Next Article in Journal
Coagulation Profile in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Overlapping Case of Advanced Systemic Sclerosis and IgG4-Related Disease after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Previous Article in Journal
Acquired Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Congenital Heart Disease: A Case Report
Previous Article in Special Issue
Successful Treatment of a Patient with Drug-Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease with Upadacitinib: A Case Report
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 60
Issue 2
10.3390/medicina60020267
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Audiological Manifestations in Patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

by
Vija Vainutienė
1,*,
Justinas Ivaška
2,
Jolanta Dadonienė
1,3,
Vilma Beleškienė
2,
Tatjana Ivaškienė
1 and
Eugenijus Lesinskas
2
1
State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Santariškių str. 5, LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
2
Clinic of Ear, Nose, Throat and Eye Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M.K. Čiurlionio str. 21, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
3
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M.K. Čiurlionio str. 21, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(2), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020267
Submission received: 23 December 2023 / Revised: 30 January 2024 / Accepted: 1 February 2024 / Published: 3 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) is a rare, autoimmune, multisystemic disease characterized by vasculitis and necrotizing granuloma that commonly affects the upper and lower respiratory tract and kidneys. Audiovestibular dysfunction in GPA diseases may have different clinical presentations. The aim of the present study was to evaluate hearing function in patients with GPA and to compare the results with a healthy control group. Materials and Methods: A total of 34 individuals participated in the study. The GPA group consisted of 14 participants, and the control group was composed of 20 healthy participants with no signs or symptoms of ear disease. The ages ranged from 18 to 65 years old, with a mean age of 43.8 years. The participants underwent a complete audiological evaluation using otoscopy, impedance audiometry, pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry—evaluation of speech thresholds, and speech recognition in quiet. Both ears were tested. All of the participants of the study were native Lithuanian speakers. Data were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System software SAS® Studio 3.8. A p value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Results: 92.85% of patients from the GPA group reported hearing-related symptoms: hearing loss, tinnitus, and fullness in the ears. The arithmetic means of all hearing thresholds at frequencies from 125 Hz to 8000 Hz were significantly higher in the GPA group. The results revealed statistically significant differences between the two groups in the Speech Detection Threshold, Speech Recognition Threshold, Speech Discomfort level, and Word Recognition Scores. Conclusions: The frequency of hearing loss, the average hearing thresholds, and speech thresholds were higher in GPA patients than in healthy individuals. The most common type of hearing loss was sensorineural. Audiological assessments should be considered during the routine evaluation of patients with GPA disease to prevent hearing-related disabilities.

1. Introduction

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), also known as Wegener‘s granulomatosis, is a rare, autoimmune, multisystemic disease characterized by vasculitis and necrotizing granuloma, mostly affecting the upper and lower respiratory tract and kidneys [1]. The disease was first reported by Heinz Klinger in 1931 and later described by Friedrich Wegener in 1936 [2,3]. GPA is a small vessel vasculitis and belongs to anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis [4]. The pathogenesis of GPA is complex, with important roles for ANCA, cellular immunity, neutrophils, fibroblasts, vascular endothelial cells, and inflammatory mediators [5,6].
The prevalence of GPA is 3–14 cases per million population per year, and the disease can occur in all racial groups, but Caucasians are the most affected [7,8]. The disease can appear at any age, and it affects both genders [9].
Patients with GPA usually report fatigue, night sweats, weight loss, and respiratory symptoms such as cough, recurrent sinusitis, epistaxis, and hemoptysis. Otorhinolaryngological symptoms may be the first clinical manifestation of the disease, as the upper respiratory tract is often affected [10,11]. The nasal cavity and the paranasal sinuses are the most frequent sites of GPA in the head and neck region [12]. Otologic manifestations occur in 8–65% of patients with GPA [13,14,15]. Otologic involvement in GPA can range from serous otitis media to sensorineural hearing loss and can occur during the course of the disease, in addition to being the first and only sign of GPA [16,17].
Hearing loss in GPA can vary in severity and can affect one or both ears. Delayed diagnosis and therapy can negatively affect the prognosis of hearing. Early detection and appropriate medical management are important to control inflammation and minimize the impact on hearing. In the medical literature, the analysis of the relationship between GPA and hearing loss is mostly based on pure tone audiometry. Data on the level of speech perception in patients with GPA, as determined by speech audiometry, are scarce, and no such study has been carried out in Lithuania so far.
The aim of the present study was to investigate audiological manifestations and to study the hearing status of patients with GPA.

2. Materials and Methods

A total of 34 individuals participated in the study. The GPA group consisted of 14 participants, and the control group consisted of 20 healthy participants with no signs or symptoms of ear disease. Both ears were tested. All of the participants of the study were native Lithuanian speakers. The diagnosis of GPA was confirmed at Vilnius University Santaros Clinics, Department of Rheumatology. At the time of diagnosis, the disease was classified as GPA if it met the 1990 ACR classification criteria [18]. Patients diagnosed with GPA between 2007 and 2023 were included in the study. Before inclusion into the study, it was ensured that all the patients met the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for GPA [19]. ANCA was detected using an indirect immunofluorescence assay and, if positive, was confirmed via an antigen-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All 14 patients with GPA underwent biopsies (sometimes multiple biopsies of different organs), and in 12 cases, a biopsy revealed granulomatous inflammation, consistent with the diagnosis of GPA or pauci-immune glomerulonephritis in the case of renal biopsy. In 2 cases, the biopsy results were non-specific, and the diagnosis of GPA was made on the basis of other criteria, such as a typical clinical presentation and an ANCA-positive result. The hearing assessment was carried out at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Department of Ear, nose and throat diseases between December 2022 and December 2023. All audiograms were reviewed and interpreted by the same otorhinolaryngologist.
The participants underwent a comprehensive audiological assessment comprising otoscopy, impedance audiometry, pure tone audiometry, and speech audiometry. The examination of the ear canal and the tympanic membrane was performed using an otoscope. The external ear, ear canal, and tympanic membrane were examined for any abnormalities or signs of infection. Tympanometry was performed using a Homoth impedance audiometer at a probe tone frequency of 226 Hz. The compliance of the tympanic membrane and the pressure in the middle ear were measured to identify conditions such as otitis media or Eustachian tube dysfunction. The results of tympanometry were presented in a graph showing compliance, gradient, and pressure. According to the normative values, the tympanograms were classified as Type A, Type B, or Type C curves [20]. Type A is a bell-shaped curve with maximum compliance at +50 to −100 daPa and indicates normal middle ear pressure. The Type B tympanogram is described as a flat curve with no maximum point of compliance. The most common cause of this pattern is reduced mobility of the tympanic membrane due to fluid in the middle ear. The type B tympanogram also corresponds to other pathology of the middle ear, such as tympanosclerosis, cholesteatoma, and middle ear tumors. The type C tympanogram is characterized by a bell-shaped curve in the negative pressure range (below −100 daPa) and indicates impaired Eustachian tube function [21].
Audiological examinations were performed in a double-walled sound-treated booth using a calibrated clinical audiometer (Interacoustics AC40, Assens, Denmark). Pure tone audiometry is a basic test to assess a person’s hearing thresholds at different frequencies. It provides pure tones of different frequencies and intensities to identify the softest sounds a person can hear. Pure tone audiometry was performed at frequencies of 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz both using air and bone conduction. The softest sound a person can hear at a given frequency is called a hearing threshold. In order to assess hearing sensitivity and to provide diagnostic information on the severity, type, and configuration of hearing loss, pure tone thresholds in air and bone were determined. Based on the results of pure tone audiometry, hearing loss was classified into conductive, sensorineural, and mixed. Conductive hearing loss (CHL) was defined when the air-bone gap was greater than 10 dB. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was defined when both the air and bone conduction thresholds were less than 15 dB with an air–bone gap less than 10 dB. Mixed hearing loss (MHL) was defined as a combination of conductive and sensorineural components [22].
Speech audiometry is used to assess participants’ speech perception abilities. It helps to determine the individual’s Speech Detection Threshold (SDT), Speech Recognition Threshold (SRT), Word Recognition Score (WRS), and Speech Discomfort Level (SDL). SDT is the lowest level at which the speech signal is heard. SRT is the intensity at which the patient understands and correctly repeats 50% of the items on the list. WRS is the percentage of test words that the patient repeats correctly. The WRS is administered at a comfortable listening level and assesses the person’s ability to recognize and understand spoken words. SDL is the level at which the speech sounds become uncomfortably loud or when the person feels discomfort [23]. Speech audiometry tests were administered using speech audiometry materials in the Lithuanian language. The speech stimuli were routed from a CD player (Panasonic DVD-S42, Dalian, China) to the clinical audiometer and delivered to the participants via TDH−39 headphones. For speech recognition, each participant was presented with a list of 25 bisyllabic phonetically balanced words in quiet. WRS was calculated by the percentage of correctly repeated words. SDL was measured by asking participants to indicate their discomfort in response to increasing levels of speech stimuli.
Data were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System software SAS® Studio 3.8 (Copyright © SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Descriptive statistics for continuous variables were presented as a mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between the groups were examined using two-way repeated measures ANOVA with the ear as within-subject and the group as between-subject factors. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The study was approved by the Vilnius Regional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Lithuania. The participants signed an informed consent form at the beginning of the study.

3. Results

Thirty-four individuals (17 females and 17 males) took part in the study. The ages ranged from 18 to 65 years old, with a mean age of 43.8 years. A detailed description of the participants is given in Table 1.
The mean duration of GPA was 2.8 years, ranging from 0.5 to 15 years. Overall, 71.4 % of the GPA cases were positive for ANCA.
Hearing-related symptoms such as hearing loss, tinnitus, fullness of the ears, and otalgia were reported by 92.9% of the GPA group (Table 2).
71.4% of patients in the GPA group had a type A tympanogram, 17.9% had a flat tympanogram (type B), and 10.7% had a non-measurable acoustic impedance due to the presence of the ventilation tube and the blockage of the external auditory canal by an exostosis. All control group subjects had normal tympanograms. In 60.7% of the GPA patients, the pure tone audiogram showed some degree of hearing loss. The most common type of hearing impairment was sensorineural (32.1%); 21.4% of the GPA patients had mixed hearing loss, and 7.1% had conductive hearing impairment. The arithmetic means of all hearing thresholds at all frequencies from 125 Hz to 8000 Hz were significantly higher in the GPA group compared to the controls (Table 3).
The highest hearing thresholds were observed in the GPA group with mixed hearing impairment (Table 4).
The speech audiometry test showed that the mean SDT was 32.9 ± 17.2 dB, SRT was 43.6 ± 17.6 dB, WRS was 97.4 ± 5.7%, and SDL was 97.9 ± 8.9 dB in the GPA group. The results in the control group were as follows: SDT 17.5 ± 4.2 dB, SRT 27.4 ± 3.9 dB, WRS 99.5 ± 1.3%, and SDL 101.1 ± 3.7 dB. The results of the GPA and control groups were compared using the analysis of variance model (ANOVA) for repeated measures. The results revealed statistically significant differences between the values of SDT, SRT, SDL, and WRS for both groups (Table 5).

4. Discussion

Otological manifestations, including chronic otitis media and sudden or progressive sensorineural hearing loss, have been described in various autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, polyarteritis nodosa, Churg–Strauss syndrome, temporal arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, Kawasaki disease, and Cogan‘s syndrome [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].
GPA is a rare, autoimmune disease that primarily affects small- to medium-sized blood vessels. The clinical manifestations of GPA are heterogeneous. While it predominantly involves the respiratory tract and kidneys, it can also affect various other organs, including the ears. The otological manifestations of GPA can have significant implications for hearing status. Hearing loss can have a significant impact on a patient’s quality of life, affecting communication, social relationships, and general well-being. According to the literature, otological signs are present in 8–65% of patients with GPA, mainly as auditory symptoms in the form of SNHL or CHL [13,14,34]. CHL in patients with GPA may develop due to granulation tissue affecting the middle ear, nasopharynx, or Eustachian tube [16,35]. Inner ear involvement, which leads to SNHL in GPA, is due to inner ear vasculitis, capillary occlusion, thickened vessel walls, and hemorrhages within the stria vascularis, spiral ligaments, and vestibule [36,37,38].
The incidence of audiological involvement in GPA varies across patient populations and studies. In a study by Wali et al., hearing impairment was found in 35% of patients with GPA [13]. Bakthavachalam et al. reported that 56% of patients with GPA had hearing loss, and the most common hearing loss was sensorineural in 47% of cases. The data by Bakthavachalam et al. indicate that other factors, such as age-related changes in hearing, may have influenced the results of the hearing tests performed on GPA patients in their study [39]. Age-related hearing loss, also known as presbycusis, is the most common cause of SNHL in elderly patients [40]. The age of the participants in our study ranged from 18 to 65 years. The patients over 65 years were excluded from our study to avoid age-related hearing loss. Our study revealed that 60.7% of patients with GPA had some degree of hearing loss in the pure tone audiogram. The most common type of hearing loss was sensorineural (32.1%). The highest hearing thresholds were observed in the GPA group with MHL.
Diagnosing the otological manifestations in GPA can be challenging, as symptoms may be non-specific and overlap with other ear disorders [41]. Hearing assessments in individuals with GPA require both pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry. Pure tone audiometry can help to identify any hearing loss associated with GPA disease and determine the degree and configuration of the hearing loss. Speech audiometry helps to assess patients’ ability to hear and understand specific types of speech stimuli [42]. Speech audiometry tests performed in our study indicated that patients with GPA had higher speech thresholds compared to the control group. The results revealed statistically significant differences between the GPA and control groups in SDT, SRT, SDL, and WRS.
The diagnostic challenges discussed by Thornton et al. highlight the importance of a combination of otoscopic examination, audiometric tests, and imaging studies to assess the nature and extent of hearing impairment [43]. Usually, otologic symptoms are non-specific findings, ranging from mild inflammation to profound hearing loss, and may affect one or both ears. A review by Kempf et al. emphasizes the clinical heterogeneity of GPA, including the variable manifestation of hearing loss [44]. Patients may experience a gradual onset of symptoms or a sudden decline in hearing function. Otological symptoms may include tinnitus, dizziness, and fullness in the ears. Ear involvement may occur during the course of the disease, but it should be noted that hearing loss may be the initial symptom of GPA [17,45,46]. The study by Bakthavachalam et al. suggests that GPA should be considered if hearing loss is permanent or acute [39].
In our study, 92.9% of patients with GPA reported hearing-related symptoms, such as hearing loss, tinnitus, fullness in the ears, and otalgia. Our study revealed that otological symptoms as initial manifestations of GPA have been observed in five patients (35.7% cases): two patients presented with GPA as acute serous otitis media, two others were diagnosed with GPA after persistent purulent inflammation of the middle ear, and in one case, GPA was diagnosed at the onset of sensorineural hearing loss with facial nerve palsy. A study by Fauci et al. revealed that serous otitis media was the initial symptom of GPA in 25% of GPA patients, and hearing loss was the initial symptom in 6% of cases [47].

5. Conclusions

Based on our study, we conclude that GPA patients had a higher prevalence of hearing impairment and a higher mean hearing threshold than healthy subjects. The most common type of hearing loss in patients with GPA was sensorineural. The results revealed statistically significant differences between the two groups in SDT, SRT, SDL, and WRS. Hearing assessments of individuals with GPA disease play a key role in determining the impact of the disease on their hearing function. Speech audiometry and pure tone audiometry are valuable tools in this assessment process. The early detection of hearing problems and appropriate management of hearing issues can significantly improve the quality of life of individuals with this rare autoimmune disease; therefore, audiological assessments should be taken into account during the routine assessment of patients with GPA to prevent hearing-related disabilities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V. and J.I.; methodology, V.V., J.I., J.D., and E.L.; formal analysis, V.V. and T.I.; investigation, V.V., J.D., and V.B.; writing—original draft preparation, V.V.; writing—review and editing, J.I., J.D., and E.L.; data curation, V.V., J.I., V.B., T.I., and E.L.; validation, V.V., J.I., and E.L.; visualization, V.V.; supervision, J.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Vilnius Regional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Lithuania (protocol code 2022/12-1482-948, date of approval 20 December 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset collected and/or analyzed in the present study is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Falk, R.J.; Gross, W.L.; Guillevin, L.; Hoffman, G.S.; Jayne, D.R.; Jennette, J.C.; Kallenberg, C.G.; Luqmani, R.; Mahr, A.D.; Matteson, E.L.; et al. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s): An alternative name for Wegener’s granulomatosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 863–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wegener, F. Uber generalisierte, septische Gefaesserkrankungen. Verhandlungen Dtsch. Ges. Fur Pathol. 1936, 29, 202–227. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wegener, F. Uber eine eigenartige Rhinogene Granulomatose mit besondere Beteilgung des Arteriensystems und der Nieren. Beitr. Pathol. Anat. 1939, 102, 36–51. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bacon, P.A. The spectrum of Wegener’s granulomatosis and disease relapse. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 330–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Koike, H.; Furukawa, S.; Mouri, N.; Fukami, Y.; Iijima, M.; Katsuno, M. Early ultrastructural lesions of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody- versus complement-associated vasculitis. Neuropathology 2022, 42, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Al-Hussain, T.; Hussein, M.H.; Conca, W.; Al Mana, H.; Akhtar, M. Pathophysiology of ANCA-associated Vasculitis. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2017, 24, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gonzalez-Gay, M.A.; Garcia-Porrua, C. Epidemiology of the vasculitides. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2011, 27, 729–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Koldingsnes, W.; Nossent, H. Epidemiology of Wegener’s granulomatosis in northern Norway. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43, 2481–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bajema, I.M.; Hagen, E.C.; Woude, F.J.; Bruijin, J.A. Wegener’s granulomatosis: A metaanalysis of 349 literary case reports. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1997, 129, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Felicetti, M.; Cazzador, D.; Padoan, R. Ear, nose and throat involvement in granulomatosis with polyangiitis: How it present and how it determines disease severity and long-term outcomes. Clin. Rheumatol. 2018, 37, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gubbels, S.P.; Barkhuizen, A.; Hwang, P.H. Head and neck manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am. 2003, 36, 685–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wojciechowska, J.; Krajewski, W.; Krajewski, P. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis in otolaryngologist practice: A review of current knowledge. Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016, 9, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wali, J.P.; Wig, N.; Handa, R. Otological manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Indian. J. Otol. 1998, 4, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  14. Takagi, D.; Nakamaru, Y.; Maguchi, S. Otologic manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Laryngoscope 2002, 112, 1684–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cotch, M.F.; Hoffman, G.S.; Yerg, D.E.; Kaufman, G.I.; Targondki, P.; Kaslow, R.A. The epidemiology of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Estimates of the five-year period prevalence, annual mortality, and geographic disease distribution from population-based data sources. Arthritis Rheum. 1996, 39, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bradley, P.J. Clinical records: Wegener’s granulomatosis of the ear. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1983, 97, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nicklasson, B.; Stangeland, N. Wegener’s granulomatosis presenting as otitis media. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1982, 96, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fries, J.F.; Hunder, G.; Bloch, D.A.; Michel, B.A.; Arend, W.P.; Calabrese, L.H.; Fauci, A.S.; Leavitt, R.Y.; Lie, J.T.; Lightfoot, R.W.; et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of vasculitis. Summary. Arthritis Rheum. 1990, 33, 1135–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Robson, J.C.; Grayson, P.C.; Ponte, C.; Suppiah, R.; Craven, A.; Judge, A.; Khalid, S.; Hutchings, A.; Luqmani, R.A.; A Watts, R.; et al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022, 81, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jerger, J.F. Clinical experience with impedence audiometry. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1970, 92, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Onusko, E. Tympanometry. Am. Fam. Phys. 2004, 70, 1713–1720. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kramer, S. Audiology: Science to Practice; Plural Publishing: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 111–174. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lawson, G.; Peterson, M. Speech Audiometry; Plural Publishing: San Diego, CA, USA, 2011; pp. 27–45. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rahne, T.; Clauß, F.; Plontke, S.K. Prevalence of hearing impairment with rheumatoid arthritis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA, Wegener’s granulomatosis), or systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Rheumatol. 2017, 36, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rahne, T.; Plontke, S.K.; Keyßer, G. Vasculitis and the ear: A literature review. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2020, 32, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ralli, M.; D’Aguanno, V.; Di Stadio, A.; De Virgilio, A.; Croce, A.; Longo, L.; Greco, A.; Vincentiis, M. Audiovestibular Symptoms in Systemic Autoimmune Diseases. J. Immunol. Res. 2018, 2018, 5798103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Seccia, V.; Fortunato, S.; Cristofani-Mencacci, L.; Dallan, I.; Casani, A.P.; Latorre, M.; Paggiaro, P.; Bartoli, M.L.; Sellari-Franceschini, S.; Baldini, C. Focus on audiologic impairment in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Laryngoscope 2016, 126, 2792–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Andonopoulos, A.P.; Naxakis, P.; Goumas, C. Sensorineural hearing disorders in systemic lupus erythematosus. A controlled study. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 1995, 13, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Choung, Y.H.; Cho, M.J.; Park, K. Audio-vestibular disturbance in patients with Behcet’s disease. Laryngoscope 2006, 116, 1987–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kastanioudakis, I.; Skevas, A.; Danielidis, V. Inner ear involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective clinical study. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1995, 109, 713–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ishiyama, A.; Canalis, R.F. Otological manifestations of Churg-Strauss syndrome. Laryngoscope 2001, 111, 1619–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsunoda, K.; Akaogi, J.; Ohya, N.; Murofushi, T. Sensorineural hearing loss as the initial manifestation of polyarteritis nodosa. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2001, 115, 311–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tumiati, B.; Casoli, P.; Parmeggiani, A. Hearing loss in the Sjogren syndrome. Ann. Intern. Med. 1997, 126, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Greco, A.; Marinelli, C.; Fusconi, M.; Macri, G.F.; Gallo, A.; De Virgillio, A.; Zambetti, G.; Vincentiis, M. Clinic manifestations in granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2016, 29, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fenton, J.E.; O’Sullivan, T.J. The otological manifestations of Wegener’s granulomatosis. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1994, 108, 144–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Naohiro, Y.; Yukiko, I. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of otitis media with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Allergol. Int. 2014, 63, 523–532. [Google Scholar]
  37. Maguchi, S.; Fukuda, S.; Takizawa, M. Histological findings in biopsies from patients with cytoplasmic-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (cANCA)-positive Wegener’s granulomatosis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2001, 28, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Santos, F.; Salviz, M.; Domond, H.; Nadol, J.B. Otopathology of vasculitis in granulomatosis with polyangitis. Otol. Neurotol. 2015, 36, 1657–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bakthavachalam, S.; Driver, M.S.; Cox, C.; Spiegel, J.H.; Grundfast, K.M.; Merkel, P.A. Hearing loss in Wegener’s granulomatosis. Otol. Neurotol. 2004, 25, 833–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yamasoba, T.; Lin, F.R.; Someya, S.; Kashio, A.; Sakamoto, T.; Kondo, K. Current concepts in age-related hearing loss: Epidemiology and mechanistic pathways. Hear. Res. 2013, 303, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Brown, P.; Conlon, N.; Feighery, C. Toothache and hearing loss: Early symptoms of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). BMJ Case Rep. 2016, 2016, bcr2016214672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Martin, F.N.; Champlin, C.A.; Perez, D.D. The question of phonetic balance in word recognition testing. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2000, 11, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Thornton, M.A.; O’Sullivan, T.J. Otological Wegener’s granulomatosis: A diagnostic dilemma. Clin. Otolaryngol. Allied Sci. 2000, 25, 433–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kempf, H.G. Ear involvement in Wegener’s granulomatosis. Clin. Otolaryngol. Allied Sci. 1989, 14, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Grover, R.A.; Grover, R.S. Missed Otological Presentation of Wegener’s Granulomatosis: A Case. Indian. J. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 2022, 74, 492–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Batinović, F.; Martinić, M.K.; Durdov, M.G.; Sunara, D. A Case of Unilateral Otologic Symptoms as Initial Manifestations of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. J. Audiol. Otol. 2023, 27, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fauci, A.S.; Haynes, B.F. Wegener’s granulomatosis: Prospective clinical and therapeutic experience with 85 patients for 21 years. Ann. Intern. Med. 1983, 98, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.
GPA
Group
(N- 14)		Control Group
(N- 20)
Age, average ± SD 47.2 ± 10.140.4 ± 9.2
Sex Female 6 (42.9%)11 (55.0%)
Male 8 (57.1%)9 (45.0%)
Disease duration, years (range) 2.8 (0.5–15)-
ANCA-positive 10 (71.4%)-
Medication
usage (ever) 		Glucocorticoids14 (100%)-
Immunosuppressants13 (92.9%)
Biologicals 4 (28.6%)
Organ involvement
(ever) 		Ear, nose, throat14 (100%)-
Lung10 (71.4%)
Kidney6 (42.9%)
Nervous system3 (21.4%)
Musculoskeletal system1 (7.1%)
Skin1 (7.1%)
Eye1 (7.1%)
Table 2. Frequency of otological symptoms in GPA group.
Table 2. Frequency of otological symptoms in GPA group.
SymptomNumber (%)
Hearing loss8 (57.1)
Tinnitus7 (50.0)
Fullness in the ears6 (42.9)
Otalgia2 (14.3)
Table 3. The arithmetic means (± standard deviation (SD)) of pure tone audiometry hearing thresholds at frequencies from 125 Hz to 8000 Hz in patients with GPA and control groups.
Table 3. The arithmetic means (± standard deviation (SD)) of pure tone audiometry hearing thresholds at frequencies from 125 Hz to 8000 Hz in patients with GPA and control groups.
FrequencyGPA Group (dB)
N = 14		Control Group (dB)
N = 20
Mean ± SDMean ± SDp Value
125 Hz 18.4 ± 12.36.0 ± 3.0<0.0001
250 Hz 18.9 ± 15.16.6 ± 3.5 0.0002
500 Hz 21.3 ± 17.27.3 ± 3.20.0003
1000 Hz 21.6 ± 16.77.9 ± 3.20.0002
2000 Hz 23.9 ± 19.98.5 ± 4.30.0004
4000 Hz 33.8 ± 24.310.1 ± 3.8<0.0001
8000 Hz 35.9 ± 29.911.5 ± 3.40.0003
Table 4. The arithmetic means (±SD) of pure tone audiometry hearing thresholds at frequencies from 125 Hz to 8000 Hz in patients with GPA in different types of hearing impairment.
Table 4. The arithmetic means (±SD) of pure tone audiometry hearing thresholds at frequencies from 125 Hz to 8000 Hz in patients with GPA in different types of hearing impairment.
FrequencyType of Hearing Impairment
Normal HearingCHLSNHLMHL
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SD
125 Hz11.0 ± 3.932.5 ± 3.515.6 ± 4.226.9 ± 17.7
250 Hz10.5 ± 3.735.0 ± 14.113.8 ± 4.430.6 ± 21.1
500 Hz10.0 ± 3.337.5 ± 3.514.4 ± 3.238.1 ± 22.0
1000 Hz11.0 ± 3.237.5 ± 10.615.6 ± 9.038.9 ± 20.7
2000 Hz11.0 ± 3.940.0 ± 0.016.3 ± 9.243.1 ± 25.2
4000 Hz14.0 ± 7.035.0 ± 0.034.4 ± 17.457.5 ± 26.7
8000 Hz14.5 ± 5.047.5 ± 24.730.6 ± 20.665.0 ± 34.9
Table 5. Speech audiometry results in GPA and control groups.
Table 5. Speech audiometry results in GPA and control groups.
SDT (dB)SRT (dB)WRS (%)SDL (dB)
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SD
GPA group32.9 ± 17.243.6 ± 17.697.4 ± 5.797.9 ± 8.9
Control group17.5 ± 4.227.4 ± 3.999.5 ± 1.3101.1 ± 3.7
pvalue<0.001<0.0010.030.04
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vainutienė, V.; Ivaška, J.; Dadonienė, J.; Beleškienė, V.; Ivaškienė, T.; Lesinskas, E. Audiological Manifestations in Patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. Medicina 2024, 60, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020267

AMA Style

Vainutienė V, Ivaška J, Dadonienė J, Beleškienė V, Ivaškienė T, Lesinskas E. Audiological Manifestations in Patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. Medicina. 2024; 60(2):267. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vainutienė, Vija, Justinas Ivaška, Jolanta Dadonienė, Vilma Beleškienė, Tatjana Ivaškienė, and Eugenijus Lesinskas. 2024. "Audiological Manifestations in Patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis" Medicina 60, no. 2: 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020267

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop