Next Article in Journal
Revisiting the Role of the Leucine Plug/Valve in the Human ABCG2 Multidrug Transporter
Previous Article in Journal
Induction of Cell Death and Regulation of Autocrine Vitamin D Metabolism in Cervical Cancer by Physiological and GI20 Doses of 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in the Development and Application of Cell-Loaded Collagen Scaffolds

1
Dongguan Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Formulation Technology, Biomedical Innovation Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research and Development of Natural Drugs, and School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808, China
2
Department of Pathophysiology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(9), 4009; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094009
Submission received: 11 March 2025 / Revised: 5 April 2025 / Accepted: 17 April 2025 / Published: 24 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)

Abstract

:
Tissue engineering techniques aim to improve or replace biological tissues or organs by utilizing the extracellular matrix to facilitate the repair of damaged tissues or organs. Collagen-based scaffolds offer numerous advantages, including excellent biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, biodegradability, hemostatic properties, and mechanical strength. Collagen scaffolds can reconstruct the extracellular microenvironment, promote cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation, and play a critical role in cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interactions. Collagen has been extensively utilized in tissue engineering to facilitate tissue repair and organ reconstruction. This review examines the properties of collagen, including its composition, structure, biological characteristics, and role in regulating various cellular behaviors. Additionally, the preparation of cell-loaded collagen scaffolds is discussed, along with a comprehensive overview of their applications in various tissues, including skin, nerve, bone/cartilage, heart, liver, and others. Emerging strategies and future perspectives for clinical tissue repair are also presented. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the mechanisms underlying the use of cell-loaded collagen scaffolds as advanced biomaterials, emphasizing their potential to expand the clinical applications of collagen.

1. Introduction

Tissue and organ regeneration after injury or disease remains a significant clinical challenge, as regular healing is a dynamic, complex, and multi-stage process involving various cellular processes and cell-matrix interactions [1]. Although human tissues possess regenerative capabilities, their capacity is limited, particularly in pathological conditions where repair through intrinsic healing mechanisms becomes challenging [2]. In recent years, advances in tissue engineering technology have offered potential solutions to organ shortages, tissue defects, and dysfunctions by constructing scaffolds that mimic the extracellular matrix, delivering oxygen and nutrients to tissues, and providing appropriate biological and physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, and mechanical strength to repair or restore damaged bones, organs, or tissues [3]. An ideal tissue-engineered scaffold comprises three key elements to support cell-tissue regeneration: an appropriate cell source, growth factor, and scaffold biomaterial [4].
Currently, materials commonly used for tissue engineering are categorized into natural polymers (e.g., collagen, gelatin, chitosan, alginate, elastin, and fibronectin, among others) and synthetic polymers (e.g., polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl alcohol, and polysorbate lactone) [5,6]. Collagen, derived from the natural extracellular matrix, exhibits excellent biocompatibility, degradability, and low immunogenicity. It minimizes adverse reactions such as infections, inflammation, and local tissue responses while contributing to cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation, thereby promoting tissue repair [7,8,9]. Gelatin, a derivative of collagen, retains the specific biological properties of collagen, exhibiting improved water solubility and processability compared to collagen, and is extensively used in the fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds. Although it preserves the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) sequence, it lacks the active triple-helix structure, thereby influencing certain aspects of cellular behavior regulation [10]. Additionally, collagen can activate coagulation factors to produce thrombin in response to tissue injury, cleave fibrinogen into fibrin, and aggregate platelets to form a thrombus, effectively preventing bleeding. These hemostatic properties have led to its widespread clinical use [11]. Collagen can also be a carrier for delivering drugs or growth factors, enabling stable and sustained release to enhance tissue repair further [12]. Consequently, collagen shows significant potential as a cellular scaffold in regenerative medicine across various tissue engineering applications.
This review provides a brief introduction to collagen, focusing on its structure, biological properties, and effects on the regulation of cellular behavior, as well as outlining the methods of collagen scaffold preparation, detailing its specific applications in tissues such as skin, nerves, bone, heart, and liver, and concluding with an outlook on future research directions in the field of collagen.

2. Collagen Sources, Structure and Properties

To date, 40 vertebrate collagen genes have been identified, forming 29 different homo- or heterotrimers. For example, most type I collagens consist of a heterotrimer composed of two α1 chains and one α2 chain, whereas type II, III, and VII collagens exist exclusively as homotrimers [13]. Type I collagens are primarily derived from mammalian skin and tendon tissues, including porcine, bovine, and ovine sources, while type II collagen is predominantly obtained from cartilage tissues of bovine, porcine, and chicken origin [13]. Notably, collagen can also be sourced from marine organisms [14], such as jellyfish, sea urchins, starfish, fish, and sustainable fishery by-products, including fish phosphorus [15,16], fish skin [16], and fish bones. In the human body, collagen constitutes approximately 30% of the total protein content and is distributed across various tissues, including the skin, intervertebral discs [17], tendons [18], bones [19,20], cornea [21] and placenta [22].
The primary structure of collagen predominantly consists of the repeating amino acid sequence [Gly-X-Y]n, where proline and hydroxyproline occupy the X and Y positions, respectively; the secondary structure results from the spatial exclusion between proline and hydroxyproline residues at the X and Y positions, forming an α-helix [23]. The tertiary structure, known as tropocollagen, is approximately 300 nm in length, 1.5 nm in diameter, and has a molecular weight of approximately 300 kDa. It is synthesized into a superhelix from three left-handed helical polypeptide chains [24]. Additionally, the tertiary structure forms a collagen microfiber synthesized from tropocollagen, with a staggered quarter-cycle arrangement of the head and tail. These fibers are cross-linked in parallel by covalent bonds and exhibit a band gap in a D-type cycle (approximately 67 nm) [25] (Figure 1).
The primary mechanical strength of collagen arises from its triple helix structure and protofibrils. Structurally, the triple helix adopts an all-trans amide-bonded polyproline type II helix, stabilized by intrachain n→π* interactions between adjacent amide groups and interchain hydrogen bonding between the Gly N-H and Xaa C=O groups [26]. Variations in the Gly-X-Y sequence along the collagen chain length also result in localized differences in helix spacing, kinetics, and thermal stability, thereby affecting the mechanical properties of collagen [27]. Within collagen chains, atoms of individual chains are linked by covalent bonds, while hydrogen bonds, dipole-dipole interactions, ionic bonds, and van der Waals forces connect protofibrils to form fiber bundles [28]. The length, diameter, spatial distribution, type, and molecular weight of collagen fibers collectively determine the mechanical properties of tissues.
In living organisms, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are the only enzymes capable of degrading collagen [29]. Furthermore, the overexpression of MMP-9 in chronic wounds results in delayed wound healing by disrupting the structure of basement membrane proteins, thereby impeding keratinocyte migration, attachment, and epidermal reconstruction [30,31]. Thus, collagen can not only be thoroughly degraded and absorbed by the body but also bind to overexpressed MMPs in wounds to inhibit their activity and prevent the degradation of the extracellular matrix. Additionally, promoting inhibition of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP) expression and the subsequent inhibition of MMP activity further reduces the inflammatory response [32].

3. Effects of Collagen on Cellular Behavior

Collagens interact with cells through various receptors, and their role in regulating cell growth, differentiation, and migration via receptor binding is well-documented. Cell adhesion is a fundamental cellular process that involves the attachment of cells to other cells or inanimate surfaces. Collagen-cellular recognition often occurs through the binding of integrins and discoidin domain receptors (DDRs). The triple-helical collagen ligand GxOGEx’ binds to integrins α1β1, α2β1, α10β1, and α11β1, supporting cellular activity. The strength of cellular adhesion largely depends on the intrinsic affinity between the collagen ligand and the receptor [33,34]. DDR1 and DDR2 are dimeric discoidin domain-containing protein receptors with tyrosine kinase activity, which are activated upon binding to collagen. DDR1 primarily interacts with collagen types I, II, III, and IV, recognizing the collagen triple-helical structure through its discoidin domains. It is widely expressed in epithelial cells, neurons, and macrophages [35,36]. DDR2, in contrast, binds mainly to collagen types I and III and exhibits a high affinity for the GVMGFO motif in collagen [37]. It is predominantly expressed in MSCs, fibroblasts, and chondrocytes [37]. Overexpression of DDR or activation of DDR receptors at the GVMGFO site promotes enhanced integrin-mediated cell adhesion [38]. On the other hand, DDRs mediate cell migration by regulating the cytoskeleton and remodeling the extracellular matrix and protease activity. For example, DDR1 binding to collagen activates the MAPK/ERK pathway, which regulates immune cell migration, monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation, and the secretion of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α and monocyte chemotactic protein-1, further enhancing macrophage migration and chemotaxis [35]. In contrast, smooth muscle cells lacking DDR1 exhibit reduced proliferation, decreased migration, and diminished MMP activity [39]. DDR2 activation primarily regulates MMP expression to mediate cell migration by inducing MMP-8 expression, degrading collagen networks, and releasing collagen-derived chemotactic peptides, thereby inducing neutrophil chemotactic migration in 3D matrices [40]. Human lung fibroblast migration is facilitated through the degradation of the basement membrane by MMP-2 and MMP-10 [41].
In addition, cell migration relies on sensing environmental cues and responding by migrating toward or away from them through mechanisms such as chemotaxis, haptotaxis, durotaxis, and contact guidance [42]. Haptotaxis is triggered by anisotropic alterations in the collagen matrix in vivo, potentially caused by cell-mediated changes in matrix tension or variations in local collagen synthesis and deposition [43,44]. Collagen matrix stiffness influences durotactic migration, where cell clusters migrate along stiffness gradients within the collagen matrix [45]. Cells perceive the topology of collagen fibers within the matrix, resulting in contact-guided migration behavior that enhances the speed and persistence of cell migration [42,46].
Cell proliferation in organisms is influenced by various factors within the extracellular environment and microenvironment, including the vasculature and extracellular matrix. Among these, tissue injury represents a physiological process requiring the proliferation of parenchymal cells to repair damaged tissues. Collagen is the most abundant ECM protein in the dermis and plays a key role in normal tissue homeostasis and skin wound healing [47]. During wound healing, matrix synthesis and remodeling primarily result from the production of collagen and MMPs, particularly MMP-2, by fibroblasts [48]. DDR2 primarily mediates the regulation of collagen, MMP expression, and cell proliferation. Increased DDR2 expression enhances endogenous collagen synthesis, and more collagen can activate DDR2, thereby promoting fibroblast proliferation [49]. It also induces MMP-2 expression, which facilitates the degradation of the damaged matrix, leading to the release of growth factors and chemokines that further stimulate fibroblast proliferation and ECM remodeling [37,49,50]. Studies have shown that DDR2-deficient mice exhibit delayed wound closure, reduced fibroblast recruitment, decreased tensile strength, and diminished collagen content in skin wound healing [51]. Moreover, dysregulated DDR1 expression is associated with impaired wound healing, as keloid fibroblasts express higher levels of DDR1 than normal fibroblasts, potentially contributing to keloid formation by promoting excessive collagen deposition [48].
Specifically, the application of collagen dressing releases degradation products that promote fibroblast proliferation [52]. Additionally, activated platelets or inflammatory cells release MMP-1, which cleaves collagen telopeptides to expose bioactive sites on collagen fibers, enabling immune cells and fibroblasts to migrate and proliferate toward the injured tissues in response to chemokines and cytokines [53]. Meanwhile, macrophages provide a sustained source of growth factors that stimulate fibroplasia and angiogenesis, thereby promoting endothelial cell proliferation for the repair of damaged tissues [54].
Stem cells are undifferentiated, immature, self-replicating cells, including pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells (ESCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hematopoietic stem cells, and neural stem cells (NSCs), whose differentiation is influenced by multiple factors [55]. These factors include structural properties such as matrix stiffness, pore structure, and scaffold fiber diameter. For example, collagen hydrogels can stimulate the upregulation of SOX-9 expression, thereby mediating the differentiation of early-cohesion-stage MSCs into chondrocytes via ROCK-dependent actinomyosin contraction [56]. Additionally, collagen influences the differentiation behavior of other cell types, such as human dermal fibroblasts (NHDFs) [57] and mouse adult myoblasts (C2C12) [58].

4. Collagen Scaffold Preparation

4.1. Chemical Cross-Linking

Chemically cross-linked hydrogels are formed through covalent bonding between polymer chains via various reactions, including Schiff base formation, Michael addition, condensation, ‘click’ chemistry, UV cross-linking, free-radical polymerization, and enzyme-induced cross-linking [59]. They have enhanced mechanical properties and stability compared to physically cross-linked hydrogels.

4.1.1. Click Chemistry

‘Click chemistry’ is a combinatorial chemistry strategy focusing on synthesizing carbon-heteroatom (C-X-C) bonds. Key reaction types in this approach include cycloaddition, nucleophilic ring-opening, the carbonyl chemistry of non-alcoholic aldehydes, and the addition of carbon-carbon double or triple bonds [60].
Thiol-alkene click chemistry activates thiols (-SH) through light or thermal initiators, leading to the formation of sulfur radicals. This process facilitates the Michael addition of olefinic double bonds (C=C) via free radical chain reactions. Alternatively, under alkaline conditions, the thiolate anion (R-S) undergoes a nucleophilic attack on the activated olefinic double bond, resulting in the formation of a thioether bond. This reaction exhibits high efficiency but necessitates the incorporation of click-functional groups into natural macromolecules [60,61]. Pupkaite et al. [62] utilized thiol-modified collagen and PEG-maleimide through a Michael addition reaction to form an injectable hydrogel. The hydrogel-encapsulated bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) maintained over 90% survival. Xu et al. [61] developed hydrogels composed of thiol-modified collagen and acrylate copolymers through a Michael addition reaction, which enabled the encapsulation of BMSCs, facilitating rapid diffusion and the formation of cellular networks.
The copper-free click chemistry reaction, strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC), proceeds through the nucleophilic attack of azide (N3) on the carbon atoms of an alkyne, forming a five-membered ring via a [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction. This reaction is devoid of copper toxicity, enabling scaffold fabrication in the presence of living cells and facilitating in-situ cross-linking of living tissues [60,63].Chen et al. [64] Cross-linked collagen via a SPAAC reaction and hyaluronic acid via a Michael addition reaction and combined the two to form an interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel. This hydrogel was inoculated with corneal epithelial cells, achieving a 99% survival rate. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) can be conjugated and immobilized onto the collagen surface via the SPAAC reaction, enhancing the adhesion and proliferation of corneal epithelial cells [65]. This reaction may also facilitate the introduction of specific functional groups into collagen, enabling efficient gelation.

4.1.2. Photoactivated Cross-Linking

Photoactivated cross-linking offers the advantage of rapidly forming hydrogel networks under mild conditions. Moreover, the physicochemical properties of the hydrogel, such as pore size and elastic modulus, can be tailored by adjusting the duration and intensity of light exposure, as well as the concentration of the photoinitiator [66].
Methacrylate groups containing conjugated double bonds are commonly introduced into natural macromolecules to provide photosensitive cross-linking sites. Upon UV exposure, photoinitiators cleave to generate free radicals, which subsequently attack unsaturated conjugated double bonds, triggering chain polymerization reactions that lead to the formation of covalent cross-linked networks [66]. He et al. [67] synthesized light-cured collagen methacrylate (COLMA) and chondroitin methacrylate (CSMA) by modifying type I collagen and chondroitin sulfate with methacrylic anhydride. This process resulted in a photo-cross-linked two-component CSMA-COLMA hydrogel matrix with an average storage modulus of 3.3 kPa and an elastic modulus of 30.3 kPa. Keratinocytes and fibroblasts encapsulated in the hydrogel expressed characteristic proteins. In addition, this system can also cross-link type II collagen (Col-II-MA), thereby promoting cellular morphological changes, BMSC proliferation, cartilage formation, and upregulation of chondrogenic gene expression [68].
Riboflavin (RF), also known as vitamin B2, is a cross-linking agent and photoinitiator for UV curing. RF transitions into an excited singlet state upon absorption of UV light energy, subsequently undergoing an intersystemic crossover mechanism to form the excited triplet state. When RF absorbs energy from ultraviolet light, it changes into an excited singlet state, undergoing intersystem crossing to form an excited triplet state and directly interacting with oxygen, generating singlet oxygen radicals. These radicals further oxidize collagen, forming intramolecular and intermolecular covalent cross-links between collagen amino acids [69,70]. Compared to methacrylic anhydride, this approach eliminates the need for photoinitiators, making it milder and more biologically safe; however, its mechanical properties are limited. Fan et al. [70] compared the bioactivity of fibroblasts in collagen matrices cross-linked by EDC/NHS, kyonipin, and RF. They found that RF-cross-linked matrices, which did not involve chemical cross-linking agents, exhibited a cell survival rate exceeding 80%, whereas chemically cross-linked collagen matrices exhibited some cytotoxic effects. In another study, BMSCs were encapsulated in a collagen/hyaluronic acid liquid mixture containing RF, which rapidly polymerized into a gel under blue light irradiation within three minutes [71].

4.1.3. Enzyme Cross-Linking

Enzyme cross-linking offers several advantages, including mild reaction conditions, minimal by-product formation, high specificity, and high yield. The key enzymes utilized in this process include lysine oxidase (LOX), glutamine transaminase (MTG), and horseradish peroxidase (HRP), which primarily target amino groups. Under physiological conditions, the post-translational modification of these enzymes on collagen helps maintain its stability, elasticity, and bioactivity. The strength of the gel can be regulated by adjusting the enzyme concentration, facilitating the formation of robust covalent bonds and promoting rapid gelation [72,73].
LOX is an enzyme primarily reliant on copper ions to catalyze the oxidative deamination of the ε-amino groups of lysine or hydroxylysine residues in collagen, generating aldehyde groups that condense to form stable aldimine cross-links [74,75]. This process primarily occurs during in vivo biosynthesis and is limited by the reaction rate, making it less commonly applied in the synthesis of biomaterials.
HRP utilizes H2O2 as an oxidant, catalyzing the formation of free radical couplings through tyrosine, histidine, or lysine residues, which enables rapid and non-specific cross-linking [76]. Ying et al. [73] cross-linked collagen and tyrosinated hyaluronic acid using HRP and H2O2 to form a hydrogel, in which encapsulated human microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs) and fibroblasts exhibited significant proliferative activity.
MTG possesses high catalytic efficiency and is widely employed to enhance the mechanical strength of collagen, which catalyzes the acyl transfer reaction between the γ-carboxamido group of glutamine residues (the acyl donor) and the ε-amino group of lysine residues (the acyl acceptor) in collagen peptide chains, leading to the formation of both inter- and intramolecular ε-(γ-glutamyl)-lysine covalent bonds [77]. For example, Tayabally et al. [78] cross-linked collagen with transglutaminase to form hydrogels, which provided an ideal environment for the three-dimensional culture of human dental pulp stem cells (HDPSCs). While an increased concentration of MTG promoted the formation of collagen fibers, it simultaneously enhanced the adhesion and proliferation of fibroblasts in the hydrogel [77].

4.2. Physical Force

Physically cross-linked hydrogels are primarily formed through reversible molecular interactions, including electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic/hydrophilic interactions, crystallization, self-assembly, and thermally induced chain entanglement. A significant advantage of these hydrogels is their biosafety, as they do not necessitate the introduction of chemical cross-linking agents, thereby mitigating potential cytotoxicity and other related concerns [79].
Temperature-induced phase transition hydrogels are modulated by varying the ratios of hydrophilic and hydrophobic components, resulting in differential solubilities at specific temperatures. These transitions are characterized by the Low Critical Solution Temperature (LCST) and Upper Critical Solution Temperature (UCST) [80]. Du et al. [81] employed simulated body fluid (SBF) to prepare a pH-neutral, rapid-sol-gel reversible thermosensitive collagen (RRTC) hydrogel. This material gelled into a hydrogel within 60 s at 37 °C and reverted to a collagen solution at 4 °C. The hydrogel effectively encapsulated various cells, including mouse fibroblasts (L929), HUVECs, mouse myeloma cells (Sp2/0), murine aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (MOVAS), rat intestinal epithelial cells (IEC-6), and human chondrocytes (HCs), resulting in approximately a ten-fold increase in proliferation over 14 days. Huang et al. [56] pre-polymerized neutral collagen, incubated at 4 °C and then at 37 °C for 30 min to form a hydrogel. The self-assembly of the collagen fiber network was controlled by adjusting the pre-polymerization time at 4 °C. As the incubation time at low temperatures increased, the diameter of the collagen fibers and their self-assembly progressively improved, leading to a more organized and interconnected collagen fiber network. Additionally, collagen fiber alignment was optimized using a low-temperature ammonia vapor technique. Collagen solution was introduced into a homemade freeze-casting device, where collagen fiber formation was induced at 0 °C. After 48 h, the collagen was immersed in 5× PBS to cause swelling, resulting in a fibrous collagen scaffold with high porosity, anisotropic properties, and enhanced cellular adhesion. This scaffold was then inoculated with NHDFs and C2C12 [82]. Unfortunately, the mechanical properties of self-assembled gels formed through temperature-induced phase transitions are insufficient to meet the mechanical demands of hard tissues (Figure 2).

4.3. Ionic Interaction Gelation

Sodium alginate is a naturally occurring polysaccharide-based polymer known for its unique gelation properties in aqueous solutions when exposed to divalent cations (e.g., Ca2⁺, Ba2⁺). These properties closely resemble those of a natural extracellular matrix, allowing for the encapsulation of cells in a highly hydrated, three-dimensional environment [83]. However, sodium alginate hydrogels possess certain limitations, including instability and fragility. Specifically, (1) the mechanical properties are insufficient to provide adequate support in stress-induced environments, and (2) the gel lacks adequate cell adhesion sites, resulting in suboptimal cellular interactions. Interpenetrating Polymer Network (IPN) technology can address these limitations. An IPN hydrogel is a three-dimensional network structure formed by two or more interpenetrating and entangled, cross-linked polymers. This structure has been extensively utilized as a scaffolding material in various biomedical applications, including tissue engineering and drug delivery systems [84]. Collagen, renowned for its exceptional cell adhesion properties, facilitates the migration of individual cells or cell clusters. Additionally, its abundance of functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amino groups) promotes the formation of hydrogen bonds with sodium alginate, creating an interpenetrating network. This interaction enhances the three-dimensional mesh structure of the co-blended hydrogel, improving its mechanical properties, promoting cell adhesion, and facilitating cell proliferation and migration [85].
Calcium ions (Ca2⁺) play a pivotal role in modulating the stiffness of hydrogels. Bernero et al. [86] cross-linked fast-relaxing and slow-relaxing alginate-collagen IPN hydrogels using 20 mM CaCl2 and 5 mM CaCl2, respectively. Their study revealed that the fast-relaxing gel promoted the early proliferation of murine osteoblasts (IDG-SW3), whereas the slow-relaxing gel facilitated osteogenic differentiation. Due to its ability to adjust stiffness, sodium alginate/collagen gel precursor solutions were also employed in microgel printing, incorporating the human fibroblast cell line (HS-5) and the epithelial adenocarcinoma cell line (MDA-MB-231). Adding Ca2⁺ subsequently induced gelation, enabling stiffness-adjustable 3D cell printing [87].
Alginate/collagen IPN network hydrogels provide a robust scaffold for facilitating diverse forms of cell growth, as demonstrated by Zhang et al. [88]. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) were employed to treat skin wounds by loading them onto these hydrogels. Furthermore, human osteosarcoma cells (MG-63), human osteosarcoma clonal cells (U2OS), epithelial adenocarcinoma cells (MDA-MB-231), and human colon cancer cells (HCT-116) were encapsulated within the hydrogels to construct 3D in vivo microenvironments for the study of cell migration [89].
Overall, the combination of collagen and alginate leverages the advantages of both materials, particularly the ability to preserve cellular activity during rapid gelation via ionic interactions. This synergy holds significant potential for developing cell-loaded structures in tissue regeneration engineering.

4.4. Freeze-Drying

Porous sponge scaffolds are considered ideal natural scaffolds due to their interconnected structure, which provides mechanical support and promotes cell adhesion and migration. These scaffolds are typically fabricated via a freeze-drying process, which effectively preserves the active triple-helical structure of collagen, as it does not require the addition of exogenous chemical reagents and is maintained at low temperatures. Additionally, pore size, morphology, and distribution can be precisely controlled by adjusting the freezing rate, freeze-drying temperature, and polymer concentration [90,91]. However, sponge scaffolds exhibit inherent limitations due to process constraints: (1) Their mechanical strength is insufficient to withstand significant mechanical loads in hydrated environments, restricting their application in tissues with high mechanical demands. (2) The degradation rate of these scaffolds is relatively rapid in comparison to other cross-linking methods, with a single collagen sponge completely degrading within weeks in an enzymatic in vivo environment. (3) Challenges related to long-term stability and storage arise, as sponge scaffolds are prone to moisture absorption, which can result in structural softening, collapse, and compromised performance in implanted tissue applications. Consequently, careful storage is necessary to maintain dryness and preserve their structural integrity [92,93].
To improve mechanical strength and degradation rate, cross-linkers or other biomaterials are often introduced to enhance the physicochemical properties of scaffolds. Khadivar et al. [94] freeze-dried type I collagen, along with nano-fibrillar cellulose and carboxymethyl diethylaminoethyl cellulose, to obtain porous sponges, resulting in scaffolds with enhanced tensile strength and improved stability. These scaffolds were subsequently loaded with BMSCs and differentiated keratinocytes for the repair of full-thickness wound injuries. Zhao et al. [95] cross-linked collagen with bialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose to enhance mechanical properties and optimize pore density. The resulting sponges formed a bilayer structure, with a dense upper layer supporting the proliferation of C2C12 myoblasts and a porous lower layer promoting the growth of osteoblasts MC3T3-E1. Table 1 summarizes the various cell types and preparation methods for collagen scaffold encapsulation. Table 2 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of preparation methods for cell-loaded collagen scaffolds.

5. Cell-Loaded Collagen Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

5.1. Skin Tissue Engineering

Skin trauma disrupts the normal anatomical structure and function, often resulting from exposure to external factors such as chemicals or environmental hazards. The physiological process of wound healing is divided into four phases: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling [52]. Currently, three main strategies in skin tissue engineering have been identified: (1) cell patches or solutions composed entirely of cells; (2) 3D scaffolds fabricated from synthetic or natural polymers; (3) 3D scaffolds and dermal substitutes co-cultured with cells in vitro. Collagen plays a crucial role in wound healing by supporting hemostasis, mitigating inflammation, inducing angiogenesis, and aiding tissue regeneration. Collagen enhances the healing process by maintaining cell viability and improving retention at the wound site when combined with stem cells. For instance, Lashkari et al. [96] developed a bilayer nanofiber scaffold dressing for full-thickness wounds in rats using electrospinning to deposit polycaprolactone/gelatin (PCL/Gel) nanofibers onto a collagen/alginate (Col/Alg) hydrogel. The dressing was subsequently seeded with adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), which alleviated inflammation, enhanced epithelialization, and induced collagen regeneration. Similarly, Khadivar et al. [94] used bone marrow-derived MSCs, differentiated into keratinocyte-like cells, in conjunction with skin scaffolds made of type I collagen, carboxymethyl diethylaminoethyl cellulose, and nanofibrillar cellulose to accelerate the healing of full-thickness wounds in rats. The same can be applied to chronic wounds. Through enhanced vascularization and paracrine signaling, 3D MSC spheroids combined with an injectable temperature-sensitive collagen/chitosan/β-glycerophosphate hydrogel accelerated the healing of diabetic wounds [97].
Collagen is also a viable option for dermal replacement matrix material, possessing a 3D structure similar to that of the dermis and the ability to be rapidly vascularized and appropriately degraded, thereby maintaining optimal strength and toughness. Liu et al. [98] implanted BMSCs into collagen dermal replacement scaffolds (CDRSs) to create bioactive skin substitutes for wound healing applications. These scaffolds effectively modulated the polarization of M1-type macrophages, supporting non-contractile epithelialization, granulation tissue formation, and neovascularization in diabetic wounds. These scaffolds are promising for treating chronic wounds and preventing disease recurrence. Xie et al. [99] inoculated MSCs into collagen/glycosaminoglycan matrices to engineer dermal-like tissue sheets (EDSs). When applied to wounds in diabetic and healthy mice, MSCs in the EDSs exhibited improved preservation compared to those in standalone collagen hydrogels or matrices. The EDSs retained a higher density of MSCs, enhanced their activity, and extended their presence at the wound site. Both collagen dermal substitutes induced the expression of chemokines and pro-angiogenic factors in injured tissue, facilitating chronic wound healing.

5.2. Neural Tissue Engineering

Injuries to the central nervous system (CNS) are a leading cause of disability worldwide and profoundly impact patients’ quality of life; however, effective therapeutic options for prediction and treatment remain lacking. Recent progress in neural tissue regeneration engineering has facilitated the development of novel therapeutic paradigms for neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and spinal cord injury (SCI) [100]. The restricted migratory capacity of exogenous cells toward the injury site hinders the in situ proliferation of neural stem cells. Collagen, however, serves as a scaffold for endogenous and transplanted cells, supporting cell growth and providing directional guidance for neural development [101]. In recent years, integrating transplantable biomaterials with cell-based therapies has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy.
TBI results from external mechanical forces that induce tissue strain or deformation, leading to secondary brain damage. This secondary injury is characterized by inflammation, necrosis, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and vascular disruption. As these delayed responses progress, they aggravate neurodegeneration and contribute to increased cell death [102]. Collagen scaffolds mitigate cell inactivation due to insufficient tissue support by enabling the controlled transport of neural stem cells to the injury site and promoting their growth in the affected area. Kim et al. [103] reported that a novel delivery method using collagen/fibronectin hydrogel for delivering mouse neural stem cell (mNSC) spheroids maintained mNSC viability, reduced neuronal degeneration, and enhanced cognitive function. Treated mice exhibited a significant increase in preference for novel objects, demonstrating improved cognitive performance through the reconstruction of the damaged cortex to treat mild TBI. Zhang et al. [104] utilized collagen/heparan sulfate porous scaffolds embedded with neural stem cells (NSCs) to treat a rat model of TBI induced by controlled cortical impingement. Following treatment, marked improvements were observed in the injured brain tissue, including enhanced nerve fibers, synapses, and myelin regeneration. Furthermore, brain edema and apoptosis were substantially reduced, resulting in a significant restoration of motor and cognitive functions in the rats.
The intervertebral disc consists of an inner nucleus pulposus (NP), primarily made up of type I collagen, and an outer annulus fibrosus (AF), which comprises a meshwork of type II collagen, water, and proteoglycans [105]. Strategies to reduce vascularization in the NP tissue have demonstrated potential in mitigating intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD)—for instance, Hu et al. [106] developed an in situ injectable collagen/methacrylate hyaluronic acid hydrogel that encapsulates MSCs and incorporates the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor cabozantinib. This hydrogel-maintained disc height protected nerve endings and reduced vascularization and inflammation in a rat model of caudal IDD induced by puncture. AF defects majorly contribute to recurrent disc herniation and post-discectomy degeneration. In an animal model of caudal disc AF defects, administration of an injectable collagen hydrogel containing MSCs significantly enhanced the MRI index, preserved disc structure, minimized apoptosis, and promoted anti-inflammatory expression [107].
SCI typically results in permanent disability as well as motor and sensory deficits. Current treatment strategies primarily focus on reducing spinal cord swelling by preventing cell death, minimizing oxidative stress, blocking secondary damage, and removing damaged bone, disc, and ligament fragments. However, these approaches remain insufficient for promoting axonal regeneration [108]. Collagen scaffolds have emerged as promising tools for facilitating cell transport and bridging devices to re-establish continuity in the injured region, promoting neuronal regeneration. Zou et al. [109] inoculated human fetal brain neural stem cells (hbNSPCs) and spinal cord-derived neural stem cells (hscNSPCs) onto oriented collagen sponge scaffolds, followed by transplantation into rats’ completely transected spinal cords. hscNSPC-ACSS effectively promoted neuronal regeneration, myelin sheath formation around nerve fibers, and synaptogenesis. This scaffold structure substantially improved motor function recovery and optimized the microenvironment at the injury site. Furthermore, a three-dimensional collagen/silk protein scaffold, designed to mimic the anatomical structure of the spinal cord lumen, was found to support cell growth under both in vivo and in vitro conditions. This scaffold enables the targeted delivery of NSCs, enhances spinal cord continuity, and effectively fills the injury cavity [110].

5.3. Bone/Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Bone tissue, the hard connective tissue of the human body, provides structural support and protects delicate internal organs. Severe bone defects can result from trauma, infection, congenital malformations, osteogenesis imperfecta, and osteoporosis [111]. While bone tissue is inherently self-repairing and regenerative, minor defects usually heal without medical intervention. However, natural regeneration becomes insufficient when bone defects surpass a critical size. The efficient regeneration, mineralization, and healing of bone tissue depend on its dynamic remodeling processes, which are governed by intricate cellular mechanisms. The most common clinical approaches for treating bone defects are surgical reconstruction and bone grafting [112]. In recent years, advancements in bone tissue engineering have introduced innovative solutions for addressing bone defects, surpassing the limitations of traditional bone healing and reconstruction techniques [113].
Bone tissue scaffolds must meet three essential criteria: osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity, and biocompatibility [114]. Collagen, a vital component of the bone matrix, plays a critical role in bone formation. Existing research has demonstrated that collagen plays a crucial role in the mineralization process, and mineralized collagen facilitates bone regeneration through its osteoconductive properties and inherent bioactivity. Beyond serving as a structural substitute for bone tissue, collagen promotes stem cell proliferation, enhances osteogenic differentiation, and suppresses osteoclast differentiation [115].
Collagen is often combined with ceramic materials, such as hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass, to improve the scaffold’s osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties [116]. Guo et al. [117] utilized 3D printing to incorporate BMSCs and hydroxyapatite (HAP) into collagen scaffolds designed to mimic the composition of bone. This approach enhanced alkaline phosphatase expression and generated bioactive substances that promote bone formation, suggesting potential applications in the treatment of bone defect diseases. Calabrese et al. [118] incorporated human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) into collagen/HAP scaffolds, thereby enhancing osteogenic differentiation, bone formation, and angiogenic potential. In another study, collagen/HAP/strontium-doped mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds were inoculated with osteoblasts (OBs) derived from bone trabeculae and osteoclast precursors (OCs) from hematopoietic samples. These cells adhered to the scaffold surface through filamentous pseudopodia and membrane protrusions, further enhancing ALP expression [119].
Furthermore, collagen can be combined with synthetic polymers such as polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and polylactic acid-hydroxyacetic acid copolymer (PLGA) to improve mechanical strength and stability [116,120]. Liu et al. [121] seeded BMSCs onto collagen/PVA-CaCO₃ membranes, which effectively promoted the adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. Yang et al. [122] seeded MSCs onto collagen/PLGA/HAP fibrous scaffolds, where the collagen coating enhanced cell-membrane interactions, promoted cell spreading, and increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity along with osteogenic gene expression. Collagen/phosphorus-modified polycaprolactone (P-PCL) bioactive scaffolds inoculated with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) exhibited superior ALP activity and increased mineralized nodule formation, enhancing osteoinductivity [123]. Despite these promising results, the studies above did not utilize bone defect models, which restricts their clinical relevance.
Articular cartilage repair is limited in self-renewal capacity because it lacks blood vessels, lymph nodes, and nerves. The structural integrity of the collagen network plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of cartilage regeneration scaffolds. Type I collagen has been shown to create an ideal physiological microenvironment for cartilage formation by BMSCs and to support the reconstruction of both superficial and calcified cartilage. A collagen-decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) scaffold was fabricated by integrating collagen with dECM derived from immature cartilage tissues at distinct developmental stages. This scaffold promoted the differentiation of BMSCs into fibrochondrocytes [124]. Additionally, Yu et al. [125] employed ADSCs embedded in collagen/silk protein scaffolds in a New Zealand rabbit model of cartilage defect. This approach significantly enhanced cartilage regeneration, facilitating the gradual replacement of cartilage with newly formed cartilage tissue.

5.4. Cardiac Tissue Engineering

In humans, the myocardium’s extracellular matrix (ECM) comprises approximately 75% to 80% fibrous collagen, predominantly types I and III, synthesized by cardiac fibroblasts. This collagen provides elasticity and structural integrity to cardiac tissues, interacts with integrins to mediate cell adhesion, and supports the shape, thickness, and stiffness of the myocardium throughout the cardiac deformation cycle [126]. Cardiovascular diseases, particularly myocardial infarction (MI), are the leading cause of death globally. MI results from the acute obstruction of coronary arteries, leading to an inadequate blood supply to the corresponding myocardial region, which causes necrosis and dysfunction of heart tissue. Current therapeutic approaches primarily focus on limiting MI by restoring blood flow to the ischemic myocardium through reperfusion techniques, including coronary intervention, thrombolysis, and coronary artery bypass grafting. However, these interventions are insufficient in stimulating the repair and regeneration of damaged myocardial tissue. Promoting myocardial regeneration in vivo remains a central objective in cardiac tissue engineering [127].
Conductive materials play a critical role in cardiac tissue engineering. However, the sole use of electroactive biomaterials is often incompatible with cardiac tissue growth due to their degradation rates and mechanical properties. Conversely, collagen can serve as a scaffold at defective sites, maintaining structural integrity, providing cellular attachment domains, and replicating the microenvironment necessary for cardiomyocyte growth [128]. Roshanbinfar et al. [129] employed the conductive material PEDOT–PSS (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate) to modify the micromorphology of collagen hydrogel single fibers. The resulting morphology exhibited coarser, tangled fibers interspersed with finer individual fibers, resembling the natural cardiac ECM structure. Human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes within collagen-PEDOT–PSS hydrogels exhibited near-adult myonode lengths, enhanced contractility, improved calcium handling, and increased conduction velocity. Intracardiac injection into infarcted mice protected the infarcted myocardium from induced ventricular tachycardia. Tohidi et al. [130] incorporated gold nanoparticles and (3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES)-grafted oxidized bacterial cellulose into hydrogels functionalized with hyaluronic acid and collagen. Hydrogels loaded with human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes underwent electrical resistance measurements, yielding a value of approximately 0.1 S/m. This electrical conductivity is suitable for electrical stimulation, confirming the potential of these hydrogels as scaffolds for the treatment of MI.
In recent years, 3D printing technology has emerged as a promising strategy for creating highly controlled 3D tissue environments that closely replicate natural tissues. Kim et al. [131] employed collagen/methacryloylated gelatin hydrogel as a bio-ink for encapsulating human ventricular cardiomyocytes (hCMs) and cardiac fibroblasts (hCFs). By comparing two preparation methods—3D bioprinting and manual inoculation via pipette—they observed that the hydrogel used in 3D bioprinting had a more porous structure, which enhanced cell viability. The transplantation of 3D-printed patches into rats with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) enhanced long-term graft survival, vascularization, and stability, reduced fibrosis, increased left ventricular thickness, and improved cardiac function. Additionally, limitations may arise in encapsulating cardiomyocytes due to the mechanical modulus of a single collagen fraction [132]. To overcome this limitation, the Freeform Reversible Embedding of Suspended Hydrogels (FRESH) method was proposed for the 3D bioprinting of collagen. Lee et al. [133] demonstrated that this technique enables precise control over the composition and microstructure of collagen, allowing for the design of human cardiac constructs that replicate the heart’s structure, from capillaries to the entire organ. Using this method, human cardiomyocytes were encapsulated in 3D-printed ventricles, which exhibited synchronized contraction during peak systolic periods, directed action potential propagation, and up to 14% wall thickening.

5.5. Liver Tissue Engineering

The liver is a vital organ with many essential functions in the human body and exhibits substantial regenerative capacity. However, severe injury can impair this regenerative capacity. Dysfunctions resulting from factors such as drugs, toxins, viral infections, and cancers can lead to end-stage liver disease or acute liver failure, with in situ liver transplantation remaining the only effective treatment [134]. Liver tissue engineering has emerged as a promising solution to address the shortage of liver transplants and the adverse effects associated with immunosuppression. Cells can be seeded onto biodegradable polymer scaffolds with three-dimensional structures, which can subsequently be implanted into the body to support organ architecture and promote liver tissue regeneration [135].
Isolated hepatocytes often undergo cell death or loss of function due to the absence of cellular interactions and disruption of their native microenvironment. Collagen, therefore, provides hepatocytes with a microenvironment that closely resembles the native liver tissue, supporting liver tissue regeneration. One study utilized collagen bio-ink to establish an appropriate microenvironment for hepatocytes, HUVECs, and human lung fibroblasts. The bio-ink was injected into the ducts of polycaprolactone (PCL) frameworks, successfully creating a microenvironment that supported the co-cultivation of these cell types. This setup induced the formation of a capillary-like network, which enhanced hepatocyte protein secretion and metabolic activity [136]. Another study developed a bionic membrane composed of esterified collagen and chitosan methacrylate. Hepatocytes cultured on this collagen-integrated membrane exhibited a complete differentiation pattern, demonstrating superior growth, viability, and enhanced liver-specific functions relative to those cultured on chitosan methacrylate esterified-only membranes [137].
In addition to the simple encapsulation of cells within biomaterials, more advanced 3D models have been developed to better mimic liver physiology and generate intricate structures that replicate the architecture of liver tissue. These models can promote cell differentiation, proliferation, and migration, ultimately enhancing liver injury repair [138]. Gao et al. [139] utilized buckminsterfullerene tablets functionalized with collagen (Col-Nor), which were further loaded with cells to construct a centimeter-scale bioprinted liver micro-model. The gel’s diffusion and proliferation of HUVECs formed a vascularized network. In contrast, this network’s primary human hepatocyte (PHH) spheroids could produce liver-specific proteins and upregulate cytochrome activity, exhibiting functional liver tissue characteristics in vitro. In particular, demineralized collagen sponge scaffolds can be engineered to serve as scaffolds for in vitro liver models. Following the differentiation of rat small hepatocytes (SHs) into mature hepatocytes, an in vitro liver model can subsequently be reconstructed through interactions with liver nonparenchymal cells (NPCs) on collagen sponges [140]. HepG2 cells cultured on honeycomb-structured collagen sponges, which exhibit a significant increase in albumin mRNA expression levels, can be utilized for drug metabolism studies, toxicity testing, and screening of therapeutic agents [141]. Additionally, hydroxyapatite-mineralized collagen sponges can serve as carriers for the anti-hepatocellular carcinoma drug, the STAT-3 inhibitor WP1066, facilitating the sustained release of the drug in an in vitro hepatocyte model comprising HEPA1-6 and HepG2 cells. This system effectively inhibits the viability of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the synergistic action of the drug and hydroxyapatite [142].
Moreover, in vitro liver models can be used to investigate cellular behavior under disease conditions or in response to changes in the microenvironment. A hepatic sinusoidal model was developed through coaxial extrusion 3D bioprinting, where the core compartment of the pre-vascular structure consisted of alginate and methylcellulose bio-ink loaded with HepG2 cells, which mimic the properties of human hepatocytes. The outer structure was printed using collagen/fibronectin bio-ink containing HUVECs and human dermal fibroblasts. The interactions between these different cell types in the culture model increased albumin secretion from HepG2 cells when co-cultured with HUVECs, while fibroblasts played a supportive role in angiogenesis [143].

5.6. Other Tissue Engineering

Collagen is the primary protein component in tissues such as tendons and ligaments. It has been extensively used in tendon tissue engineering to facilitate myogenic fiber regeneration and restore motor function [144]. Vascularization and innervation are critical factors for muscle regeneration and functional recovery. Incorporating cell-mediated microvascular networks into scaffolds represents a promising strategy to promote these processes. HUVECs were co-encapsulated with human mesenchymal stem cells within collagen hydrogels to treat muscle injuries. This approach not only accelerated muscle regeneration but also strengthened muscle innervation, promoted angiogenesis, and facilitated anastomosis, thereby contributing to the restoration of function in the injured muscle [145].
Cells and biomaterials are commonly used in vascular tissue engineering to construct near-native substitutes for cardiovascular tissue. Kim et al. [146] encapsulated fibroblasts in a collagen/alginate hydrogel for 3D bioprinting to replicate the structural characteristics of human blood vessels. The encapsulated cells exhibited a high survival rate of 92.13 ± 0.70%, but further in vivo studies are needed. Additionally, it has been shown that collagen scaffolds seeded with endothelial cells, when implanted into a murine carotid artery injury model, prevented in vivo cell inactivation, reduced injury-induced inflammation, and enhanced endothelialization and the reduction of smooth muscle proliferation [147]. Furthermore, constructing 3D tissue models of the microvascular system using collagen is valuable for preclinical drug screening and pathological studies. For instance, collagen/alginate scaffolds fabricated via an embedded printing method supported astrocyte branching and facilitated direct interaction with endothelial cells, a crucial aspect of neurovascular model development [148]. The arrangement and topology of collagen fibers within the hydrogel were also found to influence the organization of HUVECs in a microvascular model [149].
Biomaterials have been widely used in stomatology, particularly in periodontal regeneration, alveolar bone defect repair, and the healing of oral mucosal tissues. In these applications, collagen is pivotal in promoting rapid hemostasis, facilitating cell migration, and aiding bone regeneration [150,151]. Wang et al. [152] developed a double-layered scaffold composed of collagen and strontium-doped calcium silicate loaded with human gingival fibroblasts (hGFs). These collagen/strontium-doped calcium silicate bilayer scaffolds promoted the secretion of osteogenesis-related proteins by the human GFs. Upon implantation in animal models, the scaffolds supported the growth of new bone tissue, which progressively invaded the scaffold, ultimately facilitating periodontal regeneration. Additionally, human periodontal membrane fibroblasts (HPLFs) were loaded into collagen/riboflavin/dental light-emitting diode (LED) injectable hydrogels, resulting in the differentiation of the fibroblasts into myofibroblasts and pro-osteoblasts. This differentiation facilitated the targeted repair of periodontal tissues [153].
Collagen scaffolds have been widely explored for regenerating various tissues, including the skin, bone, cartilage, nerve, heart, and liver (Figure 3). The microenvironment required for cell growth differs among these tissues. Collagen’s inherent properties as a natural extracellular matrix ensure its excellent biocompatibility, supporting effective tissue repair in various contexts. Table 3 summarizes the multiple applications of collagen scaffolds in tissue repair and regeneration, highlighting the key findings associated with their use.

6. Conclusions and Outlook

Collagen is one of the primary structural proteins in the vertebrate extracellular matrix, constituting approximately 25% of the total body protein. Its unique triple-helical structure, composed of collagen fibers, endows it with exceptional tensile strength and flexibility, providing essential structural support for cells and tissues. Collagen plays a crucial role in the coagulation pathway, facilitating platelet adhesion, promoting platelet aggregation, and facilitating thrombus formation, ultimately leading to hemostasis. Furthermore, it plays a pivotal role in wound healing, inflammation, and photoaging. Signal transduction via multiple molecular binding sites with cell surface integrins or DDRs synergistically influences its mechanical strength and fiber alignment, promoting cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation.
Collagen scaffolds can be cross-linked through chemical methods, such as click chemistry, methacrylation reactions, or enzyme-mediated cross-linking; through physical methods, including intermolecular hydrogen bonding or temperature-induced phase transitions; or through ion-actuated gelation or freeze-drying into a porous sponge. These processes enhance the structural strength of the scaffolds, regulate their degradation rate, maintain cellular activity, improve stability, and reduce the likelihood of scaffold shrinkage or collapse. In tissue engineering, cells are loaded into collagen scaffolds and subsequently implanted into organisms, effectively integrating cell therapy and tissue engineering for tissue repair. These scaffolds are widely used in repairing skin, nerves, bones, cartilage, hearts, livers, and other tissues. Numerous studies have extended the functionality of collagen scaffolds by biofunctionalizing them with antimicrobial and antioxidant materials and incorporating active ingredients such as growth factors, extracellular vesicles, exosomes, and drugs, thereby conferring multifunctionality to the scaffolds and improving their reparative efficacy [154,155]. However, collagen scaffolds encounter challenges in clinical applications, requiring further advancements to enable effective translational use. Although collagen and its degradation products, such as amino acids, are non-toxic and biodegradable, the cellular sources and additional materials incorporated to enhance the performance of collagen scaffolds may provoke adverse biological reactions. This highlights the importance of carefully considering design to minimize host responses.
In conclusion, collagen tissue engineering applications represent a promising therapeutic approach for repairing tissue and organ damage, addressing challenges such as the organism’s limited self-healing capacity and the limitations of organ transplantation while offering innovative opportunities to integrate cellular therapies. However, the technology of implanting cell-laden scaffolds into the human body is still in its developmental stages and requires further research and optimization. Overcoming these challenges is crucial to advancing the clinical translation of collagen scaffolds and unlocking their full potential in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.H. and X.P.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.H., S.S. and H.Z.; writing—review and editing, Q.H., S.S. and H.Z.; visualization, T.F. and Y.X.; supervision and project administration, Y.Z. (Yanfang Zhou) and Y.Z. (Yue Zhou); funding acquisition, X.P. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2025A1515011391) and the Guangdong Medical Research Fund (B2023458), both based in Guangdong, China, as well as the Guangdong Medical University Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Base (1JG23084).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AbbreviationFull Name
MMPsMatrix metalloproteinases
TIMPsTissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases
DDRsDiscoidin Domain Receptors
SPAACStrain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition
COLMACollagen methacrylate
CSMAChondroitin sulfate methacrylate
Col-II-MAType II collagen methacrylamide
RFRiboflavin
LOXLysine oxidase
MTGGlutamine transaminase
HRPHorseradish peroxidase
LCSTLow Critical Solution Temperature
UCSTUpper Critical Solution Temperature
SBFSimulated body fluid
IPNsInterpenetrating Polymer Networks
ESCsEmbryonic stem cells
BMSCsBone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
HUVECsHuman umbilical vein endothelial cells
HDPSCsHuman dental pulp stem cells
L929Mouse fibroblasts
MOVASsMurine aortic vascular smooth muscle cells
IEC-6Rat intestinal epithelial cells
HCsHuman chondrocytes
MSCMesenchymal stem cell
NHDFsNormal Human Dermal Fibroblasts
C2C12Murine myoblasts
IDG-SW3Murine bone cells
HS-5Human fibroblast cell line
MDA-MB-231Epithelial adenocarcinoma cells
hUC-MSCsHuman umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells
MG-63Human osteosarcoma cells
U2OSHuman osteosarcoma clonal cells
HCT-116Human colon cancer cells
NSCsNeural stem cells
PCL/GelPolycaprolactone/Gelatin
Col/AlgCollagen/Alginate
ADSCsAdipose-derived Stem Cells
CDRSsCollagen dermal replacement scaffolds
EDSEngineered dermal substitute
CNSCentral Nervous System
TBITraumatic brain injury
SCISpinal cord injury
mNSCmouse Neural stem cell
NPNucleus pulposus
AFAnnulus fibrosus
IDDIntervertebral Disc Degeneration
hbNSPCsHuman brain-derived neural stem/progenitor cells
hscNSPCsHuman spinal cord-derived neural stem/progenitor cells
ACSSAligned collagen sponge scaffold
HAPHydroxyapatite
hADSCsHuman adipose-derived stem cells
P-PCLPhosphorus-modified polycaprolactone
AD-MSCsAdipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells
ALPAlkaline phosphatase
OBsOsteoblasts
OCsOsteoclast precursors
dECMDecellularized extracellular matrix
ECMExtracellular matrix
MIMyocardial infarction
hiPSCHuman-induced pluripotent stem cell
APTES3-Aminopropyl-triethoxysilane
hCMsHuman ventricular cardiomyocytes
hCFsHuman cardiac fibroblasts
AMIAcute myocardial infarction
FRESHFreeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels
PCLPolycaprolactone
PHHsPrimary human hepatocytes
HCsHepatocytes
ECsEndothelial cells
hGFsHuman gingiva fibroblasts
HPLFsHuman periodontal membrane fibroblasts

References

  1. Li, W.; Hu, J.; Chen, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Xin, Y.; Tian, Q.; Wang, S. Emerging advances in hydrogel-based therapeutic strategies for tissue regeneration. Regen. Ther. 2023, 24, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ju, Y.; Hu, Y.; Yang, P.; Xie, X.; Fang, B. Extracellular vesicle-loaded hydrogels for tissue repair and regeneration. Mater. Today Bio 2023, 18, 100522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sanchez Armengol, E.; Hock, N.; Saribal, S.; To, D.; Summonte, S.; Veider, F.; Kali, G.; Bernkop-Schnurch, A.; Laffleur, F. Unveiling the potential of biomaterials and their synergistic fusion in tissue engineering. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 196, 106761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krishani, M.; Shin, W.Y.; Suhaimi, H.; Sambudi, N.S. Development of Scaffolds from Bio-Based Natural Materials for Tissue Regeneration Applications: A Review. Gels 2023, 9, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Noro, J.; Vilaca-Faria, H.; Reis, R.L.; Pirraco, R.P. Extracellular matrix-derived materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: A journey from isolation to characterization and application. Bioact. Mater. 2024, 34, 494–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, M.U.A.; Aslam, M.A.; Bin Abdullah, M.F.; Hasan, A.; Shah, S.A.; Stojanović, G.M. Recent perspective of polymeric biomaterial in tissue engineering—A review. Mater. Today Chem. 2023, 34, 101818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Patrawalla, N.Y.; Kajave, N.S.; Albanna, M.Z.; Kishore, V. Collagen and Beyond: A Comprehensive Comparison of Human ECM Properties Derived from Various Tissue Sources for Regenerative Medicine Applications. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, Y.; Lee, K.; Kawazoe, N.; Yang, Y.; Chen, G. PLGA-collagen-ECM hybrid scaffolds functionalized with biomimetic extracellular matrices secreted by mesenchymal stem cells during stepwise osteogenesis-co-adipogenesis. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 7195–7206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Khatoon, F.; Narula, A.K.; Sehgal, P. Efficacy of collagen based biomaterials in diabetic foot ulcer wound healing. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 217, 113345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sonwane, S.; Bonde, S.; Bonde, C.; Chandarana, C. Advances in gelatin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: A review. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2025, 107, 106789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, Y.; Cheng, N.; Sun, H.; Hou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Z. Advances in the development and optimization strategies of the hemostatic biomaterials. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1062676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, N.; Liu, Y.D.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, T.W.; Peng, L.H. Pharmacological Functions, Synthesis, and Delivery Progress for Collagen as Biodrug and Biomaterial. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sorushanova, A.; Delgado, L.M.; Wu, Z.; Shologu, N.; Kshirsagar, A.; Raghunath, R.; Mullen, A.M.; Bayon, Y.; Pandit, A.; Raghunath, M.; et al. The Collagen Suprafamily: From Biosynthesis to Advanced Biomaterial Development. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1801651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fassini, D.; Wilkie, I.C.; Pozzolini, M.; Ferrario, C.; Sugni, M.; Rocha, M.S.; Giovine, M.; Bonasoro, F.; Silva, T.H.; Reis, R.L. Diverse and Productive Source of Biopolymer Inspiration: Marine Collagens. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 1815–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Núñez-Tapia, I.; Macouzet-Garduño, J.; Ramírez-Ruiz, F.; Vázquez-Vázquez, F.C.; Álvarez-Pérez, M.A.; Bucio-Galindo, L.; Piña-Barba, M.C. Bio-based composite membranes from fish scales: A novel approach to harnessing collagen and hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering applications. Biomed. Eng. Adv. 2025, 9, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Núñez-Tapia, I.A.; Vázquez-Vázquez, F.C.; Mendoza, O.F.; Bucio-Galindo, L.; Álvarez-Pérez, M.A.; Barba, M.C.P. Comparison of Commercial Collagen and Marine Collagen: Efficiency and Effects on the Formation of EDC/NHS-Crosslinked Membranes. Biomed. Mater. Devices 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, B.; O’Connell, G.D. Effect of collagen fibre orientation on intervertebral disc torsion mechanics. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2017, 16, 2005–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Giacomini, F.; Baiao Barata, D.; Suk Rho, H.; Tahmasebi Birgani, Z.; van Blitterswijk, C.; Giselbrecht, S.; Truckenmuller, R.; Habibovic, P. Microfluidically Aligned Collagen to Maintain the Phenotype of Tenocytes In Vitro. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 13, e2303672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raju, V.; Koorata, P.K. Computational assessment on the impact of collagen fiber orientation in cartilages on healthy and arthritic knee kinetics/kinematics. Med. Eng. Phys. 2023, 117, 103997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moo, E.K.; Tanska, P.; Federico, S.; Al-Saffar, Y.; Herzog, W.; Korhonen, R.K. Collagen fibres determine the crack morphology in articular cartilage. Acta Biomater. 2021, 126, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Espana, E.M.; Birk, D.E. Composition, structure and function of the corneal stroma. Exp. Eye Res. 2020, 198, 108137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Karami, A.; Tebyanian, H.; Soufdoost, R.S.; Motavallian, E.; Barkhordari, A.; Nourani, M.R. Extraction and Characterization of Collagen with Cost-Effective Method from Human Placenta for Biomedical Applications. World J. Plast. Surg. 2019, 8, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Gelse, K. Collagens—Structure, function, and biosynthesis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003, 55, 1531–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pei, Y.; Yang, W.; Tang, K.; Kaplan, D.L. Collagen processing with mesoscale aggregates as templates and building blocks. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 63, 108099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Penuela, L.; Negro, C.; Massa, M.; Repaci, E.; Cozzani, E.; Parodi, A.; Scaglione, S.; Quarto, R.; Raiteri, R. Atomic force microscopy for biomechanical and structural analysis of human dermis: A complementary tool for medical diagnosis and therapy monitoring. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fiala, T.; Heeb, R.; Vigliotti, L.; Wennemers, H. The Yin and Yang of How N-Terminal Acyl Caps Affect Collagen Triple Helices. Biomacromolecules 2023, 24, 3954–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kirkness, M.W.; Lehmann, K.; Forde, N.R. Mechanics and structural stability of the collagen triple helix. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2019, 53, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zeng, R.; Tang, K.; Tian, H.; Pei, Y. Collagen materials with oriented structure for biomedical applications. J. Polym. Sci. 2023, 62, 998–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Laronha, H.; Caldeira, J. Structure and Function of Human Matrix Metalloproteinases. Cells 2020, 9, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reiss, M.J.; Han, Y.-P.; Garcia, E.; Goldberg, M.; Yu, H.; Garner, W.L. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 delays wound healing in a murine wound model. Surgery 2010, 147, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, W.Q.; Tang, W.; Hu, S.Q.; Fu, X.L.; Wu, H.; Shen, W.Q.; Chen, H.L. Effect of matrix metalloproteinases on the healing of diabetic foot ulcer: A systematic review. J. Tissue Viability 2023, 32, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhu, R.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Shi, G.; Cai, X.; Dou, R.; Tang, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, J. The potential of collagen-based materials for wound management. Mater. Today Chem. 2024, 41, 102295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hamaia, S.; Farndale, R.W. Integrin Recognition Motifs in the Human Collagens. In I Domain Integrins; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 127–142. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ricard-Blum, S. The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a004978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ma, Y.; Gong, H.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, D. Discoid Domain Receptors Signaling in Macrophages-Mediated Diseases. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2025, 18, 907–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Silva, M.E.; Hernandez-Andrade, M.; Abasolo, N.; Espinoza-Cruells, C.; Mansilla, J.B.; Reyes, C.R.; Aranda, S.; Esteban, Y.; Rodriguez-Calvo, R.; Martorell, L.; et al. DDR1 and Its Ligand, Collagen IV, Are Involved in In Vitro Oligodendrocyte Maturation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mariadoss, A.V.A.; Wang, C.Z. Exploring the Cellular and Molecular Mechanism of Discoidin Domain Receptors (DDR1 and DDR2) in Bone Formation, Regeneration, and Its Associated Disease Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, H.; Bihan, D.; Chang, F.; Huang, P.H.; Farndale, R.W.; Leitinger, B. Discoidin domain receptors promote alpha1beta1-and alpha2beta1-integrin mediated cell adhesion to collagen by enhancing integrin activation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hou, G.; Vogel, W.; Bendeck, M.P. The discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase DDR1 in arterial wound repair. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Afonso, P.V.; McCann, C.P.; Kapnick, S.M.; Parent, C.A. Discoidin domain receptor 2 regulates neutrophil chemotaxis in 3D collagen matrices. Blood 2013, 121, 1644–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pedro, A.; Ruiz, G.J. Discoidin domain receptors regulate the migration of primary human lung fibroblasts through collagen matrices. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2012, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. SenGupta, S.; Parent, C.A.; Bear, J.E. The principles of directed cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021, 22, 529–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Charras, G.; Sahai, E. Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 813–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. McCarthy, J.B.; Vachhani, B.; Iida, J. Cell Adhesion to Collagenous Matrices. Pept. Sci. 1996, 40, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Clark, A.G.; Maitra, A.; Jacques, C.; Bergert, M.; Perez-Gonzalez, C.; Simon, A.; Lederer, L.; Diz-Munoz, A.; Trepat, X.; Voituriez, R.; et al. Self-generated gradients steer collective migration on viscoelastic collagen networks. Nat. Mater. 2022, 21, 1200–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Riching, K.M.; Cox, B.L.; Salick, M.R.; Pehlke, C.; Riching, A.S.; Ponik, S.M.; Bass, B.R.; Crone, W.C.; Jiang, Y.; Weaver, A.M.; et al. 3D collagen alignment limits protrusions to enhance breast cancer cell persistence. Biophys. J. 2014, 107, 2546–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhu, J.; Thompson, C.B. Metabolic regulation of cell growth and proliferation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 436–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cario, M. DDR1 and DDR2 in skin. Cell Adh Migr. 2018, 12, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Olaso, E.; Labrador, J.P.; Wang, L.; Ikeda, K.; Eng, F.J.; Klein, R.; Lovett, D.H.; Lin, H.C.; Friedman, S.L. Discoidin domain receptor 2 regulates fibroblast proliferation and migration through the extracellular matrix in association with transcriptional activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 3606–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kou, H.; Han, Q.; Xu, C.; Liao, L.; Hou, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J. The fibrillogenesis influence the binding specificity of collagen to discoidin domain receptor 2 and cell behavior. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2025, 250, 114554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Olaso, E.; Lin, H.-C.; Wang, L.-H.; Friedman, S.L. Impaired dermal wound healing in discoidin domain receptor 2-deficient mice associated with defective extracellular matrix remodeling. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2011, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shi, S.; Wang, L.; Song, C.; Yao, L.; Xiao, J. Recent progresses of collagen dressings for chronic skin wound healing. Collagen and Leather 2023, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. San Antonio, J.D.; Jacenko, O.; Fertala, A.; Orgel, J. Collagen Structure-Function Mapping Informs Applications for Regenerative Medicine. Bioengineering 2020, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Adam, J.; Singer, R.A.F.C. Cutaneous wound healing. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 341, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bao, M.; Xie, J.; Huck, W.T.S. Recent Advances in Engineering the Stem Cell Microniche in 3D. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Huang, D.; Li, Y.; Ma, Z.; Lin, H.; Zhu, X.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, X. Collagen hydrogel viscoelasticity regulates MSC chondrogenesis in a ROCK-dependent manner. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eade9497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sapudom, J.; Karaman, S.; Quartey, B.C.; Mohamed, W.K.E.; Mahtani, N.; Garcia-Sabate, A.; Teo, J. Collagen Fibril Orientation Instructs Fibroblast Differentiation Via Cell Contractility. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2301353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Liu, X.; Gao, Y.; Long, X.; Hayashi, T.; Mizuno, K.; Hattori, S.; Fujisaki, H.; Ogura, T.; Wang, D.O.; Ikejima, T. Type I collagen promotes the migration and myogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts via the release of interleukin-6 mediated by FAK/NF-kappaB p65 activation. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Duquette, D.; Dumont, M.-J. Comparative studies of chemical crosslinking reactions and applications of bio-based hydrogels. Polym. Bull. 2018, 76, 2683–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, X.; Xiong, Y. Application of "Click" Chemistry in Biomedical Hydrogels. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 36918–36928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xu, G.; Wang, X.; Deng, C.; Teng, X.; Suuronen, E.J.; Shen, Z.; Zhong, Z. Injectable biodegradable hybrid hydrogels based on thiolated collagen and oligo(acryloyl carbonate)-poly(ethylene glycol)-oligo(acryloyl carbonate) copolymer for functional cardiac regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2015, 15, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pupkaite, J.; Rosenquist, J.; Hilborn, J.; Samanta, A. Injectable Shape-Holding Collagen Hydrogel for Cell Encapsulation and Delivery Cross-linked Using Thiol-Michael Addition Click Reaction. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20, 3475–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Xu, H. Click Chemistry in Natural Product Modification. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 774977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, F.; Le, P.; Lai, K.; Fernandes-Cunha, G.M.; Myung, D. Simultaneous Interpenetrating Polymer Network of Collagen and Hyaluronic Acid as an In Situ-Forming Corneal Defect Filler. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 5208–5216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lee, H.J.; Fernandes-Cunha, G.M.; Putra, I.; Koh, W.-G.; Myung, D. Tethering Growth Factors to Collagen Surfaces Using Copper-Free Click Chemistry_ Surface Characterization and in Vitro Biologica. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 23389–23399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yang, X.; Li, X.; Wu, Z.; Cao, L. Photocrosslinked methacrylated natural macromolecular hydrogels for tissue engineering: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 246, 125570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. He, S.; Li, H.; Chi, B.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Huang, Q. Construction of a dual-component hydrogel matrix for 3D biomimetic skin based on photo-crosslinked chondroitin sulfate/collagen. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, K.; Sun, J.; Wei, D.; Yuan, L.; Yang, J.; Guo, L.; Fan, H.; Zhang, X. Photo-crosslinked mono-component type II collagen hydrogel as a matrix to induce chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 8707–8718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tonndorf, R.; Gossla, E.; Aibibu, D.; Lindner, M.; Gelinsky, M.; Cherif, C. Wet spinning and riboflavin crosslinking of collagen type I/III filaments. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 14, 015007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fan, L.; Jung, O.; Herrmann, M.; Shirokikh, M.; Stojanovic, S.; Najman, S.; Körte, F.; Xiong, X.; Schenke-Layland, K.; Barbeck, M. Deciphering UVA/Riboflavin Collagen Crosslinking: A Pathway to Improve Biomedical Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2401742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lin, C.L.; Su, Y.W.; Chen, Y.W.; Kuo, C.H.; Tu, T.Y.; Tsai, J.C.; Shyong, Y.J. BMSC loaded photo-crosslinked hyaluronic acid/collagen hydrogel incorporating FG4592 for enhanced cell proliferation and nucleus pulposus differentiation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 273, 132828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhao, L.; Li, X.; Zhao, J.; Ma, S.; Ma, X.; Fan, D.; Zhu, C.; Liu, Y. A novel smart injectable hydrogel prepared by microbial transglutaminase and human-like collagen: Its characterization and biocompatibility. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 68, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ying, H.; Zhou, J.; Wang, M.; Su, D.; Ma, Q.; Lv, G.; Chen, J. In situ formed collagen-hyaluronic acid hydrogel as biomimetic dressing for promoting spontaneous wound healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 101, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dong, G.; Lin, L.R.; Xu, L.Y.; Li, E.M. Reaction mechanism of lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2) studied by computational methods. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 211, 111204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lopez-Jimenez, A.J.; Basak, T.; Vanacore, R.M. Proteolytic processing of lysyl oxidase-like-2 in the extracellular matrix is required for crosslinking of basement membrane collagen IV. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 16970–16982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ahmadian, M.; Khoshfetrat, A.B.; Khatami, N.; Morshedloo, F.; Rahbarghazi, R.; Hassani, A.; Kiani, S. Influence of gelatin and collagen incorporation on peroxidase-mediated injectable pectin-based hydrogel and bioactivity of fibroblasts. J. Biomater. Appl. 2021, 36, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Jiang, H.; Zheng, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Hou, M.; Zhu, J. Feasibility Study of Tissue Transglutaminase for Self-Catalytic Cross-Linking of Self-Assembled Collagen Fibril Hydrogel and Its Promising Application in Wound Healing Promotion. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 12606–12615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tayabally, S.E.H.; Khan, A.A.; Abdallah, S.H.; Khattak, M.N.K.; Jayakumar, M.N.; Rani Samsudin, A.B. Increased strength in the Col-Tgel induces apoptosis in the human dental pulp stem cells: 3D culturing of human dental pulp stem cells at different strengths of collagen. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 2674–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, J.; Luo, H. Constructions and Properties of Physically Cross-Linked Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers. Polym. Rev. 2022, 63, 574–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yang, X.; Ahmad, K.; Yang, T.; Fan, Y.; Zhao, F.; Jiang, S.; Chen, P.; Hou, H. Collagen-based hydrogel sol-gel phase transition mechanism and their applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 340, 103456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Du, M.; Zhao, E.; Li, J.; Yao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Qu, C. Rapid sol-gel reversible thermosensitive collagen for 3D cell culture. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 681, 132813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rieu, C.; Parisi, C.; Mosser, G.; Haye, B.; Coradin, T.; Fernandes, F.M.; Trichet, L. Topotactic Fibrillogenesis of Freeze-casted Microridged Collagen Scaffolds for 3D Cell Culture. ACS Appl. Mater. 2019, 11, 14672–14683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, H.; Yang, L.; Yang, Y. A review of sodium alginate-based hydrogels: Structure, mechanisms, applications, and perspectives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 292, 139151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zou, Z.; Zhang, B.; Nie, X.; Cheng, Y.; Hu, Z.; Liao, M.; Li, S. A sodium alginate-based sustained-release IPN hydrogel and its applications. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 39722–39730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Brunel, L.G.; Long, C.M.; Christakopoulos, F.; Cai, B.; Johansson, P.K.; Singhal, D.; Enejder, A.; Myung, D.; Heilshorn, S.C. Interpenetrating networks of fibrillar and amorphous collagen promote cell spreading and hydrogel stability. bioRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Bernero, M.; Zauchner, D.; Muller, R.; Qin, X.H. Interpenetrating network hydrogels for studying the role of matrix viscoelasticity in 3D osteocyte morphogenesis. Biomater. Sci. 2024, 12, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ort, C.; Chen, Y.; Ghagre, A.; Ehrlicher, A.; Moraes, C. Bioprintable, Stiffness-Tunable Collagen-Alginate Microgels for Increased Throughput 3D Cell Culture Studies. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 2814–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yao, M.; Zhang, K.; Chen, Z.; Yue, H.; Shi, J.; Guan, F.; et al. Sodium alginate/collagen hydrogel loaded with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells promotes wound healing and skin remodeling. Cell Tissue Res. 2021, 383, 809–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. De, S.; Singh, N. Collagen-alginate 3D microscaffolds for studying cellular migration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 245, 125308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, D.; Qin, C.; Shi, Y. A review of preparation methods of porous skin tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 32, 104109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Angulo, D.E.L.; Sobral, P.J.d.A. The Effect of Processing Parameters and Solid Concentration on the Microstructure and Pore Architecture of Gelatin-Chitosan Scaffolds Produced by Freeze-Drying. Mater. Res. 2016, 19, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Katrilaka, C.; Karipidou, N.; Petrou, N.; Manglaris, C.; Katrilakas, G.; Tzavellas, A.N.; Pitou, M.; Tsiridis, E.E.; Choli-Papadopoulou, T.; Aggeli, A. Freeze-Drying Process for the Fabrication of Collagen-Based Sponges as Medical Devices in Biomedical Engineering. Materials 2023, 16, 4425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Lowe, C.J.; Reucroft, I.M.; Grota, M.C.; Shreiber, D.I. Production of Highly Aligned Collagen Scaffolds by Freeze-drying of Self-assembled, Fibrillar Collagen Gels. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Khadivar, P.; Alipour, M. Synergic effect of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells and differentiated keratinocytes-like cells with a novel cellulose and collagen nanoscaffold on wound healing in rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 160, 114404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Xie, X.; Lei, J.; Ge, L.; Yuan, L.; Li, D.; Mu, C. Controlling the Pore Structure of Collagen Sponge by Adjusting the Cross-Linking Degree for Construction of Heterogeneous Double-Layer Bone Barrier Membranes. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 2058–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lashkari, M.; Rahmani, M.; Yousefpoor, Y.; Ahmadi-Zeidabadi, M.; Faridi-Majidi, R.; Ameri, Z.; Salary, M.; Azizi, S.; Shahabi, A.; Rahi, A.; et al. Cell-based wound dressing: Bilayered PCL/gelatin nanofibers-alginate/collagen hydrogel scaffold loaded with mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 239, 124099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yang, M.; He, S.; Su, Z.; Yang, Z.; Liang, X.; Wu, Y. Thermosensitive Injectable Chitosan/Collagen/β-Glycerophosphate Composite Hydrogels for Enhancing Wound Healing by Encapsulating Mesenchymal Stem Cell Spheroids. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 21015–21023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Liu, H.; Yang, R.; Zhao, S.; Zhou, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, L.; Xie, J. Collagen scaffolds derived from bovine skin loaded with MSC optimized M1 macrophages remodeling and chronic diabetic wounds healing. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2023, 8, e10467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Xie, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Chen, M.; Yao, B.; Dong, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, Q.; Tredget, E.E.; Xu, R.H.; et al. An Engineered Dermal Substitute with Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhances Cutaneous Wound Healing. Tissue Eng. Part A 2023, 29, 491–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bartlett, R.D.; Eleftheriadou, D.; Evans, R.; Choi, D.; Phillips, J.B. Mechanical properties of the spinal cord and brain: Comparison with clinical-grade biomaterials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 2020, 258, 120303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wareham, L.K.; Baratta, R.O.; Del Buono, B.J.; Schlumpf, E.; Calkins, D.J. Collagen in the central nervous system: Contributions to neurodegeneration and promise as a therapeutic target. Mol. Neurodegener. 2024, 19, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tan, H.X.; Borgo, M.P.D.; Aguilar, M.I.; Forsythe, J.S.; Taylor, J.M.; Crack, P.J. The use of bioactive matrices in regenerative therapies for traumatic brain injury. Acta Biomater. 2020, 102, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kim, J.T.; Cho, S.M.; Youn, D.H.; Hong, E.P.; Park, C.H.; Lee, Y.; Jung, H.; Jeon, J.P. Therapeutic effect of a hydrogel-based neural stem cell delivery sheet for mild traumatic brain injury. Acta Biomater. 2023, 167, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhang, J.; Wang, R.J.; Chen, M.; Liu, X.Y.; Ma, K.; Xu, H.Y.; Deng, W.S.; Ye, Y.C.; Li, W.X.; Chen, X.Y.; et al. Collagen/heparan sulfate porous scaffolds loaded with neural stem cells improve neurological function in a rat model of traumatic brain injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2021, 16, 1068–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zeldin, L.; Mosley, G.E.; Laudier, D.; Gallate, Z.S.; Gansau, J.; Hoy, R.C.; Poeran, J.; Iatridis, J.C. Spatial mapping of collagen content and structure in human intervertebral disk degeneration. JOR Spine 2020, 3, e1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hu, H.; Hu, R.; Fu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, T.; Cui, S.; Wan, Y.; Guo, W.; et al. An injectable anti-vascularization functionalized hydrogel for degenerative nucleus pulposus repair. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2024, 203, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yu, L.; Wu, H.; Zeng, S.; Hu, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, Q.; Xiang, C.; Feng, Z. Menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells combined with collagen I gel as a regenerative therapeutic strategy for degenerated disc after discectomy in rats. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2024, 15, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mneimneh, A.T.; Mehanna, M.M. Collagen-based scaffolds: An auspicious tool to support repair, recovery, and regeneration post spinal cord injury. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 601, 120559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zou, Y.; Ma, D.; Shen, H.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, B.; Fan, Y.; Sun, Z.; Chen, B.; Xue, W.; Shi, Y.; et al. Aligned collagen scaffold combination with human spinal cord-derived neural stem cells to improve spinal cord injury repair. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 5145–5156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jiang, J.P.; Liu, X.Y.; Zhao, F.; Zhu, X.; Li, X.Y.; Niu, X.G.; Yao, Z.T.; Dai, C.; Xu, H.Y.; Ma, K.; et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting collagen/silk fibroin scaffold combined with neural stem cells promotes nerve regeneration after spinal cord injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2020, 15, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Li, W.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wu, T.; Huang, K.; Wang, B.; Liao, J. Self-healing hydrogels for bone defect repair. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 16773–16788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhou, J.; Zhang, Z.; Joseph, J.; Zhang, X.; Ferdows, B.E.; Patel, D.N.; Chen, W.; Banfi, G.; Molinaro, R.; Cosco, D.; et al. Biomaterials and nanomedicine for bone regeneration: Progress and future prospects. Exploration 2021, 1, 20210011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Aslam Khan, M.U.; Aslam, M.A.; Bin Abdullah, M.F.; Stojanovic, G.M. Current Perspectives of Protein in Bone Tissue Engineering: Bone Structure, Ideal Scaffolds, Fabrication Techniques, Applications, Scopes, and Future Advances. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2024, 7, 5082–5106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Feng, P.; Zhao, R.; Tang, W.; Yang, F.; Tian, H.; Peng, S.; Pan, H.; Shuai, C. Structural and Functional Adaptive Artificial Bone: Materials, Fabrications, and Properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2214726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Bai, H.; Zhu, Z.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, C.; Che, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Collagen-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Des. 2021, 210, 110049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Li, R.; Xu, S.; Guo, Y.; Cao, C.; Xu, J.; Hao, L.; Luo, S.; Chen, X.; Du, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. Application of collagen in bone regeneration. J. Orthop. Transl. 2025, 50, 129–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Guo, C.; Wu, J.; Zeng, Y.; Li, H. Construction of 3D bioprinting of HAP/collagen scaffold in gelation bath for bone tissue engineering. Regen. Biomater. 2023, 10, rbad067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Calabrese, G.; Giuffrida, R.; Forte, S.; Fabbi, C.; Figallo, E.; Salvatorelli, L.; Memeo, L.; Parenti, R.; Gulisano, M.; Gulino, R. Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells seeded into a collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold promote bone augmentation after implantation in the mouse. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Borciani, G.; Montalbano, G.; Perut, F.; Ciapetti, G.; Baldini, N.; Vitale-Brovarone, C. Osteoblast and osteoclast activity on collagen-based 3D printed scaffolds enriched with strontium-doped bioactive glasses and hydroxyapatite nanorods for bone tissue engineering. Biomed. Mater. 2024, 19, 065007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ramírez-Ruiz, F.; Núñez-Tapia, I.; Piña-Barba, M.C.; Alvarez-Pérez, M.A.; Guarino, V.; Serrano-Bello, J. Polycaprolactone for Hard Tissue Regeneration: Scaffold Design and In Vivo Implications. Bioengineering 2025, 12, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liu, Y.; Gao, X.; Li, Y.; Gao, A.; Zheng, Z.; Wei, J.; Yang, H.; Ping, H.; Xie, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Intrafibrillar calcium carbonate mineralization of electrospinning polyvinyl alcohol/collagen films with improved mechanical and bioactive properties. J. Mater. Chem. B 2025, 13, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yang, X.; Li, Y.; He, W.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, R.; Feng, Q. Hydroxyapatite/collagen coating on PLGA electrospun fibers for osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2018, 106, 2863–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Safari, B.; Aghazadeh, M.; Roshangar, L.; Aghanejad, A.; Davaran, S. A bioactive porous scaffold containing collagen/ phosphorous-modified polycaprolactone for osteogenesis of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 171, 111220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Cao, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, M.; Liu, Y.; Cui, X.; Liang, J.; Wang, Q.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, X. Childhood Cartilage ECM Enhances the Chondrogenesis of Endogenous Cells and Subchondral Bone Repair of the Unidirectional Collagen–dECM Scaffolds in Combination with Microfracture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 57043–57057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Yu, S.; Shu, X.; Chen, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Jing, J.; Yan, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, C. Construction of ultrasonically treated collagen/silk fibroin composite scaffolds to induce cartilage regeneration. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Majid, Q.A.; Fricker, A.T.R.; Gregory, D.A.; Davidenko, N.; Hernandez Cruz, O.; Jabbour, R.J.; Owen, T.J.; Basnett, P.; Lukasiewicz, B.; Stevens, M.; et al. Natural Biomaterials for Cardiac Tissue Engineering: A Highly Biocompatible Solution. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 554597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Liu, T.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, H.; Peng, S.; Zhang, D.; Li, K.; Chen, Y.; Chen, M. Advanced Cardiac Patches for the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2024, 149, 2002–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Tashakori-Miyanroudi, M.; Rakhshan, K.; Ramez, M.; Asgarian, S.; Janzadeh, A.; Azizi, Y.; Seifalian, A.; Ramezani, F. Conductive carbon nanofibers incorporated into collagen bio-scaffold assists myocardial injury repair. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 1136–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Roshanbinfar, K.; Schiffer, M.; Carls, E.; Angeloni, M.; Kolesnik-Gray, M.; Schruefer, S.; Schubert, D.W.; Ferrazzi, F.; Krstic, V.; Fleischmann, B.K.; et al. Electrically Conductive Collagen-PEDOT:PSS Hydrogel Prevents Post-Infarct Cardiac Arrhythmia and Supports hiPSC-Cardiomyocyte Function. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2403642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tohidi, H.; Maleki, N.; Simchi, A. Conductive, injectable, and self-healing collagen-hyaluronic acid hydrogels loaded with bacterial cellulose and gold nanoparticles for heart tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 280, 135749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kim, K.S.; Joo, H.J.; Choi, S.C.; Kim, J.H.; Park, C.Y.; Song, M.H.; Noh, J.M.; Cha, J.J.; Hong, S.J.; Ahn, T.H.; et al. Transplantation of 3D bio-printed cardiac mesh improves cardiac function and vessel formation via ANGPT1/Tie2 pathway in rats with acute myocardial infarction. Biofabrication 2021, 13, 045014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Das, S.; Kim, S.-W.; Choi, Y.-J.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.-H.; Kong, J.-S.; Park, H.-J.; Cho, D.-W.; Jang, J. Decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks and the external stimuli to enhance cardiac tissue development in vitro. Acta Biomater. 2019, 95, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Lee, A.; Hudson, A.R.; Shiwarski, D.J.; Tashman, J.W.; Hinton, T.J.; Yerneni, S.; Bliley, J.M.; Campbell, P.G.; Feinberg, A.W. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science 2019, 365, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Nadi, A.; Moradi, L.; Ai, J.; Asadpour, S. Stem Cells and Hydrogels for Liver Tissue Engineering: Synergistic Cure for Liver Regeneration. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2020, 16, 1092–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Nair, D.G.; Weiskirchen, R. Recent Advances in Liver Tissue Engineering as an Alternative and Complementary Approach for Liver Transplantation. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 46, 262–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lee, J.W.; Choi, Y.J.; Yong, W.J.; Pati, F.; Shim, J.H.; Kang, K.S.; Kang, I.H.; Park, J.; Cho, D.W. Development of a 3D cell printed construct considering angiogenesis for liver tissue engineering. Biofabrication 2016, 8, 015007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Morelli, S.; D’Amora, U.; Piscioneri, A.; Oliviero, M.; Scialla, S.; Coppola, A.; De Pascale, D.; Crocetta, F.; De Santo, M.P.; Davoli, M.; et al. Methacrylated chitosan/jellyfish collagen membranes as cell instructive platforms for liver tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 281, 136313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Huang, D.; Gibeley, S.B.; Xu, C.; Xiao, Y.; Celik, O.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Leong, K.W. Engineering liver microtissues for disease modeling and regenerative medicine. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1909553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Gao, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhao, H.; Xia, S.; Liu, W.; Bai, H.; Lv, F.; Zheng, X.; Huang, Y.; Gu, Q.; et al. Synthesis of easily-processable collagen bio-inks using ionic liquid for 3D bioprinted liver tissue models with branched vascular networks. Sci. China Chem. 2023, 66, 1489–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Keisuke Harada, T.M.; Miyamoto, S.; Sugimoto, S.; Ikeda, S.; Takeda, H.; Mochizuki, Y.; Hirata, K. Rapid formation of hepatic organoid in collagen sponge by rat small hepatocytes and hepatic nonparenchymal cells. J. Hepatol. 2003, 39, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Nishida, Y.; Taniguchi, A. A three-dimensional collagen-sponge-based culture system coated with simplified recombinant fibronectin improves the function of a hepatocyte cell line. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2016, 52, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Martinez-Castillo, M.; Piña-Barba, C.; Núñez-Tapia, I.A.; Hernandez-Santillan, M.; Hernández-Barragán, A.; Gutiérrez-Reyes, G. Collagen matrix scaffold as vehicle of WP1066, STAT-3 inhibitors, in an in vitro hepatocellular model. Ann. Hepatol. 2024, 29, 101403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Taymour, R.; Chicaiza-Cabezas, N.A.; Gelinsky, M.; Lode, A. Core-shell bioprinting of vascularizedin vitroliver sinusoid models. Biofabrication 2022, 14, 045019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Rico-Llanos, G.A.; Borrego-Gonzalez, S.; Moncayo-Donoso, M.; Becerra, J.; Visser, R. Collagen Type I Biomaterials as Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2021, 13, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wei, S.Y.; Chen, P.Y.; Hsieh, C.C.; Chen, Y.S.; Chen, T.H.; Yu, Y.S.; Tsai, M.C.; Xie, R.H.; Chen, G.Y.; Yin, G.C.; et al. Engineering large and geometrically controlled vascularized nerve tissue in collagen hydrogels to restore large-sized volumetric muscle loss. Biomaterials 2023, 303, 122402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Kim, S.D.; Jin, S.; Kim, S.; Son, D.; Shin, M. Tyramine-Functionalized Alginate-Collagen Hybrid Hydrogel Inks for 3D-Bioprinting. Polymers 2022, 14, 3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Unterman, S.; Freiman, A.; Beckerman, M.; Abraham, E.; Stanley, J.R.L.; Levy, E.; Artzi, N.; Edelman, E. Tuning of Collagen Scaffold Properties Modulates Embedded Endothelial Cell Regulatory Phenotype in Repair of Vascular Injuries In Vivo. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, 4, 2220–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Wang, S.; Bai, L.; Hu, X.; Yao, S.; Hao, Z.; Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Lu, H.; He, J.; Wang, L.; et al. 3D Bioprinting of Neurovascular Tissue Modeling with Collagen-Based Low-Viscosity Composites. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, e2300004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Enrico, A.; Voulgaris, D.; Ostmans, R.; Sundaravadivel, N.; Moutaux, L.; Cordier, A.; Niklaus, F.; Herland, A.; Stemme, G. 3D Microvascularized Tissue Models by Laser-Based Cavitation Molding of Collagen. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, e2109823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yang, B.; Liu, H.; Jiang, L.; Zeng, Y.; Han, Y.; Sha, C.; Xie, X.; Li, H.; Zhou, J.; Lin, W. 3D bioprinting of collagen-based materials for oral medicine. Collagen Leather 2023, 5, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Gelin, A.; Masson-Meyers, D.; Amini, F.; Moharamzadeh, K.; Tayebi, L. Collagen: The superior material for full-thickness oral mucosa tissue engineering. J. Oral Biosci. 2024, 66, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Wang, C.Y.; Chiu, Y.C.; Lee, A.K.; Lin, Y.A.; Lin, P.Y.; Shie, M.Y. Biofabrication of Gingival Fibroblast Cell-Laden Collagen/Strontium-Doped Calcium Silicate 3D-Printed Bi-Layered Scaffold for Osteoporotic Periodontal Regeneration. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Chang, Y.-T.; Lai, C.-C.; Lin, D.-J. Collagen Scaffolds Laden with Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts Promote Periodontal Regeneration in SD Rat Model. Polymers 2023, 15, 2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Gil-Cabrerizo, P.; Saludas, L.; Prosper, F.; Abizanda, G.; Echanove-Gonzalez de Anleo, M.; Ruiz-Villalba, A.; Garbayo, E.; Blanco-Prieto, M.J. Development of an injectable alginate-collagen hydrogel for cardiac delivery of extracellular vesicles. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 629, 122356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Fu, C.; Fan, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, W.; Ma, J.; Xiao, J. One-step fabrication of an injectable antibacterial collagen hydrogel with in situ synthesized silver nanoparticles for accelerated diabetic wound healing. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 480, 148288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of collagen fibrillogenesis in vivo.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of collagen fibrillogenesis in vivo.
Ijms 26 04009 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the preparation methods of cell-loaded collagen scaffolds.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the preparation methods of cell-loaded collagen scaffolds.
Ijms 26 04009 g002
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of cell-loaded collagen scaffolds and their applications in various fields of tissue engineering.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of cell-loaded collagen scaffolds and their applications in various fields of tissue engineering.
Ijms 26 04009 g003
Table 1. The multiple cells and preparation methods for collagen scaffold encapsulation.
Table 1. The multiple cells and preparation methods for collagen scaffold encapsulation.
MethodScaffoldCross-Linking Agent or
Influencing Factor
Encapsulated CellsReference
Click
Chemistry
Thiolated-collagen injectable hydrogelThiol-alkene click chemistryBMSCs[61]
Thiolated-collagen injectable hydrogelThiol-alkene click chemistryBMSCs, HUVEC[62]
Hyaluronic acid/collagen hydrogelSPAACCorneal epithelial cells[64]
EGF/collagen scaffoldsSPAACCorneal epithelial cells[65]
Photoactivated Cross-linkingCSMA-COLMA hydrogelMethacrylic anhydrideKeratinocytes, Fibroblasts[67]
Col-II-MA hydrogelMethacrylic anhydrideBMSCs[68]
Collagen scaffoldsRiboflavinFibroblasts[70]
Collagen/hyaluronic acid scaffoldsRiboflavinBMSCs[71]
Enzyme Cross-linkingCollagen-hyaluronic acid hydrogelHRPHMEC, Fibroblasts[73]
Collagen fibril hydrogelMTGFibroblasts[77]
Transglutaminase-cross-linked collagen hydrogels (Col-Tgel) MTGHDPSCs[78]
Physical ForceRapid sol-gel reversible thermosensitive collagen (RRTC) hydrogelpH/TemperatureL929,
HUVEC, Mouse myeloma cells (Sp2/0), MOVAS, IEC-6, HC
[81]
Collagen hydrogelpH/TemperatureMSC[56]
3D biomimetic collagen scaffoldspH/TemperatureNHDFs, C2C12[82]
Ionic Interaction GelationAlginate-collagen interpenetrating network (IPN) hydrogelCaCl2IDG-SW3 [86]
Collagen-alginate microgelsCaCl2HS-5, MDA-MB-231[87]
Sodium alginate/collagen hydrogelCaCl2hUC-MSCs[88]
Collagen-alginate 3D microscaffoldsCaCl2MG-63, MDA-MB-231, U2OS, HCT-116 [89]
Freeze-dryingCellulose and collagen nano-scaffoldFreeze-dryingBMSCs and differentiated keratinocytes[94]
Double-layer collagen spongeFreeze-dryingC2C12/MC3T3-E1[95]
Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of cell-loaded collagen scaffold preparation methods.
Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of cell-loaded collagen scaffold preparation methods.
MethodAdvantagesDisadvantagesReference
Click
Chemistry
  • Highly efficient
  • Highly specific covalent bonding
  • Non-cytotoxic properties
  • It is suitable for in situ cross-linking in living tissue
  • Requires that natural polymers incorporate click groups
[60,61,62,65]
Photoactivated
Cross-linking
  • Mild reaction conditions
  • In situ gelation
  • The modulation of mechanical properties is facilitated
  • Applicable to 3D bioprinting of live cells
  • Restricted light penetration depth
[66,69,70,71]
Enzyme
Cross-linking
  • Absence of exogenous reagent residues
  • Biocompatibility
  • Preserves the triple helix structure
  • Elevated specificity
  • Reaction rate limitation: LOX
  • Inadequate mechanical properties
[73,74,75,77]
Physical Force
  • Absence of chemical modification
  • Rapid and reversible molding
  • Facile handling
  • Inadequate mechanical properties
  • Necessitates precise temperature regulation
[56,79,81]
Ionic Interaction Gelation
  • Rapid prototyping
  • Synergistic improvement in mechanical properties
  • Increases cell adhesion sites
  • The pH sensitivity of collagen must be tuned to a neutral equilibrium for effective cross-linking
[83,84,85,86,89]
Freeze-drying
  • Tunable pore size
  • Absence of exogenous chemical residues
  • Straightforward preparation process
  • Swift absorption of wound exudate
  • Inadequate mechanical properties
  • Accelerated degradation rates
  • Long-term stability and storage problems
[90,91,92,93,94]
Table 3. Cell-loaded collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.
Table 3. Cell-loaded collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.
Tissue/Organ to Be RegeneratedScaffoldEncapsulated CellsKey FindingsReference
Skin/Wound HealingBilayered PCL/gelatin nanofibers-alginate/collagen hydrogelADSCsThe bilayer scaffold containing ADSCs reduced inflammation and improved re-epithelialization and collagen reorganization.[96]
A novel cellulose and collagen nano-scaffoldBone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and differentiated keratinocyte-like cellsCell therapy did not induce inflammation; combining scaffold and cellular therapy enhanced collagen deposition.[94]
Thermosensitive injectable chitosan/collagen/β-glycerophosphate composite hydrogelsMSCsThe combined treatment accelerated the wound closure in diabetic mice by enhanced vascularization and paracrine effects.[97]
Collagen dermal-replacement scaffolds BMSCsCBS-MSCs facilitated the noncontractile and re-epithelialization processes, as well as granulation tissue regeneration and neovascularization, in chronic diabetic wounds.[98]
A collagen–glycosaminoglycan matrix to form a dermis-like tissue sheetMSCsProlonged MSC engraftment is associated with accelerated wound re-epithelialization and healing, accompanied by increased macrophage recruitment and angiogenesis.[99]
NerveCollagen-fibrin hydrogelmNSCEnhanced cognitive function through the reconstruction of the damaged cortex.[103]
Collagen/heparan sulfate porous scaffoldsNSCsEnhanced regeneration of neurons, nerve fibers, synapses, and myelin sheaths in injured brain tissue, reduced brain edema and apoptosis, and substantially recovered motor and cognitive functions.[104]
Methacrylate hyaluronic acid/collagen hydrogelMSCsMaintained disc height, protected NP, and alleviated vascularization and inflammation.[106]
Type I collagen hydrogelMSCsIt effectively prevents disc degeneration and inhibits cell apoptosis following discectomy.[107]
Collagen sponge scaffoldhbNSPCs hscNSPCsEffectively promoted long-term cell survival and neuronal differentiation and improved the SCI microenvironment by reducing inflammation and glial scar formation.[109]
Collagen/silk fibroin scaffoldNSCsSignificantly increased the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials, as well as improved continuity and cavity filling within the injured spinal cord.[110]
Bone/CartilageHAP/collagen scaffoldBMSCsBMSCs on the scaffold remained viable and continued to proliferate, exhibiting high alkaline phosphatase expression.[117]
Collagen-HAP scaffoldhADSCsCapable of recruiting host cells to undergo osteogenic differentiation while promoting bone enlargement and the formation of vascular elements.[118]
Collagen/strontium-doped bioactive glasses/HAP nanorods scaffoldOBsPositively influenced cell proliferation and metabolic activity, enhancing alkaline phosphatase activity in osteoblasts and reducing osteoclast differentiation.[119]
Collagen/PVA-CaCO₃ membranesBMSCsEffectively promoted BMSC adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation.[121]
Collagen/PLGA/HAP fibrous scaffoldsMSCsCollagen coating enhanced cell–membrane interactions.[122]
Collagen/phosphorous-modified polycaprolactone porous scaffoldAD-MSCsFacilitates cell adhesion, proliferation, and upregulation of osteogenic marker genes, thereby inducing osteogenic differentiation of stem cells.[123]
Unidirectional collagen-dECM scaffoldsBMSCsHighlights the immature cartilage and dECM at different developmental stages, which result in the diversified effects of BMSCs.[124]
Collagen/silk fibroin scaffoldADSCsStimulates chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells and enhances cartilage regeneration.[125]
CardiacCollagen-PEDOT–PSS hydrogelHuman-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytesFacilitates partial regeneration of cardiac muscle, improving contractility, calcium handling, and conduction efficiency.[129]
Collagen-hyaluronic acid hydrogelsHuman embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytesExhibits heat sensitivity, self-repair capability, and electrical conductivity, facilitating myocardial regeneration.[130]
Gelatin-methacryloyl–collagen hydrogelhCM, hCFVessel formation and stabilization, reduced fibrosis, increased left ventricle thickness, and enhanced cardiac function.[131]
Collagen bio-inkHuman cardiomyocytesThe printed heart model demonstrates synchronized contraction, directed action potential propagation, and wall thickening during peak ventricular contraction.[133]
LiverCollagen hydrogelHCs, HUVEC, Human lung fibroblastsConstructs liver tissue structures that facilitate interaction between heterogeneous cells.[136]
Methacrylated chitosan/jellyfish collagen membranesHepatocytesProvides an optimal microenvironment for liver cells.[137]
Norbornene-functionalized collagen (Col-Nor) hydrogelHUVECDevelopment of a three-dimensional (3D) liver tissue model incorporating branching vascular networks.[139]
Demineralized collagen spongeSHs, NPCsHepatic organoids can be rapidly reconstructed in a collagen sponge by rat SHs and NPCs.[140]
Demineralized collagen spongeHepG2The collagen sponge can be utilized for drug metabolism studies, toxicity testing, and therapeutic agent screening.[141]
HAP-mineralized collagen spongesHEPA1-6, HepG2Collagen matrix scaffold as a vehicle in an in vitro hepatocellular model.[142]
Alginate/methylcellulose bio-ink–collagen/fibronectin bio-inkHepG2, HUVEC, Human dermal fibroblastsDevelopment of an In vitro Triple-Culture Model with Complex Hepatic Sinusoids. [143]
TendonCollagen hydrogelHUVEC, MSCsDevelopment of large vascularized neural tissue structures for repairing volumetric muscle loss and restoring muscle function.[145]
VascularTyramine-functionalized alginate-collagen hybrid hydrogelFibroblast cellsThree-dimensional (3D) printed vascular extracellular matrix (ECM) mimetic scaffolds for supporting tissue regeneration.[146]
Collagen scaffoldECsIt prevents in vivo cell inactivation, reduces injury-induced inflammation, and enhances endothelialization and smooth muscle proliferation.[147]
Alginate/collagen hydrogelsMouse brain microvascular endothelial cells (BEND.3), AstrocytesA 3D hollow coaxial neurovascular model is fabricated.[148]
Collagen hydrogelsHUVECDeveloping organ-on-a-chip and 3D tissue models with complex microvasculature.[149]
StomatologyCollagen/strontium-doped calcium silicate scaffoldhGFGuided periodontal regeneration.[152]
Collagen/riboflavin hydrogelsHPLFsWell-oriented periodontal ligament and alveolar bone regeneration.[153]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Q.; Feng, T.; Xie, Y.; Swamiappan, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, H.; Peng, X. Recent Advances in the Development and Application of Cell-Loaded Collagen Scaffolds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094009

AMA Style

He Q, Feng T, Xie Y, Swamiappan S, Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Zhou H, Peng X. Recent Advances in the Development and Application of Cell-Loaded Collagen Scaffolds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(9):4009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094009

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Qiming, Tao Feng, Yingyan Xie, Sathiskumar Swamiappan, Yue Zhou, Yanfang Zhou, Hui Zhou, and Xinsheng Peng. 2025. "Recent Advances in the Development and Application of Cell-Loaded Collagen Scaffolds" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 9: 4009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094009

APA Style

He, Q., Feng, T., Xie, Y., Swamiappan, S., Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhou, H., & Peng, X. (2025). Recent Advances in the Development and Application of Cell-Loaded Collagen Scaffolds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(9), 4009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop