Next Article in Journal
Kalanchoe tomentosa: Phytochemical Profiling, and Evaluation of Its Biological Activities In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico
Previous Article in Journal
Antioxidative and Antiglycative Stress Activities of Selenoglutathione Diselenide
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effectiveness of a Dietary Supplement with Honey, Propolis, Pelargonium sidoides Extract, and Zinc in Children Affected by Acute Tonsillopharyngitis: An Open, Randomized, and Controlled Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bee-Inspired Healing: Apitherapy in Veterinary Medicine for Maintenance and Improvement Animal Health and Well-Being

by
Jevrosima Stevanović
1,
Uroš Glavinić
1,
Marko Ristanić
1,*,
Vladimira Erjavec
2,
Barış Denk
3,
Slobodan Dolašević
4 and
Zoran Stanimirović
1
1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Small Animal Clinic, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03204, Turkey
4
Institute for Animal Husbandry, Zemun, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(8), 1050; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17081050
Submission received: 1 July 2024 / Revised: 4 August 2024 / Accepted: 6 August 2024 / Published: 9 August 2024

Abstract

:
This review aims to present current knowledge on the effects of honey bee products on animals based on in vivo studies, focusing on their application in clinical veterinary practice. Honey’s best-proven effectiveness is in treating wounds, including those infected with antibiotic-resistant microorganisms, as evidenced in horses, cats, dogs, mice, and rats. Propolis manifested a healing effect in numerous inflammatory and painful conditions in mice, rats, dogs, and pigs and also helped in oncological cases in mice and rats. Bee venom is best known for its effectiveness in treating neuropathy and arthritis, as shown in dogs, mice, and rats. Besides, bee venom improved reproductive performance, immune response, and general health in rabbits, chickens, and pigs. Pollen was effective in stimulating growth and improving intestinal microflora in chickens. Royal jelly might be used in the management of animal reproduction due to its efficiency in improving fertility, as shown in rats, rabbits, and mice. Drone larvae are primarily valued for their androgenic effects and stimulation of reproductive function, as evidenced in sheep, chickens, pigs, and rats. Further research is warranted to determine the dose and method of application of honey bee products in animals.

1. Introduction

Honey bee products, used by humans for centuries, have been gathering increasing attention in the scientific and professional public due to their therapeutic potential. Their use for numerous health problems, known as apitherapy, steadily increases in humans. However, the application of bee products in veterinary medicine is much less known to the professional and general public, although evidence shows their effectiveness in treating various diseases in animals.
Apitherapy refers to the use of honey bee (Apis mellifera) products for the treatment or prevention of health problems in humans and animals and is considered a branch of complementary and alternative medicine. Honey bee products encompass a diverse range of substances, including those derived primarily from plants (nectar, pollen, and plant resins collected and processed by bees with their secretions into honey, bee pollen, and propolis) and those synthesized by bees from their glands (such as royal jelly and bee venom). It is less known that bee larvae, primarily drone larvae, also hold promise for health maintenance and improvement [1,2].
This work distinguishes itself through its original focus, emphasizing findings from in vivo studies, namely those conducted on animals. Furthermore, the included studies are meticulously selected, adhering to three key criteria: they must have been published within the last 15 years, reported in peer-reviewed journals, and available in full-text format.

2. Honey

Clinical trials have extensively investigated the effects of honey on a wide range of animals, including dogs, horses, cats, cattle, and pigs, with preclinical trials involving rats, mice, and rabbits [3]. Once overshadowed by antibiotics, medical-grade honey is regaining popularity due to its antimicrobial and pro-healing properties, making it valuable for cutaneous wound healing [4]. Honey’s best-known and proven efficacy in animals is in the treatment of burns and wounds, especially those refractory to conventional treatments [3,4,5,6,7]. Among the various types of honey, mānuka honey, derived from the Leptospermum scoparium shrub native to southeastern Australia and New Zealand, has proven particularly effective. The advantage of mānuka honey over other honey types is attributed to its unusually high methylglyoxal (MGO) content, considered a major antibacterial compound in mānuka honey [8]. However, there are other mechanisms of antimicrobial action characteristic of most honey types: enzymatic production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), high osmolarity due to high sugar concentration, low pH level, and the presence of the bee antimicrobial peptide defensin-1 [9]. In a study on horses, contaminated wounds on the hind limbs healed faster and more successfully when treated with mānuka honey gel or just mānuka honey compared to untreated control wounds [5]. However, in an experiment on mice, chestnut honey showed better efficacy than mānuka honey in terms of angiogenesis and reepithelialization on the seventh day of treatment, while after 14 days, the effect of both kinds of honey was equally effective and significantly better compared to the control [7]. Importantly, mānuka honey may be less effective in treating wounds because its high MGO content adversely affects two of the mechanisms of antimicrobial action by modifying protein components; MGO inhibits glucose oxidase (the enzyme responsible for H2O2 generation), so the accumulation of H2O2 is disabled [10], while defensin-1, after modification by MGO, loses its antibacterial activity [11].
Interestingly, MGO concentration in mānuka honey is still considered one of its main quality factors (presented as an important potency measure) incorporated in the ”Unique Mānuka Factor” (UMF™) grading system. Originally, the UMF grade reflected only the level of antibacterial activity of honey without information about the components responsible for it [9]. With the discovery of MGO and its antibacterial potency, its concentration became the key signature marker for UMF [12]; however, MGO alone cannot explain the entirety of the antimicrobial effectiveness of mānuka honey, as this honey inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria at concentrations well below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of MGO alone [13,14,15,16]. The relationship between the MGO content of honey and its antibacterial effect varies and depends on the bacterial species [13,14,15,16,17]. For example, the positive correlation was strong in cases of Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli and moderate in the case of Staphylococcus aureus, but no relationship was recorded between MGO content and efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa [17]. The latest is in accordance with the previous evidence that MGO is not solely responsible for the efficacy of mānuka honey against P. aeruginosa [13,14,15,16]. These findings explain the result of an earlier study in which manuka honey with a lower UMF value showed greater antimicrobial activity than honey with a higher UMF value [18]. Overall, neither the MGO level nor the UMF value represents a reliable indicator of the antibacterial effect.
Excellent effects in wound healing with honey were demonstrated in cats [6,19] (Figure 1—not previously published) and dogs [20,21] (Figure 2—not previously published) regardless of whether a commercial product with medical-grade honey (L-Mesitran®) was used [6,19,21] or raw honey was applied to the gauze and then to the wound [20]. L-Mesitran® showed exceptional efficacy in treating cutaneous injuries. For instance, in a case where a cat had complete skin loss across 100% of its leg with a fractured distal ulna, the leg healed entirely, including the bone, with the regrowth of new skin and hair [6] (Figure 3).
Full-thickness skin wounds of cats treated with medical grade honey exhibited superior outcomes (reduced edema, enhanced angiogenesis, and increased fibroblast concentration) than those treated with Hypericum perforatum; the latter significantly improved only tissue perfusion compared to the untreated controls [4]. This is a very important result since H. perforatum is traditionally used for wound healing, and it achieves healing effects through the stimulation of epithelialization and granulation [22,23], collagen accumulation [22], and the expression of genes related to tissue repair and regeneration [24].
An extensive leg wound in a 5-year-old female cattle was also successfully treated with raw honey, further proving honey’s remarkable healing properties, although the wound did not fully heal due to the cow being slaughtered before complete recovery (Figure 4). The wound was rinsed with tap water, covered with raw honey, and bandaged daily for the first two weeks. Thereafter, the bandage was changed, and honey was applied every second day. No antiseptics were used during the wound healing.
In addition to wound treatment, experiments on rats showed the efficacy of honey in the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal problems, especially in the healing of gastric ulcers [25,26,27,28] and disorders related to metabolic syndrome, such as hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hyperlipidemia [29,30,31,32,33].

3. Propolis

There is much evidence of the successful treatment of animals with propolis products. Propolis-based products have proven to be a good alternative to conventional antimicrobials, with ample evidence of successful treatment in animals. For example, propolis has shown an excellent antifungal effect in preclinical studies on laboratory mice with vulvovaginal candidiasis; mucoadhesive propolis-based gel demonstrated antifungal efficacy similar to clotrimazole cream [34], while propolis extract incorporated in mucoadhesive thermoresponsive systems showed antifungal action similar and even superior, depending on the propolis concentration, to those with nystatin [35].
The great attention of veterinarians has been attracted by the possibility of using propolis in the treatment of bovine mastitis caused by microorganisms resistant to conventional antibiotics because of the promising efficacy that propolis ethanolic extracts demonstrated against etiological agents of bovine mastitis, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. However, that efficacy was demonstrated indirectly, e.g., in vitro, against standard strains and wild-types of S. aureus and E. coli isolated from mastitic milk [36], against S. aureus cultivated in complex media or milk [37], and against damages induced by S. aureus and E-coli in bovine mammary epithelial cells [38]. However, negative effect of propolis on mammary tissue was also reported, as it reduced the viability of bovine mammary gland explants [36]. Thus, before the introduction of propolis into the veterinary practice of mastitis treatment in cattle, clinical studies should confirm the effectiveness, dosage, and safety of propolis use in mastitis control.
The antiviral effects of propolis have been evidenced in some in vivo studies, mostly against herpes simplex viruses HSV-1 and HSV-2 [39,40]. The antiparasitic effect has been evidenced in animal models for some types of propolis. After oral administration, propolis extracts effectively decreased the infection level of the microsporidian parasite Nosema ceranae in honey bee intestine [41,42,43]. Propolis extracts were also highly effective against other protistan parasites, such as Trypanosoma brucei [44], Plasmodium falciparum, P. berghei [45], and P. chabaudi [46], as evidenced in experiments on rats applying doses 400 and 600 mg/kg against T. brucei [44] and much lower doses against Plasmodium sp. in mice [45,46]. The antiparasitic properties of propolis have also been recorded against helminths, such as against Schistosoma mansoni. A single dose of propolis (400 mg/kg) administered to mice significantly reduced the burden of worms and the number of eggs, both immature and those in feces [47].
Exceptional success in wound healing with propolis products has been evidenced in several animal species [48]. In rats, all tested formulations of propolis gel, containing 1.2%, 2.4%, and 3.6% w/v (dry matter) of propolis, showed good activity in healing skin lesions, and the best results were achieved in the group treated with a gel containing 3.6% propolis [49]. In dogs, propolis paste 30% significantly reduced the healing time of wounds due to enhanced reepithelization and contraction of wounds [50]. Healing burn wounds with ointments containing propolis was very successful in pigs [51,52]. The healing effect is explained by the prevention of fibronectin biosynthesis and its degradation in the wound area [51], as well as by the broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, acceleration of neoangiogenesis and epithelialization [52].
Interestingly, propolis, as an aqueous or ethanolic extract, was shown to be effective as an adjuvant in veterinary vaccines and even superior to traditional vaccine adjuvants [53]. For example, propolis significantly increased antibody production when added to canine parvovirus and canine coronavirus vaccines [54], a vaccine against porcine parvovirus [53], and a vaccine against the bacterium Aeromonas salmonicida, the cause of furunculosis in fish [55].
Hydroalcoholic extracts of red propolis have shown gastroprotective properties in rats. The basis of this effect was a significant inhibition of the development of acute ulcers, a significant decrease in the volume of gastric secretion, and a significant increase in the production of gastric mucus, as well as antioxidant, and anti-Helicobacter pylori activities [56].
As added to broiler feed, even at low doses (10 mg/kg), propolis effectively protected the liver and blood vessels by inhibiting the formation of pathological lesions; with an increase in the dose to 50 mg/kg, the positive effects were even better [57].
Propolis has also been found to have anticancer potential [58] and alleviate the toxic effects of chemotherapy agents [59]. The antitumor activity of propolis observed in in vivo experiments (on rats and mice) indicates its potential application in the treatment of oncological cases in veterinary medicine [58,59,60].
Propolis is effective in healing numerous inflammatory and painful conditions in the oral cavity, such as candidiasis, gingivitis, periodontitis, ulcers, pulp mummification, supragingival plaque, caries, herpes, wounds after surgical interventions, and cancers, as evidenced in experiments on laboratory animals [61,62,63,64]. Besides, employing propolis for tooth storage before reimplantation in healthy mixed-breed dogs proved to be effective in enhancing the success rate of the procedure [65]. It is also worth noting the excellent effectiveness of topically applied propolis ear drops in otitis externa in dogs [66] and propolis eye drops in corneal wound healing in rats [67].
When administered as a dietary supplement to alloxan-induced diabetic mice, propolis preparations mitigated hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity by reducing oxidative stress and minimizing the deleterious effects of free radicals on tissue [68].
Propolis achieves therapeutic properties thanks to its complex composition, but primarily to numerous phenolic compounds, of which flavonoids, phenolic acids, and esters are the most biologically active [69,70]. For propolis activities, many underlying mechanisms have been discovered and reviewed [69,70,71]. For example, the antimicrobial effect of propolis is based on stimulating macrophages to activate Th1 cells, which enhances the cellular immune response (release of cytokines that are essential coordinators of the immune response to intracellular pathogens); in some microorganisms, propolis disrupts the permeability of the cell membrane leading to leakage of cellular components [71]. The anti-inflammatory activity of propolis is accomplished by inhibiting cyclooxygenase and prostaglandin biosynthesis, neutralizing free radicals, reducing cytokines, nitric oxide synthesis, and immunosuppression [70]. Various mechanisms are involved in the anticancer effect of propolis, among which are those already mentioned, including its powerful antioxidant and immunomodulatory potential, as well as its ability to stimulate cell cycle arrest, induce apoptosis, inhibit angiogenesis and metastasis of tumors, inhibit specific oncogene signaling pathways, inhibit glucose uptake and metabolism in the cancer cell, and possibly participate in epigenetic regulation [71].

4. Bee Venom (Apitoxin)

Bee venom has been used since ancient times in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and its success in therapy lies in its anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects, reducing swelling and pain, as evidenced by numerous preclinical and clinical studies [72,73,74]. Melittin, the dominant component of bee venom (≥50% w/w of bee venom), is responsible for its anti-inflammatory effect and also exhibits anticancer potential [75,76]. For melittin, as well as other components of bee venom (phospholipase A2 and apamin), a neuroprotective effect has been demonstrated, explaining the positive effects of bee stings on neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and intervertebral disc degeneration recorded in experiments on dogs [77] and mice [78,79,80]. In experimental animals, bee venom was effective in the therapy of neuropathies caused by nerve injuries or chemotherapeutics [81,82,83].
Bee venom acupuncture has proven useful in the case of a dog diagnosed with idiopathic facial paralysis; such a therapy led to a gradual improvement of clinical signs, and complete recovery of sensory and neurological facial signs in a dog was noted after eight weeks [84].
Thanks to its antioxidant potential, bee venom improves reproductive performance, immune response, and general health status, as demonstrated in rabbits [85,86]. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic mechanisms were underlying the gastroprotective effect of bee venom in an experiment on mice [87]. When added as a supplement to food or water, bee venom has improved feed conversion and increased body weight in broiler chickens without adverse side effects [88,89], while administering bee venom through a live bee sting or by injection positively affected the growth, survival, and immunity of young pigs [90]. In vivo studies on dogs [91], broiler chickens [92], mice [93], and pigs [94] have also shown that bee venom acts as an immunoprophylactic agent, as well as having antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral effects. The positive therapeutic effect of melittin in animals infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) opens up the possibility of its use in treating MRSA infections [95]. Finally, the antidiabetic potential of bee venom was studied on laboratory rats [96,97]. A single-dose injection (0.5 mg/kg) can be considered an initial step in demonstrating its antidiabetic effects [97]. Additionally, the selection of solvent for the use of dry bee venom in injectable and/or topical forms is crucial. This is because the degradation/dysfunction of a specific peptide and the more complex enzymatic bioactivity of the main components in the venom should be prevented, thereby preserving the desired effectiveness of the treatment. To ensure optimal antioxidant activity, we recommend to dissolve the venom in physiological saline [98].

5. Pollen

Due to its exceptional nutritional composition, bee-collected pollen (known as “bee pollen”) is considered a “functional food” and is most commonly recommended as a dietary supplement [99]. The potential of bee pollen in animal husbandry was mainly investigated in terms of its effect on growth performance, meat performance and slaughter yield. Adding bee pollen or its ethanolic extract to poultry feed in a range of 400–800 mg/kg feed effectively stimulated animal growth and improved broiler gut microflora [100]. However, this supplementation did not significantly improve meat performance and slaughter yield [101]. Even a ten-times higher concentration of bee pollen (7.5–20 g/kg feed) given to broilers did not affect slaughter yield despite significant improvement in the growth performance, the immune response [102,103,104], and the microbiological composition of the intestine [104].
The medicinal effects of bee pollen have been demonstrated only in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and inflammation [105,106,107] and diabetes-induced testicular dysfunction [108] in experiments on rats.
From the above, one gets the impression that the evidence of the apitherapeutic effects of pollen on animals is scarce. This may be due to the poor bioavailability of pollen nutrients (due to the strong protective layers of pollen grains) and the extreme susceptibility of pollen to microbial spoilage. That is why it is necessary to work on the development of new technologies that will prevent pollen spoilage, protect sensitive pollen compounds, and ensure a higher degree of accessibility [99].

6. Royal Jelly

Very little data exists on the clinical effects of royal jelly. Here, we show only those that meet the criteria set for this review paper. In in vivo experiments (on laboratory rats), royal jelly was shown to protect the body from the toxic effects of chemotherapy, including nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and pulmonary fibrosis [109,110,111]. The anticancer potential of royal jelly has been demonstrated in experiments on mice [112,113]. Royal jelly is also attributed to anti-aging effects, supported by scientific evidence obtained in experiments on mice [114]. In immature rats, royal jelly has been found to promote folliculogenesis and increase ovarian hormones [115], and in ovariectomized rats, it improved bone strength [116] and showed potential in the prevention of osteoporosis [117]. It has been shown in rabbits to alleviate neurological disorders by increasing estrogen levels and the activity of the cholinergic and antioxidative systems while reducing cholesterol and restoring the autonomic nervous system [118]. Interestingly, royal jelly showed beneficial effects related to male fertility and reproductive success in rats [119,120,121], mice [122,123], and rabbits [124,125]. Bioactive components responsible for royal jelly biological activities are fatty acids (e.g., 10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid), free amino acids, peptides, proteins, and phenolic compounds, among which the most numerous are flavonoids [126].

7. Drone Larvae

It is well known that animals have been eating honey bee larvae to provide significant amounts of energy and supplement their protein needs [2,127]. However, due to its importance for the bee colony, worker brood should not be taken, while drone brood can be used in cases where it is obtained as a by-product of the usual beekeeping procedure known as ’drone brood removal’ aimed at controlling the Varroa destructor mite. This is a biotechnical procedure in which beekeepers insert a special ’trap frame’ (frame with comb cells of a size corresponding to drone brood) into the hive to attract V. destructor mites (because drone brood is eight times more attractive to them than worker brood) [128]. When removing the ’trap frames’ from the hive, the entire drone brood is discarded. This product is generally considered waste and remains unused despite its exceptional chemical composition and high nutritional value (due to the presence of proteins, fatty acids, vitamins, hormones, and antioxidants) [127], as well as pharmacological properties [2] and potential that justify its use in maintaining health. In veterinary medicine, drone larvae are primarily valued for their androgenic effects and positive impact on reproductive performance, fertility, and/or productivity. Androgenic effects have been demonstrated in various animals (laboratory and farm animals), and the studies almost always used drone larvae homogenate (DLH), either freshly made or in the form of the commercial preparation ‘Apilarnil’ invented by Nicolae Iliesiu in 1981 in Romania. ’Apilarnil’ is made from drone larvae through a process that includes homogenization, filtration, and lyophilization [2]. For example, the androgenic effects of DLH have been demonstrated in rams when given as a dietary supplement (at doses of 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg body weight); all doses improved ram reproductive functions, reflected in increased offspring numbers. The optimal effect on sperm quality was achieved with a dose of 15 mg/kg of body weight administered once daily, which resulted in a 30.4% increase in ejaculate volume, a 14.3% increase in sperm concentration in ejaculate, and a sperm motility score of 9.2/10 points [129]. The androgenic effect of DLH in castrated laboratory rats was evidenced through a significant increase in the expression of Spot14-like androgen-inducible protein (SLAP) in rat prostate [130]. In male broilers, food supplementation with DLH during the growth period also led to androgenic effects; after 20 days of administration of DLH (4 g per broiler per day), secondary sexual characteristics (comb size, wattle size, and aggression) were more pronounced than in the control group [131]. When DLH was added to the feed of broilers aged 28 to 55 days, at doses of 2.5 and 7.5 g per individual, it also stimulated the development of secondary sexual characteristics and sexual maturation in males (increased testis weight, increased testosterone concentration, and comb size), but also led to a decrease in blood glucose and cholesterol levels and a reduction in fear [132]. Feed supplemented with DLH in doses of 2.5 and 7.5 g per individual did not stimulate the development of secondary sexual characteristics in female broilers, and anabolic effects were absent regardless of the sex of the broilers [132].
In females, the effect of DLH is different; it exhibited anabolic and actoprotective effects in young pigs when administered as a dietary supplement. Namely, given to gilts at a concentration of 25 mg of dry matter per 1 kg of food, DLH significantly increased in production parameters (live weight, average daily gain, and slaughter yield) [133]. Besides, DLH significantly affected hormone levels (increased cortisol and decreased testosterone), whereby a significantly better effect was achieved when selenopyran was introduced into the food along with DLH at a concentration of 1.2 mg per 1 kg of food [133]. An anabolic effect was also recorded in another experiment on gilts, where DLH was added to the feed (25 mg/kg of forage) for 180 days [134]; the results motivated the authors to suggest DLH as a valuable dietary additive in livestock farming for increasing meat production. However, in the same experiment, DLH significantly affected folliculogenesis in the ovaries; it stimulated the early stages of folliculogenesis but caused a decrease in the size of Graafian follicles with signs of atresia in the final stage of follicular development, along with changes in the expression of growth factors GDF9 and BMP15 responsible for proper follicle development and ovulation. In another study, supplementary feeding with 0.5 g of DLH daily enhanced the reproductive function of gilts during puberty by reducing the time to their first estrous cycle for artificial insemination [135]. Therefore, care should be taken when treating gilts with DHL (can be given to those intended for slaughter but not to those planned for reproduction).
Finally, in experimental rats, DLH showed neuroprotective potential and therapeutic potential in sepsis. Namely, it prevents the apoptosis of Purkinje cells by lowering the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β) that are elevated during sepsis and thus prevents sepsis-induced apoptosis in the brain [136]. It also protects the liver from lipopolysaccharide (LSP)-induced damage by reducing tissue damage, inhibiting the TLR4/HMGB-1/NF-κB signaling pathway, and protecting liver cells from DNA damage and oxidative stress [137].

8. Precautions and Final Remarks

It is important to state that products from the honey bee hive can be contaminated, both with chemicals (primarily acaricides used by beekeepers to control the honey bee mite Varroa destructor, but also with other pesticides commonly used in agriculture) and other environmental pollutants [138,139]. Fat-rich products such as wax and propolis, as well as hive air, are particularly prone to contamination [140,141,142]. Therefore, for the protection of health, strength, and immunity of honeybee colonies, it is advisable to either utilize products derived from natural sources, such as plants, algae, and fungi [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153], or employ traditional beekeeping methods that minimize stress, reduce pathogens exposure, and negate the need for chemical treatments [154,155].
Finally, it should be emphasized that apitherapy in veterinary practice can only be applied after examination by a licensed veterinarian. Additionally, when using any bee product, care should be taken regarding the possibility of allergic reactions, though they are less commonly reported compared to humans. If an allergic reaction such as envenomation with honey bee venom is suspected, prompt veterinary attention should be sought to manage symptoms and prevent further complications [156,157].
Apitherapy has great potential for application in veterinary medicine, but officially, it can only be used as a complementary method of treatment. Growing evidence underscores the value of apitherapy in promoting animal health and vitality (Table 1). This leads to an increasing interest of animal owners and veterinarians in using bee products. However, they must recognize the potential risks associated with apitherapy, including potentially fatal anaphylactic reactions in certain cases [158,159]. However, further preclinical and clinical trials are necessary to comprehensively understand the basic mechanisms of action of bee products and determine the optimal doses and methods of their application in animals.

Author Contributions

J.S. and Z.S. conceived the idea for the manuscript and led the article. All authors performed the bibliographic research, revised critically different versions of the manuscript, and added intellectual content. V.E. provided photos that were reported in this paper for the first time. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, project no. 5455, Utilization of the food industry waste for improving honey bee health and protecting the environment–Waste2ProtectBees and by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development, and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia (Contract No. 451-03-66/2024-03/200143) for the activities led by Zoran Stanimirović.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The formal written consent of the owner was obtained before the animal entered the study. All procedures complied with the relevant Slovenian governmental regulations (Animal Protection Act, Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 43/2007).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Weis, W.A.; Ripari, N.; Conte, F.L.; da Silva Honorio, M.; Sartori, A.A.; Matucci, R.H.; Sforcin, J.M. An overview about apitherapy and its clinical applications. Phytomedicine Plus 2022, 2, 100239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sawczuk, R.; Karpinska, J.; Miltyk, W. What do we need to know about drone brood homogenate and what is known. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 245, 111581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vogt, N.A.; Vriezen, E.; Nwosu, A.; Sargeant, J.M. A scoping review of the evidence for the medicinal use of natural honey in animals. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 7, 618301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chatzimisios, K.; Tsioli, V.; Brellou, G.D.; Apostolopoulou, E.P.; Angelou, V.; Pratsinakis, E.D.; Cremers, N.A.J.; Papazoglou, L.G. Evaluation of the effectiveness of medical-grade honey and Hypericum perforatum ointment on second-intention healing of full-thickness skin wounds in cats. Animals 2023, 14, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bischofberger, A.S.; Dart, C.M.; Horadagoda, N.; Perkins, N.R.; Jeffcott, L.B.; Little, C.B.; Dart, A.J. Effect of Manuka honey gel on the transforming growth factor β1 and β3 concentrations, bacterial counts and histomorphology of contaminated full-thickness skin wounds in equine distal limbs. Aust. Vet. J. 2016, 94, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lukanc, B.; Potokar, T.; Erjavec, V. Complete skin regeneration with medical honey after skin loss on the entire circumference of a leg in a cat. J. Tissue Viability 2020, 29, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Budak, Ö.; Çakıroğlu, H. Examination the effects of chestnut and Manuka honey for wound healing on mice experimental model. Med. Sci. Discov. 2022, 9, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Blair, S.E.; Cokcetin, N.N.; Harry, E.J.; Carter, D.A. The unusual antibacterial activity of medical-grade Leptospermum honey: Antibacterial spectrum, resistance and transcriptome analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 28, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kwakman, P.H.; Zaat, S.A. Antibacterial components of honey. IUBMB Life 2012, 64, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Majtan, J.; Bohova, J.; Prochazka, E.; Klaudiny, J. Methylglyoxal may affect hydrogen peroxide accumulation in manuka honey through the inhibition of glucose oxidase. J. Med. Food 2014, 17, 290–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Majtan, J.; Klaudiny, J.; Bohova, J.; Kohutova, L.; Dzurova, M.; Sediva, M.; Bartosova, M.; Majtan, V. Methylglyoxal-induced modifications of significant honeybee proteinous components in manuka honey: Possible therapeutic implications. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Unique Mānuka Factor, the Golden Standard in Mānuka Honey, the Rating System. Available online: https://www.umf.org.nz/unique-manuka-factor/ (accessed on 29 April 2024).
  13. Lu, J.; Carter, D.A.; Turnbull, L.; Rosendale, D.; Hedderley, D.; Stephens, J.; Gannabathula, S.; Steinhorn, G.; Schlothauer, R.C.; Whitchurch, C.B.; et al. The effect of New Zealand kanuka, manuka and clover honeys on bacterial growth dynamics and cellular morphology varies according to the species. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lu, J.; Turnbull, L.; Burke, C.M.; Liu, M.; Carter, D.A.; Schlothauer, R.C.; Whitchurch, C.B.; Harry, E.J. Manuka-type honeys can eradicate biofilms produced by Staphylococcus aureus strains with different biofilm-forming abilities. PeerJ 2014, 2, e326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lu, J.; Cokcetin, N.N.; Burke, C.M.; Turnbull, L.; Liu, M.; Carter, D.A.; Whitchurch, C.B.; Harry, E.J. Honey can inhibit and eliminate biofilms produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bouzo, D.; Cokcetin, N.N.; Li, L.; Ballerin, G.; Bottomley, A.L.; Lazenby, J.; Whitchurch, C.B.; Paulsen, I.T.; Hassan, K.A.; Harry, E.J. Characterizing the mechanism of action of an ancient antimicrobial, Manuka honey, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa using modern transcriptomics. MSystems 2020, 5, e00106-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Green, K.J.; Lawag, I.L.; Locher, C.; Hammer, K.A. Correlation of the antibacterial activity of commercial manuka and Leptospermum honeys from Australia and New Zealand with methylglyoxal content and other physicochemical characteristics. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0272376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Girma, A.; Seo, W.; She, R.C. Antibacterial activity of varying UMF-graded Manuka honeys. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lukanc, B.; Potokar, T.; Erjavec, V. Observational study of the effect of L-mesitran® medical honey on wound healing in cats. Vet. Arhiv 2018, 88, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Peteoaca, A.; Istrate, A.; Goanta, A.; Girdan, G.; Stefanescu, A.; Tanase, A. Therapeutic approach in managing degloving injuries of the front limbs in a dog—A case report. Sci. Work. Ser. C Vet. Med. 2019, 65, 70–78. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lukanc, B.; Šteh, T.; Erjavec, V. The effect of medical honey on second intention wound healing in dogs. Vet. Arh. 2023, 93, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yalcınkaya, E.; Basaran, M.M.; Tunckasık, M.E.; Yazici, G.N.; Elmas, Ç.; Kocaturk, S. Efficiency of Hypericum perforatum, povidone iodine, tincture benzoin and tretinoin on wound healing. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 166, 113209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vatnikov, Y.; Shabunin, S.; Kulikov, E.; Karamyan, A.; Lenchenko, E.; Sachivkina, N.; Bobkova, N.; Bokov, D.; Zhilkina, V.; Tokar, A.; et al. Effectiveness of biologically active substances from Hypericum perforatum L. in the complex treatment of purulent wounds. Int. J. Pharm. Res. 2020, 12, 1108–1117. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sotirova, Y.; Kiselova-Kaneva, Y.; Vankova, D.; Tasinov, O.; Ivanova, D.; Popov, H.; Hristova, M.; Nikolova, K.; Andonova, V. Tissue regeneration and remodeling in rat models after application of Hypericum perforatum L. extract-loaded bigels. Gels 2024, 10, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bukhari, M.H.; Khalil, J.; Qamar, S.; Qamar, Z.; Zahid, M.; Ansari, N.; Bakhshi, I.M. Comparative gastroprotective effects of natural honey, Nigella sativa and cimetidine against acetylsalicylic acid induced gastric ulcer in albino rats. JCPSP J. Coll. Physici. 2011, 21, 151–156. [Google Scholar]
  26. Almasaudi, S.B.; El-Shitany, N.A.; Abbas, A.T.; Abdel-Dayem, U.A.; Ali, S.S.; Al Jaouni, S.K.; Harakeh, S. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiulcer potential of manuka honey against gastric ulcer in rats. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2016, 2016, 3643824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Almasaudi, S.B.; Abbas, A.T.; Al-Hindi, R.R.; El-Shitany, N.A.; Abdel-Dayem, U.A.; Ali, S.S.; Saleh, R.M.; Al Jaouni, S.K.; Kamal, M.A.; Harakeh, S.M. Manuka honey exerts antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities that promote healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcer in rats. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 5413917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Harakeh, S.; Saber, S.H.; Akefe, I.O.; Shaker, S.; Hussain, M.B.; Almasaudi, A.S.; Saleh, S.M.; Almasaudi, S. Saudi honey alleviates indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer via improving antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses in male albino rats. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 3040–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Erejuwa, O.O.; Gurtu, S.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Wahab, M.S.; Sirajudeen, K.N.; Salleh, M.S. Hypoglycemic and antioxidant effects of honey supplementation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2010, 80, 74. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Erejuwa, O.O.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Wahab, M.S.; Sirajudeen, K.N.; Salleh, M.M.; Gurtu, S. Antioxidant protection of Malaysian tualang honey in pancreas of normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Ann. Endocrinol. Paris 2010, 71, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Erejuwa, O.O.; Nwobodo, N.N.; Akpan, J.L.; Okorie, U.A.; Ezeonu, C.T.; Ezeokpo, B.C.; Nwadike, K.I.; Erhiano, E.; Abdul Wahab, M.S.; Sulaiman, S.A. Nigerian honey ameliorates hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Nutrients 2016, 8, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arabmoazzen, S.; Sarkaki, A. Antidiabetic effect of honey feeding in noise induced hyperglycemic rat: Involvement of oxidative stress. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2015, 18, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Hemmati, M.; Karamian, M.; Malekaneh, M. Anti-atherogenic potential of natural honey: Anti-diabetic and antioxidant approaches. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2015, 3, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Berretta, A.A.; de Castro, P.A.; Cavalheiro, A.H.; Fortes, V.S.; Bom, V.P.; Nascimento, A.P.; Marquele-Oliveira, F.; Pedrazzi, V.; Ramalho, L.N.; Goldman, G.H. Evaluation of mucoadhesive gels with propolis (EPP-AF) in preclinical treatment of candidiasis vulvovaginal infection. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 641480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bonfim, A.P.; Sakita, K.M.; Faria, D.R.; Arita, G.S.; Vendramini, F.A.; Capoci, I.R.; Braga, A.G.; Dos Santos, R.S.; Bruschi, M.L.; Becker, T.C.; et al. Preclinical approaches in vulvovaginal candidiasis treatment with mucoadhesive thermoresponsive systems containing propolis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fiordalisi, S.A.; Honorato, L.A.; Loiko, M.R.; Avancini, C.A.; Veleirinho, M.B.; Machado Filho, L.C.; Kuhnen, S. The effects of Brazilian propolis on etiological agents of mastitis and the viability of bovine mammary gland explants. J. Dairy. Sci. 2016, 99, 2308–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Santana, H.F.; Barbosa, A.A.; Ferreira, S.O.; Mantovani, H.C. Bactericidal activity of ethanolic extracts of propolis against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from mastitic cows. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, K.; Jin, X.L.; Shen, X.G.; Sun, L.P.; Wu, L.M.; Wei, J.Q.; Marcucci, M.C.; Hu, F.L.; Liu, J.X. Effects of Chinese propolis in protecting bovine mammary epithelial cells against mastitis pathogens-induced cell damage. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 8028291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shimizu, T.; Takeshita, Y.; Takamori, Y.; Kai, H.; Sawamura, R.; Yoshida, H.; Watanabe, W.; Tsutsumi, A.; Park, Y.K.; Yasukawa, K.; et al. Efficacy of Brazilian propolis against herpes simplex virus type 1 infection in mice and their modes of antiherpetic efficacies. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 976196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sartori, G.; Pesarico, A.P.; Pinton, S.; Dobrachinski, F.; Roman, S.S.; Pauletto, F.; Rodrigues, L.C.; Prigol, M. Protective effect of brown Brazilian propolis against acute vaginal lesions caused by herpes simplex virus type 2 in mice: Involvement of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2012, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Arismendi, N.; Vargas, M.; López, M.D.; Barría, Y.; Zapata, N. Promising antimicrobial activity against the honey bee parasite Nosema ceranae by methanolic extracts from Chilean native plants and propolis. J. Apicult. Res. 2018, 57, 522–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burnham, A.J.; De Jong, E.; Jones, J.A.; Lehman, H.K. North American propolis extracts from upstate New York decrease Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia) spore levels in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Naree, S.; Ellis, J.D.; Benbow, M.E.; Suwannapong, G. The use of propolis for preventing and treating Nosema ceranae infection in western honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1787) workers. J. Apicult. Res. 2021, 60, 686–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nweze, N.E.; Okoro, H.O.; Al Robaian, M.; Omar, R.M.; Tor-Anyiin, T.A.; Watson, D.G.; Igoli, J.O. Effects of Nigerian red propolis in rats infected with. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2017, 26, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Afrouzan, H.; Zakeri, S.; Mehrizi, A.A.; Molasalehi, S.; Tahghighi, A.; Shokrgozar, M.A.; Es-Haghi, A.; Djadid, N.D. Anti-plasmodial assessment of four different Iranian propolis extracts. Arch. Iran. Med. 2017, 20, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. AlGabbani, Q.; Mansour, L.; Elnakady, Y.A.; Al-Quraishy, S.; Alomar, S.; Al-Shaebi, E.M.; Abdel-Baki, A.A. In vivo assessment of the antimalarial and spleen-protective activities of the Saudi propolis methanolic extract. Parasitol. Res. 2017, 116, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Silva, M.P.; Silva, T.M.; Mengarda, A.C.; Salvadori, M.C.; Teixeira, F.S.; Alencar, S.M.; Luz Filho, G.C.; Bueno-Silva, B.; de Moraes, J. Brazilian red propolis exhibits antiparasitic properties in vitro and reduces worm burden and egg production in an mouse model harboring either early or chronic Schistosoma mansoni infection. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 264, 113387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Oryan, A.; Alemzadeh, E.; Moshiri, A. Potential role of propolis in wound healing: Biological properties and therapeutic activities. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 98, 469–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Berretta, A.A.; Nascimento, A.P.; Bueno, P.C.; Leite, M.M.; Marchetti, J.M. Propolis standardized extract (EPP-AF®), an innovative chemically and biologically reproducible pharmaceutical compound for treating wounds. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abu-Seida, A.M. Effect of propolis on experimental cutaneous wound healing in dogs. Vet. Med. Int. 2015, 2015, 672643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Olczyk, P.; Komosinska-Vassev, K.; Wisowski, G.; Mencner, L.; Stojko, J.; Kozma, E.M. Propolis modulates fibronectin expression in the matrix of thermal injury. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 748101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Staniczek, J.; Jastrzębska-Stojko, Ż.; Stojko, R. Biological activity of propolis ointment with the addition of 1% nanosilver in the treatment of experimentally-evoked burn wounds. Polymers 2021, 13, 2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ma, X.; Guo, Z.; Shen, Z.; Wang, J.; Hu, Y.; Wang, D. The immune enhancement of propolis adjuvant on inactivated porcine parvovirus vaccine in guinea pig. Cell Immunol. 2011, 270, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ferreira, L.N.; Fonseca, F.P.; Caetano de Castro, C.; Sica Siedler, B.; Silveira Munhoz, L.; D’Avila Vargas, G.; Fischer, G.; Oliveira Hubner, S. Effect of the etanolic extract from green propolis on production of antibodies after immunization against Canine Parvovirus (CPV) and Canine Coronavirus (CCoV). Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 2012, 49, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, S.; Wang, D.; Cao, Y.; Lu, T.; Liu, H.; Li, S. Effects of propolis on the immune enhancement of the formalin-inactivated Aeromonas salmonicida vaccine. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 4759–4770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. de Mendonça, M.A.A.; Ribeiro, A.R.S.; de Lima, A.K.; Bezerra, G.B.; Pinheiro, M.S.; de Albuquerque-Júnior, R.L.C.; Gomes, M.Z.; Padilha, F.F.; Thomazzi, S.M.; Novellino, E.; et al. Red propolis and its dyslipidemic regulator formononetin: Evaluation of antioxidant activity and gastroprotective effects in rat model of gastric ulcer. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Babińska, I.; Kleczek, K.; Makowski, W.; Szarek, J. Effect of feed supplementation with propolis on liver and kidney morphology in broiler chickens. Pak. Vet. J. 2013, 33, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  58. Salehi, A.; Hosseini, S.M.; Kazemi, S. Antioxidant and anticarcinogenic potentials of propolis for dimethylhydrazine-induced colorectal cancer in Wistar rats. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 8497562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rizk, S.M.; Zaki, H.F.; Mina, M.A. Propolis attenuates doxorubicin-induced testicular toxicity in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 67, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sameni, H.R.; Yosefi, S.; Alipour, M.; Pakdel, A.; Torabizadeh, N.; Semnani, V.; Bandegi, A.R. Co-administration of 5FU and propolis on AOM/DSS induced colorectal cancer in BALB-c mice. Life Sci. 2021, 276, 119390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cavalcante, D.R.R.; de Oliveira, P.S.; Góis, S.M.; Soares, A.F.; Cardoso, J.C.; Padilha, F.F.; de Albuquerque Júnior, R.L.C. Effect of green propolis on oral epithelial dysplasia in rats. Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol. 2011, 77, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Arslan, S.; Silici, S.; Percin, D.; Koç, A.N.; Er, Ö. Antimicrobial activity of poplar propolis on mutans streptococci and caries development in rats. Turk. J. Biol. 2012, 36, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bueno-Silva, B.; Koo, H.; Falsetta, M.L.; Alencar, S.M.; Ikegaki, M.; Rosalen, P.L. Effect of neovestitol–vestitol containing Brazilian red propolis on accumulation of biofilm in vitro and development of dental caries in vivo. Biofouling 2013, 29, 1233–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ribeiro, D.R.; Alves, A.V.; dos Santos, E.P.; Padilha, F.F.; Gomes, M.Z.; Rabelo, A.S.; Cardoso, J.C.; Massarioli, A.P.; de Alencar, S.M.; de Albuquerque-Junior, R.L. Inhibition of DMBA-induced oral squamous cells carcinoma growth by Brazilian red propolis in rodent model. Basic. Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015, 117, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Darweesh, F.A.; Zaher, A.R.; Zaghlool, A.E.; Helal, M.E.; El-Sabaa, H.M. Honey bee propolis as a storage medium on teeth replantation in dogs (histological, histochemical and radiographic study). Mansoura J. Dent. 2014, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lozina, L.A.; Peichoto, M.E.; Boehringer, S.I.; Koscinczuk, P.; Granero, G.E.; Acosta, O.C. Efficacy of Argentine propolis formulation for topical treatment of canine otitis externa. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2010, 62, 1359–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Martin, L.F.; Rocha, E.M.; Garcia, S.B.; Paula, J.S. Topical Brazilian propolis improves corneal wound healing and inflammation in rats following alkali burns. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 13, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Oršolić, N.; Sirovina, D.; Končić, M.Z.; Lacković, G.; Gregorović, G. Effect of Croatian propolis on diabetic nephropathy and liver toxicity in mice. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Farooqui, T.; Farooqui, A.A. Molecular mechanism underlying the therapeutic activities of propolis: A critical review. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2010, 6, 186–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Araujo, M.A.; Libério, S.A.; Guerra, R.N.; Ribeiro, M.N.; Nascimento, F.R. Mechanisms of action underlying the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of propolis: A brief review. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2012, 22, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Oršolić, N.; Jazvinšćak Jembrek, M. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of propolis and its polyphenolic compounds against cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Ye, Y.; Wang, X.R.; Lin, L.T.; Xiao, L.Y.; Zhou, P.; Shi, G.X.; Liu, C.Z. Bee venom therapy: Potential mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Toxicon 2018, 148, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kocyigit, A.; Guler, E.M.; Kaleli, S.; Kocyigit, A.; Guler, E.M.; Kaleli, S. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties of honey bee venom on Freund’s Complete Adjuvant-induced arthritis model in rats. Toxicon 2019, 161, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lin, T.Y.; Hsieh, C.L. Clinical applications of bee venom acupoint injection. Toxins 2020, 12, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Oršolić, N. Bee venom in cancer therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012, 31, 173–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Aufschnaiter, A.; Kohler, V.; Khalifa, S.; Abd El-Wahed, A.; Du, M.; El-Seedi, H.; Büttner, S. Apitoxin and its components against cancer, neurodegeneration and rheumatoid arthritis: Limitations and possibilities. Toxins 2020, 12, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tsai, L.C.; Lin, Y.W.; Hsieh, C.L. Effects of bee venom injections at acupoints on neurologic dysfunction induced by thoracolumbar intervertebral disc disorders in canines: A randomized, controlled prospective study. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 363801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Alvarez-Fischer, D.; Noelker, C.; Vulinović, F.; Grünewald, A.; Chevarin, C.; Klein, C.; Oertel, W.H.; Hirsch, E.C.; Michel, P.P.; Hartmann, A. Bee venom and its component apamin as neuroprotective agents in a Parkinson disease mouse model. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Mohammadi-Rad, M.; Ghasemi, N.; Aliomrani, M. Evaluation of apamin effects on myelination process in C57BL/6 mice model of multiple sclerosis. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 14, 424. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Nguyen, C.D.; Lee, G. Neuroprotective activity of melittin—The main component of bee venom—Against oxidative stress induced by Aβ25–35 in in vitro and in vivo models. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Khalil, W.K.; Assaf, N.; ElShebiney, S.A.; Salem, N.A. Neuroprotective effects of bee venom acupuncture therapy against rotenone-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis. Neurochem. Int. 2015, 80, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Choi, J.; Jeon, C.; Lee, J.H.; Jang, J.U.; Quan, F.S.; Lee, K.; Kim, W.; Kim, S.K. Suppressive effects of bee venom acupuncture on paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain in rats: Mediation by spinal α2-adrenergic receptor. Toxins 2017, 9, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Li, D.; Chung, G.; Kim, S.K. The involvement of central noradrenergic pathway in the analgesic effect of bee venom acupuncture on vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in rats. Toxins 2020, 12, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Sung, H.J.; Park, H.M. Therapeutic trial of bee venom acupuncture for idiopathic facial paralysis in a dog. J. Vet. Clin. 2013, 30, 107–110. [Google Scholar]
  85. El-Hanoun, A.; El-Komy, A.; El-Sabrout, K.; Abdella, M. Effect of bee venom on reproductive performance and immune response of male rabbits. Physiol. Behav. 2020, 223, 112987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Elkomy, A.; El-Hanoun, A.; Abdella, M.; El-Sabrout, K. Improving the reproductive, immunity and health status of rabbit does using honey bee venom. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 105, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Mohamed, W.A.; Abd-Elhakim, Y.M.; Ismail, S.A. Involvement of the anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and anti-secretory activity of bee venom in its therapeutic effects on acetylsalicylic acid-induced gastric ulceration in rats. Toxicology 2019, 419, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Han, S.M.; Lee, K.G.; Yeo, J.H.; Oh, B.Y.; Kim, B.S.; Lee, W.; Baek, H.J.; Kim, S.T.; Hwang, S.J.; Pak, S.C. Effects of honeybee venom supplementation in drinking water on growth performance of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2396–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kim, D.H.; Han, S.M.; Keum, M.C.; Lee, S.; An, B.K.; Lee, S.R.; Lee, K.W. Evaluation of bee venom as a novel feed additive in fast-growing broilers. Brit. Poult. Sci. 2018, 59, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Han, S.M.; Lee, K.G.; Yeo, J.H.; Hwang, S.J.; Jang, C.H.; Chenoweth, P.J.; Pak, S.C. Effects of bee venom treatment on growth performance of young pigs. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2009, 37, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shin, J.C.; Kim, S.H.; Park, H.J.; Seo, K.W.; Song, K.H. Effect of aromatherapy and apipuncture on Malassezia-related otitis externa in dogs. J. Vet. Clin. 2012, 29, 470–473. [Google Scholar]
  92. Jung, B.G.; Lee, J.A.; Park, S.B.; Hyun, P.M.; Park, J.K.; Suh, G.H.; Lee, B.J. Immunoprophylactic effects of administering honeybee (Apis melifera) venom spray against Salmonella gallinarum in broiler chicks. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2013, 75, 1287–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Uddin, M.B.; Lee, B.H.; Nikapitiya, C.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, T.H.; Lee, H.C.; Kim, C.G.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, C.J. Inhibitory effects of bee venom and its components against viruses in vitro and in vivo. J. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 853–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Lee, J.; Kim, Y.M.; Kim, J.H.; Cho, C.W.; Jeon, J.W.; Park, J.K.; Lee, S.H.; Jung, B.G.; Lee, B.J. Nasal delivery of chitosan/alginate nanoparticle encapsulated bee (Apis mellifera) venom promotes antibody production and viral clearance during porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection by modulating T cell related responses. Vet. Immunol. Immunop. 2018, 200, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Choi, J.H.; Jang, A.Y.; Lin, S.; Lim, S.; Kim, D.; Park, K.; Han, S.M.; Yeo, J.H.; Seo, H.S. Melittin, a honeybee venom derived antimicrobial peptide, may target methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 6483–6490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Mousavi, S.M.; Imani, S.; Haghighi, S.; Mousavi, S.E.; Karimi, A. Effect of Iranian honey bee (Apis mellifera) venom on blood glucose and insulin in diabetic rats. J. Arthropod-Borne Dis. 2012, 6, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Denk, B.; Fidan, A.F. Effects of honeybee (Apis mellifera) venom on redox balance, biochemical and hematological profile in diabetic rats: A preliminary study. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2021, 45, 257–265. [Google Scholar]
  98. Denk, B. Exploring Apis mellifera L. venom’s antioxidant power in various solvents: Unveiling its in vitro potential. Kocatepe Vet. J. 2023, 16, 420–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kostić, A.Ž.; Milinčić, D.D.; Barać, M.B.; Ali Shariati, M.; Tešić, Ž.L.; Pešić, M.B. The application of pollen as a functional food and feed ingredient—The present and perspectives. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Kročko, M.; Čanigová, M.; Bezeková, J.; Lavová, M.; Haščík, P.; Ducková, V. Effect of nutrition with propolis and bee pollen supplements on bacteria colonization pattern in gastrointestinal tract of broiler chicken. Sci. Pap. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 45, 63–67. [Google Scholar]
  101. Haščík, P.; Trembecká, L.; Tkáčová, J.; Kročko, M.; Čuboň, J.; Kačániová, M. Effect of bee pollen dietary supplementation on meat performance of Ross 308 broiler chickens. J. Microb. Biotec. Food 2015, 4, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fazayeli-Rad, A.R.; Afzali, N.; Farhangfar, S.H.; Asghari, M.R. Effect of bee pollen on growth performance, intestinal morphometry and immune status of broiler chicks. Eur. Poult. Sci. 2015, 79, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Abood, S.S.; Ezzat, H.N. Effect of adding different levels from bee pollen in diet on productive performance of broiler chickens. Plant Arch. 2018, 18, 2435–2438. [Google Scholar]
  104. Petričević, V.; Lukić, M.; Škrbić, Z.; Rakonjac, S.; Stanojković, A.; Nikšić, D.; Živković, V. Production parameters, microbiological composition of intestines and slaughter performance of broilers fed with bee pollen. Züchtungskunde 2022, 94, 36–46. [Google Scholar]
  105. Locatelli, M.; Macchione, N.; Ferrante, C.; Chiavaroli, A.; Recinella, L.; Carradori, S.; Zengin, G.; Cesa, S.; Leporini, L.; Leone, S.; et al. Graminex pollen: Phenolic pattern, colorimetric analysis and protective effects in immortalized prostate cells (PC3) and rat prostate challenged with LPS. Molecules 2018, 23, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Chen, X.; Wu, R.Z.; Zhu, Y.Q.; Ren, Z.M.; Tong, Y.L.; Yang, F.; Dai, G.H. Study on the inhibition of Mfn1 by plant-derived miR5338 mediating the treatment of BPH with rape bee pollen. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Chen, X.; Wu, R.Z.; Ren, Z.M.; Tong, Y.L.; Chen, S.; Yang, F.; Dai, G.H. Regulation of microRNAs by rape bee pollen on benign prostate hyperplasia in rats. Andrologia 2020, 52, e13386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mohamed, N.A.; Ahmed, O.M.; Hozayen, W.G.; Ahmed, M.A. Ameliorative effects of bee pollen and date palm pollen on the glycemic state and male sexual dysfunctions in streptozotocin-induced diabetic Wistar rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 97, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Karadeniz, A.; Simsek, N.; Karakus, E.; Yildirim, S.; Kara, A.; Can, I.; Kisa, F.; Emre, H.; Turkeli, M. Royal jelly modulates oxidative stress and apoptosis in liver and kidneys of rats treated with cisplatin. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2011, 2011, 981793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Ibrahim, A.; Eldaim, M.A.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. Nephroprotective effect of bee honey and royal jelly against subchronic cisplatin toxicity in rats. Cytotechnology 2016, 68, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zargar, H.R.; Hemmati, A.A.; Ghafourian, M.; Arzi, A.; Rezaie, A.; Javad-Moosavi, S.A. Long-term treatment with royal jelly improves bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in rats. Can. J. Physiol. Pharm. 2017, 95, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Albalawi, A.E.; Althobaiti, N.A.; Alrdahe, S.S.; Alhasani, R.H.; Alaryani, F.S.; BinMowyna, M.N. Antitumor activity of royal jelly and its cellular mechanisms against Ehrlich solid tumor in mice. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 7233997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhang, S.; Shao, Q.; Geng, H.; Su, S. The effect of royal jelly on the growth of breast cancer in mice. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 7615–7621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Okumura, N.; Toda, T.; Ozawa, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Ikuta, T.; Tatefuji, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Shimizu, T. Royal jelly delays motor functional impairment during aging in genetically heterogeneous male mice. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ghanbari, E.; Khazaei, M.R.; Khazaei, M.; Nejati, V. Royal jelly promotes ovarian follicles growth and increases steroid hormones in immature rats. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 11, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Shimizu, S.; Matsushita, H.; Minami, A.; Kanazawa, H.; Suzuki, T.; Watanabe, K.; Wakatsuki, A. Royal jelly does not prevent bone loss but improves bone strength in ovariectomized rats. Climacteric 2018, 21, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Hattori, S.; Omi, N. The effects of royal jelly protein on bone mineral density and strength in ovariectomized female rats. Phys. Act. Nutr. 2021, 25, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Pan, Y.; Xu, J.; Jin, P.; Yang, Q.; Zhu, K.; You, M.; Hu, F.; Chen, M. Royal jelly ameliorates behavioral deficits, cholinergic system deficiency, and autonomic nervous dysfunction in ovariectomized cholesterol-fed rabbits. Molecules 2019, 24, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Hassan, A.A. Effect of royal jelly on sexual efficiency in adult male rats. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci. 2009, 23, 155–160. [Google Scholar]
  120. Mahdivand, N.; Najafi, G.; Nejati, V.; Shalizar-Jalali, A.; Rahmani, F. Royal jelly protects male rats from heat stress-induced reproductive failure. Andrologia 2019, 51, e13213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Asadi, N.; Kheradmand, A.; Gholami, M.; Saidi, S.H.; Mirhadi, S.A. Effect of royal jelly on testicular antioxidant enzymes activity, MDA level and spermatogenesis in rat experimental Varicocele model. Tissue Cell 2019, 57, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zahmatkesh, E.; Najafi, G.; Nejati, V.; Heidari, R. Protective effect of royal jelly on the sperm parameters and testosterone level and lipid peroxidation in adult mice treated with oxymetholone. Avicenna J. Phytomedi. 2014, 4, 43. [Google Scholar]
  123. Azad, F.; Nejati, V.; Shalizar-Jalali, A.; Najafi, G.; Rahmani, F. Royal jelly protects male mice against nicotine-induced reproductive failure. Vet. Res. Forum. 2018, 9, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  124. El-Hanoun, A.M.; Elkomy, A.E.; Fares, W.A.; Shahien, E.H. Impact of royal jelly to improve reproductive performance of male rabbits under hot summer conditions. World Rabbit. Sci. 2014, 22, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Khadr, A.H.; Abdou, A.; El-Sherbiny, A.M. Age of puberty and fertility of male New Zealand white rabbits orally administered with royal jelly or/and bee honey. J. Anim. Poult. Prod. Mansoura Univ. 2015, 6, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Guo, J.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Cao, J.; Tian, W.; Ma, B.; Dong, Y. Active components and biological functions of royal jelly. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 82, 104514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ghosh, S.; Jung, C.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Nutritional value and chemical composition of larvae, pupae, and adults of worker honey bee, Apis mellifera ligustica as a sustainable food source. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2016, 19, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Odemer, R.; Odemer, F.; Liebig, G.; de Craigher, D. Temporal increase of Varroa mites in trap frames used for drone brood removal during the honey bee season. J. Appl. Entomol. 2022, 146, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Shoinbayeva, K.B.; Omirzak, T.; Bigara, T.; Abubakirova, A.; Dauylbay, A. Biologically active preparation and reproductive function of stud rams. Asian J. Pharm. 2017, 11, 184–191. [Google Scholar]
  130. Seres, A.B.; Ducza, E.; Báthori, M.; Hunyadi, A.; Béni, Z.; Dékány, M.; Hajagos-Tóth, J.; Verli, J.; Gáspár, R. Androgenic effect of honeybee drone milk in castrated rats: Roles of methyl palmitate and methyl oleate. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 153, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yucel, B.; Acikgoz, Z.; Bayraktar, H.; Seremet, C. The effect of apilarnil (drone bee larvae) administration on growth performance and secondary sex characteristics of male broilers. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2011, 10, 2263–2266. [Google Scholar]
  132. Altan, O.; Yucel, B.; Açikgoz, Z.; Seremet, C.; Kosoglu, M.; Turgan, N.; Ozgonul, A.M. Apilarnil reduces fear and advances sexual development in male broilers but has no effect on growth. Brit. Poult. Sci. 2013, 54, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Zdorovjova, J.V.; Boryayev, G.I.; Nosov, A.V.; Katayev, O.G.; Meloyan, G.M.; Zemljanova, J.V.; Kistanova, J.K. Hormonal status and productive qualities of young pigs at inclusion in a diet feeding homogenate drone brood. Agrar. Sci. J. 2018, 2, 3–7. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  134. Kistanova, E.; Zdoroveva, E.; Nevitov, M.; Nosov, A.; Vysokikh, M.; Sukhanova, I.; Vishnyakova, P.; Abadjieva, D.; Ankova, D.; Rashev, P.; et al. Drone brood fed supplement impacts on the folliculogenesis in growing gilts. Vet. Arh. 2020, 90, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yemets, Y.M. Dietary effects of drone larves homogenate on the homeostatic constants and the reproductive capacity of Large White gilts. Transl. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 3, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Hamamci, M.; Doganyigit, Z.; Silici, S.; Okan, A.; Kayma, E.; Yilmaz, S.; Tokpina, A.; Inan, L.E. Apilarnil: A novel neuroprotective candidate. Acta Neurol. Taiwan. 2020, 29, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
  137. Doğanyiğit, Z.; Okan, A.; Kaymak, E.; Pandır, D.; Silici, S. Investigation of protective effects of apilarnil against lipopolysaccharide induced liver injury in rats via TLR 4/HMGB-1/NF-κB pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 125, 109967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Stevanovic, J.; Stanimirović, Z.; Aleksić, N.; Simeunović, P.; Vučićević, M. The influence of natural and synthetic substances applied in honey bee health care on the quality of bee products (invited paper). In Proceedings of the Apimondia Symposium “Apiecotech Serbia 2012”, Belgrade, Serbia, 18–19 February 2012; pp. 9–34. [Google Scholar]
  139. Kasiotis, K.M.; Zafeiraki, E.; Manea-Karga, E.; Anastasiadou, P.; Machera, K. Pesticide residues and metabolites in Greek honey and pollen: Bees and human health risk assessment. Foods 2023, 12, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Végh, R.; Csóka, M.; Mednyánszky, Z.; Sipos, L. Pesticide residues in bee bread, propolis, beeswax and royal jelly–a review of the literature and dietary risk assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2023, 176, 113806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Simsek, I.; Kuzukiran, O.; Yurdakok-Dikmen, B.; Sireli, U.T.; Beykaya, M.; Filazi, A. Comparison of selected lipophilic compound residues in honey and propolis. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021, 102, 104068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ilić, D.; Brkić, B.; Sekulić, M.T. Biomonitoring: Developing a beehive air volatiles profile as an indicator of environmental contamination using a sustainable in-field technique. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Stanimirović, Z.; Glavinić, U.; Lakić, N.; Radović, D.; Ristanić, M.; Tarić, E.; Stevanović, J. Efficacy of plant-derived formulation “Argus Ras” in control. Acta Vet. Beogr. 2017, 67, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Stanimirovic, Z.; Glavinic, U.; Jovanovic, N.M.; Ristanic, M.; Milojković-Opsenica, D.; Mutic, J.; Stevanovic, J. Preliminary trials on effects of lithium salts on Varroa destructor, honey and wax matrices. J. Apicult. Res. 2022, 61, 375–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Stanimirović, Z.; Glavinić, U.; Ristanić, M.; Jelisić, S.; Vejnović, B.; Niketić, M.; Stevanović, J. Diet supplementation helps honey bee colonies in combat infections by enhancing their hygienic behaviour. Acta Vet. Beogr. 2022, 72, 145–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Jovanovic, N.M.; Glavinic, U.; Delic, B.; Vejnovic, B.; Aleksic, N.; Mladjan, V.; Stanimirovic, Z. Plant-based supplement containing B-complex vitamins can improve bee health and increase colony performance. Prev. Vet. Med. 2021, 190, 105322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Jovanovic, N.M.; Glavinic, U.; Ristanic, M.; Vejnovic, B.; Stevanovic, J.; Cosic, M.; Stanimirovic, Z. Contact varroacidal efficacy of lithium citrate and its influence on viral loads, immune parameters and oxidative stress of honey bees in a field experiment. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 1000944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Jovanovic, N.M.; Glavinic, U.; Ristanic, M.; Vejnovic, B.; Ilic, T.; Stevanovic, J.; Stanimirovic, Z. Effects of plant-based supplement on oxidative stress of honey bees (Apis mellifera) infected with Nosema ceranae. Animals 2023, 13, 3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Dolasevic, S.; Stevanovic, J.; Aleksic, N.; Glavinic, U.; Deletic, N.; Mladenovic, M.; Stanimirovic, Z. The effect of diet types on some quality characteristics of artificially reared Apis mellifera queens. J. Apicult. Res. 2020, 59, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Glavinic, U.; Stankovic, B.; Draskovic, V.; Stevanovic, J.; Petrovic, T.; Lakic, N.; Stanimirovic, Z. Dietary amino acid and vitamin complex protects honey bee from immunosuppression caused by Nosema ceranae. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187726. [Google Scholar]
  151. Glavinic, U.; Stevanovic, J.; Ristanic, M.; Rajkovic, M.; Davitkov, D.; Lakic, N.; Stanimirovic, Z. Potential of fumagillin and Agaricus blazei mushroom extract to reduce Nosema ceranae in honey bees. Insects 2021, 12, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Glavinic, U.; Rajkovic, M.; Vunduk, J.; Vejnovic, B.; Stevanovic, J.; Milenkovic, I.; Stanimirovic, Z. Effects of Agaricus bisporus mushroom extract on honey bees infected with Nosema ceranae. Insects 2021, 12, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Glavinic, U.; Blagojevic, J.; Ristanic, M.; Stevanovic, J.; Lakic, N.; Mirilovic, M.; Stanimirovic, Z. Use of thymol in Nosema ceranae control and health improvement of infected honey bees. Insects 2022, 13, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Taric, E.; Glavinic, U.; Vejnovic, B.; Stanojkovic, A.; Aleksic, N.; Dimitrijevic, V.; Stanimirovic, Z. Oxidative stress, endoparasite prevalence and social immunity in bee colonies kept traditionally vs. those kept for commercial purposes. Insects 2020, 11, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Taric, E.; Glavinic, U.; Stevanovic, J.; Vejnovic, B.; Aleksic, N.; Dimitrijevic, V.; Stanimirovic, Z. Occurrence of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) pathogens in commercial and traditional hives. J. Apicult. Res. 2019, 58, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Rostaher, A.; Mueller, R.S.; Meile, L.; Favrot, C.; Fischer, N.M. Venom immunotherapy for Hymenoptera allergy in a dog. Vet. Dermatol. 2021, 32, 206-e52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Moore, A.; Burrows, A.K.; Rosenkrantz, W.S.; Ghubash, R.M.; Hosgood, G. Modified rush venom immunotherapy in dogs with Hymenoptera hypersensitivity. Vet. Dermatol. 2023, 34, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Vazquez-Revuelta, P.; Madrigal-Burgaleta, R. Death due to live bee acupuncture apitherapy. J. Investig. Allerg. Clin. 2018, 28, 45–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Chen, J.; Lariviere, W.R. The nociceptive and anti-nociceptive effects of bee venom injection and therapy: A double-edged sword. Prog. Neurobiol. 2010, 92, 151–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A part of the leg of a 1-year-old female was cat cut off by a lawnmower. The wound healed completely by the second intention with the use of medical honey. The sterile syringe was used as a scale for later wound size assessment. The leg on the day of presentation (a), 7 days (b), 11 days (c), 19 days (d), 24 days (e), and 30 days later (f). Medical grade honey was applied to the wound daily for the first 10 days and thereafter every 2–3 days (Original photo, V. Erjavec).
Figure 1. A part of the leg of a 1-year-old female was cat cut off by a lawnmower. The wound healed completely by the second intention with the use of medical honey. The sterile syringe was used as a scale for later wound size assessment. The leg on the day of presentation (a), 7 days (b), 11 days (c), 19 days (d), 24 days (e), and 30 days later (f). Medical grade honey was applied to the wound daily for the first 10 days and thereafter every 2–3 days (Original photo, V. Erjavec).
Pharmaceuticals 17 01050 g001
Figure 2. Dehiscence after unilateral mastectomy in a 12-year-old bitch: (a) on the day of presentation; (b) two days after presentation; (c) four days after presentation; (d) 14 days after presentation; (e) 21 days after presentation; (f) two months after presentation. Medical-grade honey was applied to the wound daily by the owner (Original photo, V. Erjavec).
Figure 2. Dehiscence after unilateral mastectomy in a 12-year-old bitch: (a) on the day of presentation; (b) two days after presentation; (c) four days after presentation; (d) 14 days after presentation; (e) 21 days after presentation; (f) two months after presentation. Medical-grade honey was applied to the wound daily by the owner (Original photo, V. Erjavec).
Pharmaceuticals 17 01050 g002
Figure 3. Complete skin loss across 100% of an 8-year-old female cat’s forelimb (a) healed completely with minimal scarring (b) using medical honey [6]. (Original photo, V. Erjavec).
Figure 3. Complete skin loss across 100% of an 8-year-old female cat’s forelimb (a) healed completely with minimal scarring (b) using medical honey [6]. (Original photo, V. Erjavec).
Pharmaceuticals 17 01050 g003
Figure 4. An extensive wound on a cow’s rare leg was successfully healed with raw honey, not medical-grade honey. An infected wound with necrotic material and surrounding erythema on the first day of treatment (a), wound covered with some necrotic tissue and pus 14 days later (b), the wound is almost clean, has contracted, is covered with granulation tissue (c) and is epithelializing from the margins (d) 1.5 and 2.5 months later (Original photos donated by Clinic of ruminants, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana).
Figure 4. An extensive wound on a cow’s rare leg was successfully healed with raw honey, not medical-grade honey. An infected wound with necrotic material and surrounding erythema on the first day of treatment (a), wound covered with some necrotic tissue and pus 14 days later (b), the wound is almost clean, has contracted, is covered with granulation tissue (c) and is epithelializing from the margins (d) 1.5 and 2.5 months later (Original photos donated by Clinic of ruminants, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana).
Pharmaceuticals 17 01050 g004
Table 1. The effects of honey bee products are demonstrated in vivo.
Table 1. The effects of honey bee products are demonstrated in vivo.
Honey Bee ProductAnimalEffectReference(s)
HoneyHorsesWound healing[5]
CatsWound healing[4,6,19]
DogsWound healing[20,21]
MiceWound healing[7]
RatsGastroprotective effect[25]
Gastric ulcer healing[26,27,28]
Hypoglycemic and antioxidant effects[29]
Protection of pancreas [30]
Cardioprotective effects [31]
Antidiabetic effect [32]
Anti-atherogenic effect [33]
PropolisMiceAntifungal efficacy on vulvovaginal candidiasis[34,35]
Antiparasitic (antimalarial activity) against Plasmodium chabaudi[46]
Antiparasitic (antimalarial) effect against Plasmodium falciparum and P. berghei[45]
Antiparasitic properties against Schistosoma mansoni[47]
Anticarcinogenic potentials[60]
Mitigating hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity by reducing oxidative stress[68]
Honey beesAntiparasitic effect against Nosema ceranae[41,42,43]
RatsAntiparasitic effect against Trypanosoma brucei and T. congolense[44]
Wound healing[49]
Anticarcinogenic potential[58]
Gastroprotective properties due to anti-oxidant and anti-Helicobacter pylori activities[56]
Protective role during the initial phases of lingual carcinogenesis [61]
Antimicrobial activity against mutans streptococci,
Caries prevention
[62]
Anticaries effects[63]
Chemopreventive and gastroprotective effects[64]
Corneal wound healing[67]
DogsWound healing[50]
Storage medium (on teeth replantation)[65]
Antimicrobial effects in otitis externa[66]
PigsBurn wounds healing[51,52]
Chickens Protective effect on liver and kidney [57]
Bee venomDogsAnti-inflammatory and analgesic effects[77]
Healing effect on Malassezia-related otitis externa [91]
Healing effect on facial paralysis[84]
MiceNeuroprotective effect in Parkinson’s disease[78]
Neuroprotective effect in multiple sclerosis[79]
Antiviral efficacy against a broad panel of viruses[93]
Neuroprotective effects[80,81]
RabbitsPositive impact on reproductive performance and immune response of male individuals[85]
Improvement of reproductive traits (sexual-stimulant), immune response, and health [86]
ChickensGrowth promoter[88,89]
Immunoprophylactic effects[92]
PigsPromotion of antibody production and viral clearance in PRRS virus infection[94]
Positive impact on growth, survival, and immunity[90]
Rats Gastroprotective effect [87]
Antidiabetic effect[96,97]
Analgesic effect[83]
Antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus[82]
PollenRatsAnti-inflammatory and protective effects in prostatitis treatment[105]
Healing effects in prostate hyperplasia and inflammation[106,107]
Protective role in diabetes-related glycemic control problems and sexual dysfunctions in male individuals[108]
ChickensPositive effect on gut microflora colonization[100]
Growth promoter[101]
Improvement of growth performance and immune status[102]
Improvement in weight gain and food conversion rate[103]
Positive effect on daily gain, feed conversion, and microbiological composition of intestine[104]
Royal jellyRatsProtection of liver and kidneys during chemotherapy[109]
Nephroprotective effect[110]
Anti-fibrotic effect against pulmonary fibrosis[111]
Stimulation of folliculogenesis and secretion of steroid hormones[115]
Improvement of bone strength after ovariectomy[116]
Prevention of osteoporosis after ovariectomy [117]
Improvement of fertility and reproductive success in males [119,120,121]
MiceAntioxidant, immunomodulatory and anticancer effects[112]
Apoptotic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects[113]
Anti-aging effect[114]
Improvement of fertility and reproductive success in males[122,123]
RabbitsAlleviation of neurological disorders after ovariectomy[118]
Improvement of fertility and reproductive success in males[124,125]
Drone larvaeSheepStimulation of reproductive function in rams[129]
RatsAndrogenic effect in castrated males[130]
Liver-protective effects[137]
Neuroprotective effect[136]
BroilersAndrogenic effects[131]
Androgenic effects,
Decrease in blood glucose and cholesterol levels
[132]
PigsAnabolic effects (increase in production parameters) in females[133]
Anabolic effect in females[134]
Improvement of fertility; stimulation of reproductive function (by reducing the time to the first estrous cycle for artificial insemination)[135]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stevanović, J.; Glavinić, U.; Ristanić, M.; Erjavec, V.; Denk, B.; Dolašević, S.; Stanimirović, Z. Bee-Inspired Healing: Apitherapy in Veterinary Medicine for Maintenance and Improvement Animal Health and Well-Being. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17081050

AMA Style

Stevanović J, Glavinić U, Ristanić M, Erjavec V, Denk B, Dolašević S, Stanimirović Z. Bee-Inspired Healing: Apitherapy in Veterinary Medicine for Maintenance and Improvement Animal Health and Well-Being. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(8):1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17081050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stevanović, Jevrosima, Uroš Glavinić, Marko Ristanić, Vladimira Erjavec, Barış Denk, Slobodan Dolašević, and Zoran Stanimirović. 2024. "Bee-Inspired Healing: Apitherapy in Veterinary Medicine for Maintenance and Improvement Animal Health and Well-Being" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 8: 1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17081050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop