Next Article in Journal
Click to Correction: Interactive Bidirectional Dynamic Propagation Video Object Segmentation Network
Previous Article in Journal
Study of a Crosstalk Suppression Scheme Based on Double-Stage Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers’ Accuracy for Unmanned Vehicles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Performance Evaluation of Real-Time Kinematic Global Navigation Satellite System with Survey-Grade Receivers and Short Observation Times in Forested Areas

by
Mihnea Cățeanu
* and
Maria Alexandra Moroianu
Department of Forest Engineering, Forest Management Planning and Terrestrial Measurements, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, Șirul Ludwig van Beethoven 1, 500123 Brașov, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(19), 6404; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196404
Submission received: 19 August 2024 / Revised: 30 September 2024 / Accepted: 1 October 2024 / Published: 2 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue GNSS Signals and Precise Point Positioning)

Abstract

The Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) method is currently the most widely used method for positioning using Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) due to its accuracy, efficiency and ease of use. In forestry, position is a critical factor for numerous applications, with GNSS currently being the preferred solution for obtaining such data. However, the decreased performance of GNSS observations in challenging environments, such as under the forest canopy, must be considered. This paper analyzes the performance of a survey-grade GNSS receiver under coniferous/deciduous tree cover. Unlike most previous research concerning this topic, the focus here is on employing a methodology that is as close as possible to real working conditions in the field of forestry. To achieve this, short observation times of 30 s were used, with corrections received directly in the field from a Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) of the national RTK network in Romania. In total, 84 test points were determined, randomly distributed under the canopy, with reference data collected by topographical surveys using total station equipment. In terms of the overall horizontal accuracy, an RMSE of 2.03 m and MAE of 1.63 m are found. Meanwhile, the overall vertical accuracy is lower, as expected, with an RMSE of 4.85 m and MAE of 4.01 m. The variation in GNSS performance under the different forest compositions was found to be statistically significant, while GNSS-specific factors such as DOP values only influenced the precision and not the accuracy of observations. We established that this methodology offers sufficient accuracy, which is application-dependent, even if the majority of GNSS solutions were code-based, rather than carrier-phase-based, due to strong interference from the vegetation.
Keywords: RTK-GNSS; accuracy and precision of GNSS observations; forestry RTK-GNSS; accuracy and precision of GNSS observations; forestry

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cățeanu, M.; Moroianu, M.A. Performance Evaluation of Real-Time Kinematic Global Navigation Satellite System with Survey-Grade Receivers and Short Observation Times in Forested Areas. Sensors 2024, 24, 6404. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196404

AMA Style

Cățeanu M, Moroianu MA. Performance Evaluation of Real-Time Kinematic Global Navigation Satellite System with Survey-Grade Receivers and Short Observation Times in Forested Areas. Sensors. 2024; 24(19):6404. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196404

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cățeanu, Mihnea, and Maria Alexandra Moroianu. 2024. "Performance Evaluation of Real-Time Kinematic Global Navigation Satellite System with Survey-Grade Receivers and Short Observation Times in Forested Areas" Sensors 24, no. 19: 6404. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196404

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop