PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study
Abstract
:1. Background
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Overview
2.1.1. Phase 1: Feasibility Test
Participants
- Knowledge surveys
- 2.
- Focus groups with users
Data Collection
- Knowledge surveys
- 2.
- Focus groups with users
Analysis
- Knowledge surveys
- 2.
- Focus groups with users
2.1.2. Phase 2: Patient Decision Aid Development
2.1.3. Phase 3: User-Testing
Participants
Data Collection
Analysis
2.1.4. Phase 4: Validation of the PDA
Participants
2.2. Data Collection
2.3. Statistical Analysis
2.4. Study Status
2.5. Ethics and Dissemination
3. Discussion
4. Challenges and Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Barry, M.J.; Edgman-Levitan, S. Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 780–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Stacey, D.; Légaré, F.; Col, N.F.; Bennett, C.L.; Barry, M.J.; Eden, K.B.; Holmes-Rovner, M.; Llewellyn-Thomas, H.; Lyddiatt, A.; Thomson, R.; et al. Decision-aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 4, CD001431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ferraro, S.; Bussetti, M.; Rizzardi, S.; Braga, F.; Panteghini, M. Verification of Harmonization of Serum Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Measurements and Implications for Medical Decisions. Clin. Chem. 2021, 67, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraro, S.; Bussetti, M.; Panteghini, M. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for early detection of prostate cancer: Managing the gap between clinical and laboratory practice. Clin. Chem. 2021, 67, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Briss, P.; Rimer, B.; Reilley, B.; Coates, R.C.; Lee, N.C.; Mullen, P.; Corso, P.; Hutchinson, A.B.; Hiatt, R.; Kerner, J.; et al. Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2004, 26, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilt, T.J.; Jones, K.M.; Barry, M.J.; Andriole, G.L.; Culkin, D.; Wheeler, T.; Aronson, W.J.; Brawer, M.K. Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffmann, T.C.; Del Mar, C. Patients’ expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: A systematic review. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015, 175, 274–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rychetnik, L.; Doust, J.; Thomas, R.; Gardiner, R.; Mackenzie, G.; Glasziou, P. A Community Jury on PSA screening: What do well-informed men want the government to do about prostate cancer screening—A qualitative analysis. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e004682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pignone, M. Weighing the benefits and downsides of prostate-specific antigen screening. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 1554–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Izquierdo, F.; Guerra-Rodríguez, M.; del Díaz Campo, P.; y Blasco-Amaro, J.A. Patient Decisión Aids Tool for Prostate Cancer. Madrid: Plan de Calidad para el SNS del MSSSI. Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Agencia Laín Entralgo; 2011. Available online: http://www.madrid.org/bvirtual/BVCM017405.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Riikonen, J.M.; Guyatt, G.H.; Kilpeläinen, T.P.; Craigie, S.; Agarwal, A.; Agoritsas, T.; Couban, R.; Dahm, P.; Järvinen, P.; Montori, V.; et al. Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening Choice: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern. Med. 2019, 179, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ankolekar, A. The Benefits and Challenges of Using Patient Decision Aids to Support Shared Decision Making in Health Care. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform. 2018, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferraro, S.; Bussetti, M.; Bassani, N.; Rossi, R.S.; Incarbone, G.P.; Bianchi, F.; Maggioni, M.; Runza, L.; Ceriotti, F.; Panteghini, M. Definition of Outcome-Based Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Thresholds for Advanced Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction. Cancers 2021, 13, 3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gravel, K.; Légaré, F.; Graham, I.D. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implement. Sci. 2006, 1, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rothberg, M.B.; Steele, J.R.; Wheeler, J.; Arora, A.; Priya, A.; Lindenauer, P.K. The relationship between time spent communicating and communication outcomes on a hospital medicine service. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2012, 27, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Joseph-Williams, N.; Lloyd, A.; Edwards, A.; Stobbart, L.; Tomson, D.; Macphail, S.; Dodd, C.; Brain, K.; Elwyn, G.; Thomson, R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: Lessons from the MAGIC programme. BMJ 2017, 357, j1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martínez-González, N.A.; Neuner-Jehle, S.; Plate, A.; Rosemann, T.; Senn, O. The effects of shared decision-making compared to usual care for prostate cancer screening decisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernal-Soriano, M.C.; Parker, L.A.; López-Garrigós, M.; Hernández-Aguado, I.; Gómez-Pérez, L.; Caballero-Romeu, J.P.; Pastor-Valero, M.; García, N.; Alfayate-Guerra, R.; Lumbreras, B. Do the Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Tests That Are Ordered in Clinical Practice Adhere to the Pertinent Guidelines? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Field, B.; Booth, A.; Ilott, I.; Gerrish, K. Using the Knowledge to Action Framework in practice: A citation analysis and systematic review. Implement. Sci. 2014, 9, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kappen, S.; Jürgens, V.; Freitag, M.H.; Winter, A. Early detection of prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing: An empirical evaluation among general practitioners and urologists. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 3079–3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Degner, L.F.; Sloan, J.A.; Venkatesh, P. The Control Preferences Scale. Can. J. Nurs. Res. 1997, 29, 21–43. [Google Scholar]
- Stacey, D.; Volk, R.J.; IPDAS Evidence Update Leads (Hilary Bekker, Karina Dahl Steffensen, Tammy, C. Hoffmann, Kirsten McCaffery, Rachel Thompson, Richard Thomson, Lyndal Trevena, Trudy van der Weijden, and Holly Witteman). The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: Evidence Update 2.0. Med. Decis. Mak. 2021, 41, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mottet, N.; van den Bergh, R.C.N.; Briers, E.; Van den Broeck, T.; Cumberbatch, M.G.; De Santis, M.; Fanti, S.; Fossati, N.; Gandaglia, G.; Gillessen, S.; et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur. Urol. 2021, 79, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elwyn, G.; O’Connor, A.; Stacey, D.; Volk, R.; Edwards, A.; Coulter, A.; Thomson, R.; Barratt, A.; Barry, M.; Bernstein, S.; et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: Online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006, 333, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kushniruk, A.W.; Patel, V.L. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J. Biomed. Inf. 2004, 37, 56–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rees, C.; Abed, R.; Sheard, C. Development of a reliable and valid questionnaire to test the prostate cancer knowledge of men with the disease. Patient Educ. Couns. 2003, 51, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Connor, A. User Manual—Decisional Conflict Scale 1993; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2010; Available online: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_manuals/UM_Decisional_Conflict.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2022).
- Holmes-Rovner, M.; Kroll, J.; Schmitt, N.; Rovner, D.R.; Breer, M.L.; Rothert, M.L.; Padonu, G.; Talarczyk, G. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: The Satisfaction With Decision Scale. Med. Decis. Mak. 1996, 16, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, A.; Chung, K.C.; Keir, C.; Patrick, D.L. Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: A systematic review. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lumbreras, B.; Parker, L.A.; Alonso-Coello, P.; Mira-Bernabeu, J.; Gómez-Pérez, L.; Caballero-Romeu, J.P.; Pertusa-Martínez, S.; Cebrián-Cuenca, A.; Moral-Peláez, I.; López-Garrigós, M.; et al. PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158904
Lumbreras B, Parker LA, Alonso-Coello P, Mira-Bernabeu J, Gómez-Pérez L, Caballero-Romeu JP, Pertusa-Martínez S, Cebrián-Cuenca A, Moral-Peláez I, López-Garrigós M, et al. PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(15):8904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158904
Chicago/Turabian StyleLumbreras, Blanca, Lucy Anne Parker, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Javier Mira-Bernabeu, Luis Gómez-Pérez, Juan Pablo Caballero-Romeu, Salvador Pertusa-Martínez, Ana Cebrián-Cuenca, Irene Moral-Peláez, Maite López-Garrigós, and et al. 2022. "PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 15: 8904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158904