Next Article in Journal
Reply to Vrijdag et al. Comment on “Mankowska et al. Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency: A Narrative Review. Medicina 2021, 57, 1096”
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Lycium chinense, Cuscuta chinensis, Senna tora, Ophiopogon japonicus, and Dendrobium nobile Decoction on a Dry Eye Mouse Model
Previous Article in Journal
An Open-Label Trial Study of Quality-of-Life Assessment in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Their Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Diagnosis and Management of Dry Eye Disease and Ocular Surface Inflammation”

by
Giuseppe Giannaccare
1,* and
Antonio Di Zazzo
2
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
2
Department of Ophthalmology, University Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2022, 58(6), 764; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060764
Submission received: 27 May 2022 / Revised: 2 June 2022 / Accepted: 3 June 2022 / Published: 5 June 2022
It is estimated that a wide proportion of the world’s population (5% to 50%) may suffer from dry eye disease to a various extent [1]. Since the prevalence is higher in older people, the global burden of the disease is projected to further increase in the next decades due to the ageing of populations. Nevertheless, there is still lack of reliable and validated biomarker(s) to diagnose the condition, monitor its course over time and guide clinical management. As such, the “real life” diagnosis is usually reached by combining multiple subjective and invasive tests performed at the slit-lamp, such as among others vital dye staining and tear film break-up time. However, these tests are observer-dependent and lack standardization, resulting in high interobserver and intraobserver variance [2,3]. Another important problem is the poor concordance between the objective signs and the symptoms experienced by patients, in particular in cases with neurosensory abnormalities [4].
To overcome these issues, recent non-invasive devices have been developed to measure various novel diagnostic parameters, such as non-invasive break-up time, tear meniscus height, infrared meibography, aberrometry, tear film interferometry, humidity, temperature and corneal nerves metrics [5,6,7,8,9,10]. All-in-one integrate devices combining multiple tests to obtain a comprehensive ocular surface evaluation are now available. These devices have the great advantage of providing automated results, thus improving the diagnostic repeatability and reproducibility. Moreover, given the complex and multifactorial nature of dry eye disease, the possibility to identify the ocular surface structure or the tear film layer mostly affected can allow for a targeted treatment.
In parallel with the development of novel diagnostic devices, new dry eye treatments have also been developed and introduced on the market. With regards to topical treatment, tear substitutes formulations have evolved into multiple-action combined formulas targeting different key mechanisms of the vicious dry eye cycle [11,12]. Soft corticosteroids, cyclosporine A, tacrolimus and lifitegrast have been indicated as possible useful and safe tools to control inflammation. Certain dietary constituents also seem to have positive effects on the ocular surface health, with omega-3 fatty acids having the strongest level of evidence in support of their use. The treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction has also progressively shifted from simple lid hygiene to novel in-office treatments based on devices administering therapeutic levels of heat and pressure/vibration [13], as well as intense pulse light [14] or low-level light therapy [15].
This collection of articles will provide a focused update on the most compelling diagnostic and therapeutic innovations for dry eye disease and ocular surface inflammation. As Guest Editors, we would like to thank the authors who will contribute to this Special Issue and the reviewers who will provide helpful suggestions to further improve the quality of the papers. We would also like to extend our gratitude to the team of the journal Medicina for their robust support in this project.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.G. and A.D.Z.; methodology, G.G. and A.D.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, G.G. and A.D.Z.; writing—review and editing, G.G. and A.D.Z.; supervision, G.G. and A.D.Z.All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stapleton, F.; Alves, M.; Bunya, V.Y.; Jalbert, I.; Lekhanont, K.; Malet, F.; Na, K.S.; Schaumberg, D.; Uchino, M.; Vehof, J.; et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul. Surf. 2017, 15, 334–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Giannaccare, G.; Vigo, L.; Pellegrini, M.; Sebastiani, S.; Carones, F. Ocular Surface Workup with Automated Noninvasive Measurements for the Diagnosis of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Cornea 2018, 37, 740–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pellegrini, M.; Giannaccare, G.; Bernabei, F.; Moscardelli, F.; Sessa, M.; Arpinati, M.; Bonifazi, F.; Versura, P. Longitudinal Corneal Endothelial Cell Changes in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cornea 2021, 40, 462–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Song, H.; Zhang, M.; Hu, X.; Li, K.; Jiang, X.; Liu, Y.; Lv, H.; Li, X. Correlation Analysis of Ocular Symptoms and Signs in Patients with Dry Eye. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 2017, 1247138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Giannaccare, G.; Bonifazi, F.; Sebastiani, S.; Sessa, M.; Pellegrini, M.; Arpinati, M.; Moscardelli, F.; Versura, P.; Campos, E. Meibomian Gland Dropout in Hematological Patients Before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cornea 2018, 37, 1264–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bernabei, F.; Versura, P.; Pellegrini, M.; Moscardelli, F.; Bonifazi, F.; Sessa, M.; Arpinati, M.; Scorcia, V.; Giannaccare, G. Longitudinal Analysis of Infrared Meibography in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cornea 2020, 39, 812–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Giannaccare, G.; Pellegrini, M.; Sebastiani, S.; Moscardelli, F.; Versura, P.; Campos, E.C. In vivo confocal microscopy morphometric analysis of corneal subbasal nerve plexus in dry eye disease using newly developed fully automated system. Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2019, 257, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Di Cello, L.; Pellegrini, M.; Vagge, A.; Borselli, M.; Ferro Desideri, L.; Scorcia, V.; Traverso, C.E.; Giannaccare, G. Advances in the noninvasive diagnosis of dry eye disease. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vigo, L.; Pellegrini, M.; Bernabei, F.; Carones, F.; Scorcia, V.; Giannaccare, G. Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Noninvasive Workup in the Setting of Dry Eye Disease. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 2020, 5804123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gaudenzi, D.; Mori, T.; Crugliano, S.; Grasso, A.; Frontini, C.; Carducci, A.; Yadav, S.; Sgrulletta, R.; Schena, E.; Coassin, M.; et al. AS-OCT and ocular hygrometer as innovative tools in dry eye disease diagnosis. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fariselli, C.; Giannaccare, G.; Fresina, M.; Versura, P. Trehalose/hyaluronate eyedrop effects on ocular surface inflammatory markers and mucin expression in dry eye patients. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2018, 12, 1293–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Vigo, L.; Senni, C.; Pellegrini, M.; Vagge, A.; Ferro Desideri, L.; Carones, F.; Scorcia, V.; Giannaccare, G. Effects of a New Formulation of Multiple-Action Tear Substitute on Objective Ocular Surface Parameters and Ocular Discomfort Symptoms in Patients with Dry Eye Disease. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vigo, L.; Pellegrini, M.; Carones, F.; Scorcia, V.; Giannaccare, G. Short-Term Effects of a Novel Eye Mask Producing Heat and Vibration for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Pilot Study. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 2021, 1370002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vigo, L.; Taroni, L.; Bernabei, F.; Pellegrini, M.; Sebastiani, S.; Mercanti, A.; Di Stefano, N.; Scorcia, V.; Carones, F.; Giannaccare, G. Ocular Surface Workup in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Treated with Intense Regulated Pulsed Light. Diagnostics 2019, 9, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Giannaccare, G.; Pellegrini, M.; Carnovale Scalzo, G.; Borselli, M.; Ceravolo, D.; Scorcia, V. Low-Level Light Therapy Versus Intense Pulsed Light for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Preliminary Results from a Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. Cornea 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giannaccare, G.; Di Zazzo, A. Special Issue “Diagnosis and Management of Dry Eye Disease and Ocular Surface Inflammation”. Medicina 2022, 58, 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060764

AMA Style

Giannaccare G, Di Zazzo A. Special Issue “Diagnosis and Management of Dry Eye Disease and Ocular Surface Inflammation”. Medicina. 2022; 58(6):764. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giannaccare, Giuseppe, and Antonio Di Zazzo. 2022. "Special Issue “Diagnosis and Management of Dry Eye Disease and Ocular Surface Inflammation”" Medicina 58, no. 6: 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58060764

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop