Next Article in Journal
Microplastics in Freshwater: What Is the News from the World?
Next Article in Special Issue
The Permeability of Natural versus Anthropogenic Forest Edges Modulates the Abundance of Ground Beetles of Different Dispersal Power and Habitat Affinity
Previous Article in Journal
A Case Study of Nematode Communities’ Dynamics along Successional Paths in the Reclaimed Landfill
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/d12070275
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trait-Specific Responses of Carabid Beetle Diversity and Composition in Pinus densiflora Forests Compared to Broad-Leaved Deciduous Forests in a Temperate Region

by
Jong-Kook Jung
1,*,† and
Joon-Ho Lee
1,2
1
Entomology Program, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Gwanakro 1, Gwanakgu, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Gwanakro 1, Gwanakgu, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Present address: Division of Forest Insect Pests and Diseases, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Korea.
Diversity 2020, 12(7), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/d12070275
Submission received: 16 June 2020 / Revised: 6 July 2020 / Accepted: 7 July 2020 / Published: 9 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Faunistical and Ecological Studies on Carabid Beetles)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Since successful reforestation after the 1970s, Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora) forests have become the most important coniferous forests in Korea. However, the scarcity of evidence for biodiversity responses hinders understanding of the conservation value of Korean red pine forests. This study was conducted to explore the patterns of carabid beetle diversity and assemblage structures between broad-leaved deciduous forests and P. densiflora forests in the temperate region of central Korea. Carabid beetles were sampled by pitfall trapping from 2013 to 2014. A total of 66 species were identified from 9541 carabid beetles. Species richness in broad-leaved deciduous forests was significantly higher than that in pine forests. In addition, the species composition of carabid beetles in broad-leaved deciduous forests differed from that of P. densiflora forests. More endemic, brachypterous, forest specialists, and carnivorous species were distributed in broad-leaved deciduous forests than in P. densiflora forests. Consequently, carabid beetle assemblages in central Korea are distinctively divided by forest type based on ecological and biological traits (e.g., endemisim, habitat types, wing forms, and feeding guilds). However, possible variation of the response of beetle communities to the growth of P. densiflora forests needs to be considered for forest management based on biodiversity conservation in temperate regions, because conifer plantations in this study are still young, i.e., approximately 30–40-years old.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The positive ecological role in plantation forests has been emphasized recently because it prevents the loss of biodiversity caused by deforestation worldwide [1,2]. For example, plantations can have direct impacts on biodiversity [3], as well as stand dynamics and structure [4]. The global plantation area is approximately 7.3% of the total forested area (291 million ha) [5]. However, conifer forests in Korea, mainly plantations, cover approximately 36.9% of the total forested area (2.3 million ha) [6]. Almost all natural forests in Korea had been destroyed until the 1960s and have recovered since the 1970s [7]. For this reason, a large area of forests in Korea is composed of 30–50-year-old conifer plantations and naturally regenerating deciduous forests covering approximately 87.3% of the total forested area [6]. Thus, understanding biotic responses of young forests, including plantations and regenerated forests, provides valuable insight into biodiversity conservation in temperate forests of Korea.
Among young conifer plantation forests in Korea, Pinus densiflora forests are the most important, covering approximately 24.7% (1,562,843 ha) of the total forested area [6]. However, biodiversity in P. densiflora forests, as compared with young broad-leaved deciduous forests (Quercus spp.) in Korea, is poorly understood despite successful reforestation since the 1970s. In human-dominated landscapes, the diversity and composition of carabid beetles [8,9,10,11] and moths [12] in coniferous forests (mainly P. densiflora) have been investigated and compared to those in secondary mixed forests. In mountains in temperate regions, the effects of forest types on moths [13,14] and carabids [15,16,17] have been compared. Differences in carabid communities among forest types have been occasionally observed due to the effects of habitat fragmentation [8,11] and landscape heterogeneity [10]. However, the species diversity and composition of moths [13,14] and carabids [9,15,16,17] in coniferous plantations are generally similar to those in secondary or natural forests, except that the species richness of all carabid beetles is increased in regenerating deciduous forests [10]. In temperate regions, few studies have considered the ecological and biological traits of carabid beetles to compare diversity between forest types, such as habitat type [10,11], body size [10], and wing morphs [10,11,17]. By considering ecological and biological traits, the species richness of macropterous species differed only in grasslands as compared with various forest types, such as two natural forests (broad-leaved deciduous and P. densiflora forests) and one plantation (a deciduous coniferous forest) [17], and the species richness of brachypterous and forest specialists decreased significantly as a result of habitat fragmentation irrespective of forest type [11]. Nonetheless, the low number of spatial replications for measuring biodiversity in young P. densiflora forests is limited to emphasizing the conservation value compared to young broad-leaved deciduous forests because the distribution of insects is basically related to the local environment, such as habitat heterogeneity and elevation, in addition to habitat types.
To compare biodiversity in young P. densiflora and young broad-leaved deciduous forests, we studied carabid beetles because they are diverse, ecologically well known, and abundant in most ecosystems [18]. In particular, large-bodied and flightless carabid beetles are more vulnerable to disturbances than generalist species that have high mobility [19]. The endemism rate could also be an important biological characteristic because endemism is closely related to the low dispersal ability of carabid beetles combined with adaptation to specific local environments [20]. In addition, feeding guilds could also be an important trait, because diversity and distribution of carnivorous and herbivorous species are influenced by vegetation [21] and microhabitat characteristics, such as leaf litter [22]. These ecological and biological traits could provide a basis for biodiversity conservation in different forest types.
The primary aim of this study was to compare the abundance, species richness, and composition of carabid beetles based on ecological and biological traits (all carabid beetles, geographical distribution, wing morph, habitat preference, and feeding guilds) between young broad-leaved deciduous forests (Quercus spp. dominated, abbreviated to BLF hereafter) and young pine plantations (P. densiflora dominated, abbreviated to PF hereafter) in central Korea. In addition, we characterized carabid communities in each forest type by indicator species analysis, because carabid communities can not be regenerated even in relatively old plantations [23].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Carabid beetles were studied in Yeongwol-gun and Jeongseon-gun, which are located in central Korea (Figure 1a). Because of the higher proportion of mountainous forests in the study area with steep terrain, forest landscapes are well preserved. In Yeongwol-gun and Jeongseon-gun, forests cover approximately 85% of the area [24]. The study area is surrounded by several reserves, such as Mt. Chiaksan National Park (17,567 ha), Mt. Sobaeksan National Park (32,205 ha), Mt. Taebaeksan National Park (7005 ha), and forest genetic resource reserves on Mt. Gariwangsan (2475 ha) (Figure 1b). Moreover, the Donggang River traversing Yeongwol-gun, Jeongseon-gun, and Pyeongchang-gun has been designated an ecological and landscape conservation area (6497 ha) because of its beautiful landscape and high biodiversity. The climate of the region is temperate, with an average annual temperature of 11.03 °C; the average temperatures of the warmest and coolest months from 2011 to 2013 were 31.07 °C and −11.77 °C, respectively; the annual precipitation in 2011, 2012, and 2013 was 2085.7, 1398.8, and 1245.5 mm, respectively [25].
Carabid beetles were sampled at 22 study sites (Figure 1b). The location and environmental characteristics of the study sites are described in Table 1. Half of the 22 sites were PF, the other half BLF. Forest information (forest types and ages) in this study area was confirmed by the Korean forest geographic information service system [6]. The latitude and longitude (i.e., spatial location) of the study sites were 37°05′03″ N, 37°22′23″ N and 128°13′48″ E, 128°48′35″ E, respectively, but the spatial locations of the two forest types were quite distinct (Figure 1b). In addition, forest ages of PF were relatively higher than those of BLF (Welch two sample t-test, t = 3.49, p = 0.002). However, elevation was not different between the two forest types (range of 245–473 m for PF and 273–744 m for BLF, t = 1.49, p = 0.157) (Table 1). These five variables for each sampling site were used in the redundancy analysis (RDA) to explain the variation in carabid beetle assemblages between forest types.

2.2. Sampling

Three pitfall traps were installed at each study site for collecting carabid beetles from 2013 to 2014. Sampling periods differed among study sites, ranging between 78–196 days (234–588 trap × days, Table 1). Short sampling periods at some study sites, such as YNC, YNG, and YBD, may have limited appropriate carabid beetle collection. However, we sampled carabid beetles at least from August to October at all sampling sites because the diversity of carabid beetles during these months in mountainous forests of central Korea was higher than that in other months [26].
The trap was a plastic cup (9.5 cm in diameter, 10 cm in height, 430 mL in volume), and a plastic roof was placed 3 cm above each trap to prevent the inflow of rainfall and litter. Pitfall traps were unbaited, containing preservatives (200 mL, 95% ethyl-alcohol/95% ethylene-glycol = 1:1) as killing-preserving solutions, which were replaced every 4 weeks. Collected carabid beetles were transported to the laboratory, dried, mounted, and identified to the species level under a dissecting microscope (63×, Olympus SZ61, Tokyo, Japan). Identification was performed according to [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Nomenclature confirmed the list of Korean Carabidae by [32,33,34,35]. Endemism with respect to Korea, including South and North Korea, was confirmed according to [32,34,36]. The identified carabid beetles were stored in the Insect Ecology Laboratory at Seoul National University.

2.3. Data Analysis

All of the following statistical approaches were performed in R version 3.3.2 [37]. The species richness of carabid beetles in each forest type was estimated by individual-based rarefaction curves using the “vegan” R package [38]. Rarefaction curves are based on a random resampling of the pool of captured individuals and are used to estimate expected richness at lower sample sizes [39]. Rarefaction methods enable meaningful standardization and comparison of datasets [39]. For the rarefaction curves, carabid beetle samples were pooled based on forest type and forest age.
To compare the abundance and species richness of total carabid beetles and functional groups between two forest types, a t-test was applied. For the t-test, carabid beetle samples were pooled at each site. In addition, we standardized species richness and abundance, dividing them by trap × days (ranging between 234 and 588 trap × days) for statistical analyses (Table 1) because sampling periods were different at each study site and some pitfall traps were disturbed by rain.
The RDA was performed to explain the variation in carabid beetle assemblages between forest types and to visualize differences in species composition between forest types. Because there is a possible “horseshoe effect” in ordination [40], a Hellinger transformation was applied to species data prior to RDA. To preselect the environmental variables, we applied the “ordistep” function from the “vegan” R package [41], which performs both forward and backward selection of variables based on P-values. The vegan function “anova” was used to assess the significance of each variable in the final model (sequential test) and to obtain the P-values for each variable based on permutation tests [42]. We further compared the species richness of different ecological groups of carabid beetles by performing a Pearson correlation analysis against plot scores of the first and second axes resulting from the ordination analysis (plot scores for RDA1 and RDA2 based on weighted averages of site scores).
The indicator value (IndVal) approach was conducted to find indicator species between forest types that could characterize the habitats [43]. Flexible IndVal was independent of the relative abundance of other species, and there was no need to use pseudospecies. IndVal is at maximum value (1.00) when all individuals of a species occur in a single group of sites and when the species is found in all sites of that group. Therefore, abundance and occurrence stability indices for species were determined for analysis. The statistical significance of the species indicator value (α = 0.1) was determined using the Monte Carlo permutation test [44,45].

3. Results

3.1. Diversity and Abundance of Carabid Beetles

A total of 66 species were identified from 9541 collected carabid beetles (Table S1). Three Synuchus species, i.e., Synuchus nitidus (3888 individuals, 40.75% of total), Synuchus cycloderus (2587 individuals, 27.11%), and Synuchus agonus (825 individuals, 8.65%), and Eucarabus cartereti, 1982 (418 individuals, 4.38%), were abundant, comprising over 80% of the total carabid beetle assemblages (Table S1). Fourteen endemic specieswere collected, comprising 8.84% of the total abundance (843 individuals).
Individual-based rarefaction curves indicated that the species richness of carabid beetles in BLF was higher than that in PF (Figure 2a). When considering forest age for each forest type, the species richness of carabid beetles in 31–40-year-old BLF was more distinct than the other three forest types (Figure 2b). Considering ecological groups, the abundances of brachypterous, forest specialists, open-habitat species, and carnivorous species were not different between the two forest types, while those of widespread, macropterous, and herbivorous species were significantly higher in PF (Table 2). The abundance of endemic species was higher only in BLF. The species richness of endemic, brachypterous, forest specialist, and carnivorous species, in PF were significantly lower than those in BLF.

3.2. Species Composition of Carabid Beetles

The RDA for carabid beetles was significant (permutation test for RDA under reduced model, F4,17 = 3.51, p < 0.001). The first and second axes accounted for 36.55% of the total variation, with the first and second axes explaining 24.17% (permutation test, F1,17 = 7.51, p < 0.001) and 12.37% (F1,17 = 3.84, p = 0.005), respectively (Table 3). The first axis of the RDA was strongly and positively associated with elevation and longitude, while forest type was negatively related to the first RDA axis (Figure 3 and Table 3). In addition, the species composition in BLF appeared to be distinct from that in PF (Figure 3). Species richness in most ecological groups showed positive correlations with weighted average site scores on the first RDA axis, whereas species richness of open-habitat species showed weak and positive correlations with the first axis (Table 3).
According to forest types, the following two characteristic groups of carabid beetle species were detected: (1) numerous in BLF, i.e., Eucarabus cartereti cartereti, Harpalus discrepans, Pristosiavigil, Leistus niger, and Cymindis collaris; (2) abundant in PF, i.e., Coptolabrus smaragdinus branickii (Table 4). However, P. vigil, C. collaris, and C. s. branickii had low indicator values (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1. Carabid Beetle Diversity in Different Forest Types

In temperate forests of Korea composed of young coniferous and deciduous forests, we found that forest type and elevation were important factors that influenced carabid beetle assemblages. In particular, the species richness of carabid beetles of the BLF in this study was obviously higher than inPF, although the average elevation did not differ between the forest types. These results were rather different from those in previous studies conducted in Korea [15], China [16], and Japan [17], whereas similar findings were reported in Japan [46] and Korea [10]. In particular, the diversity of carabid beetles was significantly reduced in conifer plantations, especially in more heterogeneous landscapes [10]. In Japan, carabid beetles in fragmented landscapes at high elevations (1240–1490 m) showed no differences in diversity between natural forests (evergreen coniferous and broad-leaved deciduous) and plantations (deciduous coniferous) [17]. In contrast, similar carabid diversity between pine plantations and oak forests was reported from Korea and China [15,16], but the estimated species richness in mixed forests was higher than that reported in China [16]. On the basis of ecological traits of carabid beetles in several habitat types, including deciduous, mixed, and mature conifer forests, more forest specialists were caught in deciduous forests, while more forest generalists were caught in mature conifer plantations [46]. Thus, conifer plantations sometimes support biodiversity, but this is dependent on the history of disturbances such as forest management or biogeographical characteristics. In fact, many forest-inhabiting species in Korea are flightless, and thus they cannot disperse from source habitats to fragments, especially the large-bodied species [47]. However, our study region is composed of continuous mountainous forests, not fragmented landscapes, although the locations of the study sites of each forest type were not pairwise in the same locality. Thus, PF could have the potential to support low biodiversity, at least for carabid beetles.
Although this study showed that the diversity of carabid beetles clearly differed between forest types, the synergistic effect of elevation, locality of study sites, and forest type could also be important to understand carabid beetle assemblages in this region. Thus, interpretation of our results should be carefully applied to forest management for biodiversity conservation. This is because the difference in carabid communities could be due to the mixed effect of forest types and other environmental variables, such as moisture, pH, organic matter, texture [17,48], leaf litter [22], canopy cover [16], and elevation [49].

4.2. Ecological and Biological Traits of Carabid Beetles and Forest Types

Plant species (i.e., forest type) are regarded as the primary factor for insect communities, especially herbivorous insects [50,51]. However, understanding the distributional pattern of carnivorous carabids in temperate forests could be more important as compared with phytophagous or omnivorous carabids because, in general, the biodiversity of carnivorous carabids is habitat heterogeneity dependent [52]. In fact, most carabid beetle species in this study were carnivorous (i.e., 9436 individuals belonging to 54 species), whereas only 105 belonging to 12 species were phytophagous or omnivorous (e.g., species belonging to genus Amara and Harpalus), which could occasionally occur in forests with understory vegetation because of forest gaps or forest roads. Thus, temperate forests in Korea could have no herbivorous carabid beetles. Nonetheless, forest type can alter other herbivorous insect communities, and carnivorous carabid beetles could change according to changes in the abundance and composition of herbivorous communities.
Unlike feeding guilds, this study suggested that the trait-specific response of carabid beetles to different forest types appears to be valuable information for establishing biodiversity conservation plans in young reforested landscapes. In this study, the species richness of endemic, brachypterous, and forest specialists in BLF was obviously higher than that in PF, while the abundance of macropterous and widespread species in PF was obviously higher than that in BLF. In general, highly heterogeneous topography due to mountains is regarded as one of the reasons for the high diversity of forest specialist carabid beetles in Korea. In fact, many forest specialists are brachypterous and they prefer stable environments, such as BLF in this study. PF with homogenized environments can be suitable habitats for macropterous and widespread species, such as S. cycloderus and S. nitidus. In fact, these two species, which are dominant in forests of South Korea [10], were significantly more common in PF than in BLF and accounted for approximately 68% of all carabid beetles in this study. Consequently, ecological and biological traits for carabid beetles are very useful to understand the distributional pattern of biodiversity in temperate forests and are beneficial for forestry through biodiversity conservation.

4.3. Habitat Specialists for Forest Types

This study showed that only three species (E. cartereti, H. discrepans, and L. niger) could be considered BLF specialists, although the species composition was quite different between forest types. However, some species or groups could have the potential to become bioindicators of distinct forest types. For example, species, belonging to the genus Pterostichus were more numerous in BLF (258 individuals belonging to 8 species) than in PF (69 individuals belonging to three species) (Table S1).
In contrast, there were no habitat specialists in PF, only C. s. branickii was more frequently observed in PF than in BLF. C. s. branickii is a habitat specialist in PF patches [11], and this species is also found in open habitats, such as agricultural fields, orchards, and lawns [53,54]. Thus, this species appears to be a habitat generalist. In the genus Synuchus, some species, such as S. cycloderus and S. nitidus, can also be used as potential bioindicators. Although they were found in almost every study site, these two species were abundant in PF. This could be largely due to the habitat preference of Synuchus towards dry forests [55]. In fact, P. densiflora trees are generally planted on south-facing slopes of mountains in Korea, and the trees prefer well-drained soils. In addition, P. densiflora is considered to be the most preferable tree species for plantations in Korea because of its esthetic value [56]. Thus, habitat conditions in PF are generally dry, especially in fragmented patches [11]. For these reasons, some Synuchus species, especially S. cycloderus and S. nitidus, are potential bioindicators in PF. Nonetheless, many PF in this study were still young, approximately 31–50-years old. Therefore, habitat specialists did not have enough time to establish populations in PF.

5. Conclusions

This study showed that carabid beetle assemblages in temperate forests of central Korea were distinctively divided by forest type based on ecological and biological traits (e.g., endemism, habitat types, and wing forms). This suggested that monoculture plantations in temperate regions (i.e., P. densiflora in this study), which appeared to be simple habitats, could have a limited ability to preserve high biodiversity, at least for carabid beetles. In particular, young P. densiflora plantations may not be appropriate for supporting populations of endemic, brachypterous, and forest specialist species. For biodiversity conservation in Korea as a reforested area, however, possible variation of the beetle community response to forest growth of P. densiflora plantations need to be considered.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/12/7/275/s1, Table S1: List of carabid beetles with number of individuals in Pinus densiflora forests (PF) and broad-leaved deciduous forests (BLF) in central Korea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-K.J. and J.-H.L.; Data curation, J.-K.J.; Formal analysis, J.-K.J.; Funding acquisition, J.-H.L.; Investigation, J.-K.J.; Methodology, J.-K.J.; Project administration, J.-H.L.; Visualization, J.-K.J.; Writing—original draft, J.-K.J.; Writing—review and editing, J.-H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Brain Korea 21 plus.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brockerhoff, E.G.; Jactel, H.; Parrotta, J.A.; Quine, C.P.; Sayer, J. Plantation forests and biodiversity: Oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 17, 925–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hartmann, H.; Daoust, G.; Bigué, B. Negative or positive effects of plantation and intensive forestry on biodiversity: A matter of scale and perspective. For. Chron. 2010, 86, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lindenmayer, D.B.; Hobbs, R.J.; Salt, D. Plantation forests and biodiversity conservation. Aust. For. 2003, 66, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Carnus, J.-M.; Parrotta, J.; Brockerhoff, E.G.; Arbez, M.; Jactel, H.; Kremer, A.; Lamb, D.; O’Hara, K.; Walters, B. Planted forests and biodiversity. J. For. Ecol. 2006, 104, 65–77. [Google Scholar]
  5. MacDicken, K.; Jonsson, Ö.; Piňa, L.; Maulo, S.; Adikari, Y.; Garzuglia, M.; Lindquist, E.; Reams, G.; D’Annunzio, R. The Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: How Are the World’s Forests Changing? Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Korea Forest Service. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry No. 46. Korea Forest Service, 2016. Available online: https://www.forest.go.kr (accessed on 6 April 2017).
  7. Lee, D.K. Ecological Management of Forests; Seoul National University Press: Seoul, Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Do, Y. The effect of fragmentation and intensive management on carabid beetles in coniferous forest. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2013, 11, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jung, J.-K.; Kim, S.-T.; Lee, S.-Y.; Yoo, J.-S.; Lee, J.-H. Comparison of Ground Beetle Communities (Coleoptera: Carabidae) between Coniferous and Deciduous Forests in Agricultural Landscapes. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2013, 29, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jung, J.-K.; Kim, S.-T.; Lee, S.Y.; Park, C.-G.; Park, J.-K.; Lee, J.-H. A comparison of diversity and species composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) between conifer plantations and regenerating forests in Korea. Ecol. Res. 2014, 29, 877–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jung, J.-K.; Lee, S.K. Trait-specific response of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to forest fragmentation in the temperate region in Korea. Biodivers. Conserv. 2018, 27, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Choi, S.W.; Park, M.; Kim, H. Differences in moth diversity in two types of forest patches in an agricultural landscape in Southern Korea—Effects of habitat heterogeneity. J. Ecol. Field. Biol. 2009, 32, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Choi, S.-W. Diversity and composition of larger moths in three different forest types of Southern Korea. Ecol. Res. 2008, 23, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yi, H.-B.; Kim, H.-J. Species Composition and Species Diversity of Moths (Lepidoptera) on Quercus mongolica forests sand Pinus densiflora forests, in Korean National Long-term Ecological Research Sites (Mt. Nam, Mt. Jiri, Mt. Wolak). Korean J. Appl. Ѐntomol. 2010, 49, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chang, S.J.; Kim, J.K. Distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in different forests of central Kangwon-do. J. For. Sci. Kangwon Nat. Univ. 2000, 16, 42–49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Warren-Thomas, E.; Zou, Y.; Dong, L.; Yao, X.; Yang, M.; Zhang, X.; Qin, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sang, W.; Axmacher, J.C. Ground beetle assemblages in Beijing’s new mountain forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 334, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ogai, T.; Kenta, T. The effects of vegetation types and microhabitats on carabid beetle community composition in cool temperate Japan. Ecol. Res. 2016, 31, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lövei, G.L.; Sunderland, K.D. Ecology and Behavior of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annu. Rev. Ѐntomol. 1996, 41, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rainio, J.; Niemelä, J. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodivers. Conserv. 2003, 12, 487–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schuldt, A.; Assmann, T. Environmental and historical effects on richness and endemism patterns of carabid beetles in the western Palaearctic. Ecography 2009, 32, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Harvey, J.A.; Van Der Putten, W.H.; Turin, H.; Wagenaar, R.; Bezemer, T.M. Effects of changes in plant species richness and community traits on carabid assemblages and feeding guilds. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 127, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Koivula, M.; Punttila, P.; Haila, Y.; Niemelä, J. Leaf litter and the small-scale distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the boreal forest. Ecography 1999, 22, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Elek, Z.; Magura, T.; Tóthmérész, B. Impacts of non-native Norway spruce plantation on abundance and species richness of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Web Ecol. 2001, 2, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. KOSIS. Korean Statistical Information Service. 2015. Available online: http://kosis.kr/ (accessed on 8 March 2015).
  25. KMA. Korea Meteorological Administration. 2016. Available online: http://www.kma.go.kr/ (accessed on 28 August 2016).
  26. Jung, J.-K.; Suk, S.-W.; Kim, B.-Y.; Hong, E.J.; Kim, Y.; Jeong, J.-C. Differences in temporal variation of ground beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) between two well-preserved areas in Mt. Sobaeksan National Park. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2017, 33, 122–129. [Google Scholar]
  27. Habu, A. Fauna Japonica, Carabidae Truncatipennes Group (Insecta: Coleoptera); Biogeographical Society of Japan: Japan, Tokyo, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  28. Habu, A. Fauna Japonica, Carabidae: Harpalini (Insecta: Coleoptera); Keigaku Publishing Co. Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  29. Habu, A. Fauna Japonica, Carabidae: Platynini (Insecta: Coleoptera); Keigaku Publishing Co. Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  30. Habu, A. Classification of the Callistini of Japan (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Entomol. Rev. Jpn. 1987, 42, 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kwon, Y.J.; Lee, S.M. Classification of the subfamily Carabinae from Korea (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Insecta Koreana 1984, 4, 1–363. [Google Scholar]
  32. Park, J.K. Subfamily Carabinae in Korea (Coleoptera: Carabidae); Economic Insects of Korea 23; Junghaeng-Sa: Seoul, Korea, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  33. Park, J.K.; Choi, I.J.; Park, J.; Choi, E.Y. Insect Fauna of Korea, vol. 12, no. 16, Arthropoda: Insecta: Coleoptera: Carabidae: Chlaeniini, Truncatipennes Group: Odacanthinae, Lebiinae; Junghaengsa, Inc.: Incheon, Korea, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  34. Park, J.K.; Paik, J.C. Family Carabidae. Economic Insects of Korea 12; Junghaeng-Sa: Seoul,, Korea, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  35. Park, J.K.; Park, J. Insect Fauna of Korea, vol. 12, no. 13, Arthropoda: Insecta: Coleoptera: Carabidae: Pterostichinae; Junghaengsa, Inc.: Incheon, Korea, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  36. Löbl, I.; Smetana, A. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Archostemata-Myxophaga-Adephaga; Apollo Books: Stenstrup, Denmark, 2003; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  37. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 6 April 2017).
  38. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Friendly, M.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; McGlinn, D.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2020).
  39. Gotelli, N.J.; Colwell, R.K. Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 2001, 4, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Legendre, P.; Gallagher, E. Ecologically meaningful transformation for ordination of species data. Oecologia 2001, 129, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oksanen, J. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities in R: Vegan Tutorial. 2007. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260136364_Multivariate_Analysis_of_Ecological_Communities_in_R_Vegan_Tutorial (accessed on 14 April 2017).
  42. Legendre, P.; Oksanen, J.; Ter Braak, C.J.F. Testing the significance of canonical axes in redundancy analysis. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2010, 2, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dufrêne, M.; Legendre, P. Species Assemblages and Indicator Species: The Need for a Flexible Asymmetrical Approach. Ecol. Monogr. 1997, 67, 345–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Legendre, P.; Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  45. McGeoch, M.A.; Chown, S.L. Scaling up the value of bioindicators. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13, 46–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fuller, R.J.; Oliver, T.H.; Leather, S.R. Forest management effects on carabid beetle communities in coniferous and broadleaved forests: Implications for conservation. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2008, 1, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kotze, D.J.; O’Hara, R.B. Species decline—But why? Explanation of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia 2003, 135, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Antvogel, H.; Bonn, A. Environmental parameters and micospatial distribution of insects: A case study of carabids in an alluvial forest. Ecography 2001, 24, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Eyre, M.D.; Rushton, S.P.; Luff, M.L.; Telfer, M.G. Investigating the relationships between the distribution of British ground beetle species (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and temperature, precipitation and altitude. J. Biogeogr. 2005, 32, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Usher, M.B.; Keiller, S.W.J. The macrolepidoptera of farm woodlands: Determinants of diversity and community structure. Biodivers. Conserv. 1998, 7, 725–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lepš, J.; Novotny, V.; Basset, Y. Habitat and successional status of plants in relation to the communities of their leaf-chewing herbivores in Papua New Guinea. J. Ecol. 2001, 89, 186–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Purtauf, T.; Roschewitz, I.; Dauber, J.; Thies, C.; Tscharntke, T.; Wolters, V. Landscape context of organic and conventional farms: Influences on carabid beetle diversity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 108, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, Y.; Axmacher, J.C.; Wang, C.; Li, L.; Yu, Z. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the intensively cultivated agricultural landscape of northern China—Implications for biodiversity conservation. Insect Conserv. Diver. 2010, 3, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jung, J.-K.; Lee, J.-H. Forest–farm edge effects on communities of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) under different landscape structures. Ecol. Res. 2016, 31, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fujita, A.; Maeto, K.; Kagawa, Y.; Itô, N. Effects of forest fragmentation on species richness and composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Brachinidae) in urban landscapes. Ѐntomol. Sci. 2008, 11, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Korea Forest Research Institute. Economic Tree Species 1: Pine Tree. Korea Forest Service, 2012. Available online: http://know.nifos.go.kr (accessed on 1 June 2020).
Diversity 12 00275 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of (a) study area and (b) study sites (filled circle, broad-leaved deciduous forests (BLF); opened circle, Pinus densiflora forests (PF)).
Figure 1. Map of (a) study area and (b) study sites (filled circle, broad-leaved deciduous forests (BLF); opened circle, Pinus densiflora forests (PF)).
Diversity 12 00275 g001
Diversity 12 00275 g002 550
Figure 2. Individual-based rarefaction curves for ground-beetle catches (a) in Pinus densiflora forests (PF) and broad-leaved deciduous forests (BLF), and (b) in forest age classes (III, 21–30-years old; IV, 31–40-years old; V, 41–50-years old). Data points indicate average species numbers computed for the given number of individuals.
Figure 2. Individual-based rarefaction curves for ground-beetle catches (a) in Pinus densiflora forests (PF) and broad-leaved deciduous forests (BLF), and (b) in forest age classes (III, 21–30-years old; IV, 31–40-years old; V, 41–50-years old). Data points indicate average species numbers computed for the given number of individuals.
Diversity 12 00275 g002
Diversity 12 00275 g003 550
Figure 3. A RDA ordination of species composition of ground beetles in 22 sites. The first and second RDA axes are shown. The different forest types are shown as closed circles by different colors, i.e., black, broad-leaved deciduous forests and grey, Pinus densiflora forests.
Figure 3. A RDA ordination of species composition of ground beetles in 22 sites. The first and second RDA axes are shown. The different forest types are shown as closed circles by different colors, i.e., black, broad-leaved deciduous forests and grey, Pinus densiflora forests.
Diversity 12 00275 g003
Table
Table 1. Environmental characteristics for each study site with sampling information.
Table 1. Environmental characteristics for each study site with sampling information.
LocationCode for SiteForest Type aForest Age Class bLatitudeLongitudeElevation (m)Trap × DaysSampling Period
Jeongseon-eupGwangha-riDJGwBLFIII37°21′39″ N128°37′43″ E296330Jul–Oct 2013
Gasu-riDJGaBLFIII37°18′49″ N128°37′41″ E285330Jul–Oct 2013
Unchi-riDJUBLFIII37°16′36″ N128°36′48″ E278330Jul–Oct 2013
Deokcheon-riDJDBLFIII37°15′43″ N128°35′23″ E273330Jul–Oct 2013
Yeongwol-eupGeoun-riDYGPFV37°14′09″ N128°31′11″ E258330Jul–Oct 2013
Suju-meyonBeopheung-riYSB1PFIV37°22′18″ N128°15′45″ E473330Jul–Oct 2013
Beopheung-riYSB2BLFIV37°22′23″ N128°15′24″ E488588Apr–Oct 2014
Unhak-riYSUPFV37°19′53″ N128°12′24″ E461579Jul 2013–Jun 2014
Mureung-riYSMPFV37°17′28″ N128°15′50″ E280579Jul 2013–Jun 2014
Jucheon-myeonDocheon-riYJDPFV37°17′16″ N128°13′48″ E323579Jul 2013–Jun 2014
Yongseok-riYJYoPFIV37°13′12″ N128°16′14″ E355579Jul 2013–Jun 2014
Hanbando-myeonHutan-riYHHPFIV37°11′56″ N128°22′03″ E245579Jul 2013–Jun 2014
Ongjeong-riYHOPFIV37°13′07″ N128°21′08″ E303579Jul 2013–Jun 2014
Jungdong-myeonJikdong-riYJJBLFIV37°10′13″ N128°43′27″ E434339Jun–Oct 2014
Yeonsang-riYJYeBLFIV37°12′01″ N128°35′07″ E332339Jun–Oct 2014
Sangdong-eupNaedeok-riYSNBLFIV37°08′37″ N128°48′32″ E664339Jun–Oct 2014
Deokgu-riYSDBLFIV37°05′29″ N128°48′35″ E744339Jun–Oct 2014
Gimsatgat-myeonNae-riYGNBLFIV37°05′53″ N128°42′03″ E525339Jun–Oct 2014
Waseok-riYGWBLFIII37°05′03″ N128°36′14″ E339339Jun–Oct 2014
Nam-myeonGwangcheon-riYNGPFV37°09′21″ N128°25′38″ E266234Aug–Oct 2014
Changwon-riYNCPFV37°10′31″ N128°22′06″ E298234Aug–Oct 2014
Buk-myeonDeoksang-riYBDPFIII37°17′19″ N128°23′43″ E350234Aug–Oct 2014
a Abbreviation of habitat types are: BLF, broad-leaved deciduous forests; PF, Pinus densiflora dominated forest; b Forest age classes in our study sties were confirmed by the forest geographic information service system in Korea (Korea Forest Service, 2016): III, 21–30-years old; IV, 31–40-years old; V, 41–50-years old.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of carabid catches (abundance and species richness) between Pinus densiflora forests (PF) and broad-leaved deciduous forests (BLF). Bold characters indicate statistical difference of abundance or species richness of carabid beetles between BLF and PF (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Comparison of carabid catches (abundance and species richness) between Pinus densiflora forests (PF) and broad-leaved deciduous forests (BLF). Bold characters indicate statistical difference of abundance or species richness of carabid beetles between BLF and PF (p < 0.05).
Dependent VariablesCarabid Catches (Mean ± S.E.)Statistics
PF (n = 11)BLF (n = 11)t-valuep
Abundance
All species540.6 ± 96.46326.7 ± 77.631.7280.1002
Endemic species7.6 ± 2.4769.0 ± 27.40−2.2310.0494
Widespread species533.0 ± 95.44257.7 ± 56.442.4830.0243
Brachypterous species53.3 ± 14.87172.0 ± 70.11−1.6570.1261
Macropterous species487.4 ± 87.95154.7 ± 33.313.5370.0037
Forest specialists519.0 ± 91.69301.5 ± 79.251.7950.0881
Open-habitat species21.6 ± 12.4725.3 ± 8.67−0.2390.8135
Carnivorous species539.5 ± 96.24318.4 ± 75.340.9420.3573
Herbivorous species1.2 ± 0.388.4 ± 2.76−3.0020.0084
Species richness
All species10.0 ± 0.8815.4 ± 1.99−2.4660.0274
Endemic species1.1 ± 0.314.5 ± 0.90−3.5340.0039
Widespread species8.9 ± 0.7210.9 ± 1.32−1.3270.2038
Brachypterous species4.5 ± 0.588.0 ± 1.41−2.3300.0362
Macropterous species5.5 ± 0.787.4 ± 1.13−1.3250.2021
Forest specialists7.2 ± 0.6011.3 ± 1.71−2.2620.0423
Open-habitat species2.8 ± 0.724.1 ± 0.99−1.0410.3116
Carnivorous species9.2 ± 0.7713.3 ± 1.75−2.4590.0265
Herbivorous species0.82 ± 0.262.1 ± 0.55−0.94640.3629
Table
Table 3. Correlations between environmental variables or species richness and the axes in the RDA analyses (total inertia = 0.3808). Species richness was calculated by biological or ecological groups.
Table 3. Correlations between environmental variables or species richness and the axes in the RDA analyses (total inertia = 0.3808). Species richness was calculated by biological or ecological groups.
VariablesRDA 1RDA 2RDA 3RDA 4
Eigenvalue0.09210.04710.02180.0114
% variation explain †24.1712.375.723.00
Environmental variables
Forest type** −0.64*** 0.54−0.02−0.23
Elevation*** 0.870.140.05−0.32
Latitude−0.290.12*** 0.760.23
Longitude* 0.45** −0.62−0.20−0.25
Species richness
Total*** 0.85−0.180.06−0.16
Endemic*** 0.86−0.070.08−0.14
Widespread*** 0.80−0.230.06−0.17
Brachypterous*** 0.79−0.060.09−0.20
Macropterous* 0.43−0.32−0.02−0.05
Forest specialists*** 0.83−0.010.02−0.18
Open-habitat0.24* −0.430.08−0.04
Carnivorous species*** 0.76−0.110.04−0.20
Herbivorous species** 0.55* −0.480.070.00
† Percentage = 100 × (variation explained by respective axis)/(variation explained by all environmental variables). Statistically significant correlations are indicated by * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 4. Two-way indicator table showing carabid beetle species indicator value for habitat clustering hierarchy according to forest type, the number of individuals of ground beetle species by forest types, and their proportion in observation (%). Carabid species that showed high indicator value (p < 0.1) were listed.
Table 4. Two-way indicator table showing carabid beetle species indicator value for habitat clustering hierarchy according to forest type, the number of individuals of ground beetle species by forest types, and their proportion in observation (%). Carabid species that showed high indicator value (p < 0.1) were listed.
Forest TypesIndicator Valuep-ValueNumber of Individuals (Proportion in Observation, %)
QFPF
Broad-leaved deciduous forest (QF)
Eucarabus cartereti cartereti0.9980.001416 (100.0)2 (9.1)
Harpalus discrepans0.7490.02330 (63.6)4 (27.3)
Pristosia vigil0.7290.06077 (54.5)2 (18.2)
Leistus niger niger0.6740.0338 (45.5)
Cymindis collaris0.6030.0938 (36.4)
Pinus densiflora-dominated forest (PF)
Coptolabrus smaragdinus branickii0.6990.0816 (27.3)51 (54.5)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, J.-K.; Lee, J.-H. Trait-Specific Responses of Carabid Beetle Diversity and Composition in Pinus densiflora Forests Compared to Broad-Leaved Deciduous Forests in a Temperate Region. Diversity 2020, 12, 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12070275

AMA Style

Jung J-K, Lee J-H. Trait-Specific Responses of Carabid Beetle Diversity and Composition in Pinus densiflora Forests Compared to Broad-Leaved Deciduous Forests in a Temperate Region. Diversity. 2020; 12(7):275. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12070275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Jong-Kook, and Joon-Ho Lee. 2020. "Trait-Specific Responses of Carabid Beetle Diversity and Composition in Pinus densiflora Forests Compared to Broad-Leaved Deciduous Forests in a Temperate Region" Diversity 12, no. 7: 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12070275

APA Style

Jung, J. -K., & Lee, J. -H. (2020). Trait-Specific Responses of Carabid Beetle Diversity and Composition in Pinus densiflora Forests Compared to Broad-Leaved Deciduous Forests in a Temperate Region. Diversity, 12(7), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12070275

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop