Next Article in Journal
Research on Trajectory Planning of Autonomous Vehicles in Constrained Spaces
Previous Article in Journal
Nanoporous Gold-Modified Screen-Printed Electrodes for the Simultaneous Determination of Pb2+ and Cu2+ in Water
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Study on Miniaturized In-Situ Self-Calibrated Thermometers Based on Ga and Ga-Zn Fixed Points

Sensors 2024, 24(17), 5744; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175744
by Haiying Huang, Wenlu Cai *, Yongjian Mao, Kun Wan, Yong Wen, Yuqiang Han, Qiang Zhang, Rong Zhang and Xing Zheng
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Sensors 2024, 24(17), 5744; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175744
Submission received: 21 June 2024 / Revised: 22 August 2024 / Accepted: 1 September 2024 / Published: 4 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors sholuld include additional references regarding miniature fixed points and self-validation.

There are no uncertainty discusssion, which is crucial for providing self-calibration.

Author Response

Please check the attachment. 

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript compares 3 pairs of self-calibrated thermometers based on Ga and GaZn fixed points.

It presents a structure very appropriate to the work to be presented, describing well the thermometers and the measurement and calibration procedures. The results obtained are good and also include the study of the supercooling phenomenon.

The authors should correct and/or expand the following points to improve the quality of the manuscript.

1. The name figure 6 appears in two figures. Renumber in text and figure caption from that figure and the following ones.

2. Regarding the effect of super cooling, I believe it would be necessary to better explain the phenomenon to understand why it occurs in the smaller self-calibrated thermometer. Some references to the supercooling phenomenon could be included.

I recommend publishing the article with the exposed minor revisions.

Author Response

Please check the attachment.  

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1. Figure 7 and 9 need to be better explained in the text. How were the errors calculated?

 

2. Figure 6 and 8: I suggest adding a zoomed-in inset to each figure to the plot so the black, red and blue lines are clearly seen

 

 

3.2Integration of M&C System

 

3. The type T thermocouple’s make (manufacturer) and model should be mentioned.

 

4. The the hearting control subsystem’s make (manufacturer) and model should be mentioned in the text.

 

5. What data processing subsystem software was used to process the temperature data?

 

 

6. Overall, the English language usage should be improved.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Please seek help from a native English speaker to help with editing the manuscript.

Author Response

Please check the attachment.  

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop