Next Article in Journal
Suicide among Older Adults with Dementia: Effects of Korea’s Long-Term Care Insurance System
Next Article in Special Issue
Music Is Life—Follow-Up Qualitative Study on Parental Experiences of Creative Music Therapy in the Neonatal Period
Previous Article in Journal
Hopelessness and Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Any Role for Mediating Variables?
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of a Voice-Centered Psycho-Educational Program on Maternal Self-Efficacy: A Feasibility Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 12
10.3390/ijerph18126580
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combining Kangaroo Care and Live-Performed Music Therapy: Effects on Physiological Stability and Neurological Functioning in Extremely and Very Preterm Infants

by
Loïs C. Span
1,*,
Nienke H. van Dokkum
1,
Anne-Greet Ravensbergen
1,2,
Arend F. Bos
1 and
Artur C. Jaschke
1,2
1
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
2
Department of Music Therapy, ArtEZ University of the Arts, 7523 WB Enschede, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(12), 6580; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126580
Submission received: 25 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 16 June 2021 / Published: 18 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Auditory Experience, Music and Voice across the Perinatal Period: Innovations in Theory, Research and Clinical practice)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Interventions such as kangaroo care (KC) and live-performed music therapy (LPMT), are increasingly used to facilitate stress reduction in neonates. This study aims to investigate the effect of combining the two on physiological responses and neurological functioning in very preterm infants. Infants received six sessions of LPMT. KC was added to one LPMT session. Physiological responses included heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation. We videotaped infants for 30 min before and after two sessions to assess general movements (GMs). We included 17 infants, gestational age median 26.0 weeks (IQR 25.6–30.6 weeks), of whom six were males. Combined interventions showed a decrease in heart rate from mean 164 bpm before to 157 bpm during therapy, p = 0.001. Oxygen saturation levels increased during combination therapy from median 91.4% to 94.5%, p = 0.044. We found no effects of LPMT or combined interventions on GMs. Infants with a postnatal age (PNA) <7 days generally seem to display less optimal GMs after therapy compared with infants with a PNA >7 days. In conclusion, combining interventions is equally beneficial for physiological stability and neurological functioning as LPMT alone. Future studies should focus on the effects of this combination on parent-infant bonding.

1. Introduction

Prematurity is a global concern, with 10.6% of all live births in 2014 ending before 37 weeks of gestation. This comprises over 14.9 million infants globally, with preterm birth rates increasing in most countries [1,2]. In Europe, the percentage of very preterm births (<32 weeks’ gestation) ranges from 0.7 to 1.4% of all live births [3]. Very preterm infants are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, with 10–15% infant mortality and 5–10% cerebral palsy [3,4]. Survival rates of extremely and very preterm infants are also increasing due to technological advances and the combined efforts of obstetricians and neonatologists worldwide [5]. Still, complications of preterm birth are the leading cause of infant mortality and morbidity in almost all countries [1]. Shortened gestation predisposes preterm infants to a wide array of complications. Preterm infants are at higher risk for neurodevelopmental impairments [6,7] as well as behavioral [8] and attentional problems [9]. The tiniest and most fragile infants are at highest risk of these disabilities [10], with a 40% prevalence being reported for infants delivered at 24–32 weeks gestational age (GA) [11]. The focus for antenatal, perinatal and neonatal interventions has therefore diverted from minimalization of death rates to the optimization of preterm infant care, to reduce long-term morbidity, especially the prevention of brain injury and abnormal brain development [9].
Several interventions are provided to these infants during their stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). One of the most commonly implemented interventions is kangaroo care (KC), where skin-to-skin contact between infants and parents is considered as a key part of care. Numerous studies have reported on the benefits of KC related to physiological stability, that is thermoregulation, stable cardiorespiratory functions and blood glucose levels, as well as improved sleep-wake cycles and higher rates of breastfeeding [12,13,14]. KC is also an effective therapy to relieve procedural pain and improve neurodevelopment [12,13,14,15]. Therefore, KC has become a popularized strategy worldwide for promoting parent-infant attachment and for modifying NICU distress.
Over recent years, evidence is rapidly accumulating that music-based interventions may also positively impact preterm infants’ physiological stability and behavioral states [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Studies report that music aids in the stabilization of heart rate, blood pressure and respiration [18,20], as well as the improvement of oral feeding tolerance [17,22,23]. Recent research suggests that the best practice of music therapy is live-performed music therapy (LPMT) as it is an individual approach adjusted to the infants’ physiological and behavioral state with encouragement of parental participation [19,23,24]. LPMT can be defined as “a clinical and evidence-based health intervention in which music is used within a therapeutic setting to address patients’ physical, emotional, cognitive, and social needs” [19]. LPMT is a feasible intervention that is tolerated well and does not cause overstimulation in extremely and very preterm infants [25,26].
The individual KC and LPMT interventions have therefore proven their value in neonatal care [25,27]. Nonetheless, only a few studies exist that investigate the combined effects of musical interventions and KC [24,28,29,30,31]. These studies generally reported stable or slightly beneficial changes in physiological parameters during and after therapy. However, these studies mostly used music-based interventions i.e., recorded music, live-harp music and maternal singing, rather than LPMT, and include mainly older infants. Consequently, the combined effects of LPMT and KC in extremely and very preterm infants have been studied insufficiently. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the added value of combining KC and LPMT compared with LMPT alone on physiological stability and neurological functioning in extremely and very preterm infants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Setting and Population

For this prospective, single-center, within-subject, comparative crossover study, we included infants born between September 2020 and April 2021. All clinically stable infants, born with a gestational age of less than 32 weeks, combined with a birth weight of <2000 g, who were cared for in the level III-IV NICU of the University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands, were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were: (a) medical instability (e.g., continuing bradycardias, apneas, saturation drops or acute illness) (b) significant congenital anomalies, (c) intraventricular hemorrhages grade 3 or 4, (d) heavy sedation and (e) surgical intervention until five days after. Nurses and neonatologists were consulted for risk assessment of individual cases. Parents needed to have a sufficient understanding of the Dutch or English language to understand the purpose of this research, give informed consent, and schedule appointments for the study interventions. Parents were approached during the first week after birth to participate in the study and were provided with written and oral information about the study. Infants were included in the study after both parents provided written informed consent. This study was conducted within an ongoing pilot trial concerning the feasibility and effects of LPMT for extremely and very preterm infants. Because of its pilot nature, we did not perform a sample size calculation. This study’s ethical approval was obtained by the institutional ethical review board of the University Medical Center Groningen (METc 2019/093) and was registered online (ISRCTN94562698).

2.2. Procedure

After enrolment, a certified music therapist, who specialized in NICU music therapy, provided detailed information on the LPMT as provided at our neonatal ward. Infants in the music therapy trial received six sessions of LPMT consisting of roughly 15 min of actual music. Two of these sessions, provided on different days, were used for the current study, one consisting of LPMT only and one where LPMT was provided during a KC session.

2.2.1. Music Therapy

A full explanation of the music therapy trial has been described previously [25]. In summary, LPMT was based on the Rhythm, Breath and Lullaby method, as developed by Loewy [23]. While observing the infants’ vital signs, the music therapist played improvised melodies using two musical interventions. The type of instrument was carefully selected for each session and depended on the gestational age and developmental progress. The first instrument we used was the Remo Lullaby Ocean Disc, a round drum with metal balls inside that simulates womb sounds. The second instrument we used was live singing accompanied by guitar arpeggios. The Ocean Disc was used in the first three sessions. After the third session, guitar arpeggios and voice were introduced. Parents were encouraged to provide their song of kin, i.e., a meaningful song that the music therapist rewrote to resemble a lullaby. If a song of kin was not provided, Twinke Twinkle Little Star was the lullaby of choice.

2.2.2. Kangaroo Care

KC is standard practice in Dutch neonatal wards. The preterm infant is clad in a diaper and is held in a vertical upright position against the parent’s bare chest while covered with clothing or a blanket. Parents are motivated to provide KC as soon as the infant is medically stable. Skin-to-skin contact was provided for a minimum of 60 min a day. One of the LPMT sessions was scheduled during such a 60 min period. After the 15 min of LPMT, parents continued KC for a minimum of 30 min.

2.3. Measures

2.3.1. Physiological Stability

We determined physiological stability using heart rate, respiratory rate and peripheral oxygen saturation. For all three, we calculated means in the hour before therapy, during therapy and in the hour after therapy. Data on physiological parameters were extracted from bedside monitors, in which they were stored in five second intervals.

2.3.2. General Movement Assessment

We determined neurological functioning using the General Movement Assessment (GMA), including the detailed General Movement Optimality Score (GMOS). The Prechtl GMA is one of the most reliable indicators for early neuromotor deficits and reflects impairments of brain regions involved in neurodevelopment [32,33,34,35]. The GMA describes the quality and quantity of the spontaneous motor repertoire. We recorded infants before and after both interventions for a minimum of 30 min. Infants were recorded in supine or lateral recumbent position, preferably without clothing and distracting objects. From the recordings, we first assessed the quality of General Movements (GMs) based on visual gestalt perception, differentiating normal GMs from abnormal GMs, in the categories poor repertoire, cramped synchronized and chaotic movements. Next, the GMOS was applied to all recordings, where the subcategories, i.e., neck and trunk, upper extremities and lower extremities, were scored. The GMOS ranges between 5 and 42 points, with higher scores indicating better neurological performance [34]. All scoring was performed by two trained and licensed GM assessors (N.H.v.D. and A.F.B.), who were blinded for patient characteristics and the type of intervention.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Analyses were performed using SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA). First, we reported baseline characteristics of infants using descriptive statistics. Baseline characteristics included gender, birth weight, gestational age, postnatal age during intervention, and respiratory support. Next, we compared differences in heart rate, respiratory rate and peripheral oxygen saturation before, during and after therapy sessions with one another, using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. Finally, we assessed differences in GMOS before and after therapy sessions and tested these using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test. We also tested the differences in delta GMOS of LPMT alone compared with LPMT and KC together, using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test. Results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

Overall, 50 infants were eligible to participate in this study. Of these, two could not be asked for participation because of logistical reasons, three infants deceased and ten were transferred to other hospitals before participation could be asked. Of the remaining 35 eligible infants, the parents of six declined participation for this study. Consequently, this study included 29 infants, of which 17 completed both interventions. They had a median gestational age of 26.0 weeks (Interquartile Range (IQR) 25.6–30.6 weeks) and median birth weight 900 g (IQR 766–1380 g). We present the baseline characteristics in Table 1. The twelve infants who were transferred to other care facilities before the interventions could be completed did not statistically differ regarding GA (p = 0.093), birth weight (p = 0.141) and male-female ratio (p = 0.096).

3.2. Physiological Parameters

3.2.1. Heart Rate

In Figure 1 we present the differences between the heart rate of all included infants, infants <7 days postnatal age (PNA) and infants >7 days PNA. Combined interventions showed a significant decrease in heart rate during therapy (median 164 bpm before to median 157 bpm during therapy, p = 0.001). A significant increase of heart rate was observed after combined therapy (median 157 bpm during to median 166 bpm after, p = 0.01). Heart rate before, during and after LPMT alone remained stable (p = 0.25 to 0.91 for all three comparisons). In infants with a PNA <7 days, heart rate seemed to rise during LMPT alone, whereas combined with KC, it seemed to drop.

3.2.2. Respiratory Rate

In Figure 2 we present the results on respiratory rate in infants of all postnatal ages, <7 days PNA and >7 days PNA. There were neither significant changes in the respiratory rate in the LPMT group, nor were there any significant changes in the combined therapy group of all infants (p = 0.16 to p = 0.89). Respiratory rate increased significantly after combined interventions in the <7 days PNA group compared with during therapy (p = 0.046). Although not statistically significantly different, respiratory rate seemed to drop during combined interventions, whereas it seemed to rise during LPMT.

3.2.3. Peripheral Oxygen Saturation

In Figure 3, we present the responses of all included infants compared with infants that received therapy before and after 7 days PNA. Oxygen saturation decreased statistically significantly after LPMT (median 94.0% before to median 92.7% after, p = 0.011). Regarding combined interventions, we observed an increase of oxygen saturation during therapy (median 91.4% before to median 94.5% during, p = 0.044). This oxygen saturation increase during LPMT combined with KC was significant in infants older than 7 days PNA (p = 0.033). Although not statistically significant, oxygen saturation levels of preterm infants seemed to slightly elevate during combined therapy and slightly drop during LPMT alone in both PNA groups.

3.3. Neurological Functioning

We analyzed a total of 68 recordings, 17 before and 17 after LPMT and compared these recordings with 17 before, and 17 after LPMT combined with KC. We present GMs patterns of individual recordings in Table 2. One infant scored hypokinetic on two of the recordings, so we excluded this infant for GMA. Most infants’ GMs were scored ‘poor repertoire’. There was no statistically significant difference between the pre–post-therapy in GMOS in infants provided with LPMT (31.3 vs. 29.6, p = 0.20) or combined interventions (28.2 vs. 27.6, p = 0.86). Comparing the delta GMOS’ for both interventions also revealed no significant differences (Figure 4).
Because of the vast differences in GMOS scores, we decided post-hoc to investigate the patterns of GMs in detail. We noticed that infants with a PNA <7 days had more irregular GMOS’ than infants >7 days PNA, although this could not be supported statistically (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

This study investigated the effects of LPMT during KC compared with LPMT alone on physiological stability and neurological functioning in extremely and very preterm infants. We demonstrated that combining LPMT and KC was beneficial for physiological stability, illustrated by a decrease in heart rate of roughly 7 bpm during therapy, as well as an improved oxygen saturation. Our results did not show effects of either LPMT or combined interventions on GMs. Preterm infants who received therapy with a PNA of <7 days generally displayed less optimal GMOS’ after therapy than infants with a PNA of >7 days. The key points of our study are summarized in Table 3.
We found a decreased heart rate during combined interventions, which was not evident during LPMT alone. This finding is in line with those of Teckenberg-Jansson and colleagues, who concluded that live music therapy during KC has a positive impact on physiological parameters, particularly heart rate, during therapy in infants between 24 and 36 weeks of GA [24]. A recent meta-analysis examining the effects of music therapy alone also did not detect heart rate changes after therapy [20]. These outcomes might imply that the beneficial effects of combination therapy are largely the effect of KC alone. KC provides a multisensory stimulation, including emotional, tactile, visual and auditory stimuli and is proven to be beneficial for autonomic functioning, improved mother-infant interaction and better sleep wake cycles [36]. Parent-infant synchrony offers a unique co-regulatory framework for stabilizing physiological parameters and improving neurodevelopmental outcomes that might cause decreases in heart rate during combination therapy [37,38,39].
We did not identify effects of either intervention on respiratory rate. This finding is similar to other studies reporting continued stability of respiratory rate during combination therapy and LPMT alone [18,22,30,31,40]. In our study, respiratory rate seemed to slightly increase during LPMT alone and slightly decrease during LPMT combined with KC. This trend was visible for both PNA groups. None of these analyses regarding respiratory rate reached statistical significance, except for one and all respiratory rates were within normal ranges for preterm infants. Ultimately, baseline outcomes of all participating infants did not show any differences during or after both therapies, indicating that respiratory rate remained unchanged.
Regarding oxygen saturation, we found a slight decrease after LPMT alone. Oxygen saturation slightly increased during combination therapy. Ettenberger and colleagues, as well as Yusuf and colleagues also found an increase in oxygen saturation during combination therapy [28,29]. The decrease after LPMT that we found is in contrast with several recent meta-analyses investigating the physiological effects of music therapy alone, which reported improvement or stabilization of oxygen saturation [18,20,41,42]. Of note, our finding of only a 1.3% lower peripheral oxygen saturation is, although statistically significant, clinically irrelevant. Slight variations in peripheral oxygen saturation in preterm infants are common, and 1.3% falls withing the range of measurement error considered to be around 3–4% [43]. Findings may also be biased, because we did not specifically record the ventilatory oxygen changes made by nurses during and after therapy. Even so, the incongruity between both interventions suggests that combination therapy has a more favorable effect on oxygen saturation than LPMT alone.
Overall, our findings indicated improved physiological stability when comparing combined interventions with LPTM alone. These effects were only short-term, as after combined interventions physiological parameters returned to initial values. Regardless of the variation in the methodological approach, other studies investigating the effects of combination therapy generally also reported stable or slightly beneficial changes in vital parameters during and after combination therapy [24,28,29,30,31,40]. Previous studies have reported that both KC and music therapy are well accepted, cost-effective, accessible, and safe methods that improve physiological parameters and neurodevelopmental outcomes, and reduce infant stress [13,18,20]. The possible effect of KC is expected to be greatest in low-resource countries, because other options for care of preterm infants remain limited. Despite the high impact and apparent feasibility of KC and LPMT, few preterm infants in low-resource countries currently have access to KC, let alone LPMT [14]. Our findings therefore contribute to the growing body of evidence on the effectiveness of KC and LPMT, but also raise questions about worldwide feasibility. Future research could focus on the feasibility of these interventions in low recourse settings.
One of our most important findings was that there was no difference in GMOS before and after interventions, which indicates no immediate effect on neurological functioning for either form of therapy. We were unable to confirm the findings of Bos and colleagues, who reported a vast increase in GMOS from before to after therapy [44]. Infants in our study were, however, slightly younger than infants in their study, which may explain this difference. The similar persistent stability of GMs in both therapies suggests that LPMT during KC is also feasible in extremely and very preterm infants admitted to the NICU. Potentially, there could be clinical advantages to the synergic effects of combination therapy that were not investigated or established in this study. Over the years, numerous studies have demonstrated beneficial outcomes for individual treatments of KC and music therapy regarding neurodevelopmental outcomes, parent-infant bonding, and stress reduction in both infants and parents [15,18,20,38,45,46,47,48]. Future studies should aim to further clarify the effects of LPMT alone and in combination with KC on neurological functioning in the short-term and long-term.
Strikingly, we found that infants reacted better to LPMT therapy after 7 days PNA when compared with receiving therapy before 7 days PNA. The mean delta GMOS of infants before 7 days PNA was primarily negative for both interventions, whereas for infants after 7 days PNA the delta was predominantly positive, indicating better neurological outcomes after 7 days PNA. The differences found between PNA groups are intriguing and warrant further analysis. Previous studies found that the GMA is a good indicator for brain functioning and short-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants [32,33,49,50,51]. However, it has also been reported that detailed GMOS scoring may be inconsistent and influenced by many unknown factors during the first week after birth [51,52,53,54]. It may be that potential positive effects of LPMT during the first week on neurological functioning are concealed by this varying GMOS. Still, we also cannot rule out that LPMT is not apt for the tiny infant during the first days after birth, due to the transition from fetal to neonatal period, even if morbidities are not so severe. Then, perhaps we should postpone LPMT until 7 days after birth, at least until future studies have elucidated this further.

Strengths and Limitations

The main strength of this research is the structured approach in which parents and preterm infants were provided with LPMT and KC. LPMT sessions were provided by the same certified music therapist and performed on fixed times and dates. The most significant limitation of this study is the small sample size. Small intervention groups complicate the study’s reliability because it may lead to higher variability. However, the results of our findings were relatively consistent with previous literature and we consider them valid. Another limitation of our study is the lack of a control group of KC alone. A control group could have provided a clearer overview of the defined effects of KC, LPMT and combination therapy. Future research should distinguish the isolated effects of both individual therapies and compare them both to a combined intervention. Finally, there was some variety in timeframe between filming GMs and therapy. We tried to systematically film infants, but not every infant could be recorded in the same timespan before or after therapy because of logistical reasons, e.g., medical procedures, standard care and availability of the music therapist. We only measured infants at a specific moment and did not follow them over a more extended period. These short-term observations make this research more prone to selection bias. Research investigating the long-term effects of combination therapy on neurodevelopmental outcomes is highly warranted.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study supports the clinical use of LPMT alone and LPMT during KC in extremely and very preterm infants admitted to the NICU. Combining LPMT with KC may be slightly more beneficial for physiological stability and equally effective for neurological functioning. We advise that LPMT should be postponed until 7 days after birth. Future large-scale studies are highly needed to further clarify the effects of LPMT and combination therapies and should focus on long-term neurodevelopment and parent-infant bonding.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.B. and L.C.S.; Methodology, A.F.B., L.C.S., N.H.v.D. and A.-G.R.; Validation, A.F.B., N.H.v.D. and A.C.J.; Formal Analysis, L.C.S.; Investigation, L.C.S., N.H.v.D. and A.F.B.; Data Curation, L.C.S. and A.-G.R.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, L.C.S. and N.H.v.D.; Writing—Review & Editing, A.C.J., A.F.B. and A.-G.R.; Visualization, L.C.S., A.F.B. and N.H.v.D.; Supervision, A.F.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Nienke H. van Dokkum was financially supported by a grant from the Junior Scientific Masterclass of the University of Groningen. The financers have had no role in any stage of the project, including the decision to submit the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Medical Ethical Review Board of the University of Groningen (METc 2019/093) and was registered online (ISRCTN94562698).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all parents or guardians of the participants in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Acknowledgments

We kindly thank all medical and nursing staff of the neonatal intensive care unit of the University Medical Center Groningen. In particular, we greatly appreciate the help of the research nurses of the neonatal department.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Preterm Birth. WHO.int. 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth (accessed on 14 October 2020).
  2. Chawanpaiboon, S.; Vogel, J.P.; Moller, A.-B.; Lumbiganon, P.; Petzold, M.; Hogan, D.; Landoulsi, S.; Jampathong, N.; Kongwattanakul, K.; Laopaiboon, M.; et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: A systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2019, 7, e37–e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Buitendijk, S.; Zeitlin, J.; Cuttini, M.; Langhoff-Roos, J.; Bottu, J. Indicators of fetal and infant health outcomes. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2003, 111 (Suppl. 1), S66–S77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zeitlin, J.; Szamotulska, K.; Drewniak, N.; Mohangoo, A.; Chalmers, J.; Sakkeus, L.; Irgens, L.; Gatt, M.; Gissler, M.; Blondel, B.; et al. Preterm birth time trends in Europe: A study of 19 countries. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013, 120, 1356–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Blencowe, H.; Cousens, S.; Chou, D.; Oestergaard, M.; Say, L.; Moller, A.-B.; Kinney, M.; Lawn, J. The Born Too Soon Preterm Birth Action Group. Born Too Soon: The global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod. Health 2013, 10 (Suppl. 1), S2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Pickler, R.H.; McGrath, J.; Reyna, B.A.; McCain, N.L.; Lewis, M.; Cone, S.; Wetzel, P.; Best, A.M. A Model of Neurodevelopmental Risk and Protection for Preterm Infants. J. Périnat. Neonatal Nurs. 2010, 24, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Arhan, E.; Gücüyener, K.; Soysal, Ş.; Şalvarlı, Ş.; Gürses, M.A.; Serdaroğlu, A.; Demir, E.; Ergenekon, E.; Türkyılmaz, C.; Önal, E.; et al. Regional brain volume reduction and cognitive outcomes in preterm children at low risk at 9 years of age. Child’s Nerv. Syst. 2017, 177, 695–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Foulder-Hughes, L.; Cooke, R.W. Motor, cognitive, and behavioural disorders in children born very preterm. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2003, 45, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saigal, S.; Doyle, L. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008, 371, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Behrman, R.E.; Butler, A.S. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; pp. 1–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ment, L.R.; Vohr, B.R. Preterm birth and the developing brain. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7, 378–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Head, L.M. The Effect of Kangaroo Care on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants. J. Périnat. Neonatal Nurs. 2014, 28, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Königk, E. Quantitative dünnschichtchromatographie von 14C-markierten nukleotiden. J. Chromatogr. A 1968, 37, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lawn, J.E.; Mwansa-Kambafwile, J.; Horta, B.L.; Barros, F.C.; Cousens, S. ‘Kangaroo mother care’ to prevent neonatal deaths due to preterm birth complications. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 39 (Suppl. 1), i144–i154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boundy, E.O.; Dastjerdi, R.; Spiegelman, D.; Fawzi, W.W.; Missmer, S.A.; Lieberman, E.; Kajeepeta, S.; Wall, S.; Chan, G.J. Kangaroo Mother Care and Neonatal Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015, 137, e20152238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mooney-Leber, S.M.; Brummelte, S. Neonatal pain and reduced maternal care: Early-life stressors interacting to impact brain and behavioral development. Neuroscience 2017, 342, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Haslbeck, F.B.; Bassler, D. Music From the Very Beginning—A Neuroscience-Based Framework for Music as Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Standley, J. Music Therapy Research in the NICU: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Neonatal Netw. 2012, 31, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. AMTA. What Is Music Therapy. American Music Therapy Association, 2018. Available online: https://www.musictherapy.org/about/musictherapy (accessed on 16 May 2021).
  20. Bieleninik, Ł.; Ghetti, C.; Gold, C. Music Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20160971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Standley, J.M.; Gutierrez, C. Benefits of a comprehensive evidence-based NICU-MT program: Family-centered, neurodevelop-mental music therapy for premature infants. Pediatr. Nurs. 2020, 46, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
  22. Haslbeck, F.B. Music therapy for premature infants and their parents: An integrative review. Nord. J. Music Ther. 2012, 21, 203–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Loewy, J.; Stewart, K.; Dassler, A.-M.; Telsey, A.; Homel, P. The Effects of Music Therapy on Vital Signs, Feeding, and Sleep in Premature Infants. Pediatrics 2013, 131, 902–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Teckenberg-Jansson, P.; Huotilainen, M.; Pölkki, T.; Lipsanen, J.; Järvenpää, A.-L. Rapid effects of neonatal music therapy combined with kangaroo care on prematurely-born infants. Nord. J. Music Ther. 2011, 20, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Van Dokkum, N.H.; Jaschke, A.C.; Ravensbergen, A.-G.; Reijneveld, S.A.; Hakvoort, L.; De Kroon, M.L.A.; Bos, A.F. Feasibility of Live-Performed Music Therapy for Extremely and Very Preterm Infants in a Tertiary NICU. Front. Pediatr. 2020, 8, 581372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Morales-Betancourt, C.; Acuña-Muga, J.; López-Maestro, M.; De La Cruz-Bértolo, J.; Moral-Pumarega, M.T.; Pallás-Alonso, C.R.; Vena, M.E. Live music can play a major role in aiding the development of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr. 2020, 109, 1895–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Karlsson, V.; Heinemann, A.-B.; Sjörs, G.; Nykvist, K.H.; Ågren, J. Early Skin-to-Skin Care in Extremely Preterm Infants: Thermal Balance and Care Environment. J. Pediatr. 2012, 161, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yusuf, N.; Hadisaputro, S.; Runjati, R.; Suwondo, A.; Mashoedi, I.D.; Supriyana, S. The effectiveness of combination of kangaroo mother care method and lullaby music therapy on vital sign change in infants with low birth weight. Belitung Nurs. J. 2017, 3, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ettenberger, M.; Cárdenas, C.R.; Parker, M.; Odell-Miller, H. Family-centred music therapy with preterm infants and their parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Colombia—A mixed-methods study. Nord. J. Music Ther. 2016, 26, 207–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Schlez, A.; Litmanovitz, I.; Bauer, S.; Dolfin, T.; Regev, R.; Arnon, S. Combining kangaroo care and live harp music therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit setting. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. IMAJ 2011, 13, 354–358. [Google Scholar]
  31. Arnon, S.; Diamant, C.; Bauer, S.; Regev, R.; Sirota, G.; Litmanovitz, I. Maternal singing during kangaroo care led to autonomic stability in preterm infants and reduced maternal anxiety. Acta Paediatr. 2014, 103, 1039–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Einspieler, C.; Bos, A.F.; Libertus, M.E.; Marschik, P.B. The General Movement Assessment Helps Us to Identify Preterm Infants at Risk for Cognitive Dysfunction. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Prechtl, H.F.; Einspieler, C.; Cioni, G.; Bos, A.F.; Ferrari, F.; Sontheimer, D. An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. Lancet 1997, 349, 1361–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Einspieler, C.; Prechtl, H.F.R. Prechtl’s assessment of general movements: A diagnostic tool for the functional assessment of the young nervous system. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2005, 11, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Einspieler, C.; Marschik, P.B.; Pansy, J.; Scheuchenegger, A.; Krieber, M.; Yang, H.; Kornacka, M.K.; Rowinska, E.; Soloveichick, M.; Bos, A.F. The general movement optimality score: A detailed assessment of general movements during preterm and term age. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2016, 58, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Flacking, R.; Lehtonen, L.; Thomson, G.; Axelin, A.; Ahlqvist, S.; Moran, V.H.; Ewald, U.; Dykes, F.; SCENE Group. Closeness and separation in neonatal intensive care. Acta Paediatr. 2012, 101, 1032–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Feldman, R. Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental out-comes, and risk conditions. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2007, 48, 329–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kostandy, R.R.; Ludington-Hoe, S.M. The evolution of the science of kangaroo (mother) care (skin-to-skin contact). Birth Defects Res. 2019, 111, 1032–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gathwala, G.; Singh, B.; Balhara, B. KMC facilitates mother baby attachment in low birth weight infants. Indian J. Pediatr. 2008, 75, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lai, H.-L.; Chen, C.-J.; Peng, T.-C.; Chang, F.-M.; Hsieh, M.-L.; Huang, H.-Y.; Chang, S.-C. Randomized controlled trial of music during kangaroo care on maternal state anxiety and preterm infants’ responses. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2006, 43, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Standley, J.M. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of music therapy for premature infants. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2002, 17, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Bosanquet, M.; Copeland, L.G.; Ware, R.S.; Boyd, R.N. A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2013, 55, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nitzan, M.; Romem, A.; Koppel, R. Pulse oximetry: Fundamentals and technology update. Med. Devices Évid. Res. 2014, 7, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bos, M.; van Dokkum, N.H.; Ravensbergen, A.; Kraft, K.E.; Bos, A.F.; Jaschke, A.C. Pilot study finds that performing live music therapy in intensive care units may be beneficial for infants’ neurodevelopment. Acta Paediatr. 2021. [epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Charpak, N.; Ruiz, J.G.; Zupan, J.; Cattaneo, A.; Figueroa, Z.; Tessier, R.; Cristo, M.; Anderson, G.; Ludington, S.; Mendoza, S.; et al. Kangaroo Mother Care: 25 years after. Acta Paediatr. 2007, 94, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mori, R.; Khanna, R.; Pledge, D.; Nakayama, T. Meta-analysis of physiological effects of skin-to-skin contact for newborns and mothers. Pediatr. Int. 2010, 52, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Walworth, D.; Standley, J.M.; Robertson, A.; Smith, A.; Swedberg, O.; Peyton, J.J. Effects of neurodevelopmental stimulation on premature infants in neonatal intensive care: Randomized controlled trial. J. Neonatal Nurs. 2012, 18, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Arnon, S.; Shapsa, A.; Forman, L.; Regev, R.; Bauer, S.; Litmanovitz, I.; Dolfin, T. Live Music Is Beneficial to Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Environment. Birth 2006, 33, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adde, L.; Rygg, M.; Lossius, K.; Øberg, G.K.; Støen, R. General movement assessment: Predicting cerebral palsy in clinical practise. Early Hum. Dev. 2007, 83, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Barnes, F.; Graham, L.; Loganathan, P.; Nair, V. General Movement Assessment Predicts Neuro-Developmental Outcome in Very Low Birth Weight Infants at Two Years—A Five-Year Observational Study. Indian J. Pediatr. 2021, 88, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. De Vries, N.; Erwich, J.; Bos, A. General movements in the first fourteen days of life in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Early Hum. Dev. 2008, 84, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. De Vries, N.K.S.; Bos, A.F. The quality of general movements in the first ten days of life in preterm infants. Early Hum. Dev. 2010, 86, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hempenius, M.A.; Verhagen, E.A.; Tanis, J.C.; Einspieler, C.; Bos, A.F. Early neonatal morbidities and neurological functioning of preterm infants 2 weeks after birth. J. Perinatol. 2018, 38, 1518–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ploegstra, W.M.; Bos, A.F.; de Vries, N.K. General movements in healthy full term infants during the first week after birth. Early Hum. Dev. 2014, 90, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 18 06580 g001 550
Figure 1. Heart rate before, during and after LPMT compared with combined interventions. The boxes represent the interquartile ranges and the whiskers represent the range of all infants. Grey stars indicate the outliers of this study. PNA, Postnatal age; LPMT, live-performed music therapy; KC, kangaroo care; Bpm, beats per minute; B, before therapy; D, during therapy; A, after therapy; *, p < 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 1. Heart rate before, during and after LPMT compared with combined interventions. The boxes represent the interquartile ranges and the whiskers represent the range of all infants. Grey stars indicate the outliers of this study. PNA, Postnatal age; LPMT, live-performed music therapy; KC, kangaroo care; Bpm, beats per minute; B, before therapy; D, during therapy; A, after therapy; *, p < 0.05; **, p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001.
Ijerph 18 06580 g001
Ijerph 18 06580 g002 550
Figure 2. Respiratory rate before, during and after LPMT compared with combined interventions. The boxes represent the interquartile ranges and the whiskers represent the range of all infants. Grey points and stars indicate the outliers of this study. PNA, postnatal age; LPMT, live-performed music therapy; KC, kangaroo care; B, before therapy; D, during therapy; A, after therapy; *, p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Respiratory rate before, during and after LPMT compared with combined interventions. The boxes represent the interquartile ranges and the whiskers represent the range of all infants. Grey points and stars indicate the outliers of this study. PNA, postnatal age; LPMT, live-performed music therapy; KC, kangaroo care; B, before therapy; D, during therapy; A, after therapy; *, p < 0.05.
Ijerph 18 06580 g002
Ijerph 18 06580 g003 550
Figure 3. Oxygen saturation before, during and after LPMT compared with combined interventions. The boxes represent the interquartile ranges and the whiskers represent the range of all ages. Grey points and stars indicate the outliers of this study. LPMT: live-performed music therapy KC: kangaroo care; B, before therapy; D, during therapy; A, after therapy; *, p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Oxygen saturation before, during and after LPMT compared with combined interventions. The boxes represent the interquartile ranges and the whiskers represent the range of all ages. Grey points and stars indicate the outliers of this study. LPMT: live-performed music therapy KC: kangaroo care; B, before therapy; D, during therapy; A, after therapy; *, p < 0.05.
Ijerph 18 06580 g003
Ijerph 18 06580 g004 550
Figure 4. Delta General Movement Optimality Score (GMOS) for all infants, infants <7 days PNA and infants >7 days PNA. Grey points indicate the outliers of this study. GMOS, General movement optimality score; LPMT, live-performed music therapy; KC, kangaroo care; PNA, postnatal age.
Figure 4. Delta General Movement Optimality Score (GMOS) for all infants, infants <7 days PNA and infants >7 days PNA. Grey points indicate the outliers of this study. GMOS, General movement optimality score; LPMT, live-performed music therapy; KC, kangaroo care; PNA, postnatal age.
Ijerph 18 06580 g004
Table
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics for infants that completed both interventions.
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics for infants that completed both interventions.
CharacteristicN = 17
Gestational age (weeks)26.0 (25.6–30.6)
Birth weight (grams)900 (766–1380)
Sex
 Male6 (35)
 Female11 (65)
Kangaroo care
 Mother11 (65)
 Father6 (35)
Respiratory support during LPMT
 Mechanical ventilation1 (6)
 CPAP11 (65)
 High flow/low flow/no support5 (29)
Respiratory support during LPMT + KC
 Mechanical ventilation5 (29)
 CPAP7 (41)
 High flow/low flow/no support5 (29)
PNA during first therapy session (days)17.0 (5.5–26.0)
Time between filming and start intervention (min)55 (12–115)
Time between end intervention and filming (min)25 (15–60)
LPMT: Live-performed music therapy CPAP: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure. KC: Kangaroo Care. PNA: postnatal age. Min: minutes. Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or n (%) where appropriate. Percentages do not always add up to 100 because of rounding.
Table
Table 2. The GMOS and quality of general movements per individual infant before and after LPMT alone and combined interventions.
Table 2. The GMOS and quality of general movements per individual infant before and after LPMT alone and combined interventions.
InfantGMOS LPMTGMOS LPMT during KC
NumberBeforeAfterDeltaBeforeAfterDelta
1PR (34)PR (33)↓N (38)N (39)↑
2N (32)PR (32)=PR (25)PR (25)=
3N (36)N (40)↑N (33)PR (26)↓
4PR (27)PR (33)↑PR (22)PR (30)↑
5 *PR (26)PR (25)↓H (No score)H (No score)NA
6PR (31)PR (32)↑N (36)PR (26)↓
7PR (33)PR (23)↓PR (33)PR (25)↓
8PR (32)PR (28)↓PR (25)PR (25)=
9PR (32)PR (25)↓PR (19)PR (27)↑
10PR (31)PR (32)↑PR (34)PR (22)↓
11PR (31)PR (30)↓PR (25)PR (25)=
12PR (23)N (35)↑PR (21)PR (28)↑
13N (38)PR (27)↓PR (28)PR (29)↑
14PR (30)PR (25)↓N (33)N (35)↑
15PR (32)PR (30)↓PR (31)PR (32)↑
16PR (32)PR (25)↓PR (28)PR (21)↓
17PR (26)PR (23)↓PR (22)PR (26)↑
GMOS: general movement optimality score (ranges between 5 and 42), LPMT: live-performed music therapy, KC: kangaroo care, N, normal; PR, poor repertoire; H, hypokinetic; IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable; ↑, increase; =, no change; ↓, decrease; * Was not used in statistical analysis, because hypokinetic GMs could not be scored.
Table
Table 3. Key points of this study.
Table 3. Key points of this study.
  • Combining LPMT and KC was beneficial for physiological stability.
  • No effect on GMOS was found for either LPMT or combined interventions.
  • Preterm infants who received therapy with a PNA of <7 days generally displayed less optimal GMOS’ after therapy than infants with a PNA of >7 days
  • LPMT during KC is also feasible in extremely and very preterm infants admitted to the NICU.
  • We advise to postpone LPMT until 7 days after birth.
  • Future studies should aim to further clarify the effects of LPMT alone and in combination with KC on neurological functioning.
LPMT, Live-performed music therapy; KC, Kangaroo Care; GMOS, General Movement Optimality Score; PNA, Postnatal age; NICU, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Span, L.C.; van Dokkum, N.H.; Ravensbergen, A.-G.; Bos, A.F.; Jaschke, A.C. Combining Kangaroo Care and Live-Performed Music Therapy: Effects on Physiological Stability and Neurological Functioning in Extremely and Very Preterm Infants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6580. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126580

AMA Style

Span LC, van Dokkum NH, Ravensbergen A-G, Bos AF, Jaschke AC. Combining Kangaroo Care and Live-Performed Music Therapy: Effects on Physiological Stability and Neurological Functioning in Extremely and Very Preterm Infants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(12):6580. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Span, Loïs C., Nienke H. van Dokkum, Anne-Greet Ravensbergen, Arend F. Bos, and Artur C. Jaschke. 2021. "Combining Kangaroo Care and Live-Performed Music Therapy: Effects on Physiological Stability and Neurological Functioning in Extremely and Very Preterm Infants" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 12: 6580. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop