Next Article in Journal
The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Prescription Opioid Distribution after the Legalization of Recreational Marijuana in Colorado
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health and Economic Loss Assessment of PM2.5 Pollution during 2015–2017 in Gansu Province, China

1
Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems (Ministry of Education), College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
3
Key Laboratory for Environmental Pollution Prediction and Control, Gansu Province, College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
4
Institute for Environmental Strategy, Gansu Academy of Eco-environmental Sciences, Lanzhou 730020, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(9), 3253; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093253
Submission received: 11 April 2020 / Revised: 29 April 2020 / Accepted: 4 May 2020 / Published: 7 May 2020

Abstract

:
Many studies have reported that air pollution, especially fine particulate matter (PM2.5), has a significant impact on health and causes economic loss. Gansu Province is in the northwest of China, which is a typical economically underdeveloped area. However, few studies have evaluated the economic loss of PM2.5 related to health effects in this province. In this study, a log-linear exposure-response function was used to estimate the health impact of PM2.5 in 14 cities in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017, and the amended human capital (AHC) and cost of illness (COI) method were used to evaluate the related economic loss caused by the health impact from PM2.5. The results show that the estimated total number of health endpoints attributed to PM2.5 pollution were 1,644,870 (95%CI: 978,484–2,215,921), 1,551,447 (95%CI: 917,025–2,099,182) and 1,531,372 (95%CI: 899,769–2,077,772) in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017, respectively. Correspondingly, the economic losses related to health damage caused by PM2.5 pollution were 42,699 (95%CI: 32,380–50,768) million Chinese Yuan (CNY), 43,982 (95%CI: 33,305–52,386) million CNY and 44,261 (95%CI: 33,306–52,954) million CNY, which were equivalent to 6.45% (95%CI: 4.89%–7.67%), 6.28% (95%CI: 4.75%–7.48%), and 5.93% (95%CI: 4.64%–7.10%) of the region Gross Domestic Product (GDP) from 2015 to 2017, respectively. It could be seen that the proportions of health economic loss to GDP were generally high, although the proportion had a slight downward trend. The economic loss from chronic bronchitis and all-cause mortality accounted for more than 94% of the total economic loss. The health impact, economic loss and per capita economic loss in Lanzhou, the provincial capital city of Gansu, were obviously higher than other cities from the same province. The economic loss in Linxia accounted for the highest proportion of GDP. The health impacts in the Hexi region, including the cities of Jiuquan, Jiayuguan, Zhangye, Jinchang and Wuwei, were generally lower, but the economic loss and per capita economic loss were still higher. We also found that urbanization and industrialization were highly correlated with health economic loss caused by PM2.5 pollution. In conclusion, the PM2.5-related health economic burden in Gansu Province was serious. As an economically underdeveloped region, it was very important to further adopt rigid and effective pollution control policies.

1. Introduction

Air pollution is now the world’s largest environmental health risk, and is ranked as the fourth among all factors [1,2]. The vast majority of the world population is exposed to aPM2.5 pollution concentration that exceeds the World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) levels of 10 μg/m3 [2]. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study showed that there were about 4.2 million premature deaths related to ambient air pollution across the world [3]. With the rapid industrialization and urbanization, China is also faced with serious air quality issues over the past few decades [4]. In particular, the persistent and heavy haze weather, represented by PM2.5, occurs more frequently, is on an unprecedented large scale [5], and has become an important issue affecting China’s environmental quality, public health and social sustainable development [6].The relationship between air pollution and various adverse health outcomes has been studied extensively worldwide [7,8,9,10,11]. Among all kinds of air pollutants, PM2.5 is considered to be more toxic and harmful to human health [12], and is most closely related to various health effect endpoints [13]. It can penetrate deep into the lungs and trigger systemic effects, and increase the risk of disease by increasing oxidative stress [14,15]. These adverse effects on human health have caused significant economic and social costs [16,17,18], bringing great pressure to environmental managers and decision makers. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the value of health damage to residents’ exposure to particulate matter.
A few studies have shown that long-term exposure to PM2.5 pollution is associated with premature death from cardiovascular, respiratory and cerebrovascular diseases, as well as the increase in chronic bronchitis, emphysema and asthma [19,20,21,22], which inspires that quantitative assessment of health-related economic loss caused by atmospheric particulate pollution has been carried out in China. These researches focused on the relatively developed regions, such as Beijing, Shanghai, the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta region [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Maji et al. [32] and Yang et al. [33] evaluated the health economic loss due to PM2.5 of some of the main cities in China, separately. Li et al. [34] estimated that, under four different baseline levels of PM2.5, the health economic loss was 4.32–6.32 billion Chinese Yuan in 2015 in Beijing. Wang et al. [35] found that the PM2.5-related premature deaths were estimated to be 13,162 (95% CI: 10,761–15,554), and the economic loss was 22.1 (95% CI: 18.1–26.1) billion Chinese Yuan in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD). However, there is still a serious lack of research on the assessment of health economic loss attributed to PM2.5-related air pollution in less developed regions, such as Northwest China. Under different socioeconomic conditions, different regions have different sources of PM2.5, as well as health effects, resulting in there are also being some differences in health economic loss. Qi et al. [36] estimated the health economic burden, regional distribution and contribution to regional inequality of air pollution in 112 key cities in China from 2003 to 2010, the results of which showed that the more underdeveloped the regional economy, the heavier the health economic burden of pollution would be.
Gansu Province is located in the northwest of China (Figure 1), belongs to arid or semi-arid areas, and called the core strategic zone of China’s inland “The Silk Road Economic Belt”. It is often subject to serious particulate pollution that comes from anthropogenic and natural sources. Meanwhile, Gansu Province is a typical underdeveloped region in China, the per capita GDP was 28,497 Chinese Yuan in 2017 [37], ranking the first from the bottom in China. Thus, Gansu Province faces the dual pressure of economic development and environmental protection. To date, research on health effect and economic loss of atmospheric particulate matter (especially PM2.5) in the region remains scarce. In this paper, we evaluated the residents’ health risks and the economic loss attributed to PM2.5 in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017, and analyzed the evaluation results of different cities. In order to provide cost-benefit analysis basis or decision-making reference for formulating policies such as air pollution prevention and control to reduce the welfare loss.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Areas

Gansu is the most diverse province in natural geographical environment in China, consisting of 14 cities (Figure 1). The types of climate and major industrial structures of economy vary significantly among cities. The climate type of Longnan belongs to “subtropical monsoon climate”, which belongs to the humid region. The cities in the southeast of Gansu Province, including Qingyang, Pingliang, Tianshui, Dingxi and Linxia, have a “temperate monsoon climate” and sub-humid region. The central and northwestern regions of Gansu Province are located in the arid and semi-arid regions. Wuwei, Jinchang, Zhangye, Jiuquan and Jiayuguan have a typical “temperate continental climate”.
The province as a whole can be divided into three traditional economic regions: the Lanzhou metropolitan area, Hedong area and Hexi area (including Jiuquan, Jiayuguan, Zhangye, Jinchang and Wuwei). Lanzhou, located in the central part of Gansu Province, is the capital and the largest city of Gansu Province. It is also a typical heavy industry city in Northwest China, with the highest GDP among all cities in Gansu Province. At the same time, Lanzhou city is located in a long and narrow valley basin, the terrain conditions are relatively closed [38]. Jiayuguan, Jiuquan and Jinchang are also important industrial bases in Gansu Province, with relatively high GDP. Among them, Jiayuguan has the highest per capita GDP in the province. Located in the easternmost part of Gansu, Qingyang is a heavy industry base in the Hedong area, and its GDP is also relatively high, but its per capita GDP is lower than that of the Hexi area. Longnan, Dingxi, Gannan and Linxia are located in the remote loess hilly-gully region or alpine mountainous area, with a relatively weak economic foundation and a low degree of industrialization.

2.2. Data Collection

2.2.1. PM2.5 Concentrations and Socio-Economic Data

The annual average PM2.5 concentrations of 14 cities in Gansu Province during the study period are obtained from the Gansu Provincial Environmental Status Bulletin (2015–2017) published by the Department of Ecology and Environment of Gansu Province (http://sthj.gansu.gov.cn/Department/list.jsp?urltype=tree.TreeTempUrl&wbtreeid=1076). The exposed population is the permanent residents of cities in the study area, which is divided into children (0–14 years of age) and adults (≥15 years of age). The population and GDP data of 14 cities are derived from the Gansu Development Yearbook (2016–2018) [37,39,40].

2.2.2. Exposure–Response Coefficients

The selection of exposure–response coefficients is one of the key links with health risk assessment. Considering health endpoints that have been identified in the existing epidemiological researches, and the availability of the required data, including exposure response coefficient with PM2.5, the health endpoints associated with PM2.5 exposure are selected in this paper, including all-cause mortality, chronic bronchitis, hospitalization for respiratory diseases, hospitalization for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, outpatient visits to internal medicine, outpatient visits to pediatrics, and asthma attacks. For the selection of the exposure–response coefficients, due to the level of air pollution in different regions and the sensitivity of different populations to atmospheric particulate matter pollution being different [41], literature containing epidemiological data from Gansu Province is selected in preference, and then the coefficients in other regions of China are applied to analysis when there is a lack of relevant data in the local region, in order to make the exposure–response more reasonable to the actual situation in the study area, and improve the accuracy of this study as much as possible. The selected exposure–response coefficients are shown in Table 1.

2.2.3. Health Information

The mortality data of 14 cities are obtained from the Gansu Development Yearbook (2016–2018). The morbidity of chronic bronchitis is obtained from the China Health and Family Planning Statistical Yearbook (2016) [46]. The hospitalization rates of respiratory diseases and cardio-cerebrovascular diseases are obtained from An Analysis Report of National Health Service Survey in China (2013) [47]. The visiting rate of internal medicine and pediatric, expenses of per capita outpatient and hospitalization, and the loss of working time for hospitalization are based on the average data across Gansu Province, which are obtained from China Health and the Family Planning Statistical Yearbook (2016–2018) [46,48,49]. The loss of working time for outpatient is assumed to be 0.5 days [31,50,51]. The relevant health information of the study area is shown in Table 2.

2.3. Estimating Health Effects

The current epidemiological studies on air pollution are mostly based on the relative risk model of Poisson regression [28,53]. Therefore, this paper adopts the exposure–response relationship derived from epidemiological studies to estimate the health loss due to PM2.5 exposure. The calculation formula is expressed as:
E = E 0 × e [ β · ( C C 0 ) ]
N = P · ( E E 0 ) = P · E · { 1 1 e [ β · ( C C 0 ) ] }
where N represents the number of excess cases or deaths caused by PM2.5 pollution, P is the exposed population, E refers to the incidence of each health endpoint under actual PM2.5 concentration (%), E0 is the incidence of each health endpoint under the baseline PM2.5 concentration (%), β is the exposure–response coefficient, C refers to the actual PM2.5 concentration (μg/m3), and C0 is the baseline PM2.5 concentration. This paper selects the World Health Organization Air Quality Guidelines (WHO AQG), i.e., PM2.5 is 10 μg/m3.

2.4. Economic Loss Evaluation of Health Effects

In this study, the amended human capital (AHC) and cost of illness (COI) approaches are combined to estimate economic loss due to the health damage related to PM2.5 pollution.

2.4.1. Amended Human Capital (AHC)

Since the human capital (HC) approach ignores the value of personal health and social happiness, the AHC approach uses per capita GDP to measure the value of a statistical year of life, and is widely used in recent decades. It estimates human capital from the perspective of the entire society, without considering individual differences [24]. AHC is used to calculate the economic loss of PM2.5-related all-cause mortality and chronic bronchitis, which is calculated as follows [51,54]:
D C 1 = N · i = 1 t G D P p c i d v = N · G D P p c 0 · i = 1 t ( 1 + α ) i ( 1 + γ ) i
where DC1 is the economic loss from health impact (all-cause mortality and chronic bronchitis) attributed to PM2.5, N is the number of all-cause mortality and chronic bronchitis patients caused by PM2.5, G D P p c i d v is the discounted value of per capita GDP in year I, GDPpc0 is the per capita GDP in base year, t is the average number of life-years lost due to PM2.5 pollution, taking 18 years [55], α is the growth rate of per capita GDP, and γ is the social discount rate, %. According to the literature and the economic development of Gansu Province in recent years, we set γ and α to 8% and 6%, respectively. For chronic bronchitis, the disability weight of chronic bronchitis (DALY) is about 40% [13,51], that is, 40% of the average human capital is taken as the disability loss.

2.4.2. Cost of Illness (COI)

The COI approach is used to estimate the economic costs of health damage by calculating various disease-related expense, including outpatient visits, hospitalizations and asthma [30,31]. The basic formula is as follows:
D C 2 = i = 1 m ( C p i + G D P p × T I i ) × N i
where DC2 is the economic loss from outpatient visits, hospitalizations and asthma attributed to PM2.5, Cpi represents the direct medical cost per case of health endpoint i (outpatient visits, hospitalizations, asthma), GDPp is the daily per capita GDP of the study city, TIi is the working time loss due to health endpoint I, Ni is the number of cases of health endpoint i caused by PM2.5 pollution, i is the type of health endpoint, and m represents the number of health endpoint.

3. Results

3.1. PM2.5 Pollution Characteristics

The annual average concentrations of PM2.5 were 42, 39 and 37 μg/m3 in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017, respectively. The annual average concentrations of PM2.5 in different cities are shown in Figure 2. It could be seen that the levels of PM2.5 in eight cities had gradually decreased from 2015 to 2017. However, the levels of PM2.5 in Wuwei, Qingyang, Dingxi and Linxia were lowest in 2016, and they were highest in Lanzhou and Jiayuguan in 2016. In general, the annual average concentrations of PM2.5 had shown the largest decline in Pingliang during the study period, followed by Zhangye and Jiuquan.
The annual average concentration of PM2.5 in all cities exceeded the value of the WHO AQG (10 μg/m3), and most cities exceeded the Secondary Standard Concentration Limit of China’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (35 μg/m3). Even in 2017, only a few cities met the Secondary Standard Concentration Limit of 35 μg/m3. Among these cities, Lanzhou suffered the worst serious PM2.5 pollution, with the annual average concentration exceeding the national average for the same period from 2015 to 2017, respectively [56]. On the one hand, Lanzhou was located in the valley basin, and the special closed terrain causes static wind and temperature inversion to occur frequently, which was not conducive to the diffusion of pollutants. On the other hand, Lanzhou was one of the largest industrial cities of Northwest China, and, as the capital city of Gansu, the economic development level was higher than that of the other 13 cities, with more coal consumption, car ownership and traffic volume. This could result in larger emissions of pollutants.

3.2. Health Effects of PM2.5 Pollution

Figure 3 shows the health effects of PM2.5 pollution in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017. The total number of people affected by PM2.5 in 2015, 2016 and 2017 was 1,644,870 (95%CI: 978,484–2,215,921), 1,551,447 (95%CI: 917,025–2,099,182) and 1,531,372 (95%CI: 899,769–2,077,772), accounting for 6.4%, 5.9%, and 5.8% of the permanent population at the end of the year, respectively. Therefore, the affected population showed a slightly decreasing trend from 2015 to 2017 all over the province. The proportion of the affected population decreased by 5.68% (95%CI: 5.27%–6.28%) in 2015–2016, larger than the change in 2016–2017.
The sensitivity of health endpoints to PM2.5 was different. The number of outpatient visits to internal medicine was the highest, followed by outpatient visits to pediatrics. The number of outpatient visits far exceeded other health effects, and reached 1,068,764 (95%CI: 549,804–1,551,288), 1,025,286 (95%CI: 514,083–1,470,329) and 1,016,486 (95%CI: 506,716–1,460,968) from 2015 to 2017, respectively. Contrastingly, the number of PM2.5-related premature mortality was the lowest, with 38,040 (95%CI: 15,958–55,589), 35,662 (95%CI: 14,853–52,455) and 36,722 (95%CI: 15,274–54,082). As opposed to the trend of other health endpoints, the number of outpatient visits to pediatrics increased in 2017.
We also calculated the health effects of PM2.5 in each city in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017, as shown in Figure 4. Among the 14 cities, Lanzhou and Tianshui were the most affected by PM2.5 pollution. The number of people affected by PM2.5 from 2015 to 2017 was 276,673 (95%CI: 165,315–370,152), 293,496 (95%CI: 174,455–392,802) and 289,568 (95%CI: 171,066–388,916) in Lanzhou, and 200,635 (95%CI: 119,210–270,877), 200,579 (95%CI: 118,715–271,132) and 204,489 (95%CI: 120,022–277,488) in Tianshui. The affected population in the two cities accounted for 29.02%, 31.85% and 32.26% of the total affected population in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017, respectively. The affected population in Dingxi, Longnan, Pingliang, Linxia, Qingyang, Wuwei and Baiyin averaged between 100,000 and 200,000. The affected population in Jiuquan and Zhangye was ranging from 50,000 to 80,000. After that, the number of people affected by PM2.5 in Gannan and Jinchang was between 20,000 and 40,000. Jiayuguan was the city with the lowest health impact, the affected population was 9827 (95%CI: 5,841–13,395), 11,362 (95%CI: 6,718–15,479) and 7098 (95%CI: 4,167–9,779) from 2015 to 2017, respectively. This was related to the fact that the city had the lowest PM2.5 concentration and the smallest population, so the health impact was significantly lower than other cities.
For different health endpoints, the proportion of health endpoints in overall health effects in 14 cities was similar. Compared with other health endpoints, the proportion of outpatient visits to internal medicine was in the majority, followed by outpatient visits to pediatrics, asthma attacks and chronic bronchitis, while premature mortality, respiratory hospitalization, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular hospitalization were lower.
According to the annual variation, the number of people affected by PM2.5 in nearly half of the cities decreased year by year, including Jinchang, Baiyin, Zhangye, Pingliang, Jiuquan and Longnan. Lanzhou, Jiayuguan and Gannan suffered an increase in health impacts from 2015 to 2016, and then decreased from 2016 to 2017. On the contrary, the health effects were decreased first and then increased in Tianshui, Wuwei, Qingyang, Dingxi and Linxia.

3.3. Economic Loss of PM2.5 Pollution

The total estimated economic loss due to PM2.5-related health impacts in whole Gansu Province were 42,699 (95%CI: 32,380~50,768) million Chinese Yuan (CNY), 43,982 (95%CI: 33,305~52,386) million CNY and 44,261 (95%CI: 33,306~52,954) million CNY, which accounted for 6.45%, 6.28% and 5.93% of the province’s GDP from 2015 to 2017, respectively (Table 3). It showed that the proportion of GDP for economic loss declined slightly year by year. In each category, the cost caused by chronic bronchitis was the highest, followed by all-cause mortality, and they represented more than 94% of the total economic loss. These findings were generally consistent with the results of previous studies, for instance, Yin et al. (2015) [57], Lv et al. (2016) [13] and Wei et al. (2018) [51].
Figure 5 displays the distribution of health-related economic loss caused by PM2.5 across Gansu Province during 2015–2017. Similar to the health impact, Lanzhou suffered the greatest economic losses, which were 13,387 (95%CI: 10,400–15,635) million CNY, 14,754 (95%CI: 11,439–17,227) and 16,237 (95%CI: 12,506–19,045) from 2015 to 2017, respectively. During the study period, the contribution of economic loss in Lanzhou to the total economic loss in Gansu Province was 31.35%, 33.55% and 36.68%, which was much higher than that of other cities and showed a growing trend (Figure 6). The economic loss was the second highest in Tianshui, Jiuquan and Qingyang, averaging between 3000 and 4000 million CNY. Baiyin, Wuwei, Zhangye, Pingliang, Dingxi and Longnan were the six cities whose economic loss ranged from 2000 to 3000 million CNY in the study period. For Jinchang and Linxia, the economic loss averaged between 1000 and 2000 million CNY. The economic loss of Jiayuguan and Gannan were the lowest, which were less than 1000 million yuan, contributing less than 2% to the total economic loss in Gansu Province.
As can be seen from the pie chart in Figure 5, the proportion of economic loss caused by each health endpoint in the total economic loss also showed a roughly consistent trend in 14 cities. That is, the economic loss caused by chronic bronchitis accounted for the largest proportion, followed by all-cause mortality, and the economic loss of outpatients were the lowest.
From 2015 to 2017, the economic loss in Jiayuguan, Jinchang, Baiyin, Zhangye, Pingliang and Longnan maintained a decreasing trend, while the changes of economic loss showed opposite trends in Lanzhou and Wuwei. In addition, the economic loss in Tianshui, Jiuquan and Gannan increased first and then declined, but Tianshui’s economic loss in 2016 and 2017 was significantly higher than that in 2015, and Jiuquan’s economic loss in 2017 was significantly lower than that in 2015 and 2016. The economic loss in Qingyang, Dingxi and Linxia showed trends of decreasing first and then rising, but the magnitude of the change was slight.
The proportion of health economic loss to GDP from 2015 to 2017 had been estimated for a parallel comparison in each city. As indicated in Figure 6, on average, Linxia, with more than 7% of GDP loss during 2015–2017, was the highest proportion among all the cities. The ratio in Dingxi, Tianshui, Lanzhou, Pingliang, Longnan, Gannan and Wuwei ranged from 6% to 7%. The economic loss in Jiayuguan was equivalent to around 4% of the GDP, which was the lowest. The ratio of economic loss to GDP was reduced from 2015 to 2017 in nearly half of the cities, for example, Jinchang, Baiyin, Zhangye, Pingliang, Jiuquan, and Longnan. By contrast, the ratios in Lanzhou, Tianshui and Qingyang were relatively stable.
In terms of per capita economic loss in 14 cities (Figure 7), it ranged from 721 CNY to 4353 CNY in different cities during 2015–2017. Among them, Lanzhou had the highest per capita economic loss, with more than 3500 CNY per year. The per capita economic loss was more than 2000 CNY in Jiuquan, Jiayuguan and Jinchang. Longnan, Dingxi and Linxia had the lowest per capita economic loss, which was less than 1000 CNY per year. Overall, we could see that the per capita economic loss of cities located in the Hexi area, including Jiuquan, Jiayuguan, Zhangye, Jinchang and Wuwei, was generally significantly higher than other cities. From 2015 to 2017, the per capita economic loss continued to rise in Lanzhou and Wuwei, while that decreased in Jiayuguan, Jinchang, Baiyin, Zhangye, Pingliang, Qingyang and Longnan. Figure 7 also showed that, in addition to the influence of PM2.5 pollution, per capita economic loss generally increased with the increase in per capita GDP.

4. Discussions

4.1. Correlation Analysis with Social Economic Development

As mentioned in the result part, the health effects of air pollution in different cities had a spatial difference. Previous studies have confirmed that the level of air pollution and its health burden were associated with local socio-economic development [58,59]. In general, the number of people affected by PM2.5 in other areas was more than that in the Hexi area of Gansu Province. Larger population density and relatively higher PM2.5 concentration were important reasons for the serious health effects in these areas. Therefore, we further discussed the correlation between health effects of PM2.5 and socio-economic indicators using correlation analysis (Table 4). It was found that the PM2.5 related health effects were significantly positively correlated with the population, GDP, population density and gross industrial production of the region, especially with population and population density.
In terms of economic loss, Lanzhou, the provincial capital, suffered the highest loss, and much higher than that of other cities. Yang et al. [60] also pointed out that the welfare loss of provincial capital cities was significantly higher than that of other cities in the same province, which was related to the higher consumption level and living quality of capital cities. Correlation analysis showed that the economic loss of PM2.5-related health impacts was still significantly positively correlated with the population, GDP, population density, and gross industrial production of the region, especially the extremely significant correlation with GDP and gross industrial production. The GDP and gross industrial production of Lanzhou were indeed significantly higher than that of other 13 cities from the statistical yearbook.
From the perspective of per capita economic loss, the per capita economic loss was higher in the Hexi area overall, which was contrary to the number of health impacts. This was closely related to the per capita GDP and urbanization rate of in different areas. The per capita GDP and urbanization rate in the Hexi area were both relatively higher, while, in other areas, there were more exposed people and lower GDP, so the per capita GDP was relatively lower.

4.2. Policy Implications

The trend of time showed that the air quality had gradually improved in recent years in Gansu Province. The annual average concentration of PM2.5 dropped from 42 in 2015 to 37 μg/m3 in 2017, and the related health effects also declined year by year. This was largely due to a series of positive air pollution control measures taken in Gansu Province, which mainly involved industrial energy structure, industrial emissions, coal combustion and vehicles. Correspondingly, cities had also introduced relevant policies and measures. In 2015, Lanzhou won the “Today’s Reform Progress Award” jointly granted by the Secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris for its outstanding achievements in air pollution control [61]. In order to further improve the prevention and control of air pollution, the government formulated and issued the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Work Plan in Gansu Province, 2017, and as well as policies on the total emission reduction of major air pollutants and pollution control in the steel and other industrial. In addition, strict monitoring and early warning measures had been implemented. However, although the annual average concentration of PM2.5 had decreased year by year, it still exceeded the secondary standard concentration limit of National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The pollution situation was still severe, and more applicable measures should be taken to further combat the problem, especially in cities with serious pollution.
The absolute value of health economic loss gradually increased in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017, but the proportion of economic burden (as a proportion of GDP) showed a downward trend. Meanwhile, the expenditure on pollution prevention and control increased from 0.21% in 2015 to 0.27% in 2017 (the total expenditure on energy conservation and environmental protection was averaged about 1.4% per year during 2015–2017 period) in Gansu Province [37,39,40]. Hence, it was also important for the local government to increase investment in environmental protection from the aspects of both protecting public health and sustainable economic development.

4.3. Uncertainty Analysis

In the selection of health endpoints, the study mainly chose health endpoints that could be quantitatively evaluated, such as all-cause mortality, chronic bronchitis, hospitalization for respiratory diseases, hospitalization for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, outpatient visits to internal medicine, outpatient visits to pediatrics, and asthma attacks. However, as for the lack of relevant epidemiological studies and available basic data, other health endpoints were ignored, including lung function changes and mental illnesses that had been shown to be associated with PM2.5 [62,63,64]. Thus, it was not comprehensive enough to measure all health endpoints caused by PM2.5, which probably underestimated the health impact and economic loss of PM2.5 pollution.
The exposure–response coefficient of PM2.5 depended on the results of epidemiological and toxicological studies. At present, many other factors in the process of establishing the exposure– response relationship in relevant studies were still unclear and uncertain, and further studies were needed. In addition, the exposure–response coefficient varied by different regions and cities. The higher the exposure–response coefficient, the higher the health impact would be. For example, in this study, the exposure–response coefficient of all-cause mortality was selected from the local study results in Lanzhou. It was higher than that of other regions in China, and the estimated number of all-cause mortality was relatively high. Therefore, the exposure–response coefficient of the local or similar region should be prioritized to avoid errors caused by regional differences, so as to improve the accuracy of the study as far as possible.
There was no scientific basis for setting a specific threshold currently. In the assessment of the health risks of air pollution, the selection of a threshold usually included no threshold (or zero threshold), natural background values, the lowest concentration values observed in the epidemiological literature, as well as the air quality standards released by government or AQG released by WHO [65]. The lower safe threshold of air pollution was used in our study, that is, the AQG was used as the threshold concentration, because it was based on a large amount of scientific evidence currently associated with air pollution and its health effects. Most studies have also used this threshold. It was clear that the results of health economic loss were also sensitive to the threshold of PM2.5 concentration. Taking the city of Lanzhou as an example, according to our calculation, the economic loss accounted for 6.39%, 6.52% and 6.49% of GDP under the reference concentration of 10 μg/m3 from 2015 to 2017, respectively, and 3.96%, 4.25% and 4.01% under the reference concentration of 35 μg/m3 (national secondary standard), respectively. Therefore, reducing PM2.5 concentration to meet stringent air quality standards could reduce health damage and avoid a large quantity of economic loss [66].
Furthermore, we did not consider the spatial differences of PM2.5 concentrations and population distribution within the city when calculating the health effects of PM2.5 pollution in each city. Another point was that, although the morbidity, per capita hospitalization and outpatient costs of different diseases varied in different cities, the average health information of Gansu Province was used when the information for disease incidence rate in a city was not available, due to the data availability. In conclusion, the selection of health endpoints, exposure–response coefficient, threshold concentration of PM2.5 and baseline level all influenced the results of the study.

5. Conclusions

We conducted a spatio-temporal assessment of the economic loss caused by PM2.5-related health effects in cities of Gansu Province, combining epidemiological methods with economic methods.
The number of health damage caused by PM2.5 pollution was 1,644,870 (95%CI: 978,484–2,215,921), 1,551,447 (95%CI: 917,025–2,099,182) and 1,531,372 (95%CI: 899,769–2,077,772) in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017, respectively, and it could be drawn that there were downward trends year by year. Among the different health endpoints, PM2.5 pollution had the strongest impact on outpatient visits (internal medicine and pediatrics). For a single city, Lanzhou with the highest PM2.5 concentration and most exposed population suffered the highest health impacts, while the health impact in Jiayuguan was the lowest. The health impacts in Hexi area were generally lower than that in other areas.
The economic value of health loss caused by PM2.5 were 42,699 (95%CI: 32,380–50,768) million CNY, 43,982 (95%CI: 33,305–52,386) million CNY and 44,261 (95%CI: 33,306–52,954) million CNY in Gansu from 2015 to 2017, respectively. On the whole, although the proportion of economic loss in the total GDP declined slightly, it remained high, accounting for 6.45% (95%CI: 4.89%–7.67%), 6.28% (95%CI: 4.75%–7.48%) and 5.93% (95%CI: 4.64%–7.10%) of GDP for that year, respectively. Chronic bronchitis and all-cause mortality were the main sources of total economic loss, with a combined contribution rate of more than 94%. Among the 14 cities, Lanzhou had the highest economic loss, equivalent to about one third of the total health economic loss of Gansu Province, and the highest per capita economic loss. Linxia suffered the greatest health economic loss in terms of the proportion of local GDP.
Despite the uncertainties, according to the quantitative evaluation results, the health-related economic loss caused by PM2.5 pollution accounted for a high proportion in the GDP, highlighting the severity of the health effects caused by PM2.5 pollution in Gansu Province. It brought greater pressure on the sustainable development of local economy and society, due to the low level of economic development. Hence, efforts should be made to strengthen the control of air pollution in the region, in order to minimize the health hazards and economic loss caused by air pollution.

Author Contributions

Data curation, W.J.; methodology, Q.L., Y.T. and Y.L.; supervision, Q.L. and W.J.; visualization, Y.L. and Y.N.; writing—original draft, Q.L.; writing—review & editing, Y.T. and J.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0206201).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. The World Bank. The Cost of Air Pollution: Strengthening the Economic Case for Action; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO. Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Forouzanfar, M.H.; Afshin, A.; Alexander, L.T.; Anderson, H.R.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Biryukov, S.; Brauer, M.; Burnett, R.; Cercy, K.; Charlson, F.J.; et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016, 388, 1659–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Silver, B.; Reddington, C.L.; Arnold, S.R.; Spracklen, D.V. Substantial changes in air pollution across China during 2015–2017. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 114012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, P.; Ding, Y.H.; Liu, Y.J. Atmospheric circulation and dynamic mechanism for persistent haze events in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2017, 34, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Xie, Z.X.; Li, Y.; Qin, Y.C.; Rong, P.J. Value Assessment of Health Losses Caused by PM2.5 Pollution in Cities of Atmospheric Pollution Transmission Channel in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Lin, H.L.; Liu, T.; Xiao, J.P.; Zeng, W.L.; Li, X.; Guo, L.C.; Zhang, Y.H.; Xu, Y.J.; Tao, J.; Xian, H.; et al. Mortality burden of ambient fine particulate air pollution in six Chinese cities: Results from the Pearl River Delta study. Environ. Int. 2016, 96, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dehghani, M.; Fazlzadeh, M.; Sorooshian, A.; Tabatabaee, H.R.; Miri, M.; Baghani, A.N.; Delikhoon, M.; Mahvi, A.H.; Rashidi, M. Characteristics and health effects of BTEX in a hot spot for urban pollution. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 155, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Burnett, R.; Chen, H.; Szyszkowicz, M.; Fann, N.; Hubbell, B.; Pope, C.A.; Apte, J.S.; Brauer, M.; Cohen, A.; Weichenthal, S.; et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 9592–9597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Yang, B.Y.; Qian, Z.M.; Li, S.S.; Fan, S.J.; Chen, G.B.; Syberg, K.M.; Xian, H.; Wang, S.Q.; Ma, H.M.; Chen, D.H.; et al. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution (including PM1) and metabolic syndrome: The 33 Communities Chinese Health Study (33CCHS). Environ. Res. 2018, 164, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karimi, A.; Shirmardi, M.; Mostafa, H.; Birgani, Y.T.; Neisi, A.; Takdastan, A.; Goudarzi, G. Concentrations and health effects of short- and long-term exposure to PM2.5, NO2, and O3 in ambient air of Ahvaz city, Iran (2014–2017). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Filonchyk, M.; Yan, H.W.; Li, X.J. Temporal and spatial variation of particulate matter and its correlation with other criteria of air pollutants in Lanzhou, China, in spring-summer periods. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2018, 9, 1100–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lv, L.Y.; Li, H.Y. Health Economic Evaluation of PM10 and PM2.5 Pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Nankaiensis 2016, 49, 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bayat, R.; Ashrafi, K.; Motlagh, M.S.; Hassanvand, M.S.; Daroudi, R.; Fink, G.; Künzli, N. Health impact and related cost of ambient air pollution in Tehran. Environ. Res. 2019, 176, 108547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Landrigan, P.J.; Fuller, R.; Acosta, N.J.R.; Adeyi, O.; Arnold, R.; Basu, N.; Baldé, A.B.; Bertollini, R.; Reilly, S.B.; Boufford, J.I.; et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 2018, 391, 462–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. OECD. The Cost of Air Pollution: Health Impacts of Road Transport; OECD: Paris, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. RAND. Costs of Selected Policies to Address Air Pollution in China; RAND Corporation: Santa Monica, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Economic Cost of the Health Impact of Air Pollution in Europe: Clean Air, Health and Wealth; WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Apte, J.S.; Marshall, J.D.; Cohen, A.J.; Brauer, M. Addressing global mortality from ambient PM2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 8057–8066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pope, C.A.; Burnett, R.T.; Thun, M.J.; Calle, E.E.; Krewski, D.; Ito, K.; Thurston, G.D. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2002, 287, 1132–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kan, H.D.; Chen, B.H. Analysis of Exposure-Response Relationships of Air Particulate Matter and Adverse Health Outcomes in China. J. Environ. Health 2002, 19, 422–424. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lelieveld, J.; Evans, J.S.; Fnais, M.; Giannadaki, D.; Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 2015, 525, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, M.S.; Song, Y.; Cai, X.H. A health-based assessment of particulate air pollution in urban areas of Beijing in 2000–2004. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 376, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hou, Q.; An, X.; Wang, Y.; Tao, Y.; Sun, Z. An assessment of China’s PM10-related health economic losses in 2009. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 435, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, X.L.; Yu, X.Y.; Wang, Y.; Fan, C.Y. Economic evaluation of health losses from air pollution in Beijing, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 11716–11728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yin, H.; Pizzol, M.; Jacobsen, J.B.; Xu, L.Y. Contingent valuation of health and mood impacts of PM2.5 in Beijing, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 630, 1269–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wu, R.; Dai, H.C.; Geng, Y.; Xie, Y.; Masui, T.; Liu, Z.Q.; Qian, Y.Y. Economic Impacts from PM2.5 Pollution-Related Health Effects: A Case Study in Shanghai. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 5035–5042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yu, G.H.; Wang, F.F.; Hu, J.; Liao, Y.; Liu, X.Z. Value Assessment of Health Losses Caused by PM2.5 in Changsha City, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Xie, Y.; Dai, H.C.; Hanaoka, T.; Masui, T. Health and economic impacts of PM2.5 pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2016, 26, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang, D.S.; Xu, J.H.; Zhang, S.Q. Valuing the health risks of particulate air pollution in the Pearl River Delta, China. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 15, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, X.C.; Yao, T.; Fung, J.C.H.; Lin, C.Q. Estimation of health and economic costs of air pollution over the Pearl River Delta region in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 566, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Maji, K.J.; Ye, W.F.; Arora, M.; Nagendra, S.M.S. PM2.5-related health and economic loss assessment for 338 Chinese cities. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Y.; Luo, L.W.; Song, C.; Yin, H.; Yang, J.T. Spatiotemporal Assessment of PM2.5-Related Economic Losses from Health Impacts during 2014–2016 in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Li, L.; Lei, Y.L.; Wu, S.M.; Chen, J.B.; Yan, D. The health economic loss of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Voorhees, A.S.; Zhao, B.; Jang, C.; Jiang, J.K.; Fu, J.S.; Ding, D.; Zhu, Y.; Hao, J.M. Assessment of short-term PM2.5-related mortality due to different emission sources in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 123, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qi, Y.; Lu, H.Y. Pollution, health and inequality—Overcoming the trap of “environmental health poverty”. Manag. World 2015, 9, 32–51. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gansu Province Bureau of Statistics. Gansu Development Yearbook 2018; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2018.
  38. Wang, S.; Feng, X.; Zeng, X.; Ma, Y.; Shang, K. A study on variations of concentrations of particulate matter with different sizes in Lanzhou, China. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 2823–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gansu Province Bureau of Statistics. Gansu Development Yearbook 2016; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2016.
  40. Gansu Province Bureau of Statistics. Gansu Development Yearbook 2017; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2017.
  41. Yin, Y.W.; Cheng, J.P.; Duan, Y.S.; Wei, H.P.; Ji, R.X.; Yu, J.L.; Yu, H.R. Economic evaluation of residents’ health hazard caused by PM2.5 of haze pollution in a city. J. Environ. Health 2011, 28, 250–252. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, R.H. The Time Series Analysis of Air Pollution and the Mortality Caused by Respiratory and Circulatory System Disease in Lanzhou City; Lanzhou University: Lanzhou, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tao, Y.; Liu, Y.M.; Mi, S.Q.; Guo, Y.T. Atmospheric pollution characteristics of fine particles and their effects on human health. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2014, 34, 592–597. [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, H.J.; Zhou, D.Q.; Wei, Y.J. An Assessment of PM2.5-Related Health Risks and Associated Economic Losses in Chinese Cities. Environ. Sci. 2018, 39, 3467–3475. [Google Scholar]
  45. Xie, P.; Liu, X.Y.; Liu, Z.R.; Li, T.T.; Bai, Y.H. Exposure-response functions for health effects of ambient particulate matter pollution applicable for China. China Environ. Sci. 2009, 29, 1034–1040. [Google Scholar]
  46. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China Health and Family Planning Statistical Yearbook 2016; China Union Medical University Press: Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  47. Center for Health Statistics and Information. An Analysis Report of National Health Service Survey in China (2013); China Union Medical University Press: Beijing, China, 2015.
  48. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China Health and Family Planning Statistical Yearbook 2017; China Union Medical University Press: Beijing, China, 2017.
  49. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China Health and Family Planning Statistical Yearbook 2018; China Union Medical University Press: Beijing, China, 2018.
  50. Yang, D.R.; Wang, H.X.; Lan, L.; Tao, Y.; Mi, S.Q. Evaluation of Economic Losses Due to Human Health Damage from Air Pollution before and after Energy Reform in Lanzhou. Environ. Eng. 2013, 31, 112–116. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wei, G.R.; Shi, X.M. Evaluation the Extent of Health Damage Caused by PM2.5 Particulate in Xi’an City. Environ. Sci. 2018, 39, 3015–3021. [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu, C.H.; Hong, J.G.; Shang, Y.X.; Sun, J.; Duolikun, M.; Shan, M.N.; Gao, Y.; Ren, X.M.; Liu, C.S.; Zhang, Y.J.; et al. Comparison of asthma prevalence in children from 16 cities of China in 20 years. Chin. J. Pract. Pediatr. 2015, 30, 596–600. [Google Scholar]
  53. Xie, Z.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, R. Death effects assessment of PM2.5 Pollution in China. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 1813–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yin, H.; Pizzol, M.; Xu, L. External costs of PM2.5 pollution in Beijing, China: Uncertainty analysis of multiple health impacts and costs. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 26, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Han, M.X.; Guo, X.M.; Zhang, Y.S. The human capital loss of air pollution in cities, China. China Environ. Sci. 2006, 26, 509–512. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. China Environmental Status Bulletin (2015–2017). Available online: http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/zghjzkgb/lnzghjzkgb/ (accessed on 29 August 2019).
  57. Yin, H.; Xu, L.Y.; Cai, Y.P. Monetary Valuation of PM10-Related Health Risks in Beijing China—The Necessity for PM10 Pollution Indemnity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 9967–9987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Han, F.; Lu, X.C.; Xiao, C.C.; Chang, M.; Huang, K. Estimation of Health Effects and Economic Losses from Ambient Air Pollution in Undeveloped Areas: Evidence from Guangxi, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Lin, X.; Wang, D. Spatiotemporal evolution of urban air quality and socioeconomic driving forces in China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2016, 26, 1533–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, S.Y.; Fang, D.L.; Chen, B. Human health impact and economic effect for PM2.5 exposure in typical cities. Appl. Energy 2019, 249, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. The Official Website of Gansu Province, China. Former Choking City Breathes Clean Air in More Days. Available online: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/m/gansu/2016-02/16/content_23506776.htm (accessed on 5 September 2019).
  62. Liu, S.; Song, G.J. Evaluation of PM2.5’s adverse human health effect in cities. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2016, 36, 1468–1476. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  63. Lu, J.G.; Lee, J.J.; Gino, F.; Galinsky, A.D. Polluted Morality: Air Pollution Predicts Criminal Activity and Unethical Behavior. Psychol. Sci. 2018, 29, 340–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, X. The impact of exposure to air pollution on cognitive performance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 9193–9197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Guo, X.B.; Yang, X. Environmental Pollution and Health Research Series (Part. 1): Air Pollution and Health; Hubei Publishers of Science and Technology: Wuhan, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, D.; Aunan, K.; Seip, H.M.; Larssen, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, D. The assessment of health damage caused by air pollution and its implication for policy making in Taiyuan, Shanxi, China. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Geographical location of Gansu Province.
Figure 1. Geographical location of Gansu Province.
Ijerph 17 03253 g001
Figure 2. The annual average PM2.5 concentration of cities in Gansu from 2015 to 2017.
Figure 2. The annual average PM2.5 concentration of cities in Gansu from 2015 to 2017.
Ijerph 17 03253 g002
Figure 3. Health effects related to PM2.5 in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017. Note: In Figure 3, ACM, RH, CCH, OIM, OP, CB, AT refer to all-cause mortality, respiratory hospitalization, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular hospitalization, outpatient visits to internal medicine, outpatient visits to pediatrics, chronic bronchitis, asthma attacks, respectively. The same below.
Figure 3. Health effects related to PM2.5 in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017. Note: In Figure 3, ACM, RH, CCH, OIM, OP, CB, AT refer to all-cause mortality, respiratory hospitalization, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular hospitalization, outpatient visits to internal medicine, outpatient visits to pediatrics, chronic bronchitis, asthma attacks, respectively. The same below.
Ijerph 17 03253 g003
Figure 4. Health effects related to PM2.5 in 14 cities in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017.
Figure 4. Health effects related to PM2.5 in 14 cities in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017.
Ijerph 17 03253 g004
Figure 5. Economic loss of PM2.5-related health impacts in 14 cities in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017.
Figure 5. Economic loss of PM2.5-related health impacts in 14 cities in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017.
Ijerph 17 03253 g005
Figure 6. Ratio of economic loss of each city in the total economic loss and the ratio of economic loss to GDP from 2015 to 2017.
Figure 6. Ratio of economic loss of each city in the total economic loss and the ratio of economic loss to GDP from 2015 to 2017.
Ijerph 17 03253 g006
Figure 7. Per capita economic loss in 14 cities in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017. Note: In Figure 7, the size of the circle represents PM2.5 concentration.
Figure 7. Per capita economic loss in 14 cities in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017. Note: In Figure 7, the size of the circle represents PM2.5 concentration.
Ijerph 17 03253 g007
Table 1. Exposure-response coefficients of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) related health effects.
Table 1. Exposure-response coefficients of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) related health effects.
Health OutcomeExposure–Response Coefficient β (95%CI)
All-cause mortality0.0083 (0.0032, 0.0131) [42]
Respiratory hospitalization0.00604 (0.00441, 0.00789) [43]
Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular hospitalization0.00697 (0.00464, 0.00906) [43]
Outpatient visits to internal medicine0.0049 (0.0027, 0.007) [44]
Outpatient visits to pediatrics0.0056 (0.002, 0.009) [44]
Chronic bronchitis (0–14)0.0486 (0.0401, 0.0570) [13]
Chronic bronchitis (≥15)0.0686 (0.0574, 0.0797) [13]
Asthma attacks (0–14)0.0208 (0.0118, 0.0300) [45]
Asthma attacks (≥15)0.021 (0.0145, 0.0274) [45]
Table 2. The health information in Gansu.
Table 2. The health information in Gansu.
Year201520162017
Mortality (‰)Mortality Rate per City [37,39,40]
Morbidity (‰)Chronic bronchitis (0–14)7.2 [46]7.27.2
Chronic bronchitis (≥15)7.27.27.2
Asthma attacks (0–14)23.9 [52]23.923.9
Asthma attacks (≥15)12.4 [51]12.412.4
Visiting Rate (‰)Outpatient visits to internal medicine179.8 [46]180.6 [48]181.3 [49]
Outpatient visits to pediatrics83.1 [46]89.1 [48]94.4 [49]
Hospitalization Rate (‰)Respiratory hospitalization13.3 [47]13.313.3
Cardio-cerebrovascular hospitalization18.7 [47]18.718.7
Medical Costs Per Case (CNY/case)outpatient costs 169.7 [46]177.4 [48]190.9 [49]
hospitalization costs5447.1 [46]5587.5 [48]5769.8 [49]
Loss of Working Time (day)average outpatient time0.50.50.5
average hospitalization time9.7 [46]9.1 [48]8.8 [49]
Table 3. Economic loss of PM2.5-related health impacts in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017.
Table 3. Economic loss of PM2.5-related health impacts in Gansu Province from 2015 to 2017.
Health OutcomeEconomic Loss of Health Effects (in Million CNY)
201520162017
ACM14,213.8314,601.6414,856.45
(5980.11, 20,719.46)(6125.30, 21,343.40)(6214.83, 21,771.20)
RH393.28371.14368.74
(295.69, 499.14)(278.26, 471.55)(276.46, 469.18)
CCH628.27593.52589.92
(435.73, 790.49)(410.15, 747.76)(407.54, 744.37)
OIM147.31143.38148.15
(84.51, 203.76)(81.95, 198.48)(84.68, 205.49)
OP76.9079.9687.22
(29.28, 117.14)(30.29, 122.06)(33.02, 133.48)
CB26075.9127,073.5127,095.92
(24,701.58, 27,029.60)(25,565.71, 28,141.09)(25,480.61, 28,267.91)
AT1163.961118.511115.04
(853.48, 1408.56)(813.56, 1361.67)(809.22, 1362.10)
Total42,699.4643,981.6544,261.44
(32,380.38, 50,768.15)(33,305.22, 52,386.00)(33,306.36, 52,953.74)
Total/GDP6.45%6.28%5.93%
(4.89%, 7.67%)(4.75%, 7.48%)(4.47%, 7.10%)
Note: ACM, RH, CCH, OIM, OP, CB, AT refer to all-cause mortality, respiratory hospitalization, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular hospitalization, outpatient visits to internal medicine, outpatient visits to pediatrics, chronic bronchitis, asthma attacks, respectively.
Table 4. Correlation between PM2.5 related health impact, economic loss and socioeconomic indicators.
Table 4. Correlation between PM2.5 related health impact, economic loss and socioeconomic indicators.
CategoryYearPopulationGDPPer Capita GDPUrbanization RatePopulation DensityGross Industrial Production
Health Impact20150.977 **0.706 **−0.312−0.1840.813 **0.536 *
20160.959 **0.802 **−0.082−0.0880.791 **0.703 *
20170.953 **0.747 **−0.164−0.1290.811 **0.650 *
Economic Loss20150.645 *0.998 **0.2900.3660.548 *0.915 **
20160.650 *0.999 **0.4380.3610.552 *0.945 **
20170.648 *0.997 **0.3610.3610.574 *0.948 **
Per Capita Economic Loss2015−0.2630.5250.955 **0.927 **−0.0920.601 *
2016−0.1030.655 *0.958 **0.855 **−0.0090.675 **
20170.0010.764 **0.879 **0.854 **0.1300.811 **
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (p < 0.05); ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (p < 0.01).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liao, Q.; Jin, W.; Tao, Y.; Qu, J.; Li, Y.; Niu, Y. Health and Economic Loss Assessment of PM2.5 Pollution during 2015–2017 in Gansu Province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093253

AMA Style

Liao Q, Jin W, Tao Y, Qu J, Li Y, Niu Y. Health and Economic Loss Assessment of PM2.5 Pollution during 2015–2017 in Gansu Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(9):3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093253

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liao, Qin, Wangqiang Jin, Yan Tao, Jiansheng Qu, Yong Li, and Yibo Niu. 2020. "Health and Economic Loss Assessment of PM2.5 Pollution during 2015–2017 in Gansu Province, China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 9: 3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093253

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop