Therapeutic Relationship in eHealth—A Pilot Study of Similarities and Differences between the Online Program Priovi and Therapists Treating Borderline Personality Disorder
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- To what extent are patients able to form a therapeutic relationship with priovi?
- What are the characteristics of this relationship?
- How does it differ from the working alliance with the human therapist
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Recruitment and Sample
2.2. Procedure
2.3. Data Analysis
2.4. Intervention
3. Results
3.1. Qualitative Results
3.1.1. Priovi Is Helpful, Supportive and Always There
“I thought it was great that I could take it with me, use it on my cell phone. That was very valuable for me.”(priovi is always available, P4)
“Priovi’s advantage is that it’s accessible anytime and that I can look things up anytime. I can do the exercises anytime. […] With my therapist I can only do that once or twice a week.”(priovi is always available, P4)
“[Priovi’s validating communication style] means a lot to me. It’s a reason to keep working with the program. I think I would already have quit had it not been for that. I experienced enough lack of understanding from other human beings, I don’t need that electronically.”(priovi validates and normalizes, P5)
“I can just work more independently with it than I could with just face-to-face therapy. This makes me feel a whole lot more self-effective and less reliant; if something doesn’t work out, I don’t have to wait until I can discuss it in therapy, I can do something myself.”(priovi promotes self-efficacy, P9)
3.1.2. Priovi Evokes Emotions (But Not as Much as a Human)
“In a personal relationship, the judging part of my brain is more active [than in the relationship with priovi], because the program can’t devalue me. Not really. Not even I think “Priovi thinks I’m crap”. My mind can’t go there with priovi, but in a human relationship, it can.”(priovi can’t judge, P6)
“I’m a bit anxious about the program because I know that once I’m in an emotional spiral, I can’t get out of it quickly by myself.”(priovi leaves me alone with my emotions, P7)
“[…] kind text messages like ‘Have you already done something nice for yourself today?’ or ‘It’s great that you’re here’ or something like that, that’s like the sun shining on you… it just does tremendous good, to have something like that right in the middle of your busy day-to-day life, and it’s not only in that moment, it’s something to carry with you over the next couple of hours.”(priovi evokes pleasant emotions, P8)
“From one day to the next, I stopped getting any more text messages and that made me really fall apart because I thought I could rely upon getting one every day, and then suddenly I got nothing.”(priovi’s technical errors evoke emotional pain, P8)
3.1.3. Priovi Is Less Flexible
“I feel like I can stabilize what I’ve learned more cleanly with priovi because I always read the same explanations, I always do the same exercises. I feel this way there are fewer steps in between. With a human counterpart, there is always that other person’s judgment or impression that factors into it, and with priovi, there isn’t.”(priovi is always the same, P3)
“It’s just more personal with a human counterpart who can directly answer any question I have, which may not be included in the program. I think I need that human counterpart to learn how to trust and just to talk about things and ask things that the program can’t answer for me.”(priovi isn’t very flexible or individual, P9)
“Well, [the therapist] is just more flexible. And it may be easier for someone knowing my biography to identify triggers for current moods.”(priovi isn’t very flexible or individual, P7)
“Well, [priovi] works with general hypotheses, which are surely correct but also too general for me.”(priovi is general, P5)
“Priovi is like a box, it’s got its content but nothing more can fit in. But my therapist doesn’t stand still, there is always something new, there’s food for thought and new reactions. Priovi can’t think. It’s got its content and that’s it.”(priovi isn’t very flexible or individual, P6)
3.1.4. There Are Links between the Relationship to the Therapist and Priovi
“Well, what was also part of it was that I thought ‘my therapist will be glad and she thinks it’s good for me to do this’ and then I also knew it really does help me so I thought ‘I’ll just do my exercises’.”(good relationship to therapist motivates use of priovi, P4)
“Since I have such a close, trusting relationship with my therapist and really trust her completely, I knew this [priovi] can’t be bad, it’ll be okay if she says so. I just knew I could rely upon that.”(good relationship to therapist prevents fear of using priovi, P9)
“If I hadn’t worked so continuously on so many things with priovi, the trusting relationship to my therapist wouldn’t have gotten that much closer, as it did. It strengthened and improved it because I just worked continuously on this all and I realized I was making progress, I was feeling self-efficient. And that deepened the bond to my therapist.”(working with priovi strengthens bond to therapist, P9)
3.1.5. Priovi Is No Human
“[…] it really felt like having a friend, like I’d met Pia [Priovi’s protagonist] and when I had a problem I wondered if maybe there was something in priovi about it and I looked it up.”(Priovi feels almost like a person, P4)
“Right in the beginning, I was able to choose my nickname [as the name priovi would use to address me]. That, and the text messages I got, always kept me from feeling treated like ‘just a number’, neither by priovi nor by my therapist.”(It is possible to identify with priovi, P2)
“The difference is an emotional one. Electronics don’t have emotions. They don’t have brains. And therefore no human traits.”(priovi is less emotional than a human, P5)
“I could take the program to my family, who kind of frowned upon my borderline diagnosis and didn’t really know what it was, and then I could show them on the screen and they could read about it and they understood it. That made things much easier.”(priovi helps explaining BPD to others, P4)
“To me, it’s like several modules that you work through to attain a certain level of know-how, mostly on a cognitive level. Face-to-face therapy operates much more on an emotional level.”(priovi provides information, helps to understand and priovi is less emotional than a human, P7)
3.2. Quantitative Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Semi-Structured Interview: Therapeutic Relationship to Priovi/Therapist
- What does priovi mean to you?
- Are there any other programs or objects which have a similar significance to you? If so, what are similarities and differences compared to priovi?
- What does your therapist mean to you and how does it compare to what priovi means to you?
- How much do you feel priovi is embedded in your face-to-face therapy?
- How much do you feel priovi is associated with your therapist?
- Studies suggest that in order to have a successful therapeutic relationship, it is necessary to feel “known as a person”. What do you think about that? Are there any differences between priovi and your therapist regarding this?
- (also ask this question for other categories: „get to the solution“ and „relate to me“) [32]
- Studies also suggest that technological interventions such as priovi mainly help via specific elements like psychoeducation or exercises whereas traditional therapy mainly helps via unspecific things like the therapeutic relationship. What do you think about that? [25]
- What do you feel helped you most about priovi/traditional therapy?
References
- Volkert, J.; Gablonski, T.C.; Rabung, S. Prevalence of personality disorders in the general adult population in Western countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 2018, 213, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bender, D.S.; Dolan, R.T.; Skodol, A.E.; Sanislow, C.A.; Dyck, I.R.; McGlashan, T.H.; Shea, M.T.; Zanarini, M.C.; Oldham, J.M.; Gunderson, J.G. Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2001, 158, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hörz, S.; Zanarini, M.C.; Frankenburg, F.R.; Reich, D.B.; Fitzmaurice, G. Ten-year use of mental health services by patients with borderline personality disorder and with other axis II disorders. Psychiatr. Serv. 2010, 61, 612–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunderson, J.G.; Stout, R.L.; McGlashan, T.H.; Shea, M.T.; Morey, L.C.; Grilo, C.M.; Zanarini, M.C.; Yen, S.; Markowitz, J.C.; Sanislow, C.; et al. Ten-year course of borderline personality disorder: Psychopathology and function from the collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2011, 68, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Javaras, K.N.; Zanarini, M.C.; Hudson, J.I.; Greenfield, S.F.; Gunderson, J.G. Functional Outcomes in Community-Based Adults with Borderline Personality Disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2017, 89, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahediabghari, S.; Boursiquot, P.; Links, P. Impact of psychotherapy on psychosocial functioning in borderline personality disorder patients. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hastrup, L.H.; Jennum, P.; Ibsen, R.; Kjellberg, J.; Simonsen, E. Societal costs of Borderline Personality Disorders: A matched-controlled nationwide study of patients and spouses. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2019, 140, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iliakis, E.A.; Sonley, A.K.I.; Ilagan, G.S.; Choi-Kain, L.W. Treatment of borderline personality disorder: Is supply adequate to meet public health needs? Psychiatr. Serv. 2019, 70, 772–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karyotaki, E.; Riper, H.; Twisk, J.; Hoogendoorn, A.; Kleiboer, A.; Mira, A.; MacKinnon, A.; Meyer, B.; Botella, C.; Littlewood, E.; et al. Efficacy of self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms a meta-analysis of individual participant data. JAMA Psychiatry 2017, 74, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersson, G.; Carlbring, P.; Titov, N.; Lindefors, N. Internet Interventions for Adults with Anxiety and Mood Disorders: A Narrative Umbrella Review of Recent Meta-Analyses. Can. J. Psychiatry 2019, 64, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuester, A.; Niemeyer, H.; Knaevelsrud, C. Internet-based interventions for posttraumatic stress: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2016, 43, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zanarini, M.C.; Conkey, L.C.; Temes, C.M.; Fitzmaurice, G.M. Randomized, Controlled Trial of Web-based Psychoeducation for Women with Borderline Personality Disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2018, 79, 16m11153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rizvi, S.L.; Dimeff, L.A.; Skutch, J.; Carroll, D.; Linehan, M.M. A Pilot Study of the DBT Coach: An Interactive Mobile Phone Application for Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder and Substance Use Disorder. Behav. Ther. 2011, 42, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rizvi, S.L.; Hughes, C.D.; Thomas, M.C. The DBT coach mobile application as an adjunct to treatment for suicidal and self-injuring individuals with borderline personality disorder: A preliminary evaluation and challenges to client utilization. Psychol. Serv. 2016, 13, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jacob, G.A.; Hauer, A.; Köhne, S.; Assmann, N.; Schaich, A.; Schweiger, U.; Fassbinder, E. A Schema Therapy–Based eHealth Program for Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (priovi): Naturalistic Single-Arm Observational Study. JMIR Ment. Health 2018, 5, e10983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prada, P.; Zamberg, I.; Bouillault, G.; Jimenez, N.; Zimmermann, J.; Hasler, R.; Aubry, J.M.; Nicastro, R.; Perroud, N. EMOTEO: A Smartphone Application for Monitoring and Reducing Aversive Tension in Borderline Personality Disorder Patients, a Pilot Study. Perspect. Psychiatr. Care 2017, 53, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilagan, G.; Iliakis, E.; Wilks, C.; Ipsit, V.V.; Choi-Kain, L.W. Smartphone applications targeting borderline personality disorder symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Borderline Personal. Disord. Emot. Dysregul. 2020, 7, 12. [Google Scholar]
- Young, J.E.; Klosko, J.S.; Weishaar, M.E. Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Klein, J.P.; Hauer, A.; Berger, T.; Fassbinder, E.; Schweiger, U.; Jacob, G. Protocol for the REVISIT-BPD trial, a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of an internet-based self-management intervention in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fassbinder, E.; Hauer, A.; Schaich, A.; Schweiger, U.; Jacob, G.A.; Arntz, A. Integration of e-Health Tools Into Face-to-Face Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Chance to Close the Gap between Demand and Supply? J. Clin. Psychol. 2015, 71, 764–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flückiger, C.; Del Re, A.C.; Wampold, B.E.; Symonds, D.; Horvath, A.O. How Central is the Alliance in Psychotherapy? A Multilevel Longitudinal Meta-Analysis. J. Couns. Psychol. 2012, 59, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horvath, A.O.; Del Re, A.C.; Flückiger, C.; Symonds, D. Alliance in Individual Psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 2011, 48, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barnicot, K.; Katsakou, C.; Bhatti, N.; Savill, M.; Fearns, N.; Priebe, S. Factors predicting the outcome of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: A systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2012, 32, 400–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Flückiger, C.; Del, A.C.; Wampold, B.E.; Horvath, A.O. The Alliance in Adult Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis. Psychotherapy 2018, 55, 316–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kiluk, B.D.; Serafini, K.; Frankforter, T.; Nich, C.; Carroll, K.M. Only Connect: The Working Alliance in Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Behav. Res. Ther. 2014, 63, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Heim, E.; Rötger, A.; Lorenz, N.; Maercker, A. Working alliance with an avatar: How far can we go with internet interventions? Int. Interv. 2018, 11, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berger, T.; Boettcher, J.; Caspar, F. Internet-based guided self-help for several anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial comparing a tailored with a standardized disorder-specific approach. Psychotherapy 2014, 51, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez Penedo, J.M.; Babl, A.M.; Grosse Holtforth, M.; Hohagen, F.; Krieger, T.; Lutz, W.; Meyer, B.; Moritz, S.; Klein, J.P.; Berger, T. The Association of Therapeutic Alliance With Long-Term Outcome in a Guided Internet Intervention for Depression: Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Control Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e15824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berger, T. The therapeutic alliance in internet interventions: A narrative review and suggestions for future research. Psychother. Res. 2017, 27, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maffei, C.; Fossati, A.; Barraco, A.; Bagnato, M.; Deborah, D.; Namia, C.; Novella, L.; Petrachi, M. Interrater Reliability and Internal Consistency of the Structured Clinical Interview for Dsm-Iv Axis Ii Personality. J. Pers. Disord. 1997, 11, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arntz, A.; Van den Hoorn, M.; Cornelis, J.; Verheul, R.; Van den Bosch, W.M.C.; De Bie, A.J.H.T. Reliability and validity of the borderline personality disorder severity index. J. Pers. Disord. 2003, 17, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shattell, M.M.; Starr, S.S.; Thomas, S.P. “Take my hand, help me out”: Mental health service recipients’ experience of the therapeutic relationship. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 2007, 16, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Munder, T.; Wilmers, F.; Leonhart, R.; Linster, H.W.; Barth, J. Working alliance inventory-short revised (WAI-SR): Psychometric properties in outpatients and inpatients. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 2010, 17, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mayring, P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken; 12. überar.; Beltz Verlag: Weinheim, Germany; Basel, Switzerland, 2010; ISBN 978-3-407-25730-7. [Google Scholar]
- Arntz, A.; van Genderen, H. Schematherapie bei Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung; Beltz: Weinheim, Germany, 2010; ISBN 9783621277464. [Google Scholar]
- Faßbinder, E.; Schweiger, U. Das schematherapeutische Modusmodell. Psychotherapie 2013, 18, 123–143. [Google Scholar]
- Weisel, K.K.; Fuhrmann, L.M.; Berking, M.; Baumeister, H.; Cuijpers, P.; Ebert, D.D. Standalone smartphone apps for mental health—A systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digit. Med. 2019, 2, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reins, J.A.; Buntrock, C.; Zimmermann, J.; Grund, S.; Harrer, M.; Lehr, D.; Baumeister, H.; Weisel, K.; Domhardt, M.; Imamura, K.; et al. Efficacy and Moderators of Internet-Based Interventions in Adults with Subthreshold Depression: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Psychother. Psychosom. 2020, 1–13. Available online: https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/507819 (accessed on 6 August 2020).
- Schweiger, J.I.; Kahl, K.G.; Klein, J.P.; Sipos, V.; Schweiger, U. Innovation in psychotherapy, challenges, and opportunities: An opinion paper. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Probst, G.H.; Berger, T.; Flückiger, C. The Alliance-Outcome Relation in Internet-Based Interventions for Psychological Disorders: A Correlational Meta-Analysis. Verhaltenstherapie 2019, 29, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penedo, J.M.G.; Berger, T.; Grosse Holtforth, M.; Krieger, T.; Schröder, J.; Hohagen, F.; Meyer, B.; Moritz, S.; Klein, J.P. The Working Alliance Inventory for guided Internet interventions (WAI-I). J. Clin. Psychol. 2020, 76, 973–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristic | N | % |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 2 | 12.5 |
Female | 14 | 87.5 |
Highest Education | ||
Secondary school (9 years) | 1 | 6.25 |
Secondary school (12/13 years) | 4 | 25 |
Vocational training | 6 | 37.5 |
University degree | 5 | 31.25 |
Employment Status | ||
Student/apprentice | 2 | 12.5 |
Voluntary service | 1 | 6.25 |
Employed | 8 | 50 |
Unemployed | 2 | 12.5 |
Incapacitated for work | 3 | 18.75 |
Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders (DSM IV) | ||
Axis I | ||
Affective disorders | 13 | 81.25 |
Substance use disorders | 6 | 37.5 |
Anxiety disorders | 12 | 75 |
Obsessive-compulsive disorder | 3 | 18.75 |
Posttraumatic stress disorder | 11 | 68.75 |
Eating disorders | 9 | 56.25 |
Axis II (except BPD) | ||
Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder | 5 | 31.25 |
Schizotypal personality disorder | 1 | 6.25 |
Avoidant personality disorder | 5 | 31.25 |
Paranoid personality disorder | 3 | 18.75 |
Narcissistic personality disorder | 1 | 6.25 |
Category | Subcategory | N | % |
---|---|---|---|
Priovi is helpful, supportive and always there | Priovi is always available | 8 | 88 |
Priovi validates and normalizes | 9 | 100 | |
Priovi motivates | 3 | 33 | |
Priovi promotes self-efficacy | 1 | 11 | |
Priovi helps being more aware | 2 | 22 | |
Priovi evokes emotions (but not as much as a human) | Priovi can’t judge | 3 | 33 |
Priovi leaves me alone with my emotions | 4 | 44 | |
Priovi’s technical errors evoke emotional pain | 1 | 11 | |
Priovi evokes pleasant emotions | 5 | 55 | |
Priovi evokes aversive emotions | 5 | 55 | |
Priovi is less flexible | Priovi isn’t very individual or flexible | 9 | 100 |
Priovi is general | 7 | 77 | |
Priovi is always the same | 2 | 22 | |
There are links between the relationship to priovi and the therapist | Good relationship to therapist prevents fear of using priovi | 2 | 22 |
Good relationship to therapist motivates to use priovi | 1 | 11 | |
Working with priovi strengthens bond to therapist | 1 | 11 | |
Priovi is no human | Priovi is less emotional than a human | 9 | 100 |
Priovi feels almost like a person | 4 | 44 | |
It is possible to identify with priovi | 2 | 22 | |
Priovi provides information, helps to understand | 6 | 66 | |
Priovi helps explaining BPD to others | 1 | 11 |
Measurement | M | SD | N |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | |||
WAItherapist total | 3.97 | 0.47 | 13 |
WAItherapist task | 3.83 | 0.61 | 13 |
WAIpriovi task | 3.54 | 0.86 | 12 |
T2 | |||
WAItherapist total | 3.89 | 0.73 | 16 |
WAItherapist task | 3.73 | 0.79 | 16 |
WAIpriovi task | 3.47 | 0.73 | 15 |
T3 | |||
WAItherapist total | 4.04 | 0.53 | 16 |
WAItherapist task | 3.83 | 0.68 | 16 |
WAIpriovi task | 3.33 | 0.83 | 16 |
T4 | |||
WAItherapist total | 4.11 | 0.57 | 16 |
WAItherapist task | 3.98 | 0.73 | 16 |
WAIpriovi task | 3.45 | 0.82 | 16 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Köhne, S.; Schweiger, U.; Jacob, G.A.; Braakmann, D.; Klein, J.P.; Borgwardt, S.; Assmann, N.; Rogg, M.; Schaich, A.; Faßbinder, E. Therapeutic Relationship in eHealth—A Pilot Study of Similarities and Differences between the Online Program Priovi and Therapists Treating Borderline Personality Disorder. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176436
Köhne S, Schweiger U, Jacob GA, Braakmann D, Klein JP, Borgwardt S, Assmann N, Rogg M, Schaich A, Faßbinder E. Therapeutic Relationship in eHealth—A Pilot Study of Similarities and Differences between the Online Program Priovi and Therapists Treating Borderline Personality Disorder. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(17):6436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176436
Chicago/Turabian StyleKöhne, Sandra, Ulrich Schweiger, Gitta A. Jacob, Diana Braakmann, Jan Philipp Klein, Stefan Borgwardt, Nele Assmann, Mirco Rogg, Anja Schaich, and Eva Faßbinder. 2020. "Therapeutic Relationship in eHealth—A Pilot Study of Similarities and Differences between the Online Program Priovi and Therapists Treating Borderline Personality Disorder" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 17: 6436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176436
APA StyleKöhne, S., Schweiger, U., Jacob, G. A., Braakmann, D., Klein, J. P., Borgwardt, S., Assmann, N., Rogg, M., Schaich, A., & Faßbinder, E. (2020). Therapeutic Relationship in eHealth—A Pilot Study of Similarities and Differences between the Online Program Priovi and Therapists Treating Borderline Personality Disorder. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176436