Next Article in Journal
The Association of Polymorphisms in Genes Encoding Antioxidant Enzymes GPX1 (rs1050450), SOD2 (rs4880) and Transcriptional Factor Nrf2 (rs6721961) with the Risk and Development of Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Medium Term Outcomes of TVT-Abbrevo for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Efficacy and Safety at 5-Year Follow-Up
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers in Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis Tissues: Digital vs. Manual Analysis—A Proof of Concept Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 58
Issue 10
10.3390/medicina58101413
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Medicina 2022, 58(2), 329.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Lu et al. Periodontal Pathogen Adhesion, Cytotoxicity, and Surface Free Energy of Different Materials for an Implant Prosthesis Screw Access Hole. Medicina 2022, 58, 329

by
Hsin-Ying Lu
1,
Jason Hou
1,
Yuta Takahashi
2,
Yukihiko Tamura
3,
Shohei Kasugai
1,
Shinji Kuroda
1,* and
Hidemi Nakata
1,*
1
Department of Oral Implantology and Regenerative Dental Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan
2
Dental Hospital Clinical Laboratory Division, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan
3
Department of Dental Pharmacology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2022, 58(10), 1413; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101413
Submission received: 23 September 2022 / Revised: 24 September 2022 / Accepted: 26 September 2022 / Published: 9 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Osseointegration and Dental Implants: An Update)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Error in Figure

In the original publication [1], there were some mistakes in Figures 4 and 5 as published. In Figure 4, the X-axis is corrected, but the label of the X-axis was missing a “/” symbol, The corrected Figure 4 appears below.
In Figure 5 GE-1 cells cytotoxicity test, there was statistical mistake as published. The corrected Figure 5 appears below.

Text Correction

There was an error in the original publication due to the statistical mistake. A correction has been made to Section 3.2. Cytotoxicity. The corrected paragraph appears below.
The toxicity of each compound was tested against GE-1 cells. LDH and CCK8 assays were performed for 24 and 72 h, respectively. Among the six materials, both CE and GP showed a significant difference (p < 0.01) compared to cotton (Figure 5). On day 3, GP showed the highest level of LDH cytotoxicity, indicating toxicity to the GE-1 cells in comparison to cotton. PTFE, PF, and wax showed no signs of cytotoxicity compared to cotton.
As shown in Figure 5B, the CCK8 assay results were consistent with that of the LDH assay. CE and GP showed the lowest cell viability of GE-1 cells, which was significantly lower than that of cotton and the other materials on day 3 (p < 0.01). The GE-1 cell samples were inspected under an Olympus IX70 Microscope with TH4-100 Lamp and DP25 photo image (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) to observe the qualitative results (Figure 6).
This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Lu, H.-Y.; Hou, J.; Takahashi, Y.; Tamura, Y.; Kasugai, S.; Kuroda, S.; Nakata, H. Periodontal Pathogen Adhesion, Cytotoxicity, and Surface Free Energy of Different Materials for an Implant Prosthesis Screw Access Hole. Medicina 2022, 58, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Medicina 58 01413 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Plot of the four liquids against PTFE, PF, and wax. The lines represent the best linear fit to the plotted point, respective to their material. The linear equation was used to solve for m and b to determine the SFE of the respective materials. (B) Plot of the four liquids against gutta percha and caviton ex. The lines represent the best linear fit to the plotted point, respective to their material. The linear equation was used to solve for m and b to determine the SFE of the respective materials.
Figure 4. (A) Plot of the four liquids against PTFE, PF, and wax. The lines represent the best linear fit to the plotted point, respective to their material. The linear equation was used to solve for m and b to determine the SFE of the respective materials. (B) Plot of the four liquids against gutta percha and caviton ex. The lines represent the best linear fit to the plotted point, respective to their material. The linear equation was used to solve for m and b to determine the SFE of the respective materials.
Medicina 58 01413 g004
Medicina 58 01413 g005 550
Figure 5. GE-1 cells cytotoxicity test. (A) Lactate dehydrogenase assay of the materials against GE-1 cells. The cells were incubated with the materials for 24 and 72 h. (B) Cell counting kit 8 assay of the materials. GE-1 cells were cultured for 24 and 72 h. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10; ** p < 0.01 vs. cotton group).
Figure 5. GE-1 cells cytotoxicity test. (A) Lactate dehydrogenase assay of the materials against GE-1 cells. The cells were incubated with the materials for 24 and 72 h. (B) Cell counting kit 8 assay of the materials. GE-1 cells were cultured for 24 and 72 h. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10; ** p < 0.01 vs. cotton group).
Medicina 58 01413 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, H.-Y.; Hou, J.; Takahashi, Y.; Tamura, Y.; Kasugai, S.; Kuroda, S.; Nakata, H. Correction: Lu et al. Periodontal Pathogen Adhesion, Cytotoxicity, and Surface Free Energy of Different Materials for an Implant Prosthesis Screw Access Hole. Medicina 2022, 58, 329. Medicina 2022, 58, 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101413

AMA Style

Lu H-Y, Hou J, Takahashi Y, Tamura Y, Kasugai S, Kuroda S, Nakata H. Correction: Lu et al. Periodontal Pathogen Adhesion, Cytotoxicity, and Surface Free Energy of Different Materials for an Implant Prosthesis Screw Access Hole. Medicina 2022, 58, 329. Medicina. 2022; 58(10):1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101413

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Hsin-Ying, Jason Hou, Yuta Takahashi, Yukihiko Tamura, Shohei Kasugai, Shinji Kuroda, and Hidemi Nakata. 2022. "Correction: Lu et al. Periodontal Pathogen Adhesion, Cytotoxicity, and Surface Free Energy of Different Materials for an Implant Prosthesis Screw Access Hole. Medicina 2022, 58, 329" Medicina 58, no. 10: 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101413

APA Style

Lu, H. -Y., Hou, J., Takahashi, Y., Tamura, Y., Kasugai, S., Kuroda, S., & Nakata, H. (2022). Correction: Lu et al. Periodontal Pathogen Adhesion, Cytotoxicity, and Surface Free Energy of Different Materials for an Implant Prosthesis Screw Access Hole. Medicina 2022, 58, 329. Medicina, 58(10), 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101413

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop