Next Article in Journal
The Role of Lymph Node Downstaging Following Neoadjuvant Treatment in a Group of Patients with Advanced Stage Cervical Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Medium and High-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 60
Issue 6
10.3390/medicina60060870
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression of Pluripotency Factors OCT4 and LIN28 Correlates with Survival Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma

by
Pinelopi Bosgana
1,†,
Sophia Nikou
2,†,
Foteinos-Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos
3,
Vasiliki Bravou
2,
Charalambos Kalophonos
3,
Eleni Kourea
1,
Vasiliki Tzelepi
1,
Vassiliki Zolota
1 and
Fotios Sampsonas
4,*
1
Department of Pathology, Medical School, University of Patras, 26504 Rion, Greece
2
Department of Anatomy, Embryology and Histology, Medical School, University of Patras, 26504 Rion, Greece
3
Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Patras, 26504 Rion, Greece
4
Department of Pulmonology, Medical School, University of Patras, 26504 Rion, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Medicina 2024, 60(6), 870; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060870
Submission received: 10 April 2024 / Revised: 15 May 2024 / Accepted: 24 May 2024 / Published: 26 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Pulmonology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Lung adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality despite recent therapeutic advances. Cancer stem cells have gained increasing attention due to their ability to induce cancer cell proliferation through self-renewal and differentiation into multiple cell lineages. OCT4 and LIN28 (and their homologs A and B) have been identified as key regulators of pluripotency in mammalian embryonic (ES) and induced stem (IS) cells, and they are the crucial regulators of cancer progression. However, their exact role in lung adenocarcinoma has not yet been clarified. Materials and Methods: The aim of this study was to explore the role of the pluripotency factors OCT4 and LIN28 in a cohort of surgically resected human lung adenocarcinomas to reveal possible biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis and potential therapeutic targets. The expressions of OCT4, LIN28A and LIN28B were analyzed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 96 patients with lung adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry. The results were analyzed with clinicopathologic parameters and were related to the prognosis of patients. Results: Higher OCT4 expression was related to an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (p < 0.001). Nuclear LIN28B expression was lower in stage I and II tumors (p < 0.05) compared to advanced stage tumors. LIN28B cytoplasmic expression was associated with 5-year OS rates not only in univariate (p < 0.005), but also in multivariate analysis (where age, gender, histopathological subtype and stage were used as cofactors, p < 0.01 HR = 2.592). Patients with lower LIN28B expression showed improved 5-year OS rates compared to patients with increased LIN28B expression. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that OCT4 and LIN28B are implicated in lung adenocarcinoma progression and prognosis outcome; thus, they serve as promising prognostic biomarkers and putative therapeutic targets in lung adenocarcinomas.

1. Introduction

Adenocarcinoma of the lung (LADC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide despite recent therapeutic advantages. In the 2015 World Health Organization classification, invasive lung adenocarcinoma was further classified into different subtypes, with different prognoses [1] such as EGFR and KRAS mutations, as well as Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS1 translocations, which are the most common molecular alterations detected in lung adenocarcinomas and form the basis for targeted therapies [2,3].
Stem cells are either partially differentiated or they partially differentiated cells that can further differentiate into various other cell types and divide indefinitely to produce more of the same stem cell [3]. These cells have unique properties of self-renewal and pluripotency [3]. Stem cells continue to self-renew due to an autoregulated network of transcription factors, which inhibits differentiation and promotes proliferation [4]. Dysregulation of these mechanisms can lead to premature differentiation and/or continuous self-renewal/proliferation of stem cells, which is a well-known hallmark of cancer progression [5].
The LIN28 gene encodes an RNA-binding protein that governs the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression; thus, it has a crucial role in tissue development [6,7,8,9]. LIN28 controls stem cell self-renewal, thus influencing many cellular functions including cell growth, stem cell differentiation, metabolism and carcinogenesis. The LIN28 family of RNA-binding proteins consists of two highly conserved homologs LIN28A and LIN28B with similar functions [10]. LIN28 binds to let-7 pre-microRNA, and it blocks the biogenesis of mature let-7 in mouse embryonic stem cells (ES) [8]. Various studies link microRNA to critical oncogenic pathways such as the RAS pathways, Myc and JAK-STAT3. In particular, reduced let-7microRNA expression has been observed in many types of cancer, resulting in cancer progression and adverse patient prognosis [9].
OCT4 (also known as POU5F1) is a protein that is encoded in humans by the POU5F1 gene, which is located on chromosome 6p21 [11]. During embryonic development, the expression of OCT4 affects the differentiation of embryonic stem cells that are maintaining their capacity for self-renewal. Also, OCT4 expression is increased in germ cell and embryonic cell tumors, rendering OCT4 a molecular marker of germ cell tumors [12].
OCT4 and LIN28 are transcription factors with a key role in pluripotency maintenance in mammalian ES and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), regulating, in this way, cancer progression [13,14]. However, their role in lung adenocarcinoma has not yet been fully clarified.
The aim of this study was to explore the role of pluripotency factors OCT4 and LIN28 (homolog A and B) in a cohort of surgically resected human lung adenocarcinomas to reveal the possible biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis and the potential therapeutic targets for lung adenocarcinomas.

2. Materials and Methods

Our study included 96 patients who underwent surgical resection for lung adenocarcinoma at the University Hospital of Patras between 2000 and 2009. All tumors were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE). The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides of the specimens were reviewed by an expert pathologist (PB) to determine the histological subtype, grade and T- and N-stage of the tumor according to the revised 2015 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of Lung Tumors [15]. A representative block was selected for each patient. Non-neoplastic lung parenchyma adjacent to the tumor was also present in most of the blocks (95%). Medical history and clinical outcomes were retrieved from the patients’ records from the Division of Oncology of the University Hospital of Patras. Overall survival was evaluated after an observation period of 5 years (60 months). This study was approved by the Bioethics & Research Committee of the University Hospital of Patras, Greece (approval code: 509 and approval date: 11 July 2019) in full compliance with the guidelines detailed in the Declaration of Helsinki, which provides the “ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects”.

2.1. Immunohistochemical Staining

Serial 3 μm tissue sections were cut, mounted on poly-L lysine-coated slides and subjected to immunohistochemical staining. Briefly, the sections were initially dried for 24 h at 60 °C, deparaffinized in xylene and hydrated in gradient alcohol. The antigen was retrieved in Tris/EDTA buffer (pH 9) with a pressure antigen retrieval procedure for 12 min. Next, endogenous peroxidase was inactivated using a peroxidase-blocking solution (0.3% H2O2) at room temperature for 10 min. The sections were then incubated with the primary antibodies. Information about the primary antibodies, as well as the positive and negative controls used for antibody validation, are shown in Table 1. Immunohistochemical signaling was detected with Dako EnVision polymer (Dako EnVision Mini Flex, Dako Omnis, Angilent Technology Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA, GV823). Diaminobenzidine (Dako Omnis, Santa Clara, USA, GV823) was used as a chromogen, and Harris Hematoxylin was used for nuclear counterstaining.

2.2. Evaluation of the Immunohistochemical Staining

The immunoreactivity was assessed by an expert pathologist (PB), who was blinded to the pathological and clinical characteristics of each case. The intensity and the distribution of positively stained cancer cells were evaluated as described below. The localization (nuclear and cytoplasmic) of the stains was also evaluated. The immunoreactivity was calculated with the following formula: The staining immunoreactivity was scored from 0% to 100% (at 5% as intervals) by calculating the proportion of positive tumor cells (more than 1000 cells were counted). The intensity of stained cells was assessed with a three-tiered scale. The overall score was calculated by multiplying the percentage (%) of positive-stained cells by the intensity of the staining, ranging from 0 to 300. Other components of the tumor microenvironment, such as lymphocytes, macrophages and endothelial cells were also evaluated and scored as positive or negative based on the presence or absence of any staining. Microphotographs were obtained by a Lumenera INFINITY HD digital camera (Teledyne Lumenera Co, OTT, Canada) mounted on an Olympus BX41 microscope (Olympus Europa SE & Co, Hamburg, Germany).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

2.3.1. Associations of OCT4 and LIN28 with Clinicopathological Parameters and the Correlations between Proteins

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25 (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY, USA). The expression of the markers was associated with clinicopathological parameters. Categorical variables were evaluated with the Chi-square or Fisher exact tests. For ordinal or continuous variables, Kruskal–Wallis or Mann–Whitney tests were used for comparisons between groups. Correlations between the expressions of the proteins were performed using Spearman’s correlation test.

2.3.2. Survival Analysis

Survival analysis was assessed with Kaplan–Meier plots, and the differences between groups were evaluated with the exact log-rank test. OS and DFS rates were calculated as the interval between the date of diagnosis and the date of death (or the last follow-up). Multivariable analysis was performed with Cox’s proportional hazard regression model. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical, Demographic and Histopathological Data

The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Ninety-six (96) cases were included in this study. The median age of the patients was 65.5 years (range 39–84). Sixteen patients (16.7%) had undergone pneumonectomy, 68 (70.8%) lobectomy, 9 (9.3%) double lobectomy and 3 (3.1%) wedge excision. Two- and three-year survival outcomes were available in 88 patients, and five-year survival outcomes were available in 81 patients.

3.2. Expression of OCT4 in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Positive OCT4 immunohistochemical staining was observed in the nuclei of the neoplastic cells. The epithelial cells of adjacent non neoplastic lung tissue, lymphocytes and stromal cells were negative for OCT4 (Figure 1). In 61/96 patients, a positive nuclear expression of OCT4 (63.5%) was noted. The immunohistochemical score of OCT4 nuclear expression ranged between 0 and 120 (mean = 4 ± 5) (±SD). The relationships between OCT4 immunohistochemical expression and the clinicopathological data of the patients is presented in Table 3. No significant correlations were observed between OCT4 expression and age (p = 0.595), gender (p = 0.939), histological subtype (p = 0.673) and clinical stage (p = 0.542). The immunohistochemical expression of OCT4 in patients with lung adenocarcinoma was associated with 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates. A higher nuclear expression of OCT4 was associated with improved 5-year OS rates (p = 0.008). Patients with a higher expression of OCT4 had improved outcomes compared to patients with lower OCT4 expression levels (Figure 2).

3.3. Expression of LIN28A in Lung Adenocarcinomas

Positive immunohistochemical expressions of LIN28A were observed only in the nuclei of malignant epithelial cells. Epithelial cells of adjacent non neoplastic lung tissue, lymphocytes and stromal cells were negative for LIN28A (Figure 3). In 62/96 patients (64.5%), positive LIN28A nuclear staining was observed, while no LIN28A immunohistochemical expression was observed in 34/96 patients (13.5%) (Table 4).
The immunohistochemical score of the positive nuclear immunohistochemical expression ranged between 0 and 75 (median 4 ± 6) (±SD). The relationship between the LIN28A immunohistochemical expression and the clinicopathological data of the patients is presented in Table 3. The immunohistochemical expression of LIN28A was associated with tumor stage and the 5-year survival outcome in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with metastatic lymph nodes (stage N2) had lower LIN28A expression compared to patients with N0 and N1 disease (p = 0.01) (Figure 4). No statistically significant correlations were observed between LIN28A expression and 5-year OS rates (p = 0.123), age (p = 0.779), gender (p = 0.538), histological subtype (p = 0.678) and stage (p = 0.512).

3.4. Expression of LIN28B in Lung Adenocarcinomas

Positive LIN28B immunohistochemical expression was observed and evaluated in the nucleus and cytoplasm of lung adenocarcinoma cells. In adjacent non neoplastic lung tissue, epithelial cells, lymphocytes and stromal cells were negative for LIN28B (Figure 5). In 68/96 (70.8%) of the patients, positive LIN28B nuclear expression was observed, while no LIN28B nuclear expression was observed in 28/96 (29.2%) patients. In 78/96 patients (81.3%), positive LIN28B cytoplasmic expression was observed, while there was negative LIN28B cytoplasmic expression (Table 5) found in 18/96 patients (18.8%).
The immunohistochemical score of the nuclear LIN28B expression ranged between 0 and 140 (median 14 ± 24) (±SD). The immunohistochemical score of the cytoplasmic LIN28B expression ranged between 0 and 210 (median 68 ± 52) (±SD). The relationships between LIN28B immunohistochemical expression and the clinicopathological data of the patients is presented in Table 5. Nuclear and cytoplasmic LIN28B expression was associated with patient stage and survival. Positive LIN28B cytoplasmic expression was related to 5-year survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with lower LIN28B cytoplasmic expression had a better 5-year survival (p = 0.005) rate compared to patients with increased LIN28B expression (Figure 6). No associations between LIN28B cytoplasmic expression and stage (p = 0.562), age, gender and histological subtype were observed. Increased LIN28B nuclear expression was statistically significantly associated with poor 2-year survival rates (p = 0.021) (Figure 7). The association between LIN28B nuclear expression and stage revealed that patients with early stage lung adenocarcinoma (stages I and II) had statistically significantly lower nuclear expression (p = 0.046). No statistically significant association was observed between the nuclear LIN28B expression and age, gender and histological subtype.

4. Discussion

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide [16]. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the discovery of molecular changes; however, the pathogenesis of the disease has not been fully clarified. In this study, we examined the role of pluripotency factor OCT4 and LIN28 (and their A and B homologs) in lung adenocarcinoma in relation to prognosis.
In our study, OCT4 was overexpressed in lung adenocarcinoma, and we showed that a higher OCT4 expression was associated with improved 5-year OS rates. The latest trend in OCT4 research is in connecting OCT4 to epigenetic regulations, which are crucial in cancer development [17,18,19]. However, results about the prognostic role of OCT4 are contradictory. In line with our findings, studies conducted on oral cancer [20] and testicular cancer [21] demonstrated that higher OCT4 expression was associated with better OS rates. It should be noted here that OCT4 has two isomorphs (OCT4A/B). It is possible that the isomorphs that each OCT4 antibody detects target different regions of the OCT4 protein. In contrast, in many types of cancer such as breast cancer and acute myeloid leukemia, increased OCT4 is associated with reduced overall survival rates compared to patients with low OCT4 expression [22,23]. In esophageal carcinoma, increased OCT4 expression was associated with poor prognosis [24]. In lung cancer, a meta-analysis published in 2019 highlighted that increased OCT4 expression was associated with lower overall survival and higher TNM stage [25]. These results contradict our study, where high OCT4 expression in lung adenocarcinoma was associated with better overall survival rates. More studies need to be conducted in large cohorts of patients to elucidate the prognostic role of OCT4 in lung adenocarcinoma.
We also showed that LIN28A is overexpressed in lung adenocarcinoma. However, in our cohort of lung adenocarcinoma patients no statistically significant association was found with aggressive tumor parameters and patients’ prognosis. We found that patients with metastatic lymph nodes (N2) had lower LIN28A expression compared to patients with N0 and N1 disease (p = 0.01) which is contradictory with the current literature results. It is possible that the relatively small number of patients in our cohort is a limitation of this analysis. Several studies have revealed that stem cell markers LIN28A and LIN28B regulate gene expression, either by directly binding to messenger RNA (mRNA) or by blocking the biogenesis of Let-7 microRNAs; thus, they are implicated in cancer development [26,27,28,29]. LIN28A, in combination with NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2, can reprogram human somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells. LIN28A also regulates mammalian stem cell self-renewal and promotes tissue repair [30]. LIN28A has been found to be reactivated in ~15% of human cancers and is considered a biomarker of multiple advanced cancers. A high level of LIN28A protein and the subsequent blockage of let-7 biogenesis is associated with tumorigenesis, invasiveness and poor prognosis of malignancies such as lung cancer, liver cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer and prostate cancer [31]. To the best of our knowledge, the role of LIN28A in human lung adenocarcinoma tissue samples has not been investigated before in the literature. In a recent in vitro study using A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells, LIN28A was linked to MMP2/9 expression. In particular, LIN28A silencing ameliorated MMP2/9 expression levels, as well as metastases. Consequently, LIN28A serves as a marker for tumor development and invasion with potential therapeutic uses [32].
We also observed that LIN28B was overexpressed in lung adenocarcinoma with prognostic value. Increased nuclear and cytoplasmic LIN28B expression was associated with advanced patient stage and reduced survival rates. To the best of our knowledge, there is no other study exploring the role of LIN28A/B in association with prognosis in human lung adenocarcinoma tissue samples. However, in vitro experiments have been conducted in lung cancer cell lines. Our findings agree with the current literature. LIN28B is implicated in the development of multiple tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the mechanism of LIN28B activation in cancer remains unclear [33,34]. Overexpression of LIN28A/B has been associated with poor prognosis in many cancers. In a recent meta-analysis including 3772 LIN28A-associated and 1730 LIN28B-associated cases, elevated LIN28A/B expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis in human malignancies [28] such as gastric carcinoma [35], esophageal carcinoma [36], hepatocellular carcinoma [37], breast carcinoma [38], squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity [39,40] and adenocarcinoma of the pancreas [41]. A genome-wide analysis study in lung cancer revealed that the H19 gene, which is associated with tumor-cell proliferation, is involved in many types of cancer [42], and it causes an increase in LIN28B expression, which, in turn, promotes lung cancer [43]. In experimental mouse models of non-small cell lung carcinoma, it was found that LIN28B overexpression significantly increased the number of tumor cells, accelerated tumor initiation and resulted in reduced overall survival rates [44]. Also, elevated LIN28B levels have been found in 24% of lung carcinomas harboring the KRAS mutation [44]. Another in vitro study in lung carcinoma cell lines revealed that micro-RNA miR-563 targets and represses LIN28B, thus causing a decrease in cell proliferation [45]. These studies support the prognostic role of LIN28B, as demonstrated in our study, where patients with low nuclear expression had better 5-year survival rates. Our results also highlight LIN28 as an attractive therapeutic target in lung cancer.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study shows that the pluripotency factor OCT4 and LIN28 (and their homologs A and B) are implicated in lung adenocarcinoma development and progression with prognostic value. In particular, LIN28B may serve as a marker for dismal patient prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. Further studies are needed to elucidate their role in lung adenocarcinoma and to explore their potential application as therapeutic agents.

Author Contributions

Methodology, P.B. and V.B.; Validation, E.K.; Formal analysis, S.N.; Investigation, F.-I.D.; Resources F.-I.D.; Writing—review & editing, C.K., V.T., V.Z. and F.S.; Visualization, V.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Patras, Greece (approval code: 509 and approval date: 11 July 2019) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Octamer binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4); RNA-binding protein LIN28 (LIN28); cancer stem cells (CSCs); embryonic stem cells (ES); induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS); overall survival (OS); hazard ratio (HR); lung adenocarcinoma (LADC); formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE); data not available or unknown (NA); standard deviation (SD), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS); and repressor of Silencing 1 (ROS1).

References

  1. Travis, W.D.; Brambilla, E.; Riely, G.J. New pathologic classification of lung cancer: Relevance for clinical practice and clinical trials. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 992–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yoshizawa, A.; Sumiyoshi, S.; Sonobe, M.; Kobayashi, M.; Fujimoto, M.; Kawakami, F.; Tsuruyama, T.; Travis, W.D.; Date, H.; Haga, H. Validation of the IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification for prognosis and association with EGFR and KRAS gene mutations: Analysis of 440 Japanese patients. J. Thorac. Oncol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Study Lung Cancer 2013, 8, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stadtfeld, M.; Hochedlinger, K. Induced pluripotency: History, mechanisms, and applications. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 2239–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Schulz, W.A.; Hoffmann, M.J. Transcription factor networks in embryonic stem cells and testicular cancer and the definition of epigenetics. Epigenetics 2007, 2, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tarayrah, L.; Chen, X. Epigenetic regulation in adult stem cells and cancers. Cell Biosci. 2013, 3, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tsialikas, J.; Romer-Seibert, J. LIN28: Roles and regulation in development and beyond. Development 2015, 142, 2397–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Polesskaya, A.; Cuvellier, S.; Naguibneva, I.; Duquet, A.; Moss, E.G.; Harel-Bellan, A. Lin-28 binds IGF-2 mRNA and participates in skeletal myogenesis by increasing translation efficiency. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 1125–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ali, P.S.; Ghoshdastider, U.; Hoffmann, J.; Brutschy, B.; Filipek, S. Recognition of the let-7g miRNA precursor by human Lin28B. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 3986–3990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chan, H.W.; Lappas, M.; Yee, S.W.; Vaswani, K.; Mitchell, M.D.; Rice, G.E. The expression of the let-7 miRNAs and Lin28 signalling pathway in human term gestational tissues. Placenta 2013, 34, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rehfeld, F.; Rohde, A.M.; Nguyen, D.T.; Wulczyn, F.G. Lin28 and let-7: Ancient milestones on the road from pluripotency to neurogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2015, 359, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Takeda, J.; Seino, S.; Bell, G.I. Human Oct3 gene family: cDNA sequences, alternative splicing, gene organization, chromosomal location, and expression at low levels in adult tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 4613–4620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, X.; Lu, H.; Sun, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, H. Prognostic value of octamer binding transcription factor 4 for patients with solid tumors: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2020, 99, e22804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jerabek, S.; Merino, F.; Schöler, H.R.; Cojocaru, V. OCT4: Dynamic DNA binding pioneers stem cell pluripotency. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1839, 138–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Saunders, A.; Faiola, F.; Wang, J. Concise review: Pursuing self-renewal and pluripotency with the stem cell factor Nanog. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Travis, W.D.; Brambilla, E.; Nicholson, A.G.; Yatabe, Y.; Austin, J.H.M.; Beasley, M.B.; Chirieac, L.R.; Dacic, S.; Duhig, E.; Flieder, D.B.; et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification. J. Thorac. Oncol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Study Lung Cancer 2015, 10, 1243–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Larsen, J.E.; Minna, J.D. Molecular biology of lung cancer: Clinical implications. Clin. Chest Med. 2011, 32, 703–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Villodre, E.S.; Kipper, F.C.; Pereira, M.B.; Lenz, G. Roles of OCT4 in tumorigenesis, cancer therapy resistance and prognosis. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2016, 51, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mohiuddin, I.S.; Wei, S.J.; Kang, M.H. Role of OCT4 in cancer stem-like cells and chemotherapy resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Patra, S.K. Roles of OCT4 in pathways of embryonic development and cancer progression. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2020, 189, 111286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ge, N.; Lin, H.X.; Xiao, X.S.; Guo, L.; Xu, H.M.; Wang, X.; Jin, T.; Cai, X.Y.; Liang, Y.; Hu, W.H.; et al. Prognostic significance of Oct4 and Sox2 expression in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J. Transl. Med. 2010, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, Y.C.; Ling, T.Y.; Lu, S.H.; Kuo, H.C.; Ho, H.N.; Yeh, S.D.; Shen, C.N.; Huang, Y.H. Chemotherapeutic sensitivity of testicular germ cell tumors under hypoxic conditions is negatively regulated by SENP1-controlled sumoylation of OCT4. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 4963–4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yin, J.Y.; Tang, Q.; Zhai, L.L.; Zhou, L.Y.; Qian, J.; Lin, J.; Wen, X.M.; Zhou, J.D.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhu, X.W.; et al. High expression of OCT4 is frequent and may cause undesirable treatment outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc. Oncodev. Biol. Med. 2015, 36, 9711–9716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, T.; Sun, B.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Gu, Q.; Dong, X.; Liu, F. OCT4 expression and vasculogenic mimicry formation positively correlate with poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 19634–19649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. He, W.; Li, K.; Wang, F.; Qin, Y.R.; Fan, Q.X. Expression of OCT4 in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is significantly associated with poorer prognosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, H.; Wang, L.; Shi, S.; Xu, Y.; Dai, X.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Sun, S.; et al. The Prognostic and Clinicopathologic Characteristics of OCT4 and Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Curr. Mol. Med. 2019, 19, 54–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Piskounova, E.; Polytarchou, C.; Thornton, J.E.; LaPierre, R.J.; Pothoulakis, C.; Hagan, J.P.; Iliopoulos, D.; Gregory, R.I. Lin28A and Lin28B inhibit let-7 microRNA biogenesis by distinct mechanisms. Cell 2011, 147, 1066–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Balzeau, J.; Menezes, M.R.; Cao, S.; Hagan, J.P. The LIN28/let-7 Pathway in Cancer. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, J.; Xu, A.; Miao, C.; Yang, J.; Gu, M.; Song, N. Prognostic value of Lin28A and Lin28B in various human malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int. 2019, 19, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Büssing, I.; Slack, F.J.; Grosshans, H. let-7 microRNAs in development, stem cells and cancer. Trends Mol. Med. 2008, 14, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, S.K.; Lee, H.; Han, K.; Kim, S.C.; Choi, Y.; Park, S.W.; Bak, G.; Lee, Y.; Choi, J.K.; Kim, T.K.; et al. SET7/9 methylation of the pluripotency factor LIN28A is a nucleolar localization mechanism that blocks let-7 biogenesis in human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 15, 735–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dou, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, R.; Shu, Z.; Yuan, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhou, A.; Yu, J. SUMOylation modulates the LIN28A-let-7 signaling pathway in response to cellular stresses in cancer cells. Mol. Oncol. 2020, 14, 2288–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, W.L.; Chang, J.M.; Chong, I.W.; Hung, Y.L.; Chen, Y.H.; Huang, W.T.; Kuo, H.F.; Hsieh, C.C.; Liu, P.L. Curcumin Inhibits LIN-28A through the Activation of miRNA-98 in the Lung Cancer Cell Line A549. Molecules 2017, 22, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, W.; Hu, Z.; Bao, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Zheng, Q.; Lyu, D.; Chen, D.; Yu, T.; Li, Y.; et al. A LIN28B Tumor-Specific Transcript in Cancer. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 2016–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tian, N.; Shangguan, W.; Zhou, Z.; Yao, Y.; Fan, C.; Cai, L. Lin28b is involved in curcumin-reversed paclitaxel chemoresistance and associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 6074–6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, Q.; Peng, J.; Liu, W.; He, X.; Cui, L.; Chen, X.; Yang, M.; Liu, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, H. Lin28B is a novel prognostic marker in gastric adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 5083–5092. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Hamano, R.; Miyata, H.; Yamasaki, M.; Sugimura, K.; Tanaka, K.; Kurokawa, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Takiguchi, S.; Fujiwara, Y.; Mori, M.; et al. High expression of Lin28 is associated with tumour aggressiveness and poor prognosis of patients in oesophagus cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2012, 106, 1415–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cheng, S.W.; Tsai, H.W.; Lin, Y.J.; Cheng, P.N.; Chang, Y.C.; Yen, C.J.; Huang, H.P.; Chuang, Y.P.; Chang, T.T.; Lee, C.T.; et al. Lin28B is an oncofetal circulating cancer stem cell-like marker associated with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Feng, J.; Cui, X.; Huang, W.; Li, Y.; Su, F.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, J.; Lv, X.; et al. Lin28 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stemness via downregulation of let-7a in breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, D.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Yuan, C.; Zhang, W.; Yuan, H.; Ye, J.; Yang, J.; Jiang, H.; et al. The pluripotency factor LIN28B is involved in oral carcinogenesis and associates with tumor aggressiveness and unfavorable prognosis. Cancer Cell Int. 2015, 15, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, T.; Jia, J.; Xiong, X.; He, H.; Bu, L.; Zhao, Z.; Huang, C.; Zhang, W. Increased expression of Lin28B associates with poor prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhou, M.; Chen, H.; Wang, H.; Min, J.; Chen, J.; Wu, S.; Ni, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. The KRAS/Lin28B axis maintains stemness of pancreatic cancer cells via the let-7i/TET3 pathway. Mol. Oncol. 2021, 15, 262–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Tycko, B. Monoallelic expression of the human H19 gene. Nat. Genet. 1992, 1, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ren, J.; Fu, J.; Ma, T.; Yan, B.; Gao, R.; An, Z.; Wang, D. LncRNA H19-elevated LIN28B promotes lung cancer progression through sequestering miR-196b. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 1372–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Meder, L.; König, K.; Dietlein, F.; Macheleidt, I.; Florin, A.; Ercanoglu, M.S.; Rommerscheidt-Fuss, U.; Koker, M.; Schön, G.; Odenthal, M.; et al. LIN28B enhanced tumorigenesis in an autochthonous KRAS(G12V)-driven lung carcinoma mouse model. Oncogene 2018, 37, 2746–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, X.; Li, M.; Sun, G.; Bai, Y.; Lv, D.; Liu, C. MiR-563 restrains cell proliferation via targeting LIN28B in human lung cancer. Thorac. Cancer 2020, 11, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medicina 60 00870 g001
Figure 1. (A): Positive nuclear expression of OCT4 in tumor cells (red arrows). Adjacent non neoplasmatic cells were negative for OCT4 expression (magnification ×400 (B): Negative nuclear expression of OCT4 in tumor cells. (magnification ×400). Scale bars at 20 μm.
Figure 1. (A): Positive nuclear expression of OCT4 in tumor cells (red arrows). Adjacent non neoplasmatic cells were negative for OCT4 expression (magnification ×400 (B): Negative nuclear expression of OCT4 in tumor cells. (magnification ×400). Scale bars at 20 μm.
Medicina 60 00870 g001
Medicina 60 00870 g002
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival estimate. A 5-year survival estimate according to OCT4 expression in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with higher expression of OCT4 had improved outcomes compared to patients with lower OCT4 expression levels. (p = 0.008). A p-value of < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival estimate. A 5-year survival estimate according to OCT4 expression in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with higher expression of OCT4 had improved outcomes compared to patients with lower OCT4 expression levels. (p = 0.008). A p-value of < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
Medicina 60 00870 g002
Medicina 60 00870 g003
Figure 3. (A) Positive nuclear expression of LIN28A in tumor cells (red arrows). The adjacent non neoplasmatic cells were negative (×200). (B) Negative LIN28A expression in tumor cells (magnification ×400). Scale bars at 20 μm.
Figure 3. (A) Positive nuclear expression of LIN28A in tumor cells (red arrows). The adjacent non neoplasmatic cells were negative (×200). (B) Negative LIN28A expression in tumor cells (magnification ×400). Scale bars at 20 μm.
Medicina 60 00870 g003
Medicina 60 00870 g004
Figure 4. LIN28A expression is associated with lymph node metastasis status. A boxplot analysis indicated that patients with lymph node metastasis (stage N2) have significantly lower LIN28A expression compared to (N0) or (N1) stage (p = 0.01). A p-value of < 0.05 was statistically significant.
Figure 4. LIN28A expression is associated with lymph node metastasis status. A boxplot analysis indicated that patients with lymph node metastasis (stage N2) have significantly lower LIN28A expression compared to (N0) or (N1) stage (p = 0.01). A p-value of < 0.05 was statistically significant.
Medicina 60 00870 g004
Medicina 60 00870 g005
Figure 5. (A) Positive cytoplasmic (black arrow) and nuclear (red arrows) expressions of LIN28B in tumor cells (×200). (B) Negative nuclear and cytoplasmic expressions in tumor cells (×400). Scale bars at 20 μm.
Figure 5. (A) Positive cytoplasmic (black arrow) and nuclear (red arrows) expressions of LIN28B in tumor cells (×200). (B) Negative nuclear and cytoplasmic expressions in tumor cells (×400). Scale bars at 20 μm.
Medicina 60 00870 g005
Medicina 60 00870 g006
Figure 6. Kaplan–Meier survival estimate. A 5-year survival estimate according to the LIN28B expression in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with increased cytoplasmic LIN28B expression had poorer 5-year survival rates compared to patients with lower LIN28B expression (p = 0.005). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Figure 6. Kaplan–Meier survival estimate. A 5-year survival estimate according to the LIN28B expression in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with increased cytoplasmic LIN28B expression had poorer 5-year survival rates compared to patients with lower LIN28B expression (p = 0.005). A p-value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Medicina 60 00870 g006
Medicina 60 00870 g007
Figure 7. Kaplan–Meier survival estimate. A 2-year survival estimate according to the LIN28B expression in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with increased nuclear LIN28B expression had poorer 2-year survival rates compared to patients with lower LIN28B expression (p = 0.021). A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Figure 7. Kaplan–Meier survival estimate. A 2-year survival estimate according to the LIN28B expression in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with increased nuclear LIN28B expression had poorer 2-year survival rates compared to patients with lower LIN28B expression (p = 0.021). A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Medicina 60 00870 g007
Table 1. Information about the antibodies used in this study.
Table 1. Information about the antibodies used in this study.
AntibodyDilution and Incubation TimeProviderAntigen RetrievalPositive Control for IHCNegative
Control for
IHC
Anti-OCT4
rabbit polyclonal		1:100
Overnight		Abcam
Inc.
Cambridge, UK		Tris/EDTA buffer (pH 9)Breast
carcinoma		Rabbit immunoglobulin fraction (X0936 DAKO, Hamburg, Germany)
Anti-LIN28A
rabbit polyclonal		1:100
Overnight		Abcam
Inc.
Cambridge, UK		Tris/EDTA buffer (pH 9)Hepatocellular
carcinoma		Rabbit immunoglobulin fraction (X0936 DAKO, Hamburg, Germany)
Anti-LIN28B
rabbit polyclonal		1:100
Overnight		Abcam
Inc.
Cambridge, UK		Tris/EDTA buffer (pH 9)Hepatocellular
carcinoma		Rabbit immunoglobulin fraction (X0936 DAKO, Hamburg, Germany)
Table 2. Clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients.
Table 2. Clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients.
Clinicopathologic CharacteristicsN (%)
Total96 (100)
Male81 (84.4)
Female15 (15.6)
Age<65 years 48
>65 years 48
Histology
Solid44 (45.8)
Lepidic9 (9.4)
Acinar23 (24)
Papillary7 (7.3)
Colloid7 (7.3)
Enteric5 (5.2)
Fetal1 (1)
Stage
I31 (32.3)
II26 (27.1)
III26 (27.1)
IV8 (8.3)
NA5 (5.2)
pT stage
T114 (14.6)
T255 (57.3)
T316 (16.7)
T410 (10.4)
NA1 (1.0)
pN stage
N037 (38.5)
N133 (34.4)
N220 (20.8)
NA6 (6.3)
Abbreviations—NA: data not available or unknown; pT: pathologic tumor status; pN: pathologic node status; Stage: as specified by the AJCC 8th edition; and AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Table 3. Relationship between the immunohistochemical expression of OCT4 and clinicopathological data.
Table 3. Relationship between the immunohistochemical expression of OCT4 and clinicopathological data.
OCT4 Nuclear
61 (63.5%)4 ± 5
Age<65484 ± 40.405
>65485 ± 7
GenderMale814 ± 60.879
Female154 ± 4
Histological
subtype		Solid444 ± 40.911
Non-solid525 ± 7
pTpT1144 ± 40.435
pT2555 ± 6
pT3164 ± 4
pT4103 ± 3
pNpN0375 ± 40.483
pN1334 ± 7
pN2203 ± 3
Stage1314 ± 40.412
2266 ± 9
3263 ± 3
485 ± 6
Abbreviations—pT: pathologic tumor status; pN: pathologic node status; Stage: according to the AJCC 8th edition; and AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Table 4. Relationships between the immunohistochemical expression of LIN28A and clinicopathological data.
Table 4. Relationships between the immunohistochemical expression of LIN28A and clinicopathological data.
LIN28A
62 (64.5%)4 ± 6
Age<65484 ± 80.567
>65483 ± 3
GenderMale813 ± 60.201
Female155 ± 7
Histological subtypeSolid443 ± 30.987
Non-solid524 ± 7
pTpT1144 ± 40.468
pT2554 ± 6
pT3164 ± 7
PT4103 ± 4
pNpN0375 ± 80.098
pN1334 ± 5
pN2201 ± 2
Stage1315 ± 80.396
2263 ± 2
3263 ± 6
482 ± 2
Abbreviations—pT: pathologic tumor status, pN: pathologic node status, Stage: according to the AJCC 8th edition; and AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Significant p-values appear in bold.
Table 5. Relationships between the nuclear and cytoplasmic LIN28B immunohistochemical expression and clinicopathological data.
Table 5. Relationships between the nuclear and cytoplasmic LIN28B immunohistochemical expression and clinicopathological data.
LIN28B
Nucleus		LIN28B
Cytoplasm
Total = 96Positive (%)Mean ± SDp-ValuePositive (%)Mean ± SDp-Value
68
(70.8%)		14 ± 24 78
(81.3%)		68 ± 52
Age<654814 ± 230.3574861 ± 500.423
>654815 ± 254876 ± 53
GenderMale8115 ± 260.878168 ± 510.759
Female1512 ± 111570 ± 55
Histological subtypeSolid4415 ± 250.8664461 ± 500.034
Non-solid5214 ± 235275 ± 53
pTpT11430 ± 490.4541496 ± 570.879
pT25512 ± 145559 ± 45
pT31614 ± 211675 ± 63
pT4107 ± 101072 ± 52
pNpN03716 ± 260.1393770 ± 570.059
pN13314 ± 193356 ± 42
pN2207 ± 102079 ± 54
Stage13114 ± 250.0953172 ± 540.489
22617 ± 202655 ± 46
3266 ± 92667 ± 52
4820 ± 27884
Abbreviations—pT: pathologic tumor status; pN: pathologic node status; Stage: according to the AJCC 8th edition; SD: standard deviation (SD); and AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Significant p-values appear in bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bosgana, P.; Nikou, S.; Dimitrakopoulos, F.-I.; Bravou, V.; Kalophonos, C.; Kourea, E.; Tzelepi, V.; Zolota, V.; Sampsonas, F. Expression of Pluripotency Factors OCT4 and LIN28 Correlates with Survival Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Medicina 2024, 60, 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060870

AMA Style

Bosgana P, Nikou S, Dimitrakopoulos F-I, Bravou V, Kalophonos C, Kourea E, Tzelepi V, Zolota V, Sampsonas F. Expression of Pluripotency Factors OCT4 and LIN28 Correlates with Survival Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Medicina. 2024; 60(6):870. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060870

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bosgana, Pinelopi, Sophia Nikou, Foteinos-Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos, Vasiliki Bravou, Charalambos Kalophonos, Eleni Kourea, Vasiliki Tzelepi, Vassiliki Zolota, and Fotios Sampsonas. 2024. "Expression of Pluripotency Factors OCT4 and LIN28 Correlates with Survival Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma" Medicina 60, no. 6: 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060870

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop