Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
CIMBCurrent Issues in Molecular Biology
  • Review
  • Open Access

5 August 2021

Circulating miRNAs Related to Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transitions (EMT) as the New Molecular Markers in Endometriosis

,
,
and
1
Department of Biomedicine and Genetics, Medical University of Lodz, Pomorska 251, C-5, 92-213 Lodz, Poland
2
Operative and Conservative Gynecology Ward, Dr. K. Jonscher Municipal Medical Centre, Milionowa 14, 93-113 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Section Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disease defined by the presence of endometrial-like tissue found outside the uterus, most commonly in the peritoneal cavity. Endometriosis lesions are heterogenous but usually contain endometrial stromal cells and epithelial glands, immune cell infiltrates and are vascularized and innervated by nerves. The complex etiopathogenesis and heterogenity of the clinical symptoms, as well as the lack of a specific non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers, underline the need for more advanced diagnostic tools. Unfortunately, the contribution of environmental, hormonal and immunological factors in the disease etiology is insufficient, and the contribution of genetic/epigenetic factors is still fragmentary. Therefore, there is a need for more focused study on the molecular mechanisms of endometriosis and non-invasive diagnostic monitoring systems. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) demonstrate high stability and tissue specificity and play a significant role in modulating a range of molecular pathways, and hence may be suitable diagnostic biomarkers for the origin and development of endometriosis. Of these, the most frequently studied are those related to endometriosis, including those involved in epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), whose expression is altered in plasma or endometriotic lesion biopsies; however, the results are ambiguous. Specific miRNAs expressed in endometriosis may serve as diagnostics markers with prognostic value, and they have been proposed as molecular targets for treatment. The aim of this review is to present selected miRNAs associated with EMT known to have experimentally confirmed significance, and discuss their utility as biomarkers in endometriosis.

1. Introduction

Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent chronic gynecological disease with mixed features of benign disease and malignancy. Although spontaneous remission is possible, it is suggested that endometriosis may progress to carcinogenesis [1]. It is characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue and the growth of dysfunctional endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity [2]. The typical clinical symptoms are dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, dysuria, infertility, cyclic and acyclic pelvic pain [3,4]. Despite the severity of some of these symptoms, as many as 11% of cases go undiagnosed [5], and symptomatic endometriosis occurs in approximately 10% of all women of reproductive age [6,7]. A recent meta-analysis found the total incidence of endometriosis, to demonstrate high heterogeneity, ranging from 1.36–3.53/per 1000 person years depending on the source of information [8].
Limited evidence suggests that the incidence of endometriosis can also depend on population type and ethnicity, with black women being less frequently diagnosed with endometriosis, and Asian women more likely, than white women. Moreover, there was a significant difference in the likelihood of endometriosis diagnosis between Hispanic and white women [9]. However, is not clear whether this variation reflects differences in response to treatment among ethnic groups [10].
A number of other interrelated risk factors for endometriosis have been identified, including clinical characteristics, hormonal, immunological, genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. The development and progression of the disease may also be associated with certain familial predispositions [11,12]. The fact that the endometriosis phenotype demonstrates such variability suggests that a single etiopathogenetic explanatory model is not sufficient. Indeed, there are many inconsistent theories and hypothesis concerning the pathogenesis of endometriosis [11,12,13]. One of the most popular, associated with intraperitoneal and ovarian endometriosis, is Sampson’s implantation theory, or the retrograde menstruation theory, which proposes that eutopic fragments of the endometrium are the implanted outside the uterine cavity as a result of menstrual reflux through the fallopian tubes [14]. Ectopic tissue implantation and proliferation is facilitated by an inflammatory process that escapes immune surveillance, which has been suggested to be overloaded or insufficient in women with endometriosis [7,15].
A recent theory concerns the role of M1/M2 macrophage activity and its polarization in endometriosis, with the transition from classical M1 macrophage activity to alternative M2; this correlates with the histological features of the initial acute inflammation and subsequent with pro-fibrotic activity and the process of tissue remodeling characteristic of advanced stages of endometriosis. In fact, M1 macrophages have been found to be more abundant in ovarian endometriosis in stages I–II, while M2 macrophages are found in large amounts in stages III-IV [16]. It has been found that peritoneal macrophages demonstrate lower cytotoxic potency in the peritoneal cavity of women with endometriosis and the pattern of secreted cytokines and chemokines is altered. However, it has not been clarified whether the change in the peritoneal microenvironment is a cause or a consequence of endometriosis [7].
As such, many alternative hypotheses exist for the development and dissemination of endometrial implants, especially those remote from the peritoneal cavity. Some authors propose that the main feature of endometriosis is bone marrow-derived stem cell trafficking. Due to their contribution to unlimited cell proliferation and to a high developmental plasticity, they are able to differentiate directly into endometriotic cells at ectopic locations and infiltrate the eutopic endometrium [17,18,19]. Emerging evidence suggests that the endometriotic phenotype of stem cells may be modulated by microRNA. Significant epigenetic changes in the level of miRNA expression in turn result in dysregulated expression of their target genes involved in epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), which can be associated with the proliferation, migration and the local invasion of the endometrial cells at ectopic sites [17,20,21,22]. This review highlights the importance of selected circulating EMT-related miRNAs in the pathophysiology of endometriosis and examines their potential as diagnostic biomarkers for endometriosis.

3. Role of miRNAs in the Pathophysiology of Endometriosis

The diagnosis of endometriosis can only be established by direct visualization of the lesions during invasive laparoscopic surgery, ideally with histological confirmation [60,61]. Different imaging techniques, such as ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, have proven unreliable in the diagnosis or staging of the disease [62]. Therefore, there is a need for a search for a reliable, highly specific, non-invasive test that can be used in both cases [3].
The recent discovery of miRNAs as stable and specific modulators of gene expression has enabled their use in numerous diseases as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Various studies of miRNAs have identified their important role in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of endometriosis. At the endometrial level, miRNA is involved in the dynamic changes associated with the menstrual cycle and the pathophysiology of reproductive disorders, such as endometriosis and recurrent miscarriages [63].
MicroRNAs are small molecules of ribonucleic acid (RNA) which act as post-transcriptional gene expression regulators. They repress protein synthesis by inhibiting the translation of the target messenger RNA (mRNA). They play essential roles in the epigenetic control mechanisms of many biological and physiopathological processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, migration, matrix remodeling, angiogenesis, and apoptosis [64,65]. It is currently known that miRNA can regulate many mRNAs, and at the same time one mRNA can be regulated by various miRNAs [66,67]. They are one of the most important molecules influencing the information pathways in cells. miRNA molecules are present both intracellularly and in the inter/extracellular space, as well as in circulating bodily fluids (bio-fluids). miRNAs can be transported into the systemic circulation in exosomes or microvesicles, in which they can be incorporated into distant cells with functional consequences [68,69]. Moreover, it has been shown that miRNAs circulate in the blood stream under the protection of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and are delivered, with functional targeting capabilities, to recipient cells [70]. It is known that aberrant miRNA expression usually causes dysregulation of the target genes involved in the development of many diseases, including endometriosis [71,72].
Numerous studies have confirmed that the miRNA expression profile is altered in both eutopic and ectopic endometrial tissues in women with endometriosis compared to controls [63,71,72,73,74,75]. Four miRNAs, viz. miR-34c-5p, miR-9-3p, miR-9-5p and miR-34b, were found to be downregulated in eutopic endometrial tissues of women with endometriosis [76], while the most frequently deregulated miRNAs in endometriosis are believed to be miR-200, miR-143, miR-145, miR-20a, miR199a and the let-7 families [22,77]. In addition, an miRNA candidate panel comprising miR-20a-5p, miR-199a-3p, miR-143-3p and let-7b-5p showed diagnostic potential in differentiating healthy women from women with endometriosis with a similar sensitivity and specificity to laparoscopy [73,78].
Liquid biopsy in the form of plasma, serum, whole blood, or peritoneal fluid supernatant has been found to demonstrate an altered miRNA signature patients with endometriosis [79]. The samples from patients demonstrate increased expression of numerous miRNAs in blood serum (miR-125b-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-342-3p and miR-451a) [80] or in serum exosomes (miR-22-3p and miR-320a, miR-197-5p, miR-320b, miR-3692-5p, miR-4476, miR-4530, miR-4532, miR-4721, miR-4758-5p, miR-494-3p, miR-6126, miR-6734-5p, miR-6776-5p, miR-6780b-5p, miR-6785-5p, miR-6791-5p, miR-939-5p) [81] or in plasma (miR-145, miR-33a-5p) compared to controls [82,83]. Other miRNAs have been found to be downregulated in serum samples (miR-3613-5p and let-7b, miR-6313, miR-142-3p, miR-17) or in serum exosomes (miR-134-5p, miR-3141, miR-4499, miR-6088, miR-6165, miR-6728-5p [84], or in plasma (miR-154-5p, miR-196b-5p, miR-378a-3p) [83] from patients with endometriosis compared to controls [80,85,86].
In addition, elevated levels of CD14 + monocytes/macrophages and miRNAs have been reported in peritoneal fluid supernatant from endometriosis patients. For example, miR-146b can inhibit M1 polarization of endometrial stromal cells co-cultured with macrophages [87], which are reported to be the main source of pro-inflammatory chemotactic cytokines and the main source of neuroangiogenesis [88]. The evolution of endometriosis has been linked to a range of M1 macrophage polarization markers, including tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)—a marker with a strong inflammatory, cytotoxic and angiogenic potential, and IL-1β, IL-12, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-6, which promote the growth of endometrial cells. Importantly, the levels of secreted inflammatory cytokines of macrophages has been found to correlate with changes in miR-125b-5p and let-7b-5p in the serum of patients with endometriosis [89]. Other miR-146 targets, such as IRAK1, TRAF6, STAT1 and IRF5, play a key role in mediating M1 polarization; hence their regulation in endometrial tissue may be important in the etiopathogenesis of endometriosis [87].
The mechanism by which endometriosis systemically alters macrophage cytokine production may be based on the activity of miRNAs, which, when transported in the exosomes, can regulate genes in distant cells. For example, miR-22-3p was found to be significantly increased in exosomes derived from peritoneal macrophages from endometriosis; it appears to be delivered from macrophages to ectopic endometrial stromal cells via exosomes, where it promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion cells by targeting SIRT1 and activating the NF-κB pathway [84]. Of particular interest may be miR-451, which is believed to target the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). This mitogenic cytokine can shape a proliferative and angiogenic phenotype conducive to the establishment and/or growth of endometriosis. In addition to the epithelium of endometrial lesions [90] and peritoneal macrophages [91], levels of MIF are also elevated in peripheral blood [92] and in peritoneal fluid [93,94] in women with endometriosis. The relative expression of MIF was negatively correlated with that of miR-451, and it is possible that the modulation of this miRNA expression may underpin the mechanism limiting the survival of endometriotic lesions [95]. Apart from the aforementioned miR-451a, which is suggested to be a mediator of inflammation and T-cell immunity [96], higher expression in the peritoneal cavity of patients with endometriosis is also found in miR-106b-3p and miR-486-5p [97]. In addition, the increase in the level of miR451a and miR-486-5p positively correlates with the severity of the disease, and exosomal miRNA-1908, -130b, -4488, -432, -342, -425, -505, -6508, -145, -365a and -365b were differently expressed in both early and advanced stages of endometriosis compared to the control group [98]. Two of the latter, i.e., miRNA-1908 and -130b, have been proven alter immune cells such as regulatory T cells and macrophages [99,100] and, together with miRNA-451a, may contribute to the abnormal peritoneal immune microenvironment in patients with endometriosis [98]. Peritoneal cytokine profile in infertile patients with endometriosis was related to increased levels of stem cell growth factor b, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and IL-8, while IL-13 decreased significantly [101]. Mention should also be made of other cytokines, inflammatory and adhesive factors which, as messengers, can influence the immune cell response and contribute to the evolution of endometriosis. These are: CXCL1, CXCL2 and MCP-2/3, TNF-α, TNFR1, fibroblast growth factor 2, vascular cell adhesion molecule, αV and β3 integrins, interleukin 1 α (IL-1α) and macrophage inflammatory protein 1b [98]. Thus, in the light of the above data, the exosomal miRNA is an important factor changing the immune microenvironment in the cavity of the peritoneum of women with endometriosis.
On the one hand, circulating miRNAs have become attractive biomarkers in endometriosis due to their lower complexity, tissue specificity and stability in urine, blood and tissues [102]. On the other hand, as the level of miRNA expression depends on the phase of the menstrual cycle, hormonal dysregulation and circadian variability may result in differentiated expression [74,76,103]. In addition, studies have been based on a range of different test technologies and cell types. Nevertheless, miRNA research opens up new horizons in understanding the pathogenetic molecular events of endometriosis, with the aim of determining the potential of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers of endometriosis. However, more research is still needed as no single or panel miRNAs seem to meet the criteria for a diagnostic biomarker in endometriosis.

5. Conclusions

Endometriosis is a common gynecological disease of unknown etiology. The typical clinical symptoms are a serious problem in gynecology and obstetrics, and the disease often remains undiagnosed for several years. Early diagnosis is important in endometriosis, and therefore there is an urgent need to better understand the molecular mechanism underlying the disease progression and to identify novel and more efficient diagnostic predictors for accurate identification of endometriosis, so that optimal therapeutic strategies could be found. There is growing evidence that specific miRNAs are involved in the development and progression of endometriosis through the regulation of broad signaling pathways. Recently, miRNAs have been recognized as promising early biomarkers in endometriosis, because of their tissue-specific expression profiles and noninvasive techniques for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with confirmed diagnosis. While there is agreement among some studies that miRNAs are differentially expressed and the level of their expression varies compared with control tissue, there is also disagreement among these levels of expression. For progress to be made in understanding the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of endometriosis, greater emphasis needs to be placed upon standardization of study designs and populations. The significance of EMT as a trigger of epigenetic changes amenable to launch the endometriosis should be also considered.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Z. and E.B.-L.; methodology, A.Z.; software, M.M.-S.; validation, M.M.-S., S.J. and E.B.-L.; formal analysis, E.B.-L.; investigation, A.Z.; resources, S.J.; data curation, A.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Z., M.M.-S. and. E.B.-L.; writing—review and editing, M.M.-S. and E.B.-L.; visualization, A.Z.; supervision, E.B.-L.; project administration, M.M.-S.; funding acquisition, A.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moga, M.A.; Bălan, A.; Dimienescu, O.G.; Burtea, V.; Dragomir, R.M.; Anastasiu, C.V. Circulating miRNAs as Biomarkers for Endometriosis and Endometriosis-Related Ovarian Cancer-An Overview. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Giudice, L.C.; Kao, L.C. Endometriosis. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2004, 364, 1789–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Giudice, L.C. Clinical practice. Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 2389–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Johnson, N.P.; Hummelshoj, L.; World Endometriosis Society Montpellier Consortium. Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2013, 28, 1552–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kavoussi, S.K.; Lim, C.S.; Skinner, B.D.; Lebovic, D.I.; As-Sanie, S. New paradigms in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 28, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kajihara, H.; Yamada, Y.; Kanayama, S.; Furukawa, N.; Noguchi, T.; Haruta, S.; Yoshida, S.; Sado, T.; Oi, H.; Kobayashi, H. New insights into the pathophysiology of endometriosis: From chronic inflammation to danger signal. Gynecol. Endocrinol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2011, 27, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Laganà, A.S.; Garzon, S.; Götte, M.; Viganò, P.; Franchi, M.; Ghezzi, F.; Martin, D.C. The Pathogenesis of Endometriosis: Molecular and Cell Biology Insights. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sarria-Santamera, A.; Orazumbekova, B.; Terzic, M.; Issanov, A.; Chaowen, C.; Asúnsolo-Del-Barco, A. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incidence and Prevalence of Endometriosis. Healthcare 2020, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bougie, O.; Yap, M.I.; Sikora, L.; Flaxman, T.; Singh, S. Influence of race/ethnicity on prevalence and presentation of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019, 126, 1104–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gerlinger, C.; Faustmann, T.; Hassall, J.J.; Seitz, C. Treatment of endometriosis in different ethnic populations: A meta-analysis of two clinical trials. BMC Womens Health 2012, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Asghari, S.; Valizadeh, A.; Aghebati-Maleki, L.; Nouri, M.; Yousefi, M. Endometriosis: Perspective, lights, and shadows of etiology. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 106, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Borghese, B.; Zondervan, K.T.; Abrao, M.S.; Chapron, C.; Vaiman, D. Recent insights on the genetics and epigenetics of endometriosis. Clin. Genet. 2017, 91, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Albertsen, H.M.; Ward, K. Genes Linked to Endometriosis by GWAS Are Integral to Cytoskeleton Regulation and Suggests That Mesothelial Barrier Homeostasis Is a Factor in the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 24, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yovich, J.L.; Rowlands, P.K.; Lingham, S.; Sillender, M.; Srinivasan, S. Pathogenesis of endometriosis: Look no further than John Sampson. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2020, 40, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gupta, S.; Agarwal, A.; Sekhon, L.; Krajcir, N.; Cocuzza, M.; Falcone, T. Serum and peritoneal abnormalities in endometriosis: Potential use as diagnostic markers. Minerva Ginecol. 2006, 58, 527–551. [Google Scholar]
  16. Laganà, A.S.; Salmeri, F.M.; Ban Frangež, H.; Ghezzi, F.; Vrtačnik-Bokal, E.; Granese, R. Evaluation of M1 and M2 macrophages in ovarian endometriomas from women affected by endometriosis at different stages of the disease. Gynecol. Endocrinol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2020, 36, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Eggers, J.C.; Martino, V.; Reinbold, R.; Schäfer, S.D.; Kiesel, L.; Starzinski-Powitz, A.; Schüring, A.N.; Kemper, B.; Greve, B.; Götte, M. microRNA miR-200b affects proliferation, invasiveness and stemness of endometriotic cells by targeting ZEB1, ZEB2 and KLF4. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2016, 32, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pluchino, N.; Taylor, H.S. Endometriosis and Stem Cell Trafficking. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 23, 1616–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Laganà, A.S.; Salmeri, F.M.; Vitale, S.G.; Triolo, O.; Götte, M. Stem Cell Trafficking During Endometriosis: May Epigenetics Play a Pivotal Role? Reprod. Sci. 2018, 25, 978–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Proestling, K.; Birner, P.; Gamperl, S.; Nirtl, N.; Marton, E.; Yerlikaya, G.; Wenzl, R.; Streubel, B.; Husslein, H. Enhanced epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and upregulated MYC in ectopic lesions contribute independently to endometriosis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2015, 13, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bartley, J.; Jülicher, A.; Hotz, B.; Mechsner, S.; Hotz, H. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) seems to be regulated differently in endometriosis and the endometrium. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014, 289, 871–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mashayekhi, P.; Noruzinia, M.; Zeinali, S.; Khodaverdi, S. Endometriotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Epigenetic Pathogenesis: Deregulation of miR-200b, miR-145, and let7b in A Functional Imbalanced Epigenetic Disease. Cell J. 2019, 21, 179–185. [Google Scholar]
  23. Anger, D.L.; Zhang, B.; Boutross-Tadross, O.; Foster, W.G. Tyrosine receptor kinase B (TrkB) protein expression in the human endometrium. Endocrine 2007, 31, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Acloque, H.; Adams, M.S.; Fishwick, K.; Bronner-Fraser, M.; Nieto, M.A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: The importance of changing cell state in development and disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1438–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kalluri, R.; Weinberg, R.A. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1420–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, Y.-M.; Yang, W.-X. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in the development of endometriosis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 41679–41689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Herington, J.L.; Bruner-Tran, K.L.; Lucas, J.A.; Osteen, K.G. Immune interactions in endometriosis. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2011, 7, 611–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Podgaec, S.; Dias Junior, J.A.; Chapron, C.; Oliveira, R.M.D.; Baracat, E.C.; Abrão, M.S. Th1 and Th2 ummune responses related to pelvic endometriosis. Rev. Assoc. Medica Bras. 1992 2010, 56, 92–98. [Google Scholar]
  29. Grund, E.M.; Kagan, D.; Tran, C.A.; Zeitvogel, A.; Starzinski-Powitz, A.; Nataraja, S.; Palmer, S.S. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha regulates inflammatory and mesenchymal responses via mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, p38, and nuclear factor kappaB in human endometriotic epithelial cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 73, 1394–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, W.; Khor, T.O.; Xu, C.; Shen, G.; Jeong, W.-S.; Yu, S.; Kong, A.-N. Activation of Nrf2-antioxidant signaling attenuates NFkappaB-inflammatory response and elicits apoptosis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008, 76, 1485–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. González-Ramos, R.; Van Langendonckt, A.; Defrère, S.; Lousse, J.-C.; Colette, S.; Devoto, L.; Donnez, J. Involvement of the nuclear factor-κB pathway in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 94, 1985–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, J.; Wang, Z.; Cao, J.; Chen, Y.; Dong, Y. A novel and compact review on the role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2018, 16, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Leconte, M.; Nicco, C.; Ngô, C.; Chéreau, C.; Chouzenoux, S.; Marut, W.; Guibourdenche, J.; Arkwright, S.; Weill, B.; Chapron, C.; et al. The mTOR/AKT inhibitor temsirolimus prevents deep infiltrating endometriosis in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 179, 880–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lyu, D.; Tang, N.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, J.; Liu, Z.; Liu, H. TGR5 agonist INT-777 mitigates inflammatory response in human endometriotic stromal cells: A therapeutic implication for endometriosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 71, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ngô, C.; Chéreau, C.; Nicco, C.; Weill, B.; Chapron, C.; Batteux, F. Reactive oxygen species controls endometriosis progression. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xiao, F.; Liu, X.; Guo, S.-W. Platelets and Regulatory T Cells May Induce a Type 2 Immunity That Is Conducive to the Progression and Fibrogenesis of Endometriosis. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 610963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Omwandho, C.O.A.; Konrad, L.; Halis, G.; Oehmke, F.; Tinneberg, H.-R. Role of TGF-betas in normal human endometrium and endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2010, 25, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Itoga, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Takeuchi, H.; Yamasaki, S.; Sasahara, N.; Hoshi, T.; Kinoshita, K. Fibrosis and smooth muscle metaplasia in rectovaginal endometriosis. Pathol. Int. 2003, 53, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yan, D.; Liu, X.; Xu, H.; Guo, S.-W. Mesothelial Cells Participate in Endometriosis Fibrogenesis through Platelet-Induced Mesothelial-Mesenchymal Transition. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, e4124–e4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, Q.; Duan, J.; Liu, X.; Guo, S.-W. Platelets drive smooth muscle metaplasia and fibrogenesis in endometriosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 428, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, Q.; Duan, J.; Olson, M.; Fazleabas, A.; Guo, S.-W. Cellular Changes Consistent with Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Fibroblast-to-Myofibroblast Transdifferentiation in the Progression of Experimental Endometriosis in Baboons. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 23, 1409–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Akhmetshina, A.; Palumbo, K.; Dees, C.; Bergmann, C.; Venalis, P.; Zerr, P.; Horn, A.; Kireva, T.; Beyer, C.; Zwerina, J.; et al. Activation of canonical Wnt signalling is required for TGF-β-mediated fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, J.; Dai, Y.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, S. Endometriotic mesenchymal stem cells significantly promote fibrogenesis in ovarian endometrioma through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by paracrine production of TGF-β1 and Wnt1. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2016, 31, 1224–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Matsuzaki, S.; Darcha, C. Involvement of the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway in the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Fibrosis in Endometriosis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Douchi, D.; Ohtsuka, H.; Ariake, K.; Masuda, K.; Kawasaki, S.; Kawaguchi, K.; Fukase, K.; Oikawa, M.; Motoi, F.; Naitoh, T.; et al. Silencing of LRRFIP1 reverses the epithelial-mesenchymal transition via inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 2015, 365, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ghahhari, N.M.; Babashah, S. Interplay between microRNAs and WNT/β-catenin signalling pathway regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer. Eur. J. Cancer Oxf. Engl. 1990 2015, 51, 1638–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Loverro, G.; Maiorano, E.; Napoli, A.; Selvaggi, L.; Marra, E.; Perlino, E. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 and insulin-like growth factor-1 expression in ovarian endometriotic cysts: A preliminary study. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2001, 7, 423–429. [Google Scholar]
  48. Young, V.J.; Ahmad, S.F.; Brown, J.K.; Duncan, W.C.; Horne, A.W. Peritoneal VEGF-A expression is regulated by TGF-β1 through an ID1 pathway in women with endometriosis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hung, S.W.; Zhang, R.; Tan, Z.; Chung, J.P.W.; Zhang, T.; Wang, C.C. Pharmaceuticals targeting signaling pathways of endometriosis as potential new medical treatment: A review. Med. Res. Rev. 2021, 41, 2489–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xu, H.; Zhang, T.; Man, G.C.W.; May, K.E.; Becker, C.M.; Davis, T.N.; Kung, A.L.; Birsner, A.E.; D’Amato, R.J.; Wong, A.W.Y.; et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor C is increased in endometrium and promotes endothelial functions, vascular permeability and angiogenesis and growth of endometriosis. Angiogenesis 2013, 16, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sharkey, A.M.; Day, K.; McPherson, A.; Malik, S.; Licence, D.; Smith, S.K.; Charnock-Jones, D.S. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human endometrium is regulated by hypoxia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Taylor, R.N.; Yu, J.; Torres, P.B.; Schickedanz, A.C.; Park, J.K.; Mueller, M.D.; Sidell, N. Mechanistic and therapeutic implications of angiogenesis in endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 16, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lin, S.-C.; Lee, H.-C.; Hsu, C.-T.; Huang, Y.-H.; Li, W.-N.; Hsu, P.-L.; Wu, M.-H.; Tsai, S.-J. Targeting Anthrax Toxin Receptor 2 Ameliorates Endometriosis Progression. Theranostics 2019, 9, 620–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lin, X.; Dai, Y.; Xu, W.; Shi, L.; Jin, X.; Li, C.; Zhou, F.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, X.; et al. Hypoxia Promotes Ectopic Adhesion Ability of Endometrial Stromal Cells via TGF-β1/Smad Signaling in Endometriosis. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 1630–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, W.-N.; Wu, M.-H.; Tsai, S.-J. Hypoxia and reproductive health: The role of hypoxia in the development and progression of endometriosis. Reprod. Camb. Engl. 2021, 161, F19–F31. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bruner-Tran, K.L.; Eisenberg, E.; Yeaman, G.R.; Anderson, T.A.; McBean, J.; Osteen, K.G. Steroid and cytokine regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in endometriosis and the establishment of experimental endometriosis in nude mice. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 4782–4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jana, S.; Chatterjee, K.; Ray, A.K.; DasMahapatra, P.; Swarnakar, S. Regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Activity by COX-2-PGE2-pAKT Axis Promotes Angiogenesis in Endometriosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Pino, M.; Galleguillos, C.; Torres, M.; Sovino, H.; Fuentes, A.; Boric, M.A.; Johnson, M.C. Association between MMP1 and MMP9 activities and ICAM1 cleavage induced by tumor necrosis factor in stromal cell cultures from eutopic endometria of women with endometriosis. Reprod. Camb. Engl. 2009, 138, 837–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yu, M.-M.; Zhou, Q.-M. 3,6-dihydroxyflavone suppresses the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration and invasion in endometrial stromal cells by inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 4009–4017. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kennedy, S.; Bergqvist, A.; Chapron, C.; D’Hooghe, T.; Dunselman, G.; Greb, R.; Hummelshoj, L.; Prentice, A.; Saridogan, E.; ESHRE Special Interest Group for Endometriosis and Endometrium Guideline Development Group. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2005, 20, 2698–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Scarselli, G.; Rizzello, F.; Cammilli, F.; Ginocchini, L.; Coccia, M.E. Diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. A review. Minerva Ginecol. 2005, 57, 55–78. [Google Scholar]
  62. Chamié, L.P.; Blasbalg, R.; Pereira, R.M.A.; Warmbrand, G.; Serafini, P.C. Findings of pelvic endometriosis at transvaginal US, MR imaging, and laparoscopy. Radiogr. Rev. Publ. Radiol. Soc. N. Am. Inc. 2011, 31, E77–E100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hull, M.L.; Nisenblat, V. Tissue and circulating microRNA influence reproductive function in endometrial disease. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2013, 27, 515–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Braza-Boïls, A.; Marí-Alexandre, J.; Gilabert, J.; Sánchez-Izquierdo, D.; España, F.; Estellés, A.; Gilabert-Estellés, J. MicroRNA expression profile in endometriosis: Its relation to angiogenesis and fibrinolytic factors. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2014, 29, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Marí-Alexandre, J.; García-Oms, J.; Barceló-Molina, M.; Gilabert-Aguilar, J.; Estellés, A.; Braza-Boíls, A.; Gilabert-Estellés, J. MicroRNAs and angiogenesis in endometriosis. Thromb. Res. 2015, 135 (Suppl. 1), S38–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nyholt, D.R.; Low, S.-K.; Anderson, C.A.; Painter, J.N.; Uno, S.; Morris, A.P.; MacGregor, S.; Gordon, S.D.; Henders, A.K.; Martin, N.G.; et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies new endometriosis risk loci. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1355–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rahmioglu, N.; Nyholt, D.R.; Morris, A.P.; Missmer, S.A.; Montgomery, G.W.; Zondervan, K.T. Genetic variants underlying risk of endometriosis: Insights from meta-analysis of eight genome-wide association and replication datasets. Hum. Reprod. Update 2014, 20, 702–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Haider, B.A.; Baras, A.S.; McCall, M.N.; Hertel, J.A.; Cornish, T.C.; Halushka, M.K. A critical evaluation of microRNA biomarkers in non-neoplastic disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Khalaj, K.; Miller, J.E.; Lingegowda, H.; Fazleabas, A.T.; Young, S.L.; Lessey, B.A.; Koti, M.; Tayade, C. Extracellular vesicles from endometriosis patients are characterized by a unique miRNA-lncRNA signature. JCI Insight 2019, 4, e128846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Michell, D.L.; Vickers, K.C. Lipoprotein carriers of microRNAs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1861, 2069–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Petracco, R.; Dias, A.C.D.O.; Taylor, H.; Petracco, Á.; Badalotti, M.; Michelon, J.D.R.; Marinowic, D.R.; Hentschke, M.; Azevedo, P.N.D.; Zanirati, G.; et al. Evaluation of miR-135a/b expression in endometriosis lesions. Biomed. Rep. 2019, 11, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cho, S.; Mutlu, L.; Grechukhina, O.; Taylor, H.S. Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 103, 1252–1260.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Jia, S.-Z.; Yang, Y.; Lang, J.; Sun, P.; Leng, J. Plasma miR-17-5p, miR-20a and miR-22 are down-regulated in women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2013, 28, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rekker, K.; Saare, M.; Roost, A.M.; Kaart, T.; Sõritsa, D.; Karro, H.; Sõritsa, A.; Simón, C.; Salumets, A.; Peters, M. Circulating miR-200-family micro-RNAs have altered plasma levels in patients with endometriosis and vary with blood collection time. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 104, 938–946.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, W.-T.; Zhao, Y.-N.; Han, B.-W.; Hong, S.-J.; Chen, Y.-Q. Circulating microRNAs identified in a genome-wide serum microRNA expression analysis as noninvasive biomarkers for endometriosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Saare, M.; Rekker, K.; Laisk-Podar, T.; Rahmioglu, N.; Zondervan, K.; Salumets, A.; Götte, M.; Peters, M. Challenges in endometriosis miRNA studies—From tissue heterogeneity to disease specific miRNAs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 2282–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Agrawal, S.; Tapmeier, T.; Rahmioglu, N.; Kirtley, S.; Zondervan, K.; Becker, C. The miRNA Mirage: How Close Are We to Finding a Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarker in Endometriosis? A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Papari, E.; Noruzinia, M.; Kashani, L.; Foster, W.G. Identification of candidate microRNA markers of endometriosis with the use of next-generation sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Fertil. Steril. 2020, 113, 1232–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ghafouri-Fard, S.; Shoorei, H.; Taheri, M. Role of Non-coding RNAs in the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Moustafa, S.; Burn, M.; Mamillapalli, R.; Nematian, S.; Flores, V.; Taylor, H.S. Accurate diagnosis of endometriosis using serum microRNAs. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, e1–e557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Yuan, M.; Li, D.; Sun, C.; Wang, G. Serum Exosomal MicroRNAs as Potential Circulating Biomarkers for Endometriosis. Dis. Markers 2020, 2020, 2456340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bashti, O.; Noruzinia, M.; Garshasbi, M.; Abtahi, M. miR-31 and miR-145 as Potential Non-Invasive Regulatory Biomarkers in Patients with Endometriosis. Cell J. 2018, 20, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Pateisky, P.; Pils, D.; Szabo, L.; Kuessel, L.; Husslein, H.; Schmitz, A.; Wenzl, R.; Yotova, I. hsa-miRNA-154-5p expression in plasma of endometriosis patients is a potential diagnostic marker for the disease. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2018, 37, 449–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhang, L.; Li, H.-H.; Yuan, M.; Li, D.; Wang, G.-Y. Exosomal miR-22-3p derived from peritoneal macrophages enhances proliferation, migration, and invasion of ectopic endometrial stromal cells through regulation of the SIRT1/NF-κB signaling pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Kästingschäfer, C.S.; Schäfer, S.D.; Kiesel, L.; Götte, M. miR-142-3p is a novel regulator of cell viability and proinflammatory signalling in endometrial stroma cells. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2015, 30, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wang, F.; Wang, H.; Jin, D.; Zhang, Y. Serum miR-17, IL-4, and IL-6 levels for diagnosis of endometriosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018, 97, e10853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, Z.; Li, H.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, B.; Meng, L.; Feng, X. miR-146b level and variants is associated with endometriosis related macrophages phenotype and plays a pivotal role in the endometriotic pain symptom. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 58, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. McKinnon, B.; Bersinger, N.A.; Wotzkow, C.; Mueller, M.D. Endometriosis-associated nerve fibers, peritoneal fluid cytokine concentrations, and pain in endometriotic lesions from different locations. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 97, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nematian, S.E.; Mamillapalli, R.; Kadakia, T.S.; Majidi Zolbin, M.; Moustafa, S.; Taylor, H.S. Systemic Inflammation Induced by microRNAs: Endometriosis-Derived Alterations in Circulating microRNA 125b-5p and Let-7b-5p Regulate Macrophage Cytokine Production. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kats, R.; Al-Akoum, M.; Guay, S.; Metz, C.; Akoum, A. Cycle-dependent expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the human endometrium. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2005, 20, 3518–3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Akoum, A.; Kong, J.; Metz, C.; Beaumont, M.C. Spontaneous and stimulated secretion of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and macrophage migration inhibitory factor by peritoneal macrophages in women with and without endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 77, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Morin, M.; Bellehumeur, C.; Therriault, M.-J.; Metz, C.; Maheux, R.; Akoum, A. Elevated levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the peripheral blood of women with endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2005, 83, 865–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kats, R.; Metz, C.N.; Akoum, A. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor is markedly expressed in active and early-stage endometriotic lesions. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kats, R.; Collette, T.; Metz, C.N.; Akoum, A. Marked elevation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 78, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Graham, A.; Falcone, T.; Nothnick, W.B. The expression of microRNA-451 in human endometriotic lesions is inversely related to that of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and regulates MIF expression and modulation of epithelial cell survival. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2015, 30, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chen, H.; Qin, S.; Lei, A.; Li, X.; Gao, Q.; Dong, J.; Xiao, Q.; Zhou, J. Expansion of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in endometriosis patients: A pilot study. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 47, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Marí-Alexandre, J.; Barceló-Molina, M.; Belmonte-López, E.; García-Oms, J.; Estellés, A.; Braza-Boïls, A.; Gilabert-Estellés, J. Micro-RNA profile and proteins in peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis: Their relationship with sterility. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 109, 675–684.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chen, Y.; Wang, K.; Xu, Y.; Guo, P.; Hong, B.; Cao, Y.; Wei, Z.; Xue, R.; Wang, C.; Jiang, H. Alteration of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells, Chronic Inflammatory Cytokines, and Exosomal miRNA Contribute to the Peritoneal Immune Disorder of Patients With Endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 2019, 26, 1130–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Ye, S.-B.; Li, Z.-L.; Luo, D.-H.; Huang, B.-J.; Chen, Y.-S.; Zhang, X.-S.; Cui, J.; Zeng, Y.-X.; Li, J. Tumor-derived exosomes promote tumor progression and T-cell dysfunction through the regulation of enriched exosomal microRNAs in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 5439–5452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, S. MiR-130b promotes obesity associated adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance in diabetes mice through alleviating M2 macrophage polarization via repression of PPAR-γ. Immunol. Lett. 2016, 180, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Jørgensen, H.; Hill, A.S.; Beste, M.T.; Kumar, M.P.; Chiswick, E.; Fedorcsak, P.; Isaacson, K.B.; Lauffenburger, D.A.; Griffith, L.G.; Qvigstad, E. Peritoneal fluid cytokines related to endometriosis in patients evaluated for infertility. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 107, 1191–1199.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Weber, J.A.; Baxter, D.H.; Zhang, S.; Huang, D.Y.; Huang, K.H.; Lee, M.J.; Galas, D.J.; Wang, K. The microRNA spectrum in 12 body fluids. Clin. Chem. 2010, 56, 1733–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Bulun, S.E.; Monsavais, D.; Pavone, M.E.; Dyson, M.; Xue, Q.; Attar, E.; Tokunaga, H.; Su, E.J. Role of estrogen receptor-β in endometriosis. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2012, 30, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Humphries, B.; Yang, C. The microRNA-200 family: Small molecules with novel roles in cancer development, progression and therapy. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 6472–6498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ohlsson Teague, E.M.C.; Van der Hoek, K.H.; Van der Hoek, M.B.; Perry, N.; Wagaarachchi, P.; Robertson, S.A.; Print, C.G.; Hull, L.M. MicroRNA-regulated pathways associated with endometriosis. Mol. Endocrinol. Baltim. Md. 2009, 23, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hawkins, S.M.; Creighton, C.J.; Han, D.Y.; Zariff, A.; Anderson, M.L.; Gunaratne, P.H.; Matzuk, M.M. Functional microRNA involved in endometriosis. Mol. Endocrinol. Baltim. Md. 2011, 25, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Matsuzaki, S.; Darcha, C. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition-like and mesenchymal to epithelial transition-like processes might be involved in the pathogenesis of pelvic endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2012, 27, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Park, S.-M.; Gaur, A.B.; Lengyel, E.; Peter, M.E. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 894–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Liang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, C.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, D.; He, J.; Hua, W.; Duan, P. miR-200c suppresses endometriosis by targeting MALAT1 in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017, 8, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Du, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xiong, W.; Li, N.; Liu, H.; He, H.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L. Estradiol promotes EMT in endometriosis via MALAT1/miR200s sponge function. Reprod. Camb. Engl. 2019, 157, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Filigheddu, N.; Gregnanin, I.; Porporato, P.E.; Surico, D.; Perego, B.; Galli, L.; Patrignani, C.; Graziani, A.; Surico, N. Differential expression of microRNAs between eutopic and ectopic endometrium in ovarian endometriosis. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010, 2010, 369549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Shi, X.-Y.; Gu, L.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.-R.; Shi, Y.-L. Downregulation of miR-183 inhibits apoptosis and enhances the invasive potential of endometrial stromal cells in endometriosis. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 33, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yang, R.Q.; Teng, H.; Xu, X.H.; Liu, S.Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Guo, F.J.; Liu, X.J. Microarray analysis of microRNA deregulation and angiogenesis-related proteins in endometriosis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, T.; Deng, J.; Xia, X.; Fang, X. microRNA-141 inhibits TGF-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through inhibition of the TGF-β1/SMAD2 signalling pathway in endometriosis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2020, 301, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhang, M.; Wang, S.; Tang, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, T.; Xia, X.; Fang, X. Downregulated circular RNA hsa_circ_0067301 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in endometriosis via the miR-141/Notch signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 514, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ramón, L.A.; Braza-Boïls, A.; Gilabert-Estellés, J.; Gilabert, J.; España, F.; Chirivella, M.; Estellés, A. microRNAs expression in endometriosis and their relation to angiogenic factors. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2011, 26, 1082–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wu, J.; Cui, S.H.; Li, H.Z.; Li, Q.H.; Yuan, R.; Zhang, Y.P.; Zhao, T.W. Ultrasound diagnosis in gynecological acute abdomen. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2016, 30, 211–217. [Google Scholar]
  118. Lin, S.-C.; Wang, C.-C.; Wu, M.-H.; Yang, S.-H.; Li, Y.-H.; Tsai, S.-J. Hypoxia-induced microRNA-20a expression increases ERK phosphorylation and angiogenic gene expression in endometriotic stromal cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E1515–E1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Zhao, M.; Tang, Q.; Wu, W.; Xia, Y.; Chen, D.; Wang, X. miR-20a contributes to endometriosis by regulating NTN4 expression. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 41, 5793–5797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Taguchi, A.; Yanagisawa, K.; Tanaka, M.; Cao, K.; Matsuyama, Y.; Goto, H.; Takahashi, T. Identification of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha as a novel target for miR-17-92 microRNA cluster. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 5540–5545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Lei, Z.; Li, B.; Yang, Z.; Fang, H.; Zhang, G.-M.; Feng, Z.-H.; Huang, B. Regulation of HIF-1alpha and VEGF by miR-20b tunes tumor cells to adapt to the alteration of oxygen concentration. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tsuzuki, T.; Okada, H.; Cho, H.; Tsuji, S.; Nishigaki, A.; Yasuda, K.; Kanzaki, H. Hypoxic stress simultaneously stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor via hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and inhibits stromal cell-derived factor-1 in human endometrial stromal cells. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2012, 27, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wing, L.-Y.C.; Chuang, P.-C.; Wu, M.-H.; Chen, H.-M.; Tsai, S.-J. Expression and mitogenic effect of fibroblast growth factor-9 in human endometriotic implant is regulated by aberrant production of estrogen. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 5547–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Hsu, C.-Y.; Hsieh, T.-H.; Tsai, C.-F.; Tsai, H.-P.; Chen, H.-S.; Chang, Y.; Chuang, H.-Y.; Lee, J.-N.; Hsu, Y.-L.; Tsai, E.-M. miRNA-199a-5p regulates VEGFA in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells and contributes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J. Pathol. 2014, 232, 330–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Dai, L.; Gu, L.; Di, W. MiR-199a attenuates endometrial stromal cell invasiveness through suppression of the IKKβ/NF-κB pathway and reduced interleukin-8 expression. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2012, 18, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Liu, Y.; Lu, C.; Fan, L.; Wang, J.; Li, T.; Liu, Z.; Sheng, J.; Qian, R.; Duan, A.; Lu, D. MiR-199a-5p Targets ZEB1 to Inhibit the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Ovarian Ectopic Endometrial Stromal Cells Via PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signal Pathway In Vitro and In Vivo. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 27, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Maged, A.M.; Deeb, W.S.; El Amir, A.; Zaki, S.S.; El Sawah, H.; Al Mohamady, M.; Metwally, A.A.; Katta, M.A. Diagnostic accuracy of serum miR-122 and miR-199a in women with endometriosis. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. Off. Organ. Int. Fed. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018, 141, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Dai, L.; Lou, W.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, X.; Di, W. MiR-199a inhibits the angiogenic potential of endometrial stromal cells under hypoxia by targeting HIF-1α/VEGF pathway. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 4735–4744. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  129. Cosar, E.; Mamillapalli, R.; Ersoy, G.S.; Cho, S.; Seifer, B.; Taylor, H.S. Serum microRNAs as diagnostic markers of endometriosis: A comprehensive array-based analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zheng, B.; Xue, X.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, C.-Y.; Duan, P. The differential expression of microRNA-143,145 in endometriosis. Iran. J. Reprod. Med. 2014, 12, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  131. Nimi-Hoveidi, E.; Kohan, L.; Hashemi, S.S. Association of miR-143 rs41291957 and rs4705342 genetic variants with endometriosis risk in infertile women. KAUMS J. FEYZ 2016, 20, 441–446. [Google Scholar]
  132. Adammek, M.; Greve, B.; Kässens, N.; Schneider, C.; Brüggemann, K.; Schüring, A.N.; Starzinski-Powitz, A.; Kiesel, L.; Götte, M. MicroRNA miR-145 inhibits proliferation, invasiveness, and stem cell phenotype of an in vitro endometriosis model by targeting multiple cytoskeletal elements and pluripotency factors. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 99, 1346–1355.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Sun, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, C.; Tang, S.-C.; Ren, H. The insights of Let-7 miRNAs in oncogenesis and stem cell potency. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2016, 20, 1779–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Cho, S.; Mutlu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Taylor, H.S. Aromatase inhibitor regulates let-7 expression and let-7f-induced cell migration in endometrial cells from women with endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Grechukhina, O.; Petracco, R.; Popkhadze, S.; Massasa, E.; Paranjape, T.; Chan, E.; Flores, I.; Weidhaas, J.B.; Taylor, H.S. A polymorphism in a let-7 microRNA binding site of KRAS in women with endometriosis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012, 4, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Sahin, C.; Mamillapalli, R.; Yi, K.W.; Taylor, H.S. microRNA Let-7b: A Novel treatment for endometriosis. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 5346–5353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Woo, J.-H.; Yang, Y.-I.; Ahn, J.-H.; Choi, Y.S.; Choi, J.-H. Interleukin 6 secretion from alternatively activated macrophages promotes the migration of endometriotic epithelial cells. Biol. Reprod. 2017, 97, 660–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  138. Chen, P.-Y.; Qin, L.; Barnes, C.; Charisse, K.; Yi, T.; Zhang, X.; Ali, R.; Medina, P.P.; Yu, J.; Slack, F.J.; et al. FGF regulates TGF-β signaling and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition via control of let-7 miRNA expression. Cell Rep. 2012, 2, 1684–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Dai, X.; Jiang, Y.; Tan, C. Let-7 Sensitizes KRAS Mutant Tumor Cells to Chemotherapy. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.