Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta
Abstract
:1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
3.1. TRI Facility Distribution
3.2. Toxic Air Chemical Releases
3.3. Complaints to Air Toxic Chemical Releases
3.4. Resolution of Complaints to Air Toxic Releases
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bullard, R.D. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, USA, 2008; p. 262. [Google Scholar]
- United Church of Christ. Toxic Wastes and Race at Twenty: 1987–2007; United Church of Christ March: Cleveland, OH, USA, 2007; Volume 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Atari, D.O.; Luginaah, I.; Xu, X.; Fung, K. Spatial variability of ambient nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide in sarnia, “chemical valley”, Ontario, Canada. J. Toxicol. Environ.Health Part A 2008, 71, 1572–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. LEARN About the Toxics Release Inventory. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/learn-about-toxics-release-inventory (accessed on 9 November 2015).
- Choi, H.S.; Shim, Y.K.; Kaye, W.E.; Ryan, P.B. Potential residential exposure to toxics release inventory chemicals during pregnancy and childhood brain cancer. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Langlois, P.H.; Brender, J.D.; Suarez, L.; Zhan, F.B.; Mistry, J.H.; Scheuerle, A.; Moody, K. Maternal residential proximity to waste sites and industrial facilities and conotruncal heart defects in offspring. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2009, 23, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wilson, S.M.; Fraser-Rahim, H.; Williams, E.; Zhang, H.; Rice, L.; Svendsen, E.; Abara, W. Assessment of the distribution of Toxic Release Inventory facilities in metropolitan charleston: An environmental justice case study. Am. J. Public Health 2012, 102, 1974–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perlin, S.A.; Setzer, R.W.; Creason, J.; Sexton, K. Distribution of industrial air emissions by income and race in the united states: An approach using the Toxic Release Inventory. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- U.S. Census Bureau. American Factfinder-Results. Available online: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1 (accessed on 18 March 2015).
- Spielman, S.E.; Folch, D.; Nagle, N. Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the american community survey. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 46, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dollar, D.; Gatti, R. Gender Inequality, Income, and Growth: Are Good Times Good for Women; World Health Organization: Washington, DC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey: Selected Economic Characteristics; U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
- Mohai, P.; Lantz, P.M.; Morenoff, J.; House, J.S.; Mero, R.P. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in residential proximity to polluting industrial facilities: Evidence from the americans’ changing lives study. Am. J. Public Health 2009, 99, S649–S656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- United Church of Christ. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites; United Church of Christ: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Hutch, D.J.; Bouye, K.E.; Skillen, E.; Lee, C.; Whitehead, L.; Rashid, J.R. Potential strategies to eliminate built environment disparities for disadvantaged and vulnerable communities. Am. J. Public Health 2011, 101, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Konisky, D.M.; Reenock, C. Compliance bias and environmental (in)justice. J. Polit. 2013, 75, 506–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hird, J.A. Environmental policy and equity: The case of superfund. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 1993, 12, 323–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Folger, J.K.; Nam, C.B. Education of the American Population, (A 1960 Census Monograph); U.S. Department of Commerce: Washington, DC, USA, 1967; p. 290.
- U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Survey, 2015 Annual Social and Economic Supplement; U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, DC, USA, 2015.
- Jiao, Y.Q.; Bower, J.K.; Im, W.; Basta, N.; Obrycki, J.; Al-Hamdan, M.Z.; Wilder, A.; Bollinger, C.E.; Zhang, T.W.; Hatten, L.S.; et al. Application of citizen science risk communication tools in a vulnerable urban community. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Variable | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total number of air toxic releases | 19.8 | 27.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 10.0 | 24.0 | 218.0 |
Total amount of air toxics emitted (lbs) | 851,634.7 | 5,592,370.4 | 0 | 51.0 | 4055.0 | 59,137.9 | 5,715,497.1 |
Amount of air toxics emitted per release (lbs) | 18,250.4 | 84,447.1 | 0 | 5.9 | 260.8 | 2566.5 | 742,272.4 |
Total number of complaints | 2.9 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 33.0 |
Average time to resolve complaint (days) | 36.4 | 65.7 | 0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 44.6 | 386.0 |
Variable | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Lower Quartile | Median | Upper Quartile | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median Household Income (U.S. Dollars) | 51,816 | 22,345 | 4705 | 37,223 | 48,081 | 63,075 | 163,474 |
% of population are female HS graduates | 8.6 | 3.1 | 0 | 6.3 | 8.8 | 11.0 | 16.2 |
% of population are females with undergraduate degree | 8.4 | 4.8 | 0 | 4.7 | 7.6 | 11.5 | 22.0 |
% of population are females with graduate degree | 3.0 | 2.8 | 0 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 40.0 |
% of population White | 56.1 | 32.7 | 0 | 23.7 | 68.2 | 85.7 | 100.0 |
% of population Black | 32.7 | 33.2 | 0 | 6.3 | 16.8 | 57.0 | 100.0 |
% of population Hispanic | 6.5 | 9.3 | 0 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 6.9 | 71.2 |
% of population Asian | 2.9 | 3.6 | 0 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 3.8 | 20.5 |
% of households with income below the poverty line | 11.4 | 11.3 | 0 | 4.3 | 7.8 | 13.9 | 75.4 |
% of households on public assistance | 2.8 | 3.8 | 0 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 30.0 |
% of housing units vacant | 5.6 | 4.4 | 0 | 3.1 | 4.7 | 6.6 | 57.9 |
Socio-Demographic Characteristics | Facility Present N = 135 | No Facility Present N = 541 | OR (95% CI) | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Median Household Income | ||||
>$77,500 | 6 (4.4%) | 69 (12.8%) | 1.00 | |
$50,000–$77,500 | 42 (31.1%) | 197 (36.4%) | 2.5 (1.0–6.0) | 0.4 |
$22,500–$50,000 | 80 (59.3%) | 234 (43.3%) | 3.9 (1.6–9.4) | 0.005 |
<$22,500 | 7(5.2%) | 41 (7.5%) | 2.0 (0.6–6.2) | 0.85 |
% of population White, Median (IQR) | 65.6 (44.0–83.4) | 70.2 (21.6–87.0) | 1.004 (0.998, 1.009) | 0.2302 |
% of population non-White, Median (IQR) | 32.5 (15.5–54.2) | 27.9 (11.6–75.2) | 0.997 (0.991, 1.002) | 0.2616 |
% of population Black, Median (IQR) | 17.5 (8.4–34.6) | 16.1 (5.5–63.6) | 0.993 (0.987, 0.998) | 0.0240 |
% of population Hispanic, Median (IQR) | 4.5 (2.0–10.9) | 2.9 (1.3–5.9) | 1.03 (1.013, 1.049) | 0.0007 |
% of population Asian, Median (IQR) | 0.9 (0.2–3.6) | 1.6 (0.3–3.6) | 0.992 (0.941, 1.044) | 0.7517 |
% of Female HS diploma, Median (IQR) | 9.6 (7.3–11.5) | 8.5 (6.0–10.9) | 1.115 (1.050, 1.183) | 0.0009 |
% of Female Undergrad degree, Median (IQR) | 5.7 (3.8–9.0) | 8.3 (5.0–12.1) | 0.904 (0.865, 0.944) | <0.0001 |
% of Female Grad degree, Median (IQR) | 1.8 (0.9–2.7) | 2.3 (1.2–3.9) | 0.823 (0.745, 0.909) | 0.0001 |
% of population with income below poverty line, Median (IQR) | 10.7 (5.6–16.2) | 7.7 (4.0–13.8) | 1.002 (0.986, 1.018) | 0.8119 |
% of Housing Vacant, Median (IQR) | 5.3 (3.8–7.3) | 4.7 (3.9–6.8) | 1.017 (0.983, 1.052) | 0.3396 |
% of Households on Public Assist, Median (IQR) | 2.1 (1.0–3.7) | 1.5 (0.7–3.3) | 1.002 (0.955, 1.051) | 0.1466 |
Census Tract Characteristics | Unadjusted OR | Adjusted OR | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
Median Household Income | |||
>$77,500 | 1.00 | 1.0 | |
$50,000–$77,500 | 2.5 (1.0, 6.0) | 1.7 (0.6, 4.3) | 0.8 |
$22,500–$50,000 | 3.9 (1.6, 9.4) | 2.4 (1.8, 6.7) | 0.05 |
<$22,500 | 2.0 (0.6, 6.2) | 1.7 (0.4, 8.0) | 0.9 |
% Hispanic | 1.03 (1.013, 1.049) | 1.012 (0.994, 1.032) | 0.2 |
% Black | 0.993 (0.987, 0.998) | 0.985 (0.977, 0.993) | 0.0005 |
% females with undergrad degree | 0.904 (0.865, 0.944) | 0.894 (0.842, 0.949) | 0.0002 |
Census Tract Characteristics | Total Amount Toxic Air Chemicals Released | Average Amount of Toxic Air Chemicals per Release | Number of Toxic Air Chemical Releases | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slope Coefficient (95% CI) | p Value | Slope Coefficient (95% CI) | p Value | Slope Coefficient (95% CI) | p Value | |
Median Household Income | −0.0000082 (−0.0005, 0.0003) | 0.62 | 0.000011 (−0.004, 0.006) | 0.80 | −0.00022 (−0.00069, 0.00026) | 0.37 |
% Females with undergrad degree | −0.19 (−0.13, −0.24) | 0.009 | −0.18 (−0.11, −0.22) | 0.004 | 0.96 (−0.74, 2.66) | 0.26 |
% Non-White | 0.0080 (−0.067, 0.09) | 0.35 | 0.0061 (−0.07, 0.89) | 0.37 | 0.0035 (−0.20, 0.20) | 0.97 |
Census Tract Characteristics | Number of Complaints | Time to Resolution of Complaints | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted OR | p Value | Adjusted OR | p Value | |
TRI Facility | ||||
Present (1) | 4.065 (2.779, 5.935) | <0.0001 | 1.723 (1.100, 2.732) | 0.02 |
Absent (0) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Median Household Income | 1.000 (1.000, 1.000) | 0.44 | 1.000 (1.000, 1.000) | 0.78 |
% of population Black | 0.989 (0.983, 0.995) | 0.0006 | 0.994 (0.985, 1.003) | 0.20 |
% of population Hispanic | 1.020 (1.000, 1.036) | 0.05 | 1.031 (1.010, 1.054) | 0.0101 |
% of population Asian | 0.922 (0.875, 0.971) | 0.0021 | - | - |
% of population female undergrad degree | 0.957 (0.929, 1.021) | 0.05 | 1.007 (0.941, 1.078) | 0.83 |
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Johnson, R.; Ramsey-White, K.; Fuller, C.H. Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080747
Johnson R, Ramsey-White K, Fuller CH. Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016; 13(8):747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080747
Chicago/Turabian StyleJohnson, Ryan, Kim Ramsey-White, and Christina H. Fuller. 2016. "Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13, no. 8: 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080747
APA StyleJohnson, R., Ramsey-White, K., & Fuller, C. H. (2016). Socio-demographic Differences in Toxic Release Inventory Siting and Emissions in Metro Atlanta. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(8), 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080747