Next Article in Journal
Nitrous Oxide Inhalant Abuse: Preliminary Results from a Cross-Sectional Study on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Italian Physicians (2023)
Previous Article in Journal
Arthroscopic Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer for a Patient with Axillary Nerve Injury and Concomitant Rotator Cuff Tear: A Case Report and Technical Notes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 59
Issue 10
10.3390/medicina59101819
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Graphene Oxide and Silver Nanoparticle Hybrid Composite on Acinetobacter baumannii Strains, Regarding Antibiotic Resistance and Prevalence of AMP-C Production

by
Povilas Lozovskis
1,*,
Erika Skrodenienė
1,
Virginija Jankauskaitė
2 and
Astra Vitkauskienė
1
1
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kaunas Klinikos, The Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Department of Production Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, 51424 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(10), 1819; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101819
Submission received: 19 August 2023 / Revised: 29 September 2023 / Accepted: 9 October 2023 / Published: 12 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Growing antibiotic resistance among bacteria is a global issue that is becoming harder and more expensive to solve. Traditional treatment options are becoming less effective, causing more fatal outcomes of nosocomial infections. Since the development of new antibiotics has stagnated in the last decade, a novel approach is needed. Materials and Methods: Graphene-based materials are being developed and tested for various applications, and the medical field is no exception. We tested 98 clinical A. baumannii strains for antibiotic resistance, AMP-C production and the effectiveness of a graphene oxide and silver nanoparticle hybrid nanocomposite. The disc diffusion method was used to determine antibiotic susceptibility results. Antibiotic discs containing cefotaxime, cloxacillin and clavulanate were used to detect AMP-C production. The effectiveness of the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite was determined by counting colony forming units (CFUs) after a suspension of A. baumannii and the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite was plated on MH agar and incubated overnight to grow colonies. Results: In our research, we found that A. baumannii strains are resistant to the majority of commonly used antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance levels and AMP-C production can be factors, indicating the better effectiveness of the graphene oxide and silver nanoparticle hybrid nanocomposite. Conclusions: In this study, a GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite was shown to have the potential to fight even the most problematic bacteria like A. baumannii.

1. Introduction

The last few years have brought many challenges to the health care system worldwide. This has resulted in the increased use of various drugs, including antibiotics [1]. The dependence between the inadequate usage of antibiotics and emerging resistance has been known for a long time [2], but efforts to reduce the unneeded use of antibiotics appear to be futile, since global use of antibiotics is ever-growing [3,4,5]. Recent increases in use of disinfectants may have led to increased evolutionary pressure for pathogens to adapt new resistance mechanisms that will be effective against currently used antimicrobial drugs [6]. We will need a novel approach to prevent and treat new and more resistant bacterial strains. Graphene-based materials have already demonstrated their antimicrobial properties against various pathogens [7,8]. There are few suggested ways to facilitate interaction between bacteria and graphene-based nanoparticles. The synergy of different antimicrobial activities seems to be the most important factor for the bactericidal effectiveness of the aforementioned materials [9]. Enriching graphene-based materials with silver nanoparticles has been shown to increase their effectiveness against pathogens like S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa and even C. albicans [10]. Our previous studies have shown that a graphene oxide and silver nanoparticle (GO–Ag) hybrid nanocomposite has antimicrobial properties against P. aeruginosa. To further test its potential, we investigated the effect of the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite on a more environment-resistant bacteria—Acinetobacter baumannii.
A. baumannii, just a couple of decades ago, was known as a species of soil bacteria causing opportunistic infections, mainly in rural communities. However, with high innate resistance, this bacterium quickly established its presence in health care facilities and became one of the most common dangerous nosocomial pathogens. As long as A. baumannii can acquire new resistance mechanisms, therapeutic options are narrowing [11]. This rapid growth in A. baumannii resistance to multiple antibiotics was an essential factor prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to add A. baumannii to the group of pathogens that cause concern, known as ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter species) pathogens. It is difficult to compare current A. baumannii antibiotic resistance levels with historic data, due to changes in taxonomy, but research from the early 2000s show that A. baumannii had already developed resistance to virtually all of the then-used antibiotics, and a quarter of all nosocomial infection-causing strains could have been carbapenem-resistant [12]. In a decade, resistance to carbapenems has increased more than twofold [13].
The virulence factors of A. baumannii include porins, capsular polysaccharide, lipopolysaccharide, various metal acquisition systems, several types of secretion systems, productions of antibiotic degrading enzymes and others [14]. One of the prevalent mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in A. baumannii is AMP-C β-lactamase production [15]. It is associated with resistance to many widely used β-lactam antibiotics.
An excellent way to approach the problem is to prevent nosocomial infections instead of treating them [16]. This could be achieved by coating surfaces of hospital equipment that cannot be disinfected by other means with materials with antimicrobial properties like as GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposites.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. A. baumannii Isolation and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

A collection, containing 98 clinical A. baumannii strains, was collected from various clinical materials (blood, lower respiratory tract and surgical wounds) from 2015 to 2020 in The Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinic. For our study, samples were chosen randomly, but we ensured that only one sample from different patients was kept for further testing. Strains were identified using MALDI-TOF (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) mass spectrometry. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined using the disc diffusion method (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) on freshly cultivated colonies. Susceptibility was determined for 16 antibiotics. A. baumannii strains were inoculated in trypticase soy broth with 15% glycerin and kept in a freezer at −80 °C for further testing. For more accessible data management, antibiotics were grouped into ß-lactam (ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem) and second line (gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tigecycline colistin) antibiotics. Inhibition zones around antibiotic discs were evaluated according to EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) guidelines.

2.2. Detection of AMP-C ß-Lactamases

To determine if any of the A. baumannii strains were producing AMP-C β-lactamases, we used the ESBL AMPC Detection kit (Abtek Biologicals, Liverpool, UK). Mueller–Hinton agar plates were swabbed with A. baumannii culture suspension in saline of 0.5 McFarland turbidity. Four discs (CTX30 (30 µg cefotaxime), CXV40 (30 µg cefotaxime and 10 µg clavulanate), CTC230 (30 µg cefotaxime and 200 µg cloxacillin), CCC240 (30 µg cefotaxime, 10 µg clavulanate and 200 µg cloxacillin) were placed on the agar plates. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The following day, the inhibition zones were measured. Results were interpreted using the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. GO–Ag Hybrid Nanocomposite Effect on A. baumannii Strains

Silver nanoparticles, stabilized with polyvinylpyrrolidone (10 mg/mL), were drop-wise added to a graphene oxide dispersion (5 mg/mL) at a ratio of 1.3:1. The detailed preparation of the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite was described in our previous studies [17]. To determine the effect of the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite on A. baumannii strains, we used the method of counting colony forming units (CFUs) after different incubation times with the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite. To make 0.5 MF turbidity bacterial suspension in saline, we used A. baumannii strains cultivated on 5% blood agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company) overnight at 37 °C in an incubator. Volumes of 180 µL of bacterial suspension and 20 µL of GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite were mixed in a tube and vortexed. The tubes were placed in a 37 °C incubator. After 45 and 90 min, the samples were spread on Mueller–Hinton agar plates using a 1 µL loop and plating in a streak pattern. Grown A. baumannii CFUs were counted after plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C.
Statistical analysis was undertaken using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 (IBM, Armonk, NJ, USA) software. Chi squared tests and Fisher’s exact tests were performed. Results were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Antibiotic Resistance and AMP-C β-lactamases Production

AMP-C production was found in 32 out of 98 (32.7%) A. baumannii strains (Table 1). Antibiotic resistance levels, among tested A. baumannii strains, were high against the most tested antibiotics (Table 1).
Almost all tested A. baumannii strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam (98.0%, 96.9% and 95.5%, respectively) (Table 1). Over 90% of strains were resistant to imipenem, cefepime and meropenem (93.9%, 92.9% and 92.9%, respectively). The most effective antibiotic against tested A. baumannii strains was colistin, as all strains were susceptible. Among all 98 A. baumannii strains that we tested for antibiotic resistance, only one was susceptible to all 16 antibiotics, and one strain was resistant only to tetracycline.
AMP-C-producing strains were significantly less resistant to ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, aminoglycosides and tigecycline than AMP-C-non-producing strains (Table 1). Only 40.6% and 25.0% of AMP-C-producing A. baumannii stains were resistant to ampicillin-sulbactam (p < 0.001) and cefoperazone-sulbactam (p < 0.001), respectively. In comparison, 93.9% and 84.9% of AMP-C-non-producing strains were resistant to these antibiotics. Resistance to other ß-lactam antibiotics was similar among AMP-C-producing and -non-producing strains. Resistance to gentamicin, amikacin and tobramycin among AMP-C-producing strains was 68.8%, 68.8% and 71.9%, respectively, while AMP-C-non-producing strains were significantly more resistant at 90.9%, 89.4% and 87.9%, respectively (p = 0.011, p = 0.005, p = 0.049). The only significant difference was observed regarding resistance to tigecycline. AMP-C-producing A. baumannii strains were less resistant to tigecycline than AMP-C-non-producing strains: 56.3% vs. 77.3%, respectively (p = 0.033).
No significant differences between AMP-C-producing and -non-producing A. baumannii strains were found, regarding resistance to the remaining antibiotics.

3.2. Effect of GO–Ag Hybrid Nanocomposite on AMP-C-Producing and AMP-C-Non-Producing A. baumannii Strains

The influence of A. baumannii and GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite interaction time was determined by the growth of A. baumannii colonies (Figure 1).
After 45 min of incubation with the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite, AMP-C-non-producing A. baumannii strains were affected slightly more than AMP-C-producing strains. Growth was observed in 75.0% of AMP-C-producing strains and in 66.7% of AMP-C-non-producing strains, but the difference was not statistically significant. When incubation time was increased to 90 min, the difference between AMP-C-non-producing and -producing A. baumannii strains was even smaller. Only 21.2% of AMP-C-non-producing and 21.9% of AMP-C-producing strains were growing.

3.3. Effect of GO–Ag Hybrid Nanocomposite on Antibiotic-Resistant A. baumannii Strains

The GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite had various effects on A. baumannii strains with different levels of antibiotic resistance (Figure 2). After 45 min of incubation with the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite, A. baumannii strains resistant to doxycycline, tetracycline and tigecycline were inhibited significantly more frequently than susceptible strains (40.6% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.001; 36.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.002; 36.2% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.049, respectively) (Figure 2). When the incubation time was increased to 90 min, significantly stronger inhibition was observed among doxycycline- and tetracycline-resistant A. baumannii strains (94.2% vs. 41.4%, p < 0.001; 88.0% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.001, respectively).
We also compared the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite effect on AMP-C-non-producing (n = 66) and -producing (n = 32) strains, regarding antibiotic resistance. After 45 min of incubation with the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite, AMP-C-non-producing A. baumannii strains that were resistant to doxycycline (41.7% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.016), tetracycline (40.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.0027), and tigecycline (41.2% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.01) were significantly more affected than susceptible strains (Figure 3). When the incubation time was increased to 90 min, the only significant differences were those regarding doxycycline (93.8% vs. 38.9%, p < 0.001) and tetracycline (87.3% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.001) resistance.
When we compared the effect of the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite on the AMP-C-producing strains (Figure 4), after 45 min of incubation, a significant difference was only found regarding doxycycline resistance. Resistant A. baumannii strains were affected more severely than susceptible strains (38.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.019). After 90 min of incubation, strains resistant to doxycycline (95.2% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.03) and tetracycline (89.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.001) were affected more than susceptible strains. A. baumannii strains susceptible to cefoperazone-sulbactam were affected more severely than resistant strains (87.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.047).

4. Discussion

A. baumannii has quickly become a major nosocomial threat. The plethora of its virulence factors and ever-growing resistance to antimicrobials are the main factors that have caused A. baumannii to be established among the most problem-causing pathogens in health care facilities [14]. The problem of A. baumannii is likely to become even more severe, since the natural habitat of this bacteria is increasing, caused by climate change [18]. In the near future, A. baumannii is likely to occupy niches left by bacteria that will not be capable of adapting to climate change. Recent studies from around the world show very high resistance levels among nosocomial A. baumannii strains [19,20,21]. These factors indicate that community-acquired A. baumannii infections, caused by extensively drug-resistant strains, might become a common issue.
The antimicrobial resistance of the A. baumannii strains we studied coincides with global resistance trends. In our study, many A. baumannii strains were resistant to all tested antibiotics except colistin. A. baumanni’s multi-drug resistance significantly reduces patient treatment options [16]. Ampicillin and cefoperazone combinations with sulbactam, as well as colistin, appear to be the most effective drugs [22], as demonstrated when AMP-C-producing positive strains were tested for antibiotic resistance. A third of the A. baumannii strains tested positive for AMP-C production; this coincides with the other studies conducted in tertiary care institutions [23,24].
A novel approach to antibiotic-resistant bacteria is needed, as antimicrobial treatment options are running out for the cases caused by the most resistant bacteria strains. Various graphene derivatives have already been shown to have antimicrobial properties [25] and are being developed into products that will improve healthcare [26]. We have already tested the effects of the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite on P. aeruginosa [17]. The innate resistance mechanisms and acquired genomic variations [27] of A. baumannii might cause longer incubation times to be needed to significantly suspend the growth of bacteria colonies compared to P. aeruginosa [17]. Nevertheless, the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite was able to inhibit or reduce the growth of the tested A. baumannii strains. Resistance to cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline and tetracycline was associated with increased effectiveness of the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite against all A. baumannii strains. AMP-C production seems not to be a significant factor for the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite effect on its own. When the results were combined with antibiotic resistance, after 45 min of incubation, AMP-C-non-producing A. baumannii strains that are susceptible to cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam and tetracycline antibiotics were affected the least. Increasing the incubation time to 90 min significantly reduced the CFU numbers. Cefoperazone-sulbactam was the only case where resistance was associated with a significantly weaker inhibition of AMP-C-producing A. baumannii strains after 90 min of incubation.
The results showed that A. baumannii strains with lower antibiotic resistance levels were less affected after 45 min incubation with the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite than more resistant strains. Bacteria with strong resistance to certain antibiotics have been shown to be more susceptible to other antibiotics with different modes of action [28,29]. The difference between antibiotic-resistant and -susceptible strains’ survival also might be explained by how the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite interacts with bacteria cells [8,9]. The GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite particles might block bacteria cells from interacting with the environment and exchanging essential nutrients, so the A. baumannii strains with higher metabolic needs (the ones producing antimicrobial neutralizing substances) might enter starvation sooner. Also, cells unable to excrete metabolites might become damaged due to osmotic pressure. The fact that prolonged incubation equalizes the effectiveness of the GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite supports the theory that antibiotic susceptible strains are less affected due to lower metabolic needs.

5. Conclusions

A novel approach is needed to keep effectively fighting antibiotic-resistant A. baumannii, as well as other pathogens. Graphene-based materials are promising to be a prospective solution. Even though its effectiveness may vary due to various factors, prolonged pathogen–GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite interaction helped to significantly reduce the vitality of most of the tested A. baumannii strains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.L. and A.V.; methodology, P.L. and V.J.; software, P.L.; validation, A.V. and E.S.; formal analysis, P.L.; investigation, P.L.; resources, A.V. and V.J.; data curation, E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, P.L.; writing—review and editing, E.S.; visualization, P.L.; supervision, A.V.; project administration, A.V.; funding acquisition, A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data not publicly shared due to ongoing research that includes this dataset.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saini, V.; Jain, C.; Singh, N.P.; Alsulimani, A.; Gupta, C.; Dar, S.A.; Haque, S.; Das, S. Paradigm Shift in Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Bacterial Isolates during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gould, I.M. A review of the role of antibiotic policies in the control of antibiotic resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1999, 43, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ganguly, N.K.; Arora, N.K.; Chandy, S.J.; Fairoze, M.N.; Gill, J.P.; Gupta, U.; Hossain, S.; Joglekar, S.; Joshi, P.C.; Kakkar, M.; et al. Rationalizing antibiotic use to limit antibiotic resistance in India. Indian J. Med. Res. 2011, 134, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Browne, A.J.; Chipeta, M.G.; Haines-Woodhouse, G.; Kumaran, E.P.A.; Hamadani, B.H.K.; Zaraa, S.; Henry, N.J.; Deshpande, A.; Reiner, R.C., Jr.; Day, N.P.J.; et al. Global antibiotic consumption and usage in humans, 2000–2018: A spatial modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 2021, 5, e893–e904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Medic, D.; Bozic Cvijan, B.; Bajcetic, M. Impact of Antibiotic Consumption on Antimicrobial Resistance to Invasive Hospital Pathogens. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 259. [Google Scholar]
  6. Guo, J.; Liao, M.; He, B.; Liu, J.; Hu, X.; Yan, D.; Wang, J. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on household disinfectant consumption behaviors and related environmental concerns: A questionnaire-based survey in China. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aunkor, M.T.H.; Raihan, T.; Prodhan, S.H.; Metselaar, H.S.C.; Malik, S.U.F.; Azad, A.K. Antibacterial activity of graphene oxide nanosheet against multidrug resistant superbugs isolated from infected patients. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2020, 7, 200640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Perreault, F.; de Faria, A.F.; Nejati, S.; Elimelech, M. Antimicrobial Properties of Graphene Oxide Nanosheets: Why Size Matters. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 7226–7236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Azizi-Lalabadi, M.; Hashemi, H.; Feng, J.; Jafari, S.M. Carbon nanomaterials against pathogens; the antimicrobial activity of carbon nanotubes, graphene/graphene oxide, fullerenes, and their nanocomposites. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 284, 102250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cobos, M.; De-La-Pinta, I.; Quindós, G.; Fernández, M.J.; Fernández, M.D. Graphene Oxide–Silver Nanoparticle Nanohybrids: Synthesis, Characterization, and Antimicrobial Properties. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 376. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zavascki, A.P.; Carvalhaes, C.G.; Picão, R.C.; Gales, A.C. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: Resistance mechanisms and implications for therapy. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2010, 8, 71–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dijkshoorn, L.; Nemec, A.; Seifert, H. An increasing threat in hospitals: Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, L.-K.; Kuo, S.-C.; Chang, K.-C.; Cheng, C.-C.; Yu, P.-Y.; Chang, C.-H.; Chen, T.-Y.; Tseng, C.-C. Clinical Antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Strains with Higher Susceptibility to Environmental Phages than Antibiotic-sensitive Strains. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, C.-R.; Lee, J.H.; Park, M.; Park, K.S.; Bae, I.K.; Kim, Y.B.; Cha, C.-J.; Jeong, B.C.; Lee, S.H. Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: Pathogenesis, Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms, and Prospective Treatment Options. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Y.; Liu, X. Detection of AmpC β-lactamases in Acinetobacter baumannii in the Xuzhou region and analysis of drug resistance. Exp. Ther. Med. 2015, 10, 933–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Eliopoulos, G.M.; Maragakis, L.L.; Perl, T.M. Acinetobacter baumannii: Epidemiology, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Treatment Options. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 1254–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lozovskis, P.; Jankauskaitė, V.; Guobienė, A.; Kareivienė, V.; Vitkauskienė, A. Effect of Graphene Oxide and Silver Nanoparticles Hybrid Composite on P. aeruginosa Strains with Acquired Resistance Genes. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 5147–5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sabour, A. Global Risk Maps of Climate Change Impacts on the Distribution of Acinetobacter baumannii Using GIS. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2174. [Google Scholar]
  19. Aldali, J.A. Acinetobacter baumannii . Saudi Med. J. 2023, 44, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hafiz, T.A.; Alghamdi, S.S.; Mubaraki, M.A.; Alghamdi, S.S.M.; Alothaybi, A.; Aldawood, E.; Alotaibi, F. A two-year retrospective study of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii respiratory infections in critically Ill patients: Clinical and microbiological findings. J. Infect. Public Health 2023, 16, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jalali, Y.; Liptáková, A.; Jalali, M.; Payer, J. Moving toward Extensively Drug-Resistant: Four-Year Antimicrobial Resistance Trends of Acinetobacter baumannii from the Largest Department of Internal Medicine in Slovakia. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1200. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vázquez-López, R.; Solano-Gálvez, S.G.; Juárez Vignon-Whaley, J.J.; Abello Vaamonde, J.A.; Padró Alonzo, L.A.; Rivera Reséndiz, A.; Muleiro Álvarez, M.; Vega López, E.N.; Franyuti-Kelly, G.; Álvarez-Hernández, D.A.; et al. Acinetobacter baumannii Resistance: A Real Challenge for Clinicians. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 205. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yadav, S.K.; Bhujel, R.; Hamal, P.; Mishra, S.K.; Sharma, S.; Sherchand, J.B. Burden of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infection in Hospitalized Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Nepal. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gupta, R.; Malik, A.; Rizvi, M.; Ahmed, M. Presence of metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) & AmpC positive non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli among Intensive Care Unit patients with special reference to molecular detection of bla(CTX-M) & bla(AmpC) genes. Indian J. Med. Res. 2016, 144, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, P.; Huo, P.; Zhang, R.; Liu, B. Antibacterial Properties of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 737. [Google Scholar]
  26. Estévez-Martínez, Y.; Vázquez Mora, R.; Méndez Ramírez, Y.I.; Chavira-Martínez, E.; Huirache-Acuña, R.; Díaz-de-León-Hernández, J.N.; Villarreal-Gómez, L.J. Antibacterial nanocomposite of chitosan/silver nanocrystals/graphene oxide (ChAgG) development for its potential use in bioactive wound dressings. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 10234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sarshar, M.; Behzadi, P.; Scribano, D.; Palamara, A.T.; Ambrosi, C. Acinetobacter baumannii: An Ancient Commensal with Weapons of a Pathogen. Pathogens 2021, 10, 387. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Kristiansson, E.; Larsson, D.G.J. Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 42, fux053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Oz, T.; Guvenek, A.; Yildiz, S.; Karaboga, E.; Tamer, Y.T.; Mumcuyan, N.; Ozan, V.B.; Senturk, G.H.; Cokol, M.; Yeh, P.; et al. Strength of Selection Pressure Is an Important Parameter Contributing to the Complexity of Antibiotic Resistance Evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 31, 2387–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medicina 59 01819 g001
Figure 1. A graph showing reduction in growth of A. baumannii strains due to increased incubation with GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite over time.
Figure 1. A graph showing reduction in growth of A. baumannii strains due to increased incubation with GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite over time.
Medicina 59 01819 g001
Medicina 59 01819 g002
Figure 2. The frequency of A. baumannii strains with different antibiotic resistance levels, affected by GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite after 45 and 90 min of incubation. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. The frequency of A. baumannii strains with different antibiotic resistance levels, affected by GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite after 45 and 90 min of incubation. * p < 0.05.
Medicina 59 01819 g002
Medicina 59 01819 g003
Figure 3. The frequency of AMP-C-non-producing A. baumannii strains with different antibiotic resistance levels, effected by GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite after 45 and 90 min of incubation. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. The frequency of AMP-C-non-producing A. baumannii strains with different antibiotic resistance levels, effected by GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite after 45 and 90 min of incubation. * p < 0.05.
Medicina 59 01819 g003
Medicina 59 01819 g004
Figure 4. The frequency of AMP-C-producing A. baumannii strains with different antibiotic resistance levels, affected by GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite after 45 and 90 min of incubation. * p < 0.05.
Figure 4. The frequency of AMP-C-producing A. baumannii strains with different antibiotic resistance levels, affected by GO–Ag hybrid nanocomposite after 45 and 90 min of incubation. * p < 0.05.
Medicina 59 01819 g004
Table 1. Comparison of antibiotic resistance levels among AMP-C-producing and AMP-C-non-producing A. baumannii strains.
Table 1. Comparison of antibiotic resistance levels among AMP-C-producing and AMP-C-non-producing A. baumannii strains.
AntibioticAll A. baumannii
Strains (n = 98)
(n (%))		AMP-C
-Producing
(n = 32) (n (%))		AMP-C
-Non-Producing
(n = 66) (n (%))		p-Value
Ampicillin-sulbactam75 (76.5)13 (40.6)62 (93.9)<0.001
Cefoperazone-sulbactam64 (65.3)8 (25.0)56 (84.8)<0.001
Piperacillin-tazobactam94 (95.5)30 (93.8)64 (97.0)0.45
Cefepime91 (92.9)28 (87.5)63 (95.5)0.152
Ceftazidime95 (96.9)31 (96.9)64 (97.0)0.98
Imipenem92 (93.9)29 (90.6)63 (95.5)0.35
Meropenem91 (92.9)28 (87.5)63 (95.5)0.152
Gentamicin82 (83.7)22 (68.8)60 (90.9)0.005
Amikacin81 (82.7)22 (68.8)59 (89.4)0.011
Tobramycin81 (82.7)23 (71.9)58 (87.9)0.049
Ciprofloxacin96 (98.0)32 (100.0)64 (97.0)0.32
Doxycycline69 (70.4)21 (65.6)48 (72.7)0.47
Tetracycline83 (84.7)29 (90.6)55 (83.3)0.591
Tigecycline69 (70.4)18 (56.3)51 (77.3)0.033
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole86 (87.8)31 (96.9)55 (83.3)0.055
Colistin0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lozovskis, P.; Skrodenienė, E.; Jankauskaitė, V.; Vitkauskienė, A. Effect of Graphene Oxide and Silver Nanoparticle Hybrid Composite on Acinetobacter baumannii Strains, Regarding Antibiotic Resistance and Prevalence of AMP-C Production. Medicina 2023, 59, 1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101819

AMA Style

Lozovskis P, Skrodenienė E, Jankauskaitė V, Vitkauskienė A. Effect of Graphene Oxide and Silver Nanoparticle Hybrid Composite on Acinetobacter baumannii Strains, Regarding Antibiotic Resistance and Prevalence of AMP-C Production. Medicina. 2023; 59(10):1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lozovskis, Povilas, Erika Skrodenienė, Virginija Jankauskaitė, and Astra Vitkauskienė. 2023. "Effect of Graphene Oxide and Silver Nanoparticle Hybrid Composite on Acinetobacter baumannii Strains, Regarding Antibiotic Resistance and Prevalence of AMP-C Production" Medicina 59, no. 10: 1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101819

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop