Next Article in Journal
Screening and Bioinformatics Analysis of Crucial Gene of Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Based on GEO Database
Previous Article in Journal
Progress of Diabetic Macular Edema after Loading Injection of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents in Real-World Cases
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Percutaneous N-Butyl-Cyanoacrylate Embolization for Treating Ruptured Pancreaticoduodenal Aneurysm: A Case Report

Medicina 2022, 58(10), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101320
by Joo Yeon Jang 1, Jin Hyeok Kim 1, Tae Un Kim 1, Hwaseong Ryu 1, Tae Beom Lee 2, Je Ho Ryu 2 and Ung Bae Jeon 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Medicina 2022, 58(10), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101320
Submission received: 18 August 2022 / Revised: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A nice, concise report of a novel technique to deal with a potentially lethal situation. 

 

I would simply ask the authors about their initial choice of embolic material to try to treat the aneurysm. Why not start with coils?

Author Response

Thank you for your comment. In an emergent situation like our case, NBCA can embolize the aneurysm in less time than using a coil. In other words, when using a coil, it takes some time for thrombus formation. On the other hand, if using NBCA, immediate embolization can be achieved. It also depends on the preference and familiarity of the operator. For these reasons, we chose NBCA for the initial embolic material.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors report a case report on a ruptured visceral aneurysm. 

The percoutaneus embolization is performed in some cases by others authors in non ruptured aneurysms.In the introduction the authors should better expose the problem of the ruptured visceral aneurysms.

In the description of the case it is singular the increment of the sac in few hours.The author should explain this. In the description the authors assert that there was an high risk of rupture but by TC the rupture was evident immediately.

The percoutaneus embolization in this case was very  dangerous. I think that an open approach was more appropriate. The Authors should explain better this choice.A great dose of fortune was requested to obtain a good results. The Authors sould discuss these problems.The conclusions are not appropriate.A single case cannot lead any conclusion.The authors should assert that only in extreme cases  such an approach can be attempted.In the maiority of these cases, after a failure of catheter embolization, an open operation should be preferred. In the reference the following paper could be quoted :single center experience in the treatment of visceral artery aneurysms by Martinelli O. et all, Annals of vascular surgery 2019.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

the text has been improved and although the scientific interest is moderate it can be published in my opinion.Remain a doubt on the increment of the sac in few hours

Back to TopTop