Next Article in Journal
Diversity in Morphometric, Pomological, and Fruit-Quality Traits of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) Traditional Varieties: Implications for Landrace Differentiation at Regional Scale
Next Article in Special Issue
Diversity of Coral-Associated Fauna: An Urgent Call for Research
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular and Morphological Analyses Support Different Taxonomic Units for Asian and Australo-Pacific Forms of Ischnura aurora (Odonata, Coenagrionidae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Filling a Gap: A Population of Eunicella verrucosa (Pallas, 1766) (Anthozoa, Alcyonacea) in the Tavolara-Punta Coda Cavallo Marine Protected Area (NE Sardinia, Italy)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/d14080607
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatial Ecology of the Association between Demosponges and Nemalecium lighti at Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean

by
Jacopo Gobbato
1,2,*,
Andrea Magrini
1,
Jaaziel E. García-Hernández
3,
Francesca Virdis
4,
Paolo Galli
1,2,5,
Davide Seveso
1,2 and
Simone Montano
1,2
1
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (DISAT), University of Milan—Bicocca, Piazza Della Scienza, 20126 Milan, Italy
2
MaRHE Center (Marine Research and High Education Center), Magoodhoo Island, Faafu Atoll 12030, Maldives
3
Marine Genomic Biodiversity Laboratory, Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico—Mayagüez, P.O. Box 9000, Mayagüez, PR 00681, USA
4
Reef Renewal Foundation, P.O. Box 371 Kralendijk, Bonaire Dutch Caribbean
5
University of Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 14143, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(8), 607; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080607
Submission received: 25 June 2022 / Revised: 24 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 July 2022 / Published: 28 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity of Coral-Associated Fauna II)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Coral reefs are known to be among the most biodiverse marine ecosystems and one of the richest in terms of associations and species interactions, especially those involving invertebrates such as corals and sponges. Despite that, our knowledge about cryptic fauna and their ecological role remains remarkably scarce. This study aimed to address this gap by defining for the first time the spatial ecology of the association between the epibiont hydrozoan Nemalecium lighti and the Porifera community of shallow coral reef systems at Bonaire. In particular, the host range, prevalence, and distribution of the association were examined in relation to different sites, depths, and dimensions of the sponge hosts. We report Nemalecium lighti to be in association with 9 out of 16 genera of sponges encountered and 15 out of 16 of the dive sites examined. The prevalence of the hydroid–sponge association in Bonaire reef was 6.55%, with a maximum value of over 30%. This hydrozoan has been found to be a generalist symbiont, displaying a strong preference for sponges of the genus Aplysina, with no significant preference in relation to depth. On the contrary, the size of the host appeared to influence the prevalence of association, with large tubular sponges found to be the preferred host. Although further studies are needed to better understand the biological and ecological reason for these results, this study improved our knowledge of Bonaire’s coral reef cryptofauna diversity and its interspecific associations.

1. Introduction

Coral reefs are recognized as one of the most important marine ecosystems on the planet, since they host the highest biodiversity among marine environments [1]. The complex topography created by the living organisms, such as cnidarians and sponges, provides a three-dimensional structure that supports an incredible diversity of organisms, well suited for species interactions and associations [2]. Unfortunately, this fundamental environment is experiencing severe degradation due to the impacts directly related to climate change and anthropogenic activities [3]. As these ecosystems disappear, scientists find themselves racing against time to increase our knowledge of cryptofauna ecological interactions and their potential role in the survival and resilience of the reef ecosystem [4]. For example, hermatypic corals have evolved crucial microbial symbiotic relationships in order to maintain their health status, improve energy production, cope with environmental changes, complete nutrient recycling, have a defense mechanism for predators, or as a protection from potential pathogen agents and coral feeding organisms [5,6,7,8]. Additionally, stony corals have also developed a symbiotic association with several distinct phyla that are involved such as Cnidaria, Porifera, Echinodermata, Annelida, Arthropoda, and Mollusca [9].
Hydrozoans are an example of a group of organisms that has been able to develop a plethora of symbiotic relationships with several marine organisms [10,11], including scleractinians and sponges [12,13,14]. Currently, there are records for a total of 20 hydrozoan families and 50 genera involved in symbiotic associations with different animals worldwide [15]. Sponges emerged as a suitable host due to the constant water filtration, which results in the continuous presence of nutrients that are available to its symbionts [15,16]. In particular, there are six families of hydrozoans that are generally found in relation to sponges (Cytaeididae, Corynidae, Cladonematidae, Tubulariidae, Sphaerocorynidae, and Campanulariidae) [16]. Worldwide, a total of 26 species of hydrozoans have been identified as epibionts of sponges; however, little information is known about most of these associations [16,17].
Bonaire coral reef systems have recently been recognized as one of the most biodiverse, robust, resilient, and healthy ecosystems in the South Caribbean region [18]. In this context, the island serves as an interesting hotspot to study hydrozoan–sponge associations, since sponges are one of the dominant benthic groups on the reef, second only to corals [19]. Recently, several studies have been conducted identifying novel symbiotic relationships between the reef organisms, such as the zoantharian Parazoanthus axinellae epibiotic on the sponge of the genus Axinella [16], Pteroclava krempfi with alcyonaceans [20], the sponge Agelas conifera and the agariciid corals Agaricia agaricites and Helioseris cucullata [21], the coral-gall crab Opecarcinus hypostegus and the agariciid Agaricia undata [22], crabs of the genus Platypodiella and zoantharians of the genus Palythoa with the sponge Niphates digitalis [23], sponges, scleractinians, ascidians and zoantharians with polychaetes Spirobranchus [24,25], and the Stylaster–Millepora association first reported in Bonaire [26]. Nevertheless, coral reef-associated fauna remain strongly understudied, and the total number of species of micro- and macro-invertebrates involved in association with other reef organisms in this region remains largely unknown, despite the potential benefit that these cryptic associations may have on the survival and resilience of the coral reef ecosystems [4,8]. One of these understudied organisms is Nemalecium lighti (Hargitt, 1924), a common thecate hydroid species belonging to the Haleciidae family that can be found all year round in all tropical waters, constituting one of the most abundant hydroid species [27,28]. N. lighti can be usually found on reef rock substrate, on corals, and on sponge surfaces, where it can better exploit the presence of planktonic particles to feed in the water column [29,30]. Its presence seems to have no influence on the functionality of the feeding strategy of the sponge host, as already demonstrated for other hydrozoans species [16,30], but see [31]. Therefore the impact of these associations on the sponges appears negligible, or even beneficial in some cases, as it may act as protection from predators thanks to the hydrozoan nematocysts [30,32].
In light of this, there are few studies that have examined the spatial ecology of crypto invertebrates associated with sponges [33,34]. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate and characterize the association of Nemalecium lighti with sponges in the coral reefs of Bonaire Island, with particular attention focused on determining the host range, prevalence, and distribution of this association. The results obtained provide a foundation for additional studies aimed at bridging the gap in our understanding concerning the cryptofauna diversity and its fundamental ecological role in coral reef ecosystems.

2. Materials and Methods

Underwater surveys were conducted between May and August 2021 to investigate the prevalence and distribution of Nemalecium lighti–sponge associations (Figure 1) in the reef system around Bonaire Island (12°12′ N, 68°35′ W), an area which is entirely protected since 1979 as part of the Bonaire National Marine Park (BNMP) [18].
Along the west coast of the island, 16 different sites were chosen randomly based on their SCUBA shore-diving accessibility (Figure 2 and Table 1).
Quantitative analyses were conducted by SCUBA diving, randomly placing three belt transects of 25 m × 2 m at two different depths for each site (total = 96 transects), resulting in 16 “shallow” stations between a 5–9 m depth and 16 “deep” stations between a 10–15 m depth.
Every sponge individual encountered within our transects, including without the presence of Nemalecium lighti, was counted. The prevalence was calculated as the number of sponges associated with N. lighti divided by the total number of sponges counted at that specific time and place. In addition, the taxon-specific prevalence for each sponge’s genus was calculated as the number of sponge hosting associations for each genus, divided by the total number of counted sponges belonging to the same genus, according to Montano et al. 2016 [20]. All sponges were photographed in situ and were identified at the genus level using the relevant literature [35]. Sponges were included in the dataset and counted only when 50% of the individual or more lay within the belt transect area. Furthermore, the potential relationship between the association and the host size was evaluated through a comparison of the observed prevalence with that of five sponge size classes (C1: 5–10 cm; C2: 10–20 cm; C3: 20–30 cm; C4: 40–50 cm; C5: > 50 cm). The size of the sponges was estimated by placing a tape measure on the side of each specimen.
All the data obtained were tested for normality with Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. In case the normal distribution and homogeneity of variance was violated, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were performed to analyze the mean differences between the sites, depths, and dimensions of the sponge host. Data are presented as the arithmetic mean ± standard error unless stated otherwise. All the statistical analysis performed for this study were conducted using IBM SPSS 27 Software (IBM SPSS 27, New York, NY, USA).

3. Results

In the area investigated, a total of 1755 sponges belonging to the class of Demospongiae were counted and classified in 14 families belonging to 16 different genera, with Scopalina (26.67%), Aplysina (14.30%), Agelas (13.16%), and Aiolochroia (9.46%) emerging as the more abundant, while the remaining genera only represented under 7% of the sponges found in the area (Table 2).
The genus Scopalina resulted as being the most abundant and prevalent group in both the shallow and the deep, with values of, respectively, 27.82% and 26.51% (Table 2). The genus Agelas showed a completely different distribution in relation to depth with a relative abundance of 5.45% in the shallow stations and 19.34% in the deep ones (Table 2). A similar trend was observed for Niphates, with an increase of the relative abundance from 4.66% in the shallow stations to 8.92% in the deep stations. The genera Clathria, Cliona, Halisarca, Monanchora, and Phorbas were extremely poorly represented in the study area at both depths, with Halisarca resulting as being the only genus completely absent in the shallow stations. Moreover, the spatial distribution of sponges between deep and shallow stations showed different trends for Agelas, Desmapsamma, Ectyoplasia, and Niphates at the two depths considered for the study, even if they were not statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, p > 0.05).
Regarding the sponge-hydroid interactions, Nemalecium lighti has been found in association with 9 out of 16 genera of sponges and in 15 out of 16 of the dive sites surveyed. A total of 115 sponge individuals hosted at least one colony of N. lighti. The prevalence of the occurrence of the hydroid–sponge association in the Bonaire reef was 6.55%, with a maximum value of 33.33%. The mean prevalence of the association on the analyzed reef sites was 5.06 ± 1.91%. Among them, “Bari Reef” (BR), “Alice in Wonderland” (AiW), and “La Machaca” (LM) showed higher values with, respectively, 20.82 ± 3.56%, 17.59 ± 2.31%, and 8.67 ± 2.72%, with the others showing less than 6% (Table 1). However, the differences of prevalence among the tested sites were not statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, p > 0.05). With regards to the depths considered, the mean prevalence for the deep stations resulted in being higher compared to the shallow stations with, respectively, 5.86 ± 2.77% and 4.27 ± 1.91% (Figure 3a), even if the differences between the stations were not statistically significant both in relation to the site and genera (Mann–Whitney Test, p > 0.05).
Furthermore, the taxon-specific prevalence was calculated for each genus of sponge that was found to be the host of the association (Table 2). Sponges belonging to the genus Aplysina were the most involved in the association with N. lighti, with a prevalence of 21.76 ± 4.72% in shallow stations and 27.22 ± 3.44% in the deep stations (Figure 3b). Similarly, Verongula and Aiolochroia were the second most involved in association with N. lighti, even if not notably in the shallow stations. By contrast, Cliona showed an elevated prevalence in the shallow station and no association in the deep station. There were seven genera (Callyspongia, Clathria, Ectyoplasia, Halisarca, Monanchora, Niphates, and Phorbas) that did not show an association in either the shallow stations or the deep stations, whereas the Iotrochota–Nemalecium lighti association was found only in deep stations. The differences in the prevalences among the analyzed genera were tested as being statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis Test, p < 0.05).
When correlating the sponge dimension with the N. lighti association, most of the sponges belonged to the smaller size classes of 5–30 cm (~70%), whereas only a minor part of the sponges was comprised in the larger size classes of 40–50 cm (Figure 4a). Despite this, a positive increase in prevalence was recorded, with values of 1.41 ± 0.66%, 5.75 ± 0.79%, 8.09 ± 1.62%, 13.78 ± 4.40%, and 15.04 ± 1.96% for C1 to C5 size classes, respectively (Figure 4b). Furthermore, the sponges belonging to the genus Aplysina showed a particular behavior in this regard, being the only genus with association cases in all the size classes, in both shallow and deep stations.

4. Discussion

Over the years, multiple studies have addressed the role of coral reef biodiversity and its overall impact on the health of these ecosystems [1,4,9]. More specifically, Bonaire coral reef ecosystems emerged as an incredible source of rare or previously unreported reef organism associations. In this perspective, this study assessed for the first time the distribution, host range, and prevalence of the sponges–Nemalecium lighti association in this region, aiming to partially fill the knowledge deficiency about cryptofauna associations involving sponges and hydrozoans. The surveys revealed associations between host sponges and N. lighti at all the explored sites except one, suggesting a widespread distribution for the association all along the west coast of Bonaire, with some sites showing notably high values of prevalence (BR, AiW, and LM). The host range of this association accounts for nine genera belonging to the class Demospongiae, suggesting that N. lighti can be considered as a generalist, since it appears to not target a specific sponge species, at least within the depth ranges we conducted our surveys in. The spatial distribution of the hydroids along the reef zonation has been addressed in previous studies, revealing that different environmental conditions and depths may have an impact on the development of associations and the peculiar assemblage of hydroid species [36,37,38]. In particular, it has been observed that the maximum diversity of hydrozoans and related associations with sponges was reached on the reef slope, with a continued increase with the depth until reaching 30 m [29]. Similarly, in the present study, the prevalence of associations is slightly higher in the deep stations compared to the shallow ones. However, this result needs to be confirmed in future studies by considering not only the shallower part of the coral reefs but extending the surveys to mesophotic depths. In addition, considering that N. lighti is a small cryptic hydroid species growing to a maximum 2 cm that settles on the surface of sponges but sometimes also in protected and shaded parts of their structure, it cannot be excluded that some of the interactions may have been overlooked during our surveys, resulting in an underestimation of its actual prevalence.
The taxon-specific prevalence revealed that the highest prevalence of occurrence of the N. lighti–sponge association was observed with the genus Aplysina (26%). This prevalence value was almost four times higher than for the second genus involved in the association (Verongula with 6.98 ± 2.34%) and extremely more significant than for all the other species, which showed prevalence values lower than 5%. Sponges of the genus Aplysina represent an abundant and important component of the marine coastal ecosystems in tropical and subtropical waters [39], where they contribute to the three-dimensionality of the reef structure, which is fundamental for hosting and sustaining several species of associated fauna. The preference of N. lighti for this genus may be the result of the complex tubular growth morphology that exposes the epibiont hydroid to a strong current and water flow, characteristics usually exploited by this species [16,40].
In addition, sponges are known to produce an array of chemicals and metabolic products that are ecologically important for different purposes (e.g., growth, protection, competition) [41]. Among them, sponges belonging to the genus Aplysina are known to produce high concentrations of brominated alkaloids metabolites (up to 13% of the dry weight) related to antimicrobial activity and cytotoxic activity [42]. These sponges probably produce them as a chemical defense, biofouling, and deterrent against fish predators, as tested on Thalassoma bifasciatum and Blennius sphinx [43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. This peculiar characteristic of the Aplysina sponges may be one of the factors that enhances the association with N. lighti, as it may take advantage of this defense mechanism of the host to protect itself from predators or microbial offense [50]. However, future investigations to test this hypothesis and to elucidate the nature of this association in the reefs of Bonaire are needed.
Finally, the observed increase in prevalence related to the dimension of the sponges suggests that other factors pertaining to the host also determine the ability of N. lighti to settle on sponges. In particular, an increase in sponge (species-dependent) size may correspond to an increase of the favorable surface on which the hydroids can establish the association. In addition, the amount of time necessary for the sponge to grow may also be a contributing factor for the settlement of larvae, increasing the probability of growth on the sponge surface. Further studies are needed to test both of the scenarios proposed and to clearly understand the effect of host size on this particular association.

5. Conclusions

This study provides the first characterization and quantification of the association between the cryptic hydrozoan Nemalecium lighti and the demosponge community within the coral reef systems of Bonaire. This hydrozoan has been found to be a generalist symbiont of different genera of sponge along the west coast of Bonaire. Even though the differences in the prevalence of occurrence of the associations were not significantly important with regards to the depth, future investigations extending into the deeper parts of the reef, including mesophotic depths, may be important to better define the role of depth in this association. However, the dimension of the host resulted in influencing the prevalence of association, with a large tubular sponge found to be the preferred host for N. lighti. Moreover, the taxon-specific prevalence revealed that the genus most involved in the association with N. lighti was Aplysina, with an extremely higher prevalence value compared to the other genera recorded. This may be associated with the production of brominated alkaloid metabolites that serve as antimicrobial and biofouling as well as chemical protection from predators. Additional studies are needed to better understand the implications of this preference and what the main biological and ecological reasons for these results are. Overall, this study improves our understanding of the cryptofauna diversity of coral reef associations in Bonaire.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G. and S.M.; validation, J.E.G.-H., S.M. and D.S.; formal analysis, J.G. and A.M.; investigation, A.M. and F.V.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.; writing—review and editing, S.M., J.E.G.-H. and D.S.; supervision, S.M., F.V. and P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Reef Renewal Bonaire Foundation for the logistic support provided. AM is grateful to Giorgia Ferrari and Camilla Rinaldi for the unique help during the field activities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fisher, R.; O’Leary, R.A.; Low-Choy, S.; Mengersen, K.; Knowlton, N.; Brainard, R.E.; Caley, M.J. Species richness on coral reefs and the pursuit of convergent global estimates. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Stella, J.S.; Jones, G.P.; Pratchett, M.S. Variation in the structure of epifaunal invertebrate assemblages among coral hosts. Coral Reefs 2010, 29, 957–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Caley, M.J.; Buckley, K.A.; Jones, G.P. Separating ecological effects of habitat fragmentation, degradation, and loss on coral commensals. Ecology 2001, 82, 3435–3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Montano, S. The Extraordinary Importance of Coral-Associated Fauna. Diversity 2020, 12, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Spotte, S. Supply of regenerated nitrogen to sea anemones by their symbiotic shrimp. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 1996, 198, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rouzé, H.; Lecellier, G.; Mills, S.C.; Planes, S.; Berteaux-Lecellier, V.; Stewart, H. Juvenile Trapezia spp. crabs can increase juvenile host coral survival by protection from predation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014, 515, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pollock, F.J.; Katz, S.M.; Bourne, D.G.; Willis, B.L. Cymo melanodactylus crabs slow progression of white syndrome lesions on corals. Coral Reefs 2013, 32, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Montano, S.; Fattorini, S.; Parravicini, V.; Berumen, M.L.; Galli, P.; Maggioni, D.; Arrigoni, R.; Seveso, D.; Strona, G. Corals hosting symbiotic hydrozoans are less susceptible to predation and disease. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 2017, 284, 20172405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Stella, J.S.; Pratchett, M.S.; Hutchings, P.A.; Jones, G.P. Coral-associated invertebrates: Diversity, ecological importance, and vulnerability to disturbance. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 2011, 49, 43–104. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bo, M.; Di Camillo, C.G.; Puce, S.; Canese, S.; Giusti, M.; Angiolillo, M.; Bavestrello, G. A tubulariid hydroid associated with anthozoan corals in the Mediterranean Sea. Ital. J. Zool. 2011, 78, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reimer, J.D.; Wee, H.B.; García-Hernández, J.E.; Hoeksema, B.W. Zoantharia (Anthozoa: Hexacorallia) abundance and associations with Porifera and Hydrozoa across a depth gradient on the west coast of Curaçao. Syst. Biodivers. 2018, 16, 820–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Montano, S.; Arrigoni, R.; Pica, D.; Maggioni, D.; Puce, S. New insights into the symbiosis between Zanclea (cnidaria, hydrozoa) and scleractinians. Zool. Scr. 2015, 44, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Montano, S.; Seveso, D.; Galli, P.; Puce, S.; Hoeksema, B.W. Mushroom corals as newly recorded hosts of the hydrozoan symbiont Zanclea sp. Mar. Biol. Res. 2015, 11, 773–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Montano, S.; Maggioni, D.; Arrigoni, R.; Seveso, D.; Puce, S.; Galli, P. The hidden diversity of Zanclea associated with scleractinians revealed by molecular data. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Puce, S.; Cerrano, C.; Di Camillo, C.G.; Bavestrello, G. Hydroidomedusae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) symbiotic radiation. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2008, 88, 1715–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Puce, S.; Calcinai, B.; Bavestrello, G.; Cerrano, C.; Gravili, C.; Boero, F. Hydrozoa (Cnidaria) symbiotic with Porifera: A review. Mar. Ecol. 2005, 26, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Villamizar, E.; Laughlin, R.A. Fauna Associated with the Sponges Aplysina archeri and Aplysina lacunosa in a Coral Reef of the Archipelago de Los Roques, National Park, Venezuela. In Fossil and Recent Sponges, 1st ed.; Reitner, J., Keupp, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1991; pp. 522–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. IUCN. Coral Reef Resilience Assessment of the Bonaire National Marine Park. Netherlands Antilles. 2011. Available online: https://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2011-008.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2022).
  19. Frade, P.R.; Bongaerts, P.; Baldwin, C.C.; Trembanis, A.C.; Bak, R.P.M.; Vermeij, M.J.A. Bonaire and Curaçao. In Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems, 1st ed.; Loya, Y., Puglise, K., Bridge, T., Eds.; Series Coral Reef of the World; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Montano, S.; Allevi, V.; Seveso, D.; Maggioni, D.; Galli, P. Habitat preferences of the Pteroclava krempfi-alcyonaceans symbiosis: Inner vs outer coral reefs. Symbiosis 2017, 72, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. García-Hernández, J.E.; van Moorsel, G.W.N.M.; Hoeksema, B.W. Lettuce corals overgrowing tube sponges at St. Eustatius, Dutch Caribbean. Mar. Biodivers. 2017, 47, 55–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. García-Hernández, J.E.; de Gier, W.; van Moorsel, G.W.N.M.; Hoeksema, B.W. The scleractinian Agaricia undata as a new host for the coral-gall crab Opecarcinus hypostegus at Bonaire, southern Caribbean. Symbiosis 2020, 81, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Garcia-Hernandez, J.E.; Reimer, J.D.; Hoeksema, B.W. Sponges hosting the zoantharia-associated crab Platypodiella spectabilis at St. Eustatius, Dutch Caribbean. Coral Reefs 2016, 35, 209–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. García-Hernández, J.E.; Hoeksema, B.W. Sponges as secondary hosts for Christmas tree worms at Curaçao. Coral Reefs 2017, 36, 1243–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hoeksema, B.W.; García-Hernández, J.E.; van Moorsel, G.W.N.M.; Olthof, G.; ten Hove, H.A. Extension of the recorded host range of Caribbean Christmas tree worms (Spirobranchus spp.) with two scleractinians, a zoantharian, and an ascidian. Diversity 2020, 12, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Montano, S.; Reimer, J.D.; Ivanenko, V.N.; García-Hernández, J.E.; van Moorsel, G.W.N.M.; Galli, P.; Hoeksema, B.W. Widespread occurrence of a rarely known association between the hydrocorals Stylaster roseus and Millepora alcicornis at Bonaire, Southern Caribbean. Diversity 2020, 12, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gravier-Bonnet, N.; Bourmaud, C.A.F. Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) of Coral Reefs: Preliminary Results on Community Structure, Species Distribution and Reproductive Biology in Juan de Nova Island (Southwest Indian Ocean). West. Indian Ocean J. Mar. Sci. 2006, 5, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Coma, R.; Ribes, M.; Orejas, C.; Gili, J.M. Prey capture by a benthic coral reef hydrozoan. Coral Reefs 1999, 18, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Di Camillo, C.G.; Bavestrello, G.; Valisano, L.; Puce, S. Spatial and temporal distribution in a tropical hydroid assemblage. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2008, 88, 1589–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bouillon, J.; Gravili, C.; Pagès, F.; Gili, J.M.; Boero, F. An Introduction to Hydrozoa, 1st ed.; Betsch, J.M., Bouchet, P., Érard, C., Eds.; Mémoires du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle: Paris, France, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lewis, T.B.; Finelli, C.M. Epizoic zoanthids reduce pumping in two Caribbean vase sponges. Coral Reefs 2015, 34, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Puyana, M.; Fenical, W.; Pawlik, J.R. Are there activated chemical defenses in sponges of the genus Aplysina from the Caribbean? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2003, 246, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wulff, J.L. Ecological interactions of marine sponges. Can. J. Zool. 2006, 84, 146–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Padua, A.; Lanna, E.; Klautau, M. Macrofauna inhabiting the sponge Paraleucilla magna (Porifera: Calcarea) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2013, 93, 889–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zea, S.; Henkel, T.P.; Pawlik, J.R. The Sponge Guide: A Picture Guide to Caribbean Sponges. Available online: https://www.spongeguide.org (accessed on 21 January 2022).
  36. Calder, D.R. Local distribution and biogeography of the hydroids (Cnidaria) of Bermuda. Caribb. J. Sci. 1993, 29, 61–74. [Google Scholar]
  37. Calder, D.R. Associations between hydroid species assemblages and substrate types in the mangal at Twin Cays, Belize. Can. J. Zool. 1991, 69, 2067–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Calder, D.R. Abundance and distribution of hydroids in a mangrove ecosystem at Twin Cays, Belize, Central America. Hydrobiologia 1991, 216, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Diaz, M.C.; Rützler, K. Sponges: An essential component of Caribbean coral reefs. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2001, 69, 535–546. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hargitt, C.M. Hydroids of the Philippine Islands. Philipp. J. Sci. 1924, 24, 467–507. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id=24462 (accessed on 14 July 2022).
  41. Amelia, M.; Suaberon, F.A.; Vad, J.; Fahmi, A.D.M.; Saludes, J.P.; Bhubalan, K. Recent Advances of Marine Sponge—Associated Microorganisms as a Source of Commercially Viable Natural Products. Mar. Biotechnol. 2022, 24, 492–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hentschel, U.; Schmid, M.; Wagner, M.; Fieseler, L.; Gernert, C. Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of bacteria with antimicrobial activities from the Mediterranean sponges Aplysina aerophoba and Aplysina cavernicola. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2001, 35, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Thoms, C.; Ebel, R.; Proksch, P. Activated chemical defense in Aplysina sponges revisited. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006, 32, 97–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Assmann, M.; Lichte, E.; Pawlik, J.R.; Köck, M. Chemical defenses of the Caribbean sponges Agelas wiedenmayeri and Agelas conifera. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 207, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ebel, R.; Brenzinger, M.; Kunze, A.; Gross, H.J.; Proksch, P. Wound activation of protoxins in marine sponge Aplysina aerophoba. Can. Field-Nat. 1997, 111, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Weiss, B.; Ebel, R.; Elbrächter, M.; Kirchner, M.; Proksch, P. Defense metabolites from the marine sponge Verongia aerophoba. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1996, 24, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Teeypant, R.; Woerdenbang, H.J.; Gross, H.J.; Proksch, P. Biotransformation of the Brominated Compounds in the Marine Sponge Verongia aerophoba: Evidence for an Induced Chemical Defense? Planta Med. 1993, 59, A641–A642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thoms, C.; Wolff, M.; Padmakumar, K.; Ebel, R.; Proksch, P. Chemical Defense of Mediterranean Sponges Aplysina cavernicola and Aplysina aerophoba. Z. Fur Naturforsch. 2004, 59, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chanas, B.; Pawlik, J.R.; Lindel, T.; Fenical, W. Chemical defense of the Caribbean sponge Agelas clathrodes (Schmidt). J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 1997, 208, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wulff, J.L. Resistance vs recovery: Morphological strategies of coral reef sponges. Funct. Ecol. 2006, 20, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diversity 14 00607 g001 550
Figure 1. Two examples of the association between demosponges and Nemalecium lighti in Bonaire reef system: N. lighti associated with (a) Scopalina ruetzleri and (b) Ircinia sp.
Figure 1. Two examples of the association between demosponges and Nemalecium lighti in Bonaire reef system: N. lighti associated with (a) Scopalina ruetzleri and (b) Ircinia sp.
Diversity 14 00607 g001
Diversity 14 00607 g002 550
Figure 2. Map of Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean (12°12′ N, 68°35′ W) highlighting the dive sites investigated for sponges–Nemalecium lighti association in this study. Map made from OpenStreetMap loaded into QGIS.
Figure 2. Map of Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean (12°12′ N, 68°35′ W) highlighting the dive sites investigated for sponges–Nemalecium lighti association in this study. Map made from OpenStreetMap loaded into QGIS.
Diversity 14 00607 g002
Diversity 14 00607 g003 550
Figure 3. Prevalence of Nemalecium lighti–sponges association in the study area: (a) Mean association prevalence for all the genera considered and (b) for the genus Aplysina in relation to depth.
Figure 3. Prevalence of Nemalecium lighti–sponges association in the study area: (a) Mean association prevalence for all the genera considered and (b) for the genus Aplysina in relation to depth.
Diversity 14 00607 g003
Diversity 14 00607 g004 550
Figure 4. Hosts’ size class distribution and prevalence analyses in the study area: (a) Number of sponges for each class size; (b) Prevalence of Nemalecium lighti–sponges association in relation to the host class size. The bold line in the middle of the boxes is the median value, the bottom part of the boxes is the lower quartile, the top part of the boxes is the upper quartile, the lines departing from the boxes are the lower and upper extremes, and the circle is an outlier value.
Figure 4. Hosts’ size class distribution and prevalence analyses in the study area: (a) Number of sponges for each class size; (b) Prevalence of Nemalecium lighti–sponges association in relation to the host class size. The bold line in the middle of the boxes is the median value, the bottom part of the boxes is the lower quartile, the top part of the boxes is the upper quartile, the lines departing from the boxes are the lower and upper extremes, and the circle is an outlier value.
Diversity 14 00607 g004
Table
Table 1. Coordinates, maximum and mean value of prevalence of association between sponges and Nemalecium lighti for each of the dive sites considered for the analyses in the study area.
Table 1. Coordinates, maximum and mean value of prevalence of association between sponges and Nemalecium lighti for each of the dive sites considered for the analyses in the study area.
N°Dive SitesCoordinatesMaximum Prevalence (%)Mean Prevalence (% ± SE)
1Tolo Reef (Tol)12°12′92″ N; 068°20′22″ W15.384.89 ± 2.68
2Jeff Davies Memorial (JDM)12°12′18″ N; 068°18′50″ W8.332.67 ± 1.69
3Oil Slick Leap (OSL)12°12′03″ N; 068°18′51″ W5.550.93 ± 0.93
4Andrea I (AI)12°11′29″ N; 068°17′80″ W12.502.08 ± 2.08
5Andrea II (AII)12°11′18″ N; 068°17′48″ W13.332.22 ± 2.22
6La Machaca (LM)12°10′20″ N; 068°17′22″ W17.868.67 ± 2.73
7Buddy’s Reef (BM)12°10′14″ N; 068°17′18″ W16.674.01 ± 2.81
8Bari Reef (BF)12°10′04″ N; 068°17′10″ W33.3320.82 ± 3.56
9Something Special (SS)12°09′70″ N; 068°17′02″ W3.702.12 ± 0.70
10Town Pier (TP)12°08′57″ N; 068°16′40″ W2.630.44 ± 0.44
11Punt Viekant (PV)12°06′91″ N; 068°17′66″ W0.000.00 ± 0.00
12Alice in Wonderland (AiW)12°05′99″ N; 068°17′12″ W22.2217.59 ± 2.31
13Salt Pier (SP)12°05′01″ N; 068°16′91″ W9.524.37 ± 2.01
14Invisibles (I)12°04′65″ N; 068°16′80″ W17.652.94 ± 2.94
15Tori Reef (Tor)12°04′25″ N; 068°16′84″ W10.001.67 ± 1.67
16Pink Beach (PB)12°03′85″ N; 068°16′90″ W11.115.56 ± 1.87
Table
Table 2. Genera of sponges considered for the analyses in the study area with values of relative abundance, maximum and mean prevalence of association with Nemalecium lighti.
Table 2. Genera of sponges considered for the analyses in the study area with values of relative abundance, maximum and mean prevalence of association with Nemalecium lighti.
GenusRelative Abundance (%)Maximum Prevalence (%)Mean Prevalence (% ± SE)
Agelas13.167.272.70 ± 1.12
Aiolochroia9.468.624.09 ± 1.69
Aplysina14.3036.1726.06 ± 4.76
Callyspongia3.130.000.00 ± 0.00
Clathria0.230.000.00 ± 0.00
Cliona0.4025.005.00 ± 4.56
Desmapsamma4.058.692.74 ± 1.62
Ectyoplasia3.820.000.00 ± 0.00
Halisarca0.170.000.00 ± 0.00
Iotrochota4.734.000.80 ± 0.73
Ircinia6.385.882.81 ± 1.01
Monanchora0.460.000.00 ± 0.00
Niphates6.840.000.00 ± 0.00
Phorbas0.110.000.00 ± 0.00
Scopalina26.674.111.78 ± 0.76
Verongula6.0915.386.98 ± 2.34
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gobbato, J.; Magrini, A.; García-Hernández, J.E.; Virdis, F.; Galli, P.; Seveso, D.; Montano, S. Spatial Ecology of the Association between Demosponges and Nemalecium lighti at Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean. Diversity 2022, 14, 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080607

AMA Style

Gobbato J, Magrini A, García-Hernández JE, Virdis F, Galli P, Seveso D, Montano S. Spatial Ecology of the Association between Demosponges and Nemalecium lighti at Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean. Diversity. 2022; 14(8):607. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gobbato, Jacopo, Andrea Magrini, Jaaziel E. García-Hernández, Francesca Virdis, Paolo Galli, Davide Seveso, and Simone Montano. 2022. "Spatial Ecology of the Association between Demosponges and Nemalecium lighti at Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean" Diversity 14, no. 8: 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080607

APA Style

Gobbato, J., Magrini, A., García-Hernández, J. E., Virdis, F., Galli, P., Seveso, D., & Montano, S. (2022). Spatial Ecology of the Association between Demosponges and Nemalecium lighti at Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean. Diversity, 14(8), 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop