Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
4,4′-(Pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrrole-1,4-diyl)dianiline
Previous Article in Journal
Diethyl [(4-{(9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl}-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)(benzamido)methyl]phosphonate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ethyl (S)-2-Benzamido-5-[(4,6-dimethylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino]pentanoate
 
 
Short Note
Peer-Review Record

6-Nitro-7-tosylquinazolin-4(3H)-one

Molbank 2020, 2020(4), M1168; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1168
by Thi Ngoc Nguyen 1,2, Thi Phuong Thuy Tran 1, Thi Hoang Mai Vu 1, Hoa Binh Nguyen 1, Nguyet Suong Huyen Dao 1, Van Giang Nguyen 1, Dinh Luyen Nguyen 1, Nguyen Trieu Trinh 3 and Van Hai Nguyen 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Molbank 2020, 2020(4), M1168; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1168
Submission received: 3 November 2020 / Revised: 18 November 2020 / Accepted: 19 November 2020 / Published: 21 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Heterocycle Reactions)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Nguyen et al. reported the synthesis of a previously unknown compound using known chemistry. The paper is worth to be published in Molbank since it meets all the journal requirements after the following minor criticism are addressed:

The paper contains  some typos, please check it thoroughly

in the abstract, third line "radicals" should be "radical"

page 5, tenth line, I would add "in literature" at the end of the sentence

I would add some references to highlight the importance of the quinazolinone scaffold such as 10.3390/molecules25204780; 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104345; 10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115606; 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.05.001; 10.1002/cmdc.201300287; 10.14233/ajchem.2013.15509 and others

Author Response

Your comments:

Nguyen et al. reported the synthesis of a previously unknown compound using known chemistry. The paper is worth to be published in Molbank since it meets all the journal requirements after the following minor criticism are addressed:

Point 1: The paper contains some typos, please check it thoroughly in the abstract, third line "radicals" should be "radical"

Our response:

Thank you for your comments.

We have accordingly updated the whole sentence as shown in the second sentence of the Abstract in the manuscript. We’ve also checked the manuscript thoroughly for any other typos and found none.

Point 2: Page 5, tenth line, I would add "in literature" at the end of the sentence

Our response:

We have checked the tenth line in Page 5 but cannot find a suitable place to add “in literature” as suggested by the reviewer.

We reckon it was a typo and have found that a better place is the tenth line in Page 3, not Page 5. We have thus gone ahead and updated the suggested “in literature” at the end of the tenth line in Page 3 as shown in the updated manuscript.

Point 3: I would add some references to highlight the importance of the quinazolinone scaffold such as 10.3390/molecules25204780; 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104345; 10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115606; 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.05.001; 10.1002/cmdc.201300287; 10.14233/ajchem.2013.15509 and others

Our response:

We have incorporated all these six references (numbered 7 to12) both in text and in the References to highlight the importance of the quinazoline scaffold. As a result, all reference numbers have been changed accordingly as shown in the updated manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop