Next Article in Journal
Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors Targeting the Eph-Ephrin System with a Focus on Amino Acid Conjugates of Bile Acids
Next Article in Special Issue
Peptide-Based Drug Predictions for Cancer Therapy Using Deep Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Laboratory Selection of Trypanosomatid Pathogens for Drug Resistance
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Predicting Anticancer Drug Resistance Mediated by Mutations

Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(2), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15020136
by Yu-Feng Lin 1,†, Jia-Jun Liu 2,†, Yu-Jen Chang 2, Chin-Sheng Yu 3, Wei Yi 1, Hsien-Yuan Lane 4,5,6 and Chih-Hao Lu 2,4,7,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(2), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15020136
Submission received: 30 December 2021 / Revised: 16 January 2022 / Accepted: 21 January 2022 / Published: 24 January 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting and novel manuscript evaluating role of mutations in chemoresistance development. A high quality schematic figure should be added to improve quality of article. There is no reference from 2020 and only two references from 2021. The first paragraph of introduction is about drug resistance; However, it does not provide full description of drug resistance. For instance, by understanding mutations, we can provide novel therapeutics for reversing chemoresistance. However, recent experiments have shown that nanoparticles can also prevent drug resistance. Please provide more statements about drug resistance. Suggested articles (Doi, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118491; Doi, 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.020). The discussion section should be extended and elaborated. Add more descriptions to improve it.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors presented an interesting study on the prediction of drug-resistane mutations. The study is well designed and conducted; however, in my opinion, it lacks tackling several aspects.

First of all, there are no references to similar studies of this type. In addition, the changes in ligand-interaction patterns upon mutation should be presented, visualized and compared. Moreover, the interpretation of the results should be more deeply discussed, as I understand, that actually the predictions are made on the basis of predictions (SIFT and Polyphen output)? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors addressed all the comments raised in the review. The paper canbe published in the current form.

Back to TopTop