciting a robust immune response, with increased IgG1, IL-4, INF-γ and IL-17 production, as well as enhanced opsonophagocytic activity. Immunization improved survival and reduced the bacterial loads in the organs (liver, spleen, bloodstream), although the skin bacterial loads remained unchanged [173,174,175]. Additionally, these antibodies enhanced the phagocytic capacity, inhibited bacterial invasion, and led to 100% survival in passively immunized mice [176]. Another bivalent vaccine, based on FlaB and PilQ (a type IV pilus secretory complex component) and adjuvanted with alum, yielded a survival rate of 83% and reduced the bacterial loads in both the organs and skin [177]. Finally, a trivalent vaccine combining FlaA, FlaB and PilA induced the highest IgG production, strongly stimulated splenocyte proliferation and cytokine production (IL-4, INF-γ, IL-12), and also reduced IL-10 levels. Vaccine administration improved survival and decreased the bacterial loads in the liver and bloodstream but not in the skin [178].
Some pili-based vaccine candidates have been developed without experimental challenges. A liposomal vaccine containing a pilin-derived B-cell epitope and an influenza hemagglutinin-derived T-helper epitope was designed with TLR agonists (Pam3CAG, Pam2CAG) as adjuvants and a mannosylated lipid for DC targeting [179]. The liposomal formulation enhanced the immune response by improving drug targeting and adsorption. In animal studies, the vaccine increased the IgG levels following IP administration and the IgA levels in the pulmonary mucosa after IN administration. The PakSer epitope combined with Pam3CAG elicited a stronger response, while PakCys was more effective with Pam2CAG. However, a delayed immune response and an incomplete immune profile limited the conclusions that could be reached [179]. A chimeric PilQ-PilA vaccine adjuvanted with alum significantly increased the IgG and IgG1 isotype levels, indicating a Th2-biased response. Sera from immunized mice completely inhibited P. aeruginosa PAO1 motility [180]. Additionally, the tight adherence pili or Flp combined with the montanide ISA 266 adjuvant, stimulated T cell proliferation, cytokine production (IL-4, INF-γ, and IL-17), and a balanced Th1/Th2 response in murine models [181].
The immunogenicity of PilS2, a type IVb pilin, has recently been evaluated. An in-silico-designed PilS2 chimera, administered with or without alum, enhanced the humoral responses in mice [182]. PilS2 expressed in E. coli increased IgG production, with alum enhancing the IgG2b and IgG3 levels [182,183]. The combination with alum also stimulated splenocytes more effectively, increasing the IL-4 levels without altering the IFN-γ and IL-17 levels, and enhanced the phagocytic capacity (99.98% versus 97% without alum) [183]. However, the efficacy of this vaccine remains unproven.

4.7. Flagellin-Based Vaccines

In the previous section, several flagellin-based vaccines were discussed [173,175,176,177,178,184]. Early studies from the 1980s demonstrated that flagellar antigens (FAgs) could generate protective antibodies against P. aeruginosa, with divalent FAgs providing protection regardless of the strain’s serotype [185,186,187]. The FlaB flagellin, when combined with alginate and IN administered to mice, increased the IgG levels and opsonophagocytic activity [188].
In murine models of acute pneumonia, multivalent vaccines combining FlaA, FlaB and P. aeruginosa OMPs (OprF and OprI) induced robust IgG responses, improved bacterial clearance and reduced lung damage, particularly against non-mucoid strains of P. aeruginosa [189]. Antibodies against polymeric flagella were more effective, but monomeric flagellin induced superior TLR5 activation, crucial for innate immunity [190]. A vaccine combining FlaA and the polymannuronic acid (PMA) improved the IgG responses, inhibited motility and protected against both non-mucoid and mucoid strains, without impairing TLR5 activation [191]. Bivalent vaccines with flagellins A and B produced significantly higher survival rates in pneumonia models than monovalent vaccines. This combination enhanced the phagocytic capacity and neutrophil recruitment, inhibited motility and promoted a Th2-biased immune response, including elevated IL-17 levels [192]. Furthermore, a chimeric protein combining FlaA, FlaB, PcrV and OprF reduced bacterial colonization in the liver and lungs, with 100% survival rates in mice challenged with both the PAO1 and PAK strains [193].
FlgE, a protein related to the flagellar hook structure, was identified as a promising antigen. When adjuvanted with alum, FlgE elicited a Th2-biased immune response and reduced both the bacterial loads in the organs and inflammation in murine pneumonia models [194]. The conjugated reFliC-FN, a fusion of flagellin type A (FliC) with ferritin using nanotechnology, shifted the immune responses from the Th2 to Th1 profile, increasing survival rates by 50%, reducing bacterial colonization, and providing broader protection against strains with flagellins A and B in acute lung infections [195].
In recent years, O-polysaccharides have gained attention for their immunogenic potential. Choi et al. investigated both native FlaA and its deglycosylated form (dnFlaA). Although both generated similar antibody levels, dnFlaA failed to protect against P. aeruginosa in a burn infection model and yielded poor results in motility inhibition assays. These findings highlight the critical role of O-glycans in vaccine efficacy [196].
Two flagellin-based formulations have reached clinical trials. The monovalent vaccine advanced to phase I and II trials in healthy volunteers, and high levels of specific antibodies against P. aeruginosa flagellin were reported [197,198]. Subsequently, the bivalent formulation reached phase III trials and was tested in non-colonized CF patients, reducing the colonization rates in the vaccinated patients. Notably, 34% of patients were protected from acute infections and 51% from chronic infections [199].

4.8. Other Protein-Based Vaccines

Several less-explored targets for P. aeruginosa vaccination include proteins such as elastase, catalase, ETA, and others. Sokol and colleagues investigated elastase epitopes (15 and 42) conjugated to KLH or tetanus toxoid (TT) as carrier proteins [200]. Both formulations generated similar IgG and IgA titers, but no significant reduction in the pulmonary bacterial load was observed in acute pneumonia models in rats, suggesting protection against the proteolytic activity of elastase rather than the bacteria itself [200]. Mutant elastases with reduced proteolytic activity, developed by Kawamoto et al., demonstrated promising protective effects in a sepsis model [201].
Immunization with the catalase KatA protein was evaluated through a single IPP inoculation or IPP followed by an IT booster. The IPP plus IT inoculation elicited a more robust immune response, reducing the bacterial loads in both the BAL and lungs, and increased the activity of phagocytic cells [202]. Later studies also assessed the immunogenic capacity of amidase, aminopeptidase, KatE, and Pa13, although the responses varied depending on the protein used [203]. A peptide vaccine targeting the siderophore FpvA, conjugated with KLH and adjuvanted with Curdlan, promoted the recruitment of DCs and T cells, and induced a Th17-type immune response after IN administration, reducing pulmonary edema and bacterial colonization in a murine pneumonia model [204].
Extensive research on P. aeruginosa ETA, a potent toxin that inhibits protein synthesis, has been conducted [205]. A non-toxic ETA variant, engineered by removing Glu-553 from the active site, was administered with FA via SC or IP routes, generating specific antibodies [206]. Another non-toxic ETA variant, ETA Δ576–613, provided protection against P. aeruginosa infection in mice when adjuvanted with alum [207]. Additionally, combining this non-toxic ETA variant with pilin enhanced both mucosal and systemic immunity, increasing the IgG and IgA levels in the serum and saliva after IN administration in mice [208]. However, the variability of pilin sequences may affect the potential protective efficacy. ETA combined with flagellin also increased IgG titers and demonstrated high protective efficacy in sepsis models, although its effectiveness against multiple P. aeruginosa strains remains untested [209].
The iron-binding periplasmic protein HitA, adjuvanted with BCG or with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA), showed some potential in reducing the bacterial load and histological damage in the lungs and liver in a sepsis model [210]. Similarly, the HasAp protein adjuvanted with naloxone elicited a Th2-based immune response, reduced the inflammation and bacterial load in the liver, but had limited effects on other organs (kidneys and lungs) [211].
Recent advances in nanotechnology have allowed the development of a PLGA-encapsulated ETA vaccine. This nanovaccine generated significantly higher IgG levels than uncoated ETA and induced a robust Th17 response, reducing bacterial colonization in the spleen in a sepsis model [212]. Similarly, ETA encapsulated in gold nanoparticles and administered with FA produced elevated IgG titers and resulted in a 100% survival rate following a P. aeruginosa challenge [213]. A conjugate of detoxified ETA toxoid and LPS with FA, encapsulated in gold particles, increased the IgG levels and survival rates in sepsis models without toxicity [214].
Finally, Cairns and colleagues developed a vaccine system based on the trisaccharide D-rhamnan derived from the A-band of P. aeruginosa [215,216]. This glycoconjugate vaccine elicited a good immune response, which was further improved using the diphtheria toxoid CRM197 [217]. The synthetic conjugates of tetra- and pentasaccharides triggered specific immune responses in both rabbits and mice and cross-reacted with LPS from different P. aeruginosa serotypes and clinical isolates.

4.9. Outer Membrane Vesicle-Based Vaccines

Gram-negative bacteria, including P. aeruginosa, release outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) containing proteins, eDNA, RNA, and other molecules [218]. The protein composition of the OMVs varies depending on their biogenesis, and these vesicles can transport bacterial materials to host cells, acting as inflammatory VFs [219]. Similar to live-attenuated vaccines, OMVs contain VFs such as endotoxins (e.g., LPS), which may pose safety-related issues.
OMVs are being explored as vaccine platforms to induce immune responses. Recent studies have evaluated recombinant OMVs (rOMVs) from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis carrying P. aeruginosa antigens such as PcrV and HitA. When administered via IM injection in murine models, these vaccines generated specific IgG and IgM antibodies, enhanced T cell responses (Th1 and Th17) and increased production of TNF-α, IL-17A and INF-γ [220]. In addition, bacterial colonization in the organs (lung, liver and spleen) was reduced, particularly in the bloodstream [220,221]. In burn infection models, a similar vaccine combining P. aeruginosa OMVs with diphtheria toxoid and alum, administered via SC, achieved 100% survival in immunized mice [222]. It also significantly reduced the bacterial loads in the organs (liver, spleen, blood, skin) while decreasing inflammatory cell infiltration by eight-fold. However, three doses of vaccine were required to induce the optimal immune response [222]. With advances in nanotechnology, Noh and colleagues developed cellular nanodiscs derived from P. aeruginosa OMVs, which enhanced both cellular and humoral immune responses, protecting against pneumonia by reducing the lung bacterial loads and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-12, IL-17A and TNF-α) [223].
Despite these promising results, OMV-based vaccine development is still in the preliminary stages. Recent work by Bi et al. revealed that X-ray irradiation could induce OMV release, which reduced edema, lesions and pulmonary inflammation in a sepsis mouse model. Preventive treatment with irradiated OMVs reduced peritoneal bacterial colonization by 39.5%, while post-infection treatment yielded a 50.9% reduction [224]. A novel approach using hybrid membrane vesicles (HMVs), composed of macrophage membranes fused with bacterial OMVs and incorporated in gold nanoparticles, effectively stimulated B-cell proliferation in the spleen and antibody production. In sepsis and pneumonia models, prophylactic vaccination produced significant reductions in lung bacterial colonization and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β), resulting in 100% survival over 14 days [225]. Furthermore, Takahara et al. examined the differences in vesicle production between biofilm and planktonic cultures. Biofilm-derived OMVs contained higher concentrations of LPS and phospholipids, suggesting a more pronounced inflammatory profile and more efficient macrophage recognition [226].

4.10. Autoinducer Vaccines

Quorum sensing (QS) is a bacterial communication process that relies on extracellular signaling molecules, known as autoinducers. These molecules, which include acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs), enable bacteria to respond collectively to changes in population density [227] and have been explored as potential vaccine components. In this context, N-3-oxododecanoyl homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C12-HSL) was conjugated to bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a carrier protein to stimulate antibody production in murine models of acute lung infection. This vaccine generated antibody titers over 100-fold higher than those in the controls and improved the survival rates in some vaccinated mice 48 h post-infection after IN challenge. Although administration of the vaccine reduced the TNF-α levels and modulated lung inflammation, it did not effectively decrease bacterial colonization or enhance bacterial clearance by the immune system [228].

4.11. Nucleic Acid Vaccines

Nucleic acid vaccines have gained importance in recent years, particularly during the SARS-Cov2 pandemic, due to their safety profile and ability to elicit both humoral and cellular immune responses [229].
OprF has been investigated as a DNA vaccine against P. aeruginosa by testing the pVR1020 plasmid in chronic pneumonia models. Immunization reduced the lung lesions and bacterial loads, with strong opsonizing antibodies and a predominant Th2-biased response. Gene gun administration produced higher and faster antibody responses than IM injection [230]. A multivalent DNA vaccine combining OprF, OprI, PcrV and PilA, administered via IM electroporation, reduced the bacterial loads in the lungs and bloodstream in acute pneumonia models, generating a Th1-biased immune response with elevated levels of IFN-γ and microphage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) in BAL, as well as increased phagocytic cell infiltration. In this case, gene gun delivery yielded suboptimal results, highlighting the importance of delivery methods in the efficacy of the vaccine [231]. A bivalent DNA vaccine containing OprF and PcrV epitopes, delivered with a polyaspartamide/polyethylene glycol di-aldehyde (PSIH/PEG DA) hydrogel, allowed controlled antigen release, higher specific IgG titers and cytokine levels (INF-γ, IL-4, TNF-α, IL-2, and IL-17), and improved survival rate (83%) with reduced bacterial loads and inflammation in a pneumonia model [232].
The TLR5 receptor plays a fundamental role in pathogen recognition and activation of innate immune responses by detection of flagellin. However, excessive TLR5 activation can hinder the innate immune response to P. aeruginosa [233]. To address this challenge, the researchers engineered a DNA vaccine using a mutant flagellin (FliC R90A) to minimize TLR5 activation. The mutant successfully induced high levels of cross-reactive antibodies against type A (FlaA) and B (FliC) flagellins, while minimizing TLR5 interference. However, the reduction of TLR5 activation may impact long-term immunity [234].
In mouse sepsis models, the recombinant pVAX1-OprF-VP22 vaccine, combining OprF with the VP22 protein from herpes simplex virus type 1, induced higher IgG2a levels (indicating a Th1-biased response) and increased IFN-γ, providing enhanced protection against infection [235]. However, the VP22 protein lost its structural conformation when it fused to the amino terminus of OprF due to the location at this end of its cell-penetrating peptide. In chicken models, divalent and fusion vaccines combining oprL and oprF genes of P. aeruginosa provided 80% protection and induced high IFN-γ and IL-2 levels, while monovalent vaccines were less effective (40–50% protection) [236]. Further optimization of the OprL/OprF divalent vaccine dosage revealed that a dose of 100 µg was optimal [237]. A trivalent vaccine combining OprL, OprF and FlgE improved the survival rates by 10%, reaching 90% protection after challenge in chickens. However, its efficacy was slightly lower compared to an inactivated vaccine control [238].
Two mRNA vaccines encoding PcrV and a fusion protein OprF-I have recently been evaluated in murine models of burns and sepsis [239]. The PcrV-based vaccine generated a higher specific IgG titer than the OprF-I vaccine, although the combined vaccine enhanced both responses. The mRNA-PcrV vaccine was more effective in activating CD4+ T cells, promoting IL2 and IL4 secretion, opsonizing antibody production and also activating IFN-γ secreting cells. However, neither vaccine significantly activated CD8+ T cells. While all the vaccines provided protection against different P. aeruginosa strains by reducing bacterial colonization in the organs and inflammation, the mRNA-PcrV and the combined vaccine were the most effective against severe P. aeruginosa infections [239].

5. Conclusions and Future Prospects

P. aeruginosa is an important pathogen that poses a serious health threat, especially to individuals with CF and bronchiectasis, due to its ability to infect the respiratory tract. Additionally, P. aeruginosa is one of the most prevalent pathogens in ICU infections associated with mechanical ventilation and nosocomial infections. It has a broad clinical spectrum, affecting both immunocompetent patients and especially those with some degree of immunosuppression. Furthermore, it easily develops resistance to antimicrobials, including next-generation drugs, and exhibits notable virulence. This pathogen has attracted great attention from the scientific community over the past five decades, with efforts aimed at developing effective antimicrobials and vaccines. Regarding vaccines, a broad spectrum of vaccine strategies has been developed; however, due to safety concerns and limited evidence of efficacy against chronic pulmonary infections, few vaccine candidates have progressed to clinical trials. To date, no vaccine against P. aeruginosa has received marketing authorization approval. Despite this, previous studies have provided valuable insights into the mechanisms that can guide the future development of vaccines. Understanding how P. aeruginosa interacts with the immune system is crucial for designing vaccines that elicit both humoral and cellular immune responses.
Most vaccine candidates reviewed have been effective in increasing the serum IgG antibody levels specific to P. aeruginosa, regardless of the administration route. However, for optimal protection, especially against pathogens targeting mucosal surfaces, vaccines should prioritize stimulating IgA production at these sites. The Th17 immune responses are particularly promising, as they enhance mucosal immunity through cytokine production and neutrophil recruitment, while the Th1 responses triggered by specific adjuvants, such as alum, combined with naloxone or adenovirus vectors, may offer protection against acute infections.
Whole-cell vaccines, including inactivated or live-attenuated variants, and particularly auxotrophic variants, have shown high immunogenicity and induction of the cellular immune response, making them effective against P. aeruginosa. However, challenges such as toxicity from the bacterial LPS remain. Protein-based vaccines, especially those targeting OMPs, represent a promising alternative due to their conservation, ease of production, and surface accessibility. The use of live-attenuated bacterial vectors such as Salmonella to boost mucosal immunity is also being explored. However, chronic infections, especially in CF patients, require further study to assess the vaccine effectiveness. To improve vaccine safety, several strategies are being considered, including optimized antigen delivery and novel adjuvants like dmLT, which promote Th17-type responses. Mucoadhesive polymers could enhance antigen retention at mucosal sites, improving the efficacy, reducing the required antigen dose and minimizing the associated side effects. Nanoparticle-based platforms hold great promise for enhancing mucosal immunity by targeting respiratory tissues. These platforms can improve antigen stability, increase presentation to immune cells, and enable the co-delivery of multiple antigens for broader protection. DNA vaccines also offer flexibility in encoding multiple targets and could complement other vaccine strategies. RNA-based vaccines, which proved highly effective during the COVID-19 pandemic, present a novel approach for bacterial infections like P. aeruginosa. These vaccines can be rapidly designed to include multiple antigens, providing greater safety and higher efficacy and versatility than traditional vaccine methods. mRNA vaccines could address challenges such as antigen variability and downregulation in chronic infections.
Developing a vaccine against P. aeruginosa presents a significant challenge for researchers due to the wide range of VFs produced by the bacterium, as well as its remarkable adaptability and resistance mechanisms. However, the growing threat of multidrug-resistant strains and the vulnerability of high-risk populations highlight the urgent need for a solution. Producing a successful vaccine against P. aeruginosa may be possible in the near future by the use of multivalent strategies, including advanced technologies such as nanotechnology and RNA-based platforms, and by obtaining a more detailed understanding of host–pathogen interactions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26052012/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S.-F., V.F.-V., M.M. and G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, R.S.-F., V.F.-V., A.S-R. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, R.S.-F., V.F.-V., A.S.-R., P.G., M.M. and G.B.; visualization, R.S-F., M.M. and V.F.-V.; supervision, M.M. and G.B.; funding acquisition, G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the SERGAS-Galician Healthcare Service (Program “Innova Saúde”), CIBERINFEC (CB21/13/00055), and the projects PI18/00501 and PI21/00704 to G.B., integrated in the National Plan for Scientific Research, Development and Technological Innovation 2013–2016 from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the Institute of Health Carlos III. V.F-V. is funded by a predoctoral fellowship from Conselleria de Cultura, Xunta de Galicia (IN606A-2019/012).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created in this study.

Acknowledgments

The artwork was created with BioRender scientific illustration software (2024) (https://www.biorender.com/). We sincerely thank the Fundación Pública Galega de Investigación Biomédica INIBIC for their grant supporting the publication costs of this open-access article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Murray, C.J.L.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Aguilar, G.R.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: A Systematic Analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report 2022; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; p. 82. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pirnay, J.-P.; Bilocq, F.; Pot, B.; Cornelis, P.; Zizi, M.; Van Eldere, J.; Deschaght, P.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Jennes, S.; Pitt, T.; et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Population Structure Revisited. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Weiner-Lastinger, L.M.; Abner, S.; Edwards, J.R.; Kallen, A.J.; Karlsson, M.; Magill, S.S.; Pollock, D.; See, I.; Soe, M.M.; Walters, M.S.; et al. Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated with Adult Healthcare-Associated Infections: Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2015–2017. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2020, 41, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Raoofi, S.; Pashazadeh Kan, F.; Rafiei, S.; Hosseinipalangi, Z.; Noorani Mejareh, Z.; Khani, S.; Abdollahi, B.; Seyghalani Talab, F.; Sanaei, M.; Zarabi, F.; et al. Global Prevalence of Nosocomial Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0274248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Irek, E.O.; Amupitan, A.A.; Obadare, T.O.; Aboderin, A.O. A Systematic Review of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Africa: An Antimicrobial Resistance Perspective. Afr. J. Lab. Med. 2018, 7, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. MSD Manual. Pseudomonas and Related Infections. 2022. Available online: https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/infectious-diseases/gram-negative-bacilli/pseudomonas-and-related-infections (accessed on 17 September 2024).
  9. Killough, M.; Rodgers, A.M.; Ingram, R.J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Recent Advances in Vaccine Development. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hortal, J.; Muñoz, P.; Cuerpo, G.; Litvan, H.; Rosseel, P.M.; Bouza, E. Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients Undergoing Major Heart Surgery: An Incidence Study in Europe. Crit. Care 2009, 13, R80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Berra, L.; Sampson, J.; Wiener-Kronish, J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Acute Lung Injury or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia? Minerva Anestesiol. 2010, 76, 824–832. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Chou, C.-C.; Shen, C.-F.; Chen, S.-J.; Chen, H.-M.; Wang, Y.-C.; Chang, W.-S.; Chang, Y.-T.; Chen, W.-Y.; Huang, C.-Y.; Kuo, C.-C.; et al. Recommendations and Guidelines for the Treatment of Pneumonia in Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019, 52, 172–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jean, S.-S.; Chang, Y.-C.; Lin, W.-C.; Lee, W.-S.; Hsueh, P.-R.; Hsu, C.-W. Epidemiology, Treatment, and Prevention of Nosocomial Bacterial Pneumonia. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luyt, C.-E.; Hekimian, G.; Koulenti, D.; Chastre, J. Microbial Cause of ICU-Acquired Pneumonia: Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia versus Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2018, 24, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Anwar, S.; Peng, J.-L.; Zahid, K.R.; Zhou, Y.-M.; Ali, Q.; Qiu, C.-R. Cystic Fibrosis: Understanding Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator Mutation Classification and Modulator Therapies. Adv. Respir. Med. 2024, 92, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Elborn, J.S. Cystic Fibrosis. Lancet 2016, 388, 2519–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gómez, M.I.; Prince, A. Opportunistic Infections in Lung Disease: Pseudomonas Infections in Cystic Fibrosis. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2007, 7, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jarych, D.; Augustynowicz-Kopec, E.; Iwanska, A.; Parniewski, P.; Majchrzak, M. Molecular Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Strateva, T.; Mitov, I. Contribution of an Arsenal of Virulence Factors to Pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Ann. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 717–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nadal Jimenez, P.; Koch, G.; Thompson, J.A.; Xavier, K.B.; Cool, R.H.; Quax, W.J. The Multiple Signaling Systems Regulating Virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2012, 76, 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Balasubramanian, D.; Schneper, L.; Kumari, H.; Mathee, K. A Dynamic and Intricate Regulatory Network Determines Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jurado-Martín, I.; Sainz-Mejías, M.; McClean, S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An Audacious Pathogen with an Adaptable Arsenal of Virulence Factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huszczynski, S.M.; Lam, J.S.; Khursigara, C.M. The Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lipopolysaccharide in Bacterial Pathogenesis and Physiology. Pathogens 2019, 9, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, K.; Yoon, S.S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm, a Programmed Bacterial Life for Fitness. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 1053–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mann, E.E.; Wozniak, D.J. Pseudomonas Biofilm Matrix Composition and Niche Biology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 893–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hoffman, L.R.; D’Argenio, D.A.; MacCoss, M.J.; Zhang, Z.; Jones, R.A.; Miller, S.I. Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Induce Bacterial Biofilm Formation. Nature 2005, 436, 1171–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Goltermann, L.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Importance of the Exopolysaccharide Matrix in Antimicrobial Tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Aggregates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02696-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Williams McMackin, E.A.; Djapgne, L.; Corley, J.M.; Yahr, T.L. Fitting Pieces into the Puzzle of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System Gene Expression. J. Bacteriol. 2019, 201, e00209-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hauser, A.R. The Type III Secretion System of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Infection by Injection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 654–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sana, T.G.; Berni, B.; Bleves, S. The T6SSs of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain PAO1 and Their Effectors: Beyond Bacterial-Cell Targeting. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Schwarzer, C.; Fischer, H.; Machen, T.E. Chemotaxis and Binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Scratch-Wounded Human Cystic Fibrosis Airway Epithelial Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Haiko, J.; Westerlund-Wikström, B. The Role of the Bacterial Flagellum in Adhesion and Virulence. Biology 2013, 2, 1242–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jacobsen, T.; Bardiaux, B.; Francetic, O.; Izadi-Pruneyre, N.; Nilges, M. Structure and Function of Minor Pilins of Type IV Pili. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 209, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Perraud, Q.; Cantero, P.; Roche, B.; Gasser, V.; Normant, V.P.; Kuhn, L.; Hammann, P.; Mislin, G.L.A.; Ehret-Sabatier, L.; Schalk, I.J. Phenotypic Adaption of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Hacking Siderophores Produced by Other Microorganisms. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2020, 19, 589–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Paola, T.P. Visión panorámica del sistema inmune. Rev. Medica Clin. Las Condes 2012, 23, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sainz-Mejías, M.; Jurado-Martín, I.; McClean, S. Understanding Pseudomonas aeruginosa–Host Interactions: The Ongoing Quest for an Efficacious Vaccine. Cells 2020, 9, 2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lavoie, E.G.; Wangdi, T.; Kazmierczak, B.I. Innate Immune Responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Microbes Infect. 2011, 13, 1133–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Morris, A.E.; Liggitt, H.D.; Hawn, T.R.; Skerrett, S.J. Role of Toll-like Receptor 5 in the Innate Immune Response to Acute P. aeruginosa Pneumonia. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2009, 297, L1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lee, W.L.; Harrison, R.E.; Grinstein, S. Phagocytosis by Neutrophils. Microbes Infect. 2003, 5, 1299–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jouault, A.; Saliba, A.M.; Touqui, L. Modulation of the Immune Response by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type-III Secretion System. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1064010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Moser, C.; Jensen, P.Ø.; Thomsen, K.; Kolpen, M.; Rybtke, M.; Lauland, A.S.; Trøstrup, H.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Immune Responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Infections. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 625597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hastings, C.J.; Himmler, G.E.; Patel, A.; Marques, C.N.H. Immune Response Modulation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Persister Cells. mBio 2023, 14, e00056-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mak, T.W.; Saunders, M.E.; Jett, B.D. (Eds.) Chapter 12—Mucosal and Cutaneous Immunity. In Primer to the Immune Response, 2nd ed.; Academic Cell: Burlington, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 269–292. ISBN 978-0-12-385245-8. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bayes, H.K.; Ritchie, N.D.; Evans, T.J. Interleukin-17 Is Required for Control of Chronic Lung Infection Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 3507–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mak, T.W.; Saunders, M.E.; Jett, B.D. (Eds.) Chapter 9—T Cell Development, Activation and Effector Functions. In Primer to the Immune Response, 2nd ed.; Academic Cell: Burlington, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 197–226. ISBN 978-0-12-385245-8. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ding, F.; Han, L.; Fu, Q.; Fan, X.; Tang, R.; Lv, C.; Xue, Y.; Tian, X.; Zhang, M. IL-17 Aggravates Pseudomonas aeruginosa Airway Infection in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Front. Immunol. 2022, 12, 811803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wonnenberg, B.; Bischoff, M.; Beisswenger, C.; Dinh, T.; Bals, R.; Singh, B.; Tschernig, T. The Role of IL-1β in Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Lung Infection. Cell Tissue Res. 2016, 364, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lovewell, R.R.; Patankar, Y.R.; Berwin, B. Mechanisms of Phagocytosis and Host Clearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2014, 306, L591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Malhotra, S.; Don Hayes, J.; Wozniak, D.J. Cystic Fibrosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: The Host-Microbe Interface. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00138-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hajj Hussein, I.; Chams, N.; Chams, S.; El Sayegh, S.; Badran, R.; Raad, M.; Gerges-Geagea, A.; Leone, A.; Jurjus, A. Vaccines Through Centuries: Major Cornerstones of Global Health. Front. Public Health 2015, 3, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Polack, F.P.; Thomas, S.J.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Perez, J.L.; Marc, G.P.; Moreira, E.D.; Zerbini, C.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Corbett, K.S.; Edwards, D.K.; Leist, S.R.; Abiona, O.M.; Boyoglu-Barnum, S.; Gillespie, R.A.; Himansu, S.; Schäfer, A.; Ziwawo, C.T.; DiPiazza, A.T.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Design Enabled by Prototype Pathogen Preparedness. Nature 2020, 586, 567–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mak, T.W.; Saunders, M.E.; Jett, B.D. (Eds.) Chapter 14—Vaccination. In Primer to the Immune Response, 2nd ed.; Academic Cell: Burlington, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 333–375. ISBN 978-0-12-385245-8. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kamei, A.; Coutinho-Sledge, Y.S.; Goldberg, J.B.; Priebe, G.P.; Pier, G.B. Mucosal Vaccination with a Multivalent, Live-Attenuated Vaccine Induces Multifactorial Immunity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acute Lung Infection. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 1289–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fuentes-Valverde, V.; García, P.; Moscoso, M.; Bou, G. Double Auxotrophy to Improve the Safety of a Live Anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cabral, M.P.; Correia, A.; Vilanova, M.; Gärtner, F.; Moscoso, M.; García, P.; Vallejo, J.A.; Pérez, A.; Francisco-Tomé, M.; Fuentes-Valverde, V.; et al. A Live Auxotrophic Vaccine Confers Mucosal Immunity and Protection against Lethal Pneumonia Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Priebe, G.P.; Meluleni, G.J.; Coleman, F.T.; Goldberg, J.B.; Pier, G.B. Protection against Fatal Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia in Mice after Nasal Immunization with a Live, Attenuated aroA Deletion Mutant. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 1453–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Priebe, G.P.; Brinig, M.M.; Hatano, K.; Grout, M.; Coleman, F.T.; Pier, G.B.; Goldberg, J.B. Construction and Characterization of a Live, Attenuated aroA Deletion Mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a Candidate Intranasal Vaccine. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Priebe, G.P.; Walsh, R.L.; Cederroth, T.A.; Kamei, A.; Coutinho-Sledge, Y.S.; Goldberg, J.B.; Pier, G.B. IL-17 Is a Critical Component of Vaccine-Induced Protection against Lung Infection by LPS-Heterologous Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 4965–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cabral, M.P.; García, P.; Beceiro, A.; Rumbo, C.; Pérez, A.; Moscoso, M.; Bou, G. Design of Live Attenuated Bacterial Vaccines Based on D-Glutamate Auxotrophy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Pigula, M.; Lai, Y.-C.; Koh, M.; Diercks, C.S.; Rogers, T.F.; Dik, D.A.; Schultz, P.G. An Unnatural Amino Acid Dependent, Conditional Pseudomonas Vaccine Prevents Bacterial Infection. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. DiGiandomenico, A.; Rao, J.; Goldberg, J.B. Oral Vaccination of BALB/c Mice with Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa O Antigen Promotes Increased Survival in an Acute Fatal Pneumonia Model. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 7012–7021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. DiGiandomenico, A.; Rao, J.; Harcher, K.; Zaidi, T.S.; Gardner, J.; Neely, A.N.; Pier, G.B.; Goldberg, J.B. Intranasal Immunization with Heterologously Expressed Polysaccharide Protects against Multiple Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 4624–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Scarff, J.M.; Goldberg, J.B. Vaccination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Mice. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2008, 15, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Moustafa, D.A.; DiGiandomenico, A.; Raghuram, V.; Schulman, M.; Scarff, J.M.; Michael R Davis, J.; Varga, J.J.; Dean, C.R.; Goldberg, J.B. Efficacy of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Serogroup O9 Vaccine. Infect. Immun. 2023, 91, e00247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bridge, D.R.; Whitmire, J.M.; Makobongo, M.O.; Merrell, D.S. Heterologous Pseudomonas aeruginosa O-Antigen Delivery Using a Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium wecA Mutant Strain. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 306, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dubensky, T.W.; Skoble, J.; Lauer, P.; Brockstedt, D.G. Killed but Metabolically Active Vaccines. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 917–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Meynet, E.; Laurin, D.; Lenormand, J.L.; Camara, B.; Toussaint, B.; Le Gouëllec, A. Killed but Metabolically Active Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Based Vaccine Induces Protective Humoral- and Cell-Mediated Immunity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pulmonary Infections. Vaccine 2018, 36, 1893–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS, Vaccine Types. Available online: https://www.hhs.gov/immunization/basics/types/index.html (accessed on 20 September 2024).
  70. Cripps, A.W.; Dunkley, M.L.; Clancy, R.L. Mucosal and Systemic Immunizations with Killed Pseudomonas aeruginosa Protect against Acute Respiratory Infection in Rats. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 1427–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Cripps, A.W.; Dunkley, M.L.; Clancy, R.L.; Kyd, J. Vaccine Strategies against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in the Lung. Behring Inst. Mitt. 1997, 262–268. [Google Scholar]
  72. Cripps, A.W.; Peek, K.; Dunkley, M.; Vento, K.; Marjason, J.K.; McIntyre, M.E.; Sizer, P.; Croft, D.; Sedlak-Weinstein, L. Safety and Immunogenicity of an Oral Inactivated Whole-Cell Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine Administered to Healthy Human Subjects. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 968–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rodgers, A.M.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; Vincente-Perez, E.M.; Dubois, A.V.; Ingram, R.J.; Larrañeta, E.; Kissenpfennig, A.; Donnelly, R.F. Design and Characterisation of a Dissolving Microneedle Patch for Intradermal Vaccination with Heat-Inactivated Bacteria: A Proof of Concept Study. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 549, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Blackwood, C.B.; Sen-Kilic, E.; Boehm, D.T.; Hall, J.M.; Varney, M.E.; Wong, T.Y.; Bradford, S.D.; Bevere, J.R.; Witt, W.T.; Damron, F.H.; et al. Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses against Bordetella pertussis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Murine Model of Mucosal Vaccination against Respiratory Infection. Vaccines 2020, 8, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sen-Kilic, E.; Blackwood, C.B.; Huckaby, A.B.; Horspool, A.M.; Weaver, K.L.; Malkowski, A.C.; Witt, W.T.; Bevere, J.R.; Damron, F.H.; Barbier, M. Defining the Mechanistic Correlates of Protection Conferred by Whole-Cell Vaccination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acute Murine Pneumonia. Infect. Immun. 2021, 89, e00451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fan, Y.; Mu, Y.; Lu, L.; Tian, Y.; Yuan, F.; Zhou, B.; Yu, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Lei, S.; et al. Hydrogen Peroxide-Inactivated Bacteria Induces Potent Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses and Releases Nucleic Acids. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 69, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Amara, A.A.; Salem-Bekhit, M.M.; Alanazi, F.K. Sponge-Like: A New Protocol for Preparing Bacterial Ghosts. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 545741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sheweita, S.A.; Amara, A.A.; Gamal, H.; Ghazy, A.A.; Hussein, A.; Bahey-El-Din, M. Bacterial Ghosts of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a Promising Candidate Vaccine and Its Application in Diabetic Rats. Vaccines 2022, 10, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Jiang, B.; Luo, Y.; Yan, N.; Shen, Z.; Li, W.; Hou, C.; Xiao, L.; Ma, C.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; et al. An X-Ray Inactivated Vaccine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Keratitis in Mice. Vaccine 2023, 41, 4700–4709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Fisher, M.W.; Devlin, H.B.; Gnabasik, F.J. New Immunotype Schema for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Based on Protective Antigens. J. Bacteriol. 1969, 98, 835–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Hanessian, S.; Regan, W.; Watson, D.; Haskell, T.H. Isolation and Characterization of Antigenic Components of a New Heptavalent Pseudomonas Vaccine. Nat. New Biol. 1971, 229, 209–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Alexander, J.W.; Fisher, M.W.; MacMillan, B.G.; Altemeier, W.A. Prevention of Invasive Pseudomonas Infection in Burns with a New Vaccine. Arch. Surg. 1969, 99, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Alexander, J.W.; Fisher, M.W. Immunological Determinants of Pseudomonas Infections of Man Accompanying Severe Burn Injury. J. Trauma. 1970, 10, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Alexander, J.W.; Fisher, M.W. Vaccination for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am. J. Surg. 1970, 120, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Alexander, J.W.; Fisher, M.W.; MacMillan, B.G. Immunological Control of Pseudomonas Infection in Burn Patients: A Clinical Evaluation. Arch. Surg. 1971, 102, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Young, L.S.; Meyer, R.D.; Armstrong, D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine in Cancer Patients. Ann. Intern. Med. 1973, 79, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Pennington, J.E.; Reynolds, H.Y.; Wood, R.E.; Robinson, R.A.; Levine, A.S. Use of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine in Pateints with Acute Leukemia and Cystic Fibrosis. Am. J. Med. 1975, 58, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Haghbin, M.; Armstrong, D.; Murphy, M.L. Controlled Prospective Trial of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine in Children with Acute Leukemia. Cancer 1973, 32, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Pennington, J.E. Preliminary Investigations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine in Patients with Leukemia and Cystic Fibrosis. J. Infect. Dis. 1974, 130, S159–S162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Miler, J.M.; Spilbury, J.F.; Jones, R.J.; Ror, E.A.; Lowbury, E.J.L. A New Polyvalent Pseudomonas Vaccine. J. Med. Microbiol. 1977, 10, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Roe, E.A.; Jones, R.J. Immunization of Burned Patients against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection at Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1983, 5 (Suppl. 5), S922–S930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jones, R.J.; Roe, E.A.; Lowbury, E.J.L.; Miler, J.J.; Spilsbury, J.F. A New Pseudomonas Vaccine: Preliminary Trial on Human Volunteers. Epidemiol. Infect. 1976, 76, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Langford, D.T.; Hiller, J. Prospective, Controlled Study of a Polyvalent Pseudomonas Vaccine in Cystic Fibrosis—Three Year Results. Arch. Dis. Child. 1984, 59, 1131–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Cryz, S.J.; Furer, E.; Sadoff, J.C.; Germanier, R. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Immunotype 5 Polysaccharide-Toxin A Conjugate Vaccine. Infect. Immun. 1986, 52, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Cryz, S.J.; Fürer, E.; Cross, A.S.; Wegmann, A.; Germanier, R.; Sadoff, J.C. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa O-Polysaccharide Toxin A Conjugate Vaccine in Humans. J. Clin. Investig. 1987, 80, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cryz, S.J.; Lang, A.; Rüdeberg, A.; Wedgwood, J.; Que, J.U.; Fürer, E.; Schaad, U. Immunization of Cystic Fibrosis Patients with a Pseudomonas aeruginosa O-Polysaccharide-Toxin A Conjugate Vaccine. Behring Inst. Mitt. 1997, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Schaad, U.B.; Lang, A.B.; Wedgwood, J.; Ruedeberg, A.; Que, J.U.; Fürer, E.; Cryz, S.J. Safety and Immunogenicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Conjugate A Vaccine in Cystic Fibrosis. Lancet 1991, 338, 1236–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Cryz, S.J.; Sadoff, J.C.; Fürer, E. Immunization with a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Immunotype 5 O Polysaccharide-Toxin A Conjugate Vaccine: Effect of a Booster Dose on Antibody Levels in Humans. Infect. Immun. 1988, 56, 1829–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Döring, G. Prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 300, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Bahy, R.; Fatyan, E.; Saafan, A.E.; El-Gebaly, E.A.E.A. Preparation and Evaluation of a New Combined Conjugated Vaccine against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 1543–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pier, G.B. Promises and Pitfalls of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lipopolysaccharide as a Vaccine Antigen. Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 2549–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Hatano, K.; Boisot, S.; DesJardins, D.; Wright, D.C.; Brisker, J.; Pier, G.B. Immunogenic and Antigenic Properties of a Heptavalent High-Molecular-Weight O-Polysaccharide Vaccine Derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 3608–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Saylor, K.; Gillam, F.; Lohneis, T.; Zhang, C. Designs of Antigen Structure and Composition for Improved Protein-Based Vaccine Efficacy. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tuon, F.F.; Dantas, L.R.; Suss, P.H.; Tasca Ribeiro, V.S. Pathogenesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm: A Review. Pathogens 2022, 11, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Pier, G.B.; Small, G.J.; Warren, H.B. Protection against Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Rodent Models of Endobronchial Infections. Science 1990, 249, 537–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Pier, G.B.; DesJardin, D.; Grout, M.; Garner, C.; Bennett, S.E.; Pekoe, G.; Fuller, S.A.; Thornton, M.O.; Harkonen, W.S.; Miller, H.C. Human Immune Response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mucoid Exopolysaccharide (Alginate) Vaccine. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 3972–3979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Cryz, S.J.; Fürer, E.; Que, J.U. Synthesis and Characterization of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alginate-Toxin A Conjugate Vaccine. Infect. Immun. 1991, 59, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Theilacker, C.; Coleman, F.T.; Mueschenborn, S.; Llosa, N.; Grout, M.; Pier, G.B. Construction and Characterization of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mucoid Exopolysaccharide-Alginate Conjugate Vaccine. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 3875–3884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Azimi, S.; Safari Zanjani, L. Immunization against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Alg-PLGA Nano-Vaccine. Iran. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 2021, 24, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Afshari, H.; Maleki, M.; Hakimian, M.; Tanha, R.A.; Salouti, M. Immunogenicity Evaluating of the SLNs-Alginate Conjugate against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Immunol. Methods 2021, 488, 112938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, J.; Yang, Y. A Semisynthetic Oligomannuronic Acid-Based Glycoconjugate Vaccine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ACS Cent. Sci. 2024, 10, 1515–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Moyle, P.M.; Toth, I. Modern Subunit Vaccines: Development, Components, and Research Opportunities. ChemMedChem 2013, 8, 360–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Finke, M.; Duchêne, M.; Eckhardt, A.; Domdey, H.; von Specht, B.U. Protection against Experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection by Recombinant P. aeruginosa Lipoprotein I Expressed in Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 1990, 58, 2241–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Parvaei, M.; Habibi, M.; Shahbazi, S.; Babaluei, M.; Farokhi, M.; Asadi Karam, M.R. Immunostimulatory Chimeric Protein Encapsulated in Gelatin Nanoparticles Elicits Protective Immunity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Respiratory Tract Infection. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 133964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Matthews-Greer, J.M.; Robertson, D.E.; Gilleland, L.B.; Gilleland, H.E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Outer Membrane Protein F Produced in Escherichia coli Retains Vaccine Efficacy. Curr. Microbiol. 1990, 20, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Gilleland, H.E.; Gilleland, L.B.; Fowler, M.R. Vaccine Efficacies of Elastase, Exotoxin A, and Outer-Membrane Protein F in Preventing Chronic Pulmonary Infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Rat Model. J. Med. Microbiol. 1993, 38, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Peluso, L.; de Luca, C.; Bozza, S.; Leonardi, A.; Giovannini, G.; Lavorgna, A.; Rosa, G.D.; Mascolo, M.; Luna, L.O.D.; Catania, M.R.; et al. Protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infection in Mice by Recombinant OprF-Pulsed Dendritic Cell Immunization. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Worgall, S.; Krause, A.; Rivara, M.; Hee, K.-K.; Vintayen, E.V.; Hackett, N.R.; Roelvink, P.W.; Bruder, J.T.; Wickham, T.J.; Kovesdi, I.; et al. Protection against P. aeruginosa with an Adenovirus Vector Containing an OprF Epitope in the Capsid. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Krause, A.; Whu, W.Z.; Qiu, J.; Wafadari, D.; Hackett, N.R.; Sharma, A.; Crystal, R.G.; Worgall, S. RGD Capsid Modification Enhances Mucosal Protective Immunity of a Non-Human Primate Adenovirus Vector Expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprF. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2013, 173, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Worgall, S.; Krause, A.; Qiu, J.; Joh, J.; Hackett, N.R.; Crystal, R.G. Protective Immunity to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Induced with a Capsid-Modified Adenovirus Expressing P. aeruginosa OprF. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 13801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Krause, A.; Whu, W.Z.; Xu, Y.; Joh, J.; Crystal, R.G.; Worgall, S. Protective Anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa Humoral and Cellular Mucosal Immunity by AdC7-Mediated Expression of the P. aeruginosa Protein OprF. Vaccine 2011, 29, 2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Bahey-El-Din, M.; Mohamed, S.A.; Sheweita, S.A.; Haroun, M.; Zaghloul, T.I. Recombinant N-Terminal Outer Membrane Porin (OprF) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is a Promising Vaccine Candidate against Both P. aeruginosa and Some Strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 310, 151415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mayeux, G.; Gayet, L.; Liguori, L.; Odier, M.; Martin, D.K.; Cortès, S.; Schaack, B.; Lenormand, J.-L. Cell-Free Expression of the Outer Membrane Protein OprF of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for Vaccine Purposes. Life Sci. Alliance 2021, 4, e202000958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Thanvi, R.; Nada, S.; Dissanayake, R.; Vartak, A.; Sebilleau, C.O.; Alom, N.-E.; Prestwich, E.G.; Wall, K.A.; Sucheck, S.J. Synthesis and Evaluation of a Self-Adjuvanting Pseudomonal Vaccine Based on Major Outer Membrane Porin OprF Epitopes Formulated with Low-Toxicity QS-21-Containing Liposomes. Bioconjugate Chem. 2023, 34, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Gomi, R.; Sharma, A.; Wu, W.; Sung, B.; Worgall, S. Post-Exposure Immunization by Capsid-Modified AdC7 Vector Expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprF Clears P. Aeruginosa Respiratory Infection. Vaccine 2017, 35, 7174–7180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chen, T.-Y.; Shang, H.-F.; Chen, T.-L.; Lin, C.-P.; Hui, C.-F.; Hwang, J. Recombinant Protein Composed of Pseudomonas Exotoxin A, Outer Membrane Proteins I and F as Vaccine against P. aeruginosa Infection. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 52, 524–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lee, J.W.; Parlane, N.A.; Wedlock, D.N.; Rehm, B.H.A. Bioengineering a Bacterial Pathogen to Assemble Its Own Particulate Vaccine Capable of Inducing Cellular Immunity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, M.; Sun, C.; Gu, J.; Yan, X.; Wang, B.; Cui, Z.; Sun, X.; Tong, C.; Feng, X.; Lei, L.; et al. Salmonella Typhimurium Strain Expressing OprF-OprI Protects Mice against Fatal Infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 59, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Cui, Z.; Han, D.; Sun, X.; Zhang, M.; Feng, X.; Sun, C.; Gu, J.; Tong, C.; Lei, L.; Han, W. Mannose-Modified Chitosan Microspheres Enhance OprF-OprI-Mediated Protection of Mice against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection via Induction of Mucosal Immunity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 667–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Hassan, R.; El-Naggar, W.; Abd El-Aziz, A.M.; Shaaban, M.; Kenawy, H.I.; Ali, Y.M. Immunization with Outer Membrane Proteins (OprF and OprI) and Flagellin B Protects Mice from Pulmonary Infection with Mucoid and Nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2018, 51, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Jing, H.; Zhang, X.; Zou, J.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, D.; Wu, W.; Yang, F.; Lu, D.; Zou, Q.; et al. Oligomerization of IC43 Resulted in Improved Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infection. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 159, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Westritschnig, K.; Hochreiter, R.; Wallner, G.; Firbas, C.; Schwameis, M.; Jilma, B. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase I Study Assessing the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Hybrid Outer Membrane Protein OprF/I Vaccine (IC43) in Healthy Volunteers. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2014, 10, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Mansouri, E.; Gabelsberger, J.; Knapp, B.; Hundt, E.; Lenz, U.; Hungerer, K.-D.; Gilleland, H.E.; Staczek, J.; Domdey, H.; von Specht, B.-U. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Hybrid Outer Membrane Protein F-I Vaccine in Human Volunteers. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 1461–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Mansouri, E.; Blome-Eberwein, S.; Gabelsberger, J.; Germann, G.; von Specht, B.U. Clinical Study to Assess the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa OprF-OprI Vaccine in Burn Patients. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 37, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Rello, J.; Krenn, C.-G.; Locker, G.; Pilger, E.; Madl, C.; Balica, L.; Dugernier, T.; Laterre, P.-F.; Spapen, H.; Depuydt, P.; et al. A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of a Pseudomonas Vaccine in Ventilated ICU Patients. Crit. Care 2017, 21, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Adlbrecht, C.; Wurm, R.; Depuydt, P.; Spapen, H.; Lorente, J.A.; Staudinger, T.; Creteur, J.; Zauner, C.; Meier-Hellmann, A.; Eller, P.; et al. Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of IC43 Recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine in Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Patients-a Randomized Clinical Trial. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Larbig, M.; Mansouri, E.; Freihorst, J.; Tümmler, B.; Köhler, G.; Domdey, H.; Knapp, B.; Hungerer, K.D.; Hundt, E.; Gabelsberger, J.; et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of an Intranasal Pseudomonas aeruginosa Hybrid Outer Membrane Protein F-I Vaccine in Human Volunteers. Vaccine 2001, 19, 2291–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Baumann, U.; Göcke, K.; Gewecke, B.; Freihorst, J.; von Specht, B.U. Assessment of Pulmonary Antibodies with Induced Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Induced by Nasal Vaccination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Clinical Phase I/II Study. Respir. Res. 2007, 8, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Göcke, K.; Baumann, U.; Hagemann, H.; Gabelsberger, J.; Hahn, H.; Freihorst, J.; von Specht, B.U. Mucosal Vaccination with a Recombinant OprF-I Vaccine of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Healthy Volunteers: Comparison of a Systemic vs. a Mucosal Booster Schedule. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 37, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Gonzaga, Z.J.C.; Merakou, C.; DiGiandomenico, A.; Priebe, G.P.; Rehm, B.H.A. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Derived Particulate Vaccine Protects against P. aeruginosa Infection. Vaccines 2021, 9, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Gonzaga, Z.J.C.; Zhang, J.; Rehm, B.H.A. Intranasal Delivery of Antigen-Coated Polymer Particles Protects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. ACS Infect. Dis. 2022, 8, 744–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Shaikh, M.O.F.; Schaefers, M.M.; Merakou, C.; DiBlasi, M.; Bonney, S.; Liao, T.; Zurakowski, D.; Kehl, M.; Tabor, D.E.; DiGiandomenico, A.; et al. Multicomponent Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccines Eliciting Th17 Cells and Functional Antibody Responses Confer Enhanced Protection against Experimental Acute Pneumonia in Mice. Infect. Immun. 2022, 90, e00203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Sabzehali, F.; Goudarzi, H.; Goudarzi, M.; Chirani, A.S.; Izad, M.H.Y. Immunopotentiating properties of chimeric OprF-OprI-PopB protein against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 in the infected burned rat model. Iran. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 2022, 25, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Wu, W.; Huang, J.; Duan, B.; Traficante, D.C.; Hong, H.; Risech, M.; Lory, S.; Priebe, G.P. Th17-Stimulating Protein Vaccines Confer Protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 186, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Gao, C.; Yang, F.; Wang, Y.; Liao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, H.; Zou, Q.; Gu, J. Vaccination with a Recombinant OprL Fragment Induces a Th17 Response and Confers Serotype-Independent Protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Mice. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 183, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Liu, C.; Pan, X.; Xia, B.; Chen, F.; Jin, Y.; Bai, F.; Priebe, G.; Cheng, Z.; Jin, S.; Wu, W. Construction of a Protective Vaccine Against Lipopolysaccharide-Heterologous Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Based on Expression Profiling of Outer Membrane Proteins During Infection. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Baker, S.M.; Pociask, D.; Clements, J.D.; McLachlan, J.B.; Morici, L.A. Intradermal Vaccination with a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine Adjuvanted with a Mutant Bacterial ADP-Ribosylating Enterotoxin Protects against Acute Pneumonia. Vaccine 2019, 37, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Tian, J.; Gong, Q.; Zhu, S.; Li, Y. Extracellular Polysaccharide of Lactobacillus Plantarum Enhance Immune Efficacy of oprH Gene Recombinant Subunit Vaccine from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2023, 85, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Golpasha, I.D.; Mousavi, S.F.; Owlia, P.; Siadat, S.D.; Irani, S. Immunization with 3-Oxododecanoyl-L-Homoserine Lactone-r-PcrV Conjugate Enhances Survival of Mice against Lethal Burn Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bosn. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 2015, 15, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Asadi Karam, M.R.; Badmasti, F.; Ahmadi, K.; Habibi, M. Vaccination of Mice with Hybrid Protein Containing Exotoxin S and PcrV with Adjuvants Alum and MPL Protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Fakoor, M.H.; Mousavi Gargari, S.L.; Owlia, P.; Sabokbar, A. Protective Efficacy of the OprF/OprI/PcrV Recombinant Chimeric Protein Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Burned BALB/c Mouse Model. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 1651–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Kalantari, H.; Habibi, M.; Ferdousi, A.; Asadi Karam, M.R.; Mohammadian, T. Development of a Multi-Epitope Vaccine Candidate against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Causing Urinary Tract Infection and Evaluation of Its Immunoreactivity in a Rabbit Model. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2024, 42, 6212–6227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Sawa, T.; Yahr, T.L.; Ohara, M.; Kurahashi, K.; Gropper, M.A.; Wiener-Kronish, J.P.; Frank, D.W. Active and Passive Immunization with the Pseudomonas V Antigen Protects against Type III Intoxication and Lung Injury. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Yang, F.; Gu, J.; Yang, L.; Gao, C.; Jing, H.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, H.; Zou, Q.; Lv, F.; Zhang, J. Protective Efficacy of the Trivalent Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine Candidate PcrV-OprI-Hcp1 in Murine Pneumonia and Burn Models. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Naito, Y.; Hamaoka, S.; Kinoshita, M.; Kainuma, A.; Shimizu, M.; Katoh, H.; Moriyama, K.; Ishii, K.J.; Sawa, T. The Protective Effects of Nasal PcrV-CpG Oligonucleotide Vaccination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia. Microbiol. Immunol. 2018, 62, 774–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wan, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, L.; Cheng, X.; Gao, C.; Wang, Y.; Xu, W.; Zou, Q.; Gu, J. Rational Design of a Chimeric Derivative of PcrV as a Subunit Vaccine Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Howlader, D.R.; Mandal, R.S.; Lu, T.; Maiti, S.; Dietz, Z.K.; Das, S.; Whittier, S.K.; Nagel, A.C.; Biswas, S.; Varisco, D.J.; et al. Development of a nano-emulsion based multivalent protein subunit vaccine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1372349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Das, S.; Howlader, D.R.; Zheng, Q.; Ratnakaram, S.S.K.; Whittier, S.K.; Lu, T.; Keith, J.D.; Picking, W.D.; Birket, S.E.; Picking, W.L. Development of a Broadly Protective, Self-Adjuvanting Subunit Vaccine to Prevent Infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 583008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Howlader, D.R.; Das, S.; Lu, T.; Hu, G.; Varisco, D.J.; Dietz, Z.K.; Walton, S.P.; Ratnakaram, S.S.K.; Gardner, F.M.; Ernst, R.K.; et al. Effect of Two Unique Nanoparticle Formulations on the Efficacy of a Broadly Protective Vaccine Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 706157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Howlader, D.R.; Das, S.; Lu, T.; Mandal, R.S.; Hu, G.; Varisco, D.J.; Dietz, Z.K.; Ratnakaram, S.S.K.; Ernst, R.K.; Picking, W.D.; et al. A Protein Subunit Vaccine Elicits a Balanced Immune Response That Protects against Pseudomonas Pulmonary Infection. NPJ Vaccines 2023, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Wang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Wan, C.; Wei, J.; Gao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, H.; Peng, L.; Luo, P.; Lu, D.; et al. Development of a Chimeric Vaccine Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Based on the Th17-Stimulating Epitopes of PcrV and AmpC. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 601601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Ou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, T.; Cui, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Zou, Q.; Gu, J.; Zuo, Q. Intranasal Vaccination with rePcrV Protects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Generates Lung Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells. J. Immunol. Res. 2022, 2022, 1403788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Li, Y.; Pu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zeng, S.; Gao, C.; Wang, Y.; Yin, D.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Self-assembled ferritin nanoparticles displaying PcrV and OprI as an adjuvant-free Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1184863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Inoue, K.; Kinoshita, M.; Muranishi, K.; Ohara, J.; Sudo, K.; Kawaguchi, K.; Shimizu, M.; Naito, Y.; Moriyama, K.; Sawa, T. Effect of a Novel Trivalent Vaccine Formulation against Acute Lung Injury Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Vaccines 2023, 11, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Bröms, J.E.; Forslund, A.-L.; Forsberg, A.; Francis, M.S. PcrH of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is Essential for Secretion and Assembly of the Type III Translocon. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 188, 1909–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Schaefers, M.M.; Duan, B.; Mizrahi, B.; Lu, R.; Reznor, G.; Kohane, D.S.; Priebe, G.P. PLGA-Encapsulation of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa PopB Vaccine Antigen Improves Th17 Responses and Confers Protection against Experimental Acute Pneumonia. Vaccine 2018, 36, 6926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Cheng, X.; Chen, Z.; Gao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Wan, J.; Wei, Y.; Zeng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Structural and Biological Insights into Outer Membrane Protein Lipotoxin F of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Implications for Vaccine Application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Askarian, F.; Tsai, C.-M.; Cordara, G.; Zurich, R.H.; Bjånes, E.; Golten, O.; Sørensen, H.V.; Kousha, A.; Meier, A.; Chikwati, E.; et al. Immunization with Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenase CbpD Induces Protective Immunity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2301538120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Banadkoki, A.Z.; Keshavarzmehr, M.; Afshar, Z.; Aleyasin, N.; Fatemi, M.J.; Behrouz, B.; Hashemi, F.B. Protective Effect of Pilin Protein with Alum+naloxone Adjuvant against Acute Pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Biologicals 2016, 44, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Gao, C.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cui, Z.; Liao, Y.; Luo, P.; Wu, W.; et al. A Novel Structurally Identified Epitope Delivered by Macrophage Membrane-Coated PLGA Nanoparticles Elicits Protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Kao, D.J.; Churchill, M.E.A.; Irvin, R.T.; Hodges, R.S. Animal Protection and Structural Studies of a Consensus Sequence VaccineTargeting the Receptor Binding Domain of the Type IV Pilus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 374, 426–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Kao, D.J.; Hodges, R.S. Advantages of a Synthetic Peptide Immunogen Over a Protein Immunogen in the Development of an Anti-Pilus Vaccine for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009, 74, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Korpi, F.; Hashemi, F.B.; Irajian, G.; Fatemi, M.J.; Laghaei, P.; Behrouz, B. Flagellin and Pilin Immunization against Multi-Drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Protects Mice in the Burn Wound Sepsis Model. Immunol. Lett. 2016, 176, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Mousavi, M.; Behrouz, B.; Irajianm, G.; Mahdavi, M.; Korpi, F.; Motamedifar, M. Passive immunization against Pseudomonas aeruginosa recombinant PilA in a murine burn wound model. Microb Pathog. 2016, 101, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Laghaei, P.; Hashemi, F.B.; Irajian, G.; Korpi, F.; Amirmozafari, N.; Behrouz, B. Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type a and b Flagellin Vaccines in a Burned Mouse Model. Mol. Immunol. 2016, 74, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Saffari, M.; Behbood, S.; Irajian, G.; Khorshidi, A.; Moniri, R.; Behrouz, B. Antibodies Raised against Divalent Type b Flagellin and Pilin Provide Effective Immunotherapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection of Mice with Burn Wounds. Biologicals 2017, 45, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Bakht azad, S.; Nikokar, I.; Faezi, S.; Rasooly, S.; Mahdavi, M. Evaluation of the Immune Responses Following Co-Administration of PilQ and Type b-Flagellin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Burn Mouse Model. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 123, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Hashemi, F.B.; Behrouz, B.; Irajian, G.; Laghaei, P.; Korpi, F.; Fatemi, M.J. A Trivalent Vaccine Consisting of “Flagellin A+B and Pilin” Protects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in a Murine Burn Model. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 138, 103697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Heurtault, B.; Gentine, P.; Thomann, J.-S.; Baehr, C.; Frisch, B.; Pons, F. Design of a Liposomal Candidate Vaccine Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Its Evaluation in Triggering Systemic and Lung Mucosal Immunity. Pharm. Res. 2009, 26, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Gholami, M.; Chirani, A.S.; Razavi, S.; Falak, R.; Irajian, G. Immunogenicity of a Fusion Protein Containing PilQ and Disulphide Turn Region of PilA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Mice. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 65, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Ahmadbeigi, Y.; Chirani, A.S.; Soleimani, N.; Mahdavi, M.; Goudarzi, M. Immunopotentiation of the Engineered Low-Molecular-Weight Pilin Targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Combination of Immunoinformatics Investigation and Active Immunization. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 124, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Jazi, M.A.; Chirani, A.S.; Hajikhani, B.; Ebrahimipour, G.; Goudarzi, M. Unraveling the Immunopotentiation of P. aeruginosa PAPI-1 Encoded Pilin: From Immunoinformatics Survey to Active Immunization. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023, 125, 111197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Jazi, M.A.; Hajikhani, B.; Goudarzi, M.; Ebrahimipour, G. Exploiting Immunopotential PAPI-1 Encoded Type IVb Major Pilin Targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Heliyon 2024, 10, e36859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Ahmadi, H.; Behrouz, B.; Irajian, G.; Amirmozafari, N.; Naghavi, S. Bivalent Flagellin Immunotherapy Protects Mice against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in Both Acute Pneumonia and Burn Wound Models. Biologicals 2017, 46, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Holder, I.A.; Naglich, J.G. Experimental Studies of the Pathogenesis of Infections Due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Immunization Using Divalent Flagella Preparations. J. Trauma. 1986, 26, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Holder, I.A.; Wheeler, R.; Montie, T.C. Flagellar Preparations from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Animal Protection Studies. Infect. Immun. 1982, 35, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Montie, T.C.; Craven, R.C.; Holder, I.A. Flagellar Preparations from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Isolation and Characterization. Infect. Immun. 1982, 35, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Faezi, S.; Bahrmand, A.R.; Mahdavi, M.; Siadat, S.D.; Sardari, S.; Nikokar, I.; Khanaki, K.; Mirzajani, E.; Goudarzi, G. Preparation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alginate-Flagellin Immunoconjugate. Biologicals 2017, 47, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Weimer, E.T.; Lu, H.; Kock, N.D.; Wozniak, D.J.; Mizel, S.B. A Fusion Protein Vaccine Containing OprF Epitope 8, OprI, and Type A and B Flagellins Promotes Enhanced Clearance of Nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 2356–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Campodónico, V.L.; Llosa, N.J.; Grout, M.; Döring, G.; Maira-Litrán, T.; Pier, G.B. Evaluation of Flagella and Flagellin of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as Vaccines. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 746–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Campodónico, V.L.; Llosa, N.J.; Bentancor, L.V.; Maira-Litran, T.; Pier, G.B. Efficacy of a Conjugate Vaccine Containing Polymannuronic Acid and Flagellin against Experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infection in Mice. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 3455–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Behrouz, B.; Hashemi, F.B.; Fatemi, M.J.; Naghavi, S.; Irajian, G.; Halabian, R.; Imani Fooladi, A.A. Immunization with Bivalent Flagellin Protects Mice against Fatal Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 2017, 5689709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Korpi, F.; Irajian, G.; Forouhi, F.; Mohammadian, T. A Chimeric Vaccine Targeting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence Factors Protects Mice against Lethal Infection. Microb. Pathog. 2023, 178, 106033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wan, C.; Gao, C.; Xie, Q.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Fang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zou, Q.; Lu, G.; et al. Flagella Hook Protein FlgE Is a Novel Vaccine Candidate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Identified by a Genomic Approach. Vaccine 2021, 39, 2386–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Wei, Y.; Cheng, X.; Liao, Y.; Zeng, S.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wan, J.; Gu, J.; et al. Recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Flagellin Delivered Using Ferritin Nanoparticles Provides Enhanced Cross-Protection against Lung Infection in Mice. Mol. Immunol. 2023, 163, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Choi, M.; Shridhar, S.; Fox, H.; Luo, K.; Amin, M.N.; Tennant, S.M.; Simon, R.; Cross, A.S. The O-Glycan Is Essential for the Induction of Protective Antibodies against Lethal Infection by Flagella A-Bearing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2024, 92, e00427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Döring, G.; Pfeiffer, C.; Weber, U.; Mohr-Pennert, A.; Dorner, F. Parenteral Application of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Flagella Vaccine Elicits Specific Anti-Flagella Antibodies in the Airways of Healthy Individuals. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995, 151, 983–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Crowe, B.A.; Enzersberger, O.; Schober-Bendixen, S.; Mitterer, A.; Mundt, W.; Livey, I.; Pabst, H.; Kaeser, R.; Eibl, M.; Eibl, J. The First Clinical Trial of Immuno’s Experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa Flagellar Vaccines. Antibiot Chemother 1991, 44, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Döring, G.; Meisner, C.; Stern, M. A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Flagella Vaccine in Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11020–11025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Sokol, P.A.; Kooi, C.; Hodges, R.S.; Cachia, P.; Woods, D.E. Immunization with a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Elastase Peptide Reduces Severity of Experimental Lung Infections Due to P. aeruginosa or Burkholderia cepacia. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 181, 1682–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Kawamoto, S.; Shibano, Y.; Fukushima, J.; Ishii, N.; Morihara, K.; Okuda, K. Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Glu-141 and His-223 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Elastase: Catalytic Activity, Processing, and Protective Activity of the Elastase against Pseudomonas Infection. Infect. Immun. 1993, 61, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Thomas, L.D.; Dunkley, M.L.; Moore, R.; Reynolds, S.; Bastin, D.A.; Kyd, J.M.; Cripps, A.W. Catalase Immunization from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Enhances Bacterial Clearance in the Rat Lung. Vaccine 2000, 19, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Thomas, L.D.; Cripps, A.W.; Kyd, J.M. Immune Response Mechanisms against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Associated with Mucosal Immunization with Protein Antigens in a Rat Model of Acute Lung Infection. Vaccine 2009, 27, 3324–3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Sen-Kilic, E.; Blackwood, C.B.; Boehm, D.T.; Witt, W.T.; Malkowski, A.C.; Bevere, J.R.; Wong, T.Y.; Hall, J.M.; Bradford, S.D.; Varney, M.E.; et al. Intranasal Peptide-Based FpvA-KLH Conjugate Vaccine Protects Mice from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acute Murine Pneumonia. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Michalska, M.; Wolf, P. Pseudomonas Exotoxin A: Optimized by Evolution for Effective Killing. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Lukac, M.; Pier, G.B.; Collier, R.J. Toxoid of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin A Generated by Deletion of an Active-Site Residue. Infect. Immun. 1988, 56, 3095–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Chen, T.-Y.; Lin, C.P.; Loa, C.-C.; Chen, T.-L.; Shang, H.-F.; Hwang, J.; Hui, C.-F. A Nontoxic Pseudomonas Exotoxin A Induces Active Immunity and Passive Protective Antibody against Pseudomonas Exotoxin a Intoxication. J. Biomed. Sci. 1999, 6, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Hsieh, J.C.; Tham, D.M.; Feng, W.; Huang, F.; Embaie, S.; Liu, K.; Dean, D.; Hertle, R.; FitzGerald, D.J.; Mrsny, R.J. Intranasal Immunization Strategy To Impede Pilin-Mediated Binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Airway Epithelial Cells. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 7705–7717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Farajnia, S.; Peerayeh, S.N.; Tanomand, A.; Majidi, J.; Goudarzi, G.; Naghili, B.; Rahbarnia, L. Protective Efficacy of Recombinant Exotoxin A—Flagellin Fusion Protein against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Can. J. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Elhosary, M.A.; Bahey-El-Din, M.; AbdelBary, A.; El Guink, N.; Aboushleib, H.M. Immunization with the Ferric Iron-Binding Periplasmic Protein HitA Provides Protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Murine Infection Model. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 131, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Hamad, A.S.; Edward, E.A.; Sheta, E.; Aboushleib, H.M.; Bahey-El-Din, M. Iron Acquisition Proteins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as Potential Vaccine Targets: In Silico Analysis and In Vivo Evaluation of Protective Efficacy of the Hemophore HasAp. Vaccines 2022, 11, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Safari Zanjani, L.; Shapouri, R.; Dezfulian, M.; Mahdavi, M.; Shafiee Ardestani, M. Exotoxin A-PLGA Nanoconjugate Vaccine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection: Protectivity in Murine Model. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Abbasi, M.; Tanomand, A.; Kafilzadeh, F.; Zolghadri, S.; Hosainzadegan, H. Preparation and Evaluation of the Exotoxin A Nano-Gold Conjugate as a Vaccine Candidate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Iran. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 2021, 24, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Najafzadeh, F.; Tanomand, A.; Haddadi, A.; Majidi, J. Immunological Properties of Exotoxin A Toxoid—Detoxified Lipopolysaccharide—Gold Nanoparticles Conjugate Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Iran. J. Immunol. 2021, 18, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Jamshidi, M.P.; Cairns, C.; Chong, S.; St Michael, F.; Vinogradov, E.V.; Cox, A.D.; Sauvageau, J. Synthesis and Immunogenicity of a Methyl Rhamnan Pentasaccharide Conjugate from Pseudomonas aeruginosa A-Band Polysaccharide. ACS Infect. Dis. 2022, 8, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Cairns, C.M.; Michael, F.S.; Jamshidi, M.; van Faassen, H.; Yang, Q.; Henry, K.A.; Hussack, G.; Sauvageau, J.; Vinogradov, E.V.; Cox, A.D. Structural Characterization and Evaluation of an Epitope at the Tip of the A-Band Rhamnan Polysaccharide of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ACS Infect. Dis. 2022, 8, 1336–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Jamshidi, M.P.; Cairns, C.; Khieu, N.H.; Chan, K.; Michael, F.S.; Cox, A.; Sauvageau, J. Optimization of the Synthesis and Conjugation of the Methyl Rhamnan Tip of Pseudomonas aeruginosa A-Band Polysaccharide and Immunogenicity Evaluation for the Continued Development of a Potential Glycoconjugate Vaccine. ACS Infect. Dis. 2024, 10, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Zavan, L.; Fang, H.; Johnston, E.L.; Whitchurch, C.; Greening, D.W.; Hill, A.F.; Kaparakis-Liaskos, M. The Mechanism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Outer Membrane Vesicle Biogenesis Determines Their Protein Composition. Proteomics 2023, 23, 2200464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Bomberger, J.M.; MacEachran, D.P.; Coutermarsh, B.A.; Ye, S.; O’Toole, G.A.; Stanton, B.A. Long-Distance Delivery of Bacterial Virulence Factors by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Outer Membrane Vesicles. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Li, P.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Guan, Z.; Sun, W. Outer Membrane Vesicles Displaying a Heterologous PcrV-HitA Fusion Antigen Promote Protection against Pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. mSphere 2021, 6, e00699-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Li, P.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Cimino, J.; Guan, Z.; Sun, W. Recombinant Pseudomonas Bionanoparticles Induce Protection against Pneumonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Infect. Immun. 2021, 89, e0039621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Zare Banadkoki, E.; Rasooli, I.; Ghazanfari, T.; Siadat, S.D.; Shafiee Ardestani, M.; Owlia, P. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Outer Membrane Vesicles-Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate as a Vaccine Candidate in a Murine Burn Model. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 22324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Noh, I.; Guo, Z.; Zhou, J.; Gao, W.; Fang, R.H.; Zhang, L. Cellular Nanodiscs Made from Bacterial Outer Membrane as a Platform for Antibacterial Vaccination. ACS Nano 2022, 17, 1120–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Bi, H.; Qin, J.; Huang, J.; Zhong, C.; Liu, Y. Outer Membrane Vesicles from X-ray-Irradiated Pseudomonas aeruginosa Alleviate Lung Injury Caused by P. aeruginosa Infection-Mediated Sepsis. APMIS 2024, 132, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Peng, X.; Luo, Y.; Yang, L.; Yang, Y.Y.; Yuan, P.; Chen, X.; Tian, G.-B.; Ding, X. A Multiantigenic Antibacterial Nanovaccine Utilizing Hybrid Membrane Vesicles for Combating Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2024, 13, e12524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Takahara, M.; Hirayama, S.; Futamata, H.; Nakao, R.; Tashiro, Y. Biofilm-Derived Membrane Vesicles Exhibit Potent Immunomodulatory Activity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbiol. Immunol. 2024, 68, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Papenfort, K.; Bassler, B. Quorum-Sensing Signal-Response Systems in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Miyairi, S.; Tateda, K.; Fuse, E.T.; Ueda, C.; Saito, H.; Takabatake, T.; Ishii, Y.; Horikawa, M.; Ishiguro, M.; Standiford, T.J.; et al. Immunization with 3-Oxododecanoyl-l-Homoserine Lactone–Protein Conjugate Protects Mice from Lethal Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Wang, C.; Yuan, F. A Comprehensive Comparison of DNA and RNA Vaccines. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2024, 210, 115340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Price, B.M.; Galloway, D.R.; Baker, N.R.; Gilleland, L.B.; Staczek, J.; Gilleland, H.E. Protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Chronic Lung Infection in Mice by Genetic Immunization against Outer Membrane Protein F (OprF) of P. aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 3510–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Saha, S.; Takeshita, F.; Sasaki, S.; Matsuda, T.; Tanaka, T.; Tozuka, M.; Takase, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Okuda, K.; Ishii, N.; et al. Multivalent DNA Vaccine Protects Mice against Pulmonary Infection Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Vaccine 2006, 24, 6240–6249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Zhang, Y.; Tian, L.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, X.; Qin, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, X. Enhanced Protective Efficacy of an OprF/PcrV Bivalent DNA Vaccine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using a Hydrogel Delivery System. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 172, 116264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. PubChem TLR5—Toll Like Receptor 5 (Human). Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/TLR5/human (accessed on 30 September 2024).
  234. Saha, S.; Takeshita, F.; Matsuda, T.; Jounai, N.; Kobiyama, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Sasaki, S.; Yoshida, A.; Xin, K.-Q.; Klinman, D.M.; et al. Blocking of the TLR5 Activation Domain Hampers Protective Potential of Flagellin DNA Vaccine. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Yu, X.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Q.; Lei, J. A DNA Vaccine Encoding VP22 of Herpes Simplex Virus Type I (HSV-1) and OprF Confers Enhanced Protection from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Mice. Vaccine 2016, 34, 4399–4405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Gong, Q.; Ruan, M.D.; Niu, M.F.; Qin, C.L.; Hou, Y.; Guo, J.Z. Immune Efficacy of DNA Vaccines Based on oprL and oprF Genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Chickens. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 4219–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Gong, Q.; Ruan, M.; Niu, M.; Qin, C. Immune Efficacy of Different Immunization Doses of Divalent Combination DNA Vaccine pOPRL+pOPRF of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021, 83, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Gong, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhai, W.; Niu, M. Immune Responses and Protective Efficacy of a Trivalent Combination DNA Vaccine Based on oprL, oprF and flgE Genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Veterinární Medicína 2022, 67, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Wang, X.; Liu, C.; Rcheulishvili, N.; Papukashvili, D.; Xie, F.; Zhao, J.; Hu, X.; Yu, K.; Yang, N.; Pan, X.; et al. Strong Immune Responses and Protection of PcrV and OprF-I mRNA Vaccine Candidates against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. npj Vaccines 2023, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Progression of P. aeruginosa infection in host cells. Infection progresses through adhesion, invasion, and dissemination. Flagella, pili, and OMPs mediate adhesion and biofilm formation. The T3SS injects cytotoxins (ExoS, ExoU) that disrupt the cytoskeleton, while proteases and phospholipases degrade the epithelial barriers. Dissemination, driven by flagella, rhamnolipids, and quorum-sensing systems, promotes immune evasion and bacterial spread, leading to acute infections with severe tissue damage or chronic infections, where P. aeruginosa undergoes adaptive changes and downregulates VFs to enhance biofilm formation. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; OMPs, outer membrane proteins; T3SS, type III secretion system; VFs, virulence factors.
Figure 1. Progression of P. aeruginosa infection in host cells. Infection progresses through adhesion, invasion, and dissemination. Flagella, pili, and OMPs mediate adhesion and biofilm formation. The T3SS injects cytotoxins (ExoS, ExoU) that disrupt the cytoskeleton, while proteases and phospholipases degrade the epithelial barriers. Dissemination, driven by flagella, rhamnolipids, and quorum-sensing systems, promotes immune evasion and bacterial spread, leading to acute infections with severe tissue damage or chronic infections, where P. aeruginosa undergoes adaptive changes and downregulates VFs to enhance biofilm formation. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; OMPs, outer membrane proteins; T3SS, type III secretion system; VFs, virulence factors.
Ijms 26 02012 g001
Figure 2. Major virulence factors as targets for vaccine development against P. aeruginosa. IM, inner membrane; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; OM, outer membrane; OMP, outer membrane protein; OMV, outer membrane vesicle; OPS, O-antigen; PG, peptidoglycan; QS, quorum sensing; T3SS, type III secretory system.
Figure 2. Major virulence factors as targets for vaccine development against P. aeruginosa. IM, inner membrane; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; OM, outer membrane; OMP, outer membrane protein; OMV, outer membrane vesicle; OPS, O-antigen; PG, peptidoglycan; QS, quorum sensing; T3SS, type III secretory system.
Ijms 26 02012 g002
Figure 3. Upper panel: Activation pathways of M1 and M2 macrophages. The pro-inflammatory cascade triggered by M1 macrophage activation is shown on the left. The anti-inflammatory cascade resulting from M2 macrophage activation is depicted on the right. The arrows represent connections between pathways. ECM, extracellular matrix; I, inflammasome; IL, interleukin; N, neutrophil; ROS, reactive oxygen species. Lower panel: Cytokines and factors released during the inflammatory and anti-inflammatory phases. Pro-inflammatory molecules are shown with a red background and anti-inflammatory molecules are shown with a green background.
Figure 3. Upper panel: Activation pathways of M1 and M2 macrophages. The pro-inflammatory cascade triggered by M1 macrophage activation is shown on the left. The anti-inflammatory cascade resulting from M2 macrophage activation is depicted on the right. The arrows represent connections between pathways. ECM, extracellular matrix; I, inflammasome; IL, interleukin; N, neutrophil; ROS, reactive oxygen species. Lower panel: Cytokines and factors released during the inflammatory and anti-inflammatory phases. Pro-inflammatory molecules are shown with a red background and anti-inflammatory molecules are shown with a green background.
Ijms 26 02012 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of vaccine designs by base components. Graphical representation of the number of vaccine designs categorized by their primary base components. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; OMP, outer membrane protein; OMV, outer membrane vesicle.
Figure 4. Distribution of vaccine designs by base components. Graphical representation of the number of vaccine designs categorized by their primary base components. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; OMP, outer membrane protein; OMV, outer membrane vesicle.
Ijms 26 02012 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santamarina-Fernández, R.; Fuentes-Valverde, V.; Silva-Rodríguez, A.; García, P.; Moscoso, M.; Bou, G. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine Development: Lessons, Challenges, and Future Innovations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052012

AMA Style

Santamarina-Fernández R, Fuentes-Valverde V, Silva-Rodríguez A, García P, Moscoso M, Bou G. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine Development: Lessons, Challenges, and Future Innovations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(5):2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santamarina-Fernández, Rebeca, Víctor Fuentes-Valverde, Alis Silva-Rodríguez, Patricia García, Miriam Moscoso, and Germán Bou. 2025. "Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine Development: Lessons, Challenges, and Future Innovations" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 5: 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052012

APA Style

Santamarina-Fernández, R., Fuentes-Valverde, V., Silva-Rodríguez, A., García, P., Moscoso, M., & Bou, G. (2025). Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccine Development: Lessons, Challenges, and Future Innovations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(5), 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052012

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop