Effectiveness of a Psycho-Social Intervention Aimed at Reducing Attrition at Methadone Maintenance Treatment Clinics: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
2.2. Procedure
2.3. Intervention
2.3.1. Intervention Group
2.3.2. Control Group
2.4. Measures
2.4.1. Drug Use and Detoxification Intention
2.4.2. MMT-Related Perceptions
2.4.3. Family and Social Support
2.4.4. Health Status
2.5. Sample Size Estimation
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics
3.2. Primary Outcome
3.3. Secondary Outcomes
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ritchie, H.; Roser, M. Drug Use. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/drug-use (accessed on 29 October 2019).
- Dennis, B.B.; Naji, L.; Bawor, M.; Bonner, A.; Varenbut, M.; Daiter, J.; Plater, C.; Pare, G.; Marsh, D.C.; Worster, A.; et al. The effectiveness of opioid substitution treatments for patients with opioid dependence: A systematic review and multiple treatment comparison protocol. Syst. Rev. 2014, 3, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joseph, H.; Stancliff, S.; Langrod, J. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT): A review of historical and clinical issues. Mt. Sinai J. Med. 2000, 67, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Mattick, R.P.; Breen, C.; Kimber, J.; Davoli, M. Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009, CD002209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ward, J.; Hall, W.; Mattick, R.P. Role of maintenance treatment in opioid dependence. Lancet 1999, 353, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahamad, K.; Hayashi, K.; Nguyen, P.; Dobrer, S.; Kerr, T.; Schutz, C.G.; Montaner, J.S.; Wood, E. Effect of low-threshold methadone maintenance therapy for people who inject drugs on HIV incidence in Vancouver, BC, Canada: An observational cohort study. Lancet HIV 2015, 2, e445–e450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.M.; Li, X.Y.; Chow, E.P.; Li, T.; Xian, Y.; Lu, Y.H.; Tian, T.; Zhuang, X.; Zhang, L. Methadone maintenance treatment programme reduces criminal activity and improves social well-being of drug users in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2015, 5, e005997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wittchen, H.U.; Apelt, S.M.; Soyka, M.; Gastpar, M.; Backmund, M.; Golz, J.; Kraus, M.R.; Tretter, F.; Schafer, M.; Siegert, J.; et al. Feasibility and outcome of substitution treatment of heroin-dependent patients in specialized substitution centers and primary care facilities in Germany: A naturalistic study in 2694 patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008, 95, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mullen, L.; Barry, J.; Long, J.; Keenan, E.; Mulholland, D.; Grogan, L.; Delargy, I. A national study of the retention of Irish opiate users in methadone substitution treatment. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abus. 2012, 38, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peles, E.; Schreiber, S.; Adelson, M. 15-Year survival and retention of patients in a general hospital-affiliated methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) center in Israel. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010, 107, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peles, E.; Schreiber, S.; Adelson, M. Trends in substance abuse and infectious disease over 20 years in a large methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) clinic in Israel. Subst. Abus. 2014, 35, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambdin, B.H.; Masao, F.; Chang, O.; Kaduri, P.; Mbwambo, J.; Magimba, A.; Sabuni, N.; Bruce, R.D. Methadone treatment for HIV prevention-feasibility, retention, and predictors of attrition in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A retrospective cohort study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 59, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sheikh Fathollahi, M.; Torkashvand, F.; Najmeddin, H.; Rezaeian, M. Predictors of One-Year Retention in Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) in Iran, Rafsanjan. Int. J. High Risk Behav. Addict. 2016, 5, e29121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cao, X.; Wu, Z.; Rou, K.; Li, L.; Lin, C.; Wang, C.; Luo, W.; Pang, L.; Yin, W.; Li, J.; et al. Retention and its predictors among methadone maintenance treatment clients in China: A six-year cohort study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014, 145, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zhang, L.; Chow, E.P.; Zhuang, X.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tang, C.; Ling, L.; Tucker, J.D.; Wilson, D.P. Methadone maintenance treatment participant retention and behavioural effectiveness in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, K.; Zhuang, G. Retention in methadone maintenance treatment in mainland China, 2004–2012: A literature review. Addict. Behav. 2014, 39, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Effective Medical Treatment of Opiate Addiction. National Consensus Development Panel on Effective Medical Treatment of Opiate Addiction. JAMA 1998, 280, 1936–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Psychosocially Assisted Pharmacological Treatment of Opioid Dependence; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Stein, M.D.; Friedmann, P. Need for medical and psychosocial services among injection drug users: A comparative study of needle exchange and methadone maintenance. Am. J. Addict. 2002, 11, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLellan, A.T.; Arndt, I.O.; Metzger, D.S.; Woody, G.E.; O’Brien, C.P. The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse treatment. JAMA 1993, 269, 1953–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amato, L.; Minozzi, S.; Davoli, M.; Vecchi, S. Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, CD004147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Wei, X.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Li, H.; Jia, W. Long-term effects of methadone maintenance treatment with different psychosocial intervention models. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Song, R.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Cai, B.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Ke, J.; Lou, J.; et al. Educational and Behavioral Counseling in a Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program in China: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gruber, V.A.; Delucchi, K.L.; Kielstein, A.; Batki, S.L. A randomized trial of 6-month methadone maintenance with standard or minimal counseling versus 21-day methadone detoxification. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008, 94, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schiff, M.; Nacasch, N.; Levit, S.; Katz, N.; Foa, E.B. Prolonged Exposure for Treating PTSD Among Female Methadone Patients Who Were Survivors of Sexual Abuse in Israel. Soc. Work Health Care 2015, 54, 687–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hser, Y.I.; Li, J.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, R.; Du, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, B.; Evans, E.; Wu, F.; Chang, Y.J.; et al. Effects of a randomized contingency management intervention on opiate abstinence and retention in methadone maintenance treatment in China. Addiction 2011, 106, 1801–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Wu, Z.; Liang, L.J.; Lin, C.; Zhang, L.; Guo, S.; Rou, K.; Li, J. An intervention targeting service providers and clients for methadone maintenance treatment in China: A cluster-randomized trial. Addiction 2013, 108, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Wu, Z.; Rou, K.; Pang, L.; Cao, X.; Shoptaw, S.; Detels, R. Challenges in providing services in methadone maintenance therapy clinics in China: Service providers’ perceptions. Int. J. Drug Policy 2010, 21, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.S. A humble service that has delivered public health good. Public Health 2007, 121, 884–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zou, X.; Chen, W.; Ling, L. Trends and factors in human immunodeficiency virus and/or hepatitis C virus testing and infection among injection drug users newly entering methadone maintenance treatment in Guangdong Province, China 2006–2013: A consecutive cross sectional study. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e015524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, J.; Lau, J.T.; Xu, H.; Zhong, Y.; Hao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Fan, L.; Ling, W. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the relative efficacy of the addition of a psycho-social intervention to standard-of-care services in reducing attrition and improving attendance among first-time users of methadone maintenance treatment in China. AIDS Behav. 2013, 17, 2002–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, J.; Xu, H.; Lau, J.T.; Hao, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Fan, L.; Zhao, Y.; Hao, C.; Ling, W. Misconceptions predict dropout and poor adherence prospectively among newly admitted first-time methadone maintenance treatment clients in Guangzhou, China. Addiction 2012, 107, 1641–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, J.; Lau, J.T.; Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, C.; Liu, J. Mental health and interpersonal factors associated with HIV-related risk behaviors among non-institutionalized female injection drug users who are also sex workers in China. Women Health 2010, 50, 20–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lau, J.T.F.; Gu, J.; Tsui, H.Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, Z.; Cao, W. Anticipated suicidal ideation among female injecting drug users who are sex workers of negative or unknown HIV status in China. Women Health 2018, 58, 774–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shou, J.; Ren, L.; Wang, H.; Yan, F.; Cao, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, S.; Liu, Y. Reliability and validity of 12-item Short-Form health survey (SF-12) for the health status of Chinese community elderly population in Xujiahui district of Shanghai. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2016, 28, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lam, C.L.; Tse, E.Y.; Gandek, B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual. Life Res. 2005, 14, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Che, Y.; Assanangkornchai, S.; McNeil, E.; Chongsuvivatwong, V.; Li, J.; Geater, A.; You, J. Predictors of early dropout in methadone maintenance treatment program in Yunnan province, China. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010, 29, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, A.; Xia, Y.H.; Chen, W.; Ling, L.; Tan, W.K.; Zheng, R.J. Predictors of retention related factors at the initial methadone maintenance treatment clinics in Guangdong province. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2009, 30, 1230–1233. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.L.; Tan, H.Z.; Sun, Z.Q.; Zhang, H.; Chen, M.S.; Ou, Q.Y. Study on the time of retention and related influencing factors of patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment in Hunan province. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2009, 30, 672–675. [Google Scholar]
- Austin, P.C. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: Reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat. Med. 2014, 33, 1242–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Austin, P.C. Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: A systematic review. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2008, 1, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.S.; Groenwold, R.H.; Belitser, S.V.; Pestman, W.R.; Hoes, A.W.; Roes, K.C.; Boer, A.; Klungel, O.H. Reporting of covariate selection and balance assessment in propensity score analysis is suboptimal: A systematic review. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2015, 68, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuart, E.A. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Stat. Sci. 2010, 25, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0.; IBM Corp: Armonk, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12; StataCorp LP: College Station, TX, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Stone, A.C.; Carroll, J.J.; Rich, J.D.; Green, T.C. Methadone maintenance treatment among patients exposed to illicit fentanyl in Rhode Island: Safety, dose, retention, and relapse at 6 months. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018, 192, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darker, C.D.; Ho, J.; Kelly, G.; Whiston, L.; Barry, J. Demographic and clinical factors predicting retention in methadone maintenance: Results from an Irish cohort. Ir J. Med. Sci. 2016, 185, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pashaei, T.; Shojaeizadeh, D.; Rahimi Foroushani, A.; Ghazitabatabae, M.; Moeeni, M.; Rajati, F.; Razzaghi, E.M. Effectiveness of Relapse Prevention Cognitive-Behavioral Model in Opioid-Dependent Patients Participating in the Methadone Maintenance Treatment in Iran. Iran. J. Public Health 2013, 42, 896–902. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Pang, L.; Hao, Y.; Mi, G.; Wang, C.; Luo, W.; Rou, K.; Li, J.; Wu, Z. Effectiveness of first eight methadone maintenance treatment clinics in China. AIDS 2007, 21, S103–S107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gauthier, G.; Eibl, J.K.; Marsh, D.C. Improved treatment-retention for patients receiving methadone dosing within the clinic providing physician and other health services (onsite) versus dosing at community (offsite) pharmacies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018, 191, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adelson, M.; Linzy, S.; Peles, E. Characteristics and Outcome of Male and Female Methadone Maintenance Patients: MMT in Tel Aviv and Las Vegas. Subst. Use Misuse 2018, 53, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiaoli, W.; Lirong, W.; Xueliang, W.; Jinsong, L.; Hengxin, L.; Wei, J. Risk Factors of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Drug Users from Eleven Methadone Maintenance Treatment Clinics in Xi’an, China. Hepat. Mon. 2014, 14, e19601. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Andrade, C. Propensity Score Matching in Nonrandomized Studies: A Concept Simply Explained Using Antidepressant Treatment During Pregnancy as an Example. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2017, 78, e162–e165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jupiter, D.C. Propensity Score Matching: Retrospective Randomization? J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017, 56, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Before-matching Sample (n = 359) | After-matching Sample (n = 248) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Intervention | SDiff | Control | Intervention | SDiff | |
(%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |||
Socio-demographic characteristics | ||||||
Sex (female) | 8.7 | 14.5 | 0.182 | 10.5 | 12.9 | 0.075 |
Age (>45 years) | 63.6 | 61.3 | 0.048 | 57.3 | 59.7 | 0.049 |
Education level | ||||||
Primary or below | 17.3 | 21.0 | 0.094 | 17.7 | 19.4 | 0.044 |
Junior high | 68.2 | 59.7 | 0.178 | 68.5 | 60.5 | 0.168 |
Senior high or above | 14.5 | 19.4 | 0.131 | 13.7 | 20.2 | 0.174 |
Current marriage status | ||||||
Single | 43.4 | 38.7 | 0.096 | 40.3 | 38.7 | 0.033 |
Married/cohabitating | 40.5 | 39.8 | 0.014 | 44.4 | 41.9 | 0.050 |
Divorced/other | 16.2 | 21.5 | 0.136 | 15.3 | 19.4 | 0.108 |
Current employment status (Employed) | 33.5 | 40.3 | 0.141 | 35.5 | 45.2 | 0.199 |
Monthly income (>1000 CNY) | 42.2 | 46.2 | 0.081 | 42.7 | 53.2 | 0.195 |
Being HIV positive (yes) | 1.7 | 11.3 | 0.397a | 2.4 | 4.0 | 0.091 |
Drug use-related characteristics | ||||||
Age of initial drug use (>25 years old) | 60.1 | 54.3 | 0.117 | 56.5 | 54.0 | 0.050 |
Duration of drug use (>20 years) | 58.4 | 61.6 | 0.065 | 56.5 | 59.3 | 0.057 |
Ever injected drugs (yes) | 59.0 | 73.1 | 0.301a | 65.3 | 64.5 | 0.017 |
Times of compulsory detoxification | ||||||
0 | 20.5 | 21.1 | 0.015 | 21.1 | 22.8 | 0.041 |
1-2 | 45.6 | 35.1 | 0.215 | 43.9 | 39.8 | 0.083 |
3~ | 33.9 | 43.8 | 0.204 | 35.0 | 37.4 | 0.050 |
Current drug use | ||||||
No use | 20.2 | 21.0 | 0.020 | 26.6 | 21.8 | 0.112 |
Less than once a day | 26.0 | 33.9 | 0.173 | 22.6 | 33.1 | 0.236 |
At least once a day | 53.8 | 45.2 | 0.173 | 50.8 | 45.2 | 0.112 |
detox intention score | ||||||
<8 | 23.7 | 25.3 | 0.037 | 20.0 | 29.0 | 0.210 |
8-9 | 42.2 | 34.4 | 0.161 | 40.3 | 35.5 | 0.099 |
10 | 34.1 | 40.3 | 0.129 | 39.5 | 35.5 | 0.083 |
MMT-related perceptions | ||||||
Having proper perception about MMT aim/time | 43.9 | 43.5 | 0.008 | 42.7 | 44.4 | 0.034 |
Having proper perception about MMT dosage | 42.2 | 40.9 | 0.026 | 38.7 | 46.0 | 0.148 |
Self-efficacy of MMT retention in the next six months | ||||||
Low | 24.3 | 26.9 | 0.060 | 25.0 | 25.0 | <0.001 |
Medium | 47.4 | 44.6 | 0.056 | 47.6 | 47.6 | <0.001 |
High | 28.3 | 28.5 | 0.004 | 27.4 | 27.4 | <0.001 |
Willing to accept psycho-social services (yes) | 72.3 | 87.6 | 0.389a | 84.7 | 84.7 | <0.001 |
Family and Social Support | ||||||
Score of Perceived Social Support Scale (Mean, SD) | 10.4, 2.0 | 10.1, 2.4 | 0.149 | 10.2, 2.2 | 10.5, 2.2 | 0.147 |
Family awareness of MMT | ||||||
Disagree/Extremely disagree | 21.4 | 29.6 | 0.189 | 21.8 | 21.0 | 0.020 |
Don’t know/hard to say | 40.5 | 28.5 | 0.254a | 36.3 | 33.1 | 0.067 |
Agree/Extremely agree | 38.2 | 41.9 | 0.076 | 41.9 | 46.0 | 0.083 |
Family support in MMT | ||||||
Disagree/Extremely disagree | 9.2 | 9.7 | 0.017 | 8.9 | 9.7 | 0.028 |
Don’t know/hard to say | 28.3 | 27.4 | 0.020 | 25.8 | 25.8 | <0.001 |
Agree/Extremely agree | 62.4 | 62.9 | 0.010 | 65.3 | 64.5 | 0.017 |
Good MMT communication with family members | ||||||
Disagree/Extremely disagree | 19.1 | 28.5 | 0.222 | 25.0 | 23.4 | 0.037 |
Don’t know/hard to say | 40.5 | 26.3 | 0.305a | 30.6 | 30.6 | <0.001 |
Agree/Extremely agree | 40.5 | 45.2 | 0.095 | 44.4 | 46.0 | 0.032 |
Overall health status (Mean, SD) | ||||||
Physical functioning | 50.8, 9.0 | 49.4, 9.5 | 0.153 | 50.6, 9.1 | 50.7, 8.5 | 0.016 |
Role-physical | 45.7, 16.5 | 44.9, 16.3 | 0.047 | 44.7, 17.0 | 46.9, 15.5 | 0.137 |
Role-emotional | 44.7, 18.8 | 37.8, 21.0 | 0.346 a | 43.3, 19.6 | 43.5, 19.2 | 0.009 |
Mental health | 45.9, 8.3 | 44.6, 10.3 | 0.147 | 46.3, 8.8 | 46.7, 9.2 | 0.049 |
General health | 44.3, 9.4 | 43.2, 11.3 | 0.109 | 44.3, 9.9 | 42.8, 11.3 | 0.138 |
Bodily pain | 49.8, 8.3 | 48.4, 9.0 | 0.160 | 50.1, 9.1 | 49.3, 8.3 | 0.095 |
Vitality | 49.0, 9.2 | 46.4, 9.8 | 0.267 a | 49.0, 9.8 | 47.6, 9.3 | 0.150 |
Social functioning | 43.3, 9.9 | 43.0, 10.5 | 0.033 | 42.6, 10.8 | 43.7, 9.7 | 0.114 |
Physical Component Summary | 49.3, 7.5 | 49.2, 8.5 | 0.005 | 49.1, 7.8 | 49.2, 7.3 | 0.004 |
Mental Component Summary | 44.1, 10.5 | 40.4, 13.0 | 0.320 a | 43.6, 11.0 | 43.7, 11.0 | 0.005 |
Attrition Rates (%) | Propensity-Matched Cohort | ||
---|---|---|---|
M1 | M6 | M12 | |
Control | 19.4 (24/124) | 52.4 (65/124) | 75.0 (93/124) |
Intervention | 10.5 (13/124) | 39.5 (49/124) | 58.9 (73/124) |
RR (95% CI) | 0.901 (0.811,1.001) | 0.787 (0.623,0.993) * | 0.608 (0.420,0.880) * |
Absolutely risk reduction (95% CI) | 0.089 [0.001,0.177] * | 0.129 (0.006,0.252) * | 0.161 (0.046,0.277) * |
Reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction | 12 | 8 | 6 |
M0 (n = 248) n (%) | M1 (n = 211) n (%) | M6 (n = 172) n (%) | P for Trend | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Socio-economic status | ||||
Current employment status (Employed) | ||||
Control | 44 (35.5) | 30 (30.3) | 29 (37.7) | 0.864 |
Intervention | 56 (45.2) | 47 (43.1) | 47 (50.0) | 0.516 |
RR (95% CI) | 1.18 (0.96,1.45) | 1.23 (0.99,1.51)+ | 1.25 (0.96,1.63) | |
Monthly income (>1000 CNY) | ||||
Control | 54 (43.5) | 38 (38.8) | 30 (39.0) | 0.481 |
Intervention | 66 (53.2) | 52 (47.7) | 52 (55.9) | 0.767 |
RR (95% CI) | 1.21 (0.95,1.54) | 1.17 (0.92,1.49) | 1.39 (1.04,1.85)* | |
Drug use-related characteristics | ||||
Current drug use | ||||
Control | 91 (73.4) | 26 (28.6) | 16 (21.6) | <0.001* |
Intervention | 97 (78.2) | 21 (19.6) | 12 (13.2) | <0.001* |
RR (95% CI) | 1.22 (0.78,1.90) | 0.889 (0.76,1.04) | 0.903 (0.78,1.04) | |
Detox intention score (=10) | ||||
Control | 49 (39.5) | 42 (42.4) | 25 (32.5) | 0.391 |
Intervention | 44 (35.5) | 54 (49.1) | 49 (51.6) | 0.014* |
RR (95% CI) | 0.94 (0.77,1.14) | 1.13 (0.88,1.45) | 1.40 (1.08,1.81)* | |
MMT-related perceptions | ||||
Proper perception about MMT aim/duration | ||||
Control | 53 (42.7) | 50 (50.0) | 34 (44.2) | 0.730 |
Intervention | 55 (44.4) | 53 (47.7) | 52 (54.7) | 0.133 |
RR (95% CI) | 1.03 (0.83,1.28) | 0.96 (0.73,1.25) | 1.23 (0.92,1.66) | |
Proper perception about MMT dosage | ||||
Control | 48 (38.7) | 39 (39.0) | 28 (36.4) | 0.763 |
Intervention | 57 (46.0) | 40 (36.0) | 28 (29.5) | 0.012* |
RR (95% CI) | 1.13 (0.92,1.41) | 0.95 (0.77,1.18) | 0.90 (0.73,1.12) | |
Social Support | ||||
Score of Perceived Social Support Scale (Mean, SD) | ||||
Control | 10.20,2.19 | 10.39,2.57 | 10.30,1.99 | 0.887 |
Intervention | 10.52,2.18 | 10.22,2.35 | 10.08,2.16 | 0.059+ |
Mean diff (95% CI) | 0.28 (−0.22,0.87) | −0.03 (−0.69,0.63) | −0.23 (−0.86,0.41) | |
Family awareness of MMT (agree/extremely agree) | ||||
Control | 52 (41.9) | 55 (55.6) | 31 (44.3) | 0.513 |
Intervention | 57 (46.0) | 63 (57.3) | 49 (54.4) | 0.180 |
RR (95% CI) | 1.08 (0.86,1.34) | 1.04 (0.76,1.42) | 1.22 (0.90,1.66) | |
Family support in MMT (Agree/Extremely agree) | ||||
Control | 81 (65.3) | 71 (71.7) | 43 (61.4) | 0.748 |
Intervention | 80 (64.5) | 78 (71.6) | 70 (77.8) | 0.034* |
RR (95% CI) | 0.98 (0.70,1.37) | 0.99 (0.65,1.53) | 1.74 (1.07,2.82) * | |
Good MMT communication with family members (Agree/Extremely agree) | ||||
Control | 55 (44.4) | 54 (54.5) | 28 (40.0) | 0.796 |
Intervention | 57 (46.0) | 60 (54.5) | 46 (51.1) | 0.401 |
RR (95% CI) | 1.03 (0.82,1.29) | 1.00 (0.74,1.35) | 1.23 (0.92,1.63) | |
Overall health status (Mean, SD) | ||||
Physical component summary | ||||
Control | 49.13,7.81 | 50.60,7.61 | 50.36,7.93 | 0.717 |
Intervention | 49.16,7.33 | 51.40,6.99 | 50.17,8.05 | 0.165 |
Mean difference (95% CI) | 0.03 (−1.86,1.93) | 0.80 (−1.18,2.79) | −0.20 (−2.62,2.23) | |
Mental component summary | ||||
Control | 43.64,11.01 | 45.07,11.13 | 43.70,11.10 | 0.396 |
Intervention | 43.70,10.98 | 42.93,11.68 | 46.46,12.47 | 0.058+ |
Mean difference (95% CI) | 0.06 (−2.69,2.81) | −2.14 (−5.25,0.97) | 2.77 (−0.80,6.33) |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fan, X.; Zhang, X.; Xu, H.; Yang, F.; Lau, J.T.F.; Hao, C.; Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Hao, Y.; Gu, J. Effectiveness of a Psycho-Social Intervention Aimed at Reducing Attrition at Methadone Maintenance Treatment Clinics: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224337
Fan X, Zhang X, Xu H, Yang F, Lau JTF, Hao C, Li J, Zhao Y, Hao Y, Gu J. Effectiveness of a Psycho-Social Intervention Aimed at Reducing Attrition at Methadone Maintenance Treatment Clinics: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(22):4337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224337
Chicago/Turabian StyleFan, Xiaoyan, Xiao Zhang, Huifang Xu, Fan Yang, Joseph T.F. Lau, Chun Hao, Jinghua Li, Yuteng Zhao, Yuantao Hao, and Jing Gu. 2019. "Effectiveness of a Psycho-Social Intervention Aimed at Reducing Attrition at Methadone Maintenance Treatment Clinics: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 22: 4337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224337
APA StyleFan, X., Zhang, X., Xu, H., Yang, F., Lau, J. T. F., Hao, C., Li, J., Zhao, Y., Hao, Y., & Gu, J. (2019). Effectiveness of a Psycho-Social Intervention Aimed at Reducing Attrition at Methadone Maintenance Treatment Clinics: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224337