Next Article in Journal
Vertebral Augmentation: Is It Time to Get Past the Pain? A Consensus Statement from the Sardinia Spine and Stroke Congress
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Prognostic Value of Myocardial Viability by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 58
Issue 10
10.3390/medicina58101430
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perioperative Management and Clinical Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Children with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

by
Huan-Rong Qiu
1,†,
Liang Zhang
1,*,† and
Zhi-Jun Zhu
2,*
1
Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
2
Liver Transplantation Center, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Medicina 2022, 58(10), 1430; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101430
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 30 September 2022 / Accepted: 3 October 2022 / Published: 11 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatology)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Liver transplantation (LT) has been accepted as a life-saving option as a last resort for children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). Perioperative management of LT for HoFH poses extra challenges for clinicians largely due to premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). We aimed to analyze our data of pediatric LT recipients with HoFH, with special attention paid to perioperative management and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: After obtaining approval from the local ethics committee, the clinical data of pediatric patients with HoFH who underwent LT at our institution between January 2014 and February 2021 were retrospectively studied. Results: Six pediatric LT recipients with HoFH were included in the analysis. Although ASCVDs were common before LT, all children with HoFH survived the perioperative period without in-hospital mortality. However, one patient experienced acute myocardial infarction two months following LT and was successfully treated with medical interventions. Post-LT metabolic improvement was shown by declines in serum total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in the early post-LT period (for TC: 14.7 ± 3.2 mmol/L vs. 5.5 ± 1.8 mmol/L, p < 0.001; for LDL-C: 10.6 ± 2.2 mmol/L vs. 3.6 ± 1.2 mmol/L, p < 0.001, respectively) and at the last follow-up (for TC: 14.7 ± 3.2 mmol/L vs. 4.5 ± 0.9 mmol/L, p = 0.001; for LDL-C: 10.6 ± 2.2 mmol/L vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 mmol/L, p = 0.001, respectively). Dietary restrictions could be lifted after LT. However, three patients required restarting lipid-lowering therapy after LT due to suboptimal LDL-C levels and progression of ASCVDs. Conclusions: Our data suggest that LT can be a safe and feasible therapeutic option for well-selected patients with HoFH, offering relaxed dietary restrictions and remarkable reductions in LDL-C levels. However, concerns remain regarding progression of ASCVDs after LT.

1. Introduction

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant inherited metabolic disorder caused by mutations in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B-100 (Apo B), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), or LDLR adaptor protein 1 (LDLRAP1) genes. FH is generally classified into two phenotypes: heterozygous FH (HeFH) and homozygous FH (HoFH). The former is relatively common, with a reported prevalence of 1:500, whereas the latter is scarce, with an approximate incidence of 1:1,000,000 [1,2,3]. In both phenotypes, FH is characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, xanthomatosis, and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). However, patients with HoFH have been reported to have remarkably higher LDL-C levels with earlier onset and more accelerated progression of ASCVDs than those with HeFH [1,2]. If left untreated, patients with HoFH typically develop aortic valve and coronary artery disease (CAD) and even experience cardiac death in the second or third decade of life [2,3,4,5,6,7].
Conventional therapeutic options, including statins with or without ezetimibe [8,9,10,11] and LDL apheresis [12,13], are usually insufficient to achieve ideal LDL-C treatment targets and prevent cardiovascular consequences in HoFH patients. The latest approved novel lipid-lowering agents, such as lomitapide [14,15], mipomersen [16,17], PCSK9 inhibitors [18,19,20,21,22,23], and evinacumab [24,25], are significant advances. However, their use is limited by availability, cost, and age restrictions. Other promising approaches, such as gene therapy [26,27] and hepatocyte transplantation [28], are currently being explored. Finally, liver transplantation (LT) has been considered a therapeutic alternative for HoFH patients, especially when all other traditional options have been exhausted [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
Perioperative management of patients with HoFH is always challenging, primarily due to premature ASCVDs. However, there are only a few case reports regarding perioperative management of HoFH patients undergoing either dental, endovascular interventional, or open-heart surgery [38,39,40]. LT is generally accompanied by severe intraoperative hemodynamic disturbances, making it one of the highest-risk noncardiac surgeries. To our knowledge, no study has focused on perioperative issues of LT for HoFH patients. Thus, we report our perioperative experience with a case series of HoFH children treated with LT.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

This study was initiated after obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Friendship Hospital (No.2021-P2-080-01). Pediatric patients (younger than 18 years) with a diagnosis of HoFH who underwent LT between January 2014 and February 2021 at Beijing Friendship Hospital were included in the study. HoFH was defined by meeting at least one of the following criteria: (1) genetic confirmation of two mutant alleles of LDLR, Apo B, PCSK9, and LDLRAP1 gene locus or (2) an untreated LDL-C > 13 mmol/L or treated LDL-C ≥ 8 mmol/L together with presence of xanthomas before the age of 10 years or diagnosis of HeFH in both parents [4].

2.2. Preoperative Evaluation

In our clinical practice, patients were generally screened for clinical presentations, medical history, family history, physical examinations, laboratory tests, and imaging detection (e.g., echocardiography, coronary computed tomography, or carotid vascular ultrasound) to reach a diagnosis of HoFH. Furthermore, special attention was paid to preoperative medical treatments, dietary restrictions, and disease-specific ASCVDs. For patients with a prior history of CAD, valvular heart disease, stroke, or who were noted to have severe cardiovascular comorbidities complicated by cardiac insufficiency or pulmonary hypertension, a multidisciplinary discussion was arranged to assess the appropriateness and optimal timing of LT.

2.3. Anesthesia and Surgery

The anesthetic and surgical techniques were performed according to the standard protocols of our institution. Briefly, anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl, and cisatracurium and was maintained on inhalational and intravenous anesthesia with sevoflurane, remifentanil, and cisatracurium. Mechanical ventilation was initiated at a tidal volume of 6–8 mL/kg, a frequency of 12–20/min, and an FiO2 of 0.6. An arterial line was inserted into the radial artery for continuous monitoring of invasive arterial pressure, and a triple-lumen central venous catheter was inserted into the right internal jugular vein for continuous monitoring of central venous pressure and fluid and vasopressor infusions. A Swan–Ganz catheter was placed into the pulmonary artery in selected high-risk cases (e.g., left ventricular insufficiency, pulmonary hypertension, recent myocardial infarction, or severe ischemic heart disease) to measure cardiac output, pulmonary arterial pressure, and mixed venous oxygen saturation. All the liver grafts were procured from China Donation after Citizen’s Death donors and were preserved with the University of Wisconsin solution. Anastomosis of the liver graft was performed using a conventional caval replacement technique. Although the inferior vena cava was totally clamped during the anhepatic stage, neither temporary portocaval shunt nor venovenous bypass was used for any patient. Intraoperative management was mainly focused on correcting hemodynamic disturbances and maintaining the balance between oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption, especially during critical periods, such as anesthesia induction, inferior vena cava clamping, and graft reperfusion. After surgery, all patients were transferred to the intensive care unit for postoperative care.

2.4. Immunosuppression and Follow-Up Protocol

The basic immunosuppressive regimen consisted of methylprednisolone and tacrolimus. Treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone (10 mg/kg) was initiated before reperfusion. Intravenous methylprednisolone was gradually tapered from the recommended initial dose of 3–4 mg/kg/day during the first week postoperatively and was switched to oral methylprednisone at 1 mg/kg/day on postoperative day 8. Oral tacrolimus was administered on postoperative day 1 at an initial dose of 0.1–0.2 mg/kg/day. The target level of tacrolimus was 8–10 ng/mL. In addition, treatment with 10 mg of intravenous basiliximab was used in children weighing at least 20 kg before reperfusion and on postoperative day 4. Postoperative lipid profiles were monitored daily or bidaily until first discharge and monthly, quarterly, or semiannually thereafter, depending on lipid profile status. Carotid vascular ultrasound, echocardiography, and coronary computed tomography were performed semiannually, annually, or every three years, depending on vascular and valvular status.

2.5. Data Collection and Statistical Analysis

The following data were recorded: age, sex, weight, height, medical history, family history, graft type, graft weight, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, urine output, total fluid infusion, blood transfusions, occurrence of postreperfusion syndrome [41], acute myocardial infarction (AMI) [42], and in-hospital death. The other variables collected included diet restriction, LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels, and echocardiography, coronary computed tomography, and carotid vascular ultrasound findings preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Values are represented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), median and interquartile range (IQR), or number and proportion. Paired observations of TC and LDL-C levels at baseline, during the early post-LT period, and at the last follow-up were assessed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test or paired t-test, as appropriate. Differences were considered significant if the p value was < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software (version 22.0; IBM SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Preoperative Characteristics and Clinical Course

During the study period, six children underwent LT for HoFH at our institution. All the patients met the phenotypic and genetic criteria for HoFH before admission to our institution and were transplanted due to refractory hypercholesterolemia (i.e., occurrence of insensitivity to existing lipid-lowering therapy together with LDL-C levels ≥ 3.5 mol/L) [4]. At the time of LT, their mean age was 7 years (range, 2–12 years), 83.3% were male, and they had a mean height of 124 cm (range, 90–146 cm) and a mean weight of 23.8 kg (range, 14.0–30.0 kg) (Table 1). All patients were treated with a low-saturated-fat, low-cholesterol diet, five of whom had early signs of ASCVDs. The most frequently used lipid-lowering medications were statins (n = 4) and ezetimibe (n = 4), followed by probucol (n = 2) (Table 2).

3.2. Intraoperative Parameters and Clinical Course

All the liver grafts were whole grafts. The mean graft weight was 518.3 ± 76.5 g, and the mean graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 2.48 ± 1.10%. The average cold and warm ischemia times were 525 ± 150 min and 4 ± 1 min, respectively. The median (IQR) blood loss was 4.2 (2.7) mL/kg, and the mean urine output and fluid infusion were 2.7 ± 1.3 mL/kg and 84.3 ± 37.7 mL/kg, respectively. Nontransfusion was attained in four (66.7%) patients, and fresh frozen plasma was only indicated for one (16.7%) patient. The incidence of postreperfusion syndrome was 66.7%, but no patients experienced ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia, heart failure, or cardiac arrest. Finally, all patients survived LT without in-hospital mortality (Table 1).

3.3. Postoperative Complications and Clinical Outcomes

Patient #3 experienced AMI two months after LT and was successfully treated with medical interventions. Patient #4 developed hepatic artery thrombus without elevated liver enzymes on postoperative day 11, and he had received oral warfarin and intravenous prostaglandin E1 for anticoagulation. Finally, the patient was noted to have arterial collateral formation on postoperative day 19; he did not suffer graft failure or biliary complications in the post-LT period. Patient #5 was successfully treated with increased immunosuppression for an acute rejection episode that occurred 10 days after LT (Table 1). At one month post-LT, the dietary cholesterol restriction was lifted in all HoFH children (Table 2). The postoperative TC and LDL-C levels decreased significantly during the early post-LT period (for TC: 14.7 ± 3.2 mmol/L vs. 5.5 ± 1.8 mmol/L, p < 0.001; for LDL-C: 10.6 ± 2.2 mmol/L vs. 3.6 ± 1.2 mmol/L, p < 0.001, respectively) and at the time of the last follow-up (for TC: 14.7 ± 3.2 mmol/L vs. 4.5 ± 0.9 mmol/L, p = 0.001; for LDL-C: 10.6 ± 2.2 mmol/L vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 mmol/L, p = 0.001, respectively) when compared with the baseline levels (Figure 1). Despite this, patient #5 did not achieve an ideal LDL-C level of < 3.5 mmol/L after LT, and two patients (patients #1 and #3) were noted to have ASCVD progression at the last follow-up (Table 2). Consequently, these patients still needed to be treated with lipid-lowering agents. Until the last follow-up date of 31 August 2022, graft and patient survival were 100% (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Little is known about the perioperative issues of LT for patients with HoFH. Herein, we describe 100% patient and graft survival in six HoFH children with a mean follow-up of forty-six months. Despite the small case series, several clinical implications can be drawn: (1) children with HoFH are often complicated with varying degrees of ASCVDs before LT, which may increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events after LT. (2) LT can significantly reduce LDL-C levels and lift dietary restriction in children with HoFH. (3) Risk of progression of ASCVDs in HoFH children is not entirely eliminated after LT.
HoFH is a rare autosomal dominant disorder that typically manifests as premature ASCVDs owing to markedly elevated LDL-C levels. ASCVDs in HoFH patients include CAD, hypercholesterolemic valvulopathy, and carotid, aortic, renal, and peripheral artery stenosis. If not diagnosed and treated early, patients with HoFH often develop severe ASCVDs and may experience sudden cardiovascular death from progressive CAD or aortic valve disease in the second or third decade of life [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Unfortunately, HoFH is underdiagnosed and undertreated in developed and developing countries [1,2]. Diagnosis of HoFH can usually be made using a combination of clinical findings, laboratory results, family history, and genetic testing. According to the current diagnostic criteria endorsed by the European Atherosclerosis Society [4], HoFH is diagnosed based on either phenotypic or genetic criteria. The phenotypic criteria of HoFH typically include an untreated LDL-C level of > 13 mmol/L or a treated LDL-C level of ≥ 8 mmol/L with the presence of xanthomas before the age of 10 years or evidence of HeFH in both parents. The genetic diagnosis of HoFH requires identification of mutations in two alleles at gene loci for LDLR, Apo B, PCSK9, or LDLRAP1.
The current guidelines recommend that HoFH patients receive aggressive lipid-lowering regimens as soon as possible after diagnosis [3,4,6] because the risk of ASCVDs increases with age and decreases with decreasing LDL-C levels [43,44]. Statins, either alone or in combination with ezetimibe, remain the cornerstone of the medical treatment of HoFH in the pediatric population [8,9,10,11]. Probucol was one of the leading pharmacologic options for HoFH before the era of statins but is now only available in some Asian countries because of prolongation of the QT interval and reduction in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [45]. Other novel lipid-lowering agents, including lomitapide [14,15], mipomersen [16,17], PCSK9 inhibitors (e.g., alirocumab, evolocumab, and inclisiran) [18,19,20,21,22,23], and evinacumab [24,25], have been shown to significantly reduce LDL-C levels in adult HoFH patients. However, only mipomersen, evolocumab, and evinacumab have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as adjunct therapies for HoFH in patients aged 12 years and older [46]. Despite these lipid-lowering agents, guideline-recommended LDL-C targets of less than 3.5 mmol/L are not achieved in some pediatric patients with HoFH; therefore, alternative therapies are urgently needed. The current standard of care for pediatric patients with HoFH is LDL apheresis [12,13], which reduces LDL-C levels dramatically. However, it fails to halt progression of ASCVDs as LDL-C levels often remain above acceptable targets. In addition, this therapy is costly, invasive, and time-consuming for pediatric HoFH patients. Other attractive approaches, such as gene therapy [26,27] or hepatocyte transplantation [28], are largely underexplored. Finally, LT has been a last resort for pediatric patients with HoFH since the 1980s [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. In our case series, none of these six children with HoFH received aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with mipomersen, evolocumab, evinacumab, or LDL apheresis before LT, which may reflect a real problem with undertreatment in settings where availability of lipid-lowering therapy is limited.
Theoretically, LT enables replacement of intrahepatic LDL receptors, which account for approximately 75% of the total dysfunctional LDL receptors [37]; therefore, LT offers a potentially curative option for HoFH, but its use is limited by organ scarcity, economic reasons, transplant-related morbidity and mortality, and the requirement of lifelong immunosuppression. Consequently, LT is not generally recommended as the first-line treatment of HoFH [4,47]. Although substantially lowering the LDL-C level may be achieved with LT, the reduction in LDL-C levels may fluctuate and rebound, and the progression of ASCVDs can be problematic. In line with our results, previous studies have reported fluctuating LDL-C levels in HoFH patients after LT [30,31,32,33,34,37], perhaps because of residual extrahepatic LDL receptors and immunosuppressive drug-induced hyperlipidemia [37]. Consequently, postoperative lipid-lowering therapy may be crucial for achieving acceptable LDL-C levels and halting progression of ASCVDs. Unfortunately, the optimal LDL-C targets for pediatric LT recipients with HoFH have not been determined. Based on guideline-recommended LDL-C targets in HoFH children, it seems reasonable to reach a target LDL-C goal of < 3.5 mmol/L following LT [4,5,6,7]. Consistent with prior studies [36,48], our study indicated that ASCVDs in children with HoFH could be exacerbated after LT, even when existing LDL-C goals are attained. However, whether a stricter target LDL-C level would reduce the risk of ASCVD progression following LT remains unclear, and research evidence is limited.
Perioperative management of LT for children with HoFH represents a medical challenge for clinicians. The complexity of these challenging patients and the specific risks of LT require the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team that consists of LT surgeons, anesthesiologists, hepatologists, cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, neurological physicians, pediatricians, intensivists, and radiologists. Generally, patients with HoFH are reported to have severe cardiovascular comorbidities, such as CAD and aortic valve disease, which sometimes require surgical and nonsurgical interventions [38,39,40,49]. Therefore, caution must be taken in assessing cardiovascular risk to ensure patient safety since preoperative ASCVDs will inevitably increase the risk of postoperative cardiovascular complications [32,33,37]. In our series, one patient experienced AMI in the early postoperative period despite careful cardiac precautions, suggesting an elevated cardiac risk in HoFH patients treated with LT. In addition, it should be noted that pediatric HoFH patients must be strictly followed up because of the suboptimal LDL-C levels and progression of ASCVDs after LT. Based on our experience, we have established a perioperative management algorithm for HoFH children treated with LT (see Table 3).
To our knowledge, this is the first study mainly focusing on perioperative issues in HoFH children treated with LT. Other strengths include the representative nature of the patient sample, the detailed information on laboratory and imaging results, and the high response rate during follow-up. Nevertheless, several limitations also deserve mention. First, this study is limited by the relatively small sample size and lack of a control group; thus, future studies will be necessary to confirm our observations. Second, most children with HoFH did not receive guideline-recommended lipid-lowering agents because of limited drug availability, side effects, or high cost. Future studies are warranted to determine whether aggressive lipid-lowering therapy can achieve acceptable LDL levels to avoid the possibility of LT. Third, to minimize the risk of ASCVD progression, the optimal LDL-C level in HoFH children after LT remains to be determined. Finally, the median follow-up was relatively short; therefore, long-term graft and patient survival should be observed.

5. Conclusions

Our data suggest that LT can be a safe and feasible therapeutic option for well-selected children with HoFH, offering relaxed dietary restrictions and remarkable reductions in LDL-C levels. However, it is essential to recognize that some HoFH children treated with LT still require reinitiation of lipid-lowering therapy following LT because of suboptimal LDL-C levels and ASCVD progression. Therefore, adequate preoperative evaluation, meticulous perioperative management, and strict postoperative follow-up are critical to optimizing clinical outcomes of LT for children with HoFH.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z. and H.-R.Q.; validation, L.Z. and Z.-J.Z.; data curation, H.-R.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-R.Q. and L.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.Z.; visualization, Z.-J.Z. and L.Z.; supervision, Z.-J.Z. and L.Z.; project administration, L.Z.; funding acquisition, Z.-J.Z. and L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grant YYQDKT201812 (L.Z.) from the Research Foundation of Beijing Friendship Hospital, grant 202012024 (Z.-J.Z.) from the Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research, and grant 81970562 (Z.-J.Z.) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional Review Board of Beijing Friendship Hospital approved the study protocol on 30 March 2021 (No.2021-P2-080-01), and it was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective study design.

Data Availability Statement

The data collected and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Na Zeng from the Methodology Platform of the National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases for her help with data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Apo Bapolipoprotein B-100
AMIacute myocardial infarction
ASCVDatherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
CADcoronary artery disease
FHfamilial hypercholesterolemia
LDLlow-density lipoprotein
LDL-Clow-density lipoprotein cholesterol
LDLRlow-density lipoprotein receptor
LDLRAP1low-density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1
LTliver transplantation
HeFHheterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia
HoFHhomozygous familial hypercholesterolemia
PCSK9proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9
TCtotal cholesterol

References

  1. Tromp, T.R.; Hartgers, M.L.; Hovingh, G.K.; Vallejo-Vaz, A.J.; Ray, K.K.; Soran, H.; Freiberger, T.; Bertolini, S.; Harada-Shiba, M.; Blom, D.J.; et al. Worldwide experience of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: Retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2022, 399, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nordestgaard, B.G.; Chapman, M.J.; Humphries, S.E.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Masana, L.; Descamps, O.S.; Wiklund, O.; Hegele, R.A.; Raal, F.J.; Defesche, J.C.; et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: Guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: Consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 3478–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Harada-Shiba, M.; Ohta, T.; Ohtake, A.; Ogura, M.; Dobashi, K.; Nohara, A.; Yamashita, S.; Yokote, K.; Joint Working Group by Japan Pediatric Society and Japan Atherosclerosis Society for Making Guidance of Pediatric Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Guidance for Pediatric Familial Hypercholesterolemia 2017. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2018, 25, 539–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Cuchel, M.; Bruckert, E.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Raal, F.J.; Santos, R.D.; Hegele, R.A.; Kuivenhoven, J.A.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Descamps, O.S.; Steinhagen-Thiessen, E.; et al. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: New insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur. Heart J. 2014, 35, 2146–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Daniels, S.R.; Gidding, S.S.; de Ferranti, S.D.; National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Pediatric aspects of familial hypercholesterolemias: Recommendations from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2011, 5, S30–S37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wiegman, A.; Gidding, S.S.; Watts, G.F.; Chapman, M.J.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Cuchel, M.; Ose, L.; Averna, M.; Boileau, C.; Borén, J.; et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents: Gaining decades of life by optimizing detection and treatment. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 2425–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Catapano, A.L.; Graham, I.; De Backer, G.; Wiklund, O.; Chapman, M.J.; Drexel, H.; Hoes, A.W.; Jennings, C.S.; Landmesser, U.; Pedersen, T.R.; et al. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 14, 2999–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Luirink, I.K.; Wiegman, A.; Kusters, D.M.; Hof, M.H.; Groothoff, J.W.; de Groot, E.; Kastelein, J.J.P.; Hutten, B.A. 20-Year Follow-up of Statins in Children with Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1547–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stein, E.A.; Dann, E.J.; Wiegman, A.; Skovby, F.; Gaudet, D.; Sokal, E.; Charng, M.J.; Mohamed, M.; Luirink, I.; Raichlen, J.S.; et al. Efficacy of Rosuvastatin in Children With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Association With Underlying Genetic Mutations. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 1162–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. van der Graaf, A.; Cuffie-Jackson, C.; Vissers, M.N.; Trip, M.D.; Gagné, C.; Shi, G.; Veltri, E.; Avis, H.J.; Kastelein, J.J. Efficacy and safety of coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin in adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 52, 1421–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de Jongh, S.; Ose, L.; Szamosi, T.; Gagné, C.; Lambert, M.; Scott, R.; Perron, P.; Dobbelaere, D.; Saborio, M.; Tuohy, M.B.; et al. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with simvastatin. Circulation 2002, 106, 2231–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Luirink, I.K.; Hutten, B.A.; Greber-Platzer, S.; Kolovou, G.D.; Dann, E.J.; de Ferranti, S.D.; Taylan, C.; Bruckert, E.; Saheb, S.; Oh, J.; et al. Practice of lipoprotein apheresis and short-term efficacy in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Data from an international registry. Atherosclerosis 2020, 299, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Beigel, R.; Beigel, Y. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Long term clinical course and plasma exchange therapy for two individual patients and review of the literature. J. Clin. Apher. 2009, 24, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cuchel, M.; Meagher, E.A.; du Toit Theron, H.; Blom, D.J.; Marais, A.D.; Hegele, R.A.; Averna, M.R.; Sirtori, C.R.; Shah, P.K.; Gaudet, D.; et al. Efficacy and safety of a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: A single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2013, 381, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Nohara, A.; Otsubo, Y.; Yanagi, K.; Yoshida, M.; Ikewaki, K.; Harada-Shiba, M.; Jurecka, A. Safety and Efficacy of Lomitapide in Japanese Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH): Results from the AEGR-733-301 Long-Term Extension Study. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2019, 26, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Stein, E.A.; Dufour, R.; Gagne, C.; Gaudet, D.; East, C.; Donovan, J.M.; Chin, W.; Tribble, D.L.; McGowan, M. Apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibition with mipomersen in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess efficacy and safety as add-on therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2012, 126, 2283–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Raal, F.J.; Braamskamp, M.J.; Selvey, S.L.; Sensinger, C.H.; Kastelein, J.J. Pediatric experience with mipomersen as adjunctive therapy for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2016, 10, 860–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Raal, F.J.; Honarpour, N.; Blom, D.J.; Hovingh, G.K.; Xu, F.; Scott, R.; Wasserman, S.M.; Stein, E.A.; TESLA, Investigators. Inhibition of PCSK9 with evolocumab in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (TESLA Part B): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015, 385, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Santos, R.D.; Stein, E.A.; Hovingh, G.K.; Blom, D.J.; Soran, H.; Watts, G.F.; López, J.A.G.; Bray, S.; Kurtz, C.E.; Hamer, A.W.; et al. Long-Term Evolocumab in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Santos, R.D.; Ruzza, A.; Hovingh, G.K.; Wiegman, A.; Mach, F.; Kurtz, C.E.; Hamer, A.; Bridges, I.; Bartuli, A.; Bergeron, J.; et al. Evolocumab in Pediatric Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1317–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Daniels, S.; Caprio, S.; Chaudhari, U.; Manvelian, G.; Baccara-Dinet, M.T.; Brunet, A.; Scemama, M.; Loizeau, V.; Bruckert, E. PCSK9 inhibition with alirocumab in pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: The ODYSSEY KIDS study. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2020, 14, 322–330.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blom, D.J.; Harada-Shiba, M.; Rubba, P.; Gaudet, D.; Kastelein, J.J.P.; Charng, M.J.; Pordy, R.; Donahue, S.; Ali, S.; Dong, Y.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Adults With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The ODYSSEY HoFH Trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Raal, F.J.; Kallend, D.; Ray, K.K.; Turner, T.; Koenig, W.; Wright, R.S.; Wijngaard, P.L.J.; Curcio, D.; Jaros, M.J.; Leiter, L.A.; et al. Inclisiran for the Treatment of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1520–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Raal, F.J.; Rosenson, R.S.; Reeskamp, L.F.; Hovingh, G.K.; Kastelein, J.J.P.; Rubba, P.; Ali, S.; Banerjee, P.; Chan, K.C.; Gipe, D.A.; et al. Evinacumab for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rosenson, R.S.; Burgess, L.J.; Ebenbichler, C.F.; Baum, S.J.; Stroes, E.S.G.; Ali, S.; Khilla, N.; Hamlin, R.; Pordy, R.; Dong, Y.; et al. Evinacumab in Patients with Refractory Hypercholesterolemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2307–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Omer, L.; Hudson, E.A.; Zheng, S.; Hoying, J.B.; Shan, Y.; Boyd, N.L. CRISPR Correction of a Homozygous Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor Mutation in Familial Hypercholesterolemia Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Hepatol. Commun. 2017, 1, 886–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ajufo, E.; Cuchel, M. Recent Developments in Gene Therapy for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2016, 18, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Barahman, M.; Zhang, W.; Harris, H.Y.; Aiyer, A.; Kabarriti, R.; Kinkhabwala, M.; Roy-Chowdhury, N.; Beck, A.P.; Scanlan, T.S.; Roy-Chowdhury, J.; et al. Radiation-primed hepatocyte transplantation in murine monogeneic dyslipidemia normalizes cholesterol and prevents atherosclerosis. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 1170–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Starzl, T.E.; Bahnson, H.T.; Hardesty, R.L.; Iwatsuki, S.; Gartner, J.C., Jr.; Bilheimer, D.W.; Shaw, B.W., Jr.; Griffith, B.P.; Zitelli, B.J.; Malatack, J.J.; et al. Heart-liver transplantation in a patient with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Lancet 1984, 323, 1382–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Sanna, C.; Stéphenne, X.; Revencu, N.; Smets, F.; Sassolas, A.; Di Filippo, M.; Descamps, O.S.; Sokal, E.M. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in childhood: Genotype-phenotype description, established therapies and perspectives. Atherosclerosis 2016, 247, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ishigaki, Y.; Kawagishi, N.; Hasegawa, Y.; Sawada, S.; Katagiri, H.; Satomi, S.; Oikawa, S. Liver Transplantation for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2019, 26, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Mansoorian, M.; Kazemi, K.; Nikeghbalian, S.; Shamsaeefar, A.; Mokhtari, M.; Dehghani, S.M.; Bahador, A.; Salahi, H.; Amoozgar, H.; Malek Hosseini, S.A. Liver transplantation as a definitive treatment for familial hypercholesterolemia: A series of 36 cases. Pediatr. Transplant. 2015, 19, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Alim, A.; Tokat, Y.; Erdogan, Y.; Gokkaya, Z.; Dayangac, M.; Yuzer, Y.; Oezcelik, A. Liver transplantation for homozygote familial hypercholesterolemia: The only curative treatment. Pediatr. Transplant. 2016, 20, 1060–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gulsoy Kirnap, N.; Kirnap, M.; Bascil Tutuncu, N.; Moray, G.; Haberal, M. The curative treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia: Liver transplantation. Clin. Transplant. 2019, 33, e13730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Martinez, M.; Brodlie, S.; Griesemer, A.; Kato, T.; Harren, P.; Gordon, B.; Parker, T.; Levine, D.; Tyberg, T.; Starc, T.; et al. Effects of Liver Transplantation on Lipids and Cardiovascular Disease in Children With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Am. J. Cardiol. 2016, 118, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cephus, C.E.; Qureshi, A.M.; Sexson Tejtel, S.K.; Alam, M.; Moodie, D.S. Coronary artery disease in a child with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Regression after liver transplantation. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2019, 13, 880–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Al Dubayee, M.; Kayikcioglu, M.; van Lennep, J.R.; Hergli, N.; Mata, P. Is Liver Transplant Curative in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia? A Review of Nine Global Cases. Adv. Ther. 2022, 39, 3042–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ladha, S.; Makhija, N.; Kiran, U.; Aarav, S.K. Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Anesthetic Challenges and Review of Literature. World J. Pediatr. Congenit. Heart Surg. 2020, 11, NP83–NP87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saththasivam, P.; Herrera, E.; Lawrie, G.; Jabbari, O.A.; Barker, C.M.; Sheinbaum, R. Unsuccessful Redo MitraClip Procedure Leads to Acute Right Ventricular Failure in a Patient With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia and a Preexisting Atrial Septal Defect. A A Case Rep. 2016, 7, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, S.; Min, S.; Willard, G.; Lo, I.; D’Souza, R.; Park, A. Minimizing the risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: A case report. J. Dent. Anesth. Pain Med. 2020, 20, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aggarwal, S.; Kang, Y.; Freeman, J.A.; Fortunato, F.L.; Pinsky, M.R. Postreperfusion syndrome: Cardiovascular collapse following hepatic reperfusion during liver transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 1987, 19, 54–55. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. VanWagner, L.B.; Serper, M.; Kang, R.; Levitsky, J.; Hohmann, S.; Abecassis, M.; Skaro, A.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M. Factors Associated With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Liver Transplantation Among a National Sample. Am. J. Transplant. 2016, 16, 2684–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ference, B.A.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Graham, I.; Ray, K.K.; Packard, C.J.; Bruckert, E.; Hegele, R.A.; Krauss, R.M.; Raal, F.J.; Schunkert, H.; et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 2459–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. EAS Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Studies Collaboration (FHSC). Global perspective of familial hypercholesterolaemia: A cross-sectional study from the EAS Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Studies Collaboration (FHSC). Lancet 2021, 398, 1713–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yamashita, S.; Masuda, D.; Matsuzawa, Y. Did we abandon probucol too soon? Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2015, 26, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Butt, W.Z.; Yee, J.K. The Role of Non-statin Lipid-Lowering Medications in Youth with Hypercholesterolemia. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2022, 24, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Harada-Shiba, M.; Arai, H.; Ishigaki, Y.; Ishibashi, S.; Okamura, T.; Ogura, M.; Dobashi, K.; Nohara, A.; Bujo, H.; Miyauchi, K.; et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia 2017. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2018, 25, 751–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Greco, M.; Robinson, J.D.; Eltayeb, O.; Benuck, I. Progressive Aortic Stenosis in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia After Liver Transplant. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20160740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gao, M.; Yu, W.; Hu, H.; Liu, H.; Fan, K.; Gu, C.; Wang, L.; Yu, Y. Case Report: Cardiac Surgery and Combined Lipid-Lowering Drug Therapy for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Front. Pediatr. 2020, 8, 535949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medicina 58 01430 g001 550
Figure 1. Changes in serum TC and LDL-C levels over time. Baseline levels were obtained in the immediate preoperative period. Post-LT levels were defined as those measured at normalization, first discharge, or one month following LT, whichever occurred first. The latest levels were obtained at the time of the last follow-up. Significant decreases in postoperative serum TC and LDL-C levels were noted. Post-LT TC levels: mean 5.5 mmol/L versus baseline levels: mean 14.7 mmol/L; p < 0.001. Latest TC levels: mean 4.5 mmol/L versus baseline levels: mean 14.7 mmol/L; p = 0.001. Post-LT LDL-C levels: mean 3.6 mmol/L versus baseline levels: mean 10.6 mmol/L; p < 0.001. Latest LDL-C levels: mean 2.8 mmol/L versus baseline levels: mean 10.6 mmol/L; p = 0.001. LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LT liver transplantation, TC total cholesterol.
Figure 1. Changes in serum TC and LDL-C levels over time. Baseline levels were obtained in the immediate preoperative period. Post-LT levels were defined as those measured at normalization, first discharge, or one month following LT, whichever occurred first. The latest levels were obtained at the time of the last follow-up. Significant decreases in postoperative serum TC and LDL-C levels were noted. Post-LT TC levels: mean 5.5 mmol/L versus baseline levels: mean 14.7 mmol/L; p < 0.001. Latest TC levels: mean 4.5 mmol/L versus baseline levels: mean 14.7 mmol/L; p = 0.001. Post-LT LDL-C levels: mean 3.6 mmol/L versus baseline levels: mean 10.6 mmol/L; p < 0.001. Latest LDL-C levels: mean 2.8 mmol/L versus baseline levels: mean 10.6 mmol/L; p = 0.001. LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LT liver transplantation, TC total cholesterol.
Medicina 58 01430 g001
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and related complications.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and related complications.
Case 1Case 2Case 3Case 4Case 5Case 6
Age at onset (year)613211
Age at admission (year)1219753
Age at LT (year)12210763
SexMaleFemaleMaleMaleMaleMale
Weight at LT (kg)30.012.026.028.028.016.5
Height at LT (cm)14690144134115106
XanthomasYesYesYesYesYesYes
ASCVDsYesNoYesYesYesYes
Family historyFDR: HeFHNoFDR: HeFH; SDR: Premature CADFDR: HeFH, Premature CADFDR: HeFH; SDR: HeFHSDR: Premature CAD
Cardiac historyNoNoAnginaCADNoMyocarditis
Graft weight (g)568540571575383473
GRWR (%)1.894.502.202.051.372.87
Warm ischemia time (min)553533
Cold ischemia time (min)520720420560630300
Operation time (min)461312224145380205
Blood loss (mL/kg)3.34.23.85.04.210.3
Urine output (mL/kg/h)4.93.22.22.11.02.9
Fluid infusion (mL/kg)152.562.585.742.969.692.3
RBC (mL/kg)8.721.70000
FFP (mL/kg)6.700000
ComplicationsPRSNoAMIPRS, HATPRS, rejectionPRS
ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CAD, coronary artery disease; FDR, first-degree relatives; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; GRWR, graft-to-recipient weight ratio; HAT, hepatic artery thrombosis; HeFH, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; LT, liver transplantation; PRS, postreperfusion syndrome; RBC, red blood cell; SDR, second-degree relatives.
Table
Table 2. Lipid profiles, ASCVDs, diet restriction, and lipid-lowering therapy before and after LT.
Table 2. Lipid profiles, ASCVDs, diet restriction, and lipid-lowering therapy before and after LT.
Case 1Case 2Case 3Case 4Case 5Case 6
Baseline TC (mmol/L)17.4814.0612.6612.7211.6319.63
Post-LT TC (mmol/L)7.037.675.083.533.476.27
Latest TC (mmol/L)4.004.614.194.046.273.94
Baseline LDL-C (mmol/L)13.4910.118.998.968.8113.23
Post-LT LDL-C (mmol/L)5.024.683.402.072.434.15
Latest LDL-C (mmol/L)2.402.812.702.504.022.51
Pre-LT CVUScIMT↑, CAS (moderate)NormalcIMT↑cIMT↑, CPcIMT↑cIMT↑
Latest CVUScIMT↑NormalCAS (severe)cIMT↑, CPNormalNormal
Pre-LT ECHOSVAS (moderate)NormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
Latest ECHOAS (severe)NormalLeft ventricular SWMANormalNormalNormal
Pre-LT coronary CTRCA plaques
(no stenosis)		NormalRCA (mild stenosis)NormalNormalNormal
Latest coronary CTNormalNormalLM, LAD, LCX (severe stenosis); RCA (mild stenosis)NormalNormalNormal
Change in ASCVDsExacerbatedStabilizedExacerbatedStabilizedStabilizedStabilized
Pre-LT diet restrictionYesYesYesYesYesYes
Post-LT diet restrictionLiftedLiftedLiftedLiftedLiftedLifted
Pre-LT lipid-lowering therapyStatinsStatinsStatins, ezetimibeStatins, ezetimibe, probucolEzetimibeEzetimibe, probucol
Latest lipid-lowering therapyStatinsNoStatinsNoEzetimibeNo
Follow-up (months)937937232519
OutcomeAliveAliveAliveAliveAliveAlive
AS, aortic stenosis; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CAS, carotid artery stenosis; cIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; CP, carotid plaque; CT, computed tomography; CVUS, carotid vascular ultrasound; ECHO, echocardiogram; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; LCX, left circumflex coronary artery; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LM, left main coronary artery; LT, liver transplantation; RCA, right coronary artery; SVAS, supravalvular aortic stenosis; SWMA, segmental wall motion abnormalities; TC, total cholesterol.
Table
Table 3. Summary of perioperative considerations of LT for HoFH children.
Table 3. Summary of perioperative considerations of LT for HoFH children.
Considerations
Preoperative
 Diet restrictionA low-saturated-fat, low-cholesterol diet is necessary
 Lipid-lowering therapyConsider aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with lipid-lowering agents and LDL apheresis
 Preoperative evaluationECHO, coronary CT, and CVUS can be used to assess the severity of ASCVDs thoroughly
 FastingProlonged fasting should be avoided
 PremedicationPremedication is recommended, especially in crying and anxious children
Intraoperative
 Vascular accessDifficult vascular access may be encountered due to diffuse atherosclerosis
 Anesthesia inductionAnesthesia can be induced under the guidance of IBP to avoid hemodynamic disturbances
 Anesthesia maintenanceEnsure adequate depth of anesthesia
 MonitoringECG, TEE, and NIRS can be used to detect any sign of myocardial and cerebral ischemia
 ManagementMaintain the balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand
Postoperative
 Postoperative analgesiaMultimodal analgesia is recommended
 Early monitoringECG, BNP, myocardial enzymes, and lipid profiles should be closely monitored
 ImmunosuppressionTacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen in combination with methylprednisolone
 Lipid-lowering therapyReinitiation of lipid-lowering therapy may be needed
 Long-term follow-upFocus on the progression of ASCVDs
ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CT, computed tomography; CVUS, carotid vascular ultrasound; ECG, electrocardiograph; ECHO, echocardiogram; HoFH, homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; IBP, invasive blood pressure; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LT, liver transplantation; NIRS, near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, H.-R.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, Z.-J. Perioperative Management and Clinical Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Children with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Medicina 2022, 58, 1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101430

AMA Style

Qiu H-R, Zhang L, Zhu Z-J. Perioperative Management and Clinical Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Children with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Medicina. 2022; 58(10):1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101430

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Huan-Rong, Liang Zhang, and Zhi-Jun Zhu. 2022. "Perioperative Management and Clinical Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Children with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia" Medicina 58, no. 10: 1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101430

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop