Next Article in Journal
Effects of Luteolin on Human Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Array: Inferring Novel Genes
Next Article in Special Issue
Punicalagin Targets Atherosclerosis: Gene Expression Profiling of THP-1 Macrophages Treated with Punicalagin and Molecular Docking
Previous Article in Journal
Protocol for Increasing the Sensitivity of MS-Based Protein Detection in Human Chorionic Villi
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fruit Peels: Food Waste as a Valuable Source of Bioactive Natural Products for Drug Discovery
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 44
Issue 5
10.3390/cimb44050141
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Subtilisin of Leishmania amazonensis as Potential Druggable Target: Subcellular Localization, In Vitro Leishmanicidal Activity and Molecular Docking of PF-429242, a Subtilisin Inhibitor

by
Pollyanna Stephanie Gomes
1,2,3,4,†,
Monique Pacheco Duarte Carneiro
1,4,5,†,
Patrícia de Almeida Machado
1,2,4,
Valter Viana de Andrade-Neto
6,
Alessandra Marcia da Fonseca-Martins
1,2,3,4,
Amy Goundry
5,
João Vitor Marques Pereira da Silva
7,
Daniel Claudio Oliveira Gomes
8,
Ana Paula Cabral de Araujo Lima
5,
Vítor Ennes-Vidal
9,
Ana Carolina Rennó Sodero
7,
Salvatore Giovanni De-Simone
10,11,12 and
Herbert L. de Matos Guedes
1,2,3,4,*
1
Laboratório de Imunologia Clínica, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz—Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil
2
Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil
3
Laboratório de Imunofarmacologia, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho IBCCF, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-170, Brazil
4
Laboratório de Imunobiotecnologia, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Goés, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
5
Laboratório de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular de Proteases, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho IBCCF, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-170, Brazil
6
Laboratório de Bioquímica de Tripanossomatídeos, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil
7
Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-170, Brazil
8
Núcleo de Doenças Infecciosas, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29047-100, Brazil
9
Laboratório de Estudos Integrados em Protozoologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, Brazil
10
Center for Technological Development in Health (CDTS), National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation on Diseases Neglected Population (INCT-IDPN), FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil
11
Epidemiology and Molecular Systematic Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil
12
Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, Biology Institute, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói 24020-141, Brazil
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(5), 2089-2106; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44050141
Submission received: 16 December 2021 / Revised: 8 February 2022 / Accepted: 9 February 2022 / Published: 9 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Application of Natural and Pseudo Natural Products in Drug Discovery and Development)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Subtilisin proteases, found in all organisms, are enzymes important in the post-translational steps of protein processing. In Leishmania major and L. donovani, this enzyme has been described as essential to their survival; however, few compounds that target subtilisin have been investigated for their potential as an antileishmanial drug. In this study, we first show, by electron microscopy and flow cytometry, that subtilisin has broad localization throughout the cytoplasm and membrane of the parasite in the promastigote form with foci in the flagellar pocket. Through in silico analysis, the similarity between subtilisin of different Leishmania species and that of humans were determined, and based on molecular docking, we evaluated the interaction capacity of a serine protease inhibitor against both life cycle forms of Leishmania. The selected inhibitor, known as PF-429242, has already been used against the dengue virus, arenaviruses, and the hepatitis C virus. Moreover, it proved to have antilipogenic activity in a mouse model and caused hypolipidemia in human cells in vitro. Here, PF-429242 significantly inhibited the growth of L. amazonensis promastigotes of four different strains (IC50 values = 3.07 ± 0.20; 0.83 ± 0.12; 2.02 ± 0.27 and 5.83 ± 1.2 µM against LTB0016, PH8, Josefa and LV78 strains) whilst having low toxicity in the host macrophages (CC50 = 170.30 µM). We detected by flow cytometry that there is a greater expression of subtilisin in the amastigote form; however, PF-429242 had a low effect against this intracellular form with an IC50 of >100 µM for intracellular amastigotes, as well as against axenic amastigotes (94.12 ± 2.8 µM for the LV78 strain). In conclusion, even though PF-429242 does not affect the intracellular forms, this drug will serve as a tool to explore pharmacological and potentially leishmanicidal targets.

1. Introduction

Leishmania spp. is an obligate intracellular parasite that resides within host cells. The clinical forms of leishmaniasis can be divided basically into three different types: cutaneous (CL), mucocutaneous (MCL), and visceral (VL), the latter of which can be lethal if not treated. The most common form around the world is CL, characterized by ulcerative, painless, single, or multiple lesions [1]. Currently, 92 and 83 countries or territories are endemic for CL and VL, respectively [2]. Over 1 billion people live in leishmaniasis endemic areas, where about 95% of CL cases occur [2]. Annually, between 700,000 and 1 million new cases arise. In 2020, of all the endemic countries, Brazil was present in the ranking of the ten countries with the highest number of VL and CL cases [2]. One of the major etiologic agents of American tegumentary leishmaniasis in Brazil is Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis [3,4], although the infection caused by this species has already been described as having a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, including the visceral form [5,6].
Leishmaniasis treatment is challenging because the available drugs can cause several side effects, such as cardiotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity [7]. In addition, they are associated with high costs and unsatisfactory results as they have low selectivity, thus requiring higher doses, whereas the routes of administration are painful. These drawbacks mean patients often drop out of treatment [8], leading to the rise and spread of drug resistance [9]. Due to the great burden of leishmaniasis worldwide and the difficulties related to treatment, new therapeutic strategies are needed.
Parasite proteases have been demonstrated to be involved in parasite-host interaction [10]. The use of different protease inhibitors (natural or synthetic) has been reported to cause a significant reduction in the virulence of pathogens by modifying the pathophysiology of diseases, indicating their potential as potent and efficacious antiparasitic drugs [11]. Serine proteases, in particular, are important virulence factors in parasitic diseases. In Plasmodium, the merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) is crucial for the merozoite egress: in order to achieve its function, it must first be cleaved by a parasite-derived serine protease [12]. Toxoplasma serine proteases also appear to mediate the release of secretory proteins from the rhoptries, which is important in the penetration process [13]. Viral infections also rely on serine proteases, such as NS3 of the dengue virus [14], whereas the coronaviruses that cause SARS and MERS depend on serine proteases located at the host cell surface for their activation [15].
Leishmania spp. have between 26 and 28 serine protease genes [16]. Through comparative genomic analysis of four species of Leishmania, Silva-Almeida and coworkers (2014) observed 15 conserved alleles of serine proteases, which were predominantly grouped on chromosome 28 [17]. Serine proteases have been classified into evolutionarily unrelated clans, and can be subdivided into families, based on their catalytic mechanism. The clans differ in terms of the general fold and the order of the catalytic residues in the primary sequence; a catalytic triad of serine proteases is typically composed of histidine, serine, and aspartic residues in the active site [18]. Despite this highly evolutionarily conserved triad in the active site, studies have shown unusual folds unrelated any other serine protease, with an active site consisting instead of histidine, an aspartic acid, or even a tetrad consisting of serine, two histidine, and aspartic acid, as described in the cytomegalovirus [19,20].
In Leishmania spp., the serine proteases are distributed in 6 clans among 8 families, and they represent one of three protease groups within the genome, consisting of 10–16% of all the protease genes. Until now, only functions of the SB, SC, and SF clans have functions demonstrated in the genus [16].
In Leishmania, there are two isoforms of genes from each clan and the SB clan includes the S8 family, known as the subtilase family, which is the second largest family of serine peptidases [16]. Two genes encoding subtilisin (SUB) have been identified in L. major (Q4Q827 and Q4QG50); however, only Q4QG50 has the S8 domain [21]. Accordingly, Swenerton and coworkers (2010) observed that SUB is required for the normal regulation of the trypanothione reductase system of Leishmania, as it appears that SUB has the function of processing the terminal peroxidases [22]. In this study, they generated a SUB knockout mutant for L. donovani (SUB−/−) and attempted the same in L. major; however, only one allele could be deleted (SUB+/−), despite multiple attempts at targeting the second allele [22]. L. donovani SUB−/− mutants demonstrated a reduced ability to differentiate from promastigotes into amastigotes in vitro. In addition, the resulting axenic amastigotes had abnormal membranes, retained flagella, and increased binucleation [22].Thus, SUB appears to be involved in maintaining the survival and viability of Leishmania.
To investigate the potential of a known inhibitor of serine proteases that could target SUB and have antileishmanial activity, we chose PF-429242 dihydrochloride, which is described to be an inhibitor of membrane-bound transcription factor site-1 protease (MBTP1—human subtilisin) [23]. Moreover, PF-429242 has already been shown to be effective in the suppression of viral replication in cells infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) [24], Lassa virus [25], lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus [26], arenaviruses [27], and dengue virus [28], and more recently we demonstrated that it significantly inhibited the growth of promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes of L. infantum [29].
Thus, in this study, we will evaluate the ability of PF-429242 in binding Leishmania SUB through molecular docking and determine the cellular location of the S8 domain-containing SUB in L. amazonensis. Thereafter, to determine whether SUB could be a potential druggable target, we use the serine protease, PF-429242, as an investigative pharmacological tool against the promastigotes and amastigotes of L. amazonensis.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Reagents

PF-429242 dihydrochloride was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and dissolved in deionized water. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) and resazurin (7-hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one-10-oxide sodium salt) were both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.2. Parasites

Four strains of L. amazonensis were used: MHOM/BR/77/LTB0016, MHOM/BR/75/Josefa, IFLA/BR/1967/PH8 and RAT/BA/74/LV78. The parasites were obtained from the footpad lesions of infected BALB/c mice (Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation—CEUA of UFRJ, protocol number 080/2018) and then maintained as promastigotes in culture. L. amazonensis Josefa strain was cultured in M199 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 0.02% hemin, 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Cultilab, Sao Paulo, Brazil), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. L. amazonensis LTB0016 was cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 5 mg/mL hemin, 0.5 mg/mL folic acid, 0.2 mg/mL D-biotin and 4 mg/mL adenine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO USA). L. amazonensis PH8 and LV78 strains were grown in Schneider’s Drosophila medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 20% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. All promastigote cultures were incubated at 26 °C and passaged to a new medium twice per week. Promastigotes were used until third passage in culture. Axenic amastigotes of L. amazonensis LV78 strain were cultured in Grace’s Insect Media (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), pH 5.3, supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated FBS and 50 U/mL streptomycin, then maintained at 32 °C [30]. The amastigotes were used until the fifth passage in culture.

2.3. Multiple Sequence Alignment

The complete sequence of the SUB of L. amazonensis was analyzed for the percentage of identity and degree of similarity with other sequenced members of the serine protease family present in the SWISSPROT and Tr-EMBL protein banks. Database searches were performed using programs from the BLAST family. The multiple alignment was performed using the Clustal O (1.2.4) program in order to identify conserved regions, such as the catalytic triad and specificity subsites.

2.4. Cloning and Protein Expression of the Catalytic Domain from Subtilisin

The open reading frame (ORF) of SUB was amplified from the genomic DNA of L. major by PCR using oligonucleotides based on the N-terminal and C-terminal of the L. major gene sequences (LMJF_13_1040) deposited in the UnitProt protein database (Q4QG50). The catalytic domain (amino acids 88–409) alone was also amplified (forward primer with Ndel restriction site (underline): ggga tcccatatgttctctggccgtggcgtccgcgtg; reverse primer with EcoRI restriction site (underline) and stop codon (in italic): ggaattcctagagcgccacgactccggccacgat). The amplified DNA fragments (ORF, and catalytic domain 1302 bp) were purified from an agarose gel using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA), cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and transformed into E. coli DH5α. Plasmids were then purified from E. coli cultures using the Miniprep DNA Extraction kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and sequenced. The sequencing reactions were performed in an ABI PRISM 377 Sequencer (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (enzyme FS) (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
The catalytic domain of SUB was released from the pGEM-T vector using the restriction enzymes NdeI and EcoRI (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and subsequently ligated into a similarly digested pET28a vector using T4 DNA ligase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). For protein expression, the construct was transformed into BL21(DE3) or Rosette-gami 2 strains of E. coli. The positive clones were induced with 1 mM IPTG (varying time and temperature), and the conditions that resulted in the highest level of expression of proteins in soluble form were selected. The recombinant N-terminal his-tagged proteins were isolated using an Ni-NTA Superflow resin affinity column (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) using binding buffer (Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl and 5 mM Imidazole) and elution buffer (Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl and 200 mM Imidazole). When necessary, gel filtration chromatography steps using the Shim-pack Diol 150 column (Shimadzu, Torrance, CA, USA) were applied.

2.5. Anti-Subtilisin Sera

Polyclonal anti-subtilisin antibodies were generated in rabbits through four subcutaneous immunizations with the recombinant SUB catalytic domain (500 μg/dose with 7 days intervals). The first immunization was used in complete Freund’s adjuvant (SC-24018, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). The following immunizations were used together with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Six days after the last immunization, the animal was euthanized, and the serum was collected. Confirmation of the production of specific antibodies was assessed by Western blot.

2.6. Western Blot

L. amazonensis promastigote lysate (30 µg) was separated on an 8–10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (BIORAD, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was incubated with the primary antibody in 0.5% non-fat milk (rabbit polyclonal anti-subtilisin, 1:200) overnight at 4 °C, washed, and incubated with the anti-rabbit HRP secondary antibody (1:4000) in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h and revealed with ECL reagent (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA, RPN2106).

2.7. Flow Cytometry and Immunofluorescence Analysis (IFA)

L. amazonensis (1 × 106 cells) parasites were processed and analyzed for flow cytometry and IFA as previously described [31]. Briefly, parasites fixed with 0.4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized or not with 0.01% Triton X-100, were incubated at room temperature for 2 h with the anti-subtilisin polyclonal antibody (1:400). Cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), then incubated with Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:750) for 1 h at room temperature.
For flow cytometry, data acquisition and analysis were performed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer equipped with a 15 mW argon laser emitting at 488 nm (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). The omission of the primary antibody was used as a negative control. Each experimental population was first mapped using a two-parameter histogram of forward-angle light scatter versus side scatter. The mapped population (n = 10,000) was then analyzed for log green fluorescence using a single parameter histogram, and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each experimental system was divided by the MFI from the auto-fluorescence controls to obtain the variation index.
For IFA, the cells were incubated with DAPI solution at 1:20,000 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), adhered on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and mounted with ProLong® Gold Antifade (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). Images were captured on a Zeiss AxioImager 4.8 confocal microscope (Oberkochen, Germany) in the Confocal Platform of the Instituto Oswaldo Cruz—Fiocruz.

2.8. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

The TEM was performed as described previously [32]. Briefly, L. amazonensis promastigotes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2, dehydrated in methanol, embedded in resin (Lowicryl K4M) and cut. The sections were incubated with anti-subtilisin polyclonal antibody (1:200) in PBS for 2 h. After that, they were washed and incubated with anti-rabbit IgG antibodies bound to gold particles. The samples were observed on a Zeiss EM10C transmission electron microscope (Oberkochen, Germany).

2.9. Structure Prediction of Subtilisin

The L. major subtilisin and human subtilisin serine protease (S1P—also known as MBTP1,SKI1) amino acid sequences were retrieved from the UniProt database [33], under the codes, Q4QG50 and Q14703, respectively. The L. amazonensis sequence was obtained from the genome [34]. The S8 domain of the L. major and L. amazonensis SUBs were predicted by the Pfam server [35]. The ab initio modeling of the S8 domain was carried out using the fully automated Robetta server, which is available online (http://robetta.bakerlab.org) [36]. As the active site determination is crucial to study protein–ligand interactions, the DoGSiteScorer server [37] was used to predict the structural pockets and cavities of the SUB models. This tool combines pocket prediction, characterization and druggability estimation. The catalytic triad was predicted by comparison with the human model. Protein electrostatic surfaces were analyzed using the APBS software package in the PyMOL program (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.7.5.0, Schrödinger, LLC, San Francisco, CA, USA) in order to map the features of each catalytic site.

2.10. Molecular Docking

Docking simulations of the inhibitor, PF-429242, at the binding site of the SUB were carried out using AutoDock Vina [38]. The 3D structure of the inhibitor was built using the Avogadro program [39]. Hydrogens were added, considering the pH as 7.2, and the structure was minimized by the steepest descent method. Hydrogen atoms were also added to protein, and non-polar hydrogen atoms were merged. Protein coordinates were set to be rigid, whereas ligand bonds were set to be rotatable, and a grid box of 22.5 × 22.5 × 22.5 Å was centered on the cavity predicted by the DoGSiteScorer server. The number of generated binding modes was set to 100.

2.11. Cytotoxicity Assay

Peritoneal macrophages from BALB/c mice were obtained from the peritoneal cavity as described before [40], and 2 × 106 cells/mL prepared in RPMI with 10% FBS were distributed in 96-well plates. The plates were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 1 h, after which the wells were washed three times with PBS to remove non-adherent cells then incubated again in RPMI/10% FBS. The following day, the cells were washed with PBS and PF-429242 was added at different concentrations in RPMI/10% FBS (200; 100; 50; 25; 12.5; 6.25; 3.12; 1.56; and 0.78 µM). After 72 h at 37 °C, resazurin (final concentration 50 μM per well) or MTT (50 μg per well; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were added and the plates incubated again at 37 °C for 3 h or 4 h, respectively. MTT reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.7% isopropanol/HCl solution. The reactions were read on a SpectraMax fluorometer at excitation/emission of 560/590 nm for resazurin or on a SpectraMax spectrophotometer at 570 nm for MTT. The inhibition was calculated by comparing the percentage of cell death to the untreated control.

2.12. Promastigote Viability

Promastigotes (2 × 106 cells/mL) of L. amazonensis (LTB0016, PH8, Josefa e LV78) from log-phase culture were incubated for 72 h at 25 °C in 96-well plates with different concentrations of PF-429242 (100–0.01 µM) prepared in RPMI-1640 medium without phenol red (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 10% FBS. Cultured promastigotes without the addition of PF-429242 were used as a control. Afterwards, MTT was added, and the plates incubated at 25 °C for 4 h. The reaction was stopped using a 0.7% isopropanol/HCl solution and the reading was carried out in a SpectraMax spectrophotometer at 570 nm. Results were calculated as the inhibition percentage of promastigote growth compared with the untreated control.

2.13. Anti-Amastigote Activity

Peritoneal macrophages (2 × 106 cells/mL), obtained as described before [40], were distributed over 13 mm glass coverslips in 24-well plates and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After 1 h, the cells were washed then incubated overnight before being washed again. The cells were then incubated with L. amazonensis promastigotes (LTB0016, Josefa and PH8) in the stationary phase of growth at a 5:1 ratio for 4 h at 33 °C and 5% CO2. Afterwards, wells were washed with PBS to remove free parasites and PF-429242 was added at different concentrations (100; 10; 1; 0.1; and 0.01 µM) in RPMI/10% FBS. Infected cells in the absence of the inhibitor were used as a control. After 72 h of treatment at 33 °C and 5% CO2, the coverslips were removed and the cells stained with Panotico (Laborclin, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The coverslips were mounted on slides and for each coverslip the number of parasites within a total of 100 macrophages was counted. Results were calculated as the percentage of inhibition of amastigote growth compared with the untreated controls and IC50 values.

2.14. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) or GraFit 5 software. In order to select the most suitable tests, the normality and homogeneity of variances were first checked. Differences between mean values were evaluated by the use of a parametric Student’s t-test (two-tailed) or one-way ANOVA. Results are expressed as mean ± one standard deviation (SD), and differences between the control and treated groups were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05. IC50 values were obtained by non-linear regression in the GraphPad Prism 8 program.

3. Results

3.1. Sequence Aligment of the Catalytic Domain of Subtilisin

Through a database search (Swiss-Prot), we determined the sequence similarity of the SUB catalytic domain between L. mexicana, L. major, L. donovani, L. infantum, L. braziliensis, L. panamensis, Trypanosoma cruzi and T. brucei as compared with L.amazonensis by BLAST (Table S1, See Supplementary Materials). Although the degree of conservation was not so high for Trypanosoma (T. cruzi and T. brucei), with around only 36% identity, there was high sequence conservation among the Leishmania species, greater than 78% (Figure S1). The sequence data described are available under the accession numbers in Table S1.

3.2. Detection of Subtilisin in L. amazonensis

The catalytic domain of L. major SUB (Q4QG50) was cloned into an expression vector (Figure S2A—lane 2) and the recombinant protein was purified by affinity chromatography on a nickel column (Figure S2B—lane 3), which was used to generate polyclonal anti-subtilisin antibodies.
In order to detect the presence of SUB in L. amazonensis, the anti-subtilisin antibody was used against cell lysates in Western blot analysis (Figure 1A). As expected, a band around 150 kDa was identified. In addition, lower and higher bands were detected, these are possibly aggregates or degradation products of the same protein which may be indicative of SUB cleavage in other sites. We performed Western blot with the anti-subtilisin antibody in recombinant L.major SUB, and catalytic domain was also recognized (Figure S2C). In order to determine whether the SUB of L. amazonensis was located intracellularly or at the cell surface, flow cytometry was performed using promastigotes that were permeabilized, or not, then labeled with the anti-subtilisin antibody (Figure 1B). Although there was no difference, there seems to be a slight increase intracellularly.

3.3. Sub-Cellular Localization of Subtilisin in the L. amazonensis

Through immunofluorescence, it was seen that SUB of L. amazonensis was expressed throughout the parasite body, especially an accumulation around in the flagellar pocket (Figure 2A,B).
In order to confirm this concentration close to the flagellar pocket, immunolocalization by TEM was performed (Figure 2C). The greatest concentration of SUB was indeed found in the flagellar pocket (black arrows). The same was also observed with confocal microscopy to detect the SUB of L. major (Figure S3).

3.4. Molecular Modeling

PF-429242 has been shown to inhibit human subtilisin serine protease, S1P [41,42]. Here, molecular modeling studies were carried out to evaluate the binding mode of PF-429242 in the SUBs of L. major and L. amazonensis. The S8 domain, which contains the catalytic triad essential for serine endopeptidase activity, was identified through the Pfam server. In the S8 domain, human S1P has 259 amino acid residues, whereas L. amazonensis has 371 and L. major has 381. The 3D structures of the S8 domain of the SUB were obtained by the Robetta server. The selected models showed good stereochemical evaluation by Ramachandran plot (more than 92% of residues located in favored regions) and an adequate position of the catalytic site. It is important to highlight that the pH value of 7.2 had to be considered, since the protonation of the catalytic histidine is located on the delta nitrogen. This is the most favorable scenario for the catalysis by serine protease, in which the imidazole ring of histidine is stabilized by the aspartate of the catalytic triad.
The three SUB models (Figure 3A–C) showed 9 β-sheets. Additionally, 8, 14, and 13 α-helix structures were identified in the human, L. amazonensis and L. major models, respectively. No disulfide bonds were identified in any of the cysteine residues of the sequences.
Residues involved in the active binding site were indicated by the DogSiteScorer server (Table 1). The site in the human SUB showed the biggest pocket volume, with 513.34 Å3 and 31 residues, whereas the L. major pocket was the smallest (134.27 Å3 and 10 residues). The L. major model showed a greater number of side chains facing inward to the binding site.
In order to investigate the electrostatic potential of the SUB binding site surface, MEP was carried out by the auxiliary plug-in, PyMOL APBS Tools, for the three enzymes. They each showed different profiles (data not shown), but in the case of the L. amazonensis SUB, the surrounding region of the catalytic triad was predominantly positively charged whereas the most central region of the triad was a more negatively charged region. It was also possible to observe that the region near the catalytic histidine would be a less negatively charged location compared with the surface next to the other serine and aspartate of the catalytic triad.
Docking results suggest similar conformation of PF-429242 inside the binding sites of the three models (Figure 3), promoting an ionic interaction to the aspartate residue from the catalytic site. The resultant complexes also indicate that the inhibitor interacts through a hydrogen bond with the histidine residue from the catalytic site of the human and L. major SUBs (His36 and His43, respectively), and produces hydrophobic contacts with phenylalanine, threonine, leucine, and tyrosine residues.
PF-429242 conformation does not interact with the Asn134 in the human S1P. However, this corresponding residue in the Leishmania enzymes is an arginine (Arg195). This mutation to a charged residue may be a crucial difference that could be explored further in the development of new selective drugs.

3.5. Effect of the Inhibitor PF-429242 in Mammalian Cells and L. amazonensis

As in silico analysis suggested PF-429242 binding to Leishmania SUB, we next evaluated the effect of this inhibitor on peritoneal macrophages and L. amazonensis survival through in vitro assays. PF-429242 had a significant effect against promastigote forms of L. amazonensis in vitro, with IC50 values of 3.07 ± 0.20, 0.83 ± 0.12, 2.02 ± 0.27 and 5.83 ± 1.2 µM against the LTB0016, PH8, Josefa, and LV78 strains, respectively (Table 2). On the other hand, PF-429242 had low cytotoxic effects on mammalian cells, peritoneal macrophages from BALB/c mice, with a CC50 value of 170.30 µM. Significant toxicity was only seen for a concentration of 200 µM (Figure 4). From these values, the selectivity index (SI) towards the promastigotes over the host cells could be calculated (SI = 55.47, 205.18, 84.31 and 29.15 for LTB0016, PH8, Josefa, and LV78, respectively) (Table 2). In contrast, PF-429242 showed low activity against L. amazonensis intracellular amastigotes, with an IC50 >100 µM against LTB0016, PH8, and Josefa strains, and against axenic amastigotes of the LV78 strain at 94.12 ± 2.8 µM (Table 2).
Furthermore, PF-429242 significantly altered the survival of the promastigotes in concentrations greater than 1 µM (Figure 5A,B). However, against intracellular amastigotes, this compound only significantly reduced the survival at 100 µM for all three strains, as well as at 10 µM for the PH8 strain (Figure 5C). The same was seen for the axenic amastigotes of the LV78 strain (Figure 5D).

3.6. Expression of Subtilisin in Life Cycle Forms

Although PF-429242 had the capacity to impair the growth of promastigotes, as shown in Figure 5, this inhibitor was less effective against the amastigote form (Figure 5D). Thus, we evaluated the expression of SUB in both the promastigote and amastigote forms (Figure 6) by flow cytometry under permeabilized conditions. Greater expression of this enzyme was detected in the amastigote than in promastigote (16.73 ± 0.65 and 2.98 ± 0.30, p < 0.0035).
Although PF-429242 was not effective against the amastigote form of L.amazonensis, it did have an effect against the promastigotes. This could be due to the fact that the amastigotes appear to possess more of the target, SUB. This inhibitor could be used as the basis for developing more effective antileishmanial drugs.

4. Discussion

The role of peptidases has been studied in various pathological contexts, including infection by parasitic helminths [42] and fungi [43], and cancer [44]. In protozoans, peptidases have been reported to have several functions, such as evasion of the immune system, mediating interaction with host cells, and ensuring their infectivity, virulence and nutrition [45], as in the case of the etiologic agents of malaria and toxoplasmosis. The serine protease subtilisin is required for many stages of the parasite life cycle.
In Plasmodium, the importance of subtilisin-like protease 1 (SUB) is related to the continuation of the life cycle for several species of the genus [46]. When using a potent inhibitor of the SUB propeptide-like protein, the egress of the merozoite form of Plasmodium was impaired, thereby affecting its survival [47].
The subtilisin-like peptidase is the most well-known subtilase found in Plasmodium, mainly in the early stages in exomes, merozoite-secreting organelles [48]. In Toxoplasma gondii, TgSUB1 cleaves several microneme protein complexes on the surface of the parasite and is responsible for activating gliding motility and host invasion [49].
A study in 2010 revealed the importance of SUB for different species of Leishmania [22]. In this study, it was observed that the subtilisin-like protease gene could only be knocked out in L. donovani but not in L. major, in which only one allele could be silenced, suggesting that it may be essential for the survival of this species [22]. Furthermore, these Leishmania mutants demonstrated greater sensitivity to hydroperoxides [22], as well as reduced viability during in vivo infection, for both the heterozygotic L. major line and the SUB-deficient L. donovani. Thus, it can be said that this serine protease plays a role in Leishmania virulence. Additionally, subtilisin is involved in promastigote to amastigote differentiation that directly affects the virulence of the parasite [22].
However, despite the observed importance of this protease in Leishmania parasites, the cell localization had, until now, not been determined. In our study, we identified the presence of SUB in promastigotes of both L. amazonensis and L. major, using an antibody produced against the highly conserved catalytic domain, with a particularly high concentration of this protease in the region of the flagellar pocket. The flagellar pocket serves several functions for Leishmania, including motility for migration, attachment to the midgut microvilli and stomodeal valve of the vector, and potential sensory functions [50]. The process of capturing macromolecules from the parasitophorous vacuole of the host cells by amastigotes is mediated by the flagellar pocket [51]. According to the location of subtilisin we hypothesise that this enzyme may participate in a function in the flagellar pocket, perhaps related to parasite nutrition or interaction with the host; however, this must be elucidated. Previously, studies have reported that targeting proteins in the flagellum can damage the flagellar pocket of L. mexicana, thus impairing the viability of the parasites in the host macrophage [52].
The protein sequence of subtilisin for the L. amazonensis reference strain M2269 is 1467 amino acids, which equates to approximately 154 kDa. Using antibodies against the SUB catalytic domain, three bands were identified in the lysates from L. amazonensis LTB0016. The largest band (144 kDa) was approximately the size of that expected for the reference strain. The two smaller bands (129 kDa and 57 kDa) could indicate cleavage of the full-length protein. A cleavage site to remove a signal peptide has been predicted for subtilisin of L. donovani [22]. Although other potential cleavage sites are not yet known.
Studies investigating the serine proteases of L.amazonensis have identified enzymes around the same size as the smallest band detected in the present study, although these serine proteases have not been classified nor have the functions been investigated. Using gel zymography, a serine protease of 68 kDa was identified in the PH8 strain L.amazonensis [53], whereas a 56 kDa serine protease was identified in the same strain in a different study [54]. Similar to subtilisin, this 56 kDa serine protease was detected in the flagellar pocket [54]. This serine protease was also found in cytoplasmic vesicles and released into the extracellular environment through the flagellar pocket.
Since the proper functioning of the flagellar pocket is vital to Leishmania spp., targeting a specific protein known to localize in this region, that may have a role in the flagellar pocket, could be one route to consider in terms of drug development. Silva-Lopez et al. (2007) demonstrated that generic serine protease inhibitors (Bza, TPCK, and TLCK) impaired the viability and altered the morphology of L. amazonensis promastigotes [50]. Ultrastructural changes have been observed in Leishmania upon treatment with Bza and TPCK in particular, with alterations in the flagellar pocket region and membrane, including bleb formation. However, the effects caused by TPCK were more pronounced than those of Bza, with the detection of intracellular vesicular bodies [50]. Ultrastructural changes have been observed in Leishmania upon treatment with Bza and TPCK in particular, with alterations in the flagellar pocket region and membrane, including bleb formation. However, the effects caused by TPCK were more pronounced than those of Bza, with the detection of intracellular vesicular bodies [50].
In a recent study by our group, we evaluated the effect of PF-429242 during in vitro infection with L. infantum [29]. In this work, we demonstrated that PF-429242 acts on L. infantum promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes inducing morphological changes in the flagellum, which corresponds with our data of the cellular localization of subtilisin [29].
In the current study, we used PF-429242 in molecular docking studies with the binding site of the L. major and L. amazonensis SUB as well as the human S1P (or MBTP1). The catalytic domain of the L. amazonensis SUB shared 27.47% identity with the human MBTP1 (Table S1). Based on the similarity observed with S1P, the amino acids that potentially make up the catalytic triad have been highlighted in the sequences given, as seen in Figure S1.
The results indicate that PF-429242 adopts a similar conformation with the in silico modeled active sites of all three enzymes. The catalytic aspartate residue is key to the binding, since it promotes an ionic interaction to the ligand which stabilizes the complex. However, Asn134 in S1P is not conserved in the Leishmania SUBs, as it is replaced by Arg195. One aspect to consider for an antileishmanial drug is one which would inhibit the parasite protein, but not affect the human homologue. Thus, since Arg and Asn residues have different physical-chemical properties, this could be explored further to optimize the activity and selectivity of new inhibitors.
PF-429242 showed low toxicity to murine macrophages but was active against the promastigote form of four different strains of L. amazonensis. PF-429242 was demonstrated to be less active against the intracellular amastigote compared with the extracellular forms. This can be explained by the fact that the activity of serine protease in L. amazonensis is greater in promastigotes than in amastigotes [51]. Moreover, the drug is very hydrophilic, which can be a factor that makes it difficult for it to reach the amastigote. In addition, PF-429242 has already been shown to have a high clearance rate (75 mL/min/kg) and thus was administered in the animal models of one study every 6 h for 24 h [41]. According to our data, L. amazonensis amastigotes also have a higher amount of SUB when compared with promastigotes, which may therefore require a higher concentration of the compound for enzymatic inhibition.
Depending on the Leishmania species, amastigote forms can be hosted individually in small, tight parasitophorous vacuoles (PVs) or grouped into large, loose PVs, which may explain the need to test higher drug concentrations or improved delivery across membranes [55]. Furthermore, the need to cross the host cell membrane and the parasite membrane can result in loss of the compound before reaching the amastigotes [56].
Recently, PF-429242 treatment of L. infantum-infected macrophages was effective [29] but this was not observed for the L. amazonensis-infected macrophages. This is likely due to the large parasitophorous vacuoles present in L. amazonensis-infected macrophages that generates a resistant mechanism in tryparedoxin peroxidase isoform, which is different from parasitophorous vacuoles of L. infantum [57].
Drug encapsulation strategies could be the focus of future studies to improve the delivery of this inhibitor for the treatment of infections caused by the different Leishmania species. In fact, PF-429242 has already been encapsulated in a lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) in an attempt to enhance the efficiency of drug delivery and its ability to eliminate chronic infections, wherein the authors obtained satisfactory results [26].
Here, we show for the first time the cellular location of the subtilisin-like serine protease in the flagellar pocket of L.amazonensis and that the serine protease inhibitor, PF-429242, can affect promastigote survival but not that of the amastigotes.

5. Conclusions

Here, we show for the first time the cellular location of the subtilisin-like serine protease in the flagellar pocket of L. amazonensis and that the serine protease inhibitor, PF-429242, can affect promastigote survival but not the amastigotes. However, these findings will allow the creation of strategies to increase drug delivery to maintain efficacy against the L. amazonensis intracellular forms and during in vivo infection.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb44050141/s1, Table S1: Percentage of similarity between the catalytic domain sequences. The similarity was obtained by Clustal O (1.2.4); Figure S1: Multiple sequence alignment of trypanosomatid and human subtilisins (MBTP1). Alignment of the catalytic domain sequences of SUBs from L. amazonensis, L. braziliensis, L. donovani, L. infantum, L. major, L. mexicana, L. panamensis, T. cruzi, T. brucei and Homo sapiens. Sequences were obtained from the UnitProt database, and the alignment was performed using the Clustal O (1.2.4) program. * indicates amino acids are equal in the same position: identify high similarities, moderate similarities and yellow highlighting indicates the amino acids that potentially form the catalytic triad; Figure S2: Cloning, expression and purification of the catalytic domain of L. major subtilisin. (A) PCR amplification of LMJF_13_1040; lane 1, the complete ORF and lane 2, the catalytic domain only. (B) Purification of the recombinant SUB catalytic domain expressed by E. coli detected on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel. (C) Detection of the recombinant L. major SUB catalytic domain with the anti-subtilisin antibody. Lane 1, anti-subtilisin immunized serum and lane 2, non-immunized serum; Figure S3: Immunolocalization of subtilisin in L. major by confocal microscopy. (A) L. major promastigotes were fixed, incubated with anti-subtilisin antibody (1:100) and then incubated with Texas Red-labeled secondary antibody (1:1000). Images were acquired by excitation at 590 nm and emission at 615 nm. The nuclei were stained blue with DAPI. (B) Differential interference contrast (DIC) image of figure (A); Figure S4: Two-dimensional representation of the PF-429242 structure generated in PubChem Sketcher V2.4.

Author Contributions

Conception and idea: H.L.d.M.G., Design of the study: P.S.G., M.P.D.C., P.d.A.M., S.G.D.-S. and H.L.d.M.G. Acquisition of data: P.S.G., M.P.D.C., P.d.A.M., J.V.M.P.d.S., A.M.d.F.-M., V.E.-V., V.V.d.A.-N. and H.L.d.M.G. Analysis and interpretation of data: P.S.G., M.P.D.C., V.E.-V., P.d.A.M., A.G., V.V.d.A.-N., A.P.C.d.A.L. and H.L.d.M.G. Support and material: V.V.d.A.-N., V.E.-V., D.C.O.G., S.G.D.-S., A.P.C.d.A.L. and H.L.d.M.G. Drafting the article: P.S.G., M.P.D.C., P.d.A.M., A.G., A.P.C.d.A.L. and H.L.d.M.G. Revising the article critically for important intellectual content: P.S.G., P.d.A.M., D.C.O.G., A.C.R.S., S.G.D.-S., A.P.C.d.A.L. and H.L.d.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) grant number E-26/202.421/2017 and E-26/202.942/2019. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro by grant PIBIC/PIBITI.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and approved by Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation (CEUA 080/2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Brasil (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, and Fiocruz. We thank Bartira Rossi Bergmann, Suzana Côrte-Real, Dario Kalume and Carlos Rangel Rodrigues for providing support and supplies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Torres-Guerrero, E.; Quintanilla-Cedillo, M.R.; Ruiz-Esmenjaud, J.; Arenas, R. Leishmaniasis: A review. F1000Research 2017, 6, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. WHO. Leishmaniasis; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. Herrera, G.; Barragan, N.; Luna, N.; Martinez, D.; De Martino, F.; Medina, J.; Nino, S.; Paez, L.; Ramirez, A.; Vega, L.; et al. An interactive database of Leishmania species distribution in the Americas. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Valdivia, H.O.; Almeida, L.V.; Roatt, B.M.; Reis-Cunha, J.L.; Pereira, A.A.; Gontijo, C.; Fujiwara, R.T.; Reis, A.B.; Sanders, M.J.; Cotton, J.A.; et al. Comparative genomics of canine-isolated Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis from an endemic focus of visceral leishmaniasis in Governador Valadares, southeastern Brazil. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Barral, A.; Pedral-Sampaio, D.; Grimaldi Junior, G.; Momen, H.; McMahon-Pratt, D.; Ribeiro de Jesus, A.; Almeida, R.; Badaro, R.; Barral-Netto, M.; Carvalho, E.M.; et al. Leishmaniasis in Bahia, Brazil: Evidence that Leishmania amazonensis produces a wide spectrum of clinical disease. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1991, 44, 536–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. de Oliveira, J.P.; Fernandes, F.; Cruz, A.K.; Trombela, V.; Monteiro, E.; Camargo, A.A.; Barral, A.; de Oliveira, C.I. Genetic diversity of Leishmania amazonensis strains isolated in northeastern Brazil as revealed by DNA sequencing, PCR-based analyses and molecular karyotyping. Kinetoplastid. Biol. Dis. 2007, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oliveira, L.F.; Schubach, A.O.; Martins, M.M.; Passos, S.L.; Oliveira, R.V.; Marzochi, M.C.; Andrade, C.A. Systematic review of the adverse effects of cutaneous leishmaniasis treatment in the New World. Acta Trop. 2011, 118, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brito, N.C.; Machado de Assis, T.S.; Rabello, A.; Cota, G. Intralesional infiltration versus parenteral use of meglumine antimoniate for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: A cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bassanini, I.; Parapini, S.; Ferrandi, E.E.; Gabriele, E.; Basilico, N.; Taramelli, D.; Sparatore, A. Design, Synthesis and In Vitro Investigation of Novel Basic Celastrol Carboxamides as Bio-Inspired Leishmanicidal Agents Endowed with Inhibitory Activity against Leishmania Hsp90. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sakanari, J.A.; Staunton, C.E.; Eakin, A.E.; Craik, C.S.; McKerrow, J.H. Serine proteases from nematode and protozoan parasites: Isolation of sequence homologs using generic molecular probes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 4863–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Agbowuro, A.A.; Huston, W.M.; Gamble, A.B.; Tyndall, J.D.A. Proteases and protease inhibitors in infectious diseases. Med. Res. Rev. 2018, 38, 1295–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Das, S.; Hertrich, N.; Perrin, A.J.; Withers-Martinez, C.; Collins, C.R.; Jones, M.L.; Watermeyer, J.M.; Fobes, E.T.; Martin, S.R.; Saibil, H.R.; et al. Processing of Plasmodium falciparum Merozoite Surface Protein MSP1 Activates a Spectrin-Binding Function Enabling Parasite Egress from RBCs. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 18, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lentini, G.; El Hajj, H.; Papoin, J.; Fall, G.; Pfaff, A.W.; Tawil, N.; Braun-Breton, C.; Lebrun, M. Characterization of Toxoplasma DegP, a rhoptry serine protease crucial for lethal infection in mice. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zou, C.; Huang, C.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Q.; Ni, X.; Sun, J.; Dai, J. Virulence difference of five type I dengue viruses and the intrinsic molecular mechanism. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shulla, A.; Heald-Sargent, T.; Subramanya, G.; Zhao, J.; Perlman, S.; Gallagher, T. A transmembrane serine protease is linked to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor and activates virus entry. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 873–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Alves, C.R.; Souza, R.S.; Charret, K.D.S.; Cortes, L.M.C.; Sa-Silva, M.P.; Barral-Veloso, L.; Oliveira, L.F.G.; da Silva, F.S. Understanding serine proteases implications on Leishmania spp lifecycle. Exp. Parasitol. 2018, 184, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Silva-Almeida, M.; Souza-Silva, F.; Pereira, B.A.; Ribeiro-Guimaraes, M.L.; Alves, C.R. Overview of the organization of protease genes in the genome of Leishmania spp. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Krem, M.M.; Di Cera, E. Molecular markers of serine protease evolution. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 3036–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Qiu, X.; Culp, J.S.; DiLella, A.G.; Hellmig, B.; Hoog, S.S.; Janson, C.A.; Smith, W.W.; Abdel-Meguid, S.S. Unique fold and active site in cytomegalovirus protease. Nature 1996, 383, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, L.; Yuan, C.; Huang, M. A general strategy to inhibit serine protease by targeting its autolysis loop. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ivens, A.C.; Peacock, C.S.; Worthey, E.A.; Murphy, L.; Aggarwal, G.; Berriman, M.; Sisk, E.; Rajandream, M.A.; Adlem, E.; Aert, R.; et al. The genome of the kinetoplastid parasite, Leishmania major. Science 2005, 309, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Swenerton, R.K.; Knudsen, G.M.; Sajid, M.; Kelly, B.L.; McKerrow, J.H. Leishmania subtilisin is a maturase for the trypanothione reductase system and contributes to disease pathology. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 31120–31129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wang, F.; Xu, C.; Luo, R.; Peng, K.; Ramkumar, N.; Xie, S.; Lu, X.; Zhao, L.; Zuo, C.J.; Kohan, D.E.; et al. Site-1 protease-derived soluble (pro)renin receptor targets vasopressin receptor 2 to enhance urine concentrating capability. JCI Insight 2019, 4, e124174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Blanchet, M.; Sureau, C.; Guevin, C.; Seidah, N.G.; Labonte, P. SKI-1/S1P inhibitor PF-429242 impairs the onset of HCV infection. Antiviral Res. 2015, 115, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Urata, S.; Yun, N.; Pasquato, A.; Paessler, S.; Kunz, S.; de la Torre, J.C. Antiviral activity of a small-molecule inhibitor of arenavirus glycoprotein processing by the cellular site 1 protease. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wen, A.M.; Le, N.; Zhou, X.; Steinmetz, N.F.; Popkin, D.L. Tropism of CPMV to Professional Antigen Presenting Cells Enables a Platform to Eliminate Chronic Infections. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 1, 1050–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Urata, S.; Weyer, J.; Storm, N.; Miyazaki, Y.; van Vuren, P.J.; Paweska, J.T.; Yasuda, J. Analysis of Assembly and Budding of Lujo Virus. J. Virol. 2015, 90, 3257–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hyrina, A.; Meng, F.; McArthur, S.J.; Eivemark, S.; Nabi, I.R.; Jean, F. Human Subtilisin Kexin Isozyme-1 (SKI-1)/Site-1 Protease (S1P) regulates cytoplasmic lipid droplet abundance: A potential target for indirect-acting anti-dengue virus agents. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Machado, P.A.; Gomes, P.S.; Midlej, V.; Coimbra, E.S.; de Matos Guedes, H.L. PF-429242, a Subtilisin Inhibitor, Is Effective in vitro Against Leishmania infantum. Front Microbiol. 2021, 12, 583834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carlsen, E.D.; Hay, C.; Henard, C.A.; Popov, V.; Garg, N.J.; Soong, L. Leishmania amazonensis amastigotes trigger neutrophil activation but resist neutrophil microbicidal mechanisms. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 3966–3974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ennes-Vidal, V.; Vitorio, B.D.S.; Menna-Barreto, R.F.S.; Pitaluga, A.N.; Goncalves-da-Silva, S.A.; Branquinha, M.H.; Santos, A.L.S.; d’Avila-Levy, C.M. Calpains of Leishmania braziliensis: Genome analysis, differential expression, and functional analysis. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2019, 114, e190147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Graham, L.; Orenstein, J.M. Processing tissue and cells for transmission electron microscopy in diagnostic pathology and research. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 2439–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D158–D169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Tschoeke, D.A.; Nunes, G.L.; Jardim, R.; Lima, J.; Dumaresq, A.S.; Gomes, M.R.; de Mattos Pereira, L.; Loureiro, D.R.; Stoco, P.H.; de Matos Guedes, H.L.; et al. The Comparative Genomics and Phylogenomics of Leishmania amazonensis Parasite. Evol. Bioinform. Online 2014, 10, 131–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Finn, R.D.; Coggill, P.; Eberhardt, R.Y.; Eddy, S.R.; Mistry, J.; Mitchell, A.L.; Potter, S.C.; Punta, M.; Qureshi, M.; Sangrador-Vegas, A.; et al. The Pfam protein families database: Towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D279–D285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Raman, S.; Vernon, R.; Thompson, J.; Tyka, M.; Sadreyev, R.; Pei, J.; Kim, D.; Kellogg, E.; DiMaio, F.; Lange, O.; et al. Structure prediction for CASP8 with all-atom refinement using Rosetta. Proteins 2009, 77, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Volkamer, A.; Kuhn, D.; Rippmann, F.; Rarey, M. DoGSiteScorer: A web server for automatic binding site prediction, analysis and druggability assessment. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2074–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hanwell, M.D.; Curtis, D.E.; Lonie, D.C.; Vandermeersch, T.; Zurek, E.; Hutchison, G.R. Avogadro: An advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J. Cheminform. 2012, 4, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Layoun, A.; Samba, M.; Santos, M.M. Isolation of murine peritoneal macrophages to carry out gene expression analysis upon Toll-like receptors stimulation. J. Vis. Exp. 2015, 2015, 52749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hawkins, J.L.; Robbins, M.D.; Warren, L.C.; Xia, D.; Petras, S.F.; Valentine, J.J.; Varghese, A.H.; Wang, I.K.; Subashi, T.A.; Shelly, L.D.; et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of site 1 protease activity inhibits sterol regulatory element-binding protein processing and reduces lipogenic enzyme gene expression and lipid synthesis in cultured cells and experimental animals. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 326, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Caffrey, C.R.; Goupil, L.; Rebello, K.M.; Dalton, J.P.; Smith, D. Cysteine proteases as digestive enzymes in parasitic helminths. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0005840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mandujano-Gonzalez, V.; Villa-Tanaca, L.; Anducho-Reyes, M.A.; Mercado-Flores, Y. Secreted fungal aspartic proteases: A review. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2016, 33, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kryza, T.; Silva, M.L.; Loessner, D.; Heuze-Vourc’h, N.; Clements, J.A. The kallikrein-related peptidase family: Dysregulation and functions during cancer progression. Biochimie 2016, 122, 283–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. de Magalhaes, M.T.Q.; Mambelli, F.S.; Santos, B.P.O.; Morais, S.B.; Oliveira, S.C. Serine protease inhibitors containing a Kunitz domain: Their role in modulation of host inflammatory responses and parasite survival. Microbes Infect. 2018, 20, 606–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Withers-Martinez, C.; Suarez, C.; Fulle, S.; Kher, S.; Penzo, M.; Ebejer, J.P.; Koussis, K.; Hackett, F.; Jirgensons, A.; Finn, P.; et al. Plasmodium subtilisin-like protease 1 (SUB1): Insights into the active-site structure, specificity and function of a pan-malaria drug target. Int. J. Parasitol. 2012, 42, 597–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tarr, S.J.; Withers-Martinez, C.; Flynn, H.R.; Snijders, A.P.; Masino, L.; Koussis, K.; Conway, D.J.; Blackman, M.J. A malaria parasite subtilisin propeptide-like protein is a potent inhibitor of the egress protease SUB1. Biochem. J. 2020, 477, 525–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yeoh, S.; O’Donnell, R.A.; Koussis, K.; Dluzewski, A.R.; Ansell, K.H.; Osborne, S.A.; Hackett, F.; Withers-Martinez, C.; Mitchell, G.H.; Bannister, L.H.; et al. Subcellular discharge of a serine protease mediates release of invasive malaria parasites from host erythrocytes. Cell 2007, 131, 1072–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Saouros, S.; Dou, Z.; Henry, M.; Marchant, J.; Carruthers, V.B.; Matthews, S. Microneme protein 5 regulates the activity of Toxoplasma subtilisin 1 by mimicking a subtilisin prodomain. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 36029–36040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Silva-Lopez, R.E.; Morgado-Diaz, J.A.; Chavez, M.A.; Giovanni-De-Simone, S. Effects of serine protease inhibitors on viability and morphology of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis promastigotes. Parasitol. Res. 2007, 101, 1627–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alves, C.R.; Corte-Real, S.; Bourguignon, S.C.; Chaves, C.S.; Saraiva, E.M. Leishmania amazonensis: Early proteinase activities during promastigote-amastigote differentiation in vitro. Exp. Parasitol. 2005, 109, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tran, K.D.; Rodriguez-Contreras, D.; Vieira, D.P.; Yates, P.A.; David, L.; Beatty, W.; Elferich, J.; Landfear, S.M. KHARON1 mediates flagellar targeting of a glucose transporter in Leishmania mexicana and is critical for viability of infectious intracellular amastigotes. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 22721–22733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Morgado-Diaz, J.A.; Silva-Lopez, R.E.; Alves, C.R.; Soares, M.J.; Corte-Real, S.; De Simone, S.G. Subcellular localization of an intracellular serine protease of 68 kDa in Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis promastigotes. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2005, 100, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Silva-Lopez, R.E.; Morgado-Diaz, J.A.; Alves, C.R.; Corte-Real, S.; Giovanni-De-Simone, S. Subcellular localization of an extracellular serine protease in Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis. Parasitol. Res. 2004, 93, 328–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Real, F.; Mortara, R.A. The diverse and dynamic nature of Leishmania parasitophorous vacuoles studied by multidimensional imaging. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Yang, N.J.; Hinner, M.J. Getting across the cell membrane: An overview for small molecules, peptides, and proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1266, 29–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Henard, C.A.; Carlsen, E.D.; Hay, C.; Kima, P.E.; Soong, L. Leishmania amazonensis amastigotes highly express a tryparedoxin peroxidase isoform that increases parasite resistance to macrophage antimicrobial defenses and fosters parasite virulence. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cimb 44 00141 g001 550
Figure 1. Detection of subtilisin in L. amazonensis. (A) Western blot analysis of L. amazonensis (MHOM/BR/77/LTB0016) promastigotes (30 µg of lysate) using an anti-subtilisin antibody (1:500) and an anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:4000). The subtilisin-like protein bands are indicated by the black arrows. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of Triton X-100-permeabilized (grey line) and non-permeabilized (black line) L. amazonensis promastigotes labeled with the anti-subtilisin antibody (1:400) and an Alexa 488 secondary antibody (1:750). The variation index of the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) was obtained by the division of the MFI from labeled parasites by the non-stained autofluorescence control (black fill). Experiments were performed in triplicate and graphs are representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 1. Detection of subtilisin in L. amazonensis. (A) Western blot analysis of L. amazonensis (MHOM/BR/77/LTB0016) promastigotes (30 µg of lysate) using an anti-subtilisin antibody (1:500) and an anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:4000). The subtilisin-like protein bands are indicated by the black arrows. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of Triton X-100-permeabilized (grey line) and non-permeabilized (black line) L. amazonensis promastigotes labeled with the anti-subtilisin antibody (1:400) and an Alexa 488 secondary antibody (1:750). The variation index of the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) was obtained by the division of the MFI from labeled parasites by the non-stained autofluorescence control (black fill). Experiments were performed in triplicate and graphs are representative of three independent experiments.
Cimb 44 00141 g001
Cimb 44 00141 g002 550
Figure 2. Immunolocalization of L. amazonensis subtilisin. (A) Paraformaldehyde-fixed L. amazonensis promastigotes were permeabilized with Triton X-100 and labeled with anti-subtilisin antibody (1:400) and an Alexa 488 secondary antibody (1:750). The parasites were then analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy. Parasites treated with the secondary antibody alone presented no fluorescence intensity (data not shown). The images shown are representative of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis by Student’s t-test p < 0.05. (B) The labeling of the cell cytoplasm, in detail. Bar represents 10 μm (C) Transmission electron microscopy of L. amazonensis promastigotes using anti-subtilisin (1:200) and gold-conjugated anti-IgG antibodies (arrows). Scale 0.5 μm.
Figure 2. Immunolocalization of L. amazonensis subtilisin. (A) Paraformaldehyde-fixed L. amazonensis promastigotes were permeabilized with Triton X-100 and labeled with anti-subtilisin antibody (1:400) and an Alexa 488 secondary antibody (1:750). The parasites were then analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy. Parasites treated with the secondary antibody alone presented no fluorescence intensity (data not shown). The images shown are representative of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis by Student’s t-test p < 0.05. (B) The labeling of the cell cytoplasm, in detail. Bar represents 10 μm (C) Transmission electron microscopy of L. amazonensis promastigotes using anti-subtilisin (1:200) and gold-conjugated anti-IgG antibodies (arrows). Scale 0.5 μm.
Cimb 44 00141 g002
Cimb 44 00141 g003 550
Figure 3. Suggested binding mode of PF-429242 (carbons in gray) in the subtilisin binding site. (A) Human subtilisin S1P (carbons in cyan), (B) L. amazonensis SUB (carbons in yellow), and (C) L. major SUB (carbons in pink). Protein residues in close contact with the inhibitor are shown as lines and labeled. Hydrogen bonding interactions are shown as a dotted green line. Secondary structures are shown as a transparent cartoon.
Figure 3. Suggested binding mode of PF-429242 (carbons in gray) in the subtilisin binding site. (A) Human subtilisin S1P (carbons in cyan), (B) L. amazonensis SUB (carbons in yellow), and (C) L. major SUB (carbons in pink). Protein residues in close contact with the inhibitor are shown as lines and labeled. Hydrogen bonding interactions are shown as a dotted green line. Secondary structures are shown as a transparent cartoon.
Cimb 44 00141 g003
Cimb 44 00141 g004 550
Figure 4. Cytotoxicity of PF-429242 in mammalian cells. Peritoneal macrophages from BALB/c mice were treated with different concentrations of PF-429242 for 72 h at 37 °C. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT assays. Graphs represent the percentage of viable macrophages after treatment. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test was performed. Experiments were performed in triplicate and graphs are representative of three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. Cytotoxicity of PF-429242 in mammalian cells. Peritoneal macrophages from BALB/c mice were treated with different concentrations of PF-429242 for 72 h at 37 °C. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT assays. Graphs represent the percentage of viable macrophages after treatment. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test was performed. Experiments were performed in triplicate and graphs are representative of three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001.
Cimb 44 00141 g004
Cimb 44 00141 g005 550
Figure 5. Survival percentage of promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes treated with PF-429242. L. amazonensis promastigotes, and intracellular or axenic amastigotes were treated with different concentrations of PF-429242 for 72 h. (A) LTB, (B) Josefa, (C) PH8, and (D) LV78. Promastigotes measured by resazurin or MTT. Infected macrophages were fixed, stained with Panotico and counted on a microscope. The total number of amastigotes within 100 macrophages were assessed. Graphs show the average from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test was performed to compare results with the untreated control. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Survival percentage of promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes treated with PF-429242. L. amazonensis promastigotes, and intracellular or axenic amastigotes were treated with different concentrations of PF-429242 for 72 h. (A) LTB, (B) Josefa, (C) PH8, and (D) LV78. Promastigotes measured by resazurin or MTT. Infected macrophages were fixed, stained with Panotico and counted on a microscope. The total number of amastigotes within 100 macrophages were assessed. Graphs show the average from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test was performed to compare results with the untreated control. **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05.
Cimb 44 00141 g005
Cimb 44 00141 g006 550
Figure 6. Intracellular protein expression of subtilisin in promastigotes and axenic amastigotes. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of L. amazonensis axenic promastigotes and amastigotes (RAT/BA/74/LV78). Cells were labeled with the anti-subtilisin antibody (1:400) and an Alexa 488 secondary antibody (green) (1:750). (B) The variation index of the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) was obtained by the division of the MFI from labeled parasites by the non-stained autofluorescence control (black fill).
Figure 6. Intracellular protein expression of subtilisin in promastigotes and axenic amastigotes. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of L. amazonensis axenic promastigotes and amastigotes (RAT/BA/74/LV78). Cells were labeled with the anti-subtilisin antibody (1:400) and an Alexa 488 secondary antibody (green) (1:750). (B) The variation index of the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) was obtained by the division of the MFI from labeled parasites by the non-stained autofluorescence control (black fill).
Cimb 44 00141 g006
Table
Table 1. Residues involved in the binding site of the human and Leishmania subtilisin S8 domain.
Table 1. Residues involved in the binding site of the human and Leishmania subtilisin S8 domain.
SpecieCatalytic SiteNumber of ResiduesVolume (Å3)Surface (Å2)Drugscore
HumanAsp5, His36, Ser20131513.34562.950.78
L.amazonensisAsp10, His43, Ser30824486.93644.390.82
L.majorAsp10, His43, Ser30810134.27188.720.18
Table
Table 2. Effect of PF-429242 against peritoneal macrophages and promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes of L. amazonensis.
Table 2. Effect of PF-429242 against peritoneal macrophages and promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes of L. amazonensis.
Cytotoxicity against Peritoneal Macrophages—CC50 (µM)Antileishmanial Activity against
L. amazonensis
PromastigotesIntracellular AmastigotesAmastigote-like
IC50 (µM)SIIC50 (µM)SIIC50 (µM)
LTB0016PH8JOSEFALV78LTB0016PH8JOSEFALV78LTB0016PH8JOSEFALV78LTB0016PH8JOSEFALV78LV78
PF-429242170.30 ± 6.413.07 ± 0.200.83 ± 0.122.02 ± 0.275.83 ± 1.255.47205.1884.3129.15>100>100>100-----94.12 ± 2.84
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gomes, P.S.; Carneiro, M.P.D.; Machado, P.d.A.; de Andrade-Neto, V.V.; da Fonseca-Martins, A.M.; Goundry, A.; Pereira da Silva, J.V.M.; Gomes, D.C.O.; Lima, A.P.C.d.A.; Ennes-Vidal, V.; et al. Subtilisin of Leishmania amazonensis as Potential Druggable Target: Subcellular Localization, In Vitro Leishmanicidal Activity and Molecular Docking of PF-429242, a Subtilisin Inhibitor. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 2089-2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44050141

AMA Style

Gomes PS, Carneiro MPD, Machado PdA, de Andrade-Neto VV, da Fonseca-Martins AM, Goundry A, Pereira da Silva JVM, Gomes DCO, Lima APCdA, Ennes-Vidal V, et al. Subtilisin of Leishmania amazonensis as Potential Druggable Target: Subcellular Localization, In Vitro Leishmanicidal Activity and Molecular Docking of PF-429242, a Subtilisin Inhibitor. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022; 44(5):2089-2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44050141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gomes, Pollyanna Stephanie, Monique Pacheco Duarte Carneiro, Patrícia de Almeida Machado, Valter Viana de Andrade-Neto, Alessandra Marcia da Fonseca-Martins, Amy Goundry, João Vitor Marques Pereira da Silva, Daniel Claudio Oliveira Gomes, Ana Paula Cabral de Araujo Lima, Vítor Ennes-Vidal, and et al. 2022. "Subtilisin of Leishmania amazonensis as Potential Druggable Target: Subcellular Localization, In Vitro Leishmanicidal Activity and Molecular Docking of PF-429242, a Subtilisin Inhibitor" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 44, no. 5: 2089-2106. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44050141

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop