Next Article in Journal
Sex Differences in Traditional School Bullying Perpetration and Victimization among Adolescents: A Chain-Mediating Effect
Next Article in Special Issue
Exclusive Breastfeeding and Childhood Morbidity: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Parent-Focused Psychotherapy for the Preventive Management of Chronicity in Anorexia Nervosa: A Case Series
Previous Article in Special Issue
Food Parenting Practices and Feeding Styles and Their Relations with Weight Status in Children in Latin America and the Caribbean
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Physical Contact on Preterm Infants’ Vital Sign Response to Live Music Therapy

by
Susann Kobus
1,2,*,
Marlis Diezel
1,2,
Monia Vanessa Dewan
1,2,
Britta Huening
1,2,
Anne-Kathrin Dathe
1,2,3,
Ursula Felderhoff-Mueser
1,2 and
Nora Bruns
1,2
1
Department of Paediatrics I, University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
2
Centre for Translational Neuro- and Behavioural Sciences (C-TNBS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
3
Department of Health and Nursing, Occupational Therapy, Ernst-Abbe-University of Applied Sciences Jena, 07745 Jena, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(15), 9524; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159524
Submission received: 22 June 2022 / Revised: 28 July 2022 / Accepted: 1 August 2022 / Published: 3 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2nd Edition: Advances in Maternal and Child Healthcare)

Abstract

:
Evidence that music therapy stabilises vital parameters in preterm infants is growing, but the optimal setting for therapy is still under investigation. Our study aimed to quantify the effect of physical contact during live music therapy in preterm infants born < 32 weeks’ gestational age (GA) on post-therapy vital sign values. Live music therapy was delivered twice-weekly until discharge from hospital to 40 stable infants < 32 weeks’ GA. Baseline and post-therapy heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation and physical contact during each session were recorded. 159 sessions were performed with, and 444 sessions without, physical contact. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses based on directed acyclic graphs were performed. The mean GA was 28.6 ± 2.6 weeks, and 26 (65%) infants were male. Mean absolute values for heart and respiratory rates lowered during music therapy regardless of physical contact. The mean post-therapy SaO2 was higher compared to baseline values regardless of physical contact (mean differences −8.6 beats/min; −13.3 breaths/min and +2.0%). There were no clinically relevant changes in vital sign responses between therapy sessions, with or without physical contact, or adjusted post-therapy values for any of the studied vital signs. Physical contact caused better baseline and post-therapy vital sign values but did not enhance the vital sign response to music therapy. Thus, the effect of music therapy on preterm infants’ vital signs is independent of physical contact and parents’ presence during music therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit.

1. Introduction

Music therapy is a promising non-medical intervention to reduce stress and pain in preterm and sick newborn infants and children [1,2,3,4]. Preterm infants are repetitively exposed to stressful and painful stimuli during their initial hospital stay. Very preterm birth occurs during a phase of rapid brain development, putting these infants at risk for acquired brain injury from external factors such as stress and physiological instability [5,6]. At the same time, the preterm brain displays great neuroplasticity to compensate possible injury.
Interventions to attenuate stress and stabilize the infant during this crucial phase hold promise to either prevent or attenuate damage to the developing brain. Research investigating long-term effects of music therapy is only evolving [7,8] but vital sign responses to music therapy as a surrogate parameter of short term-stabilisation has been well-studied [9,10,11]. Currently, the optimal setting in which music therapy should be applied is under investigation [12,13,14,15,16].
For example, preterm infants with severe brain injury displayed physiological and behavioural instability during the singing of their mother and kangaroo care [17]. In stable infants with normal hearing, additional live music therapy during kangaroo care to enhance stress reduction showed beneficial effects on heart rate, oxygen saturation [18,19,20,21], length of hospital stay, and re-hospitalisation rate compared to kangaroo care alone [22]. The applied study designs included cross-over designs [19], randomized controlled trials [17,18,21,22], and analysis of a complete cohort [20], typically comparing baseline with post-therapy values.
Physical contact, often delivered as kangaroo care, has long been known to provide various benefits for preterm infants including physiological and behavioural stabilisation and pain relief [23,24,25,26,27]. It attenuates stress in parents, improves parental self-efficacy [28] and reduces pain in routine procedures or examinations in preterm infants [29]. However, the effect of physical contact by touching or holding the infant on infants’ responses to music therapy remains largely unknown.
The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of physical contact on a parent during live-performed music therapy by a qualified music therapist, compared to music therapy alone, on vital sign responses in stable preterm infants born < 32 weeks’ gestational age.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

This study analysed a subset of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial (Clinical trial number DRKS00025753) that recruited 80 infants for 1:1 randomization to either routine care or routine care plus music therapy. Participating infants were randomly allocated to the intervention group or to the non-intervention group. To investigate the effects of physical contact on vital sign response during music therapy, we analysed protocols of music therapy sessions performed in the intervention group.

2.2. Eligibility and Recruitment

Eligible for participation were preterm infants born between October 2018 and May 2021 at the University Hospital Essen < 32 weeks gestational age.
Exclusion criteria were congenital hearing disorders, intraventricular haemorrhage °III according to Papile, periventricular infarction, cerebral malformations, and underlying neurodevelopmental diseases that were known at the time of screening for eligibility for the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the parent/guardian within the first week of life at a minimum age of 72 h for the main study and all associated analyses. The local ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen (18-8035-BO) approved the study. The registration number for clinical research is DRKS00025753.

2.3. Intervention

Clinically stable patients received live music therapy from the second week of life twice per week until their hospital discharge [12,30]. The music therapist coordinated the timing of the individual therapy sessions with the nursing staff and parents in compliance with clinical routine. During each session, the infant remained in the same position as it had been before the beginning of the session, either in the incubator, heated cot or parents’ arms. Physical contact was considered as the infant being held by one parent in their arms, on their chest (including kangaroo care), legs or shoulders or if the parent was touching their child with the hand.
During each session the music therapist sang individually improvised melodies and/or used the instrument sansula. In the first few sessions, improvised singing of humming tones or tone sequences was applied and guided by the infant’s breathing and reactions. The sansula has its origins in the African kalimba, which is surrounded by an eardrum. It creates an enveloping and long-lasting soft sound.
Music therapy was planned to last 20 to 30 min and carried out at a low volume for each individual infant in order to not disturb the surrounding patients. Vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) were recorded from the patient monitor directly before and at the end of each music therapy session. The presence of parents, and physical contact with the parent during the session were recorded. Clinical data were obtained from the patient history.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Categorical variables are summarized as counts and relative frequencies. Continuous variables were summarised as means with 95% confidence intervals or standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, and as median with interquartile range if data were skewed. A two-sided t-test was performed to assess vital sign differences between sessions with and without physical contact.
Multivariable analyses were carried out using generalized linear models with the post-therapy values for heart and respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation as outcomes. We used causal diagrams derived from the theory of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) [31] to define minimally sufficient adjustment sets for each analysis, as recommended for causal inference studies in paediatric and critical care research [32,33]. Based on these DAGs (see Supplementary Figures S1–S3), we adjusted our analyses by corrected gestational age to estimate the total effect of physical contact on vital signs during music therapy. Critical illness was considered as adjusted per restriction (=study design) because music therapy was performed only in stable infants. Additionally, we adjusted for repeated measurement within individuals. Because it was not required to adjust for baseline vital sign values according to the DAGs, even though this seems natural, we conducted a sensitivity analysis including pre-therapy vital sign values.
All calculations were carried out using SAS Enterprise Guide 8.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Patients

During the study period, 144 infants < 32 weeks’ gestational age received treatment at the University Hospital Essen. Eighty infants were included, 40 in the intervention and 40 in the non-intervention group, which was not further analysed in this study. Sixty-four infants were not recruited (Figure 1). Reasons for non-recruitment (Figure 1) were external referrals (n = 3 [5%]), death before recruitment (n = 11 [17%]), transfer to an external centre (n = 4 [6%]), cerebral haemorrhage °III or higher (n = 3 [5%]), critical maternal illness/death (n = 2 [3%]), insufficient German language skills to understand the study objectives (n = 3 [5%]), hospital stay during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (music therapy was not permitted during that time) (n = 6 [9%]), and refusal (n = 32 [50%]). Non-recruited infants had a mean gestational age of 28 + 3 weeks (range 22 + 4 to 31 + 6 weeks) and a mean birthweight of 1151 g (range 210 to 2030 g). Included infants were older and had lower birth weights (Table 1).

3.2. Music Therapy Sessions

A total of 604 music therapy sessions were performed between 23 + 6 and 43 + 0 weeks corrected gestational age with a mean duration of 24.2 ± 8.6 min (range 10 to 55 min). One hundred fifty-nine music therapy interventions were conducted with, and 444 interventions without, physical contact with the parents. Each infant received an average of 14 music therapy sessions, of which six were performed with physical contact (range 0 to 19 sessions) and eight without (range 1 to 23 sessions).

3.3. Vital Sign Response

Heart and respiratory rates after therapy were lower compared to baseline, while oxygen saturation increased (Table 2, Supplementary Table S1). Infants with physical contact during the music therapy session had lower baseline values for heart and respiratory rates and higher baseline oxygen saturations than infants without physical contact. The mean response to music therapy was slightly lower in infants with physical contact compared to infants without physical contact, but nonetheless resulted in better post-therapy values (Table 2, Figure 2). Alike, relative vital sign responses were lower in infants with physical contact compared to no physical contact (Figure 3).

3.4. Multivariable Analyses

After adjusting for confounders, there were no clinically relevant differences in vital sign responses between sessions with and without physical contact in the main analyses and the sensitivity analyses (Table 3). The adjusted values yielded no clinically relevant difference from unadjusted values (Table 2 and Table 3). Detailed model information of the main and sensitivity analyses is presented in Supplementary Table S2.

4. Discussion

This study showed improved vital signs in preterm infants after music therapy regardless of physical contact during the intervention. Baseline values of heart and respiratory rates in our study were lower in infants exposed to physical contact with their parents, resulting in lower absolute post-therapy values. For oxygen saturation, these findings were inverted. After adjustment for confounders, post-therapy vital sign values did not differ between groups.
Only a few studies compared the effect of kangaroo care or physical contact with and without music therapy [20], and music therapy with and without kangaroo care [21], on preterm infants’ vital signs. Combining music therapy with kangaroo care showed stronger declines of heart and respiratory rates and an increase of oxygen saturation compared to kangaroo care alone [21]. Another study with music therapy by a qualified music therapist who sang and played improvised melodies on an ocean disc and guitar showed decreased heart rates and increased oxygen saturations in infants who received music therapy during kangaroo care, while infants receiving music therapy alone showed no vital sign responses [20]. Matching the results of these two studies, combining kangaroo care and lullaby music showed stronger effects on heart rate and oxygen saturation compared to an only-lullaby music group and a control group receiving kangaroo care [34]. In contrast, a recent study found equal effects of music therapy on vital sign responses in infants exposed to physical contact with their parents and those who did not [35]. Our results align with these findings with respect to the relative vital sign responses and the adjusted post-therapy values. Regarding absolute vital sign values, the better baseline values in infants with physical contact before the session resulted in even further stabilisation compared to infants without physical contact. The co-conditioning for regulating heart and respiratory rates, created during gestation, continued after birth during the physical contact, and increased the emotional connection and autonomic co-regulation between mother and infant [36].
According to our findings, physical contact affected baseline vital signs but did not impact the changes induced by music therapy. However, physical contact during music therapy may provide benefits that are not reflected by changes of vital signs, but by physiological stability and possibly neurological functioning. For example, a study on family-centred music therapy found higher weight gain, shorter length of stay, and lower re-hospitalisation rates in preterm infants who received music therapy during kangaroo care compared to no music therapy [22]. Whether combining music therapy with non-medical interventions like non-nutritive sucking, swaddling, positioning, facilitated tucking, kangaroo care or skin-to-skin contact or multi-sensorial stimulation, the practice provides benefits that last beyond short- or mid-term stabilisation and deserves further investigation.
Our study has several limitations. No data on changes in oxygen supplementation during therapy sessions were recorded. Further, music therapy sessions had different durations, were carried out at different times of the day, and with time-lapses from feeding, possibly leading to variations of vital sign responses.
In summary, this study provides evidence that physical contact during music therapy is safe, feasible, and produces similar vital sign responses compared to music therapy without physical contact. Until further investigations have elucidated whether combining physical contact and music therapy provide long-term benefits compared to music therapy alone, music therapy should be integrated into clinical routine, even if parents are absent during the session.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19159524/s1. Figure S1: Directed acyclic graph on the total effect of physical contact during music therapy on the heart rate; Figure S2: Directed acyclic graph on the total effect of physical contact during music therapy on the respiratory rate; Figure S3: Directed acyclic graph on the total effect of physical contact during music therapy on the oxygen saturation; Table S1: Vital sign values in 40 stable preterm infants before and after 604 music therapy sessions with and without physical contact; Table S2: Model information of the multivariable analyses.

Author Contributions

Study design: N.B., M.V.D., U.F.-M. and S.K.; delivery of music therapy: S.K. and M.D.; statistical analyses: N.B. and A.-K.D., figures: N.B.; drafting of manuscript: S.K., critical revision: N.B., B.H., M.V.D., U.F.-M. and A.-K.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study received financial support from the Stiftung Universitaetsmedizin Essen. M.V.D. and N.B. received funding from the Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen (IFORES).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen (18-8035-BO). Clinical trial registration number: DRKS00025753.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians for the main study and all associated analyses before inclusion into the study.

Data Availability Statement

Original data will be made available to any qualified researcher upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank all families for their participation in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ting, B.; Tsai, C.-L.; Hsu, W.-T.; Shen, M.-L.; Tseng, P.-T.; Chen, D.T.-L.; Su, K.-P.; Jingling, L. Music Intervention for Pain Control in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Costa, V.S.; Bündchen, D.C.; Sousa, H.; Bündchen Pires, L.; Felipetti, F.A. Clinical benefits of music-based interventions on preterm infants’ health: A systematic review of randomised trials. Acta Paediatr. 2022, 111, 478–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mikulis, N.; Inder, T.E.; Erdei, C. Utilising recorded music to reduce stress and enhance infant neurodevelopment in neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr. 2021, 110, 2921–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. da Silva Santa, I.N.; Schveitzer, M.C.; Dos Santos, M.L.B.M.; Ghelman, R.; Filho, V.O. Music Interventions in Pediatric Oncology: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement. Ther. Med. 2021, 59, 102725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Herz, J.; Bendix, I.; Felderhoff-Mueser, U. Peripheral immune cells and perinatal brain injury: A double-edged sword? Pediatr. Res. 2022, 91, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guillot, M.; Miller, S.P. The dimensions of white matter injury in preterm neonates. Semin. Perinatol. 2021, 45, 151469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haslbeck, F.B.; Bucher, H.U.; Bassler, D.; Hagmann, C.; Natalucci, G. Creative Music Therapy and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Pre-term Infants at 2 Years: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 660393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Haslbeck, F.B.; Jakab, A.; Held, U.; Bassler, D.; Buchera, H.-U.; Hagmann, C. Creative music therapy to promote brain function and brain structure in preterm infants: A randomized controlled pilot study. NeuroImage Clin. 2020, 25, 102171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hartling, L.; Shaik, M.S.; Tjosvold, L.; Leicht, R.; Liang, Y.; Kumar, M. Music for medical indications in the neonatal period: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009, 94, F349–F354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bieleninik, L.; Ghetti, C.; Gold, C. Music Therapy for Preterm Infants and Their Parents: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20160971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Loewy, J.; Stewart, K.; Dassler, A.-M.; Telsey, A.; Homel, P. The effects of music therapy on vital signs, feeding, and sleep in premature infants. Pediatrics 2013, 131, 902–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kobus, S.; Diezel, M.; Dewan, M.V.; Huening, B.; Dathe, A.-K.; Felderhoff-Mueser, U.; Bruns, N. Music Therapy Is Effective during Sleep in Preterm Infants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cevasco-Trotter, A.M.; Evans, E.H.; Baird-Galloway, A.C. There is a lack of contraindications for live music listening for preterm and term infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. J. Perinatol. 2022; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Stegemann, T.; Geretsegger, M.; Phan Quoc, E.; Riedl, H.; Smetana, M. Music Therapy and Other Music-Based Interventions in Pediatric Health Care: An Overview. Medicines 2019, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Burić, K. Receptive Music therapy as an Additional Intervention in the Rehabilitation Program of Cardiovascular Patients. Cardiol. Croat. 2021, 16, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lynch, K.A.; Emard, N.; Liou, K.T.; Popkin, K.; Borten, M.; Nwodim, O.; Atkinson, T.M.; Mao, J.J. Patient Perspectives on Active vs. Passive Music Therapy for Cancer in the Inpatient Setting: A Qualitative Analysis. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2021, 62, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Epstein, S.; Bauer, S.; Levkovitz Stern, O.; Litmanovitz, I.; Elefant, C.; Yakobson, D.; Arnon, S. Preterm infants with severe brain injury demonstrate unstable physiological responses during maternal singing with music therapy: A randomized controlled study. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2021, 180, 1403–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schlez, A.; Litmanovitz, I.; Bauer, S.; Dolfin, T.; Regev, R.; Arnon, S. Combining kangaroo care and live harp music therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit setting. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2011, 13, 354–358. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Meder, U.; Tarjanyi, E.; Kovacs, K.; Szakmar, E.; Cseko, A.J.; Hazay, T.; Belteki, G.; Szabo, M.; Jermendy, A. Cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants during maternal singing combined with skin-to-skin care. Pediatr. Res. 2021, 90, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Span, L.C.; van Dokkum, N.H.; Ravensbergen, A.-G.; Bos, A.F.; Jaschke, A.C. Combining Kangaroo Care and Live-Performed Music Therapy: Effects on Physiological Stability and Neurological Functioning in Extremely and Very Preterm Infants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Teckenberg-Jansson, P.; Huotilainen, M.; Pölkki, T.; Lipsanen, J.; Järvenpää, A.-L. Rapid effects of neonatal music therapy combined with kangaroo care on prematurely-born infants. Nord. J. Music Ther. 2011, 20, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ettenberger, M.; Cárdenas, C.R.; Parker, M.; Odell-Miller, H. Family-centred music therapy with preterm infants and their parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Colombia—A mixed-methods study. Nord. J. Music Ther. 2016, 26, 207–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bera, A.; Ghosh, J.; Singh, A.K.; Hazra, A.; Som, T.; Munian, D. Effect of Kangaroo Mother Care on Vital Physiological Parameters of The Low Birth Weight Newborn. Indian J. Community Med. 2014, 39, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cong, X.; Ludington-Hoe, S.M.; McCain, G.; Fu, P. Kangaroo Care modifies preterm infant heart rate variability in response to heel stick pain: Pilot study. Early Hum. Dev. 2009, 85, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Özdel, D.; Sarı, H.Y. Effects of the prone position and kangaroo care on gastric residual volume, vital signs and comfort in preterm infants. Jpn. J. Nurs. Sci. 2020, 17, e12287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Harrison, L.L.; Leeper, J.D.; Yoon, M. Effects of early parent touch on preterm infants’ heart rates and arterial oxygen saturation levels. J. Adv. Nurs. 1990, 15, 877–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bijari, B.B.; Iranmanesh, S.; Eshghi, F.; Baneshi, M.R. Gentle Human Touch and Yakson: The Effect on Preterm’s Behavioral Reactions. ISRN Nurs. 2012, 2012, 750363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Campbell-Yeo, M.L.; Disher, T.C.; Benoit, B.L.; Johnston, C.C. Understanding kangaroo care and its benefits to preterm infants. Pediatr. Health Med. Ther. 2015, 6, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hunny, S.; Manisha, R. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) for procedural pain in infants. A meta-analysis from the current evidence of randomized control trials and cross-over trials. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2022, 11, 1250–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kobus, S.; Diezel, M.; Huening, B.; Dewan, M.V.; Felderhoff-Mueser, U.; Bruns, N. Parents’ Perception of Family-Centered Music Therapy with Stable Preterm Infants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pearl, J. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 1995, 82, 669–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lederer, D.J.; Bell, S.C.; Branson, R.D.; Chalmers, J.D.; Marshall, R.; Maslove, D.M.; Ost, D.E.; Punjabi, N.M.; Schatz, M.; Smyth, A.R.; et al. Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2019, 16, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Williams, T.C.; Bach, C.C.; Matthiesen, N.B.; Henriksen, T.B.; Gagliardi, L. Directed acyclic graphs: A tool for causal studies in paediatrics. Pediatr. Res. 2018, 84, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yusuf, N.; Hadisaputro, S.; Runjati, R.; Suwondo, A.; Mashoedi, I.D.; Supriyana, S. The effectiveness of combination of kangaroo mother care method and lullaby music therapy on vital sign change in infants with low birth weight. Belitung Nurs. J. 2017, 3, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lai, H.-L.; Chen, C.-J.; Peng, T.-C.; Chang, F.-M.; Hsieh, M.-L.; Huang, H.-Y.; Chang, S.-C. Randomized controlled trial of music during kangaroo care on maternal state anxiety and preterm infants’ responses. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2006, 43, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ludwig, R.J.; Welch, M.G. Darwin’s Other Dilemmas and the Theoretical Roots of Emotional Connection. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Flow chart of the included and excluded participants of the study.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the included and excluded participants of the study.
Ijerph 19 09524 g001
Figure 2. Baseline and post-therapy vital sign values in 40 stable preterm infants receiving music therapy with and without physical contact at the University Hospital Essen between October 2018 and July 2021. Blue = no physical contact (159 sessions); red = with physical contact (444 sessions); error bars = 95 % confidence intervals. (A) Heart rate. (B) Respiratory rate. (C) Oxygen saturation.
Figure 2. Baseline and post-therapy vital sign values in 40 stable preterm infants receiving music therapy with and without physical contact at the University Hospital Essen between October 2018 and July 2021. Blue = no physical contact (159 sessions); red = with physical contact (444 sessions); error bars = 95 % confidence intervals. (A) Heart rate. (B) Respiratory rate. (C) Oxygen saturation.
Ijerph 19 09524 g002
Figure 3. Relative change of vital signs during music therapy sessions in 40 stable preterm infants receiving music therapy with (159 sessions) and without (444 sessions) physical contact at the University Hospital Essen between October 2018 and July 2021. A negative value indicates a lower, and a positive value a higher, post-therapy value compared to the baseline value. + signs = individual measurements; blue line = median; red diamond = mean. (A) Heart rate. (B) Respiratory rate. (C) Oxygen saturation.
Figure 3. Relative change of vital signs during music therapy sessions in 40 stable preterm infants receiving music therapy with (159 sessions) and without (444 sessions) physical contact at the University Hospital Essen between October 2018 and July 2021. A negative value indicates a lower, and a positive value a higher, post-therapy value compared to the baseline value. + signs = individual measurements; blue line = median; red diamond = mean. (A) Heart rate. (B) Respiratory rate. (C) Oxygen saturation.
Ijerph 19 09524 g003
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of participants.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of participants.
Therapy Group Receiving Music Therapy
(n = 40)
Non-Intervention Group Not Analysed in This Study
(n = 40) **
Male [n (%)]26 (65%)23 (58%)
GA (weeks) [mean ± SD (range)]28.6 ± 2.6 (23.9–31.7)28.8 ± 2.5 (22.9–31.9)
Birth weight (g) [mean ± SD (range)]1136 ± 404 (340–1790)1147 ± 396 (360–2120)
Died [n (%)]3 (8%)2 (5%)
Mean age at death (days)2278
APGAR score at 10 min [median (IQR)]9 (8–9)9 (8–9)
Early-onset sepsis [n (%)]7 (18%)6 (15%)
Late-onset sepsis [n (%)]10 (25%)11 (28%)
Bronchopulmonary dypslasia (mild) [n (%)]2 (5%)2 (5%)
Bronchopulmonary dypslasia (severe) [n (%)]2 (5%)2 (5%)
Intraventricular haemorrhage °I–II [n (%)]9 (23%)6 (15%)
Intraventricular haemorrhage °III [n (%)] *2 (5%)1 (3%)
Necrotizing enterocolitis [n (%)]1 (3%)2 (5%)
Patent ductus arteriosus [n (%)]17 (43%)16 (40%)
  Medical therapy [n (%)]16 (40%)16 (40%)
  Surgical therapy [n (%)]1 (3%)0
Antibiotic treatment (days) [median (IQR)]5 (0–15)4 (0–6)
APGAR = Appearance, Pulse, grimace, Activity, and Respiration; IQR = interquartile range; SD = standard deviation; * Grade III° haemorrhage developed after inclusion into the study. ** The non-intervention group is presented for transparency to show that randomization produced demographically equal groups.
Table 2. Unadjusted heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation before and after music therapy sessions with and without physical contact to parents.
Table 2. Unadjusted heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation before and after music therapy sessions with and without physical contact to parents.
Vital SignSessions
(n)
Baseline
Mean (95% CI)
After Therapy
Mean (95% CI)
Difference
Mean (95% CI)
Physical contactHeart rate (beats/min)159158.7 (156.4–160.9)151.3 (148.6–153.9)−7.4 (−9.8–(−5.1))
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)15953.5 (51.0–55.9)41.7 (39.6–43.8)−11.8 (−14.7–(−8.8))
SaO2 (%)15895.7 (95.0–96.3)97.3 (96.8–97.9)1.7 (1.0–2.3)
No physical contactHeart rate (beats/min)444162.2 (160.9–163.5)153.2 (151.6–154.7)−9.0 (−10.3–(−7.7))
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)434 *57.4 (55.9–59.0)43.6 (42.1–45.0)−13.9 (−15.8–(−11.9))
SaO2 (%)44694.7 (94.3–95.2)96.9 (96.5–97.2)2.2 (1.8–2.5)
* Missing values for respiratory rates originate from infants on full mechanical respiratory support during the session.
Table 3. Adjusted heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation before and after music therapy sessions with and without physical contact to parents.
Table 3. Adjusted heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation before and after music therapy sessions with and without physical contact to parents.
Vital SignPhysical ContactSessions
(n)
Adjusted Value after Therapy
Mean (95% CI) a
Sensitivity Analysis
Mean (95% CI)
Heart rate (beats/min)yes159152.8 (149.2–156.4)153.4 (150.7–156.1)
no444151.5 (149.2–153.8)151.8 (149.9–153.8)
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)yes15941.6 (39.4–43.9)42.2 (39.9–44.4)
no434 *42.6 (40.6–44.6)42.1 (40.2–44.0)
SaO2 (%)yes15897.3 (96.8–97.7)97.0 (96.5–97.4)
no44697.4 (96.9–97.9)97.2 (96.9–97.6)
* Missing values for respiratory rates originate from infants on full mechanical respiratory support during the session. a adjusted for corrected gestational age and repeated measurements within individuals.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kobus, S.; Diezel, M.; Dewan, M.V.; Huening, B.; Dathe, A.-K.; Felderhoff-Mueser, U.; Bruns, N. Impact of Physical Contact on Preterm Infants’ Vital Sign Response to Live Music Therapy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159524

AMA Style

Kobus S, Diezel M, Dewan MV, Huening B, Dathe A-K, Felderhoff-Mueser U, Bruns N. Impact of Physical Contact on Preterm Infants’ Vital Sign Response to Live Music Therapy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(15):9524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159524

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kobus, Susann, Marlis Diezel, Monia Vanessa Dewan, Britta Huening, Anne-Kathrin Dathe, Ursula Felderhoff-Mueser, and Nora Bruns. 2022. "Impact of Physical Contact on Preterm Infants’ Vital Sign Response to Live Music Therapy" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 15: 9524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159524

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop