Next Article in Journal
Undertaking Healthy Nutrition Behaviors by Patients with Type 1 Diabetes as an Important Element of Self-Care
Previous Article in Journal
How Do Religiosity and Spirituality Associate with Health-Related Outcomes of Adolescents with Chronic Illnesses? A Scoping Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Levels, Distribution and Health Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Agricultural Soils from the Pearl River Delta of China

1
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Processes and Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, China
2
Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Earth and Environment Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(20), 13171; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013171
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 11 October 2022 / Accepted: 12 October 2022 / Published: 13 October 2022

Abstract

:
To reveal the pollution status of agricultural soils along with rapid urbanization and economic growth, a large regional survey of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in agricultural soils was conducted in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) of China. The results showed that the total residues of 23 OCPs were in the range of ND-946 ng/g dry weight. OCP residues showed distinct spatial distribution characteristics within the PRD. OCPs were mainly found in areas with high agricultural production and industrial activities. Higher OCP concentrations were observed in the top layer of soil, while the concentration decreases to marginal levels when the soil depth is greater than 50 cm. OCPs are mainly derived from historical use. Hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) in the top soil of the study area are mainly from the use of lindane. Soil pH was negatively and significantly correlated with total OCP concentration. The human health risk assessment showed no health risk for children, while for adults, there is a non-carcinogenic risk, which needs to be noticed. Agricultural activities and industrial production have made the region a pollution hotspot and should arouse more stringent regulation to protect the environment and food safety.

1. Instruction

Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) are a kind of chlorinated compound with high environmental persistence. In the middle of the 20th century, in order to prevent the invasion of pests and improve the harvest of crops, OCPs were widely used and promoted worldwide as a highly effective compound to compensate for the growing world population. However, due to the continuous overuse and abuse of OCPs, the environment and human health are now affected. Some OCPs are considered endocrine disrupting chemicals and systemic toxicants because of their ability to disrupt hormonal homeostasis and disrupt the endocrine system, thereby causing harm to humans and non-target organisms, such as acting as teratogens, disrupting neuroendocrine function, suppressing immunity and reproductive system function, and causing lipid and metabolic disorders [1,2,3].
According to the statistics of the World Health Organization, there are about three million cases of pesticide poisoning reported in the world every year, of which more than 10% lead to death [4,5]. Thus, OCPs are banned in most developed countries, but are still widely used in most third world countries because of their low price and availability. The use of persistent organic pollutants was not eased until the adoption of the Stockholm Convention in May 2001, and 12 pollutants were listed as persistent organic pollutants including nine OCPs [5].
Although most OCPs have been included in the Convention since 2001, due to the stability, refractory and lipophilicity of OCPs, they have caused a certain accumulation in the ecological environment and human beings [6,7,8]. Soil, as the primary accumulation medium for OCPs, is critical for the environmental cycling of these chemicals and has the potential to pose risks to human health and ecology [9]. Pokhrel [10] found high concentrations of OCPs in the soil of commercial land in Nepal. Zhang [11] detected OCP content by sampling the soil of vegetable fields in the suburbs of Changchun, Northeast China, and found that most of the organochlorine pesticides in soil samples originated from historical applications. Kafaei [12] found that most of the chlordane pesticide residues in agricultural soils in southern Iran came from historical applications, and they found that hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) and dichlorotriphenyltrichloroethanes (DDTs) were recently used in the soils of the studied plains. Chen [13] found that OCPs also exist in the Tibetan Plateau; they found the local use of DDT, dicofol and HCHs may be an important source of the accumulation found in the soil of the Tibetan Plateau. In addition, aldrin and endosulfan are considered to be good indicators for studying atmospheric transport and deposition of OCPs from South Asia and Southeast Asia. Zhou [14] conducted a study on OCP contamination in breast milk from 12 provinces in mainland China. The results showed that DDTs were the most common drugs, followed by HCH and hexachlorobenzene (HCB).
For a long time, China’s population growth, rapid economic development, and other reasons, have resulted in the excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, and soil pesticide pollution has become a major environmental problem for the country. The soil pollution in the Pearl River Delta region is also becoming more and more serious due to the development of industry. The intensified agricultural and industrial activities may be one of the reasons for the increase in the level of various chemical pollutants in the environment.
Twenty-three OCPs were classified into six major types for detection [15]. Thus, in this study, we classify organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) into six categories: HCHs (α-HCH, β-HCH, γ-HCH and δ-HCH); DDTs (p,p’-DDE, p,p’-DDT, o,p’-DDD, p,p’-DDD, o,p’-DDE and o,p’-DDT); DRINS (aldrin, dieldrin, mirex, Dieldrin); SULPHS (α-endosulfan, β-endosulfan); CHLS (cis-chlordane, trans-chlordane, cis-nonachlor, trans-nonachlor, epoxyheptachlor A and epoxyheptachlor B); and HCB (hexachlorobenzene).
Through the analysis of 240 soil samples in the Pearl River Delta, we can investigate the current situation of OCP residues and provide basic data for the pollution by organic pollutants in the Pearl River Delta.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. The Situation of the Pearl River Delta Region of China

The PRD is located in the south of the Tropic of Cancer, between 23°40′ and 21°30′ north latitude; that is, mostly in the tropical range with a subtropical climate. It is warm and humid all year round, has a rainy season and high temperature season synchronization, fertile soil, crisscrossing rivers, and is good for agriculture. The main crops in the PRD are rice, sugar cane, banana, and pineapple. It is the region with the fastest agricultural and rural economic development, and is an important vegetable, grain, and fruit production base in Guangdong Province. The soil environmental quality is closely related to people’s health.

2.2. Sample Collection and Preparation

A total of 240 topsoil samples were collected from various farmlands in the PRD. The sampling sites were located in Guangdong Province and samples were collected in the second half of 2019. At each sampling site, soil from five cores were collected using stainless steel and then composited into one single sample. In addition, 72 samples were collected for vertical soil profiles. The soil profiles were excavated to a depth of 80 cm. Soil samples were collected at 10 cm intervals. A total of 240 surface soil samples were collected (48 soil samples in Guangzhou, 30 soil samples in Shenzhen, 18 soil samples in Dongguan, 30 soil samples in Jiangmen, 16 soil samples in Zhongshan, 28 soil samples in Huizhou, 24 soil samples in Zhaoqing, 18 soil samples in Zhuhai, and 27 soil samples in Foshan), the latitude and longitude of the sampling points were recorded using GPS.
The soil samples were stored at −20 ℃ until analysis. After freeze-drying, stones, plant tissues and other debris were removed from the samples, which were then ground and passed through a 1 mm sieve. The sample preparation and analysis procedures for OCPs were adapted from the reported methods [16]. A total of 6 g of soil sample was extracted with 20 mL of dichloromethane and hexane (1:1; v/v) in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min, and the extraction repeated 3 times. The extracts were concentrated and cleaned up by passing them through a Florisil column and eluted with 60 mL hexane and dichloromethane (4:1; v/v). Then, the elution was concentrated and exchanged into 1 mL hexane with a gentle nitrogen flow. Detailed information of the total organic carbon (TOC) is shown in Text S1.

2.3. Sample Analysis

The quantification of OCPs was carried out using a GC MS-QP2010, Shimadzu, Japan with an HP-5MS quartz capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm inner diameter ×0.25 μm film thickness). The ion source used by the mass spectrometer was an electron bombardment source (EI), and the ion monitoring (SIM) mode was used to quantitatively analyze the samples. The procedure is as follows: the initial temperature is 80 ℃ for 2 min, then it is heated to 140 ℃ for 10 min at a rate of 10 ℃/min, and then to 280 ℃ for 5 min at a rate of 4 ℃/min.

2.4. Human Health Risk Assessment

The noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risks of the OCPs were evaluated using the methods recommended by the USEPA [17]. A human health risk assessment of OCP exposure in urban farmland soil in the Pearl River Delta was conducted. Among the pollutants studied, α-HCH, γ-HCH and DDTs are considered to be non-carcinogenic compounds, while α-HCH, γ-HCH, β-HCH and DDTs are considered to be carcinogenic. Organic matter in soil enters the human body mainly via food ingestion, dermal contact and through the respiratory tract. Therefore, this study calculated and analyzed the non-carcinogenic risk and carcinogenic risk in different age groups via oral ingestion, skin contact and respiratory inhalation, so as to evaluate the health risk caused by OCP residues in urban farmland soil in the Pearl River Delta.
The average daily dose (ADD, mg·kg−1·day−1) of HCHs and DDTs via non-dietary (ingestion, dermal contact, and respiratory inhalation) pathways were calculated using the following equations:
ADD ingest = Cs × IR × CF × EF × ED BW × AT × CF ADD dermal = Cs × CF × SA × AF × ABS × EF × ED BW × AT × CF ADD inhale = Cs × IhR × EF × ED PEF × BW × AT × CF
A hazard quotient (HQ) was introduced to estimate the non-cancer risks of HCHs and DDTs in soils via non-dietary pathways. It is based on the ADD and the specific reference dose (RfD) with the following equations:
H Q = A D D R f D H I = H Q i = A D D i R f D i
The cancer risk assessments on humans were estimated using the ADD and multiplying by a slope factor (SF). The commonly used expression of risk value R of carcinogenic risk is:
R = ADD × SF
The representative meanings and reference values of each parameter in the above formula are shown in Table S1. The RfD and SF values required for evaluation in this paper mainly refer to the integrated Risk Information System (IRIS, USA) database, and the specific reference values are shown in Table S2.

2.5. Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Quality controls were implemented to ensure the correct identification and accurate quantification of the target analyses. A method-blank sample was included in every batch of 15 samples to control any systematic contamination. The recovery rates of 23 OCPs in the samples ranged from 75.2 to 107.8%. The RSD for replicate analyses was lower than 15% (n = 3). During routine sample analysis, a duplicate was included in every batch of 15 samples with an RSD of detected concentration lower than 10% (n = 3).

2.6. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2016, Origin 10.6 (OriginLab Inc., Northampton, MA, USA) and SPSS 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between the contaminant concentrations in soil, total organic carbon (TOC) in soil, and the pH. ArcGIS 10.5 was used to map the spatial distribution of 23 OCPs in soil in the Pearl River Delta.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Residual Status of OCPs in the Pearl River Delta

The status of OCP residues in the Pearl River Delta is shown in Table 1. The total concentration of residual OCPs in the 240 soil samples in the study area ranged from ND to 946 ng/g dry weight, with an average concentration of 65.5 ng/g and a detection rate of 89.6%. Among them, DDTs accounted for the largest share of the total OCPs, with concentrations ranging from ND to 743 ng/g, and the average value was 34.2 ng/g; followed by HCHs, with concentrations ranging from ND to 110 ng/g, and an average value of 4.52 ng/g. Thus, it can be seen that DDTs and HCHs are the main components of OCP pollution in the Pearl River Delta. In addition to DDTs and HCHs, other important OCPs, including DRINs, SULPHs, CHLs and HCB, were also found in this study, reflecting the pesticide use habits in local agricultural production activities. The detection rates of 23 OCPs were higher than 50% only for DDTs (65.4%) and HCHs (64.2%), while the detection rates of the rest of the contaminants did not exceed 50%; therefore, the distribution of DDTs and HCHs in the soil were mainly studied in this study.
The overall coefficient of variation of OCPs was as high as 216%, indicating that there is considerable dispersion in the use of organochlorine pesticides in the PRD region, with a large variation in the content of OCPs from region to region and a high degree of their local enrichment, which generally reflects the disorderly use of pesticides, mostly in a fragmented production and management mode [15], and more obviously influenced by human activities.
According to China’s Soil Environmental Quality Standard (GB-156182018) (China State Environmental Protection Administration, 2018), the risk screening limits of HCHs and DDTs in agricultural soils are 100 ng/g, respectively, and the rest of the organic pesticides under this amount are not counted due to a lack of information. According to the results of this study, the concentrations of HCHs and DDTs in 240 agricultural soils in the Pearl River Delta exceeded this safety standard in 1 and 17 soil samples, with exceedance rates of 0.42% and 7.08%, respectively, both of which were higher than those in the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta in 2008 (Yangtze River Delta: the exceedance rate of HCHs was 0 and DDTs was 6.6%; 2008 Pearl River Delta: the exceedance rate of HCHs was 0 and the exceedance rate of DDTs was 2.3%) [16,18]. The residue levels of OCPs in this study were comparable to those in the Yangtze River Delta (DDTs: mean concentration 56.2 ng/g; HCHs: mean concentration 2.46 ng/g; total mean concentration: 59.3 ng/g) [16] and are applicable to similar industrial and agricultural activities. Compared with 2008, the residues of OCPs in agricultural soils in the Pearl River Delta (DDTs: average concentration 12.3 ng/g; HCHs: average concentration 1.87 ng/g; total average concentration: 20.67 ng/g) [18] showed a significant increasing trend.
The increase in OCPs must be related to the use of organic pesticides in the Pearl River Delta in the last decade. Meanwhile, the diversity of latitude and longitude makes the difference in temperature, environment and soil organic matter also lead to differences in the residual concentrations of OCPs in different cities (Table 2).
The PRD region is located at the southern end of the subtropics, with sufficient light and heat, abundant rainfall and water resources, a high degree of soil weathering and leaching, and high activity of microorganisms, thus accelerating the degradation rate of HCHs and DDTs. In addition, the soils were often washed and drenched by rainwater, which can accelerate the migration and transformation rate of HCHs and DDTs in agricultural soils in the PRD. In China, the use of HCHs is higher than that of DDTs, but in the soil, DDTs and its degradation products are in higher concentration than HCHs because DDTs have high stability and degrade more slowly than HCHs.

3.2. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of OCPs in the Pearl River Delta

The spatial distribution of the concentration of sampling sites were drawn based on the residual concentration of OCPs in the surface soil, as presented in Figure 1 and Figure S1. The regional characteristics of the distribution of OCPs in the PRD are relative obviously, and higher concentration of OCPs were found in cities with high population density and frequent agricultural activities, such as Dongguan and Zhaoqing, indicating that agricultural activities related to pest control needs may cause OCP pollution [33]. The same higher concentration of OCPs were found in cities where industrial production is intensive, such as in Shenzhen, Foshan, and Guangzhou, indicating that a large number of factories may be another reason for OCP pollution.
While the transition region mainly evolved into intermediate values, the low value areas were mainly distributed in the southeast of the PRD. The residual concentrations of soil OCPs in the study area belong to the middle and lower levels, and the areas with a high content of total OCPs (>200 ng/g) are mainly concentrated in Dongguan, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Foshan. The intermediate values (50~200 ng/g) were mainly found in the plains of the PRD, covering about 65% of the whole region; the low content areas (<50 ng/g) were mainly found in the fringes of the east and west of the PRD, mainly in the mountains and hills. By combining Table 1 and Figure 1, it can be seen that the highest value of OCPs appeared in Foshan, which was 946 ng/g.

3.3. Vertical Distribution Characteristics of OCP in Soil Profiles

The vertical concentration and distribution of OCPs in soil at different depths in the cities of the PRD were mapped and the results are shown in Figure 2. The OCP residues varied from cities to cities, which may be related to local agricultural activity habits and industry, such as in Guangzhou and Zhaoqing. However, in the vertical soils of all cities, it is evident that higher OCP concentrations can be observed in the top layer of soil distributed between 0–50 cm, while the concentration of OCPs decreases to marginal levels when the soil depth is greater than 50 cm. OCPs are classes of chemically stable and difficult to decompose organic substances, and most OCPs are hydrophobic, lipid-soluble compounds, resulting in the impossibility of losing a large amount of OCPs in the soil via their infiltration to the subsurface layer, but are, instead, more adsorbed by soil particles. Therefore, in the soil profile, higher concentrations of OCPs are only found in the upper layer of soils with more agricultural and industrial activities. The concentration of OCPs decreases with soil depth, indicating that OCPs do not cause secondary pollution through groundwater infiltration. This result is similar to that of Sun [16].

3.4. Source Identification of OCPs in the Pearl River Delta

3.4.1. HCHs

There are two types of organochlorine pesticides used commercially, industrial HCH and lindane. Industrial HCHs mainly contain 60% to 70% α-HCH, 5% to 12% β-HCH, 10% to 12% γ-HCH, 6% to 10% δ-HCH and others; while in lindane, the main component consists of γ-HCH (99%) [34]. The results of the determination of HCHs from all samples in the PRD region are shown in Table 1, from which it can be seen that the residual levels of HCHs in the study area ranged from ND to 110 ng/g, with the detection rates of α-, β-, γ- and δ-HCH being 32.5%, 31.3%, 35.8%, and 32.1%, respectively. Among the HCHs, microorganisms in soil do not easily degrade β-HCH either, because of its lower saturated vapor pressure, high melting and boiling point, and higher bioaccumulation properties than other isomers. α-HCH and γ-HCH in soil will be converted to β-HCH, which is relatively stable in nature, via long time residues, if no other HCHs are inputted [35]. The possible interconversion between the isomers makes the composition characteristics of each isomer in HCH residues in the environment able to be used as an environmental indicator. Therefore, a number of relevant studies have indicated that the α-HCH/γ-HCH ratio can be used to distinguish the main sources of HCHs in soil [18,36]. In general, when α-HCH/y-HCH in soil is < 3, it indicates that HCHs in the area mainly originate from the input of lindane; when α-HCH/γ-HCH is > 7, it indicates that they probably originated from industrial HCH use and the contaminants have been degraded over a long period of time. In this study, we first calculate the ratios of each sampling site, then average the ratios to obtain the ratios of isomers of HCHs and DDTs. The α-HCH/γ-HCH ratios in the surface soil samples of the study area were generally lower than three, indicating that the HCHs in the soil at most of the sampling sites were likely to be sourced from lindane.
To analyze whether HCHs in the PRD are historical residues or recent inputs, the results of β-HCH/(α-HCH+γ-HCH) was used in this study to make a judgment [37]. When β-HCH/(α-HCH+γ-HCH) is higher than 0.5, it indicates that the source of the HCHs is mainly historical residues, and when the ratio is lower than 0.5, the HCHs in the soil are considered to be mainly recent new inputs of contaminants [38]. In this study, the mean value of β-HCH/(α-HCH+γ-HCH) in all 240 samples was 3.72, indicating that the residues of the HCHs in this study area were mainly historical residues. In conclusion, the source of the HCHs in the top soil of the study area is mainly due to the use of lindane and historical application residual contamination.

3.4.2. DDTs

From Table 1, the total detection rate of DDT isomers and metabolites (o,p’-DDT, p,p’-DDT, o,p’-DDD, p,p’-DDD, o,p’-DDE and p,p’-DDE) was 65.4%, and the residue levels ranged from ND to 743 ng/g with a mean value of 34.2 ng/g. The average level of DDT residues was higher than that of HCHs, with the highest detection rate of p,p’-DDE and the highest residue concentration of p,p’-DDT.
Initially, industrial DDT was used in the environment, mainly consisting of 75% p,p’-DDT, 15% o,p’-DDT, 5% p,p’-DDD, 5% p,p’-DDE and other substances [39]. However, some studies have shown that after the ban of industrial DDT, dicofol is slowly becoming a new source input of DDT in the environment. Dicofol and industrial DDTs differ in composition, with dicofol being rich in o,p’-DDT, with a ratio of o,p’-DDT/p,p’-DDT above 1.3 to 9.3, while industrial DDT has an o,p’-DDT/p,p’-DDT of only 0.2 to 0.3. Therefore, the ratio of o,p’-DDT/p,p’-DDT can be used to discriminate the presence or absence of dicofol input in the soil environment. From the composition of DDT isomers in PRD soils, the o,p’-DDT/p,p’-DDT ratios are all below 0.3, indicating that the soils in the region are dominated by industrial sources of DDTs [18].
In the soil environment, DDT is degraded in two ways, aerobic decomposition and anaerobic decomposition, under the action of microorganisms. DDT reacts under aerobic conditions to form DDE, and in anaerobic environment to form DDD, so the magnitude of (DDE+DDD)/DDT can be used to indicate the degradation of DDT and to determine whether the contamination of DDTs is a historical residue or a new input [40]. If (DDE+DDD)/DDT is > 1, it means that DDTs are mainly from historical residues and degradation is relatively complete; on the contrary, if (DDE+DDD)/DDT is < 1, this indicates that the pollutants are mainly from new inputs [41]. The mean value of (DDE+DDD)/DDT in the surface soil of the Pearl River Delta was 1.43, indicating that the DDTs were mainly from historical residues. In conclusion, it can be concluded that historical residues of industrial DDTs are the main source of DDTs in agricultural soils in the PRD.

3.4.3. Other OCPs

The main components of industrial endosulfan are α-endosulfan and β-endosulfan in a 7:3 ratio. α-endosulfan is more volatile and degradable than β-endosulfan in soils [42,43]. In this study, α-endosulfan had the highest detection rate of 22.6% with a mean value of 13.0 ng/g. The mean concentration of α-endosulfan in soil did not differ much from most cities in other countries, except for West Ethiopia [44] and Goa, India [45]. Although β-endosulfan was generally not detected in this study, the results based on α-endosulfan/β-endosulfan suggest that there is no new input of endosulfan in the region, which mainly originates from historical use and may have been degraded to endosulfan sulfate.
Industrial chlordane is the main source of trans and cis chlordane in the soil environment, and its main components include 11% cis chlordane, 13% trans chlordane, 5% heptachlor, and 5% trans heptachlor [46]. In the soil environment, trans-chlordane is degraded at a faster rate than cis-chlordane, so the size of trans-chlordane/cis-chlordane is often used to determine the residual status of chlordane in soil [47]. The ratio of industrial chlordane is about 1.18, and when trans/cis chlordane > 1.18, it indicates a recent input of chlordane to the study area, and conversely, if trans/cis chlordane < 1, it indicates that chlordane in the soil originated from historical use. In the present study, the ratio was generally below 1.18, indicating that industrial chlordane in the surface soils of the region was derived from residues of historical use.

3.5. Correlations among Soil Properties and Pollutants

Soil is a system with a rich composition, mainly consisting of solid, liquid and gas phase systems, and the components of the soil system can be broadly divided into soil organisms, soil minerals, soil organic matter, liquid, and air. The migration of organochlorine pesticides in the soil is generally achieved by diffusion, water infiltration and other effects. Therefore, the distribution characteristics and migration patterns of organochlorine pesticides in soil are not only determined by the nature of the contaminants themselves [48], but also may be related to soil physicochemical properties such as pH, temperature, moisture, porosity, and organic matter content in the soil. In this study, the correlation between soil physicochemical properties and the distribution characteristics of organochlorine pesticides in various regions of the PRD was mainly analyzed and determined (Table S3). The correlation between OCP concentration and soil properties is shown in Figure S2.
pH values in the PRD region ranged from 5.00 to 8.87, with an average pH of 6.69, the soil was acidic in a few areas and weakly alkaline in most areas. A Spearman correlation analysis showed that the pH was negatively correlated with the concentration of total soil OCPs (r = −0.191, p < 0.01), which was similar to the findings of Gong, Gao, and Zhang [23,48,49]. This is probably because soil pH has an effect on the composition and structure of humic acid. Some studies have shown that humic acid particles become smaller with increasing pH, while increasing pH decreases the number of voids in humic acid polymers and reduces the number of interaction sites [50]. In the present study, soil pH was negatively correlated with total OCP concentration, and it is speculated that the reason for this may be that changes in pH have some effect on the composition and structure of humic acids in the soil, which in turn leads to changes in soil OCP concentrations.
As hydrophobic substances, OCPs are more inclined to be adsorbed by soil organic matter, and the high concentration of organic matter can provide a sufficient carbon source for microorganisms in soil, thus accelerating the decomposition of OCPs by microorganisms. In this study, the TOC in various areas of the Pearl River Delta ranged from 0.08–46.4 g/kg with a mean value of 12.9 g/kg. The Spearman correlation analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between TOC and total OCP concentrations. This result is similar to the results of Sun [51], who concluded that there was no significant correlation between OCPs and TOC in the field soil by comparing the correlation between OCP concentrations and TOC in plastic greenhouses and field soil in northern China. Although there are many reports showing that OCPs are significantly correlated with TOC, the results cannot be generalized, and different conditions may affect the relationship between OCPs and TOC. It has been shown that in an air-soil system in equilibrium, there is a proportional relationship between the soil organic matter content and the concentration of hydrophobic compounds in soil [52,53]. The sampling areas in the Pearl River Delta are all open land rather than closed space, and the equilibrium state is relatively difficult to reach. Therefore, the lack of significant correlation between OCPs and TOC may be due to the distribution of OCPs in the soil and the adsorption state of TOC in the soil did not reach equilibrium. In conclusion, environmental factors, such as pH, can affect the residual levels of OCPs in soil to some extent, but the specific mechanism of the effect of TOC on soil OCPs residues needs further study.

3.6. Human Health Risk Assessment

3.6.1. Non-Carcinogenic Health Risk Evaluation

The U.S. National Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) stipulates that for cumulative non-carcinogenic risk, if the cumulative non-carcinogenic risk value of OCPs is HI < 1, the non-carcinogenic risk is relatively small or negligible. On the contrary, if the cumulative non-carcinogenic risk value of OCPs is HI > 1, it will have harmful effects on human health and there is non-carcinogenic risk. The study evaluated the non-carcinogenic risk of OCPs in urban agricultural soils in the PRD for different age stages and different exposure routes, and the evaluation results are shown in Figure 3a. For the average non-carcinogenic risk of OCPs (HI = 0.57 for children and HI = 1.76 for adults), the evaluation results showed that the OCPs had no non-carcinogenic risk for children, while the OCPs had a non-carcinogenic risk for adults. The non-carcinogenic risks of o,p’-DDT, p,p’-DDT and γ-HCH were relatively large. The non-carcinogenic risk values of PRD soils were lower than the USEPA in the children group (HI < 1), but the mean non-carcinogenic risk in the adult group was > 1, indicating that OCPs in PRD urban agricultural soils have no non-carcinogenic risk to children’s bodies, but have some non-carcinogenic risk to adults and is of concern.

3.6.2. Carcinogenic Health Risk Evaluation

For different age stages and different exposure routes, the carcinogenic risk of OCPs in the soil of urban agricultural fields in the PRD was calculated and analyzed, in which the non-carcinogenic health risk values caused by oral intake, respiratory intake and dermal contact are shown in Figure 3b, respectively. It is generally accepted that the carcinogenic risk is very high when the carcinogenic risk is > 10−1, high when 10−3 < carcinogenic risk < 10−1, moderate when 10−4 < carcinogenic risk < 10−3, low when 10−6 < carcinogenic risk < 10−4, and very low when carcinogenic risk < 10−6. In this study, the carcinogenic risk values of OCPs in soil at most sites were small and the risk level was very low or low. As shown in Figure 3b, γ-HCH and β-HCH were the main contributors to the carcinogenic risk of OCPs. Overall, HCHs and DDTs in the soil of the PRD urban farmland pose, essentially, no carcinogenic risk to the health of local residents, whether through oral or dermal exposure or through inhalation.

4. Conclusions

This study reveals the current status of OCPs in agricultural soils in the PRD region. The residuals of OCPs show quite different spatial distributions. Higher concentrations of OCPs were found in cities with high agricultural activities, such as Zhaoqing and Dongguan, and in cities with intensive industrial production activities, such as Guangzhou and Shenzhen, where the rapid development of agriculture and industry is considered to be the main source of OCPs.
Soil profiles showed that OCP concentrations decreased to marginal levels in soils greater than 50 cm in depth, indicating that OCPs do not cause contamination through groundwater infiltration. The historical use of industrial DDT was considered the main source of DDTs, while the source of HCHs was mainly due to lindane use and residual contamination from historical use. The concentrations of OCPs were negatively correlated with pH and not significantly correlated with TOC. Based on the assessment of this study, the health risk from OCP contamination in soil is generally low for children, but there is still some non-carcinogenic risk for adults.
Although OCPs are now listed in the Stockholm Convention as chemicals to control, there are regions where OCPs are still being used because they are inexpensive and readily available. Therefore, future research should focus on reducing the use of OCPs. On this basis, to reduce the accumulation of OCPs in agricultural soils, we propose the development and use of biochar to decrease the accessibility of OCPs, the enhancement of soil microbial communities, and that the studied area should also be continuously monitored [54].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph192013171/s1, Figure S1: Concentration of OCPs of different cities; Figure S2: The relationship between OCPs and environmental factors (pH, TOC), Linear regressions were used to test the Spearman correlation between OCPs and pH and TOC; Table S1: Parameters used in exposure cancer and no-cancer risk assessments; Table S2: Parameters used in exposure cancer and no-cancer risk assessments in different pathways; Table S3: Physical Chemical Properties of Soils; Text S1: Soil physicochemical test.

Author Contributions

Methodology, J.H. and C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Y.; writing—review and editing, J.H., H.X. and J.S.; data curation, H.Z. and T.A.; supervision, J.S. and J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (22076031), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1800704), and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515010366).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Martyniuk, C.J.; Mehinto, A.C.; Denslow, N.D. Organochlorine pesticides: Agrochemicals with potent endocrine-disrupting properties in fish. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2020, 507, 110764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fernandez, M.F.; Olmos, B.; Granada, A.; López-Espinosa, M.J.; Molina-Molina, J.M.; Fernandez, J.M.; Cruz, M.; Olea-Serrano, F.; Olea, N. Human exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and prenatal risk factors for cryptorchidism and hypospadias: A nested case-control study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fu, X.J.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.Y.; Yu, J. The association between environmental endocrine disruptors and cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 2020, 187, 109464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tian, H.Z. Determination of chloramphenicol, enrofloxacin and 29 pesticides residues in bovine milk by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 2011, 83, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Keswani, C.; Dilnashin, H.; Birla, H.; Roy, P.; Tyagi, R.K.; Singh, D.; Rajput, V.D.; Minkina, T.; Singh, S.P. Global footprints of organochlorine pesticides: A pan-global survey. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022, 44, 149–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aichner, B.; Bussian, B.; Lehnik-Habrink, P.; Hein, S. Levels and spatial distribution of persistent organic pollutants in the environment: A case study of German Forest soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 12703–12714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Barber, J.L.; Sweetman, A.J.; Van Wijk, D.; Jones, K.C. Hexachlorobenzene in the global environment: Emissions, levels, distribution, trends and processes. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 349, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fommei, E.; Turci, R.; Ripoli, A.; Balzan, S.; Bianchi, F.; Morelli, L.; Coi, A. Evidence for persistent organochlorine pollutants in the human adrenal cortex. J. Appl. Toxico. 2017, 37, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, J.T.; Pan, L.L.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Zhan, Y.; Zhu, L.Z.; Li, X.D. Organic contamination and remediation in the agricultural soils of China: A critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 724–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pokhrel, B.; Gong, P.; Wang, X.P.; Chen, M.K.; Wang, C.F.; Gao, S.P. Distribution, sources, and air-soil exchange of OCPs, PCBs and PAHs in urban soils of Nepal. Chemosphere 2018, 200, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.J.; Wang, Y.; Hua, D.L. Occurrence, distribution and possible sources of organochlorine pesticides in peri-urban vegetable soils of Changchun, Northeast China. Hum. Eco Risk Assess. Int. J. 2017, 23, 2033–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kafaei, R.; Arfaeinia, H.; Savari, A.; Mahmoodi, M.; Rezaei, M.; Rayani, M.; Sorial, G.A.; Fattahi, N.; Ramavandi, B. Organochlorine pesticides contamination in agricultural soils of southern Iran. Chemosphere 2020, 240, 124983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, L.G.; Feng, Q.H.; He, Q.S.; Huang, Y.M.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, G.; Zhao, W.; Gao, B.; Lin, K.; Xu, Z.H. Sources, atmospheric transport and deposition mechanism of organochlorine pesticides in soils of the Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 577, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, P.P.; Wu, Y.N.; Yin, S.A.; Li, J.G.; Zhao, Y.F.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.J.; Liu, Y.P.; Yang, X.; Li, X.W. National survey of the levels of persistent organochlorine pesticides in the breast milk of mothers in China. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, H.F. Long-Rang Atmospheric Transport and Transformations of Organochlorine Pesticides (OCPs) in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; China University of Geosciences: Wuhan, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sun, J.T.; Pan, L.L.; Zhan, Y.; Lu, H.N.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Liu, W.X.; Wang, X.L.; Li, X.D.; Zhu, L.Z. Contamination of phthalate esters, organochlorine pesticides and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in agricultural soils from the Yangtze River Delta of China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 544, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. USEPA. Mid-Atlantic RISK Assessment; Untied States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2015.
  18. Dou, L.; Yang, G.Y. Distribution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Surface Soil of Pearl River Delta Economic Zone. Environ. Sci. 2015, 36, 2954–2963. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, H.Y.; Gao, R.T.; Jiang, S.R. Spatial Variability of Organochlorine Pesticides (DDTs and HCHs) in Surface Soils of Farmland in Beijing, China. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2006, 39, 1403–1410. [Google Scholar]
  20. An, Q.; Dong, Y.H.; Wang, H. Residues and distribution character of organochlorine pesticides in soils in Nanjing area. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2005, 25, 470–474. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, H.B.; Luo, Y.M.; Zhao, Q.G. Hong Kong soil reserches Ⅳ Contents and compositions of organochlorines in soil. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2006, 43, 220–225. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, L.G.; Ran, Y.; Xing, B.S.; Mai, B.X.; He, J.H.; Wei, X.G.; Fu, J.M.; Sheng, G.Y. Contents and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and organochlorine pesticides invegetable soils of Guangzhou, China. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gong, Z.M.; Tao, S.; Xu, F.L.; Dawson, R.; Liu, W.X.; Cui, Y.H.; Cao, J.; Wang, X.J.; Shen, W.R.; Zhang, W.J.; et al. Level and distribution of DDT in surface soils from Tianjin, China. Chemosphere 2004, 54, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tang, J.F.; Feng, J.Y.; Gang, L.I.; Liang, M.Q.; Wang, R.J.; Cai, C. Occurrence and possible sources of organochlorine pesticides in soils of Ningbo, East China. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 2018, 109, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qu, C.K.; Albanese, S.; Li, J.J.; Cicchella, D.; Zuzolo, D.; Hope, D.; Cerino, P.; Pizzolante, A.; Doherty, L.A.; Lima, A.; et al. Organochlorine pesticides in the soils from Benevento provincial territory, southern Italy: Spatial distribution, air-soil exchange and implications for environmental health. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 674, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tesi, J.N.; Tesi, G.O.; Ossai, J.C.; Agbozu, I.E. Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in agricultural soils of Southern Nigeria: Spatial distribution, source identification, ecotoxicological and human health risks assessment. Environ. Forensics 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yun, S.M.; Yoon, J.k.; Kim, J.I.; Kim, I.J.; Kim, H.K.; Chung, H.M.; Kim, D.J.; Noh, H.J. Evaluation of residual level and distribution characteristics of organochlorine pesticides in agricultural soils in South Korea. Environ. Sci Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 46003–46017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nyihirani, F.; Qu, C.K.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, Y.C.; Mbululo, Y.; Janneh, M.; Qi, S.H. Level, source, and distribution of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in agricultural soils of Tanzania. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2022, 194, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qu, C.K.; Albanese, S.; Chen, W.; Lima, A.; Doherty, L.A.; Piccolo, A.; Arienzo, M.; Qi, S.H.; De Vivo, B. The status of organochlorine pesticide contamination in the soils of the Campanian Plain, southern Italy, and correlations with soil properties and cancer risk. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 216, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mishra, K.; Sharma, R.C.; Kumar, S. Contamination levels and spatial distribution of organochlorine pesticides in soils from India. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 76, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ge, J.; Woodward, L.A.; Li, Q.X.; Wang, J. Composition, distribution and risk assessment of organochlorine pesticides in soils from the Midway Atoll, North Pacific Ocean. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 452, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Calvelo Pereira, R.; Monterroso, C.; Martínez Cortizas, A.; Macías, F. Analysis of composition, distribution and origin of hexachlorocyclohexane residues in agricultural soils from NW Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 5583–5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tang, Z.W.; Huang, Q.F.; Nie, Z.Q.; Yang, Y.F.; Yang, J.; Qu, D.; Cheng, J.L. Levels and distribution of organochlorine pesticides and hexachlorobutadiene in soils and terrestrial organisms from a former pesticide-producing area in Southwest China. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2016, 30, 1249–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Niu, L.L.; Xu, C.; Yao, Y.J.; Liu, K.; Yang, F.X.; Tang, M.L.; Liu, W.P. Status, Influences and Risk Assessment of Hexachlorocyclohexanes in Agricultural Soils Across China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 12140–12147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jiang, Y.F.; Wang, X.T.; Jia, Y.; Wang, F.; Wu, M.H.; Sheng, G.Y.; Fu, J.M. Occurrence, distribution and possible sources of organochlorine pesticides in agricultural soil of Shanghai, China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huang, H.F.; Qi, S.H.; Qu, C.K.; Li, H.; Chen, W.W.; Zhang, L.; Hu, T.; Shi, L. Distribution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Soil from Jiufeng Mountain Range in Fujian, China. Environ. Sci. 2014, 35, 2691–2697. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, Y.W.; Wang, T.; Li, A.; Fu, J.J.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Q.H.; Jiang, G.B. Selection of bioindicators of polybrominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated biphenyls, and organochlorine pesticides in mollusks in the Chinese Bohai Sea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 7159–7165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cheng, C.; Liu, W.J.; Hu, T.P.; Xing, X.L.; Mao, Y.; Shi, M.M.; Xu, A.; Su, Y.W.; Li, X.Y.; Yu, H.K.; et al. Status of organochlorine pesticide pollution on surface soil of Huixian wetland in Guilin, China. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2021, 40, 371–381. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hitch, R.K.; Day, H.R. Unusual persistence of DDT in some western USA soil. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1992, 48, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, S.Y. Residues and Soil-Air Exchange of Chlorinated POPs with Their Associated Human Health Risks from Typical Agricultural Area and Industrial Area in the Hangzhou City; Zhejiang University: Zhejiang, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  41. Harner, T.; Wideman, J.L.; Jantunen, L.M.; Bidleman, T.F.; Parkhurst, M.J. Residues of organochlorine pesticides in Alabama soils. Environ. Pollut. 1999, 106, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jia, H.L.; Li, Y.F.; Wang, D.G.; Cai, D.J.; Yang, M.; Ma, J.M.; Hu, J.X. Endosulfan in China 1-gridded usage inventories. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2009, 16, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ketyam, B.; Imsilp, K.; Poapolathep, A.; Poapolathep, S.; Jermnak, U.; Phaochoosak, N.; Tanhan, P. Health risk associated with the consumption of duck egg containing endosulfan residues. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Westbom, R.; Hussen, A.; Megersa, N.; Retta, N.; Mathiasson, L.; Björklund, E. Assessment of organochlorine pesticide pollution in Upper Awash Ethiopian state farm soils using selective pressurised liquid extraction. Chemosphere 2008, 72, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chakraborty, P.; Zhang, G.; Li, J.; Sivakumar, A.; Jones, K.C. Occurrence and sources of selected organochlorine pesticides in the soil of seven major Indian cities: Assessment of air–soil exchange. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 204, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bidleman, T.F.; Jantunen, L.M.M.; Helm, P.A.; Brorström-Lundén, E.; Juntto, S. Chlordane enantiomers and temporal trends of chlordane isomers in arctic air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sun, Q.P. Contaminations and Health Risks of Organopesticides in Surface Water of Hangzhou; Zhejiang University: Zhejiang, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gao, J.; Zhou, H.F.; Pan, G.Q.; Wang, J.Z.; Chen, B.Q. Factors influencing the persistence of organochlorine pesticides in surface soil from the region around the Hongze Lake, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 443, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, H.; Lu, Y.L.; Dawson, R.W.; Shi, Y.J.; Wang, T.Y. Classification and ordination of DDT and HCH in soil samples from the Guanting Reservoir, China. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 762–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alawi, M.; Khalili, F.; Da’as, K. Interaction behavior of organochlorine pesticides with dissolved Jordanian humic acid. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1995, 28, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, Y.; Chang, X.P.; Zhao, L.X.; Zhou, B.; Weng, L.P.; Li, Y.T. Comparative study on the pollution status of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and bacterial community diversity and structure between plastic shed and open-field soils from northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 741, 139620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Borisover, M.D.; Graber, E.R. Specific interactions of organic compounds with soil organic carbon. Chemosphere 1997, 34, 1761–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kannan, K.; Battula, S.; Loganathan, B.G.; Hong, C.S.; Lam, W.H.; Villeneuve, D.L.; Sajwan, K.; Giesy, J.P.; Aldous, K.M. Trace organic contaminants, including toxaphene and trifluralin, in cotton field soils from Georgia and South Carolina, USA. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2003, 45, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ali, N.; Khan, S.; Li, Y.Y.; Zheng, N.G.; Yao, H.Y. Influence of biochars on the accessibility of organochlorine pesticides and microbial community in contaminated soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 647, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of residual OCP concentration in agricultural soil in the PRD.
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of residual OCP concentration in agricultural soil in the PRD.
Ijerph 19 13171 g001
Figure 2. Vertical distributions of the concentrations and compositions of OCPs in agricultural soils of the PRD.
Figure 2. Vertical distributions of the concentrations and compositions of OCPs in agricultural soils of the PRD.
Ijerph 19 13171 g002
Figure 3. (a) Non-carcinogenic risks and (b) carcinogenic risks to children and adults through dietary and non-dietary exposure pathways to OCPs.
Figure 3. (a) Non-carcinogenic risks and (b) carcinogenic risks to children and adults through dietary and non-dietary exposure pathways to OCPs.
Ijerph 19 13171 g003
Table 1. Concentration of 23 OCPs in agricultural soil samples of the Pearl River Delta.
Table 1. Concentration of 23 OCPs in agricultural soil samples of the Pearl River Delta.
CompoundMin
ng/g
Max
ng/g
Mean
ng/g
Detection Rate
/%
α-HCHND a37.71.0932.5
γ-HCHND89.01.4035.8
β-HCHND11.80.7031.3
δ-HCHND68.31.3332.1
ΣHCHsND1104.5264.2
o,p’-DDDND1652.3315.0
o,p’-DDEND1743.8023.8
p,p’-DDEND97.62.0628.3
o,p’-DDTND48915.227.9
p,p’-DDDND58.60.345.42
p,p’-DDTND58010.527.5
ΣDDTsND74334.265.4
AldrinND5.800.040.83
Dieldrin ND12.60.172.50
EndrinND2832.813.33
MirexND29.20.515.42
α-EndosulfanND28813.022.5
β-EndosulfanNDND--
cis-chlordaneND20.40.639.17
Trans-ChlordaneND8.700.081.25
heptachlor epoxide isomer AND1133.8921.3
heptachlor epoxide isomer BND1020.430.42
Cis-NonachlorND90.40.632.92
trans-NonachlorNDND--
HCBND41.50.404.58
ΣOCPsND94665.589.6
a ND, none-detectable.
Table 2. Residual concentrations of HCHs and DDTs in soils of different regions.
Table 2. Residual concentrations of HCHs and DDTs in soils of different regions.
RegionsYear of SamplingHCHs ng/g (Mean)DDTs ng/g (Mean)References
Beijing 20030.64~32.32 (1.47)1.42~5910.80 (77.18)[19]
Nanjing2002–20032.7~130.6 (13.6)6.3~1050.7 (64.1)[20]
Hong Kong 2002–20032.5~11 (6.19)ND~5.7 (0.52)[21]
Guangzhou1999, 20020.19~42.3 (4.39)3.58~831 (81.4)[22]
Tianjin20011.3~1094.6 (45.8)0.071~972.24 (56.01)[23]
Yangtze River Delta20140.37~30.3 (2.46)0.13~3515 (56.2)[16]
Pearl River Delta2008ND~41.62 (1.87)ND~383.41 (12.30)[18]
Ningbo——2.7~28.2 (4.6)2.2~566.6 (55.6)[24]
Southern Italy2015ND~0.72 (0.065)ND~16.4 (1.22)[25]
Southern Nigeria——ND~156 (15.5)——[26]
Korea2017ND~14.51 (0.2)ND~2187.18 (23.18)[27]
Tanzania2019ND~1.54 (0.234)ND~47.44 (2.29)[28]
Campanian Plain20110.03~17.3 (1.38)0.08~1231 (107)[29]
Dibrugarh2009-2010178~1701 (705)75~2296 (757)[30]
Midway Atoll2006ND~127 (23.5)1.4~643 (191)[31]
Galicia, NW Spain2003ND~2305 (200)——[32]
Pearl River Delta2019ND~110 (4.52)ND~743 (34.2)This study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, S.; Huang, J.; Zhou, H.; Cao, C.; Ai, T.; Xing, H.; Sun, J. Levels, Distribution and Health Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Agricultural Soils from the Pearl River Delta of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013171

AMA Style

Yao S, Huang J, Zhou H, Cao C, Ai T, Xing H, Sun J. Levels, Distribution and Health Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Agricultural Soils from the Pearl River Delta of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(20):13171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Siyu, Jiahui Huang, Haijun Zhou, Cuiting Cao, Tao Ai, Huanhuan Xing, and Jianteng Sun. 2022. "Levels, Distribution and Health Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Agricultural Soils from the Pearl River Delta of China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 20: 13171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop