Next Article in Journal
Temporal Changes in Incidence Rates of the Most Common Gynecological Cancers in the Female Population in Central Serbia
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Sectional Study to Evaluate Knowledge on Hand Hygiene in a Pandemic Context with SARS-CoV-2
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

COVID-19 and Postural Control—A Stabilographic Study Using Rambling-Trembling Decomposition Method

Medicina 2022, 58(2), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58020305
by Magdalena Żychowska 1, Kamila Jaworecka 1, Ewelina Mazur 1, Kajetan Słomka 2, Wojciech Marszałek 2, Marian Rzepko 3, Wojciech Czarny 3 and Adam Reich 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Medicina 2022, 58(2), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58020305
Submission received: 9 January 2022 / Revised: 10 February 2022 / Accepted: 14 February 2022 / Published: 17 February 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study aim was to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 on postural (orthostatic) control in subjects who have recently recovered from the infection vs. healthy control group (33 vs. 35 individuals). The used "rambling-trembling decomposition method" considered as valuable. Patients who expressed olfactory dysfunction and/or respiratory distress because of COVID-19 showed symptoms of balance deficiency following COVID-19. Monitoring for neurological sequels and complications of COVID-19 should be evaluated and considered. I believe that this paper undoubtedly contributes to a better knowledge not only of the consequences and complications of COVID-19, but also their prediction - based on specific clinical abnormalities and/or symptoms.

Author Response

We are grateful to the reviewer for the very positive comments.  

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is well presented in all aspects of form and content. All sections are correct, and the data and results are presented in an appropriate and meaningful way.

Discussion is made on the results of the study, but it is too long in the first paragraphs (lines 222-269).  Although the data included could be related to the contributions of the study, it could be shortened.

There is a typographical mistake in reference 12 (line 134).

Author Response

We are grateful to the reviewer for highly valuable comments. As suggested we have shortened the discussion and corrected the typo by ref. 12. 

Back to TopTop