Next Article in Journal
A Distinctive Metabolomics Pattern Associated with the Administration of Combined Sacubitril/Valsartan to Healthy Subjects: A Kinetic Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Pharmacogenomics of Tirzepatide: Genomic Insights into Dual GIP/GLP-1 Agonist Response in Type 2 Diabetes and Atherosclerosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioactive Plant-Derived Compounds as Novel Perspectives in Oral Cancer Alternative Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expanding the Knowledge of the Molecular Effects and Therapeutic Potential of Incomptine A for the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: In Vivo and Bioinformatics Studies, Part III

by
Normand García-Hernández
1,*,
Fernando Calzada
2,*,
Elihú Bautista
3,
José Manuel Sánchez-López
4,5,
Miguel Valdes
2,6,7,
Claudia Velázquez
8 and
Elizabeth Barbosa
6
1
Unidad de Investigación Médica en Genética Humana, UMAE Hospital Pediatría 2° Piso, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Av. Cuauhtémoc 330, Col. Doctores, Mexico City 06725, Mexico
2
Unidad de Investigación Médica en Farmacología, UMAE Hospital de Especialidades, 2° Piso CORSE, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Av. Cuauhtémoc 330, Col. Doctores, Mexico City 06725, Mexico
3
CONAHCYT-División de Biología Molecular, Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica A. C, San Luis Potosí 78216, Mexico
4
Hospital Infantil de Tlaxcala, Investigación y Enseñanza, 20 de Noviembre S/M, San Matias Tepetomatitlan, Apetatitlan de de Antonio Carvajal, Tlaxcala 90606, Mexico
5
Phagocytes Architecture and Dynamics, IPBS, UMR5089 CNRS-Université Toulouse 3, 205 Route de Narbonne, 31077 Toulouse, France
6
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Plan de San Luis y Salvador Díaz Mirón S/N, Col. Casco de Santo Tomás, Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico City 11340, Mexico
7
Laboratorio de Inmunología, Departamento de Sistemas Biológicos, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco, Calz. del Hueso 1100, Col. Villa Quietud, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04960, Mexico
8
Área Académica de Farmacia, Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Circuito exHacienda La Concepción S/N, Carretera Pachuca-Atocpan, San Agustin Tlaxcala 42076, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(9), 1263; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18091263
Submission received: 29 July 2025 / Revised: 19 August 2025 / Accepted: 19 August 2025 / Published: 25 August 2025

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a group of blood cancers that arise in the lymphatic nodes and other tissues after an injury to the DNA of B/T lineage and NK lymphocytes. Recently, we reported that incomptine A (IA) has in vivo antilymphoma properties. This research aimed to evaluate the effects of IA in the treatment of NHL using antilymphoma activity, Tandem Mass Tag (TMT), and bioinformatics approaches. Methods: The antilymphoma activity of IA was tested on male Balb/c mice inoculated with U-937 cells. Also, TMT, gene ontology enrichment, Reactome pathway, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes pathway, molecular docking, toxicoinformatic, and pharmaceutical analyses were performed. Results: By TMT analysis of the altered levels of proteins present in the lymph nodes of Balb/c mice with NHL and treated with IA, we identified 106 significantly differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), including Il1rap, Ifi44, Timd4, Apoa4, and Fabp3 as well as Myh3, Eno 2, and H4c11. Among these, the Fhl1 result was the most important cluster altered and a potential core target of IA for the treatment of NHL. Network pharmacology studies have revealed that DEPs are associated with processes such as muscle contraction, glycolysis, hemostasis, epigenetic regulation of gene expression, transport of small molecules, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes, systemic lupus erythematosus, alcoholism, and platelet activation, signaling, and aggregation. Computational studies revealed strong binding affinities with six proteins associated with cancer, positive pharmacokinetic properties, and no toxicity. Conclusions: Our contribution suggests that IA may be a compound with potential therapeutic effects against NHL.

1. Introduction

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a kind of blood cancer that generally develops in lymph nodes or in lymphatic tissue present in the organs of the human body such as the skin, intestines, or stomach. NHL is characterized by the malignant transformation of NK, T, or B cells and is associated with an increased proliferation and reduction in apoptosis [1]. NHL affects people of all ages, but is rare in children. There were 544,352 new cases and 259,793 deaths around the world in 2020; among these, 112,576 were women and 147,217 were men [1,2]. In Mexico, it was reported that NHL was the ninth leading cause of cancer for both sexes and was the fourth cause of death among neoplasms of lymphatic tissue and blood-forming and related organs [3]. Treatment is according to the subtype and stage of disease; usually, chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy are the principal ways to treat NHL. In relation to chemotherapy, the drugs currently employed are effective but expensive, and they show several side effects such as mouth sores, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, bladder irritation, and blood in the urine [4,5]. Methotrexate, an antimetabolite compound, is the first-line drug to treat NHL in Mexico; however, it causes hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, dermatologic toxicity, and genotoxic damage, among others [5]. Therefore, it is important to understand the processes involved in the development of NHL and search for novel drugs that are easy to obtain, cheap, with low side effects, more effective, and that have therapeutic potential to treat several neoplasms. In this sense, recently the use of proteomic, network pharmacology, and computational studies has attracted increasing attention for finding novel drugs. Also, the integration of studies that include in vivo and in vitro activity associated with proteomic studies, network pharmacology, and in silico approaches have provided an important research strategy to know and elucidate the mode of action, find new targets, discover new biomarkers of the disease, and determine pharmacokinetic properties and toxicity, among others [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Incomptine A (IA), a heliangolide sesquiterpene lactone isolated from the roots and leaves of Decachaeta incompta (DC) R. M. King and H. Robinson [16], has been reported with several biological properties such as antiprotozoal, antibacterial, antipropulsive, anti-inflammatory, allelopathic, spermatic, antimicrobial, and phytotoxic effects as well as cytotoxic and antitumor activity (Figure 1 and Figure 2). In relation to its cytotoxic properties, IA exhibited dose-dependent activity against four subtypes of NHL cells (U-937, Farage, SU-DHL-2, and REC-1), three subtypes of leukemia cells (Hl-60, K562, and REH), and six subtypes of breast cancer cells (4T1, MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, T-47D, MCF7, and MCF10A). Also, it regulates NF-kB expression, induces apoptosis, induces the production of reactive oxygen species, and induces the differential protein expression of cytoskeleton proteins and glycolytic enzymes in U-937 cells and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in mice [10,16]. Additionally, IA could affect the antiapoptotic function of hexokinase II in 4T1 breast cancer cells [17].
As a part of our study of the antitumor properties of IA and search for new natural anticancer products [10,17], we reported the molecular effects and therapeutic potential of IA for the treatment of NHL using antilymphoma activity, Tandem Mass Tag (TMT), gene ontology enrichment, Reactome pathway, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes pathway, molecular docking, and toxicoinformatic and pharmaceutical analysis.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Identification of Sesquiterpene Lactone Incomptine A from Decachaeta Incompta

Dichloromethane extract from Decachaeta incompta (DCEDi) leaves was analyzed to detect the presence of sesquiterpene lactone IA by HPLC-DAD, using as standard an authentic sample obtained previously [16]. The results showed the presence of the heliangolide IA at 44.9 min (Figure 3) (Table 1). Incomptine A was obtained as white crystals from CH2Cl2-hexane with Rf of 0.60 and mp of 176–177 °C. IA was identified by comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR data (Table 2) with the spectroscopic data obtained from the authentic sample. In the 13C-NMR spectra, 17 signals were observed. The 1H and 13C NMR (Table 2) showed the presence of the α, β-unsaturated γ-lactone by the signals for an exocyclic methylene (δH 6.40, 1H, dd, J = 2.0, 0.5 Hz and 5.80, 1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz) and a γ-lactone carbonyl (δC 169.7, C). These spectra showed signals for a trisubstituted double bond (δH 5.31, 1H, dq, J = 11.0, 1.5 Hz, CH; δC 126.1, CH, δC 136.0, C), a disubstituted double bond (δH 5.55, 1H, dd, J = 11.5, 7.5 Hz, and δH 6.14, 1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz; CH; δC 128.3, δC 132.3; CH), an epoxy group (δH 3.26, 1H, dd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, CH; δC 60.4, CH, δC 61.2, C), two methyl groups (δH 1.41, 3H, s; δC 19.7, CH and δH 1.88, 3H, s; δC 23.7, CH), and one acetyl group (δH 2.02, 3H, s, δC 20.7, CH; δC 169.2, C). Finally, all the signals of the 1H and 13C NMR spectra obtained were compared with those reported in the literature [16] and were confirmed by MNova from MestreLab (version 14.0). Also, a presumptive identification was made by thin-layer chromatography (Figure 4); the same retention factor was obtained comparing with an authentic sample [16].

2.2. In Silico Prediction of Pharmacokinetics and Toxicological and Physicochemical Properties of Incomptine A and Methotrexate

The absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) properties of incomptine (IA) and methotrexate (MTX) were predicted utilizing ADMETlab, SwissADME, admetSAR, and PROTOX web servers (accessed on 13 July 2025). It is important to highlight that in recent years, the bioinformatic analysis to predict the ADMET properties of compounds under drug development has increased and has become an indispensable tool in the development of new drug candidates [13,18,19]. In this context, ADMET properties were calculated for IA and MTX to compare them (Table 3). The analysis suggests that IA has better oral absorption than MTX. In relation to the metabolism of IA and MTX, several CYP450 isoforms were evaluated to know if the molecules were substrates and/or inhibitors of them. Results suggest that both compounds can be metabolized by CYP3A4; they did not act like inhibitors of any CYP isoforms evaluated. In respect to distribution, the results suggest that IA has a better volume of distribution than MTX, and their excretion results suggest that IA may have a higher half-life than MTX. Finally, results of toxicity suggest that MTX may be more toxic and cause hepatotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and respiratory toxicity. In addition, the median lethal dose to humans predicted that MTX is more lethal than IA, in agreement with their category classes, I and IV, respectively.
Physicochemical properties are important parameters measured in medicinal chemistry to know the probability of the molecules submitted for study to be a candidate for the development of new drugs and their possibility of being administered orally (Table 4). According to the results, IA proved to be a better candidate for an orally administered drug than MTX because it may have a better solubility than MTX (LogP and LogS); moreover, the solubility class is better for IA than MTX according to the ADMET results, which indicated better absorption for IA. Drug-likeness analysis showed that IA fulfills all the important characteristics for an orally administered drug satisfactorily in comparison with MTX, which violates three important filters (Veber, Egan, and Muegge).

2.3. Cytotoxic Activity of Incomptine A and Methotrexate

The cytotoxic activities of incomptine A (IA) and methotrexate (MTX) were assayed on U-937 cells (histiocytic lymphoma) by MTT test. To compare the cytotoxic activity of the sesquiterpene lactone IA, we included MTX as the positive control, considering that it is an antimetabolite drug used in Mexico for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma [5]. The results for cytotoxic activity on the U-937 cells showed that IA and MTX had dose-dependent cytotoxic effects (Figure 5). In addition, IA showed a better cytotoxic activity compared with MTX (Table 5).

2.4. Antilymphoma Activity of Sesquiterpene Lactone, Incomptine A, and Methotrexate

To evaluate the antilymphoma effect of sesquiterpene lactone, incomptine A (IA), and methotrexate (MTX), the weight of the lymph nodes of male mice with NHL were obtained, and the percentages of inhibition of lymph nodes after treatment were calculated. Table 6 shows the antilymphoma activity in mice treated with IA and MTX. Both compounds had strong antitumor activity, with ED50 values of 7.5 mg/kg and 1.4 mg/kg, respectively. MTX was more potent than IA.
In addition, the proteomics study was performed at a dose of 10 mg/kg; the antilymphoma activity was studied in these conditions. IA showed 62% growth inhibition of lymph nodes in male Balb/c mice. In the case of MTX, it was not determinate, because a dose of 10 mg/kg caused 100% mortality in the first week of the test. Therefore, for the proteomic study, for MTX, the percentage of growth inhibition in lymph nodes was obtained at a dose of 1.25 mg/kg; the result was 33.4% growth inhibition in male Balb/c mice and 20% mortality.

2.5. Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Lymph Nodes from Male Balb/C Mice with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Treated with Incomptine A

To delve deeper and explore the changes induced in the proteome of the lymph nodes from male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and treated with IA (LNNHLTIA) or MTX (LNNHLTMTX), compared with lymph nodes of male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LNNHL), the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified by a TMT-based labeling approach coupled with UHPLC-MS/MS.
The lymph nodes were clustered as pools of all mice in each group, including the 10 mg/kg and 1.25 mg/kg IA and MTX treatments, respectively. The lymph node samples were lysed, and then the protein was alkylated and digested. The peptide samples were labeled with TMT reagent and subjected to UHPLC-MS/MS; six raw MS files with 20,453 peptides were compared against the mouse protein database. Among these, a total of 2717 proteins were identified and quantified in the lymph node samples. The DEPs were quantified according to the values of fold change (FC); FC > 1.5 was considered upregulated, while FC < 0.66 was considered downregulated (Table 7). The raw proteomics data have been deposited into the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE, through px-submission-tool (version 2.7.3) partner repository under the dataset identifier PXD060392.
In total, we obtained 106 significant DEPs, including 66 downregulated and 40 upregulated; among these, IA induced downregulation in 66 proteins and upregulation in 40. Also, 42 were altered by IA only (Table 8), and 64 overlapped in IA and MTX (Table 9). MTX induced downregulation in 57 and upregulation in 7 proteins (Table 8). In addition, the 106 DEPs gained were used for the next step of research on potential targets and the effect of IA in the treatment of NHL.

2.6. Bioinformatic Analysis

2.6.1. Protein–Protein Interaction Network of Incomptine A Potential Targets for the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

In order to find the most important protein clusters altered and potential core targets of incomptine A (IA) in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in male Balb/c mice, a total of 106 DEPs (Table 8 and Table 9), containing 66 downregulated and 40 upregulated proteins, were investigated by the protein–protein interaction (PPI) enrichment networks using Cytoscape as well as the String database (Figure 6). A large number of interactions were found to be enriched, including Fhl1, Il1rap, Ifi44, Timd4, Apoa4, Fabp3, Myh3, Eno 2, and H4c11. Among these, Fhl1 resulted as the most important DEP; it was shown directly or indirectly interacting with 101 other DEPs, containing other DEPs with fewer interactions such as Il1rap, Ifi44, Timd4, Apoa4, Fabp3, Myh3, Eno 2, and H4c11. Fhl1 was a downregulated protein, as were Fabp3, Ifi44, Myh3, and Eno 2. H4c11, Apoa4, Il1rap, and Timd4 were upregulated proteins. Also, four DEPs, including Prorsd1, Ccdc90b, Gid8, and Spg20 proteins, showed no connection with other proteins.

2.6.2. Results of the Enrichment Study Performed with G: Profiler, Gene Ontology, Reactome, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

To visually disclose the enrichment pathways of the 106 DEPs, g: Profiler, gene ontology (GO), Reactome (REAC), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were carried out for a bioinformatics analysis. A large number of pathways were enriched according to g: Profiler analysis of the GO, REAC, and KEGG databases (Figure 7A).
In total, 190 terms were significantly enriched with 179, 8, and 3 related with GO, KEGG, and REAC, respectively. In the case of GO, 25, 115, and 39 terms corresponded with molecular function (MF), biological process (BP), and cellular component (CC), respectively. The top 30 significantly enriched terms by GO, KEGG, and REAC are displayed in Figure 7B.

2.6.3. Results of the Gene Ontology Enrichment Study

Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was further utilized to explore the enriched biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF) terms. For the BP terms, muscle system process and muscle contraction were the most abundant among the top 10 biological processes (Figure 8). In CC terms, contractile fiber, myofibril, sarcomere, and actin cytoskeleton were the most abundant among the top 10 cellular components. Finally, the most abundant terms were actin binding and actin filament binding among the top 10 MF terms (Figure 8).

2.6.4. Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Pathway Analysis

The GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were carried out through the DAVID database to forecast the pathway and the functional annotation enrichment related to incomptine A (IA) for the treatment of NHL in male Balb/c mice. The full analysis of 106 DEPs performed through Gene ontology (GO) functional analysis yielded 179 entries, with 115 associated with biological process (BP), 39 under cellular component (CC), and 25 under molecular function (MF). These pathways showed the 10 most important pathways that are affected by the 105 DEPs. Figure 9 shows the top 10 BP, CC, MF, and KEGG terms. The primary BP included muscle system process and muscle contraction (A). In the case of CC, it included contractile fiber and myofibril (B). Primary MF comprised actin binding (C).
KEGG analysis was associated with cytoskeleton in muscle cells and motor proteins (D). Necroptosis (Figure 10A), neutrophil extracellular trap formation, cardiac muscle contraction, and dilated cardiomyopathy (Figure 10B), among others, are some pathways affected by downregulated proteins such as Pgam5, Slc25a4, and H2ax as well as Myl2, Myl3, Atp2a1, and Tpm2.

2.6.5. Results of the Reactome Enrichment Analysis

The analysis of Reactome (REAC) exhibited nine important networks: glycolysis, glucose metabolism, metabolism of carbohydrates, transport of small molecules, striated muscle contraction, muscle contraction, hemostasis, platelet activation signaling and aggregation, and transcriptional regulation by small RNAs, among others, were enriched in several DEPs (Figure 11).
Among these, glycolysis, glucose metabolism, and metabolism of carbohydrates were enriched in three downregulated genes, Eno2, Eno3, and Pgam2. Transport of small molecules was enriched in five genes; among these, Mb, Slc4a1, and Slc25a4 were downregulated, and Apod and Apoa4 were upregulated. Muscle contraction and striated muscle contraction were enriched in 14 downregulated genes: Tmod4, Tnnc2, Myh3, Myh8, Tpm1, Mybpc2, Myl3, Actn3, Myl1, Tpm2, Myl2, Acta1, Tnnt3, and Tnn12. Hemostasis was enriched in three downregulated genes containing Tgfb1, Actn2, and Atp2a1. Platelet activation signaling and aggregation was enriched in one downregulated gene, Tgfb1. Finally, transcriptional regulation by small RNAs was enriched in four upregulated proteins containing H4c11, Polr2e, H3f3b, and H2ax.

2.6.6. Molecular Docking Studies of the Sesquiterpene Lactone, Incomptine A Against Six Differentially Expressed Proteins in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Mice

We carried out molecular docking studies with the aim of deepening the antilymphoma properties of the sesquiterpene lactone, incomptine A (IA). In this sense, we considered the previous results obtained here, containing those of the TMT, GO, KEGG, REAC and PPI analyses. Molecular docking studies were performed to obtain additional information about the interactions between sesquiterpene lactone, IA with six DEPs; methotrexate (MTX), an antilymphoma drug currently used for the treatment of NHL in Mexico, was used as a control ligand. The complete analysis of molecular docking studies suggested that IA presents more affinity to all DEPs selected for this study than MTX, including Apoa4 (−6.35 Kca/mol), Fabp3 (−7.17 Kca/mol), Fhl1 (−6.86 Kca/mol), IFi44 (−6.55 Kca/mol), Il1rap (−7.15 Kca/mol), and Timd4 (−7.24 Kca/mol), in comparison with MTX, Apoa4 (−4.27 Kca/mol), Fabp3 (−4.84 Kca/mol), Fhl1 (−4.92 Kca/mol), IFi44 (−5.72 Kca/mol), Il1rap (−6.02 Kca/mol), and Timd4 (−5.11 Kca/mol), respectively. Furthermore, it is important to denote that in almost all proteins, the binding site is the same for IA and MTX, and they share several aminoacidic residues with mostly polar interactions (Table 9). The only protein where IA did not share the same binding position with MTX was IFi44 (Table 10, Figure 12).

3. Discussion

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are the 10th most common malignant neoplasm that are an important cause of mortality and morbidity around the world. In this sense, nearly 544,352 persons are diagnosed with NHL annually, resulting in nearly 259,793 deaths in 2020 [1,20,21,22]. In the last ten years, NHLs have had a rise in mortality rate and incidence with 112, 576 cases in women and 147,217 cases in men [2]. In the case of Mexico, it has been reported that NHLs were the ninth cause of cancer for both genders and were the fourth cause of death [3,4].
The first-line treatments for NHLs are chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy, including drugs such as prednisone, cisplatin, fludarabine, doxorubicin, vincristine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and rituximab. However, several of these drugs show limited efficacy, and some types of aggressive lymphomas relapse and progress into refractory lymphoma [23,24,25]. They also have several side effects such as kidney injury, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and myelosuppression, among others [3,5]. In this sense, the investigation of new antitumor drugs with the best efficacy and safety is very important around the world and remains a challenge.
Part of our ongoing research involves new anti-NHL drugs isolated from Mexican medicinal plants. Previously, we reported the antilymphoma activity in a mouse model at a dose of 5 mg/kg of the sesquiterpene lactone incomptine A (IA) [10]. To expand on these findings, in this work, the antilymphoma activity of the IA was evaluated at a dose of 10 mg/kg using in vitro, in vivo, and bioinformatics approaches, enhancing the translatability of our prior findings, and we assessed the impact of IA on additional aspects of NHL.
First, the dichloromethane extract of the leaves of Decachaeta incompta was subject to sequential chromatographic methods, including column chromatography and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) over silica gel, to afford a sesquiterpene lactone that was identified as IA by HPLC (Figure 3 and Table 1), TLC (Figure 4), and NMR methods (Table 2). The retention time, retention factor, and NMR data were the same as those for the authentic sample provided by Dr. Bautista [16].
Once the identification of IA was made, an in silico ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) analysis was performed [18]. In silico techniques represent a fast and economic strategy that helps to reduce time and costs in research for the development of new drugs [26,27,28]. ADMET and physicochemical properties were calculated in order to compare the results of IA against MTX, considering that the first is a potential drug and the second is one drug used currently in Mexico for the treatment of cancers such as NHL. Incomptine A exhibits favorable drug-like properties. An ADMET evaluation was carried out; this kind of in silico study brings valuable information for new molecules, including several parameters that must been determined when a new drug is in development [17,27,28]. Considering the constant advancement and development of computer software for in silico techniques, these have been transformed into a valuable tool that allows researchers to determine these and other parameters reducing costs and time and avoiding the use of animals [28]. The complete analysis of the ADMET calculation suggests that IA may have better absorption when it is administered orally than MTX, which also is reflected in a better distribution of the drug. In respect to metabolism, this parameter was similar to MTX, and the excretion calculated for IA suggests that it may have a longer T1/2 than MTX. These results may support the important activity described in this study that IA is more active than MTX for NHL treatment. Moreover, the toxicities of both molecules were determined; in this sense, we observe that IA may have lower toxicity than MTX, with a predicted human lethal dose 50 (LD50) of 3 mg/kg for IA in comparison with 1330 mg/kg for MTX. This result suggests a wide therapeutic window for the use of IA in comparison with MTX and classifies IA in Class IV (300 < LD50 ≤ 2000 mg/kg) in comparison with MTX, which is collocated in Class I, which is considered fatal by ingestion (LD50 ≤ 5 mg/kg). MTX is known as one of the most widely used anticancer agents [29,30,31]. It is important to highlight that the result of toxicity obtained in this study of IA was in agreement with the in vivo toxicity reported previously and confirms the predicted findings by bioinformatics [32]. In contrast, it is also known that the use of MTX may generate side effects such as nephrotoxicity, muscle pain, red eyes, swollen gums, and hair loss, among others [33,34]. It also has been reported that high doses of MTX may be toxic to humans and mice [5,35]. This is according to some predictions obtained from ADMET studies and represents an advantage in the use of IA as a drug for the treatment of cancer. Commonly, the route of administration of MTX is intravenous, which is painful for the patients [36]; in comparison, IA represents one important alternative because our results suggest better oral absorption with important pharmacological anticancer activity, and perhaps with lower side effects, than MTX. Finally, the drug likeness analysis supports the information showed in the ADMET study, because it suggests that IA fulfills the necessary criteria to be an important candidate for the development of an orally administered drug.
After the ADMET analysis of IA was made, its cytotoxic activity was determined using U-937 cells (histiocytic lymphoma) that are associated as a cause of NHL [37]. The results showed that IA was nearly six times most active than MTX (Table 5 and Figure 5), used as positive control. Cytotoxic activity of the sesquiterpene lactone, IA, was more significant than those reported for other natural products with important cytotoxic properties such as farnesol, nerol, citral, and geraniol [38]. The cytotoxic activity here reported for IA is in agreement with previous reports about its cytotoxic properties on several cancer cell lines, including four subtypes of NHL cells (U-937, Farage, SU-DHL-2, and REC-1), three subtypes of leukemia cells (Hl-60, K562, and REH), and six subtypes of breast cancer cells (4T1, MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, T-47D, MCF7, and MCF10A) [10,17]. In addition, it is important to highlight that it has been reported that IA was not cytotoxic to the MCF10A normal human mammary breast cell line [17]. These results of ADMET and cytotoxicity suggest that IA has antitumor potential [39,40,41,42,43].
Then, antilymphoma activity was tested by comparing the effect of IA and the antilymphoma drug MTX, which was chosen considering that currently it is used in Mexico to treat NHL [3]. The results showed that IA was less active that MTX (Table 6); however, the activity of IA was similar to other natural products with significant antilymphoma properties, including flavonoid glycosides and sesquiterpenoids [10,35,38]. In addition, IA is a sesquiterpene lactone, a group of compounds with an α-methylene-γ-lactone moiety in their structure that have been reported as a new promising form of cancer therapy based on their anticancer activity. The most important examples include eupatolide, deoxyelephantopin, and parthenolide. In the last case, it is undergoing cancer clinical trials [39]. It is important to mention that although MTX was more potent in this study, it caused mortality in the treated mice at doses ≥ 1.25 mg/kg; in particular, a dose of 10 mg/kg caused 100% mortality in the first week of the test. Also, it has been reported to have serious side effects including pancreatitis, cirrhosis, aplastic anemia, leukopenia, and gastrointestinal bleeding [43].
The next step of this work was to delve deeper and explore the changes induced in the proteome of the lymph nodes from male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and treated with IA at doses of 10 mg/kg. Recently, we reported a proteomic study in a mouse model at a dose of 5 mg/kg of incomptine A [10]. To expand on these findings, in this work, the antilymphoma activity of the IA was evaluated at a dose of 10 mg/kg using in vitro, in vivo, and bioinformatics approaches, enhancing the translatability of our prior findings and assessing the impact of IA on additional aspects of NHL.
The results of antilymphoma activity showed that IA caused 62% growth inhibition of lymph nodes in male Balb/c mice. The case of MTX was not determinate because the dose of 10 mg/kg caused 100% mortality. Therefore, the proteomic study for MTX of the lymph nodes was obtained at a dose of 1.25 mg/kg (Table 6). TMT proteomics technology was used to identify the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) of the lymph nodes from male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and treated with IA (LNNHLTIA) or MTX (LNNHLTMTX) and from male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LNNHL). A total of 2717 proteins were identified and quantified in the LNNHLTIA in this study, among which 106 proteins showed significant expression differences (Table 8 and Table 9), including 66 downregulated proteins and 40 upregulated proteins. In general, IA induced more downregulation than upregulation of proteins in the lymph nodes of mice with NHL, 62% and 38%, respectively, in agreement with our previous study. Also, the number of DEPs at a dose of 10 mg/kg was 40% higher compared with those obtained at a dose of 5 mg/kg [10].
All DEPs altered by IA treatment were subjected to PPI analysis, showing that the four and a half LIM domains protein 1 (Fhl1) was the most important core protein (Figure 6); it showed direct or indirect interaction with other proteins, including Il1rap, Ifi44, Timd4, Apoa4, and Fabp3 as well as Myh3, Eno 2, and H4c11. The last three were reported recently to be possibly associated with the appearance of NHL [10]. According to the PPI network, GO, KEGG, and REAC analyses, the DEPs including Fhl1, Il1rap, Ifi44, Timd4, Apoa4, Fabp3, Myh3, Eno 2, and H4c11 may be associated with several processes, including muscle contraction, glycolysis, hemostasis, epigenetic regulation of gene expression, transport of small molecules, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes, systemic lupus erythematosus, alcoholism, and platelet activation, signaling, and aggregation (Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11).
Four and a half LIM domains protein 1 (Fhl1) resulted in the most important cluster altered and a potential core target of IA for the treatment of NHL in male Balb/c mice. In PPI, it showed direct interaction relationships with 40 downregulated proteins and 2 upregulated proteins. It also had an indirect interaction relationship with 59 DEPs. Fhl1 is widely expressed in humans, particularly in skeletal and cardiac muscle cells. Fhl1 participates in the development of the skeletal muscle and myocardium as well in the regulation of gene transcription, thyroid function, blood glucose levels, myoblast differentiation, and other biological process. Abnormal expression of Fhl1 is associated with several diseases such as skeletal muscle disease, reductive myopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and viral infections (chikungunya and cashmere). It also regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, adhesion, migration, transcription, and other cellular processes, and it plays an important role in cell growth. In tumors, the expression of Fhl1 is upregulated or downregulated and plays a role in promoting or inhibiting tumor development. The expression of Fhl1 is downregulated in several cancers such as lung, prostate, breast, ovarian, colon, thyroid, brain, kidney, liver, and skin (melanoma), as well as oral cancers. In contrast, the expression of Fhl1 is upregulated in cancers such as laryngeal carcinomas, gastric signet ring cell carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, gastric cancer, acute promyelocytic leukemia, and glioblastoma, among others. It is important to highlight that considering the significant differences observed in the expressions of Fhl1 between different tumors, Fhl1 is advised as a prognostic marker and could be a potential target for cancer therapy research including NHL [44].
In relation to the proteins, Il1rap, Ifi44, Timd4, Apoa4, Fabp3, Myh3, Eno 2, and H4c11 showed ≤ 24 direct or indirect interaction relationships with other DEPs. These eight DEPs have been reported to be associated with one or more cancers including pancreatic, kidney, tongue, colorectal, breast, bone, cervical, stomach, small-cell lung, non-small-cell lung, head, neck, lung, liver, and nasopharyngeal cancer, among others, as well as myeloblastic, chronic myeloid, acute myeloid, and acute lymphoblastic leukemias. It is important to note that Il1rap, Ifi44, Timd4, Fabp3, and Eno 2 have been reported as potential therapeutic targets and potential prognostic biomarkers for several cancers [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60].
Molecular docking assay was performed to obtain additional information about the interaction between the sesquiterpene lactone IA and the six DEPs implicated in NHL, Il1rap, Apoa4, Fabp3, IFi44, Timd4, and Fhl1. This technique has gained significant importance in the development of novel treatments for various diseases. This computational technique predicts the binding affinity of ligands to receptor proteins. The assay yields free Gibbs energy (ΔG) values, which indicate the exergonic nature of the reaction. A more negative ΔG value suggest a higher probability of ligand–protein union and interaction [61,62].
The results of molecular docking showed that IA has better affinity to all the proteins used in this study in comparison with MTX because its ΔG values were lower compared with those obtained from MTX. Moreover, in almost all proteins, the binding site as well as the polar interactions between IA and MTX were the same. This kind of interaction is important because it gives stability to the binding position. Our results suggest that both molecules bind on the same position of the proteins, and perhaps, IA may have better activity than MTX for the treatment of NHL. Also, this is the first report that involves Il1rap, Apoa4, Fabp3, IFi44, Timd4, and Fhl1 with NHL.
In agreement with the GO, REAC, and KEGG pathway as well as TMT, PPI network, and molecular docking analyses, the sesquiterpene lactone IA showed direct or indirect interaction with 106 depositions. Among these, Fhl1 was the most important core protein. In this context, Fhl1 could be a potential therapeutic target and potential prognostic biomarker in NHL. In addition, these results support the effects of IA in several processes such as muscle contraction, glycolysis, hemostasis, epigenetic regulation of gene expression, transport of small molecules, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes, systemic lupus erythematosus, alcoholism, and platelet activation, signaling, and aggregation, among others. Also, the results of ADMET and antilymphoma activity provide additional evidence that support the therapeutic antitumor potential of IA. In addition, the information obtained in this work indicates that all approaches used can be employed to reliably find potential therapeutic targets and potential prognostic biomarkers to several cancers, including NHL. Additional assays, including immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, ELISA, and miRNA expression, among others, are mandatory to validate the results obtained here. Also, other assays are required to explore the way IA promotes lymphoma cell death in NHL, such as apoptosis (i.e., caspase activity, TUNEL staining, and annexin V/PI flow cytometry) and the effect on the glycolytic pathway (i.e., expression of aldolase A, lactate dehydrogenase, and hexokinase II). Given the aforementioned, we propose that IA can be considered a promising molecule with an exceptional pharmacological profile. Its potential application in the future as a novel pharmacological treatment for NHL, or as a foundation for the development of new molecule derivates to enhance its efficacy in treating this disease, warrants continued investigation of this molecule to acquire more information from it.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Isolation of Incomptine A from Dichloromethane Extract of Decachaeta Incompta

The sesquiterpene lactone IA was obtained from the aerial parts of Decachaeta incompta (Asteraceae), collected in February 2022 in the State of Oaxaca, Mexico. The leaves of the plant were botanically identified by the MS Abigail Aguilar Contreras biology of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. A sample (voucher 15311) was deposited at the Herbarium, IMSSM. The phytochemical procedure was performed according to a protocol previously described [16]. IA was identified by NMR spectra and HPLC-DAD and by comparison with an authentic sample having a purity near 99%. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), was used to dissolve IA and MTX (Sigma Aldrich).

4.2. Chemicals and Instrumentation

Triethylammonium bicarbonate buffer (1.0 M, pH 8.5 ± 0.1), tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride solution (0.5 M, pH 7.0), iodoacetamide (IAA), formic acid (FA), acetonitrile (ACN), methanol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), trypsin from bovine pancreas Promega (Madison, WI, USA), ultrapure water (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), TMT 6-plex Isobaric Label Reagent, and Pierce Quantitative Colorimetric Peptide Assay Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). were used in this work. An Ultimate 3000 nano UHPLC system was coupled to a Q Exactive HF MS equipped with a Nano spray Flex Ion Source Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). TMT-based Quantification Analytical Service was provided by Creative Proteomics (Shirley, NY, USA).

4.3. Cell Culture Conditions

U-937 cells were acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (CRL-1593,2, histiocytic lymphoma). To develop the mice model, U-937 cells were cultured at 37 °C in RPMI 1640 culture medium (GIBCO Cat: 11875-093) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO Cat: 16000044), streptomycin (100 μg/mL)/penicillin (100 U/mL), and 5% CO2. In vivo tests were realized using cell cultures at a density of 2.5 × 106 cells in T75 flasks (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Cell viability was determined by the trypan blue exclusion test. Cells were resuspended in fresh medium 24 h before treatments to ensure exponential growth.
The cytotoxic activity of incomptine A (IA) against U-937 cells was assessed using the colorimetric 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) test, Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Exponentially growing cells of U-937 cell lines were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5.0 × 103 cells per well in 100 μL and treated with five serial concentrations between 0.1 μM and 4.0 μM of IA or MTX for 24 h under 5% CO2 and 95% O2 at 37 °C. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO; the final concentration of DMSO used was 0.1% (v/v) for each sample. Cells (U-937) treated with 0.1% DMSO served as the control group. After incubation for specified times, MTT reagent (10 μL, 5 mg dissolved in 1 mL of PBS) was added to each well and incubated for 4 h. The plates were centrifuged (10 min at 350 × g), and the purple formazan crystals of metabolized yellow tetrazolium salt by viable cells were dissolved in 150 μL of DMSO. Absorbance was quantified at 570 nm using the ELISA plate reader. Results were expressed as a percentage of viability, with 100% representing control cells treated with 0.1% DMSO alone. Then, the CC50 was determined. This was defined as the treatment concentration at which 50% reduction in cellular proliferation was observed. This was calculated graphically using the curve-fitting algorithm of the computer software Prism 5.03 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). Values were calculated as means ± S.E.M. from three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using one-way ANOVA, as well as Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests, with a value of p < 0.05 to establish a significant difference between the study groups.

4.4. Animals

To induce the lymphoma model, healthy male Balb/c mice (25 ± 3g) were provided by the animal house of the Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI, from Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. The research had ethical authorization by the National Committee of Scientific Research from the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social with registration numbers: R-2018-785-111 and R-2020-3601-186. Mice were maintained in polyvinyl cages at 22 °C and light–dark periods of 12 h, with ad libitum access to food and water in agreement with Mexican Official Norma, NOM-062-ZOO-1999 [63].

4.4.1. Antilymphoma Test

Briefly, healthy male Balb/c mice were divided into 9 groups with 5 mice per group: LNNHL1, LNNHL, LNNHLTIA [LNNHLTIAa, LNNHLTIAb, LNNHLTIAc, and beingLNNHLTIAd], and LNNHLTMTX [LNNHLTMTXa, LNNHLTMTXb, and LNNHLTMTX c]. For comparison, LNNHL1, designated as the healthy group, was treated with tween 80 in water (2% v/v), and LNNHL was used as negative control only, inoculated with 1 × 106 U-937 cells. LNNHLTIA and LNNHLTMTX groups were injected intraperitoneally with 1 × 106 U-937 cells and treated orally for 9 days with incomptine A (IA, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 mg-kg−1) or methotrexate (MTX, 1.25, 2.5, and 3.75 mg-kg−1), respectively. Animals were maintained under observation for 30 days, recording their daily survival and weight. Mice were sacrificed, and axillary and inguinal lymph nodes were removed and weighted. Antilymphoma activity was obtained by comparing the total lymph node weight of each group against the negative control, and the percentage of inhibition and the 50% effective inhibitory doses (ED50) were calculated. Lymph nodes obtained of the groups LNNHLTIA, LNNHLTMTX, and LNNHL were used in the TMT test.
The ED50 was calculated graphically using the curve-fitting algorithm of the computer software Prism 5.03 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). Values were calculated as means ± S.E.M. (n = 5). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using one-way ANOVA as well as Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests with a value of p < 0.05 to establish a significant difference between the study groups.

4.4.2. Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Protein Expression Induced Through IA or MTX

To evaluate the effects in the proteome of the non-Hodgkin lymphoma experimental model, we clustered the lymph nodes as pools of all mice in each group, concerning IA and MTX treatments of 10 mg/kg and 1.25 mg/kg, respectively. Then, tissue was lysed using a TissueLyser after being centrifuged at low temperature for 15 min at 12,000 rpm, and the protein concentration was performed with a BCA kit. Following that, 100 μg of protein was treated with TCEP (10 mM) for 1 h at 56 °C and then alkylated with IAA (20 mM) for 1h in dark at room temperature. Then, trypsin was added (1:50) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. The peptides were brought to almost dryness and re-dissolved with TEAB (100 mM). After that, each sample of peptides was treated with anhydrous acetonitrile (41 μL) and centrifuged. The supernatant was treated with TMT Reagent using the following: (C-)/TMT, MTX/TMT, and IA/TMT. Finally, the reaction was incubated for 1 h at room temperature; then, it was treated with 5% hydroxylamine (8 μL) and incubated for another 15 min.

4.4.3. Nano UHPLC-MS/MS Analyses

The labeled peptides obtained in Section 4.4.2 were subjected to analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS using an Ultimate 3000 nano UHPLC system coupled to a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer equipped with a Nano spray Flex Ion Source (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Briefly, the sample (2 μg) was injected onto a trap column (PepMap C18, 100 Å, 100 μm × 2 cm, 5 μm) and subjected to fractionation using an analytical column (PepMap C18, 100 Å, 75 μm × 50 cm, 2 μm). A linear gradient was used: 5 to 7% buffer B for 2 min, from 7% to 20% buffer B for 80 min, from 20% to 40% buffer B for 35 min, then from 40% to 90% buffer B for 4 min. Mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid in water; B: 0.1% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile. For labeled samples, the full scan was performed between 350 and 1650 m/z at a resolution of 200 to 120,000 Th and a gain control of 3 to 6. The MS/MS scan was operated in Top 15 mode using a resolution of 200 to 30,000 Th; automatic gain control target 1 × 105; charge state exclusion: unassigned, 1, > 6; dynamic exclusion 40 s, normalized collision energy at 32%; isolation window of 1.2 Th.

4.4.4. Protein Identification

The six raw MS files were subjected to analysis and compared against mouse protein database using Maxquant (v2.6.7.0), ProteoWizard (version 3), and Proteome Discoverer 3.2 (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The parameters were set as follows: The protein modifications were oxidation (M, variable), carbamidomethylation (C, fixed), and TMT-6Plex. Enzyme specificity was set to trypsin, the precursor ion mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm, the maximum missed cleavages were set to 2, and MS/MS tolerance was 0.6 Da. The distribution of all the proteins identified according to the protein mass (kDa), the distribution of 20,453 peptides identified according to the length, and the distribution of 2717 of the proteins identified according to sequence coverage, were performed. Data analytical report was carried out by Analytical Service from Creative Proteomics (New York, NY, USA) with p < 0.05 (indicates > 95% confidence of change in protein concentration respect of the magnitude of change) selected to designate differentially expressed proteins.

4.4.5. Differentially Expressed Protein Analysis

A total of 2717 proteins were identified for this work, with (C-)/TMT and MTX/TMT used to determine protein differential expression between treatments MTX/TMT and IA/TMT establishing the ratios MTX/C, IA/C, and IA/MTX. It is important to highlight that fold-change cutoffs at protein level accepted with biological meaning are defined as 1.5 times up or down. Therefore, the screening criteria for the relative quantitation of proteins in this work were as follows: fold change < 0.67 was considered downregulated, and fold-change > 1.5 was considered upregulated. Each comparison was analyzed using enrichment processes analysis and cell signaling pathways.

4.5. Bioinformatic Methodology

The log ratio data matrix was used to feed the algorithms for the analysis of cellular process enrichment networks and signaling pathways through programming language R v4.2.2 and RStudio v3.1.4, applying the clusterProfiler v4.2.2, MSigDB in R (Molecular Signatures Database, accessed 24 May 2025), enrich plot, and ggplo2 packages (accessed 24 May 2025). Also, we used symbol. mouse ID data (org.Mm.eg.db, accessed 24 May 2025), KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), gene ontology (GO), biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), and cellular component (CC), and Reactome databases. The enrichGO, compareCluster, and enrichKEGG functions were applied. The results were plotted with the functions “emapplot”, “aplot_list”, “dotplot”, and “cnetplot” for visualization. Dotplot and three onthologies plots enrichment was performed with the ClusterProfiler package of the R v4.2.2 tool, following the steps proposed by the developer, using the GO databases (BP, MF, CC) and FDR < 0.05 as the value of statistical significance. Additionally, enrichment networks were performed in Cytoscape plug-in using the ClueGo (Version 2.5.10) as well as STRING plugins (confidence cutoff of 0.4) for both analyses, following the developer’s manual using KEGG and GO databases and setting a p < 0.05 as the statistical significance criterion. In parallel, we performed a functional enrichment analysis, also known as over-representation analysis (ORA), using the g: Profiler tool available online, for which we used the parameters preset by the program. The log ratio (log1.5) is the log of the fold-changes, i.e., log1.5 (condition 1/condition 2). Log ratios are used/plotted in graphs for the exploratory analysis of pathways and functional enrichment of cellular processes in each of the different treatments, generating a log ratio values matrix with each protein. These data are better to show because they center around zero, giving reductions a negative value and increments a positive value, and because the log ratios are symmetric around zero [64].

4.5.1. Comparison of Shared Processes and Molecules

Differentially expressed proteins obtained for each treatment were analyzed with the g: Profiler tool available online. Graphs and pathway enrichment tables and figures were generated by comparing with KEGG, GO, and Reactome databases. Enrichment plot images generated in the x-axis show the number of different enriched processes according to each database, while the y-axis plots the significance value obtained in ascending order (−log10 adj-p-value); a dashed cutoff at the top of the graph divides the most significant enriched cellular processes, and a black circle with a number of different processes of interest are highlighted according to each database, according to the order in which they appear in a general list of enriched processes. At the bottom is the list of the representative processes marked and arranged by significance value, the first having the highest value. The list is labeled by ID (number in the general list of the process), resource (database with which the process was enriched), term ID (identification of the process according to each platform), term name (name of the enriched process according to each database), and adj-p-value (significance value of the process) shown with number and color scale and arranged in a descending order. Finally, to know how many molecules and cellular processes are shared between the different conditions, the modulated proteins data and their change values were used to analyze them with the DiVenn v2.0 online tool [65,66,67]. All annotations to refer proteins are based on the UNIQID gene name or UNIPROT-ID. http://geneontology.org/; https://reactome.org/; https://www.uniprot.org/; or https://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html (accessed on 24 May 2025).

4.5.2. In Silico Physicochemical, Pharmacokinetic, and Toxicological Properties

To determine the physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological properties of IA and MTX, ADMETlab [68], SwissADME [19], admetSAR [69], and PROTOX [70] servers were used. These servers work using the SMILES code for each chemical structure; therefore, the IA structure was drawn on ChemDraw software (version 20.0.0.22), and the SMILES code was obtained (code: C=C1C(=O)O[C@@H]2/C=C(/C)CC[C@H]3O[C@@]3(C)C[C@@H](OC(C)=O)[C@H]12), on the other hand, MTX SMILES code was obtained from PubChem library (CID 126941, and SMILES code: CN(Cc1cnc2nc(N)nc(N)c2n1)c1ccc(C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)O)C(=O)O)cc1). Both codes were used on in silico servers to predict the properties previously described for IA and MTX.

4.5.3. Molecular Docking Studies

Blind docking experiments were carried out in order to determine the probability of the ligands MTX and IA to bind to the proteins proposed in the study. The apolipoprotein A-IV (Apoa4, ID: P06728), fatty acid-binding (Fabp3, ID: P11404), four and a half LIM domains protein 1 (Fhl1, ID: P97447), interferon-induced protein 44 (Ifi44, ID: Q8BV66), interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (Il1rap, ID: Q61730), and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 4 (Timd4, IDQ6U7R4) were used as targets of the study. The crystals were retrieved from the Uniprot database (https://www.uniprot.org/) (accessed on 29 May 2025). Proteins were optimized; for this, the molecules of water and ions were eliminated and only those important for catalytic activity were preserved, the polar hydrogen atoms were added, and proteins were ionized considering a basic environment (pH = 7.4). Gasteiger charges were assigned; the computed output topologies from the previous steps were used as input files for docking simulations.
For ligands optimization, the two-dimensional (2D) structure of methotrexate (CID: 126941) was retrieved from the chemical library PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (accessed on 29 May 2025), for incomptine-A, and the 2D structure of the proposed ligand was drawn. Both ligands were optimized and submitted to energetic and geometrical minimization using Avogadro software (Avogadro: an open-source molecular builder and visualization tool. Version 1.2.0) [71].
Docking analysis was carried out using Autodock 4.2 software [72]. The search parameters were as follows: A grid-base procedure was employed to generate the affinity maps delimiting a grid box of 126 × 126 × 126 Å3 in each space coordinate, with a grid-point spacing of 0.375 Å. The grid centers (x, y, z) for each protein search were −28.512, 7.344, 21.938 for Apoa4; 0.815, 2.902, 1.116 for Fabp3; −1.118, −0.813, −5.054 for Fhl1; 5.872, −0.066, −7.999 for Ifi44; 30.545, 10.244, −27.227 for Il1rap; and −12.49, −4.782, −4.185 for Timd4. Lamarckian genetic algorithm was employed as scoring function with a randomized initial population of 100 individuals and a maximum number of energy evaluations of 1 × 107 cycles. The analysis of the interactions in the protein–ligand complex was visualized with Drug Discovery Version 20.1.0.19295 (https://www.3ds.com/products/biovia/discovery-studio (accessed on 29 May 2025)) [73].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we used GO, REAC, and KEGG pathways as well as TMT, PPI network, ADMET, and molecular docking analyses and identified 106 differentially expressed lymph node proteins in NHL. We likewise found that Fhl1 was the most important core protein expressed in this study, suggesting that it plays an important role in the pathology of NHL. Also, the results suggest that Fhl1 could be a potential therapeutic target and potential prognostic biomarker of NHL. In addition, we provide additional evidence that supports IA as a potential agent for the treatment of NHL. Computational techniques such as PPI network, GO, REAC, ADMET, molecular docking, and KEGG pathway associated with TMT may be used as tools to find potential targets of drugs in NHL. Additionally, our findings could have potential clinical value in the diagnosis and therapeutic treatment of NHL beyond enriching the existing information of the pharmacological activity of IA on NHL. This study confirms that IA is a sesquiterpene lactone with several targets and several pathways. However, our research was limited by the lack of experimental validation, particularly in the bioinformatics approaches, and in the translatability of mouse NHL models to human disease. Moreover, clinical studies should be conducted focusing on Fhl1 as a key hub gene for early NHL diagnosis and as a potential target in precision medicine for NHL. Therefore, future studies are needed to investigate the role and impact of Fhl1 on patients with NHL and to elucidate its precise actions underlaying their effects. Furthermore, systematic studies are necessary to validate the protein targets, changes at the protein level in treated lymph nodes, and role of specific proteins in NHL. These studies should include immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, ELISA, and miRNA expression, among others.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C. and N.G.-H.; Methodology, E.B. (Elihú Bautista), E.B. (Elizabeth Barbosa), C.V., J.M.S.-L. and M.V.; Software, J.M.S.-L. and M.V.; Validation, N.G.-H. and F.C.; Formal analysis N.G.-H. and F.C.; Investigation, E.B. (Elihú Bautista), E.B. (Elizabeth Barbosa), C.V., J.M.S.-L. and M.V.; Resources, F.C. and N.G.-H.; Data curation, C.V. and E.B. (Elizabeth Barbosa); Writing—original draft preparation, F.C., M.V., J.M.S.-L. and N.G.-H.; Writing—review and editing, F.C. and N.G.-H.; Visualization, F.C.; Supervision, N.G.-H.; Project administration and funding acquisition, F.C. and N.G.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, contract grant sponsor Fondo de Investigación en Salud: FIS/IMSS/PROT/EMER18/1846 (Approval no: R-2018-785-111). This research did not receive external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Study was approved by the National Ethics Committee of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, protocol codes R-2018-785-111 (9 October 2018) and R-2020-3601-186 (12 August 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

This research study did not involve humans.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Donovan García García for the technical support given to create and upload the mass spectrometry proteomics data to BS.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rapier-Sharman, N.; Clancy, J.; Pickett, B.E. Joint secondary transcriptomic analysis of non-Hodgkin’s B-cell lymphomas predicts reliance on pathways associated with the extracellular matrix and robust diagnostic biomarkers. J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol. 2022, 5, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, L.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Glabal cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Hernández-Ruiz, E.; Alvarado-Ibarra, M.; Lien-Chang, L.E.; Banda-Garcia, L.; Aquino-Salgado, J.L.; Barragan-Ibanez, G.; Ramirez-Romero, E.F.; Nolasco-Cancino, C.; Herrera-Olivares, W.; Morales-Adrian, J.J.; et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Mexico. World J. Oncol. 2021, 12, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Palacio-Mejia, L.S.; Hernandez-Avila, J.E.; Hernandez-Avila, M.; Dyer-Leal, D.; Barranco, A.; Quezada-Sanchez, A.D.; Alvarez-Aceves, M.; Cortes-Alcala, R.; Fernandez-Wheatley, J.L.; Ordonez-Hernandez, I.; et al. Leading causes of excess mortality in Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020–2021: A death certificates study in a middle-income country. Lancet Reg. Health Am. 2022, 13, 100303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Howard, S.C.; McCormick, J.; Pui, C.H.; Buddington, R.K.; Harvey, R.D. Preventing and managing toxicities of high-dose methotrexate. Oncologist 2016, 21, 1471–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zeng, J.; Luo, Q.; Wang, X.; Xie, W.; Dong, S.; Fu, H.; Wei, Y.; Liu, T. Network pharmacology- and molecular docking-base investigation of the therapeutical potential and mechanism of daucosterol against multiple myeloma. Transl. Cancer Res. 2023, 12, 1006–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, C.; Cheng, H.; Li, N.; Liu, T.; Ma, Y. Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification-based proteomics reveals candidate proteins of fat deposition in Chinese indigenous sheep with morphologically different tails. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 710449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, H.-J.; Lan, H.-Q.; Wang, M.-Y.; Wang, C.-F.; Wei, L.-G.; Xu, C. Transcriptome analysis reveals norathyriol prolongs the lifespan via regulation metabolism in C. elegans. Metabolites 2024, 14, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, S.; Hong, H.; Yuan, Y.; Yin, Y.; Zeng, J.; Xiao, J. Exploring the mechanism of action of quercetin for the treatment of cervical high-risk human papilloma virus using network pharmacology and molecular docking. Chin. Med. Nat. Prod. 2024, 4, e35–e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Calzada, F.; García-Hernández, N.; Bautista, E.; Sánchez-López, J.M.; Valdes, M.; Velázquez, C.; Barbosa, E. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of incomptine A in treating non-Hodgkin lymphoma associated with U-937 cells: Bioinformatics approaches, Part I. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 18, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Merzouki, O.; Arrousse, N.; Ech-chihbi, E.; Alanazi, A.S.; Mabrouk, E.H.; Hefnawy, M.; El Moussaoui, A.; Touijer, H.; El Barnossi, A.; Taleb, M. Enveironmentally friendly synthesis of new mono. And bis-pyrazole derivatives; in vitro antimicrobial, antifungal, and antioxidant activity; and in silico studies: DFT, ADMETox, and molecular docking. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kalitin, N.; Koroleva, N.; Lushnikova, A.; Babaeva, M.; Samoylenkova, N.; Savchenko, E.; Smirnova, G.; Borisova, Y.; Kostarev, A.; Karamysheva, A.; et al. N-glycoside of indolo [2, 3-a] pyrrolo [3, 4-c] carbazole LC1269 exerts anti-glioblastoma effects by G2 cell cycle arrest and CDK1 activity modulation: Molecular docking studies, biological investigations, and ADMET prediction. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bulbul, M.V.; Mermer, A.; Kolbasi, B.; Kocabas, F.; Kalender, S.M.; Kirectepe Aydin, K.A.; Demiorcan, T.; Keskin, I. mTor pathway inhibition, anticancer activity and in silico calculations of novel hydazone derivatives in two- and three-dimensional cultured type 1 endometrial cancer cells. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kolberg, L.; Raudvere, U.; Kuzmin, I.; Adler, P.; Vilo, J.; Peterson, H. g: Profiler-interoperable web service for functional enrichment analysis and gene identifier mapping (2023 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W207–W212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, D.-F.; Cui, Z.-H.; Wang, L.-Y.; Zhang, K.-H.; Cao, L.-T.; Zheng, S.-J.; Zhang, L.-X. Tandem mas tag (TMT)-based proteomic analysis of Cryptosporidium andersoni oocysts before and after excystation. Parasit. Vectors 2021, 14, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bautista, E.; Calzada, F.; Yepez-Mulia, L.; Chavez-Soto, M.; Ortega, A. Incomptines C and D, two heliangolides from Decachaeta incompta and their antiprotozoal activity. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 1698–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arietta-García, A.G.; Calzada, F.; Ramírez-Sánchez, I.; Bautista, E.; García-Hernandez, N.; Ordoñez-Razo, R.M. Advances in the properties of incomptine A: Cytotoxic activity and downregulation of hexokinase II in breast cancer cell lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Taslimi, P.; Akhundova, F.; Kurbanova, M.; Türkan, F.; Tuzum, B.; Sujayev, A.; Sadeghian, N.; Maharramov, A.; Farzaliyev, V.; Gülcin, I. Biological activity and molecular docking study of some bicyclic structures: Antidiabetic and anticholinergic potentials. Polycycl. Aromat. Comp. 2022, 42, 6003–6016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friedlieness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ferlay, J.; Colombet, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Parkin, D.M.; Piñeros, M.; Znaor, A.; Bray, F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 149, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lasater, E.A.; Amin, D.N.; Bannerji, R.; Mali, R.S.; Barret, K.; Rys, R.N.; Oeh, J.; Lin, E.; Sterne-Weiler, T.; Ingalla, E.R.; et al. Targeting MCL-1 and BCL-2 with polatuzumab, vedotin and venetoclax overcomes treatment resistance in R/R non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Results from preclinical models and a phase IB study. Am. J. Hematol. 2023, 98, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cho-Vega, J.H.; Rassidakis, G.Z.; Admirand, J.H.; Oyarzo, M.; Ramalingam, P.; Paraguaya, A.; Medeiros, L.J. MCL-1 expression in B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Hum. Pathol. 2004, 35, 1095–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zare-Shahneh, F.; Valiyari, S.; Barandaran, B.; Abdolalizadeh, J.; Bandehagh, A.; Azadmehr, A.; Hajiaghaee, R. Inhibitory and cytotoxic activities of Salvia officinais L. extract on human lymphoma and leukemia cells by induction of apoptosis. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2013, 3, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cvetkovic’, Z.; Markovic’, O.; Marinkovic’, G.; Pejic’, S.; Vucic’, V. Tumor microenvironment, inflammation, and inflammatory prognostic indices in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas: A Narrative review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Swerdlow, S.H.; Campo, E.; Pileri, S.A.; Harris, N.L.; Stein, H.; Siebert, R.; Advani, R.; Ghielmini, M.; Salles, G.A.; Zelenetz, A.D.; et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2016, 127, 2375–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, Y.; Lawless, M.; Li, M.; Fairman, K.; Embry, M.; Mitchell, C.A. Prediction of physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of botanical constituents by computational models. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2024, 44, 1236–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Khan, T.; Lawrence, A.; Azad, I.; Raza, S.; Joshi, S.; Khan, A. Computational drug design and prediction of important parameters using in silico methods—A review. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 2019, 15, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cheng, F.; Li, W.; Liu, G.; Tang, Y. In silico ADMET prediction: Recent advances, current challenges and future trends. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 1273–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Widemann, B.; Adamson, P. Understanding and managing methotrexate nephrotoxicity. Oncologist 2006, 11, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rizvi, S.; Shahzad, Y.; Saleh, A.; Muhammad, N. Dose issues in cancer chemotherapy. Oncology 2020, 98, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guellec, C.; Blasco, H.; Benz, I.; Hulin, A. Therapeutic drug monitoring of methotrexate after its administration in high-dose protocols. Therapie 2010, 65, 163–169. [Google Scholar]
  32. Calzada, F.; Bautista, E.; Hidalgo-Figueroa, S.; Garcia-Hernandez, N.; Barbosa, E.; Velazquez, C.; Ordoñez-Razo, R.M.; Arietta-Garcia, A.G. Antilymphoma effect of incomptine A: In Vivo, in silico, and toxicological studies. Molecules 2021, 26, 6646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Widemann, B.; Balis, F.; Kempf-Bielak, B.; Bielak, S.; Pratt, C.; Ferari, S.; Bacci, G.; Craft, A.; Adamson, P. High-dose methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity in patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer 2004, 100, 2222–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Darmon, M.; Ciroldi, M.; Thiery, G.; Schelmmer, B.; Azoulay, E. Clinical review: Specific aspects of acute renal failure in cancer patients. Crit. Care 2006, 10, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Calzada, F.; Solares-Pascasio, J.I.; Valdes, M.; Garcia-Hernandez, N.; Velazquez, C.; Ordoñez-Razo, R.M.; Barbosa, E. Antilymphoma potential of the ethanol extract and rutin obtained of the leaves from Schinus mole Linn. Phcog. Res. 2018, 10, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Campbell, M.; Perrier, D.; Dorr, R.; Alberts, D.; Finley, P. Methotrexate: Bioability and pharmacokinetics. Cancer Treat. Rep. 1985, 69, 833–838. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zubair, A.C.; Ali, S.A.; Rees, R.C.; Goepel, J.R.; Winfield, D.A.; Goysns, M.H. Analysis of the colonization of unirradiated and irradiated SCID mice by human lymphoma and non-malignant lymphoid cells. Leuk. Lymphoma 1996, 22, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Calzada, F.; Ramírez-Santos, J.; Ordoñez-Razo, R.M.; Valdes, M.; Velazquez, C.; Barbosa, E. Anti-lymphoma activity of acyclic terpénoids and its structure-activity relationship: In vitro, in vitro, and in silico studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Babaei, G.; Aliarab, A.; Abroon, S.; Rasmi, Y.; Aziz, S.G. Application of sesquiterpene lactone: A new promising from cancer therapy based on anticancer activity. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 105, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abdolmohamma, M.H.; Fouladdel, S.; Shafiee, A.; Amin, G.; Ghaffari, S.; Azizi, E. Anticancer effects and cell cycle analysis on human breast cancer T47D cells treated with extracts of Astrodaucus persicus (Boiss). Drude in comparison to doxorubicin. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 16, 112–118. [Google Scholar]
  41. Perumal, A.; AlSalhi, M.S.; Kanakarajan, S.; Devanesan, S.; Selvaraj, R.; Tamizhazhagan, V. Phytochemical evaluation and anticancer activity of rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum) fruit endocarp extracts against human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG-2) cells. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 1816–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Suffness, M.; Douros, J. Current status of the NCI plant and animal product program. J. Nat. Prod. 1982, 45, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shetty, A.; Cho, W.; Alazawi, W.; Syn, W.K. Methotrexate hepatotoxicity and the impact of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2017, 354, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tao, Y.; Wu, Y.; Shen, R.; He, S.; Miao, X. Role of four and half LIM domain protein 1 in tumors (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2024, 29, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Frenay, J.; Belleye, P.-S.; Oudot, A.; Helbling, A.; Petitot, C.; Ferrand, C.; Collin, B.; Dias, A.M.M. IL-1RAP, a key therapeutic target in cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pan, H.; Wang, H.; Huang, W.; Dai, Y.; Yang, M.; Liang, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, L.; Huang, W.; Yuan, L.; et al. Interferon-induced protein 44 correlated with immune infiltration serves as a potential prognostic indicator in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Frotn. Oncol. 2020, 10, 557157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Han, Y.; Lun, Y. A Pan-cancer study of tumor associated efferocytosis core genes and preliminary exploration of TIMD4 in renal cell carcinoma. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2025, 29, e70671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Darwish, N.M.; Al-Hail, M.K.; Mohamed, Y.; Saady, R.A.; Mohsen, S.; Zar, A.; Al-Mansoori, L.; Pederson, S. Apolipoproteins in the commonest cancers. Cancers 2023, 15, 5565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tang, Z.; Shen, Q.; Xie, H.; Zhou, X.; Li, J.; Feng, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, S.; Ni, S. Elevated expression of FABP3 and FABP4 cooperatively correlates with porr prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oncotarget 2016, 7, 46253–46261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Toydemir, R.M.; Rutherford, A.; Whitby, F.G.; Jorde, L.B.; Carey, J.C.; Bamshad, M.J. Mutations in embryonic myosin heavy chain (MYH3) cause Freeman-Sheldon syndrome and Sheldon-Hall syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hu, G.; Yao, H.; Wei, Z.; Li, L.; Yu, Z.; Li, J.; Luo, X.; Guo, Z. A bioinformatic approach to identify a disufidptosis-related gene signature for prognostic implication in colon adenocarcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 12403. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee, D.-Y.; Kang, Y.; Im, N.-R.; Kim, B.; Kwon, T.-K.; Jung, K.-Y.; Baek, S.-K. Actin-associated gene expression is aassociated with early regional metastasis of tongue cancer. Laryngoscope 2021, 131, 813–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yu, X.-J.; Yang, M.-J.; Zhou, B.; Wang, G.-Z.; Huang, Y.-C.; Wu, L.-C.; Cheng, X.; Wen, Z.-S.; Huang, J.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-D.; et al. Characterization of somatic mutations in air pollution-related lung cancer. EBioMedicine 2015, 2, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sun, J.; Li, S.; Wang, F.; Fan, C.; Wang, J. Idetification of key pathways and genes in PTEN mutation prostae cancer by bioinformatics analysis. BMC Med. Genet. 2019, 20, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pan, D.; Chen, J.; Feng, C.; Wu, W.; Wang, Y.; Tong, J.; Zhou, D. Preferential localization of MUC1 glycoprotein in exosomes secreted by non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Q.; Hu, H.; Chen, S.-Y.; Liu, C.-J.; Hu, F.-F.; Yu, J.; Wu, Y.; Guo, A.-Y. Transcriptome and regulatory network analyses of CD-19-CART-T immunotherapy for B-ALL. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2019, 17, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yan, G.; Dai, M.; Poulet, S.; Wang, N.; Boudreault, J.; Daliah, G.; Ali, S.; Lebrun, J.-J. Combined in vitro/in vivo genome-wide CRISPR screens in triple negative breast cancer identify cancer stemness regulators in paclitaxel resistence. Oncogenesis 2023, 12, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, C.-C.; Wang, H.; Wang, W.-D.; Wang, L.; Liu, W.-J.; Wang, J.-H.; Geng, Q.-R. ENO2 promotes cell proliferation, glycolys, and glucocorticoid-resistance inn acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 46, 1525–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Isgró, M.A.; Bottoni, P.; Scatena, R. Neuron-specif enolase as a biomarker: Biochemical and clinical aspects. In Advances in Cancer Biomarkers; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 867; Springer Science: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 867, pp. 126–143. [Google Scholar]
  60. Gao, L.; Yang, F.; Tang, D.; Xu, Z.; Tang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Yang, D.; Sun, D.; Chen, Z.; Teng, Y. Mediation of PKM2-dependent glycolytic and non-glycolytic pathways by ENO2 in head and neck cancer development. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2023, 42, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Agu, P.; Afiukwa, C.; Orji, O.; Ezeh, E.; Ofole, I.; Ogbu, C.; Uwuja, E.; Aja, P. Molecular docking as a tool for the discovery of molecular targets of nutraceuticals in diseases management. Sci. Rep. 2023, 7, 13384–13421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ferreira, L.; N dos Santos, R.; Oliva, C.; Anridopulo, A. Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drugs Design Strategies. Molecules 2013, 20, 13384–13421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. NOM-062-ZOO-1999; Norma Oficial Mexicana. Especificaciones Técnicas para la Producción, Cuidado y uso de Animales de Laboratorio. Diario Oficial de la Federación: Mexico City, Mexico, 2001. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/203498/NOM-062-ZOO-1999_220801.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2025).
  64. Wu, T.; Hu, E.; Xu, S.; Chen, M.; Guo, P.; Dai, Z.; Feng, T.; Zhou, L.; Tang, W.; Zhan, L.; et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2021, 2, 100141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Raudvere, U.; Kolberg, L.; Kuzmin, I.; Arak, T.; Adler, P.; Peterson, H.; Vilo, J. g: Profiler: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W191–W198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sun, L.; Dong, S.; Ge, Y.; Fonseca, J.P.; Robinson, Z.T.; Mysore, K.S.; Mehta, P. DiVenn: An Interactive and integrated web-based visualization tool for comparing gene lists. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Oliveros, J.C. Venny. An interactive Tool for Comparing Lists with Venn’s Diagrams. Available online: https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (accessed on 11 May 2025).
  68. Xiong, G.; Wu, Z.; Yi, J.; Fu, L.; Yang, Z.; Hsieh, C.; Yin, M.; Zeng, X.; Wu, C.; Lu, A.; et al. ADMETlab 2.0: An integrative online plataform for accurate and comprehensive predictions of ADMET properties. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W5–W14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cheng, F.X.; Li, W.H.; Zhou, Y.D.; Shen, J.; Wu, Z.R.; Liu, G.X.; Lee, P.W.; Tang, Y. admetSAR: A Comprehensive source and free tool for assessment of chemical ADMET properties. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 3099–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Banerjee, P.; Kemmler, E.; Dunkel, M.; Preissner, R. ProTox 3.0: A webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W513–W520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hanwell, M.; Curtis, D.; Lonie, D.; Vandermeersch, T.; Zurek, E.; Hutchison, G. Avogadro: An advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J. Cheminform. 2012, 4, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Morris, G.; Lindstrom, W.; Sanner, M.; Belew, R.; Goodshell, D.; Olson, A. Autodock4 and AutodockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2785–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Drug Discovery. BIOVIA Discovery Studio Visualizer; Version 20.1.0.19295; Dassault Systems BIOVIA: Waltham, MA, USA, 2025; Available online: https://www.3ds.com/products/biovia/discovery-studio (accessed on 22 May 2025).
Figure 1. Pharmacological activities reported for incomptine A (IA).
Figure 1. Pharmacological activities reported for incomptine A (IA).
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g001
Figure 2. Decachaeta incompta (DC) R. M. King and H. Robinson.
Figure 2. Decachaeta incompta (DC) R. M. King and H. Robinson.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g002
Figure 3. Chromatographic profile (240 nm) of dichloromethane extract from Decachaeta incompta (DCEDi) leaves (A) and incomptine A (B) standard. The x-axis indicates the retention time in minutes, while the y-axis indicates the peak % signal intensity.
Figure 3. Chromatographic profile (240 nm) of dichloromethane extract from Decachaeta incompta (DCEDi) leaves (A) and incomptine A (B) standard. The x-axis indicates the retention time in minutes, while the y-axis indicates the peak % signal intensity.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g003
Figure 4. Thin-layer chromatography of presumptive identification of incomptine A (IA) in dichloromethane extract from Decachaeta incompta (DCEDi) leaves. (A) DCEDi leaves; (B) incomptine A; (C) incomptine B. Mobile phase: CHCl3: EtOAc (7.5: 2.5, v/v); adsorbent: silica gel 60F254 pre-coated TLC plates (Merck, Darmstadt); detection: compounds and extract were visualized by spraying with a 10 % solution of H2SO4 in water and then heating at 120 °C.
Figure 4. Thin-layer chromatography of presumptive identification of incomptine A (IA) in dichloromethane extract from Decachaeta incompta (DCEDi) leaves. (A) DCEDi leaves; (B) incomptine A; (C) incomptine B. Mobile phase: CHCl3: EtOAc (7.5: 2.5, v/v); adsorbent: silica gel 60F254 pre-coated TLC plates (Merck, Darmstadt); detection: compounds and extract were visualized by spraying with a 10 % solution of H2SO4 in water and then heating at 120 °C.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g004
Figure 5. Cytotoxic activity of IA and MTX against U-937 cells (histiocytic lymphoma). The graphs show the % growth inhibition of the U-937 cell line treated with IA (A) and MTX (B) at different concentrations after 24 h of exposure. Data were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism 6.03 (n = 3 and p < 0.05, GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA); CC50 was defined as the treatment concentration at which 50% reduction in cellular proliferation was observed. The assays were performed in triplicate, and these data were used to obtain the CC50 by lineal regression analysis.
Figure 5. Cytotoxic activity of IA and MTX against U-937 cells (histiocytic lymphoma). The graphs show the % growth inhibition of the U-937 cell line treated with IA (A) and MTX (B) at different concentrations after 24 h of exposure. Data were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism 6.03 (n = 3 and p < 0.05, GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA); CC50 was defined as the treatment concentration at which 50% reduction in cellular proliferation was observed. The assays were performed in triplicate, and these data were used to obtain the CC50 by lineal regression analysis.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g005
Figure 6. PPI network map of protein clusters and core targets in male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with incomptine A. The green color shows downregulated proteins and the red/cream color shows upregulated proteins. PPI, protein–protein interaction.
Figure 6. PPI network map of protein clusters and core targets in male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with incomptine A. The green color shows downregulated proteins and the red/cream color shows upregulated proteins. PPI, protein–protein interaction.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g006
Figure 7. Results of bioinformatics analysis using g: Profiler. (A) Significant enriched terms in the GO, REAC, and KEGG databases. GO: MF, gene ontology molecular function; GO: BP, gene ontology process; GO: CC, gene ontology cellular component; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; REAC, Reactome. (B) List of top 30 significantly changed terms enriched by GO, KEGG, and REAC databases.
Figure 7. Results of bioinformatics analysis using g: Profiler. (A) Significant enriched terms in the GO, REAC, and KEGG databases. GO: MF, gene ontology molecular function; GO: BP, gene ontology process; GO: CC, gene ontology cellular component; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; REAC, Reactome. (B) List of top 30 significantly changed terms enriched by GO, KEGG, and REAC databases.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g007
Figure 8. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of DEPs obtained from male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with incomptine A. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function.
Figure 8. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of DEPs obtained from male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with incomptine A. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g008
Figure 9. GO enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway analysis in male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. (A) Gene ontology (GO) in terms of biological process; (B) GO in terms of cellular component; (C) GO in terms of molecular function; (D) KEGG pathway analysis.
Figure 9. GO enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway analysis in male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. (A) Gene ontology (GO) in terms of biological process; (B) GO in terms of cellular component; (C) GO in terms of molecular function; (D) KEGG pathway analysis.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g009
Figure 10. Correlation between DEPs and pathways in KEGG analysis: (A) necroptosis; (B) cardiac muscle contraction and dilated cardiomyopathy.
Figure 10. Correlation between DEPs and pathways in KEGG analysis: (A) necroptosis; (B) cardiac muscle contraction and dilated cardiomyopathy.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g010
Figure 11. Correlation between DEPs and networks in REAC analysis.
Figure 11. Correlation between DEPs and networks in REAC analysis.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g011
Figure 12. The interaction mode between incomptine A (1) and methotrexate (2) and six potential targets: (A) apolipoprotein A-IV, (B) fatty acid-binding, (C) four and a half LIM domains protein 1, (D) interferon-induced protein 44, (E) interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein, and (F) T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 4.
Figure 12. The interaction mode between incomptine A (1) and methotrexate (2) and six potential targets: (A) apolipoprotein A-IV, (B) fatty acid-binding, (C) four and a half LIM domains protein 1, (D) interferon-induced protein 44, (E) interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein, and (F) T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 4.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01263 g012
Table 1. HPLC coupled to diode array, retention time, and percentage in area of incomptine A identified of the dichloromethane extract from Decachaeta incompta leaves.
Table 1. HPLC coupled to diode array, retention time, and percentage in area of incomptine A identified of the dichloromethane extract from Decachaeta incompta leaves.
CompoundR.T. * (min)Area (%)Molecular Weight (g/mol)Molecular Formula
Incomptine A44.9510.42304.35C17H20O5
* R.T.: Retention time.
Table 2. 1H and 13C NMR data (500 MHz and 125 MHz) of incomptine A (IA) in CDCl3.
Table 2. 1H and 13C NMR data (500 MHz and 125 MHz) of incomptine A (IA) in CDCl3.
PositionIncomptine A
δH, mult. (J in Hz)δC (ppm)
13.26 dd (7.5, 1.0)60.4
25.55 dd (11.5, 7.5128.3
36.14 d (11.5)132.3
4-136.0
55.31 dq (11.0, 1.5)126.1
65.01 dd (11.0, 1.5)75.7
72.94 quin (3.0, 1.5)50.1
85.20 ddd (4.5, 3.0, 2.0)77.0
92.70 dd (14.5, 4.5)43.0
9’1.38 ddd (14.5, 3.0, 0.5
10-61.2
11-137.2
12-169.7
136.40 dd (2.0, 0.5)124.8
13’5.80 d (2.0
141.41 s19.7
151.88 s23.7
Ac (C=O)-169.2
Ac (CH3)2.02 s20.7
Table 3. Expected pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties for incomptine A (IA) and methotrexate (MTX).
Table 3. Expected pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties for incomptine A (IA) and methotrexate (MTX).
Pharmacokinetics Properties
Absorption Metabolism
IAMTX IAMTX
Gastrointestinal absorptionHighLow CYP2C9 substrateNoNo
Hematoencephalic barrierYesNo CYP2D6 substrateNoNo
Caco-2 permeabilityHighLow CYP3A4 substrateYesYes
p-glycoprotein substrateYesYes CYP2C9 inhibitorNoNo
p-glycoprotein inhibitorNoNo CYP2D6 inhibitorNoNo
Log Kp (skin permeation)–6.89 cm/s–10.39 cm/s CYP3A4 inhibitorNoNo
CYP1A2 inhibitorNoNo
CYP2C19 inhibitorNoNo
Distribution Excretion
MitochondrialYesYes CL4.64 mL/min/Kg2.41 mL/min/Kg
Protein plasma binding75.9%63.4% T1/20.78 h0.39 h
Volume distribution1.38 L/Kg0.32 L/Kg
Toxicity
IAMTX IAMTX
HepatotoxicityInactiveActive CarcinogenicityInactiveInactive
NeurotoxicityInactiveActive ImmunotoxicityInactiveInactive
NephrotoxicityInactiveInactive MutagenicityInactiveInactive
Respiratory toxicityActiveActive CytotoxicityInactiveInactive
CardiotoxicityInactiveInactive
Predicted rats LD502.68 mol/Kg3.49 mol/Kg
Predicted human LD501330 mg/Kg3.0 mg/Kg
Expected toxicity class *IVI
Predictions were obtained from ADMETlab, SwissADME, admetSAR, and PROTOX web servers. T1/2: Half lifetime; * Toxicity classes are defined according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). LD50 is expressed in mg/kg. Class I: fatal by ingestion (LD50 ≤ 5); Class II: fatal by ingestion (5 < LD50 ≤ 50); Class III: fatal by ingestion (50 < LD50 ≤ 300); Class IV: fatal by ingestion (300 < LD50 ≤ 2000); Class V: fatal by ingestion (2000 < LD50 ≤ 5000); Class VI: fatal by ingestion (LD50 > 5000).
Table 4. Physicochemical properties for IA and MTX.
Table 4. Physicochemical properties for IA and MTX.
Physicochemical Properties
IAMTXDrug-Likeness
Molecular formulaC17H22O5C20H22N8O5
Molecular weight306.35 g/mol454.44 g/mol IAMTX
TPSA65.13 Å2210.54 Å2LipinskyYesYes
Lipophilicity (LogP)2.33−0.32GhoseYesYes
Water solubility (LogS)−2.71−2.41VeberYesNo, 1 violation
Solubility classSolubleVery solubleEganYesNo, 1 violation
Number of rotating links210MueggeYesNo, 1 violation
Number of H-bond donors05PAINS00
Number of H-bond acceptors59
Predictions were obtained from ADMETlab and SwissADME.
Table 5. Median cytotoxic concentration calculated against U-937 cell line from IA and MTX.
Table 5. Median cytotoxic concentration calculated against U-937 cell line from IA and MTX.
CompoundCC50 (μM) a
Incomptine A (IA)0.29 ± 0.01 *
Methotrexate (MTX)1.60 ± 0.02
a U-937 cell line (histiocytic lymphoma); CC50: median cytotoxic concentration causing 50% cell death. Calculated by linear regression analysis of percentage mortality against concentration. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3 and * p < 0.05).
Table 6. Results of the antilymphoma activity after the treatment with IA and MTX on male Balb/c mice with NHL.
Table 6. Results of the antilymphoma activity after the treatment with IA and MTX on male Balb/c mice with NHL.
Compound% Inhibition (10 mg/kg) in Male Balb/c Mice aED50 (mg/kg) b
Incomptine A (IA)62.0 ± 1.57.5 ± 0.01
Methotrexate (MTX)ND *1.4 ± 0.02
a Results are expressed as average ± SEM (n = 6 and p < 0.05). * ND: not determined; MTX at doses ≥ 1.25 mg/kg caused mortality in male Balb/c mice. b ED50: median effective dose that caused 50% of mice to have the desired pharmacological effect.
Table 7. Differentially expressed proteins for the treatment of IA or MTX in lymph nodes from male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Table 7. Differentially expressed proteins for the treatment of IA or MTX in lymph nodes from male Balb/c mice with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
C-(DMSO) vsDownregulated FC < 0.66 (1/1.5)Upregulated FC > 1.5
MTX577
IA6640
Data represents the fold change (FC) with the number of DEPs. IA at a dose of 10 mg/kg, MTX at a dose of 1.25 mg/kg and negative control, male Balb/c mice with NHL. DEPs were compared with mouse protein.
Table 8. Proteins altered for IA only (10 mg/kg) in lymph nodes from male mice with NHL and treated with IA or MTX (1.25 mg/kg) and identified by TMT.
Table 8. Proteins altered for IA only (10 mg/kg) in lymph nodes from male mice with NHL and treated with IA or MTX (1.25 mg/kg) and identified by TMT.
Protein IDProtein NameGene NameIA (FC)MTX (FC)
P04202Transforming growth factor beta 1Tgfb10.643493WC
P97434Myosin phosphatase Rho interacting proteinMprip0.637507WC
Q9EQN3Domain family member 4Tsc22d40.621895WC
P49717DNA replication licensing factor MCM4Mcm40.605720WC
P56375Acylphosphatase-2Acyp20.612446WC
Q64339Ubiquitin-like protein ISG15Isg150.596993WC
Q8CI51PDZ and LIM domain protein 5Pdlim50.610126WC
Q9QXV3Inhibitor of growth protein 1Ing10.612365WC
Q9WVR4RNA-binding proteinFxr20.604267WC
P15089Mast cell carboxypeptidase ACpa31.684613WC
P57746V-type proton ATPase subunit DAtp6v1d1.692460WC
Q00623Apolipoprotein A-IApoa11.714051WC
Q61490CD 106 antigenAlcam1.592873WC
Q64314Hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34Cd341.557006WC
Q80SZ7Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(O)Gng51.847469WC
Q8C3X2Coiled-coil domain-containing protein 90BCcdc90b1.602073WC
Q9CQI7U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein BSnrpb21.583845WC
Q9D0M1Phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthase-associated protein 1Prpsap11.605011WC
Q9D7M1Glucose-induced degradation protein 8 homologGid81.630454WC
Q9JL35High mobility group nucleosome-binding domain containing protein 5Hmgn51.665424WC
O09167Large ribosomal subunit protein eL21Rpl212.107700WC
O35387HCLS1-associated protein X-1Hax11.777345WC
O70494Transcription factor Sp3Sp31.687230WC
P84244Histone H3.3H3f3a; H3f3b2.804078WC
Q8CGP2Histone H2B type 1-PHist1h2bp2.244255WC
P12246Serum amyloid P-componentApcs1.636670WC
P15864Histone H1.2H1-2 or Hist1h1c2.578941WC
P27661Histone H2AXH2ax or H2afx2.641841WC
P28184Metallothionein-3Mt31.630307WC
P51910Apolipoprotein DApod1.835178WC
P62806Histone H4H4c11 or Hist1h4a3.246594WC
P97315Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 1Csrp11.620372WC
P97864Caspase-7Casp71.611143WC
Q80UW8DNA-directed RNA polymerases I, II, and III subunit RPABC1Polr2e1.715163WC
Q8BTS4Nuclear pore complex protein Nup54Nup541.595948WC
Q8BX10Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PGAM5, mitochondrialPgam51.578568WC
Q8CGP5Histone H2A type 1-FHist1h2af2.449976WC
Q8JZY2COMM domain-containing protein 10Commd101.674767WC
Q9D0A3ArpinArpin1.560642WC
Q9D820Prolyl-tRNA synthetase associated domain-containing protein 1Prorsd11.790119WC
Q9QZQ8Core histone macro-H2A.1Macroh2a1 or H2afy2.275530WC
Q9Z2D6Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2Mecp21.942897WC
FC, fold change; WC, without change.
Table 9. Proteins altered by IA (10 mg/kg) and MTX (1.25 mg/kg) in lymph nodes from male mice with NHL and identified by TMT.
Table 9. Proteins altered by IA (10 mg/kg) and MTX (1.25 mg/kg) in lymph nodes from male mice with NHL and identified by TMT.
Protein IDProtein NameGene NameIA (FC)MTX (FC)
O09165Calsequestrin-1Casq10.1161920.168875
O70250Phosphoglycerate mutase 2Pgam20.1305080.153858
P13412Troponin I, fast skeletal muscleTnni20.1242950.155632
P20801Troponin C, skeletal muscleTnnc20.1385950.178338
P17183Gamma-enolaseEno20.1514920.204480
Q9QZ47Troponin T, fast skeletal muscleTnnt30.1686880.187661
P97457Myosin regulatory light chain 2, skeletal muscle isoformMylpf0.1607830.185690
P13542Myosin-8Myh80.1675940.188003
Q9WUZ7SH3 domain-binding glutamic acid-rich proteinSh3bgr0.1811640.214274
P05977Myosin light chain 1/3, skeletal muscle isoformMyl10.1801400.223749
Q5SX39Myosin-4Myh40.1888000.191696
P58774Tropomyosin beta chain Tpm20.1834960.197290
P32848Parvalbumin alphaPvalb 0.1868710.197277
Q5SX40Myosin-1Myh1 0.1930770.224988
Q9JKS4LIM domain-binding protein 3Ldb3 0.2102070.245489
P07310Creatine kinase M-typeCkm0.2050440.218269
P58771Tropomyosin alpha-1 chainTpm10.2119970.215467
Q9JK37Myozenin-1Myoz10.2122860.240133
Q8R429Sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 1Atp2a10.2413640.246236
Q62234Myomesin-1Myom10.2354610.252929
Q6P8J7Creatine kinase S-type, mitochondrialCkmt20.2374300.265434
Q8R1X6SpartinSpg200.2552820.309371
P51667Myosin regulatory light chain 2, ventricular/cardiacMy12 0.2442510.292434
muscle isoform
P09542Myosin light chain 3My130.2381130.2115191
Q5XKE0Myosin-binding protein C, fast-typeMybpc20.2575200.274625
Q9WUB3Glycogen phosphorylase, muscle formPygm0.2501240.280577
P13541Myosin-3Myh30.2454560.259989
A2ASS6TitinTtn0.2784990.310760
P21550Beta-enolaseEno30.2873610.301657
P23927Alpha-crystallin B chainCryab0.2801050.307071
Q9JI91Alpha-actinin-2Actn20.2821260.349733
O88990Alpha-actinin-3Actn30.3095650.335477
P04247MyoglobinMb0.3277170.314839
Q9JLH8Tropomodulin-4Tmod40.3427170.419507
P97447Four and a half LIM domains protein 1Fhl10.3591500.385025
P11404Fatty acid-binding protein, heartFabp30.3756260.505352
P68134Actin, alpha skeletal muscleActa10.4011630.351810
Q9JIF9MyotilinMyot0.3937250.442669
P48962ADP/ATP translocase 1Slc25a40.4349970.292006
Q9DAZ9Abscission/NoCut checkpoint regulatorZfyve190.4639850.424291
Q64345Interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3Ifit30.4084820.500078
Q9R0Y5Adenylate kinase isoenzyme 1Ak10.3944180.342173
Q7TQ48SarcalumeninSrl0.4172230.452027
Q3TJD7PDZ and LIM domain protein 7Pdlim70.4234440.581780
Q8VHX6Filamin-CFlnc0.4605150.528664
Q91Z83Myosin-7Myh70.4507770.432883
A2ABU4Myomesin-3Myom30.4477760.505737
Q8BV66Interferon-induced protein 44Ifi440.5491420.481085
P15307Proto-oncogene c-RelRel0.5130740.548115
P04919Band 3 anion transport proteinSlc4a10.5067320.390399
Q99NB8Ubiquilin-4Ubqln40.4536020.576117
Q9CQC7NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplexNdufb40.5812190.459827
subunit 4
P45591Cofilin-2Cfl20.5971590.624516
Q9DA08SAGA-associated factor 29 homologCcdc1010.5942090.656104
Q9D1L0Coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain-containing protein 2Chchd20.5807120.635534
Q9CXW228S ribosomal protein S22, mitochondrialMrps220.6357890.602915
Q9R059 Four and a half LIM domains protein 3Fhl30.6450770.581828
P06728Apolipoprotein A-IVApoa41.5221751.508959
P01645Ig kappa chain V-V region HP 93G7KV5AC1.7483031.688753
P47955Large ribosomal subunit protein P1Rplp11.5742901.558623
Q501J7Phosphatase and actin regulator 4Phactr41.6032991.505982
Q6U7R4T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 4Timd41.7252751.539719
Q61730Interleukin-1 receptor accessory proteinIl1rap1.6656891.502210
P26645Myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrateMarcks1.8913901.679438
FC, fold change.
Table 10. Protein–ligand interactions from molecular docking, ∆G (kcal/mol), and Ki (µM).
Table 10. Protein–ligand interactions from molecular docking, ∆G (kcal/mol), and Ki (µM).
ProteinLigands
Incomptine A (IA) Methotrexate (M)
ΔGKiH-BRNPI ΔGKiH-BRNPI
Apoa4−6.3522.12Phe303, Thr357, Leu358, Glu359, Lys361, Gly361Met194, Leu197, Leu263, Val300, Arg304, Lys360 −4.27744.4Glo308, Gly311, Glu312, Asn315, Glu349, Asn352, Ser353, Ser356, Glu359Arg348, Met355
Fabp3−7.175.53Phe17, Tyr20, Thr54, Lys59, Thr61, Thr75, Ala76, Asp77, Arg79, Gln96Met21, Leu24, Val26, Leu105, Leu116, Leu118 −4.84284.07Asn60, Thr61, Glu62, Asn64, Phe65, Phe71, Asp72, Glu73, Thr75, Ala76, Asp78Lys59, Ile63, Val74
Fhl1−6.869.38Gly103, Thr120, Trp122, Cys126, Thr128, Ser130, Lys133, Glu146, Asp147Lys102, Phe127, Phe148 −4.92284.1Arg100, Cys101, Tyr117, Gly119, Thr120, Val121, Trp122, Gly145, Glu146, Phe148Lys102, Phe105, Lys118
IFi44−6.5515.9Thr8, Gln10, Gln11, Lys58, Cys59, Val60, Gln82, Glu83, Phe86Cys14, Leu81 −5.7264.22Ile356, Tyr357, Asn358, Lys363, Leu366, Ser378, Leu381, Val382, Val383, Met398, Leu399, Ser402, Ala403, Glu406Leu377
Il1rap−7.155.74Gln34, Gln36, Arg143, Arg143Ile35, Met142, Phe144, Pro145 −6.0238.51Thr31, Met32, Arg33, Gln34, Ile35, Gln36, Phe144, Pro145, Pro161, Asn162, Arg227, Thr228, Val229Val37, Met142, Arg143
Timd4−7.244.9Arg113, Phe120, Asn121, Asp122, Val123, Leu300, Gly303, Thr306Lys124, Phe299, Arg302 −5.11180.54Ala23, Ser24, Glu25, Thr37, Leu38, Pro39, Cys40, His41, Ser96, Ala124, Asn126, Val127, Cys310, Gln312, Asp26, Lys215, Leu311, Arg313, His314
Apoa4: apolipoprotein A-IV, Fabp3: fatty acid-binding, Fhl1: four and a half LIM domains protein 1, Ifi44: interferon-induced protein 44, Il1rap: interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein, Timd4: T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 4.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Hernández, N.; Calzada, F.; Bautista, E.; Sánchez-López, J.M.; Valdes, M.; Velázquez, C.; Barbosa, E. Expanding the Knowledge of the Molecular Effects and Therapeutic Potential of Incomptine A for the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: In Vivo and Bioinformatics Studies, Part III. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18091263

AMA Style

García-Hernández N, Calzada F, Bautista E, Sánchez-López JM, Valdes M, Velázquez C, Barbosa E. Expanding the Knowledge of the Molecular Effects and Therapeutic Potential of Incomptine A for the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: In Vivo and Bioinformatics Studies, Part III. Pharmaceuticals. 2025; 18(9):1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18091263

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Hernández, Normand, Fernando Calzada, Elihú Bautista, José Manuel Sánchez-López, Miguel Valdes, Claudia Velázquez, and Elizabeth Barbosa. 2025. "Expanding the Knowledge of the Molecular Effects and Therapeutic Potential of Incomptine A for the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: In Vivo and Bioinformatics Studies, Part III" Pharmaceuticals 18, no. 9: 1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18091263

APA Style

García-Hernández, N., Calzada, F., Bautista, E., Sánchez-López, J. M., Valdes, M., Velázquez, C., & Barbosa, E. (2025). Expanding the Knowledge of the Molecular Effects and Therapeutic Potential of Incomptine A for the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: In Vivo and Bioinformatics Studies, Part III. Pharmaceuticals, 18(9), 1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18091263

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop