CD44 Gene Polymorphisms as a Risk Factor for Susceptibility and Their Effect on the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Male Patients
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Subjects and Specimen Collection
2.2. Selection of CD44 Polymorphisms
2.3. Genomic DNA Extraction and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
SNP Genotypes | All Cases (n = 279) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Male (n = 126) | Female (n = 153) | AOR (95% CI) | p Value | |
rs1425802 | ||||
AA | 49 (38.9%) | 53 (34.6%) | 1.00 | |
AG | 58 (46.0%) | 70 (45.8%) | 1.117 (0.663–1.883) | p = 0.678 |
GG | 19 (15.1%) | 30 (19.6%) | 1.463 (0.729–2.935) | p = 0.284 |
AG + GG | 77 (61.1%) | 100 (65.4%) | 1.201 (0.736–1.961) | p = 0.464 |
rs187115 | ||||
AA | 86 (68.3%) | 106 (69.3%) | 1.00 | |
AG | 35 (27.8%) | 43 (28.1%) | 0.997 (0.587–1.693) | p = 0.992 |
GG | 5 (4.0%) | 4 (2.6%) | 0.647 (0.168–2.490) | p = 0.527 |
AG + GG | 40 (31.7%) | 47 (30.7%) | 0.953 (0.573–1.585) | p = 0.854 |
rs713330 | ||||
TT | 104 (82.5%) | 137 (89.5%) | 1.00 | |
TC | 21 (16.7%) | 15 (9.8%) | 0.540 (0.265–1.101) | p = 0.090 |
CC | 1 (0.8%) | 1 (0.7%) | 0.773 (0.047–12.632) | p = 0.857 |
TC + CC | 22 (17.5%) | 16 (10.5%) | 0.551 (0.275–1.102) | p = 0.092 |
rs11821102 | ||||
GG | 114 (90.5%) | 133 (86.9%) | 1.00 | |
GA | 10 (7.9%) | 18 (11.8%) | 1.545 (0.685–3.487) | p = 0.294 |
AA | 2 (1.6%) | 2 (1.3%) | 0.865 (0.118–6.338) | p = 0.886 |
GA + AA | 12 (9.5%) | 20 (13.1%) | 1.435 (0.670–3.073) | p = 0.353 |
rs10836347 | ||||
CC | 109 (86.5%) | 128 (83.7%) | 1.00 | |
CT | 17 (13.5%) | 24 (15.7%) | 1.202 (0.614–2.354) | p = 0.591 |
TT | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.6%) | ---- | --- |
CT + TT | 17 (13.5%) | 25 (16.3%) | 1.252 (0.643–2.440) | p = 0.509 |
rs13347 | ||||
CC | 48 (38.1%) | 75 (49.0%) | 1.00 | |
CT | 68 (54.0%) | 68 (44.4%) | 0.637 (0.388–1.047) | p = 0.075 |
TT | 10 (7.9%) | 10 (6.6%) | 0.639 (0.247–1.650) | p = 0.355 |
CT + TT | 78 (61.9%) | 78 (51.0%) | 0.638 (0.394–1.032) | p = 0.067 |
SNP Genotypes | All Cases (n = 279) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Never-Smoker (n = 180) | Ever-Smoker (n = 99) | AOR (95% CI) | p Value | |
rs1425802 | ||||
AA | 61 (33.9%) | 41 (41.4%) | 1.00 | |
AG | 81 (45.0%) | 47 (47.5%) | 0.877 (0.408–1.885) | p = 0.736 |
GG | 38 (21.1%) | 11 (11.1%) | 0.362 (0.129–1.017) | p = 0.054 |
AG + GG | 119 (66.1%) | 58 (58.6%) | 0.699 (0.341–1.432) | p = 0.328 |
rs187115 | ||||
AA | 123 (68.3%) | 69 (69.7%) | 1.00 | |
AG | 53 (29.4%) | 25 (25.3%) | 0.713 (0.331–1.533) | p = 0.386 |
GG | 4 (2.2%) | 5 (5.1%) | 2.938 (0.379–22.763) | p = 0.302 |
AG + GG | 57 (31.7%) | 30 (30.3%) | 0.826 (0.396–1.722) | p = 0.611 |
rs713330 | ||||
TT | 156 (86.7%) | 85 (85.9%) | 1.00 | |
TC | 24 (13.3%) | 12 (12.1%) | 0.407 (0.156–1.061) | p = 0.066 |
CC | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.0%) | --- | --- |
TC + CC | 24 (13.3%) | 14 (14.1%) | 0.556 (0.220–1.405) | p = 0.214 |
rs11821102 | ||||
GG | 157 (87.2%) | 90 (90.9%) | 1.00 | |
GA | 21 (11.7%) | 7 (7.1%) | 0.626 (0.184–2.125) | p = 0.452 |
AA | 2 (1.1%) | 2 (2.0%) | 2.355 (0.117–47.223) | p = 0.576 |
GA + AA | 23 (12.8%) | 9 (9.1%) | 0.749 (0.239–2.352) | p = 0.621 |
rs10836347 | ||||
CC | 153 (85.0%) | 84 (84.8%) | 1.00 | |
CT | 26 (14.4%) | 15 (15.2%) | 1.467 (0.538–4.004) | p = 0.454 |
TT | 1 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) | ---- | --- |
CT + TT | 27 (15.0%) | 15 (15.2%) | 1.448 (0.533–3.934) | p = 0.468 |
rs13347 | ||||
CC | 83 (46.1%) | 40 (40.4%) | 1.00 | |
CT | 83 (46.1%) | 53 (53.5%) | 0.925 (0.446–1.920) | p = 0.835 |
TT | 14 (7.8%) | 6 (6.1%) | 0.454 (0.121–1.707) | p = 0.243 |
CT + TT | 63 (53.9%) | 59 (59.6%) | 0.842 (0.415–1.707) | p = 0.633 |
SNP Genotypes | All Cases (n = 279) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Well/Moderately-Differentiated (n = 247) | Poorly Cell Differentiated (n = 32) | AOR (95% CI) | p Value | |
rs1425802 | ||||
AA | 90 (36.4%) | 12 (37.5%) | 1.00 | |
AG | 115 (46.6%) | 13 (40.6%) | 0.886 (0.379–2.071) | p = 0.779 |
GG | 42 (17.0%) | 7 (21.9%) | 1.487 (0.526–4.204) | p = 0.455 |
AG + GG | 157 (63.6%) | 20 (62.5%) | 1.029 (0.471–2.246) | p = 0.943 |
rs187115 | ||||
AA | 173 (70.0%) | 19 (59.4%) | 1.00 | |
AG | 67 (27.1%) | 11 (34.4%) | 1.511 (0.671–3.402) | p = 0.319 |
GG | 7 (2.9%) | 2 (6.2%) | 2.448 (0.450–13.325) | p = 0.300 |
AG + GG | 74 (30.0%) | 13 (40.6%) | 1.605 (0.741–3.477) | p = 0.230 |
rs713330 | ||||
TT | 215 (87.0%) | 26 (81.3%) | 1.00 | |
TC | 31 (12.6%) | 5 (15.6%) | 1.158 (0.400–3.347) | p = 0.787 |
CC | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (3.1%) | 8.266 (0.425–160.676) | p = 0.163 |
TC + CC | 32 (13.0%) | 6 (18.7%) | 1.371 (0.509–3.696) | p = 0.533 |
rs11821102 | ||||
GG | 220 (89.1%) | 27 (84.4%) | 1.00 | |
GA | 23 (9.3%) | 5 (15.6%) | 2.048 (0.684–6.135) | p = 0.200 |
AA | 4 (1.6%) | 0 (0%) | --- | --- |
GA + AA | 27 (10.9%) | 5 (15.6%) | 1.677 (0.568–4.949) | p = 0.349 |
rs10836347 | ||||
CC | 209 (84.6%) | 28 (87.5%) | 1.00 | |
CT | 37 (15.0%) | 4 (12.5%) | 0.854 (0.278–2.630) | p = 0.784 |
TT | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0%) | ---- | --- |
CT + TT | 38 (15.4%) | 4 (12.5%) | 0.843 (0.274–2.594) | p = 0.766 |
rs13347 | ||||
CC | 106 (42.9%) | 17 (53.1%) | 1.00 | |
CT | 123 (49.8%) | 13 (40.6%) | 0.565 (0.256–1.248) | p = 0.158 |
TT | 18 (7.3%) | 2 (6.3%) | 0.586 (0.121–2.848) | p = 0.508 |
CT + TT | 141 (57.1%) | 15 (46.9%) | 0.567 (0.264–1.218) | p = 0.146 |
References
- Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Midha, A.; Dearden, S.; McCormack, R. Egfr mutation incidence in non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology: A systematic review and global map by ethnicity (mutmapii). Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 2892–2911. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Rosell, R.; Moran, T.; Queralt, C.; Porta, R.; Cardenal, F.; Camps, C.; Majem, M.; Lopez-Vivanco, G.; Isla, D.; Provencio, M.; et al. Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Syvanen, A.C. Accessing genetic variation: Genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2, 930–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shastry, B.S. Snps in disease gene mapping, medicinal drug development and evolution. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 52, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodfellow, P.N.; Banting, G.; Wiles, M.V.; Tunnacliffe, A.; Parkar, M.; Solomon, E.; Dalchau, R.; Fabre, J.W. The gene, mic4, which controls expression of the antigen defined by monoclonal antibody f10.44.2, is on human chromosome 11. Eur. J. Immunol. 1982, 12, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNDERHILL, C. Cd44: The hyaluronan receptor. J. Cell Sci. 1992, 103, 293–298. [Google Scholar]
- Tölg, C.; Hofmann, M.; Herrlich, P.; Ponta, H. Splicing choice from ten variant exons establishes cd44 variability. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21, 1225–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodison, S.; Urquidi, V.; Tarin, D. Cd44 cell adhesion molecules. Mol. Pathol. 1999, 52, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Z.; Wu, R.-R.; Lv, L.; Li, P.; Zhang, L.-Y.; Hao, Q.-L.; Li, W. Prognostic value of cd44 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 3632–3646. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.; Gao, Y.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, T.; Cui, R.; Jiang, Y.; Shi, J. Overexpression of cd44 is associated with the occurrence and migration of non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 3159–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Hu, B.; Ma, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Han, H.; Chen, J. Cd44 promotes cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 5627–5633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senbanjo, L.T.; Chellaiah, M.A. Cd44: A multifunctional cell surface adhesion receptor is a regulator of progression and metastasis of cancer cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Winder, T.; Ning, Y.; Yang, D.; Zhang, W.; Power, D.G.; Bohanes, P.; Gerger, A.; Wilson, P.M.; Lurje, G.; Tang, L.H.; et al. Germline polymorphisms in genes involved in the cd44 signaling pathway are associated with clinical outcome in localized gastric adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 129, 1096–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, L.; Deng, J.; Zhu, X.; Zheng, J.; You, Y.; Li, N.; Wu, H.; Lu, J.; Zhou, Y. Cd44 rs13347 c > t polymorphism predicts breast cancer risk and prognosis in chinese populations. Breast Cancer Res. 2012, 14, R105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chou, Y.E.; Hsieh, M.J.; Chiou, H.L.; Lee, H.L.; Yang, S.F.; Chen, T.Y. Cd44 gene polymorphisms on hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility and clinicopathologic features. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 231474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chou, Y.-E.; Hsieh, M.-J.; Hsin, C.-H.; Chiang, W.-L.; Lai, Y.-C.; Lee, Y.-H.; Huang, S.-C.; Yang, S.-F.; Lin, C.-W. Cd44 gene polymorphisms and environmental factors on oral cancer susceptibility in taiwan. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stracquadanio, G.; Vrugt, B.; Flury, R.; Schraml, P.; Würl, P.; Müller, T.H.; Knippschild, U.; Henne-Bruns, D.; Breitenstein, S.; Clavien, P.-A.; et al. Cd44 snp rs187115: A novel biomarker signature that predicts survival in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, W.C.; Huang, Y.H.; Yang, S.F.; Wang, S.S.; Kuo, W.H.; Hsueh, C.W.; Huang, C.H.; Chou, Y.E. Effect of cd44 gene polymorphisms on risk of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder in taiwan. Tumour. Biol. 2016, 37, 6971–6977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Q.; Wang, J.; Chen, A.; Huang, B.; Li, G.; Li, X.; Wang, J. Associations of five polymorphisms in the cd44 gene with cancer susceptibility in asians. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.Y.; Yang, T.Y.; Chen, K.C.; Li, Y.J.; Hsu, K.H.; Tsai, C.R.; Chen, C.Y.; Hsu, C.P.; Hsia, J.Y.; Chuang, C.Y.; et al. Egfr l858r mutation and polymorphisms of genes related to estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism in never-smoking female lung adenocarcinoma patients. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 2149–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goldstraw, P.; Chansky, K.; Crowley, J.; Rami-Porta, R.; Asamura, H.; Eberhardt, W.E.; Nicholson, A.G.; Groome, P.; Mitchell, A.; Bolejack, V.; et al. The iaslc lung cancer staging project: Proposals for revision of the tnm stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the tnm classification for lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2016, 11, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, Y.; Au, J.S.; Thongprasert, S.; Srinivasan, S.; Tsai, C.M.; Khoa, M.T.; Heeroma, K.; Itoh, Y.; Cornelio, G.; Yang, P.C. A prospective, molecular epidemiology study of egfr mutations in asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology (pioneer). J Thorac. Oncol. 2014, 9, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hsu, C.H.; Tseng, C.H.; Chiang, C.J.; Hsu, K.H.; Tseng, J.S.; Chen, K.C.; Wang, C.L.; Chen, C.Y.; Yen, S.H.; Chiu, C.H.; et al. Characteristics of young lung cancer: Analysis of taiwan’s nationwide lung cancer registry focusing on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and smoking status. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 46628–46635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Groot, P.M.; Wu, C.C.; Carter, B.W.; Munden, R.F. The epidemiology of lung cancer. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2018, 7, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cook, M.B.; McGlynn, K.A.; Devesa, S.S.; Freedman, N.D.; Anderson, W.F. Sex disparities in cancer mortality and survival. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2011, 20, 1629–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Freemantle, N.; Nazareth, I.; Hunt, K. Gender differences in survival and the use of primary care prior to diagnosis of three cancers: An analysis of routinely collected uk general practice data. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dresler, C.M.; Fratelli, C.; Babb, J.; Everley, L.; Evans, A.A.; Clapper, M.L. Gender differences in genetic susceptibility for lung cancer. Lung Cancer (Amst. Neth.) 2000, 30, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeyapalan, Z.; Deng, Z.; Shatseva, T.; Fang, L.; He, C.; Yang, B.B. Expression of cd44 3′-untranslated region regulates endogenous microrna functions in tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 39, 3026–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyoshi, T.; Kondo, K.; Hino, N.; Uyama, T.; Monden, Y. The expression of the cd44 variant exon 6 is associated with lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 1997, 3, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shinohara, S.; Hanagiri, T.; Taira, A.; Takenaka, M.; Oka, S.; Chikaishi, Y.; Uramoto, H.; So, T.; Yamada, S.; Tanaka, F. Immunohistochemical expression and serum levels of cd44 as prognostic indicators in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncology 2016, 90, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chandra, V.; Lee, Y.-M.; Gupta, U.; Mittal, B.; Kim, J.J.; Rai, R. Quantitative assessment of cd44 genetic variants and cancer susceptibility in asians: A meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 74286–74302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, Y.; Chen, Z.-j.; Lan, F.; He, Q.-t.; Chen, S.-y.; Du, Y.-f.; Li, S.; Qin, X. Association of cd44 polymorphisms and susceptibility to hbv-related hepatocellular carcinoma in the chinese population. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2019, 33, e22977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; Qing, H.; Su, X.; Wang, C.; Li, Z.; Liu, S. Association of cd44 gene polymorphism with survival of nsclc and risk of bone metastasis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2015, 21, 2694–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Wild Type (N = 110) n (%) | EGFR Mutation (N = 169) n (%) | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
Age | |||
< 65 | 53 (48.2%) | 84 (49.7%) | p = 0.804 |
≥ 65 | 57 (51.8%) | 85 (50.3%) | |
Mean ± SD | 65.36 ± 13.48 | 65.76 ± 13.57 | p = 0.817 |
Gender | |||
Male | 66 (60.0%) | 60 (35.5%) | p < 0.001 |
Female | 44 (40.0%) | 109 (64.5%) | |
Cigarette Smoking Status | |||
Never-smoker | 49 (44.5%) | 131 (77.5%) | p < 0.001 |
Ever-smoker | 61 (55.5%) | 38 (22.5%) | |
Stage | |||
I + II | 26 (23.4%) | 47 (27.8%) | p = 0.438 |
III + IV | 84 (76.4%) | 122 (72.2%) | |
Tumor T Status | |||
T1 + T2 | 60 (54.5%) | 108 (63.9%) | p = 0.119 |
T3 + T4 | 50 (45.5%) | 61 (36.1%) | |
Lymph Node Status | |||
Negative | 29 (26.4%) | 54 (32.0%) | p = 0.318 |
Positive | 81 (73.6%) | 115 (68.0%) | |
Distant Metastasis | |||
Negative | 54 (49.1%) | 80 (47.3%) | p = 0.774 |
Positive | 56 (50.9%) | 89 (52.7%) | |
Cell Differentiation | |||
Well | 8 (7.3%) | 21 (12.4%) | p = 0.001 |
Moderately | 80 (72.7%) | 138 (81.7%) | |
Poorly | 22 (20.0%) | 10 (5.9%) |
All Cases (N = 279) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNP Genotypes | Wild Type (N = 110) | Mutation Type (N = 169) | AOR (95% CI) | p Value |
rs1425802 | ||||
AA | 38 (34.5%) | 64 (37.9%) | 1.00 | |
AG | 51 (46.4%) | 77 (45.6%) | 0.867 (0.499–1.507) | p = 0.613 |
GG | 21 (19.1%) | 28 (16.6%) | 0.710 (0.345–1.462) | p = 0.353 |
AG + GG | 72 (65.5%) | 105 (62.1%) | 0.821 (0.489–1.380) | p = 0.457 |
rs187115 | ||||
AA | 74 (67.3%) | 118 (69.8%) | 1.00 | |
AG | 33 (30.0%) | 45 (26.6%) | 0.846 (0.487–1.469) | p = 0.552 |
GG | 3 (2.7%) | 6 (3.6%) | 1.438 (0.335–6.170) | p = 0.625 |
AG + GG | 36 (32.7%) | 51 (30.2%) | 0.893 (0.524–1.520) | p = 0.676 |
rs713330 | ||||
TT | 94 (85.5%) | 147 (87.0%) | 1.00 | |
TC | 15 (13.6%) | 21 (12.4%) | 1.052 (0.502–2.207) | p = 0.893 |
CC | 1 (0.9%) | 1 (0.6%) | 0.643 (0.036–11.491) | p = 0.764 |
TC + CC | 16 (14.5%) | 22 (13.0%) | 1.024 (0.498–2.106) | p = 0.949 |
rs11821102 | ||||
GG | 98 (89.1%) | 149 (88.2%) | 1.00 | |
GA | 11 (10.0%) | 17 (10.1%) | 0.905 (0.396–2.070) | p = 0.813 |
AA | 1 (0.9%) | 3 (1.7%) | 2.076 (0.199–21.675) | p = 0.542 |
GA + AA | 12 (10.9%) | 20 (11.8%) | 0.995 (0.453–2.185) | p = 0.989 |
rs10836347 | ||||
CC | 96 (87.3%) | 141 (83.4%) | 1.00 | |
CT | 14 (12.7%) | 27 (16.0%) | 1.275 (0.623–2.607) | p = 0.506 |
TT | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.6%) | ---- | --- |
CT + TT | 14 (12.7%) | 28 (16.6%) | 1.311 (0.643–2.673) | p = 0.456 |
rs13347 | ||||
CC | 47 (42.7%) | 76 (45.0%) | 1.00 | |
CT | 57 (51.8%) | 79 (46.7%) | 0.958 (0.571–1.609) | p = 0.873 |
TT | 6 (5.5%) | 14 (8.3%) | 1.657 (0.578–4.749) | p = 0.348 |
CT + TT | 63 (57.3%) | 93 (55.0%) | 1.025 (0.619–1.696) | p = 0.924 |
SNP Genotypes | Wild Type (N = 66) | L858R | Exon 19 in-Frame Deletion | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(N = 18) | AOR (95% CI) | (N = 38) | AOR (95% CI) | ||
rs1425802 | |||||
AA | 23 (34.8%) | 5 (27.8%) | 1.00 | 19 (50.0%) | 1.00 |
AG + GG | 43 (65.2%) | 13 (72.2%) | 1.502 (0.462–4.889) | 19 (50.0%) | 0.567 (0.248–1.296) |
rs187115 | |||||
AA | 47 (71.2%) | 12 (66.7%) | 1.00 | 24 (63.2%) | 1.00 |
AG + GG | 19 (28.8%) | 6 (33.3%) | 1.283 (0.416–3.961) | 14 (36.8%) | 1.403 (0.592–3.323) |
rs713330 | |||||
TT | 55 (83.3%) | 15 (83.3%) | 1.00 | 32 (84.2%) | 1.00 |
TC + CC | 11 (16.7%) | 3 (16.7%) | 1.077 (0.256–4.529) | 6 (15.8%) | 1.159 (0.375–3.583) |
rs11821102 | |||||
GG | 60 (90.9%) | 13 (72.2%) | 1.00 | 37 (97.4%) | 1.00 |
GA + AA | 6 (9.1%) | 5 (27.8%) | 3.991 (1.002–16.499) | 1 (2.6%) | 0.167 (0.019–1.496) |
rs10836347 | |||||
CC | 59 (89.4%) | 17 (94.4%) | 1.00 | 32 (84.2%) | 1.00 |
CT + TT | 7 (10.6%) | 1 (5.6%) | 0.488 (0.056–4.263) | 6 (15.8%) | 1.565 (0.474–5.166) |
rs13347 | |||||
CC | 24 (36.4%) | 6 (33.3%) | 1.00 | 16 (42.1%) | 1.00 |
CT + TT | 42 (63.6%) | 12 (66.7%) | 1.165 (0.386–3.519) | 22 (57.9%) | 0.795 (0.346–1.823) |
Variable Genotypic Frequencies | Tumor AJCC “T” Classification | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 + T2 n (%) | T3 + T4 n (%) | AOR (95% CI) | p Value | |
CD44 (rs713330) All Cases (n = 126) | (n = 72) | (n = 54) | ||
TT | 65 (90.3%) | 39 (72.2%) | 1.00 | |
TC + CC | 7 (9.7%) | 15 (27.8%) | 4.250 (1.529–11.814) | p = 0.006 |
CD44 (rs713330) EGFR Wild Type (n = 66) | (n = 37) | (n = 29) | ||
TT | 34 (91.9%) | 21 (72.4%) | 1.00 | |
TC + CC | 3 (8.1%) | 8 (27.6%) | 5.398 (1.203–24.223) | p = 0.028 |
CD44 (rs713330) EGFR Mutation Type (n = 60) | (n = 35) | (n = 25) | ||
TT | 31 (88.6%) | 18 (72.0%) | 1.00 | |
TC + CC | 4 (11.4%) | 7 (28.0%) | 3.490 (0.852–14.297) | p = 0.082 |
CD44 (rs10836347) All Cases (n = 126) | (n = 72) | (n = 54) | ||
CC | 65 (90.3%) | 44 (81.5%) | 1.00 | |
CT + TT | 7 (9.7%) | 10 (18.5%) | 2.194 (0.770–6.250) | p = 0.141 |
CD44 (rs10836347) EGFR Wild Type (n = 66) | (n = 37) | (n = 29) | ||
CC | 36 (97.3%) | 23 (79.3%) | 1.00 | |
CT + TT | 1 (2.7%) | 6 (20.7%) | 9.136 (1.028–81.200) | p = 0.047 |
CD44 (rs10836347) EGFR Mutation Type (n = 60) | (n = 35) | (n = 25) | ||
CC | 29 (82.9%) | 21 (84.0%) | 1.00 | |
CT + TT | 6 (17.1%) | 4 (16.0%) | 1.023 (0.246–4.258) | p = 0.975 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, J.-P.; Hsieh, M.-J.; Chou, Y.-E.; Chao, Y.-H.; Tsao, T.C.-Y.; Yang, S.-F. CD44 Gene Polymorphisms as a Risk Factor for Susceptibility and Their Effect on the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Male Patients. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17092981
Li J-P, Hsieh M-J, Chou Y-E, Chao Y-H, Tsao TC-Y, Yang S-F. CD44 Gene Polymorphisms as a Risk Factor for Susceptibility and Their Effect on the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Male Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(9):2981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17092981
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Ju-Pi, Ming-Ju Hsieh, Ying-Erh Chou, Yu-Hua Chao, Thomas Chang-Yao Tsao, and Shun-Fa Yang. 2020. "CD44 Gene Polymorphisms as a Risk Factor for Susceptibility and Their Effect on the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Male Patients" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 9: 2981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17092981
APA StyleLi, J.-P., Hsieh, M.-J., Chou, Y.-E., Chao, Y.-H., Tsao, T. C.-Y., & Yang, S.-F. (2020). CD44 Gene Polymorphisms as a Risk Factor for Susceptibility and Their Effect on the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Male Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 2981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17092981