Next Article in Journal
A Simple Eco-Friendly HPLC-PDA Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Paclitaxel and Seliciclib in Plasma Samples for Assessing Their Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics in Combination Therapy for Uterine Sarcoma
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Constipation on Health Outcomes in Medically Hospitalized Patients: A Prospective Study on Laxative Use and Health Care Outcomes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

National Study of Fournier Gangrene in Spain (2016–2021): Gender/Sex Differences in Mortality and Risks

by
Isabel Belinchón-Romer
1,2,
Alberto Ramos-Belinchón
3,
Ester Lobato-Martínez
4,
Verónica Sánchez-García
2 and
José-Manuel Ramos-Rincón
1,4,*
1
Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 Sant Joan d’Alacant, Spain
2
Department of Dermatology, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain
3
Urology Department, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, 28007 Madrid, Spain
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(10), 1600; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101600
Submission received: 30 August 2024 / Revised: 17 September 2024 / Accepted: 24 September 2024 / Published: 29 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Urology & Nephrology)

Abstract

:
Background and Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze sex differences in risk factors associated with hospital mortality in patients with Fournier gangrene (FG). Materials and Methods: A retrospective population-based study (2016–2021) included FG hospitalizations in Spain. To identify the risk factors, we used multivariable logistic regression and reported adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: There were 3644 admissions for FG during the study period (82.5% men and 17.5% women). The mean hospitalization rate per 1000 admissions/year was 0.23 for men and 0.05 for women, and the mean hospitalization rate per 100,000 inhabitants/year was 2.7 for men and 0.4 in women. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (44.9%) and diabetes mellitus (35.6%). The main complications were sepsis (22.1%), 29.8% were admitted to the intensive care unit and 16.1% died. Mortality was higher in women (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.07–1.63). The main independent risk factors for mortality in the entire sample were older age, neoplasms, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, sepsis, acute kidney injury, and admission to the intensive care unit. In women, they were older age, leukemia, sepsis, acute kidney injury, and admission to the intensive care unit. Conclusions: The overall FG mortality rate was slightly higher in women than in men, people aged >64 years, people with chronic kidney disease, sepsis, and acute kidney injury, and admission to the intensive care unit. The independent factors associated with mortality in women were similar in both sexes.

1. Introduction

Jean Fournier first described the clinical characteristics of Fournier gangrene (FG) in 1883 based on five cases with no apparent cause [1]. FG is an acute necrotizing infection of the scrotum, penis, and perineum that can spread to the inguinal region, lower limbs, anterior abdominal wall, and even the chest [2,3]. It involves thrombosis of subcutaneous blood vessels secondary to obliterating endarteritis, causing tissue hypoxia and reduced vascular supply, which in turn facilitates the overgrowth of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria [4].
FG mainly affects men aged 50 to 70 years [5,6], and has a global incidence of 1.6 cases per 100,000 men/year [6]. Patients usually have underlying diseases such as diabetes, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, malignant neoplasms, or alcoholism, which lead to vascular and immune disorders that increase susceptibility to polymicrobial acute necrotizing infection [2,3,4,6]. FG has a high mortality rate ranging from 15% to 30% in the most recent series [2,3,4,6,7,8,9]. There are several studies that have explored epidemiological and prognostic factors in FG and [2,3,4,6] comparing men and women with the disease. Several scales are available to assess mortality risk (e.g., Fournier Gangrene Severity Index, Uludag Fournier Gangrene Severity Index, Simplified FGSI, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system [7,8]), and numerous studies have used these scales in different populations [9,10,11].
The Spanish Health Ministry maintains a compulsory Registry of Specialist Care Activities, which includes the demographic characteristics of hospitalized patients, called the minimum basic dataset [12]. Researchers have used this database to analyze the epidemiological and clinical aspects of numerous clinical entities, including urological and dermatological entities [13]. It is a valuable resource for estimating current case numbers and temporal trends [14].
Since the available evidence on FG risk factors is based on case series [2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10,11] and in the absence of in-depth research comparing men and women with the disease, we aim to provide a different perspective. Using administrative data from the Registry of Specialist Care Activities—Minimum Basic Dataset, we conducted a population-based study of patients admitted to the hospital with FG and analyzed sex differences in epidemiology and risk factors associated with hospital mortality

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Data Source, and Study Period

We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with a diagnosis of FG discharged from a public hospital in Spain. We collected data from the Registry of Specialist Care Activities—Minimum Basic Dataset, which included patients’ demographic characteristics, as well as administrative and clinical variables related to the diagnoses and procedures performed during hospitalization, coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) [12]. The Spanish Health Ministry conducted periodic audits to evaluate registry accuracy.
We obtained data for people hospitalized with FG by searching for the relevant ICD-10 codes: N49.3 (FG) for men and N76.89 (other specified inflammation of vagina and vulva) for women. The ICD-10 code for men is specific to FG, while the code for women is not as specific. Since patients with FG typically require debridement, we excluded those who did not undergo surgery. To minimize the non-specific nature of the ICD code for women, we included only patients who went to the operating room. We identified 4755 cases of FG (3855 with the male-specific code and 890 with the female-specific code). Excluded from the study were 1101 patients (23.2% of the total), including 850 men (22.0%) and 251 women (22.8%)

2.2. Variables

We analyzed age, sex, length of hospital stay, comorbidities directly or indirectly related to FG, and prognostic factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ischemic heart disease, heart failure, neoplasms, lymphoma, leukemia, HIV or hepatitis C infection, organ transplant), complications (sepsis, acute kidney injury (AKI), pulmonary embolism), type of discharge (home/deceased), and surgical intervention. Table 1 shows the ICD-10 codes of all clinical entities and comorbidities included in the study.

2.3. Data Analysis

The rate of hospitalization for FG was defined as the number of FG admissions per 100,000 inhabitants/year, obtained from the Spanish Statistics Institute (https://www.ine.es/en/, accessed on 26 September 2024), and the number of FG admissions per 1000 all-cause admission years, obtained from the Registry of Specialist Care Activities—Minimum Basic Dataset (https://pestadistico.inteligenciadegestion.sanidad.gob.es/publicoSNS/N/rae-cmbd/rae-cmbd, accessed on 26 September 2024). Hospitalization and mortality rates were adjusted by age using the direct method of standardization, with Eurostat 2013 data as reference population
Categorical variables were presented as absolute values and percentages. For continuous variables, we calculated means and standard deviations if the data were normally distributed according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) if they were not.
To analyze the differences in hospital mortality between men and women, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test, because the distribution was not normal (p value < 0.05 in Kolmogorov–Smirnov test). A p significance was set as significant. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Significant variables in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model using a stepwise selection method with the likelihood ratio test. The CoxSnell R2 statistic and the Nagelkerke R2 statistic were used to measure the strength of the relationship between dependent (mortality) and independent variables. To test the model fit, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with a 95% CI. IBM SPSS for Windows (version 25.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for all the statistical analyses.

2.4. Ethical Aspects

This study did not require ethics committee approval or informed consent from participants, according to Spanish legislation. To guarantee patient anonymity, the Spanish Health Ministry provided a database after removing all possible patient identifiers.

3. Results

3.1. Yearly Evolution

During the study period, there were 26.4 million hospital admissions, of which 3644 were for FG. The number of annual FG admissions increased from 457 in 2016 to 781 in 2021. The number of yearly admissions was more than four times greater in men (82.5%) than in women (17.5%) (Figure 1). The mean hospitalization rates were 0.14 per 1000 admissions/year (0.23 for men and 0.05 for women) and 1.7 per 100,000 inhabitants/year (2.7 for men and 0.4 in women). The mean hospitalization rate per 1000 admissions/year was 0.23 for men and 0.05 for women. The crude and standardized hospitalization rates were approximately five times higher in men than in women (Table 2).

3.2. Epidemiological Characteristics of Participants

Of the 3644 FG admissions, 82.5% were men and 17.5% were women The main comorbidities (in descending order) were hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, obesity, and neoplasms. The main complications were sepsis and AKI. About 30% of cases involved admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for a median duration of 5 days. The reason for discharge was death in almost one-fifth of cases. The median length of the hospital stay was 18 days (Table 3).

3.3. Sex Differences in Participant Characteristics

Table 3 shows sex differences in age, comorbidities, complications, and FG course. The main epidemiological difference was in the proportion of women versus men aged > 80 years (p < 0.001). Regarding comorbidities, women had a lower prevalence of smoking, alcohol consumption, neoplasms, COPD, ischemic heart disease, and cirrhosis, but a higher prevalence of obesity, CKD, and heart failure (p < 0.05). The median length of hospital stay was shorter in women (p = 0.002). The proportion of admission to ICU and days of admission in ICU, complications during hospitalization, and the types of infections diagnosed during hospitalization were similar in both sexes.

3.4. Crude and Standarized Rate of Mortality

The mortality rate was higher in women than in men (20.9% vs. 15.1% with OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09–1.56). The crude and standardized rate of mortality is in Table 4.

3.5. Sex Differences in Mortality

We also found higher mortality odds rates in women than in men when we analyzed people with hypertension, diabetes, those admitted to the ICU, and those aged 65 to 79 years. We also found a higher mortality odds rate in women than in men when the patients had no other comorbidities and complications. There were no differences in the other variables analyzed (Table 5).

3.6. Risk Factors for Mortality among All Patients

Table 6 shows the risk factors for mortality in men, women, and both, and in Table 7 the crude ORs are shown. Figure 2 presents the adjusted ORs (aORs) obtained through multivariable analysis. The adjusted mortality risk was higher in women (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.07–1.63); people aged 65–79 years (aOR 2.09, 95% CI 1.70–2.56) and 80 years or older (aOR 5.92, 95% CI 4.66–7.53); people with neoplasms (aOR 3.97, 95% CI 3.22–4.90), CKD (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.236–2.30), heart failure (aOR:136, 95%CI 1.04–1.79), leukemia (aOR:2.39 95%CI: 1.01–5.19), sepsis as an acute complication (aOR 3.53, 95% CI 2.88–4.31), and AKI (aOR 2.42, 95% CI 1.96–2.99); and people admitted to the ICU (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27–1.89). The model has a Cox–Snell R2 value of 0.226 and a Nagelkerle R2 value of 0.352. The AUC of the model was 0.831 (95% CI 0.817–0.844, p < 0.001).

3.7. Risk Factors for Mortality among Men and Women

Similar variables were associated with a higher mortality risk in men as in the whole study sample: age 65–79 years, age 80 years or older, neoplasms, CKD, heart failure, sepsis, AKI, and ICU admission (Figure 2). The model has a Cox–Snell R2 value of 0.184 and a Nagelkerle R2 value of 0.321. The AUC of the model was 0.841 (95% CI 0.824–0.859, p < 0.001). The factors associated with higher mortality in women were age 65–79 years, age ≥ 80 years, leukemia, sepsis, AKI, and ICU admission. The model has a Cox–Snell R2 value of 0.213 and a Nagelkerle R2 value of 0.333. The AUC of the model was 0.827 (95% CI 0.790–0.863 p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

This study described the hospitalization rates of men and women with FG in Spain. We observed a high mortality rate in both sexes, although it was slightly higher in women than that in men. There were some minor differences between the sexes in disease epidemiology and other characteristics, with fewer comorbidities in women. Mortality was associated with older age, and was particularly high in people aged 80 years. Other factors associated with mortality were underlying neoplasms (both sexes), CKD (only men), sepsis as a complication (both sexes), AKI (both sexes), ICU admission (only men), and not undergoing surgery (only men).
In a 2009 study from the USA by Sonrensen et al., the rate of FG hospitalization was 1.6 cases per 100,000 men/year, which represented 0.02% of all hospital admissions in men [5]. We found a slightly higher hospitalization rate, with 2.7 cases per 100,000 men/year, or 0.023% of all hospital admissions in men/year. The differences between the two studies may be attributed to the different epidemiological and social situations in the populations. In women, we found an FG hospitalization rate of 0.64 per 100,000 women/year or 0.005% of all admissions. We cannot compare these results with previous findings because we identified no studies that specifically reported FG hospitalization in women.
FG predominantly affects men [15,16]; in fact, some publications have reported no cases in women [17,18], although others have found a prevalence ranging from 13% to 30% [9,11,15,19]. The proportion of women observed in our study (17.5%) was within the upper range reported in the most recent publications, possibly because we searched for ICD-10 diagnostic code N76.89. However, there are an increasing number of reports on FG in women [9,11]. Different case series have shown higher mortality in women than in men with this condition [10,19,20,21], which is in line with our findings.
According to previous studies, the main comorbidities associated with FG include diabetes, alcoholism, cardiovascular disease, and alcohol consumption [11,15,16,17]. The main comorbidities in our study were hypertension (44.9%), diabetes mellitus (35.3%), dyslipidemia (25.3%), smoking (18.3%), obesity (14.3%), and neoplasms (12.6%), and when we analyzed the differences by gender/sex, a smaller proportion of women had hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or a smoking habit and a larger proportion were obese.
In our population-based study, older age was the primary risk factor for mortality, as other studies [22,23]. In contrast, other studies have shown no association between older age alone and mortality risk [11,24].
Several meta-analyses have reported an association between kidney failure and increased mortality [9,25,26,27]. In our study, CKD and AKI were the risk factors for mortality. Early diagnosis of acute injury and consideration of solutions such as dialysis may provide patients with a better chance of survival [9].
Men and women with neoplasms had a higher mortality risk in our study, as reported in previous publications [9,27,28]. Several studies have linked hypotension with mortality [11,27]. Although we were unable to specifically evaluate hypotension, we analyzed sepsis accompanied by hypotension and AKI. Sepsis and AKI were relevant mortality risk factors in both men and women with FG. Therefore, as other authors have commented [11,28,29], it is important to diagnose hemodynamic instability and parameters of sepsis and septic shock in people with infections, specifically FG, to intensify therapeutic efforts [28,29].
Previous studies have linked ICU admission to higher mortality [11,30]. Individuals who require ICU admission typically have hemodynamic instability related to hypotension, sepsis, and kidney failure. The multivariable analysis we fitted to define the confounding factors showed significant associations between mortality and these variables, including sepsis, acute kidney injury, and ICU admission, and independent factors of poor prognosis [31].
In this study, we were unable to obtain information regarding treatment. The therapeutic strategy for FG should be based on hemodynamic stabilization, early radical surgical debridement, wide-spectrum antibiotic therapy, daily cleaning and dressing, hyperbaric oxygen therapy in some cases, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy [15,29]. Initial debridement with sufficient resection of nonviable tissues is considered the most important factor for survival [25,29]. In our study, we include patients who have undergone surgical debridement. However, we were unable to evaluate the number of debridements each patient received. As we had no information on non-surgical treatments, we were unable to evaluate their impact on mortality.
The main strength of this study was that our data source enabled the analysis of FG hospitalization and mortality risk factors for each sex separately. While other studies have analyzed mortality risk factors in patients with FG, none have included an in-depth comparison of the findings in men and women.
However, our study had several limitations. First, it relies on administrative databases, which assumes that the ICD-10 codes used accurately represent the same disease (one code is specific to FG in men, while the code for women is not specific to FG). Since patients with FG typically require debridement, we included only those who underwent surgery to reduce the nonspecific nature of the ICD code for women. Second, the database recorded admissions rather than patients, and if a patient was admitted more than once for FG, each admission was treated as a separate unit of analysis. Third, the information available for each admission included a set of coded diagnoses at discharge. Attending clinicians sometimes record only the diagnoses that they consider most relevant, and do not always use diagnostic codes. Consequently, we may have been missed. Fourth we had no information on the extent of FG (perineal, abdominal, etc.) or non-surgical treatment (pharmacotherapy, fluid therapy, etc.). Fifth, this type of administrative database contained no laboratory results, meaning that we were unable to analyze the different FG mortality risk scales. Sixth, we did not have detailed microbiological information and only generic ICD-10 codes for microbiological infections. Finally, the time from symptom onset to admission is unknown. This is an important factor because people who die from FG tend to have a longer duration of symptoms at admission [9].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, FG predominantly affected men with approximately 2 out of every 10 cases occurring in women. We observed a high FG mortality rate, which was slightly higher in women, people aged ≥ 65 years (especially those aged ≥ 80 years), and people with CKD, sepsis, AKI, and ICU admission. The independent factors associated with mortality were similar in both sexes, except for neoplasia and CKD (not significant in women). The Spanish medical administrative registry provides key information about the public health burden of FG in Spain, highlighting comorbidity and mortality in both sexes.

Author Contributions

I.B.-R.: Conceptualization; Investigation; Writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. A.R.-B.: Data curation; formal analysis; writing, reviewing, and editing. E.L.-M.: Data curation; formal analysis; V.S.-G.: Investigation; Writing, review, and editing. J.-M.R.-R.: Conceptualization; Data curation; formal analysis; Investigation; Writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not require ethics committee approval or informed consent from participants, according to Spanish legislation. To guarantee patient anonymity, the Spanish Health Ministry provided a database after removing all possible patient identifiers.

Informed Consent Statement

This study was approved by the Spain Data Protection Agency. According to Spain legislation; neither approval from the ethics committee nor informed consent from the study populations are required for registry linkage studies.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The database is provided by the Spanish Health Ministry and is intended for research or administrative purposes; therefore, it is not freely available to the public.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Transparency Statement

The corresponding author, Jose-Manuel Ramos-Rincon, affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported, that no important aspects of the study have been omitted, and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

References

  1. Fournier, A. Gangéne foudroyante de la verge. Sem. Med. 1883, 3, 345–348. [Google Scholar]
  2. Desai, R.; Batura, D. A contemporaneous narrative review of Fournier’s gangrene. Urologia 2023, 90, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bowen, D.; Hughes, T.; Juliebø-Jones, P.; Somani, B. Fournier’s gangrene: A review of predictive scoring systems and practical guide for patient management. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2024, 11, 20499361241238521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Arora, A.; Rege, S.; Surpam, S.; Gothwal, K.; Narwade, A. Predicting Mortality in Fournier Gangrene and Validating the Fournier Gangrene Severity Index: Our Experience with 50 Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in India. Urol. Int. 2019, 102, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sorensen, M.D.; Krieger, J.N.; Rivara, F.P.; Broghammer, J.A.; Klein, M.B.; Mack, C.D.; Wessells, H. Fournier’s Gangrene: Population based epidemiology and outcomes. J. Urol. 2009, 181, 2120–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Doluoğlu, Ö.G.; Karagöz, M.A.; Kılınç, M.F.; Karakan, T.; Yuceturk, C.N.; Sarici, H.; Ozgur, B.C.; Eroglu, M. Overview of different scoring systems in Fournier’s Gangrene and assessment of prognostic factors. Turk. J. Urol. 2016, 42, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wirjopranoto, S.; Affandi, M.R.; Ashari, F.Y.; Azmi, Y.A.; Soetanto, K.M. Evaluating prognostic indicators for in-hospital mortality in Fournier’s gangrene: A 7-year study in a tertiary hospital. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2024, 96, 12387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yilmazlar, T.; Ozturk, E.; Ozguc, H.; Ercan, I.; Vuruskan, H.; Oktay, B. Fournier’s gangrene: An analysis of 80 patients and a novel scoring system. Tech. Coloproctol. 2010, 14, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tosun, Y.; Akıncı, O.; Küçük, H.F. Risk factors for mortality in Fournier’s gangrene of anorectal origin. Ulus. Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022, 28, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ferretti, M.; Saji, A.A.; Phillips, J. Fournier’s Gangrene: A Review and Outcome Comparison from 2009 to 2016. Adv. Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2017, 6, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Temoçin, F.; Atilla, A.; Kuruoğlu, T.; Kamalı-Polat, A. Fournier’s Gangrene: Microbiological Profile and Risk Factors for Mortality: Review of 97 Cases. Infect. Dis. Clin. Microbiol. 2023, 5, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Real Decreto 69/2015, de 6 de febrero, por el que se regula el Registro de Actividad de Atención Sanitaria Especializada. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 1235: 10790-10890. Available online: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/docs/BOE_RD_69_2015_RAE_CMBD.pdf (accessed on 3 August 2024).
  13. Montero-Vilchez, T.; Grau-Perez, M.; Garcia-Doval, I. Epidemiology and Geographic Distribution of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis in Spain: A National Population-Based Study of Hospital Admissions from 2016 to 2020. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2023, 114, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ramos-Rincón, J.M.; Pinargote-Celorio, H.; González-de-la-Aleja, P.; Sánchez-Payá, J.; Reus, S.; Rodríguez-Díaz, J.-C.; Merino, E. Impact of influenza related hospitalization in Spain: Characteristics and risk factor of mortality during five influenza seasons (2016 to 2021). Front. Public Health 2024, 12, 1360372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bensardi, F.Z.; Hajri, A.; Kabura, S.; Bouali, M.; El Bakouri, A.; El Hattabi, K.; Fadil, A. Fournier’s gangrene: Seven years of experience in the emergencies service of visceral surgery at Ibn Rochd University Hospital Center. Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond.) 2021, 71, 102821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, A.; Ahmed, K.; Aydin, A.; Khan, M.S.; Dasgupta, P. Fournier’s gangrene. A clinical review. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2016, 88, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiménez-Pacheco, A.; Arrabal-Polo, M.Á.; Arias-Santiago, S.; Arrabal-Martín, M.; Nogueras-Ocaña, M.; Zuluaga-Gómez, A. Fournier gangrene: Description of 37 cases and analysis of associated health care costs. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2012, 103, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Oyelowo, N.; Ahmed, M.; Lawal, A.T.; Sudi, A.; Tolani, A.M.M.A.; Fidelis, L.; Bello, A.; Maitama, H.Y. Fournier’s gangrene: Presentation and predictors of mortality in Zaria, Nigeria. Ann. Afr. Med. 2021, 20, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shet, P.; Mustafa, A.D.; Varshney, K.; Rao, L.; Sawdagar, S.; McLennan, F.; Ansari, S.; Shet, D.; Sivathamboo, N.; Campbell, S. Risk Factors for Mortality Among Patients With Fournier Gangrene: A Systematic Review. Surg. Infect. 2024, 25, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koch, G.E.; Abbasi, B.; Agoubi, L.; Breyer, B.N.; Clark, N.; Dick, B.P.; Friedrich, J.B.; Hampson, L.A.; Hernandez, A.; Maine, R.; et al. Multidisciplinary management in Fournier’s gangrene. Curr. Probl. Surg. 2024, 61, 101499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khalid, A.; Devakumar, S.; Huespe, I.; Kashyap, R.; Chisti, I. A Comprehensive Literature Review of Fournier’s Gangrene in Females. Cureus 2023, 15, e38953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Furr, J.; Watts, T.; Street, R.; Cross, B.; Slobodov, G.; Patel, S. Contemporary trends in the inpatient management of Fournier’s gangrene: Predictors of length of stay and mortality based on population-based sample. Urology 2017, 102, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, S.Y.; Dupree, J.M.; Le, B.V.; Kim, D.Y.; Zhao, L.C.; Kundu, S.D. A contemporary analysis of Fournier gangrene using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Urology 2015, 85, 1052–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tenório, C.E.L.; Lima, S.V.C.; Albuquerque, A.V.; Cavalcanti, M.P.; Teles, F. Risk factors for mortality in fournier’s gangrene in a general hospital: Use of simplified founier gangrene severe index score (SFGSI). Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2018, 44, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lin, T.Y.; Ou, C.H.; Tzai, T.S.; Tong, Y.; Chang, C.; Cheng, H.; Yang, W.; Lin, Y. Validation and simplification of Fournier’s Gangrene Severity Index. Int. J. Urol. 2014, 21, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tufano, A.; Dipinto, P.; Passaro, F.; Anceschi, U.; Franco, G.; Flammia, R.S.; Proietti, F.; Antonelli, L.; Di Pierro, G.B.; Prata, F.; et al. The Value of Fournier’s Gangrene Scoring Systems on Admission to Predict Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. El-Qushayri, A.E.; Khalaf, K.M.; Dahy, A.; Mahmoud, A.R.; Benmelouka, A.Y.; Ghozy, S.; Mahmoud, M.U.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Alkahtani, S.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. Fournier’s gangrene mortality: A 17-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 92, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Simsek, A. Perianal Infections in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy: The Risk of Fournier’s Gangrene Leading to Mortality and Irreversible Organ Damage. Wounds 2022, 34, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, K.F.; Shi, C.X.; Chen, S.Y.; Wei, W. Progress in Multidisciplinary Treatment of Fournier’s Gangrene. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 6869–6880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bozkurt, F.T.; Öncel, H.F.; Salar, R. Predictive factors for mortality in intensive care patients with Fournier’s gangrene: Five years’ experience from a single center in Turkey. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2023, 27, 2326–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rello, J.; Valenzuela-Sánchez, F.; Ruiz-Rodriguez, M.; Moyano, S. Sepsis: A review of advances in management. Adv. Ther. 2017, 34, 2393–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Yearly Fournier gangrene, in all patients, men and women.
Figure 1. Yearly Fournier gangrene, in all patients, men and women.
Medicina 60 01600 g001
Figure 2. Independent risk factors for hospital mortality in all patients, men and women with Fournier gangrene (adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals).
Figure 2. Independent risk factors for hospital mortality in all patients, men and women with Fournier gangrene (adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals).
Medicina 60 01600 g002
Table 1. International Classification Disease 10th edition (ICD-10) codes used in the study.
Table 1. International Classification Disease 10th edition (ICD-10) codes used in the study.
ICD-10 Codes
Diseases
Fournier Gangrene for men N49.3
Fournier gangrene in women (other specified inflammation of vagina and vulva)N76.89
Comorbidities
HypertensionI10; I11; I12; I13; I15
Diabetes mellitusE10; E11
DyslipidemiaE78
SmokingF17
NeoplasmsC01; C02; C03; C04; C05; C06; C07; C08; C09; C10; C11; C12; C13; C14; C15; C16; C17; C18; C19; C20; C21; C22; C23; C24; C25; C26; C27; C28; C29; C30; C31; C32; C33; C34; C35; C36; C37; C38; C39; C40; C41; C42; C43; C44; C45; C46; C47; C48; C49; C50; C51; C52; C53; C54; C55; C56; C57; C58; C59; C60; C61; C62; C63; C64; C65; C66; C67; C68; C69; C70; C71; C72; C73; C74; C75; C76; C77; C78; C79; C80
ObesityE66
Chronic kidney diseaseN18
Alcohol consumptionF10
Ischemic heart diseaseI21; I22; I23; I24; I25
COPDJ44
Heart failureI50
LeukemiaC92; C93; C94; C95; C96
LymphomaC81; C82; C83; C84; C85; C86; C87; C88; C89; C90; C91
CirrhosisK74
Vascular diseaseI73
Hepatitis CB18.2; B19.20; B19.21
HIVB20
TransplantZ94
Complications
SepsisA40; A41
Acute kidney injuryN17
Pulmonary embolismI26
Microbiology
Escherichia coliB96.2
StreptococcusB95.0; B95.1; B95.4; B95.5
StaphylococcusB96.6; B95.7; B95.8
PseudomonasB96.5
Table 2. Episodes and crude and standardized rate of hospitalization per 1000 all-cause admissions and per 100,000 inhabitants (men, women, and both).
Table 2. Episodes and crude and standardized rate of hospitalization per 1000 all-cause admissions and per 100,000 inhabitants (men, women, and both).
MenWomenTotal
NRH aRH bNRH aRH bNRH aRH b
Crude Rates
20163660.171.6910.040.44570.101.0
20173860.181.7910.040.44770.101.0
20185100.232.21210.050–56310.141.4
20194920.222.11010.040.45930.131.3
20205810.302.51240.060.57050.171.5
20216700–322.91110.050.57810.181.6
Mean4900.232.71060.050.45960.141.7
Standarized rates *
2016-0.1821.7-0.0420.4-0.1071.0
2017-0.1861.8-0.0390.4-0.1081.0
2018-0.2392.4-0.0490.5-0.1381.4
2019-0.2312.3-0.0410.4-0.1311.3
2020-0.3192.6-0.0610.5-0.1821.5
2021-0.3303.0-0.0470.4-0.1811.6
Mean-0.243.0-0.050.4-0.141.3
* Adjusted by age using the direct method of standardization. Abbreviations: N, sample size (number of admissions); RH, rate of hospitalizations. a Number of hospitalizations for Fournier gangrene per 1000 all-cause admissions per year. b Number of hospitalizations for Fournier gangrene per 100,000 inhabitants per year.
Table 3. General characteristics of the population and differences between men and women.
Table 3. General characteristics of the population and differences between men and women.
Total aMen aWomen ap Value b
Total3641 (100) 3004 (82.5)637 (17.5)
Age (years)
median (IQR)63(49–76)63 (55–73)62 (49–76)0.059
<64 y1950 (53.5)1605 (53.4)345 (51.0)<0.001
65–70 y1179 (22.4)1007 (33.5)173 (26.9)
≥80 y515 (14.1)293 (13.1)122 (19.7)
Primary diagnosis 3114 (85.5)2618 (87.1)496 (77.5)<0.001
Comorbidities
Hypertension1637 (44.9)1371 (45.6)266 (41.6)0.066
Diabetes mellitus1288 (35.3)1060 (35.3)228 (35.7)0.845
Dyslipidemia921 (25.3)761 (25.3)160 (25.0)0.920
Smoking666 (18.3)602 (20.0)63 (10.0)<0.001
Obesity520 (14.3)385 (12.8)135 (21.1)<0.001
Neoplasms458 (12.6)392 (13.0)66 (10.3)0.066
Alcohol consumption344 (9.4)335 (11.1)9 (1.4)<0.001
Chronic kidney disease306 (8.4)239 (7.9)68 (10.6)0.028
COPD262 (7.2)252 (8.4)10 (1.6)<0.001
Heart failure258 (7.1)195 (6.5)63 (9.9)0.003
Ischemic heart disease229 (6.3)206 (6.9)23 (3.6)0.003
Hepatitis C55 (1.5)50 (1.7)5 (0.8)0.109
Cirrhosis37 (1.0)36 (1.291 (0.2)0.014
Lymphoma35 (1.0)24 (0.9)11 (1.7)0.042
Leukemia27 (0.7)20 (0.7)7 (1.1)0.250
Vascular disease
Transplant26 (0.7)24 (0.8)2 (0.390.185
HIV18 (0.5)15 (0.5)3 (0.5)1.00
Complications
Sepsis828 (22.7)669 (23.3)159 (24.9)0.151
Acute kidney injury627 (17.2)16.9 (50)120 (18.8)0.249
Pulmonary embolism29 (0.9)23 (0.8)6 (0.9)0.625
ICU admission189 (29.8)1119 (31.1)930 (31.4)0.436
Days in ICU, median (IQR)5 (2–11)4 (2–11)6 (2–13)0.140
Hospital mortality588 (20.9)455 (15.1)133 (20.9)0.002
Days in hospital, median (IQR)18 (8–33)18 (9–33)16 (6–32)0.002
Surgical intervention
<48 h after intervention 2918 (80.1)2398 (79.8)520 (81.4)0.365
Microbiology (ICD-10 code)
Escherichia coli519 (14.2)427 (14.2992 (14.4)0.902
Streptococcus269 (7.4)223 (7.4)46 (7.290.845
Staphylococcus190 (5.2)166 (5.5)24 (3.9)0.068
Pseudomonas163 (4.5)140 (4.7)23 (3.6)0.239
a The results are presented as number (%) of admissions unless otherwise specified. b Significant p values (<0.05) are in bold. Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision; ICU, intensive care unit, IQR, interquartile range; N, sample size (number of admissions).
Table 4. Episodes and crude and standardized rate * of mortality per 1000 Spanish cases of death and per 100,000 inhabitants (men, women, and both).
Table 4. Episodes and crude and standardized rate * of mortality per 1000 Spanish cases of death and per 100,000 inhabitants (men, women, and both).
MenWomenTotal
NRH aRH bNRH aRH bNRH aRH b
Crude rates
2016670.220.29190.080.08860.150.18
2017670.310.29150.070.06820.190.18
2018650.300.28250.190.10900.210.19
2019660.310.28230.110.10890.210.19
2020870.350.37250.100.101120.230.23
20211030.440.44260.120.101290.290.27
Mean750.310.33220.0100.09970.210.21
Standardized rates *
2016-0.40.33 0.330.08 0.430.19
2017-0.500.32 0.140.05 0.380.17
2018-0.410.31 0.240.09 0.350.19
2019-0.380.31 0.170.08 0.310.18
2020-0.630.40 0.480.10 0.580.24
2021-0.580.48 0.230.09 0.460.27
Mean-0.500.36 0.270.08 0.420. 21
* Adjusted by age using the direct method of standardization. Abbreviations: N, sample size (number of admissions); RH, rate of hospitalizations. a Number of hospitalizations for Fournier gangrene per 1000 all-cause deaths during admission per year. b Number of hospitalizations for Fournier gangrene per 100,000 inhabitants per year.
Table 5. Comparison of hospital mortality in men and women.
Table 5. Comparison of hospital mortality in men and women.
HM in men, % (n/N) aHM in women, % (n/N) aOR (95% CI)p Value b
Total 15.1 (455/3004)20.9 (133/637)1.48 (1.19–1.83)0.001
Age in years
<64 y7.9 (127/1605)10.2 (35/344)0.98 (0.69–1.38)0.163
65–80 y20.0 (201/1006)28.7 (49/171)1.44 (1.03–1.96)0.015
≥80 y32.3 (127/393)40.2 (49/122)1.29 (0.94–1.78)0.126
Hypertension
No13.3 (218/1634)14.5 (54/372)1.03 (0.80–1.52)0.557
Yes17.3 (237/1370)29.8 (79/265)2.03 (1.50–2.73)<0.001
Diabetes
No16.2 (315/1944)18.2 (75/411)1.15 (0.87–1.52)0.311
Yes13.2 (150/1060)25.5 (58/226)2.27 (1.60–3.21)<0.001
Dyslipidemia
No15.1 (338/2244)20.5 (98/477)1.45 (1.13–1.87)0.003
Yes15.4 (117/760)21.9 (35/160)1.53 (1.00–2.15)0.060
Smoking
No16.1 (387/2402)21.6 (124/573)1.14 (1.43–1.80)0.002
Yes11.3 (68/602)14.1 (9/64)1.28 (0.60–2.71)0.532
Neoplasms
No12.8 (335/2612)20.0 (114/571)1.69 (1.34–2.14)<0.001
Yes30.6 (120/392)28.8 (19/66)0.91 (0.51–1.62)0.885
Obesity
No15.3 (401/2620)20.7 (104/503)1.44 (1.13–1.83)0.003
Yes14.1 (54/384)21.6 (29/134)1.68 (1.02–2.780.055
Chronic kidney disease
No13.7 (378/2766)18.1 (103/569)1.39 (1.09–177)0.006
Yes32.4 (77/238)44.1 (30/68)1.65 (0.95–2.86)0.084
Alcohol consumption
No14.9 (398/2669)20.9 (131/628)1.50 (1.21–1.87)<0.001
Yes17.0 (57/335)22.2 (2/9)1.39 (0.28–6.88)0.656
Ischemic heart disease
No14.8 (413/2798)20.5 (126/614)1.49 (1.19–1.86)<0.001
Yes20.4 (42/206)30.4 (7/23)1.71 (0.66–4.42)0.286
COPD
No14.3 (394/2752)20.7 (130/627)1.56 (1.26–1.95)<0.001
Yes24.2 (61/252)30.0 (3/10)1.34 (0.33–5.34)0.710
Heart failure
No13.4 (377/2810)19.2 (110/574)1.53 (1.21–1.93)<0.001
Yes40.2 (78/194)36.5 (23/63)0.85 (0.76–1.53)0.603
Leukemia
No15.0 (449/2984)20.5 (129/630)1.45 (1.17–1.80)<0.001
Yes30.0 (6/20)57.1 (4/7)3.11 (0.52–18.3)0.376
Lymphoma
No15.0 (448/2980)20.8 (130/626)1.48 (1.19–1.84)<0.001
Yes29.2 (7/24)27.3 (3/11)0.91 (1.18–4.47)1.00
Cirrhosis
No15.0 (446/2968)20.9 (579/3604)1.49 (1.20–1.85)<0.001
Yes25.0 (9/36)0.0 (0/1)NA1.00
Hepatitis C
No15.0 (443/2954)20.9 (132/632)1.49 (1.20–1.85)<0.001
Yes24.4 (12/50)20.0(1/5)0.79 (0.08–7.78)1.00
HIV
No15.2 (454/2989)20.7 (131/634)1.45 (1.17–1.80)0.001
Yes6.7 (1/15)66.7 (2/3)28.0 (1.2–648)0.056
Transplant
No15.0 (448/2980)20.9 (133/635)1.49 (1.20–1.83)<0.001
Yes29.2 (7/24)29.2 (0/2)NA1.00
Sepsis
No9.2 (214/2236)13.4 (64/479)1.53 (1.13–2.06)0.005
Yes36.1 (241/668)43.7 (69/158)1.37 (0.96–1.95)0.083
Acute kidney injury
No9.9 (248/2497)13.7 (71/518)1.44 (1.08–1.91)0.011
Yes40.8 (207/507)52.1 (62/119)1.56 (1.05–2.35)0.035
Pulmonary embolism
No15.9 (447/2981)20.8 (131/631)1.48 (1.19–1.84)<0.001
Yes34.8 (8/23)33.3 (2/6)0.93 (0.14–6.28)1.00
ICU admission
No10.1 (205/2033)15.1 (67/445)1.58 (1.17–2.18)0.002
Yes26.4 (245/929)34.8 (65/187) 1.48 (1.06–2.07)0.025
a The results are presented as percentage (number of events/sample size). b Significant p values (<0.05) are in bold. Abbreviations: NA: not available; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HM, hospital mortality; ICU, intensive care unit; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio.
Table 6. Risk factors for hospital mortality in all patients (n = 3004), men (n = 3004), and women (n = 558) with Fournier gangrene.
Table 6. Risk factors for hospital mortality in all patients (n = 3004), men (n = 3004), and women (n = 558) with Fournier gangrene.
All Patients Men Female
Hospital Mortality, % (n/N) ap Value bHospital mortality, % (n/N) ap Value bHospital mortality, % (n/N) ap Value b
Total 16.1 (588/3641)15.1 (445/3004)20.9 (133/558)
Sex
Male15.1 (445/3004)
Female20.9 (133/558)<0.001
Age
< 64 y8.3 (162(1949)7.9 (127/1605)10.2 (35/344)
65–70 y21.2 (250/1177)<0.00120.0 (201/1006)<0.00128.7 (49/171)<0.001
≥ 80 y34.0 (176/517)<0.00132.3 (127/393)<0.00140.2 (49/122)<0.001
Hypertension
No13.6 (272/2006)13.3 (218/634)14.5 (54/372)
Yes19.3 (316/163)<0.00117.3 (237–1370)0.00329.8 (79/265)<0.001
Diabetes
No16.6 (390/2355)16.2 (315/1944)18.2 (75/411)
Yes15.4 (198/1288)0.37113.2 (140/1060)0.02925.7 (58/226)0.032
Dyslipidemia
No16.0 (436/2722)15.1 (338/2244)20.5 (98/477)
Yes16.5 (152/921)0.71715.4 (117/760)0.39821.9 (35/160)0.720
Smoking
No17.2 (511/2977)16.1 (387/2402)21.0 (124/573)
Yes11.6 (77/666)<0.00111.3 (68/602)0.00314.1 (9/64)0.195
Neoplasms
No14.1 (449/3185)12.8 (335/2612)20.0 (114/571)
Yes30.3 (139/458)<0.00130.6 (120/392)<0.00128.8 (19/66)0.916
Obesity
No16.2 (505/3124)15.3 (401/2620)20.7 (104/503)
Yes16.0 (83/519)0.94614.1 (54/384)0.59321.6 (29/134)0.811
Chronic kidney disease
No14.4 (481/335)13.7 (378/2766)18.1 (103/569)
Yes34.7 (107/308)<0.00132.4 (77/238)<0.00144.1 (30/68)<0.001
Alcohol consumption
No16.0 (529/3299)14.9 (398/2669)20.9 (131/628)
Yes17.2 (59/344)0.59217.5 (57/335)0.33222.2 (2/9)0.988
Ischemic heart disease
No15.8 (539/3414)14.8 (413/2798)20.8 (126/614)
Yes21.4 (49/229)0.03220.4 (42/206)0.03430.4 (7/23)0.293
COPD
No15.5 (524/3381) 14.3 (394/2752)20.7 (130/627)
Yes24.4 (64/262)<0.00124.2 (61/252)<0.00130.0 (3/10)0.443
Heart failure
No14.4 (487/3386)13.4 (377/2810)19.2 (110/574)
Yes39.3 (101/257)<0.00140.2 (78/194)<0.00126.5 (23/63)0.003
Leukemia
No16.0 (578/3616)15.0 (449/2984)20.5 (129/630)
Yes37.0 (10/17)0.00730.0 (6/20)0.10657.1 (4/7)0.038
Lymphoma
No16.0 (578/3608)15.0 (4482980)20.3 (130/627)
Yes28.6 (10/35)0.06129.2 (7/24)0.07827.3 (3711)0.706
Cirrhosis
No16.1 (579/2606)15.0 (446/2968)20.9 (133/636)
Yes24.3 (9/37)0.1725.0 (9/36)0.1020.0 (0/11)1.00
Hepatitis C
No16.0 (575/3588)15.3 (443/2954)20.9 (132/632)
Yes23.6 (13/55)0.13824.0 (12/60)0.53120.0 (1/5)1.00
HIV
No16.1 (585/3625)15.2 (454/2989)20.7 (131/634)
Yes16.7 (3/18)1.006.7 (1/15)0.21366.7 (273)0.112
Transplant
No16.1 (581/3617)15.0 (448/2980)20.9 (133/635
Yes26.9 (7/26)0.17429.2 (7/24)0.0780.0 (0/2)1.00
Sepsis
No9.9 (278/2817)9.2 (214/2336)13.4 (64/479)
Yes37.5 (310/826)<0.00136.1 (241/668)<0.00143.7 (69/479)<0.001
Acute kidney injury
No10.6 (319/3017)9.9 (248/2497)13.7 (71/518)
Yes43.0 (269/626)<0.00140.8 (207/507)<0.00152.1 (62/119)<0.001
Pulmonary embolism
No16.0 (578/3614)15.0 (447/2981)20.8 (131/631)
Yes34.5 (10/29)0.01834.8 (8/23)0.01633.3 (2/6)0.610
ICU admission
No10.7 (272/2480)10.1 (205/2033)15.3 (67/445)
Yes27.8 (310/1160)<0.00126.4 (245/929)<0.00134.8 (65/187)<0.001
a The results are presented as percentage (number of events/sample size). b Significant p values (<0.05) are in bold. Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ICU, intensive care unit; N, sample size (number of admissions).
Table 7. Odds ratio for hospital mortality in all patients (n = 3004), men (n = 3004), and women (n = 558) with Fournier gangrene.
Table 7. Odds ratio for hospital mortality in all patients (n = 3004), men (n = 3004), and women (n = 558) with Fournier gangrene.
All Patients Men Female
OR (95% CI)p Value aOR (95% CI)p Value aOR (95% CI)p Value a
Total
Sex
Male1
Female1.48 (1.19–1.83)<0.001
Age
<64 y111
65–70 y2.98 (2.40–3.68)<0.0012.90 (2.30–3.70)<0.0013.54 (2.19–5.74)<0.001
≥80 y5.69 (4.40–7.35)<0.0015.55 (4.20–7.34)<0.0015.92 (3.8–9.80)<0.001
Hypertension
No111
Yes1.55 (1.27–1.82)<0.0011.35 (1.11–1.65)0.0032.50 (1.69–3.62)<0.001
Diabetes
No111
Yes0.91 (0.76–1.10)0.3710.78 (0.63–0.97)0.0291.54 (1.05–2.29)0.032
Dyslipidemia
No111
Yes1.03 (0.84–1.26)0.7171.02 (0.82–1.29)0.3981.08 (0.70–1.64)0.720
Smoking
No111
Yes0.63 (0.49–0.81)<0.0010.66 (0.50–0.87)0.0030.59 (0.28–1.23)0.195
Neoplasms
No111
Yes2.65 (2.12–3.21)<0.0012.99 (2.35–3.82)<0.0011.62 (0.91–2.86)0.916
Obesity
No111
Yes0.98 (0.76–1.27)0.9460.90 (0.67–1.23)0.5931.06 (0.66–168)0.811
Chronic kidney disease
No111
Yes3.16 (2.45–4.07)<0.0013.02 (2.25–4.05)<0.0013.57 (2.11–6.03)<0.001
Alcohol consumption
No111
Yes1.08 (0.80–1.45)0.5921.17 (0.86–1.58)0.3321.84 (0.22–5.28)0.988
Ischemic heart disease
No111
Yes1.45 (1.04–2.02)0.0321.49 (1.03–2.11)0.0341.69 (0.68–4.20)0.293
COPD
No111
Yes1.76 (1.31–2.37)<0.0011.91 (1.40–2.60)<0.0011.63 (0.42–642)0.443
Heart failure
No111
Yes3.85 (2.94–5.04)<0.0014.33 (3.19–5.89)<0.0012.42 (1.39–4.21)0.003
Leukemia
No111
Yes3.09 (1.41–6.78)0.0072.40 (0.92–6.33)0.1065.18 (1.14–22.42)0.038
Lymphoma
No111
Yes2.09 (1.00–4.38)0.0612.32 (0.96–5.64)0.0781.43 (0.37–5.49)0.706
Cirrhosis
No111
Yes1.68 (0.78–3.58)0.171.88 (0.88–4.03)0.102NC1.00
Hepatitis C
No111
Yes1.63 (0.86–3.04)0.1381.79 (0.93–3.45)0.5310.42 (0.10–8.541.00
HIV
No111
Yes1.03 (0.30–3.61)1.000.39 (0.05–3.04)0.2137.69 (0.69–85.23)0.112
Transplant
No111
Yes1.92 (0.80–4.60)0.1742.32 (0.96–0.56)0.078NA1.00
Sepsis
No111
Yes5.48 (4.54–6.61)<0.0015.59 (4.53–6.91)<0.0016.02 (3.32–7.52)<0.001
Acute kidney injury
No111
Yes6.37 (5.23–7.55)<0.0016.25 (5.03–7.80)<0.0016.84 (4.41–10.71)<0.001
Pulmonary embolism
No111
Yes2.76 (1.28–5.97)0.0183.02 (1.27–7.11)0.0161.98 (0.34–10.53) 0.610
ICU admission
No111
Yes3.12 (2.63–3.74)<0.0013.19 (2.60–3.92)<0.0013.00 (2.02–4.47)<0.001
a Significant p values (<0.05) are in bold. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ICU, intensive care unit; N, sample size (number of admissions); OR, odds ratio; NA: not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Belinchón-Romer, I.; Ramos-Belinchón, A.; Lobato-Martínez, E.; Sánchez-García, V.; Ramos-Rincón, J.-M. National Study of Fournier Gangrene in Spain (2016–2021): Gender/Sex Differences in Mortality and Risks. Medicina 2024, 60, 1600. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101600

AMA Style

Belinchón-Romer I, Ramos-Belinchón A, Lobato-Martínez E, Sánchez-García V, Ramos-Rincón J-M. National Study of Fournier Gangrene in Spain (2016–2021): Gender/Sex Differences in Mortality and Risks. Medicina. 2024; 60(10):1600. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101600

Chicago/Turabian Style

Belinchón-Romer, Isabel, Alberto Ramos-Belinchón, Ester Lobato-Martínez, Verónica Sánchez-García, and José-Manuel Ramos-Rincón. 2024. "National Study of Fournier Gangrene in Spain (2016–2021): Gender/Sex Differences in Mortality and Risks" Medicina 60, no. 10: 1600. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101600

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop