Next Article in Journal
Comparison of the Properties of Brand-Name and Generic Nadifloxacin Creams
Previous Article in Journal
Recovery of Infarcted Myocardium in an In Vivo Experiment
 
 
Medicina is published by MDPI from Volume 54 Issue 1 (2018). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Lithuanian Medical Association, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, and Vilnius University.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Diagnosis between Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Study of 156 Patients

by
Vilma Brimienė
,
Gintautas Brimas
* and
Kęstutis Strupas
Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology, and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2011, 47(3), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina47020021
Submission received: 23 September 2009 / Accepted: 17 March 2011 / Published: 22 March 2011

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the efficacy of different imaging methods in differentiating between chronic pancreatitis and cancer in focal pancreatic lesions and staging of adenocarcinoma.
Material and Methods
. Between June 2005 and October 2007, 156 consecutive patients were enrolled into the prospective clinical trial. The patients were randomized into two groups. Ultrasonoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound were performed in both the groups. Group A patients were additionally examined by computed tomography and tumor marker assay, while in the group B, intraoperative ultrasonoscopy with biopsy and urgent histological examination were done. Results of each imaging technique regarding differential diagnosis and cancer stage were compared with the fi ndings of surgical and histological examination.
Results. Chronic pancreatitis and adenocarcinoma were documented in 58 (37.2%) and 78 (50%) patients, respectively. The size of the lesions and clinical presentation were similar in both the groups, but cancer patients were older than patients with pancreatitis (P<0.001). Preoperatively endosonoscopy had the highest accuracy in assessing differential diagnosis (92.1%) and adenocarcinoma (91.8%), whereas computed tomography had the highest accuracy in assessing tumor size (84.5%) and transabdominal ultrasonography in assessing lymph node involvement (78.9%) and distant metastases (88.6%). Intraoperative ultrasound was the most accurate imaging technique in the assessment of differential diagnosis (100%), adenocarcinoma (98.5%), extent of primary tumor (84.8%), lymph node involvement (87.9%), and distant metastases (100%).
Conclusions. In the differential diagnosis between chronic pancreatitis and adenocarcinoma, preoperative ultrasonography and intraoperative ultrasound are the best imaging methods. When ultrasonography is nondiagnostic, computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound are alternative techniques.
Keywords: diagnosis; pancreatic cancer; chronic pancreatitis diagnosis; pancreatic cancer; chronic pancreatitis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brimienė, V.; Brimas, G.; Strupas, K. Differential Diagnosis between Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Study of 156 Patients. Medicina 2011, 47, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina47020021

AMA Style

Brimienė V, Brimas G, Strupas K. Differential Diagnosis between Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Study of 156 Patients. Medicina. 2011; 47(3):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina47020021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brimienė, Vilma, Gintautas Brimas, and Kęstutis Strupas. 2011. "Differential Diagnosis between Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective Study of 156 Patients" Medicina 47, no. 3: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina47020021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop