Next Article in Journal
Digital Workflow for Implant Placement and Immediate Chairside Provisionalization of a Novel Implant System without Abutment—A Case Report
Next Article in Special Issue
Tertiary Cytoreduction for Isolated Lymphnode Recurrence (ILNR) Ovarian Cancer in a BRCA2 Mutated Patient: Our Experience and Prevalence of BRCA 1 or 2 Genes Mutational Status in ILNR
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Malnutrition Measured by Hypalbuminemia and Body Mass Index on the Outcome of Geriatric Patients with a Fracture of the Proximal Femur
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Survival and Chemosensitivity in Advanced High Grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with and without a BRCA Germline Mutation: More Evidence for Shifting the Paradigm towards Complete Surgical Cytoreduction

Medicina 2022, 58(11), 1611; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111611
by Diederick De Jong 1, Mohamed Otify 1, Inga Chen 2, David Jackson 3, Kelum Jayasinghe 1, David Nugent 1, Amudha Thangavelu 1, Georgios Theophilou 1 and Alexandros Laios 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Medicina 2022, 58(11), 1611; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111611
Submission received: 24 September 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 8 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Gynecological Surgery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I'd like to commend the authors on their well-written paper.


The methodology is described clearly, the results are well-presented, and the conclusion with limitations is well-written and balanced.


I have no additional comments, and I believe the paper should be published in its current form.

Author Response

Many thanks for the positive feedback from the reviewer.

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an article that compared the prognosis of patients with at least stage III ovarian cancer according to germline BRCA mutation status.

 

Why did you not include somatic BRCA-mutated patients?

 

In your population, are there any patients who have benefited from HIPEC?

 

The number of mutated patients is relatively small and to separate survival analysis between BRCA1 and BRCA2 has low statistical power.

Author Response

Thank you for your valuable comments. 

The setting for testing for somatic BRCA mutations was not available at the time.

As we do not yet offer HIPEC at our center, it is difficult to say which of these patients would have benefited from HIPEC.

We appreciate the number of the BRCA mutated patients was small (39/162, yet 23.2% within the known incidence of BRCA mutation in a such cohort of patients. For that same reason, there was no further attempt to check survivals between BRCA1 and BRCA 2 patients. Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop