Next Article in Journal
Polypharmacy in Older Adults with Alzheimer’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Scientific Research Directions on the Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry of the Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Scientometric Study
Previous Article in Journal
Sexual Dysfunction in Women and Men with Psoriasis: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

De Novo Skin Neoplasms in Liver-Transplanted Patients: Single-Center Prospective Evaluation of 105 Cases

Medicina 2022, 58(10), 1444; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101444
by Alessia Paganelli 1,2,*,†, Paolo Magistri 3,†, Shaniko Kaleci 2, Johanna Chester 2, Claudia Pezzini 2, Barbara Catellani 3, Silvana Ciardo 2, Alice Casari 2, Francesca Giusti 2, Sara Bassoli 2, Stefano Di Sandro 3, Giovanni Pellacani 2,4, Francesca Farnetani 2,*,† and Fabrizio Di Benedetto 3,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Medicina 2022, 58(10), 1444; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101444
Submission received: 17 September 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 13 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates on the Diagnosis and Therapy of Skin Neoplasms)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

your data are good, greetings for your manuscript.

I have not major revision. I suggest to add something in the conclusion for example with future studies to improve knowledge of immunological mechanism during solid-organ transplant. And I suggest to describe why diabetes is a comorbidities at baseline, because I think is very important and ineteresting.

Reference are correct and appropriated.

Thank you.

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your kind suggestions. The suggested considerations have been added to the manuscript (in region modality).

Reviewer 2 Report

In this paper, Paganelli and colleagues addresses an interesting subject regarding the prospective evaluation of skin neoplasms in liver transplanted patients. Moreover, although are some previous studies addressing the same topic, the authors report evaluation of a considerable higher number of patient’s, 105, taking into consideration the baseline characteristics of the enrolled patients. Their conclusions are based on the clinical data evaluated with statistical significance evaluation on the mentioned interval. Given these I recommend the article for publication.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your kind description. We sincerely appreciated your comments.

Back to TopTop