Next Article in Journal
Genomic, Epigenomic, Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches in Atopic Dermatitis
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Their Products in the Treatment of Injured Spinal Cords
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 45
Issue 6
10.3390/cimb45060330
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Heme Interactions as Regulators of the Alternative Pathway Complement Responses and Implications for Heme-Associated Pathologies

by
Stefanos A. Tsiftsoglou
Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45(6), 5198-5214; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060330
Submission received: 7 May 2023 / Revised: 13 June 2023 / Accepted: 14 June 2023 / Published: 16 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Blood Physiology: Molecular Mechanisms of Vascular Wall Functioning, 2nd Volume)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Heme (Fe2+-protoporphyrin IX) is a pigment of life, and as a prosthetic group in several hemoproteins, it contributes to diverse critical cellular processes. While its intracellular levels are tightly regulated by networks of heme-binding proteins (HeBPs), labile heme can be hazardous through oxidative processes. In blood plasma, heme is scavenged by hemopexin (HPX), albumin and several other proteins, while it also interacts directly with complement components C1q, C3 and factor I. These direct interactions block the classical pathway (CP) and distort the alternative pathway (AP). Errors or flaws in heme metabolism, causing uncontrolled intracellular oxidative stress, can lead to several severe hematological disorders. Direct interactions of extracellular heme with alternative pathway complement components (APCCs) may be implicated molecularly in diverse conditions at sites of abnormal cell damage and vascular injury. In such disorders, a deregulated AP could be associated with the heme-mediated disruption of the physiological heparan sulphate–CFH coat of stressed cells and the induction of local hemostatic responses. Within this conceptual frame, a computational evaluation of HBMs (heme-binding motifs) aimed to determine how heme interacts with APCCs and whether these interactions are affected by genetic variation within putative HBMs. Combined computational analysis and database mining identified putative HBMs in all of the 16 APCCs examined, with 10 exhibiting disease-associated genetic (SNPs) and/or epigenetic variation (PTMs). Overall, this article indicates that among the pleiotropic roles of heme reviewed, the interactions of heme with APCCs could induce differential AP-mediated hemostasis-driven pathologies in certain individuals.

1. Introduction

1.1. Pleiotropic Functions of Heme, Transport and Heme-Associcated Pathologies

Heme (Fe2+-protoporphyrin IX) is a pigment of life in all organisms ranging from bacteria to mammals [1,2,3,4]. In terms of structure, heme exhibits a protoporphyrin IX tetrapyrrole ring system that is coordinated by a central iron ion through the four nitrogen atoms of the assembled moiety [5]. Heme also exhibits eight alkyl substituents (four methyl, two propionates and two vinyl groups) attached to its pyrrole rings. As a covalent prosthetic group in several vital hemoproteins, such as hemoglobins, myoglobins, cytochromes and enzymes, it serves as the essential gas carrier of oxygen (O2), nitrogen oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO) [6,7,8,9].
In the hemoglobin chains, the iron ion is bound to a histidine residue and to oxygen which binds at the other coordinated position of iron. The iron ion in hemoglobin is in its ferrous state (Fe2+) facilitating the reversible association with molecular oxygen. When the oxidation of hemoglobin occurs, iron transitions to its ferric state (Fe3+), thus converting hemoglobin to methemoglobin, which has limited oxygen-carrying capacity. In the presence of chloride (Cl−) ions, heme is converted to hemin, the oxidized form of iron protoporphyrin IX [5]. Our current knowledge about the functions of heme has been derived from experimental work using hemin, the oxidized form of heme (Fe3+-protoporphyrin IX) with a chloride ligand.
Heme is a major activator and regulator of erythropoiesis [5,10,11,12], an essential constituent of the red blood cells (RBCs), and a central element in cellular metabolism and mitochondrial bioenergetics. In addition, heme contributes to globin biosynthesis [12,13], induces cell signaling and sensing pathways [14,15], and it also facilitates proteolysis via ubiquitination [14,15,16] among its several pleiotropic biological activities and properties summarized in Table 1 as examples.
Heme is synthesized de novo in the mitochondria [3,5,17], while it is catabolized by heme oxygenases (HOs) into bilirubin and CO2 [4,5,18,19,20]. Unfortunately, despite being essential for erythropoiesis and pivotal for several other molecular processes, heme as a free agent can be hazardous as a potent oxidant in the formation of volatile radical oxygen species (ROS) [14,21,22,23].
The diverse effects of heme suggest that under healthy conditions, its intracellular levels and trafficking are constantly monitored, and tightly regulated, by an extensively network of heme-binding proteins (HeBPs) [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. These proteins are of diverse ontologies and contain often multiple heme-binding motifs (HBMs) that bind labile heme (biologically available and non-covalently bound) transiently with various affinities (Kd) [1,5,26,31,32,33,34]. These classes of motifs exhibit a primary architecture such as X4(C/H/Y)0X4 and contain an amino acid, histidine (H), tyrosine (Y), or cysteine (C), coordinated to the iron ion of heme and surrounded by positively-charged amino acids or cysteine–proline motifs (CP motifs) or cysteine [35,36]. The transport of labile heme in and out of the cells is also achieved through its transient binding to several shuttle proteins, receptors and complexes [27,37,38,39]. Heme is extracellularly sequestered when damaged or ruptured cells release considerable amounts of hemoproteins and eventually labile heme into tissues, organs and into the circulation [22].
Table
Table 1. Heme in diverse molecular processes and pathologies 1.
Table 1. Heme in diverse molecular processes and pathologies 1.
Beneficial Effects (+)
  • Serves as prosthetic group in hemoproteins such as hemoglobin, myoglobin, cytochromes and enzymes [1,2,3,4,5,10]
  • Acts as a gas carrier for O2, CO and NO [6,7,8,9]
  • Enhances globin mRNA translation [12,13]
  • Induces hemoglobin biosynthesis and erythropoiesis [5,11,13,40,41,42,43]
  • Activates cell signaling and regulates sensing [14,15]
  • Regulates mitochondrial respiratory bioenergetics [17,44,45]
  • Binds to DNA G4 structural domains [46]
  • Regulates the transcriptional dynamics of several genes [5,10]
  • Activates chaperones such as the heat shock proteins HSP70 and HSP90 [47]
  • Forms conjugation adducts with N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) and other thiols [21]
Harmful Effects (−)
  • Stimulates toll-like receptors (TLRs) affecting the immune response [48,49]
  • Regulates complement and coagulation responses [50,51,52,53,54,55]
  • Promotes ubiquitination and proteolysis [14,16]
  • Acts as a major oxidant promoting ROS accumulation and cell stress [14,22,24]
  • Stimulates stroke cell lysis and neuron ferroptosis [56,57,58]
  • Inhibits neuronal functions such as the low conductance K+ channels [59,60]
Heme-Associated Pathologies
  • Severe hematological disorders such as acute intermittent porphyrias [61] and anemias [5] that include congenital sideroblastic anemia [62] and Diamond–Blackfan anemia [63,64]
  • Hemolytic syndromes [66]
  • Severe sepsis [65]
  • Neurodegeneration [67,68]
  • Neurological disorders [69,70]
  • Cardiovascular arrythmias [71,72]
Heme-Associated Complementopathies [73]
  • Hemostasis-driven thromboinflammation [74]
  • Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) [75,76]
  • Hemolytic diseases and cell lysis conditions such as hemolytic uremic syndromes, hemorrhage, sepsis and sickle cell disease [53,77,78]
  • Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [75,79,80]
  • Ferroptosis in traumatic brain injury [68]
  • Ischemic stroke with cerebral hemorrhage [81]
  • Neurodegeneration [82]
  • Huntington’s disease [83]

1.2. Interactions of Heme with Complement Components

Extracellularly, in plasma, heme is scavenged by hemopexin (HPX) [84], albumin and several other proteins [85], while it also interacts directly with the complement components C1q [55], C3 [54] and factor I [51] (Figure 1). These direct interactions influence the activation and regulation dynamics of the classical (CP) and alternative (AP) complement pathways. Heme can interact with C1q and inhibit the classical complement pathway that is typically associated with the specific recognition and tagging of surface blebs of apoptotic vascular endothelial cells [55,86,87]. In addition, the association of heme with C3 at sites of endothelial damage was found to downregulate the expression of CD46/MCP and CD55/DAF, thus limiting the decay accelerative capacity of the compromised cells mainly to locally available CFH, and therefore promoting the formation of a hyperactive AP C3 convertase [54]. The interaction of heme with CFI blocks its proteolytic capacity against C3b, therefore also supporting the formation of a hyperactive AP C3 convertase [51].
The AP has recently attracted renewed interest due to its multidimensional involvement in important immune [88,89,90] and hemostatic processes [74]. Interestingly and in terms of the competing biochemical dynamics between the CP and AP, recent data have suggested that the contribution of the AP in complement activation on cell surfaces depends on the strength of CP initiation [91]. In that perspective, a heme-crippled C1q can enhance the AP activation dynamics, if there is lack of effective decay accelerating activity to control the formation of a C3bBb convertase.
Heme can downregulate CD46/MCP and CD55/DAF limiting the local decay accelerator factor potential to CFH, while it can also distort C3 [54] and block the proteolytic capacity of CFI [51]. The exposure of endothelia to heme can also promote the rapid exocytosis of Weibel–Palade bodies, the TLR4-dependent surface membrane expression of P-selectin known to bind C3b/C3(H2O) and trigger the AP, and the release of the prothrombotic von Willebrand factor [54,77]. The occurrence of local noncanonical AP activation and its association with the induction of thrombosis hemostatic responses has been recently discussed for SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 [92,93,94,95,96]. In both of these quite different scenarios, the heme-induced stress and the viral infection, the disruption of the physiological heparan sulphate–CFH coating could be a common and pivotal attribute for the maintenance of a deregulated AP amplification loop [79]. Other parameters in the host background, such as natural genetic variation (e.g., indels, SNPs) and epigenetic modifications (e.g., phosphorylation) of complement AP components, may also synergistically favor the enhanced assembly of a deregulated AP amplification loop.
Cimb 45 00330 g001 550
Figure 1. A schematic representation of the human complement system. The three activation pathways of the system (classical, lectin and alternative) are represented together with the terminal pathway that eventually leads to the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC) after complement activation. Regulatory inhibitory proteins are shown in shaded boxes and complement receptors in pentagons. One positive regulator, properdin (P), which stabilizes the C3 convertase C3bBb is also shown. This study investigates the transient interactions of heme with the AP components and their effects on associated products and processes. Overall, 16 AP components, highlighted in red, appeared to contain putative HBMs, while 10 of them, highlighted in red and pale blue shades, contain putative HBMs which overlay with sites or residues that exhibit genetic variation (encoded SNPs: single nucleotide polymorphisms). Some of these variations may increase, directly or indirectly, the avidity of certain complement components for heme, increasing its capacity to deregulate the AP amplification loop dynamics in certain carriers of the mutations. The deregulation of the AP amplification loop by heme can facilitate a faster consumption of C3, inefficient opsonization and activation of hemostasis. Increased turnover of C3 can also gradually cripple the activation of the downstream terminal complement components. This can eventually lead to reduction in C5a anaphylatoxin release and limited or no formation of the terminal MAC. In such an asynchronous setting, C3a becomes dominant over C5a, as the main complement anaphylatoxin released locally and in circulation (C3a > > > C5a). The AP has multidimensional involvement in important immune [88,89,90] and hemostatic responses and associated processes [74]. Figure 1 is adapted from [97] with minor modifications.
Figure 1. A schematic representation of the human complement system. The three activation pathways of the system (classical, lectin and alternative) are represented together with the terminal pathway that eventually leads to the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC) after complement activation. Regulatory inhibitory proteins are shown in shaded boxes and complement receptors in pentagons. One positive regulator, properdin (P), which stabilizes the C3 convertase C3bBb is also shown. This study investigates the transient interactions of heme with the AP components and their effects on associated products and processes. Overall, 16 AP components, highlighted in red, appeared to contain putative HBMs, while 10 of them, highlighted in red and pale blue shades, contain putative HBMs which overlay with sites or residues that exhibit genetic variation (encoded SNPs: single nucleotide polymorphisms). Some of these variations may increase, directly or indirectly, the avidity of certain complement components for heme, increasing its capacity to deregulate the AP amplification loop dynamics in certain carriers of the mutations. The deregulation of the AP amplification loop by heme can facilitate a faster consumption of C3, inefficient opsonization and activation of hemostasis. Increased turnover of C3 can also gradually cripple the activation of the downstream terminal complement components. This can eventually lead to reduction in C5a anaphylatoxin release and limited or no formation of the terminal MAC. In such an asynchronous setting, C3a becomes dominant over C5a, as the main complement anaphylatoxin released locally and in circulation (C3a > > > C5a). The AP has multidimensional involvement in important immune [88,89,90] and hemostatic responses and associated processes [74]. Figure 1 is adapted from [97] with minor modifications.
Cimb 45 00330 g001

1.3. Heme Interactions with APCCs and Complement Deregulation

Therefore, the direct extracellular interactions of heme with complement components, and in particular with AP complement components (APCCs), are of particular interest towards understanding molecularly, diverse heme-associated pathologies mediated by complement deregulation. Such heme-associated complementopathies [73] (Table 1) are characterized by cell populations or sites of abnormal cellular damage and vascular injury. This potential involvement of the AP activation as a mediator of disease pathologies, triggered by heme-induced stress, formed the conceptual basis for investigating the heme binding interactions with APCCs. Given the recent progress in the advanced computational prediction of HBMs in HeBPs, the questions of whether the APCCs carry putative HBMs and whether these HBMs overlay with sites or residues that may genetically (encoded SNPs) and/or epigenetically (PTMs: post-translational modifications) vary among individuals were assessed. Such natural variability could be interesting in explaining, mechanistically, a tendency towards the deregulation of the AP, identifying potential personalized biomarkers of susceptibility for advanced diagnostics and revealing common targets for personalized pharmacological intervention in a diverse range of diseases induced by poorly controlled heme-driven cell stress. Using the UniProt database, the HeMoQuest-WESA algorithms, as well as the PhosphoSitePlus and ClinVar databases, this study investigated combinatorically 16 unique genes encoding APCCs for the presence of HBMs, and identified 10 with sites of encoded SNP and mapped PTM variabilities. The results of this analysis as well as the nature of these parameters, their potential biochemical synergies and implications are presented in the results and discussed in this manuscript.

2. Computational Evaluation of Heme Interactions with APCCs

2.1. Identification of Putative HBMs in APCCs

In order to explore whether APCCs carry putative HBMs, the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/, accessed on 19 October 2022) [98] was utilized first to retrieve the reviewed canonical as well as the alternative spliced encoded isoforms of the C3, C4BPA, C4BPB, CFB, CFD, CFH, CFHR1, CFHR2, CFHR3, CFHR4, CFHR5, CFI, CFP, CR1, DAF and MCP genes [16 genes, 46 full length sequences in total] [99]. Second, upon consideration, the two genes encoding the C4BP chains were also added as C4BP can act as a cofactor for the degradation of the activated C3b (Figure 1) [100]. All the retrieved protein sequences were then submitted to the HeMoQuest server (SeqD-HBM algorithm) (https://www.pharma.uni-bonn.de/www-en/pharmazeutische-biochemie-und-bioanalytik-en/hemoquest, accessed on 30 October 2022) [35,36] for the identification of putative heme-binding motifs.
All the submissions included the online option for solvent accessibility predicted by the WESA algorithm. WESA is a sequence-based solvent accessibility meta-predictor program that has been incorporated into HeMoQuest for the prediction of protein surfaces with exposed HBMs [101,102]. Using this forward approach described, the recovered protein sequences were screened for solvent-exposed HBMs. The sum of all the putative HBMs discovered, as well as their predicted affinities for heme, is reported in the original HeMoQuest report submitted in the Supplementary Materials of this manuscript.
The analysis of all the retrieved APCC protein sequences in the HeMoQuest server revealed the presence of several putative HBMs in each of the sequences examined, all with variable Net charges and Predicted Kd (μM) (Supplementary Materials and Figure 1). The majority of the putative HBMs appeared scattered in both the soluble as well as the cell-anchored receptors (Supplementary Materials). There are sequence regions that exhibit shorter (C3, CFB, CFHR3, CFHR4-2) and in a few cases extended (CFP, CFH, DAF-5, CR1-Intra and C4BPA) stretches of consecutive or overlapping HBMs. Interestingly, among all those examined, CFP appears to contain the highest percentage of putative HBM sequences compared to the overall length of the mature protein, with 158 out of the total 442 aa (~36%). In addition, CFD, CFHR4 and C4BPA appear to contain a putative HBM in their corresponding signal guidance sequences.

2.2. Exploration of Genetic and Epigenetic Variation in Putative HBMs of APCCs

To determine the biological significance of the putative HBMs identified in APCCs, the presence of residual genetic (encoded SNPs) and epigenetic (PTMs) variations of interest in any of the identified HBMs was reviewed. These two layers were explored on the conceptual basis that some of the HBMs may be located in regions, folds or domains of each molecular structure, which may contribute significantly to certain functions of each complement component. In terms of the analysis, the identified putative HBMs of each APCC were manually accessed through the UniProt database for the identification of only short disease-associated variants, such as missense SNPs which reside within any of the identified putative HBMs for each molecule. Nearly all of the disease-associated encoded SNPs curated in this study are reported in the dbSNP [103] and ClinVar [104] NCBI databases. All the findings and positionings of the curated HBM missense SNP variants in the protein sequences are also reported in the Supplementary Materials and Table 2 of this manuscript.
To further investigate the variations detected within the putative HBMs, the presence of any reported epigenetic marks in residues that lie within the identified putative HBMs was also explored through the PhosphoSitePlus (PSP) database [105]. For clarity reasons, among the marks reported in the PSP database, only the ones identified in multiple high- and low-throughput studies (≥5 cited references) were recorded. All the findings and positionings of the curated HBM PTM variants in the protein sequences are also reported in the Supplementary Materials and Table 2 of this manuscript.
The detection of genetic variations within the identified putative HBMs indicated the presence of clinical-disease-relevant missense SNPs in HBMs of 10 out of the initial 16 assessed genes (Figure 1 and Table 2). These are functionally relevant variants that have been identified through genomic studies of complement AP-mediated diseases as discussed earlier. The majority of these coding SNPs are located in the positions surrounding the residue with heme coordinating roles, while in some cases the latter may also vary (Table 2). Some of the HBM sequences listed in Table 2 exhibit variations in multiple residues and in some cases this could be important in terms of understanding, combinatorically, the changes in local motif microstructures and charges.
Although there is natural diversity in the amino acid substitutions listed in Table 2, several of the reported disease-associated variations can introduce structural and/or complement-relevant functional changes in each APCC. Such changes may affect either aspects of protein production, stability and secretion, or may function in relation to the physiologically complement-relevant partners or competitors. Some of these disease-relevant effects may also be charge-related, as some amino acid substitutions introduce point charge alterations depending on their associated neutral, basic or acidic R groups.
Some of the charge-associated and disease-related variations, however, may also be relevant for the dynamics of the HBMs to interact with excess of heme when available. As the HBMs–heme dynamics rely on coordinated electrostatic interactions, amino acid substitutions that introduce basic residues (R > K > H charge strength) can increase the potential of certain HBMs to bind heme more competitively. Reversibly, amino acid substitutions that replace basic residues with others that are non-charged probably weaken these interactions. In case there is more than one such substitution in each HBM, the effects are dependent on the overall charge change. Based on this concept, in Table 2, 12 unique red (●) or 15 unique green (●) marks were introduced to tag variants that probably strengthen (●/+) or weaken (●/−) the potential HBM–heme interaction dynamics. Hence, some of the red (●)-tagged variants in Table 2 may predispose to increased susceptibility of heme-induced and complement-mediated pathologies (Table 1). Reversibly, some of the green (●) tagged variants may protect from heme-induced and complement-mediated stress responses. Among the red (●)-tagged variants that introduce noticeable charge changes in the identified putative HBMs and are: for C3: the rs1967565177 (C873R), for CFH: the rs201671665 (Q400K)-rs1061170 (Y402H), rs886039869 (C984R), VAR_025872 (C1043R), rs55679475 (Y1058H) and rs121913055 (L1189R), for CFI: the rs141853578 (G119R) and rs75612300 (H183R), 1 for CFP: the VAR_083039 (E244K) and 1 for CR1: the rs2274567 (H1208R).
In order to examine whether epigenetic marks of post-translational modifications (PTMs) could contribute mechanistically to variability in heme interaction at the protein level, similarly as for the SNPs/HBMs overlay, repeated marks of PTMs from the PhosphoSitePlus database were identified only in CFH (Table 2). In particular, this included the phosphorylation of threonine (T) 1193, which replaces a neutral hydroxyl group with a negatively charged phosphate. This phosphorylation introduces a potential decrease (−) in the overall charge of this HBM, which may weaken its affinity for heme. It is interesting to note that within the same HBM 1186KQKLYSRTG1194 located in the CCP/Sushi 20 domain (Table 2), the rs121913055 (L1189R) potentially increases (+) the local charge, while the rs761877050 (G1194D) potentially decreases (−) the local charge. Thus, in terms of the local motif architecture, the potential affinity of this HBM for heme may vary depending on its genetic and/or epigenetic variation among individuals.

3. The Conceptual Basis of Heme-Mediated Alternative Pathway Deregulation

The central core presented in this manuscript describes a conceptual effort to investigate the molecular interactions of cell stress released heme with complement components, and builds primarily on years of progress in understanding the multidimensional roles and dynamic interactions of heme in cells and tissues. As an approach, it is primarily based on advances in computational analysis for the identification of HBMs, as well as the database organization of recorded disease-relevant genomic variation and epigenetic marks. This effort expands on earlier findings and observations describing interactions of heme with specific complement components [51,54,55], and attempts to bridge them with the involvement of complement in inflammation and hemostasis at sites of abnormal cellular damage and vascular injury. As the biochemistry of complement components has been intensely investigated for decades and the majority of its structures have now been solved in high resolution [106,107], this computational evaluation aimed to explore the interactions of heme with all known APCCs, determine their impact in the AP as a system unit [88,89], and eventually uncover potential sources of genetic and epigenetic variability among individuals.
One of the initial findings that appeared interesting is the fact that although the study included the HeMoQuest analysis of isoforms encoded by 16 genes, only 10 of them exhibited HBMs that overlayed disease-associated SNPs (Section 2.2 and Table 2). This could be due to the lack of further additional mapped disease variants for the remaining candidates, or, unexpectedly, it could be mechanistically associated with a preferable tendency of heme to interact primarily first with a given set of APCCs with more reachable or more chemically active HBMs. As all solvent-exposed HBMs can be competitively occupied by heme, the presence of multiple putative HBMs indicates that when heme is in various excess gradients, it can bind through multiple nodes to all the components examined and compete with their physiologically relevant partners and competitors. This could be important for APCCs heavily coated with putative HBMs such as CFP (Section 2.1).
The binding of heme to certain HBMs may directly distort important physiological protein–protein interactions critical for complexes such as the one that stabilizes the critical AP C3bBb C3 convertase (Section 2.1 and Figure 1) [106], and/or reduces the catalytic activity of certain proteases such CFI [108], all potentially influencing aspects of AP regulation [89]. Other effects may be potentially indirect, as labile heme may distort the interactions of APCCs with other important cellular constituents such as heparan sulfate in the case of CFH [79,109]. Thus, in this context, the transient effects of labile heme and its associated disruptions are influenced by aspects of availability and chemical avidity of the HBMs for heme. As the approach described in this study does not examine the structural interactions of heme with every APCC at the atomic level, we cannot exclude from case-to-case indirect contributions from other factors such as contributions from distal or proximal folds, do-mains and residues.
In terms of the HBM chemical potency for heme, SNP-encoded changes in the local charges may enhance the HBM–heme interaction dynamics (Figure 2). Clinically relevant and disease-associated missense SNPs in HBMs may genetically enhance the association dynamics with heme by encoding amino acid substitutions that enhance heme–complement protein interface interactions and increase the predisposition of certain individuals to AP deregulation upon certain suitable stimulation [89], as in aHUS [53], stroke [81] or neurodegeneration [82].
Among the red (●)-tagged variants described in Section 2.2 (Table 2), some appeared quite interesting, three of which were for CFH. The rs201671665 (Q400K) and rs1061170 (Y402H) variants reside very close in the same HBM within the CCP/Sushi 7 domain of CFH, which physiologically interacts with various polyanions present in host cell surface groups such as sialic acids and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), namely heparan sulfate [79,96,109]. Similarly, the rs121913055 (L1189R) is also located in an HBM within the C-terminal end CCP/Sushi 20 domain of CFH, which can also physiologically interact with various polyanion ligands such as heparan sulfate and microbes [90,96,109]. Such interactions at the C-terminal end physiologically promote the oligomerization and deposition of CFH in a higher density on the surface of host cells, which facilitates the inactivation of C3b through the N-terminal region of factor H [109].
In individuals carrying these three CFH SNPs, heme might outcompete the host cell surface polyanions such as heparan sulfate and sialic acids [96]. Recombinant fragments of CFH with the Y402H polymorphism have shown impaired interaction with various ligands including heparin, C reactive protein, and fibromodulin; interestingly, the same polymorphism has also been intracellularly associated with reduced mitochondrial function, increased oxidative stress and the accumulation of oxidized lipids in AMD [79,109]. Such effects, which may include CFH in individuals with combinations of the three variants discussed, might also resemble more disease conditions similarly characterized by oxidative stress [56,57,58,68] (e.g., ferroptosis). In terms of disease mechanisms, the potential involvement of the AP could be associated with the heme-mediated disruption of the physiological heparan sulphate–CFH coating of cells undergoing ferroptosis, or suffering from significant heme-mediated oxidative stress. Such a disruption, could induce cell surface noncanonical AP activation in a heme-skewed microenvironment that promotes its deregulation.
Heme accumulated and released during cell damage may also compete with heparan sulphate for CFH and bind CFI. Τhe heme-mediated disruption of the physiological heparan sulphate–CFH coating of cells [96] could induce cell surface noncanonical AP activation in a heme-skewed microenvironment that favors deregulation leading to local C3 depletion. The presence of heme can downregulate CD46/MCP and CD55/DAF limiting the local decay accelerator factor potential to CFH, while it can also distort C3 [54] and block the proteolytic capacity of CFI [51]. The exposure of endothelia to heme can also promote the rapid exocytosis of Weibel–Palade bodies, the TLR4-dependent surface membrane expression of p-selectin known to bind C3b/C3(H2O) and trigger the AP, and the release of the prothrombotic von Willebrand factor [54,77].
Within a spin-off concept of the frame presented, CFH in individuals carrying combinations of the three variants discussed might be more prone and susceptible to competitive disruption by other non-polyanion ligands utilized by various microbes such as heme [90,92,95]. In this context, heme might be cleverly utilized by several microbes as a means of anchoring to target cells through CFH and specific cell-surface antigen (entry receptor) binding [94,95,96,110,111,112]. This mode probably also enables them to bypass the innate immune responses through various further means which may include C3 depletion by non-canonical AP deregulation and C3 convertase hijacking (Table 2 and Figure 2) [90,92].
The identified red (●)-tagged genetic variants of CFI, the rs141853578 (G119R) and rs75612300 (H183R), are located in the SRCR non-catalytic heavy-chain domain and in certain individuals may increase the local affinity for heme. Computational modeling has indicated that the putative site of interaction of heme to factor I is at the interface between the heavy- and the light-chain of factor I [51], and thus may potentially affect its proteolytic activity and the integration with the C3b/factor H and, by homology, the C3b/CR1 complex [108,113]. The identified red (●)-tagged genetic variant rs1967565177 (C873R) of C3 resides in the MG7 domain of the α’-chain which is a binding region for several C3 inhibitors that block the assembly of the AP pro-convertase and the degradation of C3b by FI [106].
The epigenetic phosphorylation of CFH at threonine (T) 1193, which replaces a neutral hydroxyl group with a negatively charged phosphate, introduces a local charge decrease (−) that may limit its affinity for the negatively charged cell surface polyanions and/or heme. This may act as a functional switch influencing the oligomerization state of CFH and to a further extent its interactions with C3 and CFI. In past studies, phosphorylation marks on C3 after platelet activation had been found to promote the dynamics of the AP amplification loop [114,115] (Figure 1).
In terms of pharmacological targeting, if the identified red (●)-tagged variations increase the strength of interactions of the APCC putative HBMs with heme, one rational approach for handling oxidative stress and AP deregulation might aim at controlling and reducing the levels of heme in patients carrying combinations of the associated polymorphisms. This could be achieved with heme neutralizers such NAC that can act both intracellularly and extracellularly. Heme forms conjugation adducts with N-acetyl cysteine and glutathione [21,116], as well as others extracellularly with protein scavengers such as hemopexin and albumin. In concept, such small-molecule heme neutralizers could be utilized alongside selected AP complement inhibitors aimed at C3 [117,118,119], CFB and CFD [120,121,122], as well as potentially other APCCs [75]. Therefore, various potential therapeutic schemes could be custom designed to stabilize disease progression and potentially ameliorate some heme-associated clinical phenotypes (Table 1 and Table 2), if applied relatively early in individuals diagnosed with a predisposition to AP deregulation [123].
In conclusion, this article indicates that extracellular heme can interact directly with multiple APCCs through putative HBMs causing AP deregulation at sites of abnormal cell damage and vascular injury. Individuals carrying genetic variations that increase the strength of interactions of the APCC putative HBMs with heme may be more prone to developing complementopathies associated with the disruption of the physiological heparan sulphate–CFH coat of stressed cells and the induction of local hemostatic responses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb45060330/s1. All relevant data are submitted along with the manuscript material.

Funding

This work was funded by an extended fellowship to S.A.T. for teaching in the School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH) (ΠΔ 407/80).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability

All the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files.

Acknowledgments

S.A.T. is grateful to AUTH and its senior faculty for the teaching fellowship. In addition, S.A.T. wishes to thank Asterios S. Tsiftsoglou for his careful reading of this manuscript and all the retrospective discussions about the magnificent, and constantly evolving, world of heme biology.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AMD: age-related macular degeneration, AP: alternative pathway, APCCs: alternative pathway complement components, C3: complement component C3, C4BP: C4b binding protein, CFB: complement factor B, CFD: complement factor D, CFH: complement factor H, CFHR: complement factor H-related protein, CFI: complement factor I, CFP: complement factor properdin, CO: carbon monoxide, CP: classical pathway, CP motifs: cysteine–proline motifs, DAF: decay-accelerating factor, GAGs: glycosaminoglycans, HeBPs: heme-binding proteins, HBMs: heme-binding motifs, HO: heme oxygenase, HPX: hemopexin, MAC: membrane attack complex, MCP: membrane cofactor protein, NAC: N-acetyl cysteine, PNH: paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, PSP: PhosphoSitePlus database, PTMs: post-translational modifications, RBC: red blood cell, ROS: reactive oxygen species, SNPs: single nucleotide polymorphisms, SRCR: scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain, TLR: toll-like receptor, WESA: weighted ensemble solvent accessibility algorithm.

References

  1. Gallio, A.E.; Fung, S.S.-P.; Cammack-Najera, A.; Hudson, A.J.; Raven, E.L. Understanding the Logistics for the Distribution of Heme in Cells. JACS Au 2021, 1, 1541–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Furuyama, K.; Kaneko, K.; Vargas, V. Heme as a Magnificent Molecule with Multiple Missions: Heme Determines Its Own Fate and Governs Cellular Homeostasis. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2007, 213, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ajioka, R.S.; Phillips, J.D.; Kushner, J.P. Biosynthesis of heme in mammals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2006, 1763, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ponka, P. Cell biology of heme. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1999, 318, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tsiftsoglou, A.S.; Tsamadou, A.I.; Papadopoulou, L.C. Heme as key regulator of major mammalian cellular functions: Molecular, cellular, and pharmacological aspects. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 111, 327–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martínková, M.; Kitanishi, K.; Shimizu, T. Heme-based globin-coupled oxygen sensors: Linking oxygen binding to functional regulation of diguanylate cyclase, histidine kinase, and methyl-accepting chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 27702–27711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Shimizu, T.; Lengalova, A.; Martínek, V.; Martínková, M. Heme: Emergent roles of heme in signal transduction, functional regulation and as catalytic centres. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 5624–5657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martínková, M.; Vávra, J.; Sergunin, A.; Jeřábek, P.; Shimizu, T. Signal transduction mechanisms in heme-based globin-coupled oxygen sensors with a focus on a histidine kinase (AfGcHK) and a diguanylate cyclase (YddV or EcDosC). Biol. Chem. 2022, 403, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shimizu, T.; Huang, D.; Yan, F.; Stranava, M.; Bartosova, M.; Fojtíková, V.; Martínková, M. Gaseous O2, NO, and CO in Signal Transduction: Structure and Function Relationships of Heme-Based Gas Sensors and Heme-Redox Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 6491–6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsiftsoglou, A.S.; Vizirianakis, I.S.; Strouboulis, J. Erythropoiesis: Model systems, molecular regulators, and developmental programs. IUBMB Life 2009, 61, 800–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsiftsoglou, A.S.; Wong, W.; Robinson, S.H.; Hensold, J. Hemin increases production of β-like globin RNA transcripts in human erythroleukemia K-562 cells. Dev. Genet. 1989, 10, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bruns, G.P.; London, I.M. The effect of hemin on the synthesis of globin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1965, 18, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hunt, T.; Vanderhoff, G.; London, I.M. Control of globin synthesis: The role of heme. J. Mol. Biol. 1972, 66, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Georgiou-Siafis, S.K.; Tsiftsoglou, A.S. Activation of KEAP1/NRF2 stress signaling involved in the molecular basis of hemin-induced cytotoxicity in human pro-erythroid K562 cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 175, 113900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hou, S.; Reynolds, M.F.; Horrigan, F.T.; Heinemann, S.H.; Hoshi, T. Reversible binding of heme to proteins in cellular signal transduction. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 918–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ishikawa, H.; Kato, M.; Hori, H.; Ishimori, K.; Kirisako, T.; Tokunaga, F.; Iwai, K. Involvement of heme regulatory motif in heme-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of IRP2. Mol. Cell 2005, 19, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yien, Y.Y.; Perfetto, M. Regulation of Heme Synthesis by Mitochondrial Homeostasis Proteins. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 895521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gozzelino, R.; Jeney, V.; Soares, M.P. Mechanisms of cell protection by heme Oxygenase-1. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010, 50, 323–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Belcher, J.D.; Beckman, J.D.; Balla, G.; Balla, J.; Vercellotti, G. Heme degradation and vascular injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 12, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ryter, S.W.; Tyrrell, R.M. The heme synthesis and degradation pathways: Role in oxidant sensitivity. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000, 28, 289–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Georgiou-Siafis, S.K.; Samiotaki, M.K.; Demopoulos, V.J.; Panayotou, G.; Tsiftsoglou, A.S. Formation of novel N-acetylcysteine-hemin adducts abrogates hemin-induced cytotoxicity and suppresses the NRF2-driven stress response in human pro-erythroid K562 cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 880, 173077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kumar, S.; Bandyopadhyay, U. Free heme toxicity and its detoxification systems in human. Toxicol. Lett. 2005, 157, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jeney, V.; Balla, J.; Yachie, A.; Varga, Z.; Vercellotti, G.M.; Eaton, J.W.; Balla, G. Pro-oxidant and cytotoxic effects of circulating heme. Blood 2002, 100, 879–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Chiabrando, D.; Vinchi, F.; Fiorito, V.; Mercurio, S.; Tolosano, E. Heme in pathophysiology: A matter of scavenging, metabolism and trafficking across cell membranes. Front. Pharmacol. 2014, 5, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Leung, G.C.H.; Fung, S.S.P.; Gallio, A.E.; Blore, R.; Alibhai, D.; Raven, E.L.; Hudson, A.J. Unravelling the mechanisms controlling heme supply and demand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2104008118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Donegan, R.K.; Moore, C.M.; Hanna, D.A.; Reddi, A.R. Handling heme: The mechanisms underlying the movement of heme within and between cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 133, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ponka, P.; Sheftel, A.D.; English, A.M.; Scott Bohle, D.; Garcia-Santos, D. Do Mammalian Cells Really Need to Export and Import Heme? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Reddi, A.R.; Hamza, I. Heme Mobilization in Animals: A Metallolipid’s Journey. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hamza, I.; Dailey, H.A. One ring to rule them all: Trafficking of heme and heme synthesis intermediates in the metazoans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2012, 1823, 1617–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Fleming, M.D.; Hamza, I. Mitochondrial heme: An exit strategy at last. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 4328–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kim, H.; Moore, C.M.; Mestre-Fos, S.; Hanna, D.A.; Williams, L.D.; Reddi, A.R.; Torres, M.P. Depletion Assisted Hemin Affinity (DAsHA) Proteomics Reveals an Expanded Landscape of Heme Binding Proteins in the Human Proteome. Metallomics 2023, 15, mfad004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Homan, R.A.; Jadhav, A.M.; Conway, L.P.; Parker, C.G. A Chemical Proteomic Map of Heme-Protein Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 15013–15019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tsolaki, V.-D.C.; Georgiou-Siafis, S.K.; Tsamadou, A.I.; Tsiftsoglou, S.A.; Samiotaki, M.; Panayotou, G.; Tsiftsoglou, A.S. Hemin accumulation and identification of a heme-binding protein clan in K562 cells by proteomic and computational analysis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2022, 237, 1315–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chambers, I.G.; Willoughby, M.M.; Hamza, I.; Reddi, A.R. One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them: The trafficking of heme without deliverers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2021, 1868, 118881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Paul George, A.A.; Lacerda, M.; Syllwasschy, B.F.; Hopp, M.T.; Wißbrock, A.; Imhof, D. HeMoQuest: A webserver for qualitative prediction of transient heme binding to protein motifs. BMC Bioinform. 2020, 21, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wißbrock, A.; George, A.A.P.; Brewitz, H.H.; Kühl, T.; Imhof, D. The molecular basis of transient heme-protein interactions: Analysis, concept and implementation. Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20181940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Severance, S.; Hamza, I. Trafficking of Heme and Porphyrins in Metazoa. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4596–4616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Krishnamurthy, P.; Xie, T.; Schuetz, J.D. The role of transporters in cellular heme and porphyrin homeostasis. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 114, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Latunde-Dada, G.O.; Simpson, R.J.; McKie, A.T. Recent advances in mammalian haem transport. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rutherford, T.; Clegg, J.B.; Higgs, D.R.; Jones, R.W.; Thompson, J.; Weatherall, D.J. Embryonic erythroid differentiation in the human leukemic cell line K562. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Dean, A.; Erard, F.; Schneider, A.B.; Schechter, A.N. Induction of hemoglobin accumulation in human K562 cells by hemin is reversible. Science 1981, 212, 459–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gusella, J.; Weil, S.; Tsiftsoglou, A.; Volloch, V.; Neumann, J.; Keys, C.; Housman, D. Hemin does not cause commitment of murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells to terminal differentiation. Blood 1980, 56, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Rutherford, T.R.; Clegg, J.B.; Weatherall, D.J. K562 human leukaemic cells synthesise embryonic haemoglobin in response to haemin. Nature 1979, 280, 164–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Piel, R.B.; Dailey, H.A.; Medlock, A.E. The mitochondrial heme metabolon: Insights into the complex(ity) of heme synthesis and distribution. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2019, 128, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Medlock, A.E.; Shiferaw, M.T.; Marcero, J.R.; Vashisht, A.A.; Wohlschlegel, J.A.; Phillips, J.D.; Dailey, H.A. Identification of the mitochondrial heme metabolism complex. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gray, L.T.; Puig Lombardi, E.; Verga, D.; Nicolas, A.; Teulade-Fichou, M.P.; Londoño-Vallejo, A.; Maizels, N. G-quadruplexes Sequester Free Heme in Living Cells. Cell Chem. Biol. 2019, 26, 1681–1691.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ghosh, A.; Garee, G.; Sweeny, E.A.; Nakamura, Y.; Stuehr, D.J. Hsp90 chaperones hemoglobin maturation in erythroid and nonerythroid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E1117–E1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Canesin, G.; Hejazi, S.M.; Swanson, K.D.; Wegiel, B. Heme-Derived Metabolic Signals Dictate Immune Responses. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Dutra, F.F.; Bozza, M.T. Heme on innate immunity and inflammation. Front. Pharmacol. 2014, 5, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Hopp, M.-T.; Imhof, D. Hemolysis-derived heme interacts with components of the blood coagulation system. Hamostaseologie 2023, 43, T-02-03. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gerogianni, A.; Dimitrov, J.D.; Zarantonello, A.; Poillerat, V.; Chonat, S.; Sandholm, K.; McAdam, K.E.; Ekdahl, K.N.; Mollnes, T.E.; Mohlin, C.; et al. Heme Interferes With Complement Factor I-Dependent Regulation by Enhancing Alternative Pathway Activation. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 901876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Poillerat, V.; Gentinetta, T.; Leon, J.; Wassmer, A.; Edler, M.; Torset, C.; Luo, D.; Tuffin, G.; Roumenina, L.T. Hemopexin as an Inhibitor of Hemolysis-Induced Complement Activation. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Roumenina, L.T.; Rayes, J.; Lacroix-Desmazes, S.; Dimitrov, J.D. Heme: Modulator of Plasma Systems in Hemolytic Diseases. Trends Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Frimat, M.; Tabarin, F.; Dimitrov, J.D.; Poitou, C.; Halbwachs-Mecarelli, L.; Fremeaux-Bacchi, V.; Roumenina, L.T. Complement activation by heme as a secondary hit for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Blood 2013, 122, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Roumenina, L.T.; Radanova, M.; Atanasov, B.P.; Popov, K.T.; Kaveri, S.V.; Lacroix-Desmazes, S.; Frémeaux-Bacchi, V.; Dimitrov, J.D. Heme interacts with C1q and inhibits the classical complement pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 16459–16469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zille, M.; Oses-Prieto, J.A.; Savage, S.R.; Karuppagounder, S.S.; Chen, Y.; Kumar, A.; Morris, J.H.; Scheidt, K.A.; Burlingame, A.L.; Ratan, R.R. Hemin-Induced Death Models Hemorrhagic Stroke and Is a Variant of Classical Neuronal Ferroptosis. J. Neurosci. 2022, 42, 2065–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zille, M.; Karuppagounder, S.S.; Chen, Y.; Gough, P.J.; Bertin, J.; Finger, J.; Milner, T.A.; Jonas, E.A.; Ratan, R.R. Neuronal Death after Hemorrhagic Stroke in Vitro and in Vivo Shares Features of Ferroptosis and Necroptosis. Stroke 2017, 48, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Gatidis, S.; Föller, M.; Lang, F. Hemin-induced suicidal erythrocyte death. Ann. Hematol. 2009, 88, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sahoo, N.; Yang, K.; Coburger, I.; Bernert, A.; Swain, S.M.; Gessner, G.; Kappl, R.; Kühl, T.; Imhof, D.; Hoshi, T.; et al. Intracellular hemin is a potent inhibitor of the voltage-gated potassium channel Kv10.1. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Burton, M.J.; Kapetanaki, S.M.; Chernova, T.; Jamieson, A.G.; Dorlet, P.; Santolini, J.; Moody, P.C.E.; Mitcheson, J.S.; Davies, N.W.; Schmid, R.; et al. A heme-binding domain controls regulation of ATP-dependent potassium channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3785–3790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Balwani, M.; Desnick, R.J. The porphyrias: Advances in diagnosis and treatment. Blood 2012, 120, 4496–4504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bergmann, A.K.; Campagna, D.R.; McLoughlin, E.M.; Agarwal, S.; Fleming, M.D.; Bottomley, S.S.; Neufeld, E.J. Systematic molecular genetic analysis of congenital sideroblastic anemia: Evidence for genetic heterogeneity and identification of novel mutations. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2010, 54, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Tolosano, E.; Chiabrando, D. Diamond Blackfan anemia at the crossroad between ribosome biogenesis and heme metabolism. Adv. Hematol. 2010, 2010, 790632. [Google Scholar]
  64. Flygare, J.; Karlsson, S. Diamond-Blackfan anemia: Erythropoiesis lost in translation. Blood 2007, 109, 3152–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Larsen, R.; Gozzelino, R.; Jeney, V.; Tokaji, L.; Bozza, F.A.; Japiassú, A.M.; Bonaparte, D.; Cavalcante, M.M.; Chora, Â.; Ferreira, A.; et al. A central role for free heme in the pathogenesis of severe sepsis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2010, 2, 51ra71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Larsen, R.; Gouveia, Z.; Soares, M.P.; Gozzelino, R. Heme cytotoxicity and the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2012, 3, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Chiabrando, D.; Fiorito, V.; Petrillo, S.; Tolosano, E. Unraveling the Role of Heme in Neurodegeneration. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Wagner, K.R.; Sharp, F.R.; Ardizzone, T.D.; Lu, A.; Clark, J.F. Heme and Iron Metabolism: Role in Cerebral Hemorrhage. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2003, 23, 629–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Koudo, R.; Kurokawa, H.; Sato, E.; Igarashi, J.; Uchida, T.; Sagami, I.; Kitagawa, T.; Shimizu, T. Spectroscopic characterization of the isolated heme-bound PAS-B domain of neuronal PAS domain protein 2 associated with circadian rhythms. FEBS J. 2005, 272, 4153–4162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Doré, S.; Takahashi, M.; Ferris, C.D.; Zakhary, R.; Hester, L.D.; Guastella, D.; Snyder, S.H. Bilirubin, formed by activation of heme oxygenase-2, protects neurons against oxidative stress injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 2445–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Guo, Y.; Zhao, H.; Lin, Z.; Ye, T.; Xu, D.; Zeng, Q. Heme in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Ubiquitous Dangerous Molecule Worthy of Vigilance. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 9, 781839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sawicki, K.T.; Chang, H.C.; Ardehali, H. Role of heme in cardiovascular physiology and disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2015, 4, e001138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Gavriilaki, E.; Brodsky, R.A. Complementopathies and precision medicine. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2152–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Noris, M.; Galbusera, M. The complement alternative pathway and hemostasis. Immunol. Rev. 2023, 313, 139–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dreismann, A.K.; Hallam, T.M.; Tam, L.C.S.; Nguyen, C.V.; Hughes, J.P.; Ellis, S.; Harris, C.L. Gene targeting as a therapeutic avenue in diseases mediated by the complement alternative pathway. Immunol. Rev. 2023, 313, 402–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Risitano, A.M.; Frieri, C.; Urciuoli, E.; Marano, L. The complement alternative pathway in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: From a pathogenic mechanism to a therapeutic target. Immunol. Rev. 2023, 313, 262–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Merle, N.S.; Paule, R.; Leon, J.; Daugan, M.; Robe-Rybkine, T.; Poillerat, V.; Torset, C.; Frémeaux-Bacchi, V.; Dimitrov, J.D.; Roumenina, L.T. P-selectin drives complement attack on endothelium during intravascular hemolysis in TLR-4/heme-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 6280–6285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Hopp, M.T.; Imhof, D. Linking labile heme with thrombosis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Armento, A.; Ueffing, M.; Clark, S.J. The complement system in age-related macular degeneration. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 4487–4505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Geerlings, M.J.; de Jong, E.K.; den Hollander, A.I. The complement system in age-related macular degeneration: A review of rare genetic variants and implications for personalized treatment. Mol. Immunol. 2017, 84, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sato, Y.; Falcone-Juengert, J.; Tominaga, T.; Su, H.; Liu, J. Remodeling of the Neurovascular Unit Following Cerebral Ischemia and Hemorrhage. Cells 2022, 11, 2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Dalakas, M.C.; Alexopoulos, H.; Spaeth, P.J. Complement in neurological disorders and emerging complement-targeted therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 16, 601–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Singhrao, S.; Neal, J.; Morgan, B.; Gasque, P. Increased Complement Biosynthesis By Microglia and Complement Activation on Neurons in Huntington’s Disease. Exp. Neurol. 1999, 159, 362–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hvidberg, V.; Maniecki, M.B.; Jacobsen, C.; Højrup, P.; Møller, H.J.; Moestrup, S.K. Identification of the receptor scavenging hemopexin-heme complexes. Blood 2005, 106, 2572–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ascenzi, P.; Bocedi, A.; Visca, P.; Altruda, F.; Tolosano, E.; Beringhelli, T.; Fasano, M. Hemoglobin and heme scavenging. IUBMB Life 2005, 57, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Nauta, A.J.; Trouw, L.A.; Daha, M.R.; Tijsma, O.; Nieuwland, R.; Schwaeble, W.J.; Gingras, A.R.; Mantovani, A.; Hack, E.C.; Roos, A. Direct binding of C1q to apoptotic cells and cell blebs induces complement activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002, 32, 1726–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Navratil, J.S.; Watkins, S.C.; Wisnieski, J.J.; Ahearn, J.M. The Globular Heads of C1q Specifically Recognize Surface Blebs of Apoptotic Vascular Endothelial Cells. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 3231–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Liszewski, M.K.; Atkinson, J.P. Alternative pathway activation: Ever ancient and ever new. Immunol. Rev. 2022, 313, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Harrison, R.A.; Harris, C.L.; Thurman, J.M. The complement alternative pathway in health and disease—Activation or amplification? Immunol. Rev. 2022, 313, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Shaughnessy, J.; Chabeda, A.; Lewis, L.A.; Ram, S. Alternative pathway amplification and infections. Immunol. Rev. 2023, 313, 162–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. de Boer, E.C.; Thielen, A.J.; Langereis, J.D.; Kamp, A.; Brouwer, M.C.; Oskam, N.; Jongsma, M.L.; Baral, A.J.; Spaapen, R.M.; Zeerleder, S.; et al. The contribution of the alternative pathway in complement activation on cell surfaces depends on the strength of classical pathway initiation. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2023, 12, e1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lo, M.W.; Amarilla, A.A.; Lee, J.D.; Albornoz, E.A.; Modhiran, N.; Clark, R.J.; Ferro, V.; Chhabra, M.; Khromykh, A.A.; Watterson, D.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 triggers complement activation through interactions with heparan sulfate. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2022, 11, e1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Boussier, J.; Yatim, N.; Marchal, A.; Hadjadj, J.; Charbit, B.; El Sissy, C.; Carlier, N.; Pène, F.; Mouthon, L.; Tharaux, P.L.; et al. Severe COVID-19 is associated with hyperactivation of the alternative complement pathway. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022, 149, 550–556.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Clausen, T.M.; Sandoval, D.R.; Spliid, C.B.; Pihl, J.; Perrett, H.R.; Painter, C.D.; Narayanan, A.; Majowicz, S.A.; Kwong, E.M.; McVicar, R.N.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Depends on Cellular Heparan Sulfate and ACE2. Cell 2020, 183, 1043–1057.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zheng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, J.; Guo, Z.; Sheng, J.; Ye, X.; Jin, G.; Wang, C.; Chai, W.; Yan, J.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein causes blood coagulation and thrombosis by competitive binding to heparan sulfate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 1124–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Loeven, M.A.; Rops, A.L.; Berden, J.H.; Daha, M.R.; Rabelink, T.J.; van der Vlag, J. The role of heparan sulfate as determining pathogenic factor in complement factor H-associated diseases. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 63, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sim, R.B.; Tsiftsoglou, S.A. Proteases of the complement system. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2004, 32, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Bateman, A.; Martin, M.J.; Orchard, S.; Magrane, M.; Agivetova, R.; Ahmad, S.; Alpi, E.; Bowler-Barnett, E.H.; Britto, R.; Bursteinas, B.; et al. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D480–D489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rodríguez de Córdoba, S. Genetic variability shapes the alternative pathway complement activity and predisposition to complement-related diseases. Immunol. Rev. 2023, 313, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ermert, D.; Blom, A.M. C4b-binding protein: The good, the bad and the deadly. Novel functions of an old friend. Immunol. Lett. 2016, 169, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Chen, H.; Zhou, H.X. Prediction of solvent accessibility and sites of deleterious mutations from protein sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 3193–3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Shan, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhou, H.X. Fold recognition and accurate query-template alignment by a combination of PSI-BLAST and threading. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 2001, 42, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sherry, S.T.; Ward, M.H.; Kholodov, M.; Baker, J.; Phan, L.; Smigielski, E.M.; Sirotkin, K. DbSNP: The NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, 308–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Landrum, M.J.; Lee, J.M.; Benson, M.; Brown, G.R.; Chao, C.; Chitipiralla, S.; Gu, B.; Hart, J.; Hoffman, D.; Jang, W.; et al. ClinVar: Improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D1062–D1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Hornbeck, P.V.; Kornhauser, J.M.; Latham, V.; Murray, B.; Nandhikonda, V.; Nord, A.; Skrzypek, E.; Wheeler, T.; Zhang, B.; Gnad, F. 15 years of PhosphoSitePlus®: Integrating post-translationally modified sites, disease variants and isoforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D433–D441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Geisbrecht, B.V.; Lambris, J.D.; Gros, P. Complement component C3: A structural perspective and potential therapeutic implications. Semin. Immunol. 2022, 59, 101627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sim, R.B.; Schwaeble, W.; Fujita, T. Complement research in the 18th–21st centuries: Progress comes with new technology. Immunobiology 2016, 221, 1037–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Roversi, P.; Johnson, S.; Caesar, J.J.E.; McLean, F.; Leath, K.J.; Tsiftsoglou, S.A.; Morgan, B.P.; Harris, C.L.; Sim, R.B.; Lea, S.M. Structural basis for complement factor I control and its disease-associated sequence polymorphisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 12839–12844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Ferreira, V.P.; Pangburn, M.K.; Cortés, C. Complement control protein factor H: The good, the bad, and the inadequate. Mol. Immunol. 2010, 47, 2187–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Richard, K.L.; Kelley, B.R.; Johnson, J.G. Heme uptake and utilization by gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Choby, J.E.; Skaar, E.P. Heme Synthesis and Acquisition in Bacterial Pathogens. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3408–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Létoffé, S.; Heuck, G.; Delepelaire, P.; Lange, N.; Wandersman, C. Bacteria capture iron from heme by keeping tetrapyrrol skeleton intact. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 11719–11724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Tsiftsoglou, S.A.; Willis, A.C.; Li, P.; Chen, X.; Mitchell, D.A.; Rao, Z.; Sim, R.B. The catalytically active serine protease domain of human complement factor I. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 6239–6249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ekdahl, K.N.; Nilsson, B. Phosphorylation of complement component C3 and C3 fragments by a human platelet protein kinase. Inhibition of factor I-mediated cleavage of C3b. J. Immunol. 1995, 154, 6502–6510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Nilsson-Ekdahl, K.; Nilsson, B. Phosphorylation of C3 by a casein kinase released from activated human platelets increases opsonization of immune complexes and binding to complement receptor type 1. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001, 31, 1047–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Georgiou-Siafis, S.K.; Samiotaki, M.K.; Demopoulos, V.J.; Panayotou, G.; Tsiftsoglou, A.S. Glutathione-Hemin/Hematin Adduct Formation to Disintegrate Cytotoxic Oxidant Hemin/Hematin in Human K562 Cells and Red Blood Cells’ Hemolysates: Impact of Glutathione on the Hemolytic Disorders and Homeostasis. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sim, R.; Twose, T.M.; Sim, E.; Reid, K.B.M. Intrinsic chemical reactivity of activated human complement component C3: A historical glimpse into research during 1979–1980 on the covalent binding properties of C3, C4 and alpha-2 macroglobulin. Immunobiology 2022, 227, 152209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Skendros, P.; Germanidis, G.; Mastellos, D.C.; Antoniadou, C.; Gavriilidis, E.; Kalopitas, G.; Samakidou, A.; Liontos, A.; Chrysanthopoulou, A.; Ntinopoulou, M.; et al. Complement C3 inhibition in severe COVID-19 using compstatin AMY-101. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabo2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Pedersen, H.; Jensen, R.K.; Jensen, J.M.B.; Fox, R.; Pedersen, D.V.; Olesen, H.G.; Hansen, A.G.; Christiansen, D.; Mazarakis, S.M.M.; Lojek, N.; et al. A Complement C3–Specific Nanobody for Modulation of the Alternative Cascade Identifies the C-Terminal Domain of C3b as Functional in C5 Convertase Activity. J. Immunol. 2020, 205, 2287–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Andersen, J.F.; Lei, H.; Strayer, E.C.; Kanai, T.; Pham, V.; Pan, X.-Z.; Alvarenga, P.H.; Gerber, G.F.; Asojo, O.A.; Francischetti, I.M.; et al. A bispecific inhibitor of complement and coagulation blocks activation in complementopathy models via a novel mechanism. Blood 2023, 2022019359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Rajagopal, V.; Leksa, N.C.; Gorham, R.D.; Jindal, S.; Nair, S.V.; Knockenhauer, K.E.; Chan, J.; Byun, T.S.; Mercadante, C.J.; Moore, S.J.; et al. SAR443809: A Selective Inhibitor of the Complement Alternative Pathway, Targeting Complement Factor Bb. Blood Adv. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Schubart, A.; Flohr, S.; Junt, T.; Eder, J. Low-molecular weight inhibitors of the alternative complement pathway. Immunol. Rev. 2022, 313, 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Thurman, J.M.; Fremeaux-Bacchi, V. Alternative pathway diagnostics. Immunol. Rev. 2023, 313, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cimb 45 00330 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of heme–complement protein interactions through heme-binding motifs (HBMs) that can lead to the deregulation of the alternative pathway (AP) amplification loop. In clinical pathologies characterized by the uncontrolled release of cell-stressed intracellular heme, heme can locally deplete complement C3 and induce activation of hemostasis responses. The oval Ts in blue indicate potential sites for therapeutic intervention, either by scavenging the excess of heme released, and/or by blocking the deregulation of the AP amplification loop using advanced next-generation complement inhibitors.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of heme–complement protein interactions through heme-binding motifs (HBMs) that can lead to the deregulation of the alternative pathway (AP) amplification loop. In clinical pathologies characterized by the uncontrolled release of cell-stressed intracellular heme, heme can locally deplete complement C3 and induce activation of hemostasis responses. The oval Ts in blue indicate potential sites for therapeutic intervention, either by scavenging the excess of heme released, and/or by blocking the deregulation of the AP amplification loop using advanced next-generation complement inhibitors.
Cimb 45 00330 g002
Table
Table 2. Identification of 10 APCCs with putative HBMs containing reported disease-associated encoding SNPs.
Table 2. Identification of 10 APCCs with putative HBMs containing reported disease-associated encoding SNPs.
Symbol,
Gene ID 1,2		Predicted HBMs 3,4Corresponding SNPs 4,5,6,7ClinVar/UniProt Disease Associations 6
C3,
718		In P01024:
150FTVNHKLLP158,
734LRRQHARASHLGLA747
869NPAFCSLATTKRRHQQTV886
1097SQVLCGAVK1105		rs147859257,155,K>Q [++>~](●)
rs578116271,736,R>Q [+++>~](●)
rs1967565177,873,C>R [~>+++](●)
rs750654763,1100,L>P [~>~]
  • Age-related macular degeneration 9
  • Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with C3 anomaly, complement component 3 deficiency
734LRRQHARASHLGLA747
1460AFKVHQYFNVE1470		rs117793540,735,R>W [+++>~](●)
AR_063220,1464,H>D [+>--](●)
  • Hemolytic uremic syndrome atypical 5 (AHUS5)
869NPAFCSLATTKRRHQQTV886rs1443451793,881,R>H [+++>+](●)
  • Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome
CFB,
629		In P00751/P00751-2:
299KVASYGVKP307
504PSKGHESCM512		rs374738591,306,K>R [++>+++](●)
rs138207668,508,H>Q [+>~](●)
  • Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with B factor anomaly
  • Macular degeneration
CFD,
1675		In P00746:
154GIVNHAGRR162rs373019471,155,I>V [~>~]
  • Recurrent Neisseria infections due to factor D deficiency
CFH,
3075		In P08603/P08603-2:
295RNGFYPATR303rs142937931,303,R>W [+++>~](●)
  • Age-related macular degeneration 4
  • CFH-Related dense deposit disease/membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II
  • Hemolytic uremic syndrome, atypical, susceptibility to, 1
398YNQNYGRKF406rs201671665,400,Q>K [~>++](●)
  • Factor H deficiency
398YNQNYGRKF406rs1061170,402,Y>H [~>+](●)
  • Age-related macular degeneration 4
  • Basal laminar drusen
In P08603:
759IILEEHLKNK768
807QIQLCPPPP815
976EKWSHPPSCIKTDCLSLP993
1054VQNAYIVSR1062		rs772553879,760,I>L [~>~]
rs752302466,808,I>M [~>~]
rs149938052,982,P>S [~>~]
rs55679475,1058,Y>H [~>+](●)
rs55771831,1060,V>L [~>~]
  • Age-related macular degeneration 4
  • Basal laminar drusen
  • CFH-Related dense deposit disease/membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II
  • Hemolytic uremic syndrome, atypical, susceptibility to, 1
976EKWSHPPSCIKTDCLSLP993
1039GRPTCRDTSCVNPP1052
1161PKCLHPCVI1169
1186KQKLYSRTG1194
1208SSRSHTLRTTCWDGK1222		VAR_025870,978,W>C [~>~]
rs886039869,984,C>R [~>+++](●)
VAR_025872,1043,C>R [~>+++](●)
VAR_025878,1163,C>W [~>~]
VAR_063650,1169,I>L [~>~]
rs121913055,1189,L>R [~>+++](●)
rs460897,1191,S>L [~>~]
T1193,phosphorylation 5
rs761877050,1194,G>D [~>--]
rs121913059,1210,R>C [+++>~](●)
rs121913051,1215,R>*/R>G [+++>~](●)
  • Hemolytic uremic syndrome, atypical, susceptibility to, 1
1208SSRSHTLRTTCWDGK1222rs121913059,1210,R>C [+++>~](●)
rs121913051,1215,R>*
VAR_025887,1215,R>Q [+++>~](●)
  • CFH-Related disorders
  • Complement factor H deficiency
CFHR3,
10878		In Q02985:
  • Age-related macular degeneration 1
260EPPRCIHPCIITE272rs745503234,268,C>F [~/~]
In Q02985-2:
199EPPRCIHPCII209rs745503234,207,C>F [~/~]
CFHR5,
81494		In Q9BXR6:
25FPKIHHGFLY34
136TPPICSFTKGECHVPIL152		rs1653577983,26,P>S [~>~]
rs181511327,144,K>N [++>~](●)
  • CFH-Related dense deposit disease/membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II
CFI,
3426		In P05156:
91LECLHPGTK99
330KNRMHIRRK338		rs1478686846,98,T>A [~>~]
rs759676430,336,R>*
  • Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome
114VSLKHGNTD122rs141853578,119,G>R [~>+++](●)
  • Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome 3 (AHUS3)
  • Age-related macular degeneration-13 (ARMD13)
179TECLHVHCRGL189rs75612300,183,H>R [+>+++](●)
  • Hemolytic uremic syndrome atypical 3 (AHUS3)
179TECLHVHCRGL189

261GKGFHCKSG269
369YIGGCWILT377

384ASKTHRYQI392

567DWISYHVGRP576		rs368615806,187,R>*
rs143366614,187,R>Q [+++>~](●)
rs547901965,261,G>S [~/~]
rs763931500,371,G>V [~/~]
rs1579173999,373,C>S [~/~]
rs1373768125,387,T>I [~/~]
rs1292929833,389,R>C [+++>~](●)
rs200973120,570,S>T [~/~]
  • Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with I factor anomaly
CFP,
5199		In P27918:
97SQLRYRRCV105rs132630259,100,R>W [+++>~](●)
  • Properdin deficiency, types I–III
161RACNHPAPKCGGHCPGQ177
201PWTPCSASCHGGPHEPKE218		rs132630258,161,R>*
rs132630260,206,S>*
  • Properdin deficiency, X-linked
239PGLAYEQRRCTGLP252VAR_083039,244,E>K [-->++](●)
  • Properdin deficiency, type II
410LLPKYPPTV418rs132630261,414,Y>D [~>--](●)
  • Properdin deficiency, type III
CD35/CR1,
1378		In P17927 (CR1*1/A/F):
  • Malaria, severe, resistance to
1208HTPSHQDNF1216rs2274567,1208,H>R [+>+++](●)
In E9PDY4 (CR1*2/B/S):
1658HTPSHQDNF1666rs2274567,1658,H>R [+>+++](●)
CD46/MCP,
4179		In P15529/P15529-2→15:
  • Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with MCP/CD46 anomaly
80CDRNHTWLP88rs761000846,82,R>Q [+++>~](●)
In P15529:
317PRPTYKPPV325rs41317833,324,P>L [~>~]
In P15529-3/-8/-11:
302PRPTYKPPV310rs41317833,309,P>L [~>~]
In P15529-4/-9/-12:
287PRPTYKPPV295rs41317833,294,P>L [~>~]
In P15529-7/-15:
283CLKGYPKPE291rs886045838,288,P>A [~>~]
Notes: 1. NCBI Gene database, 2. In red: 10 genes encoding complement components of the alternative pathway that contain putative heme-binding motifs with disease associated SNPs as reported in the NCBI ClinVar and UniProt databases, 3. The numberings on the listed HBMs indicate the position of each motif in each encoded isoform as listed in the UniProt database, 4. Highlighted in closed boxes are SNPs that encode for amino acid substitutions in positions occupied by cysteines (C), histidines (H) or tyrosines (Y) that have heme coordinating roles within the corresponding HBMs, as reported in the HeMoQuest analysis report, 5. Underlined are residues in HBMs that exhibit post-translational variation with repeatedly detected (≥5 references) epigenetic marks of post-translational modifications as reported in the PhosphoSitePlus database, 6. Disease conditions in the NCBI ClinVar and UniProt databases associated with the identified SNPs of interest, 7. A total of 12 unique red (●) or 15 unique green (●) marks were introduced to tag variants that probably strengthen (●/+) or weaken (●/−) the potential HBM–heme dynamics. In this context, some of the red (●)-tagged variants may predispose to increased susceptibility to heme-induced and complement-mediated pathologies, while some of the green (●)-tagged variants may protect from heme-induced and complement-mediated stress responses.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsiftsoglou, S.A. Heme Interactions as Regulators of the Alternative Pathway Complement Responses and Implications for Heme-Associated Pathologies. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 5198-5214. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060330

AMA Style

Tsiftsoglou SA. Heme Interactions as Regulators of the Alternative Pathway Complement Responses and Implications for Heme-Associated Pathologies. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2023; 45(6):5198-5214. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsiftsoglou, Stefanos A. 2023. "Heme Interactions as Regulators of the Alternative Pathway Complement Responses and Implications for Heme-Associated Pathologies" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 45, no. 6: 5198-5214. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060330

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop