Next Article in Journal
Transformational Leadership and Employee Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Employee Relations Climate and the Moderating Role of Subordinate Gender
Next Article in Special Issue
Can Hip-Knee Line Angle Distinguish the Size of Pelvic Incidence?—Development of Quick Noninvasive Assessment Tool for Pelvic Incidence Classification
Previous Article in Journal
An Investigation into Art Therapy Aided Health and Well-Being Research: A 75-Year Bibliometric Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Prevalence and Severity of Sick Leave due to Low Back Disorders among Workers in Slovenia: Analysis of National Data across Gender, Age and Classification of Economic Activities
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Epidural Steroid Injections for Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(1), 231; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010231
by Massimiliano Carassiti 1,*, Giuseppe Pascarella 1, Alessandro Strumia 1, Fabrizio Russo 2, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia 2, Rita Cataldo 1, Francesca Gargano 1, Fabio Costa 1, Michelangelo Pierri 3, Francesca De Tommasi 4, Carlo Massaroni 4, Emiliano Schena 4 and Felice Eugenio Agrò 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(1), 231; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010231
Submission received: 3 December 2021 / Revised: 19 December 2021 / Accepted: 22 December 2021 / Published: 26 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low Back Pain (LBP))

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

First of all, well structured and great review. 

 

Author should clearly discriminate between chronic back pain and acute back pain, back pain and leg pain. I understand this study is focused on chronic lumbar pain rather than acute pain and leg pain, I would request authors to clearly address that they are focused on back pain and not mentioning about leg symptom. In my opinion, lumbar disc herniation is usually acute condition, and degeneration process after disc herniation promotes degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Additionally, ESI could potentially used for acute conditions and leg symptom; author should also mention about that. 

 

L105  more important than the mechanical compression in the pathogenesis,,” unless there are no neurological deficits”. 

 

L111  additional causes of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: spondylolisthesis, epidural lipomatosis, 

 

L114 All these factors do potentially cause chronic back pain finally, however, again, author should clearly discriminate between chronic back pain and acute back pain, back pain and leg pain. 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your appreciation.

Best regards.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In this narrative review, the authors summarized the application of epidural steroid injection for low back pain management; outlined the mechanism of lumbosacral radicular pain symptom, rationale of epidural steroid injection and the indications; discussed the safety and efficacy of epidural steroid injection. This study is well designed, and the data from literatures is well interpreted. While some new findings can be recognized, some minor issues are raised as well.

  • Regarding the procedure is performed in patients with low back pain caused by lumbar disk herniation and/or lumbar canal stenosis with anatomical abnormity, image guided operation becomes essential for the outcome. The authors can take this into account and analyze the results of the procedure guided by X-ray, computerized tomography, neuronavigation and ultrasound respectively.
  • The safety and efficacy of epidural steroid injection is well discussed in the manuscript; however, the complication of the procedure was missed. Recent reports indicate that local epidural injection can led to severe consequences (PMID: 28824864, PMID: 10969325). The authors can add some inputs about the potential complications for the epidural steroid injection for low back pain in the discussion section

Author Response

Thank you very much for your appreciation.

Best regards.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Acceptable as is.

Back to TopTop