The Influence of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in Shangzhou District
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
2.3. Calculation of Ecosystem Services Value
3. Results
3.1. Land Use Change
3.2. Ecosystem Service Value Changes
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Daily, G.C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, J.; Yang, K. Research progress on ecosystem services valuation. Acta Ecol. Sinica 2007, 27, 346–356. [Google Scholar]
- Costanza, R.; D’arge, R.; de Groot, R.; Farber, M.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, L.; Yu, L.; Wu, W. Spatial characteristics of ecosystem service function and value in qianjiang city, hubei province. Acta Ecol. Sinica 2011, 31, 7379–7387. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, Y.; Wang, R.; Huang, J.; Yang, W. Spatial-temporal Changes of Terrestrial Ecosystem Services in China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2012, 57, 720–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, J.; Luo, W.; Du, T.; Li, Z.; Lv, Y. Evaluation of ecosystem service value change in the Taihu Lake in the last ten years. Acta Ecol. Sinica 2015, 35, 2255–2264. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, L.; Chen, W.; Li, S. Improvement of ecosystem service value approach based on unit-area value equivalency factor. J. Nat. Resour. 2015, 30, 1243–1254. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, W.; Kang, W.; He, J. Value analysis of ecosystem service function in Dongting Lake area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 2016, 25, 217–229. [Google Scholar]
- Rönnbäck, P. The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 29, 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolund, P.; Hunhammar, S. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 29, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, Y.; Lu, C. The value of ecosystem services in China. Resour. Sci. 2015, 5, 1740–1746. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, J.; Li, J.; Yao, X. The spatial-temporal variation characteristics of the ecosystem service value of Wuhan urban circle. J. Appl. Ecol. 2014, 25, 883–891. [Google Scholar]
- Li, T.H.; Li, W.K.; Qian, Z.H. Variation sinecosystem service value inresponsetol and use changes in Shenzhen. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1427–1435. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.; Cai, W.; Xu, S.; Huang, Z.; Qiu, Y. Risk assessment of coastal ecosystem in Beibu gulf of Guangxi. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 22, 2977–2986. [Google Scholar]
- Posner, S.; Verutes, G.; Koh, I.; Denu, D.; Ricketts, T. Global use of ecosystem service models. Ecosyst. Serv. 2016, 17, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghermandi, A.; Sheela, A.M.; Justus, J. Integrating similarity analysis and ecosystem service value transfer: Results from atropical coastal wetland in India. Ecosyst. Serv. 2016, 22, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Liao, L.; Long, H.; Qin, J. Analysis of ecosystem service value effect of land use transformation: A case study of Hunan Province. Geogr. Res. 2015, 34, 691–700. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, G.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q. Effects of spatio-temporal changes in land use on the value of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Delta. Acta Ecol. Sinica 2014, 34, 3311–3319. [Google Scholar]
- Min, J.; Gao, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, A. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Land Use and Ecosystem Services Value in Wuhan City. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2006, 20, 170–174. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, C.; Li, S. Effects of Land Use Change on the Value of Ecosystem Services in Western China—Taking Baoji City as an Example. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2010, 23, 340–344. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.; Dai, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y. Change of ecosystem service value based on land use datasets in Sanjiangyuan area. Prog. Geogr. 2012, 31, 970–977. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, G.; Lu, C.; Leng, Y.; Zheng, D.; Li, S. Evaluation of ecological assets on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. J. Nat. Resour. 2003, 18, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, L.; Xu, X.; Luo, T.; Zhu, G.; Ma, Z. Equivalent revision method of ecosystem service value based on land use—A case study of Bohai bay. Geogr. Stud. 2012, 31, 1175–1184. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, W.; Wu, J.; Tang, W. Spatial-temporal change of ecosystem service value in rapidly urbanized areas—A case study of Suzhou. Land Nat. Resour. Res. 2018, 6, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X.; Guo, L.; Xue, D.; Sun, S. Gannan district land use pattern and ecosystem service value of time and space evolution. Acta Ecol. Sinica 2019, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, D.; Chen, Z.; Peng, B. Coordination and spatial differentiation of land use ecological service value and economic development—A case study of Dongting lake in the west. Geogr. Res. 2018, 37, 1692–1703. [Google Scholar]
- Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; de Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 25, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, N.; Liu, J. Summary of Research on Plant Biomass (Summary). Subtrop. Plant Sci. 2011, 40, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Tian, X. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in Naoli River Basin in Recent 60 Years. Acta Ecol. Sinica 2013, 33, 3169–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X. The Estimation and Distribution of Net Primary Productivity of Natural Vegetation in China. Nat. Resour. 1993, 1, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
- Lieth, H.; Box, E.O.X. Evapotranspiration and primary production: C W Thornthwaite Memorial Mode. Publ. Climatol. 1972, 25, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
- Man, M.; Luo, J. Ecological benefit evaluation of Shaanxi province farmland conversion project. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2006, 34, 4735–4737. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Feng, S.; Qu, F. A study on the coupling and coordination of farmland protection, intensive use of construction land and urbanization. J. Nat. Resour. 2017, 32, 1002–1015. [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, J. Research on coordinated development of urbanization and farmland protection from the perspective of ecological civilization—A case study of ningde city, fujian province. China Agric. Resour. Reg. 2014, 35, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y.; Yuan, J. Spatial evolution of coordination degree of urbanization development in Shaanxi province from 2000 to 2015. Econ. Geogr. 2018, 38, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, G. Research on the influence of returning farmland to forest and grass on land use change—A case study of yan ‘an ecological construction demonstration zone. J. Nat. Resour. 2006, 21, 274–279. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Bao, W.; Pang, X. Relationship between tianbao and farmland conversion project and environmental sustainable development. Resour. Environ. Yangtze River Basin 2004, 13, 296–300. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, M.; Cao, M.; Zhu, Z. Research on the relationship between land use change and social and economic development in Shaanxi province. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2011, 39, 10031–10033. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, C.; Pu, L.; Meng, A. A comparative study of cultivated land changes in different economic development stages—A case study of Jiangzhou, Guangxi and Wujiang, Jiangsu. Resour. Sci. 2006, 28, 50–56. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, Y.; Niu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, Y. The relationship between land use change and economic development in the Yangtze river delta. Econ. Geogr. 2008, 28, 982–985. [Google Scholar]
Land Use | Farmland | Woodland | Grassland | Water | Unused Land | Built-Up Land |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecosystem | Farmland | Forest | Grassland | Water | Desert | — |
Regulating service | 1760.8 | 8317.6 | 2212.2 | 18440.2 | 26.5 | 0 |
Supporting service | 3371.3 | 7494.7 | 3849.2 | 18298.7 | 327.3 | 0 |
Provisioning service | 973.4 | 2389.1 | 309.7 | 97.3 | 8.8 | 0 |
Cultural service | 8.8 | 1132.6 | 35.4 | 3840.2 | 8.8 | 0 |
Total | 6114.3 | 19334 | 6406.5 | 40676.4 | 371.4 | 0 |
Years | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rt | 1.764 | 1.797 | 1.706 | 1.620 |
Years | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|
St | 0.217 | 0.283 | 0.403 | 0.443 |
At | 0.215 | 0.282 | 0.398 | 0.439 |
Wt | 1.008 | 1.002 | 1.013 | 1.007 |
Land Type | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | Rate of Increase | Annual Rate of Increase |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of Total Area | Percent of Total Area | Percent of Total Area | Percent of Total Area | |||
Farmland | 25.19 | 23.41 | 23.30 | 23.31 | −7.46 | −0.50 |
Woodland | 32.74 | 33.40 | 33.88 | 33.83 | 3.35 | 0.22 |
Grassland | 40.83 | 41.79 | 41.09 | 40.92 | 0.21 | 0.01 |
Water area | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 10.47 | 0.70 |
Built-up land | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.43 | 1.61 | 67.56 | 4.50 |
Unused land | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 614.29 | 40.95 |
2000 | 2015 | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Farmland | Woodland | Grassland | Water Area | Built-up Land | Unused Land | ||
Farmland | 59311.24 | 2308.42 | 3406.27 | 34.44 | 1565.41 | 16.06 | 66641.84 |
Woodland | 501.59 | 85813.63 | 257.56 | 1.76 | 19.85 | 16.99 | 86611.38 |
Grassland | 1814.26 | 1373.29 | 104577.30 | 62.09 | 198.93 | 9.78 | 108035.65 |
Water area | 0.90 | 8.69 | 13.14 | 703.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 726.42 |
Built-up land | 41.74 | 7.28 | 13.09 | 0.08 | 2486.73 | 0.21 | 2549.13 |
Unused land | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6.74 | 6.83 |
Sum | 61669.82 | 89511.31 | 108267.35 | 802.07 | 4270.92 | 49.79 | 264571.26 |
Area change | −4972.02 | 2899.93 | 231.70 | 75.65 | 1721.79 | 42.95 | — |
Area change ratio | 50.00 | 29.16 | 2.33 | 0.76 | 17.31 | 0.43 | 100.00 |
2000 | 2015 | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Farmland | Woodland | Grassland | Water Area | Built−Up Land | Unused Land | ||
Farmland | 0.00 | 2188.49 | 71.38 | 121.93 | −686.41 | 39.80 | 1735.20 |
Woodland | −475.53 | 0.00 | −238.78 | 4.57 | −27.53 | 26.01 | −711.25 |
Grassland | −38.02 | 1273.16 | 0.00 | 218.57 | −91.40 | 24.05 | 1386.36 |
Water area | −3.17 | −22.52 | −46.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −71.95 |
Built−up land | 18.30 | 10.10 | 6.01 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 35.34 |
Unused land | −0.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.24 |
Total | −498.65 | 3449.23 | −207.65 | 345.39 | −805.33 | 90.48 | 2373.46 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yuan, K.; Li, F.; Yang, H.; Wang, Y. The Influence of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in Shangzhou District. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081321
Yuan K, Li F, Yang H, Wang Y. The Influence of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in Shangzhou District. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(8):1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081321
Chicago/Turabian StyleYuan, Keyue, Fei Li, Haijuan Yang, and Yiming Wang. 2019. "The Influence of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in Shangzhou District" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 8: 1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081321
APA StyleYuan, K., Li, F., Yang, H., & Wang, Y. (2019). The Influence of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in Shangzhou District. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081321