Phosphorus Recovery from Sewage Sludge Using Acidithiobacilli
by
,
Surendra K. Pradhan
1,*
,
Helvi Heinonen-Tanski
1, 
Anna-Maria Veijalainen
1,
Sirpa Peräniemi
2 and
Eila Torvinen
1 1
Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
2
Department of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(13), 7135; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137135
Submission received: 5 May 2021
/
Revised: 30 June 2021
/
Accepted: 30 June 2021
/
Published: 3 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Sludge Treatment and Disposal)
Abstract
:Sewage sludge contains a significant amount of phosphorus (P), which could be recycled to address the global demand for this non-renewable, important plant nutrient. The P in sludge can be solubilized and recovered so that it can be recycled when needed. This study investigated the P solubilization from sewage sludge using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. The experiment was conducted by mixing 10 mL of sewage sludge with 90 mL of different water/liquid medium/inoculum and incubated at 30 °C. The experiment was conducted in three semi-continuous phases by replacing 10% of the mixed incubated medium with fresh sewage sludge. In addition, 10 g/L elemental sulfur (S) was supplemented into the medium in the third phase. The pH of the A. thiooxidans and A. ferrooxidans treated sludge solutions was between 2.2 and 6.3 until day 42. In phase 3, after supplementing with S, the pH of A. thiooxidans treated sludge was reduced to 0.9, which solubilized and extracted 92% of P. We found that acidithiobacilli supplemented with S can be used to treat sludge, i.e., achieve hygienization, removal of heavy metals, and solubilization and recovery of P.
1. Introduction
Phosphorus (P) is an important plant nutrient and an increasingly valuable natural resource due to its limited supply. On the other hand, P leaching to surface water is often a serious environmental problem as noticed, for instance, in the Baltic Sea [1]. Sewage sludge contains a significant amount of P. A large amount of sewage sludge is generated worldwide every day and the amounts of sludge are expected to increase as a consequence of population growth. The disposal of such a large quantity of sewage sludge is a serious environmental concern. The spreading of sludge on agricultural land would be a good option since it recycles nutrients and increases soil organic matter. There are, however, several constraints to the reuse of sewage sludge in agriculture: (1) sludge contains a large number of pathogens, (2) it may contain high concentrations of heavy metals, and (3) it is bulky and expensive to transport. Despite these constraints, a significant amount of sludge is recycled in agriculture, which in turn, means that this is one of the main sources of P contamination in water bodies [1]. Therefore, the sewage sludge has to be treated properly before reuse.
P can be recovered from sewage sludge as phosphoric acid by using sulfuric acid [2], but drying the sludge and using a large amount of commercial acid is expensive. The bioleaching of rock phosphate with acid-producing microorganisms has been widely studied [3,4,5]. The advantages of the biochemical process are its low costs [6], high efficiency, and environmental friendliness. Therefore, it would be highly advantageous to develop a biochemical process to recover P from sludge.
The bacteria Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans are autotrophic, mesophilic, and acidophilic iron- and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria [7]. They can produce sulfuric acid from reduced sulfur compounds (Equation (1) so that the pH can be even lower than 1 [3,8,9,10]. The produced sulfuric acid solubilizes the phosphorus (Equations (2) and (3) [4]. It has been reported that A. thiooxidans was able to recover 94% of P from rock phosphate [5]. In another investigation, A. ferrooxidans was used to solubilize P from dried sewage sludge [11].
2S0 + 3O2 + 2H2O→2H2SO4
3H2SO4 + Ca3(PO4)2→2H3PO4 + 3CaSO4
3H2SO4 + 2FePO4→2H3PO4 + Fe2(SO4)3
Sewage sludge was selected for this study since (1) it contains large amounts of P, (2) the production of sewage sludge is increasing, and (3) it can contain a high level of iron (Fe) and sulfate (SO4) since iron sulfate is used for coagulation in wastewater treatment plants.
The main aim of this study was to test the ability of both the A. thiooxidans and A. ferrooxidans to recover P from sewage sludge. The individual objectives were (1) to compare the abilities of the two acidophilic bacteria to solubilize the P from sewage sludge and (2) to identify the needs of these bacteria for optimal growth in a sludge environment.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sewage Sludge
Partially dewatered sludge (about 5% total solids content) was collected from the Lehtoniemi wastewater treatment plant in Kuopio, Finland, and stored at 4 °C. The microbial and chemical characteristics of the sludge were analyzed before the experiment (Table 1).
2.2. Chemical Analysis
The physicochemical analysis of sludge was performed before and after the experiment. The pH was measured using an electrode (pH 3210, WTW, Weilheim, Germany). Total solid (TS) was analyzed by drying the sludge at 105 °C (Memmert UM 400 Drying Oven) for 24 h and organic matter (OM) was analyzed as volatile solids by dry combustion of the dried sludge at 550 °C for 2 h in an incinerator (Carbolite ELF 11/14). The total concentration of heavy metals, total-S (sulfur) and total-P were determined using total reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF) (S2 Picofox TXRF Spectrometer, Bruker, Hanau, Germany) after acid digestion. The total concentrations of heavy metals were measured from the sludge (before the experiment) and the supernatants of the sludge solution at the end of each of the three phases of the experiment. The chemical characteristics of the dewatered sludge samples before treatment are presented in Table 1. Total-N, PO4-P, soluble iron, sulfate, and total-P were analyzed with a Hach spectrophotometer according to the standard method described in the company’s catalog. Total-P was also determined by the spectrophotometer using the standard method [12].
2.3. Fecal Indicator Bacteria
Fecal coliforms, total coliforms, clostridia, and enterococci were analyzed before and after each phase of the treatment. Fecal coliforms were determined using the standard plate count method on MFC agar and incubated (Termaks, Bergen, Norway) at 44 °C for 24 h [13]. Enterococci were cultured in bile esculin azide agar and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h [14]. Clostridia were determined on sulfite-iron agar after the sample was treated at 80 °C for 10 min and the agar plates were incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 48 h [15]. The typical bacterial colony forming units (CFU) were counted from plates and calculated as log10 CFU/mL (Table 1). A similar method was used to analyze these bacteria from sludge after treatment and the results are presented as log10 CFU/mL.
2.4. Microorganisms and Growth Media
The liquid cultures of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (DSM 29444) and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (DSM 14887) were purchased from DSMZ, Germany. The cells were further inoculated in liquid media according to the instructions provided by the company.
A. ferrooxidans cultures were grown in DSMZ 882 liquid medium. The medium was prepared by mixing solution A (950 mL), B (49 mL), and C (1 mL) (Solution A: (NH4)2SO4 132 mg/L, KH2PO4 27 mg/L, CaCl2 × 2H2O 147 mg/L, MgCl2 × 6H2O 53 mg/L. Solution B: FeSO4 × 7H2O 20g/L. Solution C: MnCl2 × 2H2O 76 mg/L, ZnCl2 68 mg/L, CoCl2 × 6H2O 64 mg/L, H3BO3 31 mg/L, Na2MoO4 10 mg/L, CuCl2 × 2H2O 67 mg/L) according to the instructions provided by DSMZ [16]. The agar plates for this bacterium were prepared by mixing the solutions A (600 mL), B (150 mL), and C (250 mL) (Solution A: (NH4)2SO4 3 g/L, KCl 100 mg/L, KH2PO4 50 mg/L, MgSO4 × 7 H2O 500 mg/L, Ca(NO3)2 × 4H2O 1.5 mg/L. Solution B: FeSO4 × 7 H2O 22 g/L. Solution C: Agarose 15 g/L) as described by Visca [17].
Cultures of A. thiooxidans were grown in DSMZ 71 liquid medium; this medium was prepared by mixing solutions A (900 mL) and B (100 mL) (Solution A: (NH4)2SO4 3 g/L, KH2PO4 3 g/L, CaCl2 × 2 H2O 0.25 g/L, MgSO4 × 7H2O 0.5 g/L, Solution B: Na2S2O3 × 5H2O 3.2 g/L) according to the instructions given by DSMZ [18]. The agar plates for A. thiooxidans were prepared by mixing solutions A (850 mL), B (148 mL), and BCG (2 mL) (Solution A: (NH4)2SO4 0.4 g/L, MgSO4 × 7 H2O 0.5 g/L, CaCl2 0.25 g/L, KH2PO4 4 g/L, FeSO4 0.01 g/L, Agar-2 13 g/L. Solution B: Na2S2O3 × 5H2O 5 g/L, BCG (bromocresol green) (0.4% solution) 2 mL/L) as described [19]. All these prepared media were stored at 4 °C and used within two months.
2.5. Cultivation and Enumeration of Acidithiobacilli
Each Acidithiobacillus spp. was cultivated in 1 L of its respective DSMZ medium at 30 °C for 15 days following the instructions provided by DSMZ. The bacterial numbers in the inoculum were determined by direct count, spread plate, and the MPN (most probable number) method.
In the direct count method, a few drops of Trypan solution (Trypan Blue stain 0.4%, Invitrogen, Molecular Probes, Lawrence, Massachusetts, USA) were added to the diluted sample to differentiate between viable and dead cells. The cells were counted under a light microscope using the Fuchs Rosenthal counting chamber (Germany). The observed cells are presented as log10 cells/mL (Table 2). In the agar plate culture method, 0.1 mL of sample from different dilutions was cultured on agar plates using the spread plate method and incubated at 30 °C for 10–15 days. These colonies were counted with the density calculated as log10 CFU/mL (Table 2). In the MPN method, 0.1 mL of the sample was added to 5 tubes with cultivation media and incubated at 30 °C for 10–15 days. The positive and negative tubes were observed, and the results were interpreted using the MPN table. The MPN results are presented in Table 2.
The acidophilic microorganisms were also analyzed after each experimental phase using the spread plate culture method as described for the inoculum.
2.6. P-Solubilization Experimental Setup
A total of 90 mL of the sterilized broths (growing media)/inocula were poured into 250 mL glass bottles and 10 mL of sewage sludge was added. The solutions were mixed well and incubated at 30 °C in a shaker incubator at 150 rpm (Certomat shaker and incubator). The bottles were closed loosely to guarantee good aeration. The details of the experimental setup and symbols are given in Table 3. The pH was measured two to three times each week during the incubation.
The experiment was designed as a semi-continuous process and conducted in three phases. The incubation of phase 1 lasted for 21 days. On day 21, 10 mL of the sample was removed from the incubated bottle and 10 mL of the new sludge was added. Phase 2 was conducted from day 21 to day 42. As expected, the pH did not decline until the end of phase 2 (day 42), therefore elemental sulfur was supplemented in phase 3. At the start of phase 3 or on day 42, 10 mL of the incubated sample was replaced with 10 mL of new sludge, and 10 g/L of elemental sulfur (S) (Fluka 80% pure) was added. The incubation then continued until day 63 when the experiment was terminated.
After the experiment, indicator microorganisms and acidophilic bacteria were analyzed from the incubated sludge solution and the result is presented in Table 4. The remaining solutions were filtered through a 0.45 µm filter paper and separated into solid and liquid fractions. The pH, total-P, PO4-P, total-S, SO4, total iron, Fe2+, and trace elements were determined from the liquid fraction. The soluble elements in the solutions were calculated from the original sludge and presented as soluble percentages (Table 5).
2.7. Statistical Analyses
All the raw data were gathered in an Excel file and transformed into the SPSS 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). These data were tested for normality before statistical analysis. The normally distributed data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA combined with Tukey’s post hoc tests. The pH and percentage of solubilized elements were analyzed using Pearson and Spearman correlations.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Role of Acidithiobacilli
This study showed that A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans pure and mixed cultures survived very well in the sewage sludge for 63 days at 30 °C (Table 4). The A. thiooxidans population was higher at the end of phase 1 as compared to the situation at the end of phase 2 in the TC and T treatments. This might be due to the residual soluble sulfate in the liquid media and inoculum. Another reason might be that the low pH had solubilized the sulfate present in sludge. In phase 2, the exchange of 10 mL of sludge increased the pH of the solution (Figure 1) and the higher pH might have reduced the solubility of sulfate, which in turn might have inhibited the growth of A. thiooxidans. It is recognized that the growth of acidophilic bacteria may be inhibited by the increasing total solid content [20]. Our result showed that total solid (TS) up to 1.1% (w/v) did not affect the growth of acidophilic bacteria. More work will be needed to identify the range of TS in the sludge inoculum that can achieve better acidophilic bacterial growth.
After the addition of S in phase 3, the growth of A. thiooxidans was increased in treatments T and TC (Table 4), whereas their pH was reduced. The decrease of media pH is an indirect indication of the growth of the acidophilic bacteria and their production of sulfuric acid [21,22]. Our result was similar to that presented by Pangayao et al. [22], who used the same S treatment.
It was found that unidentified S- and Fe-oxidizing microbes were already present in the used sludge and that these microbes grew in the control liquid media (i.e., TC, FC and FTC). This might be attributable to the presence of nutrients and optimum pH in liquid media but not in the water control (0-Control in Table 3). These indigenous sulfur- and/or iron-oxidizing microbes that had originated from the sludge grew well in our selective agar plates, which made it easier to detect their presence. Unfortunately, molecular identifications were not performed for these indigenous acidithiobacilli, so that we do not know how closely related they are to the A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans used in our study.
3.2. The pH in the Experimental Sludge Solution
In this process, the pH was found to be the major factor determining the solubilizing of the P and heavy metals and hygienization of the sludge. The initial pH of the sludge was 6.5 ± 0.4 (Table 1) and the pH of the control (O) remained similar during the entire experiment, even after the addition of S (Figure 1). The pH values of the A. thiooxidans treated sludge and liquid media control (TC, T and FT) were increased on days 1–4 in phase 1 of the experiment, possibly because the calcium in sludge may have released some alkalinity [23]. At the beginning of the incubation, treatments T and TC had pH > 5. The pH values gradually declined until the end of phase 1 but they increased in phase 2 (Figure 1). This might be due to the residual S from liquid media/inoculum in phase 1 but the lack of a sufficient level of S compounds in phase 2 meant that the production of sulfuric acid was low. Another reason might be that the sulfate in sludge could no longer be solubilized in phase 2 since the pH of the A. thiooxidans treated sludge had increased to >pH 6 after the exchange of sludge at the beginning of phase 2.
A. ferrooxidans liquid medium and inoculum treated sludge, i.e., FC and F had significantly lower pH values (p < 0.05) compared to A. thiooxidans liquid medium and inoculum treated sludge, i.e., TC and T in phases 1 and 2. This might be because of the lower pH of the A. ferrooxidans liquid medium and inoculum (i.e., about pH 2) than that of the A. thiooxidans inoculum (i.e., about pH 4). The other reason for the low pH might be that the A. ferrooxidans was likely to simultaneously oxidize both iron and sulfur compounds, thus increasing the acidity [24]. However, A. ferrooxidans metabolizes slowly so sulfur oxidization would also be slow, and this bacterium produces a very small amount of sulfuric acid [24]. After adding S in phase 3, A. thiooxidans reduced the pH more than A. ferrooxidans or the A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans mixture. A similar result has been reported in a past study [3] when A. thiooxidans produced more acids (39.81 mM H2SO4) than A. ferrooxidans alone (28.83 mM H2SO4) or A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans together, especially in the metabolism of elemental S [25].
After adding elemental S in phase 3, the pH of the sludge solution treated with A thiooxidans treatments (TC+S, FTC+S, T+S) decreased. The treatment T+S eventually reached the lowest pH of all the treatments. These low pH values may have been caused by the added S, which is oxidized to sulfuric acid by A. thiooxidans [26]. A. thiooxidans produced 0.125 M of H2SO4 in treatment T+S (calculated as H+ = 10−pH). A similar reduction of pH was evident in the liquid medium control media TC+S and FTC+S because these controls contained indigenous sulfur-oxidizing microbes (Table 4). However, these indigenous acidophilic microbes were not able to reduce the pH efficiently and thus the solubilization of P remained modest. After 63 days of incubation, the pH with S was significantly lower than the situation without S (p = 0.03, F = 5.77) (data not shown). However, it would be interesting to clarify if P-solubilization would be increased by S-additions already in phases 1 or 2 or at both of these time points. Although there is some debate about the optimum temperature for A. thiooxidans, 28–30 °C has been the most commonly used temperature [27], as applied in this study.
3.3. Solubilization of Major Nutrients and Trace Elements
The highest degree of P solubilization (92%) was observed at the pH of 0.9 in A. thiooxidans treated sludge, i.e., T+S in phase 3 (Table 5, Figure 2). The P solubilization was negatively correlated (p < 0.05, r = −0.802) with the pH of the sludge solutions and a significant amount of P solubilization occurred only at pH < 2. Generally, some P solubilization can start at pH as high as 5 but the extent of solubilization is modest until the pH reaches 2.5, especially if pH is adjusted by organic acids [28]. According to these authors, H2SO4 solubilizes less P than HNO3 and HCl if the same moles of acids are used. The P content in our reactor was 200 mg/L in phase 1, 366 mg/L in phase 2, and 501 mg/L in phase 3. Less than 20% of the P was solubilized when the pH of the sludge solution was above 2. A similar result has been reported earlier [26], but only 18% of P was solubilized with organic acids at pH 1.7.
Most of the P present in sludge may be present as FePO4 [29] or as different calcium (Ca) and hydrogen phosphates [30], which have a low solubility in weak acids. The clear reduction of pH in phase 3 was found after the addition of elemental S since A. thiobacillus (close to A. thiooxidans) oxidized elemental S to H2SO4 [10] and the sulfuric acid was able to solubilize the P in the sludge. A similar result was reported by Lee et al. [26], who achieved 48% P solubilization in 17 days of incubation at pH 0.9 using A. thiooxidans supplemented with S as applied here, but we achieved a higher P solubilization than these investigators. The higher P-solubilization in our study may have been due to the longer incubation time (i.e., 42 days or phases 1 and 2) prior to the addition of the S supplement, meaning that the acidophilic bacteria might have acclimatized better to the medium used here.
The sludge used in this study contained a high amount of Fe2+ and S (Table 1). The acidophilic bacteria are able to use these elements to make H2SO4 (Equation (1)) in accord with the earlier results [9]. A high amount of sulfur or reduced sulfur compound in the solution was converted into H2SO4 but there was still some residual sulfur in the solution (data not shown) as A. thiooxidans can oxidize only a limited amount of S [26,31]. It should be possible to reduce the amount of residual S by further optimization of the method. The extracted iron percentage was higher in treatments FC, FTC, F, and FT. This may be attributable to the use of a low pH inoculum and liquid medium (DSMZ 882) at the beginning, which solubilizes the iron. Another reason might be that iron is solubilized even at low acidity. For example, it has been reported that 36% of iron is solubilized at pH 6 with 100% being solubilized at pH 2 [32].
Most heavy metals tested were extracted in the liquid when the pH of the sludge decreased to about 2.5. A significant amount of rubidium (Rb) was extracted even at pH 7. The low pH values in phase 3 extracted most trace elements, i.e., chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and strontium (Sr). The trace elements titanium (Ti) and bromine (Br) were solubilized to a lesser extent at very low pH values. The low pH increased the solubility of most of the elements. The pH in the solution was significantly negatively correlated with the solubilization of Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Sr (in each case p < 0.05 and correlation coefficients from −0.51 to −0.87). Compared to our result, the lower degree of solubilization of Zn (56.9%), Mn (70.9%), Cr (85.0%), Fe (74.4%), and Cu (74.5%) have been reported previously [22], which might be because the incubation time was only 15 days in that experiment. We observed that Zn, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Cu could be solubilized even at pH 3–4, as also found previously [33], but the solubilization of Cr started at pH 6. This finding can help in the choice of different treatments for different outputs. For example, if the requirement is to eliminate certain trace elements, A. ferrooxidans treatment (F) or A. ferrooxidans liquid medium control (FC) can be used since they decreased the sludge pH to about 2.5 within 21–42 days and solubilized a substantial amount of the trace elements (Table 6).
3.4. Hygienization of Sludge
The numbers of fecal coliforms and total coliforms decreased to less than detection limits (LDL) within 21 days of incubation in acidithiobacilli treated sludge (Table 1 and Table 4). This is expected since such a low pH does not favor the growth of most coliform bacteria [34]. The numbers of enterococci and clostridia gradually declined up to 42 days or at the end of phase 2, and they had been reduced to LDL by the end of phase 3 (Table 1 and Table 4). Enterococci and clostridia have a higher survival rate in different environments, and thus they survived in sludge for a long time even at pH 2.5, but these bacteria could not survive when the pH was lower than 2. It has been reported that the survival of some pathogens can be reduced at pH values lower than 3.5 [35], but the suppression of enterococci required a pH under 2.5 [36]. Clostridia, meanwhile, could not survive at a pH below 2 [37], in contrast with the results of our study (Table 4).
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, both acidophilic bacterial types could survive in sludge media at 30 °C for 63 days. A. thiooxidans was able to solubilize 92% of P of sewage sludge if the medium was supplemented with elemental S (1 g/100 mL). Oxidation of the supplemented S resulted in a highly acidic, i.e., pH 0.9, sludge solution. Large amounts of heavy metals were removed from the sludge. All acidophilic bacterial treatments had hygienized the sludge after 63 days of incubation. Although the method took 63 days to recover 92% of P, hygienize the sludge, and eliminate the trace elements, these activities mainly occurred in phase 3, i.e., 21 days of incubation after S addition. The extracted phosphoric acid (P solubilized acidic supernatant) can be used for different purposes including the production of ammonium phosphate. We conclude that the recovery of P from sludge will not only help to prevent the depletion of P natural resources but also improve food security.
Author Contributions
S.K.P. planned and conducted the experiments, analyzed the samples, analyzed the data, and produced a manuscript draft. H.H.-T. guided the experiment, contributed to the manuscript preparation. A.-M.V. helped with the preparation of the experimental plan and reviewed the manuscript. S.P. did the chemical analysis and re-viewed the manuscript. E.T. supervised the experiment and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Maa- ja Vesitekniikan Tuki (Fund for Supporting Soil and Water Technology), reference number 40426.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ewen MacDonald for editing the English language. We thank Keerthnaa Benedict, Aizhan Kossantayeva, Sirpa Martikainen, and Laura Antikainen for their help in the laboratory.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- HELCOM. Overview of Nutrient Recycling in the Baltic Sea Countries, HELCOM—2018. Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission. Available online: https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Overview-of-nutrient-recycling-in-the-Baltic-Sea-countries.pdf (accessed on 3 January 2021).
- Donatello, S.; Tong, D.; Cheeseman, C.R. Production of technical grade phosphoric acid from incinerator sewage sludge ash (ISSA). Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 1634–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bhatti, T.M.; Yawar, W. Bacterial solubilization of phosphorus from phosphate rock containing sulfur-mud. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 103, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priha, O.; Sarlin, T.; Blomberg, P.; Wendling, L.; Mäkinen, J.; Arnold, M.; Kinnunen, P. Bioleaching phosphorus from fluorapatites with acidophilic bacteria. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 150, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calle-Castaneda, S.M.; Marquez-Godoy, M.A.; Hernandez-Ortiz, J.P. Phosphorus recovery from high concentrations of low-grade phosphate rocks using the biogenic acid produced by the acidophilic bacteria Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Miner. Eng. 2018, 115, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyagi, R.; Couillard, D.; Tran, F. Heavy-Metals Removal from Anaerobically Digested-Sludge by Chemical and Microbiological Methods. Environ. Pollut. 1988, 50, 295–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kucera, J.; Pakostova, E.; Lochman, J.; Janiczek, O.; Mandl, M. Are there multiple mechanisms of anaerobic sulfur oxidation with ferric iron in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans? Res. Microbiol. 2016, 167, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diercks, M.; Sand, W.; Bock, E. Microbial Corrosion of Concrete. Experientia 1991, 47, 514–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pronk, J.; Debruyn, J.; Bos, P.; Kuenen, J. Anaerobic Growth of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 2227–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Huber, B.; Herzog, B.; Drewes, J.E.; Koch, K.; Mueller, E. Characterization of sulfur oxidizing bacteria related to biogenic sulfuric acid corrosion in sludge digesters. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jastrzebska, M.; Saeid, A.; Kostrzewska, M.K.; Basladynska, S. New phosphorus biofertilizers from renewable raw materials in the aspect of cadmium and lead contents in soil and plants. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slovenski Inštitut za Standardizacijo. Characterization of Sludges—Determination of Trace Elements and Phosphorus—Aqua Regia Extraction Methods; EN 13346:2000; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Membrane Filter Technique for the Enumeration of Thermotolerant (Fecal) Coliform Bacteria in Water; SFS 4088; Finnish Standard Association: Helsinki, Finland, 2001; p. 4.
- Water Quality—Detection and Enumeration of Intestinal Enterococci—Part 2: Membrane Filtration Method; SFS-EN ISO 7899-2; Finnish Standard Association: Helsinki, Finland, 2000.
- Water Quality—Detection and Enumeration of the Spores of Sulfite-Reducing Anaerobes (Clostridia)—Part 2: Method by Membrane Filtration; SFS-EN 26461-2; Finnish Standard Association: Helsinki, Finland, 1993.
- DSMZ Medium 882. Available online: https://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/medium/pdf/DSMZ_Medium882.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2020).
- Visca, P.; Bianchi, E.; Polidoro, M.; Buonfiglio, V.; Valenti, P.; Orsi, N. A New Solid Medium for Isolating and Enumerating Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1989, 35, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DSMZ Medium 71. Available online: https://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/medium/pdf/DSMZ_Medium71.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2020).
- Starosvetsky, J.; Zukerman, U.; Armon, R.H. A simple medium modification for isolation, growth and enumeration of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (syn. Thiobacillus thiooxidans) from water samples. J. Microbiol. Methods 2013, 92, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Lin, J. Influence of solid content on bioleaching of heavy metals from contaminated sediment by Thiobacillus spp. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2000, 75, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishigaki, T.; Nakanishi, A.; Tateda, M.; Ike, M.; Fujita, M. Bioleaching of metal from municipal waste incineration fly ash using a mixed culture of sulfur-oxidizing and iron-oxidizing bacteria. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pangayao, D.C.; Van Hullebusch, E.D.; Gallardo, S.M.; Bacani, F.T. Bioleaching of Trace Metals from Coal Ash using Mixed Culture of Acidithiobacillus albertensis and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2015, 10, 36–45. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, P.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zou, S.; Zeng, G.; Wu, Z. Sewage sludge bioleaching by indigenous sulfur-oxidizing bacteria: Effects of ratio of substrate dosage to solid content. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 1394–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.; Yan, L.; Leng, F.; Nan, W.; Yue, X.; Zheng, Y.; Feng, N.; Li, H. Bioleaching of realgar by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans using ferrous iron and elemental sulfur as the sole and mixed energy sources. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 3260–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gan, M.; Song, Z.; Zhu, J.; Liu, X. Efficient bioleaching of heavy metals from contaminated sediment in batch method coupled with the assistance of heterotrophic microorganisms. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.; Sethurajan, M.; van de Vossenberg, J.; Meers, E.; van Hullebusch, E.D. Recovery of phosphorus from municipal wastewater treatment sludge through bioleaching using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, D.; Wood, A. Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pakdil, N.B.; Filibeli, A. Effects of organic and inorganic acids on phosphorus release from municipal sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 56, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mamais, D.; Pitt, P.; Cheng, Y.; Loiacono, J.; Jenkins, D. Determination of Ferric-Chloride Dose to Control Struvite Precipitation in Anaerobic Sludge Digesters. Water Environ. Res. 1994, 66, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musvoto, E.; Wentzel, M.; Ekama, G. Integrated chemical-physical processes modelling—II. Simulating aeration treatment of anaerobic digester supernatants. Water Res. 2000, 34, 1868–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nareshkumar, R.; Nagendran, R.; Parvathi, K. Bioleaching of heavy metals from contaminated soil using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans: Effect of sulfur/soil ratio. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 1539–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Casal, M.; Layrisse, M. The effect of change in pH on the solubility of iron bis-glycinate chelate and other iron compounds. Arch. Latinoam. Nutr. 2001, 51, 35–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Krol, A.; Mizerna, K.; Boiym, M. An assessment of pH-dependent release and mobility of heavy metals from metallurgical slag. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina, P.; Parma, A.; Sanz, M. Survival in acidic and alcoholic medium of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157:H7 isolated in Argentina. BMC Microbiol. 2003, 3, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, H.; Hart, C.A.; Sales, D.; Roberts, N.B. Bacterial killing in gastric juice—Effect of pH and pepsin on Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55, 1265–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mubarak, Z.S.C. The acid tolerance response and pH adaptation of Enterococcus faecalis in extract of lime Citrus aurantiifolia from Aceh Indonesia. F1000Research 2018, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijnands, L.M.; van der Meij-Florijn, A.; van Asch, E.D. Clostridium perfringens Associated Food Borne Disease; RIVM Report 330371005/2011; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment: Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2011.
Figure 1.
The pH of the incubated solution with different treatments in phases 1, 2, and 3. In phase 3 or 42 days of incubation, 10 mL of sample was replaced with 10 mL of new sludge +1 g of S to 100 mL. The symbols describing the treatments are presented in Table 3.
Figure 1.
The pH of the incubated solution with different treatments in phases 1, 2, and 3. In phase 3 or 42 days of incubation, 10 mL of sample was replaced with 10 mL of new sludge +1 g of S to 100 mL. The symbols describing the treatments are presented in Table 3.
Figure 2.
The total P in sludge at the beginning of each phase and the soluble PO4-P in supernatants (after filtration) at the end of the different phases of the study. The solution symbol in this figure resembles the total P in the incubated solution at the beginning of each phase.
Figure 2.
The total P in sludge at the beginning of each phase and the soluble PO4-P in supernatants (after filtration) at the end of the different phases of the study. The solution symbol in this figure resembles the total P in the incubated solution at the beginning of each phase.
Table 1.
Different parameters of the sludge sample before the experiment (without dilution). FW = fresh weight.
Table 1.
Different parameters of the sludge sample before the experiment (without dilution). FW = fresh weight.
| Chemical Parameters | Before the Experiment |
|---|---|
| pH | 6.5 ± 0.4 |
| Total solids (%) | 5.59 ± 0.02 |
| Organic matter (%) | 5.16 ± 0.07 |
| Chemical oxygen demand (g/L) | 240 |
| Total-P (g/L) FW | 2 |
| PO4-P (mg/L) FW | 130 |
| Total-N (g/L) FW | 15.5 |
| Total-sulfur (S) (mg/L) | 840 |
| K (mg/L) | 14 |
| Ca (mg/L) | 79.2 |
| Total-iron (Fe) (g/L) | 9.1 |
| Fe2+ (g/L) | 1.5 |
| Indicator bacteria | Log10 CFU/mL |
| Fecal coliforms | 5.79 ± 0.57 |
| Total coliforms | 6.29 ± 0.25 |
| Enterococci | 4.19 ± 0.28 |
| Clostridia | 4.65 ± 0.32 |
Table 2.
Numbers of acidithiobacilli in inocula before the experiment (mean ± st. dev). (N = 3).
| Method | A. ferrooxidans | A. thiooxidans |
|---|---|---|
| Microscopic cell count (log10 cells/mL) | 6.76 ± 0.15 | 6.87 ± 0.47 |
| Agar plate (log10 CFU/mL) | 7.07 ± 0.11 | 7.92 ± 1.06 |
| MPN (log10 MPN/mL) | 7.0 | 7.7 |
Table 3.
Treatments and symbols. Symbols + S means that the sulfur was added to 100 mL solution only in phase 3. Sulfur (S).
Table 3.
Treatments and symbols. Symbols + S means that the sulfur was added to 100 mL solution only in phase 3. Sulfur (S).
| Symbol | Treatment | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Before (S) supplement phases 1 and 2 | ||
| 0 | 0 Control | Sewage sludge + sterile water |
| FC | F Control | Sewage sludge + DSMZ 882 liquid medium aimed for A. ferrooxidans |
| TC | T Control | Sewage sludge + DSMZ 71 liquid medium aimed for A. thiooxidans |
| FTC | FT Control | Sewage sludge + liquid medium (50% of DSMZ 882 and 50% of sterile DSMZ 71) |
| F | F Treatment | Sewage sludge + A. ferrooxidans inoculum |
| T | T Treatment | Sewage sludge + A. thiooxidans inoculum |
| FT | FT Treatment | Sewage sludge + bacterial inoculum (50% of A. ferrooxidans + 50% of A. thiooxidans) |
| After S supplement phase 3 | ||
| 0 + S | 0 control incubated mixture solution + S | |
| FC + S | F Control incubated mixture solution + S | |
| TC + S | T Control incubated mixture solution + S | |
| FTC + S | FT Control incubated mixture solution + S | |
| F + S | F Treatment incubated mixture solution + S | |
| T + S | T Treatment incubated mixture solution + S | |
| FT + S | FT Treatment incubated mixture solution + S | |
Table 4.
Numbers of acidithiobacilli (originating from sludge and DSMZ collection) and fecal indicator bacteria at the end of each phase of the experiment (log10 CFU/mL). (N = 3). LDL (less than detection limit) is 100 CFU/mL. The numbers 1, 2 and 3 refer to the three phases of the experiment. Sulfur- and iron-oxidizing (S- and Fe-oxidizing). O is control (sterile water and sludge). FC is medium DSMZ 882 and TC is medium DSMZ 71 and FTC is a mixture of both DSMZ media. Used acidophilic bacteria F (A. ferrooxidans), T (A. thiooxidans), and FT (A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans). Different letters in the same row are significantly different results (p < 0.05).
Table 4.
Numbers of acidithiobacilli (originating from sludge and DSMZ collection) and fecal indicator bacteria at the end of each phase of the experiment (log10 CFU/mL). (N = 3). LDL (less than detection limit) is 100 CFU/mL. The numbers 1, 2 and 3 refer to the three phases of the experiment. Sulfur- and iron-oxidizing (S- and Fe-oxidizing). O is control (sterile water and sludge). FC is medium DSMZ 882 and TC is medium DSMZ 71 and FTC is a mixture of both DSMZ media. Used acidophilic bacteria F (A. ferrooxidans), T (A. thiooxidans), and FT (A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans). Different letters in the same row are significantly different results (p < 0.05).
| Microbes | Phase | O | FC | TC | FTC | Used Acidophilic Bacteria in F, T and FT Treatments | F | T | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S- and Fe-oxidizing microbes | 1 | 5.0 ± 0.3 a | 2.0 ± 0.2 b | 5.1 ± 0.1 a | 5.2 ± 0.1 a | A. ferrooxidans | 4.2 ± 0.2 a | 7.7 ± 0.1 c | 4.0 ± 0.2 a |
| S- and Fe-oxidizing microbes | 2 | 2 ± 0.2 a | 5 ± 0.5 b | 5.9 ± 0.5 b | 6 ± 0 b | A. ferrooxidans | 6 ± 0 b | 7 ± 0.7 b | 5 ± 0.9 b |
| S- and Fe-oxidizing microbes | 3 | 0.7 ± 0.4 a | 10.0 ± 1.0 b | 6.5 ± 0.3 c | 8.0 ± 0.0 bc | A. ferrooxidans | 9.9 ± 0.7 b | 7.8 ± 0.7 bc | 8.3 ± 0.0 bc |
| S- and Fe-oxidizing microbes | 1 | 4.7 ± 0.2 a | 5.4 ± 0.1 b | 6.1 ± 0.2 c | 6.2 ± 0.3 c | A. thiooxidans | 4.2 ± 0.2 a | 9.0 ± 0.3 d | 8.2 ± 0.1 e |
| S- and Fe-oxidizing microbes | 2 | 4.7 ± 0.3 a | 7 ± 0.7 b | 6.0 ± 0.7 ab | 5 ± 0.5 ab | A. thiooxidans | 9 ± 1.1 b | 8 ± 0.3 b | 8 ± 0.3 b |
| S- and Fe-oxidizing microbes | 3 | 1.0 ± 0.0 a | 7.6 ± 0.5 b | 10.6 ± 0.5 c | 7.5 ± 0.7 b | A. thiooxidans | 8.0 ± 0.0 b | 10.1 ± 1.2 c | 9.0 ± 0.0 bc |
| Fecal coliforms | 1 | 6 ± 0.1 | LDL | LDL | LDL | - | LDL | LDL | LDL |
| Fecal coliforms | 2–3 | LDL | LDL | LDL | LDL | - | LDL | LDL | LDL |
| Total coliforms | 1–3 | LDL | LDL | LDL | LDL | - | LDL | LDL | LDL |
| Enterococci | 1 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | - | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.1 |
| Enterococci | 2 | 1.0 ± 1.4 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | - | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 3.3 ± 0.2 |
| Enterococci | 3 | 4.5 ± 1.2 | LDL | LDL | LDL | - | LDL | LDL | LDL |
| Clostridia | 1 | 3.5 ± 0.0 | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | - | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.1 |
| Clostridia | 2 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 1.6 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.0 | - | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.3 |
| Clostridia | 3 | LDL | LDL | LDL | LDL | - | LDL | LDL | LDL |
Table 5.
Solubilization percentage of major nutrients and pH at the end of different phases (1, 2, 3) of the experiment. The original concentrations are presented in Table 1. The symbols describing the treatments are presented in Table 3.
| Treatment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Phase | O | FC | TC | FTC | F | T | FT |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 1 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 12 |
| 2 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 5 | 5 | |
| 3 | 0 | 21 | 27 | 25 | 10 | 92 | 19 | |
| Sulfur | 1 | 18 | 63 | 50 | 49 | 96 | 53 | 52 |
| 2 | 26 | 62 | 54 | 52 | 65 | 59 | 45 | |
| 3 | 29 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 94 | 100 | 100 | |
| Potassium | 1 | 56 | ND | 67 | 55 | ND | 71 | 63 |
| 2 | 67 | 9 | 64 | 39 | 44 | 76 | 71 | |
| 3 | 90 | 1 | 52 | 21 | ND | 62 | 69 | |
| Calcium | 1 | 21 | 52 | 45 | 48 | 80 | 55 | 57 |
| 2 | 34 | 101 | 23 | 71 | 89 | 14 | 10 | |
| 3 | 25 | 87 | 72 | 75 | 100 | 70 | 100 | |
| Iron | 1 | 0 | 59 | 1 | 56 | 74 | 1 | 51 |
| 2 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | 101 | 71 | 88 | 39 | 100 | 74 | |
| pH | 1 | 6.73 | 2.13 | 2.38 | 2.30 | 2.29 | 2.64 | 2.52 |
| 2 | 7.00 | 2.62 | 7.04 | 3.45 | 2.38 | 7.72 | 6.59 | |
| 3 | 6.64 | 1.37 | 1.47 | 1.30 | 2.47 | 0.9 | 1.69 | |
Table 6.
Trace element concentrations in sludge before the experiments and their reduction (%) after different treatments. The symbols are given in Table 3.
Table 6.
Trace element concentrations in sludge before the experiments and their reduction (%) after different treatments. The symbols are given in Table 3.
| Trace Element | Concentration in Sludge mg/L | Phase | Reduction % in Treatments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | FC | TC | FTC | F | T | FT | |||
| Ti | 1.85 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 2 | 14 | 98 | 12 | 20 |
| 3.33 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 4.51 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 15 | |
| Cr | 0.60 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 100 | 100 | 4 | 100 | |
| 1.08 | 2 | 2 | 58 | 1 | 2 | 33 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1.46 | 3 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 116 | 101 | 100 | |
| Mn | 2.80 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 58 | 100 | 100 | 73 | 100 |
| 5.04 | 2 | 3 | 100 | 2 | 93 | 100 | 0 | 18 | |
| 6.84 | 3 | 1 | 100 | 110 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Co | 4.76 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 86 | 100 |
| 8.57 | 2 | 1 | 77 | 0 | 2 | 39 | 0 | 2 | |
| 11.61 | 3 | 0 | 100 | 81 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Ni | 0.11 | 1 | 10 | 100 | 49 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 100 |
| 0.20 | 2 | 25 | 100 | 12 | 100 | 100 | 15 | 9 | |
| 0.27 | 3 | 7 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Cu | 0.75 | 1 | 11 | 100 | 91 | 100 | 100 | 86 | 100 |
| 1.35 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 9 | 51 | 100 | 4 | 3 | |
| 1.83 | 3 | 5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 102 | 100 | |
| Zn | 1.47 | 1 | 3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 2.64 | 2 | 1 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3.58 | 3 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Br | 0.05 | 1 | 60 | 59 | 59 | 59 | 61 | 77 | 68 |
| 0.08 | 2 | 100 | 56 | 84 | 59 | 65 | 100 | 72 | |
| 0.11 | 3 | 63 | 83 | 45 | 55 | 59 | 41 | 57 | |
| Rb | 0.02 | 1 | 73 | 47 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 0.03 | 2 | 100 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 101 | |
| 0.04 | 3 | 51 | 51 | 100 | 55 | 37 | 100 | 37 | |
| Sr | 0.23 | 1 | 11 | 100 | 77 | 89 | 100 | 99 | 100 |
| 0.41 | 2 | 16 | 47 | 10 | 6 | 48 | 10 | 30 | |
| 0.56 | 3 | 8 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 100 | 94 | |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Pradhan, S.K.; Heinonen-Tanski, H.; Veijalainen, A.-M.; Peräniemi, S.; Torvinen, E. Phosphorus Recovery from Sewage Sludge Using Acidithiobacilli. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137135
AMA Style
Pradhan SK, Heinonen-Tanski H, Veijalainen A-M, Peräniemi S, Torvinen E. Phosphorus Recovery from Sewage Sludge Using Acidithiobacilli. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(13):7135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137135
Chicago/Turabian StylePradhan, Surendra K., Helvi Heinonen-Tanski, Anna-Maria Veijalainen, Sirpa Peräniemi, and Eila Torvinen. 2021. "Phosphorus Recovery from Sewage Sludge Using Acidithiobacilli" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 13: 7135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137135
APA StylePradhan, S. K., Heinonen-Tanski, H., Veijalainen, A. -M., Peräniemi, S., & Torvinen, E. (2021). Phosphorus Recovery from Sewage Sludge Using Acidithiobacilli. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137135
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
