Next Article in Journal
The Study of Aviation Safe Incapacitating Device Based on LED Technology with a Smart-Illumination Sensor Unit
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Fading Factor and Updated Monitoring Strategy Adaptive Kalman Filter-Based Variational Bayesian
Previous Article in Journal
Indirect Feedback Measurement of Flow in a Water Pumping Network Employing Artificial Intelligence
Previous Article in Special Issue
End-to-End Automated Lane-Change Maneuvering Considering Driving Style Using a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Algorithm
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Modular Approach for Odometry Localization Method for Vehicles with Increased Maneuverability

Sensors 2021, 21(1), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010079
by Chenlei Han *, Michael Frey and Frank Gauterin
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2021, 21(1), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010079
Submission received: 2 December 2020 / Revised: 17 December 2020 / Accepted: 22 December 2020 / Published: 25 December 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presents an interesting design and evaluation of a localization system of a vehicle with high maneuverability based on odometry with on-board sensors. That said, it is a bit confusing that the article is in the Remote Sensors section, since no external sensors are used. Well, it can be seen as a local alternative method to improve accuracy. Perhaps it would be interesting to include a comment on the possibilities of combining external and internal sensors, to take advantage of sensory fusion and improve robustness, or as a future task.

The role of sensors in the system is relevant. Three sensors have been used as shown in Table 1. Although it is a prototype, it would be interesting to mention the cost of the sensors to contextualize it with other methods indicated in the introduction.

The definition of epsilon_i is confusing considering Equation 4 and Figure 5.b. How is the tire slip angle alpha_i defined? According to the sense of alpha_i in Fig5.b it should be epsilon_i = delta_i + alpha_i. Please clarify.

In the simulation results, line 399, it would be convenient to modify the phrase "(except version 111, 112, 113)" by ("except versions with only model-1, namely 111, 112, 113)". Otherwise it is confusing in the description of the experiments.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Very well prepared manuscript, nice graphics and text quality. After reading I found some remarks. Improving noted issues will improve readability and value of the paper.

  1. Lack of formulation of research, clear definition of errors for provided models and applied methods. This will help to improve conclusions, because then it is possible to evaluate quality and conditions of results.
  2. Explication of variables in equation I would like to see the separately described, maybe in the table. That will add clearness for reader.
  3. It would be nice to define influence of wheel diameter to odometry, at least in statement level.
  4. Lastly, acceptable linear and angular error level should be outlined in conclusions or discussion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop