Next Article in Journal
Anti-Steatotic Effect of Opuntia stricta var. dillenii Prickly Pear Extracts on Murine and Human Hepatocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Disparity Between Functional and Structural Recovery of Placental Mitochondria After Exposure to Hypoxia
Previous Article in Journal
PD1+ T Regulatory Cells Are Not Sufficient to Protect from Gestational Hypertension
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Placental Molecular Expression of Different Pathogenic Vaginal Infections

by
Daniela Roxana Matasariu
1,2,
Constantin Condac
3,4,
Victoria Bîrluțiu
4,
Ludmila Lozneanu
5,*,
Iuliana Elena Bujor
2,
Vasile Lucian Boiculese
6,
Mihai Sava
7 and
Alexandra Ursache
2
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Cuza Voda” Hospital, 700038 Iasi, Romania
2
Department of Mother and Child, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania
3
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, “Cuza Voda” Hospital, 700038 Iasi, Romania
4
Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Lucian Blaga”, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
5
Department of Morpho-Functional Sciences I—Histology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania
6
Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania
7
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Lucian Blaga”, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(7), 2863; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072863
Submission received: 18 February 2025 / Revised: 19 March 2025 / Accepted: 19 March 2025 / Published: 21 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiology and Pathophysiology of Placenta: 3rd Edition)

Abstract

:
This study evaluated the differential expression of four placental markers—vitamin D receptor (VDR), Cluster of Differentiation 44 (CD44), osteopontin (OPN), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)—in response to pathogens, which may contribute to our understanding of pathogen-specific impacts on pregnancy outcomes. We immunohistochemically (IHC) analyzed placental tissues obtained from 70 healthy-term pregnant women in the control group and compared them to tissues obtained from 78 women with pregnancy above 24 weeks of gestation, single-pathogen vaginal infection, and premature rupture of membranes/preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM/PPROM). We detected high expression of these four molecules in cases of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) and Ureaplasma urealyticum vaginal infections, and moderate expression in cases of Enterobacteriaceae infections, except for Klebsiella; the cases with Klebsiella and Candida species (spp.) vaginitis exhibited a lower expression compared to the healthy control group. VDR, CD44, and OPN had increased placental expression in GBS and Ureaplasma urealyticum vaginal infections; the opportunistic pathogenicity of both Escherichia coli and Candida spp. explains their low IHC positivity, and the tremendous ability of Gram-negative bacteria to elude the host immunity is revealed by the negative IHC staining in cases of Klebsiella vaginitis. These findings suggest that pathogen-specific alterations in the expression of these markers may contribute to the differential risk stratification of pregnancy complications and may mitigate the risks of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Interventions aiming to modulate these pathways might improve pregnancy outcomes.

1. Introduction

One of the most frequent pathologies encountered during pregnancy is vaginal infections [1], which play a significant role in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, increasing both neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality [2]. Vaginal infections can lead to endometritis, preterm birth (PB), premature or preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM/PPROM), abortion, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), low birth weight (LBW), fetal infection, and, in severe cases, fetal demise [2,3,4]. Once the infection reaches the amniotic sac, it may result in histological or clinical chorioamnionitis, with or without PROM/PPROM [5,6,7]. Chorioamnionitis is frequently recognized as having a polymicrobial etiology [8]. In some cases, infections trigger sterile intra-amniotic inflammation, which alone can result in PB [9].
The existing studies underline our limitations in identifying the infectious causes for intra-amniotic inflammation, with estimates suggesting the prevalence is likely underestimated. The prevalence seems to range between 13% and 48% in women with intact or ruptured membranes and PB, and between 46% and 53% in women with clinical and/or histological chorioamnionitis [10,11,12]. Studies have underlined that the immune response in amniotic fluid varies from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory, a phenomenon that remains incompletely comprehended and necessitates further research [7].
A variety of micro-organisms are implicated in women’s genital tract infections during pregnancy, including Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Escherichia coli (E. Coli), Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacter spp., Trichomonas vaginalis, Candida spp., and bacterial vaginosis (BV). Microbes responsible for pelvic inflammatory disease, such as Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, and Chlamydia trachomatis, also contribute [2]. Notably, Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma produce cytotoxic substances that amplify inflammation by inducing cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) synthesis and subsequent prostaglandin formation [2]. Hormonal changes during pregnancy increase susceptibility to Candida spp., with vaginal colonization observed in approximately 40% of pregnant women, although it generally results in less severe complications compared to other infections, such as late miscarriage, PB, and chorioamnionitis [2]. To uncover part of this puzzle, we conducted this research evaluating four closely linked molecules with significant roles in inflammation, placental structure, and function: vitamin D receptor (VDR), Cluster of Differentiation 44 (CD44), osteopontin (OPN), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2).
VDR mediates the endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine actions of 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D [13,14]. While VDR is primarily involved in calcium metabolism, it also exerts a multitude of other effects, among which the anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory effects are of high importance [14]. The suppression of tumoral necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and COX-2 is the mechanism through which vitamin D manages to reduce inflammation in placental trophoblast. VDR is extensively expressed in the placenta during pregnancy [15].
CD44 is a frequently encountered surface molecule with essential roles in adhesion and cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interactions. It has many extracellular ligands, such as hyaluronic acid (HA). CD44 exhibits an interesting in vitro role in lymphocyte-to-venule adhesion and in cytokine macrophage production, being highly expressed in the placental tissue starting from the second trimester of pregnancy according to the literature, as well as being supposedly involved in the limitation of trophoblast invasion [16,17,18,19]. In 2019, Mahendroo et al. investigated the expression of CD44 and HA in the cervical epithelia of mice during pregnancy infections. Their research suggested that HA depletion at the cervical epithelial level disrupts the natural barriers, allowing micro-organisms to ascend into the upper genital tract and cause preterm birth [16].
Another adhesion and cell invasion extracellular matrix marker that influences and modulates cell function by interacting with CD44 and other ligands is OPN [20,21,22]. It seems to also be a key participant in the development of the placenta and exhibits altered expression patterns in many pregnancy-related pathologies [23,24,25,26,27]. Animal studies depicted NK cells as the main source of OPN, which, despite being part of the extracellular matrix, also functions as a cytokine [22,28,29,30].
COX-2 isoform, a controlling factor in the production of prostaglandins, is expressed in only a limited variety of tissues, including the placenta [31]. The study by Cao et al. in 2021 showed that vitamin D determines the downregulation of COX-2 expression in the placenta, thus reducing inflammation. Since COX-2 is responsible for producing inflammatory molecules, its reduction helps mitigate placental inflammation [15].
Vitamin D seems to be VDR-dependent and directly modulates both the innate and adaptive immune responses [32]. Most studies have underlined the downregulation of CD44 expression via the vitamin D–VDR complex [33,34]. In addition, elevated vitamin D levels determine COX-2 downregulation [15]. Paracrine and autocrine signaling of the CD44-OPN complex promotes extravascular cell migration to inflammation sites, with OPN enhancing the expression of CD44 on the surface of various cell types [33,34]. We chose to study these highly interconnected markers within the context of inflammation because of their significant impact on the immune response pathways.
This research aimed to investigate how different types of vaginal infections during pregnancy alter the expression of VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2, thereby contributing to structural and functional changes in the placenta. All of these molecules seem to contribute to varying degrees in the physiopathology of preterm birth, with its consequent unfavorable maternal and fetal outcomes. Through analyzing these markers, we hope to obtain a plausible explanation as to why some micro-organisms have a more significant negative impact on maternal and fetal well-being than others.

2. Results

We included 70 healthy-term pregnant women in the control group and 78 women with pregnancy over 24 weeks of gestation and with single-pathogen vaginal infections. In our analysis, we detected statistically significant differences in gestational age at birth. Pregnant women without vaginal infections, on average, delivered 5 weeks later than those from the group with vaginal infections. As a consequence, the average birth weight between the two groups also differed by approximately 1000 g. As expected, the average CRP value was also statistically significantly 8 times higher in pregnant women with vaginal infections (Table 1).
The results obtained show a multitude of pathogens involved in vaginal infections, with E. coli and GBS occupying the first two positions, followed closely by Candida spp., Enterococcus, and Ureaplasma urealyticum, with almost similar percentages (Table 2). The lowest incidence pertained to Klebsiella vaginal infection (Table 2).
The univariate analyses of our markers indicated variability in their expression, with certain infections showing distinct patterns that could influence the inflammatory and immune responses in the placenta during pregnancy (Table 2 and Table 3). Pregnant women with vaginal infections had lower levels of CD44 compared to the controls, but the difference did not reach statistical significance, with a p-value of 0.185. OPN showed different expression levels depending on the pathogen involved, with statistically significant higher expression in the vaginal infection group compared to the controls, with a p-value of 0.004 (OR 2.93). COX-2 was expressed in nearly all cases, without any statistically significant difference between the two groups. VDR was found to be positive in three-quarters of the vaginal infection cases, without significant difference between the two groups, with a p-value of 0.907 (Table 4). Our results suggest that pregnant women have a 1.67 increased risk of experiencing a vaginal infection if they are CD44-negative, a 1.102 increased risk of experiencing a vaginal infection if they are VDR-negative, and a 2.933 increased risk of having a vaginal infection if they are OPN-positive (Table 4).
The histological characteristics of the placenta varied according to the infections caused by the isolated pathogens (Figure 1A–F). In E. coli infections, there was damage to the placental villi, including areas of necrosis, significant inflammation, and occasional thrombi within the chorionic vessels (Figure 1A). Klebsiella infections also showed destruction of the chorionic villi, accompanied by fibrosis and more active and intensive inflammatory response (Figure 1B). GBS infections led to inflammatory infiltrates of neutrophils in the fetal membranes (amnion and chorion), fetal blood vessels within the chorionic plate, stem villi, and chorionic villi (Figure 1C). The presence of Enterococcus faecalis resulted in membrane infiltration and occasionally affected the villi, with small clots in the placental vessels, which impaired blood flow (Figure 1D). Candida spp. infections were characterized by noticeable lymphocytic infiltration (Figure 1E). In Ureaplasma urealyticum infections, there was less severe neutrophilic infiltration of the membranes, along with prominent lymphocytic infiltration, syncytial knots, and intervillous fibrin (Figure 1F); in some cases, small thrombi in the chorionic vessels were observed, resulting from extensive inflammation and vascular injury.
Infections caused by E. coli, Klebsiella, GBS, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida spp., and Ureaplasma urealyticum can significantly alter the expression of VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2 in the placenta. Our findings indicate that VDR expression was generally variable, but it often decreased (Figure 2A–F), while the expression of CD44 was elevated in most infections (Figure 3A–F). OPN was largely absent (Figure 4A–F), while, in contrast, COX-2 expression was elevated in the majority of cases with vaginal infections (Figure 5A–F). The immunohistochemical analysis of the control group is illustrated in Figure 6.

3. Discussion

Many pieces are missing from the puzzle of maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with different vaginal infections. Oh et al. underlined our limitations in identifying infections through standard vaginal culture techniques in women with preterm birth and clinical chorioamnionitis [33]. Some studies in the literature reveal a high prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in women experiencing premature birth and chorioamnionitis [2,34]. Despite a low incidence of septicemia caused by these germs, placental and fetal cultures show a diverse range of pathogens. Additionally, there are commensal germs in the vaginal flora that can sometimes exhibit pathogenic action (depending on the time frame of colonization, differences in strain virulence, interactions with other germs, and/or suppression of the maternal immune response) and negatively impact the evolution of pregnancy [2]. One such example is Ureaplasma spp., which has a high colonization rate but is not always associated with inflammation and infection [2]. The accuracy of vaginal cultures in identifying the micro-organisms responsible for the infection improves as the gestational age decreases in cases of chorioamnionitis [35]. Despite the fact that there is a considerable number of cases in which clinical signs of infections are missing, more than half of these women have histological signs of chorioamnionitis with positive cultures [35].
Our study examined the controversy regarding these aspects in the literature, hoping to offer a plausible histological explanation for the existing inconsistencies. Due to the fact that the vaginal microbiome is extremely diverse, depending on a multitude of extrinsic and intrinsic factors, we decided to study placental key surface molecules to detect the actual impact of vaginal infections in the placenta. The clinical manifestations of the women with vaginal infections included in our study varied a lot, ranging from patients with characteristic signs and symptoms of chorioamnionitis to asymptomatic patients.
Similar to our observations, the studies by Al-Adnani et al. and N. J. Sebire et al. revealed septic infarcts, intervillous thrombi, and necrotizing villitis accompanied by perivillous inflammation in women with vaginal infections, in contrast to the findings from the control group in the placental H&E examination [8,36].
In accordance with the literature results, our results display a lower gestational age with consequent lower birth weight in women with PROM or PPROM and positive vaginal cultures [37,38,39]. The vaginal infection group exhibited a slightly lower Apgar score compared to the controls. The minimal difference may be attributed to our inclusion criteria, which selected only pregnancies > 24 weeks of gestation with vaginal positive cultures, and term pregnancies with negative vaginal cultures for the control group. The group with vaginal infections exhibited a higher leucocyte count compared to the control group. However, the difference was not statistically significant. A possible explanation could be that these women arrived at the hospital under 12 h after PROM/PPROM. During this short 12-hour time frame, leukocyte mobilization might have begun but had not yet reached a sufficient level to consistently differentiate from the control group. Additionally, upon admission, these patients were promptly administered empiric antimicrobial therapy, which could also impact this response. After admission, vaginal cultures and blood samples were collected. The difference in CRP values between the two groups was statistically significant, with higher levels observed in the vaginal infection group.
The placenta is essential for fetal development and well-being. Notwithstanding extensive research on its multitude of roles and functions, many aspects remain largely unknown [15]. The four molecules examined in this study—VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2—are involved in many placental processes and recognize an ascending trend depending on the gestational age during pregnancy [15,16,17,18,19,22]. Our results reveal that GBS and Ureaplasma urealyticum exert the most significant impact on the four studied markers, leading to high levels of VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2 in the placental tissues. The presence of Enterococcus and the absence of vaginal infections in the control group exhibit almost the same impact on the levels of the above-mentioned markers, with OPN being the least affected. Infection by Escherichia coli leads to a higher positive percentage of these markers in the patients with vaginal infections than the control group, while infection by Candida spp. results in minor alterations in the tissue expression of these markers, being lower than the expression levels observed in the control group. The least significant impact is exerted by Klebsiella infection. Therefore, according to our observation, the most aggressive micro-organisms remain to be GBS and Ureaplasma.
GBS is the most commonly identified perinatal germ, with guidelines establishing the time frame for its screening during the third trimester, along with therapeutic and prophylaxis treatment. The unfavorable maternal and neonatal outcomes resulted from GBS infection have been long acknowledged [40]. Its virulence also depends on the presence of adhesive and invasive molecules, and its ascension toward the uterine cavity is ensured by the destruction of hyaluronic acid (HA) through its hyaluronidase production [41]. The CD44 adhesion molecule plays a significant role in placental development, particularly through its involvement in angiogenesis. Its primary ligand, HA, contributes to maintaining the structural integrity of the placenta by supporting extracellular matrix organization and cellular interactions [42]. An interesting 2017 review by Jordan et al. underlines that transgenic mice with low CD44 expression prove to be protected from Group A Streptococcus infection [43]. CD44 expression is upregulated in infections that modulate local immune response. Thus, our results align with the literature findings regarding the major negative impact of GBS infection and its consequences in pregnancy. Another CD44 ligand, with known implications in angiogenesis and in the modulation of the immune response, is OPN [44,45]. The study by Diao et al. (2011) suggests that OPN expression is rapidly elevated in response to an infection [46], and this increase appears to be associated with the severity of the infection [47]. As depicted in our study as well, OPN levels seem to correlate to an extent with CRP values and increase in pregnant women with PROM. The lack of a complete correlation may be linked to the fact that, unlike CRP, which is a systemic inflammatory marker whose levels tend to be influenced by any infection, regardless of the pathogen’s virulence, high OPN levels might be more specific for severe immune responses, while its levels remain unaltered with opportunistic infections [48].
Even if the literature results reach unanimity regarding the causative link between GBS vaginal infection and unfavorable pregnancy outcomes, research should still endeavor to examine the consequences of Ureaplasma urealyticum vaginal infection. The existing results have failed in placing this germ into one of the two categories of being a simple commensal germ to being an extremely virulent one leading to chorioamnionitis [49]. Although this incertitude persists in the literature, our results are similar to those described by de Oliveira et al. in 2020 [50]. Ureaplasma urealyticum virginal infection seems to trigger significant placenta effects. Thus, all three structural placental molecules examined in this study, which are involved in cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix adhesion, cellular migration and differentiation, angiogenesis, and modulation of the local immune response, have severely altered expression in GBS and Ureaplasma urealyticum virginal infections [20,44,45].
The tissue samples from all the pregnant women in this study, including those with vaginal infections and the control group, exhibited similarly intense positivity for COX-2. Thus, based on our study findings, this molecule’s expression is more linked to inflammation rather than being infection-specific. The high levels observed in both groups can be explained by the fact that we collected placenta tissues from the control group whose pregnancies were close to the time of labor, showing increased COX-2 expression, with consequent prostaglandin production that initiated birth [51].
Vitamin D, mediated by VDR, exerts a key role in reproductive tissues, including the vagina. It regulates antimicrobial molecules that protect against bacterial infections and may also influence defensin production and neutrophil function [50,52]. Bespalova et al. made an interesting observation regarding vitamin D supplementation, with the consequent favorable result of decreasing the frequency of E. coli vaginal infection [53]. Furthermore, as suggested by Cao et al. (2021), vitamin D downregulates COX-2 signaling and expression, thus reducing inflammation [15]. We identified increased placental VDR levels in cases with SGB, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Enterococcus vaginal infections. Vaginal yeast infection is frequently encountered in pregnancy, especially due to hormonal changes that predispose women to develop such pathology [54]. Despite being a commonly encountered vaginal infection pathogen, infection by Candida spp. rarely leads to chorioamnionitis [55], although there are studies that describe placental structural changes in some cases [8]. The tissue samples of the vaginal infection-free control group exhibited similar VDR expression levels to women with Candida spp. and E. coli vaginitis. These interesting results can be explained by the opportunistic pathogenicity of both E. coli and Candida spp. [53,56].
When analyzing OPN distribution in our samples, we detected similar levels of this inflammatory and immune modulatory molecule in both the control samples and the samples showing Gram-negative enterobacteria. Our observations are similar to those of Salvi et al., who reported increased OPN levels in Gram-positive infections, which activate Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2, and lower levels in Gram-negative pathogens triggering TLR 3 and 4 [57]. Another interesting aspect of this pleiotropic molecule was revealed by Inoue et al.’s study in 2010 [58]. These authors describe two OPN isoforms: secreted OPN (sOPN) and intracellular OPN (iOPN), with the host’s resistance to fungal infection attributed to the iOPN isoform [58]. Despite the general trend to consider OPN as an inflammatory marker, with elevated levels during infections that modulate the host immune response, it appears that analyses of the involved mechanisms reveal more complex interactions than anticipated [57,58,59]. Our IHC analysis identified only secreted OPN; thus, this result may constitute a possible source of biases, but it also explains the low response to Candida spp. vaginal infection [60,61]. One of the most feared pathogens that succeed in employing a wide range of immune evasion strategies to elude the host’s defense mechanisms and to limit the host’s immune response is Klebsiella. The minimal activation of the immune response and its ability to evade detection are also extremely visible in the results we obtained [62]. This fearful micro-organism ranks last in our classification, displaying an extremely low positivity for VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2 compared to the control group.
The expression of all of the first three markers, except for COX-2, seems to correlate with the severity and the causative pathogens of vaginal infections in late pregnancy. Vitamin D supplementation might be extremely useful in lowering the host susceptibility to vaginal infections by lowering VDR placental expression. In addition, if our results are confirmed by larger population studies, we can attempt to develop local or systemic anti-CD44 and anti-OPN agents to try to control the severity of the host immune response during chorioamnionitis.
Study limitations: Our study limitations reside in the low number of included cases. Despite being aligned with the literature results, our findings need to be considered with caution until larger studies confirm them. Another limitation results from our inclusion of single-pathogen vaginitis, while many vaginal infections are caused by two or more pathogens. Additionally, our control group was composed of only women with term pregnancies. Another limitation is the lack of correlation with actual pathologies, but the results we obtained could form the basis for further research in this direction. We intend to expand our research and correlate our immunohistochemical findings with maternal and fetal outcomes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients and Tissue Samples

The study period was from January 2021 to January 2023. All of the included patients provided written informed consent. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Lucian Blaga”, Sibiu (1442/19 March 2024), and that of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital “Cuza-Voda” in Iasi, Romania (10426/24 August 2021 and 19/4 August 2023).

4.1.1. Inclusion Criteria

Specimens for the control group were collected from women who delivered at term without vaginal infections (both negative vaginal and cervical cultures), complications, associated diseases, or chronic treatment. These women also tested negative for acute infections (Toxoplasma, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, Herpes, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Syphilis, and Hepatitis B and C). For the vaginal infection group (positive vaginal/cervical cultures, more than 3+++ growth and significant inflammatory reaction), placental specimens were retrieved from age-matched women, with single pathogen-positive vaginal/cervical cultures, at >24 weeks of gestation, with PROM/PPROM, and with or without chorioamnionitis, that gave birth between 6 and 72 h after admission depending on their clinical and or paraclinical status (fever, leukocytosis, and elevated CRP levels), but were similarly free of other complications, associated diseases, or chronic treatment and negative for the above-mentioned acute infections before antibiotherapy initiation. In the vaginal infection group, we included only women with pregnancy over 24 weeks of gestation to avoid any other early placental alterations that might interfere with our observations. Stout et al. detected many placentas with intracellular bacterial colonization present in pregnancies under 24 weeks of gestation [32]. All of the included women were interviewed regarding their current medication, and those receiving antibiotic treatment were excluded from the study.

4.1.2. Exclusion Criteria

Women with obstetrical and/or other medical complications were excluded from our analysis, including malignancy; depression; genetic syndromes; infectious or autoimmune disease; pre-existing or gestational diabetes; hypertension and its complications, such as pre-eclampsia; oligohydramnios; intrauterine growth restriction, defined as ultrasound-estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile for the gestational age; smoking habits; other therapies affecting bone and mineral metabolisms; or vitamin D supplementations within three months before pregnancy. We also excluded pregnant women with more than one pathogen detected in the vaginal culture in order to determine germ-specific placental molecular changes.
We used selective and differential culture media (MacConkey agar, Oxoid; Columbia agar and sheep blood, Oxoid; Sabouraud glucose selective agar with gentamicin and chloramphenicol, Oxoid) for the detection of vaginal infection pathogens. For bacterial identification, we utilized a MicroScan WalkAway analyzer manufactured by Beckman Coulter, Inc. (Brea, CA, USA), and for Candida spp. detection, an ELITech CANDIFAST® kit (ELITECH MICROBIO, Signes, France) was used.

4.2. Immunohistochemistry

We collected four tissue samples from each placenta, one for each of the quadrants. The samples were collected from the maternal side of the placenta, aiming to harvest a sample from the edge, one from the center, and the two remaining samples at equal distances between the periphery and the center to ensure better coverage. The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections were examined by two independent pathologists with expertise in gynecological pathology. Differences were resolved through discussion and compromise until an agreement was reached. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed and evaluated by two pathologists. IHC staining was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, utilizing monoclonal antibodies against VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2. Four-micrometer-thick serial sections were prepared in citrate buffer (pH 6) after deparaffinization in xylene and rehydration in ethanol series. Endogenous peroxidase activity was inhibited with 0.3% H2O2 for 20 min at room temperature. IHC was performed to determine the expression of VDR, CD44, OPN, and anti-COX-2 using specific Abcam Company dilutions: for VDR, the dilution was 1:3000 (catalog no. ab3508, Abcam, Cambridge, UK); for CD44, it was 1:250 (catalog no. ab157107, Abcam, Cambridge, UK); for OPN, it was 1:200 (catalog no. ab8448, Abcam, Cambridge, UK); and for COX-2, it was 1:100 (catalog no. ab15191, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Then, the sections were washed, exposed to the secondary antibody for 45 min at 37 °C, and cleaned with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Hematoxylin was used as a counterstain with the standard avidin–biotin–peroxidase technique, using a liquid diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate and a chromogen system. Human jejunum served as a positive control for VDR, CD44, OPN, and anti-COX-2 to ensure the specificity and sensitivity of the staining, validate the results, and rule out false positives or negatives. For the negative control, we treated the tissue samples in a way that should result in no staining, so the tissue samples would not express the antigen of interest.
All the placental samples were examined for the presence of VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2. Positive cells (brown or yellowish-brown color in the nucleus, cytoplasm, and plasma membrane) in the epithelial and stromal compartments were considered VDR-, CD44-, OPN-, and COX-2-positive, regardless of staining intensity or the number of positive cells. The expression levels of CD44, VDR, and COX-2 were quantified by assessing the percentage of positively stained cells and the staining intensity in each section. For overall positivity, immunostaining in >5% of cells was considered positive, and immunostaining in <5% positive cells was considered negative.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

The data were imported into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS 24 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0, released in 2016, Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.). Descriptive statistics included the sample size (absolute N and N% relative frequencies); mean; standard deviation; and 95% confidence intervals for the mean, quartiles, minimum, and maximum. Statistical hypothesis tests included nonparametric tests such as Mann–Whitney U test for 2-sample comparisons. These tests were applied for the analysis of continuous numerical variables. We used Chi-square test to detect statistical significance, with a standard significance level of 0.05 applied for making decisions, and we performed a univariate analysis.

5. Conclusions

We detected variability in the expression of molecules involved in placental adhesion, angiogenesis, migration, differentiation, and immune modulation (VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2) in different pathogenic vaginal infections. Gram-negative pathogens succeed in eluding the host immune system, and this aspect was also visible in our results, with lower levels of IHC positivity for the above-mentioned molecules in cases of vaginal infections with E. coli, Enterobacter, and Klebsiella. The pathogens with the highest IHC positivity for VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2 were GBS and Ureaplasma urealyticum. In addition, the most frequently observed vaginal infection during pregnancy was due to Candida spp., which resulted in low IHC expression of these molecules.
This study evaluated the differential expression of placental markers in response to pathogens, which can contribute to our understanding of pathogen-specific impacts on pregnancy outcomes. Further research is needed to directly correlate the changes in these markers with clinical pathologies. These insights underscore the potential for targeted therapeutic interventions aimed at modulating these pathways to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C. and D.R.M.; methodology, C.C. and V.B.; software, V.L.B. and A.U.; validation, L.L., D.R.M. and A.U.; formal analysis, L.L. and I.E.B.; investigation, D.R.M.; resources, C.C. and L.L.; data curation, A.U. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C. and D.R.M.; writing—review and editing, D.R.M. and A.U.; visualization, L.L. and M.S.; supervision, V.B.; project administration, C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY “Lucian Blaga”, Sibiu (1442/19 March 2024), and of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital “Cuza-Voda” in Iasi, Romania (10426/24 August 2021 and 19/4 August 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universities of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr.T.Popa” from Iasi and “Lucian Blaga” from Sibiu, Romania, for supporting this study. We are also greatly indebted to all participants for donating their tissue/placenta.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Prasad, D.; Parween, S.; Kumari, K.; Singh, N. Prevalence, Etiology, and Associated Symptoms of Vaginal Discharge During Pregnancy in Women Seen in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar. Cureus 2021, 13, e12700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Daskalakis, G.; Psarris, A.; Koutras, A.; Fasoulakis, Z.; Prokopakis, I.; Varthaliti, A.; Karasmani, C.; Ntounis, T.; Domali, E.; Theodora, M.; et al. Maternal Infection and Preterm Birth: From Molecular Basis to Clinical Implications. Children 2023, 10, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tita, A.T.; Andrews, W.W. Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Clin. Perinatol. 2010, 37, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Williams, M.C.; O’Brien, W.F.; Nelson, R.N.; Spellacy, W.N. Histologic chorioamnionitis is associated with fetal growth restriction in term and preterm infants. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 183, 1094–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Romero, R.; Espinoza, J.; Gonçalves, L.F.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Friel, L.; Hassan, S. The role of inflammation and infection in preterm birth. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2007, 25, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Latino, M.A.; Botta, G.; Badino, C.; Maria, D.; Petrozziello, A.; Sensini, A.; Leli, C. Association between genital mycoplasmas, acute chorioamnionitis and fetal pneumonia in spontaneous abortions. J. Perinat. Med. 2018, 46, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jung, E.; Romero, R.; Yeo, L.; Diaz-Primera, R.; Marin-Concha, J.; Para, R.; Lopez, A.M.; Pacora, P.; Gomez-Lopez, N.; Yoon, B.H.; et al. The fetal inflammatory response syndrome: The origins of a concept, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and obstetrical implications. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020, 25, 101146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Al-Adnani, M.; Sebire, N.J. The role of perinatal pathological examination in subclinical infection in obstetrics. Best. Pr. Res. Clin. Obs. Gynaecol. 2007, 21, 505–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chalupska, M.; Kacerovsky, M.; Stranik, J.; Gregor, M.; Maly, J.; Jacobsson, B.; Musilova, I. Intra-Amniotic Infection and Sterile Intra-Amniotic Inflammation in Cervical Insufficiency with Prolapsed Fetal Membranes: Clinical Implications. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2021, 48, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Winters, A.D.; Romero, R.; Graffice, E.; Gomez-Lopez, N.; Jung, E.; Kanninen, T.; Theis, K.R. Optimization and validation of two multiplex qPCR assays for the rapid detection of microorganisms commonly invading the amniotic cavity. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2022, 149, 103460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. DiGiulio, D.B. Diversity of microbes in amniotic fluid. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012, 17, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Han, Y.W.; Shen, T.; Chung, P.; Buhimschi, I.A.; Buhimschi, C.S. Uncultivated bacteria as etiologic agents of intra-amniotic inflammation leading to preterm birth. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bikle, D.D.; Feingold, K.R.; Anawalt, B.; Blackman, M.R.; Boyce, A.; Chrousos, G.; Corpas, E.; de Herder, W.W.; Dhatariya, K.; Dungan, K.; et al. Vitamin D: Production, Metabolism and Mechanisms of Action. In Endotext [Internet]; MDText.com Inc.: South Dartmouth, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hsieh, J.C.; Nakajima, S.; Galligan, M.A.; Jurutka, P.W.; Haussler, C.A.; Whitfield, G.K.; Haussler, M.R. Receptor mediated genomic action of the 1,25(OH)2D3 hormone: Expression of the human vitamin D receptor in E. coli. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995, 53, 583–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cao, Y.; Jia, X.; Huang, Y.; Wang, J.; Lu, C.; Yuan, X.; Xu, J.; Zhu, H. Vitamin D stimulates miR-26b-5p to inhibit placental COX-2 expression in preeclampsia. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mahendroo, M. Cervical hyaluronan biology in pregnancy, parturition and preterm birth. Matrix Biol. 2019, 78–79, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ruscheinsky, M.; De la Motte, C.; Mahendroo, M. Hyaluronan and its binding proteins during cervical ripening and parturition: Dynamic changes in size, distribution and temporal sequence. Matrix Biol. 2008, 27, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gonzalez, J.M.; Xu, H.; Ofori, E.; Elovitz, M.A. Toll-like receptors in the uterus, cervix, and placenta: Is pregnancy an immunosuppressed state? Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2007, 197, 296.e1–296.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, C.H.; Roh, C.R.; Kim, T.J.; Choi, Y.L.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, B.G.; Lee, J.H.; Bae, D.S. Expression of CD44 adhesion molecules on human placentae. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006, 128, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, X.B.; Qi, Q.R.; Wu, K.L.; Xie, Q.Z. Role of osteopontin in decidualization and pregnancy success. Reproduction 2018, 155, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Icer, M.A.; Gezmen-Karadag, M. The multiple functions and mechanisms of osteopontin. Clin. Biochem. 2018, 59, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baines, K.J.; Klausner, M.S.; Patterson, V.S.; Renaud, S.J. Interleukin-15 deficient rats have reduced osteopontin at the maternal-fetal interface. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1079164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qi, Q.R.; Xie, Q.Z.; Liu, X.L.; Zhou, Y. Osteopontin is expressed in the mouse uterus during early pregnancy and promotes mouse blastocyst attachment and invasion in vitro. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, L.Z.; Liu, X.L.; Xie, Q.Z. Osteopontin facilitates invasion in human trophoblastic cells via promoting matrix metalloproteinase-9 in vitro. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 14121–14130. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xia, J.; Qiao, F.; Su, F.; Liu, H. Implication of expression of osteopontin and its receptor integrin alphanubeta3 in the placenta in the development of preeclampsia. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci. 2009, 29, 755–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Özer, A.; Yaylalı, A.; Koçarslan, S. The role of osteopontin in the pathogenesis of placenta percreta. Ginekol. Pol. 2018, 89, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Long, Y.; Chen, Y.; Fu, X.Q.; Yang, F.; Chen, Z.W.; Mo, G.L.; Lao, D.Y.; Li, M.J. Research on the expression of MRNA-518b in the pathogenesis of placenta accreta. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nomura, S.; Wills, A.J.; Edwards, D.R.; Heath, J.K.; Hogan, B.L. Developmental expression of 2ar (osteopontin) and SPARC (osteonectin) RNA as revealed by in situ hybridization. J. Cell Biol. 1988, 106, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Herington, J.L.; Bany, B.M. The conceptus increases secreted phosphoprotein 1 gene expression in the mouse uterus during the progression of decidualization mainly due to its effects on uterine natural killer cells. Reproduction 2007, 133, 1213–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kramer, A.C.; Erikson, D.W.; McLendon, B.A.; Seo, H.; Hayashi, K.; Spencer, T.E.; Bazer, F.W.; Burghardt, R.C.; Johnson, G.A. SPP1 expression in the mouse uterus and placenta: Implications for implantation†. Biol. Reprod. 2021, 105, 892–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yi, Y.; Cheng, J.C.; Klausen, C.; Leung, P.C.K. TGF-β1 inhibits human trophoblast cell invasion by upregulating cyclooxygenase-2. Placenta 2018, 68, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, Z.; Liu, D.; Deng, F. The Role of Vitamin D in Immune System and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Inflamm. Res. 2022, 15, 3167–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Senbanjo, L.T.; Chellaiah, M.A. CD44: A Multifunctional Cell Surface Adhesion Receptor Is a Regulator of Progression and Metastasis of Cancer Cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pazhohan, A.; Amidi, F.; Akbari-Asbagh, F.; Seyedrezazadeh, E.; Aftabi, Y.; Abdolalizadeh, J.; Khodarahmian, M.; Khanlarkhani, N.; Sobhani, A. Expression and shedding of CD44 in the endometrium of women with endometriosis and modulating effects of vitamin D: A randomized exploratory trial. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 178, 150–158. [Google Scholar]
  35. Stout, M.J.; Conlon, B.; Landeau, M.; Lee, I.; Bower, C.; Zhao, Q.; Roehl, K.A.; Nelson, D.M.; Macones, G.A.; Mysorekar, I.U. Identification of intracellular bacteria in the basal plate of the human placenta in term and preterm gestations. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2013, 208, 226.e1–226.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Witt, R.G.; Blair, L.; Frascoli, M.; Rosen, M.J.; Nguyen, Q.H.; Bercovici, S.; Zompi, S.; Romero, R.; Mackenzie, T.C. Detection of microbial cell-free DNA in maternal and umbilical cord plasma in patients with chorioamnionitis using next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ng, B.K.; Chuah, J.N.; Cheah, F.C.; Mohamed Ismail, N.A.; Tan, G.C.; Wong, K.K.; Lim, P.S. Maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. Front. Surg. 2023, 10, 1084867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McDonald, H.M.; Chambers, H.M. Intrauterine infection and spontaneous midgestation abortion: Is the spectrum of microorganisms similar to that in preterm labor? Infect. Dis. Obs. Gynecol. 2000, 5–6, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Heerema-McKenney, A. Defense and infection of the human placenta. APMIS 2018, 126, 570–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, J.R.; Tikellis, G.; Paltiel, O.; Klebanoff, M.; Magnus, P.; Northstone, K.; Golding, J.; Ward, M.H.; Linet, M.S.; Olsen, S.F.; et al. Association of common maternal infections with birth outcomes: A multinational cohort study. Infection 2024, 52, 1553–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, H.; Dong, M.; Xie, W.; Qi, W.; Teng, F.; Li, H.; Yan, Y.; Wang, C.; Han, C.; Xue, F. Mixed Vaginitis in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy Is Associated with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 798738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Holliday, M.; Uddipto, K.; Castillo, G.; Vera, L.E.; Quinlivan, J.A.; Mendz, G.L. Insights into the Genital Microbiota of Women Who Experienced Fetal Death in Utero. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Doster, R.S.; Sutton, J.A.; Rogers, L.M.; Aronoff, D.M.; Gaddy, J.A. Streptococcus agalactiae Induces Placental Macrophages to Release Extracellular Traps Loaded with Tissue Remodeling Enzymes via an Oxidative Burst-Dependent Mechanism. mBio 2018, 9, e02084-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Brokaw, A.; Furuta, A.; Dacanay, M.; Rajagopal, L.; Adams Waldorf, K.M. Bacterial and Host Determinants of Group B Streptococcal Vaginal Colonization and Ascending Infection in Pregnancy. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 720789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Obut, M.; Oğlak, S.C. Expression of CD44 and IL-10 in normotensive and preeclamptic placental tissue. Ginekol. Pol. 2020, 91, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Diao, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Xu, W.; Cao, H.; Kohanawa, M.; Li, L. Osteopontin expression and relation to streptococcal disease severity in mice. Scand J Infect Dis 2011, 43, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jordan, A.R.; Racine, R.R.; Hennig, M.J.; Lokeshwar, V.B. The Role of CD44 in Disease Pathophysiology and Targeted Treatment. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Castello, L.M.; Baldrighi, M.; Molinari, L.; Salmi, L.; Cantaluppi, V.; Vaschetto, R.; Zunino, G.; Quaglia, M.; Bellan, M.; Gavelli, F.; et al. The Role of Osteopontin as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Sepsis and Septic Shock. Cells 2019, 8, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, T. Vaginal microbiota: Potential targets for vulvovaginal candidiasis infection. Heliyon 2024, 10, e27239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. De Oliveira, D.M.P.; Forde, B.M.; Kidd, T.J.; Harris, P.N.A.; Schembri, M.A.; Beatson, S.A.; Paterson, D.L.; Walker, M.J. Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 33, e00181-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gunduz, O.; Kucukozkan, T. Predictive Role of Osteopontin and Inflammation Markers in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Premature Membrane Rupture. Adv. Res. Obs. Gynaecol. 2024, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sweeney, E.L.; Dando, S.J.; Kallapur, S.G.; Knox, C.L. The Human Ureaplasma Species as Causative Agents of Chorioamnionitis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 30, 349–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bespalova, O.; Bakleicheva, M.; Kovaleva, I.; Tolibova, G.; Tral, T.; Kogan, I. Expression of vitamin D and vitamin D receptor in chorionic villous in missed abortion. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019, 35, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Urrego, D.; Liwa, A.C.; Cole, W.C.; Wood, S.L.; Slater, D.M. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors for treating preterm labour: What is the molecular evidence? Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2019, 97, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Anderson, S.M.; Thurman, A.R.; Chandra, N.; Jackson, S.S.; Asin, S.; Rollenhagen, C.; Ghosh, M.; Daniels, J.; Vann, N.C.; Clark, M.R.; et al. Vitamin D Status Impacts Genital Mucosal Immunity and Markers of HIV-1 Susceptibility in Women. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bodnar, L.M.; Krohn, M.A.; Simhan, H.N. Maternal vitamin D deficiency is associated with bacterial vaginosis in the first trimester of pregnancy. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 1157–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Salvi, V.; Scutera, S.; Rossi, S.; Zucca, M.; Alessandria, M.; Greco, D.; Bosisio, D.; Sozzani, S.; Musso, T. Dual regulation of osteopontin production by TLR stimulation in dendritic cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013, 94, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Inoue, M.; Moriwaki, Y.; Arikawa, T.; Chen, Y.H.; Oh, Y.J.; Oliver, T.; Shinohara, M.L. Cutting edge: Critical role of intracellular osteopontin in antifungal innate immune responses. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gigi, R.M.S.; Buitrago-Garcia, D.; Taghavi, K.; Dunaiski, C.M.; van de Wijgert, J.H.H.M.; Peters, R.P.H.; Low, N. Vulvovaginal yeast infections during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health 2023, 23, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. O’Brien, V.P.; Gilbert, N.M.; Lebratti, T.; Agarwal, K.; Foster, L.; Shin, H.; Lewis, A.L. Low-dose inoculation of Escherichia coli achieves robust vaginal colonization and results in ascending infection accompanied by severe uterine inflammation in mice. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. d’Enfert, C.; Kaune, A.K.; Alaban, L.R.; Chakraborty, S.; Cole, N.; Delavy, M.; Kosmala, D.; Marsaux, B.; Fróis-Martins, R.; Morelli, M.; et al. The impact of the Fungus-Host-Microbiota interplay upon Candida albicans infections: Current knowledge and new perspectives. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 45, fuaa060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bengoechea, J.A.; Sa Pessoa, J. Klebsiella pneumoniae infection biology: Living to counteract host defences. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 43, 123–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Histopathological changes in the placenta from women with vaginal infection. (A) E. coli infection. Areas of hemorrhage in the villous and intervillous space (black arrows) (HE×10). (B) Klebsiella infection—cytotrophoblast layer showing large, irregular, and hyperchromatic nuclei with more eosinophilic or amphophilic cytoplasm (black arrows) (HE×10). (C) GBS infection—the villous space is loose and edematous, with many fetal blood vessels and rare cells (black arrows) (HE×20). (D) Enterococcus faecalis infection—the villous space is dens with less vessels and rare cells (black arrows) (HE×10). (E) Candida spp. Infection—membrane infiltration (black arrows) (HE×10). (F) Ureaplasma urealyticum infection—placental fibrinoid and lymphocytic infiltration (black arrow) (black arrows) (HE×10).
Figure 1. Histopathological changes in the placenta from women with vaginal infection. (A) E. coli infection. Areas of hemorrhage in the villous and intervillous space (black arrows) (HE×10). (B) Klebsiella infection—cytotrophoblast layer showing large, irregular, and hyperchromatic nuclei with more eosinophilic or amphophilic cytoplasm (black arrows) (HE×10). (C) GBS infection—the villous space is loose and edematous, with many fetal blood vessels and rare cells (black arrows) (HE×20). (D) Enterococcus faecalis infection—the villous space is dens with less vessels and rare cells (black arrows) (HE×10). (E) Candida spp. Infection—membrane infiltration (black arrows) (HE×10). (F) Ureaplasma urealyticum infection—placental fibrinoid and lymphocytic infiltration (black arrow) (black arrows) (HE×10).
Ijms 26 02863 g001
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical placenta expression of the VDR. The arrows indicate positive staining.
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical placenta expression of the VDR. The arrows indicate positive staining.
Ijms 26 02863 g002
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical visualization of the CD44 in the plasma membrane of some extravillous cytotrophoblastic cells in the basal plate, in the mesenchymal cells (histiocytic component), and the large majority of the decidual cells showed positive immunostaining for this marker. The arrows indicate positive staining.
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical visualization of the CD44 in the plasma membrane of some extravillous cytotrophoblastic cells in the basal plate, in the mesenchymal cells (histiocytic component), and the large majority of the decidual cells showed positive immunostaining for this marker. The arrows indicate positive staining.
Ijms 26 02863 g003
Figure 4. OPN staining was absent or very weak, being noticed at the periphery of chorionic villi (cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast layers on the surface of villi). The arrows indicate positive staining.
Figure 4. OPN staining was absent or very weak, being noticed at the periphery of chorionic villi (cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast layers on the surface of villi). The arrows indicate positive staining.
Ijms 26 02863 g004
Figure 5. COX-2 was primarily expressed in the various villous types, especially in stem villi, amniotic epithelial cells, chorionic trophoblasts, decidual cells, and weak staining in the mesenchymal cells. The arrows indicate positive staining.
Figure 5. COX-2 was primarily expressed in the various villous types, especially in stem villi, amniotic epithelial cells, chorionic trophoblasts, decidual cells, and weak staining in the mesenchymal cells. The arrows indicate positive staining.
Ijms 26 02863 g005
Figure 6. VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2 immunohistochemistry analysis from the control group. The arrows indicate positive staining.
Figure 6. VDR, CD44, OPN, and COX-2 immunohistochemistry analysis from the control group. The arrows indicate positive staining.
Ijms 26 02863 g006
Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the included women.
Table 1. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the included women.
MeanSt. Dev.95.0% CI for MeanPercentile 25 MedianPercentile 75MinMaxMann–
Whitney U
p-Value
Lower BoundUpper
Bound
Age (years)Control group27.84.326.828.827293119340.13
Vaginal infection group29.36.327.830.72530341743
Weeks of gestationControl group39.71.439.4403840413741<0.01
Vaginal infection group34.65.333.435.83036392441
Fetal birth weight (g)Control group3503.1313.93428.3357833603530367028004340<0.01
Vaginal infection group2557.311602295.72818.91350292035205704540
APGAR scoreControl group8.50.58.48.6899890.28
Vaginal infection group8.11.57.78.4789410
Antepartum hemoglobin level (milligrams/deciliter)Control group12.31.112.012.611.812.113.610.013.70.34
Vaginal infection group12.01.111.812.311.412.212.79.514.3
Postpartum hemoglobin level (milligrams/deciliter)Control group10.9.810.811.110.410.911.59.012.10.26
Vaginal infection group11.13.210.411.810.010.811.49.037.3
Antepartum hematocrit level (%)Control group36.33.435.537.135.037.038.928.140.00.15
Vaginal infection group35.25.234.036.434.336.138.312.242.1
Postpartum hematocrit level (%)Control group31.82.931.132.529.031.134.327.837.00.41
Vaginal infection group31.33.330.532.028.530.433.625.638.5
Leucocyte count (103/L)Control group13,184387412,31114,05810,26012,97016,110704025,2400.89
Vaginal infection group25,92041,82015,94935,89210,35011,48515,4309900150,303
Platelet count (106/L)Control group220,17178,308201,500238,843147,000217,500278,000132,000355,0000.46
Vaginal infection group225,70566,226210,773240,637170,000218,000260,000123,000362,000
C reactive protein value (milligrams/deciliter)Control group3.121.522.763.492.002.754.101.0010.00<0.01
Vaginal infection group24.9226.6118.9230.924.5012.9836.001.9098.00
Table 2. VDR, CD44, OPN, and anti-COX-2 placental expression in vaginal infections during pregnancy.
Table 2. VDR, CD44, OPN, and anti-COX-2 placental expression in vaginal infections during pregnancy.
VDRCD44OPNCOX-2Total
NegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositive
Candida spp.Count2101025711112
% within cultura16.7%83.3%83.3%16.7%41.7%58.3%8.3%91.7%100.0%
Escherichia coliCount31301616001616
% within cultura18.8%81.3%0.0%100.0%100.0%0.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%
Enterococcus faecalisCount11321111201313
% within cultura7.1%92.9%15.4%84.6%84.6%15.4%0.0%100.0%100.0%
KlebsiellaCount91918201010
% within cultura90.0%10.0%90.0%10.0%80.0%20.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%
Streptococcus beta hemoliticCount11311421301515
% within cultura7.1%92.9%6.7%93.3%13.3%86.7%0.0%100.0%100.0%
Ureaplasma urealyticumCount1111113901212
% within cultura8.3%91.7%8.3%91.7%25.0%75.0%0.0%100.0%100.0%
TotalCount176123554533 17778
% within cultura24.6%75.4%29.5%70.5%57.7%42.3%1.3%98.7%100%
Table 3. VDR, CD44, OPN, and anti-COX-2 placental expression in the vaginal infection group.
Table 3. VDR, CD44, OPN, and anti-COX-2 placental expression in the vaginal infection group.
VDR CD44OPNCOX-2Total
NegativePositiveNegative Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive
GroupVaginal infectionsCount 16622355453317778
%within lot 20.51%79.49%29.5%70.5%57.7%42.3%1.3%98.7%100%
No vaginal infectionsCount 14561456561407070
%within lot 20%80%20%80%80%20%0%100%100%
TotalCount 3011837111101471147148
%within lot 20.27%79.7%25%75%68.2%31.8%0.7%99.3%100%
Table 4. Statistical significance of the analyzed markers.
Table 4. Statistical significance of the analyzed markers.
Analyzed MarkersVDRCD44OPNCOX-2
Sig.0.9070.1850.004Not computed
Exp (B)0.9530.5982.933
Lower0.4270.2791.402
Upper2.1291.2806.136
OR1.1021.672.933
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matasariu, D.R.; Condac, C.; Bîrluțiu, V.; Lozneanu, L.; Bujor, I.E.; Boiculese, V.L.; Sava, M.; Ursache, A. Placental Molecular Expression of Different Pathogenic Vaginal Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072863

AMA Style

Matasariu DR, Condac C, Bîrluțiu V, Lozneanu L, Bujor IE, Boiculese VL, Sava M, Ursache A. Placental Molecular Expression of Different Pathogenic Vaginal Infections. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(7):2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072863

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matasariu, Daniela Roxana, Constantin Condac, Victoria Bîrluțiu, Ludmila Lozneanu, Iuliana Elena Bujor, Vasile Lucian Boiculese, Mihai Sava, and Alexandra Ursache. 2025. "Placental Molecular Expression of Different Pathogenic Vaginal Infections" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 7: 2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072863

APA Style

Matasariu, D. R., Condac, C., Bîrluțiu, V., Lozneanu, L., Bujor, I. E., Boiculese, V. L., Sava, M., & Ursache, A. (2025). Placental Molecular Expression of Different Pathogenic Vaginal Infections. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(7), 2863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072863

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop