1. Introduction
Total knee replacement (TKA) refers to a treatment that removes articular surfaces which cannot be repaired by itself and replaces them with artificial joints to eliminate pain and stabilize the knee joint, and can be unilateral for one-sided lesion or bilateral for two-sided lesion [
1,
2]. In 2012, according to a survey in 18 countries, about 1.1 million people received TKA every year, and the number increased by 11% yearly [
3]. In 2016, there were nearly 110 million knee osteoarthritis patients in China, and the potential patient population requiring TKA is enormous [
4].
TKA is one of the most painful procedures surgical procedures [
5,
6]. Appropriate pain management is one of the utmost concerns for patients receiving TKA. Postoperative pain of TKA is one of the important factors affecting patients’ rehabilitation [
7]. Improper pain control can affect the normal recovery of knee function, cause chronic pain, reduce the quality of life, and increase the risk of complications [
8,
9,
10,
11]. Furthermore, severe pain can also increase stress and cause sleep disorders, which may in turn reduce the patient’s immunity and increase the risk of infection [
12,
13,
14,
15]. Long-term postoperative pain may also lead to the increased use of opioids [
16], prolong the hospital stay length, and increase individual medical costs and the overall social burden [
17,
18].
At present, no consensus has been reached about the use of analgesics for pain management in TKA. The American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and other professional organizations suggested that multimodal analgesics may be used for pain management in TKA and the recommended medicines included acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), gabapentin pregabalin and ketamine, etc. [
10]. The Korean Knee Society recommended that two or more medicines having different mechanisms of action and acting on different body parts should be used for TKA patients [
11]. Research gaps in establishing a standardized evidence-based practice guidelines for operative pain management remains [
19].
In practice, multimodal analgesia has been recommended as an alternative consid-ering the risks of opioid monotherapy in surgical pain management [
20]. Clinicians have long been aware of the danger of overreliance on opioids to manage acute pain: the higher risks of adverse drug events, increased length of stay and hospital costs, and decreased patient satisfaction [
21,
22]. Multimodal analgesia refers to the approach that relies on a nonopioid foundation with addition of adjunctive opioids as needed [
23]. An increasing number of nonopioid analgesics such as NSAIDs, acetaminophen and tramadol have been proved effective for this role, with fewer side effects and a higher degree of safety than opioids [
16,
17]. Accordingly, multimodal analgesia was recommended as best practice by most recognized authorities [
13,
15,
24,
25].
Previous studies have reported the use of multimodal analgesia in TKA cases. For example, Lubis AMT et al. analyzed the combined use of NSAIDs after TKA, showing that celecoxib combined with pregabalin can effectively relieve pain while Drew JM et al. recommended celecoxib and oxycodone for TKA patients [
26,
27]. Smith SR et al. studied the use of opioids in patients before TKA, and found that patients who used opioids preoperatively suffered more pain [
28]. Currently, the studies about the use of multimodal analgesia were mainly TKA cases in western countries and research about such use among Asian patients was very limited.
Therefore, the aim of this research was to characterize the drug utilization for pain management during perioperative period of TKA in China by using real world data, and to analyze the association between drug utilization and perioperative characteristics. The results of this study were expected to provide a reference for the future development of guidelines for the use of perioperative analgesics in TKA.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Design and Data Collection
The research applied a retrospective observational research design using data extracted from the electronic medical records of hospitals. The research was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University for the project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (71603008). The ethical code: IRB00001051-19034, approved date: 25 April 2019.
All the data was collected from 145 hospitals in 31 provinces across China, dated between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018. The electronic medical records without personal identity information were directly extracted from the Health Information Systems of the hospitals.
2.2. Sample Inclusion and Exclusion
The inclusion criteria of this study were hospitalized patients who: (1) aged 18 years or older; (2) were admitted and discharged during the study period; and (3) only underwent TKA (including unilateral and bilateral) but no other surgery; and (4) had a record of analgesics prescriptions. The exclusion criteria were: (1) pregnancy during hospitalization; (2) diagnosis of cancer during hospitalization; (3) underwent operations in addition to TKA; (4) no record of analgesic use; and (5) incomplete patient information.
2.3. Surgery Characteristics
The characteristics of surgery were measured by four aspects:
The types of surgery were divided into unilateral surgery and bilateral surgery.
Surgery were classified based on different risks and complexity of surgery in accordance with Article 7 of Chapter II of the 2012 edition of the “Measures for the Management of Surgery in Medical Institutions (Trial)” [
29] into four levels: Level 1 refers to surgery with lower risk, simple procedure, and low technical difficulty; Level 2 refers to surgery with certain risks, moderate process complexity, and technical difficulty; Level 3 refers to higher-risk, more complicated, and more difficult surgery; and Level 4 refers to higher-risk, complicated, and difficult surgery.
Anesthesia methods were divided into local anesthesia and general anesthesia.
The surgery duration was calculated from the beginning to the end of the TKA operation.
2.4. Analgesics
The analgesics in this study were named using the generic names and classified using the classification system of drugs used as perioperative analgesia employed in the “Experts consensus on postoperative pain management in adults (2017)” and “Experts consensus on perioperative pain management in general surgery (2015)” [
30,
31]. Tramadol was classified as a non-opioid central analgesic rather than a weak opioid according to expert consensus in this study. They included:
- (1)
Opioids: Morphine, Oxycodone, Hydromorphone, Sufentanil, Hydrocodone, Fentanyl, Butorphanol, Dezocine, Pethidine, Pentazocine, Nalbuphine, Buprenorphine, Codeine, Dihydrocodeine
- (2)
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Ibuprofen, Diclofenac, Meloxicam, Celecoxib, Lornoxicam
- (3)
Acetaminophen
- (4)
Non-opioid central analgesics: Tramadol
- (5)
Others: Ketamine, D-ketamine, Gabapentin, Pregabalin
In this study, analgesic mode referred to the combination and type of analgesics used by a patient during a perioperative TKA in this study.
2.5. Data Analysis
The study used descriptive statistics to analyze the characteristics of TKA patients, surgery characteristics, and costs. Chi-Square Test was used to analyze the relationships among surgery characteristics and analgesic modes in TKA patients. SPSS 24.0 software (IBM corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used.
All analyses were two-tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered as statistics significance.
4. Discussion
In this retrospective study, it was found that multimodal analgesic was commonly prescribed for more than 95% of the patients in this study which was similar to findings from previous studies about postoperative pain management [
8]. NSAIDs including parecoxib, flurbiprofen axetil and celecoxib were most commonly prescribed, which was also in accordance with previous findings [
17]. In previous studies, tramadol was classified as a weak opioid agonist with two mechanisms of action [
32]. And in some study, tramadol was identified as an atypical opioid distinct from opioids [
33]. In this study, tramadol was classified as a non-opioid central analgesic based on existing expert consensus in China, which is a reflection of real-world drug utilization method in China and was therefore adopted. Surgery types, surgery levels, surgery duration, and types of anesthesia were the surgery characteristics found to have associations with the mode of drug utilization with statistical significance, which indicated that the surgery attributes should be taken in consideration when developing analgesics guideline in the future.
In this research, different modes of drug utilization used for pain management in TKA were identified. Considering the lack of guideline and quality evidence, such use could mostly be at the discretion of the prescriber based on his/her professional and clinical knowledge and experiences. These findings highlighted the lack of standardization of pain management [
34]. For instance, “celecoxib + parecoxib” was the most common mode of combined drug use, and 29 patients used Sufentanil and Remifentanil at the same time in Mode 3, both of which had the same mechanism of action. Although, there is some evidence showed that if iv parecoxib followed by oral celecoxib in different period after TKA surgery may decrease the use of morphine [
35]. However, in a study analyzing international reports of adverse reactions, celecoxib was found to pose a greater risk of adverse reactions when used in combination with other NSAIDs, such as gastrointestinal side effects, renal and urinary disorders, and hypertension [
36]. One study also confirmed a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with the combination of different NSAIDs [
37]. So, it is still necessary to be vigilant when using drugs with the same mechanism of action during perioperative period and needs further exploration [
38]. Overall, the lack of quality evidence of rational analgesic use for pain management in TKA demands efforts from researchers.
This research also found that the main analgesics used by TKA patients for pain management were celecoxib, parecoxib, flurbiprofen axetil, morphine, tramadol, and sufentanil, etc. but not acetaminophen. Acetaminophen, as an analgesic, is often used to assist the analgesic effect of other drugs. Murata-ooiwa M et al. [
18] and Mont Ma et al. [
39] both confirmed the effect of acetaminophen on the pain management after TKA surgeryin achieving effective pain control for the patients. Mont Ma et al. [
39] had also confirmed that the use of acetaminophen could reduce the probability of reoperation and save the cost of patients. In this study, very few TKA patients used acetaminophen. This might be due to the consideration that acetaminophen does not have anti-inflammatory activity but liver toxicity. Other types of analgesics, such as pregabalin was also used by the patients in this study. Some research results showed that while this other type of analgesics such as gabapentin and pregabalin could alleviate postoperative pain and reduce the use of opioids [
39,
40], the adverse reactions and effectiveness of the drugs have yet to be confirmed [
41,
42,
43,
44]. How to avoid adverse reactions of analgesics in TKA needs more clinical research.
Overall, the pain management of perioperative in China still needs improvement and refinement. Previous retrospective studies have confirmed the existence of various irrational phenomena in the current use of orthopaedic analgesics in China, such as repeated use of drugs and unreasonable dosage [
45,
46]. The rational use of perioperative analgesics (especially in orthopaedics) should be expedited by formulating guidelines and further optimising management.
To our knowledge, this is the first research to report the real-world utilization of analgesic drugs for pain management during perioperative period of TKA. However, there were some limitations in this research and needs further study. Firstly, due to the limitation of database, this study only analyzed the whole perioperative period, and did not distinguish the different stages of operation (preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative) or different anesthesia methods (pure local anesthesia, regional anesthesia or neuraxial anesthesia). Secondly, this study did not specify the dosage forms of analgesic drugs. This is relevant because different dosage forms may correspond to use at different times. In the follow-up study, it needs to combine the time and dosage form of the drug, refine the mode of drug utilization for pain management, and use the patient’s pain score and other clinical indicators to evaluate the effect of the utilization modes of analgesics.