Next Article in Journal
The Current Status of Breastfeeding Knowledge and Its Influencing Factors in Nursing Undergraduates: A Cross-Sectional Study in China
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Electrical Muscle Stimulation and Resistance Exercise Intervention on Physical and Brain Function in Middle-Aged and Older Women
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Cardiovascular Lifestyle Risk Factors among Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study

by
Franck Garanet
1,2,3,*,
Abou Coulibaly
1,4,
Adama Baguiya
1,4,
Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou
3 and
Seni Kouanda
1,4
1
Département Biomédical et Santé Publique, Institut de Recherche en Science de la Santé (IRSS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique(CNRST), Ouagadougou 03 BP 7047, Burkina Faso
2
Laboratoire de Santé Publique, Ecole Doctorale Science de la Santé (ED2S), Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7021, Burkina Faso
3
Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique Bruxelles, Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
4
Institut Africain de Santé Publique, Ouagadougou 12 BP 199, Burkina Faso
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(1), 102; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010102
Submission received: 23 August 2022 / Revised: 14 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Health Behavior, Chronic Disease and Health Promotion)

Abstract

:
Data on lifestyle risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, inadequate physical activity, and insufficient consumption of fruits and vegetables, in pregnant women in Africa, are scarce. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors among pregnant women in Burkina Faso and identify their associated factors. Pregnant women who attended antenatal care services between December 2018 and March 2019 were included in this study. A modified Poisson regression model was used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with a 95% confidence interval. A total of 1027 pregnant women participated in this study. The prevalence of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, inadequate physical activity, and insufficient consumption of fruits and vegetables were 10.2% [8.5–12.2], 3.0% [2.1–4.3], 79.4% [76.9–81.8], and 53.5% [50.5–56.6], respectively. The prevalence of more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor in pregnant women was 50.9% [48.0–54.0]. The predictors significantly associated with more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor were women over 30 years old aPR 1.26; 95% CI [1.03–1.53]), women living in fourth wealth index households (aPR 1.23; 95% CI [1.06–1.42]), in semi-urban areas (aPR 5.46; 95% CI [4.34–6.88]), and women with no occupation (aPR 1.31; 95% CI [1.18–1.44]). The prevalence of more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor was high during pregnancy in Burkina Faso. Women of childbearing age should be advised on how healthy behaviors can lead to improved pregnancy outcomes.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are among the leading causes of death worldwide [1]. In 2012, an estimated 17.5 million people died from CVD, 30% of all deaths worldwide; 7.5 million were due to coronary heart disease, and 6.7 million died from a stroke. By 2030, it is estimated that 23.6 million people will die annually from cardiovascular disease and stroke. These conditions are projected to remain the leading cause of death [2].
Smoking, alcohol consumption, inadequate physical activity, and the insufficient consumption of fruit and vegetables are well-known cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors [3,4,5,6]. Worldwide, smoking is responsible for 10% of deaths attributed to cardiovascular diseases, gradually increasing in resource-limited countries. Alcohol consumption contributes to 6% of deaths among men and 1% among women. Inadequate physical activity and the insufficient consumption of fruits and vegetables contribute to 33% and 10% of ischemic heart disease-related deaths, respectively [3,7,8,9]. For example, in Burkina Faso, the World Health Organization Stepwise approach to non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factor surveillance survey 2013 (STEPS) revealed a national prevalence of smoking of 30.8%, alcohol consumption of 17.4%, inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption of 98.9%, and insufficient physical activity of 3.5% [10].
Cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy include congenital heart disease, valvular heart disease, ischemic heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, hypertensive disorders, and venous thromboembolism. In addition, the global burden of cardiovascular disease during pregnancy has increased alarmingly in parallel with the increasing prevalence of lifestyle risk factors among women of childbearing age [11,12,13,14].
Cardiovascular diseases, considered diseases that affect the rich, are increasingly affecting the underprivileged population [15,16,17,18,19]. It is essential to address the risk factors for cardiovascular disease in pregnant women. Such efforts will help reduce adverse perinatal outcomes, such as low birth weight, fetal and infant mortality, and potential birth defects and cardiovascular disease in mothers [12,15,16,19]. Assessing the lifestyle risk factors for cardiovascular diseases could contribute to global prevention efforts. Five studies examined the risk factors for cardiovascular disease during pregnancy, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, low fruit, and vegetable consumption, daily salt intake, overweight or obesity, and hypertension [11,15,16,17,18]. However, few studies have identified the predictors of cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors in pregnancy [20,21]. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of, and factors associated with cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors in pregnant women in Burkina Faso.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Setting

The study was conducted in Sanmatenga Province, North Central Burkina Faso. There are three health districts (Kaya, Boussouma, and Barsalogho). Kaya (the regional capital) is 100 km from Ouagadougou. We selected the three largest health centers in the districts of Kaya and Boussouma that received the highest number of women who attended antenatal care (ANC). These health centers are the health centers of sectors 4 and 6 and the medical center of sector 1. In addition, in rural areas, we selected the three largest health centers that received the most significant number of pregnant women who attended ANCs (Boussouma Medical Center, the Pissila health center, and the Korsimoro Medical Center).

2.2. Study Design

We conducted a cross-sectional study from 15 December 2018 to 15 March 2019. The study population consisted of pregnant women, irrespective of their gestational age, who sought antenatal care at these health centers. All women who attended antenatal consultations were included in each health center during the collection period.

2.3. Sample Size

With a 50% proportion of pregnant women with cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors (unknown prevalence), a power of 80%, a precision of 0.05, a prevalence ratio of 1.5, and a nonresponse rate of 10%, the minimum sample size required was 900 participants. Therefore, we used the formula proposed by Kelsey et al. [22].
n 1 = ( Z α / 2 + Z 1 β ) 2   P Q ( P R + 1 ) P R ( p 1 p 2 ) 2 ˙
And n2 = PR*n1;
where;
n1 = number of exposed; n2 = number of unexposed;
Zα/2 = standard normal deviate for a two-tailed test based on alpha level (related to the confidence interval level); Z1 − β = standard normal deviate for a one-tailed test based on beta level (related to the power level);
PR = ratio of unexposed to exposed;
p1 = proportion of individuals exposed to disease and q1 = 1 − p1; p2 = proportion of unexposed individuals with disease and q2 = 1 − q2;
Q = p 1 + P R p 2 P R + 1
And Q = 1 − P.

2.4. The Variables in the Study

The main outcome variables were cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors, including fruit and vegetable consumption, physical activity, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption. First, we considered these outcomes separately and then computed another binary outcome variable that identifies the presence of at least two risk factors.
Cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors were operationalized based on standard definitions to ensure comparability and minimize errors. Participants who had consumed any form of alcohol or tobacco (with or without tobacco smoking) in the past 30 days were considered current users. Women who used tobacco daily were defined as current tobacco users. We used “exposure cards” associated with the food frequency questionnaire to collect data on the consumption of fruits and vegetables during pregnancy [23]. Fruit or vegetable intake was considered inadequate if the participant consumed fruit or vegetables less than five times daily. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), consuming five servings of fruits and vegetables daily is associated with a lower risk of death from cardiovascular disease, cancer, and respiratory disease [23].
We adopted the WHO Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health (adults) to measure physical activity levels in pregnant women. Physical activity includes travel, recreation, and work. WHO-recommended moderate-intensity physical activity (at least 150 min per week) can help reduce the risks mentioned above in adults [24]. In our study area, women generally engage in household chores and agricultural activities that meet the criteria for moderate-intensity physical activity [25]. Participants were asked various questions about their level of physical activity. Based on their responses, the interviewer recorded the hours spent on daily household activities, travel, recreation, and work. Based on the hours spent engaging in various activities, the researchers then grouped these activities into two categories: (i) less than 150 min per week of moderate-intensity physical activity (physical inactivity) and (ii) more than 150 min per week of moderate-intensity physical activity (active physical activity).
The independent variables were age, level of education, socioeconomic status (SES), geographical location, and occupation. Another variable was pre-existing illnesses or a family history of cardiovascular diseases (hyperglycemia and diabetes, high blood pressure, and a family history of hypertension).

2.5. Data Collection

Data were collected on the day of each participant’s consultation. A room was identified at each site, and each consenting woman was interviewed. A structured questionnaire was used for data collection. Health workers with experience in data collection and who spoke the local language were recruited to collect data. After face-to-face interviews to obtain demographic characteristics, maternal smoking, alcohol consumption, and blood pressure were measured. An electronic blood pressure monitor (Omron M3 Intellisense device) with an adult-sized cuff was used. Blood pressure was measured with the participant seated at the end of the interview after approximately 15 min of rest. Blood pressure was measured in each arm to determine the arm with the highest blood pressure. Two other measurements were successively performed on the identified arm at an interval of one minute. The average of the last two measurements was considered as the participant’s blood pressure.

2.6. Data Quality Assurance

The research team trained all health workers in the use of tools and different data collection techniques. A pre-test was conducted at a health center that was not included in the study. A manual covering all the required interview procedures was written and provided to each field worker.

2.7. Data Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.14.1 (Stata 2014: Revision 1 December 2015. College Station, TX, USA) [26]. A descriptive analysis was performed, and the variables were recorded as required.
For SES, 20 items related to household assets were used with principal component analysis (PCA) to generate wealth quintiles (Poorest, Second, Middle, Fourth, and Richest) [27]. These 20 items included the presence of a bucket, bowls, cup, gas fireplace, bed, mattress, table, chair, functional radio, functional clock, functional lamp, functional television, functional bicycle, functional motorcycle, functional telephone, functional cart, functional wheelbarrow, donkey or horse, and poultry, sheep, or goats. We then produced a wealth quintile.
The variables used for this study were recorded as follows: age (≤19 years, 20–29 years, and ≥30 years), educational level (one, primary, and more), wealth quintile (lowest, second, middle, fourth, and highest), geographical location (semi-urban and rural), occupation (employed or not employed), parity (primipara or multipara), marital status (married or not married), pre-existing illnesses, or history of hypertension (yes or no).
A modified Poisson regression model, in order to generate a prevalence ratio with a 95% confidence interval, was fitted to identify factors associated with cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors [28,29].

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Participants

A total of 1027 pregnant women participated in this study. The mean age was 25.8 ± 6.0 years. One hundred and forty-eight (14.4%)participants were under 20 years of age. Most study participants were aged 20 to 29 (61.6%). For most women, 63.3% did not attend school. 42.6% of the women live in rural areas. Overall, 4.6% of women had pre-existing illnesses or a family history of hypertension (Table 1).

3.2. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Alcohol Consumption

The prevalence of alcohol consumption was 10.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) [8.51–12.23]). This prevalence was high in the not employed group (10.9%) and the fourth wealth quintile group (13.2%) (Table 2).
In the multivariable regression model, the predictors significantly associated with alcohol consumption were primary or higher education level (adjusted Prevalence Ratio (aPR) 1.82; 95%CI [1.27–2.62]) and rural area (aPR) 1.94; 95% CI [1.31–2.87] (Table 2).

3.3. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Tobacco Use

The prevalence of tobacco use was 3% [2.1–4.3]. This prevalence was higher in the over 30 years group (7.7%), among those living in rural areas (6.6%), and among women with pre-existing illnesses or a family history of hypertension (6.4%) (Table 3).
In the multivariable regression model, the predictors significantly associated with tobacco use were: the 20–29 years group (aPR 0.15; 95% CI [0.04–0.50]), women in rural areas (aPR 15.02; 95% CI [3.12–72.39]), and multipara (aPR 10.07; 95% CI [3.38–29.14]) (Table 3).

3.4. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Inadequate Physical Activity

The prevalence of inadequate physical activity was 79.4% [76.9–81.8]. This prevalence was higher in semi-urban areas (93.9%) and employed women (86.1%) (Table 4).
In the multivariable regression model, the predictors significantly associated with inadequate physical activity were the second, middle, fourth, and highest wealth indices. Pregnant women with high wealth indices (middle, fourth, or highest) were more likely to have inadequate physical activity than those with lower wealth indices. Women living in semi-urban areas were 1.54 times more likely to have inadequate physical activity compared to women living in rural areas (aPR 1.54; 95% CI [1.42–1.66]) (Table 4).
In the multivariable regression model, the predictors significantly associated with inadequate physical activity were the second, middle, fourth, and highest wealth indices. Women living in semi-urban areas were 1.54 times more likely to have inadequate physical activity compared to women living in rural areas (aPR 1.54; 95% CI [1.42–1.66] (Table 4).

3.5. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Insufficient Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables

The prevalence of insufficient consumption of fruit and vegetables was 53.5% [50.5–56.6]). This prevalence was 62.2% in the ≤19 years group and 94.7% in rural areas (Table 5).
In the multivariable regression model, the predictors significantly associated with alcohol consumption were women with no education level (aPR 1.16; 95% CI [1.03–1.30]), the highest wealth group (aPR 1.19; 95% CI [1.03–1.40]), the rural area (aPR 4.47; 95% CI [3.85–5.18]), the employed group (aPR 0.73; 95% CI [0.66–0.80]), and the Pre-existing illnesses or family history of hypertension (aPR 1.17; 95% CI [1.03–1.33]) (Table 5).

3.6. Prevalence of More Than One Cardiovascular Lifestyle Risk Factor and Its Associated Factors

The prevalence of more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor in pregnant women was 50.9% (95% CI [47.9–54]). The predictors significantly associated with more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor in the multivariable regression model were: women over 30 years old (aPR 1.26; 95% CI [1.03–1.53]), women living in fourth wealth index households ((aPR) 1.23; 95% CI [1.06–1.42]), in semi-urban areas (aPR 5.46; 95% CI [4.34–6.88]), and women with no occupation (aPR 1.31; 95% CI [1.18–1.44]) (Table 6).

4. Discussion

This study estimated the prevalence and predictors of four main cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors in pregnant women: alcohol use, tobacco consumption, inadequate physical activity, and insufficient consumption of fruits and vegetables. This study is the first to model cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors in pregnant women in rural and semi-urban areas with low resources.

4.1. High Prevalence of Inadequate Physical Activity and Insufficient Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables

The most common cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor in pregnant women is physical inactivity, with a prevalence of 79.5%, which is higher than the prevalence reported in a survey of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in the general population in Burkina Faso (70.7%) [10]. Paudel et al., in a community-based cross-sectional study of 426 participants conducted in Nepal in 2018, showed a prevalence of 53.9% [20]. This may be explained by the general belief among the population (promoted by some local healthcare providers) that physical activity leads to undesirable pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriage, poor fetal growth, or premature delivery [30,31,32]. Additionally, semi-urban and rural areas have no space for physical activity. However, a systematic review of physical activity during pregnancy found that some mild to moderate physical activities protect maternally and child health from outcomes such as preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and preterm birth [24]. Global physical activity guidelines recommend moderate-intensity exercises such as brisk walking and other recreational activities for pregnant women [33]. Therefore, providing appropriate advice to encourage optimal physical activity during pregnancy may reduce cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors.
After physical inactivity, the most common risk factor was the insufficient consumption of fruits and vegetables in pregnant women, with a prevalence of 53.6%. The high proportion of pregnant women who do not consume enough fruits and vegetables could be due to poverty, which could prevent them from being able to afford fruits and vegetables. Other studies have argued that low income prevents individuals from purchasing sufficient amounts of fruits and vegetables [25,34]. Another potential factor associated with lower consumption of fruits and vegetables during pregnancy may be their seasonal and geographic availability. In most households in Burkina Faso, fruit consumption is not considered a priority compared to the daily consumption of the main cereals, especially rice and sorghum [35].

4.2. The Prevalence of Alcohol and Tobacco Consumption

The prevalence of alcohol (3%) and tobacco consumption (10.2%) among pregnant women are other key findings of this study; Paudel and al., in Nepal, have shown a prevalence of alcohol consumption (13.3%) and tobacco use (21.3%) [20]. In pregnant women, tobacco is often consumed by chewing tobacco to combat nausea, especially during the first trimester of pregnancy. However, healthcare providers have overlooked this issue. The reason for alcohol consumption among pregnant women could be the widespread availability and accessibility of traditional alcohol and imported alcoholic beverages, even in rural areas.
Another common reason for alcohol consumption in pregnant women could be that several types of traditional alcoholic beverages are brewed at home in our study area, most often by women. In most ethnic groups, “dolo,” a local beer, is considered culturally acceptable even for pregnant women. This may be due to a lack of knowledge regarding the harmful effects of these products on the mother and fetus during pregnancy [35]. Therefore, health promotion strategies should include general awareness programs to reduce cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors.

4.3. The Co-Occurrence of Cardiovascular Lifestyle Risk Factors and Associated Factors

Our study reported that half (50.9%) of pregnant women had more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor.
Women who lived in semi-urban areas were five times more likely to have more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor than those who lived in semi-urban settings. Unemployed women were 1.31 times more likely to have more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor than employed women. Thus, after adjusting for other potentially confounding variables, our study demonstrated an association between rural settings, unemployment, and cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors. Adjusting for potential confounding factors yielded more direct evidence of the contribution of these parameters to the high prevalence of cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors in pregnant women. The prevalence of these factors may be due to a lack of awareness about risky behaviors during pregnancy and cultural factors.
Similarly, limited access to suitable fruits and vegetables may be associated with poverty in the study area [25,34]. According to the World Bank, more than 40.1% of the population lives below the national poverty line [20]. Pregnant women living in the fourth wealth index were 1.23 times more likely to have more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor than those living with a low wealth index.
Several studies have provided results consistent with our findings [15,36,37]. For example, in 2018, Paudel et al. demonstrated that a high wealth index was significantly associated with cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors [20]. In 2007, Dumith et al. demonstrated that educational level was significantly associated with physical inactivity [30]. Therefore, targeted education campaigns and poverty reduction strategies should be recommended to reduce the risk factors for cardiovascular lifestyles in pregnant women.
Additionally, any contact with mothers should be an opportunity to encourage them to engage in activities that prevent cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors in pregnant women.

4.4. Limitations

This was a hospital-based, cross-sectional study. Although we ensured confidentiality during the interviews, this study was subject to recall and social desirability biases (particularly for tobacco consumption), which may underestimate or overestimate the prevalence.
We also did not consider the vegetables consumed in meals made of grains and soups. Furthermore, we explored the factors associated with lifestyle risk factors in this cross-sectional study. However, these associations can be better established by a more appropriate study design and robust analysis to provide evidence in the context of our study.

5. Conclusions

This study showed a high prevalence of low fruit and vegetable consumption and inadequate physical activity. Further emphasis on improving the management of these risk factors before and during pregnancy is critical for improving maternal and child outcomes and reducing disparities in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Any contact with pregnant women should be used as an opportunity to advise women on reducing cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors to improve the chances of a better pregnancy experience and desired outcomes.
However, existing recommendations for the prevention of cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors remain limited, and significant gaps in longitudinal, intrapartum care exist, leading to missed opportunities for the prevention of cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors in pregnancy. Further research is needed to determine optimal prevention strategies during and after pregnancy to improve women’s cardiovascular health.

Author Contributions

F.G. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. A.C., A.B., F.K.-S. and S.K. interpreted the data and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Académie de Recherche et d’Enseignement Supérieur (ARES) as part of the Research for Development Projects. However, the funding agency did not play any role in the study design, data collection, interpretation, manuscript writing, or submission.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval (reference number: 2018/12/146 dated 4 December 2018) was obtained from the Ethics Committee for Research for Health in Burkina Faso. Informed consent was obtained from all participants after an explanation of the study.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the workers who collected the data and the women and health workers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ANCAntenatal care
aPRadjusted Prevalence Ratio
cPRCrude Prevalence Ratio
CVDCardiovascular disease
CIConfidence Interval
PRPrevalence ratio
PCAPrincipal component analysis
WHOWorld Health Organization

References

  1. Murray, C.J.L.; Aravkin, A.Y.; Zheng, P.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abbasi-Kangevari, M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdelalim, A.; Abdollahi, M.; Abdollahpour, I.; et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1223–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Joseph, P.; Leong, D.; McKee, M.; Anand, S.S.; Schwalm, J.-D.; Teo, K.; Mente, A.; Yusuf, S. Reducing the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease, Part 1: The Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Circ. Res. Sept. 2017, 121, 677–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. World Health Organization. Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks. 2009. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44203 (accessed on 13 April 2022).
  4. Dávila-Cervantes, C.A. Cardiovascular disease in Mexico 1990–2017: Secondary data analysis from the global burden of disease study. Int. J. Public Health Juin. 2020, 65, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khanal, M.K.; Mansur Ahmed, M.S.A.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Banik, P.C.; Dhungana, R.R.; Bhandari, P.; Devkota, S.; Shayami, A. Prevalence and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in rural Nepalese population aged 40–80 years. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pengpid, S.; Peltzer, K. Prevalence and Correlates of Behavioral Non-Communicable Diseases Risk Factors among Adolescents in the Seychelles: Results of a National School Survey in 2015. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pastor-Valero, M.; Furlan-Viebig, R.; Menezes, P.R.; da Silva, S.A.; Vallada, H.; Scazufca, M. Education and WHO Recommendations for Fruit and Vegetable Intake Are Associated with Better Cognitive Function in a Disadvantaged Brazilian Elderly Population: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feng, Q.; Al, E. Vegetable Intake and Metabolic Risk Factors: A Mendelian Randomization Study. 2022. Available online: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.21.22272720v1 (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  9. Barbosa Filho, V.C.; de Campos, W.; Bozza, R.; Lopes A da, S. The prevalence and correlates of behavioral risk factors for cardiovascular health among Southern Brazil adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2012, 12, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. de la Santé, M. Rapport de l’Enquete Nationale sur les Facteurs de Risques Communs aux Maladies non Transmissibles au Burkina Faso: Enqute STEPS 2013; Ministère de la Santé: Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 2013; 107p.
  11. Faden, V.B.; Graubard, B.I.; Dufour, M. The relationship of drinking and birth outcome in a US national sample of expectant mothers. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 1997, 11, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. El-ammari, A.; El kazdouh, H.; Bouftini, S.; El fakir, S.; El achhab, Y. Level and potential social-ecological factors associated with physical inactivity and sedentary behavior among Moroccan school-age adolescents: A cross-sectional study. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2017, 22, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Krassovskaia, P.M.; Chaves, A.B.; Houmard, J.A.; Broskey, N.T. Exercise during Pregnancy: Developmental Programming Effects and Future Directions in Humans. Int. J. Sports Med. 2022, 43, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Taoudi, F.; Laamiri, F.Z.; Barich, F.; Hasswane, N.; Aguenaou, H.; Barkat, A. Study of the Prevalence of Obesity and Its Association with Maternal and Neonatal Characteristics and Morbidity Profile in a Population of Moroccan Pregnant Women. J. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 2021, 6188847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Grewal, J.; Carmichael, S.L.; Ma, C.; Lammer, E.J.; Shaw, G.M. Maternal periconceptional smoking and alcohol consumption and risk for select congenital anomalies. Birth Defects Res. Part A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 2008, 82, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hackshaw, A.; Rodeck, C.; Boniface, S. Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: A systematic review based on 173,687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls. Hum. Reprod Update 2011, 17, 589–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hall, J.N.; Moore, S.; Harper, S.B.; Lynch, J.W. Global variability in fruit and vegetable consumption. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 36, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gelson, E.; Gatzoulis, M.A.; Steer, P.; Johnson, M.R. Heart disease—Why is maternal mortality increasing? BJOG 2009, 116, 609–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. de Vargas Nunes Coll, C.; Domingues, M.R.; Hallal, P.C.; da Silva, I.C.M.; Bassani, D.G.; Matijasevich, A.; Barros, A.; Santos, I.S.; Bertoldi, A.D. Changes in leisure-time physical activity among Brazilian pregnant women: Comparison between two birth cohort studies (2004–2015). BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 119. [Google Scholar]
  20. Paudel, R.; Lee, K.; Singh, J.K.; Yoo, S.-J.; Acharya, D.; Kadel, R.; Adhikari, S.; Paudel, M.; Mahotra, N. Prevalence of behavioral risk factors of cardiovascular diseases and associated socio-economic factors among pregnant women in a rural area in Southern Nepal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. O’Kelly, A.C.; Michos, E.D.; Shufelt, C.L.; Vermunt, J.V.; Minissian, M.B.; Quesada, O.; Smith, G.N.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.; Garovic, V.D.; El Khoudary, S.R.; et al. Pregnancy and Reproductive Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Women. Circ. Res. 2022, 130, 652–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kelsey, J.L.; Whittemore, A.S.; Evans, A.S.; Thompson, W.D. Methods in Observational Epidemiology, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1996; p. 432. [Google Scholar]
  23. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. Le Manuel de Surveillance STEPS de l’OMS: l’Approche STEPwise de l’OMS Pour la Surveillance des Facteurs de Risque des Maladies Chroniques; Organisation Mondiale de la Santé: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005; ISBN 978-92-4-159383-0. [Google Scholar]
  24. Evenson, K.R.; Barakat, R.; Brown, W.J.; Dargent-Molina, P.; Haruna, M.; Mikkelsen, E.M.; Mottola, M.F.; Owe, K.M.; Rousham, E.K.; Yeo, S. Guidelines for Physical Activity during Pregnancy: Comparisons from Around the World. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2014, 8, 102–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Danel, P. Etude de la Consommation Alimentaire à Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso Typologie des Régimes. 2005. Available online: https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers13-07/010036361.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2022).
  26. StataCorp. Stata. Release 14. Statistical Software. College Station, TX. 2015. Available online: http://www.stata-journal.com/software/ (accessed on 30 June 2022).
  27. Vyas, S.; Kumaranayake, L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2006, 21, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Barros, A.J.; Hirakata, V.N. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: An empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2003, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Deddens, J.A.; Petersen, M.R. Approaches for estimating prevalence ratios. Occup. Environ. Med. 2008, 65, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dumith, S.C.; Domingues, M.R.; Mendoza-Sassi, R.A.; Cesar, J.A. Physical activity during pregnancy and its association with maternal and child health indicators. Rev. Saude Publica 2012, 46, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Schlüssel, M.M.; de Souza, E.B.; Reichenheim, M.E.; Kac, G. Physical activity during pregnancy and maternal-child health outcomes: A systematic literature review. Cad. Saude Publica 2008, 24 (Suppl. S4), s531–s544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nascimento, S.L.; Surita, F.G.; Godoy, A.C.; Kasawara, K.T.; Morais, S.S. Physical Activity Patterns and Factors Related to Exercise during Pregnancy: A Cross Sectional Study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128953. [Google Scholar]
  33. Valmórbida, J.L.; Vitolo, M.R. Factors associated with low consumption of fruits and vegetables by preschoolers of low socio-economic level. J. Pediatr. 2014, 90, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Niraul, S.R.; Jha, N.; Shyangwa, P.M. Alcohol consumption among women in a district of eastern Nepal. Health Renaiss. 2013, 11, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aryal, K.K.; Thapa, N.; Mehata, S.; Thapa, P.; Alvik, A.; Stray-Pedersen, B. Alcohol Consumption during Pregnancy and Postpartum Period and its Predictors in Sindhupalchowk District, Nepal. J. Nepal. Health Res. Counc. 2016, 14, 143–153. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chasan-Taber, L.; Schmidt, M.D.; Pekow, P.; Sternfeld, B.; Manson, J.; Markenson, G. Correlates of physical activity in pregnancy among Latina women. Matern. Child Health J. 2007, 11, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Niraula, S.R.; Shyangwa, P.M.; Jha, N.; Paudel, R.K.; Pokharel, P.K. Alcohol Use among Women in a Town of Eastern Nepal. J. Nepal Med. Assoc. 2004, 43, 244–249. Available online: http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/491 (accessed on 19 August 2021). [CrossRef]
Table 1. Characteristics of the participants.
Table 1. Characteristics of the participants.
Total (N = 1027)Frequency (%)
Variables
Age (years) mean (SD)25.8 ± 6.0
Age (years)
≤1914814.4
20–2963361.6
≥3024623.9
Education level
None65063.3
Primary or more37736.7
Wealth quintile
Lowest20520.0
Second20520.0
Middle20620.0
Fourth20520.0
Highest20620.0
Geographical location
Semi-urban59057.4
Rural43742.6
Occupation
Employed35334.4
Not employed67465.6
Parity
Primipara48747.4
Multipara54052.6
Marital status
Married99697.0
Not married313.0
Pre-existing illnesses or family history of hypertension
No98095.4
Yes474.6
Table 2. Alcohol consumption among pregnant women and associated factors in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso 2019 (Crude, adjusted prevalence ratio, and 95% CI).
Table 2. Alcohol consumption among pregnant women and associated factors in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso 2019 (Crude, adjusted prevalence ratio, and 95% CI).
Crude PRAdjusted PR
VariablesTotal
(N)
Prevalence
(%)
PRCI 95%paPRCI 95%p
All participants102710.2 [8.51–12.23]
Age 0.28 0.13
≤1914810.11 1
20–296339.20.90[0.51–1.59] 1.02[0.58–1.77]
≥30246131.28[0.69–2.37] 1.61[0.82–3.14]
Education 0.04 <0.001
None6508.61 1
Primary or more377131.51[1.03–2.21] ** 1.82[1.27–2.62] **
Wealth quintile 0.32 0.38
Low20511.71 1
Second20510.20.87[0.49–1.57] 0.87[0.49–1.52]
Middle2069.20.79[0.43–1.44] 0.75[0.42–1.32]
Fourth20513.21.12[0.65–1.95] 1.08[0.65–1.82]
Highest2066.80.58[0.302–1.12] 0.62[0.32–1.19]
Geographical location 0.02 <0.001
Semi urban5908.11 1
Rural43713.01.60[1.09–2.35] ** 1.94[1.31–2.87] **
Occupation 0.29 0.82
Employed3538.81 1
Not employed67410.91.25[0.82–1.90] 1.05[0.68–1.63]
Parity 0.87 0.83
Primipara48710.01 1
Multipara54010.41.03[0.70–1.51] 0.95[0.62–1.47]
Pre-existing illnesses or family history of hypertension 0.20 0.14
No98010.51 1
Yes474.30.40[0.09–1.64] 0.36[0.93–1.38]
aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio, cPR = crude prevalence ratio, ** = significant association
Table 3. Tobacco use among pregnant women and associated factors in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso, 2019; (Crude, adjusted prevalence ratio, and 95% CI).
Table 3. Tobacco use among pregnant women and associated factors in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso, 2019; (Crude, adjusted prevalence ratio, and 95% CI).
Crude Prevalence RatioAdjusted Prevalence Ratio
VariablesTotal
(N)
Prevalence
(%)
cPR95% CIpaPR95% CIp
All participants10273.0 [2.1–4.3]
Age (years) <0.001 <0.001
≤191482.01 1
20–296331.420.70[0.19–2.59] 0.15[0.04–0.50] **
≥302467.73.81[1.13–12.87] ** 0.62[0.19–2.06]
Education 0.005 0.20
Primary or more6500.81 1
None3774.35.41[1.64–17.80] ** 2.04[0.67–6.11]
Wealth quintile 0.67 0.39
Low2051.91 1
Second2052.41.25[0.34–4.65] 1.04[0.32–4.43]
Middle2063.41.74[0.51–5.95] 1.59[0.53–4.84]
Fourth2054.42.25[0.69–7.31] 1.98[0.64–6.14]
Highest2062.91.49[0.42–5.29] 2.51[0.81–7.82]
Geographical location <0.001 <0.001
Semi-urban5900.31 1
Rural4376.619.58[4.67–82.04] 15.02[3.12–72.39] **
Occupation 0.02 0.30
Employed3531.11 1
Not employed6744.03.53[1.24–10.10] ** 1.69[0.63–4.55]
Parity <0.001 <0.001
Primipara4870.61 1
Multipara5405.28.42[2.56–27.69] 10.07[3.48–29.14] **
Pre-existing illnesses or family history of hypertension 0.19 0.82
No9802.91 1
Yes476.42.23[0.68–7.35] 1.13[0.38–3.37]
aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio, cPR = crude prevalence ratio, ** = significant association
Table 4. Inadequate physical activity among pregnant women and associated factors in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso, 2019; (Crude, Adjusted prevalence ratio, and 95% CI).
Table 4. Inadequate physical activity among pregnant women and associated factors in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso, 2019; (Crude, Adjusted prevalence ratio, and 95% CI).
Crude Prevalence RatioAdjusted Prevalence Ratio
VariablesTotal
(N)
Prevalence(%)cPR95% CIpaPR95% CIp
All participants102779.4 [76.9–81.8]
Age 0.25 0.03
≤1914874.31 1
20–2963377.61.04[0.84–1.28] 1.02[0.92–1.12]
≥3024687.41.17[0.93–1.48] 1.1[0.99–1.23]
Education 0.05 0.14
None65075.21 1
Primary or more37786.71.15[1.00–1.33] ** 1.04[0.98–1.10]
Wealth quintile <0.001 <0.001
Low20573.71 1
Second20562.90.85[0.67–1.08] 0.90[0.80–1.01]
Middle20684.51.15[0.92–1.43] 1.16[1.06–1.27] **
Fourth20588.31.19[0.96–1.49] 1.25[1.15–1.36] **
Highest20687.91.19[0.96–1.48] 1.16[1.06–1.27] **
Geographical location <0.001 <0.001
Rural59059.91 1
Semi-urban43793.91.57[1.35–1.81] ** 1.54[1.42–1.66] **
Occupation 0.08 0.17
Employed35386.11 1
Not employed67475.90.88[0.76–1.02] 1.04[0.98–1.10]
Parity 0.67 0.74
Primipara48780.71 1
Multipara54078.30.97[0.85–1.11] 1.01[0.95–1.07]
Pre-existing illnesses or family history of hypertension 0.16 0.14
No98080.31 1
Yes4761.70.77[0.53–1.11] 0.85[0.68–1.05]
aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio, cPR = crude prevalence ratio, ** = significant association
Table 5. Insufficient consumption of fruit and vegetables among pregnant women and associated factors in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso, 2019; (Crude, adjusted prevalence ratio, and 95% CI).
Table 5. Insufficient consumption of fruit and vegetables among pregnant women and associated factors in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso, 2019; (Crude, adjusted prevalence ratio, and 95% CI).
Crude Prevalence RatioAdjusted Prevalence Ratio
VariablesTotal
(N)
Prevalence (%)cPR95% CIpaPR95% CIp
All participants102753.5
Age 0.16 0.30
≤1914862.21 1
20–2963353.90.87[0.69–1.09] 0.92[0.79–1.06]
≥3024647.60.76[0.58–1.01] 0.86[0.72–1.04]
Education <0.001 0.01
Primary or more65037.7 1 1
None37762.81.67[1.38–2.02] ** 1.16[1.03–1.30] **
Wealth quintile 0.98 <0.001
Low20552.21 1
Second20555.11.06[0.81–1.37] 0.90[0.80–1.01]
Middle20651.90.99[0.76–1.30] 0.94[0.83–1.06]
Fourth20553.71.03[0.79–1.34] 0.90[0.79–1.03]
Highest20654.81.05[0.81–1.37] 1.19[1.03–1.40] **
Geographical location <0.001 <0.001
Semi Urban59023.11 1
Rural43794.74.11[3.39–4.99] ** 4.47[3.85–5.18] **
Occupation 0.11 <0.001
Employed35348.41 1
Not employed67456.21.16[0.96–1.39] 0.73[0.66–0.80]
Parity 0.01 0.40
Primipara48747.61 1
Multipara54058.91.24[1.04–1.46] 1.05[0.93–1.19]
Pre-existing illnesses or family history of hypertension 0.03 0.02
No98052.41 1
Yes4776.61.46[1.04–2.05] 1.17[1.03–1.33] **
aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio; cPR= crude prevalence ratio, ** = significant association
Table 6. Factors associated with the presence of more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso, 2019.
Table 6. Factors associated with the presence of more than one cardiovascular lifestyle risk factor in rural and semi-urban Burkina Faso, 2019.
VariablesTotal (N)Prevalence (%)cPR (IC 95%)paPR (IC 95%)p
All participants102750.9
Age 0.001 0.001
≤1914841.21 1
20–2963348.81.18 [0.96–1.46] 1.06 [0.89–1.25]
≥3024662.21.51 [1.22–1.87] 1.26 [1.03–1.53] **
Education 0.001 0.08
None65042.81 1
Primary and more377651.52 [1.35–1.71] **1.09 [0.99–1.20]
Wealth quintile 0.72
Low20551.71 0.01
Second20547.80.92 [0.76–1.12] 1.10 [0.96–1.26]
Middle20651.91 [0.83–1.21] 1.07 [0.93–1.23]
Fourth20554.21.05 [0.87–1.26] 1.23 [1.06–1.42] **
Highest20649.00.95 [0.78–1.15] 0.94 [0.79–1.11]
Geographical location 0.001 0.001
Rural59014.91 1
Semi-urban43777.65.22 [4.15–6.56] **5.46 [4.34–6.88] **
Occupation 0.13 0.001
Employee35354.11 1
None67449.30.91 [0.81–1.03] 1.31 [1.18–1.44] **
Parity 0.03 0.68
Primipara48754.41 1
Multipara54047.80.88 [0.78–0.99] 0.98 [0.87–1.09]
Pre-existing illnesses or family history of hypertension 0.16
Yes98029.81 1
No4758.91.98 [1.27–3.08] **1.30 [0.90–1.87]
cPR = Crude Prevalence Ratio; aPR = adjusted Prevalence Ratio, ** = significant association
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garanet, F.; Coulibaly, A.; Baguiya, A.; Kirakoya-Samadoulougou, F.; Kouanda, S. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Cardiovascular Lifestyle Risk Factors among Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010102

AMA Style

Garanet F, Coulibaly A, Baguiya A, Kirakoya-Samadoulougou F, Kouanda S. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Cardiovascular Lifestyle Risk Factors among Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(1):102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010102

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garanet, Franck, Abou Coulibaly, Adama Baguiya, Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou, and Seni Kouanda. 2023. "Prevalence and Factors Associated with Cardiovascular Lifestyle Risk Factors among Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 1: 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010102

APA Style

Garanet, F., Coulibaly, A., Baguiya, A., Kirakoya-Samadoulougou, F., & Kouanda, S. (2023). Prevalence and Factors Associated with Cardiovascular Lifestyle Risk Factors among Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010102

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop