Next Article in Journal
Psychological Effects of Online-Based Mindfulness Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Previous Article in Journal
A Field Study on Safety Performance of Apron Controllers at a Large-Scale Airport Based on Digital Tower
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph19031622
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Protocol
Peer-Review Record

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions among Chinese Adults with Prediabetes: A Protocol for Network Meta-Analysis and CHIME-Modeled Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1622; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031622
by Yue Yin 1,2,†, Yusi Tu 1,2,†, Mingye Zhao 1,2 and Wenxi Tang 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1622; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031622
Submission received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 28 January 2022 / Accepted: 29 January 2022 / Published: 31 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Health Behavior, Chronic Disease and Health Promotion)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The protocol is well structured, I consider it suitable for publication after having resolved some doubts.

In the abstract, however, it is necessary to point out the systematic review which then gives rise to the meta-analysis.

In the methods, I suggest you declare that you will follow the PRISMA-NMA

There is no "Chinese" criterion in the registered protocol. But: “Participants/population: The research population refers to the research subjects of clinical trials, which are patients with prediabetes aged 18 years and above.”

184 RoB2?

I suggest expanding and arguing the network meta-analysis section with references and statements as follows:
"After the systematic review, we will perform a network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect effects and compare different interventions at the same time. Each intervention will generate curves of efficacy and then a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis to rank the effectiveness of interventions. SUCRA is a numeric presentation of the overall ranking and presents a single number, ranging from 0 to 1, associated with each treatment. Higher odds in SUCRA mean better results. The quality of the processing will be evaluated with the consistency or inconsistency of the analysis.
(References: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.012 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101260 ). 

Author Response

Thank you for your helpful comments and constructive suggestions, please see the attachment for our responses.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review your manuscript - Please see attached document for comments and suggestions

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your helpful comments and constructive suggestions, please see the attachment for our responses.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Back to TopTop