Next Article in Journal
Rapid Identification of Alien Chromosome Fragments and Tracing of Bioactive Compound Genes in Intergeneric Hybrid Offspring Between Brassica napus and Isatis indigotica Based on AMAC Method
Next Article in Special Issue
2-(3,4-Dichlorophenoxy)triethylamine (DCPTA) Sustains Root Activity Through the Enhancement of Ascorbate-Glutathione in Spring Maize (Zea mays L.) Under Post-Tasseling Waterlogging
Previous Article in Journal
Rodent Models of Diabetic Neuropathy, Role of Calcium Homeostasis in Pain and KB-R7943 as a Potential Therapeutic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Small Interfering RNAs as Critical Regulators of Plant Life Process: New Perspectives on Regulating the Transcriptomic Machinery
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 26
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms26052095
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

TOR Mediates Stress Responses Through Global Regulation of Metabolome in Plants

by
Lin Yang
1,2,†,
Ran Zhang
1,2,†,
Huan Zhang
1,2,
Yingyu Yang
1,2 and
Liwen Fu
1,2,*
1
Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Agri-Seeds, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Joint Center for Single Cell Biology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(5), 2095; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052095
Submission received: 15 January 2025 / Revised: 19 February 2025 / Accepted: 22 February 2025 / Published: 27 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Signaling and Stress Adaptation in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase is an evolutionarily conserved atypical Ser/Thr protein kinase present in yeasts, plants, and mammals. In plants, TOR acts as a central signaling hub, playing a pivotal role in the precise orchestration of growth and development. Extensive studies have underscored its significant role in these processes. Recent research has further elucidated TOR’s multifaceted roles in plant stress adaptation. Furthermore, mounting evidence indicates TOR’s role in mediating the plant metabolome. In this review, we will discuss recent findings on the involvement of TOR signaling in plant adaptation to various abiotic and biotic stresses, with a specific focus on TOR-regulated metabolome reprogramming in response to different stresses.

1. Introduction

Plants exist in intricate environments where they are continually subjected to a range of abiotic and biotic stresses, such as extreme temperatures, drought, high salinity, and pathogen attacks [1,2]. Given their immobility, plants have evolved a sophisticated signal transduction network to manage these challenging environmental conditions [1,2]. This network facilitates large-scale transcriptional, translational, and metabolic changes, which are crucial for redirecting the plant’s limited energies and resources from growth and development toward defense mechanisms [3]. Consequently, the plants’ stress responses are intricately linked to these adaptive changes, enabling them to survive and thrive despite adverse conditions.
The target of rapamycin (TOR) is a conserved serine/threonine kinase found in eukaryotes and is a member of the phosphoinositide-3 kinase-related protein kinase (PIKK) family [4,5]. Initially identified in the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), TOR was recognized as the target protein of rapamycin, an antibiotic produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus and first discovered in 1975 by Vézina et al. [6]. Subsequent studies have demonstrated the presence of TOR across a variety of non-photosynthetic organisms, including mammals and Drosophila [4,5]. Furthermore, TOR has been identified in plants, expanding its known presence across both photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic organisms [4,5].
The TOR genes, identified across various species, encode large proteins typically comprising 2400–2500 amino acids, and these proteins exhibit significant similarity among different eukaryotes [4,5]. A typical TOR protein is characterized by several domains arranged sequentially from the N-terminus to the C-terminus: the HEAT (Huntingtin, elongation factor 3, subunit A of PP2A, TOR1) tandem repeat sequence, FAT (FRAP/ATM/TTRAP) domain, FRB (FKBP-rapamycin binding) domain, protein kinase domain, and FATC (Carboxyl-terminal FAT domain) domain [4,5]. The HEAT repeat sequences are crucial for facilitating protein-protein interactions and membrane binding [4,5]. Both the FAT and FATC domains play roles in protein interactions and kinase activation [4,5]. The FRB domain serves as the target for rapamycin, a specific inhibitor of TOR kinase. Rapamycin binds to the FKBP12 protein (FK506-binding protein 12 kDa), forming a complex that specifically attaches to the FRB domain, thereby inhibiting TOR activity [4,5].
TOR operates primarily through two complexes, TORC1 and TORC2, which are distinguished by their composition and function [4,7,8]. TORC1 is composed of TOR, Lethal with Sec Thirteen 8 (LST8 in plants and yeast, mLST8 in mammals), and the Regulatory-Associated Protein of TOR (RAPTOR in mammals and plants, KOG1 in yeast); in contrast, TORC2 includes TOR, LST8/mLST8, Raptor Independent Companion of TOR (RICTOR), and Stress-activated MAP Kinase Interacting Protein 1 (SIN1) [4,9,10,11,12]. In yeast, there are two TOR genes, TOR1 and TOR2, with TOR1 or TOR2 capable of forming a TORC1 complex, whereas only TOR2 can form a TORC2 complex [13]. In mammals, a single TOR gene is involved in both TORC1 and TORC2 complexes [14]. In plants, only the typical TORC1 complex has been identified. However, TORC2 may not be conserved. It is possible that other proteins with similar functions could substitute for RICTOR and SIN1, suggesting the potential existence of another form of TORC2 complex in plants [13]. Notably, the FKBP12-rapamycin complex binds to the conserved FRB domain in TOR kinase, inhibiting TORC1 activity, but it cannot bind to TORC2 complexes due to the spatial occupation by mSIN1 or AVO1 [4].
Over the past two and a half decades since its discovery, extensive research in both yeast and mammalian model systems has revealed TOR’s fundamental role as a central signaling hub [8,15,16,17]. By integrating multiple major signaling pathways, TOR coordinates responses to nutrient availability, cellular energy status, growth factors, and various stressors [8,15,16,17]. Through this comprehensive integration of signals, TOR effectively orchestrates both cellular and organismal physiology, underscoring its essential function in maintaining homeostasis and regulating diverse biological processes [8,15,16,17].
In Arabidopsis, null tor mutants exhibit an embryonic lethal phenotype, and TOR in Arabidopsis has traditionally been regarded as resistant to rapamycin, which has hindered progress in plant TOR research. Some groundbreaking work addressed these challenges by developing a system to detect TOR activity in plants and creating the estradiol-inducible tor mutant, tor-es [18,19]. This innovation facilitated the discovery that plant TOR is indeed sensitive to rapamycin, albeit requiring higher concentrations [18,19]. Subsequently, the introduction of new-generation ATP-competitive chemical inhibitors targeting TOR kinases, such as AZD8055, Torin1, Torin2, and KU0063794, has significantly advanced plant TOR research [20]. TOR has been extensively reported to mediate various aspects of plant growth and development by regulating translation, transcription, autophagy, and primary and secondary metabolism. Additionally, numerous studies have highlighted TOR’s crucial role in plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses [21].
In this review, we will explore recent advances in TOR-mediated stress responses. Specifically, as the significance of TOR-regulated primary and secondary metabolism becomes increasingly recognized, we will examine the specific role of TOR-modulated metabolic reprogramming in plant responses to diverse biotic and abiotic stresses.

2. Insight on TOR-Mediated Stress Responses via Metabolome Reprogramming

2.1. TOR Is Widely Involved in Plants Responses to Various Environmental Stresses

As illustrated in Figure 1a, a typical TOR protein in plants is sequentially arranged from the N-terminus to the C-terminus as follows: HEAT repeats, FAT domain, FRB domain, kinase domain, and FATC domain [4,5]. The amino acid sequences of TOR kinases across different plant species exhibit high levels of identity. For example, Arabidopsis TOR (Q9FR53) and tomato TOR (A0A3Q7ERV7), both dicotyledonous plants, share an identity of 78.9% and a similarity of 86.9%. In comparison, AtTOR (Arabidopsis TOR) and OsTOR (rice TOR, Q0DJS1), with rice being a monocotyledonous plant, show an identity of 72.9% and a similarity of 82.2%. The high degree of identity and similarity in TOR amino acid sequences among various different monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants underscores the strong conservation of its function. To date, only one TOR complex has been identified in plants, consisting of Raptor, LST8, and TOR itself (Figure 1a, [4,5]).
The function of TOR has long been associated with regulating protein translation [22]. However, recent discoveries have revealed that TOR can either directly phosphorylate specific transcription factors, such as E2Fa and E2Fb, or indirectly regulate the stability of others, including EIN3, in ethylene signaling [19,23]. These findings underscore TOR’s crucial role in gene transcription regulation. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis indicates that TOR facilitates significant transcriptomic reprogramming [19,23].
To elucidate the role of TOR in regulating plant responses to stress, we conducted a comparative analysis of genes regulated by TOR (identified through treatment with a TOR inhibitor, Torin2) [24] and those affected by various biotic and abiotic stresses in tomatoes. Specifically, we pooled genes differentially expressed in response to various kinds of biotic stresses into one set, including Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000-, Phytophthora parasitica-, and herbivore-regulated genes (Table S1) [25,26,27]; similarly, genes differentially expressed in response to drought, salt, cold, and heat were consolidated to form the abiotic stress-responsive gene set (Table S2) [28,29,30,31]. Upon analysis of gene expression patterns, we found substantial overlap between TOR-regulated genes and stress-responsive gene sets. Specifically, approximately one-fifth (463/2058) of the TOR-mediated genes showed concordance with biotic stress-responsive genes, while approximately half (924/2058) overlapped with genes regulated under abiotic stress conditions (Figure 1b,c). This significant overlap suggests a broad involvement of TOR in modulating plant stress responses.
To elucidate the biological pathways implicated by these intersecting genes, we conducted a KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway enrichment analysis using the two overlapping gene sets. Notably, when examining the intersection between TOR-regulated genes and those responsive to biotic or abiotic stresses, the “metabolic pathways” and “biosynthesis of secondary metabolites” emerged as the most significantly enriched pathways (Figure 1d,e). Transcriptional changes are relatively direct processes that occur within hours, typically preceding metabolic changes. It is possible that TOR may affect plant stress response through transcriptome reprogramming, followed by metabolome reprogramming, ultimately leading to physiological adaptations to stress conditions.
Based on the conclusions drawn from the transcriptome analysis, we will first summarize recent findings concerning TOR-regulated plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses. Subsequently, we will specifically discuss the role of TOR-mediated metabolic changes in plant stress adaptation.

2.2. TOR-Regulated Plant Responses to Abiotic Stress

Throughout their life cycle, plants face a range of abiotic stresses, including cold, heat, drought, and salt [1]. To survive and thrive under these fluctuating environmental conditions, plants must swiftly respond to diverse stress signals [1]. A pivotal component of this adaptive response is the TOR signaling pathway, which is instrumental in regulating plant reactions to these various abiotic stresses [4].
Abnormal temperatures have a profound impact on biological processes in plants, influencing growth, development, metabolism, protein translation, and gene expression [32,33]. Recent studies indicate that TOR plays a crucial role in mediating the effects of both low and high temperatures.
In Arabidopsis, exposure to low temperatures initially causes a rapid reduction in TOR activity within the first hour, followed by a recovery after a longer duration [34,35,36]. This fluctuation pattern in TOR activity is also observed in tomatoes, suggesting that it represents a conserved mechanism across different species [24]. Furthermore, cold stress not only affects TOR activity at the post-translational level but also influences its expression levels. Specifically, cold exposure induces TOR expression between 1- and 3-h post-treatment, whereas prolonged exposure results in the repression of its expression [34]. These findings collectively indicate that cold stress modulates TOR both at the post-translational and transcriptional levels.
TOR plays a complex role in regulating cold responses in Arabidopsis. Research by Wang et al. indicates that TOR negatively regulates cold responses using 18-day-old seedlings, whereas findings by Dong et al. suggest that TOR promotes these responses using 7-week-old plants, with Thyroid Adenoma Associated (THADA) acting upstream of TOR in this process [36,37]. The findings indicate that TOR might regulate cold responses in a growth stage-dependent manner in plants. Additionally, the FERONIA-ROP2-TOR module has been shown to enhance root hair growth at low temperatures, underscoring TOR’s multifaceted role in plant cold resistance [35]. In tomatoes, low temperatures rapidly and transiently suppress TOR activity, which subsequently activates the transcriptional activity of its direct substrate, PGH1 [24]. This activation leads to increased expression of the C-REPEAT-BINDING FACTOR 1 (CBF1) gene, a key player in cold acclimation and stress response [24]. This, in turn, activates the expression of cold stress response-related genes and regulates metabolic reprogramming, enhancing the accumulation of cold-resistant metabolites and thereby improving tomato cold resistance [24]. These findings provide comprehensive insights into the intricate regulatory mechanisms of TOR in plant cold stress response.
Elevated temperatures also adversely affect grain crop yield and quality. In perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), TOR expression is upregulated under high-temperature stress [36]. In Arabidopsis, glucose via TOR governs the transcriptome reprogramming of a large number of genes involved in heat stress protection [38,39,40]. The E2Fa (E2 PROMOTER BINDING FACTOR a) transcription factor, activated by the glucose-TOR module, is shown to activate root apical meristem and promote root growth [19]. Meanwhile, recent studies also indicate that the glucose-TOR-activated E2Fa also binds to the promoters of HSF genes and enhances the expression of heat-responsive genes [38,39,40]. Specifically, the Glc-TOR-E2Fa module activates the expression of HIKESHI-LIKE PROTEIN1 (HLP1), which binds to the promoters of glucose-regulated HS-responsive genes [38,39,40]. Furthermore, Glc-TOR-E2Fa activates the expression of ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX 1 (ATX1), encoding an H3K4 methyltransferase already shown to regulate H3K4me3 levels at the promoters of HS recovery genes. Also, glucose through TOR promotes the recruitment of histone H3 acetylation marks at the promoters of HS genes to induce their transcription, leading to thermotolerance. This Glc-TOR-mediated histone acetylation is facilitated through HAC1 [38,39,40].
Salt and osmotic stress induce physiological and biochemical changes, leading to metabolic irregularities and growth cessation [41,42]. High NaCl concentration increases TOR activity, while mannitol-induced drought stress inhibits TOR activity [34]. Constitutive overexpression of TOR enhances salt and osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana, showing improved performance in root growth, fresh weight, and lateral root density [43,44]. YAK1 in Arabidopsis acts as a positive regulator of ABA-mediated drought response. Under favorable growth conditions, TOR inhibits YAK1 activity, thereby negatively regulating ABA signaling transduction and ABA-mediated drought response [45,46]. Furthermore, oxidative stress is reported to enhance TOR activity during short-time treatment while inhibiting TOR activity [34].
Abscisic acid (ABA) is a crucial stress phytohormone that plays a significant role in plant responses to various abiotic stresses, including cold, salt, osmotic, and drought conditions [47]. A sophisticated reciprocal regulation exists between ABA and TOR signaling, which balances stress adaptation and plant growth [48,49]. Under stress conditions, ABA-activated SnRK2 kinases directly interact with and phosphorylate RAPTOR, a core component of the TOR complex (TORC1) [48,49]. This interaction leads to the dissociation of TORC1, inhibition of TOR kinase activity, and subsequent repression of plant growth [48,49]. Conversely, under favorable conditions, activated TOR kinase phosphorylates PYLs, preventing ABA from binding to these receptors [48,49]. This inactivation of SnRK2 promotes plant growth [48,49]. Salicylic acid (SA) is another essential stress phytohormone involved in various abiotic stress responses. A recent study conducted on tomatoes demonstrated that inhibiting TOR under cold stress conditions significantly increased the levels of SA and its derivatives [24].
Autophagy serves as a fundamental degradation and recycling pathway for cytoplasmic substances in eukaryotes and is induced by various stressors, with a significant connection to the TOR signaling pathway [50]. In plants, inhibition of TOR signaling can initiate autophagy, while TOR overexpression can prevent it under nutrient deficiencies, salt, and drought stress, though not under oxidative or endoplasmic reticulum stress [51,52,53,54]. SNF1-related kinase 1 (SnRK1) plays a crucial role in regulating autophagy upstream of TOR during nutrient deficiency, osmotic pressure, and salt stress. In contrast, the regulation of autophagy by oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress is dependent on SnRK1 rather than TOR [52,53,54]. Although the role of plant TOR as a regulator of autophagy in response to nutrients and abiotic stress conditions is established [51,52,53,54,55], the precise connection between TOR and the core components in autophagy remains unclear. Notably, recent interactome and phosphoproteomics analyses have identified several autophagy-related proteins as potential substrates of TOR kinase, suggesting a more intricate involvement of TOR in autophagy regulation [21,56].

2.3. TOR-Regulated Plant Responses to Biotic Stress

In addition to various abiotic stresses, plants are also threatened by a range of biotic stresses, including viruses, bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and insects. To counter these biotic threats, plants have developed a sophisticated immune system comprising two layers of defense: pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [57,58]. PTI is activated by molecular patterns associated with microbes, pathogens, nematodes, herbivores, and parasites, known as MAMPs, PAMPs, NAMPs, HAMPs, and ParAMPs, respectively. In contrast, pathogen- and parasite-secreted proteins, termed effectors, are perceived by host-derived immunogenic molecules to trigger ETI [57,58]. This dual-layered immune system enables plants to effectively recognize and respond to a wide array of biotic stressors. In this review, plant defense responses against pathogens are a major focus of discussion.
The mechanisms by which plant TOR responds to various pathogens remain largely unexplored. However, recent studies have begun to elucidate potential pathways of regulation. For instance, it has been demonstrated that biotic stresses may influence TOR at the transcriptional level. Specifically, a study on tomatoes revealed that the transcription factor SlMYC2 directly binds to the promoter region of SlTOR, thereby activating its transcription [59]. Given that jasmonic acid (JA) is a crucial phytohormone involved in biotic stress responses and that MYC2 is the central transcription factor in JA signaling, it is plausible that certain biotic stresses increase JA levels, which in turn activate MYC2 and subsequently enhance TOR transcription [59,60]. In contrast, at the translational level, the Pseudomonas effector AvrRpm1 has been found to suppress TOR expression [61]. Furthermore, the type III effector AWR5, when expressed in yeast, exhibits a function similar to that of rapamycin, suggesting a potential role in TOR regulation [62]. These findings indicate a complex interplay between biotic stressors and TOR signaling, warranting further investigation.
In Solanaceae plants such as tomato and tobacco, the inhibition of TOR activity, either through the use of the TOR inhibitor Torin2 or via Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS), has been shown to enhance plant defense against various pathogens. In tomatoes, specifically, the repression of TOR activity strengthens defense mechanisms against Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria alternata, and Xanthomonas euvesicatoria [63]. Similarly, in tobacco, silencing TOR increases resistance to Xanthomonas euvesicatoria and the tobacco mosaic virus [63]. The study indicates that TOR-regulated plant immunity is dependent on SA [63]. In tomatoes, TOR coordinates cytokinin (CK) and gibberellin (GA) signaling, which mediates both development and defense [64]. The effectiveness of disease resistance mediated by TOR inhibition varies with the developmental stage, being absent in highly morphogenetic leaves but most potent in mature, differentiated ones [64]. Marash’s research demonstrated that inoculating tomatoes with pathogens at different CK/GA ratios revealed that higher CK/GA levels suppressed TOR activity and enhanced resistance, whereas lower CK/GA levels had the opposite effect [64]. This suggests that the differential regulation of TOR could modulate the development-defense trade-off in plants. In rice, TOR negatively regulates both SA- and JA-dependent immune responses and pathogen-triggered immunity (PTI) [65]. SA and JA are known to have antagonistic effects on plant immunity; SA positively regulates immunity against biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens, while JA is effective against necrotrophic pathogens [66]. This study provides valuable insights into how TOR may mitigate the competing effects of these two plant hormones, thereby regulating plant responses to a diverse array of pathogens. Furthermore, the research in rice established a sophisticated model illustrating that TOR balances plant growth and defense, promoting growth while repressing defense responses. In Arabidopsis, TOR inhibition via a TOR inhibitor increased resistance to Fusarium graminearum [67], and the suppression of TOR expression enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae and oomycete pathogens [61]. Additionally, viruses can hijack TOR signaling to facilitate their replication [68], and TOR silencing or inhibition has been shown to promote resistance against the watermelon mosaic virus [69]. Intriguingly, TOR kinases in both dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants exhibit a conserved function in suppressing defense responses, highlighting the evolutionary preservation of this regulatory mechanism across diverse plant species.

2.4. TOR-Modulated Metabolic Reprogramming Contributes to Plant Stress Responses

Mammalian mTOR-mediated metabolic reprogramming is extensively studied, and its dysregulation is implicated in severe human diseases like cancer, type 2 diabetes/obesity, and neurodegenerative disorders [70].
Similarly, in plants, multiple independent studies have demonstrated that TOR tightly regulates the plant metabolome [46,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. Of particular interest is the relationship between TOR-regulated metabolites and plant stress responses, as it has been clearly shown that stress triggers numerous metabolic changes in plants [88]. To systematically investigate this connection, we analyzed the metabolomic data from a comprehensive study by Song et al. in Arabidopsis [83]. Their analysis of an inducible tor mutant (tor-es) identified 141 differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs). Through an extensive literature review of these DAMs’ biological functions, we found that 25 metabolites were associated with abiotic stress responses, 11 with biotic stress responses, and 3 metabolites (3-Methylmalic acid, amentoflavone, and caffeine) were involved in both response pathways, highlighting the significant role of TOR in plant stress metabolism. The functions of the 33 DAMs involved in plant stress responses are summarized in Table 1. Based on the table, TOR appears to regulate plant stress responses by controlling the synthesis and accumulation of stress-response metabolites.
More direct evidence for TOR-mediated metabolic reprogramming in stress resistance comes from a study in tomato. In tomatoes, cold stress inhibits TOR kinase activity, which triggers a cascade of molecular responses that enhance cold resistance through metabolic reprogramming [24]. This inhibition prevents TOR kinase from phosphorylating the transcription factor PGH1, and the resulting dephosphorylated PGH1 exhibits increased transcriptional activity, leading to enhanced expression of the core cold stress response gene CBF1 [24]. Through this TOR-PGH1-CBF1 axis, extensive transcriptional reprogramming occurs, particularly affecting genes encoding key metabolic enzymes [24]. Specifically, while genes involved in amino acid synthesis are downregulated, those crucial for protective compound synthesis are upregulated, including CS2 and ICS1 in the shikimate synthesis pathway and OTC, ADC1, and ADC2 in the putrescine synthesis pathway [24]. Metabolomic analyses confirm that TOR inhibition under cold stress conditions substantially alters the metabolic landscape [24]. These alterations manifest as reduced amino acid synthesis coupled with enhanced production of cryoprotective compounds, including salicylic acid and its derivatives, flavonoids, and putrescine [24]. This metabolic shift suggests that TOR functions as a central regulator in cold stress response by redistributing carbon skeletons from primary metabolism toward the synthesis of cryoprotective compounds, thereby enabling plants to adapt to cold conditions [24].

3. Discussion

Plants face continuous challenges from diverse environmental stresses, which has led to the evolution of sophisticated signaling networks for survival and adaptation. The TOR has emerged as a central regulatory component within these networks, playing crucial roles in stress response mechanisms. Extensive research from multiple laboratories has demonstrated TOR’s widespread involvement in mediating plants’ responses to various environmental stresses. Despite this substantial body of work, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of how TOR-regulated metabolic alterations connect to TOR-mediated stress responses. Therefore, investigating TOR-orchestrated stress responses from a metabolic perspective offers promising new insights into deciphering these complex regulatory mechanisms.
TOR has been demonstrated to influence the accumulation of diverse metabolites in plants, though the underlying mechanisms remain largely unexplored. TOR may exert both direct and indirect control over metabolite biosynthesis. In terms of indirect regulation, TOR can trigger comprehensive transcriptome reprogramming, leading to the modulation of stress-resistant compound accumulation [24]. This often occurs at the expense of growth- and development-related metabolites, reflecting a resource allocation strategy through which plants maintain a delicate balance between defense and growth under limited energy resources [24]. Additionally, TOR can directly regulate metabolic pathways by phosphorylating key enzymatic components. This direct regulatory mechanism is exemplified in a recent tomato study, where TOR was found to phosphorylate PGH1, a crucial glycolytic enzyme that also functions as a transcription factor in CBF1 expression regulation [24].
Under natural conditions, plants are exposed to multiple concurrent environmental stresses rather than experiencing individual stressors in isolation. The TOR signaling pathway demonstrates a remarkable capacity to orchestrate multiple stress responses through its regulation of diverse compounds, as comprehensively illustrated in Table 1. These compounds are integral components of various stress response mechanisms, positioning TOR as an ideal molecular framework for investigating the complex interplay of multiple environmental stresses and their combined effects on plant physiology.
The mechanism by which TOR regulates stress responses through metabolic reprogramming is illustrated in Figure 2.
Although the connection between TOR-mediated stress adaptation and metabolome reprogramming has been established, the precise mechanisms underlying this relationship remain elusive. Current evidence suggests that transcriptome reprogramming drives large-scale metabolome reprogramming, which ultimately influences stress adaptation indirectly. However, more direct TOR substrates responsible for initiating these metabolic changes have yet to be identified. Future research should focus on screening for more catalytic enzymes that act as TOR substrates, employing advanced techniques such as phosphoproteomics or interactome analysis. These efforts will undoubtedly provide critical insights into the specific mechanisms by which TOR regulates stress adaptation through metabolome reprogramming, advancing our understanding of this complex regulatory network.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26052095/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.; data curation, L.Y., R.Z., H.Z. and L.F; writing—original draft preparation, L.Y., R.Z., H.Z. and L.F.; writing—review and editing, L.Y., R.Z., H.Z., Y.Y. and L.F.; funding acquisition, L.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32170308 to L.F.) and funding from Shanghai Jiao Tong University (grant no. WH220415006 to L.F.).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.-K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jones, J.D.G.; Staskawicz, B.J.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system: From discovery to deployment. Cell 2024, 187, 2095–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Monson, R.K.; Trowbridge, A.M.; Lindroth, R.L.; Lerdau, M.T. Coordinated resource allocation to plant growth-defense tradeoffs. New Phytol. 2022, 233, 1051–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, Y.; Xiong, Y. Plant target of rapamycin signaling network: Complexes, conservations, and specificities. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 342–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Meng, Y.; Zhang, N.; Li, J.; Shen, X.; Sheen, J.; Xiong, Y. TOR kinase, a GPS in the complex nutrient and hormonal signaling networks to guide plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 7041–7054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heitman, J.; Movva, N.R.; Hall, M.N. Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science 1991, 253, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shi, F.; Collins, S. Regulation of mTOR signaling: Emerging role of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinases and implications for cardiometabolic disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Emmerstorfer-Augustin, A.; Thorner, J. Regulation of TORC2 function and localization in yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 39, 363–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wullschleger, S.; Loewith, R.; Hall, M.N. TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell 2006, 124, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Shi, L.; Wu, Y.; Sheen, J. TOR signaling in plants: Conservation and innovation. Development 2018, 145, dev160887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Liu, G.Y.; Sabatini, D.M. mTOR at the nexus of nutrition, growth, ageing and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 183–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Inoki, K.; Kim, J.; Guan, K.L. AMPK and mTOR in cellular energy homeostasis and drug targets. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2012, 52, 381–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Burkart, G.M.; Brandizzi, F. A tour of TOR complex signaling in plants. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2021, 46, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Saha, S.; Fang, X.; Green, C.D.; Das, A. mTORC1 and SGLT2 Inhibitors—A therapeutic perspective for diabetic cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, L.; Cho, S.; Blenis, J. mTORC1, the maestro of cell metabolism and growth. Genes. Dev. 2025, 39, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ragupathi, A.; Kim, C.; Jacinto, E. The mTORC2 signaling network: Targets and cross-talks. Biochem. J. 2024, 481, 45–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Foltman, M.; Sanchez-Diaz, A. TOR complex 1: Orchestrating nutrient signaling and cell cycle progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xiong, Y.; Sheen, J. Rapamycin and glucose-target of rapamycin (TOR) protein signaling in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 2836–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xiong, Y.; McCormack, M.; Li, L.; Hall, Q.; Xiang, C.; Sheen, J. Glucose–TOR signalling reprograms the transcriptome and activates meristems. Nature 2013, 496, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Xiong, Y.; Sheen, J. The role of target of rapamycin signaling networks in plant growth and metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fu, L.; Wang, P.; Xiong, Y. Target of rapamycin signaling in plant stress responses. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 1613–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xiong, Y.; Sheen, J. Moving beyond translation: Glucose-TOR signaling in the transcriptional control of cell cycle. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 1989–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fu, L.; Liu, Y.; Qin, G.; Wu, P.; Zi, H.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, S.; et al. The TOR-EIN2 axis mediates nuclear signalling to modulate plant growth. Nature 2021, 591, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, Z.; Yang, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Yu, S.; Fu, L. TOR balances plant growth and cold tolerance by orchestrating amino acid-derived metabolism in tomato. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, C.; Wei, C.; Ma, Q.; Dong, H.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Y.; Foyer, C.H.; Yu, J. Ethylene response factors 15 and 16 trigger jasmonate biosynthesis in tomato during herbivore resistance. Plant Physiol. 2021, 185, 1182–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Naveed, Z.A.; Ali, G.S. Comparative transcriptome analysis between a resistant and a susceptible wild tomato accession in response to Phytophthora parasitica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, Z.; Ma, Q.; Foyer, C.H.; Lei, C.; Choi, H.W.; Zheng, C.; Li, J.; Zuo, J.; Mao, Z.; Mei, Y.; et al. High CO2- and pathogen-driven expression of the carbonic anhydrase βCA3 confers basal immunity in tomato. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 2827–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ikuyinminu, E.; Goñi, O.; Łangowski, Ł.; O’Connell, S. Transcriptome, biochemical and phenotypic analysis of the effects of a precision engineered biostimulant for inducing salinity stress tolerance in tomato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, Y.; An, J.; Sircar, S.; Bergis, C.; Lopes, C.D.; He, X.; Da Costa, B.; Tan, F.Q.; Bazin, J.; Antunez-Sanchez, J.; et al. HSFA1a modulates plant heat stress responses and alters the 3D chromatin organization of enhancer-promoter interactions. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, M.; Yu, H.; Zhao, G.; Huang, Q.; Lu, Y.; Ouyang, B. Profiling of drought-responsive microRNA and mRNA in tomato using high-throughput sequencing. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, R.; Song, J.; Tang, M.; Wang, L.; Yu, J.; Zhou, Y. CALMODULIN6 negatively regulates cold tolerance by attenuating ICE1-dependent stress responses in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2023, 193, 2105–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ding, Y.; Shi, Y.; Yang, S. Regulatory networks underlying plant responses and adaptation to cold stress. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2024, 58, 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kan, Y.; Mu, X.R.; Gao, J.; Lin, H.X.; Lin, Y. The molecular basis of heat stress responses in plants. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 1612–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pereyra, C.M.; Aznar, N.R.; Rodriguez, M.S.; Salerno, G.L.; Martínez-Noël, G.M. Target of rapamycin signaling is tightly and differently regulated in the plant response under distinct abiotic stresses. Planta 2019, 251, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pacheco, J.M.; Song, L.; Kuběnová, L.; Ovečka, M.; Gabarain, V.B.; Peralta, J.M.; Lehuedé, T.U.; Ibeas, M.A.; Ricardi, M.M.; Zhu, S.; et al. Cell surface receptor kinase FERONIA linked to nutrient sensor TORC signaling controls root hair growth at low temperature linked to low nitrate in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2023, 238, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, L.; Li, H.; Zhao, C.; Li, S.; Kong, L.; Wu, W.; Kong, W.; Liu, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhu, J.K.; et al. The inhibition of protein translation mediated by AtGCN1 is essential for cold tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dong, Y.; Teleman, A.A.; Jedmowski, C.; Wirtz, M.; Hell, R. The Arabidopsis THADA homologue modulates TOR activity and cold acclimation. Plant Biol. 2019, 21 (Suppl. S1), 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sharma, M.; Banday, Z.Z.; Shukla, B.N.; Laxmi, A. Glucose-regulated HLP1 acts as a key molecule in governing thermomemory. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 1081–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sharma, M.; Jamsheer, K.M.; Shukla, B.N.; Sharma, M.; Awasthi, P.; Mahtha, S.K.; Yadav, G.; Laxmi, A. Arabidopsis target of rapamycin coordinates with transcriptional and epigenetic machinery to regulate thermotolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 741965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sharma, M.; Sharma, M.; Jamsheer, K.M.; Laxmi, A. A glucose-target of rapamycin signaling axis integrates environmental history of heat stress through maintenance of transcription-associated epigenetic memory in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 7083–7102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, C.F.; Han, G.L.; Yang, Z.R.; Li, Y.X.; Wang, B.S. Plant salinity sensors: Current understanding and future directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 859224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, M.; Zhou, H.; Ma, C.; Wang, P. Regulation of plant responses to salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Deprost, D.; Yao, L.; Sormani, R.; Moreau, M.; Leterreux, G.; Nicolaï, M.; Bedu, M.; Robaglia, C.; Meyer, C. The Arabidopsis TOR kinase links plant growth, yield, stress resistance and mRNA translation. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bakshi, A.; Moin, M.; Madhav, M.S.; Datla, R.; Kirti, P.B. Target of Rapamycin (TOR) negatively regulates chlorophyll degradation and lipid peroxidation and controls responses under abiotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Stress. 2021, 2, 100020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, D.; Ntui, V.O.; Xiong, L. Arabidopsis YAK1 regulates abscisic acid response and drought resistance. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590, 2201–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Forzani, C.; Duarte, G.T.; Van Leene, J.; Clément, G.; Huguet, S.; Paysant-Le-Roux, C.; Mercier, R.; De Jaeger, G.; Leprince, A.S.; Meyer, C. Mutations of the AtYAK1 kinase suppress TOR deficiency in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 3696–3708.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kishor, P.B.K.; Tiozon, R.N.; Fernie, A.R.; Sreenivasulu, N. Abscisic acid and its role in the modulation of plant growth, development, and yield stability. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 1283–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhu, C.; Fu, L.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, P. How long should a kiss last between a kinase and its substrate? J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 789–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, P.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Z.; Hsu, C.C.; Liu, X.; Fu, L.; Hou, Y.J.; Du, Y.; Xie, S.; Zhang, C.; et al. Reciprocal regulation of the TOR kinase and ABA receptor balances plant growth and stress response. Mol. Cell 2018, 69, 100–112.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jamsheer, K.M.; Awasthi, P.; Laxmi, A. The social network of target of rapamycin complex 1 in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 7026–7040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mugume, Y.; Kazibwe, Z.; Bassham, D.C. Target of rapamycin in control of autophagy: Puppet master and signal integrator. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Soto-Burgos, J.; Bassham, D.C. SnRK1 activates autophagy via the TOR signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pu, Y.; Soto-Burgos, J.; Bassham, D.C. Regulation of autophagy through SnRK1 and TOR signaling pathways. Plant Signal Behav. 2017, 12, e1395128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pu, Y.; Luo, X.; Bassham, D.C. TOR-dependent and -independent pathways regulate autophagy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, Y.; Bassham, D.C. Autophagy: Pathways for self-eating in plant cells. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Van Leene, J.; Han, C.; Gadeyne, A.; Eeckhout, D.; Matthijs, C.; Cannoot, B.; De Winne, N.; Persiau, G.; Van De Slijke, E.; Van de Cotte, B.; et al. Capturing the phosphorylation and protein interaction landscape of the plant TOR kinase. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Jhu, M.Y.; Sinha, N.R. Parasitic plants: An overview of mechanisms by which plants perceive and respond to parasites. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2022, 73, 433–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Shelake, R.M.; Wagh, S.G.; Patil, A.M.; Červený, J.; Waghunde, R.R.; Kim, J.Y. Heat stress and plant–biotic interactions: Advances and perspectives. Plants 2024, 13, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhang, Y.; Xing, H.; Wang, H.; Yu, L.; Yang, Z.; Meng, X.; Hu, P.; Fan, H.; Yu, Y.; Cui, N. SlMYC2 interacted with the SlTOR promoter and mediated JA signaling to regulate growth and fruit quality in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1013445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Farooq, M.A.; Ayyaz, A.; Zou, H.X.; Zhou, W.; Hannan, F.; Yan, X. Jasmonic acid mediates Ca2+ dependent signal transduction and plant immunity. Plant Sci. 2024, 348, 112239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Meteignier, L.V.; El Oirdi, M.; Cohen, M.; Barff, T.; Matteau, D.; Lucier, J.F.; Rodrigue, S.; Jacques, P.E.; Yoshioka, K.; Moffett, P. Translatome analysis of an NB-LRR immune response identifies important contributors to plant immunity in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2333–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Popa, C.; Li, L.; Gil, S.; Tatjer, L.; Hashii, K.; Tabuchi, M.; Coll, N.S.; Ariño, J.; Valls, M. The effector AWR5 from the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum is an inhibitor of the TOR signalling pathway. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Marash, I.; Leibman-Markus, M.; Gupta, R.; Avni, A.; Bar, M. TOR inhibition primes immunity and pathogen resistance in tomato in a salicylic acid-dependent manner. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 1035–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Marash, I.; Gupta, R.; Anand, G.; Leibman-Markus, M.; Lindner, N.; Israeli, A.; Nir, D.; Avni, A.; Bar, M. TOR coordinates cytokinin and gibberellin signals mediating development and defense. Plant Cell Environ. 2024, 47, 629–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. De Vleesschauwer, D.; Filipe, O.; Hoffman, G.; Seifi, H.S.; Haeck, A.; Canlas, P.; Van Bockhaven, J.; De Waele, E.; Demeestere, K.; Ronald, P.; et al. Target of rapamycin signaling orchestrates growth-defense trade-offs in plants. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 305–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, H.; Wang, F.; Song, W.; Yang, Z.; Li, L.; Ma, Q.; Tan, X.; Wei, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Different viral effectors suppress hormone-mediated antiviral immunity of rice coordinated by OsNPR1. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Aznar, N.R.; Consolo, V.F.; Salerno, G.L.; Martínez-Noël, G.M. TOR signaling downregulation increases resistance to the cereal killer Fusarium graminearum. Plant Signal Behav. 2018, 13, e1414120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Schepetilnikov, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Geldreich, A.; Caranta, C.; Robaglia, C.; Keller, M.; Ryabova, L.A. Viral factor TAV recruits TOR/S6K1 signalling to activate reinitiation after long ORF translation. Embo J. 2011, 30, 1343–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ouibrahim, L.; Rubio, A.G.; Moretti, A.; Montané, M.H.; Menand, B.; Meyer, C.; Robaglia, C.; Caranta, C. Potyviruses differ in their requirement for TOR signalling. J. Gen. Virol. 2015, 96, 2898–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Szwed, A.; Kim, E.; Jacinto, E. Regulation and metabolic functions of mTORC1 and mTORC2. Physiol. Rev. 2021, 101, 1371–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, L.; Zhu, T.; Song, Y.; Luo, X.; Datla, R.; Ren, M. Target of rapamycin controls hyphal growth and pathogenicity through FoTIP4 in Fusarium oxysporum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 22, 1239–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Calderan-Rodrigues, M.J.; Luzarowski, M.; Monte-Bello, C.C.; Minen, R.I.; Zühlke, B.M.; Nikoloski, Z.; Skirycz, A.; Caldana, C. Proteogenic dipeptides are characterized by diel fluctuations and target of rapamycin complex-signaling dependency in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 758933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. da Silva, V.C.H.; Martins, M.C.; Calderan-Rodrigues, M.J.; Artins, A.; Monte Bello, C.C.; Gupta, S.; Sobreira, T.J.; Riaño-Pachón, D.M.; Mafra, V.; Caldana, C. Shedding light on the dynamic role of the “Target of Rapamycin” kinase in the fast-growing C4 species Setaria viridis, a suitable model for biomass crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 637508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Busche, M.; Scarpin, M.R.; Hnasko, R.; Brunkard, J.O. TOR coordinates nucleotide availability with ribosome biogenesis in plants. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 1615–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mubeen, U.; Giavalisco, P.; Caldana, C. TOR inhibition interrupts the metabolic homeostasis by shifting the carbon-nitrogen balance in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Signal Behav. 2019, 14, 1670595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Scarpin, M.R.; Leiboff, S.; Brunkard, J.O. Parallel global profiling of plant TOR dynamics reveals a conserved role for LARP1 in translation. Elife 2020, 9, e58795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Roustan, V.; Weckwerth, W. Quantitative phosphoproteomic and system-level analysis of TOR inhibition unravel distinct organellar acclimation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Han, C.; Hua, W.; Li, J.; Qiao, Y.; Yao, L.; Hao, W.; Li, R.; Fan, M.; De Jaeger, G.; Yang, W.; et al. TOR promotes guard cell starch degradation by regulating the activity of β-AMYLASE1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 1038–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Moreau, M.; Azzopardi, M.; Clément, G.; Dobrenel, T.; Marchive, C.; Renne, C.; Martin-Magniette, M.-L.; Taconnat, L.; Renou, J.-P.; Robaglia, C.; et al. Mutations in the Arabidopsis homolog of LST8/GβL, a partner of the target of Rapamycin kinase, impair plant growth, flowering, and metabolic adaptation to long days. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 463–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, S.; Ye, Y.; Gao, Y.; Qin, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, C.; et al. Target of rapamycin (TOR) regulates the response to low nitrogen stress via autophagy and hormone pathways in Malus hupehensis. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ren, M.; Venglat, P.; Qiu, S.; Feng, L.; Cao, Y.; Wang, E.; Xiang, D.; Wang, J.; Alexander, D.; Chalivendra, S.; et al. Target of rapamycin signaling regulates metabolism, growth, and life span in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4850–4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Li, L.; Zhu, T.; Song, Y.; Luo, X.; Feng, L.; Zhuo, F.; Li, F.; Ren, M. Functional characterization of target of rapamycin signaling in Verticillium dahliae. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Song, L.; Xu, G.; Li, T.; Zhou, H.; Lin, Q.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Wu, D.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; et al. The RALF1-FERONIA complex interacts with and activates TOR signaling in response to low nutrients. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 1120–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mubeen, U.; Jüppner, J.; Alpers, J.; Hincha, D.K.; Giavalisco, P. Target of rapamycin inhibition in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii triggers de Novo amino acid synthesis by enhancing nitrogen assimilation. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2240–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Caldana, C.; Li, Y.; Leisse, A.; Zhang, Y.; Bartholomaeus, L.; Fernie, A.R.; Willmitzer, L.; Giavalisco, P. Systemic analysis of inducible target of rapamycin mutants reveal a general metabolic switch controlling growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2013, 73, 897–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. O’Leary, B.M.; Oh, G.G.K.; Lee, C.P.; Millar, A.H. Metabolite regulatory interactions control plant respiratory metabolism via target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase activation. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 666–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Artins, A.; Martins, M.C.M.; Meyer, C.; Fernie, A.R.; Caldana, C. Sensing and regulation of C and N metabolism—Novel features and mechanisms of the TOR and SnRK1 signaling pathways. Plant J. 2024, 118, 1268–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Ding, Y.; Yang, S. Surviving and thriving: How plants perceive and respond to temperature stress. Dev. Cell 2022, 57, 947–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Jancewicz, A.L.; Gibbs, N.M.; Masson, P.H. Cadaverine’s functional role in plant development and environmental response. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ozmen, S.; Tabur, S.; Oney-Birol, S. Alleviation role of exogenous cadaverine on cell cycle, endogenous polyamines amounts and biochemical enzyme changes in barley seedlings under drought stress. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 17488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. You, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, A.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Dossa, K.; Zhou, R.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of drought-tolerant and susceptible sesame genotypes in response to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Barqawi, A.A.; Abulfaraj, A.A. Salt stress-related mechanisms in leaves of the wild barley Hordeum spontaneum generated from RNA-Seq datasets. Life 2023, 13, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Brocker, C.; Cantore, M.; Failli, P.; Vasiliou, V. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 7A1 (ALDH7A1) attenuates reactive aldehyde and oxidative stress induced cytotoxicity. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2011, 191, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Clément, G.; Anne, P.; Routaboul, J.M.; Guiboileau, A.; Soulay, F.; Shirasu, K.; Yoshimoto, K. Stitching together the multiple dimensions of autophagy using metabolomics and transcriptomics reveals impacts on metabolism, development, and plant responses to the environment in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1857–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Huh, S.U.; Lee, S.B.; Kim, H.H.; Paek, K.H. ATAF2, a NAC transcription factor, binds to the promoter and regulates NIT2 gene expression involved in auxin biosynthesis. Mol. Cells 2012, 34, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kwon, Y.S.; Lee, D.Y.; Rakwal, R.; Baek, S.B.; Lee, J.H.; Kwak, Y.S.; Seo, J.S.; Chung, W.S.; Bae, D.W.; Kim, S.G. Proteomic analyses of the interaction between the plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 and Arabidopsis thaliana. Proteomics 2016, 16, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Luo, K.; Rocheleau, H.; Qi, P.F.; Zheng, Y.L.; Zhao, H.Y.; Ouellet, T. Indole-3-acetic acid in Fusarium graminearum: Identification of biosynthetic pathways and characterization of physiological effects. Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 1135–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Alsherif, E.A.; Almaghrabi, O.; Elazzazy, A.M.; Abdel-Mawgoud, M.; Beemster, G.T.S.; Sobrinho, R.L.; AbdElgawad, H. How carbon nanoparticles, arbuscular mycorrhiza, and compost mitigate drought stress in maize plant: A growth and biochemical study. Plants 2022, 11, 3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hijaz, F.; Killiny, N. Exogenous GABA is quickly metabolized to succinic acid and fed into the plant TCA cycle. Plant Signal Behav. 2019, 14, e1573096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhou, H.; Meng, F.; Jiang, W.; Lu, X.; Zhang, R.; Huang, A.; Wu, K.; Deng, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; et al. Potassium indole-3-butyric acid affects rice’s adaptability to salt stress by regulating carbon metabolism, transcription factor genes expression, and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1416936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yang, L.; Wu, L.; Yao, X.; Zhao, S.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Ding, W. Hydroxycoumarins: New, effective plant-derived compounds reduce Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum populations and control tobacco bacterial wilt. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 215, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, Y.; Tan, C.; Li, Y.; Meng, F.; Du, Y.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, W.; Feng, N.; Zhao, L.; Zheng, D. 5-ALA, DTA-6, and nitrogen mitigate NaCl stress by promoting photosynthesis and carbon metabolism in rice seedlings. Metabolites 2024, 14, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Rhaman, M.S.; Imran, S.; Karim, M.M.; Chakrobortty, J.; Mahamud, M.A.; Sarker, P.; Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Robin, A.H.K.; Ye, W.; Murata, Y.; et al. 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated plant adaptive responses to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1451–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tan, S.; Cao, J.; Xia, X.; Li, Z. Advances in 5-aminolevulinic acid priming to enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. El-Shora, H.M.; Massoud, G.F.; El-Sherbeny, G.A.; Alrdahe, S.S.; Darwish, D.B. Alleviation of lead stress on sage plant by 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA). Plants 2021, 10, 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yang, Y.; Fang, X.; Chen, M.; Wang, L.; Xia, J.; Wang, Z.; Fang, J.; Tran, L.S.P.; Shangguan, L. Copper stress in grapevine: Consequences, responses, and a novel mitigation strategy using 5-aminolevulinic acid. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 307, 119561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yang, Y.; Xia, J.; Fang, X.; Jia, H.; Wang, X.; Lin, Y.; Liu, S.; Ge, M.; Pu, Y.; Fang, J.; et al. Drought stress in ’Shine Muscat’ grapevine: Consequences and a novel mitigation strategy-5-aminolevulinic acid. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1129114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Helaly, M.N.; El-Hoseiny, H.M.; Elsheery, N.I.; Kalaji, H.M.; Santos-Villalobos, S.d.L.; Wróbel, J.; Hassan, I.F.; Gaballah, M.S.; Abdelrhman, L.A.; Mira, A.M.; et al. 5-aminolevulinic acid and 24-epibrassinolide improve the drought stress resilience and productivity of banana plants. Plants 2022, 11, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yu, J.; Li, R.; Fan, N.; Yang, Z.; Huang, B. Metabolic pathways involved in carbon dioxide enhanced heat tolerance in bermudagrass. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Lei, S.; Rossi, S.; Yang, Z.; Yu, J.; Huang, B. Metabolic regulation of 5-oxoproline for enhanced heat tolerance in perennial ryegrass. Stress Biol. 2024, 4, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Wang, Y.; Zeng, X.; Xu, Q.; Mei, X.; Yuan, H.; Jiabu, D.; Sang, Z.; Nyima, T. Metabolite profiling in two contrasting Tibetan hulless barley cultivars revealed the core salt-responsive metabolome and key salt-tolerance biomarkers. AoB Plants 2019, 11, plz021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Bruňáková, K.; Bálintová, M.; Petijová, L.; Čellárová, E. Does phenotyping of Hypericum secondary metabolism reveal a tolerance to biotic/abiotic stressors? Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1042375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Wu, Z.; Meng, R.; Feng, W.; Wongsnansilp, T.; Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Wang, X. Study of dandelion (Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.) salt response and caffeic acid metabolism under saline stress by transcriptome analysis. Genes 2024, 15, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ramzan, M.; Haider, S.T.A.; Hussain, M.B.; Ehsan, A.; Datta, R.; Alahmadi, T.A.; Ansari, M.J.; Alharbi, S.A. Potential of kaempferol and caffeic acid to mitigate salinity stress and improving potato growth. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 21657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, J.; Ren, J.; Zhang, Q.; Lei, X.; Feng, Z.; Tang, L.; Bai, J.; Gong, C. Strigolactone enhances tea plant adaptation to drought and Phyllosticta theicola petch by regulating caffeine content via CsbHLH80. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 216, 109161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Yoo, Y.; Yoo, Y.H.; Lee, D.Y.; Jung, K.H.; Lee, S.W.; Park, J.C. Caffeine produced in rice plants provides tolerance to water-deficit stress. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zhang, N.; Lariviere, A.; Tonsor, S.J.; Traw, M.B. Constitutive camalexin production and environmental stress response variation in Arabidopsis populations from the Iberian Peninsula. Plant Sci. 2014, 225, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Xiao, P.; Qu, J.; Wang, Y.; Fang, T.; Xiao, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Khan, M.; Chen, Q.; Xu, X.; et al. Transcriptome and metabolome atlas reveals contributions of sphingosine and chlorogenic acid to cold tolerance in Citrus. Plant Physiol. 2024, 196, 634–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Piasecka, A.; Sawikowska, A.; Kuczyńska, A.; Ogrodowicz, P.; Mikołajczak, K.; Krajewski, P.; Kachlicki, P. Phenolic metabolites from barley in contribution to phenome in soil moisture deficit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Dias, M.C.; Pinto, D.C.; Figueiredo, C.; Santos, C.; Silva, A.M. Phenolic and lipophilic metabolite adjustments in Olea europaea (olive) trees during drought stress and recovery. Phytochemistry 2021, 185, 112695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Lacrampe, N.; Colombié, S.; Dumont, D.; Nicot, P.; Lecompte, F.; Lugan, R. Nitrogen-mediated metabolic patterns of susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea infection in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) stems. Planta 2023, 257, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Silambarasan, S.; Logeswari, P.; Vangnai, A.S.; Pérez, R.; Kamaraj, B.; Cornejo, P. Co-application of citric acid and Nocardiopsis sp. strain RA07 enhances phytoremediation potentiality of Sorghum bicolor L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 86244–86254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Menhas, S.; Hayat, K.; Lin, D.; Shahid, M.; Bundschuh, J.; Zhu, S.; Hayat, S.; Liu, W. Citric acid-driven cadmium uptake and growth promotion mechanisms in Brassica napus. Chemosphere 2024, 368, 143716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Cay, S. Assessment of tea saponin and citric acid-assisted phytoextraction of Pb-contaminated soil by Salvia virgata Jacq. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 49771–49778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kaya, C.; Ashraf, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Rinklebe, J.; Ahmad, P. Citric acid and hydrogen sulfide cooperate to mitigate chromium stress in tomato plants by modulating the ascorbate-glutathione cycle, chromium sequestration, and subcellular allocation of chromium. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 335, 122292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Zahan, M.I.; Karim, M.M.; Imran, S.; Hunter, C.T.; Islam, M.S.; Mia, M.A.; Hannan, M.A.; Rhaman, M.S.; Hossain, M.A.; et al. Citric acid-mediated abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Święcicka, M.; Dmochowska-Boguta, M.; Orczyk, W.; Grądzielewska, A.; Stochmal, A.; Kowalczyk, M.; Bolibok, L.; Rakoczy-Trojanowska, M. Changes in benzoxazinoid contents and the expression of the associated genes in rye (Secale cereale L.) due to brown rust and the inoculation procedure. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, X.; Huang, T.; Wang, Q.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, P.; Xie, H.; Liu, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, C.; Qin, P. Mechanisms of resistance to spot blotch in Yunnan iron shell wheat based on metabolome and transcriptomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Rao, M.J.; Feng, B.; Ahmad, M.H.; Qamar, M.T.U.; Aslam, M.Z.; Khalid, M.F.; Hussain, S.; Zhong, R.; Ali, Q.; Xu, Q.; et al. LC-MS/MS-based metabolomics approach identified novel antioxidant flavonoids associated with drought tolerance in citrus species. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1150854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Kim, S.E.; Bian, X.; Lee, C.J.; Park, S.U.; Lim, Y.H.; Kim, B.H.; Park, W.S.; Ahn, M.J.; Ji, C.Y.; Yu, Y.; et al. Overexpression of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (IbHPPD) increases abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Mata-Pérez, C.; Begara-Morales, J.C.; Chaki, M.; Sánchez-Calvo, B.; Valderrama, R.; Padilla, M.N.; Corpas, F.J.; Barroso, J.B. Protein tyrosine nitration during development and abiotic stress response in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Mishra, S.; Sharma, A.; Srivastava, A.K. Ascorbic acid: A metabolite switch for designing stress-smart crops. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2024, 44, 1350–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Biswas, S.; Biswas, A.K.; De, B. Influence of sodium chloride on growth and metabolic reprogramming in nonprimed and haloprimed seedlings of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.). Protoplasma 2020, 257, 1559–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Hu, W.; Yin, B.; Liang, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xu, J.; Zhou, S. Integrative physiological, metabolomic, and transcriptomic analysis reveals the drought responses of two apple rootstock cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zeier, J. New insights into the regulation of plant immunity by amino acid metabolic pathways. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 2085–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Zou, Y.-N.; Qin, Q.-Y.; Ma, W.-Y.; Zhou, L.-J.; Wu, Q.-S.; Xu, Y.-J.; Kuča, K.; Hashem, A.; Al-Arjani, A.-B.F.; Almutairi, K.F.; et al. Metabolomics reveals arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-mediated tolerance of walnut to soil drought. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Wang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Wang, Q.; Xie, J.; Yu, L. Transcriptomics and metabolomics revealed that phosphate improves the cold tolerance of alfalfa. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1100601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Castro-Vázquez, L.; Lozano, M.V.; Rodríguez-Robledo, V.; González-Fuentes, J.; Marcos, P.; Villaseca, N.; Arroyo-Jiménez, M.M.; Santander-Ortega, M.J. Pressurized extraction as an opportunity to recover antioxidants from orange peels: Heat treatment and nanoemulsion design for modulating oxidative stress. Molecules 2021, 26, 5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Lwalaba, J.L.W.; Zvobgo, G.; Gai, Y.; Issaka, J.H.; Mwamba, T.M.; Louis, L.T.; Fu, L.; Nazir, M.M.; Kirika, B.A.; Tshibangu, A.K.; et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals the tolerant mechanisms to cobalt and copper in barley. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 209, 111761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Jin, S.; Yoshida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Murai, A. Accumulation of hydroxycinnamic acid amides in winter wheat under snow. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 1245–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Neamțu, A.A.; Maghiar, T.A.; Turcuș, V.; Maghiar, P.B.; Căpraru, A.M.; Lazar, B.A.; Dehelean, C.A.; Pop, O.L.; Neamțu, C.; Totolici, B.D.; et al. A comprehensive view on the impact of chlorogenic acids on colorectal cancer. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 6783–6804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Huo, X.; Wang, C.; Huang, Y.; Kong, W.; Wang, X. Effect of S-Allyl-L-Cysteine on nitric oxide and Cadmium processes in Rice (Oryza sativa L. sp. Zhongzao35) seedlings. Toxics 2024, 12, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Cheng, L.L.; Huang, Y.C.; Wang, C.R.; Liu, Z.Q.; Huang, Y.Z.; Zhang, C.B.; Wagn, X.L. Mechanism of S-allyl-L-cysteine alleviating Cadmium stress in seedling roots and buds of rice seedlings. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2021, 42, 3037–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Owusu, A.G.; Lv, Y.P.; Liu, M.; Wu, Y.; Li, C.L.; Guo, N.; Li, D.H.; Gao, J.S. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal the potential mechanism of waterlogging resistance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1088537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhuang, Q.; Chen, S.; Jua, Z.; Yao, Y. Joint transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis reveals the mechanism of low-temperature tolerance in Hosta ventricosa. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0259455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zhou, C.; Zhang, J.; Miao, P.; Dong, Q.; Lin, Y.; Li, D.; Pan, C. Novel finding on how melatonin and nanoselenium alleviate 2,4-D butylate stress in wheat plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 12943–12957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Dong, X.; Han, B.; Chen, J.; Luo, D.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, Z. Multiomics analyses reveal MsC3H29 positively regulates flavonoid biosynthesis to improve drought resistance of autotetraploid cultivated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 14448–14465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Kasthuri, T.; Barath, S.; Nandhakumar, M.; Karutha Pandian, S. Proteomic profiling spotlights the molecular targets and the impact of the natural antivirulent umbelliferone on stress response, virulence factors, and the quorum sensing network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 998540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Beesley, A.; Beyer, S.F.; Wanders, V.; Levecque, S.; Bredenbruch, S.; Habash, S.S.; Schleker, A.S.S.; Gätgens, J.; Oldiges, M.; Schultheiss, H.; et al. Engineered coumarin accumulation reduces mycotoxin-induced oxidative stress and disease susceptibility. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 2490–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhou, Y.; Bai, Y.H.; Han, F.X.; Chen, X.; Wu, F.S.; Liu, Q.; Ma, W.Z.; Zhang, Y.Q. Transcriptome sequencing and metabolome analysis reveal the molecular mechanism of Salvia miltiorrhiza in response to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 26 02095 g001
Figure 1. TOR regulates a large number of stress-responsive genes. (a) Structure and complex of TOR kinase in plants. (b) Overlapping genes between TOR-regulated and biotic stress-responsive genes. (c) Overlapping genes between TOR-regulated and abiotic stress-responsive genes. (d) KEGG analysis of overlapping genes in (b). (e) KEGG analysis of overlapping genes in (c).
Figure 1. TOR regulates a large number of stress-responsive genes. (a) Structure and complex of TOR kinase in plants. (b) Overlapping genes between TOR-regulated and biotic stress-responsive genes. (c) Overlapping genes between TOR-regulated and abiotic stress-responsive genes. (d) KEGG analysis of overlapping genes in (b). (e) KEGG analysis of overlapping genes in (c).
Ijms 26 02095 g001
Ijms 26 02095 g002
Figure 2. TOR-mediated metabolic reprogramming enhances plant resilience against diverse abiotic and biotic stresses. Plants, as sessile organisms, are continuously exposed to a wide spectrum of environmental challenges. These challenges encompass both abiotic stresses, including salinity, drought, oxidative conditions, and extreme temperatures, and biotic stresses from various organisms such as microbes, pathogens, nematodes, herbivores, and parasites. Within the complex plant signaling network, TOR functions as a central regulatory hub that orchestrates metabolic reprogramming to enhance stress resilience. This master regulator integrates diverse upstream stress signals and modulates plant metabolism through multiple mechanisms. Specifically, TOR regulates transcriptional responses to enhance the production of stress-resistant metabolites, directly modifies the activity of key metabolic enzymes across various pathways, and employs additional regulatory mechanisms. Consequently, the accumulated stress-resistant compounds establish a protective biochemical “shield”, thereby significantly enhancing plant resilience against multiple environmental stressors. The sun symbolizes heat stress, while the snowflakes represent cold stress. Cracks in the ground signify drought stress, and the presence of Na+ reflects salt stress. ROS denotes oxidative stress, and microbes on the leaves or the roots indicate the invasion of plant pathogens.
Figure 2. TOR-mediated metabolic reprogramming enhances plant resilience against diverse abiotic and biotic stresses. Plants, as sessile organisms, are continuously exposed to a wide spectrum of environmental challenges. These challenges encompass both abiotic stresses, including salinity, drought, oxidative conditions, and extreme temperatures, and biotic stresses from various organisms such as microbes, pathogens, nematodes, herbivores, and parasites. Within the complex plant signaling network, TOR functions as a central regulatory hub that orchestrates metabolic reprogramming to enhance stress resilience. This master regulator integrates diverse upstream stress signals and modulates plant metabolism through multiple mechanisms. Specifically, TOR regulates transcriptional responses to enhance the production of stress-resistant metabolites, directly modifies the activity of key metabolic enzymes across various pathways, and employs additional regulatory mechanisms. Consequently, the accumulated stress-resistant compounds establish a protective biochemical “shield”, thereby significantly enhancing plant resilience against multiple environmental stressors. The sun symbolizes heat stress, while the snowflakes represent cold stress. Cracks in the ground signify drought stress, and the presence of Na+ reflects salt stress. ROS denotes oxidative stress, and microbes on the leaves or the roots indicate the invasion of plant pathogens.
Ijms 26 02095 g002
Table 1. TOR-mediated stress-related DAMs in Arabidopsis. The data originated from Song et al. [83], and the functions of the 33 stress-related DAMs were determined through comprehensive literature analysis.
Table 1. TOR-mediated stress-related DAMs in Arabidopsis. The data originated from Song et al. [83], and the functions of the 33 stress-related DAMs were determined through comprehensive literature analysis.
CompoundsClassUp- or Down-Regulated in tor-esFunctionReferences
1,5-DiaminopentanePhenolamidesupDrought, oxidative stress, heavy metal stress[89,90]
2-Aminoadipic acid (L-Homoglutamic acid)Amino acids and derivativesupOxidative stress, drought, salt[91,92,93,94]
3-IndoleacetonitrileIndole derivativesdownPathogen attack[95,96,97]
3-Methylmalic acidOrganic acids and derivativesupSalt, drought, biotic stress[98,99,100]
4-HydroxycoumarinPhenylpropanoidsdownPathogen attack[101]
5-AminolevulinateOrganic acids and derivativesupDrought, salt, heavy metal[102,103,104,105,106,107,108]
5-OxoprolineAmino acids and derivativesupHeat stress[109,110]
6-Aminocaproic acidOrganic acids and derivativesupSalt stress[111]
AmentoflavoneFlavoneupTemperature, light, drought, biotic stress[112]
Caffeic acidPhenylpropanoidsupSalt stress[113,114]
CaffeineAlkaloidsdownDrought, biotic stress[115,116]
CamalexinAlkaloidsupPathogen attack[117]
Chlorogenic acid (3-O-Caffeoylquinic acid)Organic acids and derivativesdownCold stress[118]
ChrysoeriolFlavoneupOxidative stress[119,120]
CitramalateOrganic acids and derivativesupPathogen attack[121]
Citric acid monohydrateOrganic acids and derivativesupHeavy metal[122,123,124,125,126]
Citric acidOrganic acids and derivativesupHeavy metal[122,123,124,125,126]
DIMBOA glucosideOthersupBiotic stress[127,128]
Genistein 7-O-Glucoside (Genistin)IsoflavoneupDrought[129]
Homogentisic acidOrganic acids and derivativesupAbiotic stress, ABA signaling[130]
L-(-)-TyrosineAmino acids and derivativesupAbiotic stress[131]
L-AscorbateVitamins and derivativesupAbiotic stress[132]
L-HomoserineAmino acids and derivativesupDrought, salt stress[133,134]
L-Pipecolic acidAmino acids and derivativesupBiotic stress[135]
N-Acetyl-L-phenylalanineAmino acids and derivativesupCold, drought[136,137]
NarirutinFlavoneupHeavy metal stress, oxidative stress[138,139]
N-p-Coumaroyl agmatinePhenolamidesupBiotic stress[140]
Quinic acidOrganic acids and derivativesupAbiotic stress[141]
S-Allyl-L-cysteineAmino acids and derivativesupHeavy metal stress[142,143]
Sinapyl alcoholPhenylpropanoidsupFlooding stress, cold stress[144,145]
TricinFlavonedownCold, drought, salt stress[146,147]
UmbelliferonePhenylpropanoidsdownPathogen attack[148,149]
XanthohumolFlavanoneupDrought stress[150]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, L.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.; Fu, L. TOR Mediates Stress Responses Through Global Regulation of Metabolome in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052095

AMA Style

Yang L, Zhang R, Zhang H, Yang Y, Fu L. TOR Mediates Stress Responses Through Global Regulation of Metabolome in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(5):2095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Lin, Ran Zhang, Huan Zhang, Yingyu Yang, and Liwen Fu. 2025. "TOR Mediates Stress Responses Through Global Regulation of Metabolome in Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 5: 2095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052095

APA Style

Yang, L., Zhang, R., Zhang, H., Yang, Y., & Fu, L. (2025). TOR Mediates Stress Responses Through Global Regulation of Metabolome in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(5), 2095. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop