Next Article in Journal
Survival of Frail Elderly with Delirium
Next Article in Special Issue
Displacement and Isolation: Insights from a Mental Stress Survey of Syrian Refugees in Houston, Texas, USA
Previous Article in Journal
In the Eye of the Storm: A Quantitative and Qualitative Account of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Dutch Home Healthcare
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Interaction of Vitamin D and Corticosteroids: A Mortality Analysis of 26,508 Veterans Who Tested Positive for SARS-CoV-2
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph19042254
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Predictive and Diagnostic Value of Serum Adipokines in Pregnant Women with Intrahepatic Cholestasis

by
Nazan Yurtcu
1,*,
Canan Soyer Caliskan
2,
Huri Guvey
3,
Samettin Celik
2,
Safak Hatirnaz
4 and
Andrea Tinelli
5,6,7,8
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sivas Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Medicine, Sivas 58140, Turkey
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Samsun 55270, Turkey
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Private Kütahya Parkhayat Hospital, Kütahya 43100, Turkey
4
In Vitro Fertilization Unit, Medicana International Hospital, Samsun 55080, Turkey
5
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Veris delli Ponti Hospital, 73020 Lecce, Italy
6
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Experimental Endoscopic Surgery, Imaging, Technology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, Vito Fazzi Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy
7
Phystech BioMed School, Faculty of Biological & Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, State University, 141701 Moscow, Russia
8
Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(4), 2254; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042254
Submission received: 28 November 2021 / Revised: 7 February 2022 / Accepted: 9 February 2022 / Published: 16 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Papers Collection of Editorial Board Members (and Invited Scholars) in Section Public Health Statistics and Risk Assessment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective of this study was to assess the value of serum leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin as biomarkers for the prediction and diagnosis of intra-hepatic cholestasis (ICP). This prospective study included pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy: 63 with ICP, 48 and 15 of whom had mild and severe disease, respectively, and 32 as controls. ICP women had increased median levels of serum leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin compared to the controls (p < 0.05). These biomarkers meaningfully changed regarding the severity of ICP: While leptin was reduced, apelin and ghrelin were increased, and adiponectin was increased somewhat. To predict and diagnose ICP, the predictive values of serum leptin, adiponectin, and apelin need to be accepted as comparable, with moderate to high sensitivity and specificity; however, the predictive value of serum ghrelin was somewhat lower. More research is needed to clarify the potential properties of adipokines to gain acceptance as a predictive or diagnostic biomarker for ICP.

1. Introduction

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy specific disease and its cause has not been yet elucidated [1]. It is the second common liver disorder in pregnancy after viral hepatitis, which is often characterized by itching, liver dysfunction, and/or a high bile acid level in the late second or third trimester of pregnancy. The incidence associated with ethnicity and geographical features varies between 0.2% and 2%, and 9.2% and 15.6% in South American countries, such as Bolivia and Chile, respectively [2]. ICP has also been reported to be more common during winter months, correlated with poor selenium intake and vitamin D deficiency [3,4]. Symptoms and abnormalities in laboratory findings usually resolve soon after delivery, however may recur during subsequent pregnancy or hormonal contraception use [5]. In addition to maternal complications such as itching, nausea, loss of appetite, pain in the right upper quadrant, meconium-staining of amniotic fluid, respiratory distress, preterm delivery, and fetal death, ICP may also lead to serious fetal complications [6]. In ICP, transplacental gradients decrease fetal clearance of bile acids, resulting in the accumulation of bile acids in the fetus and amniotic fluid [7]. They have an increased risk of fetal intrauterine death, spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth, and the development of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome associated with bile acids entering the lungs [8].
Although the etiology of the ICP is genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors play a role in the development and aggravation of the disease [8,9,10]. In recent studies, the etiology of ICP includes inflammatory and immune factors, in association with the disruption of the immune balance in the placenta and maternal circulation [11,12].
Leptin is a polypeptide hormone that is primarily found in adipocytes, as well as detected in the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, stomach, intestine, placenta, and immune cells [13]. In addition to a well-known role in appetite control, leptin regulates the endocrine system, energy homeostasis, insulin secretion, and reproductive cycle [13]. Leptin also plays a role in the regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses due to its structural similarity with interleukins [14]. While tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-1β increase the expression of leptin mRNA in adipose tissue, leptin increases the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12 [15].
Adiponectin is an adipocytokine that is primarily produced and secreted by white adipose tissue. Although the main function of adiponectin is to regulate carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, the existence of its additive biological functions, such as immune modulatory, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic effects, are to be yet explored [16]. Adiponectin exerts its hepato-protective effects by blocking the activation of nuclear factor-κB and suppressing the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which is mainly released by Kupffer cells, including TNF-α and IL-1β, and enhancing the synthesis of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [2,4,6,17].
Apelin is an adipocyte-derived hormone and an endogenous peptide that has important roles in energy metabolism. APJ is bound to the G protein and is the endogenous ligands of Apelin and elabela APJ [18]. It has been determined that apelin is found in the heart, endothelium, vascular smooth muscle cells, brain, kidney, testis, ovary, liver, adipose tissue, lung, and breast [19]. Apelin is responsible for the regulation of an immune response, ensuring hemodynamic balance, angiogenesis, inotropy, glucose metabolism, development of atherosclerosis, as well as nutritional control and energy metabolism, since it is secreted from adipose tissue [18,20,21,22]. In addition, the apelin and APJ receptor system prevent liver regeneration in the liver and cause apoptosis, as well [23]. Moreover, apelin in human hepatic stellate cells enables the progression of fibrosis in cirrhosis. The expression of apelin is also increased in hepatic stellate cells under hypoxic and pro-inflammatory conditions [24].
Ghrelin is an acylated single-peptide hormone modified by fatty acid released from the gastric fundus mucosa [25]. It is the endogenous ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, stimulating the secretion growth hormone and being produced in the small intestine, colon, lung, pancreas, kidney, pituitary, and hypothalamus, with the exception of the stomach [26,27]. Major functions of ghrelin involve the secretion of the growth hormone, stimulation of appetite and eating, regulation of gastric acid secretion and motility, and control of pancreatic secretion; it is also responsible for the control of glucose metabolism, adiposity, blood pressure, reproduction, memory, and reward related pathways [28,29,30]. Ghrelin increases lipid storage in the liver and the risk of developing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through various intracellular pathways [31]. However, it has a protective role against liver damage and fibrosis [32]. In addition, ghrelin influences decreasing liver inflammation by increasing adiponectin levels and decreasing free fatty acids and pro-inflammatory cytokines [33].
Evaluating the possible roles of molecules mentioned above, in the physiological and pathophysiological states of pregnancy, authors thought that measurements of serum leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin in pregnant women with ICP may provide meaningful supports for their diagnostic roles in the management of ICP. Previous studies have shown that serum levels of total bile acid, aspartate transaminase, and alanine transaminase, and serum activities of alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase are higher in women with ICP than in women without ICP, except those with other hepatobiliary diseases [34,35]. Although these indicators contain diagnostic values, they can also increase after some liver diseases, preeclampsia, chronic inflammatory diseases, and infections. Recent studies have revealed that immune factors as well as inflammatory factors play a role in the pathogenesis of ICP. Thus, there may be merit to investigating serum adipokines in pregnant women with ICP. The aim of this investigation was to determine the values of serum adipokines leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin, as biomarkers for the prediction and diagnosis of ICP and its severity.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was performed on pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy, admitted to the obstetrics service of Samsun Training and Research Hospital in Samsun, Turkey. This prospective study was conducted after the approval of the Human Ethics Committee of the University of Health Sciences (approval number KAEK 2020/3/8). The participants were enrolled consecutively for a one-year study (from March 2020 to March 2021) with an allocation ratio of 2/1 for mild or severe ICP participants/healthy participants. In addition, the study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected in a priori approval by the institution’s human research committee. Informed consents were obtained from all participants regarding the study.
All ICP women presented itching without rash. The total serum bile acid level above 10 µmol/L was considered positive for ICP diagnosis. Those with total bile acid levels between 10 and 100 µmol/L were grouped as mild ICP and those with 100 µmol/L and above were grouped as severe ICP. After being diagnosed for ICP, patients were followed up until delivery [8].
Healthy pregnant women with a normal routine pregnancy check were included in the study as the control group and the inclusion criteria were the following: singleton pregnancy within 28–32 weeks of gestation. Pregnant women with ICD and controls were excluded when there was no permission given to participate in the research, there were missing data, congenital anomalies of fetus, multiple pregnancies, HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, high liver enzymes, and low platelet count), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure, thyroid dysfunction and kidney disease, and psychiatric disorder. Pregnant women who used drugs and consumed alcohol and cigarettes were also excluded. Then, abnormal transaminases and cholestatic enzymes were maybe to viral hepatitis, symptomatic cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson’s disease, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, and cytomegalovirus, or Epstein Barr virus infection, acute fatty liver of pregnancy, drug-induced liver disease, and HIV infection were among the exclusion criteria.
The gestational age was calculated according to the first day of the last menstrual period and/or the first trimester ultrasound (US), by crown-rump length (CRL) when appropriate. US scans were performed using a Samsung Hs70A (GE Healthcare, Austria) device, equipped with 3.5 MHz abdominal and 7 MHz transvaginal transducers. In all enrolled patients, we routinely performed a physical examination, complete blood count, routine biochemistry tests, hepatitis tests, and urine examinations. After 8 h of fasting, 5 mL of blood was taken from the antecubital vein for blood chemistry analyses, and as part of demographic and obstetric data collection, age, number of pregnancy (gravida), parity, mass index (BMI), pregnancy week after ICP diagnosis, type of delivery, birth weight of newborns, Apgar score at 5th minute, presence of meconium in amniotic fluid, the condition of hospitalization in newborn intensive care unit (NICU), was also collected.
In all the pregnant women, the blood samples were analyzed for the alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bile acid, bilirubin, adiponectin, leptin, ghrelin, and apelin levels. Total bile acid levels were measured spectrophotometrically using the enzymatic method in the Cobas C501 Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Other blood tests were performed within 2 h using a hematology analyzer (GEN-S; Beckman-Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA).
The concentrations of adiponectin in the serum were measured using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, in particular, the human adiponectin ELISA kit (Cloud-Clone Corp, Cat No. SEA605Hu, Wuhan, China). This kit uses a competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassay technique to detect the level of adiponectin. The adiponectin levels were expressed as ng/mL. The mean sensitivity of this assay is 0.069 ng/mL.
The concentrations of ghrelin in the serum were measured using the commercially available human ghrelin ELISA kit (Cloud-Clone Corp, Cat No. CEA991Hu, Wuhan, China). This kit uses a competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassay technique to detect the level of ghrelin. The ghrelin levels were expressed as pg/mL. The mean sensitivity of this assay is 4.87 pg/mL.
The concentrations of leptin in the serum were measured using commercially available chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) kits, in particular, the human leptin CLIA kit (Elabscience Company, Cat No. E-CL-H0112, Houston, TX, USA). This kit uses a sandwich-chemiluminescence immunoassay technique to detect the level of leptin. The leptin levels were expressed as pg/mL. The mean sensitivity of this assay is 18.75 pg/mL.
The concentrations of apelin in the serum were measured using the commercially available human apelin ELISA kit (Cloud-Clone Corp., Cat No. CED066Hu, Wuhan, China). This kit uses a competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassay technique to detect the level of apelin. The apelin levels were expressed as pg/mL. The mean sensitivity of this assay is 8.25 pg/mL.
The enzymatic reactions were quantified in an automatic microplate photometer (TECAN-Sunrise, Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria). All assays were conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples, which have shown higher concentrations, were diluted, and measured in duplicate.
Statistical analyses were done by using IBM SPSS Statistics v23 (USA). After a normality test, continuous variables were described by the median (interquartile range (IQR): 1st quartile–3rd quartile). Categorical variables were described by numbers and percentages. The Kruskal–Wallis test with the post hoc Mann–Whitney and chi-square test were used. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off values of the parameters. p values less than 0.05 and 0.01 were considered as statistically significant. Significance values have been adjusted by the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.

3. Results

A total of 95 pregnant women were enrolled in the study, including 63 participants with ICP and 32 participants with healthy pregnancies. The selected clinical and laboratory parameters in all groups are presented in Table 1 and Table 2.
There was no significant difference among the healthy and mild and severe ICP women age, gravida, parity, and BMI (p > 0.05). The median values of gestational age at birth and birth weight in the mild and severe ICP women were found to be significantly lower than the controls (p < 0.05). The Apgar score at 5 min in the severe ICP women was significantly lower than those of the mild ICP women and controls (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the mild ICP women and the controls with regard to the median Apgar score at 5 min (p > 0.05).
The rates of meconium-staining of the amnion and admission to NICU were found to be significantly higher in severe ICP women compared to mild ICP women and controls (p < 0.05). However, these rates were found to be similar in mild ICP women and the controls (p > 0.05).
Comparison of laboratory parameters in pregnant women with mild and severe ICP and the controls displayed in Table 2. In the pregnant women with ICP, 48 had mild ICP and 15 women had severe ICP. The serum median levels of total bile acid, ALT, AST, and bilirubin for the pregnant women with the severe ICP were significantly higher than those with mild ICP and controls (p < 0.05). The serum median levels of total bile acid, ALT, AST, and bilirubin for pregnant women with mild ICP were significantly higher than those of the controls (p < 0.05).
The median serum levels of leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin are displayed in Table 2. The median serum level of leptin in women with severe ICP was significantly lower than those of women with mild ICP and the controls (p < 0.05). The median serum level of leptin in women with mild ICP was significantly lower than that of the controls (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between pregnant women with mild and severe ICP regarding the median serum level of adiponectin (p > 0.05). The median serum levels of adiponectin in pregnant women with mild and severe ICP were significantly higher than that of the controls (p < 0.05). The median serum level of apelin in pregnant women with severe ICP was significantly higher than the women with mild ICP and the controls (p < 0.05). The median serum level of serum apelin in pregnant women with mild ICP was significantly higher than that of the controls (p < 0.05). The median serum level of ghrelin in women with severe ICP was significantly higher than the women with mild ICP and the controls (p < 0.05).
A significant decrease in median level of serum leptin was detected, while there were significant increases (p < 0.05) in median levels of adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin in the pregnant women with ICP compared to the controls (Figure 1).
To assess the predictive values of studied biomarkers leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin, ROC curve analyses were performed in women with or without ICP (Figure 2). The ROC analysis of leptin data revealed a significant cut-off value ≤135.67 pg/mL with a sensitivity and specificity of 74.6% and 81.2%, respectively (p < 0.05). The ROC analysis of adiponectin data revealed a significant cut-off value >3.59 ng/mL with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.0% and 71.9%, respectively (p < 0.05). The ROC analysis of apelin data revealed a significant cut-off value >34.1 pg/mL with a sensitivity and specificity of 61.9% and 96.9%, respectively (p < 0.05). The ROC analysis of ghrelin data revealed a significant cut-off value >116.12 pg/mL with a sensitivity and specificity of 44.4% and 96.9%, respectively (p < 0.05). During the comparisons of ROC curves of serum leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin (Figure 2), there was no significant difference among their area under curve (AUC) of the ROC analyses (p > 0.05) except those of the serum apelin and ghrelin (p < 0.05). Overall, the predictive values of leptin, adiponectin, apelin could be accepted as comparable. Figure 2 demonstrates the scatter dot graphs of serum leptin (AUC value of 0.819 with a p value of p < 0.05), adiponectin (AUC value of 0.751 with a p value of p < 0.05), apelin (AUC value of 0.876 with a p value of p < 0.05), and ghrelin (AUC value of 0.712 with a p value of p < 0.05) with significant cut-off values (horizontal line) presented with optimal sensitivity and specificity values. The scatter graphs highlight the number of cases with false positive and negative biomarker values.

4. Discussion

The potential roles of serum leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin, as biomarkers for the prediction and diagnosis of ICP, were assessed with significant results: While serum leptin reduced, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin increased. These biomarkers revealed meaningful changes concerning the severity of ICP: While leptin was reduced, apelin and ghrelin were increased, and adiponectin was increased somewhat. For the diagnosis of ICP, the predictive values of serum leptin, adiponectin, and apelin need to be accepted as comparable, with moderate to high sensitivity and specificity, even if the predictive value of serum ghrelin was somewhat lower when compared to the other biomarkers. Based on the data in this study, the serum leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin measurements in pregnant women with ICP could provide meaningful clues for their diagnostic roles in the prediction, diagnosis, and management of mild and severe ICP.
In a cross-sectional study, results were obtained suggesting that the leptin/adiponectin ratio increases in preeclampsia and that the imbalance between adipocytokines may play a role in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia [36]. Although adiponectin and leptin seem to be the main adipocytokines involved in the pathogenesis of GDM in the last review, their direct relationship to the pathophysiology of GDM is not clear and further studies are needed [37].
In 2013, Wikström et al. reported that there will be an increase in the incidence between ICP and both GDM and preeclampsia [38]. The relationship of ICP with GDM and preeclampsia has been evaluated and found in many studies recently. However, there are few studies on the relationship of ICP with GDM and preeclampsia, and they state that there is a lack of reliable data [37,39].
Recent studies have demonstrated that ICP is an inflammatory process specific to pregnant women with ICP, since pro-inflammatory cells and cytokines are dominant, the response of the T helper cell type-1 is increased and the process continues by means of triggering the inflammatory reaction in liver by bile acids [40,41].
Initially, adiponectin was thought to be produced only by adipose tissue. However, it was later proven from different research groups that adiponectin is expressed in other tissues such as human and murine osteoblasts, liver parenchyma cells, myocytes, epithelial cells, and placental tissue [42]. Adiponectin levels were significantly higher in the ICP group compared to healthy pregnant women, considering that Adiponectin has anti-steatosis, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic effects on liver [43,44,45]. In the study of Masaki et al. conducted on obese mice, the response to an adiponectin treatment was evaluated after causing liver damage with lipopolysaccharide [16]. As a result, they found that the adiponectin treatment decreased the elevated serum transaminase levels, hepatic necrotic and apoptotic variations, and hepatic TNF-α level after liver injury [16]. Based on this information, adipokine levels have been expected to be low in ICP in which the inflammatory mechanisms are significant. However, it has been stated that there is an increase in cholestatic diseases and the excretion of adiponectin from the body by bile is shown as the reason for this increase [46]. Another mechanism related to the elevated levels of adiponectin is that bile acids increase the release of adipokine from adipocytes in cholestatic diseases [47]. In the study conducted by Salman et al., patients with cholestasis-related cirrhosis had higher adiponectin levels than those with cirrhosis due to other factors [48]. However, differently from the previous study, an investigation including 50 pregnant women with ICP, 50 healthy pregnant women revealed that serum adiponectin levels did not demonstrate any significant change between groups [49].
In the our study, the high adiponectin levels in ICP, similarly to other cholestatic diseases, are comparable to the literature data, and this data highlights that this investigation is the first on adiponectin levels in ICP and can enrich the scientific literature on this topic. Leptin, on the other hand, is a hormone that is also released from adipocytes and exerts opposite effects to adiponectin in many ways. Leptin releases fatty acid and triglycerides from adipose tissue while adiponectin provides storage; while leptin has pro-inflammatory properties, the anti-inflammatory properties of adiponectin are prominent [50,51]. The pro-inflammatory properties of leptin are similar to those of acute phase reactants. TNF-α and IL-1 increase the leptin expression [52]. In the study findings, in contrast to this information, leptin levels were detected to be significantly lower in pregnant women with ICP, when compared to the control group and those with severe ICP, when compared to mild cases, and even if in the case where the ICP becomes severe, then the levels of Leptin decrease further.
Ben-Ari et al. evaluated patients with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatocellular disease, with primary biliary cirrhosis due to cholestasis (PBS) compared to a healthy control group [53]. Serum leptin levels were compared in both groups, and leptin levels were significantly lower in the PBS group, when compared to the other group and was found that there was no significant difference between the hepatocellular cirrhosis group and control group in terms of leptin levels. Similarly, Suarez et al. performed a study including 30 PBS patients and 29 healthy controls, the leptin levels in the PBS group were significantly lower than the control group [54]. However, it has been demonstrated that leptin levels have been shown to increase when the level of fibrosis increases. In the study of Rieger et al. including 37 PBS and 37 healthy controls, leptin levels were compared between these two groups and its association with the severity of the disease was investigated [55]. As a result, leptin levels were found to be significantly lower in the PBS group, however no association was detected between the severity of the disease and leptin levels. Although PBS is a disease that progresses with T cell infiltration, they believed that the low leptin levels were considered to be related to long lasting development of cholestasis-associated malabsorption, and consequently adipose tissue, which is a source of leptin, and may have an association with hypoplasia. Nevertheless, the ICP is not a chronic disease as PBS, and it did not cause weight loss in pregnant women in our study group.
In the study of Pizarro et al., comparing Zucker rats having obesity (due to an inactive saturation mechanism associated with deficiency in leptin production or dysfunctional leptin receptor) with normal rats, it can be understood why the leptin level was found to be low in cholestasis [56]. In this study, it was seen that bile flow decreased in Zucker rats compared to normal rats and the bile acid level increased in the serum. The decrease expression of the Mrp2 membrane protein in the ratio of 60–80% was shown as a reason, which is responsible for the transport of bile salt and organic anions and most of the bile production. Authors could explain the lower leptin levels in the ICP group with the fact that leptin deficiency decreases the expression of the Mrp2 protein.
Apelin is a cytokine that is also released from adipose tissue, such as adiponectin and leptin. Apelin has pro-inflammatory, pro-apoptotic, and fibrotic effects on the liver [23]. In the authors’ results, the levels of apelin were found to be significantly higher in pregnant women with ICP, and it was found to be higher in pregnant women with severe ICP, when compared to pregnant women with mild cases. Principe et al. showed that the mRNA level of apelin, and the expression of apelin and APJ receptors were higher in cirrhosis-induced rats with carbon tetrachloride in comparison to the control group [57]. When cirrhotic rats were treated with the receptor antagonist, hepatic fibrosis and vascular density were found to be decreased. In a study by Yasuzaki et al. on rats, the ligand of Jo2, an apoptosis-associated antigen of Fas, was injected intraperitoneal, and it was observed that the expression of apelin and APJ were both increased, and serious apoptotic changes were detected in the liver in examinations performed after 3 and 6 h [58]. Another experimental mice study by Chen et al. demonstrated that the apelin-APJ complex induced cholangiocyte proliferation and inflammation [59]. Melgar-Lesmes et al. evaluated, in human liver cell cultures, hypoxia and inflammatory factors [24]. They have been shown to activate the system of hepatic apelin, which creates angiogenic and fibrotic effects. The apelin/APJ system might contribute to cell damage in the inflammatory process in ICP.
Although ghrelin is not an adipokine, it is involved in maintaining appetite and metabolic functions in balance with adipokines. Ghrelin is the only hormone that has anti-inflammatory, hepato-protective, and antifibrotic effects on the liver, modified by fatty acid in the body and secreted from the gastric mucosa [32]. However, in the current study results, ghrelin levels were found to be significantly higher in the ICP group and it contradicts the mentioned hepato-protective effect. In addition, significantly higher ghrelin levels were found in severe ICP cases, when compared to mild cases. In a study conducted by Tacke et al. in patients with chronic liver disease, authors reported that ghrelin levels were significantly higher than that of the healthy control group [60]. They even reported that the level of ghrelin gradually increased as the clinical findings and cirrhosis worsened. Breidet et al. showed that while serum leptin levels increased in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, there was a parallel decrease in serum ghrelin levels [61]. They attributed these changes to the insulin resistance observed in patients and the antagonistic effect between leptin and ghrelin in the hypothalamus. In this study, ghrelin levels were found to be high, while leptin was found to be low, and the antagonistic effect between leptin and ghrelin was preserved. In line with our study results, the ghrelin treatment reduced the ductal reaction and hepatic fibrosis in an experimental study on cholestatic mouse models [62]. They did not find any literature report examining the relationship of adiponectin and ghrelin with ICP, thus this study may contribute to the literature as the first study in this field.
There are some limitations of this study related to its design, including the allocation of one healthy pregnant woman per two ICP (mild or severe) women. This prevented parametric comparisons of our numeric data because of the small number of participants in the severe ICP women. To examine the impact of this condition to the post hoc power value of the studied biomarkers, we performed post hoc potency analyses on the serum adipokines leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin in the control and ICP groups. For these parameters, potency values greater than 0.95 were found and we thought that the small number of study group participants did not compromise the interpretation of our clinical and adiponectin data.

5. Conclusions

The results of the current investigation suggest the role of adipokines leptin, adiponectin, and apelin and ghrelin during ICP, especially in severe cases. Considering the results of analyses for the determination of predictive values of these biomarkers for the diagnosis of ICP, leptin, adiponectin, and apelin, they provide comparable success compared to ghrelin, which has a lower predictive value. Overall, further investigations on adipokines may better explain the role of potential biomarkers for the prediction and diagnosis of ICP.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C. and C.S.C.; methodology, N.Y. and H.G.; software, N.Y. and C.S.C.; validation, N.Y., S.H. and A.T.; formal analysis, N.Y.; investigation, S.C. and N.Y.; resources, N.Y. and H.G.; data curation, N.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, N.Y.; writing—review and editing, N.Y.; visualization, N.Y. and A.T.; supervision, A.T.; project administration, S.C. and S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was performed according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committee of the Health Sciences University Samsun Educational and Research Hospital (approval number KAEK 2020/3/8).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to express their gratitude to all those who helped during the writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bicocca, M.J.; Sperling, J.D.; Chauhan, S.P. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Review of six national and regional guidelines. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 231, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Milkiewicz, P.; Elias, E.; Williamson, C.; Weaver, J. Obstetric cholestasis. BMJ 2002, 324, 123–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wikström Shemer, E.; Marschall, H.-U. Decreased 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D levels in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2010, 89, 1420–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Williamson, C.; Geenes, V. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 124, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Casado-Espada, N.M.; De Alarcón, R.; De La Iglesia-Larrad, J.I.; Bote-Bonaechea, B.; Montejo Ángel, L. Hormonal Contraceptives, Female Sexual Dysfunction, and Managing Strategies: A Review. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Smith, D.D.; Rood, K.M. Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 63, 134–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Geenes, V.; Lövgren-Sandblom, A.; Benthin, L.; Lawrance, D.; Chambers, J.; Gurung, V.; Thornton, J.; Chappell, L.; Khan, E.; Dixon, P.; et al. The Reversed Feto-Maternal Bile Acid Gradient in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy Is Corrected by Ursodeoxycholic Acid. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e83828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ovadia, C.; Seed, P.T.; Sklavounos, A.; Geenes, V.; Di Ilio, C.; Chambers, J.; Kohari, K.; Bacq, Y.; Bozkurt, N.; Brun-Furrer, R.; et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: Results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet 2019, 393, 899–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shao, Y.; Chen, J.; Zheng, J.; Liu, C.-R. Effect of Histone Deacetylase HDAC3 on Cytokines IL-18, IL-12 and TNF-α in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 42, 1294–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Liu, X.; Lai, H.; Zeng, X.; Xin, S.; Nie, L.; Liang, Z.; Wu, M.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zou, Y. Whole-exome sequencing reveals ANO8 as a genetic risk factor for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Allen, K.; Jaeschke, H.; Copple, B.L. Bile Acids Induce Inflammatory Genes in Hepatocytes: A Novel Mechanism of Inflammation during Obstructive Cholestasis. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kirbas, A.; Biberoglu, E.; Ersoy, A.O.; Dikmen, A.U.; Koca, C.; Ozgu-Erdinc, A.S.; Uygur, D.; Caglar, T.; Biberoglu, K. The role of interleukin-17 in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2015, 29, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Park, H.-K.; Ahima, R.S. Physiology of leptin: Energy homeostasis, neuroendocrine function and metabolism. Metabolism 2015, 64, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. La Cava, A.; Matarese, G. The weight of leptin in immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shen, J.; Sakaida, I.; Uchida, K.; Terai, S.; Okita, K. Leptin enhances TNF-α production via p38 and JNK MAPK in LPS-stimulated Kupffer cells. Life Sci. 2005, 77, 1502–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Masaki, T.; Chiba, S.; Tatsukawa, H.; Yasuda, T.; Noguchi, H.; Seike, M.; Yoshimatsu, H. Adiponectin protects LPS-induced liver injury through modulation of TNF-? in KK-Ay obese mice. Hepatology 2004, 40, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wolf, A.M.; Wolf, D.; Rumpold, H.; Enrich, B.; Tilg, H. Adiponectin induces the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-1RA in human leukocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 323, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Boucher, J.; Masri, B.; Daviaud, D.; Gesta, S.; Guigné, C.; Mazzucotelli, A.; Castan-Laurell, I.; Tack, I.; Knibiehler, B.; Carpéné, C.; et al. Apelin, a Newly Identified Adipokine Up-Regulated by Insulin and Obesity. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 1764–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hosoya, M.; Kawamata, Y.; Fukusumi, S.; Fujii, R.; Habata, Y.; Hinuma, S.; Kitada, C.; Honda, S.; Kurokawa, T.; Onda, H.; et al. Molecular and functional characteristics of APJ. Tissue distribution of mRNA and interaction with the endogenous ligand apelin. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 21061–21067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Hashimoto, T.; Kihara, M.; Imai, N.; Yoshida, S.-I.; Shimoyamada, H.; Yasuzaki, H.; Ishida, J.; Toya, Y.; Kiuchi, Y.; Hirawa, N.; et al. Requirement of Apelin-Apelin Receptor System for Oxidative Stress-Linked Atherosclerosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 171, 1705–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kleinz, M.J.; Davenport, A.P. Immunocytochemical localization of the endogenous vasoactive peptide apelin to human vascular and endocardial endothelial cells. Regul. Pept. 2004, 118, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cayabyab, M.; Hinuma, S.; Farzan, M.; Choe, H.; Fukusumi, S.; Kitada, C.; Nishizawa, N.; Hosoya, M.; Nishimura, O.; Messele, T.; et al. Apelin, the Natural Ligand of the Orphan Seven-Transmembrane Receptor APJ, Inhibits Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Entry. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 11972–11976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lv, X.; Kong, J.; Chen, W.-D.; Wang, Y.-D. The Role of the Apelin/APJ System in the Regulation of Liver Disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Melgar-Lesmes, P.; Pauta, M.; Reichenbach, V.; Casals, G.; Ros, J.; Bataller, R.; Morales-Ruiz, M.; Jiménez, W. Hypoxia and proinflammatory factors upregulate apelin receptor expression in human stellate cells and hepatocytes. Gut 2011, 60, 1404–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Date, Y.; Kojima, M.; Hosoda, H.; Sawaguchi, A.; Mondal, M.S.; Suganuma, T.; Matsukura, S.; Kangawa, K.; Nakazato, M. Ghrelin, a Novel Growth Hormone-Releasing Acylated Peptide, Is Synthesized in a Distinct Endocrine Cell Type in the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Rats and Humans. Endocrinology 2000, 141, 4255–4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ibrahim Abdalla, M.M. Ghrelin—Physiological Functions and Regulation. Eur. Endocrinol. 2015, 11, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kojima, M.; Hosoda, H.; Date, Y.; Nakazato, M.; Matsuo, H.; Kangawa, K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 1999, 402, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Delporte, C. Structure and Physiological Actions of Ghrelin. Scientifica 2013, 2013, 518909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Al Massadi, O.; López, M.; Tschöp, M.; Diéguez, C.; Nogueiras, R. Current Understanding of the Hypothalamic Ghrelin Pathways Inducing Appetite and Adiposity. Trends Neurosci. 2017, 40, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Cornejo, M.P.; Castrogiovanni, D.; Schiöth, H.B.; Reynaldo, M.; Marie, J.; Fehrentz, J.; Perello, M. Growth hormone secretagogue receptor signalling affects high-fat intake independently of plasma levels of ghrelin and LEAP 2, in a 4-day binge eating model. J. Neuroendocr. 2019, 31, e12785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Quiñones, M.; Fernø, J.; Al-Massadi, O. Ghrelin and liver disease. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2019, 21, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moreno, M.; Chaves, J.F.; Sancho-Bru, P.; Ramalho, F.; Ramalho, L.N.; Mansego, M.L.; Ivorra, C.; Dominguez, M.; Conde, L.; Millán, C.; et al. Ghrelin attenuates hepatocellular injury and liver fibrogenesis in rodents and influences fibrosis progression in humans. Hepatology 2010, 51, 974–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Barazzoni, R.; Semolic, A.; Cattin, M.R.; Zanetti, M.; Guarnieri, G. Acylated ghrelin limits fat accumulation and improves redox state and inflammation markers in the liver of high-fat-fed rats. Obesity 2014, 22, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guszczynska-Losy, M.; Wirstlein, P.K.; Wender-Ozegowska, E.; Kedzia, M. Evaluation of predictive value of biochemical markers for adverse obstetrics outcomes in pregnancies complicated by cholestasis. Ginekol. Polska 2020, 91, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jelski, W.; Piechota, J.; Orywal, K.; Mroczko, B. The Alterations in Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity in the Sera of Women with Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy. Anticancer Res. 2020, 40, 1997–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Khosrowbeygi, A.; Ahmadvand, H. Leptin to adiponectin ratio in preeclampsia. Bangladesh Med. Res. Counc. Bull. 2013, 39, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mallardo, M.; Ferraro, S.; Daniele, A.; Nigro, E. GDM-complicated pregnancies: Focus on adipokines. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 8171–8180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wikström Shemer, E.; Marschall, H.U.; Ludvigsson, J.F.; Stephansson, O. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes: A 12-year population-based cohort study. BJOG 2013, 120, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Arafa, A.; Dong, J. Association between intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2020, 39, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yayi, H.; Danqing, W.; Shuyun, L.; Jicheng, L. OPINION: Immunologic Abnormality of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kosters, A.; Karpen, S.J. The Role of Inflammation in Cholestasis: Clinical and Basic Aspects. Semin. Liver Dis. 2010, 30, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Achari, A.E.; Jain, S.K. Adiponectin, a Therapeutic Target for Obesity, Diabetes, and Endothelial Dysfunction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Lam, K.S.L.; Xu, A. Protective roles of adiponectin in obesity-related fatty liver diseases: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2009, 53, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Ouchi, N.; Kihara, S.; Arita, Y.; Nishida, M.; Matsuyama, A.; Okamoto, Y.; Ishigami, M.; Kuriyama, H.; Kishida, K.; Nishizawa, H.; et al. Adipocyte-Derived Plasma Protein, Adiponectin, Suppresses Lipid Accumulation and Class A Scavenger Receptor Expression in Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages. Circulation 2001, 103, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Balmer, M.L.; Joneli, J.; Schoepfer, A.; Stickel, F.; Thormann, W.; Dufour, J.-F. Significance of serum adiponectin levels in patients with chronic liver disease. Clin. Sci. 2010, 119, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Tacke, F.; Wüstefeld, T.; Horn, R.; Luedde, T.; Rao, A.S.; Manns, M.P.; Trautwein, C.; Brabant, G. High adiponectin in chronic liver disease and cholestasis suggests biliary route of adiponectin excretion in vivo. J. Hepatol. 2005, 42, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Boutari, C.; Perakakis, N.; Mantzoros, C.S. Association of Adipokines with Development and Progression of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 33, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Salman, T.A.; Allam, N.; Azab, G.I.; Shaarawy, A.A.; Hassouna, M.M.; El-Haddad, O.M. Study of adiponectin in chronic liver disease and cholestasis. Hepatol Int. 2010, 4, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kukla, M.; Kierach, R.; Skonieczna, M.; Hudy, D.; Dąbrowski, K.; Menżyk, T.; Derra, A.; Boroń, D.; Grabarek, B. Influence of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy on levels of fibroblast growth factor 21, adiponectin and biochemical parameters in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2021, 7, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Stern, J.H.; Rutkowski, J.M.; Scherer, P.E. Adiponectin, Leptin, and Fatty Acids in the Maintenance of Metabolic Homeostasis through Adipose Tissue Crosstalk. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 770–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Scotece, M.; Conde, J.; Lopez, V.; Lago, F.; Pino, J.; Gómez-Reino, J.J.; Gualillo, O. Adiponectin and Leptin: New Targets in Inflammation. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013, 114, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Landman, R.E.; Puder, J.; Xiao, E.; Freda, P.U.; Ferin, M.; Wardlaw, S.L. Endotoxin Stimulates Leptin in the Human and Nonhuman Primate. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 1285–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Ben-Ari, Z.; Schafer, Z.; Sulkes, J.; Manhaim, V.; Tur-Kaspa, R.; Fainaru, M. Alterations in serum leptin in chronic liver disease. Am. J. Dig. Dis. 2002, 47, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. García-Suárez, C.; Crespo, J.; Fernández-Gil, P.L.; Amado, A.J.; García-Unzueta, M.T.; Romero, F.P. Plasma leptin levels in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and their relationship with degree of fibrosis. Gastroenterología y Hepatología 2004, 27, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rieger, R.; Oertelt, S.; Selmi, C.; Invernizzi, P.; Podda, M.; Gershwin, M.; Oertelt-Prigione, S. Decreased Serum Leptin Levels in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis: A Link between Metabolism and Autoimmunity? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1051, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pizarro, M.; Balasubramaniyan, N.; Solís, N.; Solar, A.; Duarte, I.; Miquel, J.F.; Suchy, F.J.; Trauner, M.; Accatino, L.; Ananthanarayanan, M.; et al. Bile secretory function in the obese Zucker rat: Evidence of cholestasis and altered canalicular transport function. Gut 2004, 53, 1837–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Principe, A.; Melgar-Lesmes, P.; Fernández-Varo, G.; del Arbol, L.R.; Ros, J.; Morales-Ruiz, M.; Bernardi, M.; Arroyo, V.; Jiménez, W. The hepatic apelin system: A new therapeutic target for liver disease. Hepatology 2008, 48, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yasuzaki, H.; Yoshida, S.-I.; Hashimoto, T.; Shibata, W.; Inamori, M.; Toya, Y.; Tamura, K.; Maeda, S.; Umemura, S. Involvement of the apelin receptor APJ in Fas-induced liver injury. Liver Int. 2013, 33, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, L.; Zhou, T.; White, T.; O’Brien, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Liangpunsakul, S.; Yang, Z.; Kennedy, L.; Saxena, R.; Wu, C.; et al. The Apelin–Apelin Receptor Axis Triggers Cholangiocyte Proliferation and Liver Fibrosis During Mouse Models of Cholestasis. Hepatology 2021, 73, 2411–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tacke, F.; Brabant, G.; Kruck, E.; Horn, R.; Schöffski, P.; Hecker, H.; Manns, M.; Trautwein, C. Ghrelin in chronic liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2003, 38, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Breidert, M.; Zimmermann, T.F.; Schneider, R.; Ehninger, G.; Brabant, G. Ghrelin/Leptin-Imbalance in Patients with Primary Biliary Cirrhosis. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2004, 112, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Petrescu, A.D.; Grant, S.; Williams, E.; Frampton, G.; Reinhart, E.H.; Nguyen, A.; An, S.; McMillin, M.; DeMorrow, S. Ghrelin reverses ductular reaction and hepatic fibrosis in a rodent model of cholestasis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 19 02254 g001 550
Figure 1. Median serum levels of leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin levels in women with intrahepatic cholestasis (ICP) and controls. Data are expressed as median with an interquartile range and compared with the Mann–Whitney test.
Figure 1. Median serum levels of leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin levels in women with intrahepatic cholestasis (ICP) and controls. Data are expressed as median with an interquartile range and compared with the Mann–Whitney test.
Ijerph 19 02254 g001
Ijerph 19 02254 g002a 550Ijerph 19 02254 g002b 550
Figure 2. In women with or without ICP, scatter dot graphs of serum leptin (area under curve (AUC) value of 0.819 with a p value of p < 0.05), adiponectin (AUC value of 0.751 with a p value of p < 0.05), apelin (AUC value of 0.876 with a p value of p < 0.05), and ghrelin (AUC value of 0.712 with a p value of p < 0.05) with significant cut-off values (horizontal line) presented with optimal sensitivity and specificity values. Comparisons of ROC curves of serum leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin. There is no significant difference among their area under the ROC curves (p > 0.05) except those of the serum apelin and ghrelin (p < 0.05). Overall, the predictive values of leptin, adiponectin, and apelin could be accepted as comparable.
Figure 2. In women with or without ICP, scatter dot graphs of serum leptin (area under curve (AUC) value of 0.819 with a p value of p < 0.05), adiponectin (AUC value of 0.751 with a p value of p < 0.05), apelin (AUC value of 0.876 with a p value of p < 0.05), and ghrelin (AUC value of 0.712 with a p value of p < 0.05) with significant cut-off values (horizontal line) presented with optimal sensitivity and specificity values. Comparisons of ROC curves of serum leptin, adiponectin, apelin, and ghrelin. There is no significant difference among their area under the ROC curves (p > 0.05) except those of the serum apelin and ghrelin (p < 0.05). Overall, the predictive values of leptin, adiponectin, and apelin could be accepted as comparable.
Ijerph 19 02254 g002aIjerph 19 02254 g002b
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics and clinical data of the women with ICP and controls.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics and clinical data of the women with ICP and controls.
Controls (n = 32)ICP Mild (n = 48)ICP Severe (n = 15)p
Age (year)26.5 (24–32) a26 (23–30) a29 (24–34) a>0.05
Gravida2 (2–3) a2 (1–3) a2 (2–3) a>0.05
Parity1 (1–2) a1 (1–2) a1 (1–2) a>0.05
BMI24 (23–27) a23 (23–26) a27 (23–29) a>0.05
Gestational age at birth40 (39–40) a37 (36–37) b36 (33–36) b<0.05
Birth weight (g)3500 (3300–3750) a3000 (2800–3200) b2900 (2700–3000) b<0.05
Apgar score at 5 min9 (8–9) a9 (8–9) a8 (7–9) b<0.05
Meconium staining of amnion, n (%) <0.05
Absent30 (93.7%)44 (91.7%)6 (40%)
Present2 (6.3%) a4 (8.3%) a9 (60%) b
Admission to NICU n (%) <0.05
Absent30 (93.7%)45 (93.8%)10 (66.7%)
Present2 (6.3%) a3 (6.3%) a5 (33.3%) b
Data are presented as median with an interquartile range (25–75%), or number with a percentage as appropriate. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA test followed by the Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney post hoc test or chi-square tests. ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. BMI, body mass index. NICU, neonatal intensive care unit. Each superscript letter (a, b) denotes significant difference when coded with a different letter among the study groups (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Comparison of laboratory parameters in women with ICP and controls.
Table 2. Comparison of laboratory parameters in women with ICP and controls.
Controls (n = 32)ICP Mild (n = 48)ICP Severe (n = 15)p
Total bile acid (µmol/L)4 (3–4.7) a21.9 (12.8–30.5) b133 (127.4–139) c<0.05
ALT (U/L)18 (12–22) a54 (48–63) b123 (78–168) c<0.05
AST (U/L)17 (13–22) a51.5 (42.2–55.7) b105 (62–122) c<0.05
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)0.33 (0.2–0.5) a2.1 (1.8–2.3) b3.7 (3.2–4.3) c<0.05
Leptin (pg/mL)343 (140–628) a92 (42–196) b18 (17–26) c<0.05
Adiponectin (ng/mL)3 (2.6–4.7) a3.8 (3.6–3.9) b3.8 (3–3.8) ab<0.05
Apelin (pg/mL)19.3 (16.6–27.5) a46 (24.6–145) b547 (399–1174) c<0.05
Ghrelin (pg/mL)39.2 (14.8–73.4) a66.3 (19–168) a742 (554–883.5) b<0.05
Data are presented as median with interquartile range (25–75%). Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA test followed by the Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney post hoc test. ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Each superscript letter (a, b, c) denotes significant difference when coded with different letter among the study groups (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yurtcu, N.; Caliskan, C.S.; Guvey, H.; Celik, S.; Hatirnaz, S.; Tinelli, A. Predictive and Diagnostic Value of Serum Adipokines in Pregnant Women with Intrahepatic Cholestasis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042254

AMA Style

Yurtcu N, Caliskan CS, Guvey H, Celik S, Hatirnaz S, Tinelli A. Predictive and Diagnostic Value of Serum Adipokines in Pregnant Women with Intrahepatic Cholestasis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(4):2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yurtcu, Nazan, Canan Soyer Caliskan, Huri Guvey, Samettin Celik, Safak Hatirnaz, and Andrea Tinelli. 2022. "Predictive and Diagnostic Value of Serum Adipokines in Pregnant Women with Intrahepatic Cholestasis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 4: 2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop