Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Distribution and Dispersal Pattern of Early Life Stages of the Small Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys Polyactis) in the Southern Yellow Sea
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Alternative Crop Cultivation in Promoting Human-Elephant Coexistence: A Multidisciplinary Investigation in Thailand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Diversity of Archaeological Animal and Plant Remains Discovered at 18th–19th-Century Sites in Iași City (NE Romania)

by
Margareta Simina Stanc
1,
George Bilavschi
1,2,
Ludmila Bacumenco-Pîrnău
1,2,
Dan Aparaschivei
2,
Luminița Bejenaru
1,3,* and
Mihaela Danu
1
1
Faculty of Biology, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 700505 Iasi, Romania
2
Institute of Archaeology, Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch, 700479 Iasi, Romania
3
“Olga Necrasov” Center of Anthropological Research, Romanian Academy, Iasi Branch, 700481 Iasi, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2024, 16(9), 520; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090520
Submission received: 27 July 2024 / Revised: 21 August 2024 / Accepted: 23 August 2024 / Published: 31 August 2024

Abstract

:
Animal and plant remains recovered from two archaeological sites in Iași city (NE Romania) were analyzed in this work. The aim of this study was to contribute to the economic and environmental evaluation of an old urban settlement. The analyzed sites, both of value in archaeological preventive research, are dated to the 18th–19th centuries. The archaeozoological analysis consisted of anatomical, taxonomic, and taphonomic identifications, quantification, estimations of age at slaughter and sex, and osteometry. The results revealed that the animal remains are of domestic origin, as indicated by traces of butchering, and can be mainly described in terms of their frequencies (i.e., number of identified specimens and minimum number of individuals), selection for slaughter, morphology, and size. The results show that animal husbandry (e.g., cattle, sheep/goat, pig, and horse) had significant importance in the economy of the settlement, and cattle were preferred for consumption. Few remains were identified for wild mammals (i.e., red deer, wild boar, and hare), birds, and mollusks. The phytolith analysis indicated that some plant resources were used in the economy of this settlement. The identification of opal silica bodies revealed the presence of grasses and cultivated cereals.

1. Introduction

The beginning of modern times in Eastern Europe (18th–19th centuries) was characterized by important transformations in economic, social, and mental structures, ideologies, and the natural environment, leading to the modernization of urban settlements in Moldavia [1,2,3]. The period covered by this research was also characterized by significant cultural and anthropological diversity and lifestyle changes, especially of the elites [3,4,5]. The demography in this period was marked by a significant increase in life expectancy, which contributed to the awareness and improvement in living conditions including food, as well as the progress of medicine [6,7]. The urban population’s food was strictly determined by the village’s ability to provide animal and vegetal resources, which emphasizes the role of the rural world, the population’s dependence on its productivity, and the maintenance of a close link between the village and the city [8].
The reconstruction of daily lives in past societies, including medieval and pre-modern ones, cannot be accomplished without information about the economy, ecology, and even ethnology derived from archaeozoological and archaeobotanical data [9,10,11,12]. In the case of the old city of Iași, for which written accounts on the fauna and vegetation diversity are sometimes lacunary and ambiguous, such a study could provide a more comprehensive view.
Archaeozoological materials typically contain faunal remains with strong mineralization (e.g., bones, teeth, cornual processes, antlers, shells), which are most often found to be related to the animals consumed within the human communities, as indicated by traces of slaughter and butchery [13]. The study of faunal remains can provide information about the diversity of animal resources used in various ways by the inhabitants of a past settlement, not only for food but also as raw materials (e.g., bone industry) or in rituals and/or burial practices. Archaeozoological remains can also be valuable indicators in the evaluation of ecology, seasonality, social structures, and zootechnical practices [14,15]. Understanding that animals were significantly important in many of the transformations during the modern period, an increasing number of researchers have investigated animal remains from the archaeological sites of those centuries [16,17,18,19,20]. In Romania, such studies are isolated and, only recently, the attention of archaeologists and archaeozoologists has also been directed toward faunal remains from modern times [21,22].
Due to their siliceous composition, phytoliths are key indicators for understanding past environments and human activities. These microscopic silica particles, formed within the cells of plants—particularly grasses—are resistant to decay and can persist in soils and sediments long after organic matter has decomposed. Phytolith analysis can provide a view of how past human societies adapted to and shaped their natural environments. For instance, these indicators have been used to trace agricultural practices in early medieval Europe. Gyulai et al. [23] examined phytoliths from archaeological sites in the Carpathian Basin (NE Hungary), assessing agricultural stability and changes over time. Similarly, Devos et al. [24] demonstrated, through phytolith analysis, agricultural activities at the early medieval trading center of Antwerp (Belgium), specifically providing evidence of Hordeum sp. (barley) cultivation. Prado et al. [25] used phytoliths and micro-algae in a multi-proxy approach to investigate architectural and environmental aspects, as well as the daily activities of a Pictish roundhouse, revealing the use of locally sourced materials in the structure’s construction and, at the same time, offering insights into cooking and craftwork practices. In Romania, medieval and modern settlements have not yet been examined through phytolith analysis, with the present study being the first one of this kind. Thus far, most studies have focused on prehistoric [26] as well as Roman and Roman–Byzantine sites [27].
This research was focused on the city of Iași in the 18th–19th centuries, from which archaeological remains of plants and animals were analyzed. The work was aimed at evaluating the diversity of animal and plant resources in the urban economy and environment, as determined based on archaeobotanical and archaeozoological results.

2. Historical and Archaeological Context

Iași was an important urban settlement in medieval Moldova, and it was first documented in the 14th century when it appeared on a list of Slavonic origin as being a city near the Prut River. Starting with the 15th century, the city expanded, especially due to the afflux of population from the villages, but also as a result of the establishment of fairs for craftspeople and traders that came from other regions [28]. In 1564, the capital of Moldova was moved to Iași, and this change in status from a simple fair to that of a royal court led to accelerated development of the city, further attracting craftspeople and merchants, most of whom were foreigners such as Armenians, Hungarians, Poles, the French, and Venetians [28,29,30]. The anthropological structure of the Iași city population changed over time under the influences of some foreign groups with whom they interacted. This evolution of the human population was also highlighted by paleoanthropological studies that explored some of the necropolises of the city [31,32]. Human dietary habits have already been investigated through the evaluation of dental macro- and micro-wear [33], but it is necessary to expand the knowledge on dietary habits with data regarding the diversity of plant and animal resources.
The preventive investigations carried out in 2018–2019 on the plots at 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street and 5th Mihai Eminescu Street add to the archaeological research carried out in the last three decades in this area, contributing to the identification and mapping of the old habitation traces at the limits of the medieval and modern city of Iași. The animal and plant remains analyzed in this study were recovered from two archaeological sites in Iași city, NE Romania (47°9′44″ N 27°35′20″ E). The remains are described briefly in the following paragraphs.
Site 1: 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street. The preventive archaeological research at 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street (formerly Crișan) in Iași city was carried out in 2018, within the perimeter of the site “Historical Center of the Iași Municipality,” LMI IS-I-s-A-03504, about 25 m W from the church of St. George-Lozonschi (built 1800, LMI IS-II-m-B-03807), but also in the immediate vicinity of other buildings included in the List of Historical Monuments in Iași. According to the written historical sources, the area has been inhabited since the 17th century, belonging to the semi-rural landscape of the medieval and pre-modern town located on the lower terrace of the former floodplain of Bahlui River.
The investigation of the site was carried out on its whole surface through opening some research units (trenches and boxes) and preserving witness intervals between them, which were removed after recording the stratigraphic data in order to achieve exhaustive study of the entire plot (Figure 1). Thus, three trenches (marked S1–S3) and three boxes (marked A–C) were excavated. In S1, the excavation highlighted three construction stages, with the oldest one being documented in 1835. The skeletal remains of ten pond turtles were recovered from the barren yellow clay at the base of cellar 2. The animals were huddled together, most probably for hibernation, suggesting their entry into the cellar during a period when the house was uninhabited and immediately before the collapse of cellar 2, which trapped the animals inside. Apart from the masonry elements uncovered on the southern side of the site, about six domestic waste pits were intercepted in trench S1. All of these pits are intrusions from the modern and contemporary period, which transported out-of-place diverse archaeological materials (e.g., fragments of pots, jugs, saucers, cups, Ottoman fritware, Chinese and Western porcelains, and iron artifacts, as well as animal skeletal remains). Three large pits were investigated in trench S2, containing large quantities of potsherds and osteological material of animal origin.
Site 2: 5th Mihai Eminescu Street. The 2019 preventive archaeological research at the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site aimed at the complete investigation of the surface that would have been affected by the construction of a new building in the area. The area under scrutiny is part of the “Historical Center of the Iași Municipality,” and is of increased interest, particularly regarding the 17th–19th centuries. Thus, the foundations of at least three surface structures were identified, as well as nine pits used as household waste dumps. The complete research of the pits was not possible due to property boundaries or the proximity of neighboring buildings. The archaeological material, consisting mostly of animal bones and ceramic fragments, is dated to the 18th–19th centuries. Of the twelve archaeological features, only seven are of particular interest in the present study. These features (i.e., Cx. 2–5, Cx. 7, Cx. 10, and Cx. 12) are household waste pits, which produced an interesting array of finds (e.g., coins, fragments of everyday use ceramic pots, stove tiles, Turkish-made smoking pipes, metal objects, and glass, as well as animal bones). Two Polish bronze coins were also discovered in Cx. 2 and Cx. 10, both issued in the 17th century (AE, 0.79 g, 15 mm, Poland, John II Casimir, solidus, 1660-1662; AE, 0.28 g, 11 × 14 mm Poland, 17th century), as well as a Turkish silver coin (AR, 0.29 g, 15 mm, perforated, Ottoman Empire, Mustafa III, 1 para, year 1185 AH/1771-1772).

3. Materials and Methods

In this work, samples of animal and plant remains (i.e., skeletal fragments and phytoliths, respectively) were analyzed. The samples were recovered from preventive investigations carried out in 2018–2019 at archaeological sites located at 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino and 5th Mihai Eminescu Streets in Iași city, NE Romania. Archaeozoological and archaeobotanical analyses were conducted in the Laboratory of Bioarchaeology, Faculty of Biology, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, Romania.
Archaeozoology. Two archaeozoological samples were analyzed, both dated to the 18th and 19th centuries according to the archaeological artifacts discovered at the sites. The first sample, coming from an archaeological site located at 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street (Sample A1), consists of 651 animal remains, and the second sample, recovered from 5th Mihai Eminescu Street (Sample A2), includes 871 remains. Both archaeozoological samples were hand-retrieved, without sediment sieving, which led to qualitative and quantitative underestimations of some taxa.
The archaeozoological analysis consisted of anatomical, taxonomic, and taphonomic identifications, quantifications of samples, estimations of age at slaughter and sex, and osteometry. For anatomical and taxonomic identifications, comparative osteological collections were used. Concerning the taphonomy, different types of traces were identified on the animal bone fragments, such as of anthropogenic origin (e.g., butchering, burning, and processing) and/or from other animals (e.g., gnawing traces by dogs or lesser wild carnivores) [14,34]. Quantification of the samples was based on the number of identified specimens (NISP) and the minimum number of individuals (MNI) estimated for the identified mammal species [13]. The estimation of slaughter ages was carried out both on the basis of the dentition and the postcranial skeleton, using data from Udrescu et al. [14], Barone [35], and Reitz and Wing [13]. The mature/immature separation in domestic animals also took into account the age of sexual maturity, with the limit being 2.5 years for cattle, 1.5 years for sheep/goat, and 13 months for pig [14]. Sex estimation was conducted only for cattle, based on the morphometric characteristics of the metapodial bones. The variation ranges of the metapodial indices for the cattle sexes (i.e., female, male, and castrated) were taken from Udrescu et al. [14]. The measurements respected the A. von den Driesch guide [36], and the resulting data were used to separate domestic and wild forms (i.e., Sus domesticus/Sus scrofa), and to estimate the sex and withers height in Bos taurus. To calculate the cattle wither height, the coefficients of Fock [37] were used.
Archaeobotany. For the phytolith analysis, 16 samples were extracted from different cultural layers (e.g., pits) across the two archaeological sites under examination, with eight samples taken from each site (EMI Samples 1-8 for 5th Mihai Eminescu Street, and CRISAN Samples 1–8 for 10th Architect G.M. Cantacuzino Street; Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Approximately 3 g of sediment from each sample underwent a chemical process based on a method adapted from Lentfer and Boyd [38]. To extract phytoliths, the sediment samples were treated with hydrochloric acid (35%), potassium hydroxide (10%), sodium polytungstate (density = 2.35), and hydrogen peroxide (30%). For microscopic examination, a single drop of the resulting mixture was placed on a slide. Immersion oil served as the medium for observation. The terminology followed the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 2.0 [39]. All samples were examined using a transmission optical microscope at 400× magnification. The phytoliths in both sites’ samples were well-preserved, allowing for the clear identification of over 250 phytoliths per sample. There were no unidentified forms in the samples. The terminology followed the International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 2.0 [39].

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Archaeozoology

Sample A1 included 651 remains attributed to mollusks, fish, birds, and mammals (Table 1). The first three faunal groups had a very low representation in the sample. The NISP percentages were as follows: 0.31% mollusks, 0.15% fish, and 1.38% birds; the largest part of the sample was represented by the mammal remains at 98.16%. Sample 2 consisted of 871 remains, which were also attributed to four taxonomic classes: 0.46% mollusks, 0.23% fish, 1.49% birds, and 97.82% mammals (Table 1).
Among the mollusks, only river mussel (Unio sp.) was identified, with four valves in Sample A1 and two in Sample A2. For fish, only two fragments were identified in Sample A1, based on which the presence of Eurasian carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Wels catfish (Silurus glanis) was established; in Sample A2, only one Teleostei radia was identified. A total of 13 bone remains were from birds (in Sample A1), all attributed to chickens (Gallus domesticus); and in Sample A2, out of the nine bird remains, six were from chickens.
Most of the faunal remains in each sample were food waste, with butchering traces identified on approximately 40% of the specimens in each sample group (Table 2). In Sample A1, 349 bones showed butchering traces, four had burning traces, and 17 had dog teeth marks. In Sample A2, 254 bones showed butchering traces, six had burning traces, three were fragments of red deer antlers (waste from processing to make objects), and five had dog teeth marks. There were no traces of human impact on dog bones, suggesting that this species had no alimentary purpose.
The proportions of domestic and wild mammals in both samples were similar, consisting of approximately 96% domestic mammals and 4% wild mammals as NISP (Table 3). Thus, both archaeozoological datasets highlight a preference for the exploitation of domestics. The following species were identified: Bos taurus (cattle), Ovis aries (sheep), Capra hircus (goat), Sus domesticus (pig), Equus ferus caballus (horse), and Canis familiaris (dog).
Cattle were preferred for consumption, followed by sheep/goat and pig. Cattle represented 66% of the total identified mammal remains in Sample A1, and 73% in Sample A2 (Table 3). Based on the minimum number of estimated individuals, cattle represent about 53% in Sample A1 and 47% in Sample A2 (Table 4). In Sample A1, based on 536 remains attributed to Bos taurus, a minimum number of 26 individuals was estimated, of which twenty-three were slaughtered at mature age (over 2.5 years old) and three at immature age (under 2.5 years old). In Sample A2, based on 447 remains identified for this species, a minimum number of fourteen individuals was estimated, of which twelve were slaughtered at mature age (over 2.5 years old) and only two at immature age (under 2.5 years old). Figure 4 shows that in Sample A1, 59.3% of the cattle remains belong to the axial skeleton and 40.7% to the appendicular skeleton; in Sample A2, 47% of the cattle remains belong to the axial skeleton and 53% to the appendicular skeleton.
In Sample A1, for cattle, many skull fragments with horn cores (i.e., 40 such skull fragments) were observed, all from adult individuals. The scatter plot of these samples (Figure 5) presents the basal circumference and the flattening index (minimum diameter at base/maximum diameter at base ×100), an index that allows the distinction between the flattened and oval cross-section horn cores of bulls and the circular cross-section horn cores of cows [40]. It is also possible to distinguish between horns of the “primigenius” morphological type, which are long, massive, curved, with thick walls, and with an oval–round or almost round base section, and of the “brachyceros” type, which is shorter [41]. The grouping of metric data on the diagram illustrates the predominance of the “brachyceros”-type horn cores belonging to females (Figure 5).
The estimation of the height at the withers in cattle was possible for only three individuals, based on three metapodal bones found unfragmented. Their dimensions and morphometric indices are presented in Table 5. Only females were estimated with the height at the withers varying between 113 to 126 cm, which is similar to other urban settlements of Medieval Moldova [42].
Based on the total identified remains for mammals, sheep/goat had proportions of 24.26% in Sample A1 and 15.57% in Sample A2 (Table 3). For this domestic group, in Sample A1, based on 197 identified remains, a minimum of 11 individuals were estimated: eight slaughtered at mature age (over 2 years old) and three at immature age (under 2 years old). In Sample A2, based on 95 identified remains, a minimum of six individuals were estimated: five were slaughtered at a mature age (over 2 years old) and one at an immature age (under 2 years old) (Table 4).
Pig remains were present in small numbers in both samples, representing only 5.17% and 3.93% (Table 3). In Sample A1, the 42 identified fragments were from four individuals: three slaughtered at a mature age (over 2 years old) and one at an immature age (under 2 years old). In Sample A2, based on 24 identified remains, there were an estimated three individuals: two mature (over 2 years old) and one immature (under 2 years old).
The remains of horse and dog were present in small numbers, and only from mature individuals (Table 4). Horse remains comprised 0.25% of Sample A1 and 2.95% of Sample A2. In Sample 2, six fragments of horse bones with butchering marks were identified (i.e., one each of coxal and radius, and two each of femur and tibia), proving the consumption of meat from this species. The proportion of dog remains was 0.49% in each sample, without any marks of butchery.
Few remains of wild mammals were identified, with only Cervus elaphus, Sus scrofa, and Lepus europaeus documented. The presence of forest wild species (i.e., red deer, wild boar) was identified in both samples. Forest-edge and open-field species (i.e., European hare) were only identified in Sample A1.
At the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street site, other wild species, including European badger (Meles meles) and European pond turtle, were reported in a previous publication [43]. The discovery of turtles, previously mentioned in the archaeological context, was described in more detail in the aforementioned study: the skeletal remains of ten adult turtles were found, both males and females, without any trace of anthropic intervention. The presence of the European pond turtle in the urban environment of the period is also attested in the documentary sources of the time, including some aspects related to its behavior and adjustment to habitat changes. The outcomes of the archaeozoological analysis of the skeletal remains of pond turtles complete the information concerning the dissemination history of this species, given that, at present, it is considered vulnerable and has an unfavorable conservation status due to being constantly threatened by the degradation, destruction, and fragmentation of habitats [43].

4.2. Archaeobotany

As previously mentioned, phytoliths were analyzed as plant remains.
Composition of the phytolith samples from the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site. In the samples taken from this site, over 2900 phytoliths were identified, which were categorized into 13 morphotypes (Table 6, Figure 6). Additionally, silica skeletons were found in three samples (i.e., EMI 2, EMI 4, and EMI 5). The phytoliths found in the samples from this site were predominantly from the Poaceae family, with the identified morphotypes indicating the presence of several subfamilies (Table 6, Figure 6). All spectra were dominated by Rondel-type phytoliths, ranging from 43.87% to 69.23%. Elongate entire morphotypes accounted for 8.86% to 18.26%, while Elongate dendritic phytoliths ranged from 2.45% to 11.27%. A significant proportion was made up of Acute bulbosus (up to 18.53%), which are produced in the vegetative parts of Poaceae taxa. Bilobate phytoliths were consistently present in these samples, with percentages ranging from 1.44% to 5.18%. All samples had preserved Crenate-type phytoliths, with one sample recording almost 6%. The Cross morphotype was identified in the two samples (EMI 3 and EMI 4). Spheroid morphotype was also found in all samples, notably reaching 14.63% in sample EMI 4. Tracheary phytoliths were modestly present in only four samples. Blocky-type phytoliths, which can be produced by monocotyledons, dicotyledons, and conifers, were present in seven out of eight samples, with percentages reaching up to 3.14%.
Composition of the phytolith samples from the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street site. The samples collected from this site had well-preserved phytoliths, with spectra based on over 3300 microscopic silica bodies, including grass and non-grass remains (Table 7, Figure 7). The spectra were homogeneous and very similar to those obtained for the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site. The Rondel morphotype clearly dominates, with percentages ranging from 43.29% to 68.88%. The percentage of Elongate entire phytoliths ranged from 7.54% to 13.93%. Elongate dendritic phytoliths were better represented than in the samples taken from the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site, with percentages ranging from 9.38% to 22.5%. The Acute bulbosus morphotype, which was present in all samples, had a maximum proportion of 9.93%. Bilobate phytoliths were less represented compared with the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site, reaching a maximum of 2.06%. Crenate phytoliths were also present in all samples from the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street site, with their proportion reaching up to 2.97%. Saddle-type phytoliths were modestly present in half of the samples, with proportions below 1%, while at the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site, this morphotype was not identified. The Spheroid morphotype was identified in seven out of eight samples, with percentages reaching up to 10.46%. Blocky-type phytoliths were better represented compared with the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site (up to 9.07%).
In both the 5th Mihai Eminescu and 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street sites, the phytolith spectra overwhelmingly reflect the dominance of taxa from the Poaceae family. The proportion of Rondel phytoliths indicates the overwhelming presence of the Pooideae subfamily (C3 grasses), which includes cereals such as wheat, barley, oats, rye, and others. The percentages of Elongate dendritic phytoliths support the hypothesis of cereal presence at both sites, with their proportion in the samples from the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street site indicating a more significant presence. Albert et al. [44] noted that both wild grasses and domesticated cereals produce Elongate dendritic phytoliths. However, they observed a significant distinction in the phytolith assemblages from cereals such as wheat and barley. These cereal-derived assemblages typically contain a higher proportion of Elongate dendritic phytoliths, often exceeding 7–8%. This elevated percentage serves as a marker for identifying phytoliths that originate from domesticated cereals, as opposed to those from wild grasses.
The high percentage of cereal inflorescences (Elongate dendritic phytoliths up to 22.5%) indicates that cereals played a role in the economy of these settlements, providing indirect evidence of the consumption of the cereals. It is plausible that feeding with byproduct fodder is also a factor. This suggests that the use of agricultural byproducts, such as chaff and grain remnants, as animal feed was likely practiced at these sites. Such a practice indicates a strategic utilization of available resources, where leftover materials from cereal processing were repurposed to sustain livestock, thereby reflecting an integrated approach to resource management in the agricultural systems of the time. Shahack-Gross et al. [45] investigated the implications of phytolith assemblages within agro-pastoral systems. They observed that, when the percentage of dendritic phytoliths in an assemblage surpasses 3%, it likely indicates that livestock were being fed cereal byproducts. This practice of foddering with cereal remnants reflects a strategic use of agricultural resources, where the byproducts of cereal processing are repurposed as animal feed. Dimitrie Cantemir detailed, in his work Descriptio Moldaviae (1716), the agricultural practices of Medieval Moldova, emphasizing that Triticum sp. (wheat) and Hordeum vulgare (barley) were the main crops grown for both human consumption and animal feed [46]. In addition to these staple cereals, the medieval population extensively cultivated Panicum miliaceum (Proso millet), while Avena sativa (oat) and Secale cereale (rye) were grown to a lesser extent. Historical records further indicate that Zea mays (maize) began to be cultivated around the mid-18th century, marking a significant expansion of the region’s agricultural variety [36,47]. Our results confirm that representatives of the Panicoideae subfamily (C4 grasses, e.g., Setaria sp., Panicum sp., Sorghum sp., and Zea sp.) were present at these two sites. The presence of Bilobate and Cross phytoliths in the samples also confirms this aspect.
Except for a single sample (CRIȘAN 7), all the other 15 samples also preserved Spheroid phytoliths. It is known that these are specific to woody dicotyledons. These data attest to the existence of trees and shrubs in the proximity of the sites, which were brought and utilized by medieval communities for various purposes, thus reflecting cultural and economic adaptations to the surrounding environment. Documents from that period confirm the presence of extensive orchards, underscoring the importance of fruit tree cultivation in Medieval Moldova agriculture [46]. The latter half of the 16th century also saw a notable increase in the cultivation of Vitis vinifera (common grape vine), leading to the establishment of vast vineyards across the hills of Moldova, which became a distinctive feature of the landscape. These orchards, along with the vineyards and cereal fields, illustrate a diverse and flourishing agricultural system that met the dietary needs of the population and bolstered the region’s economy.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the faunal resources of Iași city during the 18th–19th centuries were identified from two archaeological sites. The results of our analysis demonstrate that the faunal resources were varied, including mollusks, fish, birds, and mammals. Most of the analyzed remains belonged to mammals. Animal husbandry represented a very important occupation, with the livestock including cattle, sheep, goat, pig, horse, and dog. Cattle was the predominant exploited species, in terms of both the number of identified remains and the minimal number of individuals. In second place was the group of sheep/goat, followed by pig. Hunting had a reduced importance for the settlement under study, as only three wild mammal species were identified: red deer, wild boar, and hare.
The phytolith spectra from both sites indicate a significant role of cereals, with a strong presence of Poaceae family grasses. High percentages of Elongate dendritic phytoliths highlight the importance of cereals in the economy and diet of this settlement. The use of chaff and grain remnants as animal feed suggests efficient resource utilization and integrated agricultural practices. Evidence of diverse crops and strategic use of agricultural byproducts reflects a complex approach to resource management. Additionally, the presence of phytoliths reveals close interactions between humans, animals, plants, and bio-waste during the period under study, suggesting some structures were used for animal enclosures or waste disposal.
The faunal and phytolith evidence from the 18th and 19th centuries in Iași city indicates a complex and integrated approach to resource management, with animal husbandry, particularly cattle raising, playing a crucial role in the economy, complemented by diverse agricultural practices and efficient use of crop byproducts for animal feed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.S. and L.B.; methodology, M.S.S. and M.D.; software, M.S.S. and M.D.; validation, M.S.S., M.D. and D.A.; formal analysis, M.S.S., G.B., L.B.-P. and M.D.; investigation, M.S.S., G.B., L.B.-P., M.D. and L.B.; resources, L.B. and D.A.; data curation, M.S.S., G.B. and M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.S., G.B. and M.D.; writing—review and editing, M.S.S., G.B., D.A., L.B.-P. and M.D.; visualization, M.S.S., G.B., D.A., L.B.-P. and M.D.; supervision, L.B.; project administration, L.B.; funding acquisition, L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS—UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P4-PCE-2021-1180 within PNCDI III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bernstein, S.; Milza, P. Istoria Europei; Editura Institutul European: Iaşi, Romania, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boicu, L. Principatele Române în Raporturile Politice Internaționale (1792–1821); Editura Institutul European: Iași, Romania, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  3. Braudel, F. Gramatica Civilizaţiilor, 2nd ed.; Editura Meridiane: Bucureşti, Romania, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  4. Constantin, V.L. Elitele şi Statutul lor în Societate; Editura Oscar Print: Bucureşti, Romania, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Iacob, D.D. Elitele din Principatele Române în Prima Jumătate a Secolului al XIX-lea: Sociabilitate şi Divertisment, Iaşi; Editura Universităţii „Al. I. Cuza”: Iaşi, Romania, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Flandrin, J.-L.; Montanari, M. Histoire de L’alimentation; Ed. Fayard: Paris, France, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  7. Grigoruță, S. Boli, Epidemii şi Asistenţă Medicală în Moldova (1700–1831); Ed. Universității Alexandru Ioan Cuza Iași: Iași, Romania, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stanc, M.S.; Bejenaru, L.; Popovici, M.; Diaconu, V.; Danu, M. Animal Resources in the Economy of Medieval Moldova: Archaeozoological Case Study of the Urban Settlement from Târgu Neamt, (NE Romania). Animals 2023, 13, 2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Makowiecki, D. Zwierzęta Średniowiecznego i Nowożytnego. Poznania Oraz Okolic Podstawy Archeozoologiczne; Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe: Poznań, Poland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mladenović, M.; Mladenović, T. Animal Exploitation in the Territory of Present-Day Serbia During the Medieval Period: A Zooarchaeological Perspective. In Animal Husbandry and Hunting in the Central and Western Balkans through Time; Marković, N., Bulatović, J., Eds.; Archaeopress Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2020; pp. 167–196. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gal, E.; Bartosiewicz, L. Animal remains from the Late Medieval kitchen of the Esztergom archdiocese, Hungary-the benefits of screening. Starinar 2021, 71, 231–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pluskowski, A.; Makowiecki, D.; Maltby, M.; Rannamäe, E.; Lõugas, L.; Maldre, L.; Daugnora, L.; Black, S.; Müldner, G.; Seetah, K. The Baltic Crusades and ecological transformation: The zooarchaeology of conquest and cultural change in the Eastern Baltic in the second millennium AD. Quat. Int. 2019, 510, 28–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Reitz, E.J.; Wing, E.S. Zooarchaeology (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology), 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Udrescu, M.; Bejenaru, L.; Hrişcu, C. Introducere în Arheozoologie; Editura Corson: Iaşi, Romania, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sykes, N. Beastly Questions. Animal Answers to Archaeological Issues; Bloomsbury: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Landon, D.B.; Opishinski, A.C. Interpretive directions for historical zooarchaeology in the twenty-first century. In The Routledge Handbook of Global Historical Archaeology; Orser, C.E., Jr., Zarankin, A., Funari, P.P.A., Lawrence, S., Symonds, J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2020; pp. 573–593. [Google Scholar]
  17. Peres, T.M. Foodways archaeology: A decade of research from the southeastern United States. J. Archaeol. Res. 2017, 25, 421–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Puputti, A.-K. A zooarchaeology of modernizing human/animal relationships in Tornio, Northern Finland, 1620–1800. Post-Mediev. Archaeol. 2008, 42, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thomas, R.; Fothergill, B.T. Animals, and their bones, in the “modern” world: A multi-scalar zooarchaeology. Anthropozoologica 2014, 49, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tourigny, E.; Thomas, R.; Guiry, E.; Earp, R.; Allan, A.; Rothenburger, J.L.; Lawler, D.; Nussbaumer, M. An osteobiography of a 19th-century dog from Toronto, Canada. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 2016, 26, 818–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bălăşescu, A.; Moise, D.; Radu, V. La faune de l’Auberge Constantin Vodă (XVIIIe s., București, Roumanie). Rev. Belg. Philol. D’histoire 2002, 80, 1449–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bălăşescu, A.; Drașoveanu, F.; Radu, V. Studiul materialului faunistic descoperit în urma cercetărilor arheologice preventive din Piața Sfântu Gheorghe de la Timișoara. Date preliminare. Analele Banat. Arheol.–Istor. 2015, 23, 277–318. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gyulai, F.; Szolnoki, L.; Rózsa, Z.; Merkl, M.; Pető, Á. Plant Based Subsistence Strategy of the Medieval Ishmaelite (12th–13th c.) Population in the Carpathian Basin (NE-Hungary). Environ. Archaeol. 2017, 24, 229–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Devos, Y.; Wouters, B.; Vrydaghs, L.; Tys, D.; Bellens, T.; Schryvers, A. A soil micromorphological study on the origins of the early medieval trading centre of Antwerp (Belgium). Quat. Int. 2013, 315, 167–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prado, S.; Noble, G. A hut on the hill: A multi-proxy microbotanical and micro-algae approach to a Pictish roundhouse floor at Cairnmore, Aberdeenshire. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2022, 46, 103652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Danu, M.; Messager, E.; Carozza, J.M.; Carozza, L.; Bouby, L.; Philibert, S.; Anderson, P.; Burens, A.; Micu, C. Phytolith evidence of cereal processing in the Danube Delta during the Chalcolithic period. Quat. Int. 2019, 504, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stanc, S.; Danu, M.; Paraschiv, D.; Bejenaru, L. Bioarcheological Indicators Related to Human–Environmental Interactions in a Roman–Byzantine Settlement in Southeast Romania: Ibida Fortress. SAGE Open 2020, 10, 2158244020969664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bogdan, N.A. Orașul Iași. Monografie Istorică și Socială Ilustrată; Ed. Tehnopress: Iaşi, Romania, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cihodaru, C.; Cristian, V.; Dinu, M.; Neamţu, V.; Petrescu–Dâmboviţa, M.; Platon, G.; Rusu, D.; Timofte, M. Istoria Oraşului Iaşi; Editura Junimea: Iaşi, Romania, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chelcu, M. Orăşenii din Iaşi ȋn secolul XVII–solidarităţi şi diferenţe. Anu. Institutului Istor. G.Bariţiu Din Cluj-Napoca 2010, XLIX, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
  31. Simalcsik, A.; Groza, V.-M.; Simalcsik, R.-D.; Miu, G. The Medieval necropolis (16th–18th centuries) of “Sf. Nicolae” Church from Iaşi city (Romania). Anthropologic data. Sci. Ann. “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Univ. Iaşi Anim. Biol. 2012, 58, 183–194. [Google Scholar]
  32. Groza, V.-M.; Miu, G.; Simalcsik, A. New anthropological research on the urban population inhabiting the city of Iasi during the Middle Ages. The necropolis of the Banu church (16–19th centuries). Mem. Sci. Sect. Rom. Acad. 2013, 36, 53–70. [Google Scholar]
  33. Petraru, O.-M.; Groza, V.-M.; Lobiuc, A.; Bejenaru, L.; Popovici, M. Dental microwear as adiet indicator in the seventeenth-century human population from Iasi City, Romania. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2020, 12, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee Lyman, R. Vertebrate Taphonomy; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  35. Barone, R. Anatomie Comparée des Mammifères Domestiques; Ed. Vigot Freves: Paris, France, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  36. von den Driesch, A. A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. In Peabody Museum Bulletin 1; Harvard University: Cambridge, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fock, J. Metrische Untersuchungen an Metapodien Einiger Europäischer Rinderrassen. Ph.D. Thesis, LMU-München, München, Germany, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lentfer, C.J.; Boyd, W.E. A Comparison of Three Methods for the Extraction of Phytoliths from Sediments. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1998, 25, 1159–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. International Committee on Phytolith Taxonomy (ICPT). International code for phytolith nomenclature (ICPN) 2.0. Ann. Bot. 2019, 124, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Armitage, P.L.; Clutton-Brock, J. A System for Classification and Description of the Horn Cores of Cattle from Archaeological Sites. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1976, 3, 329–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Felius, M.; Koolmees, P.A.; Theunissen, B. On the Breeds of Cattle—Historic and Current Classifications. Diversity 2011, 3, 660–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bejenaru, L. Archaeozoological Approaches to Medieval Moldavia; BAR International Series, 1954; BAR Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bacumenco-Pirnau, L.; Bejenaru, L.; Bilavschi, G.; Hriban, C.; Botan, S. Despre fauna salbatica din targul Iasilor in perioada moderna: O descoperire arheologica inedita de braste testoase. In Studii de Antrozoologie. Gandind Dincolo de Limite; Frasin, I., Bodi, G., Vasiliu, D., Eds.; Ed. Pro Universitaria: Bucuresti, Romania, 2020; pp. 223–238. [Google Scholar]
  44. Albert, R.M.; Shahack-Gross, R.; Cabanes, D.; Gilboa, A.; Lev-Yadun, S.; Portillo, M.; Sharon, I.; Boaretto, E.; Weiner, S. Phytolith-rich layers from the Late Bronze and Iron Ages at Tel Dor (Israel): Mode of formation and archaeological significance. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2008, 35, 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shahack-Gross, R.; Boaretto, E.; Cabanes, D.; Katz, O.; Finkelstein, I. Subsistence economy in the Negev Highlands: The Iron Age and the Byzantine/Early Islamic period. Levant 2014, 46, 98–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bilavschi, G. Mărfuri de origine agricolă în comerțul Moldovei (secolele XV–XVII). In Alimentație și Demografie în Moldova din Evul Mediu Până în Epoca Modernă. Abordări Interdisciplinare; Pîrnău, L., Bilavschi, G., Bejenaru, L., Groza, M., Eds.; Editura Mega: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2022; pp. 65–92. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bodale, A. Informații documentare privind alimentația în Țara Moldovei (secolele XV–XVIII). In Alimentație și Demografie în Moldova din Evul Mediu Până în Epoca Modernă. Abordări Interdisciplinare; Pîrnău, L., Bilavschi, G., Bejenaru, L., Groza, M., Eds.; Editura Mega: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2022; pp. 45–63. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Drone photography of the archaeological site discovered at 10th Architect G.M. Cantacuzino Street (formerly Crişan), Iași city.
Figure 1. Drone photography of the archaeological site discovered at 10th Architect G.M. Cantacuzino Street (formerly Crişan), Iași city.
Diversity 16 00520 g001
Figure 2. Location of phytolith CRISAN Samples 1–8 at the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street (formerly Crişan) site.
Figure 2. Location of phytolith CRISAN Samples 1–8 at the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street (formerly Crişan) site.
Diversity 16 00520 g002
Figure 3. Location of phytolith EMI Samples 1–8 at the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site.
Figure 3. Location of phytolith EMI Samples 1–8 at the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site.
Diversity 16 00520 g003
Figure 4. Skeletal frequencies (% NISP) for Bos taurus, Ovis aries/Capra hircus, and Sus domesticus.
Figure 4. Skeletal frequencies (% NISP) for Bos taurus, Ovis aries/Capra hircus, and Sus domesticus.
Diversity 16 00520 g004
Figure 5. Scatter plot of cattle horn cores found in Sample A1.
Figure 5. Scatter plot of cattle horn cores found in Sample A1.
Diversity 16 00520 g005
Figure 6. Phytolith diagram of the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site.
Figure 6. Phytolith diagram of the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site.
Diversity 16 00520 g006
Figure 7. Phytolith diagram of the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street (formerly Crişan) site.
Figure 7. Phytolith diagram of the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street (formerly Crişan) site.
Diversity 16 00520 g007
Table 1. Distribution of animal remains by taxonomic group (NISP—number of identified specimens).
Table 1. Distribution of animal remains by taxonomic group (NISP—number of identified specimens).
AssemblageSample A1Sample A2
Faunal GroupNISP%NISP%
Mammals85297.8263998.16
Birds131.4991.38
Fish20.2310.15
Mollusks40.4620.31
Total sample871100651100
Table 2. Distribution of remains with taphonomy evidence (NISP—number of identified specimens).
Table 2. Distribution of remains with taphonomy evidence (NISP—number of identified specimens).
AssemblageSample A1Sample A2
Taphonomy EvidenceNISP%NISP%
Remains with butchering traces34940.0725439.02
Remains with burning traces40.4660.92
Remains with animal teeth marks171.9550.77
Manufactured bones and antlers00.0030.46
Total sample871-651-
Table 3. Quantification of mammal remains based on the number of identified specimens (NISPs).
Table 3. Quantification of mammal remains based on the number of identified specimens (NISPs).
AssemblageSample A1Sample A2
SpeciesNISP%NISP%
Bos taurus (cattle)53666.0144773.28
Ovis aries/Capra hircus (sheep/goat)19724.269515.57
Sus domesticus (pig)425.17243.93
Canis familiaris (dog)40.4930.49
Equus ferus caballus (horse)20.25182.95
Total domestic mammals78196.1858796.23
Cervus elaphus (red deer)151.85182.95
Sus scrofa (wild boar)111.3550.82
Lepus europaeus (European hare)50.6200.00
Total wild mammals313.82233.77
Total identified mammals812100.00610100.00
Unidentified mammals40-29-
Total mammals852-639-
Table 4. Quantification of mammal remains by the minimum number of individuals (MNI) and estimation of ages at slaughter (M—mature age; I—immature age).
Table 4. Quantification of mammal remains by the minimum number of individuals (MNI) and estimation of ages at slaughter (M—mature age; I—immature age).
AssemblageSample A1Sample A2
SpeciesMNI%Age ClassMNI%Age Class
Bos taurus2653.0623 M, 3 I1446.6712 M, 2 I
Ovis aries/Capra hircus1122.458 M, 3 I620.005 M, 1 I
Sus domesticus48.163 M, 1 I310.002 M, 1 I
Canis familiaris24.082 M13.331 M
Equus ferus caballus12.041 M26.672 M
Total domestic mammals4489.80-2686.67-
Cervus elaphus36.123 M310.003 M
Sus scrofa12.041 M13.331 M
Lepus europaeus12.041 M00.00-
Total wild mammals510.20-413.33-
Total mammals49100.00-30100.00-
Table 5. Dimensions (in mm) and estimations of sex and height at withers (in mm) for Bos taurus (GL = maximum length; Bp = maximum proximal width; SD = minimum diaphysis width; Bd = maximum distal width; and f = female).
Table 5. Dimensions (in mm) and estimations of sex and height at withers (in mm) for Bos taurus (GL = maximum length; Bp = maximum proximal width; SD = minimum diaphysis width; Bd = maximum distal width; and f = female).
BoneGL
(1)
Bp
(2)
SD
(3)
Bd
(4)
I2 (2 × 100/1)I3 (3 × 100/1)I4 (4 × 100/1)SexHeight at Withers
Metacarpus
(Sample A1)
200-3258.5-1629.25f1200
Metacarpus
(Sample A2)
21139254918.4811.8423.22f1266
Metatarsus
(Sample A2)
188.55529.55429.1715.6428.64f1131
Table 6. Phytolith data from the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site.
Table 6. Phytolith data from the 5th Mihai Eminescu Street site.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXTSAMPLE CODERondelBulliform flabellateSpheroidAcute bulbosus Elongate entireElongate dendriticCrenatePolylobateBilobateBlockyCrossCyperaceae TypeSilica skeletonsTrachearyPhytolith Sum
Cx2EMI 120354275434307110002350
Cx4EMI 228801130472460630010416
Cx5bEMI 3243130614151671461002463
Cx5bEMI 420116129514785911111417
Cx7EMI 5179142639841500011269
Cx7EMI 61890445531170570000321
Cx10EMI 71750557569611010000320
Cx10 EMI 816119686792241970000367
Table 7. Phytolith data from the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street (formerly Crişan) site.
Table 7. Phytolith data from the 10th Architect G. M. Cantacuzino Street (formerly Crişan) site.
SAMPLE CODERondelBulliform flabellateSpheroidAcute bulbosus Elongate entireElongate
dendritic
CrenatePolylobateBilobateBlockyCrossSaddleSilica skeletonsTrachearyPhytolith Sum
CRIȘAN 130011813485784370210462
CRIȘAN 22311520515010430000366
CRIȘAN 330144183341133950024437
CRIȘAN 42054517363450360110317
CRIȘAN 5209743233161906210100411
CRIȘAN 62148333943501003351101438
CRIȘAN 72296047481191199482010529
CRIȘAN 821278403961007290000403
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stanc, M.S.; Bilavschi, G.; Bacumenco-Pîrnău, L.; Aparaschivei, D.; Bejenaru, L.; Danu, M. The Diversity of Archaeological Animal and Plant Remains Discovered at 18th–19th-Century Sites in Iași City (NE Romania). Diversity 2024, 16, 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090520

AMA Style

Stanc MS, Bilavschi G, Bacumenco-Pîrnău L, Aparaschivei D, Bejenaru L, Danu M. The Diversity of Archaeological Animal and Plant Remains Discovered at 18th–19th-Century Sites in Iași City (NE Romania). Diversity. 2024; 16(9):520. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090520

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stanc, Margareta Simina, George Bilavschi, Ludmila Bacumenco-Pîrnău, Dan Aparaschivei, Luminița Bejenaru, and Mihaela Danu. 2024. "The Diversity of Archaeological Animal and Plant Remains Discovered at 18th–19th-Century Sites in Iași City (NE Romania)" Diversity 16, no. 9: 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090520

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop