Next Article in Journal
Environmental Regulation Intensity, Carbon Footprint and Green Total Factor Productivity of Manufacturing Industries
Next Article in Special Issue
Informing State-Wide Coalition Efforts to Implement and Integrate Nutrition Best Practices in Early Care and Education: Focus Group Insights from Child Care Providers
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Consumption of Drugs Prescribed for the Treatment of Asthma in Belgian Children
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph19010550
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trends in Complementary Feeding Indicators and Intake from Specific Food Groups among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Bangladesh

by
Sabuj Kanti Mistry
1,2,3,4,*,
Md Belal Hossain
1,5,
Nafis Md Irfan
6,7,8,
Manika Saha
9,
Silvia Saberin
10,
Abu Ahmed Shamim
1 and
Amit Arora
11,12,13,14,15
1
BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, 68 Shahid Tajuddin Ahmed Sharani, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
2
Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
3
ARCED Foundation, 13/1 Pallabi, Mirpur-12, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh
4
Department of Public Health, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
5
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z3, Canada
6
Institute of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
7
Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Human Toxicology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA
8
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA
9
Department of Human-Centred Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
10
Independent Researcher, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
11
Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown Campus, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
12
School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown Campus, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
13
Oral Health Services, Sydney Local Health District and Sydney Dental Hospital, NSW Health, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia
14
Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
15
Heath Equity Laboratory, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(1), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010550
Submission received: 14 September 2021 / Revised: 12 December 2021 / Accepted: 23 December 2021 / Published: 4 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Early Childhood Nutrition and Associated Food Preferences, Dietary Patterns, and Health Outcomes)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present study aims to comprehensively analyse trends in complementary feeding indicators (Introduction of solid, semi-solid, and soft foods at 6–8 months (INTRO), Minimum Dietary Diversity (MDD), Minimum Meal Frequency (MMF) and Minimum Acceptable Diet (MAD)) among children aged 6–23 months in Bangladesh. The study used data from four rounds (2007, 2011, 2014, and 2017–2018) of nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (BDHSs). The Cochran–Armitage test was performed to capture the trends in complementary feeding practices and intake from specific food groups. BDHSs are periodically conducted cross-sectional surveys in all seven administrative divisions of Bangladesh. The present analysis was performed among 8116 children (1563 in 2007, 2137 in 2011, 2249 in 2014, and 2167 in 2017–2018) aged 6–23 months. Overall, a decreasing trend was observed in all the complementary feeding indicators except INTRO from 2007 to 2014, but a substantial increase in MDD, MMF and MAD was noted in 2017–2018. A statistically significant reduction in consumption from different food groups such as legumes and nuts (p < 0.001), dairy products (p = 0.001), vitamin-A-rich fruits or vegetables (p < 0.001), and other fruits and vegetables (p < 0.001) was also observed. However, a positive trend was noted in the consumption of grains/roots/tubers (p = 0.027), and meat/fish/egg (p < 0.001). After experiencing a significant decreasing trend during 2007–2014, the recent BDHS indicates improvements in all complementary feeding indicators among young children in Bangladesh, which calls for integrated, multisectoral, and multicomponent interventions to sustain this progress.

1. Introduction

Malnutrition is among the significant public health challenges among young children in low- and middle-income countries. According to the World Health Organization, around 45% of the deaths are attributed to nutrition-related factors among children aged less than five years [1]. The first 1000 days of life is recognised as the ‘critical window’ for optimal growth and development for a child [2]. It is well established that initiation of breastfeeding within the first hour of birth and exclusive breastfeeding to 6 months of life can protect the infant from various infectious diseases and reduce the risk of neonatal mortality [3]. However, children are at an increased risk of malnutrition after 6 months of life as, at this stage, the mother’s milk alone is no longer sufficient to meet the energy and nutritional requirements for infants [4]. This transition from exclusive breastfeeding to family foods, starting around the period of 6 months of age and continuing until 24 months, is referred to as complementary feeding [3]. There is an estimate that 6% of all deaths in children under the age of 5 years in developing countries can be prevented if appropriate complementary feeding practices are followed [5]. Therefore, timely introducing complementary feeding and giving nutritionally adequate and safe complementary foods starting at the period of six months is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [6].
Late introduction and inadequate quantity of complementary feeding can result in faltered physical growth and cognitive development among infants [7,8]. Additionally, inappropriate complementary feeding practices have been found as a determinant of increased malnutrition outcomes (such as wasting, stunting and underweight) and under-5 child mortality worldwide [9,10]. If a child remains malnourished during this period, it results in a compromised immune system and a higher risk of severe infectious diseases including diarrhoea and pneumonia [11,12]. Malnutrition during these young ages can also lead to irreversible adverse effects for the rest of their lives and they may never meet their full physical and intellectual potential [8,13,14].
In Bangladesh, malnutrition continues to be a serious public health problem among young children and still, around one-third of children aged under five years are stunted [15]. Late introduction and inappropriate complementary feeding practices are among the major causes of child malnutrition in Bangladesh [16]. Many underlying and immediate causes of malnutrition are related to food insecurity and inappropriate feeding practices, which are often compounded by socio-economic and political contexts [8]. Previous studies have shown different socio-economic and individual factors influence complementary feeding practices among young children in Bangladesh [16,17,18]. In addition, factors such as women’s empowerment, exposure to mass media, and antenatal care practices have been associated with young children’s dietary diversity [19].
Considering the importance of infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices, the Government of Bangladesh has incorporated IYCF in many national health policies and programs such as the health population and nutrition sector development program HPNSDP (2011–2016) [20], second National Plan of Action for Nutrition (NPAN2) (2016–2025) [21] and National Strategy for IYCF in Bangladesh (2007) [22]. In addition, The National Women Development Policy 2011 and National Labour Policy 2012 provide extended maternity leave to support IYCF to their children [23]. Further, implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, enforcing the Breast Milk Substitutes (BMS) (Regulation of Marketing) Act, helps to protect young children from commercial baby foods and to promote improved IYCF, including exclusive breastfeeding [24].
Bangladesh demographic and health surveys (BDHSs) are periodically conducted nationwide data, which follow a well-established methodology and incorporate large numbers of covariates of IYCF. A recent study [25] analysed four rounds of BDHS data from 2004 to 2014 and found stagnating trends in complementary feeding practices in young children. As new BDHS (2017–2018) data are available, a national-level analysis with updated information will provide essential and updated information for the stakeholders. Therefore, the present study has been undertaken to analyse the trends in complementary feeding practices among children aged 6–23 months using data from the most recent four rounds of BDHSs, including the most recent one (2007, 2011, 2014 and 2017–2018). The study presents the trends in different complementary feeding indicators and explains the trends in intake of complementary foods from different food groups. Findings from this study will contribute to implementing important and effective initiatives by programme and policymakers to improve complementary feeding practices to combat widespread malnutrition among young children in Bangladesh.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources

Data from the four most recent rounds (2007, 2011, 2014, and 2017–2018) of BDHSs were used in this study. These nationally representative cross-sectional surveys followed a two-stage stratified random sampling design and covered all seven administrative divisions of Bangladesh. The detailed methodology of the respective surveys can be found in the BDHS reports [15,26,27]. BDHS 2007, 2011, 2014, and 2017–2018 collected information from 10,996, 17,749, 17,863, and 20,127 ever-married women aged 15–49 years, respectively, with a response rate of around 98%. Among these 66,735 selected women from four rounds of surveys, 61,716 were usual residents (de jure population), and the remaining were non-residents to certain geographical areas. BDHSs usually collect information about mothers and their children born within five years preceding the survey. For the present analysis, we considered information of a total of 8116 children (1563 in 2007, 2137 in 2011, 2249 in 2014, and 2167 in 2017–2018) aged 6–23 months (see Figure 1).

2.2. Outcome Measures

We measured the trends in complementary feeding practices using the four indicators recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [28]. These include Introduction of solid, semi-solid and soft foods (INTRO); Minimum Dietary Diversity (MDD); Minimum Meal Frequency (MMF); Minimum Acceptable Diet (MAD) for infant and young children. Mothers of children were interviewed regarding these indicators and were asked to recall foods given to their children in the last 24 h preceding the survey date. Brief definitions of the four outcome variables (as per WHO recommendations) are given below; these outcome variables were measured as per the given definitions:
  • Timely introduction of solid, semi-solid and soft foods (INTRO): the proportion of children between 6 and 8 months of age who received solid, semi-solid or soft foods.
  • Minimum dietary diversity (MDD): the proportion of children who received at least four or more food groups out of six food groups. Instead of seven food groups recommended by the WHO guidelines, the complementary food items provided in the last 24 h were classified into six food groups in the BDHS data as flesh foods, and eggs were combined as one group. These six groups include (1) grains, roots, and tubers; (2) legumes and nuts; (3) dairy products; (4) meat/fish/egg; (5) vitamin-A-rich fruits and vegetables; and (6) other fruits and vegetables. It is notable to mention that egg intake was captured separately from the 2011 BDHS. Therefore, trend analysis for egg intake during 2011 to 2017–2018 are also presented in this study.
  • Minimum meal frequency (MMF): the proportion of children aged 6–23 months (breastfed and non-breastfed children) who received solid, semi-solid or soft foods the minimum number of times or more in the previous day of the survey. Minimum meal frequency was defined as having at least 2 meals/day for 6–8 months, 3 or more meals/day for 9–23 months old, breastfed children and 4 or more meals/day for non-breastfed children.
  • Minimum acceptable diet (MAD): the proportion of children aged 6–23 months who received and satisfied both the conditions of minimum dietary diversity and minimum meal frequency.

2.3. Explanatory Variables

Socio-demographic variables considered in this study were: administrative division (Barisal, Chittagong, Dhaka, Khulna, Rajshahi, Rangpur, Sylhet, and Mymensingh); place of residence (urban/rural); household wealth quintile (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, and richest); child age (6–8 months, 9–11 months, 12–17 months, 18–23 months); child gender (male/female); birth order (1, 2, ≥3); maternal age at child’s birth (<20 years, 20–29 years, ≥30 years); maternal education (no education, grade 1–4, 5–9, and 10 or more); maternal occupation (housewife/working outside); fathers’ education (no education or grade 1–4, 5–9, and 10 or more); fathers’ occupation (services holder/business; agriculture-based work, non-agriculture-based work, and others).
The household wealth index was constructed using factor analysis by the DHS team and categorized as poorest, poorer, middle, richer, and richest. The details can be found in BDHS reports [15,26,27]. Body mass index (BMI) for mothers was calculated as weight in kg/(height in meter)2, which was categorized using the Asian cut-off for underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal (18.5–22.9), overweight (23.0–24.9), and obese (≥25.0) [29].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

To assess the distribution of the different variables, we performed descriptive analysis. The Cochran–Armitage test [30,31] was performed to determine the trends of complementary feeding practices among different categories of covariates. All tests were performed at a 5% level of significance. Sampling weights were used in all analyses to ensure the actual representation of the nationwide data. All analyses were performed using the statistical software package STATA (Version 13.0).

3. Results

3.1. Trends in Complementary Feeding Practice

The trends in INTRO among 6–8 months aged children and MDD among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh from 2007 to 2018 are shown in Table 1 and Figure 2. The proportion of children aged 6–8 months who received solid, semi-solid or soft foods decreased from 72.8% to 68.0% during the period of 2007 to 2014 and increased to 75.0% in 2017–2018. However, this increasing trend was not statistically significant (p = 0.505). Additionally, a nearly steady but insignificant trend in INTRO among children from all groups was observed.
The trends of MDD among 6–23 months aged children are also shown in Table 1 and Figure 2. The proportion of MDD reduced from 41.4% to 27.3% from 2007 to 2014 and then increased to 56.7% in 2017–2018, resulting in a significantly increasing trend (p < 0.001). Additionally, a significantly increasing trend was observed in all strata except that of the Rajshahi Division, where a not significantly increasing trend was noted.
The MMF decreased from 79.9% to 61.8% from 2007 to 2014 and after that increased to 78.7% in 2017–2018 (Table 2 and Figure 2). Overall, it showed a decreasing trend, but was not statistically significant (p = 0.935). A substantial reduction in MMF was observed among children from the Dhaka and Rajshahi divisions, those aged 18–23 months, those whose mother had no or primary education or were underweight, and those whose father was an agriculture-based worker, unemployed/student, retired, or a beggar. It was also noted that MMF was significantly increased in Chittagong and Rangpur Division, those whose mother was overweight, and those whose father had completed secondary education and was involved in non-agriculture-based work.
The MAD decreased from 39.4% in 2007 to 23.1% in 2014 and then significantly increased to 52.1% in 2017–2018, resulting in a significantly increasing trend (p < 0.001) (Table 2 and Figure 2). Additionally, a significantly increasing trend was observed in all strata except that of the Rajshahi Division and those whose father was involved in non-agriculture-based work.

3.2. Trends in Consumption from Different Food Groups

Overall trends in the consumption of food items from six food groups are shown in Figure 3. The consumption of grains, roots, or tubers significantly decreased from 84.6% to 78.2% from 2007 to 2014 but increased to 87.4% in 2017–2018. Although a significant increase in meat/fish/egg consumption (46.9% to 67.2%) was observed, there was a substantial reduction in consumption of legumes or nuts (29.7% to 21.5%), dairy products (39.7% to 32.2%), vitamin-A-rich fruits or vegetables (53.8% to 37.7%), and other fruits or vegetables (46.4% to 26.6%) from 2007 to 2017–2018.
The consumption of grains/roots/tubers significantly reduced among children from the Rajshahi division but increased among children from the Chittagong and Sylhet divisions, those living in urban areas, those from poorer and the richest households, and those whose mother only had primary or secondary education (Table 3). On the other hand, the consumption of legumes/nuts decreased over time for all children regardless of age, gender, place of residence, wealth status, and parents’ education and occupation.
A significant reduction in consumption of dairy products was observed among children regardless of age, gender, place of residence, wealth status, and parents’ education and occupation (Table 4). On the other hand, meat/fish/egg consumption increased over time among all children regardless of age, gender, place of residence, wealth status, and parent’s education and occupation.
Table 5 shows the trends in consuming vitamin-A rich fruits or vegetables and other fruits or vegetables among children aged 6–23 months in Bangladesh from 2007 to 2018. The consumption of vitamin-A-rich fruits/vegetables and other fruits/vegetables decreased over time among all children regardless of age, gender, place of residence, wealth status, and parent’s education and occupation.

4. Discussion

The present analyses were performed by pooling data from the four most recent rounds of nationally representative Demographic and Health Surveys of Bangladesh. Along with identifying trends in complementary feeding indicators, this study also investigated trends in dietary consumption from different food groups. Overall, a significantly increasing trend was observed for MDD and MAD, which may partially be attributable to the recent enactment of several IYCF policies in Bangladesh, such as the BMS Act 2013 [24] and NPAN 2 [21]. Consumption of food items from different food groups (grains, roots, tubers; legumes or nuts; dairy products; vitamin-A rich fruits or vegetables; other fruits or vegetables) decreased over time apart from an increasing trend in grains/roots/tubers and meat/fish/egg consumption. Divisional disaggregated data revealed the most remarkable reducing or non-significant trend in the Rajshahi division. These findings draw further attention to policymakers and program implementers to ascertain the probable reasons and inputs such as strengthening health systems and channelling behaviour change communication to be provided in this region to reduce regional variability and vulnerability.
While comparing complementary feeding practices across different strata, the most significant reduction was observed among children from the poorest wealth quintiles. Rural children were more vulnerable to a greater reduction in MDD and MAD, while a more substantial reduction in INTRO was observed among urban children in Bangladesh. One possible explanation could be that urban people have more purchasing power than rural families, and with the increase in income, children’s diets become more diversified [19,32]. However, there is also counterevidence (analysis from BDHS 2007 and 2014) revealing that children’s dietary diversity is achieved more in rural regions of Bangladesh [19]. The plausible reasons could be the easy access that rural people have to varied foods through different activities such as homegrown food production, livestock raising and fish-pond culture [33].
While exploring complementary feeding practices across child characteristics, no substantial gender differences were observed. However, the time trend analyses showed a more significant reduction in INTRO and MDD among boys than girls. It is also important to note that the achievement of an increasing trend in MDD, MMF, and MAD was lowest among children aged 6–8 months compared to older children (12–17 months and 18–23 months). Therefore, there is a need to focus on younger children, particularly when complementary feeding is initiated, and greater attention is required when designing feeding programs and policies. We found that children from the higher birth order achieved an increasing trend in INTRO, MDD, MMF, and MAD compared to the first birth order, implying that as mothers have more children, it becomes easier for them to achieve optimal feeding practices. Similar findings are also reported in other studies conducted in Ethiopia and India, where increased birth order is associated with the better achievement of INTRO, MDD and MAD [34,35]. These findings suggest that mothers become more experienced by nurturing their first child and perform better complementary feeding practices for subsequent children.
Although a significant improvement in feeding indicators in all education groups in 2017–2018 was observed, the current study findings revealed that higher maternal education was associated with the better achievement of INTRO, MDD, MMF, and MAD during 2007–2014. A similar trend was also observed for paternal education. These findings are corroborated by many other national studies across different regions such as Sri Lanka [36], India [37], Tanzania [38], and Nigeria [9]. A possible explanation of this relationship is that education helps mothers improve their knowledge on appropriate infant and young child feeding practices [39,40]. Thus, the universal coverage of primary education and the Bangladesh government’s initiative to provide increased access to higher education for girls resulted in better compliance with complementary feeding guidelines.
Maternal employment has an equivocal impact on the complementary feeding practice of young children due to women empowerment. In contrast, there is well-documented evidence suggesting that maternal employment leads to time constraints for mothers, who allocate less time for cooking diverse foods [41,42]. The current study revealed a greater reduction in INTRO and less improvement in MMF and MDD among working mothers compared to housewives. Therefore, it is pertinent to support working mothers with initiatives such as setting up breast-friendly workplaces or arranging childcare centres near their workplace. Our study findings also identified children of younger mothers (aged <20 years) who reported lower achievement in INTRO, MDD and MAD compared to older mothers (>30 years) as younger mothers may need additional support in achieving optimal feeding practices. Similar findings have been reported in the literature in nationally representative studies from Nepal and India [35,43]. Therefore, policymakers need to prioritize young mothers in delivering appropriate complementary feeding messages.
A decreasing trend was observed between 2007 and 2018 in the consumption of foods from different food groups such as legumes and nuts; dairy products; vitamin-A-rich fruits or vegetables; and other fruits or vegetables while consumption of grains/roots/tubers and meat/fish/egg was significantly increased during this time. These trends in consumption were consistent regardless of the age, gender, place of residence, wealth status of the children as well as the occupation and education of their parents. In contrast, trend analysis (2001–2014) from Nepal reported a reduction in the consumption of grains, roots, and tubers while an increased consumption in other five food groups among young children [32]. If compared with other South Asian countries, children from Bangladesh had higher consumption of meat and dairy products compared to those from Afghanistan, Nepal, and Pakistan, while consumption of vitamin-A-rich fruits and vegetables is similar to that of Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and Maldives [1]. It is notable to mention that there is a possibility of seasonal variation in fruits/vegetable consumption as BDHSs are carried out at different times of the year. It is also worthy to note that some BDHSs covered both summer and winter seasons, and the respondents were asked to report the consumption of both fruits and/or vegetables; thus, the seasonal variation may be minimized.
Overall, the study attempted to underpin different indicators of complementary feeding practices and consumption of various food groups in children aged 6–23 months in Bangladesh across different times (from 2007 to 2018) and how these indicators changed across different strata with time. Findings of the present study impart several suggestions such as a strong focus on young children, intensive training to young mothers on optimal feeding practices, supporting working mothers with setting up breastfeeding-friendly workplaces or childcare facilities at or near workplaces, and considering the divisional, regional (rural/urban), birth order, and parental education variability in complementary feeding practices while designing and implementing feeding programs and policies. Despite improvements in women’s education, increased per capita income, reduced child marriages, increased access to health care services, and antenatal visits, trends in complementary feeding practices in children aged 6–23 months have been declining in Bangladesh until 2014. An upward trend has been noted in 2017–2018 BDHS in some of the indicators and appropriate attention is needed to sustain the progress. More effort is required to ascertain how adherence to complementary feeding guidelines can be improved and future well-designed studies are warranted to elucidate the causality and factors associated with complementary feeding practices.
While the study’s main strength is the use of data from nationally representative surveys that employed well-established methods and standardised questionnaires to collect information, the study was also subjected to several limitations. Firstly, the BDHSs questionnaire measures complementary feeding indicators using 24 h recall data, which may lead to recall bias and social desirability bias by mothers, providing an under- or over-estimation of indicators. Secondly, in measuring association and predicting causality, a further well-designed longitudinal study considering potential confounding variables is required. However, the present study has generated valuable findings using large-scale nationally representative survey data that still have program implications. Moreover, it is also notable to mention that a previous publication presented the trends in feeding practices using the same survey for the period of 2004–2014. Yet, we have added the latest round of survey in our analysis (2017–2018).

5. Conclusions

The study reported a decreasing trend in almost all complementary feeding indicators and consumption from different food groups among children aged 6–23 months in Bangladesh from 2007 to 2014. However, the recent BDHS (2017–2018) noted improvements in all complementary feeding indicators. Policymakers and practitioners need to focus on an integrated, multicomponent, and multisectoral intervention to sustain this progress, and focus should be given to behaviour change communication targeting the most vulnerable populations.

Author Contributions

S.K.M. conceived and designed the study. M.B.H. carried out the data analysis. S.K.M., M.B.H., N.M.I., M.S., S.S. and A.A.S. contributed to writing the first draft of the manuscript. A.A. commented extensively on the draft of the manuscript to finalize it. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

BDHS data are publicly accessed data and we received them from MEASURE DHS on request. Ethical approval for these data was sought from the Government of Bangladesh.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Children: Improving Survival and Well-Being. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/children-reducing-mortality#:~:text=Malnourished%20children%2C%20particularly%20those%20with,under%2D5%20years%20of%20age (accessed on 3 January 2021).
  2. Martorell, R. Improved nutrition in the first 1000 days and adult human capital and health. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2017, 29, e22952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. World Health Organization. Infant and Young Child Feeding: Key Facts. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  4. World Health Organization. World Health Organization Complementary Feeding: Report of the Global Consultation, and Summary of Guiding Principles for Complementary Feeding of the Breastfed Child; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dagne, A.H.; Anteneh, K.T.; Badi, M.B.; Adhanu, H.H.; Ahunie, M.A.; Aynalem, G.L. Appropriate complementary feeding practice and associated factors among mothers having children aged 6–24 months in Debre Tabor Hospital, North West Ethiopia, 2016. BMC Res. Notes 2019, 12, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. World Health Organization. Indicators for Assessing Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices: Part 1: Definitions: Conclusions of a Consensus Meeting; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhutta, Z.A.; Ahmed, T.; Black, R.E.; Cousens, S.; Dewey, K.G.; Giugliani, E.R.J.; Haider, B.A.; Kirkwood, B.R.; Morris, S.S.; Sachdev, H.P.S.; et al. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet 2008, 371, 417–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Black, R.E.; Allen, L.H.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Caulfield, L.E.; De Onis, M.; Ezzati, M.; Mathers, C.; Rivera, J. Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition: Global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 2008, 371, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ogbo, F.A.; Page, A.; Idoko, J.; Claudio, F.; Agho, K.E. Trends in complementary feeding indicators in Nigeria, 2003–2013. BMJ Open 2015, 5, e008467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Issaka, A.I.; Agho, K.E.; Burns, P.; Page, A.; Dibley, M.J. Determinants of inadequate complementary feeding practices among children aged 6–23 months in Ghana. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Walson, J.L.; Berkley, J.A. The impact of malnutrition on childhood infections. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 31, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schaible, U.E.; Stefan, H.E. Malnutrition and infection: Complex mechanisms and global impacts. PLoS Med. 2007, 4, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Black, R.e.; Victora, C.G.; Walker, S.P.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Christian, P.; de Onis, M.; Ezzati, M.; Grantham-McGregor, S.; Katz, J.; Martorell, R.; et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013, 382, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Horton, S.; Steckel, R.H. Malnutrition: Global Economic Losses Attributable to Malnutrition 1900–2000 and Projections to 2050. In How Much Have Global Problems Cost the Earth? A Scorecard from 1900 to 2050; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 247–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT); Mitra and Associates. ICF International Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014; NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International: Dhaka, Bangladesh; Rockville, MD, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kabir, I.; Khanam, M.; Agho, K.E.; Mihrshahi, S.; Dibley, M.J.; Roy, S.K. Determinants of inappropriate complementary feeding practices in infant and young children in Bangladesh: Secondary data analysis of Demographic Health Survey 2007. Matern. Child Nutr. 2012, 8, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kabir, A.; Maitrot, M. Factors influencing feeding practices of extreme poor infants and young children in families of working mothers in Dhaka slums: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Senarath, U.; Agho, K.E.; Akram, D.-E.; Godakandage, S.S.; Hazir, T.; Jayawickrama, H.; Joshi, N.; Kabir, I.; Khanam, M.; Patel, A.; et al. Comparisons of complementary feeding indicators and associated factors in children aged 6–23 months across five South Asian countries. Matern. Child Nutr. 2012, 8, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Blackstone, S.; Sanghvi, T. A comparison of minimum dietary diversity in Bangladesh in 2011 and 2014. Matern. Child Nutr. 2018, 14, e12609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Health Population & Nutrition Sector Development Plan (HPNSDP); Planning Wing, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Second National Plan of Action for Nutrition (2016–2025); Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Institute of Public Health Nutrition (IPHN). Institute of Public Health Nutrition (IPHN) National Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding in Bangladesh; Institute of Public Health Nutrition (IPHN). Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ministry of Labour and Employment. Ministry of Labour and Employment National Labour Policy 2012; Ministry of Labour and Employment, Goverment of the Peoples’ Republic of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ministry of Law. Ministry of Law, J. a. P. A. The Breast-milk Substitutes, Infant Foods, Commercially Manufactured Complementary Foods and the Accessories Thereof (Regulation of Marketing) Act; Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of the Peoples’ Republic of Bangladesh: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  25. Na, M.; Aguayo, V.M.; Arimond, M.; Narayan, A.; Stewart, C.P. Stagnating trends in complementary feeding practices in Bangladesh: An analysis of national surveys from 2004–2014. Matern. Child Nutr. 2018, 14, e12624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT); Mitra and Associates; ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2011; NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International: Dhaka, Bangladesh; Calverton, MD, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  27. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT); Mitra and Associates; Macro International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2007; National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and Macro International: Dhaka, Bangladesh; Calverton, MD, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  28. World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  29. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004, 363, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Corcoran, C. Trend Tests for Binary Data; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  31. STATA. A Comparison of Different Tests for Trend. Available online: https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/test-for-trend/ (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  32. Na, M.; Aguayo, V.M.; Arimond, M.; Dahal, P.; Lamichhane, B.; Pokharel, R.; Chitekwe, S.; Stewart, C.P. Trends and predictors of appropriate complementary feeding practices in Nepal: An analysis of national household survey data collected between 2001 and 2014. Matern. Child Nutr. 2017, 14, e12564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Stewart, C.P.; Iannotti, L.; Dewey, K.G.; Michaelsen, K.F.; Onyango, A.W. Contextualising complementary feeding in a broader framework for stunting prevention. Matern. Child Nutr. 2013, 9, 27–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aemro, M.; Mesele, M.; Birhanu, Z.; Atenafu, A. Dietary Diversity and Meal Frequency Practices among Infant and Young Children Aged 6–23 Months in Ethiopia: A Secondary Analysis of Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey 2011. J. Nutr. Metab. 2013, 2013, 782931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Dhami, M.V.; Ogbo, F.A.; Osuagwu, U.L.; Agho, K.E. Prevalence and factors associated with complementary feeding practices among children aged 6–23 months in India: A regional analysis. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Senarath, U.; Godakandage, S.S.P.; Jayawickrama, H.; Siriwardena, I.; Dibley, M.J. Determinants of inappropriate complementary feeding practices in young children in Sri Lanka: Secondary data analysis of Demographic and Health Survey 2006–2007. Matern. Child Nutr. 2011, 8, 60–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Patel, A.; Pusdekar, Y.; Badhoniya, N.; Borkar, J.; Agho, K.E.; Dibley, M.J. Determinants of inappropriate complementary feeding practices in young children in India: Secondary analysis of National Family Health Survey 2005–2006. Matern. Child Nutr. 2012, 8, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ogbo, F.A.; Ogeleka, P.; Awosemo, A.O. Trends and determinants of complementary feeding practices in Tanzania, 2004–2016. Trop. Med. Health 2018, 46, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fein, S.B.; Labiner-Wolfe, J.; Scanlon, K.S.; Grummer-Strawn, L.M. Selected complementary feeding practices and their association with maternal education. Pediatrics 2008, 122 (Suppl. S2), S91–S97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Alderman, H.; Headey, D.D. How important is parental education for child nutrition? World Dev. 2017, 94, 448–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oddo, V.M.; Surkan, P.J.; Hurley, K.M.; Lowery, C.; De Ponce, S.; Jones-Smith, J. Pathways of the association between maternal employment and weight status among women and children: Qualitative findings from Guatemala. Matern. Child Nutr. 2018, 14, e12455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Komatsu, H.; Malapit, H.J.L.; Theis, S. Does women’s time in domestic work and agriculture affect women’s and children’s dietary diversity? Evidence from Bangladesh, Nepal, Cambodia, Ghana, and Mozambique. Food Policy 2018, 79, 256–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Khanal, V.; Sauer, K.; Zhao, Y. Determinants of complementary feeding practices among Nepalese children aged 6–23 months: Findings from demographic and health survey 2011. BMC Pediatr. 2013, 13, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 19 00550 g001 550
Figure 1. Study profile and participants enrolment.
Figure 1. Study profile and participants enrolment.
Ijerph 19 00550 g001
Ijerph 19 00550 g002 550
Figure 2. Trends of recommended infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
Figure 2. Trends of recommended infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
Ijerph 19 00550 g002
Ijerph 19 00550 g003 550
Figure 3. Trends of intake from different food groups among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
Figure 3. Trends of intake from different food groups among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
Ijerph 19 00550 g003
Table
Table 1. Trends of introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods (among 6–8 months aged children) and minimum dietary diversity (among 6–23 months aged children) in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
Table 1. Trends of introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods (among 6–8 months aged children) and minimum dietary diversity (among 6–23 months aged children) in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
CharacteristicsIntroduction of Solid, Semi-Solid or Soft Foods (%)Minimum Dietary Diversity (%)
2007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  42007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  4
Overall72.866.768.075.03.00.50541.424.327.356.737.1<0.001
Household characteristics
Administrative division
Barisal69.960.577.866.0−5.60.86835.923.129.654.752.60.002
Chittagong52.155.456.669.833.90.05635.420.822.457.261.7<0.001
Dhaka79.868.476.387.29.40.15642.325.428.454.328.4<0.001
Khulna79.190.176.680.11.30.67345.731.136.259.129.30.003
Rajshahi81.977.781.669.0−15.80.18051.930.927.357.09.80.834
Rangpur 1-74.859.769.3−7.30.493-23.428.766.2183.3<0.001
Sylhet66.450.647.359.4−10.50.46724.714.224.252.8114.2<0.001
Mymensingh 2---77.2-----52.5--
Place of residence
Urban81.876.068.680.5−1.60.80945.434.932.660.132.4<0.001
Rural70.664.667.772.83.00.54440.221.125.555.438.1<0.001
Household wealth status
Poorest71.052.860.163.6−10.50.58132.212.418.048.450.4<0.001
Poorer60.964.375.369.413.90.12932.016.822.354.871.6<0.001
Middle77.171.563.080.84.70.98845.225.528.456.424.70.001
Richer80.570.177.470.8−12.10.40845.433.231.854.620.40.006
Richest83.681.965.691.29.10.78354.237.037.370.129.5<0.001
Child characteristics
Age (month)
6–872.866.768.075.03.00.5059.06.45.819.8118.7<0.001
9–11------31.819.619.643.837.90.015
12–17------49.127.827.966.535.4<0.001
18–23------56.133.742.170.225.0<0.001
Gender
Male76.766.269.576.70.00.77442.424.626.057.535.7<0.001
Female69.567.366.372.84.80.65840.424.128.855.838.2<0.001
Birth order
182.374.466.976.4−7.20.20548.330.133.162.228.6<0.001
273.567.171.378.16.20.29041.625.124.854.029.7<0.001
≥365.160.865.868.95.90.46735.118.722.853.552.4<0.001
Maternal characteristics
Age at child’s birth (years)
<2073.663.662.771.5−2.90.65940.427.528.055.236.8<0.001
20–2974.069.169.673.1−1.20.90943.023.427.257.533.7<0.001
≥3068.561.769.786.125.70.02737.324.026.955.849.8<0.001
Level of education
0–463.054.962.563.10.20.82231.515.715.847.149.7<0.001
5–977.672.171.675.8−2.40.76047.525.528.156.719.5<0.001
10+95.283.071.185.3−10.40.30355.943.945.167.420.6<0.001
Occupation
Housewife70.265.568.876.08.20.16340.823.827.455.636.5<0.001
Working outside81.287.364.773.4−9.50.12743.431.727.258.334.5<0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2)
<18.578.956.863.273.5−6.80.20737.620.022.057.553.1<0.001
18.5–22.970.271.267.069.9−0.40.68840.224.627.154.435.3<0.001
23.0–24.066.558.471.581.923.20.04748.228.932.560.625.9<0.001
≥25.069.880.777.382.017.40.48363.834.034.558.4−8.50.053
Paternal characteristics
Level of education
0–469.261.062.269.0−0.20.79834.117.720.050.547.9<0.001
5–978.467.169.875.2−4.00.71543.425.528.455.227.2<0.001
10+72.385.277.583.114.90.41060.338.940.169.114.6<0.001
Occupation
Service holder/businessman73.877.970.572.2−2.20.51347.829.333.560.626.6<0.001
Agriculture-based worker78.662.773.668.5−12.80.32740.120.622.252.430.7<0.001
Non-agriculture-based worker73.663.370.180.89.80.03746.226.128.856.021.40.009
Others 563.559.448.268.47.80.70929.515.120.156.190.0<0.001
1 The administrative division Rangpur was created in 2010; 2 The administrative division Mymensingh was created in 2015; 3 “+” represents increase, “-” represents decrease between 2007 and 2018; 4 p-value for the Cochran–Armitage test of % change between 2007 and 2018; 5 Unemployed/student, retired, beggar, etc.
Table
Table 2. Trends of minimum meal frequency and minimum acceptable diet among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
Table 2. Trends of minimum meal frequency and minimum acceptable diet among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
CharacteristicsMinimum Meal Frequency (%)Minimum Acceptable Diet (%)
2007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  42007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  5
Overall79.962.061.878.71.40.93539.420.223.152.132.2<0.001
Household characteristics
Administrative division
Barisal72.361.260.074.7−3.30.68832.717.324.449.250.20.004
Chittagong65.752.254.675.4−14.80.00532.516.217.349.953.8<0.001
Dhaka83.062.960.379.14.70.02539.722.225.051.329.2<0.001
Khulna88.480.279.282.66.60.21144.728.031.654.521.90.022
Rajshahi91.362.570.873.419.6<0.00151.624.825.852.00.70.235
Rangpur 1-70.665.485.6−21.3<0.001-19.223.563.6230.7<0.001
Sylhet72.355.857.476.2−5.40.40723.811.317.947.198.1<0.001
Mymensingh 2---84.7-----49.1--
Place of residence
Urban83.265.465.980.73.00.93143.528.427.455.427.3<0.001
Rural78.960.960.378.01.10.84038.217.721.651.033.3<0.001
Household wealth status
Poorest83.652.953.775.69.60.09831.810.214.744.640.3<0.001
Poorer76.261.861.179.4−4.30.29331.713.817.550.559.3<0.001
Middle78.866.863.077.12.20.51843.222.423.250.015.70.030
Richer82.061.565.978.64.20.93542.927.328.150.918.40.006
Richest78.969.466.483.1−5.30.30549.330.133.165.532.9<0.001
Child characteristics
Age (month)
6–859.951.348.862.2−3.80.8049.06.35.819.3115.0<0.001
9–1173.857.252.370.34.70.28628.714.916.138.935.80.002
12–1783.862.767.284.1−0.40.06346.823.324.462.032.5<0.001
18–2389.770.268.085.05.20.03654.127.934.663.817.9<0.001
Gender
Male80.662.962.978.13.10.63439.920.422.751.829.9<0.001
Female79.161.060.679.4−0.40.72239.020.023.652.534.6<0.001
Birth order
182.564.664.282.60.00.76445.426.027.857.727.2<0.001
280.062.861.775.95.10.62140.019.020.649.122.7<0.001
≥377.559.058.977.5−0.10.83933.916.019.949.145.1<0.001
Maternal characteristics
Age at child’s birth (years)
<2082.462.761.577.95.40.07239.323.422.950.829.30.008
20–2979.462.262.578.31.30.91740.619.523.152.529.3<0.001
≥3078.060.560.080.4−3.10.11635.818.923.552.346.2<0.001
Level of education
0–477.554.655.275.13.10.01030.613.312.742.538.9<0.001
5–982.063.763.177.65.40.57444.620.823.752.016.50.015
10+81.075.569.485.6−5.60.10753.037.239.763.319.3<0.001
Occupation
Housewife78.961.460.876.33.30.07638.719.722.649.728.5<0.001
Working outside83.268.865.182.50.80.75442.126.724.855.933.0<0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2)
<18.583.861.261.678.86.00.00136.617.018.151.540.8<0.001
18.5–22.978.162.359.676.91.60.35638.320.222.849.930.00.008
23.0–24.073.460.165.082.5−12.4<0.00144.822.827.158.230.1<0.001
≥25.079.165.167.380.2−1.30.04858.028.730.753.3−8.00.036
Paternal characteristics
Level of education
0–479.856.755.378.51.60.07433.615.116.147.140.1<0.001
5–980.164.864.275.95.20.45341.421.524.349.218.9<0.001
10+79.769.770.084.1−5.50.03554.130.735.065.220.7<0.001
Occupation
Service holder/businessman78.966.463.179.3−0.60.84844.424.527.956.226.6<0.001
Agriculture-based worker83.162.357.278.35.80.00539.917.918.847.719.50.200
Non-agriculture-based worker78.260.866.979.5−1.70.00243.021.125.551.920.6<0.001
Others 579.254.354.675.05.40.00728.811.915.350.374.3<0.001
1 The administrative division Rangpur was created in 2010; 2 The administrative division Mymensingh was created in 2015; 3 “+” represents increase, “-”represents decrease between 2007 and 2018, respectively; 4 p-value for the Cochran–Armitage test of % change between 2007 to 2018, respectively; 5 Unemployed/student, retired, beggar, etc.
Table
Table 3. Trends of consuming grains, roots or tubers, and legumes or nuts among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
Table 3. Trends of consuming grains, roots or tubers, and legumes or nuts among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
CharacteristicsGrains, Roots or Tubers (%)Legumes or Nuts (%)
2007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  42007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  5
Overall84.678.878.287.43.20.02729.75.87.021.527.5<0.001
Household characteristics
Administrative division
Barisal82.177.879.984.22.60.52434.99.39.922.934.30.045
Chittagong76.073.475.488.616.7<0.00126.73.66.324.67.90.568
Dhaka86.176.475.084.7−1.60.28933.75.99.521.536.1<0.001
Khulna90.789.486.089.6−1.30.61323.810.26.617.128.20.116
Rajshahi92.583.885.486.1−7.00.01230.55.73.215.250.2<0.001
Rangpur 1-87.585.490.23.00.384-6.12.617.3−181.4<0.001
Sylhet77.072.774.788.815.30.01022.14.85.830.8−39.70.031
Mymensingh 2---89.5-----24.4--
Place of residence
Urban85.680.880.390.45.60.03239.17.610.024.637.1<0.001
Rural84.478.277.586.22.20.21226.95.36.020.424.1<0.001
Household wealth status
Poorest86.376.079.688.12.10.18824.63.54.319.620.60.144
Poorer80.278.975.588.510.30.01125.26.15.418.526.70.014
Middle86.280.076.583.9−2.60.32528.45.55.518.534.70.001
Richer85.278.780.184.3−1.10.98629.36.89.321.526.80.094
Richest85.881.179.092.07.30.04541.97.610.830.128.10.003
Child characteristics
Age (month)
6–856.047.939.756.00.00.4659.14.22.68.39.40.475
9–1186.679.476.789.83.70.39724.24.47.119.917.80.434
12–1791.484.287.293.32.00.03532.86.75.723.627.90.006
18–2393.090.588.894.71.80.45840.36.610.726.434.6<0.001
Gender
Male85.278.578.587.42.50.12928.55.46.821.026.10.002
Female84.079.177.987.33.90.11230.96.37.322.128.5<0.001
Birth order
185.179.681.087.22.40.22834.06.77.423.331.3<0.001
285.281.077.888.03.30.31830.76.46.820.433.60.003
≥383.876.375.086.93.70.76425.34.56.820.718.10.031
Maternal characteristics
Age at child’s birth (years)
<2084.077.779.984.60.70.76429.34.97.719.732.9<0.001
20–2984.579.178.587.43.50.06329.96.36.723.122.70.001
≥3086.079.075.389.43.90.17429.45.17.418.836.10.015
Level of education
0–482.774.471.685.12.90.67027.13.75.818.531.6<0.001
5–986.580.080.487.61.30.17129.66.87.621.826.50.037
10+85.486.182.789.34.50.21338.47.97.424.236.90.009
Occupation
Housewife83.278.577.586.23.50.19031.15.67.423.125.8<0.001
Working outside89.482.280.489.2−0.20.79625.07.95.919.123.40.070
Body mass index (kg/m2)
<18.587.178.476.486.9−0.20.17528.75.97.023.717.4<0.001
18.5–22.983.779.378.286.53.40.18828.95.46.220.429.6<0.001
23.0–24.076.876.578.988.114.70.00131.96.97.820.535.90.622
≥25.087.579.981.089.21.90.07138.76.69.323.140.30.608
Paternal characteristics
Level of education
0–485.177.376.286.31.40.94426.75.46.718.331.6<0.001
5–983.978.178.287.13.80.04730.74.96.922.327.40.057
10+84.683.882.389.55.90.05137.08.58.025.232.00.029
Occupation
Service holder/businessman84.281.377.885.61.70.80829.66.27.421.926.20.023
Agriculture-based worker85.179.879.586.51.70.90728.25.13.720.925.9<0.001
Non-agriculture-based worker86.977.479.988.82.20.00936.36.88.922.538.10.005
Others 581.874.972.987.16.50.65223.23.17.418.221.40.005
1 The administrative division Rangpur was created in 2010; 2 The administrative division Mymensingh was created in 2015; 3 “+” represents increase, “-“represents decrease between 2007 and 2018; 4 p-value for the Cochran–Armitage test of % change between 2007 and 2018; 5 Unemployed/student, retired, beggar, etc.
Table
Table 4. Trends of consuming dairy products and meat/fish/egg among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
Table 4. Trends of consuming dairy products and meat/fish/egg among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
CharacteristicsDairy Products (%)Meat/Fish/EGG (%)
2007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  42007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  4
Overall39.732.737.632.218.70.00146.953.055.067.243.2<0.001
Household characteristics
Administrative division
Barisal40.425.535.725.138.00.09043.051.457.665.953.30.001
Chittagong34.332.328.224.927.40.00242.949.552.967.657.7<0.001
Dhaka45.435.246.144.91.10.27045.349.953.163.640.3<0.001
Khulna43.832.235.125.541.80.00259.067.762.972.923.40.036
Rajshahi39.639.442.835.310.90.50653.760.654.568.627.80.002
Rangpur 1-31.835.527.713.10.317-59.465.877.330.1<0.001
Sylhet27.219.525.019.827.20.30036.538.749.162.371.0<0.001
Mymensingh 2---33.9-----61.2--
Place of residence
Urban47.344.944.335.125.9<0.00151.860.059.970.636.3<0.001
Rural37.429.035.331.216.60.04145.550.953.365.945.0<0.001
Household wealth status
Poorest23.114.720.919.714.80.84243.440.346.863.245.9<0.001
Poorer29.822.330.028.54.40.70236.050.549.265.181.1<0.001
Middle38.237.642.532.614.70.27545.955.757.468.449.0<0.001
Richer47.443.647.235.325.60.00554.161.060.067.224.20.001
Richest62.750.549.846.326.2<0.00157.260.462.572.326.3<0.001
Child characteristics
Age (month)
6–839.829.836.431.919.90.16312.920.019.330.6136.8<0.001
9–1143.732.734.632.226.20.01231.248.443.055.778.5<0.001
12–1741.732.538.033.220.60.04054.358.761.575.238.5<0.001
18–2336.034.739.631.512.70.29165.668.672.981.624.3<0.001
Gender
Male42.334.639.434.418.60.01048.954.153.666.936.9<0.001
Female37.130.835.729.819.60.01945.051.956.667.550.0<0.001
Birth order
143.437.943.735.618.00.04953.160.859.169.430.7<0.001
239.335.439.732.816.50.08944.554.154.667.852.3<0.001
≥336.726.127.627.824.10.00143.245.350.264.048.2<0.001
Maternal characteristics
Age at child’s birth (years)
<2036.932.842.029.918.90.37446.858.053.565.540.1<0.001
20–2940.432.138.132.519.50.01148.253.055.368.141.3<0.001
≥3040.934.631.133.518.20.03742.947.655.666.053.9<0.001
Level of education
0–427.518.625.223.514.60.28538.543.144.459.253.6<0.001
5–946.936.940.031.233.3<0.00151.956.257.369.534.1<0.001
10+58.355.952.244.523.7<0.00159.868.366.270.317.60.018
Occupation
Housewife40.132.237.633.416.70.03047.352.453.766.440.4<0.001
Working outside38.339.737.930.520.40.00445.560.859.168.350.0<0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2)
<18.531.326.731.429.16.90.86346.148.951.667.947.2<0.001
18.5–22.939.632.536.328.627.8<0.00145.955.154.265.943.8<0.001
23.0–24.058.639.239.334.840.6<0.00147.352.360.268.745.4<0.001
≥25.064.748.952.641.935.2<0.00159.157.260.268.215.30.011
Paternal characteristics
Level of education
0–428.121.029.023.715.80.43941.148.148.065.459.0<0.001
5–945.137.938.931.330.7<0.00147.954.056.365.236.1<0.001
10+65.652.752.747.427.7<0.00163.363.566.473.416.10.001
Occupation
Service holder/businessman50.840.844.640.819.80.01555.557.860.768.022.5<0.001
Agriculture-based worker31.827.232.923.027.70.08144.149.147.864.546.3<0.001
Non-agriculture-based worker42.733.738.932.424.00.00651.252.556.967.231.2<0.001
Others 532.623.129.027.715.00.26835.252.751.068.995.7<0.001
1 The administrative division Rangpur was created in 2010; 2 The administrative division Mymensingh was created in 2015; 3 “+” represents increase, “-” represents decrease between 2007 and 2018; 4 p-value for the Cochran–Armitage test of % change between 2007 and 2018; 5 Unemployed/student, retired, beggar, etc.
Table
Table 5. Trends in consumption of fruits and vegetables among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
Table 5. Trends in consumption of fruits and vegetables among 6–23 months aged children in Bangladesh, 2007–2018.
CharacteristicsVitamin-A Rich Fruits or Vegetables (%)Other Fruits or Vegetables (%)
2007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  42007201120142017–2018% Change 3p  4
Overall53.836.640.437.729.9<0.00146.417.619.726.642.7<0.001
Household characteristics
Administrative division
Barisal42.540.645.035.716.20.46539.610.615.523.540.60.026
Chittagong45.135.736.140.410.50.19742.211.517.830.926.80.005
Dhaka55.136.239.138.530.1<0.00143.117.919.124.343.5<0.001
Khulna56.835.853.424.556.9<0.00147.726.432.827.243.00.002
Rajshahi66.539.538.937.343.9<0.00161.224.315.023.361.9<0.001
Rangpur 1-38.939.647.0−21.10.067-19.120.831.7−65.60.001
Sylhet42.631.144.936.813.60.87533.717.322.522.433.70.067
Mymensingh 2---33.4-----27.6--
Place of residence
Urban50.940.238.239.622.30.00150.720.723.626.348.2<0.001
Rural54.635.641.237.032.2<0.00145.116.718.326.740.8<0.001
Household wealth status
Poorest50.929.237.935.530.20.00245.214.520.020.454.8<0.001
Poorer50.333.241.435.828.90.00138.617.417.024.736.1<0.001
Middle57.241.242.637.035.4<0.00150.314.317.030.040.4<0.001
Richer57.039.339.633.241.8<0.00147.420.821.726.444.3<0.001
Richest54.442.441.247.712.40.09051.821.722.632.237.8<0.001
Child characteristics
Age (month)
6–827.013.918.614.646.00.00121.85.05.612.244.1<0.001
9–1148.331.830.631.035.9<0.00139.815.220.319.551.0<0.001
12–1759.040.646.143.226.8<0.00152.118.517.731.439.7<0.001
18–2365.948.351.046.230.0<0.00157.625.528.731.944.6<0.001
Gender
Male53.036.938.740.124.3<0.00149.116.519.126.945.3<0.001
Female54.536.442.435.035.8<0.00143.818.820.426.339.9<0.001
Birth order
157.340.741.040.529.4<0.00148.719.220.030.637.2<0.001
251.235.339.735.031.6<0.00146.117.618.024.946.0<0.001
≥352.534.140.637.628.4<0.00144.716.321.324.046.3<0.001
Maternal characteristics
Age at child’s birth (years)
<2054.940.740.336.134.2<0.00144.017.916.627.338.0<0.001
20–2954.434.740.737.630.9<0.00148.816.719.625.747.2<0.001
≥3050.438.739.839.322.00.01241.920.423.928.432.20.004
Level of education
0–449.930.936.134.730.4<0.00139.815.316.021.745.5<0.001
5–956.736.840.234.738.7<0.00151.117.320.225.649.9<0.001
10+58.352.448.848.317.00.01454.325.524.734.636.3<0.001
Occupation
Housewife53.236.241.236.930.7<0.00143.417.419.225.940.3<0.001
Working outside55.742.037.939.030.0<0.00156.720.021.527.751.2<0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2)
<18.554.935.236.834.836.6<0.00147.815.014.320.956.3<0.001
18.5–22.951.735.740.538.026.6<0.00144.018.720.225.741.6<0.001
23.0–24.056.942.345.838.133.10.00343.218.826.829.332.20.334
≥25.061.041.043.039.535.20.00261.919.923.032.248.00.003
Paternal characteristics
Level of education
0–451.832.636.035.331.7<0.00143.817.118.423.546.4<0.001
5–952.235.342.735.132.7<0.00146.615.118.725.944.5<0.001
10+63.449.544.946.027.4<0.00154.323.824.532.939.5<0.001
Occupation
Service holder/businessman58.841.046.142.827.2<0.00146.617.621.628.538.9<0.001
Agriculture-based worker53.137.233.934.734.7<0.00148.518.016.525.048.4<0.001
Non-agriculture-based worker52.333.840.837.129.1<0.00148.917.621.126.446.0<0.001
Others 550.834.039.033.434.3<0.00140.717.017.924.140.9<0.001
1 The administrative division Rangpur was created in 2010; 2 The administrative division Mymensingh was created in 2015; 3 “+” represents increase, “-“represents decrease between 2007 and 2018; 4 p-value for the Cochran–Armitage test of % change between 2007 and 2018; 5 Unemployed/student, retired, beggar, etc.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mistry, S.K.; Hossain, M.B.; Irfan, N.M.; Saha, M.; Saberin, S.; Shamim, A.A.; Arora, A. Trends in Complementary Feeding Indicators and Intake from Specific Food Groups among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Bangladesh. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010550

AMA Style

Mistry SK, Hossain MB, Irfan NM, Saha M, Saberin S, Shamim AA, Arora A. Trends in Complementary Feeding Indicators and Intake from Specific Food Groups among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(1):550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010550

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mistry, Sabuj Kanti, Md Belal Hossain, Nafis Md Irfan, Manika Saha, Silvia Saberin, Abu Ahmed Shamim, and Amit Arora. 2022. "Trends in Complementary Feeding Indicators and Intake from Specific Food Groups among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Bangladesh" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 1: 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010550

APA Style

Mistry, S. K., Hossain, M. B., Irfan, N. M., Saha, M., Saberin, S., Shamim, A. A., & Arora, A. (2022). Trends in Complementary Feeding Indicators and Intake from Specific Food Groups among Children Aged 6–23 Months in Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010550

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop