Evolution of Bluetooth Technology: BLE in the IoT Ecosystem
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Overview of Bluetooth Technology
2.1. Historical Perspective: Development and Milestones in Bluetooth Technology
2.2. Key Features and Advancements in Different Versions of Bluetooth
2.3. Bluetooth Device Classes: Power and Range Specifications
3. Evolution of Bluetooth Low Energy
3.1. Key Characteristics of BLE and Differences from Bluetooth Classic
3.2. Technical Specifications: Detailed Technical Aspects of BLE
3.2.1. Power Consumption
3.2.2. Range
3.2.3. Throughput
3.2.4. Latency
3.2.5. Advertising and Scanning
3.2.6. Security
3.2.7. Topology
3.2.8. Frequency and Modulation
3.2.9. Summarize
3.3. Development Phases: Evolution Stages of BLE from Its Inception to the Latest Updates
3.4. BLE in Long Range Mode
- S = 2: Provides a data rate of 500 kbps with increased range.
- S = 8: Provides a data rate of 125 kbps with maximum range.
Real-World Performances
4. BLE in the IoT Ecosystem
4.1. IoT Overview: Explanation of the IoT Ecosystem and Its Components
4.2. Integration of BLE in IoT: How BLE Fits into and Enhances the IoT Framework
4.3. Use Cases: Specific Applications and Case Studies of BLE in IoT
4.3.1. Smart Homes
4.3.2. Automotive
4.3.3. Healthcare
4.3.4. Wearables
4.3.5. Retail and Proximity Marketing
4.3.6. Industrial Automation
4.3.7. Smart Cities
4.3.8. Summarize
4.4. BLE and the Sustainable Development Goals of United Nations
4.4.1. SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
4.4.2. SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
4.4.3. SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production and SDG 13: Climate Action
4.4.4. Future Perspectives for BLE and Sustainability
5. Technical Challenges and Solutions
5.1. Challenges: Common Technical Challenges in Implementing BLE in IoT
5.1.1. Power Management
5.1.2. Interference and Coexistence
5.1.3. Scalability
5.1.4. Security
5.1.5. Data Throughput and Latency
5.1.6. Interoperability
5.1.7. Range Limitations
5.1.8. Complexity of Mesh Networking
5.1.9. Firmware Updates and Maintenance
5.1.10. Summarize
5.2. Solutions: Proposed and Existing Solutions to These Challenges
5.2.1. Power Management Solutions
5.2.2. Interference and Coexistence Mitigation
5.2.3. Scalability Solutions
5.2.4. Security Enhancements
5.2.5. Data Throughput and Latency Optimization
5.2.6. Interoperability Solutions
5.2.7. Range Extension Techniques
5.2.8. Mesh Networking Solutions
5.2.9. Firmware Update and Maintenance Solutions
5.2.10. Summarize
6. Future Directions and Trends
6.1. Emerging Trends: Upcoming Advancements in BLE Technology and Its Future Role in IoT
6.1.1. Increased Data Rates and Efficiency
6.1.2. Enhanced Security Features
6.1.3. Better Location Services
6.1.4. Improved Power Management
6.1.5. Mesh Networking Enhancements
6.1.6. Integration with Other Technologies
6.1.7. Advanced Audio Capabilities
6.1.8. AI and ML Integration
6.1.9. Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.1.10. Summarize
6.2. Research Opportunities: Potential Areas for Further Research and Development
7. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
8DPSK | 8-phase Differential Phase-Shift Keying |
ADAS | Advanced Driver Assistance Systems |
AES | Advanced Encryption Standard |
AFH | Adaptive Frequency Hopping |
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
ANNs | Artificial Neural Networks |
AoA | Angle of Arrival |
AoD | Angle of Departure |
AR | Augmented Reality |
BLE | Bluetooth Low Energy |
Bluetooth SIG | Bluetooth Special Interest Group |
BR/EDR | Basic Rate/Enhanced Data Rate |
BT | Bandwidth-Bit Period Product |
C2C | Car to Car |
C2I | Car to Infrastructure |
DPSK | Differential Phase-Shift Keying |
DQPSK | Differential Quaternary Phase-Shift Keying |
EATT | Enhanced Attribute protocol |
ECDH | Elliptic Curve Diffie–Hellman |
ESL | Electronic Shelf Labels |
FEC | Forward Error Correction |
FHSS | Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum |
GATT | Generic Attribute profile |
GFSK | Gaussian Frequency Shift Keying |
GIoT | Green Internet of Things |
GIoT-BHMC | Green Internet of Things-Bluetooth Hotmeal Container |
HCI | Host Controller Interface |
HS | High Speed |
IDPS | Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems |
IEEE SA | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standards Association |
IETF | Internet Engineering Task Force |
IIoT | Industrial Internet of Things |
IoT | Internet of Things |
IPSP | Internet Protocol Support Profile |
IRK | Identity Resolving Key |
ISM Band | Industrial, Scientific and Medical Band |
ISOAL | Isochronous Adaptation Layer |
IWSN | Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks |
LC3 | Low-Complexity Communication Codec |
LE Audio | Low-Energy Audio |
LoRa | Long Range |
LOS | Line of Sight |
LPWAN | Low-Power Wide Area Network |
LTE | Long-Term Evolution |
MAC | Media Access Control |
MitM | Man in the Middle |
ML | Machine Learning |
MTU | Maximum Transmission Unit |
OOB | Out of Band |
OTA | Over the Air |
P2P | Point to Point |
PAN | Personal Area Network |
PAwR | Periodic Advertising with Responses |
PHY | Physical Layer |
PKI | Public Key Infrastructure |
PSK | Pre-Shared Keys |
RF | Radio Frequency |
RHMS | Remote Health Monitoring Systems |
RPAs | Resolvable Private Addresses |
RSSI | Received Signal Strength Indicator |
SAM | Slot Availability Mask |
SoC | System-on-Chip |
STRIDE | Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information disclosure, Denial of service and |
Elevation of privilege | |
TPMS | Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems |
UUID | Universal Unique Identifier |
VR | Virtual Reality |
WBMS | Wireless Battery Management Systems |
Wi-Fi | Wireless Fidelity |
References
- Gomez, C.; Oller, J.; Paradells, J. Overview and evaluation of bluetooth low energy: An emerging low-power wireless technology. Sensors 2012, 12, 11734–11753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikhaylov, K.; Plevritakis, N.; Tervonen, J. Performance analysis and comparison of Bluetooth Low Energy with IEEE 802.15.4 and SimpliciTI. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2013, 2, 589–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darroudi, S.M.; Gomez, C. Bluetooth low energy mesh networks: A survey. Sensors 2017, 17, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Natgunanathan, I.; Fernando, N.; Loke, S.W.; Weerasuriya, C. Bluetooth low energy mesh: Applications, considerations and current state-of-the-art. Sensors 2023, 23, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raza, U.; Kulkarni, P.; Sooriyabandara, M. Low power wide area networks: An overview. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2017, 19, 855–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L.; Xie, G.; Qu, Y.; Gao, L.; Yang, Y. Security and privacy in smart cities: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 46134–46145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. The Story Behind How Bluetooth® Technology Got Its Name. 1999. Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/about-us/bluetooth-origin/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 1.0b; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 1999; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-1-0b/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 1.1; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2001; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-1-1/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 1.2; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2003; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-1-2/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 2.0; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2004; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-2-0-edr/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 2.1; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2007; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-2-1-edr/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 3.0; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2009; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-3-0-hs/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 4.0; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2010; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-4-0/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 4.1; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2013; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-4-1/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 4.2; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2014; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-4-2/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 5.0; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2016; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-5-0/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 5.1; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2019; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-5-1/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 5.2; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2019; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-5-2/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 5.3; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2021; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-5-3/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 5.4; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-5-4/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Bluetooth SIG, Inc. Bluetooth Core Specification Version 6.0; Bluetooth Special Interest Group: Kirkland, WA, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-6-0/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Tosi, J.; Taffoni, F.; Santacatterina, M.; Sannino, R.; Formica, D. Performance evaluation of bluetooth low energy: A systematic review. Sensors 2017, 17, 2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Espinosa, E.; Longoria-Gandara, O.; Pegueros-Lepe, I.; Veloz-Guerrero, A. Power consumption analysis of Bluetooth low energy commercial products and their implications for IoT applications. Electronics 2018, 7, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dementyev, A.; Hodges, S.; Taylor, S.; Smith, J. Power consumption analysis of Bluetooth Low Energy, ZigBee and ANT sensor nodes in a cyclic sleep scenario. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Wireless Symposium (IWS), Beijing, China, 14–18 April 2013; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). FIPS PUB 197: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES); U.S. Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.197-upd1.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Çetintav, I.; Taşkın, D. Performance analysis of hardware and software based AES encryption on internet of things SoC. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023, 2849, 190004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Au, E. Bluetooth 5.0 and beyond [standards]. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2019, 14, 119–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hortelano, D.; Olivares, T.; Ruiz, M.C.; Garrido-Hidalgo, C.; López, V. From sensor networks to internet of things. Bluetooth low energy, a standard for this evolution. Sensors 2017, 17, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Texas Instruments. Texas Instruments Demos 1.5 km Range with Bluetooth. 2017. Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/bluetooth-resources/texas-instruments-demos-1-5km-range-with-bluetooth/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Nordic Semiconductor. Testing Long Range Coded PHY with Nordic’s Solution—It Simply Works. 2018. Available online: https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/testing-long-range-coded-phy-with-nordic-solution-it-simply-works-922075585 (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- STMicroelectronics. STM32WBA Bluetooth® Low Energy—Long Range. 2024. Available online: https://wiki.st.com/stm32mcu/wiki/Connectivity:STM32WBA_Long_Range (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Haddaoui, S.; Chikhi, S.; Miles, B. The IoT Ecosystem: Components, Architecture, Communication Technologies, and Protocols. In International Symposium on Modelling and Implementation of Complex Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 76–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paolone, G.; Iachetti, D.; Paesani, R.; Pilotti, F.; Marinelli, M.; Di Felice, P. A holistic overview of the Internet of Things ecosystem. IoT 2022, 3, 398–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, J.; Nemati, M.; Ranaweera, C.; Choi, J. IoT connectivity technologies and applications: A survey. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 67646–67673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, N.; Gillani, S.; Ahmed, E.; Yaqoob, I.; Imran, M. The role of edge computing in internet of things. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakroun, M.; Sayah, J.; Kallab, C.; Haddad, S. Internet of Things: Towards a solid ecosystem of interconnected things. Adv. Internet Things 2022, 12, 35–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO. International Organization for Standardization. 2024. Available online: https://iso.org/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standards Association. 2024. Available online: https://standards.ieee.org/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- IETF. Internet Engineering Task Force. 2024. Available online: https://www.ietf.org/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Sun, Y.; Li, S. A systematic review of the research framework and evolution of smart homes based on the internet of things. Telecommun. Syst. 2021, 77, 597–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-García, G.; Flores-Arias, J.; Bellido-Outeiriño, F.; Moreno-Muñoz, A.; Palacios-García, E.J.; Quero-Corrales, M.A. Home Lighting controller based on BLE. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 8–10 January 2017; pp. 340–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stopps, H.; Touchie, M.F. Residential smart thermostat use: An exploration of thermostat programming, environmental attitudes, and the influence of smart controls on energy savings. Energy Build. 2021, 238, 110834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bapat, C.; Baleri, G.; Inamdar, S.; Nimkar, A.V. Smart-lock security re-engineered using cryptography and steganography. In Proceedings of the Security in Computing and Communications: 5th International Symposium, SSCC 2017, Manipal, India, 13–16 September 2017; Proceedings 5. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, Q.T.; Tran, D.D.; Doan, D.; Nguyen, M.S. An approach of ble mesh network for smart home application. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Applications (ACOMP), Quy Nhon, Vietnam, 25–27 November 2020; pp. 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, K.T.; Bluetooth Low Energy and the automotive transformation. Texas Instruments. 2017. Available online: https://www.ti.com/lit/wp/sway008/sway008.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Fechtner, H.; Spaeth, U.; Schmuelling, B. Smart tire pressure monitoring system with piezoresistive pressure sensors and bluetooth 5. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Conference on Wireless Sensors (ICWiSe), Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, 19–21 November 2019; pp. 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shell, C.; Henderson, J.; Verra, H.; Dyer, J. Implementation of a wireless battery management system (WBMS). In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings, Pisa, Italy, 11–14 May 2015; pp. 1954–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, J.P.; Ferreira, J.C.; Monteiro, V.; Afonso, J.A.; Afonso, J.L. IoT and blockchain paradigms for EV charging system. Energies 2019, 12, 2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Q.; Sun, H.; Wang, H.; Hu, R.Q. Exploring Communication Technologies, Standards, and Challenges in Electrified Vehicle Charging. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.16830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taherdoost, H. Wearable Healthcare and Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring with IoT Integration. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2024, 81, 79–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donati, M.; Celli, A.; Ruiu, A.; Saponara, S.; Fanucci, L. A telemedicine service system exploiting BT/BLE wireless sensors for remote management of chronic patients. Technologies 2019, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaari Fourati, L.; Said, S. Remote health monitoring systems based on bluetooth low energy (BLE) communication systems. In Proceedings of the Impact of Digital Technologies on Public Health in Developed and Developing Countries: 18th International Conference, ICOST 2020, Hammamet, Tunisia, 24–26 June 2020; Proceedings 18. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Admiraal, R.; Millen, J.; Patel, A.; Chambers, T. A case study of Bluetooth technology as a supplemental tool in contact tracing. J. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2022, 6, 208–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hohmann, V. The future of hearing aid technology: Can technology turn us into superheroes? Z. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2023, 56, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Svertoka, E.; Saafi, S.; Rusu-Casandra, A.; Burget, R.; Marghescu, I.; Hosek, J.; Ometov, A. Wearables for industrial work safety: A survey. Sensors 2021, 21, 3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muddinagiri, R.; Ambavane, S.; Jadhav, V.; Tamboli, S. Proximity marketing using Bluetooth low energy. In Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, 6–7 March 2020; pp. 856–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muddinagiri, R.; Ambavane, S.; Jadhav, V.; Tamboli, S. Implementation of proximity marketing leveraging Bluetooth low energy. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC), Coimbatore, India, 2–4 July 2020; pp. 608–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allurwar, N.; Nawale, B.; Patel, S. Beacon for proximity target marketing. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2016, 15, 16359–16364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taneja, S.; Sharma, V. Role of beaconing marketing in improving customer buying experience. In Enhancing Customer Engagement Through Location-Based Marketing; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, M.Y.C.; Nguyen, T.T.; Cheng, E.Y.L.; Le, A.N.H.; Cheng, J.M.S. Proximity marketing and Bluetooth beacon technology: A dynamic mechanism leading to relationship program receptiveness. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 141, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.K.M.; Ip, C.; Park, T.; Chung, S.Y. A bluetooth location-based indoor positioning system for asset tracking in warehouse. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Macao, China, 15–18 December 2019; pp. 1408–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rondón, R.; Gidlund, M.; Landernäs, K. Evaluating bluetooth low energy suitability for time-critical industrial iot applications. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 2017, 24, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fache, V.O. Bluetooth Low Energy: A Comprehensive Technology Analysis and Role in Internet of Things Applications. Int. J. Nat. Sci. Adv. Res. 2023, 2, 211–224. Available online: https://mediterraneanpublications.com/mejnsar/article/download/235/311/487 (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Reshma, A.; Rajathi, G.M. Industrial Automation Based on BLE. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2018, 5, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z. Securing Bluetooth Low Energy: A Literature Review. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.16846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spachos, P.; Plataniotis, K. BLE beacons in the smart city: Applications, challenges, and research opportunities. IEEE Internet Things Mag. 2020, 3, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whaiduzzaman, M.; Barros, A.; Chanda, M.; Barman, S.; Sultana, T.; Rahman, M.S.; Roy, S.; Fidge, C. A review of emerging technologies for IoT-based smart cities. Sensors 2022, 22, 9271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Ortiz, J.C.; Silvestre-Blanes, J.; Sempere-Payá, V. Experimental application of bluetooth low energy connectionless in smart cities. Electronics 2021, 10, 2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omrany, H.; Al-Obaidi, K.M.; Hossain, M.; Alduais, N.A.; Al-Duais, H.S.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A. IoT-enabled smart cities: A hybrid systematic analysis of key research areas, challenges, and recommendations for future direction. Discov. Cities 2024, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zantalis, F.; Koulouras, G.; Karabetsos, S.; Kandris, D. A review of machine learning and IoT in smart transportation. Future Internet 2019, 11, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). 2015. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Ranjitha, B.; Nikhitha, M.; Aruna, K.; Murthy, B.V.; Afreen. Solar powered autonomous multipurpose agricultural robot using bluetooth/android app. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), Coimbatore, India, 12–14 June 2019; pp. 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, J.; Sharma, S. Sustainable Solar Powered Bluetooth Enabled Smart Home Automation System Using Internet-of-Things. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Computing and Signal Processing (IICCCS), Asansol, India, 19–20 September 2024; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, F.; Pang, C.; Tang, H. Sensors on Internet of Things Systems for the Sustainable Development of Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 2024, 24, 2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manaf, M.B.A.; Na’aim, M.Z.B.M. Embedding Bluetooth into green IoT for a sustainable smart living. E3S Web Conf. 2024, 479, 07015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, K.; Kaur, K. A study of power management techniques for Internet of Things (IoT). In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), Chennai, India, 3–5 March 2016; pp. 1781–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ophir, L.; Bitran, Y.; Sherman, I. Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11) and Bluetooth coexistence: Issues and solutions. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (IEEE Cat. No. 04TH8754), Barcelona, Spain, 5–8 September 2004; Volume 2, pp. 847–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Shareeda, M.A.; Saare, M.A.; Manickam, S.; Karuppayah, S. Bluetooth low energy for internet of things: Review, challenges, and open issues. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2023, 31, 1182–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Böcker, S.; Arendt, C.; Wietfeld, C. On the suitability of Bluetooth 5 for the Internet of Things: Performance and scalability analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Montreal, QC, Canada, 8–13 October 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rondón, R.; Mahmood, A.; Grimaldi, S.; Gidlund, M. Understanding the performance of bluetooth mesh: Reliability, delay, and scalability analysis. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 7, 2089–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, D.S.; Yeon, Y.M.; Kim, S.H. Multilink Internet-of-Things Sensor Communication Based on Bluetooth Low Energy Considering Scalability. Electronics 2021, 10, 2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barua, A.; Al Alamin, M.A.; Hossain, M.S.; Hossain, E. Security and privacy threats for bluetooth low energy in iot and wearable devices: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2022, 3, 251–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallavi, S.; Narayanan, V.A. An overview of practical attacks on ble based iot devices and their security. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th international conference on advanced computing & communication systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, 15–16 March 2019; pp. 694–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cäsar, M.; Pawelke, T.; Steffan, J.; Terhorst, G. A survey on Bluetooth Low Energy security and privacy. Comput. Netw. 2022, 205, 108712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, N.; Wimmer, H.; Rebman, C.M. Investigating bluetooth vulnerabilities to defend from attacks. In Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), Ankara, Turkey, 21–23 October 2021; pp. 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katila, R.; Gia, T.N.; Westerlund, T. Analysis of mobility support approaches for edge-based IoT systems using high data rate Bluetooth Low Energy 5. Comput. Netw. 2022, 209, 108925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, K.; Park, W.; Hong, M.; Park, G.; Cho, W.; Seo, J.; Han, K. Analysis of latency performance of Bluetooth low energy (BLE) networks. Sensors 2014, 15, 59–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, T.; Chakraborty, S.K. Provisioning technical interoperability within ZigBee and BLE in IoT environment. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Materials Engineering & Nano-Technology (IEMENTech), Kolkata, India, 4–5 May 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villa, D.; Lin, C.K.; Kuenzi, A.; Lang, M. Bluetooth Low Energy mesh network for power-limited, robust and reliable IoT services. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2208.04050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Jaouhari, S.; Bouvet, E. Secure firmware Over-The-Air updates for IoT: Survey, challenges, and discussions. Internet Things 2022, 18, 100508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Zhu, X.; Han, Q.L.; Zhou, W.; Wen, S.; Xiang, Y. Detecting vulnerability on IoT device firmware: A survey. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2022, 10, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultania, A.K.; Delgado, C.; Famaey, J. Enabling low-latency Bluetooth low energy on energy harvesting batteryless devices using wake-up radios. Sensors 2020, 20, 5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- García-Paterna, P.J.; Martínez-Sala, A.S.; Sánchez-Aarnoutse, J.C. Empirical study of a room-level localization system based on bluetooth low energy beacons. Sensors 2021, 21, 3665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pang, B.; T’Jonck, K.; Claeys, T.; Pissoort, D.; Hallez, H.; Boydens, J. Bluetooth low energy interference awareness scheme and improved channel selection algorithm for connection robustness. Sensors 2021, 21, 2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eltholth, A.A. Improved spectrum coexistence in 2.4 GHz ISM band using optimized chaotic frequency hopping for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth signals. Sensors 2023, 23, 5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marcel, J. How Bluetooth Technology Uses Adaptive Frequency Hopping to Overcome Packet Interference. 2024. Available online: https://www.bluetooth.com/blog/how-bluetooth-technology-uses-adaptive-frequency-hopping-to-overcome-packet-interference/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).
- Campos-Cruz, K.J.; Mancillas-López, C.; Ovilla-Martinez, B. A lightweight security protocol for beacons BLE. In Proceedings of the 2021 18th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE), Mexico City, Mexico, 10–12 November 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalinin, E.; Belyakov, D.; Bragin, D.; Konev, A. IoT Security Mechanisms in the Example of BLE. Computers 2021, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Asif, M.R.; Hasan, K.F.; Islam, M.Z.; Khondoker, R. STRIDE-based cyber security threat modeling for IoT-enabled precision agriculture systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 4.0 (STI), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 18–19 December 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, B.S.; Dias, C.C.; Santos, D.F.; Gorgonio, K.C.; Perkusich, A. An Interoperable Integration Model for Bluetooth Devices in the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), Split, Croatia, 19–21 September 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veiga, A.A.; Abbas, C.J. Proposal and application of Bluetooth mesh profile for smart cities’ services. Smart Cities 2018, 2, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Díaz-De-Cerio, D.; García-Lozano, M.; Bardají, A.V.; Valenzuela, J.L. Bluetooth Mesh Analysis, Issues, and Challenges. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 53784–53800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghori, M.R.; Wan, T.C.; Anbar, M.; Sodhy, G.C.; Rizwan, A. Review on Security in Bluetooth Low Energy Mesh Network in Correlation with Wireless Mesh Network Security. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), Bandar Seri Iskandar, Malaysia, 15–17 October 2019; pp. 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koulouras, G.; Kontakos, K.; Stavrakas, I.; Stonham, J.; Nomicos, C. Embedded compact flash. IEEE Circuits Devices Mag. 2005, 21, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baghel, L.K.; Raina, R.; Kumar, S. Evolution of Bluetooth Classic Audio towards Bluetooth LE Audio: Challenges and Road Ahead. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS), Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, 25–26 August 2023; pp. 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Qathrady, M.; Helmy, A. Improving BLE distance estimation and classification using TX power and machine learning: A comparative analysis. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, Miami, FL, USA, 21–25 November 2017; pp. 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konstantinos, K.; Orphanoudakis, T. Bluetooth beacon based accurate indoor positioning using machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2019 4th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (SEEDA-CECNSM), Piraeus, Greece, 20–22 September 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lahmadi, A.; Duque, A.; Heraief, N.; Francq, J. MitM attack detection in BLE networks using reconstruction and classification machine learning techniques. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naghdi, S.; O’Keefe, K. Detecting and correcting for human obstacles in BLE trilateration using artificial intelligence. Sensors 2020, 20, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Minea, M.; Dumitrescu, C.; Costea, I.M.; Chiva, I.C.; Semenescu, A. Developing a Solution for Mobility and Distribution Analysis Based on Bluetooth and Artificial Intelligence. Sensors 2020, 20, 7327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bluetooth Version | Release Year | Key Improvements |
---|---|---|
1.0 [8] | 1999 | Basic functionality for voice and data transmission over short distances. |
1.1 [9] | 2001 | Improved data transfer rates and error correction. |
1.2 [10] | 2003 | Enhanced security features and support for faster data transfer speeds. |
2.0 [11] | 2004 | Introduced Enhanced Data Rate (EDR) for significantly faster data transfer rates. |
2.1 [12] | 2007 | Improved power management and connection speed. |
3.0 [13] | 2009 | Introduced High Speed (HS) mode for even faster data transfer rates (up to 24 Mbps) and support for new profiles like internet sharing. |
4.0 [14] | 2010 | Introduced BLE for low-power communication. |
4.1 [15] | 2013 | Improvements to BLE functionality and connection establishment. |
4.2 [16] | 2014 | Introduced LE Data Packet Length Extensions for larger data transfers with BLE. |
5.0 [17] | 2016 | Increased BLE data rate (2 Mbps) and improved advertising features. |
5.1 [18] | 2019 | Introduced Direction Finding for improved in-door positioning and GATT improvements. |
5.2 [19] | 2019 | Focused on reliability, power consumption, and coexistence: EATT protocol, dynamic power control, improved signal stability. |
5.3 [20] | 2021 | Enhanced location services (accuracy and privacy), High Data Rate (HDR) LE, Connection Subrating, LE Power Control. |
5.4 [21] | 2023 | Featured advancements in Periodic Advertising with Responses (PAwR), enabling more efficient data transfers and improved location services. |
6.0 [22] | 2024 | Significant enhancements in speed, range, and reliability, with a particular focus on supporting advanced audio applications and IoT devices. |
Class | Max Transmission Power | Range | Bluetooth Low Energy | Bluetooth Classic |
---|---|---|---|---|
Class 1 | 100 mW (+20 dBm) | Up to 100 m (328 feet) | Common in industrial applications, supports long-range communication with low power consumption. | Common in industrial applications, provides robust connectivity for long distances. |
Class 1.5 1 | 10 mW (+10 dBm) | Up to 30 m (98 feet) | Most common in consumer electronics, used in smartphones, wearable devices, and peripherals. | Smart locks, fitness trackers, and wireless audio devices. |
Class 2 | 2.5 mW (+4 dBm) | Up to 10 m (33 feet) | Most common in consumer electronics, used in smartphones, wearable devices, and peripherals. | Common in consumer electronics, used for headsets, keyboards, and mice. |
Class 3 | 1 mW (0 dBm) | Up to 1 m (3 feet) | Less common, used in niche applications requiring short-range communication. | Less common, used in applications with minimal range requirements. |
Class 4 2 | 0.5 mW (−3 dBm) | Up to 0.5 m (1.5 feet) | Rare, hypothetical class for ultra-low power, very short-range applications. | Rare, not commonly used or standardized. |
Feature | Bluetooth Low Energy | Bluetooth Classic |
---|---|---|
Channels | 40 channels with 2 MHz spacing | 79 channels with 1 MHz spacing |
Throughput | LE 1M PHY: 1 Mbps LE 2M PHY: 2 Mbps LE 2M 2BT 1 PHY: 2 Mbps LE Coded PHY (S = 8): 125 kbps LE Coded PHY (S = 2): 500 kbps | EDR (8DPSK): 3 Mbps EDR (): 2 Mbps Basic Data Rate: 1 Mbps |
Radio Profiles 2 | Class 1: 100 mW (+20 dBm) Class 1.5: 10 mW (+10 dbm) Class 2: 2.5 mW (+4 dBm) Class 3: 1 mW (0 dBm) | Class 1: 100 mW (+20 dBm) Class 2: 2.5 mW (+4 dBm) Class 3: 1 mW (0 dBm) |
Power Consumption 3 | 0.01× to 0.5× of BT Classic | Depends on Radio Profile |
Range 4 | Class 1: up to 100 m (328 feet) Class 1.5: up to 30 m (98 feet) Class 2: up to 10 m (33 feet) Class 3: up to 1 m (3 feet) | Class 1: up to 100 m (328 feet) Class 2: up to 10 m (33 feet) Class 3: up to 1 m (3 feet) |
Network Topologies | P2P Broadcast Mesh | P2P |
BLE Version | Release Month/Year | Notable Features and Enchancements |
---|---|---|
4.0 [14] | 6/2010 | Introduction of Low-Energy Physical Layer, Low-Energy Link Layer, Enhancements to HCI for Low Energy. |
4.1 [15] | 12/2013 | BR/EDR Secure Connections, Train nudging, Generalized interlaced scan, Low duty cycle directed advertising. |
4.2 [16] | 12/2014 | LE Data Packet Length Extension, LE Secure Connections, Link Layer privacy, Link Layer Extended Scanner Filter policies. |
5.0 [17] | 12/2016 | Slot Availability Mask (SAM), 2 Msym/s PHY for LE, LE Long Range, High Duty Cycle Non-Connectable Advertising, LE Advertising Extensions. |
5.1 [18] | 01/2019 | Angle of Arrival (AoA) and Angle of Departure (AoD), Advertising Channel Index, GATT Caching, Periodic Advertising Sync Transfer. |
5.2 [19] | 12/2019 | LE Isochronous Channels, Enhanced Attribute Protocol, LE Power Control. |
5.3 [20] | 7/2021 | AdvDataInfo in Periodic Advertising, Host to Controller Encryption Key Control Enhancements, LE Enhanced Connection Update, LE Channel Classification. |
5.4 [21] | 1/2023 | Advertising Coding Selection, Encrypted Advertising Data, LE GATT Security Levels Characteristic, Periodic Advertising with Responses. |
6.0 [22] | 8/2024 | Channel Sounding, LL Extended Feature Set, Decision-Based Advertising Filtering, Enhancements for ISOAL, Monitoring Advertisers, Frame Space Update. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Koulouras, G.; Katsoulis, S.; Zantalis, F. Evolution of Bluetooth Technology: BLE in the IoT Ecosystem. Sensors 2025, 25, 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25040996
Koulouras G, Katsoulis S, Zantalis F. Evolution of Bluetooth Technology: BLE in the IoT Ecosystem. Sensors. 2025; 25(4):996. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25040996
Chicago/Turabian StyleKoulouras, Grigorios, Stylianos Katsoulis, and Fotios Zantalis. 2025. "Evolution of Bluetooth Technology: BLE in the IoT Ecosystem" Sensors 25, no. 4: 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25040996
APA StyleKoulouras, G., Katsoulis, S., & Zantalis, F. (2025). Evolution of Bluetooth Technology: BLE in the IoT Ecosystem. Sensors, 25(4), 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25040996