Next Article in Journal
The Effects of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers and Non-Healthcare Workers in Mexico: 14 Months into the Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Pattern, Orthodontic and Surgical Management of Multiple Supplementary Impacted Teeth in a Rare, Cleidocranial Dysplasia Patient: A Case Report
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Increased Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Serum Level and the Role of +936C/T Gene Polymorphism in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Medicina 2021, 57(12), 1351; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121351
by Ana Florica Chis 1,2, Ruxandra-Mioara Râjnoveanu 1,2, Milena Adina Man 1,2, Doina Adina Todea 1,2, Bogdan Augustin Chis 3,*, Bogdan Stancu 4, Ioan Anton Arghir 5, Teodora Gabriela Alexescu 6 and Carmen Monica Pop 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Medicina 2021, 57(12), 1351; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121351
Submission received: 4 November 2021 / Revised: 30 November 2021 / Accepted: 5 December 2021 / Published: 10 December 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Introduction.

i) Cigarette smoke is correctly presented as "the most cited risk factor" for COPD, but occupational risk factor (e.g. for welders, miners, melters / casters...) deserve to be considered too.  

ii) "new loci (...) might contribute to (instead of "define") the pathogenesis of COPD"

Matherials and methods

Cases and controls have been studied in consideration of the serum levels of VEGF and of the related polymorphism, not of their smoking habits, and no attention has been given to possible occupational risk factors unbalanced in the two groups. Matching criteria are insufficiently described. 

 

 

Author Response

Thank you for your valuable sugestions. 

Q1- paragraph added

Q2- paragraph changed

We rephrased and extended the Introduction and Material and methods.

We rephrased the Tables 3 and 4.

Thank you for your time and sugestions.

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is of certain interest. The only strong finding is the significantly higher circulating level of VEGF in COPD patients compared with Controls, this should acknowledged in the title. Possible clinical implications should also be discussed.

Author Response

Thank you for your valuable sugestions. 

Q1- title changed

Q2- paragraph changed

We rephrased and extended the Introduction , Material and methods and Discussions.

We rephrased the Tables 3 and 4.

Thank you for your time and sugestions.

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

A characterization of cases and controls on the basis of their occupations and corresponding profiles of occupational exposures to dusts, NOx, mists .... would have been useful. These aspects would be considered for ongoing research.    

Back to TopTop