Next Article in Journal
Effect of the BiZact™ Low-Temperature Dissecting Device on Intra- and Postoperative Morbidities Related to Tonsillectomy—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of a Predictive Score for Three-Year Mortality in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hypochloremia: A Potential Indicator of Poor Outcomes in COVID-19

Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan 24100, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(9), 1414; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091414
Submission received: 9 July 2024 / Revised: 12 August 2024 / Accepted: 27 August 2024 / Published: 29 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Disease)

Abstract

:
Background: Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) has posed formidable challenges to healthcare systems. Exploring novel biomarkers that can provide valuable prognostic insights, particularly in critically ill patients, has a significant importance. Against this backdrop, our study aims to elucidate the associations between serum chloride levels and clinical outcomes. Methods: A total of 499 patients were enrolled into the study. The serum chloride levels of patients upon hospital admission were recorded and then categorized into three groups (hypochloremia, normochloremia, and hyperchloremia) for the evaluation of clinical outcomes. Additionally, serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and D-dimer measurements were recorded for further evaluation. Results: A total of 390 (78.1%) patients tested positive for COVID-19 via polymerase chain reaction testing. Non-contrast thorax computed tomography scans were indicative of COVID-19 compatibility for all patients. A total of 210 (42%) patients were female and 289 (58%) were male. A total of 214 (42.8%) patients necessitated tocilizumab intervention; 250 (50.1%) were at an intensive care unit (ICU), with 166 (66.4%) of them receiving tocilizumab. A total of 65 (13%) patients died, 40 (61.5%) of whom received tocilizumab; 41 (63%) were in the ICU. Serum chloride levels upon admission were markedly lower and elevated D-dimer levels were apparent in tocilizumab users, patients requiring ICU care, and patients who died. Conclusions: our findings provide robust evidence supporting the value of serum chloride levels as a prognostic biomarker in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) has posed formidable challenges to healthcare systems globally [1,2,3]. Critical illness due to COVID-19 often involves a dysregulated immune response, leading to conditions such as a cytokine storm, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and multiorgan dysfunction [4,5,6]. In this ongoing battle against the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a continuous effort to decipher the complex interplay between clinical parameters and patient outcomes. Recent research underscores the significance of exploring novel biomarkers that can provide valuable prognostic insights, particularly in critically ill patients [7]. Therefore, identifying reliable predictors of disease severity and patient outcomes is of paramount importance.
Against this backdrop, our study aims to elucidate the associations between serum chloride levels (a proven parameter for a bad course of sepsis) upon hospital admission and critical clinical outcomes. By investigating the potential of hypochloremia as a prognostic biomarker, we aspire to contribute to a deeper understanding of COVID-19 pathophysiology and enhance the predictive accuracy of clinical models for disease severity and patient outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

Study Design and Setting: This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Erzincan University Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Turkey. A total of 499 patients with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction enrolled in the study. The serum chloride levels of patients upon hospital admission were recorded for independent evaluation and then categorized into three groups: ≤97 mmol/L for hypochloremia, 98–107 mmol/L for normochloremia, and ≥108 mmol/L for hyperchloremia. Patients were excluded from the study if they had complaints such as vomiting or diarrhea, a history of diuretic use, severe lipemia, or signs of chronic respiratory acidosis, as these conditions can cause hypochloremia. Additionally, patients with a history of acetazolamide use, severe dehydration, or renal failure, which can cause hyperchloremia, were also excluded. Additionally, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and D-dimer measurements were recorded, and their associations with demographic data, serum chloride levels at admission, serum chloride level groups, and other parameters were scrutinized.
Data Collection: Medical records of the patients admitted to the hospital with confirmed COVID-19 were included in the study. A total of 53 patients were excluded due to reasons of possible hyperchloremia or hypochloremia. Patient demographic data, laboratory results, clinical outcomes, and treatment interventions were extracted from the hospital data processing system.
Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted based on the nature and distribution of the variables under consideration. The normality of the observed parameters was assessed using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, revealing a departure from normal distribution. Correlation among numerical measurements was evaluated utilizing Spearman’s rank correlation analysis.
Associations between numeric serum chloride values and categorical variables, including gender, frequency of tocilizumab usage, instances of intensive care unit hospitalization, and mortality rate, were appraised using a Mann–Whitney U test. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to identify optimal cutoff values and gauge diagnostic efficacy. ROC analysis is a statistical method used to determine the diagnostic success of a test (highest specificity and sensitivity values), to compare the sensitivity and specificity values obtained at different cutoff points, to determine the specificity values corresponding to certain sensitivity values or the sensitivity values corresponding to certain specificity values, and to compare the diagnostic success of two or more tests.
The connection between serum chloride level groups and numerical measurements was investigated via a Kruskal–Wallis test, while the interplay between categorical variables was examined using a Pearson chi-square test. Statistical significance was acknowledged at a threshold of p ≤ 0.05, and a statistical software package (SPSS ver. 23) was employed for all calculations.
Ethical approval: Study approval was obtained from the scientific studies program of the Turkish Ministry of Health with the approval number 2021-01-27T15_09_55. Also, ethical approval was gained from the Ethics Committee of Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University (Number: 2023-22/8; Date: 14 December 2023). Informed consent was not obtained because of the retrospective design of the study.

3. Results

Among 499 patients, 390 (78.1%) patients tested positive for COVID-19 via polymerase chain reaction testing. Non-contrast thorax computed tomography scans were indicative of COVID-19 compatibility for all patients. Among the participants, 210 (42%) were female and 289 (58%) were male. The mean age was 61.9 ± 12.4 years, ranging from 26 to 95. During their course of observation, 214 (42.8%) patients necessitated tocilizumab intervention. Within the cohort, 250 (50.1%) patients were under intensive care unit monitoring, with 166 (66.4%) of them receiving tocilizumab treatment. A total of 65 (13%) people died, 40 (61.5%) of whom received tocilizumab treatment; 41 (63%) were monitored in the intensive care unit.
Directly considering serum chloride measurements upon admission, there were no substantial alterations in the serum chloride level, CRP, procalcitonin, D-dimer, and total length of hospital stay associated with age. The serum chloride level upon admission exhibited a modest yet statistically significant inverse correlation solely with D-dimer, while no significant links were established with CRP, procalcitonin, and total hospital stay.
Evaluation of the descriptive statistics of measurements categorized by gender showed the serum chloride level at admission had been slightly elevated in women, reaching statistical significance. However, the observed mean variance lacks clinical significance. Other measurements exhibited no significant gender-based distinctions.
Individuals employing tocilizumab displayed a significantly higher mean age by approximately 3.8 years. The serum chloride level upon admission was markedly lower, and elevated D-dimer levels were apparent in tocilizumab users. Prolonged total hospital stays were also observed among these patients. Descriptive statistics of measurements contingent on tocilizumab utilization are presented in Table 1.
Employing a serum chloride level threshold of 101.5 upon admission, individuals surpassing this value were projected to evade the cytokine storm, yielding a diagnostic success rate of 64.2% and a prediction success rate of 58.9% for identifying those prone to the cytokine storm.
With a D-dimer threshold of 933.5, individuals exceeding this value were considered susceptible to the cytokine storm, achieving diagnostic success at 70.6% and predicting those resistant to the cytokine storm at 60.7%.
The descriptive statistics pertaining to measurements in relation to intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization are presented in Table 2. Patients admitted to the ICU exhibited a significantly higher mean age by approximately 4.7 years. Serum chloride levels at admission were markedly lower in patients requiring ICU hospitalization, and notably higher D-dimer levels were observed in these patients. As an expected result, prolonged total hospital stays were evident among patients necessitating ICU care.
Using a serum chloride level threshold of 101.5 at admission, individuals surpassing this value were predicted to avoid ICU hospitalization, yielding a diagnostic success rate of 62.2% and a prediction success rate of 53.6% for identifying those likely to be ICU hospitalized.
With a D-dimer threshold of 933.5, individuals exceeding this value were anticipated to be ICU hospitalized, resulting in diagnostic success at 59.2% and predicting those unlikely to be ICU hospitalized at 53.8%.
Descriptive statistics detailing measurements in connection to mortality status are provided in Table 3. Serum chloride levels at admission were significantly lower in individuals who succumbed. Interestingly, significantly lower procalcitonin levels were evident in deceased individuals. And again, as an expected result, extended total hospital stays were observed among those who passed away.
Employing a serum chloride level threshold of 98.5 at admission, individuals surpassing this value were projected to survive, yielding a diagnostic success rate of 76.3% and predicting mortality with a success rate of 72.3%.
Utilizing a procalcitonin level threshold of 0.215, individuals exceeding this value were projected to survive, resulting in diagnostic success at 61.5% and predicting mortality with a success rate of 52.8%.
Adopting a total length of hospitalization threshold of 12.5 days, individuals surpassing this value were projected to experience mortality, yielding a diagnostic accuracy of 66.2%, while predicting survival achieved a success rate of 52.3%.
Upon segregating serum chloride measurements at the time of admission into three distinct groups and upon perusal of Table 4, it becomes evident that age, CRP, procalcitonin, and total length of stay were akin across these groups. Solely the D-dimer level exhibited statistically significant elevation in patients with hypochloremia. A comparison of these findings, with correlations accounting for direct serum chloride measurements upon admission, disclosed that solely the serum chloride levels upon admission displayed a weak yet statistically significant inverse correlation with D-dimer, while no significant associations were observed with other characteristics.
Furthermore, Table 5 presents the frequency of tocilizumab utilization, prevalence of intensive care unit hospitalizations, and mortality rate in relation to serum chloride level groupings. The frequency of tocilizumab utilization, prevalence of intensive care unit hospitalization, and mortality rate were notably higher in the hypochloremia group compared to the other two groups (normo and hyperchloremia).

4. Discussion

The pathogenesis of COVID-19 involves a dysregulated immune response leading to critical conditions, such as cytokine storms, ARDS, and multiorgan dysfunction [8,9]. Unraveling the complex interplay between clinical parameters and patient outcomes has become imperative. Recent research has underscored the value of novel biomarkers that can offer essential prognostic insights for system involvements, particularly for critically ill COVID-19 patients [10,11,12,13].
But identifying reliable predictors of disease severity and patient outcomes remains a pressing challenge.
Electrolytes maintain and regulate important cellular functions in our body. Electrolyte imbalances can significantly impact immune function, cellular homeostasis, and cardiovascular stability [14]. One of them is chloride, which is an important electrolyte, and is found predominantly in extracellular fluid [15]. Chloride level imbalances have been associated with poor prognosis especially in critically ill patients. Our study builds upon recent investigations that highlight the potential of hypochloremia, which was previously nominated as an indicator of disease severity and prognosis in sepsis and other specific diseases [16,17,18,19]. There are a few studies examining hypochloremia in more specific situations in COVID-19 patients [20,21]. Tezcan et al. investigated all electrolytes to find the most relevant one for a poor prognosis in COVID-19 [22]. There was also a study in the literature that did not fully reflect our study but was more similar to our study than others [23]. These significant studies emphasize the importance of monitoring serum chloride levels as a dynamic marker for assessing the progression of critical diseases including COVID-19. In light of this backdrop, our study aims to elucidate the associations between serum chloride levels upon hospital admission and critical clinical outcomes in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. By exploring the potential of hypochloremia as a prognostic biomarker, we seek to contribute to a deeper understanding of COVID-19 pathophysiology and enhance the predictive accuracy of clinical models for disease severity and patient outcomes.
Since there are no studies in the literature that can be directly compared to our work, we will highlight the key points and limitations of our study.
Our study’s gender-based analysis revealed subtle differences in serum chloride levels, albeit with limited clinical significance. Notably, tocilizumab users were characterized by higher mean ages, lower serum chloride levels, elevated D-dimer levels, and extended hospital stays. We inferred that serum chloride levels upon admission could prognosticate tocilizumab usage and, by extension, a cytokine storm, with reduced chloride levels potentially indicating the storm’s onset. A similar predictive potential of cytokine storm occurrence was also observed for D-dimer levels. Hereby, elevated D-dimer levels with hypochloremia seemed to be a significant parameter for the prediction of a bad course.
Furthermore, the integration of serum chloride levels and D-dimer thresholds proved highly informative for predicting ICU hospitalizations. Key characteristics such as age, serum chloride levels upon admission, and D-dimer levels emerged as pivotal factors among patients requiring ICU care. The potential for serum chloride levels to forecast ICU admission became evident, with low chloride levels standing out as a potential indicator. Concurrently, D-dimer levels demonstrated efficacy in predicting the need for ICU hospitalization.
Mortality prediction, which is a paramount concern, unveiled insights anchored in serum chloride levels and procalcitonin concentrations. Lower serum chloride levels reduced procalcitonin concentrations as an interesting result, and extended hospital stays were significantly associated with increased mortality rates. Lower CRP and lower procalcitonin levels detected in deceased patients could be related to immunosupression at the end stage of disease or due to the use of tocilizumab (40 of 65 deceased patients had been given tocilizumab treatment). In this regard, our study contradicts other studies that have found elevated inflammatory biomarkers in patients who died due to COVID-19 [24,25]. In our study, the fact that the majority of those who died were patients monitored in the intensive care unit is an expected finding and is consistent with other studies in the literature [26,27]. Our findings mainly underscore the capacity of serum chloride levels and procalcitonin concentrations in predicting mortality risk. Integrating these markers with other clinical parameters can refine the accuracy of prognostic models.

5. Conclusions

Our findings provide robust evidence supporting the value of serum chloride levels as a prognostic biomarker in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Leveraging comprehensive statistical analyses and comparisons with the relevant literature, our study strengthens the potential utility of serum chloride monitoring in refining predictive models. These insights empower healthcare practitioners with essential tools for informed clinical decision-making in the ongoing fight against COVID-19. Although our study is unique in this field, its single-center nature necessitates further large-scale studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://zenodo.org/records/12594056 (accessed on 27 August 2024).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.B. and F.K.; methodology, O.B.; software, F.K.; validation, O.B. and F.K.; formal analysis, O.B.; investigation, O.B.; resources, O.B. and F.K.; data curation, O.B.; writing—original draft preparation, O.B.; writing—review and editing, O.B. and F.K.; visualization, O.B. and F.K.; supervision, F.K.; project administration, O.B. and F.K.; funding acquisition, O.B. and F.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University (Number: 2023-22/8; Date: 14 December 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective design of the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sharma, A.; Tiwari, S.; Deb, M.K.; Marty, J.L. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2): A global pandemic and treatment strategies. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Al-Qahtani, A.A. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): Emergence, history, basic and clinical aspects. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 2531–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ramachandra, M.S.; Pratap, V. COVİD-19: A Formidable Challenge to the Healthcare System. Res. Adv. Pharm. LifeSci. 2020, 2, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, R.; Lan, Z.; Ye, J.; Pang, L.; Liu, Y.; Wu, W.; Qin, X.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, P. Cytokine Storm: The Primary Determinant for the Pathophysiological Evolution of COVID-19 Deterioration. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 589095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mehta, P.; Fajgenbaum, D.C. Is severe COVID-19 a cytokine storm syndrome: A hyperinflammatory debate. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2021, 33, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Montazersaheb, S.; Hosseiniyan Khatibi, S.M.; Hejazi, M.S.; Tarhriz, V.; Farjami, A.; Ghasemian Sorbeni, F.; Farahzadi, R.; Ghasemnejad, T. COVID-19 infection: An overview on cytokine storm and related interventions. Virol. J. 2022, 19, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Fátima Cobre, A.; Alves, A.C.; Gotine, A.R.M.; Domingues, K.Z.A.; Lazo, R.E.L.; Ferreira, L.M.; Tonin, F.S.; Pontarolo, R. Novel COVID-19 biomarkers identified through multi-omics data analysis: N-acetyl-4-O-acetylneuraminic acid, N-acetyl-L-alanine, N-acetyltriptophan, palmitoylcarnitine, and glycerol 1-myristate. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2024. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shafqat, A.; Shafqat, S.; Salameh, S.A.; Kashir, J.; Alkattan, K.; Yaqinuddin, A. Mechanistic Insights Into the Immune Pathophysiology of COVID-19; An In-Depth Review. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 835104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Soy, M.; Keser, G.; Atagündüz, P. Pathogenesis and treatment of cytokine storm in COVID-19. Turk. J. Biol. 2021, 45, 372–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Battaglini, D.; Lopes-Pacheco, M.; Castro-Faria-Neto, H.C.; Pelosi, P.; Rocco, P.R.M. Laboratory Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 857573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aboughdir, M.; Kirwin, T.; Abdul Khader, A.; Wang, B. Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Biomarkers in COVID-19: A Review. Viruses 2020, 12, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gallo Marin, B.; Aghagoli, G.; Lavine, K.; Yang, L.; Siff, E.J.; Chiang, S.S.; Salazar-Mather, T.P.; Dumenco, L.; Savaria, M.C.; Aung, S.N.; et al. Predictors of COVID-19 severity: A literature review. Rev. Med. Virol. 2021, 31, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Menez, S.; Moledina, D.G.; Thiessen-Philbrook, H.; Wilson, F.P.; Obeid, W.; Simonov, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Corona-Villalobos, C.P.; Chang, C.; Garibaldi, B.T.; et al. TRIKIC Consortium Investigators. Prognostic Significance of Urinary Biomarkers in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2022, 79, 257–267.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shrimanker, I.; Bhattarai, S. Electrolytes. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Sagar, N.; Lohiya, S. A Comprehensive Review of Chloride Management in Critically Ill Patients. Cureus 2024, 16, e55625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ruan, X.; Gao, Y.; Lai, X.; Wang, B.; Wu, J.; Yu, X. Trimatch comparison of the prognosis of hypochloremia, normolchloremia and hyperchloremia in patients with septic shock. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2024. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, J.; Yu, Z.; Zhu, B.; Ma, J. The Association between the Hypochloremia and Mortality in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. J. Vasc. Dis. 2023, 2, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Z.; Xing, C.; Li, T.; Du, L.; Wang, N. Hypochloremia is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients in the coronary care unit: A cohort study. J. Int. Med. Res. 2020, 48, 0300060520911500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Oh, H.J.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, Y.C.; Kim, E.J.; Jung, I.Y.; Oh, D.H.; Jeong, S.J.; Ku, N.S.; Han, S.H.; Choi, J.Y.; et al. An increased chloride level in hypochloremia is associated with decreased mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Valga, F.; Monzón, T.; Vega-Diaz, N.; Ruiz-Santana, S.; Aladro, S.; Diallo-Saavedra, R.; De la Flor, J.C.; Rodriguez-Perez, J.C. Hypochloremia associated with a greater incidence of pneumonia in chronic hemodialysis patients with COVID-19: A center’s experience. Nefrologia (Engl. Ed.) 2024, 44, 290–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, Y.; Hou, B.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, P. Risk Factors Associated with Long-Term Hospitalization in Patients with COVID-19: A Single-Centered, Retrospective Study. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tezcan, M.E.; Dogan Gokce, G.; Sen, N.; Zorlutuna Kaymak, N.; Ozer, R.S. Baseline electrolyte abnormalities would be related to poor prognosis in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients. New Microbes New Infect. 2020, 37, 100753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oliveira, M.H.; Abosamak, M.F.; Michael Henry, B.; Benoit, S.W.; Lippi, G.; Previdelli, I. Longitudinal serum chloride as a marker for poor prognosis in severely ill COVID-19 patients: A joint model approach. Braz. J. Biom. 2024, 42, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ruan, Q.; Yang, K.; Wang, W.; Jiang, L.; Song, J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020, 46, 846–848, Erratum in Intensive Care Med. 2020, 46, 1294–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06028-z. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Eraslan, B.Z.; Demirer, E.; Kıral, N.; Şener Cömert, S. Is There a Relationship Between Serum Procalcitonin Level and Mortality and Disease Severity in Patients Diagnosed with COVID-19? J. Izmir Chest Hosp. 2023, 37, 122–127. [Google Scholar]
  26. Grasselli, G.; Greco, M.; Zanella, A.; Albano, G.; Antonelli, M.; Bellani, G.; Bonanomi, E.; Cabrini, L.; Carlesso, E.; Castelli, G.; et al. COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network. Risk Factors Associated with Mortality Among Patients with COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 1345–1355, Erratum in: JAMA Intern. Med. 2021, 181 1021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Docherty, A.B.; Harrison, E.M.; Green, C.A.; Hardwick, H.E.; Pius, R.; Norman, L.; Holden, K.A.; Read, J.M.; Dondelinger, F.; Carson, G.; et al. ISARIC4C investigators. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: Prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 2020, 369, m1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of measurements contingent on tocilizumab utilization.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of measurements contingent on tocilizumab utilization.
Use of TocilizumabNMeanSDPercentilesp *
25thMedian75th
AgeYes21463.813.95566740.001
No28560.611.03536169
Serum chloride level at the time of admission (mmol/L)Yes214100.47.4951001070.001
No285103.36.1299103107
CRP (mg/L)Yes21477.951.63874101.150.204
No28568.0730.444.956686.80
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)Yes2140.94.480.120.210.830.911
No2850.560.790.120.230.82
D-dimer (µg/L)Yes2143557.34665.2786.7520984390.500.001
No2851313.61577.054988121313
Total length of hospital stay (days)Yes21415.45.281114190.001
No28513.024.84101216
*: Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics pertaining to measurements in relation to intensive care unit hospitalization.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics pertaining to measurements in relation to intensive care unit hospitalization.
Hospitalization in Intensive Care UnitNMeanSDPercentilesp *
25thMedian75th
AgeYes25064.312.55766730.001
No24959.611.8526069
Serum chloride level at the time of admission (mmol/L)Yes250101.27.25961011060.001
No249102.96.3199103107
CRP (mg/L)Yes25074.547.0841.7071.8597.450.683
No24970.0934.243.5067.3090.20
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)Yes2500.864.150.120.280.880.129
No2490.560.830.120.180.75
D-dimer (µg/L)Yes2502771.83916.7678.71153054.750.001
No2491777.92849.95608951883.50
Total length of hospital stay (days)Yes25015.55.491115.50190.001
No24912.54.33101116
*: Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics detailing measurements in connection to mortality status.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics detailing measurements in connection to mortality status.
DeathNMeanSDPercentilesp *
25thMedian75th
AgeYes6563.111.956.5063720.478
No43461.812.5536471
Serum chloride level at the time of admission
(mmol/L)
Yes6596.57.3590961010.001
No434102.96.3799103107
CRP (mg/L)Yes6568.241.235.3566.5092.250.346
No43472.941.243.9571.8592.30
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)Yes650.400.620.120.120.600.027
No4340.763.200.120.250.86
D-dimer (µg/L)Yes652646.23212.7660.50186832240.079
No4342220.43494.1579984.502356
Total length of hospital stay (days)Yes6515.65.581116180.011
No43413.85.06101217
*: Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 4. Descriptive statistical analyses of other measurements in relation to serum chloride level groups.
Table 4. Descriptive statistical analyses of other measurements in relation to serum chloride level groups.
Serum Chloride Level GroupNMeanSDPercentilesp *
25thMedian75th
AgeHypochloremia12361.814.075264720.907
Normal28362.211.2556370
Hyperchloremia9361.313.5536473
CRP (mg/L)Hypochloremia12370.742.637.5066.9092.900.276
Normal28374.643.3457396.80
Hyperchloremia9367.0931.143.4066.4083.45
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)Hypochloremia1230.470.620.120.190.660.397
Normal2830.853.920.120.240.88
Hyperchloremia930.600.900.120.300.84
D-dimer (µg/L)Hypochloremia1232747.493209.3703143932560.049
Normal2832182.863821.75719132108
Hyperchloremia931935.242426.09630.509852330.50
Total length of hospital stay (days)Hypochloremia12314.304.951013180.567
Normal28314.045.24101317
Hyperchloremia9313.75.23101217.50
*: Kruskal–Wallis test.
Table 5. Frequency of tocilizumab utilization, prevalence of intensive care unit hospitalizations, and mortality rate in relation to serum chloride level groupings.
Table 5. Frequency of tocilizumab utilization, prevalence of intensive care unit hospitalizations, and mortality rate in relation to serum chloride level groupings.
Hypochloremia (n = 123)Normal (n = 283)Hyperchloremia (n = 93)p *
n%n%n%
Tocilizumab useYes8065.0 a9633.9 bc3840.9 bc0.001
No4335.0 a18766.1 bc5559.1 bc
Hospitalization in intensive care unitYes7762.6 a13146.3 bc4245.2 bc0.006
No4637.4 a15253.7 b5154.8 bc
DeathYes45 a36.6 a144.9 bc66.5 bc0.001
No7863.4 a26995.1 bc8793.5 bc
*: Pearson chi-square test. a, b, c: If two parameters have different letters (such as ‘a’ and ‘b’), it means they are significantly different. If they share the same letter or have a common letter (such as ‘a’ and ‘a’ or ‘a’ and ‘ab’), they are not significantly different.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barkay, O.; Karakeçili, F. Hypochloremia: A Potential Indicator of Poor Outcomes in COVID-19. Medicina 2024, 60, 1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091414

AMA Style

Barkay O, Karakeçili F. Hypochloremia: A Potential Indicator of Poor Outcomes in COVID-19. Medicina. 2024; 60(9):1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091414

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barkay, Orçun, and Faruk Karakeçili. 2024. "Hypochloremia: A Potential Indicator of Poor Outcomes in COVID-19" Medicina 60, no. 9: 1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091414

APA Style

Barkay, O., & Karakeçili, F. (2024). Hypochloremia: A Potential Indicator of Poor Outcomes in COVID-19. Medicina, 60(9), 1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091414

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop