Next Article in Journal
Search for Disease-Specific Genetic Markers Originated from the Vitamin D Binding Protein Gene Polymorphisms in the Multiple Sclerosis Cohort in the Latvian Population
Previous Article in Journal
Neuroimmune Interactions and Their Role in Immune Cell Trafficking in Cardiovascular Diseases and Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
CANT1 Is Involved in Collagen Fibrogenesis in Tendons by Regulating the Synthesis of Dermatan/Chondroitin Sulfate Attached to the Decorin Core Protein
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Glycosaminoglycans, Instructive Biomolecules That Regulate Cellular Activity and Synaptic Neuronal Control of Specific Tissue Functional Properties

1
Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
2
Raymond Purves Bone and Joint Research Laboratories, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
3
Sydney Medical School, Northern, University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(6), 2554; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062554
Submission received: 8 January 2025 / Revised: 22 February 2025 / Accepted: 4 March 2025 / Published: 12 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Glycosaminoglycans in Human Diseases)

Abstract

:
Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are a diverse family of ancient biomolecules that evolved over millennia as key components in the glycocalyx that surrounds all cells. GAGs have molecular recognition and cell instructive properties when attached to cell surface and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteoglycans (PGs), which act as effector molecules that regulate cellular behavior. The perception of mechanical cues which arise from perturbations in the ECM microenvironment allow the cell to undertake appropriate biosynthetic responses to maintain ECM composition and tissue function. ECM PGs substituted with GAGs provide structural support to weight-bearing tissues and an ability to withstand shear forces in some tissue contexts. This review outlines the structural complexity of GAGs and the diverse functional properties they convey to cellular and ECM PGs. PGs have important roles in cartilaginous weight-bearing tissues and fibrocartilages subject to tension and high shear forces and also have important roles in vascular and neural tissues. Specific PGs have roles in synaptic stabilization and convey specificity and plasticity in the regulation of neurophysiological responses in the CNS/PNS that control tissue function. A better understanding of GAG instructional roles over cellular behavior may be insightful for the development of GAG-based biotherapeutics designed to treat tissue dysfunction in disease processes and in novel tissue repair strategies following trauma. GAGs have a significant level of sophistication over the control of cellular behavior in many tissue contexts, which needs to be fully deciphered in order to achieve a useful therapeutic product. GAG biotherapeutics offers exciting opportunities in the modern glycomics arena.

1. Introduction

Cells exist in an environment where they receive signals from extracellular matrix (ECM) components filtered through the glycocalyx or directly from adjacent interconnected cells, which have instructive properties over cellular behavior [1,2,3,4]. The ability to perceive such signals stems from glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) attached to sensory proteins on the cell surface, which allow the cell to perceive perturbations in cellular microenvironments [2], and this facilitates the orchestration of responsive cellular biosynthetic alterations in ECM components to replenish matrix components depleted by disease, degradative, or traumatic events [5]. This feed-back mechanism allows for the coordination of anabolic biosynthetic events during tissue morphogenesis and in tissue repair responses in remodeling ECMs following traumatic tissue damage and also the regulation of essential physiological processes, which regulate tissue homeostasis [6].
The importance of the ECM for cellular protection and tissue function in dense weight-bearing, tension-resisting and high-shear tissues is clearly evident and stresses the important functional roles ECM PGs play in these tissues [7,8]. Instructional cues from the ECM are important in cellular mechanosensing; cell–ECM communication allows cells to sense their microenvironment and to respond to any ECM perturbations in health and disease [9,10,11]. This allows cells to regulate tissue homeostasis and maintain optimal tissue functional properties [5], mediated by their component GAGs and reflected in the use of GAGs in biomedicine. However, our knowledge of their full therapeutic value is incomplete [12]. Dystroglycan (DG), a highly glycosylated glycoprotein, provides an interconnection between the ECM and cytoskeleton, which facilitates bioresponsive cell–ECM communication [13,14]. DG-HS-PG (neurexins, pikachurin, Eyes-shut) interactions mediated by laminin-G PG modules in their core proteins provide synaptic stabilization, synaptic plasticity and specificity of synaptic interactions through interactions with a vast array of synaptic adhesion effector proteins [15,16]. PGs and GAGs also have specific roles to play in vascular disease [17] and in the normal functioning of the CNS/PNS following injury [18,19,20,21]. The biodiversity of GAGs points to their varied functional properties in specific tissues in health and disease and in wound repair [22]. Cell surface PGs such as the syndecan and glypican families [23] have important roles to play in interactions with growth factors and morphogens [24,25] and control inflammation [26,27], cellular proliferation and differentiation and cell signalling in tissue morphogenesis, skeletogenesis and in wound repair processes [28]. The syndecans and glypicans act as growth factor receptors and signalling platforms [29,30] and are regulators of cellular behaviour [31], with important roles in tissue regeneration [32] and roles in angiogenesis and endothelial cell biology [30,33].

1.1. GAGs Convey Structural and Functional Properties to Tissues

GAGs in mammals are O-linked to serine or threonine residues or N-linked through asparagine residues to PG core proteins (Figure 1). Some mucin protein backbones can also act as acceptor molecules for the addition of GlcNAc and D-Gal residues, and selective sulfotransferases can sulfate these, leading to the attachment of KS to some classes of mucins. These have been shown to have sensory properties in some tissues [34]. Elasmobranch fish species (sharks, rays) contain sensory pits (Ampullae of Lorenzini) located on regions of the skin filled with an ultrasensitive sensory mucin-like KS gel [35], which allows for the detection of the electric fields preyfish species emit through muscular exertion [36]. This process is known as electrolocation and allows for sensitive detection of preyfish species, even in turbid poor-visibility conditions [37,38]. Some fish species also use electrolocation with low-intensity electric signals as a mechanism for communication between other members in their group; this provides information on sex, status within the group hierarchy and sexual maturity of individuals when searching for a mate [39,40]. Electric eels can generate high-intensity electric fields sufficient to immobilize prey species as a hunting mechanism [41]. Terrestrial animals have lost the ability to electrolocate, except for two monotreme species, the duck-billed platypus and echidna in Australia. These have mechano- and electroreceptors in their bill structures, which they use in electrolocation and mechano-sensing [42,43]. The platypus is a nocturnal feeder, which feeds with its eyes closed, and electrolocation is essential for its food gathering activities.

1.2. GAG Biodiversity

Five classes of GAGs have been identified in mammals on the basis of their generic repeat disaccharide structures and assembly to PG core protein GAG acceptor groups (Figure 1). Some of the glycans in repeat disaccharides are sulfated at specific positions, providing very diverse interactive properties to GAGs (Figure 1a–f). Hyaluronan (HA) is the only GAG which is unsulfated and is unattached to a PG core protein. The sulfation along a single CS, HS or KS GAG chain is not uniform, and specific domains within GAG chains act as important functional determinants, facilitating interaction with growth factors, receptors, morphogens and structural ECM components. Gene mutations in the transporter proteins and sulfate metabolic enzymes involved in GAG biosynthesis cause a number of skeletal dysplasias due to disruption in the normal PG sulfation patterns and the functional properties GAGs provide to tissues, demonstrating the importance of these sulfation motifs in tissue functional properties [44]. These dysplasias include achondrogenesis type 1B, atelosteogenesis type 2, dystrophic dysplasia, recessive multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, brachyolmia type 1 and 4, spondoepimetaphyseal dysplasia, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia with congenital dislocations, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (musculocontractural type 1), osteochondrodysplasia, brachydactyly with overlapping malformed digits and neurofascioskeletal syndrome with or without renal agenesis [45,46].

1.3. KS Biodiversity

Keratan sulfate (KS) chains contain non-sulfated polylactosamine, monosulfated and disulfated regions; however, the size of each of these regions can vary, leading to considerable size and charge heterogeneity in the KS structure (Figure 1b–e) [47]. Sulfation in KS is predominantly on GlcNAc residues in monosulfated regions, while in disulfated regions, the D-galactose residues are also sulfated. D-Gal sulfotransferase only acts on a KS disaccharide if the adjacent GlcNAc is first sulfated, giving rise to a disulfated disaccharide; thus, heterogeneous distributions of mono- or disulphation or non-sulphation regions can occur in a KS chain. GlcNAc undergoes sulfation more frequently than Gal in the KS disaccharide. Like all GAGs, the sulfation status of KS defines its functional properties. The KS linkage regions to PG also vary as O-glycans linked to serine or threonine residues or as N-glycan residues attached to asparaginee. KSI chains are end-capped with neuraminic acid, disulfated GalNAc and Gal disaccharides sulfated at C6 [48,49] and are also internally modified with L-Fucose residues to a variable degree. KS is the only branched GAG. In porcine corneal KS, the C-6 branch of the linkage oligosaccharide is extended, but the C-3 branch is prematurely truncated and terminated in a single lactosamine region capped by sialic acid [50]. Two non-sulfated lactosamine disaccharides are present nearest the reducing terminus of the C-6 branch, but 10–12 sulfated GlcNAc disaccharides are found on the more distal part of the chain. Collectively, this information has allowed for the classification of KS chains into three types: (i) KSI (corneal KS) N-linked to asparagine residues, (ii) KSII O-linked to serine or threonine residues, found in articular and other weight-bearing cartilages, and has been sub-classified into type IIA and IIB in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing cartilages [47], (iii) KSIII in brain tissue is also O-linked to serine or threonine residues, and this linkage region involves mannose residues.
KSIII in brain tissues is the second richest source of KS after the cornea [47,51]. KSI was the first form of KS identified, and the cornea is the richest tissue source of this GAG, which was named corneal KS [52]; however, this form of KS also decorates a number of PGs with a widespread tissue distribution in tissues other than the cornea; thus, its naming is a historical misnomer. KSI is present as N-linked KS chains in fibromodulin, lumican, PRELP (prolargin), keratocan and osteoadherin [47,50,53,54]. KSIIA is found in articular cartilage, meniscus and intervertebral disc; type IIB KS is found in laryngeal, tracheal, nasal cartilages, and low-weight-bearing cartilages [55,56]. With ageing, there is an overall increase in the sulfation of KS chains, and while CS chains in aggrecan are reduced in size with ageing, KS chains are increased in length [57]. The significance of these changes in the GAG chain structure on aggrecan biology is not known. A further fucosylated form of KS has also been detected in the CS1 and CS2 regions of the aggrecan core protein using MAb 3D12/H7 [58]; however, its specific roles are not known.
Monoclonal antibodies to KS (Table 1) react with extracts from most mammalian tissues, with at least sixteen ECM PGs substituted with KS, and several cell-associated KS-PGs have been identified [59]. The lack of uronic acid in KS and variable sulfation results in charge heterogeneity in KS [47,60]. A number of related poly-N-acetyl lactosamine-modified proteins exist; however, these are not sulfated [61]. The development of MAb R10G, 1B4 and 294-1B1 allows for the detection of KS-PG species of low sulfation and mucin-like proteins containing lactosamine regions containing GlcNAc and Gal residues that are sulfated. Formerly, antibodies such as 5D4 and MZ-15, which detect high charge density KS glycoforms, were routinely used in this research area; however, these do not detect such low-sulfation isoforms of KS. Thus, a new aspect of the biology of low-sulfation KS-PGs is now emerging with the development of these newer KS antibodies [34,37,62]. KS expression is elevated in many tumors, including pancreatic and lung cancer [63,64]. Highly sulfated KS is also highly expressed in astrocytic tumors and in glioblastoma [65,66]. KS in cancer has been shown to be highly associated with advanced tumor grade and poor prognosis [63,64]. Higher-level expression of KS in primary pancreatic tumors and in lung metastatic deposits is associated with worse patient survival. Epithelial mucin (MUC1) [67] and an isoform of CD44 [68] contain KS chains and KSPGs, which are widely distributed in tissues and have a diverse range of functions [47].
Table 1. Antibodies developed to KS epitopes, illustrating their diversity in structure.
Table 1. Antibodies developed to KS epitopes, illustrating their diversity in structure.
Antibody CloneAntibody SpecificityReference
5-D-4Hexa sulfated KS octa-saccharide and a linear dodecasaccharide containing N-sulfated glucosamine in KS multisulfated regions [69,70]
MZ-15Hepta and octa-saccharide KS oligosaccharides in multisulfated KS regions[70]
IB-4Tetrasulfated hexasaccharide in linear KS mono-sulfated region[70]
R10GLow sulfation KS in mono-sulfated regions[71,72,73]
294-1B1Low sulfation KS decorating podocalyxcin[74,75]
3D12/H7Sulfated fucosylated poly-N-acetyllactosamine linkage region epitope distributed throughout the CS1 and CS2 region of cartilage aggrecan [58]
6D2/B5Fucosyl-KS epitope [76]
SV2High sulfation KS chains on SV2 PG[77,78]
EFG-11Tri KS disaccharides[79]
1/14/16H9Specific equine KS antibody [80,81]
BKS-1 (+) KS neo-epitope, 6-sulfated GlcNAc adjacent to a nonsulfated lactosamine disaccharide in reducing terminal PG linkage region exposed by keratanase-1 pre-digestion.[82]
TRA-1-60Epitope is sensitive to neuraminidase, keratanase-I/II, and endo-β-D-galactosidase. Epitope identified Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc and Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6(Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3)Galβ1-4Glc this oligosaccharide, is expressed on podocalyxcin on pluripotent embryonic stem cells[83,84,85,86,87]
60-mG2a-fA cancer-specific anti-podocalyxin monoclonal antibody and effective anti-cancer therapeutic.[88]
TRA-1-81Epitope is resistant to neuraminidase but sensitive to endo-β-D-galactosidase and keratanase-I/II. Epitope is terminal Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc and Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6(Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3)Galβ1-4Glc oligosaccharides on cell surface podocalyxcin of pluripotent embryonic stem cells[83,84,85,86,87]
SSEA-1Cell surface glycan of murine embryonic pluripotent stem cells, expressed on PG and glycoprotein core proteins and bioactive lipids[89]
“i” antigenHuman autoantibody to a non-branched epitope in non-sulfated poly-N-acetyllactosamine[90,91,92,93]
“I” antigenHuman autoantibody to a branched epitope in non-sulfated poly-N-acetyllactosamine regions of KS [90,91,92,93]
4C4Highly sulfated KS on embryonic tumor cell podocalyxcin [94]
Figure 1. GAG biodiversity and the generic repeat disaccharides (a). KS types I (b), IIA (c), IIB (d) and III (e) and the linkage GAG acceptor regions upon which GAG chains are assembled by a range of sulfo- and glycosyl transferases. HS displays variable structures in the sulfated (S-domain), sulfated/N-acetylated mixed domain (S/NA domain) and N-acetylated domain (NA-domain) (f). The variable sulfation patterns in KS and HS are prominent features and responsible for the large repertoire of ligands interactive with these GAGs. Standard symbol nomenclature for glycans (SFNG) icons is used to depict specific glycan sub-structures [95,96]. KS and HS chain heterogeneity regulates physiological processes, tissue function and tissue morphogenesis. Figure modified from [63] with permission.
Figure 1. GAG biodiversity and the generic repeat disaccharides (a). KS types I (b), IIA (c), IIB (d) and III (e) and the linkage GAG acceptor regions upon which GAG chains are assembled by a range of sulfo- and glycosyl transferases. HS displays variable structures in the sulfated (S-domain), sulfated/N-acetylated mixed domain (S/NA domain) and N-acetylated domain (NA-domain) (f). The variable sulfation patterns in KS and HS are prominent features and responsible for the large repertoire of ligands interactive with these GAGs. Standard symbol nomenclature for glycans (SFNG) icons is used to depict specific glycan sub-structures [95,96]. KS and HS chain heterogeneity regulates physiological processes, tissue function and tissue morphogenesis. Figure modified from [63] with permission.
Ijms 26 02554 g001

1.4. KS Chain Heterogeneity in a Range of PGs and Mucins

KS chains in PGs display size and charge heterogeneity and range in size from 3 to 20 kDa, although larger KS chains > 60 kDa have also been reported for neuronal synaptic vesicle PG (SV2) [78]. High- and low-sulfation isoforms of KS have also been identified. SLRP family members (PRELP, osteoadherin, chondroadherin, epiphycan, and osteoglycin) have small low-sulfation KS chains (3–4 disaccharides, 3–5 kDa) [47,59]. PRELP from the cornea and sclera is present as 60–116 and 55–60 kDa proteins. Digestion with endo-β-D-galactosidase converts corneal PRELP to 45–50 kDa in size and scleral PRELP to a molecular weight of 50 kDa [97]. Digestion with N-glycanase further reduced these to 42–45 and 45KDa sized core proteins, demonstrating the presence of N-linked KS chains of low sulfation.
KS from the KS-rich region of aggrecan is 10–20 kDa in size and is O-glycosylated, while KS chains in the G1, G2, and interglobular domain (IGD) are small (3–4 disaccharides, 3–5 kDa) and may be N- or O-linked to the core protein. They are also of lower sulfation than KS in the KS-rich region [98,99]. The KS chains of normal corneal KSPGs are ~15 kDa in size and of low sulfation and have roles in tissue morphogenesis [100]. Mucin glycoproteins and PRELP have lactosamine residues, which can be sulfated on C6 of GlcNAc or Gal, leading to the formation of small KS chains of 3–4 disaccharides in size. Low sulfation impedes KS chain elongation. Mucosal tissues of the gastrointestinal, respiratory, reproductive, urinary tracts, and the surface of the eye have an enormous surface area and act as a selective molecular barrier at the epithelial surface, which acts as a barrier to the exterior environment and infection [101].
Glycanated mucins have been suggested as a therapeutic target in cancer therapy [102,103,104]. KS has been found as a component of the tumor environment [63]. Levels of mucins substituted with sulfated glycans are elevated in ovarian epithelial tumors [105]. Low-sulfation KS expression is elevated in human pancreatic [64] and ovarian cancer [74,105], metastatic lung tumors [106], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [107], bladder cancer [108]. Podocalyxcin in testicular cancer has been shown to contain a low-sulfation KS isoform [75]. The KS chains of SV2 PG are significantly larger than the aforementioned KS chains, ranging in size from 27 to 140 kDa. This may contribute to the storage properties of SV2 for neurotransmitters [78]. KS is an electrosensory GAG in neural tissues [109] and in mucin glycopolymer gels [34,37] used in electrolocation in elasmobranch fish species as well as the duck-billed platypus and echidna [37]. KS-PGs modulate neuronal migration and have instructional properties in axonal migration and the formation of correctly assembled functional neural networks [20,21,59,110].

1.5. Low-Sulfation KS-PGs and Glycoconjugates

Ampullae of Lorenzini actin microfilament electrosensory mucoid KS glycoconjugate gel [36] found in sharks and rays and phosphacan/RPTP-ζ [111], Lumican/Keratocan, Mucins, PRELP, mimecan, podocalyxcin and tectorin associated with sensory hair cells in the cochlea [112] all contain low-sulfation motif KSPGs. Mucins in the reproductive tract also contain high- and low-sulfated KS, and these may have neuronal signaling roles [34]. A large 220 kDa KS PG present in human cervical mucous may have a role in the reorganization of the cervical ECM during the reproductive cycle. In the cervical mucous of early or nonpregnant women, it is associated with cervical ripening and quantitative and qualitative changes in the endometrium [113]. Endometrial MUC1 carries sulfated lactosaminoglycan chains that are hormonally regulated and show increasing abundance in the secretory phase [114]. The 5D4 KS epitope is abundant at the luminal epithelial cell surface until the implantation phase, when it disappears, first from patches of cells and then all together.
MUC1 carries sulfated lactosaminoglycans, identifying the luminal epithelial compartment as a site of unique MUC1 glycosylation and independent regulation [67]. Glycosylation and the negative charge associated with sialo- and sulfoglycans may be important in the regulation of embryo attachment. OVCAR-3 epithelial cells isolated from the malignant ascites of a patient with progressive ovarian adenocarcinoma also do not express highly sulfated KS but express low-sulfated glycans containing tandem GlcNAc-6-O-sulfated LacNAc units [74]. Podocalyxcin in human testicular embryonic carcinoma also expresses low-sulfated KS chains [75]. In the cochlea, tectorin a cochlear KSPG associated with the tectorial membrane and sensory hair cells does not react with mab 5D4 to a highly sulfated KS of corneal and skeletal muscle PG [112]. mab 5D4 selectively stains the upper surface of the tectorial membrane, Hensen’s stripe and the mucus layer overlying the respiratory epithelium. MMM and LMM tectorins may be unique to the cochlea. HMM may be a low charge density KS PG antigenically related to either the mucins or a more specific component of the olfactory mucus layer [112]. The sulfation status of KS chains may, thus, have consequences in electrosensory tissues and in neuronal regulation [21,37,47,59,63,109,115].

2. Diversity of KS-PG Functional Roles in Health and Disease

2.1. Aggrecan

Aggrecan (ACAN) [57] is the most abundant extracellular CS-KS PG in cartilage, representing ~35% of its dry weight, and it plays a key role in its biophysical and biomechanical properties [116,117,118,119,120,121]. ACAN forms aggregates with HA that are important in tissue hydration and in the generation of internal hydrostatic pressure and viscoelastic hydrodynamic properties, which allows tissues to withstand compressive loading. In the ECM of cartilage, aggrecan–HA complexes are constrained within a type II collagen meshwork, and this collagen network is inflated by solvated aggrecan–HA complexes. The collagen network also contributes to the biophysical properties of cartilage. The water-imbibing properties of aggrecan–HA are a function of the high fixed charge density they carry from the localization of sulfated GAG and the carboxyl groups of the uronic acid polyelectrolytes, described by the Gibbs–Donnan effect [122]. The Gibbs–Donnan effect describes the unequal distribution of permeant charged ions on either side of a semipermeable membrane, which occurs in the presence of impermeant charged ions. The high negative charge density provided by GAG localization in cartilage provides this tissue with hydrophilic properties, high osmotic swelling pressure and conformational flexibility, which collectively function to absorb fluctuations in biomechanical stresses experienced by cartilage during variable movement of an articular joint and the dissipation of biomechanical forces. Aggrecan is targeted by a number of MMPs and ADAMTS 4 and 5, which degrade cartilage aggrecan in OA/RA, and a significant reduction in biomechanical competence leads to impaired joint articulation [123,124]. In the brain, aggrecan provides space-filling properties, hydration and contributes to the formation of perineuronal nets, which regulate synaptic plasticity and cognitive processes [125,126]. Aggrecan–HA macro-aggregates are important for the hydration and compartmentalization of brain tissues, providing niche environments conducive to the optimal functioning of brain cell populations, and are neuroprotective [127]. Aggrecan plays an important role in the organization of the neural ECM binding and organizing HA to the cell surface through interactions with link protein and tenascins, forming a large quaternary aggregated complex that has cell instructive properties in embryonic brain development [127]. Other members of the lectican CS-PG family (versican, neurocan, brevican) also form aggregates with HA; however, the solvation volume of these complexes is not as extensive as aggrecan–HA complexes. Aggrecan is also present in cardiac jelly, developing heart valves, and blood vessels during cardiovascular development. Aggrecan contributes to the biophysical and regulatory properties of the cardiovascular ECM [128].

2.2. SV2

SV2 occurs as a 100 and 250 kDa 12-span transmembrane PG, containing three large KS chains with unique transport and neurotransmitter storage roles as a smart gel within neural synaptic vesicles. Three variably distributed SV2 isoforms, (SV2A, SV2B, and SV2C) bind the neurotransmitters glutamate, GABA, dopamine, choline, and the Ca2+ sensor protein synaptotagmin [129,130] and store these within synaptic vesicles [131]. The interaction of SV2 with synaptotagmin mediates Ca-dependent neurotransmitter release from synaptic vesicles [132,133]. The abnormal regulation of neurotransmitter release occurs in epilepsy, Schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s disease [130]. SV2-KS interactions with Ca2+ regulate synaptic functions [133]. SV2 is phosphorylated on serine and threonine residues by serine/threonine kinases [134], which affects cytoskeletal organization, cell signaling and neurotransmitter interactions. The KS chains of SV2 interact with neurotransmitters, and the fucosylated proteins synapsin and synaptophysin tether synaptic vesicles and aid in their coordinated transport and subsequent release of neurotransmitters into the synaptic gap [131,135]. The depolymerization of the synaptic gap cell membrane facilitates fusion of the synaptic vesicles and release of their contents into the synaptic gap, where they are taken up by receptors on communicating neurons in the network [136]. SV2 is a synaptic vesicle neurotransmitter transporter and storage PG; it occurs as H and L forms. SV2A, SV2B, SV2C paralogs share 60% sequence and 80% structural homology. SV2A is expressed in peripheral sympathetic synapses, where it controls transmitter release. SV2B is the primary paralog expressed in the retina. SV2s are expressed in motor axons that innervate muscle fibers; SV2B and SV2C are expressed in all motoneurons [78,137,138,139,140,141,142].

2.3. Phosphacan

Phosphacan occurs as three CS, CS-KS PG isoforms, which may also contain the HNK-1 trisaccharide. Phosphacan modulates cell interactions and developmental processes in nervous tissue through binding to cell surface and ECM proteins [143]. Phosphacan/DSD-1 is the mouse homolog of phosphacan and is a developmentally regulated glial PG splice variant of RPTP-ζ [144,145,146]. Phosphacan modulates axonal extension during neuritogenesis [147]. Phosphacan is the soluble ectodomain of RPTP-ζ, existing as three splice variants [143,148]: (i) a full-length form containing N-terminal carbonic anhydrase-like domain, fibronectin type III repeat domain, CS attachment region and two intracellular phosphatase domains; (ii) a soluble form lacking the intracellular tyrosine phosphatase domains; and (iii) a truncated form lacking the majority of the CS attachment region. Phosphacan is widely expressed in the CNS in the cerebrum, hippocampus, cerebellum, spinal cord, olfactory system, and retina. The monoclonal antibody, Cat-315, detects a HNK-1 epitope on RPTPζ, in the developing brain [149]. RPTPζ and phosphacan regulate key developmental neural processes, including proliferation [150], differentiation [151], cell adhesion and migration [152], axonal guidance and neurite outgrowth [147,153], myelination [154,155] and participate in cognitive functional processes [109]. The extracellular domains of RPTPζ/phosphacan bind a wide array of ligands important for normal CNS development, including pleiotrophin [156], midkine [157], tenascin [158], NCAM, Ng-CAM and contactin [159,160]. Phosphacan has instructive roles in axonal guidance and neurite extension [161].

2.4. Podocalyxcin

Podocalyxcin is an anti-adhesive transmembrane polysialylated KS PG, with essential roles to play in neural development [162,163], and is a marker of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells [164]. It is upregulated in glioblastoma formation and in astrocytomas [65,66,165,166,167,168,169] and has been developed as a prognostic factor for various cancers [170,171]. The sulfation status of the KS chains on podocalyxcin on normal embryonic cells and tumor cells differs, with the former expressing a low-sulfation KS detected by MAb R-10G [71,72,73], while tumor cells produce a high-sulfation KS chain [166], detected by antibodies such as 5-D-4, MZ-14 or 4C4 [69,70,94]. Podocalyxcin co-localizes with synapsin and synaptophysin in synapse vesicle formations [162]. Synaptophysin is a major synaptic vesicle protein, which coordinates the endocytosis of synaptic vesicles during neural stimulation [172]. Synapsin tethers synaptic vesicles to cytoskeletal components, preventing premature vesicle release into the synaptic gap coordinating neurotransmitter release from the synaptic vesicles [173,174,175,176].

2.5. Lumican and Fibromodulin

The LRRs of FMOD and LUM interact with an extensive range of ECM proteins that organize and stabilize tissues. FMOD and LUM reciprocally regulate collagen fibrillogenesis but do not share functional equivalence [177]. FMOD promotes the formation of thick collagen fibers, providing mechanical strength to tissues such as the sclera, whereas LUM forms thin regularly spaced collagen fibers, providing optical clarity in the cornea [178,179]. N-terminal sulfated tyrosine residues in LUM interact with FGF-2, TSP-1, MMP-13, NC4 domains of collagen IX and IL-10, binding to collagen and promoting fibril formation [179,180]. FMOD sequesters TGF-β, controlling its bio-availability [181], binds C1q and activates the complement system [182]. LUM impedes tumor growth through its MMP inhibitory activity, affects focal adhesions and the migration and growth of tumor cells through interaction with α2β1 integrin and inhibitory effects on angiogenesis [183,184,185].

2.6. Keratocan

KERA, keratocan, originally isolated from cornea, is a 50 kDa SLRP that has been immunolocalized in IVD and the spinal cord [82] and is a 37 kDa PG in other tissues. Keratocan contains low-sulfation KS-I side chains and has neuroregulatory and matrix organizational roles during spinal development, mediated by growth factor and morphogen interactions.

2.7. Prolargin/PRELP

PRELP (proline-arginine-rich end leucine-rich repeat protein) shares 36% identity with FMOD and 33% with LUM, and it anchors perlecan and type I collagen to basement membranes, and type II collagen to cartilage [186,187]. PRELP has an N-terminal Arg and Pro extension, and its alternative name is prolargin. PRELP can contain low-sulfation KS chains in some tissue contexts. PRELP is an anchoring component in many basement membranes and binds type I and II collagens and perlecan to stabilize the basement membrane [188]. PRELP has also been identified in brain tumor biopsies [189] and in gene expression and microarray studies, which distinguish glioblastoma and meningioma cases [190]. PRELP and biglycan are deposited precisely at myofibers surrounded and/or invaded by inflammatory cells in sporadic inclusion body myositis and in polymyositis [191]. PRELP has also been identified in the anterior pituitary gland and is apparently produced by pericytes in this tissue [192].

2.8. Chondroadherin

The C-terminal domain of CHAD is a regulator of osteoclast motility. Its α2β1 integrin binding sequence inhibits pre-osteoclast migration, decreasing osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption, but has no effect on osteoblasts. CHAD is a novel regulator of bone metabolism that may find applications in the treatment of osteoporosis [193,194]

2.9. Osteomodulin

Silencing OMD gene expression significantly suppresses alkaline phosphatase activity, mineralized nodule formation and osteogenesis-associated gene transcription. OMD acts as a positive coordinator of osteogenesis through BMP2 and SMAD signaling. WNT1 is an osteo-anabolic factor and transcriptionally activates the expression of OMD, which regulates type I collagen fibril formation in vitro. OMD is located in bone tissue and has important roles in bone mineralization. OMD reduces the diameter and changes the shape of collagen fibrils, regulating the ECM during bone formation [195,196,197,198].

2.10. Osteoglycin

Studies linking osteoglycin to insulin resistance, bone development, cardiovascular disease and pancreatic cancer suggest it may be a novel marker of muscle, pancreatic, and bone metabolism. Furthermore, osteoglycin may have roles in the regulation of energy homeostasis and additional roles in metabolic disorders [199,200]. Knowledge of osteoglycin is incomplete, and further research is required to confirm these possibilities.

3. HS Biodiversity

HS is an ancient molecule that evolved through strict natural selection criteria as a highly interactive molecule in the glycocalyx [201]. The immense molecular diversity of HS equips it with interactive capability [202,203], molecular recognition, information storage and signal transfer properties [201], capable of modulating cellular behavior and regulating essential physiological life processes [204,205,206] and is reflected in a range of antibodies that have been raised to HS (Table 2). The persistence of HS from the earliest days of evolution testifies the essential roles HS played in life processes [207,208]. It should be noted that the biosynthesis of HS requires 20+ biosynthetic enzymes [209]; this is a major investment by cells in a significant level of genetic information. The biosynthetic pathways catalyzed by these enzymes also have significant energetic demands; thus, the longevity of HS through a protracted period of evolution is significant [210]. The molecular diversity of HS is a property of the glyco-code contained in its GAG chains, which facilitates highly specific interactions with a broad range of functional soluble and structural proteins [210,211,212]. After heparin, HS is the most heterogeneous GAG, and it displays a significant level of structural complexity [213]. HS is assembled from a number of non-sulfated, mono-sulfated, di-sulfated, tri-sulfated and tetra-sulfated hexa glucuronic acid-glucosamine disaccharides, which are acetylated and then de-acetylated to variable degrees in different regions of the HS chain. HS is not synthesized by a template-driven process, but its diversity reflects the spatiotemporal expression of HS biosynthetic enzymes in tissues. These are variably expressed in tissues; their expression is controlled by the Hippo cell signaling pathway and TAZ/YAP transcription factors during tissue development and repair responses following trauma in health and disease [11,214,215,216,217,218,219].
Table 2 provides information on some antibodies that have been raised to HS. These illustrate some of its structural complexity. The binding of HS by phage display antibodies involves interactions between negatively charged carboxylic acid, N- and O-sulfate groups and regions on the protein surface that contain positively charged amino acid side chains, such as lysine and arginine. The binding of phage antibodies to HS is complex. Multiple HS structures bind the basic surfaces on the variable regions of the antibodies [220]. Phage display antibodies recognize conformationally defined HS epitopes [221], rather than the sequence alone, and are sensitive to changes in both charge distribution and conformation following cation binding [222,223]. Phage display antibodies are widely used to follow HS expression in tissues and cells [223,224,225,226,227]. Cations alter phage display antibody binding profiles to HS mediated by changes in HS chain conformation, demonstrated by circular dichroism spectroscopy [228,229,230]. Native HS structures, expressed on the cell surfaces of neuroblastoma and fibroblast cells, exhibit altered antibody binding profiles following exposure to low mM concentrations of cations [222].
Table 2. HS antibodies.
Table 2. HS antibodies.
Antibody CloneTissue Antibody and Epitope ReactivitiesRefs.
HepSS1Predominantly localised to tissues rich in basement membrane.[231]
JM13Predominantly localised to tissues rich in basement membrane.
JM13 binding epitope requires the presence of 2-O-sulfated glucuronic acid residues
[232]
JM403Immunolocalised to basement membrane and some cell surface epitopes, in bovine lung, aorta and Human aorta. JM403 binding epitope is critically dependent on N-unsubstituted GlcN residues,[233]
10E4Immunolocalised to basement membrane and some cell surface epitope in human aorta, bovine intestine and kidney. The 10E4 epitope requires N-unsubstituted glucosamine residues. 10E4 binds to native “mixed” HS domains containing both N-acetylated and N-sulfated disaccharide units Ab reactivity is destroyed by heparinase III digestion[234]
3G10HS neoepitope generated by heparinase III ldigestion of HS chains. The 3G10 desaturated uronate stub epitope is attached to a HS disaccharide unit attached to the reducing terminal HS linkage region to core protein.[234]
MAb865N-acetylated regions in HS[235,236]
JM72HS-PG core protein epitope[232,237]
Phage display antibodiesAntibody tissue immunoreactivity
HS4C3HSMC3 shows strong localization in bovine intestine and kidney, O-and N- linked HS epitopes are important for Ab binding[221]
HS4D10HS4D10 epitope immunoreactivity is strong in bovine kidney
HS3G8HS3G8 immunoreactivity is strong in bovine kidney and intestine
AO4B08 and HS4E4AO4B08 recognizes HS and heparin, interacting with ubiquitous, N-, 2-O-, and 6-O-sulfated saccharide units.
HS4E4 preferentially recognized low-sulfated HS motifs containing idoA, N-sulfated and N-acetylated GlcN.
[238]

4. The Diverse Functional Properties of HS-PGs

4.1. Agrin

Agrin is a 400 kDa HSPG (212 kDa core protein), which interacts with low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-4 (LRP4) and α-dystroglycan. Chondrogenic signaling networks support chondrocyte differentiation and the upregulation of SOX9 and its transcriptional targets, COL2A1 and ACAN, which are major functional ECM components important for cartilage function. Agrin-induced chondrocyte differentiation does not induce chondrocyte hypertrophy [239]. LRP4 interacts with WNTs and BMPs [240,241,242] to regulate chondrocyte differentiation. Initiation of MuSK kinase in NMJ assembly requires neuronal agrin, which interacts with LRP, rapsyn and DOK-7 [243,244,245]. DOK7 promotes NMJ regeneration after injury [246]. Agrin clusters NMJ acetylcholine receptors [247]. NMJ agrin-Lrp4-MuSK cell signaling is disrupted in congenital myasthenic syndromes, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, Isaacs’ syndrome, Schwartz-Jampel syndrome, Fukuyama-type congenital muscular dystrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and sarcopenia [248,249]

4.2. Perlecan

Perlecan (HSPG2) (400–467 kDa core protein) is a prominent multifunctional modular PG [250,251] of cartilages and vascular tissues, which provides cell-ECM communication [3]. HSPG2 promotes the formation of rudiment cartilages [252,253] and ossification centers in endochondral ossification and skeletogenesis [253]. Perlecan promotes tissue morphogenesis and has multifunctional roles in tissue stabilization [3] through interactions with HS binding structural glycoproteins and co-localizes with elastin in blood vessels [254]. Perlecan acts as a shear flow biosensor for endothelial cells, regulating vascular tone and blood pressure through feed-on effects on SMCs [255]. Perlecan also monitors shear flow in cannalicular fluid in bone, regulating osteocytic bone metabolism [256]. Perlecan provides mechanoresponsive and osmoregulatory properties to cells [2]. Interactive instructional cell-ECM links aid in the cellular orchestration of tissue homeostasis [3]. The multifunctional properties of perlecan aid wound healing and tissue repair processes [257].

4.3. Collagen XVIII

Collagen XVIII, long (187 kDa core protein), intermediate and short alternatively spliced isoforms form networks with perlecan in blood vessel basement membranes and also stabilize the ECM [258,259]. Collagen XVIII’s stabilizing roles in tissues become apparent when mutations lead to a collagen XVIII deficiency [259].

4.4. The Syndecan Family

The syndecan PG family (SDC1-4) performs various functions [27,29,32,260,261], including cell–cell and cell–ECM interactions, wound healing [262], growth factor receptor activation, matrix adhesion and MMP activation [263,264,265,266]. SDC2 and SDC4 may act synergistically in many of these processes. SDC-1 is a G-protein coupled co-receptor in cell proliferation/differentiation. SDC-3 is a receptor for HB-GAM, promoting neurite outgrowth and synaptic plasticity during neural network development [31,260,267,268].

4.5. The Glypican Family

The glypican PG family (GPC1-6) has multiple regulatory roles in cell signaling in tissue development and repair processes in health and disease [26,251,263,269,270]. GPCs regulate adherent cell signaling generated by shear flow and also have roles in tumor development. Investigations show GPCs may be of application in biomedicine [26,271,272,273].

4.6. Serglycin

SRGN, Serglycin, is a low-molecular-weight intracellular heparin-PG that can also be secreted and incorporated into the ECM. SRGN levels are elevated in inflammatory conditions [274,275]. IL-1β or TNF-α increase SRGN expression in vitro. SRGN stores key inflammatory mediators and proteases (elastase, chymase, tryptase, carboxypeptidase) as inactive forms in storage granules and secretory vesicles [276]. SRGN has multiple functional roles in a wide range of tissues in health and disease [277].

4.7. The Neurexins

Neurexins have important roles in synaptic stabilization and function. A vast array of synaptic protein interactions with the neurexin-α, β, γ family provide specificity in synaptic interaction [278,279,280] in pre- and post-synaptic interconnections that promote neurotransduction specificity and efficiency and neural synaptic plasticity [281]. Such interactions organize multi-protein pre-synaptic voltage-gated Ca channels and neuronal receptors [16,282,283] of importance in neural transduction.

4.8. Pikachurin

Pikachurin stabilizes the photoreceptor axenome primary cilium and ribbon sy napse and interacts with photoreceptor GPR179 and α-DG to facilitate the phototransductive process [284,285,286] and essential communication with bipolar retinal neural networks in visual processing. Vision is the primary human sense, sending ~60% of all inputs to the brain for processing [287,288,289].

4.9. Eyes-Shut

Interactions between Eyes-shut and matriglycan O-mannosyl glycan of α-DG stabilize the photoreceptor ribbon synapse and improve communication with the bipolar retinal neural network [290,291] required for high-quality visual acuity [292]. The importance of such interactions in ocular vision becomes apparent in mutations in Eys, which occur in retinitis pigmentosa, which displays vision impairment [293,294]

4.10. SPOCK

SPOCK-I-III are Kazal-like domain PGs with a modular structure, similar to perlecan and agrin, characterized by five domains [241,242,295,296]. Domain I is a SPOCK-specific N-terminal domain with no significant homology to other proteins other than members of the testican/SPOCK PG gene family. Domain II is a cysteine-rich module homologous to follistatin, also found in agrin. Domain III is homologous to the extracellular calcium-binding domain of SPARC and contains two Ca2+-binding EF-hand motifs [297]. Domain IV is a disulphide-stabilized thyroglobulin-like domain, harboring a CWCV tetrapeptide sequence [298]. The C-terminal Domain V is unique to the testican/SPOCK family and harbors two potential GAG attachment sites [298]. SPOCK3 contains two consecutive SGD triplets, attachment sites for HS also shared by perlecan and agrin. SPOCKs are almost exclusively expressed in the CNS and are primarily HSPGs.

5. HS Functional Motifs That Provide Tissue Functions

Sequencing HS samples has identified several protein interactive motifs (Figure 2). The FGFR and FGF-1, 2 binding sites in HS have been identified. 2-O and 6-O sulphation motifs and N-sulfation in HS are key functional determinants of these binding sites. An HS pentasaccharide, which provides the anti-coagulant activity of anti-thrombin (AT), has also been identified. 2-O, 6-O, 3-O and N-sulfation motifs provide this biological activity. 3-O and 2-O sulfation in IdoA is a key functional determinant in AT. Sulfation at the C3 position of glucosamine is a relatively rare, but biologically significant, feature of AT and a key determinant of its binding properties to procoagulant proteases [299,300,301,302]. Lipoprotein lipase is an adipocyte enzyme that cleaves fatty acids from circulating lipoproteins, degrading circulating triglycerides in the bloodstream [303]. Wnt cell signaling pathways have roles in embryonic development and in carcinogenesis. Wnt cell signaling pathways determine cell fate, proliferation, cellular migration and polarity, cell death and also regulate the homeostasis of adult tissues. Wnt proteins are secreted, lipid-modified glycoproteins with poor solubility. Their interaction with HSPGs improves their solubility and PGs, such as perlecan transport Wnt proteins, aiding in the formation of morphogen gradients that drive embryonic development [304,305]. 2-O, 3-O, 6-O and N-sulfate motifs in HS promote interaction with Wnt proteins [306]. Roundabout 1 (Robo1) is a cell surface axon guidance receptor. Its interaction with HS and members of the Slit protein family regulates the formation of neural networks [307,308,309]. Glypican-1 interacts with Robo-1 and Slit proteins during neural network formation. Glypican 3 and Glypican 5 also interact with the primary cilium on the cell surface, which acts as a mechanosensory cell signaling hub [310,311]. The VEGF-A dimer HS interactive module has been identified, and this promotes vascular processes that support tissue development and wound repair processes [312,313].

6. CS Chain Biodiversity

Approximately two in every seven CS chains in aggrecan are terminated in 4, 6 disulfated GalNAc. This varies with the age and cartilage type. Four in seven CS chains are terminated by 4-sulfated GalNAc, and one in seven CS chains are terminated in a GlcUA linked to 4-sulfated GalNAc (Figure 3). Non-reducing terminal 4,6-disulfated GalNAc residues are 60-fold more abundant than 4,6-disulfated GalNAc in interior regions of the CS chain [314].
CS chains terminated in 4-sulfated GalNAc predominate in aggrecan from fetal to 15-year-old knee cartilage, whereas in adult 22–72 year olds, 50% of the CS chains were terminated in 4,6-disulfated GalNAc. GlcUA-4 sulfated GalNAc disaccharides terminated 7% of CS chains in fetal to 15-year-old cartilage but fell to 3% in adults, whereas GlcUA-6 sulfated GalNAc represented 9% of the CS chains in fetal to 72 year olds. This disaccharide is recognized by MAb 3-B-3 (−) [315].
The distribution of 4- and 6-sulfated CS epitopes is variable along a CS chain in aggrecan and is influenced by the maturational status of the cartilage or the extent to which the cartilage was sampled from a high- or low-weight-bearing region [316]. Certain trends have been observed in the sulfation patterns of CS in aggrecan chains. C-4-S is more predominant in aggrecan from fetal and young articular cartilage and occupies a central region in the CS chain, whereas non-sulfated chondroitin is more predominant towards the linkage region. C-6-S has a predominant distribution towards the non-reducing terminus and is more abundant in mature cartilage to the detriment of C-4-S sulfation [316,317]. Graded partial digestions of CS chains with chondroitinase ABC or ACII reveal regions along the CS chain, where MAbs 6C3, 4C3 and 7D4 are the most immunoreactive [317]. MAb 6C3 reacts optimally with regions of CS chains towards the non-reducing terminus, and this reactivity is removed during early stages of chondroitinase digestion. Further digestion of the CS chain removes MAb 4C3 reactivity, and continued digestion removes reactivity to MAb 7-D-4, which provides information on the relative placement of these sulfation motifs along the CS chain. While the fine structures of specific epitopes identified by neoepitope MAb 4C3 and 7D4 have yet to be identified, the reactivity of these antibodies in a range of tissues undergoing morphogenetic transition displays subtly differential immunolocalization patterns and are of functional significance [318,319,320,321,322,323,324,325,326]. MAb 3-B-3 identifies a non-reducing terminal disaccharide in CS, consisting of GlcUA-GalNAc-6-sulfate. This is termed a 3-B-3 (−) epitope to distinguish it from the 3-B-3(+) stub epitope disaccharide attached to the linkage region, which is generated by exhaustive end-point digestion of CS chains by chondroitinase ABC [317]. As noted above, this non-reducing terminal 3-B-3(−) epitope occurs in approximately two in every seven CS chains; disulfated C-4,6-S and C-6-S GalNAc also occur as components in this non-reducing terminal disaccharide in CS chains [314,315].
Figure 3. Diversity of structural organization of the CS side chains in aggrecan. The annotations used in (ae) are explained in the accompanying table. Regions 2, 6, 8, 9 of CS chains detected by MAb’s 3-B-3(−), 4-C-3, and 7-D-4 were identified following graded partial digestion of the CS chains using chondroitinase ABC [317]. The structures depicted are examples of the many permutations in CS structure possible. The CS chains of aggrecan are dynamic structures and vary in structure in a spatiotemporal manner during tissue development and in tissue morphogenesis and during ECM remodeling during tissue repair responses and wound healing.
Figure 3. Diversity of structural organization of the CS side chains in aggrecan. The annotations used in (ae) are explained in the accompanying table. Regions 2, 6, 8, 9 of CS chains detected by MAb’s 3-B-3(−), 4-C-3, and 7-D-4 were identified following graded partial digestion of the CS chains using chondroitinase ABC [317]. The structures depicted are examples of the many permutations in CS structure possible. The CS chains of aggrecan are dynamic structures and vary in structure in a spatiotemporal manner during tissue development and in tissue morphogenesis and during ECM remodeling during tissue repair responses and wound healing.
Ijms 26 02554 g003
Structural/Functional Diversity of the CS Side Chains of Aggrecan
LabelStructural/Functional Features of Annotated RegionsRefs.
1Non-reducing terminal disulfated CS epitopes interactive with morphogens such as IHH.[315,318,327]
2New non-reducing terminus generated by HYAL4 digestion generates 3-B-3(−) epitope[328]
3C-4-S epitopes predominate in foetal cartilage[319,329]
4Reducing terminal 3-B-3 (+) stub epitopes attached to CS linkage region generated by chondroitinase ABC.[330]
5Reducing terminal 2-B-6 (+) stub epitopes attached to CS linkage region generated by chondroitinase ABC.[330]
6Linkage region to Serine residues on aggrecan core protein and GAG accepter region involved in the biosynthesis of CS chains.
With ageing 6-sulfation levels in GalNAc increase in linkage region accompanied by increased Gal-6-S levels and lower 4-sulfation on GalNAc.
[331]
7Increased C-6-S epitope levels in overloaded cartilage regions and with ageing and reduced levels in OA are due to alterations in the expression of sulfotransferases[332,333,334,335]
8Region of CS chain detected by MAb 4-C-3[317]
9Region of CS chain detected by MAb 7-D-4[317]
Note. Regions 2, 6, 8, 9 of CS chains detected by MAb’s 3-B-3(−), 4-C-3, and 7-D-4 were identified by graded partial digestion of CS chains using chondroitinase ABC [317].

7. Variation in the CS Chain Fine Structure in Development and Pathology

Aggrecan is a major structural PG of articular and other weight-bearing tissues and also has roles in the formation of embryonic neural networks and instructive roles over neural crest cells during the formation of the notochord, which is a precursor to other spinal tissues [127] (Figure 4a–c). Aggrecan from articular cartilage contains KS and CS side chains, which constitute ~90% of the mass of this PG. Aggrecan contains approximately 8 to 10 KS chains and ~100 CS chains; each GAG chain is spaced ~1 to 1.5 nm apart, and these range in size from 14 to 21 nm in length [117]. CS is the major aggrecan GAG and is organized into CS1 and CS2 regions. A key property of aggrecan is its interaction with HA via its G1 N-terminal globular domain. This process is important in the hydration and osmoregulation of tissues [336,337], and the hydrodynamic properties conveyed are important in weight-bearing tissues such as joint cartilages [338] and IVD [119,339], although it also hydrates and provides functional properties to soft tissues such as the brain [21,340,341].
Several years ago, MAbs 3-B-3(−) and 7-D-4 were shown to identify chondrocyte clusters in pathological (osteoarthritic) canine and human articular cartilage [342]. At this time, pre-dating knowledge of stem/progenitor cell niches in tissues, these cell clusters were considered a classical feature of the onset of late-stage degenerative joint disease and were interpreted to indicate a failed, late-stage response to replace PGs in a matrix extensively degraded by matrix proteases. An alternative explanation of this cellular phenomenon, however, has now emerged. It is now believed that these ‘chondrocyte clusters’ arise from adult stem/progenitor cell niches [343,344]. The 3-B-3(−), 4-C-3 and 7-D-4 CS sulfation motifs also occur in fetal development and are markers of anabolic processes in transitional tissues. An important feature of the stem/progenitor cell niche is the sulfation of the PG GAG side chains. The variable expression of GAG sulfotransferases and glycosyl transferases in stem/progenitor cell niches supports such an interpretation [345]. Cell clusters have also been shown to express Notch 1 and CD166, biomarkers that are synonymous with the stem cell niche [319,323,346].
Figure 4. Schematic of aggrecans variable structure in articular cartilage (a), brain tissue (b) and notochord (c) and its N- and C-terminal globular domains interactive with HA and ECM components to form molecular networks. The G1 domain forms macromolecular complexes with HA stabilized by link-protein which hydrate tissues providing weight bearing properties to articular cartilages in joints and IVD. Aggrecan–HA complexes are also stabilized by brain link protein and tenascin R and C which are important in the hydration of brain tissue and the formation of perineuronal nets. Aggrecan G3 domains contain complement-like, EGF-like and lectin-like motifs which form networks in tissues forming an extended framework which conveys ECM mechanosensory cues to cells contributing to homeostasis. (d) The HNK-1 trisaccharide is a notable modification in aggrecan in brain and notochordal aggrecan with roles in the regulation of neural crest progenitor cells and nerve development but also occurs in embryonic cartilage aggrecan but absent in adult cartilage. HNK-1 has roles in the myelination of axons, and occurs in peripheral nerves and modifies CS substitution in α-thrombomodulin and phosphacan. Figure modified from [127] with permission.
Figure 4. Schematic of aggrecans variable structure in articular cartilage (a), brain tissue (b) and notochord (c) and its N- and C-terminal globular domains interactive with HA and ECM components to form molecular networks. The G1 domain forms macromolecular complexes with HA stabilized by link-protein which hydrate tissues providing weight bearing properties to articular cartilages in joints and IVD. Aggrecan–HA complexes are also stabilized by brain link protein and tenascin R and C which are important in the hydration of brain tissue and the formation of perineuronal nets. Aggrecan G3 domains contain complement-like, EGF-like and lectin-like motifs which form networks in tissues forming an extended framework which conveys ECM mechanosensory cues to cells contributing to homeostasis. (d) The HNK-1 trisaccharide is a notable modification in aggrecan in brain and notochordal aggrecan with roles in the regulation of neural crest progenitor cells and nerve development but also occurs in embryonic cartilage aggrecan but absent in adult cartilage. HNK-1 has roles in the myelination of axons, and occurs in peripheral nerves and modifies CS substitution in α-thrombomodulin and phosphacan. Figure modified from [127] with permission.
Ijms 26 02554 g004

7.1. Aggrecan CS Side Chain Modifications in Specific Tissue Contexts

Aggrecan is widely distributed in the articular hyaline cartilages of diarthrodial joints but also occurs in the elastic and fibrocartilages of rib, nasal and tracheal cartilages, larynx, outer ear and the epiglottis [56,347,348,349], and is an important functional component of the myocardial ECM [350]. Aggrecan has important roles in fetal heart development and is a functional ECM component, which contributes to the resilience of the endocardium, myocardium, epicardium and valve leaflets of mature heart tissue [351,352]. Aggrecan is also found in the CNS and PNS in perineuronal net (PNNs) structures (Figure 5). These are aggrecan–HA–tenascin C aggregate structures, which localize around neurons during development and are specialized forms of neural ECM, which have neuroprotective roles, control synaptic plasticity and have roles in memory [126,353,354].

7.2. Role of IHH in Chondrogenesis

Indian hedgehog (Ihh) [355], a member of the hedgehog protein family along with sonic hedgehog (Shh) [356], regulates chondrocyte differentiation, proliferation and maturation in articular cartilage development [357] and during endochondral ossification through interactions with parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) [358] and BMP-mediated cell signaling [359]. Ihh has multiple functions during skeletogenesis [360,361,362]. Mice lacking the Ihh gene exhibit severe skeletal abnormalities, including markedly reduced chondrocyte proliferation and abnormal maturation and an absence of mature osteoblasts, which has detrimental effects on bone development [363]. Ihh and its receptor, smoothened (smo), are expressed in chondrocytes and osteoblasts; thus, Ihh may have a direct effect on osteoblasts, or its effects may be mediated indirectly through chondrocytes during the process of endochondral ossification. IHH colocalizes with aggrecan in the growth plate. Aggrecan regulates the expression of growth factors and signaling molecules during cartilage development and is essential for proper chondrocyte organization, morphology and survival during the formation of the axial skeleton. The sulfated GAGs of the CS and KS side chains of aggrecan provide water-imbibing properties, creating a large hydrophilic molecule important for the hydration of cartilage and the provision of its hydrodynamic weight-bearing properties, but also bind growth factors and morphogens crucial to chondrocyte maturation and function [327,364]. Thus, aggrecan should not be considered merely as a space-filling bulking ECM component that provides hydration and weight-bearing properties to tissues but also has cell instructive properties capable of modulating the activity of growth factors and morphogenetic proteins, thus mediating tissue development. Indeed, aggrecan knock-out mutants display a range of severe ECM defects, which support this proposal [365,366].

7.3. HNK-1 Trisaccharide

The human natural killer-1 (HNK-1) trisaccharide (HSO3-3GlcAß1-3Galß1-4GlcNAc-) is highly expressed in the nervous system on N-linked and O-mannose-linked glycans, and its spatiotemporal expression is strictly regulated [367] (Figure 4d). Monoclonal antibody 6B4 detects O-mannose-linked HNK-1 carried by phosphacan [368]. Mice deficient in the enzyme glucuronyltransferase (GlcAT-P), a key HNK-1 biosynthetic enzyme in GlcAT-P (B3gat1), display almost complete disappearance of the HNK-1 trisaccharide epitope in the brain. This is accompanied by a significant reduction in long-term potentiation and dysfunctional spatial learning and memory formation, demonstrating HNK-1’s physiological roles in higher brain function.
HNK-1 trisaccharide is also an autoantigen associated with peripheral demyelinative neuropathy and has important roles in myelination processes and the preservation of neuronal signaling efficiency [369]. Structurally distinct HNK-1 epitopes are expressed in specific proteins in the nervous system. The HNK-1 epitope on AMPA receptor sub-unit GluA2 and aggrecan regulate neural plasticity but in different ways [370]. The HNK-1 epitope is indispensable for the acquisition of normal neuronal function, cognitive learning and memory [371]. Despite the widespread disappearance of HNK-1 in the GlcAT-P KO mouse brain, it remained in specific regions, such as perineuronal nets (PNNs) [372]. HNK-1 in PNNs appeared to be synthesized by a unique biosynthetic pathway. Loss of HNK-1 alters the distribution of postsynaptic proteins, such as alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazolepropionate (AMPA)-type glutamate receptor GluR2 and PSD-95 (postsynaptic density protein 95), also known as SAP-90 (synapse-associated protein 90), from spine heads. GluR2 is a major HNK-1 carrier glycoprotein that promotes spine morphogenesis [370]. The overexpression of GluR2 promoted spine growth in both wild-type and GlcAT-P-deficient neurons, but the increase in GlcAT-P-deficient neurons was lower than that in wild-type neurons. HNK-1 is, thus, a key factor for normal dendritic spine maturation and is involved in the distribution of postsynaptic proteins.
A novel truncated form of phosphacan, phosphacan short isoform (PSI), representing the N-terminal carbonic anhydrase- and fibronectin type III repeat domains and half of the spacer region, is modified with HNK-1 trisaccharide and oligosaccharides but no GAG. PSI interacts with the Ig cell adhesion molecules F3/contactin and L1 and promotes the outgrowth of cortical neurons [146]. Phosphacan interacts with Ng-CAM and NCAM and modulates neuronal and glial cell adhesion, neurite outgrowth, and signal transduction during CNS development [373]. Instructional interactions between neurons and glial cells regulate the development and regeneration of the CNS [145]. Migrating neurons are guided by radial glial pericellular scaffold interactions that direct the growth and migration of axons during the development of neural networks. In adult neural tissues, astrocyte PGs and myelin glycoproteins inhibit neuroregeneration. The CSPG splice variant of RPTP-β (PTP-ζ), DSD-1/phosphacan, glial PG is developmentally regulated and can display stimulatory or inhibitory properties over neurons via interactions with IgG family neuronal receptors [143]. DSD-1 glial cell CSPG, the mouse homolog of phosphacan, promotes neurite outgrowth in rat embryonic mesencephalic (E14) and hippocampal (E18) neurons. This contrasts with other CSPGs, such as members of the lectican family, which inhibit neuronal outgrowth and regeneration. However, DSD-1 also displays inhibitory properties in DRG neuron cultures, and this property appears to be associated with the DSD-1 core protein. Thus, the stimulatory or inhibitory properties of DSD-1 are neuron lineage dependent in specific tissue contexts [144]. The 3-O-sulfation of the terminal GlcA of HNK-1 trisaccharide acts as an inhibitory signal for the initiation of CS biosynthesis on thrombomodulin, preventing the interactive properties of α-thrombomodulin with thrombin and reducing its anti-coagulant activity [374,375]. HNK-1 trisaccharide is expressed on aggrecan in early cartilage development; however, by embryonic day 14, it is no longer detectable [376]. HNK-1 trisaccharide is also expressed on notochordal aggrecan and may have instructive roles over neural crest cell migration during the maturation of the notochord and formation of neural networks prior to the development of cartilaginous embryonic spinal skeletal tissues.
Figure 5. Schematic depiction of HA-lectican molecular networks in perineuronal nets showing ternary complex formations stabilized by tenascin-R. Only brevican is depicted for clarity but such networks also contain aggrecan, a major component and neurocan to a lesser degree. Phosphacan is also a component of perineuronal nets (a). Key showing the structural organization of some perineuronal net components (b). Fluorescent immunolocalisation of perineural nets in the cerebellum. Neuronal nuclei are visualized using propidium iodide (red) and aggrecan using a combination of chondroitinase ABC and FITC labeled Mab 1B5 (green) to a sub epitope which remains attached to the CS attachment region to aggrecan core protein (c). Schematic structure of the 1B5 stub epitope terminated in the unsaturated Δ-4,5 uronate residue which absorbs strongly at 232 nm (d). Figure modified from [377] with permission.
Figure 5. Schematic depiction of HA-lectican molecular networks in perineuronal nets showing ternary complex formations stabilized by tenascin-R. Only brevican is depicted for clarity but such networks also contain aggrecan, a major component and neurocan to a lesser degree. Phosphacan is also a component of perineuronal nets (a). Key showing the structural organization of some perineuronal net components (b). Fluorescent immunolocalisation of perineural nets in the cerebellum. Neuronal nuclei are visualized using propidium iodide (red) and aggrecan using a combination of chondroitinase ABC and FITC labeled Mab 1B5 (green) to a sub epitope which remains attached to the CS attachment region to aggrecan core protein (c). Schematic structure of the 1B5 stub epitope terminated in the unsaturated Δ-4,5 uronate residue which absorbs strongly at 232 nm (d). Figure modified from [377] with permission.
Ijms 26 02554 g005

8. The Structural and Functional Diversity of KS, HS and CS-PGs

The biodiversity of PG GAG side chains conveys a wide range of interactive properties with a large range of ligands such as growth factors, cytokines, morphogens, cell surface receptors and structural ECM glycoproteins, Cell associated and ECM PGs which are decorated with these GAGs thus display a wide range of functional atttributes to cell. These are summarized in Table 3.

9. Interactive Properties of GAGs and How They Influence Tissue Development

Some of the earliest studies on glycans were on mammalian corneas and lenses, and these uncovered key cell interactive concepts fundamental to our understanding of basic cell biology. PGs and their GAG side chains are essential components of the ECM of the lens capsule and basement membranes. Lumican, fibromodulin and keratocan KSPGs organize collagen fiber diameters and strategic spacing in the corneal stroma to maintain visual clarity. Genetically engineered mice and gene mutations that spontaneously arise show key aspects of PG biosynthesis and the roles these play in signal transduction to regulate cell signaling and the avascular and immune status of tissues [380]. Furthermore, control of ECM signals by neurons is pivotal to brain development, plasticity, and repair and axonal guidance via receptor–ligand interactive crosstalk with ECM components [20,21]. The interaction of semaphorin-5A (Sema5A) with HS and CS provides bifunctional attractive and inhibitory properties, affecting neuronal growth, and represents a molecular switch in neural development [425]. A unique feature of class 5 semaphorins is their seven extracellular thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) repeats, which have GAG interactive properties that convey axonal guidance and shape the nervous system during development, neuronal proliferation and migration in neuritogenesis and synapse formation [426]. HS-GAG binding is preferred over CS-GAG and mediates Sema5A oligomerization. Such interactions regulate Plexin-A2-dependent neuroprogenitor cell migration in developmental and neurological disorders and show how PGs regulate such processes. Robo–Slit interactions regulated by HSPGs also provide neuronal guidance cues during innervation of the lens and cornea [427]. Plexin A1 has also been demonstrated to be a receptor for Robo interactions that regulate neuritogenesis [428,429]. Robo–Slit interactions with GAGs provide axonal guidance in neural network assembly in a number of tissue contexts in the brain and are also operative in the spinal cord [430,431,432,433]. Furthermore, neural tissue homeostasis and repair are regulated by CS and DS PG motifs [434], and a number of KSPGs also modulate the activity of a range of neuroregulatory proteins in the brain [59], which is consistent with the unique functional capabilities of KS [47] and its roles as an electrosensory neurosentient bioresponsive cell instructive GAG [109]. Lumican and keratocan have been immunolocalized in the rat spinal cord and IVD [82].

9.1. Neural GAG Structures Have Significant Functional Roles in Synaptic Activity

HSPG-Specific Roles in Synaptic Stabilization, Specificity of Interaction and Plasticity

As already discussed, the neurexin HSPG family has key roles to play in synaptic stabilization through interactions with a vast array of adhesive synaptic proteins [15], which also ensure specificity and precision in such synaptic interactions and synaptic plasticity. HS interactions extend the range of interactive ligands operative in such interactions [16,19]. Interaction with the highly glycosylated glycoprotein DG also contributes to the stabilization and functional status of synaptic structures in cell signaling processes that regulate cellular behavior [13,435,436]. Figure 6 schematically illustrates some of these proteins, such as the neuroligins [403,437] and LRRTMs [438,439], and adaptor proteins, such as MINT [440] and CASK (calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase) [441]. CASK interacts with other proteins through its multi-modular domains and is involved in memory formation, neurotransmitter release, cell adhesion and pre- and postsynaptic signaling. Munc18-1 is a neuronal protein that interacts with syntaxin 1 and is required for synaptic vesicle exocytosis mediated by the Mint1 and Mint2 adaptor proteins [442]. Mints 1–3, also referred to as X11α/β/γ, X11/L1/L2, or APBA1/2/3, multidomain adaptor proteins, are interactive with a variety of synaptic proteins, such as CASK. CASK is a scaffold protein, with roles in the development of the nervous system and the release of neurotransmitters [441]. In the brain, Mint proteins constitute part of a multimeric complex containing Munc18-1 and syntaxin, which function as intermediates in synaptic vesicle docking/fusion. This process appears to be mediated by a phosphotyrosine-binding domain in Mint that specifically binds to phosphatidylinositol phosphates groups [443]. Neurexin-neuroligin synaptic interactions facilitate the recruitment of AMPA and other glutamate receptors such as NMDA and GluD2, which are important for neurotransmitter transmission and neuronal function [403,437]. Neurexin-3 has important roles in synapse development and synapse functions through interactions with leucine-rich-repeat transmembrane neuronal proteins (LRRTMs) [444]. Figure 6 shows a schematic presentation of these proteins.

9.2. DG-HSPG Interactive Roles in NMJ Assembly and Neuromuscular Regulation in Health and Disease

DG also has roles in the assembly of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) and synaptic basement membrane [445], where, along with perlecan, it clusters acetylcholinesterase in the NMJ, an essential feature that facilitates neuromuscular control by motoneurons [445,446]. DG has widespread properties in the development and function of the nervous system [435,436]. DG-HSPG interactions provide synaptic plasticity and specificity [13]. DG is also a component of dystrophin glycoprotein complexes, with roles to play in skeletal tissue dynamics [14] and tissue stabilization (Figure 7). Furthermore, DG also serves as a cell signaling platform and is, thus, a multifunctional glycoprotein, interactive with a wide range of proteins [447]. DG also maintains the integrity of the inner retinal membrane [448] and has roles in the formation of the photoreceptor ribbon synapse [289], connections between photoreceptors and retinal bipolar neurons, ensuring effective communication between them [288] and binding of the orphan receptor GPR179 to DG-pikachurin complexes essential for photoreceptor organization and function [285]. DG is of particular importance in the dynamic stabilization and function of the ECM [449].
DG is composed of an extracellular α-domain, which is heavily glycosylated, and this is highly interactive with a wide range of ECM components, including HSPGs through interactions with their Lam G core protein motifs [450] (Figure 7). DG also contains an intracellular β-domain, which connects to the cytoskeleton, and, thus, collectively, the α- and β-domains provide a transmembrane cytoskeleton-ECM direct link operative in cell–ECM communication and the mechanical regulation of connective tissue cells. Thus, DG provides both ECM stabilization and is a cell signaling platform through which cells can be regulated (Figure 8).
DG is a novel laminin and agrin receptor. A drastic reduction in DG in muscle tissue, caused by an absence of dystrophin, leads to muscle cell death and the symptomatology of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, which is caused by a mutation in the X-linked dystrophin gene [451]. However, DG also has roles in cellular differentiation processes in many different cell types and is now of interest in the development of many diseases [452,453]. Inappropriate glycosylation of DG appears to be a central event in the pathogenesis of several complex diseases [454,455]. Improvements in glycomics methodologies suggest that glycosylation could potentially be modulated in DG samples to ameliorate the pathological progress of these diseases. It is, thus, essential that the mechanism of action of DG in disease processes be fully deciphered in order to develop potential therapeutics. Glycans and GAGs clearly have key roles to play in these biological processes.
Figure 6. Schematic depiction of a neuron synapse depicting the stabilizing role played by the HSPG neurexin. which interacts with a large number of synaptic proteins providing synaptic plasticity and specificity of synaptic interactions. Neurexin-α and neurexin-γ isoforms are depicted interacting with neuroligin and leucine rich repeat transmembrane glycoproteins. The glutamate receptors AMPAR (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor) and NMDAR (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor) and GluD2 (glutamate dehydrogenase-2)-Cbl (cerebellin) are also potential ligands for the neurexin family. Abbreviations used: EHD, esterase homology domain; PDZ, a term derived from post-synaptic density protein (PSD95); drosphila disc large tumor suppressor (Dig 1) and zona occludens-1 protein (Zo-1); LNS, laminin, neurexin, sex-hormone binding globulin; CASK, calcium calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase-3; TM, transmembrane; LRR, leucine-rich repeat; SP, signal peptide; MINT, molecular interaction; LRRTMs, leucine-rich repeat transmembrane neuronal proteins.
Figure 6. Schematic depiction of a neuron synapse depicting the stabilizing role played by the HSPG neurexin. which interacts with a large number of synaptic proteins providing synaptic plasticity and specificity of synaptic interactions. Neurexin-α and neurexin-γ isoforms are depicted interacting with neuroligin and leucine rich repeat transmembrane glycoproteins. The glutamate receptors AMPAR (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor) and NMDAR (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor) and GluD2 (glutamate dehydrogenase-2)-Cbl (cerebellin) are also potential ligands for the neurexin family. Abbreviations used: EHD, esterase homology domain; PDZ, a term derived from post-synaptic density protein (PSD95); drosphila disc large tumor suppressor (Dig 1) and zona occludens-1 protein (Zo-1); LNS, laminin, neurexin, sex-hormone binding globulin; CASK, calcium calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase-3; TM, transmembrane; LRR, leucine-rich repeat; SP, signal peptide; MINT, molecular interaction; LRRTMs, leucine-rich repeat transmembrane neuronal proteins.
Ijms 26 02554 g006
Figure 7. Schematic depiction of key interactive glycan structures in dystroglycan, extracellular and intracellular cell signaling structures and some of the HSPG effector PGs that interact with dystroglycan. Laminin also interacts with DG through its LamG 1–5 domains. Laminin G domains in the core proteins of agrin, perlecan, Eyes-shut, pikachurin and the neurexins interact with DG providing ECM stabilization and cell-ECM communication in cell signaling pathways that regulate tissue homeostasis [436]. DG acts as a transmembrane linkage glycoprotein between the ECM and cytoskeleton and has particularly important roles to play in the nervous system where interactive HSPGs act as effector molecules in many neural processes [13,435].
Figure 7. Schematic depiction of key interactive glycan structures in dystroglycan, extracellular and intracellular cell signaling structures and some of the HSPG effector PGs that interact with dystroglycan. Laminin also interacts with DG through its LamG 1–5 domains. Laminin G domains in the core proteins of agrin, perlecan, Eyes-shut, pikachurin and the neurexins interact with DG providing ECM stabilization and cell-ECM communication in cell signaling pathways that regulate tissue homeostasis [436]. DG acts as a transmembrane linkage glycoprotein between the ECM and cytoskeleton and has particularly important roles to play in the nervous system where interactive HSPGs act as effector molecules in many neural processes [13,435].
Ijms 26 02554 g007
Figure 8. The complexities of the NMJ basal membrane showing a diagram of the NMJ (a), immunolocalisation of nerves in a NMJ using H&E staining of muscle fibres and silver esterase staining of nerves (b). Simplified schematic of key functional components of the NMJ including laminin, perlecan, agrin, dystroglycan, LRP4 and MuSK glycoproteins (c). Cholinesterase receptors are localised and anchored in the NMJ basement membrane by agrin, Musk and dystroglycan. Perlecan interactions with DGand collagen Q localise active cholinesterase sub-unit clustering, Cholinesterase and its receptors are key components that provide motor activity in the NMJ. Rapsyn adapter protein [456] and ErbR transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptors [457] also have roles in the stabilisation of cholinesterase receptors. Cytoskeletal connections provided by the beta sub-unit of DGcontribute to cell-ECM communication and neuronal cell signalimg pathways. Details of the structural organisation and domain organisation of agrin (d), perlecan (e), laminin (f), and collagen- Q cholinesterase clusters (g) are also provided in schematic diagrams.
Figure 8. The complexities of the NMJ basal membrane showing a diagram of the NMJ (a), immunolocalisation of nerves in a NMJ using H&E staining of muscle fibres and silver esterase staining of nerves (b). Simplified schematic of key functional components of the NMJ including laminin, perlecan, agrin, dystroglycan, LRP4 and MuSK glycoproteins (c). Cholinesterase receptors are localised and anchored in the NMJ basement membrane by agrin, Musk and dystroglycan. Perlecan interactions with DGand collagen Q localise active cholinesterase sub-unit clustering, Cholinesterase and its receptors are key components that provide motor activity in the NMJ. Rapsyn adapter protein [456] and ErbR transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptors [457] also have roles in the stabilisation of cholinesterase receptors. Cytoskeletal connections provided by the beta sub-unit of DGcontribute to cell-ECM communication and neuronal cell signalimg pathways. Details of the structural organisation and domain organisation of agrin (d), perlecan (e), laminin (f), and collagen- Q cholinesterase clusters (g) are also provided in schematic diagrams.
Ijms 26 02554 g008

10. Conclusions

The aim of this study was to convey the complexities of GAG’s fine structure and how this impacts tissue function in specific cell and tissue contexts in health and disease. The roles of specific GAGs in neural issues were also covered, and some GAG isoforms which have not previously been considered to have roles in this context were outlined. KS is an underappreciated GAG in tissue function in this respect, and low-sulfation KS has emerging roles in neural tissues. Further studies in this area are warranted. HS, in all its forms, has a multitude of interactive properties with a myriad of effector proteins, which convey important functional properties to tissues. This becomes apparent when abnormal assembly or degradative processes result in GAG dysfunction in a range of human diseases. A greater understanding of how GAGs convey properties to tissues and instruct cellular behavior and advances in GAG analytical techniques offers exciting possibilities, coupled with advancements in glycomics research in the development of GAG biotherapeutics. GAGs certainly have a diverse range of cell instructive properties, which could be potentially harnessed to treat functional deficits in tissues. Thorough basic studies on the roles of GAGs in tissues may well be insightful and are essential to take the field of GAG biotherapeutics forward.

Funding

This study was funded by The Melrose Personal Research Fund, Sydney, Australia. Melrose received consultancy fees from Fidia-Arthropharm Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. and has no further financial disclosures to make.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that this study received consultancy fees from Fidia-Arthropharm Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. and has no further financial disclosures to make. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Abbreviations

ASAlport syndrome
AMPAAlpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazolepropionate
AMPARα-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor
BMPBone morphogenetic protein
CASKCalcium/calmodulin-dependent serine protein kinase
CblCerebellin.
CNSCentral nervous system
DSD1Mouse homolog of phosphacan
ECMECM
FGF(R)Fibroblast growth factor (receptor)
FMODFibromodulin
F3Contactin
GABAGamma amino butyric acid
GAGGlycosaminoglycan
GlcAT-P Glucuronyltransferase, B3gat1
GluD2 Glutamate dehydrogenase-2 (GluA2)
GTPaseGuanosine triphosphate hydrolase
PGProteoglycan
HAHyaluronan
HNKHuman natural killer
IHHIndian hedgehog
IVDIntervertebral disc
KERAKeratocan
KSPGsKeratan sulfate proteoglycans
LamGLaminin G domain
L1A 200–220 kDa neuronal cell adhesion molecule
LUMLumican
MINTMolecular interaction
MUCMucin
MuSKMuscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase
NgCAMNeural glial cell adhesion molecule
NCAMNeural cell adhesion molecule
NMDARN-methyl-D-aspartate receptor
NMJNeuromuscular junction
PEN5natural killer cell restricted KS-glycoprotein
PGSL-1Platelet selectin glycoprotein ligand-1
PNSPeripheral nervous system
PTHrPparathyroid hormone-related peptide
SHHSonic hedgehog
SLRPsSmall leucine rich proteoglycans
SMOSnoothened
PRELPProlargin
PSD-95Postsynaptic density protein 95, SAP-90 (synapse protein 90)
PSIPhosphacan short isoform
RoboRoundabout (receptor)
RPTP-βTransmembrane receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase-beta, also known as protein tyrosine phosphatase-zeta (PTP-ζ)
Sema5ASemaphorin-5A
TSP-1Thrombospondin-1
VEGFVascular endothelial cell growth factor
WntDerived from int and Wg, Wingless-related integration site

References

  1. Farach-Carson, M.; Wu, D.; França, C.M. Proteoglycans in Mechanobiology of Tissues and Organs: Normal Functions and Mechanopathology. Proteoglycan Res. 2024, 2, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Krull, C.; Rife, J.; Klamer, B.; Purmessur, D.; Walter, B.A. Pericellular heparan sulfate proteoglycans: Role in regulating the biosynthetic response of nucleus pulposus cells to osmotic loading. JOR Spine 2022, 5, e1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guilak, F.; Hayes, A.J.; Melrose, J. Perlecan in Pericellular Mechanosensory Cell-Matrix Communication, Extracellular Matrix Stabilisation and Mechanoregulation of Load-Bearing Connective Tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ingber, D.; Wang, N.; Stamenovic, D. Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2014, 77, 046603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Berdiaki, A.; Neagu, M.; Tzanakakis, P.; Spyridaki, I.; Pérez, S.; Nikitovic, D. Extracellular Matrix Components and Mechanosensing Pathways in Health and Disease. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Savransky, S.; White, A.D.; Vilardaga, J.P. Deciphering the role of glycosaminoglycans in GPCR signaling. Cell Signal. 2024, 118, 111149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karamanos, N.; Theocharis, A.D.; Piperigkou, Z.; Manou, D.; Passi, A.; Skandalis, S.S.; Vynios, D.H.; Orian-Rousseau, V.; Ricard-Blum, S.; Schmelzer, C.E.H.; et al. A guide to the composition and functions of the extracellular matrix. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 6850–6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Theocharis, A.; Skandalis, S.S.; Gialeli, C.; Karamanos, N.K. Extracellular matrix structure. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 97, 4–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lepucki, A.; Orlińska, K.; Mielczarek-Palacz, A.; Kabut, J.; Olczyk, P.; Komosińska-Vassev, K. The Role of Extracellular Matrix Proteins in Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dzobo, K.; Dandara, C. The Extracellular Matrix: Its Composition, Function, Remodeling, and Role in Tumorigenesis. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Melrose, J. Hippo cell signaling and HS-proteoglycans regulate tissue form and function, age-dependent maturation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and repair. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2024, 326, C810–C828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Scott, R.; Panitch, A. Glycosaminoglycans in biomedicine. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2013, 5, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Melrose, J. Dystroglycan-HSPG interactions provide synaptic plasticity and specificity. Glycobiology 2024, 34, cwae051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hopkinson, M.; Pitsillides, A.A. Extracellular matrix: Dystroglycan interactions-Roles for the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex in skeletal tissue dynamics. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2025, 106, e12525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Südhof, T. Synaptic Neurexin Complexes: A Molecular Code for the Logic of Neural Circuits. Cell 2017, 171, 745–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Noborn, F.; Sterky, F.H. Role of neurexin heparan sulfate in the molecular assembly of synapses—Expanding the neurexin code? FEBS J. 2021, 290, 252–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wight, T.N. A role for proteoglycans in vascular disease. Matrix Biol. 2018, 71–72, 396–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schwartz, N.; Domowicz, M.S. Chemistry and Function of Glycosaminoglycans in the Nervous System. Adv. Neurobiol. 2023, 29, 117–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, P.; Lu, H.; Peixoto, R.T.; Pines, M.K.; Ge, Y.; Oku, S.; Siddiqui, T.J.; Xie, Y.; Wu, W.; Archer-Hartmann, S.; et al. Heparan Sulfate Organizes Neuronal Synapses through Neurexin Partnerships. Cell 2018, 174, 1450–1464.e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Melrose, J.; Hayes, A.J.; Bix, G. The CNS/PNS Extracellular Matrix Provides Instructive Guidance Cues to Neural Cells and Neuroregulatory Proteins in Neural Development and Repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Melrose, J. CNS/PNS proteoglycans functionalize neuronal and astrocyte niche microenvironments optimizing cellular activity by preserving membrane polarization dynamics, ionic microenvironments, ion fluxes, neuronal activation, and network neurotransductive capacity. J. Neurosci. Res. 2024, 102, e25361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ricard-Blum, S.; Vivès, R.R.; Schaefer, L.; Götte, M.; Merline, R.; Passi, A.; Heldin, P.; Magalhães, A.; Reis, C.A.; Skandalis, S.S.; et al. A biological guide to glycosaminoglycans: Current perspectives and pending questions. FEBS J. 2024, 291, 3331–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Salmivirta, M.; Jalkanen, M. Syndecan family of cell surface proteoglycans: Developmentally regulated receptors for extracellular effector molecules. Experientia 1995, 51, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bernfield, M.; Sanderson, R.D. Syndecan, a developmentally regulated cell surface proteoglycan that binds extracellular matrix and growth factors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1990, 327, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Matsuo, I.; Kimura-Yoshida, C. Extracellular distribution of diffusible growth factors controlled by heparan sulfate proteoglycans during mammalian embryogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20130545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thota, L.; Chignalia, A.Z. The role of the glypican and syndecan families of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in cardiovascular function and disease. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2022, 323, C1052–C1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Couchman, J. Transmembrane signaling proteoglycans. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010, 26, 89–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tracy, L.; Minasian, R.A.; Caterson, E.J. Extracellular Matrix and Dermal Fibroblast Function in the Healing Wound. Adv. Wound Care 2016, 5, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Afratis, N.; Nikitovic, D.; Multhaupt, H.A.; Theocharis, A.D.; Couchman, J.R.; Karamanos, N.K. Syndecans—Key regulators of cell signaling and biological functions. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zeng, Y. Endothelial glycocalyx as a critical signalling platform integrating the extracellular haemodynamic forces and chemical signalling. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 1457–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Couchman, J.; Gopal, S.; Lim, H.C.; Nørgaard, S.; Multhaupt, H.A. Fell-Muir Lecture: Syndecans: From peripheral coreceptors to mainstream regulators of cell behaviour. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 96, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chung, H.; Multhaupt, H.A.; Oh, E.S.; Couchman, J.R. Minireview: Syndecans and their crucial roles during tissue regeneration. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590, 2408–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Rossi, G.; Whiteford, J.R. Syndecans in angiogenesis and endothelial cell biology. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014, 42, 1643–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Melrose, J. Mucin-like glycopolymer gels in electrosensory tissues generate cues which direct electrolocation in amphibians and neuronal activation in mammals. Neural Regen. Res. 2019, 14, 1191–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Josberger, E.; Hassanzadeh, P.; Deng, Y.; Sohn, J.; Rego, M.J.; Amemiya, C.T.; Rolandi, M. Proton conductivity in ampullae of Lorenzini jelly. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1600112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, X.; Xia, K.; Lin, L.; Zhang, F.; Yu, Y.; St Ange, K.; Han, X.; Edsinger, E.; Sohn, J.; Linhardt, R.J. Structural and Functional Components of the Skate Sensory Organ Ampullae of Lorenzini. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 1677–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Melrose, J. Functional Consequences of Keratan Sulfate Sulfation in Electrosensory Tissues and in Neuronal Regulation. Adv. Biosyst. 2019, 3, e1800327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haueisen, M.; Reis, R.E. High resolution in turbid waters: Ampullae of lorenzini in the daggernose shark Carcharhinus oxyrhynchus (Valenciennes, 1839) (Elasmobranchii: Carcharhinidae). J. Fish Biol. 2023, 105, 1540–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pedraja, F.; Sawtell, N.B. Collective sensing in electric fish. Nature 2024, 628, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jones, T.; Allen, K.M.; Moss, C.F. Communication with self, friends and foes in active-sensing animals. J. Exp. Biol. 2021, 224, jeb242637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, J.; Cui, X.; Zhang, H. The third form electric organ discharge of electric eels. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Proske, U.; Gregory, J.E.; Iggo, A. Sensory receptors in monotremes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1998, 353, 1187–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Scheich, H.; Langner, G.; Tidemann, C.; Coles, R.B.; Guppy, A. Electroreception and electrolocation in platypus. Nature 1986, 319, 401–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gramegna Tota, C.; Leone, A.; Paganini, C.; Khan, A.; Rossi, A.; Superti-Furga, A. Chapter 6. Skeletal dysplasias caused by defects in glycosaminoglycan sulfation. In The Extracellular Matrix in Genetic Skeletal Disorders; Biology of Extracellular Matrix; Rossi, A., Zaucke, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2025; Volume 16, pp. 181–212. [Google Scholar]
  45. Watt, A.; Chung, K.C. Generalized skeletal abnormalities. Hand Clin. 2009, 25, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rimoin, D.; Cohn, D.; Krakow, D.; Wilcox, W.; Lachman, R.S.; Alanay, Y. The skeletal dysplasias: Clinical-molecular correlations. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007, 1117, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Caterson, B.; Melrose, J. Keratan sulfate, a complex glycosaminoglycan with unique functional capability. Glycobiology 2018, 28, 182–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tai, G.; Huckerby, T.N.; Nieduszynski, I.A. Multiple non-reducing chain termini isolated from bovine corneal keratan sulfates. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 23535–23546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tai, G.; Nieduszynski, I.A.; Fullwood, N.J.; Huckerby, T.N. Human corneal keratan sulfates. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 28227–28231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Oeben, M.; Keller, R.; Stuhlsatz, H.W.; Greiling, H. Constant and variable domains of different disaccharide structure in corneal keratan sulphate chains. Biochem. J. 1987, 248, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Funderburgh, J. Keratan sulfate biosynthesis. IUBMB Life 2002, 54, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meyer, K.; Linker, A.; Davidson, E.A.; Weissmann, B. The mucopolysaccharides of bovine cornea. J. Biol. Chem. 1953, 205, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Antonsson, P.; Heinegård, D.; Oldberg, A. Posttranslational modifications of fibromodulin. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 6859–16861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sommarin, Y.; Wendel, M.; Shen, Z.; Hellman, U.; Heinegard, D. Osteoadherin, a cell-binding keratan sulfate proteoglycan in bone, belongs to the family of leucine-rich repeat proteins of the extracellular matrix. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 16723–16729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nieduszynski, I.; Huckerby, T.N.; Dickenson, J.M.; Brown, G.M.; Tai, G.H.; Morris, H.G.; Eady, S. There are two major types of skeletal keratan sulphates. Biochem. J. 1990, 271, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Skandalis, S.; Theocharis, A.D.; Vynios, D.H.; Theocharis, D.A.; Papageorgakopoulou, N. Proteoglycans in human laryngeal cartilage. Identification of proteoglycan types in successive cartilage extracts with particular reference to aggregating proteoglycans. Biochimie 2004, 86, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kiani, C.; Chen, L.; Wu, Y.J.; Yee, A.J.; Yang, B.B. Structure and function of aggrecan. Cell Res. 2002, 12, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fischer, D.; Haubeck, H.D.; Eich, K.; Kolbe-Busch, S.; Stocker, G.; Stuhlsatz, H.W.; Greiling, H. A novel keratan sulphate domain preferentiallyexpressed on the large aggregating proteoglycan from human articularcartilage is recognized by the monoclonal antibody 3D12/H7. Biochem. J. 1996, 318, 1051–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Melrose, J. Keratan sulfate (KS)-proteoglycans and neuronal regulation in health and disease: The importance of KS-glycodynamics and interactive capability with neuroregulatory ligands. J. Neurochem. 2019, 149, 170–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Funderburgh, J. Keratan sulfate: Structure, biosynthesis, and function. Glycobiology 2000, 19, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hanisch, F.; Uhlenbruck, G.; Peter-Katalinic, J.; Egge, H.; Dabrowski, U.; Dabrowski, J. Unbranched polylactosamino-O-glycans on human skim milk mucins exhibit Gal beta(1-4)GlcNAc beta(1-6) repeating units. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1989, 43, 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  62. Craig, F.; Ralphs, J.R.; Bentley, G.; Archer, C.W. MZ15, a monoclonal antibody recognizing keratan sulphate, stains chick tendon. Histochem. J. 1987, 19, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hayes, A.; Melrose, J. Keratan Sulphate in the Tumour Environment. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1245, 39–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Leiphrakpam, P.; Patil, P.P.; Remmers, N.; Swanson, B.; Grandgenett, P.M.; Qiu, F.; Yu, F.; Radhakrishnan, P. Role of keratan sulfate expression in human pancreatic cancer malignancy. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kato, Y.; Hayatsu, N.; Kaneko, M.K.; Ogasawara, S.; Hamano, T.; Takahashi, S.; Nishikawa, R.; Matsutani, M.; Mishima, K.; Narimatsu, H. Increased expression of highly sulfated keratan sulfate synthesized in malignant astrocytic tumors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 369, 1041–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hayatsu, N.; Ogasawara, S.; Kaneko, M.K.; Kato, Y.; Narimatsu, H. Expression of highly sulfated keratan sulfate synthesized in human glioblastoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 368, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aplin, J.; Hey, N.A.; Graham, R.A. Human endometrial MUC1 carries keratan sulfate: Characteristic glycoforms in the luminal epithelium at receptivity. Glycobiology 1998, 8, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Takahashi, K.; Stamenkovic, I.; Cutler, M.; Dasgupta, A.; Tanabe, K.K. Keratan Sulfate Modification of CD44 Modulates Adhesion to Hyaluronate. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 9490–9496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Caterson, B.; Christner, J.E.; Baker, J.R. Identification of a monoclonal antibody that specifically recognizes corneal and skeletal keratan sulfate. Monoclonal antibodies to cartilage proteoglycan. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 8848–8854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mehmet, H.; Scudder, P.; Tang, P.W.; Hounsell, E.F.; Caterson, B.; Feizi, T. The antigenic determinants recognized by three monoclonal antibodies to keratan sulphate involve sulphated hepta- or larger oligosaccharides ofthe poly(N-acetyllactosamine) series. Eur. J. Biochem. 1986, 157, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nakao, H.; Nagai, Y.; Kojima, A.; Toyoda, H.; Kawasaki, N.; Kawasaki, T. Binding specificity of R-10G and TRA-1-60/81, and substrate specificityof keratanase II studied with chemically synthesized oligosaccharides. Glycoconj. J. 2017, 34, 789–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Makanga, J.; Kobayashi, M.; Ikeda, H.; Christianto, A.; Toyoda, H.; Yamada, M.; Kawasaki, T.; Inazu, T. Generation of rat induced pluripotent stemcells using a plasmid vector and possible application of a keratan sulfateglycan recognizing antibody in discriminating teratoma formation pheno-types. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 38, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kawabe, K.; Tateyama, D.; Toyoda, H.; Kawasaki, N.; Hashii, N.; Nakao, H.; Matsumoto, S.; Nonaka, M.; Matsumura, H.; Hirose, Y.; et al. A novel antibody for human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells recognizes a type of keratan sulfate lacking oversulfated structures. Glycobiology 2013, 23, 322–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hoshino, H.; Chen, Y.Y.; Inoue, D.; Yoshida, Y.; Khoo, K.H.; Akama, T.O.; Kobayashi, M. Expression of low-sulfated keratan sulfate in non-mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Glycobiology 2024, 34, cwad056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Muramoto, A.; Hoshino, H.; Inamura, S.; Murahashi, M.; Akama, T.O.; Terada, N.; Kobayashi, M. Expression of Podocalyxin Potentially Decorated with Low-sulfated Keratan Sulfate in Human Testicular Embryonal Carcinoma. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2024, 72, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Baker, J.; Walker, T.; Morrison, K.; Neame, P.; Christner, J. The specificity of a mouse monoclonal antibody to human aorta proteoglycans. Matrix 1989, 9, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sinouris, E.; Skandalis, S.S.; Kilia, V.; Theocharis, A.D.; Theocharis, D.A.; Ravazoula, P.; Vynios, D.H.; Papageorgakopoulou, N. Keratan sulfate-containing proteoglycans in sheep brain with particular reference to phosphacan and synaptic vesicle proteoglycan isoforms. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2009, 23, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Scranton, T.; Iwata, M.; Carlson, S.S. The SV2 protein of synaptic vesicles is a keratan sulfate proteoglycan. J. Neurochem. 1993, 61, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Papageorgakopoulou, N.; Theocharis, A.D.; Skandalis, S.S.; Vynios, D.H.; Theocharis, D.A.; Tsiganos, C.P. Immunological studies of sheep brain keratan sulphate proteoglycans. Biochimie 2002, 84, 1225–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Okumura, M.; Tagami, M.; Fujinaga, T. Consideration of the role of antigenic keratan sulphate reacting to a 1/14/16H9 antibody as a molecular marker to monitor cartilage metabolism in horses. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2000, 62, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Okumura, M.; Fujinaga, T. Establishment of a monoclonal antibody (1/14/16H9) for detection of equine keratan sulfate. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1998, 59, 1203–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hayes, A.; Melrose, J. Immunolocalization of Keratan Sulfate in Rat Spinal Tissues Using the Keratanase Generated BKS-1(+) Neoepitope: Correlation of Expression Patterns with the Class II SLRPs, Lumican and Keratocan. Cells 2020, 9, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Adewumi, O.; Aflatoonian, B.; Ahrlund-Richter, L.; Amit, M.; Andrews, P.W.; Beighton, G.; Bello, P.A.; Benvenisty, N.; Berry, L.S.; Bevan, S.; et al. Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 803–816. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Andrews, P.; Banting, G.; Damjanov, I.; Arnaud, D.; Avner, P. Three monoclonal antibodies defining distinct differentiation antigens associated with different high molecular weight polypeptides on the surface of human embryonal carcinoma cells. Hybridoma 1984, 3, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Badcock, G.; Pigott, C.; Goepel, J.; Andrews, P.W. The human embryonal carcinoma marker antigen TRA-1-60 is a sialylated keratan sulfate proteoglycan. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 4715–4719. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Natunen, S.; Satomaa, T.; Pitkanen, V.; Salo, H.; Mikkola, M.; Natunen, J.; Otonkoski, T.; Valmu, L. The binding specificity of the marker antibodies Tra-1-60 and Tra-1-81 reveals a novel pluripotency-associated type 1 lactosamine epitope. Glycobiology 2011, 21, 1125–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Schopperle, W.; DeWolf, W.C. The TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81 human pluripotent stem cell markers are expressed on podocalyxin in embryonal carcinoma. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kaneko, M.; Ohishi, T.; Kawada, M.; Kato, Y. A cancer-specific anti-podocalyxin monoclonal antibody (60-mG2a-f) exerts antitumor effects in mouse xenograft models of pancreatic carcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2020, 24, 100826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ozawa, M.; Muramatsu, T.; Solter, D. SSEA-1, a stage-specific embryonic antigen of the mouse, is carried by the glycoprotein-bound large carbohydrate in embryonal carcinoma cells. Cell Differ. 1985, 16, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Feizi, T.; Kabat, E.A.; Vicari, G.; Anderson, B.; Marsh, W.L. Immunochemical studies on blood groups.XLIX. The I antigen complex: Specificity differences among anti-I sera revealed by quantitative precipitin studies; partial structure of the I determinant specific for one anti-I serum. J. Immunol. 1971, 106, 1578–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Feizi, T.; Childs, R.A.; Watanabe, K.; Hakomori, S.I. Three types of blood group I specificity among monoclonal anti-I autoantibodies revealed by analogues of a branched erythrocyte glycolipid. J. Exp. Med. 1979, 149, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Young, R.; Akama, T.O.; Liskova, P.; Ebenezer, N.D.; Allan, B.; Kerr, B.; Caterson, B.; Fukuda, M.N.; Quantock, A.J. Differential immunogold localisation of sulphated and unsulphated keratan sulphate proteoglycans in normal and macular dystrophy cornea using sulphation motif-specific antibodies. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 127, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Young, R.; Gealy, E.C.; Liles, M.; Caterson, B.; Ralphs, J.R.; Quantock, A.J. Keratan sulfate glycosaminoglycan and the association with collagen fibrils in rudimentary lamellae in the developing avian cornea. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 3083–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fukuma, M.; Abe, H.; Okita, H.; Yamada, T.; Hata, J. Monoclonal antibody 4C4-mAb specifically recognizes keratan sulphate proteoglycan on human embryonal carcinoma cells. J. Pathol. 2003, 201, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Symbol Nomenclature for Glycans (SNFG). Symbol Nomenclature for Graphical Representation of Glycans. Glycobiology 2015, 25, 1323–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Symbol Nomenclature for Glycans (SNFG). Updates to the Symbol Nomenclature for Glycans guidelines. Glycobiology 2019, 29, 620–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Johnson, J.; Young, T.L.; Rada, J.A. Small leucine rich repeat proteoglycans (SLRPs) in the human sclera: Identification of abundant levels of PRELP. Mol. Vis. 2006, 12, 1057–1066. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Barry, F.; Rosenberg, L.C.; Gaw, J.U.; Gaw, J.U.; Koob, T.J.; Neame, P.J. N- and O-linked keratan sulfate on the hyaluronan binding region of aggrecan from mature and immature bovine cartilage. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 20516–20524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Fosang, A.; Last, K.; Poon, C.J.; Plaas, A.H. Keratan sulphate in the interglobular domain has a microstructure that is distinct from keratan sulphate elsewhere on pig aggrecan. Matrix Biol. 2009, 28, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hayashida, Y.; Akama, T.O.; Beecher, N.; Lewis, P.; Young, R.D.; Meek, K.M.; Kerr, B.; Hughes, C.; Caterson, B.; Tanigami, A.; et al. Matrix morphogenesis in cornea is mediated by the modification of keratan sulfate by GlcNAc 6-O-sulfotransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 13333–13338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Linden, S.; Sutton, P.; Karlsson, N.G.; Korolik, V.; McGuckin, M.A. Mucins in the mucosal barrier to infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2008, 1, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y. Mucin Glycans: A Target for Cancer Therapy. Molecules 2023, 28, 7033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hollingsworth, M.; Swanson, B.J. Mucins in cancer: Protection and control of the cell surface. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chugh, S.; Gnanapragassam, V.S.; Jain, M.; Rachagani, S.; Ponnusamy, M.P.; Batra, S.K. Pathobiological implications of mucin glycans in cancer: Sweet poison and novel targets. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1856, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Thomsson, K.; Vitiazeva, V.; Mateoiu, C.; Jin, C.; Liu, J.; Holgersson, J.; Weijdegård, B.; Sundfeldt, K.; Karlsson, N.G. Sulfation of O-glycans on Mucin-type Proteins From Serous Ovarian Epithelial Tumors. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2021, 20, 100150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Carpenter, J.; Kesimer, M. Membrane-bound mucins of the airway mucosal surfaces are densely decorated with keratan sulfate: Revisiting their role in the Lung’s innate defense. Glycobiology 2021, 31, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Croce, M.; Rabassa, M.E.; Price, M.R.; Segal-Eiras, A. MUC1 mucin and carbohydrate associated antigens as tumor markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2001, 7, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wilczak, M.; Surman, M.; Przybyło, M. Altered Glycosylation in Progression and Management of Bladder Cancer. Molecules 2023, 28, 3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Melrose, J. Keratan Sulfate, An Electrosensory Neurosentient Bioresponsive Cell Instructive Glycosaminoglycan. Glycobiology 2024, 34, cwae014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cavalcante, L.; Garcia-Abreu, J.; Mendes, F.A.; Moura Neto, V.; Silva, L.C.; Onofre, G.; Weissmüller, G.; Carvalho, S.L. Sulfated proteoglycans as modulators of neuronal migration and axonal decussation in the developing midbrain. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2003, 36, 993–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Takeda-Uchimura, Y.; Uchimura, K.; Sugimura, T.; Yanagawa, Y.; Kawasaki, T.; Komatsu, Y.; Kadomatsu, K. Requirement of keratan sulfate proteoglycan phosphacan with a specific sulfation pattern for critical period plasticity in the visual cortex. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 274, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Killick, R.; Richardson, G.P. Antibodies to the sulphated, high molecular mass mouse tectorin stain hair bundles and the olfactory mucus layer. Hear. Res. 1997, 103, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Fischer, D.; Kuth, A.; Winkler, M.; Handt, S.; Hauptmann, S.; Rath, W.; Haubeck, H.D. A large keratan sulfate proteoglycan present in human cervical mucous appears to be involved in the reorganization of the cervical extracellular matrix at term. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig. 2001, 8, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hoadley, M.; Seif, M.W.; Aplin, J.D. Menstrual-cycle-dependent expression of keratan sulphate in human endometrium. Biochem. J. 1990, 266, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hayes, A.; Melrose, J. Glycans and glycosaminoglycans in neurobiology: Key regulators of neuronal cell function and fate. Biochem. J. 2018, 475, 2511–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nia, H.; Ortiz, C.; Grodzinsky, A. Aggrecan: Approaches to Study Biophysical and Biomechanical Properties. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2303, 209–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Chandran, P.; Horkay, F. Aggrecan, an unusual polyelectrolyte: Review of solution behavior and physiological implications. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Plaas, A.; Moran, M.M.; Sandy, J.D.; Hascall, V.C. Aggrecan and Hyaluronan: The Infamous Cartilage Polyelectrolytes—Then and Now. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2023, 1402, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wang, C.; Kahle, E.R.; Li, Q.; Han, L. Nanomechanics of Aggrecan: A New Perspective on Cartilage Biomechanics, Disease and Regeneration. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2023, 1402, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nia, H.; Han, L.; Bozchalooi, I.S.; Roughley, P.; Youcef-Toumi, K.; Grodzinsky, A.J.; Ortiz, C. Aggrecan nanoscale solid-fluid interactions are a primary determinant of cartilage dynamic mechanical properties. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2614–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Eschweiler, J.; Horn, N.; Rath, B.; Betsch, M.; Baroncini, A.; Tingart, M.; Migliorini, F.T. The Biomechanics of Cartilage—An Overview. Life 2021, 11, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Donnan, F. “Theorie der Membrangleichgewichte und Membranpotentiale bei Vorhandensein von nicht dialysierenden Elektrolyten. Ein Beitrag zur physikalisch-chemischen Physiologie” [The theory of membrane equilibrium and membrane potential in the presence of a non-dialyzable electrolyte. A contribution to physical-chemical physiology]. Z. Elektrochem. Angew. Phys. Chem. 1911, 17, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Huang, K.; Wu, L.D. Aggrecanase and aggrecan degradation in osteoarthritis: A review. J. Int. Med. Res. 2008, 36, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Arner, E. Aggrecanase-mediated cartilage degradation. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2002, 2, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Morawski, M.; Brückner, G.; Arendt, T.; Matthews, R.T. Aggrecan: Beyond cartilage and into the brain. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 690–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rowlands, D.; Lensjø, K.K.; Dinh, T.; Yang, S.; Andrews, M.R.; Hafting, T.; Fyhn, M.; Fawcett, J.W.; Dick, G. Aggrecan Directs Extracellular Matrix-Mediated Neuronal Plasticity. J. Neurosci. 2018, 38, 10102–10113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Hayes, A.; Melrose, J. Aggrecan, the Primary Weight-Bearing Cartilage Proteoglycan, Has Context-Dependent, Cell-Directive Properties in Embryonic Development and Neurogenesis: Aggrecan Glycan Side Chain Modifications Convey Interactive Biodiversity. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Koch, C.; Lee, C.M.; Apte, S.S. Aggrecan in Cardiovascular Development and Disease. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2020, 68, 777–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Bartholome, O.; Van den Ackerveken, P.; Sanchez Gil, J.; de la Brassinne Bonardeaux, O.; Leprince, P.; Franzen, R.; Rogister, B. Puzzling Out Synaptic Vesicle 2 Family Members Functions. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dunn, A.R.; Stout, K.A.; Ozawa, M.; Lohr, K.M.; Hoffman, C.A.; Bernstein, A.I.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Sgobio, C.; Sastry, N.; et al. Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2C (SV2C) modulates dopamine release and is disrupted in Parkinson disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E2253–E2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Reigada, D.; Diez-Perez, I.; Gorostiza, P.; Verdaguer, A.; Gomez de Aranda, I.; Pineda, O.; Vilarrasa, J.; Marsal, J.; Blasi, J.; Aleu, J.; et al. Control of neurotransmitter release by an internal gel matrix in synaptic vesicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 3485–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Nowack, A.; Yao, J.; Custer, K.L.; Bajjalieh, S.M. SV2 regulates neurotransmitter release via multiple mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2010, 299, C960–C967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Wan, Q.F.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Thakur, P.; Vila, A.; Sherry, D.M.; Janz, R.; Heidelberger, R. SV2 acts via presynaptic calcium to regulate neurotransmitter release. Neuron 2010, 66, 884–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Pyle, R.A.; Schivell, A.E.; Hidaka, H.; Bajjalieh, S.M. Phosphorylation of synaptic vesicle protein 2 modulates binding to synaptotagmin. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 17195–17200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Carlson, S. SV2proteoglycan: A potential synaptic vesicle transporter and nerve terminal extracellular matrix receptor. Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol. 1996, 3, 373–386. [Google Scholar]
  136. Sudhof, T. A molecular machine for neurotransmitter release: Synaptotagmin and beyond. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1227–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bajjalieh, S.; Frantz, G.D.; Weimann, J.M.; McConnell, S.K.; Scheller, R.H. Differential expression of synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2) isoforms. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14, 5223–5235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Vogl, C.; Tanifuji, S.; Danis, B.; Daniels, V.; Foerch, P.; Wolff, C.; Whalley, B.J.; Mochida, S.; Stephens, G.J. Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A modulates vesicular release and calcium channel function at peripheral sympathetic synapses. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2015, 41, 398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Morgans, C.; Kensel-Hammes, P.; Hurley, J.B.; Burton, K.; Idzerda, R.; McKnight, G.S.; Bajjalieh, S.M. Loss of the Synaptic Vesicle Protein SV2B results in reduced neurotransmission and altered synaptic vesicle protein expression in the retina. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. von Kriegstein, K.; Schmitz, F. The expression pattern and assembly profile of synaptic membrane proteins in ribbon synapses of the developing mouse retina. Cell Tissue Res. 2003, 311, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Von Kriegstein, K.; Schmitz, F.; Link, E.; Sudhof, T.C. Distribution of synaptic vesicle proteins in the mammalian retina identifies obligatory and facultative components of ribbon synapses. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1999, 11, 1335–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Stout, K.; Dunn, A.R.; Hoffman, C.; Miller, G.W. The Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2: Structure, Function, and Disease Relevance. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 3927–3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Maurel, P.; Rauch, U.; Flad, M.; Margolis, R.K.; Margolis, R.U. Phosphacan, a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan of brain that interacts with neurons and neural cell-adhesion molecules, is an extracellular variant of a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 2512–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Garwood, J.; Schnädelbach, O.; Clement, A.; Schütte, K.; Bach, A.; Faissner, A. DSD-1-proteoglycan is the mouse homolog of phosphacan and displays opposing effects on neurite outgrowth dependent on neuronal lineage. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 3888–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Faissner, A.; Heck, N.; Dobbertin, A.; Garwood, J. DSD-1-Proteoglycan/Phosphacan and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase-beta isoforms during development and regeneration of neural tissues. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2006, 557, 25–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Garwood, J.; Heck, N.; Reichardt, F.; Faissner, A. Phosphacan short isoform, a novel non-proteoglycan variant of phosphacan/receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase-beta, interacts with neuronal receptors and promotes neurite outgrowth. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 24164–24173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Hayashi, N.; Mizusaki, M.J.; Kamei, K.; Harada, S.; Miyata, S. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan phosphacan associates with parallel fibers and modulates axonal extension and fasciculation of cerebellar granule cells. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2005, 30, 364–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Fujikawa, A.; Chow, J.P.H.; Matsumoto, M.; Suzuki, R.; Kuboyama, K.; Yamamoto, N.; Noda, M. Identification of novel splicing variants of protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type Z. J. Biochem. 2017, 162, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Dino, M.; Harroch, S.; Hockfield, S.; Matthews, R.T. Monoclonal antibody Cat-315 detects a glycoform of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase beta/phosphacan early in CNS development that localizes to extrasynaptic sites prior to synapse formation. Neuroscience 2006, 142, 1055–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ida, M.; Shuo, T.; Hirano, K.; Tokita, Y.; Nakanishi, K.; Matsui, F.; Aono, S.; Fujita, H.; Fujiwara, Y.; Kaji, T.; et al. Identification and functions of chondroitin sulfate in the milieu of neural stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 5982–5991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Maeda, N.; Noda, M. 6B4 proteoglycan/phosphacan is a repulsive substratum but promotes morphological differentiation of cortical neurons. Development 1996, 122, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Maeda, N. Proteoglycans and neuronal migration in the cerebral cortex during development and disease. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Grumet, M.; Friedlander, D.R.; Sakurai, T. Functions of brain chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans during developments: Interactions with adhesion molecules. Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol. 1996, 3, 319–330. [Google Scholar]
  154. Harroch, S.; Furtado, G.C.; Brueck, W.; Rosenbluth, J.; Lafaille, J.; Chao, M.; Buxbaum, J.D.; Schlessinger, J. A critical role for the protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type Z in functional recovery from demyelinating lesions. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Harroch, S.; Palmeri, M.; Rosenbluth, J.; Custer, A.; Okigaki, M.; Shrager, P.; Blum, M.; Buxbaum, J.D.; Schlessinger, J. No obvious abnormality in mice deficient in receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase beta. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 7706–7715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Kuboyama, K.; Fujikawa, A.; Suzuki, R.; Tanga, N.; Noda, M. Role of Chondroitin Sulfate (CS) Modification in the Regulation of Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor Type Z (PTPRZ) Activity: Pleiotrophin-PTPRZ signalling is involved in oligodendrocyte differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 18117–18128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kadomatsu, K.; Kishida, S.; Tsubota, S. The heparin-binding growth factor midkine: The biological activities and candidate receptors. J. Biochem. 2013, 153, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Sinha, A.; Kawakami, J.; Cole, K.S.; Ladutska, A.; Nguyen, M.Y.; Zalmai, M.S.; Holder, B.L.; Broerman, V.M.; Matthews, R.T.; Bouyain, S. Protein-protein interactions between tenascin-R and RPTPζ/phosphacan are critical to maintain the architecture of perineuronal nets. J. Biol. Chem. 2023, 299, 104952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Bouyain, S.; Watkins, D.J. The protein tyrosine phosphatases PTPRZ and PTPRG bind to distinct members of the contactin family of neural recognition molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2443–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Nikolaienko, R.; Hammel, M.; Dubreuil, V.; Zalmai, R.; Hall, D.R.; Mehzabeen, N.; Karuppan, S.J.; Harroch, S.; Stella, S.L.; Bouyain, S. Structural Basis for Interactions Between Contactin Family Members and Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor Type G in Neural Tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 21335–21349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Holland, S.; Peles, E.; Pawson, T.; Schlessinger, J. Cell-contact-dependent signalling in axon growth and guidance: Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase beta. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1998, 8, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Vitureira, N.; Andres, R.; Perez-Martinez, E.; Martinez, A.; Bribian, A.; Blasi, J.; Chelliah, S.; Lopez-Domenech, G.; De Castro, F.; Burgaya, F.; et al. Podocalyxin is a novel polysialylated neural adhesion protein with multiple roles in neural development and synapse formation. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Vitureira, N.; McNagny, K.; Soriano, E.; Burgaya, F. Pattern of expression of the podocalyxin gene in the mouse brain during development. Gene Expr. Patterns 2005, 5, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Toyoda, H.; Nagai, Y.; Kojima, A.; Kinoshita-Toyoda, A. Podocalyxin as a major pluripotent marker and novel keratan sulfate proteoglycan in human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Glycoconj. J. 2017, 34, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Binder, Z.A.; Siu, I.M.; Eberhart, C.G.; Ap Rhys, C.; Bai, R.Y.; Staedtke, V.; Zhang, H.; Smoll, N.R.; Piantadosi, S.; Piccirillo, S.G.; et al. Podocalyxin-like protein is expressed in glioblastoma multiforme stem-like cells and is associated with poor outcome. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hayatsu, N.; Kaneko, M.K.; Mishima, K.; Nishikawa, R.; Matsutani, M.; Price, J.E.; Kato, Y. Podocalyxin expression in malignant astrocytic tumors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 374, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. He, J.; Liu, Y.; Xie, X.; Zhu, T.; Soules, M.; DiMeco, F.; Vescovi, A.L.; Fan, X.; Lubman, D.M. Identification of cell surface glycoprotein markers for glioblastoma-derived stem-like cells using a lectin microarray and LC-MS/MS approach. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 2565–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Liu, B.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, Y. Podocalyxin promotes glioblastoma multiforme cell invasion and proliferation by inhibiting angiotensin-(1-7)/Mas signaling. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 2583–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Liu, Y.; Yang, L.; Liu, B.; Jiang, Y.G. Podocalyxin promotes glioblastoma multiforme cell invasion and proliferation via beta-catenin signaling. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Nielsen, J.S.; McNagny, K.M. The role of podocalyxin in health and disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 1669–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Qi, R.; Zhu, X.; Huang, C.; Cheng, S.; Wang, S.; Qi, X. Prognostic role of podocalyxin-like protein expression in various cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 52457–52464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Kwon, S.E.; Chapman, E.R. Synaptophysin regulates the kinetics of synaptic vesicle endocytosis in central neurons. Neuron 2011, 70, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Bykhovskaia, M. Synapsin regulation of vesicle organization and functional pools. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Cesca, F.; Baldelli, P.; Valtorta, F.; Benfenati, F. The synapsins: Key actors of synapse function and plasticity. Prog. Neurobiol. 2010, 91, 313–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Fornasiero, E.F.; Bonanomi, D.; Benfenati, F.; Valtorta, F. The role of synapsins in neuronal development. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 1383–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Song, S.H.; Augustine, G.J. Synapsin Isoforms and Synaptic Vesicle Trafficking. Mol. Cells 2015, 38, 936–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Svensson, L.; Narlid, I.; Oldberg, A. Fibromodulin and lumican bind to the same region on collagen type I fibrils. FEBS Lett. 2000, 470, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kalamajski, S.; Oldberg, A. Homologous sequence in lumican and fibromodulin leucine-rich repeat 5–7 competes for collagen binding. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Tillgren, V.; Morgelin, M.; Onnerfjord, P.; Kalamajski, S.; Aspberg, A. The Tyrosine Sulfate Domain of Fibromodulin Binds Collagen and Enhances Fibril Formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 23744–23755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Tillgren, V.; Onnerfjord, P.; Haglund, L.; Heinegard, D. The tyrosine sulfate-rich domains of the LRR proteins fibromodulin and osteoadherin bind motifs of basic clusters in a variety of heparin-binding proteins, including bioactive factors. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 28543–28553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Hildebrand, A.; Romaris, M.; Rasmussen, L.M.; Heinegard, D.; Twardzik, D.R.; Border, W.A.; Ruoslahti, E. Interaction of the small interstitial proteoglycans biglycan, decorin and fibromodulin with transforming growth factor beta. Biochem. J. 1994, 302, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Sjoberg, A.; Onnerfjord, P.; Morgelin, M.; Heinegard, D.; Blom, A.M. The extracellular matrix and inflammation: Fibromodulin activates the classical pathway of complement by directly binding C1q. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 32301–32308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Niewiarowska, J.; Brezillon, S.; Sacewicz-Hofman, I.; Bednarek, R.; Maquart, F.X.; Malinowski, M.; Wiktorska, M.; Wegrowski, Y.; Cierniewski, C.S. Lumican inhibits angiogenesis by interfering with alpha2beta1 receptor activity and downregulating MMP-14 expression. Thromb. Res. 2011, 128, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Stasiak, M.; Boncela, J.; Perreau, C.; Karamanou, K.; Chatron-Colliet, A.; Proult, I.; Przygodzka, P.; Chakravarti, S.; Maquart, F.X.; Kowalska, M.A.; et al. Lumican Inhibits SNAIL-Induced Melanoma Cell Migration Specifically by Blocking MMP-14 Activity. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Pietraszek, K.; Chatron-Colliet, A.; Brezillon, S.; Perreau, C.; Jakubiak-Augustyn, A.; Krotkiewski, H.; Maquart, F.X.; Wegrowski, Y. Lumican: A new inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-14 activity. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 4319–4324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Bengtsson, E.; Neame, P.J.; Heinegard, D.; Sommarin, Y. The primary structure of a basic leucine-rich repeat protein, PRELP, found in connective tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 25639–25644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Grover, J.; Chen, X.-N.; Korenberg, J.R.; Recklies, A.D.; Roughley, P.J. The gene organization, chromosome location, and expression of a 55-kDa matrix protein (PRELP) of human articular cartilage. Genomics 1996, 38, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Bengtsson, E.; Mörgelin, M.; Sasaki, T.; Timpl, R.; Heinegård, D.; Aspberg, A. The leucine-rich repeat protein PRELP binds perlecan and collagens and may function as a basement membrane anchor. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 15061–15068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Castells, X.; García-Gómez, J.M.; Navarro, A.; Acebes, J.J.; Godino, O.; Boluda, S.; Barceló, A.; Robles, M.; Ariño, J.; Arús, C. Automated brain tumor biopsy prediction using single-labeling cDNA microarrays-based gene expression profiling. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 2009, 18, 206–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Castells, X.; Acebes, J.J.; Boluda, S.; Moreno-Torres, A.; Pujol, J.; Julià-Sapé, M.; Candiota, A.P.; Ariño, J.; Barceló, A.; Arús, C. Development of a predictor for human brain tumors based on gene expression values obtained from two types of microarray technologies. OMICS 2010, 14, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Doppler, K.; Lindner, A.; Schütz, W.; Schütz, M.; Bornemann, A. Gain and loss of extracellular molecules in sporadic inclusion body myositis and polymyositis—A proteomics-based study. Brain Pathol. 2012, 22, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Horiguchi, K.; Syaidah, R.; Fujiwara, K.; Tsukada, T.; Ramadhani, D.; Jindatip, D.; Kikuchi, M.; Yashiro, T. Expression of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in rat anterior pituitary gland. Cell Tissue Res. 2013, 351, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Capulli, M.; Olstad, O.K.; Onnerfjord, P.; Tillgren, V.; Muraca, M.; Gautvik, K.M.; Heinegård, D.; Rucci, N.; Teti, A. The C-terminal domain of chondroadherin: A new regulator of osteoclast motility counteracting bone loss. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014, 29, 1833–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Gesteira, T.; Verma, S.; Coulson-Thomas, V.J. Small leucine rich proteoglycans: Biology, function and their therapeutic potential in the ocular surface. Ocul. Surf. 2023, 29, 521–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Lin, W.; Zhu, X.; Gao, L.; Mao, M.; Gao, D.; Huang, Z. Osteomodulin positively regulates osteogenesis through interaction with BMP2. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Zhao, W.; von Kroge, S.; Jadzic, J.; Milovanovic, P.; Sihota, P.; Luther, J.; Brylka, L.; von Brackel, F.N.; Bockamp, E.; Busse, B.; et al. Osteomodulin deficiency in mice causes a specific reduction of transversal cortical bone size. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2024, 39, 1025–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Tashima, T.; Nagatoishi, S.; Sagara, H.; Ohnuma, S.; Tsumoto, K. Osteomodulin regulates diameter and alters shape of collagen fibrils. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 463, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Matsushima, N.; Takatsuka, S.; Miyashita, H.; Kretsinger, R.H. Leucine Rich Repeat Proteins: Sequences, Mutations, Structures and Diseases. Protein Pept. Lett. 2019, 26, 108–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Deckx, S.; Heymans, S.; Papageorgiou, A.P. The diverse functions of osteoglycin: A deceitful dwarf, or a master regulator of disease? FASEB J. 2016, 30, 2651–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Lee, N.; Ali, N.; Zhang, L.; Qi, Y.; Clarke, I.; Enriquez, R.F.; Brzozowska, M.; Lee, I.C.; Rogers, M.J.; Laybutt, D.R.; et al. Osteoglycin, a novel coordinator of bone and glucose homeostasis. Mol. Metab. 2018, 13, 30–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Hayes, A.; Melrose, J. HS, an Ancient Molecular Recognition and Information Storage Glycosaminoglycan, Equips HS-Proteoglycans with Diverse Matrix and Cell-Interactive Properties Operative in Tissue Development and Tissue Function in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Esko, J.; Lindahl, U. Molecular diversity of heparan sulfate. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 108, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Lortat-Jacob, H.; Grosdidier, A.; Imberty, A. Structural diversity of heparan sulfate binding domains in chemokines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 1229–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Gabius, H. Cell surface glycans: The why and how of their functionality as biochemical signals in lectin-mediated information transfer. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 26, 43–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Gallagher, J. Structure-activity relationship of heparan sulphate. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1997, 25, 1206–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Bernfield, M.; Gotte, M.; Park, P.W.; Reizes, O.; Fitzgerald, M.L.; Lincecum, J.; Zako, M. Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68, 729–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Townley, R.; Bulow, H.E. Deciphering functional glycosaminoglycan motifs in development. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2018, 50, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Tumova, S.; Woods, A.; Couchman, J.R. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the cell surface: Versatile coordinators of cellular functions. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2000, 32, 269–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Kreuger, J.; Kjellén, L. Heparan sulfate biosynthesis: Regulation and variability. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60, 898–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Turnbull, J.; Powell, A.; Guimond, S. Heparan sulfate: Decoding a dynamic multifunctional cell regulator. Trends Cell Biol. 2001, 11, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Turnbull, J.; Miller, R.L.; Ahmed, Y.; Puvirajesinghe, T.M.; Guimond, S.E. Glycomics profiling of heparan sulfate structure and activity. Methods Enzymol. 2010, 480, 65–85. [Google Scholar]
  212. Turnbull, J.E. Heparan sulfate glycomics: Towards systems biology strategies. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010, 38, 1356–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Whitelock, J.; Iozzo, R.V.; Whitelock, J.; Iozzo, R.V. Heparan sulfate: A complex polymer charged with biological activity. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2745–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Misra, J.; Irvine, K.D. The Hippo signaling network and its biological functions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2018, 52, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Milton, C.; Grusche, F.A.; Degoutin, J.L.; Yu, E.; Dai, Q.; Lai, E.C.; Harvey, K.F. The Hippo pathway regulates hematopoiesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 2673–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Santucci, M.; Vignudelli, T.; Ferrari, S.; Mor, M.; Scalvini, L.; Bolognesi, M.L.; Uliassi, E.; Costi, M.P. The Hippo Pathway and YAP/TAZ-TEAD Protein-Protein Interaction as Targets for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Treatment. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 4857–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Pandya, M.; Gopinathan, G.; Tillberg, C.; Wang, J.; Luan, X.; Diekwisch, T.G.H. The Hippo Pathway Effectors YAP/TAZ Are Essential for Mineralized Tissue Homeostasis in the Alveolar Bone/Periodontal Complex. J. Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Stepan, J.; Anderzhanova, E.; Gassen, N.C. Hippo Signaling: Emerging Pathway in Stress-Related Psychiatric Disorders? Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Wada, K.; Itoga, K.; Okano, T.; Yonemura, S.; Sasaki, H. Hippo pathway regulation by cell morphology andstress fibers. Development 2011, 138, 3907–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Thompson, S.; Fernig, D.G.; Jesudason, E.C.; Losty, P.D.; van de Westerlo, E.M.; van Kuppevelt, T.H.; Turnbull, J.E. Heparan sulfate phage display antibodies identify distinct epitopes with complex binding characteristics: Insights into protein binding specificities. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 5621–5631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. van Kuppevelt, T.; Dennissen, M.A.; van Venrooij, W.J.; Hoet, R.M.; Veerkamp, J.H. Generation and application of type-specific anti-heparan sulfate antibodies using phage display technology. Further evidence for heparan sulfate heterogeneity in the kidney. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 12960–12966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Solari, V.; Rudd, T.R.; Guimond, S.E.; Powell, A.K.; Turnbull, J.E.; Yates, E.A. Heparan sulfate phage display antibodies recognise epitopes defined by a combination of sugar sequence and cation binding. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 6066–6072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Damen, L.; van de Westerlo, E.M.A.; Versteeg, E.M.M.; van Wessel, T.; Daamen, W.F.; van Kuppevelt, T.H. Construction and evaluation of an antibody phage display library targeting heparan sulfate. Glycoconj. J. 2020, 37, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Dennissen, M.; Jenniskens, G.J.; Pieffers, M.; Versteeg, E.M.; Petitou, M.; Veerkamp, J.H.; van Kuppevelt, T.H. Large, tissue-regulated domain diversity of heparan sulfates demonstrated by phage display antibodies. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 10982–10986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. van Kuppevelt, T. Phage display-derived antibodies: New tools to study heparan sulfate diversity. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2004, 85, A54–A55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Jenniskens, G.; Oosterhof, A.; Brandwijk, R.; Veerkamp, J.H.; van Kuppevelt, T.H. Heparan sulfate heterogeneity in skeletal muscle basal lamina: Demonstration by phage display-derived antibodies. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 4099–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Bernsen, M.; Smetsers, T.F.; van de Westerlo, E.; Ruiter, D.J.; Håkansson, L.; Gustafsson, B.; Van Kuppevelt, T.H.; Krysander, L.; Rettrup, B.; Håkansson, A. Heparan sulphate epitope-expression is associated with the inflammatory response in metastatic malignant melanoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2003, 52, 780–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Rudd, T.; Guimond, S.E.; Skidmore, M.A.; Duchesne, L.; Guerrini, M.; Torri, G.; Cosentino, C.; Brown, A.; Clarke, D.T.; Turnbull, J.E.; et al. Influence of substitution pattern and cation binding on conformation and activity in heparin derivatives. Glycobiology 2007, 17, 983–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Meneghetti, M.; Hughes, A.J.; Rudd, T.R.; Nader, H.B.; Powell, A.K.; Yates, E.A.; Lima, M.A. Heparan sulfate and heparin interactions with proteins. J. R. Soc. Interface 2015, 12, 0589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Xu, D.; Esko, J.D. Demystifying heparan sulfate-protein interactions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2014, 83, 129–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Kure, S.; Yoshie, O. A syngeneic monoclonal antibody to murine Meth-A sarcoma (HepSS-1) recognizes heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycan (HS-GAG): Cell density and transformation dependent alteration in cell surface HS-GAG defined by HepSS-1. J. Immunol. 1986, 137, 3900–3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. van den Born, J.; van den Heuvel, L.P.; Bakker, M.A.; Veerkamp, J.H.; Assmann, K.J.; Berden, J.H. Production and characterization of a monoclonal antibody against human glomerular heparan sulfate. Lab. Investig. 1991, 65, 287–289. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  233. van den Born, J.; van den Heuvel, L.P.; Bakker, M.A.; Veerkamp, J.H.; Assmann, K.J.; Berden, J.H. A monoclonal antibody against GBM heparan sulfate induces an acute selective proteinuria in rats. Kidney Int. 1992, 41, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. David, G.; Bai, X.M.; Van der Schueren, B.; Cassiman, J.J.; Van den Berghe, H. Developmental changes in heparan sulfate expression: In situ detection with mAbs. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 119, 961–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Born, J.; Jann, K.; Assmann, K.J.; Lindahl, U.; Berden, J.H. N-Acetylated domains in heparan sulfates revealed by a monoclonal antibody against the Escherichia coli K5 capsular polysaccharide. Distribution of the cognate epitope in normal human kidney and transplant kidney with chronic vascular rejection. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 22802–22809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Peters, H.; Jürs, M.; Jann, B.; Jann, K.; Timmis, K.N.; Bitter-Suermann, D. Monoclonal antibodies to enterobacterial common antigen and to Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide outer core: Demonstration of an antigenic determinant shared by enterobacterial common antigen and E. coli K5 capsular polysaccharide. Infect. Immun. 1985, 50, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. van den Born, J.; van den Heuvel, L.P.; Bakker, M.A.; Veerkamp, J.H.; Assmann, K.J.; Berden, J.H. Monoclonal antibodies against the protein core and glycosaminoglycan side chain of glomerular basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan: Characterization and immunohistological application in human tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1994, 42, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Kurup, S.; Wijnhoven, T.J.; Jenniskens, G.J.; Kimata, K.; Habuchi, H.; Li, J.P.; Lindahl, U.; van Kuppevelt, T.H.; Spillmann, D. Characterization of anti-heparan sulfate phage display antibodies AO4B08 and HS4E4. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 21032–21042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Eldridge, S.; Nalesso, G.; Ismail, H.; Vicente-Greco, K.; Kabouridis, P.; Ramachandran, M.; Niemeier, A.; Herz, J.; Pitzalis, C.; Perretti, M.; et al. Agrin mediates chondrocyte homeostasis and requires both LRP4 and α-dystroglycan to enhance cartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 1228–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Asai, N.; Ohkawara, B.; Ito, M.; Masuda, A.; Ishiguro, N.; Ohno, K. LRP4 induces extracellular matrix productions and facilitates chondrocyte differentiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 451, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Ohazama, A.; Porntaveetus, T.; Ota, M.S.; Herz, J.; Sharpe, P.T. Lrp4: A novel modulator of extracellular signaling in craniofacial organogenesis. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2010, 152A, 2974–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Van der Kraan, P.; Blaney Davidson, E.N.; van den Berg, W.B. Bone morphogenetic proteins and articular cartilage: To serve and protect or a wolf in sheep clothing’s? Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010, 18, 735–741, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Burgess, R.; Nguyen, Q.T.; Son, Y.J.; Lichtman, J.W.; Sanes, J.R. Alternatively spliced isoforms of nerve- and muscle-derived agrin: Their roles at the neuromuscular junction. Neuron 1999, 23, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Glass, D.; Yancopoulos, G.D. Sequential roles of agrin, MuSK and rapsyn during neuromuscular junction formation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1997, 7, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Prömer, J.; Barresi, C.; Herbst, R. From phosphorylation to phenotype—Recent key findings on kinase regulation, downstream signaling and disease surrounding the receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK. Cell Signal. 2023, 104, 110584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Kosco, E.; Jing, H.; Chen, P.; Xiong, W.C.; Samuels, I.S.; Mei, L. DOK7 Promotes NMJ Regeneration After Nerve Injury. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023, 60, 1453–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Herbst, R. MuSk function during health and disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2020, 716, 134676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Guarino, S.; Canciani, A.; Forneris, F. Dissecting the Extracellular Complexity of Neuromuscular Junction Organizers. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 6, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Ohkawara, B.; Ito, M.; Ohno, K. Secreted Signaling Molecules at the Neuromuscular Junction in Physiology and Pathology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Melrose, J. Perlecan, a modular instructive proteoglycan with diverse functional properties. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2020, 128, 105849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Kirn-Safran, C.; Farach-Carson, M.C.; Carson, D.D. Multifunctionality of extracellular and cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 3421–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Melrose, J.; Roughley, P.; Knox, S.; Smith, S.; Lord, M.; Whitelock, J. The structure, location, and function of perlecan, a prominent pericellular proteoglycan of fetal, postnatal, and mature hyaline cartilages. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 36905–36914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Gomes, R.J.; Farach-Carson, M.C.; Carson, D.D. Perlecan functions in chondrogenesis: Insights from in vitro and in vivo models. Cells Tissues Organs 2004, 176, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Hayes, A.; Lord, M.S.; Smith, S.M.; Smith, M.M.; Whitelock, J.M.; Weiss, A.S.; Melrose, J. Colocalization in vivo and association in vitro of perlecan and elastin. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2011, 136, 437–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Siegel, G.; Malmsten, M.; Ermilov, E. Anionic biopolyelectrolytes of the syndecan/perlecan superfamily: Physicochemical properties and medical significance. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 205, 275–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Wang, B.; Lai, X.; Price, C.; Thompson, W.R.; Li, W.; Quabili, T.R.; Tseng, W.J.; Liu, X.S.; Zhang, H.; Pan, J.; et al. Perlecan-containing pericellular matrix regulates solute transport and mechanosensing within the osteocyte lacunar-canalicular system. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014, 29, 878–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Hayes, A.; Farrugia, B.L.; Biose, I.J.; Bix, G.J.; Melrose, J. Perlecan, A Multi-Functional, Cell-Instructive, Matrix-Stabilizing Proteoglycan with Roles in Tissue Development Has Relevance to Connective Tissue Repair and Regeneration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 856261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Seppinen, L.; Pihlajaniemi, T. The multiple functions of collagen XVIII in development and disease. Matrix Biol. 2011, 30, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Myllyharju, J.; Kivirikko, K.I. Collagens and collagen-related diseases. Ann. Med. 2001, 33, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Gopal, S.; Arokiasamy, S.; Pataki, C.; Whiteford, J.R.; Couchman, J.R. Syndecan receptors: Pericellular regulators in development and inflammatory disease. Open Biol. 2021, 11, 200377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Alexopoulou, A.; Multhaupt, H.A.; Couchman, J.R. Syndecans in wound healing, inflammation and vascular biology. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 39, 505–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Fears, C.; Woods, A. The role of syndecans in disease and wound healing. Matrix Biol. 2006, 25, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Whitelock, J.; Melrose, J. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans in healthy and diseased systems. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2011, 3, 739–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Echtermeyer, F.; Bertrand, J.; Dreier, R.; Meinecke, I.; Neugebauer, K.; Fuerst, M.; Lee, Y.J.; Song, Y.W.; Herzog, C.; Theilmeier, G.; et al. Syndecan-4 regulates ADAMTS-5 activation and cartilage breakdown in osteoarthritis. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 1072–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Echtermeyer, F.; Betrand, J.; Meinecke, I.; Neugebauer, K.; Herzog, C.; Lee, Y.J.; Song, Y.W.; Dreier, R.; Pap, T. Syndecan-4 regulates cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010, 69, A23–A24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Saoncella, S.; Echtermeyer, F.; Denhez, F.; Nowlen, J.K.; Mosher, D.F.; Robinson, S.D.; Hynes, R.O.; Goetinck, P.F. Syndecan-4 signals cooperatively with integrins in a Rho-dependent manner in the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 2805–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Fisher, M.; Li, Y.; Seghatoleslami, M.R.; Dealy, C.N.; Kosher, R.A. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans including syndecan-3 modulate BMP activity during limb cartilage differentiation. Matrix Biol. 2006, 25, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Nakanishi, T.; Kadomatsu, K.; Okamoto, T.; Ichihara-Tanaka, K.; Kojima, T.; Saito, H.; Tomoda, Y.; Muramatsu, T. Expression of syndecan-1 and -3 during embryogenesis of the central nervous system in relation to binding with midkine. J. Biochem. 1997, 121, 197–205. [Google Scholar]
  269. Liu, Y.; Wierbowski, B.M.; Salic, A. Hedgehog pathway modulation by glypican 3-conjugated heparan sulfate. J. Cell Sci. 2022, 135, jcs259297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Pan, J.; Ho, M. Role of glypican-1 in regulating multiple cellular signaling pathways. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2021, 321, C846–C858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Li, G.; Feng, H.; Shi, X.; Chen, M.; Liang, J.; Zhou, Z. Highly sensitive electrochemical aptasensor for Glypican-3 based on reduced graphene oxide-hemin nanocomposites modified on screen-printed electrode surface. Bioelectrochemistry 2021, 138, 107696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Ogi, H.; Omori, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Hirao, M.; Nishiyama, M. Detection of Glypican-3 Proteins for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Marker Using Wireless-Electrodeless Quartz-Crystal Microbalance. Jpn. J Appl. Phys. 2008, 47, 4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Shemesh, J.; Jalilian, I.; Shi, A.; Heng Yeoh, G.; Knothe Tate, M.L.; Ebrahimi Warkiani, M. Flow-induced stress on adherent cells in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 2015, 15, 4114–4127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Scuruchi, M.; D’Ascola, A.; Avenoso, A.; Mandraffino, G.G.; Campo, S.S.; Campo, G.M. Serglycin as part of IL-1β induced inflammation in human chondrocytes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 669, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. D’Ascola, A.; Scuruchi, M.; Avenoso, A.; Bruschetta, G.; Campo, S.; Mandraffino, G.; Campo, G.M. Serglycin is involved in inflammatory response in articular mouse chondrocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 499, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Matsumoto, R.; Sali, A.; Ghildyal, N.; Karplus, M.; Stevens, R.L. Packaging of proteases and proteoglycans in the granules of mast cells and other hematopoietic cells. A cluster of histidines on mouse mast cell protease 7 regulates its binding to heparin serglycin proteoglycans. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 19524–19531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Scully, O.J.; Chua, P.J.; Harve, K.S.; Bay, B.H.; Yip, G.W. Serglycin in health and diseases. Anat. Rec. 2012, 295, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Dai, J.; Liakath-Ali, K.; Golf, S.R.; Südhof, T.C. Distinct neurexin-cerebellin complexes control AMPA- and NMDA-receptor responses in a circuit-dependent manner. eLife 2022, 11, e78649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  279. Traunmüller, L.; Schulz, J.; Ortiz, R.; Feng, H.; Furlanis, E.; Gomez, A.M.; Schreiner, D.; Bischofberger, J.; Zhang, C.; Scheiffele, P. A cell-type-specific alternative splicing regulator shapes synapse properties in a trans-synaptic manner. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Zhang, W.; Jiang, H.H.; Luo, F. Diverse organization of voltage-gated calcium channels at presynaptic active zones. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2022, 14, 1023256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Kim, J.; Wulschner, L.E.G.; Oh, W.C.; Ko, J. Trans-synaptic mechanisms orchestrated by mammalian synaptic cell adhesion molecules. Bioessays 2022, 44, e2200134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Cuttler, K.; Hassan, M.; Carr, J.; Cloete, R.; Bardien, S. Emerging evidence implicating a role for neurexins in neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. Open Biol. 2021, 11, 210091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Luo, F.; Sclip, A.; Merrill, S.; Südhof, T.C. Neurexins regulate presynaptic GABAB-receptors at central synapses. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Furukawa, T.; Ueno, A.; Omori, Y. Molecular mechanisms underlying selective synapse formation of vertebrate retinal photoreceptor cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 1251–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Orlandi, C.; Omori, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Ueno, A.; Roux, M.J.; Condomitti, G.; de Wit, J.; Kanagawa, M.; Furukawa, T.; et al. Transsynaptic Binding of Orphan Receptor GPR179 to Dystroglycan-Pikachurin Complex Is Essential for the Synaptic Organization of Photoreceptors. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 130–145.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Sugita, Y.; Araki, F.; Chaya, T.; Kawano, K.; Furukawa, T.; Miura, K. Role of the mouse retinal photoreceptor ribbon synapse in visual motion processing for optokinetic responses. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Kanagawa, M.; Omori, Y.; Sato, S.; Kobayashi, K.; Miyagoe-Suzuki, Y.; Takeda, S.; Endo, T.; Furukawa, T.; Toda, T. Post-translational maturation of dystroglycan is necessary for pikachurin binding and ribbon synaptic localization. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 31208–31216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Omori, Y.; Araki, F.; Chaya, T.; Kajimura, N.; Irie, S.; Terada, K.; Muranishi, Y.; Tsujii, T.; Ueno, S.; Koyasu, T.; et al. Presynaptic dystroglycan-pikachurin complex regulates the proper synaptic connection between retinal photoreceptor and bipolar cells. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 6126–6137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Sato, S.; Omori, Y.; Katoh, K.; Kondo, M.; Kanagawa, M.; Miyata, K.; Funabiki, K.; Koyasu, T.; Kajimura, N.; Miyoshi, T.; et al. Pikachurin, a dystroglycan ligand, is essential for photoreceptor ribbon synapse formation. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Husain, N.; Pellikka, M.; Hong, H.; Klimentova, T.; Choe, K.M.; Clandinin, T.R.; Tepass, U. The agrin/perlecan-related protein eyes shut is essential for epithelial lumen formation in the Drosophila retina. Dev. Cell 2006, 11, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Liu, Y.; Yu, M.; Shang, X.; Nguyen, M.H.H.; Balakrishnan, S.; Sager, R.; Hu, H. Eyes shut homolog (EYS) interacts with matriglycan of O-mannosyl glycans whose deficiency results in EYS mislocalization and degeneration of photoreceptors. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Messchaert, M.; Dona, M.; Broekman, S.; Peters, T.A.; Corral-Serrano, J.C.; Slijkerman, R.W.N.; van Wijk, E.; Collin, R.W.J. Eyes shut homolog is important for the maintenance of photoreceptor morphology and visual function in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Lo, J.; Cheng, C.Y.; Yang, C.H.; Yang, C.M.; Chen, Y.C.; Huang, Y.S.; Chen, P.L.; Chen, T.C. Genotypes Influence Clinical Progression in EYS-Associated Retinitis Pigmentosa. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2022, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Suvannaboon, R.; Pawestri, A.R.; Jinda, W.; Tuekprakhon, A.; Trinavarat, A.; Atchaneeyasakul, L.O. Genotypic and phenotypic profiles of EYS gene-related retinitis pigmentosa: A retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Vannahme, C.; Schübel, S.; Herud, M.; Gösling, S.; Hülsmann, H.; Paulsson, M.; Hartmann, U.; Maurer, P. Molecular cloning of testican-2: Defining a novel calcium-binding proteoglycan family expressed in brain. J. Neurochem. 1999, 73, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Hartmann, U.; Maurer, P. Proteoglycans in the nervous system—The quest for functional roles in vivo. Matrix Biol. 2001, 20, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Kohfeldt, E.; Maurer, P.; Vannahme, C.; Timpl, R. Properties of the extracellular calcium binding module of the proteoglycan testican. FEBS Lett. 1997, 414, 517–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Hartmann, U.; Hülsmann, H.; Seul, J.; Röll, S.; Midani, H.; Breloy, I.; Hechler, D.; Müller, R.; Paulsson, M. Testican-3: A brain-specific proteoglycan member of the BM-40/SPARC/osteonectin family. J. Neurochem. 2013, 125, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Thacker, B.; Xu, D.; Lawrence, R.; Esko, J.D. Heparan sulfate 3-O-sulfation: A rare modification in search of a function. Matrix Biol. 2014, 35, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Rezaie, A.; Giri, H. Anticoagulant and signaling functions of antithrombin. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 3142–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Azhar, A.; Singh, P.; Rashid, Q.; Naseem, A.; Khan, M.S.; Jairajpuri, M.A. Antiangiogenic function of antithrombin is dependent on its conformational variation: Implication for other serpins. Protein Pept. Lett. 2013, 20, 403–411. [Google Scholar]
  302. Quinsey, N.; Greedy, A.L.; Bottomley, S.P.; Whisstock, J.C.; Pike, R.N. Antithrombin: In control of coagulation. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 36, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  303. Mersmann, H. Lipoprotein and hormone-sensitive lipases in porcine adipose tissue. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76, 1396–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Fuerer, C.; Habib, S.J.; Nusse, R. A study on the interactions between heparan sulfate proteoglycans and Wnt proteins. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Mii, Y.; Takada, S. Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Clustering in Wnt Signaling and Dispersal. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Gao, W.; Xu, Y.; Liu, J.; Ho, M. Epitope mapping by a Wnt-blocking antibody: Evidence of the Wnt binding domain in heparan sulfate. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Bisiak, F.; McCarthy, A.A. Structure and Function of Roundabout Receptors. In Macromolecular Protein Complexes II: Structure and Function; Subcellular Biochemistry; Harris, J., Marles-Wright, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 93. [Google Scholar]
  308. Gao, Q.; Chen, C.Y.; Zong, C.; Wang, S.; Ramiah, A.; Prabhakar, P.; Morris, L.C.; Boons, G.J.; Moremen, K.W.; Prestegard, J.H. Structural Aspects of Heparan Sulfate Binding to Robo1-Ig1-2. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 3106–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Zhang, F.; Moniz, H.A.; Walcott, B.; Moremen, K.W.; Linhardt, R.J.; Wang, L. Characterization of the interaction between Robo1 and heparin and other glycosaminoglycans. Biochimie 2013, 95, 2345–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Lancaster, M.; Schroth, J.; Gleeson, J.G. Subcellular spatial regulation of canonical Wnt signalling at the primary cilium. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 700–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Ramsbottom, S.; Pownall, M.E. Regulation of Hedgehog Signalling Inside and Outside the Cell. J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Teran, M.; Nugent, M.A. Synergistic Binding of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A and Its Receptors to Heparin Selectively Modulates Complex Affinity. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 16451–16462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Robinson, C.; Mulloy, B.; Gallagher, J.T.; Stringer, S.E. VEGF165-binding sites within heparan sulfate encompass two highly sulfated domains and can be liberated by K5 lyase. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 1731–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Midura, R.; Calabro, A.; Yanagishita, M.; Hascall, V.C. Nonreducing end structures of chondroitin sulfate chains on aggrecan isolated from Swarm rat chondrosarcoma cultures. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 8009–8015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Plaas, A.; West, L.A.; Wong-Palms, S.; Nelson, F.R. Glycosaminoglycan sulfation in human osteoarthritis. Disease-related alterations at the non-reducing termini of chondroitin and dermatan sulfate. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 12642–12649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Heinegard, D. Fell-Muir Lecture: Proteoglycans and more—From molecules to biology. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2009, 90, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Caterson, B. Fell-Muir Lecture: Chondroitin sulphate glycosaminoglycans: Fun for some and confusion for others. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2012, 93, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Kluppel, M.; Wight, T.N.; Chan, C.; Hinek, A.; Wrana, J.L. Maintenance of chondroitin sulfation balance by chondroitin-4-sulfotransferase 1 is required for chondrocyte development and growth factor signaling during cartilage morphogenesis. Development 2005, 132, 3989–4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Melrose, J.; Smith, M.M.; Hughes, C.E.; Little, C.B.; Caterson, B.; Hayes, A.J. The 7D4, 4C3 and 3B3 (-) Chondroitin Sulphation Motifs are expressed at Sites of Cartilage and Bone Morphogenesis during Foetal Human Knee Joint Development. J. Glycobiol. 2016, 5, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Caterson, B.; Mahmoodian, F.; Sorrell, J.M.; Hardingham, T.E.; Bayliss, M.T.; Carney, S.L.; Ratcliffe, A.; Muir, H. Modulation of native chondroitin sulphate structure in tissue development and in disease. J. Cell Sci. 1990, 97 Pt 3, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Hayes, A.; Hughes, C.E.; Ralphs, J.R.; Caterson, B. Chondroitin sulphate sulphation motif expression in the ontogeny of the intervertebral disc. Eur. Cell Mater. 2011, 21, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Hayes, A.; Sugahara, K.; Farrugia, B.; Whitelock, J.M.; Caterson, B.; Melrose, J. Biodiversity of CS-proteoglycan sulphation motifs: Chemical messenger recognition modules with roles in information transfer, control of cellular behaviour and tissue morphogenesis. Biochem. J. 2018, 475, 587–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Hayes, A.; Smith, S.M.; Caterson, B.; Melrose, J. Concise Review: Stem/Progenitor Cell Proteoglycans Decorated with 7-D-4, 4-C-3, and 3-B-3(-) Chondroitin Sulfate Motifs Are Morphogenetic Markers of Tissue Development. Stem Cells 2018, 36, 1475–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  324. Mark, M.; Baker, J.R.; Kimata, K.; Ruch, J.V. Regulated changes in chondroitin sulfation during embryogenesis: An immunohistochemical approach. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1990, 34, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  325. Slater, R.R., Jr.; Bayliss, M.T.; Lachiewicz, P.F.; Visco, D.M.; Caterson, B. Monoclonal antibodies that detect biochemical markers of arthritis in humans. Arthritis Rheum. 1995, 38, 655–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Sorrell, J.; Lintala, A.M.; Mahmoodian, F.; Caterson, B. Epitope-specific changes in chondroitin sulfate/dermatan sulfate proteoglycans as markers in the lymphopoietic and granulopoietic compartments of developing bursae of Fabricius. J. Immunol. 1988, 140, 4263–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Cortes, M.; Baria, A.T.; Schwartz, N.B. Sulfation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans is necessary for proper Indian hedgehog signaling in the developing growth plate. Development 2009, 136, 1697–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Farrugia, B.; Mizumoto, S.; Lord, M.S.; O’Grady, R.L.; Kuchel, R.P.; Yamada, S.; Whitelock, J.M. Hyaluronidase-4 is produced by mast cells and can cleave serglycin chondroitin sulfate chains into lower molecular weight forms. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 11458–11472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Roughley, P.; White, R.J.; Glant, T.T. The structure and abundance of cartilage proteoglycan during early development of the human fetus. Pediatr. Res. 1987, 22, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Bayliss, M.; Osborne, D.; Woodhouse, S.; Davidson, C. Sulfation of chondroitin sulfate in human articular cartilage. The effect of age, topographical position, and zone of cartilage on tissue composition. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 15892–15900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Lauder, R.; Huckerby, T.N.; Brown, G.M.; Bayliss, M.T.; Nieduszynski, I.A. Age-related changes in the sulphation of the chondroitin sulphate linkage region from human articular cartilage aggrecan. Biochem. J. 2001, 358, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Han, J.; Li, D.; Qu, C.; Wang, D.; Wang, L.; Guo, X.; Lammi, M.J. Altered expression of chondroitin sulfate structure modifying sulfotransferases in the articular cartilage from adult osteoarthritis and Kashin-Beck disease. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017, 25, 1372–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Lei, J.; Yan, S.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Guo, X.; Lammi, M.J.; Han, J.; Qu, C. Abnormal expression of chondroitin sulfate sulfotransferases in the articular cartilage of pediatric patients with Kashin-Beck disease. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2020, 153, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Roughley, P.; Mort, J.S. The role of aggrecan in normal and osteoarthritic cartilage. J. Exp. Orthop. 2014, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  335. Roughley, P.; White, R.J. Age-related changes in the structure of the proteoglycan subunits from human articular cartilage. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  336. Horkay, F.; Basser, P.J.; Geissler, E. Cartilage extracellular matrix polymers: Hierarchical structure, osmotic properties, and function. Soft Matter 2024, 20, 6033–6043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Johnson, Z.; Shapiro, I.M.; Risbud, M.V. Extracellular osmolarity regulates matrix homeostasis in the intervertebral disc and articular cartilage: Evolving role of TonEBP. Matrix Biol. 2014, 40, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  338. Watanabe, H.; Yamada, Y.; Kimata, K. Roles of aggrecan, a large chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, in cartilage structure and function. J. Biochem. 1998, 124, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Wei, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, C.; Ren, Q.; Zhang, Y. Roles of large aggregating proteoglycans in human intervertebral disc degeneration. Connect. Tissue Res. 2019, 60, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Miyata, S.; Kitagawa, H. Formation and remodeling of the brain extracellular matrix in neural plasticity: Roles of chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronan. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2017, 1861, 2420–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Melrose, J. Hyaluronan hydrates and compartmentalises the CNS/PNS extracellular matrix and provides niche environments conducive to the optimisation of neuronal activity. J. Neurochem. 2023, 166, 637–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Visco, D.M.; Johnstone, B.; Hill, M.A.; Jolly, G.A.; Caterson, B. Immunohistochemical analysis of 3-B-(-) and 7-D-4 epitope expression in canine osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1993, 36, 1718–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Hiraoka, K.; Grogan, S.; Olee, T.; Lotz, M. Mesenchymal progenitor cells in adult human articular cartilage. Biorheology 2006, 43, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  344. Akita, K.; von Holst, A.; Furukawa, Y.; Mikami, T.; Sugahara, K.; Faissner, A. Expression of multiple chondroitin/dermatan sulfotransferases in the neurogenic regions of the embryonic and adult central nervous system implies that complex chondroitin sulfates have a role in neural stem cell maintenance. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 798–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  345. Mitsunaga, C.; Mikami, T.; Mizumoto, S.; Fukuda, J.; Sugahara, K. Chondroitin sulfate/dermatan sulfate hybrid chains in the development of cerebellum. Spatiotemporal regulation of the expression of critical disulfated disaccharides by specific sulfotransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 18942–18952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Hayes, A.J.; Tudor, D.; Nowell, M.A.; Caterson, B.; Hughes, C.E. Chondroitin sulfate sulfation motifs as putative biomarkers for isolation of articular cartilage progenitor cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2008, 56, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  347. Novoselov, V.P.; Savchenko, S.V.; Pyatkova, E.V.; Nadeev, A.P.; Ageeva, T.A.; Chikinev, Y.V.; Polyakevich, A.S. Morphological Characteristics of the Cartilaginous Tissue of Human Auricle in Different Age Periods. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2016, 160, 840–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Theocharis, A.; Karamanos, N.K.; Papageorgakopoulou, N.; Tsiganos, C.P.; Theocharis, D.A. Isolation and characterization of matrix proteoglycans from human nasal cartilage. Compositional and structural comparison between normal and scoliotic tissues. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1569, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Thalmann, I.; Machiki, K.; Calabro, A.; Hascall, V.C.; Thalmann, R. Uronic acid-containing glycosaminoglycans and keratan sulfate are present in the tectorial membrane of the inner ear: Functional implications. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1993, 307, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Rienks, M.; Papageorgiou, A.P.; Frangogiannis, N.G.; Heymans, S. Myocardial extracellular matrix: An ever-changing and diverse entity. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 872–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Lockhart, M.; Wirrig, E.; Phelps, A.; Wessels, A. Extracellular matrix and heart development. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 2011, 91, 535–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Fomovsky, G.M.; Thomopoulos, S.; Holmes, J.W. Contribution of extracellular matrix to the mechanical properties of the heart. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010, 48, 490–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Miyata, S.; Nadanaka, S.; Igarashi, M.; Kitagawa, H. Structural Variation of Chondroitin Sulfate Chains Contributes to the Molecular Heterogeneity of Perineuronal Nets. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  354. Reichelt, A.C.; Hare, D.J.; Bussey, T.J.; Saksida, L.M. Perineuronal Nets: Plasticity, Protection, and Therapeutic Potential. Trends Neurosci. 2019, 42, 458–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  355. Mak, K.; Kronenberg, H.M.; Chuang, P.T.; Mackem, S.; Yang, Y. Indian hedgehog signals independently of PTHrP to promote chondrocyte hypertrophy. Development 2008, 135, 1947–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Pathi, S.; Pagan-Westphal, S.; Baker, D.P.; Garber, E.A.; Rayhorn, P.; Bumcrot, D.; Tabin, C.J.; Blake Pepinsky, R.; Williams, K.P. Comparative biological responses to human Sonic, Indian, and Desert hedgehog. Mech. Dev. 2001, 106, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  357. Vortkamp, A.; Lee, K.; Lanske, B.; Segre, G.V.; Kronenberg, H.M.; Tabin, C.J. Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science 1996, 273, 603–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Kronenberg, H. PTHrP and skeletal development. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1068, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Grimsrud, C.; Romano, P.R.; D’Souza, M.; Puzas, J.E.; Schwarz, E.M.; Reynolds, P.R.; Roiser, R.N.; O’Keefe, R.J. BMP signaling stimulates chondrocyte maturation and the expression of Indian hedgehog. J. Orthop. Res. 2001, 19, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Lai, L.; Mitchell, J. Indian hedgehog: Its roles and regulation in endochondral bone development. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005, 96, 1163–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Chen, X.; Macica, C.M.; Nasiri, A.; Broadus, A.E. Regulation of articular chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation by indian hedgehog and parathyroid hormone-related protein in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58, 3788–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  362. Wei, F.; Zhou, J.; Wei, X.; Zhang, J.; Fleming, B.C.; Terek, R.; Pei, M.; Chen, Q.; Liu, T.; Wei, L. Activation of Indian Hedgehog Promotes Chondrocyte Hypertrophy and Upregulation of MMP-13 in Human Osteoarthritic Cartilage. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2012, 20, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Ohba, S. Hedgehog Signaling in Endochondral Ossification. J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  364. Ruoslahti, E.; Yamaguchi, Y. Proteoglycans as modulators of growth factor activities. Cell 1991, 64, 867–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  365. Domowicz, M.; Cortes, M.; Henry, J.G.; Schwartz, N.B. Aggrecan modulation of growth plate morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2009, 329, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Lauing, K.; Cortes, M.; Domowicz, M.S.; Henry, J.G.; Baria, A.T.; Schwartz, N.B. Aggrecan is required for growth plate architecture and differentiation. Dev. Biol. 2014, 396, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  367. Morise, J.; Takematsu, H.; Oka, S. The role of human natural killer-1 (HNK-1) carbohydrate in neuronal plasticity and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2017, 1861, 2455–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  368. Morise, J.; Kizuka, Y.; Yabuno, K.; Tonoyama, Y.; Hashii, N.; Kawasaki, N.; Manya, H.; Miyagoe-Suzuki, Y.; Takeda, S.; Endo, T.; et al. Structural and biochemical characterization of O-mannose-linked human natural killer-1 glycan expressed on phosphacan in developing mouse brains. Glycobiology 2014, 24, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  369. Voshol, H.; van Zuylen, C.W.; Orberger, G.; Vliegenthart, J.F.; Schachner, M. Structure of the HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope on bovine peripheral myelin glycoprotein P0. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 22957–22960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Morita, I.; Kakuda, S.; Takeuchi, Y.; Itoh, S.; Kawasaki, N.; Kizuka, Y.; Kawasaki, T.; Oka, S. HNK-1 glyco-epitope regulates the stability of the glutamate receptor subunit GluR2 on the neuronal cell surface. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 30209–30217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Morita, I.; Kakuda, S.; Takeuchi, Y.; Kawasaki, T.; Oka, S. HNK-1 (human natural killer-1) glyco-epitope is essential for normal spine morphogenesis in developing hippocampal neurons. Neuroscience 2009, 164, 1685–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  372. Yabuno, K.; Morise, J.; Kizuka, Y.; Hashii, N.; Kawasaki, N.; Takahashi, S.; Miyata, S.; Izumikawa, T.; Kitagawa, H.; Takematsu, H.; et al. A Sulfated Glycosaminoglycan Linkage Region is a Novel Type of Human Natural Killer-1 (HNK-1) Epitope Expressed on Aggrecan in Perineuronal Nets. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Milev, P.; Friedlander, D.R.; Sakurai, T.; Karthikeyan, L.; Flad, M.; Margolis, R.K.; Grumet, M.; Margolis, R.U. Interactions of the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan phosphacan, the extracellular domain of a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase, with neurons, glia, and neural cell adhesion molecules. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 127, 1703–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  374. Nakagawa, N.; Izumikawa, T.; Kitagawa, H.; Oka, S. Sulfation of glucuronic acid in the linkage tetrasaccharide by HNK-1 sulfotransferase is an inhibitory signal for the expression of a chondroitin sulfate chain on thrombomodulin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 415, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Hashiguchi, T.; Mizumoto, S.; Nishimura, Y.; Tamura, J.; Yamada, S.; Sugahara, K.I. Involvement of human natural killer-1 (HNK-1) sulfotransferase in the biosynthesis of the GlcUA(3-O-sulfate)-Gal-Gal-Xyl tetrasaccharide found in α-thrombomodulin from human urine. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 33003–33011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Domowicz, M.; Mueller, M.M.; Novak, T.E.; Schwartz, L.E.; Schwartz, N.B. Developmental expression of the HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope on aggrecan during chondrogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 2003, 226, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  377. Melrose, J. Fractone Stem Cell Niche Components Provide Intuitive Clues in the Design of New Therapeutic Procedures/Biomatrices for Neural Repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  378. Nikitovic, D.; Katonis, P.; Tsatsakis, A.; Karamanos, N.K.; Tzanakakis, G.N. Lumican, a small leucine-rich proteoglycan. I. UBMB Life 2008, 60, 818–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  379. Puri, S.; Coulson-Thomas, Y.M.; Gesteira, T.F.; Coulson-Thomas, V.J. Distribution and Function of Glycosaminoglycans and Proteoglycans in the Development, Homeostasis and Pathology of the Ocular Surface. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Stepp, M.; Menko, A.S. Clearing the light path: Proteoglycans and their important roles in the lens and cornea. Proteoglycan Res. 2024, 2, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Zheng, Z.; Granado, H.S.; Li, C. Fibromodulin, a Multifunctional Matricellular Modulator. J. Dent. Res. 2023, 102, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  382. Jan, A.; Lee, E.J.; Choi, I. Fibromodulin: A regulatory molecule maintaining cellular architecture for normal cellular function. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016, 80, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  383. Al-Qattan, M.; Al-Qattan, A.M. Fibromodulin: Structure, Physiological Functions, and an Emphasis on its Potential Clinical Applications in Various Diseases. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2018, 28, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  384. Zappia, J.; Tong, Q.; Van der Cruyssen, R.; Cornelis, F.M.F.; Lambert, C.; Pinto Coelho, T.; Grisart, J.; Kague, E.; Lories, R.J.; Muller, M.; et al. Osteomodulin downregulation is associated with osteoarthritis development. Bone Res. 2023, 11, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  385. Nulali, J.; Zhan, M.; Zhang, K.; Tu, P.; Liu, Y.; Song, H. Osteoglycin: An ECM Factor Regulating Fibrosis and Tumorigenesis. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  386. Chen, S.; Birk, D.E. The regulatory roles of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in extracellular matrix assembly. FEBS J. 2013, 280, 2120–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  387. Starup-Linde, J.; Viggers, R.; Handberg, A. Osteoglycin and Bone—A Systematic Review. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2019, 17, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  388. Woessner, M.; Hiam, D.; Smith, C.; Lin, X.; Zarekookandeh, N.; Tacey, A.; Parker, L.; Landen, S.; Jacques, M.; Lewis, J.R.; et al. Osteoglycin Across the Adult Lifespan. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 107, e1426–e1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  389. Leong, I. Osteoglycin—Linking bone and energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  390. Larsson, T.; Sommarin, Y.; Paulsson, M.; Antonsson, P.; Hedbom, E.; Wendel, M.; Heinegård, D. Cartilage matrix proteins. A basic 36-kDa protein with a restricted distribution to cartilage and bone. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 20428–20433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  391. Haglund, L.; Ouellet, J.; Roughley, P. Variation in chondroadherin abundance and fragmentation in the human scoliotic disc. Spine 2009, 34, 1513–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  392. Mansson, B.; Wenglen, C.; Morgelin, M.; Saxne, T.; Heinegard, D. Association of chondroadherin with collagen type, I.I. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 32883–32888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  393. Hessle, L.; Stordalen, G.A.; Wenglén, C.; Petzold, C.; Tanner, E.; Brorson, S.H.; Baekkevold, E.S.; Önnerfjord, P.; Reinholt, F.P.; Heinegård, D. The skeletal phenotype of chondroadherin deficient mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  394. Camper, L.; Heinegârd, D.; Lundgren-Akerlund, E. Integrin α2β1is a receptor for the cartilage matrix protein chondroadherin. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 138, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  395. Burg, M.; Cole, G.J. Claustrin, an antiadhesive neural keratan sulfate proteoglycan, is structurally related to MAP1B. J. Neurobiol. 1994, 25, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  396. Le Tran, N.; Wang, Y.; Nie, G. Podocalyxin in Normal Tissue and Epithelial Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  397. Wallace, B. The mechanism of agrin-induced acetylcholine receptor aggregation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1991, 331, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  398. Gustafsson, E.; Almonte-Becerril, M.; Bloch, W.; Costell, M. Perlecan maintains microvessel integrity in vivo and modulates their formation in vitro. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  399. Lavorgna, T.; Gressett, T.E.; Chastain, W.H.; Bix, G.J. Perlecan: A review of its role in neurologic and musculoskeletal disease. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1189731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  400. Marneros, A.; Olsen, B.R. Physiological role of collagen XVIII and endostatin. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 716–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  401. Kolset, S.; Pejler, G. Serglycin: A structural and functional chameleon with wide impact on immune cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 4927–4933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  402. Reissner, C.; Runkel, F.; Missler, M. Neurexins. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  403. Craig, A.; Kang, Y. Neurexin-neuroligin signaling in synapse development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  404. Patil, D.; Pantalone, S.; Cao, Y.; Laboute, T.; Novick, S.J.; Singh, S.; Savino, S.; Faravelli, S.; Magnani, F.; Griffin, P.R.; et al. Structure of the photoreceptor synaptic assembly of the extracellular matrix protein pikachurin with the orphan receptor GPR179. Sci. Signal. 2023, 16, eadd9539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  405. Sato, K.; Liu, Y.; Yamashita, T.; Ohuchi, H. The medaka mutant deficient in eyes shut homolog exhibits opsin transport defects and enhanced autophagy in retinal photoreceptors. Cell Tissue Res. 2023, 391, 249–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  406. Xiao, M.; Xue, J.; Jin, E. SPOCK: Master regulator of malignant tumors (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2024, 30, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  407. Charbonnier, F.; Chanoine, C.; Cifuentes-Diaz, C.; Gallien, C.L.; Rieger, F.; Alliel, P.M.; Périn, J.P. Expression of the proteoglycan SPOCK during mouse embryo development. Mech. Dev. 2000, 90, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  408. Cifuentes-Diaz, C.; Alliel, P.M.; Charbonnier, F.; de la Porte, S.; Molgó, J.; Goudou, D.; Rieger, F.; Périn, J.P. Regulated expression of the proteoglycan SPOCK in the neuromuscular system. Mech. Dev. 2000, 94, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  409. Zimmermann, D.; Ruoslahti, E. Multiple domains of the large fibroblast proteoglycan, versican. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 2975–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  410. Andersson-Sjöland, A.; Hallgren, O.; Rolandsson, S.; Weitoft, M.; Tykesson, E.; Larsson-Callerfelt, A.K.; Rydell-Törmänen, K.; Bjermer, L.; Malmström, A.; Karlsson, J.C.; et al. Versican in inflammation and tissue remodeling: The impact on lung disorders. Glycobiology 2015, 25, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  411. Matsumoto, K.; Shionyu, M.; Go, M.; Shimizu, K.; Shinomura, T.; Kimata, K.; Watanabe, H. Distinct interaction of versican/PG-M with hyaluronan and link protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 41205–41212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  412. Rauch, U.; Feng, K.; Zhou, X.H. Neurocan: A brain chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001, 58, 1842–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  413. Schmidt, S.; Arendt, T.; Morawski, M.; Sonntag, M. Neurocan Contributes to Perineuronal Net Development. Neuroscience 2020, 442, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  414. Mueller-Buehl, C.; Reinhard, J.; Roll, L.; Bader, V.; Winklhofer, K.F.; Faissner, A. Brevican, Neurocan, Tenascin-C, and Tenascin-R Act as Important Regulators of the Interplay Between Perineuronal Nets, Synaptic Integrity, Inhibitory Interneurons, and Otx2. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 886527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  415. Friedlander, D.; Milev, P.; Karthikeyan, L.; Margolis, R.K.; Margolis, R.U.; Grumet, M. The neuronal chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan neurocan binds to the neural cell adhesion molecules Ng-CAM/L1/NILE and N-CAM, and inhibits neuronal adhesion and neurite outgrowth. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 125, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  416. Schwartz, N.; Domowicz, M. Proteoglycans in brain development. Glycoconj. J. 2004, 21, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  417. Gubbiotti, M.; Vallet, S.D.; Ricard-Blum, S.; Iozzo, R.V. Decorin interacting network: A comprehensive analysis of decorin-binding partners and their versatile functions. Matrix Biol. 2016, 55, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  418. Neill, T.; Schaefer, L.; Iozzo, R.V. Decorin: A guardian from the matrix. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 181, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  419. Baghy, K.; Reszegi, A.; Tátrai, P.; Kovalszky, I. Decorin in the Tumor Microenvironment. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1272, 17–38. [Google Scholar]
  420. Dong, Y.; Zhong, J.; Dong, L. The Role of Decorin in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases. J. Immunol. Res. 2022, 2022, 1283383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  421. Sainio, A.; Järveläinen, H.T. Decorin-mediated oncosuppression—A potential future adjuvant therapy for human epithelial cancers. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  422. Hausser, H.; Gröning, A.; Hasilik, A.; Schönherr, E.; Kresse, H. Selective inactivity of TGF-beta/decorin complexes. FEBS Lett. 1994, 353, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  423. Nastase, M.; Young, M.F.; Schaefer, L. Biglycan: A multivalent proteoglycan providing structure and signals. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60, 963–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  424. Lall, S.; Alsafwani, Z.W.; Batra, S.K.; Seshacharyulu, P. ASPORIN: A root of the matter in tumors and their host environment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2024, 1879, 189029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  425. Nagy, G.; Zhao, X.F.; Karlsson, R.; Wang, K.; Duman, R.; Harlos, K.; El Omari, K.; Wagner, A.; Clausen, H.; Miller, R.L.; et al. Structure and function of Semaphorin-5A glycosaminoglycan interactions. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  426. Carulli, D.; de Winter, F.; Verhaagen, J. Semaphorins in Adult Nervous System Plasticity and Disease. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2021, 13, 672891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  427. Schwend, T.; Lwigale, P.Y.; Conrad, G.W. Nerve repulsion by the lens and cornea during cornea innervation is dependent on Robo–Slit signaling and diminishes with neuron age. Dev. Biol. 2012, 363, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  428. Delloye-Bourgeois, C.; Jacquier, A.; Charoy, C.; Reynaud, F.; Nawabi, H.; Thoinet, K.; Kindbeiter, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Zagar, Y.; Kong, Y.; et al. PlexinA1 is a new Slit receptor and mediates axon guidance function of Slit C-terminal fragments. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  429. Schiweck, J.; Beauchamp, M.; Humo, M.; Lelievre, V. Old friends, new story: The role of Slit2C signaling through PlexinA1. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2015, 9, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  430. Kastenhuber, E.; Kern, U.; Bonkowsky, J.L.; Chien, C.B.; Driever, W.; Schweitzer, J. Netrin-DCC, Robo-Slit, and heparan sulfate proteoglycans coordinate lateral positioning of longitudinal dopaminergic diencephalospinal axons. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 8914–8926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  431. Xu, C.; Fan, C.M. Expression of Robo/Slit and Semaphorin/Plexin/Neuropilin family members in the developing hypothalamic paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei. Gene Expr. Patterns 2008, 8, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  432. Devine, C.; Key, B. Robo-Slit interactions regulate longitudinal axon pathfinding in the embryonic vertebrate brain. Dev. Biol. 2008, 313, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  433. Mambetisaeva, E.; Andrews, W.; Camurri, L.; Annan, A.; Sundaresan, V. Robo family of proteins exhibit differential expression in mouse spinal cord and Robo-Slit interaction is required for midline crossing in vertebrate spinal cord. Dev. Dyn. 2005, 233, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  434. Hayes, A.; Melrose, J. Neural Tissue Homeostasis and Repair Is Regulated via CS and DS Proteoglycan Motifs. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 696640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  435. Jahncke, J.; Wright, K.M. The many roles of dystroglycan in nervous system development and function: Dystroglycan and neural circuit development: Dystroglycan and neural circuit development. Dev. Dyn. 2023, 252, 61–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  436. Nickolls, A.; Bönnemann, C.G. The roles of dystroglycan in the nervous system: Insights from animal models of muscular dystrophy. Dis. Models Mech. 2018, 11, dmm035931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  437. Nam, C.; Chen, L. Postsynaptic assembly induced by neurexin-neuroligin interaction and neurotransmitter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 6137–6142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  438. Ko, J.; Fuccillo, M.V.; Malenka, R.C.; Südhof, T.C. LRRTM2 functions as a neurexin ligand in promoting excitatory synapse formation. Neuron 2009, 64, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  439. Yamagata, A.; Goto-Ito, S.; Sato, Y.; Shiroshima, T.; Maeda, A.; Watanabe, M.; Saitoh, T.; Maenaka, K.; Terada, T.; Yoshida, T.; et al. Structural insights into modulation and selectivity of transsynaptic neurexin-LRRTM interaction. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  440. Zanzoni, A.; Montecchi-Palazzi, L.; Quondam, M.; Ausiello, G.; Helmer-Citterich, M.; Cesareni, G. MINT: A Molecular INTeraction database. FEBS Lett. 2002, 513, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  441. Hsueh, Y. The role of the MAGUK protein CASK in neural development and synaptic function. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 1915–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  442. Okamoto, M.; Südhof, T.C. Mints, Munc18-interacting proteins in synaptic vesicle exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 31459–31464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  443. Hay, J.; Fisette, P.L.; Jenkins, G.H.; Fukami, K.; Takenawa, T.; Anderson, R.A.; Martin, T.F. ATP-dependent inositide phosphorylation required for Ca(2+)-activated secretion. Nature 1995, 374, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  444. Zhang, R.; Jiang, H.; Liu, Y.; He, G. Structure, function, and pathology of Neurexin-3. Genes Dis. 2022, 10, 1908–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  445. Jacobson, C.; Côté, P.D.; Rossi, S.G.; Rotundo, R.L.; Carbonetto, S. The dystroglycan complex is necessary for stabilization of acetylcholine receptor clusters at neuromuscular junctions and formation of the synaptic basement membrane. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 152, 435–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  446. Peng, H.; Xie, H.; Rossi, S.G.; Rotundo, R.L. Acetylcholinesterase clustering at the neuromuscular junction involves perlecan and dystroglycan. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 145, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  447. Sciandra, F.; Bozzi, M.; Bigotti, M.G. From adhesion complex to signaling hub: The dual role of dystroglycan. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1325284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  448. Clements, R.; Turk, R.; Campbell, K.P.; Wright, K.M. Dystroglycan Maintains Inner Limiting Membrane Integrity to Coordinate Retinal Development. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 8559–8574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  449. Cohn, R. Dystroglycan: Important player in skeletal muscle and beyond. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2005, 15, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  450. Dempsey, C.; Bigotti, M.G.; Adams, J.C.; Brancaccio, A. Analysis of α-Dystroglycan/LG Domain Binding Modes: Investigating Protein Motifs That Regulate the Affinity of Isolated LG Domains. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2019, 6, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  451. Duan, D.; Goemans, N.; Takeda, S.; Mercuri, E.; Aartsma-Rus, A. Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2021, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  452. Durbeej, M.; Henry, M.D.; Campbell, K.P. Dystroglycan in development and disease. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1998, 10, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  453. Barresi, R.; Campbell, K.P. Dystroglycan: From biosynthesis to pathogenesis of human disease. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  454. Endo, T. Glycobiology of α-dystroglycan and muscular dystrophy. J. Biochem. 2015, 157, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  455. Mirouse, V. Evolution and developmental functions of the dystrophin-associated protein complex: Beyond the idea of a muscle-specific cell adhesion complex. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1182524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  456. Liao, X.; Wang, Y.; Lai, X.; Wang, S. The role of Rapsyn in neuromuscular junction and congenital myasthenic syndrome. Biomol. Biomed. 2023, 23, 772–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  457. Pearson, R.J.; Carroll, S.L. ErbB transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptors are expressed by sensory and motor neurons projecting into sciatic nerve. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2004, 52, 1299–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Specific interactive glycan sequences in HS that have been identified. Identification of specific GAG sequences interactive with fibroblast growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptor (a), vascular endothelial growth factor A dimer (b), wingless-type MMTV integration site family cell signalling complex (Wnt) morphogens (c), Roundabout-1 axonal guidance receptor (Robo-1) (d), antithrombin (e) and lipoprotein lipase (f). Glycan residues are depicted using standard SFNG icons as indicated in the key.
Figure 2. Specific interactive glycan sequences in HS that have been identified. Identification of specific GAG sequences interactive with fibroblast growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptor (a), vascular endothelial growth factor A dimer (b), wingless-type MMTV integration site family cell signalling complex (Wnt) morphogens (c), Roundabout-1 axonal guidance receptor (Robo-1) (d), antithrombin (e) and lipoprotein lipase (f). Glycan residues are depicted using standard SFNG icons as indicated in the key.
Ijms 26 02554 g002
Table 3. The structural biodiversity of KS, HS and CS PGs.
Table 3. The structural biodiversity of KS, HS and CS PGs.
PGStructural and Functional FeaturesCore Protein
Size (kDa)
GAG
Chains
Present
KS-PGs
Aggrecan, CSPG1 (ACAN)Hydrates and provides hydrodynamic viscoelastic weight bearing properties to cartilages [57].208–220CS, KSI/KSII
Lumican (LUM)MMP inhibitor, anti-angiogenic anti-cancer agent, regulates regularly organized slender collagen fibrils in cornea [378].38 KSI
Keratocan (KERA)Essential ECM component of the lens capsule, organizes collagen fiber diameters and spacing in the corneal stroma to maintain stromal clarity [194,198,379,380].37–50KSI
Fibromodulin (FMOD)Cell regulatory multifunctional matricellular modulator, maintains cellular architecture for normal tissue function, regulates collagen fibrillogenesis [381,382,383].42KSI
PRELP (Prolargin)PRELP is an anchoring component in many basement membranes binds type I and II collagens and perlecan to stabilize the basement membrane [188,198].44KSI
Osteomodulin
(osteoadherin)
OMD, is a KS-SLRP that binds to osteoblasts via αςβ3 integrin and regulates osteogenesis through its interaction with BMP2. WNT1 transcriptionally activates expression of OMD [195,196,384]42KSI
Osteoglycin(OGN)
(Mimecan)
OGN, is a class II SLRP with diverse roles in ECM assembly, regulates bone formation along with TGF-β1/TGF-β2 that controls collagen fibrillogenesis and has glucose regulatory roles in metabolic health, cancer and diabetes [199,200,385,386,387,388,389]35KSI
Chondroadherin (CHAD)CHAD, is a 38 kDa member of the KS-SLRP family containing 11 LRRs that bind to α2β1 integrin, type I, II and VI collagen and has an anchoring role in ECM stabilization, binds cells to the ECM and mediates cell-ECM communication through interactions with cell surface PGs such as the syndecans [390,391,392,393,394]36–38KSI
ClaustrinClaustrin is an anti-adhesive neural KS-PG [395]105KSII
Synaptic vesicle PG (SV2)SV2 is a synaptic vesicle neurotransmitter transporter and smart storage PG, SV2A, SV2B, SV2C paralogs share 60% sequence and 80% structural homology. SV2A controls transmitter release, SV2B is the primary paralog expressed in the retina, SV2C has roles in synaptic plasticity [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Occurs as H 250 kDa and L 100 kDa formsKS
Podocalyxcin (PODXL,TRA-1-60)Transmembrane, anti-adhesive sialo-KS-PG, up-regulated in many cancers and is a tumor stem cell biomarker [164,396]65KS
PhosphacanSoluble ectodomain of RPTP-ζ exists as three splice variants, roles in perineuronal net assembly and function in cognitive processes, modulates neurite extension in formation of neural networks [143,144,145,146,148].300KS, CS, HNK-1
HS-PGs
Agrin400 kDa HSPG, interacts with LRP4 and α-DG. Promotes chondrocyte differentiation, upregulates SOX9, COL2A1, ACAN [239]. Activates MuSK in NMJ, interacts with rapsyn, LRP,DOK, clusters Ach receptors in NMJ neuromuscular control [397]212HS
Perlecan (HSPG2)Multifunctional, modular HS/CS PG, interacts with growth factors, controls cell proliferation and differentiation, cell signaling and tissue morphogenesis, facilitates cell-ECM communication, shear flow biosensor important in tissue homeostasis and function [3,250,257,398,399].400–467HS/CS
Collagen XVIIIStabilising, basement membrane component in laminin, nidogen HSPG networks [251,263,400].187HS
The syndecansSDC 1–4 are G-protein coupled co-receptors in cell proliferation and differentiation, regulating growth factor interactions, tissue development, wound repair, tissue regeneration, inflammation in health and disease [23,24,31,32,260,261].22–48HS/CS
The glypicansGPC1-6 have multiple regulatory roles in cell signaling in tissue development and repair processes in health and disease [26,251,269,270].62HS
SerglycinIntracellular heparin PG storing bioactive compounds in vesicles [276] in immune [401] and neuroendocrine cells. With varied roles in health and disease [277]. 17.3Heparin
Neurexin (NRXN)NRXN1-3 [402] act as receptors and cell adhesion molecules [19] aiding in synaptic development [403] and stabilization and signaling along with a vast collection of ligands [15,16]. LamG motifs interact with α-DG stabilizing synaptic activity. NRXN3 provides synaptic plasticity.n/aHS
PikachurinPikachurin has roles in synaptic assembly [404] interacting with α-DG in photoreceptor ribbon synapse assembly [285,289] facilitating interaction with retinal bipolar neural networks in visual processing [288].n/aHS
Eyes-shutEyes-shut stabilises the photoreceptor primary cilium axenome which connects the inner and outer regions of the photoreceptor and has essential roles to play in phototransduction [291], Eyes shut deficiency leads to autophagy of photoreceptors and impaired vision [405].n/aHS
SPOCK (testican, sparc/osteonectin, cwcv and kazal-like domains PG, SPARC (osteonectin)SPOCK-2 is induced by viral infection or IFN, and is secreted to the ECM, where it blocks virus-cell attachment and entry. SPOCK regulates malignant tumor development [406] and has roles in embryonic development [407] and neuromuscular tissue development [408].48.4CS/HS
CS-PGs
AggrecanHydrates and provides hydrodynamic viscoelastic weight bearing properties to cartilages [57,118] but is also a component of heart and brain tissue [125]. HNK-1 in heart and brain aggrecan provides additional interactive properties [372].208–220CS, KS
Versican
(PG-M, CSPG2)
Versican plays diverse roles in cell adhesion, proliferation, migration and angiogenesis and is so named in recognition of its versatile modular structure [409]. Versican has key roles in inflammation through interactions with adhesion molecules on the surfaces of inflammatory leukocytes and chemokines that recruit inflammatory cells [410]. Versican forms macromolecular complexes with HA which are looser than aggrecan-HA aggregates conducive to cell attachment and migration [411].265CS
NeurocanNeurocan modulates cell adhesion and migration in brain development and has roles in the formation of perineuronal nets and their functional interactive properties [412,413,414,415,416].145CS
Brevican (BEHAB,CSPG7)Brevican is localised to the surface of neurons in the brain and maintains molecular networks around neurons which may slow brain ageing and AD development [416]. 96CS
Decorin (DCN)Widely distributed and highly interactive forming multifunctional networks [417]. DCN has roles in tissue protection [418] and wound repair, angiogenesis, tumor metastasis [419], autophagy, immune regulation and inflammatory diseases [420]. DCN has antifibrotic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiangiogenic and onco-suppressive properties [421] and inhibits TGFβ activity [422].36CS/DS
Biglycan (BGN)BGN is both a structural ECM component and a signaling molecule [423]. BGN LRRs have interactive properties with a range of protein ligands contributing to ECM stabilization and function. When proteolytically released from the ECM, biglycan acts as a danger signal of tissue stress or injury. Biglycan links innate immunity receptors and activators of the inflammasome, stimulating multifunctional proinflammatory signaling in tissue damage [423].38CS/DS
Asporin (ASPN)ASPN contains a distinctive group of N-terminal D-Asp-residues which are linked to cancer progression and OA. Regulates TGFβ, Wnt/β-catenin, notch, hedgehog, EGFR, HER2 cell signaling pathways [424]. 42CS
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Melrose, J. Glycosaminoglycans, Instructive Biomolecules That Regulate Cellular Activity and Synaptic Neuronal Control of Specific Tissue Functional Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062554

AMA Style

Melrose J. Glycosaminoglycans, Instructive Biomolecules That Regulate Cellular Activity and Synaptic Neuronal Control of Specific Tissue Functional Properties. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(6):2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062554

Chicago/Turabian Style

Melrose, James. 2025. "Glycosaminoglycans, Instructive Biomolecules That Regulate Cellular Activity and Synaptic Neuronal Control of Specific Tissue Functional Properties" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 6: 2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062554

APA Style

Melrose, J. (2025). Glycosaminoglycans, Instructive Biomolecules That Regulate Cellular Activity and Synaptic Neuronal Control of Specific Tissue Functional Properties. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(6), 2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062554

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop